Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘YouTube’ Category

 

[In Part II here, I give further introduction and background to Monika and Alfred Schaefer, who are defendants in trials currently underway in Munich, Germany. Their crime is “heresy” — refusing to accept the State mandated lie, known as the “Holocaust”. Here I discuss how they came to realize the fact that the “Holocaust” is a diabolical lie.

 

As Monika concluded, the “Holocaust” is, in fact, the:

 

Biggest and most pernicious and persistent lie in all of history!” 

 

— KATANA]

 

 

 

 

The Holohoaxing of Our Minds

 

The Schaefer Trials

 

Part II

 

Sep, 2018

 

By KATANA

 

Published on Sep 16, 2018

 

In Part I, I discussed how Monika and Alfred Schaefer came, via understanding that Organized jewry carried out 9/11, to question and finally conclude the falsity of the “Holocaust“.

 

Now, of all the “politically Incorrect” things that one can think and say, “Holocaust denial” is the gold standard, heads and shoulders above ordinary, mundane things, like calling a black man a “nigger“, or even calling a jew, a “jew“. It’s beyond the pale, beyond any kind of human decency, apparently, to question the most “holy of holies“, the world’s greatest “sob story” in recorded history, so we are told, by “them“.

 

Alexander Solzhenitsyn, the Nobel Prize winning Russian author had a different view on that:

 

 

 

Alexander Solzhenitsyn, stated that the jewish ruled Bolsheviks killed 66 million people up to the death of Stalin. Yet we, the general public know very little of this enormous crime of crimes, whatever the numbers, because the perpetrators, Organized jewry, controls our media, our sources of information that determine our worldview.

 

 

It is these kinds of realizations that led Monika and Alfred down a “rational garden path” of further horrific realizations, leading to the almost, perfunctory, in hindsight, rejection of the “Holocaust” as a diabolical lie against Germany, and Whites in general.

 

 

[Image Text:

Debbie: Oh … I feel so guilty for being White! We enslaved the Blacks and crucified the Jews … I never want to have a baby …

What if it was another Hitler?

Boyfriend: … You’re right, Debbie.

Man with pipe (? Jew): … Jews have been terribly persecuted … The Jews suffered Holocaust after Holocaust throughout history. It would be a sin against them … We non-Jews are all guilty and owe Jews a lot.

See:

 

 

But what of the evidence that the “Holocaust” is a diabolical lie?

 

First off, we need define what the “Holocaust” actually is. There are various definitions with some broader or narrower than others, in terms of the time period and its scope, but it can be summarized as consisting of three beliefs, namely:

 

1) There was a plan to exterminate the jews.

2) Jews were exterminated in a systematic way using gas chambers, among other methods.

3) About six million jews were killed.

 

 

 

To deny or downplay any one of these three beliefs leaves one liable to being called a “Holocaust denier”.

 

Holocaust” revisionists, almost needless to say, do not deny that jews, as declared enemies of the German State by jewish organizations, were put in camps and made to work in order to help the German war effort. And yes, those images of skeletal, dead inmates, whether jews or non-jews, in Bergen-Belsen, and Dachau, at war’s end, are shocking!

 

Yet, they are only proof of appalling diseased conditions caused as a result of Germany being bombed back to the stone age by the Allies.

 

The first of the three beliefs, that there was a plan to exterminate the jews can be shown to be false, simply for the fact there is no evidence, documentary, or otherwise for it.

 

As for the notion that the Germans simply destroyed “the Order”, the documentary evidence, as the war was coming to an end, or even better yet, just made “the Order” something that was passed on verbally, and not in writing, the revisionist John Weir [a pseudonym, likely John Wear] explained why that explanation is completely nonsensical.

 

Written orders to kill Jews under Nazi control would have to have been issued. There is no way around it, since issuing an oral command would have created its own consequences.

 

Such consequences would have been as obvious in the historical record as any written order.

 

For example, any time someone with any authority passed through Auschwitz, or Treblinka, or any of the ‘extermination camps’, he would have asked what the meaning of the pyres piled high with dead bodies was. Such a visitor would ask to see the order which granted the camp administration the power and authority to wantonly kill camp inmates. When those in charge could not produce such documentation, because the order was oral, the requester would naturally have written to Berlin to request confirmation. Berlin would have to respond.

 

One would expect to find hundreds of such letters if the extermination camps were operating on oral authorization. These queries and requests for verification would have produced a paper trail which would have survived the war, since copies of this correspondence would have proliferated as they made their way through the Nazi bureaucracy, in duplicate, and triplicate.”*

 

[* See: The Plum Cake]

 

 

In the first Ernst Zundel Trial in 1985, in Canada, Raul Hilberg* the jewish author of “The Destruction of the European Jews” admitted under cross-examination by Doug Christie, the following:

 

Christie read out a portion of the article in which it quoted Hilberg:

 

If one looks at origins, one may go back through the centuries into antiquity to discover the building blocks of the destruction of the European Jews,” Hilberg said.

 

But what began in 1941 was a process of destruction not planned in advance, not organized centrally by any agency. There was no blueprint and there was no budget for destructive measures. They were taken step by step, one step at a time. Thus came about not so much a plan being carried out, but an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus — mind reading by a far-flung bureaucracy.

 

I said that,” admitted Hilberg.

 

[* Raul Hilberg (June 2, 1926 – August 4, 2007) was an Austrian-born Jewish-American political scientist and historian. He was widely considered to be the world’s preeminent scholar of the Holocaust, and his three-volume, 1,273-page magnum opus, “The Destruction of the European Jews“, is regarded as a seminal study of the “Nazi Final Solution” by mainstream (court) historians.]

 

 

So according to Hilberg there was no conventional “plan” resulting in a “cover one’s arse with a bureaucratic German paper trail” for exterminating millions of people, just an:

 

… incredible meeting of minds, a consensus — mind reading by a far-flung bureaucracy.

 

Yeah right! German officials engaged in “mind-reading” to convey orders to carry out the killing of six million jews! This is simply not credible at all.

 

It is this knowledge, this awareness, that caused Monika and Alfred Schaefer to decide to speak out, and warn, the world about organized jewry, and its past and ongoing crimes against humanity.

 

The second belief is that “gas chambers” were used to kill millions of jews.

 

The problem with this claim is that there is no physical evidence for it, other than an admitted “reconstructed” gas chamber at the main Auschwitz (I) camp, ruins of alleged gas chambers at nearby Birkenau (Auschwitz II), tortured confessions (e.g., Hoess and others) and “testimony” by jews.

 

 

Fred Leuchter, and Germar Rudolf, have proven that these so-called “gas chambers” show no evidence whatsoever of Zyklon B being present at levels even remotely consistent with killing people. Zyklon B was a pesticide used worldwide to prevent the spread of disease, to prevent deaths in the camps, not cause deaths.

 

[Image — Fred Leuchter holding up a copy of his “Leuchter Report” submitted to court at the 1985 Zundel Trial, on the alleged gas chamber of Auschwitz and other camps, during an interview with Jim Rizoli.

See: ]

 

It is this knowledge, this awareness that caused Monika and Alfred Schaefer to decide to speak out, and warn, the world about organized jewry, and its past and ongoing crimes against humanity.

 

[Image — The New York Times: Six Million jews, since 1869 (click image to enlarge).]

 

The third belief is that “six million” jews were killed. “Six million” is a kind of magic number for religious jews, and is the required number of jews needing to perish in a holocaust for some next phase of jewish beliefs to be fulfilled. From the late 1800s this figure has been bandied about by jewish organizations, hundreds of times, as the number of jews being persecuted, killed, starved, tortured, etc. It’s a symbolic number and that’s why it is so persistent, regardless of reality.

 

 

The number of jews who died during the war in camps and elsewhere, is likely in the few hundred thousand range. Mostly caused by Allied bombing of German infrastructure.

 

In any case, should you really care that much, given that 50 million or more died in their war? Their “elders”, Organized jewry, engineered WW I, the jew-Bolshevik “Russian” revolution, WWII, the spread of Communism, and the slaughter of untold tens of millions. They engineered many other wars, including the current “War OF Terror“, kicked off by their 9/11 false flag.

 

 

It is this knowledge, this awareness that caused Monika and Alfred Schaefer to decide to speak out, and warn, the world about organized jewry, and its past and ongoing crimes against humanity.

 

Finally, an important question that is not normally addressed by Revisionists, remains.

 

If the “Holocaust” is a hoax, a black propaganda leftover from WWII, how is it still promoted and believed by all Western governments and the media? Why hasn’t it been debunked by our historians and investigative journalists looking for the scoop of the century?

 

The answer is simple. The very people, the very power, organized jewry, that crafted the “Holocaust” narrative in 1945, are the very people that still rule us today, even more so.

 

The true “horror” of the “Holocaust” is not that it occurred, but rather, in knowing that it did NOT, in fact, occur, at all! Because, then one must realize that the fraudsters and promoters of the “Holocaust Lie” are in fact, in full control of our societies, today.

 

In most European countries it is illegal to question this given history, because to do so will make you realize it is a lie. Let that thought sink in. The “Holocaust” is, in very detailed and documented fact, the “Hoax of Centuries“. Many very serious and highly qualified people have established this beyond any reasonable doubt, whatsoever.

 

Back to Monika and Alfred Schaefer.

 

They both read the material available on 9/11 and rightly concluded it was carried out by organized jewry, by Israel, and jews, and jewish sympathizers in the USA.

 

They both read the Revisionist arguments on the “Holocaust” and rightly concluded its validity. There was no genuine “Holocaust”, except in the minds of jewish supremacists that saw it as necessary propaganda to create Israel, among other agendas.

 

It was also necessary to brainwash Whites to accept, through “guilt” their racial and cultural destruction, through mass Third World invasion, as part of the bigger jewish plan to create a Jew World Order.

 

Monika and Alfred will soon face the court in Munich, to hear judgement as to whether their truth-telling, or jewish lies, will prevail in Germany today. Expect lies to prevail, it’s been done before, …

 

 

 

(TO BE CONTINUED IN PART III)

 

See Part I here: The Holohoaxing of Our Minds — The Schaefer Trials — Part I

 

 

 

============================================

 

 

Prisoners of Conscience

Monika, Alfred, and other prisoners of conscience, can be written to, at the following addresses.

 

Alfred Schaefer
JVA Stadelheim
Stadelheimer Straße 12
81549 München
GERMANY

 

Monika Schaefer
JVA Stadelheim
Schwarzenbergstr. 14
81549 München
GERMANY

 

Jeremy Bedford Turner
A5544EE
HBS/A/1-11
HMP High Down
High Down Lane
Sutton
Surrey
SM2 5PJ
UNITED KINGDOM

 

Ursula Haverbeck
JVA Bielefeld-Brackwede
z. Hd. Ursula Haverbeck
Umlostraße 100
33649 Bielefeld
GERMANY

 

Gerd Ittner
JVA Nürnberg
Mannertstraße 6
90429 Nürnberg
GERMANY

 

============================================

 

 

See also:

 

 

Read Full Post »

 

 

[Mark Collett, 37, is a British political activist and former chairman of the Young BNP, the youth division of the British National Party (BNP), and was director of publicity for the party. He has recently written a book, “The Fall of Western Man” available as a free download.

 

Here he gives a brief* overview of the “jewish Question“, actually the “jewish Problem“, focusing on organized jewry’s destructive agenda towards Whites and the West.

 

(* Appropriately I suppose given the topic, we get jewed out of half a minute, as it’s barely three and half minutes long, and not the full four minutes as touted 🙂

 

KATANA]

 

_______________________

 

 

Mark Collett

 

The jewish Question

 

Explained in Four Minutes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Click the link below to view the video:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNRwvar_QNA

 

 

YouTube Description

 

Published on Aug 24, 2018

 

An explanation of the role that the Jewish community have played in pushing multiculturalism and liberal social policy on Western civilisation.

 

 

You can now donate to my work via bitcoin:

326uEc4QyovcgT5S6mzMK8bh3SyukqPTV1

 

 

My book, The Fall of Western Man is now available. It is available as a FREE eBook and also in hardback and paperback editions.

 

The Official Website: http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/

 

FREE eBook download: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3cc…

 

Hardback Edition: http://www.lulu.com/shop/mark-collett…

 

Paperback Edition: http://amzn.eu/9LaS7HN

 

PLEASE NOTE: If you wish to debate with me in the comments about anything I have said, I welcome that. However please listen to the complete podcast and ensure you argue with the points I have made. Arguments that simply consist of nonsense such as “what gives you the right to judge” or “I’m a [insert religious affiliation] and you should be ashamed of yourself” or other such vacuous non-arguments will simply be ridiculed.

 

 

 

__________________________

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(3:24)

 

 

[00:00]

 

 

Jews have played a disproportionate role in industries and endeavors that have harmed Western society and undermined Western civilization. And they have been disproportionately involved in pushing anti-Western narratives.

 

 

 

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

[In Part I here, I give an introduction and background to Monika and Alfred Schaefer, who are defendants in trials currently underway in Munich, Germany. Their crime is heresy — refusing to accept the State mandated lie, known as the “Holocaust“.

KATANA]

 

 

 

The Holohoaxing of Our Minds

 

The Schaefer Trials

 

Part I

 

Jul 2018

 

By KATANA

 

Published on Jul 31, 2018

 

 

Monika and Alfred Schaefer are Canadian-Germans, middle-aged siblings, currently being tried in a German court — and possibly facing years in jail — for an unspeakable crime!

 

And the crime? They sincerely expressed their opinions on YouTube, and elsewhere, in Germany!

 

And what was that opinion? They dared to question the most sacred, do not touch, belief of our age, the “Holocaust”, … Oh, the horror. The Horror! THE HORROR!

 

And it all began on a sunny day. On September 11, 2001, New York, the World Trade Center Towers and the WTC 7 building were all destroyed, right down to ground level. And over 3,000 architects and engineers have come to the conclusion that it was by some form of controlled demolition. (See: 911 – Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth) Just look at the pictures and videos of the event to come to that same conclusion.

 

 

 

The official story that these three buildings were destroyed by the consequences of aircraft hitting two of the buildings is simply childish for anyone not mesmerized by “authority figure” pronouncements.

 

 

The only people capable of doing that and many other necessary steps were (((insiders))) that control the US, behind the official curtain, not 19 Arabs. Any Arabs present were mere diversionary patsies in this massive crime, that has since resulted in the deaths of millions through the wars in the Middle East.

 

 

And who are these mysteriously insiders? Well, virtually all the key players involved in the planning, the execution, and the coverup of the crime, were jews, or supporters of jews, joined at the hip to the jewish-zionist agenda.

 

 

Christopher Bollyn an investigative journalist, in his book, “Solving 9-11 – The Deception That Changed the World” names every major player in the 9/11 conspiracy, again with nearly all of them being jews.

 

 

And for what purpose? 9/11 was carried out by Organized jewry to; justify a permanent War OF Terror that puts us all under a surveillance state, whereby anyone can be seen as a potential, or real “terrorist”; to launch wars in the Middle East to create a “Greater Israel” ruling over those destroyed countries; to lay the groundwork for creating a Jew World Order tyranny, over the world.

 

 

On the 30th of May, 2014, Alfred Schaefer released his first video, titled “9/11 Gatekeepers and Controlled Opposition”. Alfred, a former long-time employee of IBM, through email exchanges with Noam Chomsky on the subject of 9/11 — who Schaefer revered as a sort of left-wing guru of truth — came to conclude (quite rightly) that Chomsky was lying and, using his prestige and status, was acting as a gate-keeper to prevent knowledge of the central jewish role in 9/11, from coming out among his world-wide, adoring, lefty followers.

 

 

Monika Schaefer was a former employee as a warden in Canada’s Jasper National Park, environmental activist, candidate for the Green Party, a musician and a violin teacher.

 

Monika Schaefer in 2008

 

Through exchanges with her brother, also became aware that 9/11 was done by Organized jewry. She spent weeks feelings emotionally nauseous, as she came to terms with the implications of understanding that our “governments” are very seriously lying to us, and are beholder to a power greater than themselves.

 

It’s from such a shocking realization that doubts are then planted about other major events in recent history.

 

Monika and Alfred travelled that road of realization, a road that led them back to their childhood, growing up in Canada, experiencing the ridicule of being “German”, of being children of “Nazis”, who exterminated “six million innocent jews”.

 

 

Monika and Alfred, finally, despite a life-time of jewish dominated media brainwashing, were able to effect a dramatic change in their worldview as a result of understanding who did 9/11. Which brings us to the heart of the matter. They both committed the “unspeakable” crime of no longer believing the diabolical lie known as the “Holocaust”!

 

Monika announced her heresy to the world in June 2016 with the release of a short video titled, “Sorry Mom, I was Wrong About the Holocaust”, in both English, and in German.

 

 

In this short five-minute video, produced by her brother when they were both in Germany, she gave a belated, yet heartfelt apology to her deceased parents for the times when she reproached them and the German people for failing to stop the “Holocaust” from happening. Monika concluded that the “Holocaust” is, in fact, the “biggest and most pernicious and persistent lie in all of history!” And that her parents knew nothing of the so-called “death camps” for the simple reason that they did NOT exist, they were only labor camps.

 

 

On her return to her hometown of Jasper, Alberta, Canada, population 5,000, she experienced a process known as “ritual defamation” whereby she was ostracized by many of the residents, prominent town people, and “fair weather friends” for her “thought crimes”.

 

 

Alfred had already announced his heresy to the world, starting with 9/11. In July 2016, he gave a speech at the London Forum on “Psychological Warfare”, which I summarized as follows:

 

In this 42 minute video Alfred Schaefer, a Canadian of German origin, delivers one of the best talks ever at the London Forum, with no punches pulled in laying bare the jewish engineered plan behind the ongoing destruction of our societies. Alfred discusses the fraudulent nature of many sacred cows held dear by our psychologically manipulated societies, with special attention to the so-called “Holocaust and the jewish engineered 9/11.

 

He brings up how organized jewry is responsible for the European civil wars, known as WWI and WWII. And how, jewish monopoly over information has sought to control us through psychological warfare that uses “control words” that inhibit us from thinking outside their imposed frames of reference. — KATANA

 

 

Monika and Alfred have blazed a trail through an apparently impenetrable tangle of lies and deceptions, to discover the origin of the false reality we live under, and yet have found a way out of that false reality, based on seeking the truth, regardless of societal pressures to conform by believing lies.

 

The origin of the false reality, of the lies we live under, is that Organized jewry has sought to create a Jew World Order tyranny. To achieve that aim, it, using “Money Power”, has gained a monopoly over all the major forms of power in our societies including finance, media, politics, education, etc., to the point that it can create Word Wars, carry out false flags, flood our countries with the Third World to racially and culturally destroy us, rewrite history, accuse and demonize Whites of historic crimes, and most relevant to Alfred and Monika, charge the German people with a crime, the “Holocaust”, that never actually happened.

 

The real “Holocaust” that has been in progress for a long time, and is being ramped up today, is that being carried out on our minds by jewish supremacists, to Holohoax us to accept our racial and cultural genocide and the establishment of a Jew World Order tyranny.

 

On Jan 3, 2018, Monika, visiting Munich, Germany, was arrested and has been imprisoned ever since. Her brother has also been arrested this month (July, 2018), and both are now on trial for expressing their opinions, for committing “heresy“.

 

(TO BE CONTINUED IN PART II)

 

 

 

See Part II here:

 

 

============================================

 

 

Prisoners of Conscience

Monika, Alfred, and other prisoners of conscience, can be written to, at the following addresses.

 

Alfred Schaefer
JVA Stadelheim
Stadelheimer Straße 12
81549 München
GERMANY

 

Monika Schaefer
JVA Stadelheim
Schwarzenbergstr. 14
81549 München
GERMANY

 

Jeremy Bedford Turner
A5544EE
HBS/A/1-11
HMP High Down
High Down Lane
Sutton
Surrey
SM2 5PJ
UNITED KINGDOM

 

Ursula Haverbeck
JVA Bielefeld-Brackwede
z. Hd. Ursula Haverbeck
Umlostraße 100
33649 Bielefeld
GERMANY

 

Gerd Ittner
JVA Nürnberg
Mannertstraße 6
90429 Nürnberg
GERMANY

 

============================================

 

See also:

 

 

Read Full Post »

 

[Andrew Hitchcock plays and then discusses a video by Rosette Delacroix on the “Kalergi Plan”. This plan is explained in Count Coudenhove Kalergi’s 1925 book “Practical Idealism“, where it talks of a future Europe consisting of a mixed Eurasian-Negroid race ruled over by jews. Kalergi himself was of mixed European and Asian heritage, married to a jewess, and who was financed by jewish bankers to push this plan, that is being carried out today.

 

The “Kalergi Plan” is just one expression of organized jewry’s aim to racially and culturally destroy Whites, as part of their agenda to create a Jew World Order tyranny.

 

Although Hitchcock and Delacroix view things through a heavy Christian lens, a view that I don’t  subscribe to, this presentation is, nevertheless, an interesting introduction to the topic.

 

KATANA]

 

 

 

Andrew Hitchcock

 

Rosette Delacroix

 

The Kalergi Plan Decoded

 

White Genocide

 

Jul 2018

 

The Andrew Carrington Hitchcock Show (714) Rosette Delacroix – The Kalergi Plan Decoded: White Genocide

 

Published on Jul 10, 2018

 

Andrew Hitchcock’s Description

 

In today’s show originally broadcast on July 10 2018, EuroFolkRadio’s Andrew Carrington Hitchcock plays an excellent YouTube presentation by Rosette Delacroix, for a show entitled, “The Kalergi Plan Decoded: White Genocide.”

 

Rosette discussed: the Kalergi plan to destroy White Nations and turn those Nations into Nations colonized by a mongrel people that would be run by Jews; how Kalergi’s wife was a Jewess; the Kol Nidre prayer; how the Jews are the only race mentioned in the Magna Carta; how the mainstream media are trying to inflame the Whites against the immigrants pouring into their respective nations; the, “Beige Power,” rap song; how the most apartheid country in the world is Israel; the preposterous, “Cheddar Man,” story; the destruction of White History by the Jewish media; how the mainstream media seem to be clamping down on free speech in preparation for a major event that will bring the Kalergi plan into affect; and many other topics.

 

Click Here To Listen To The Show

 

 

Click Here For Rosette’s YouTube Presentation, “The Kalergi Plan Decoded – White Genocide.”

 

Click Here For Rosette’s Website

 

Click Here For Rosette’s YouTube

 

Click Here For The Andrew Carrington Hitchcock Show Archive Where You Can Listen To Or Download All My Shows

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(57 mins)

 

 

[00:27]

 

Fetcho: You are listening to EuroFolkRadio network at EuroFolkRadio dot com.

And now it’s the Andrew Carrington Hitchcock show with your host Andrew Carrington Hitchcock!

 

 

Hitchcock: Hello everybody! As you all know, I like to try and do new and interesting things with this radio show, and today is no exception, because my guest is actually not going to be joining me. Was I’ve got for you is Rosette Delacroix who’s got a very popular YouTube channel and has been on my program before. She has put together YouTube video entitled “The Kalergi Plan Decoded — White Genocide..

 

And I got this sent to me and I was so impressed with it, I haven’t actually seen the YouTube yet. What I’ve done is I extracted the audio and I was playing that because I’m so busy I’ve played that about three times, while I was doing other things. And so on this program I’m going to play the YouTube for you, so you’ll get the audio. I’m going to make notes as I’m doing that. When the YouTube finishes — it’s just over forty minutes long folks — then I will make some comments and then close out the show..

 

I’ve spoken to Rosette about this. She’s very happy with the procedure that I’m going to undertake here, the process. And so, without further ado, and also folks I urge you to watch the YouTube. I’m actually going to be watching the YouTube, as I said for the first time as I recall this program, so I can see some of the imagery that she refers to that you don’t get on the audio. A link to the YouTube presentation will be within the post for this show. So now folks see without any further ado, I’m going to bring up Rosette Delacroix excellent YouTube, “The Kalergi Plan Decoded — White Genocide”.

 

[02:12]

 

 

Hi everyone it’s Rosette. I’m back today with another decoding, this one is on the “Kalergi Plan”. I call it “The Kalergi Plan Decoded — White Genocide”.

 

If you’ve been watching my presentations then you would know by now that the “hidden hand” is behind all the social engineering that’s going on behind the manipulation of the population to bring about their New World Order. An order which has them at the very top controlling the world overtly.

 

 

The “man” is getting ready to step out from behind the curtain of Oz.

 

 

They told us their agenda in the “Communist Manifesto” and in the “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion”.

 

 

However, there is one more plan that is lesser known, but just as important. This plan shows how they take over countries from the inside, a more insidious scheme, the enemy cannot be seen in a uniform with a bayonet, this time the enemy is from within.

 

 

This plan is called the “Coudenhove Kalergi Plan”, or “Kalergi Plan” for short. Named after its author, Richard Von Coudenhove Kalergi.

 

In his book “Praktischer Idealismus”, “Practical Idealism”, written in 1925, Kalergi describes the future of jews in Europe, and of a European racial composition, with the following words:

 

The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today’s races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in it’s appearance to the ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals. […]

 

Instead of destroying European jewry, Europe, against it’s own will, refined and educated this people into a future leader nation through this artificial selection process. No wonder that this people that escaped “ghetto prison” developed into a spiritual nobility of Europe. Therefore a gracious Providence provided Europe with a new race of nobility, by the Grace of spirit. This happened at the moment when Europe’s feudal aristocracy became dilapidated, and thanks to jewish emancipation.

 

So he’s telling us here, they plan to implement the destroying of the White nations, and replacing them with the mixed race, ruled over by the jews. It’s as simple as that!

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

[Blindlight, aka, Joseph Sigur, is a no-nonsense blogger dedicated to:

 

Specializing in outing jews pretending to be goy and their ‘rich race’ sidekicks.

 

Here he takes “Lauren Rose”, the young, pretty, co-host of JF’s Youtube channel, to the woodshed, for a well-deserved spanking, for dissing Patrick Little’s recent run for the Californian Senate seat.

 

She has called Patrick Little a “loser” for failing to win against the jew, Dianne Fienstein, the Democrat incumbent. Besides misusing English, whereby, in her mind, losing in a race makes you a failure in life, she also comes out in favor of not naming the jew, all because it will frighten normies away.

 

As Sigur rightly points out, her position can be likened to being content to just re-arrange the deck chairs on a ship that is sinking, rather than alerting people about the need to plug the leaks, while also finding the culprits that are making those leaks, aka, organized jewry.

 

Her coming out so strongly against Patrick Little, just like Nick Fuentes, raises suspicions about her real motives, since her stated reasons smell of “concern trolling” and are wrong, if you are serious about solving the ongoing, deliberate, destruction of the West by organized jewry, and its goy helpers.

 

Is it simply attention whoring, youthful bravado mixed with ignorance, or has she been put up to it? Whatever it is, it effectively causes her to be “working for the jews” and against our interests.

 

It also damages JF’s credibility, in that his choice of “eye candy” as his co-host, has turned out not so sweet, after all, especially when you consider her sway over her male, beta orbiting audience.

 

— KATANA]

 

_______________________

 

 

Blindlight

 

Takes

 

Lauren Rose to the “Woodshed”

 

Over Patrick Little Comments

 

Jun 20, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

Click the link below to watch the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BqMBGRci1sc

 

 

YouTube Description

 

Published on Jun 20, 2018
This is the excerpt I critiqued concerning Lauren:

 

__________________________

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(15 minutes)

 

 

[00:00]

 

 

Sigur: Okay, back after a couple of days off.

 

I’ve seen the GF live stream, that’s the French guy. JB, or whatever his name is. I’m not real sure. I’ve always had trouble remembering his initials.

 

He has taken on a woman named “Lauren Rose“. Which interestingly, somebody came on to one of my videos and said, “Lauren likes me”. And he must have been facetious. I never saw the source of why he said that. And I really haven’t paid much attention to Lauren Rose. I looked at her, and I saw her as one of the typical women that came out during the Trump campaign, that don’t ever talk about jews.

 

And most of you will remember, I say:

 

If you don’t talk about jews, you can only move deck chairs [like that saying goes about the Titanic]. You can’t find the leak!

 

And so, when anybody says that it’s impractical to talk about jews, we understand that educating the public about jews is going to be a tough battle! But it has to be done! If you don’t you just want to move deck chairs on the intentionally sinking ship, that the jews have all of us on.

 

 

So Lauren addressed the Patrick Little issue, and when she came back on JB’s [JF’s] after a few days off, apparently. And that caught my eye, I just stumbled into it. I’ve not seen her individual channel, nor seen any other comments she’s made about this issue. But she did say some things that seemed, … Well number one, it reminded me a little bit of Nick Fuentes, just a little bit more deftly put. She said:

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

[Luke Ford, an Australian living in the USA, who “converted” to Judaism in 1993, interviews Tanstaafl from the Age of Treason blog on the subject of the Jewish Question, aka, Jewish Problem.

KATANA]

 

_________________________

 

 

 

Watch the video here:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2laXMYmRAY

 

 

 

Luke Ford

 

Streamed live on Mar 27, 2018

 

 

Jonny Anomaly writes: On the alt-right, it has become fashionable over the last few years to recycle a trope from 1930s Germany: “The Jewish Question” (to which the Holocaust was supposed to be “The Final Solution”).

 

The contemporary version of the question concerns why Jews have so much influence in cognitively demanding occupations, including science, medicine, law, and politics. Although the “JQ” (as alt-righters call it) has a mundane answer, many subscribe to elaborate theories to account for the fact that most Jews don’t conform to the stereotype alt-righters expect them to.

 

For example, when a scholar documents the fact that 4 out of the 10 speakers at an inaugural white nationalist conference were Jewish, along with a vast array of other evidence that conflicts with alt-right dogma, the predictable response by people in the grip of an ideology is that Jews do this to create a smokescreen: it provides cover for all of the other Jews who plot against white nationalists.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Luke Ford

 

JQ Debate

 

with

 

Age of Treason

 

 


 

 

Published on Mar 28, 2018

 

TRANSCRIPT

(140 mins)

 

 

CONTENTS

 

Introduction — Tanstaafl’s Journey on the JQ

A Personal Disclosure

The White Network

Consequences for Your Marriage?

Growing Up in New York

The jewish Grandfather

Hitler’s Struggle and Yours

On Circumcision

Reading MacDonald

Jewish Crypsis and Parasitism

On Finding Support

How Your Work Differs from Others

An Existential Threat

Mein Kampf and National Socialism

Jewish Crypsis — Spain and Portugual

Jewish Crypsis — Today

“In Your Face” jews and “Down-low” jews

Ford’s Critique of Critics of jews

Tan’s Response

Complicating Things as jewish Camouflage

Jewish Gaslighting

Ad Hominem — Cofnas vs MacDonald

Jewish Deception and Coverups

Cofnas’ Critique and Your Respect for MacDonald

Cofnas — MacDonald’s Evidence is Counter-evidence

Any Factual Errors in Cofnas’ Work?

Cofnas Call MacDonald a “Bad Person”

Jews “Didn’t Du Nuffin!”

Ford — So Criticism of Scholarship is a Personal Attack?

Cofnas — Worried About MacDonald’s Work

Cofnas Doesn’t Prove His Case

Ford — Does Cofnas Screech “Anti-semitism”?

I Always Write “Anti-semitism” with Sneer Quotes

Whites Have Not Taken Their Own Side Hard Enough

You are Arguing Like a jew, Luke!

Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy

Jews Marrying Non-jews

Ford — So anything jews Do is Group Evolutionary Strategy?

Jews Always Arguing About What’s Best for the jews!

“Jews are Not a Monolith” — A Silly Statement!

The Root of jewing is: “Is it Good for the jews?”

Culture of Critique’s Chapter 7 on Immigration

Open Borders for Israel is My Attitude

Jews Not Threatened in a Multi-ethnic Society

Jews and the Second World War

Being Evidence Based

School Shooting in Florida

Does MacDonald’s Model Have Predictive Value?

Jewish Out-Marriage One Half of the Parasitism

Whatever jews Do is Bad Because They are the Enemy!

Do White People Have Agency?

Luke, You’re Not Making Honest Valid Arguments

Would You Describe jews as Ethnocentric?

Jews Moralize to Whites to Convince Them That What is Good for Whites is Bad

Fifteen jewish Intellectuals

Whites Don’t Recognise That jews are at War with Them!

Jews Behaving as “Nazis”

Intersectional jewing — Where One jew Agenda Conflicts with Another jew Agenda

Intersectional jewing — Promoting Reich, Pinker and Cofnas as Being Against “anti-racist” jewing

Why are Whites Unable to Overcome the jews?

Super Chats — What Should White Guys Do to Spread Awareness of the JP?

Ford — Are You a Leader?

Comments — Are All jews In On It?

Comments — Is Monomania on the JQ Better Than White Improvement?

Do jews Control the Weather?

Comments — How are Whites to Speak on jew Influence Without “anti-semite’ Being Shrieked

Jews are the Enemy Whatever They Do?

Is Steve Miller Anti-White?

Are You an Unhappy Guy?

Things That Make You Happy?

Reflections on This Interview

What Does It Mean To Be a jew?

Ford’s Fundamental Misunderstanding of Judaism

Do You Believe in Universal Morality?

Ford’s Journey To judaism

A jew Told Ford That you Can’t Convert To judaism

Ford Hasn’t Fooled jews

On Ford Being Rejected By his Peers at School

Ford As Cover Article in “The jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles”

Lawrence Auster Admitted That jews were Responsible for Open Borders

On Ford’s Hatred of jewish Organizations That are for Open Borders

Ford — Do You Thinks I’m Delusional?

How Ford Can Help Whites by Blowing the Whistle on Jews

END

NOTES & LINKS

PDF NOTES

Version History

 

 

 

Introduction — Tanstaafl’s Journey on the JQ

 

Ford: Hey, I’m Luke Ford. I’m here with the Age of Treason blogger, Tanstaafl. Tan, you’ve been blogging for quite a long time. Tell me about your evolution, in particular on the JQ.

[background sound]

 

Tan: Sorry let me mute that.

 

Ford: And here with Tanstaafl*, so we are going to get that microphone problem taken care of, and then we are going to discuss Nathan Cofnas’ critique [of Kevin MacDonald’s book “The Culture of Critique].. So Tan, take it away! Tell me when you started blogging. Tell me about the evolution of your journey on the JQ.

 

[* A pseudonym using the acronym for “There Ain’t No Such Thing As A Free Lunch“. The phrase and the acronym are central to Robert Heinlein’s 1966 science-fiction novel The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress.]

 

Tan: Right. I started in 2005. I started blogging, and that was after I had spent about twenty years, maybe, of not paying attention, being fed up with politics, mainstream politics, and ignoring it, focusing on my career. But in 2005, I think, it was Hurricane Katrina that triggered me, the racialization of that. It was sort of a “Trayvon Martin” experience that many people experienced years later. I experienced during the Katrina thing.

 

And so I started blogging. I had been talking to friends before that privately, and I just basically took it public. And moved through pretty quickly neo-conservative thought, which attracted me at first, because it seemed like a more serious approach to politics, than plain old conservative politics. And then I ran into someone named Lawrence Auster. You might be familiar with [him] — that might have been where I came across you.

 

 

And it was really Lawrence Auster, reading Lawrence Auster, that made me aware that there was something going on with the jews. Auster himself was a jew, was a convert to Christianity. But what I noticed over time with him was that he was hyper-sensitive to criticism of the Jews. He indulged in it himself, but it was always from the point of view of “What’s good for the jews?” He thought that the jews, in various ways, he criticized them for not doing what was best for themselves.

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

[Luke Ford, an Australian living in the USA, who “converted” to Judaism in 1993, interviews Kevin MacDonald and his response to a recent critique of his highly ignored (by academia), yet important book, “The Culture of Critique“, by the 30-year-old, academically unknown, New York jew, Nathan Cofnas. Cofnas was scheduled to come on with MacDonald, but was unable to, due to time zone differences, as he’s in England, studying at Oxford. 

 

Ford plays somewhat of a devil’s advocate on behalf of Cofnas, quoting some of Cofnas’, yet to be released, responses to MacDonald’s 18,0000 word response to Cofnas’s critique.

 

This transcript covers  the first 71 minute part of the Youtube video with MacDonald, and not (currently) the remaining part of the total 220 minute video, where Cofnas does appear in the last third of it.

 

Overall, my take is that, it’s all a storm in a teacup, with very weak tea being dished up by Cofnas.

 

Now, the most likely reason that until now there has been, apparently, no proper academic response to MacDonald’s work, is because its main ideas are true and significant. So what was the message that has been sent out by organized jewry to academics? For over 20 years, it’s been, “Kill the message by totally ignoring it!

 

MacDonald’s main point in his book is that jews, just like other human groups, act as a group to advance their interests often at the expense of other groups. Since organized jewry has maneuvered itself into being the most powerful group in Western societies, it has, and is wrecking utter destruction upon us! Especially by engineering the flooding of every White country, from New Zealand to Norway, with non-Whites, in order to racially and culturally destroy us! And part of the jewish group evolutionary strategy, to use Kmac’s terminology, is to prevent Whites from waking up to what they are doing to us, and responding in kind.

 

So, this interview is interesting, in that we get to see Kmac defend his book, his position, in his mild-mannered, yet strong way, against a young upstart jew making a name for himself. Cofnas fails, but rest assured, that another jew, defending their tribal war against Whites, will step into the breach and fire away.

 

Organized jewry is at total war with Whites, attempting to genocide us through whatever means. Kmac has helped us in exposing that, with his academic work, so we should all join together in supporting him, and others like him, in what ever way we can.

 

KATANA]

 

_________________________

 

 

Watch the video here:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARhqt38bMZA&t=8271s

 

 

 

Luke Ford

 

Streamed live on Mar 20, 2018

 

 

Kevin MacDonald joins me on my YouTube channel at 7pm tonight (Nathan Cofnas might come along to keep things lively) and Richard Spencer joins me at 5pm Wednesday (CA time). Nathan Cofnas joins the show here:

 

 

 

Nathan Cofnas responds: “Just read it. Pretty much what I expected. He repeats his arguments in more or less the same style, doesn’t address my arguments head on and in some key cases just ignores them. Probably I will publish an annotated version of the PDF.”

 

 

http://quillette.com/2018/03/15/alt-r…

 

 

 

Luke Ford with

 

Kevin MacDonald

 

vs

 

Nathan Cofnas

 

on

 

“The Culture of Critique”

 

 

Published on Mar 20, 2018

 

TRANSCRIPT

(71 mins)

 

 

 

Ford: And we’re back! Just trying to work out the technical difficulties and get Kevin MacDonald back in here. I hope the audio’s better. Sorry about these technical difficulties, but these things happen. And now maybe this time we’ll hear Kevin loudly and clearly. So I think that’s the important thing. So, sorry about that and we’re gonna get Kevin in here any second. So we’re talking about his response to the Nathan Cofnas critique of “The Culture of Critique”. And Kevin says:

 

I have a particular complaint, because of Steven Pinker’s not [?] antiscientific approach to my work, in part responsible for my spending the last 20 years in the intellectual wilderness.

 

Wow that is very honest! That’s kind of hot on the sleeve! That’s transparent honestly! It’s not like beating around the bush! That is just laying it down.

 

[01:00]

 

Nevertheless, Pinker has moved the scientific and popular reception of behavior genetics of evolutionary perspectives forward. See, for example, his withering criticism in the “Blank Slate of three of the figures discussed in Chapter two of “Cultural of Critique“, Stephen Jay Gould, Lewontin, and Rose.

 

And for all I know he is pursuing a tactical strategy of gradualism by supporting ideas that are still regarded with extreme hostility in large swaths of academia and the media, in the hope that things will eventually change. Though his recent work “Enlightenment Now” is not encouraging in that regard. The rest of Cofnas’ conclusion is simply name-calling — no need to respond.” says Kevin.

 

[02:01]

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »