Archive for the ‘Traitors – Journalists’ Category



[In this interview Andrew Hitchcock talks with Alison Chabloz about the “lawfare” that is being waged against her by members of the British jewish community who are using laws, introduced by jews over the years, to curtail free speech against anyone who dares to criticize  jewry in any way, but especially those that dare cast a skeptical eye against their most “holy of holies” frauds, known as the “Holocaust“.


Alison, a talented singer and musician, has created several songs that satirize various Holohoax claims made by “survivors“, including “shrunken heads, soap, and lampshades“. As a result, a jew organization known as the Campaign Against Anti-semitism, headed up by jews, Mr Falter and a Mr Silverman, have instigated a “legal” persecution campaign against her as punishment.


The importance of this case, if these jews get away with this, is then it will be just another ratcheting up the jewish run police state that Britain has become. That will lead ultimately to any criticism of jewish crimes being totally outlawed and severely punished. That will effectively mean that any criticism of European countries being flooded by non-Whites, will also be outlawed as “anti-semitism“, since organized jewry is behind it all.

So, I would urge all people concerned about truth and the survival of Whites, to attend her court appearances, and to give her as much support as possible. Your, and your children’s, future will, in part, depend upon it. — KATANA]




Andrew Hitchcock




Alison Chabloz


“No Regrets!”



Click here for the audio:



Click here for:

Andrew Carrington Hitchcock webpage for this interview


Click here for Alison’s blog:



Published on Jan 18, 2018



Andrew Hitchcock’s Description


The Andrew Carrington Hitchcock Show (541) Alison Chabloz – No Regrets!



In today’s show originally broadcast on January 18 2018, EuroFolkRadio’s Andrew Carrington Hitchcock interviews Alison Chabloz, for a show entitled, “No Regrets!


We discussed: What Alison has been up to since she was last on the show in May 2017 and her several court appearances since then; the charges that have been brought against Alison; how “Holocaust” denial is not a crime in Britain, so how has Alison committed any crime; why haven’t the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism (C AA) gone after certain Anti-Semitic Sex Pistols songs such as, “Belsen Was A Gas,” and “No One is Innocent,”; how the mainstream media have avoided covering Alison’s case as they want the British public to still believe they have their democratic right to free speech in Britain; the sentence Alison faces if she is found guilty; how elements of the British Race Relations legislation was actually drafted by the Board Of Deputies Of British jews; how Alison uploaded 9 videos to YouTube in December 2017 and all of them were banned; and many other topics.




(61 mins)





You are listening to TBR radio, brought to you by The Barnes Review.

Now the Andrew Carrington Hitchcock Show with your host, Andrew Carrington Hitchcock.


Andrew: Hello everybody. And returning with me today he is the persecuted musician, persecuted by the jews. That is Alison Chabloz of the UK. Now we’re recording the show on January the 4th, and she has a court appearance coming up in a few days. I’m not airing it until January 18th, but I knew Alison is making it available before hand. So to all Alison’s followers I want to welcome you to the show. and I want to bring Alison up. Allison are you with me?


Alison: Hello Andy. Yes!


Andrew: Excellent.


Alison: Good morning. How are you?


Andrew: Very good thank you. it’s great to have you back on. I wish it was in more pleasant circumstances. But firstly let the audience know where you can be found. your website, YouTube, what have you. any way of contacting you.


Alison: And yes, it’s just a simple Google search for my name, which is quite unusual, Alison and Chabloz, CHABLOZ. A Google search will bring up immediately my blog, WordPress blog: alisonchabloz dot wordpress dot com, and my YouTube channel and various articles about me. Just a simple Google search is the easiest way.


Andrew: Excellent. You were last on the show in May of 27th, last year. Could you give the audience an update as to what’s been happening to you, in between May of last year and January of 2018?


Alison: Well, the year continued as it began last year. I was first in front of court in December, 2016, twice. My case was adjourned in March. I think we spoke briefly about that in May. There have been altogether now, six, or seven court hearings. And I think it’s probably a record, because — perhaps your listeners will know — I’ve been charged under the Communications Act. Finally I was charged in September, or October. It was very late. It took them months to actually charge me. And, in fact, in October I had a court hearing where I was only notified that I wasn’t required to attend this hearing. This is on the fourth of October.




And I got to court, to assist the hearing — I had the right to do this. It was in a very small court and there was standing room only!


My accusers had sent somebody to oversee the proceedings. And there were a few breaks, and during one of these breaks, I was sitting outside court with my supporters and my barrister. and several policeman. I saw several policemen arrive and policewomen standing outside the court. And to cut a long story short, that day I was first arrested. They took me into a small room, a conference room inside the court building. I was arrested first for breach of bail, taken outside of the court, told I was going to be taken to the Charing Cross police station for questioning, for breach of bail, because I’d uploaded songs to the Internet over the course of the summer. And these were allegedly a breach of my bail conditions.


The bail conditions concerned was that I was not allowed to post, or send any message that’s racist, or anti-semitic and grossly offensive. It has to be both! These bail conditions, it has to be anti-semitic and grossly offensive, or it has to be racist and grossly offensive. I thought long and hard before I did publish these songs, but went ahead anyway. And I was a incited to do that for other reasons, that I go into later.


But yes. I was arrested. And then a ten minutes later standing outside court and telling the policemen and this young policewoman — I was her first arrest, so I was congratulating her about that. She was obviously very nervous, this very young policewoman.


Suddenly the officer in charge of the small group of policemen — there were three of them — came out and said:


Okay, we’re going to de-arrest you. It appears that, we’re not quite sure, because your bail conditions were imposed here in London, but it’s a Derbyshire a police investigation.


So they took me back inside court. And then about half an hour later I was again arrested! This time on in charge of incitement. I was taken to Charing Cross police. [I was] handcuffed outside court. My accusers were there with their phones and cameras taking photos of me, that they immediately published on their website. Alison Chabloz being handcuffed and dragged off! Handcuffed in front of everybody in the court! Totally unwarranted! [laughing] For singing songs! For singing songs. This is the UK today!




I spent six hours in Charing Cross police station. And then I was put into a police van. At the back of the police van. One of these coppers opened the back door and said and pointed to the floor — which was dirty, it had to be raining and it was all dirty and muddy, the floor of this cell at the back of this van — and said:


That’s the floor, but it’s also the seat! You’re welcome to sit on one of those wheel hubs, if you like.


So I was three hours in a freezing cold, White, neon lit, cell at the back of the police van! I complained bitterly that I was cold, several times. And was told by — there was a good cop, he was driving, and a bad cop — told that was all I deserved! I’d been arrested, therefore I was a criminal and that’s all I deserved!


I spent another twelve hours in custody, was interviewed, and was finally charged with a breach of bail, and a request by Derbyshire police to have me held on remand, which would have would have meant that if the magistrate’s court in Derbyshire had agreed with the police, I would at this moment be in prison for singing songs!


I was also charged with another count of incitement for a song I uploaded called “Too Extreme for the BNP”.


That’s still under investigation. There’s been no official charges brought against that song.


Since then, I was released by the remand court in Chesterfield — I was immediately released. I had a very good lawyer that day. The magistrates sat there scratching their heads for a while.


Leading me out of the court, the court guard, a little Derbyshire woman, she said:


Oh, well done! You’re saying everything that everybody thinks, but daren’t say out loud.


So, it was very nice of her. So I spent forty eight hours in prison for having uploaded two more songs to the Internet, which, in fact, as I said, earlier, I’m going to say why I did this.


The Derbyshire police are just being absolutely hopeless! They ignored all the harassment directed at myself, my career, my family, my person. They’ve ignored death threats that I sent [forwarded to] them! They ignored, or rather they explained they were going to investigate them, and then they said:


Oh no, we’ve not found anything. We’re closing the investigation.


And a week later, I was the one being arrested! On charges, trumped up charges, invented by these same persons who had been previously persecuting me! And I’d also been receiving anonymous posts through my letter box, addressed to “Mrs Holocaust Denier”! And I received in June, another one of these anonymous deliveries. And that really triggered me and I thought:


Here I am on bail with these bail conditions. I can’t go out and perform in any venues. I can’t even go and do open mikes. Basically they have silenced me in front of any kind of public, live audience. Well, I’m just going to use the Internet and publish more songs. That’s what I do! That’s my creative job. That’s my person, it’s what I do. So be it for the consequences! Let’s go for it!




So that’s where I am today. I think I’m now charged with five counts of sending, or causing to be sent, grossly offensive message via the public communications network.


There are legal arguments in this case concerning points of law. Is posting the URL, or indeed posting, uploading a song to Youtube, is that sending, or causing to be sent, …? The Judge hasn’t given any official decision on this, as yet. He’s said that he would be inclined to agree with the Crown Prosecution arguments regarding this. But as these are arguable points of law, if he does, in his written decision, come down on me, on these points law, we will just keep appealing.


And usually, under the justice system, as it stands, if a point of law is arguable then the appeals will go on until we win. I could still be found not guilty on the facts of the case, are my songs grossly offensive, or not? But as there’s no actual definition of “grossly offensive” — of course, my accusers are trying to tout this international definition of “anti-semitism” that was adopted by Theresa May’s government last November. Just a month before my first, November 2016 that is. They’re trying to tout this as “Holocaust denial”, “anti-semitism”, therefore it’s “race hate”, therefore, blah, blah, blah. This woman needs to wear a distinguishing badge and be sent to the concentration camps, etc., etc!


That’s where we are! That’s where we are today!


My censors are the ones who are the real “Holocaust” deniers, Andy. You know, they’re the ones! The mainstream will go on, and on, and on, about:


Under the Nazi regime, artist’s were censored and not allowed to perform!


[Andrew chuckling]


I heard a BBC Radio Three presenter, not so long ago — it was during the proms [?] — he was talking about a German jewish composer by the name of Paul Hindemith. And this Hindemith was a jew and he parodied something, he wrote some stuff that I don’t mind. I quite enjoy listening to, but he wrote some other awful stuff which were parodies of Wagner. And, of course, he got banned and censored, and he had to flee to the United States, this Hindemith.




But the presenter in this programme was talking about the situation, saying:


It was unimaginable, unthinkable today in 2017 that any artist would be prevented from performing!


Or that any audiences would be prevented from listening to any artist’s work! There wouldn’t have been much point in me ringing up to complain to the BBC about this! But I just thought, well, …


Andrew: They know exactly what’s going on. And it just goes to show the hypocrisy and the lies, and the fact that they’re fake news, and they have been for decades, they’ve been fake news.


The real “Holocaust” is what happened to the White race in Russia under the jewish Bolsheviks. Millions and millions killed over the years. But they don’t want to talk about that. And the funny thing is, is what they do is that the crimes that they committed against White Christians there, they then accuse the National Socialists of doing to jews to Germany! And a key example of that is the guy, rabbi Mehndi Cohen, who was bleating about my book on CBS news, and how awful it was. And how his relatives were in a synagogue in Germany and they were locked in and burnt alive! Well that’s what the jews were doing to the White Russians in Russia!


Alison: Yes!


Andrew: There’re no stories out of Germany of synagogues being put up in flames where people are in them! It’s absolutely pathetic! And shortly after that, my book got banned, so that’s one of those, “Cohencidences”!


Alison: Yes! Book burners!


Andrew: Yes. And now they’re trying to silence you. They tried to silence me and you have the garbage on the BBC:


Oh! Anyone being silenced in this day and age! It’s unthinkable! It would never happen!


Well, what do you think all this “hate crime” nonsense is then? What is “hate speech”? If you have got freedom to speak, or freedom of speech, rather, then there should be no thing as “hate speech”.


But one thing I want to ask you is, in those five songs that they’ve cited, have they actually cited the particular passages, lyrics in the songs that they don’t like, or have they just the gone over them as a blanket thing?


Alison: There are three songs, in fact. Two of them are doubly charged, sending, or causing to be sent. No, there’s nothing about that. Of course, in the witness statements from Mr Falter and Mr Silverman of the Campaign Against Anti-semitism, they cite particular passages., but nothing in the Crown submissions I’ve seen, where they talk about this. In fact, the Crown admits in their submission that there is no law in the UK which criminalizes questioning of the so-called “Holocaust”. And therefore it will be up to the court to decide whether my songs are offensive, or not!




And this international definition of anti-Semitism has already been severely criticised by, I think he’s called, Hugh Tomlinson Q.C. It’s got absolutely no, … It’s not part of British legislation! For that it would need to be voted through the Parliament and then through the House of Lords, and it’s not the case.


And interestingly, the reason why I was charged, … The third charge is for sending, because I uploaded another song, it’s a parody of “El Condo Pasa [“If I Could”. Literally Spanish for “The Condor Passes”], you know, “I’d rather be a hammer than a nail[a 1970 song by jew duo, Simon and Garfunkel] It’s a parody of this, and then it uses another jewish tune at the end, rather in the same style as “Survivors[song] where I just talk about soap and lampshades. Soap and lampshades, the colored smoke from the chimney. Everything that’s been completely debunked, even by Yad Vashem, “Holocaust” Memorial in Jerusalem.


That to them is grossly offensive, that I parody these war propaganda lies, on the basis of which so many people were hung after Nuremberg, the fake Tribunal at Nuremberg. That to them is grossly offensive!


As I said in my interview to the police officer:


Well, if the truth is grossly offensive, what are we doing? What are we doing?


There are three songs, but, there’s no specific lyrics cited by the Crown in their submissions.


Andrew: Well, let’s give some examples. Firstly, the comedian, Ricky Gervais, he made jokes about how he can make “Holocaust” jokes and get away with it. When Kate Winslet finally won an Oscar, he said to her:


I told you to do a “Holocaust” film and then you’re win an Oscar!”


He said that in an episode of Extras. He also said it when she got the Oscar. So he sends that up completely.


But let’s give an example, and this is something one of your listeners, or readers pointed out to you, and I’m pleased that you raised it before we started recording today. And that was the, … And it was actually in 1980’s. A film came out with an accompanying soundtrack called “The Great Rock N Roll Swindle” which was a kind of mockumentary about the Sex Pistols. And there was a song “Belsen was a Gas!”. Now there was the only one Sid Vicious actually wrote, and I think John Lydon was involved as well. And I think he referred to it some years later as a particularly nasty little tune, John Lydon did. Who, of course, was Johnny Rotten in the Sex Pistols day.


Alison: Yes!


Andrew: And it was subsequently, because what happened, I don’t want to get too deep into it. Basically, Johnny Rotten left the band and then Sid Vicious went out on his own. And the other two members, Paul Cook and Steve Jones, the drummer and the guitarist, they went off to Rio where Ronny Biggs [a criminal of “The Great Train Robbery” fame] was holed up.




And they recorded a couple of songs with him. They recorded one called, “No One is Innocent” and then they recorded another one, a different version of “Belsen was a Gas”.


And what happened was they ended up in both the film and the album which you can now buy anywhere you like. I imagine it has sold millions of copies over the years. But let me read some of the lyrics from, … It’s a couple of lines in the song, “No One is Innocent” which is marked up as Sex Pistols featuring Ronnie Biggs.


He says:


God save Martin Borman and Nazis on the run.
They weren’t being wicked God.
That was their idea of fun!


So they haven’t got a problem with that for some reason. But let’s look at the “Belsen was a Gas”. And I’ll tell you some the lyrics here. Actually, what I’ll do, I’ll read the whole thing, because it’s only three verses.


And this is “Belsen was a Gas”, Ronnie Biggs movie version, which again is in the movie and it’s also on the soundtrack album which you can get from any music/video retail outlet.

Belsen was”, … He opens up and says, “Okay, this time for real, Belsen was a Gasser!” and this follows a live version of “Belsen was a Gas” with Johnny Rotten singing it in the film, and then jump straight to this. Here we go.

Belsen was a gas, I heard the other day.
In the open graves where the jews all lay.
‘Life is fun and I wish you were here’
They wrote on postcards to those held dear.
Oh dear! Oh dear! Oh dear!


Dentists searched their teeth for gold.
Frisk the jews for bank notes rolled.
When they found out what they’d got,
Line them up and shoot the lot!


Kill a man. Be a man. Kill a man.
Wonder what the jews would say.
If I told them where Bormann was today.
Would they start a vendetta?
You’d better ask Ernie Ledbetter.
Ledbetter. Ledbetter. Ledbetter.


So, this is pretty violent stuff, and the idea behind it as well, I think uses the fact that there’s all these stories of people, like Martin Bormann, going off to Rio themselves. Going off to South America, and so that was another idea of the song, you know, to send it up that way as well.


Alison: Yeah.


Andrew: It had a variety of things, but they don’t seem to have any problem with this song which, you know, none of your songs are actually threatening physical violence against jews. They don’t go after that, but they go after you. It sounds to me like they don’t want to go after big fish, they want to go after small fish. What’s your thoughts?




Alison: Yes.


Coming back to what I said earlier about the reason why I was charged under the Communications Act, rather than the Public Order Act, which is the actual “hate speech” thing, that comes under the Race Relations Act. I think it’s 2006, there was an amendment added to this act, that dispensed satire.


Rowan Atkinson [a British comedian who plays the character, “Mr Bean”] was quite vocal saying, you know, this is very dangerous. And the amendment which exempts satire from being charged under this Act was passed by one vote in the House of Lords! And after, in the same year, Michael Howard, who was then the Home Secretary, he also refused EU pressure to bring in “Holocaust” denial law in the UK.


So, and he’s a jew. He was supported also by the late Leon Brittan, another jew. They cited England’s long tradition of free speech.


Let’s come back to the satire and Gervais. Gervais’ joke is something about “Schindler’s List Two” and he doesn’t say his “Holocaust” jokes online, but he boasts about the fact that:


Yes, my routine contains jokes about paedophilia, and “Holocaust” denial. You can joke about anything you want, so long as you’re prepared to accept the consequences.”


And he was offered a whole page in the jewish Chronicle to explain why it’s not necessary to give any apology for these jokes. There’s one, he does come out with on Twitter and it’s about the fictional film, fictional in the sense that the film doesn’t exist, called Schindler’s List Two. He talks about a whoopee cushion factory in Schindler’s List Two.


And then you have the song by The Sex Pistols. You have Gervais’ sidekick, one time sidekick, Karl Pilkington. Who, you know, I do find quite an interesting character in short doses. He said on BBC live television that his travel series, which is called “An Idiot Abroad”, and he was sent at great expense around the world. He was kind of bullied by Gervais and another guy, Steve Merchant, I think he’s called, into doing things he doesn’t really want to do. But he compared the experience to Anne Frank. [laughing] So, my songs, in fact, just ridicule the official narratives. I think that’s the difference! They are, …


Andrew: But they don’t! I’ve heard them and they don’t really ridicule the official narrative. You just repeat what they claim!


Alison: Yes.


Andrew: This is my point. When you talk about a woman crapping out diamonds, that’s one of the things they claim! When you talk about the different colored smoke, that’s something that they claim!


Alison: Yes.




Andrew: All the different things that you’ve said, are what they claim., because you’ve sung it, they’re saying:


Oh! You’re making fun of us!


And so, but you’re not saying, … If you sung a song and it was all denying everything, and that was it, but you just sing the claims that they have made!


I find it absolutely unbelievable! what do they think that they’re trying to achieve here? Because all they’re doing is giving you more and more publicity. Of course, you’re only getting the publicity in the alternative media. Are you aware of any mainstream media publications that have pick up stories of your trial?


Alison: Nothing!


Andrew: Nothing! Exactly! As they know let’s face it, …


Alison: Nothing since the initial hearing.


Andrew: And there won’t be. It was a like with Lawrence Burns. His case was only reported in the Cambridge Evening News[now the “Cambridge News”]. A local newspaper, I’ve never even heard of and this is what they do.


This is why jews cannot have control of the media! Because they pick and choose what they want to report. If all these stories were going out in the Daily Mail and the Express, about all these people being prosecuted for speech issues, when we keep being told that we have our democratic right to free speech, then people would start rising up against this!


Alison: Yes!


Andrew: And that’s why media control is unacceptable in a free society! Because they’re picking and choosing. It’s amazing! And that’s why the alternative media so important. And that’s why they’re trying to close it down.


But I want to make sure that we get over, because the title of your show today is “No Regrets!” and it’s based on a recent term blog post that you did, that I thought was very, very good. I posted it. It was excellent. And, of course, your trial date, for the benefit of those listening, is the tenth of January, is that correct?


Alison: That’s right yes, 10th January, Central London Magistrates’ Court. That’s on Marylebone Road at 10:00 am in the morning. And it’s a full day, it’s scheduled for a full day.


Andrew: And so, are you welcoming anyone who wants to attend?


Alison: Yes, anyone at all! Anyone at all.


Andrew: So give the address again please, it’s ten AM, on, …


Alison: It’s 10:00 AM, January the 10th. That’s next Wednesday, at Central London Magistrates’ Court, which is on Marylebone Road, in Westminster, in London. And the Marylebone train station is just around the corner, two minutes walk away. That’s the closest public transport. There are buses as well, of course, but so yes, it’s a very central location. There will be quite a lot of people there to support me, I believe.


And in relation to what you just said about the press. Whether there will be any mainstream coverage next week is doubtful in my opinion., But yes, my songs, … Frank Zappa, I think his tune is called “jewish princess”, or something like that? He was also attacked by the ADL for this song. And his arguments was:

Well I’m not singing anything that’s not already been reported”.


And that is also the case of my songs!




I’m not inventing, I didn’t, you know, find the story of Ms [Irene] Zisblatt, the “diamond swallower”. These things have already been widely reported. Okay, not by the mainstream, but certainly on the Internet, in the alternative media.


Yes, why they prosecuting me? They clearly want a legal precedent. They tried in the noughties with Frederick Toben when he was slated to be extradited to Germany. They tried and failed then.


They failed to pass a “Holocaust” denial law in 2006. They failed to criminalize satire under the Race Relations and Religious Hatred Act, was also in 2006.


That’s their objective. And yes, they have to go after little people with no particular reach. I would say, that’s the way. I think soon, you know, there will be people coming up, there will be people in the mainstream who will start to speak out, because that’s the way it will go eventually. It will go that way, and the house of cards will fall.


And if I’m found guilty, I’m found guilty! Yes, no regrets! As I say in my song.


See video here: No Regrets!


I’m certainly not going to apologize, or grovel! There’s absolutely no point in that whatsoever! I agree with Gervais here. You can see that with so many people in my situation, who’ve made a groveling apology. It’s made no difference whatsoever! You’re never made to forget it! You can apologize. David Irving is perhaps to the leading example here. There’s been no apology, but he has come back and said:


Oh yes, but there were gassings in Treblinka. We know this, because this, …


Fake! Fake! Fake documents, and blah, blah. Himmler, blah, blah!


There is no point! They will never, you will always be a vile — “vile” is such a Zionist word, isn’t it? — a vile “Holocaust” denier, neo-Nazi, anti-semite!


You will always be, even if you make a groveling apology, makes no difference whatsoever!


And they will definitely not be getting an apology, and they will certainly not be getting a guilty plea from me! So if they want to find me guilty, that’s fine, they can go ahead!


Andrew: Now, do, you know, the idea of, … Do you have a lawyer that is told you what possible punishment you could be facing, if they find you guilty? Do you have any idea of that at all, Alison?




Alison: Well, initially, I was told perhaps a community service. Something like that. It’s doubtful that they’ll actually go to the length of locking me up, first offense, etc.


It’s doubtful even if they do. There will be, if I’m found guilty, there will be an immediate appeal. And it will go probably to the divisional court.


If there is a prison sentence, for whatever, three weeks, put in prison, then we will ask for that decision to be stayed. But I think the sentencing, if I am found guilty next week, then the sentencing, will it be on that day? I’m not sure. The judge was already supposed to give a decision, an official decision, at the last hearing. But he didn’t. He just indicated verbally, without giving any reasons, why, he would be inclined to accept the crown prosecutions arguments, regard the sending of a URL. A URL in itself Andy, isn’t grossly offensive. It’s just www dot YouTube dot com and a jumble of letters and symbols and numbers. So that’s the issue here.


And, of course, if I went over to, if I took the ferry over to Calais for a day and uploaded lots of controversial songs and then came back, there’d be absolutely nothing that the English court system could do, because I would be out of their jurisdiction! This is the problem with the Internet that the jews have. Is that, how can they, there are no borders, so to speak, with the Internet.


So, we shall next Wednesday whether the judge has a sense of humor, or not. Usually these, these people don’t! Do NOT have a sense of humor, sadly.


Andrew: The Campaign Against Anti-semitism, the CAA, have actually come out and said that:


Oh yes, we influenced Downing Street.


I saw that little YouTube there about, you know, they get invited to work with the Government. So I’m starting to get a feeling of who may be, I’ve ways asked this question:


Who defines what is hate speech, and what is it?


And I’m getting the feeling I know who it is! And the Voltaire quote:


To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you’re not allowed to criticize.!


What do you think?


Alison: Yet and there’s a great video on the London Forum channel. It’s a speech given, I think, it was in the middle of last year, by Peter Rushton, called “Fifty Years of Race Law Tyranny”. And it began in the thirty’s even, with the Public Order Act, when they were clashes between the communists and the fascists. And then it went on and on. And then the first Race Relations Act, 1968. Coincidentally a year after the formation of the National Front. Because this act has gone on, and on, and now we are where we are today, with these lobby groups, the Campaign Against Anti-semitism, the Community Security Trust. I’d say the Campaign Against Anti-semitism is the more militant wing, more militant Zionist wing.




And more, they are more anti-Muslim, even than the Community Security Trust. If you listen to Peter Rushton’s speech, “Fifty Years of Race Law Tyranny” he reveals how the influence of the jewish, the Board of Deputies of British jews in the UK. Every one of these laws that was pushed through, every one of these acts that was pushed through by the British government, was influenced by letters being wrote by civil servants, who were invariably jews, …


Andrew: I understand, the legislation was drafted by the Board of Deputies of British jews. I think it goes as far as that.


Alison: Yes! Yes. And then once this legislation has been passed, the civil servants behind all these letters, you know, will be appointed as a deputy! And you can see that in another thing that happened in November. A former colleague of mine by the name of Jason Shuman, he submitted a request that, … That there’s a problem with jews, they like to boast about their associations, their hotline to senior government officials, and top ranking senior police officers.


And I think it was the Shomrim, one of these Shomrim accounts, posted a photograph of the Derbyshire Police and Crime Commissioner who is a gentleman, a labor politician by the name of Hardy L. Dinsar [sp] a Punjabi here, who arrived in the UK in 1967, who has now reached a position of power and influence. Because he’s the Police and Crime Commissioner, just of the listeners. He’s an elected politician who oversees the dealings of each police force. And this, coincidentally, this Derbyshire Police and Crime Commission — Derbyshire is my address — he is the national lead on “hate crime” in quotes, “hate crime”.


The Shomrim posted a photograph of this gentleman having been invited by the Campaign Against Anti-semitism to a meeting, to discuss the issues facing the jewish community, the rise in anti-semitism, etc., the usual stuff. And this former associate of mine Jason Shuman, he put it in a Freedom of Information request. Of course, my name’s been redacted from these documents. There was about thirty pages of e-mails between the Police and Crime Commission, his office, and the Campaign Against Anti-semitism.




It’s quite extraordinary. My name’s been redacted, but obviously half the communications are about me and why isn’t Derbyshire police arresting me for breach of bail? Steven Silverman, the Campaign Against Anti-semitism, Director for Enforcement, admits in these documents that he writes twice, he writes to the police twice a week. At least, because he’s writing to the Police and Crime Commissioner to complain that the police haven’t come and dragged me off, and clamped my legs in irons! Why, she’s uploading songs to the Internet! She’s mentioning my name! This vile, anti-semitic, “Holocaust” denier!


So yes, …


Andrew: Sorry, very quickly. And that surname “Silverman”, that reminds me of Sarah Silverman who said that she hopes Jesus Christ does come back so, she’d like to kill him again, personally! That’s over in America, of course. But there’s no group speaking out against that. So don’t come all this nonsense jews, about:


Oh, we’re so persecuted! We’re so offended!


When White Christian Jesus Christ, can be abused and there’s no call for her, to not say anything vile like that, about Jesus Christ.


So it’s all one way for the jews. And it always has been.


As Jez Turner said, I mean, he made it quite clear that, you know, we’ve been of the jewish power for centuries. We just need to look back to the formation of the Bank of England and how it was the Amsterdam jews that were behind Cromwell coming over. Different things like that. It goes on, and on, and on! And we’ve just been on this thumb for ages. And we’re trying to break free of it. We’ve had previous generations that have tried to break free of it. Previous groups, led by the likes of Arnold Leese. And then, you know, some people talk about Mosely and he talked about the legislation back then, the Public Order Act.


Various different people have tried over the years to wake people up to this, but all that’s been happening is, you know, the likes of John Tyndal get jailed, Michael McLaughlin gets jailed and, you know, just to shut them up for just trying to tell the truth. Then it’s the police force that works against the actual people, that are trying to free this country from an alien force that is not British. That is using the people of this country for their own purposes! Just milking them for their own purposes!


Alison: Yes! Exactly! And with the Internet, they are obliged to try and exert that influence on the social media companies. Yvette Cooper yesterday, talking about YouTube, and why is she getting suggestions for Red Ice Radio when she opens her YouTube channel? And I uploaded nine videos to YouTube over the month of December. And all of them were banned! All of them were censored! But there was nothing unlawful in the content of these videos. Nothing!


So my guess would be that the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism, that’s all they do. Clearly, Steven Silverman, if he’s writing twice a week to the police. Twice a week to the Police and Crime Commissioner, and goodness knows who else. He’s also writing letters to YouTube with the letter header, you know, the logo, “Campaign Against Anti-Semitism”. We’re a government organization, we have private meetings with the Home Secretary. We managed to get National Action banned, blah, blah, blah; international definition of anti-semitism adopted by the British government!




That is how they are there now censoring people! And it’s fraudulent! It’s fraudulent! And I’ve written, I’ve had a ticket open with YouTube support, and they’ve given me the address of their legal department. And I’ve written an e-mail saying:


What is this? The United Kingdom now on your list of countries supposedly with anti revisionists laws, the “Holocaust denial laws. The United Kingdom does not figure among these countries. What are you doing? This is my livelihood. This is what I do. I write songs I upload them to the Internet. What is being done to me is unlawful!


And, of course, I’m not the only one it’s happening to. It’s happening to you, you’ve had your book banned, Germar Rudolf has had his books banned from Amazon. Why are these companies complying, groveling, lowering their pants? It just shows, … And then if you say:


Well, the jews have too much power.


You’re an anti-semite! It’s the only argument that they have left Andy! People know! Even if you look at the Daily Mail’s Facebook page when there’s a story about the “Holocaust”, quite a significant percentage of the comments will show that the people are waking up to the Zionists lies, the jewish lies!


They know this. That the only way, the only way that they can keep the myth alive is by A) building more “Holocaust” Memorial centers; B) by jailing anybody that criticizes the official narrative.


And I heard that yesterday that the a Canadian citizen, Monika Schaefer, was arrested in Germany, in Munich, as she was about to attend the trial of Sylvia Stolz, who’s another prominent revisionist in Germany.


See here: Andrew Hitchcock with Alfred Schaefer – How YOU Can Help Monika Schaefer! — TRANSCRIPT


That they want to jail the accountant, a 96 year old accountant [at Auschwitz]! They will go for, … That’s another way they can keep, desperately keep, their myth alive. As we just said, and by screeching “anti-Semitism” at anybody they disagree with. That’s it! We live under a tyranny! Politically incorrect tyranny. Politically Correct tyranny, rather!


Andrew: Yes.




Alison: Where is Amnesty International with all these people?


Andrew: Exactly! Exactly!


Alison: Where is Amnesty International when it comes to Joshua Bonehill? When it comes to Jack Renshaw, when it comes to Lawrence Burns? When it comes to Jez Turner? When it comes to this book burning? Where is Amnesty International?


There used to be a cartoon. There were two prisoners inside a cell and one, “What are you in for? How long have you got? I got twenty years for armed robbery.” And the other one says,” Oh, I got ten years for saying something the government doesn’t like.” And outside the window you can see a palm tree, suggesting, oh no, this could never happen in the United Kingdom, or in Europe! But it is happening! It is happening!


The more they do, (((they))) always go too far! The more (((they))) push it, the more people will be awakened to what’s actually happening.


Andrew: Well, I think that they feel that, because they’ve got control of the media, which incidentally, is one of the things that they say is enough to satisfy the international definition of “anti-Semitism”, claiming that they control the media, when they do. So all they’re doing with this international definition of anti-Semitism, is that what they did with these “Holocaust” laws. Truth is no defense! So even if you could prove they got control of ninety six percent of the world’s media, and you can give the names of the companies, and the fact that they’ve jewish control over them.


Oh no, that doesn’t matter, because it doesn’t matter if it’s true, or not. It just matters if you accuse them of that, or not. You know, if that’s not a tyranny, I don’t know what is!


And as regards the “Holocaust” reparations, don’t forget that according to the jew, Rachel Yahuda, in Aug 2015, she claimed “Holocaust” suffering gets passed down through DNA! So my guess is as the so-called “Holocaust” survivors are dying off, these “Holocaust” reparations are going to be the gift that keeps on giving! They’re not, you know, abandon this one! They could use any way that they can.


It’s like all this money that America gives to Israel every year, billions and billions of dollars! Why are we giving them money? They’re not a Third World country! Why are they getting this money? And then it does a little you-turn and it finds it’s way back to America and pays off all these politicians via AIPAC* and things like that. And so now if you want to go to Congress in the United States, you have to pledge “Israel first”!


Alison: It’s crazy!


[* The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) is a jewish foreign special interest group that controls and directs American foreign policy of the Middle East, with foreign jew capital Tel Aviv calling the shots.

It is often referred to as the foreign “Israel lobby”, or the foreign “Jewish lobby”.

AIPAC was formed by jews during the Eisenhower administration. Since then AIPAC has pressured Congresses and Presidential administrations of both parties to send trillions of ss in American aid and support to Rothschild’s Israel. Souce: Http:// en.rightpedia.info/with/American Israel Public Affairs Committee]


Andrew: Cynthia McKinney revealed that! And so everywhere these people reside, they want to have jewish control of that country, whether it’s America, or Australia, or the UK. We’ve got such scumbag politicians that don’t represent the people, that enforce this Coudenhove Kalergi Plan upon us, bringing in all these immigrants, allowing all these media companies to keep promoting the race mixing, and anything detrimental to the sustainability of a healthy pure White race. It’s just crazy! You know, we really are living in the madness times I’m aware of in history.




Alison: I think you’re right. And I think of the old joke, you know:


What’s the difference between the “Holocaust” and a dairy cow? You stop milking the dairy cow after seventy years!”


The “Holocaust” is the myth that sustains not only the pariah state of Israel, but it also sustains this globalist agenda and the Kalergi Plan, as you say. That’s the reason, oh, the anti-racism industry, racism begins with name calling, and ends with the gas chambers at Auschwitz!


That’s why you’ve got to have all these refugees and you can’t say:


Oh, you know, we want to be a White country. We want to preserve our land.


Because that’s racist! And we know where that will lead to. Revisionism, I really believe, that is at the heart of our struggle for freedom!


And I’m plowing my little furrow in that direction. Not all nationalists agree with going for the revisionist angle. But I think that freedom of speech, we can convincingly argue why it has to be at the center of our struggle. Revisionism will finally reveal that not just the illegal state of Israel, and the way it was founded on jewish terrorism, killing British soldiers, stringing them up with piano wire in an olive grove. The photo which had a “D notice” on it, getting out and being published by The Daily Express.



The Daily Express who also in the First World War published rumors about supposedly German gas chambers, found to be a propaganda lie! Why has there never been any investigation? Any official investigation into the “Holocaust” narrative? No! Something must now be done! And the fact that the authorities are covering all this up.


They are even worse than the jews! I’m sorry, but they are the real traitors! They are traitors, not to their land.


These are the people that we should be targeting as well!


Andrew: Well in the Bible, it makes it quite clear that the traitor within your race, is twice the child of hell, as the jews themselves! Because they’re supposed, they’re part of your race and they should be fighting with you, not working with the enemy.


And that’s what we’ve got throughout government. I firmly believe that as these people go through their local councils and then become the members of parliament, they’re hand picked, with all this different baggage that can be blackmailed against them. Different things that they’ve got on these people, or just brainwashed into it.


Because it doesn’t make any sense why we’ve consistently had, over the last decades, this complete push against the British people of this country, who are the natural heirs to the land. Then they produce the children, who inherit it from them. But instead, it’s no, no, no! Let’s get all these immigrants coming in! Let’s do all the race mixing! Let’s pass all these laws that make them have greater the privileges and rights than you!




So, for example, if you were in an altercation over a car parking space in this country. The person I offended, myself, I was in an altercation with a black man in an argument over car parking space. All he has to say, is that he felt, he “felt” that it was racially motivated. And that satisfies the crime! His feelings satisfied the crime. So, of course, any lawyer is always going to say to him:


Well the other guy’s White, you just have to say you feel that it was racially motivated and then you are going to win the case.


Alison: Yes.


Andrew: You know, and this is why these people are given greater rights over the people whose country it is! And it’s absolutely crazy! And the other thing I want to point out, you talked about the Daily Express. Well, of course, the jews are so arrogant and hypocritical. We have the headline in 1933 in the Daily Express, “Judea Declares War on Germany”.


And they’re running round America, with signs, “Boycott Germany!”. “Boycott German Goods!”. And then we see them today and they’re running to Amazon to get them to take books down that they don’t like. They’re running off to YouTube, getting them to ban different videos, demonetize them. So they’re censoring everybody, and what do they do? Last year in America they’re lobbying Congress to pass a law that anyone who boycotts Israeli goods should be jailed!


And they don’t see the double standard! To them, it’s just natural jewish behavior. It’s like:


Well, we boycott everyone else, but if anyone boycotts us we’ll put them in jail!


I mean, this is how ridiculous it gets. And this is why people get so pissed off with having to keep dealing with this nonsense! Because the only country — and there’s an argument that they shouldn’t be there anyway, because it’s Palestinian territory — Israel is their country and they should stick to that country and not infiltrate all the other countries around the world.


Alison: Exactly!


Andrew: Getting them to do things for their will! That is the point!


Alison: Exactly!


Andrew: I’ve got no interest in taking over Israel. I don’t know why jews have got an interest in taking over me. Why can’t they leave me alone and stop persecuting me and my people, and persecuting the American people? And just live in one single country and let us live by ourselves, also. That’s what we want. We’re not looking to destroy other nations! We’re not looking to flood African countries with White people, because they’re not diverse enough.


But these groups are always pushing us, constantly! And I firmly believe, Alison, that we are in this period of tribulation spoken about in the Bible, because I can’t see this getting much worse. So I think that we’re going to see a major tipping point in the very near future, because these people, what always happens is they overplay their hand!




Then you find, over one hundred times in the last thousand years, they’ve been kicked out of countries. Because whatever they do for them, whatever the shabbos goy politicians do for them, it’s never ever, ever, ever, going to be enough! And they always come back and want more, and they want more, and they want more! And that’s what they do with the people. Until in the end there’s a backlash and they get kicked out of a country, and to they claim that they’ve been persecuted!


They don’t give you the reasons why they were kicked out. That’s something that they very carefully hide, although there are some honest historians, jewish historians, like Bernard Lazar, who basically said, and I’m paraphrasing, as I haven’t got my book in my hand. He said:


The only common denominator of these jews being kicked out of countries, are the jews themselves.


Because the countries, whilst they were White nations, they spoke different languages, there were different cultures, in different parts of the world, but the one common denominator is jews!


So there must be something in their behavior, because they’re the common denominator, because all these other diverse, you know, races, and lands. There’s something they’ve done to each of them that has caused them to react in such a way to kick about their countries! And note! They were kicked out of their countries, folks. They weren’t slaughtered in their countries, they were kicked out! They were asked, they were told that they had to leave! So, all these bleating over time about how they’ve been persecuted, and persecuted, you don’t go into somebody else’ country, start trying to change the laws for your own benefit, and then not expect there to be a backlash. Simple as that!


Alison: Well yes, yes, you know, the persecution argument. They seem to believe that gives them an excuse to behave like utter, …


Andrew: Exactly! That’s why they have to keep the “Holocaust” thing alive., because if that gets exposed and people realize actually they made up all these figures, and they made up the gas chambers. And people like Fred Leuchter, who did the report, they hammered that. And it was I think Raul Hillel in the Zundel trial [1985 in Canada]?


Alison: Hilberg, …


Andrew: Raul Hilberg. Thank you. And he was asked about why there was no physical evidence of the “Holocaust”? Why they couldn’t actually say that there was physical evidence of Zyklon B gas being used in gas chambers, or any bodies that had traces of that? And his answer was:


I’m at a loss!


And all these claims have been from jewish hearsay. That is what these claims have been from. When Fred Leuchter went over there, and he took samples from the walls. And he could prove that the gas chambers that they say Zyklon B was released into, to kill the prisoners in there. There was no staining on the walls in there.


But there was staining on the walls in the laundry area, which the claim has always been the Zyklon B was used to disinfect the clothing of the inmates, because there was such a great outbreak of lice there. So he finds traces of it being used in there, but couldn’t find traces of it being used in what they call the “gas chambers”. And why, as you said, earlier in the broadcast, why is there no official investigation into that? Because they already know what the answer is!




Alison: Yes. The definitive debunking of all this is Rudolf Germar’s book, “The Chemistry of Auschwitz”. He goes into minute detail and shows there’s no trace whatsoever of “Prussian Blue” in the exhibit that’s supposed to, you know, have been the gas chamber in Auschwitz. Yet the walls, you can still see the staining on the outside of the walls of the actual disinfection chambers! Yes. It has to be debunked! And, of course, as I said, earlier Rudolf has had his entire collection of books taken down from Amazon!


He said before this happened, he was unable to keep up with the orders. Things were going so fast. So now, we need more people to come out with their real names and have the bravery to speak up. And I think I can see evidence of this happening.


And there’s a couple of anecdotes for you that recently happened, just to show that the way that these people, or my persecutors are behaving.


There’s a photograph of me from the Daily Mail at my first, very first hearing, which was in December 2016. There’s a photograph of me coming outside the court. And one colleague — I’ll give her a plug, “Darkmoon dot me” — she published this photo in a recent blog article.


She re-published what I’d written, but she republished it with several comments on her website. And somebody has taken this photograph of me, Andy, and his photoshopped my nose. And, because I’ve got a Swiss name, a legacy of my marriage to a Swiss man, who’s a Gentile. And that’s how they are trying to remove support from me, by now claiming —someone’s photoshopped my nose in this image.


That the difference between the photo from The Daily Mail, thank goodness that, you know, the Daily Mail have got the original photograph still on their website, and this photo shopped image the person who did it probably didn’t realize that this photo is from the Daily Mail, that’s what they’re trying to remove support by claiming that I’m a jewish infiltrator. And that my songs are there to further restrict our right to freedom of speech, blah, blah, blah. [laughing]


And the other the other anecdote is a comment that came on my blog, by a person going under the name of “Mark”, who says;


Just so you understand better what you’re up against, even if your trial is over, and you are acquitted, your problems will not end there. They will not stop you until they silence you! Even more they will try to make an example out of you, so others are afraid to speak. They will harass you relentlessly!


And then he put a link to a Counter-Current’s argument. Which, it’s not exactly praising the jews, but it’s, you know, citing jewish “achievements”, let’s say.


Now I have a sixth sense radar with regard to these type of comments. And it just shows you that person is masquerading, parading as somebody who is in support of me, but this comment is a veiled threat!


They’re not going to leave you alone Allison, until they will silence you!


But the only way that they would be able to do that Andy, is to kill me! An unfortunate accident? That’s the only way they will be able to do that! Putting me in a prison cell isn’t going to stop me from thinking, from being being able to think. It’s not going to stop my musical muse appearing to me in my head and giving me the lines of new songs, which I’ll be able to record in my head. It’s not going to silence me. That’s the only way.




I reported this. I know who this person is, and I recorded them to the police, last week. I thought, “this is enough!” Two and a half years of harassment from this particular person going by the name of “Mark”. Coming to my blog with a Tor browser, IP address.


But I know who it is. I reported him to the police last week. And I got a an answer yesterday not from the police force, but from the Derbyshire’s Victims Support Service, which is connected to the Derbyshire Police and Crime Commissioner’s office! So I wrote them a scathing letter with copies to both my solicitor and my barrister. And will shall see. I’ve also instructed my barrister to pose several questions to the witnesses in my case next week. And we will see if these two witnesses are willing to take the risk of perjuring in themselves in court. Perjury carries a seven year maximum sentence, I think. We will see.


Perhaps the most likely outcome is that the proceedings will be in some ways again stayed and things will go on. They’ll be further legal arguments about the nature of “material”. Is a hyperlink actual “matter”. It’s just an electronic signal, there’s no, it’s just an electron. It’s not technically “matter”. And music is the same cause, it’s just sound, it’s not actual “matter”! [chuckling] So I’m accused of sending “matter over the Internet”, but that’s already, … But the wording of my charges is debatable. You can say this is material, yes. Material. We say that, you know, this, the artist’s “material”.


The dictionary definitions are all quite in my favor, it has to be said. But we shall see.


Andrew: Best of luck with it Alison, and stay in touch and we’ll do a follow up. I’m sure everything will go in your favor. I think but, well I mean, we’ve talked about what I think about this whole business on this show. We are out of time, we are actually over run, so this will be one people enjoy on the download as well.


Alison: Again! [laughing]


Andrew: Never mind. Yes, most people get it off the download anyway, and I encourage the live listeners to download all the shows anyway. Because, you know, they’re coming after Alison, they’re coming aft Jez Turner. I mean, how long is it going to be before they come after me?


You know, anyone who tries to tell the truth out there, it’s just what we were told, Scripture told us in the very end times they said:


Everything considered good will be bad, and everything considered bad will be good. It will be a time of outright lies.


And that’s exactly what we’re in. So it’s just great to actually be on the good side! And I want thank you Alison for joining me today.


Alison: Yes.


Andrew: I wish you very best of luck with this case. I want to thank everyone for listening. I’ll be back with you all tomorrow, and bye for now.


You have been listening to the Andrew Carrington Hitchcock show on the Euro Folk Radio Network. Andrew’s book the “Synagogue of Satan” is now available on his website, Andrew Carrington Hitchcock dot com, in an updated, expanded and uncensored edition.













PDF Notes

* Total words = xxx

* Total images = xx

* Total A4 pages = xx


Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):


(Available later)







Version History



Version 4:


Version 3:


Version 2: Feb 21, 2018  — Added 3 images.


Version 1: Feb 20, 2018  — Published post. Complete transcript.


Read Full Post »



[In this long (151 minutes) YouTube Hangout hosted by Andy Warski and JF, Mike Enoch debates the self identified jew, Halsey English on the topic of White advocacy and jewish power.

In many heated exchanges Enoch takes the correct position that organized jewry is a hostile “elite” that needs to be expelled from Western countries, while Halsey attempts to argue, in an almost legalistic, hairsplitting “jewy” manner, that while some jewish groups may have excessive power, jews as a whole are not the cause of White racial and cultural displacement. Yeah, right.

A bizarre part of this “debate” are the many abusive comments that Halsey directs at Enoch, calling him a lying fraud!   KATANA.]




 — If you would like to improve the accuracy of the transcript please leave any corrected text in the comments section. Corrections to misspelled names, etc., is encouraged. Thank you.










Mike Enoch






Click here for the video:






Published on Feb 14, 2018



YouTube Description


Halsey Vs. Mike Enoch






Streamed live on Feb 14, 2018






(151 mins)






Warski: What is going on everyone? Welcome back to another Warski Live. I’ve a new setup still in alpha phase. We’re getting the light fixture fixed as well. But this is part one. But, of course, joining me up it’s still in an out.


JF: Hello Andy! I think you were the only show that gets worse with time, visually!


Warski: Why you think it’s worse?


JF: I mean, I don’t know what’s happening here. You look like you have an eight-bit background that just bugged and then everything became black.


Warski: Yeah. Well that’s supposed to light up. But then when I turned it on, it over exposes everything and is a mess. So I have to get a friggin dimmer installed. Yeah believe me it’s a, it’s been a hectic day for me.


JF: A great debate on the way. Before, I’d like to hear Mike Enoch on the case of the lawsuit against you. I think it’s an important issue regarding free speech and I’d like to hear what’s happening with this.


Mike: Yeah thanks. Thanks for giving me the opportunity. I know we have a big audience here and I just want to make an appeal. I know my politics are controversial and this goes beyond my individual politics, or the politics of the people that attended the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville this summer.


There’s a lawsuit against us that is essentially an attack on the First Amendment and free speech and internet privacy as well. So these are they’re very powerful and wealthy lawyers that have taken this case and they have attempted to allege some kind of broad-based conspiracy. But, in fact, as they have admitted if you look at press reports about this lawsuit there was something in the New York Times yesterday. There have been various reports on it. They are essentially admitting that they are [02:01] attempting to use the court to shut down the Alt-Right.


To shut down political opposition. The New York Times article yesterday has the lead attorney in the case Reberta Kaplan, who is a very wealthy and powerful jewish lesbian, who has is attempting to shut down the Alt-Right, by her own admission. She is, this is a strategic lawsuit, quote of her “This is a strategic lawsuit”. Integrity First for America which is the group fundamental ng the lawsuit which is a group of about twelve very wealthy jewish lawyers, are admitted that this is a political lawsuit, because the government has not done enough to silence the Alt-Right. This is in the New York Times. They’ve admitted all these things.


Basically they are admitting they do not have a case before the court and this is purely an attempt to intimidate and silence the defendants. And it goes beyond us. You might say, all right, well tough! Look you went up against the wrong people. But it goes beyond us. As part of [03:00] this process. There’s a subpoena issued [03:02] to Twitter. Twitter is a third party they want information on people that’s tweeted certain hashtags. They want all personal identifiable information including email address, IP address, MAC address, for people that may have tweeted certain hashtags. Unite the Right, Free Cantwell, among others.


Now again, you might think I don’t care about these guys. They did something dumb. They went up against the most powerful group of people in the world, and that’s stupid. Maybe so, but if it’s us first, it’s gonna be you next. We’re out here running cover for you, for free speech. And I think we need to get campus free speech groups, the ACLU, any Pro First Amendment group, any Pro Electronic Privacy group, because there is no reason why a person that tweeted out a certain hashtag would add to their case. Like they are alleging something that’s non-existent. They don’t have a valid cause of action before the court and they know it. So if they get these subpoenas granted that’s [04:01] all that they want. So this is in case of Electronic Privacy, your right to privacy on the internet, your right to free speech and this is what these people are attempting to squash.


And I think it’s really very important that everybody gets behind, one in condemning the lawsuit, exposing the lawsuit as was it is. And I’m not asking you to support us. I understand that’s a step that many people don’t want to take. I simply want you to support the principle. Support the principles of electronic privacy and anonymity on the Internet. The right to use Twitter without being subjected to potential political witch hunts based on hashtags that you might tweet. And frankly the right of anybody to speak their mind without suffering this kind of “lawfare”. It’s important to note there is no criminal complaint. This is a civil complaint. JF, I know you’ve talked about the abuse of civil courts before. There’s no criminal complaint here, it’s a civil complaint. Why? Because a standard of evidence for a criminal complaint is much higher. They don’t expect to win this case?


They [05:00] merely want to use the case as a vehicle to get as much information on as many users of the Internet as they can. And I know that amongst those people that have tweeted the hashtags that they’re looking for are people that are not Alt-Right. People that might be pro Trump. People that might be critical of Israel. These are very serious First Amendment issues they cut to the heart of our rights as Americans. And I think every decent freedom-loving American of any race of any political affiliation needs to come out against this website. Call it for what it is. Understand what’s going on. And we need to light a fire under the butts of all the free speech organizations and Electronic Privacy organizations to come out against this!


JF: It’s indeed a very worrying story and, in fact, it’s part of a tendency to use civil courts as instruments of abuse and instruments of quasi police investigation. When they cannot [06:00] get the police to investigate, because there’s nothing to investigate, people are increasingly using in our country the civil courts as a as a bypassing of the law. And, in fact, it makes private agents and judges of civil courts in this country, essentially police investigators, judges at the same time, and agents of this state. It’s absolutely worrying and I fully support you in that.


Mike: Yeah, and it’s honestly in my opinion it’s an insult to the integrity of the court. I mean, these people are basically saying:


We don’t respect this court we don’t respect this court as a means for citizens to redress damages against each other. We use is this is a course nothing but a political vehicle. It’s just a tool we just want to use subpoena power to get information on our enemies. We don’t care that we’re not gonna win.


They’re not gonna win. I mean, they have no complaint. The complaint they’re making is emotional distress. That’s been struck down many times. Anyway, well let’s move on.


JF: So your message has been put forward. Andy today we have an amazing debate [07:02] have you been expecting as much excitement as me?


Warski: Oh yeah! The Valentine’s Day Massacre. Is that what we dubbed this?


JF: Yes. Tell your girlfriend it might be the last!


Halsey: Can I comment on the lawsuit?


JF: Yes.


Halsey: There’s one thing that I don’t seem to understand about why we would want to fight against this lawsuit. And just so, you know, I think that an attack on free speech is something that should be defended. I would donate to the group fighting against the lawsuit myself.


Mike: I’m not asking for money, I’m just, ….


Halsey: No I’m not. I’m not putting words in your mouth. Don’t worry! We’ll have plenty to today, ..


Mike: You’ll put words in my mouth later! I get it.


Halsey: Let’s agree to disagree later? Okay, what I’m saying is that a court case cuts both ways. And everything they can subpoena we can subpoena as well and anybody can subpoena the government’s decision-making process, the police records, the orders from town from Terry McAuliffe. If anything I would think this is going to turn out more [08:01] like the Moller lawsuit. It’s going to [08:02] turn out that they want Twitter names of people who nobody gives a shit about, when at the same time we could get information about people that actually we do give a shit about. So I don’t think that it’s such a bad thing that the lawsuit is going forward. I just think it has to be played right, and it can be actually a very good thing for our side.


Read Full Post »


[Andrew Anglin of Daily Stormer fame, has a debate, or conversation, with Sargon of Akkad. hosted by Baked Alaska, with input from Andy Warski. Here are a selection of clips that YouTuber, Kronos, has posted KATANA.]


Andrew Anglin




Sargon of Akkad


Feb 2018 – Clips






Streamed live 16 hours ago

NEW MERCH: https://www.bakedalaska.tv JOIN THE DISCORD: https://discord.gg/K6bs4f4 ANDREW ANGLIN: https://gab.ai/AndrewAnglin https://www.dailystormer.name SARGON OF AKKAD: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-ye… REMEMBER TO SUBSCRIBE, COMMENT, SHARE, SMASH THAT LIKE BUTTON, AND SMASH THAT BELL BUTTON BTC Wallet: 1F3iu15DwhPRAyqJF1hMiDESRpxw8psSHk ETH Wallet: 0xC397fc134B6559030102b4BD48297c5C97d4d92A LTC Wallet: LhVG4QZ6GhNsyQhsZr7zV1af92gWxP6d19 GAB: https://gab.ai/apple TWITCH: https://twitch.tv/iambakedalaska FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/realbakedalaska INSTA: https://instagram.com/bakedalaska CASHME: https://cash.me/$realbakedalaska SNAPCHAT: realbakedalaska






(Various mins)






Andrew Anglin vs. Sargon of Akkad


Anglin: So I guess my question to start with for [00:02] Sargon, would be, do you grant the moral premise that White people have a right to their own country, and you’re just saying that it’s impossible to make that happen?


Sargon: Well I said at the beginning that I didn’t really want to debate the talking points, because there’s no point!


Anglin: Then what do you want to talk about Sargon?


Sargon: Let me explain.


Alaska: Wait hold on. You agree, you agreed to a debate. I mean, and then, you know.


Sargon: I really want to talk to Andrew.


Alaska: So you just show up at a debate and you don’t want to debate them?


Sargon: Not really. It seems I’m with, ..


Alaska: Why did you contact and send me an email, …


Sargon: Let me explain.


Alaska: Okay go ahead.


Sargon: I don’t know how to contact, sorry contact Andrew?


Alaska: We have been emailing back and forth.


Sargon: Yeah, because you were in contact with Andrew.


Alaska: I know, so if you didn’t want a debate, you should have emailed me, and said, “hey I don’t really want a debate [01:00] can we have a different sort of dialogue”. But go ahead.


Sargon: I don’t want to bicker or anything. So when you said debate I figured you mean “talk about things from different perspectives”.


Alaska: Okay! Go ahead and talk!


Anglin: That’s what we can do. I’m not trying to have an aggressive debate!


Sargon: Let me talk a second.


Anglin: I think it’s I think it’s a good starting point. What I just said, that you went straight to logistics and, .. Embrace race realism. And then the moral right of White people. So go ahead.


Sargon: Okay. Listen right. The problem that I have with anything that the Alt-Right says, when it comes to the concept of an ethno-state, is that it is trying to strip away the ethnic heritage that I have inherited. Do you understand that?


Anglin: What? I don’t understand that? No. Always, is it the thing that you’re a quadroon?


Sargon: No.


Anglin: That’s not true Sargon.


Read Full Post »



[Henrik of Red Ice Radio interviews Canadian-German activist Alfred Schaefer on the situation surrounding his sister’s arrest on Jan 3 this year, in Germany, for making a video called “Sorry Mom, I Was Wrong About the Holocaust“.


Part of the subversion of Whites has been achieved through the diabolical lie known as the “Holocaust” that is used by organized jewry as a “shield and sword” to draw attention away from its massive crimes against humanity, such as the instigation of the World Wars, 9/11, etc., while also instilling guilt and shame in Whites for their very existence.


Alfred is a tireless and impassioned “man on a mission” to alert all to the reality of our dire situation and the forces behind our looming racial and cultural destruction, if we fail to act! I would urge all readers to support Alfred in his work and to help him in exposing the Orwellian situation that his sister, Monika, finds herself in as a “thought criminal“, now locked up in a maximum security prison in Germany.


In Part 2 here (Part 1 is here), Henrik explains his thinking on how Red Ice should present such taboo topics as Revisionist material, and the role of organized jewry in our racial and cultural destruction, that Alfred discusses. Since Red Ice has a large and growing audience on YouTube, Henrik rightly concludes that despite wanting to get the truth out, they must avoid getting banned by YouTube by publishing certain material discussed here in the members section.


Alfred then talks about the use of “control words“, such as “extreme right wing“, “racist“, “anti-semitism“, etc., by our enemies to frame the debate in their favour. Organized jewry through its media domination have been relentless lying to us for the purpose of effectively genociding the White race through mass invasion of non-Whites, miscegenation and other means to drive the Whites into minority status.


He then talks about how the advert of digital technology has enable us to reclaim history and expose the lies that we have been feed. Despite the availability of the true history it is a traumatic process for most people to go through as they rid themselves of the lies that they have been brainwashed with all their lives. Alfred talks about how he overcame his fears to eventually come to conclude that Adolf Hitler was one of the greatest leaders that we have ever produced.


Henrik talks about how he has become “skeptical” about the so-called “Holocaust“, because of the many things that simply don’t add up, and as such is very interested to hear about what “Holocaust deniers” have to say. He goes on to say how the “Holocaust” is always talked about in an emotional way by the main stream media, leading him to conclude there is something “fishy” with the story.


Alfred goes on to explain how the people of the West have been, through psychological manipulation, reduced to the level of spiritual, emotional cripples, that have prevented them from resisting, so far, from being flooded with millions of the Third Word.


Henrik tells how that Red Ice has put everything on the line in talking about migration, the JQ, White genocide, etc., wherever the truth leads them. How jews like Barbara Spectre, Noel Ignatiev, Gregor Gysi, talk about the desirability of White population replacement.


Alfred describes how technological development has been used by jews to further their plans, for example with their control of Hollywood, the media, etc. The World Wars and what is happening now is the final phase of the “War of the jew” to dominate the world. And how our empathy, our jew induced feelings of guilt, pathological altruism, and so forth, is being used against us.

Much more is discussed, with Alfred and Henrik ending by urging listeners to write letters of support to Monika.


I would add that Monika’s imprisonment is a real expression of the war being waged against us and our freedom to exist. Her situation is symbolic of the repression that will only get far worst unless we stand up and fight back in any way we can, however small or large. So start sending cards and letters to Monika, and anything else towards helping her and our cause.

Write to Monika now, at:


Monika Schaefer
Stadelheim Prison
Schwarzenbergstr. 14
81549 München,







Red Ice TV


Alfred Schaefer


Thought Criminal


Monika Schaefer


Arrested and Imprisoned


in Germany









Click here for the video:



Published on Jan 27, 2018



Red Ice Radio Description


 Alfred Schaefer is a German producer whose videos are aimed at exposing the propagandistic nature of the mainstream media. His videos outline how the hostile elite that are in control of much of Western Civilization have managed to subjugate entire populations and their political leadership through psychological conditioning.


Alfred Schaefer joins Henrik for a discussion about the consequences of challenging the accepted view of the Holocaust. The program begins with Alfred describing what it was like to grow up in Canada with German ancestry amid an accusatory climate of Holocaust remembrance. He describes his sister Monika’s newly found skepticism of the prevailing historical view of the Second World War and her subsequent video productions. Alfred recounts how Monika was arrested in Munich because of her videos that challenged the prevailing mainstream consensus concerning the Holocaust while attending the trial of Sylvia Stolz, a lawyer on trial for so-called Holocaust denial. Henrik and Alfred discuss with incredulity how pursuing historical inquiry can lead to criminal charges and imprisonment.


[Please support Red Ice by becoming a member. It’s only through paid membership that they can continue to do their work, and cover such controversial topics such as the Holohoax — KATANA]


In the members’ hour, Henrik and Alfred talk about the fractured nature of facts surrounding the nature of the Holocaust itself and the need for further research. The conversation then addresses the migrant crisis and how it constitutes a threat to Western civilization and how it can be viewed as a destructive companion phenomenon to Holocaust guilt and other Leftist propaganda. The conversation turns to the free fall of the mainstream media, how people crave alternative media sources, and the importance of outlets like Red Ice. Henrik speaks to the risk involved with pursing the truth about the migrant crisis, its origins, and underlying motivators. The discussion then turns to the seeming contradictions of population replacement.


Henrik and Alfred go on to discuss the severity of the current geopolitical situation as an existential crisis; the importance of pursuing moderate solutions to avoid widespread conflict; and much more.


Help keep us ad free, sign up for a membership at https://redicemembers.com

You’ll receive full access to our extensive archives.

Stream or download over 1400 programs, including radio shows, videos TV segments & our live show Weekend Warrior.


Donate: https://paypal.me/redice

Donate Bitcoin and other Cryptocurrencies: BTC: 15GFG2CVA6Ftq4w7dRuug9CQCsyrpeN1XG BCH:

1KVGWkLd5YuRxKNrVhExX8WiPCi4pGtey8 ETH:

0x90a0F323F58412eBfe086055831655A1c0D9E3B4 LTC:


More Red Ice TV & Radio: https://redice.tv/

Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/redicetv

Like us on Facebook: https://facebook.com/RedIceCreations

Listen to us on Spreaker: https://www.spreaker.com/show/red-ice…

Subscribe to our YouTube: https://youtube.com/user/RedIceRadio

RSS feeds: https://redice.tv/rss







(64 mins)







Henrik: All right ladies and gentlemen, thank you for joining us here in the second segment at Red Ice Members dot com. We’re talking with Alfred Schaefer.


And I just want to take a moment and kind of explain a few things, not only about the topic, but kind of about the way that we have to think about how we address these kinds of topics now, as well. The first thing is, of course, that we were mentioned, Red Ice TV was mentioned by name in the British Parliament. It was a couple of weeks ago now, by a lady who brought us up, we’re in the record of the UK parliament right now in reference to, I think there had a discussion about hate and violence and how people turn to terrorism and stuff like that. And we came up as a horrible right-wing example of a channel that should be censored! And this lady [Yvette Cooper], I forget her name, now even. She was literally calling, she was sitting there with a representative from Google and talking about us specifically how, you know:


What do we need to do to make you censor these kinds of channels?


And not only since that point, but around that point, we realized that okay, what we have here with the YouTube channel, I think we just broke 170,000 subscribers recently. So it’s a good, you know, it’s a good platform. It’s a good way to get the message out. And just to be frank with everyone, I also feel at the same time that I know that certain topics are just a “third rail”! I know that they would lead to censorship. Part of me feels, I don’t want to hand their reasoning to them, or the way that they just can basically say, “Okay, let’s censor it! ” Because they’re talking about these “nonsense” topics.



Read Full Post »


[Henrik of Red Ice Radio interviews Canadian-German activist Alfred Schaefer on the situation surrounding his sister’s arrest on Jan 3 this year, in Germany, for making a video called “Sorry Mom, I Was Wrong About the Holocaust“. In Part 1 here, Alfred explains the intellectual journey that both of them took to arrive at the position that Western Civilization is being destroyed by organized jewry through a long term strategy of psychological and physical subversion, with them, for example, being the power behind the invasion of Western countries by non-Whites.


Part of the subversion of Whites has been achieved through the diabolical lie known as the “Holocaust” that is used by organized jewry as a “shield and sword” to draw attention away from its massive crimes against humanity, such as the instigation of the World Wars, 9/11, etc., while also instilling guilt and shame in Whites for their very existence.


Alfred is a tireless and impassioned “man on a mission” to alert all to the reality of our dire situation and the forces behind our looming racial and cultural destruction, if we fail to act! I would urge all readers to support Alfred in his work and to help him in exposing the Orwellian situation that his sister, Monika, finds herself in as a “thought criminal“, now locked up in a maximum security prison in Germany — KATANA.]


Write to Monika now, at:


Monika Schaefer.
Stadelheim Prison.
Schwarzenbergstr. 14
81549 München,





Red Ice TV


Alfred Schaefer


Thought Criminal


Monika Schaefer


Arrested and Imprisoned


in Germany








Click here for the video:






Published on Jan 27, 2018



YouTube Description


 Alfred Schaefer is a German producer whose videos are aimed at exposing the propagandistic nature of the mainstream media. His videos outline how the hostile elite that are in control of much of Western Civilization have managed to subjugate entire populations and their political leadership through psychological conditioning.


Alfred Schaefer joins Henrik for a discussion about the consequences of challenging the accepted view of the Holocaust. The program begins with Alfred describing what it was like to grow up in Canada with German ancestry amid an accusatory climate of Holocaust remembrance. He describes his sister Monika’s newly found skepticism of the prevailing historical view of the Second World War and her subsequent video productions. Alfred recounts how Monika was arrested in Munich because of her videos that challenged the prevailing mainstream consensus concerning the Holocaust while attending the trial of Sylvia Stolz, a lawyer on trial for so-called Holocaust denial. Henrik and Alfred discuss with incredulity how pursuing historical inquiry can lead to criminal charges and imprisonment.


In the members’ hour, Henrik and Alfred talk about the fractured nature of facts surrounding the nature of the Holocaust itself and the need for further research. The conversation then addresses the migrant crisis and how it constitutes a threat to Western civilization and how it can be viewed as a destructive companion phenomenon to Holocaust guilt and other Leftist propaganda. The conversation turns to the freefall of the mainstream media, how people crave alternative media sources, and the importance of outlets like Red Ice. Henrik speaks to the risk involved with pursing the truth about the migrant crisis, its origins, and underlying motivators. The discussion then turns to the seeming contradictions of population replacement.


Henrik and Alfred go on to discuss the severity of the current geopolitical situation as an existential crisis; the importance of pursuing moderate solutions to avoid widespread conflict; and much more.


Help keep us ad free, sign up for a membership at https://redicemembers.com

You’ll receive full access to our extensive archives.

Stream or download over 1400 programs, including radio shows, videos TV segments & our live show Weekend Warrior.


Donate: https://paypal.me/redice

Donate Bitcoin and other Cryptocurrencies: BTC: 15GFG2CVA6Ftq4w7dRuug9CQCsyrpeN1XG BCH:

1KVGWkLd5YuRxKNrVhExX8WiPCi4pGtey8 ETH:

0x90a0F323F58412eBfe086055831655A1c0D9E3B4 LTC:


More Red Ice TV & Radio: https://redice.tv/

Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/redicetv

Like us on Facebook: https://facebook.com/RedIceCreations

Listen to us on Spreaker: https://www.spreaker.com/show/red-ice…

Subscribe to our YouTube: https://youtube.com/user/RedIceRadio

RSS feeds: https://redice.tv/rss







(54 mins)






Henrik: Welcome ladies and gentlemen. Henrik here with Red Ice TV. Thank you so much for tuning in. It’s always a pleasure having you with us. Today we have a issue of free speech coming to you a little bit over a year ago we had a gentleman called Alfred Schaefer on the show. I think we had him on twice actually, and his sister as well, Monika. We did a show with her. She had actually done a five-minute video that was called, “Sorry Mom, I was Wrong About the “Holocaust”. Which was a very good video. It was an honest, very down-to-earth video about her own kind of personal and emotional experiences growing up in Germany [Canada], all the things that she was taught, etc. And [01:01] her basically waking up to a kind of a different story, if you will.


And this has, in hindsight, caused a ruckus not only, of course, in Canada where she and Alfred was living, but now they’ve gone back to Germany. And they’re it’s, you know, this has intensified, if you will. So we have Alfred back with us on the show here today. And I shall go through some of this and talk a bit more in detail about what actually happened. And I want to Alfred. Welcome first of all, but I want everyone, kind of don’t assume that people know the case. Let’s talk about it from the beginning and what actually happened Alfred.


Alfred: Good. I’ll just go back to the summer of 2016. Monika was here with Professor Tony Anthony Hall and we did a number of video productions. And what really rocked the boat here was a five, or six minute video that Monika did, one in German, one in English. It’s called “Sorry Mom, I was Wrong About the Holocaust”. And in this video, a very heartfelt video, she explained how she [02:02] growing up in Canada as a German. And how the propaganda, when we started being indoctrinated with the propaganda, the people in school like back at that time, the Germans were vilified, really vilified, to the max!


That was like twenty years after, well that was in the 60s so that was 20 years after the end of hostilities, of what we call World War Two. And Monika described how she experienced that as a youngster in school, when she wore her traditional German dress and how the people mocked her. And then she started reproaching, to she eventually reproached our parents, particularly her our mom, for what the evil Nazis did., because when you are told as a little child these kinds of stories you just assume that you’re being told the truth, you just would not imagine that you would be lied to by those people who you trust who you look up to.




Read Full Post »



[In this YouTube Hangout (No 2) Morgoth, who runs the blog, Morgoth’s Review, blog regular Jim, and Theberton, talks with YouTuber, Arya Sattya about how she came to be making YouTube videos, the battle between order and choas, Eastern religions, Japanese worldview, Nietzschean philosophy, the Alt-Right, Pat Condell, Counter Jihad, and Holocaustianity, on “Holocaust Remembrance Day” Jan 27 KATANA.]




 — If you would like to improve the accuracy of the transcript please leave any corrected text in the comments section. Corrections to misspelled names, etc., is encouraged. Thank you.


— The tragic, yet funny, “Pat Condell” meme used on the cover, I believe, was originally created in 2015 by John Morlar. It mocks Condell’s constant focus on the Muslim invasion of Europe while studiously avoiding mentioning the cause, organized jewry, falsely portraying jews as a victimized group rather than the arch victimizers that they are. In other words, while Europe goes down he wants to save the very group that are behind sinking it!






Morgoth’s Review


YouTube Hangout 02



Merry Holocaustmas




Click here for the video:





Published on Jan 27, 2018



YouTube Description

In our second ever hangout the wonderful YouTuber Arya Sattya joins us to discuss religion, and Holocaustianity on Holocaust remembrance day.






(97 mins)




Morgs: Are we on?


Theberton: And we’re live.


Morgs: Okay, this is the Morgoth’s Review hangout number two.


And we’ve got a special guest, Ayra Sattya today. Hello Arya.


Ayra: Hello. Thanks for having me on.


Theberton: Do you want to introduce yourself Ayra?


Ayra: Yeah. I’ve just started a YouTube channel and I’ve got a Twitter as well just talking about I guess sort of all alts right stuff and philosophy, and things like that.




Theberton: How did you get into this kind of thing?


Ayra: I suppose I’ve been watching like, well YouTube for a long time, and I’ve been subscribed to like Millennial Woes for a few years. So just lots of things happening in the world and like in my life as well. And then watching all of the sort of Millenniyule streams over Christmas just got me sort of really motivated. So I start wanting to talk about it, so, you know, I started a channel and here I am.


Morgs: I think you jumped straight in on the Skeptic Wars, as well?


Ayra: Yeah. I’ve been watching it since like the beginning. So like even before it was like the Gamergate stuff I’ve been watching, like when it used to be about atheism and Christianity. And then it started moving into being about feminism and stuff. So, you know, I’ve been watching it [02:01] come from like the proto skeptic into the proper skeptic movement. And now they’re starting to trying to pivot towards being like classical liberals and things like that.



Read Full Post »


[In this British Channel 4 interview, cum debate/debacle, between a less than typical cucky [1] Canadian academic, Jordan Peterson, and the feminist host Cathy Newman on the female wage gap with men, we witness the total, cringe inducing, defeat of her position, as she shows continuously an inability to grasp simple points made by Peterson. In fact, she herself demonstrates a good example of a woman being put into a highly paid position, way above her ability, purely because of her gender.

Which suggests that actually the wage gap is in females’ favour as many of them are in positions higher than they should be, purely for what they don’t have between their legs, in order to fulfill affirmative action quotas KATANA.]



Jordan Peterson




Cathy Newman


On the Gender Pay Gap




Click here for the video:





Published on Jan 16, 2018



YouTube Description

Published on Jan 16, 2018

Channel 4 News’ full, fiery interview with clinical psychologist and professor Jordan B Peterson, whose views on gender have amassed great controversy – and a huge online following. He discusses the pay gap, patriarchy and his new book “12 Rules for Life.”






(29 mins)







Newman: Jordan Peterson, you’ve said that men need to, quote, “grow the hell up!” Tell me why.



Peterson: Well, because there’s nothing uglier than an old infant. There’s nothing good about it. It people who don’t grow up, don’t find the sort of meaning in their life that sustains them through difficult times. And they are certain to encounter difficult times. And they’re left bitter and resentful, and without purpose, and adrift, and hostile, and resentful, and vengeful, and arrogant, and deceitful, and of no use to themselves, and of no use to anyone else, and no partner for a woman, and there’s nothing in it that’s good!


Newman: So you’re saying, [2] I mean, that sounds pretty bad.


Peterson: Yes it is.


Newman: You’re saying there’s a crisis of masculinity. I mean, what do you do about it?


Read Full Post »

Older Posts »