Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Twitter’ Category

 

[Millennial Woes gives a humorous and informative speech on what it takes to be a man in 2017. Delivered at an Erkenbrand pre-conference dinner in Rotterdam, Netherlands, on Oct 13, 2017 — KATANA.]

 

_______________________

 

 

Millennial Woes

 

To Be a Man in 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Click the link below to view the video:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzMsWM1N9mU

 

 

Description

 

Published on Oct 21, 2017
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compete… [This video is not intended to condone violence or hate.] [This project is my livelihood. Please see http://www.millennialwoes.com/donate. Thank you.] ALTERNATIVE CHANNELS: http://www.vid.me/millennialwoes http://www.bitchute.com/channel/mille… http://www.minds.com/millennialwoes

 

 

 

 

__________________________

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(16:00)

 

 

Organizer: Millennial Woes will be doing a little broadcasting.

 

Woes: Alright, this is not going to be as serious as the other two talks, so I hope that’s that’s alright. I thought it would be appropriate to talk about what it takes to be a man in this year, in 2017. And this is based on the quote from Robert Heinlein, which I’ll read out now.

 

A human being should be able to change a diaper; plan an invasion; butcher a hog; conn a ship; design a building; write a sonnet; balance accounts; build a wall — “no comment”; set a bone; comfort the dying; take orders; give orders; cooperate; act alone; solve equations; analyze any problem; pitch manure; program a computer; cook a tasty meal; fight efficiently; and die gallantly! Specialization is for insects! [laughter]

 

Now in 2017, however, a man must be able to start an online poll that won’t be hijacked by bots; write a small software utility from scratch; code a working web page; get a public figure to retweet his pithy one-liner; [laughter] PTO skeptic — I hope you’re all aware of what’s skeptics are, terrible life forms; shelter a fellow goy in his hour of need; [laughter] withstand a demonization campaign by his nation’s tabloid media, for example; not have any skills, because they don’t teach us any, yet still have self-respect; [laughter] acquire skills and improve them, yet never get complacent; organize a local group of flashy goys; [laughter] convert Bitcoin to cash; archive a SoundCloud channel before it gets shut down; [laughter] one must understand the importance of group averages; one must understand that proportions matter just as much as absolute numbers; one must be capable of both logic and rhetoric and know that it’s not about the opponent, but the spectators.

 

A man in 2017 must be able to do a 23andme test, and pass; [laughter]

 

To be a man in 2017 one must be able to come up with some dank meme; post the dank meme; and post revisions and ironic remixes of the dank meme; organize a disinfo campaign; invent lies to tell the mainstream media, to throw them off the scent; insult antifa on twitter; insult antifa on Facebook and not get banned; [laughter] insult antifa in person and not get arrested; [loud laughter] invite antifa to a public debate on YouTube, knowing that they will shrink from the challenge, but hoping that they won’t; organize a conference, keeping it quiet; publicize a conference, keeping it safe; livestream a conference, keeping the connection stable; record a conference, keeping the audio at high quality, hopefully.

 

A man in 2017 has to understand that if the women of his group are misbehaving it’s because he is letting them; he also must be able to dissuade the women around him from voting for Hillary; [laughter] and dissuade the women around him from voting for Angela Merkel; and dissuade the women around him from voting; [loud laughter and applause] he must be able to have women call him a sexist, a misogynist, and a racist, and reply to them by un-ironically demanding a sandwich; [laughter]

 

A man in 2017 must be able to share, comment, and subscribe; he must be able to doctor a photo; put together an infographic; edit a video; design a flyer; improve the quality in a sound file; make a video that gets put on limited state;

 

If you are a man in 2017 you must be able to record a monologue on the xxx of modern culture; you must be able to convince yourself that you’re an impressing a girl with your knowledge of Evola; [laughter] and you must be able to get the references in a Murdock Murdock video; you should know the difference between Sargon of Akkad and Strap-on of Mossad; [laughter] you should know the difference between ovenproof fashion wear and fashion proof oven wear; [loud laughter] you should know the difference between “let’s play” and “let’s ride the tiger”; and you must have a secession plan for the United States. [laughter]

 

And to be a man in 2017 one must consider switching to vaping, not for the sake of one’s health, but for the sake of one’s race; and one must be able to find ways to insert the numbers 14 and 88 into otherwise innocuous statements, [laughter] at least six million times: [loud laughter and applause] one must know the difference between being “based” and working for Rebel Media; [laughter] one must know the moral difference between Erkerbrand and “Twerkinbrand”; [laughter] and one must always have a plan for what one would do, if one find oneself alone in an elevator with George Soros; [laughter] — rope on stand by.

 

One must be able as a man in 2017 to heroically charter a ship to patrol the waters off the Mediterranean and force lying NGOs to stop importing third-world invaders; one must be able to defeat feminists in debate, and understand that skeptics are not skeptical, and understand also that any amount of third-world migrants is too damn high!; one must be able to organize a raid on a Discus thread; infiltrate and subvert a liberal forum; and run a fashy Discourse server that survives for more than ten minutes; [laughter] one must also be able to make a podcast from a prison cell.

 

The man in 2017 must be able to order oven gloves from Amazon, or any other product [laughter] even after Amazon have deleted his account; [laughter] and get locked out of Facebook seven times in one year for dropping truth bombs too tough for Zuckerberg to handle; and finally he must understand that if OkCupid were to delete his account it would be a blessing!

 

The man in 2017 must be able to remain on friendly terms with almost every member of the movement, while also suffering the ambivalence of old friends; he must understand that the racism of low expectations is the race realism of low expectations; he must be able to enjoy the music of a non-White artist without forgetting the reality of group dynamics; and he must understand that yes, that black scientist is quite intelligent, but Africa is still a dump! ; lolo he must also understand that even if the Democrats are the real racists we can still catch up with them; [loud laughter and applause]

 

 

And he must understand that his privilege is not something to be ashamed of, but something to celebrate and be grateful for and to pass down; and he must understand that discrimination is the first function of sanity; and he must understand that if this blog, or that podcast, isn’t as good as he would do it, then he should just do it; and he must finally understand that jet fuel cannot melt steel beams; [laughter] on the matter from melting he must also be able to rescue a camera that has been soaked in the rain and dry it out without melting it — that’s a reference to my own channel; he must be able to identify those who have harmed her brothers and sisters; and he must see a fashy channel get shut down, and realize that it’s okay, because it will be back!

 

The man of 2017 must know that 95% of his countrymen are deluded and lost in the blue pill, and voting for the wrong party, yet still love them; he must get called a racist and just shrug his shoulders; he must be able to clear litter from his neighborhood, and yet still be the enemy of his local community; he must witness the spectacle of a pretty young White girl dating outside of her race, and still get out of bed the next morning; he must see the good in a young woman, some silly young woman, who believes in equality and wants to let the refugees in, but also see it as his responsibility to redirect that goodness.

 

The man in 2017 must watch his old school turn from White to brown, yet not despair; he must watch his country transform beyond recognition before his eyes, and remind himself that it’s okay, because one day we will reclaim what has taken from us!

 

In the meantime, the man of 2017 must be able to work in a call center for an Arab boss who hates him, but lives for the next fashy meet-up, or online hangout, or podcast, or identitarian conference.

 

As a man in 2017, one must listen to an Social Justice Warrior and answer their points calmly, politely, and concisely; one must listen to a classical liberal without laughing; [laughter] one must listen to a cuckservative without hating; one must listen to a baby-boomer without getting angry; one must listen to a libertarian without cringing; [laughter] one must listen to a civic nationalist; and one must understand the value of a wall; one must be working day and night to make America great again, to make the Netherlands greater again, to make England great again, and Scotland great again, and France great again, and Ireland great again, and Germany great again, and Austria great again, and Sweden great again. And to make Belgium great! [loud laughter]

 

The European man of 2017 must save the soul of the White race and, actually I’m not gonna read that one out — too aggressive! [laughter]

 

The European man of 2017 should be able to do all of these things, because specialization is for East Asians; [loud laughter]

 

And finally, to be a man in 2017 one must be expert in removal, we’re all familiar with technology, one must be able to remove USBs safely; under geopolitics, one must be able to remove one’s country from the European Union; and in economics, one must be able to remove one’s country from the international banking system; OPSEC, one must remove dodgy social media posts before attending a job interview; [laughter] and net etiquette, one must be able to remove copyrighted material from one’s YouTube videos; and civilizational survival, one must be able to remove cuck! Thank you! Oh, and also one must be able to remove kebab! [loud laughter and applause]

 

 

END

 

 

============================================

 

PDF Notes

Version 1 —

* Total words =
* Total images =
* Total A4 pages =

 

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):
(Available later)

 

 

 

Version History

 

Version 2:

 

Version 1: Oct 22, 2017  — Published post.

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

eric-hunt-debates-fritz-berg-cover

 

[Ryan Dawson of the Anti-NeoCon Report hosts a long (nearly 4 hours) and often heated debate between Eric Hunt and Fritz Berg on what happened to all the “missing” jews during the alleged “Holocaust” of WWII.

Eric Hunt, a producer of revisionist videos, in an unexpected change of conviction has recently revised his own revisionist views and now believes that in fact, jews and others were mass murdered in gas chambers and also shot in large numbers in the East.

Fritz Berg strongly supports the revisionist position that no homicidal gassings occurred what-so-ever and that any shootings of jews in the East were legitimate actions taken against partisans and their supporters — KATANA.]

 

_______________________

 

 

 

[90/231 mins, now complete!]

 

 

 

 

 

_________________________

 

 

____________________

 

 

Here is the full Hunt/ Fritz debate on the Holocaust. This is for ANC members This debate is specifically on the question of transit camps and gas chambers. If there were transit camps, then where are the records of where all these prisoners said to have shipped east ended up? If there were gas chambers…

This content is for VIP Subscriber and VIP Subscriber (yearly) members only.

 

http://www.ancreport.com/podcast/holocaust-debate-eric-hunt-vs-fritz-berg/

 

 

Free download of the mp3 audio file  –

 

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B7NKRD5j08vYWU5vbnVvUlBEODA

 

Questioning “The Holocaust” (Eric Hunt’s website):

Debate with Friedrich Paul Berg (Updated with download link)

 

 

Audio files (split into 4 parts) also available here at archive.org:

 Holocaust Debate – Eric Hunt vs Friedrich Berg – Parts 4 of 4

 

 

ANC Report

 

Holocaust Debate

 

Eric Hunt vs Fredrick Berg

 

 

Published on Feb 26, 2017

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

 

[00:00]

 

 

Ryan: What I thought was going to be a one hour debate, or planned, ended up being about three and a half hours.

OK, this is Ryan Dawson of ANC Report, the Anti Neo-con Report. We’re usually covering the antiwar thing, the anti neo-con material. We often get into “hidden history” and sometimes conspiracy, … Not that wacky Jonestown kind. But today’s topic is one of the more taboo, if not the most taboo topic on the Interwebs, and that’s the “Holocaust“. There’s a lot of exaggerations in both directions about the “Holocaust“. Over exaggerating it, maybe under exaggerating it.

And we have two revisionists on today, one revisionist is Eric Hunt who’s been on the program before. He has recanted some of his views and he will be explaining that. And here to debate him is Fritz Berg, or Friedrich Paul Berg of the website, Nazi Gassings dot com. Also Eric Hunt’s web site, Questioning the Holocaust dot com. And you can see his long, well recanting on that, as well as other information.

So gentleman, I’m going to give you guys the floor. Hopefully I won’t have to jump in too much. I do want to make it clear to everyone that the point of this is to get at the truth where this is never supposed to be something dogmatic and I hope people will refrain from accusations, saying somebody is anti German, or anti-jewish. The idea here is just to get at the truth of the matter, based on the best evidence available.

So Eric, I will start with you, because you were a revisionists who is now revised your revisions and you’re catching some flak for that. So I’ll let you explain your position and then I’ll let Fritz respond.

 

Eric: All right, thanks. First up I’d like to thank Fritz Berg for agreeing to debate. Fritz has never been afraid to defend his views and has debated Roberto Muehlenkamp, who accepts the garssing claims and has repeatedly asked to debate revisionist Fred Leuchter. Surprisingly it’s the revisionists like Leuchter, dodging the debate, not those defending the claims of mass gassing and shooting such as Muehlenkamp. I recommend for listeners to listen to the Berg-Muehlenkamp debates. It is my opinion Mr Muehlenkamp presents entirely logical arguments and overwhelming evidence in favor of mass gassings having occurred. We will likely not be repeating many of the same arguments from those debates here today.

 

Fritz has and is operating in the supposed spirit of the revisionists who claim to desire open debate on the Holocaust and Fritz should be commended. It’s very telling that no other top revisionist scholars, as they claim, has so far agreed to debate me upon publishing my controversial findings in an article titled “The End Of The Line” available to read at: Questioning the holocaust dot com. This exposes the hypocrisy of those claiming they simply desire open debate on the subject. I put forward that this clique of SS mass murder deniers instead want to spread their extreme, indefensible, illogical denialist falsehoods in their safe little echo chambers. I’ve determined the behavior of this community is more consistent with a religious cult like the Jonestown cult you mentioned in your opening, than something claiming to be related to science. And I’m hoping to tell people listening not to drink the Kool-Aid.

 

For those who claim to oppose censorship, both Fritz and I have been banned from the Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust forums. I have determined even before coming to this conclusion that [that forum] is paradoxically the most closed forum which claims to debate the “Holocaust“. And I have heard Fritz say the same throughout the years. I want to make it clear I’m not here to totally put down, or insult revisionists. One reason revisionists haven’t been debated more often is, because the “Holocaust Industry”, as Norman Finkelstein calls them, really does engage in many hoaxes. “Mini”, I meant to say, mini hoaxes, small hoaxes, propaganda, exaggeration and willingly spreading falsehoods. The blind believers repeatedly defend indefensible and scientifically impossible eyewitness accounts. Often these accounts are forced upon the American public, especially on naive schoolchildren.

 

eric-hunt-debates-fritz-berg-3178-elie-weisels-flaming-pits

[Image] An illustration of one of Elie Weisel’s sadistic tall tales as described in his mostly fictional book, “Night“.

 

eric-hunt-debates-fritz-berg-elie-wiesels-book-night-cover

 

I’d like to talk briefly about some of the things I’ve done and what I stand behind. Elie Weisel’s fictional tale of walking to the edge of a flaming pit of fire at the entrance of Auschwitz Birkenau, where dump trucks full of babies were dumped alive for no reason other than dramatic effect, during that titular night, is forced upon naive school children.

 

[05:04]

 

These children don’t know the flaming pit never existed, as all eyewitnesses confirm, including Weisel’s own sister. The fire and atrocity invention is just a lame literary device by a Jewish poet to represent entering into the hell of Auschwitz.

 

Realist Report Interview Eric Hunt - 1806 The Last Days Spielberg

 

My exposé on Steven Spielberg’s 1999 Academy Award winning “Holocaust” documentary, “The Last Days” is one for the ages, which I’m very proud of. To investigate in particular that film star survivor, Irene Zisblatt’s false testimony, I did what any skeptical researcher should do. I investigated her claims, bought her book and read it. I found the book to be almost total fiction and saw ways to prove it. I followed the evidence trail to Stanford University to watch her video testimony, recorded for Steven Spielberg’s Survivors of the Showa a Visual History Foundation. In this video testimony Zisblatt seems to invent in real time new fake atrocity stories, one after the other. Zisblatt claims she was selected to become a lampshade, because of her smooth skin! She claims the Nazis tried to change the color of her eyes. Zisblatt claims that Dr Mengele removed her Auschwitz tattoo in excruciating experiments. Despite being on a list of Jews quickly transited through Auschwitz to other labor camps, never given a tattoo. Zisblatt claims to have escaped from inside Auschwitz Birkenau Crematoria III gas chamber. She claims a boy then threw her over an electrified barbed wire fence, naked, onto a train where she escaped. That train would have been at least one hundred feet away from the fence.

 

Realist Report Interview Eric Hunt - 1805 Last Days of the Big Lie

 

Zisblatt’s calling card claim of repeatedly defecating and swallowing diamonds for a year and a half pales in comparison to her other outrageous lies! Steven Spielberg produced other falsehoods in that Oscar winning documentary, including featuring a discredited African American soldier who already falsely claimed to have liberated Dachau in a previous propaganda film, “Liberators”, which was withdrawn from public airing, as a hoax. As a result of sharing Zisblatt’s testimony to the world, rather than have the evidence looked at in a major examination of this outrageous false testimony, shown to children and even the US Congress, I was instead banned from Stanford University libraries!

(more…)

Read Full Post »

a-woes-by-any-other-name-cover-ver-2

 

[Millennial Woes, a Scottish vlogger, discusses his recent doxing by the Main Sewer Media, Hope Not Hate and some low-life anti-fa types  — KATANA.]

 

_______________________

 

 

a-woes-by-any-other-name-video

 

YouTube Description

 

 

The story of the attack on me by the Daily Record (including ace reporter Alan McEwen), the Scottish Sunday Herald, and other low-brow newspapers, done in collusion with Hope Not Hate and some gormless Scottish antifa.

 

Part 1: 0:00:00
Part 2: 0:03:57
Part 3: 0:28:02
Part 4: 0:53:48
Part 5: 1:08:42
Part 6: 1:16:53

 

[This channel is my livelihood. Donations to http://www.paypal.me/MillennialWoes are appreciated, as are pledges on http://www.patreon.com/MillennialWoes and bitcoin donations to 1743rc3jnBaYL3piL9eeEHqbrXrroZLVWW. Thank you.]

 

[This video is not intended to condone violence or hate.]

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-AhMPTFRwPM

 

 

 

A Woes By Any Other Name

 

 

 

 

Published on Jan 21, 2017

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

 

 

[00:00]

 

 

a-woes-by-any-other-name-2878-woes-19th-jan-2017

 

Part One: Introduction

 

Hello. This video is going to describe what has happened to yours truly over the last few weeks. And it’s going to be quite an involved story, I’m afraid. I’ll try to be brief, but we know that, I don’t tend to do that successfully very often. Nonetheless, I will try. But before I get into what happened, first things first. I’ve got a few messages from various people. To my supporters. These are the most important people. Thank you very, very much for the help you’ve given me over the last seven days! Thank you for the donations which have been very generous and numerous and certainly have made my immediate future more navigable than it was before. And also, thank you for the countless messages of moral support and encouragement that you’ve sent. Well, … It would have been pretty awful without them, honestly. I would have felt quite alone without that, so thank you!

 

To the public. I do not hate. This is contrary to what you will have read about me in the press. These ridiculous articles that are being printed, or have been printed. I want to give you my side of things. You need to be able to see me as I am and not as these hack journalists portray me. I do not hate. I do not spew hate on this channel, or anywhere else. And I don’t, I don’t encourage hate either. And certainly not deliberately. I’ve no interest in doing that. I never have had any interest in doing that.

 

I mean, we’ll get into that later. Anyway, to the police, because I know that I’ve probably been reported for “hate speech” in the last few days. I mean, I expect so.

 

So on to the police. Honestly, it seems to me [laughing] that you have better things to do than investigate someone like me. I’m just a guy talking about the world and trying to do so honestly. And that’s all I’ve ever been doing on this channel. But, I know that you have to follow up on things. So, maybe I’ll be speaking to you soon.

 

To the Scottish Government and judiciary. I don’t believe I’ve said anything illegal on my channel and I don’t think it’s “hate speech”. That is just an infantile category, of course. But I don’t think that what I do qualifies as “hate speech”. However, if you do put me on trial —and this is not threat. This is just what I think is likely to happen. If you do put me on trial for “hate speech” I think it will backfire hugely on yourselves, for various reasons. I have international support. Tens of thousands of people I know will rally around and it will just look ridiculous to put someone like me on trial. However, I’ll go into in more detail in a future video. For now, let’s concentrate on what has happened recently in the last two weeks.

 

a-woes-by-any-other-name-part-2

 

Part Two: What Happened

 

OK, so we’ll start with our rundown, a chronological rundown of what happened, starting from the 19th of November last year, 2016. And with the NPI [National Policy Institute] gathering in Washington DC. This is my, the third conference I’d attended and everything was going just swimmingly — up until the end of Richard Spencer’s speech, when some people gave Nazi salutes in the audience.

 

a-woes-by-any-other-name-2868-woes-at-npi-conference

 

Now, I’ve talked about this before on the channel, briefly, but I think it’s worth emphasizing there were about, at least, three hundred people there, I believe, at that conference. And from the footage it looks like about four people did these salutes. I don’t know who they were. I saw one of them bragging about it on a forum.

 

[05:00]

 

I don’t know if they were leftist infiltrators. I don’t know if they were just young men drunk and showing bravado. And I don’t know if they were genuine neo Nazis. But what I do know is that they did not represent the majority of that audience, or anything like it. They’re a tiny minority.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 realist-report-tanstaafl-2016-cover

 

[After a year’s break from blogging and interviews TANSTAAFL returns with this interview with John Friend at his The Realist Report site. I consider TANSTAAFL to be one of the most insightful commentators on the jewish problem, and in this interview he doesn’t disappoint with his take on what’s being going on in our movement to expose and rid ourselves of the organized evil jewish cabal that dominates our societies.

 

Topics include; the ongoing jew war on Whites, the meaning of “conspiracy theory”, kikeservatives, Twitter, the jewsmedia, Trump, Bannon, (((the echo meme))), Alt-Right, Richard Spencer, Greg Johnson, Jared Taylor, Hitler and National Socialist Germany, and White racial consciousness — KATANA.]

 

_______________________

 

 

ATTENTION READERS!

 

Volunteers are needed to help complete this transcript.

 

Please step forward and do your bit!

 

[ 65/115 mins, now complete!]

 

Always leave a message in the comments BEFORE starting on a time-slot.

 

realist-report-tanstaafl-2016-progress-chart-06

 

 

Why Bother with Transcripts?

 

Occasionally, people ask if having a transcript is really necessary (considering all the work involved) when people can just listen/watch the audio/video.

 

Here are some reasons. If you can think of any more or would like to elaborate on the ones here please leave a message in the Comments.

 

Some of the advantages of a transcript are as follows:

You are able to read the whole presentation with full accuracy at the speed that you can read, which is generally a lot faster than listening to the audio or watching the video.

Some speakers, with strong accents or idiosyncratic speech habits, are often difficult to follow.

You can easily scan the text and zoom into what interests you in a non-linear manner.

You can easily quote verbatim from the text when making comments about the text.

You can print out a hard copy for future reference.

When you listen to an audio or watch a video you tend to forget much of the points made, etc. Having it in writing allows you to refresh your memory quickly and accurately.

Transcripts lend themselves to be available off-line and spread via hard copies.

Transcripts can make it easier to create accurate translations of the material which can in turn be used to create video and audio versions.

Video and audio files often become unavailable, for many reasons including censorship (on YouTube, etc.), technical causes due to lack of equipment or power.

Video and audio files are many times larger than a text file of the same material, sometimes hundreds of times larger. In many cases presenting the information in video or audio format has no worthwhile advantage over a text file. Of course there are may cases where the opposite is true.

Other?

That all said, a transcript is often no substitute for an audio/video file and vice-versa. They are complimentary to each other.

 

_________________________

 

Readers, please:

  • BEFORE starting, indicate in the COMMENT section the time slot that you are willing to complete. For example:    >>> I will do 15:00 to 20:00 <<<
  • Every minute of transcription will take you about 15 minutes to complete accurately.
    • Doing even 1 minute is helpful!

  • As a double-check, please look at the COMMENTS to see whether anyone has indicated they are already doing a particular time-slot. (Comments are automatically posted. There is always some delay in the time-slot status being updated in the actual post by me.)
  • Time slots that I know are being worked on will be marked as IN PROGRESS in the post so as to help avoid unnecessary duplication of effort. Always check the COMMENTS though.
  • If you have little time, don’t worry or fuss about typos, spelling, punctuation, etc. I can clean it up.
  • If something is unclear put your best guess followed by some question marks, e.g., “He said that xxx ??? thought this, …” Don’t spend time trying to figure it out.
  • Please enter the transcript in the comment section with the times. I will then copy it (after proofing it) into the post.
  • NOTE: Comments with MORE than 3 URLs are automatically treated as SPAM by this WordPress system. So in those cases change the 4th or more URLs from, e.g.: “abc.com” to “abc . com”.
  • Another way to help if you don’t have time to do any transcription is to point out any errors.
  • Remember that old adage, “Many hands make light work“.

Thank you.

 

____________________

 

 

On this edition of The Realist Report, we’re joined once again by Tanstaafl of Age of Treason. To begin the program, Tanstaafl gives listeners an overview of what he’s been up to lately, including being banned from Twitter for making factual statements about Jews and their anti-White agenda. We move on to focus on the Jewish problem more generally, and the open and quite blatant war being waged on Whites by the organized Jewish community. We also discuss Trump’s election, the Alt Right, and related topics.

 

http://therealistreport.com/the-realist-report-tanstaafl/

 

The Realist Report

 

Interviews

 

TANSTAAFL — 2016

 

 

Published on Dec 8, 2016

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

 

[00:00]

 

 

 

John Friend: All right folks. Welcome back to another edition of the Realist Report. This is your host John Friend. Joining me today is TANSTAAFL, who maintains the excellent website Age of Treason. TANSTAAFL is one of the most insightful and articulate commentators in the alternative independent media today, especially when it comes to the jewish problem. A topic that we will be discussing at length during this podcast.

 

Tan thanks for joining me. How are you today sir?

 

John: Good! Well, you sound fine and, you know, if you’ve got to sneeze, or cough, or anything, …

 

TAN: I may! [laughing]

 

John: … Just put yourself on mute and I’m sure we can deal with it. Thanks for coming on the program. Last time you were on was actually a year ago, exactly. I was just looking at my website and one year ago, today. Well, I guess when I post this program, which will be technically tomorrow, December 7th. You were on and I’ve been wanting to or I had been wanting to interview you for a long time because I followed your work for a number of years and listened to pretty much all of your podcasts and you’ve been a big, you know, influence in my thinking, especially when it comes to racial issues and, of course, the jewish problem.

 

So, just to get started, could you talk about what you’ve been up to lately? I know you were recently shoahed from Twitter. So you are no longer on Twitter, but I see you’ve been blogging a lot lately so, why don’t you just tell us what you’ve been up to well.

 

TAN: Well, yeah, I wouldn’t call it a lot. I’ve actually been pretty inactive for the last year. Actually, it started even before I talked to you last. But, I’ve been active mostly on Twitter. I had stopped blogging so much. Before I had been in the habit of posting about once a week, once every couple of weeks, and it really dropped off to almost nothing. But Twitter is, … It wasn’t because I was not paying attention to what was going on and didn’t have thoughts. It was just because I was expressing myself mainly through Twitter. Which is really a different form of media. It’s like, it’s been called a “micro blog” and that is really a good description for it. So, instead of writing these long posts on a blog, you write little snippets of thoughts that fit in 140 characters and you can whip them off pretty quickly and in response to lots of different stories. So it’s becomes addictive! You know, you’re sitting there paying attention to what’s going on in the news, what everybody’s excited about and you have some insight into it, or you just want to bring it to other people’s attention and you comment on it. And the big problem with it, as I found out — I was well aware I was just wondering when it would happen — but I found out a couple of weeks ago right, you know, few weeks after the election. When Twitter decides that you’re too much of a problem, they can just delete your account and it’s as if you never existed.

 

So I don’t really plan on going back, as useful as I found it. Most of the value was, for me, in the besides sharing thoughts with other like minds, was, … What I found on Twitter was that basically the enemy is using it as a communication platform. Very similar to what they, what was uncovered back several years ago. I think 2012 election cycle. The journalist email list that they used to use back then — it might have been even 2008 cycle? I can’t recall now. It was quite a while ago. But basically before Twitter existed, the jews and the jews media and their fellow travellers used to communicate with each other via a private email list, that was invite only. But it was a massive number of people. And when it was uncovered and the e-mails were shared by somebody, it was shocking to a lot of people. That these people were colluding and, you know, coming up with a shared narrative about how to deal with certain scandals that broke. And we’ve seen it again in this election cycle with the Wiki Leaks thing, I mean there was there was a bit of that.

 

But every day on Twitter — and you don’t even have to have an account on Twitter — you can sign up. And the main reason to sign up is so you can make a list. But even if you don’t sign up for Twitter you can just go to these different accounts one by one and look at what they’re saying. It’s convenient when you make a list, because it basically mashes them all together. And that’s one of the first things I did after they kicked me off. I just created a dummy account so that I could create a list of all these jews media jews, so that I could see what they were chattering about, what they were screeching about today. And so basically it’s what they call that, “opposition research“?

 

[05:00]

 

John: Sure

(more…)

Read Full Post »