Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Robert Faurisson’ Category

jim-rizoli-with-hadding-scott-cover

 

[In yet another interesting interview Jim Rizoli talks with a well-known figure in the Revisionist movement, Hadding Scott. We learn about Hadding’s earlier years and how he first learnt from his mother the old saying, “Don’t believe everything that you hear!” Then, we learn how he became aware of some of the character traits of jews from listening to the Larry King radio show. Hadding recounts it was in 1992 that he became finally convinced that the “Holocaust” was a myth after listening to a Dr. Willian Pierce radio show. Further on, the matter of the “revisionists” who have moved away from revisionism, like Irving, Weber, Cole and now Eric Hunt, is discussed   — KATANA.]

 

 

_______________________

 

 

im-rizoli-with-hadding-scott-video

 

YouTube Description

 

 

Jim Rizoli interviews Hadding Scott, Feb 2017, discussing Hadding’s ‘awakening’ concerning revisionism of Iraq and then, of course, WWII.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_553gsl07TQ&feature=youtu.be

 

 

 

Jim Rizoli

 

Interviews

 

Hadding Scott

 

 

 

Published on Jan 17, 2017

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

 

 

[00:00]

 

 

Jim: Hi everyone, Jim Rizoli here. And I have another special guest for the show today, it’s Hadding Scott. And we’re going to be discussing a little bit about his life and some of the things that he’s been doing. So let’s get started.

 

So Hadding again, welcome to the program.

 

Hadding: Well, hello!

 

Jim: First of all, the only, really thing I know about you is just in e-mails, I see coming here and there. And the biggest thing I know about you, I should say is, because my brother Joe. He was very much involved listening to your discussion about Henry Ford with Carolyn Yeager.

 

Hadding: Oh yeah, “The International Jew Study Hour”.

 

jim-rizoli-with-hadding-scott-3149-hadding-scott-website

 

Jim: Right, right! So, maybe you can tell us a little bit, … I’ll tell you what, before we get into that, why don’t we, you know, find out a little bit about you. So, what would you consider yourself?

 

Hadding: Well, I really hate to see somebody prevail through lying! This is something that you could notice in various things that I’ve done. But, you know, I really came to “Holocaust” revisionism through other things.

 

Jim: Yup.

 

Hadding: My origin has a lot to do with, … My parents were about a generation older than people my age. I just born in the ninety sixties. My parents were born in the nineteen twenties. And my mother was raised by her grandparents who were born not very long aft the War Between the States. So I got a very old perspective from my mother. And my mother always used to say, “Don’t believe everything that you hear!” And she gave me another perspective, when I brought home what I learned about Abraham Lincoln in school. And she also told me that all the stories about the cruelty of slavery in the South were not true. That this was exaggeration. And that slaves generally, were treated very well. And that the war was not about slavery, right?

 

So this really is a nice analogy to Holocaust revisionist. And I grew up with that.

 

jim-rizoli-with-hadding-scott-3150-lincoln

Jim: Are you a teacher or anything like that? Are you an academic person?

 

Hadding: I have been a teacher.

 

Jim: OK.

 

Hadding: Not presently.

 

Jim: OK. Well, basically you, you know, you’re like me. I mean, I, you know, I got into this, because I didn’t like lying! [laughing] So, you know, I didn’t like people saying things that were just completely absurd and they’re lying and I’m trying to figure out what, why are they saying this if it’s not true? So I could understand that. So what were the first things that you took up within your travel through life, here? What were some of the topics? I mean, you mentioned Abraham Lincoln. But I mean, what other things did you do?

 

Hadding: Well, I can tell you how I arrived at Holocaust revisionist, all right? From this dissident perspective that was inherent in my parentage and my upbringing, I was already accustomed to the idea that much of what we hear in mass media is not true. I grew up with that! Right? But I had other things still that I needed to learn. I needed to learn that there was lying also about the Second World War, because my parents didn’t really have any inkling of that. My mother was very well informed about how there was lying against the South, but not about lying against Germany. But it was not a big leap to think that there might have been lying against Germany. But a lot of this depends on what you think about the character of the jews. Right?

 

I grew up with this idea that the jews were pretty much like everybody else, except they had a different religion, and the [???] jews were victimized by some mass psychosis that swept over Germany. And you have to learn about the jews to understand that this is not really how it was. And the way that I became acquainted with the real character of the jews was by listening to the Larry King Radio Show on the Mutual Broadcasting Network, beginning around 1978 and into the early 1980s.

 

jim-rizoli-with-hadding-scott-3155-larry-king

 

[05:01]

 

I used to, actually I dropped out of high school at a very early age, actually. I got away with that. And I would stay up all night listening to Larry King radio show. And this was a big eye opener for me, because Larry King from my perspective was insane! [Jim laughing] This was a man who professed to believe in racial equality, whereas I as a Southerner, knew first hand that this was clearly not true! And I noticed other things about Larry King. Well for one thing he made no secret of being a jew. He talked about it often and he would have guests on his show all the time the he identified as jews and many of them were buddies from the old neighborhood in Brooklyn. You could learn from listening to the Larry King Show the character of New York City jews and the fact that jews were very prevalent in the mass media and had no shame about using their positions in mass media to promote specifically jewish interests. And Larry King was also extremely unfair to callers that disagreed with him on these particular issues, like race, and, … Well, especially race. If you disagreed with racial equality, he was very likely to badger you until you became incoherent and then hang up on you and then play the Looney Tunes thing. Right? [Mimicking the Looney Tunes music]

 

jim-rizoli-with-hadding-scott-3154-cartoon-greedy-jew

 

This was extremely unfair and this was really how I learned about jews. I mean, it’s sort of like seeing the platonic form of something, you know, you see the platonic form and then you see how that form exists in it’s imperfect form and the others. So, Larry King was sort of “concentrated jew”. And I saw that there was a little bit of Larry King in a lot of jews!

 

Jim: Did you ever call into the show?

 

Hadding: I did a couple of times.

 

Jim: And what happened?

 

Hadding: It was a long time ago, … I managed to get some stuff out and got hung up on.

 

Jim: [Laughing] Yeah! So that was your bad introduction to jews. And he’s such a wack job anyway, that guy!

 

Hadding: The thing about Larry King is he’s completely different on television, compared to how he was on the radio.

 

Jim: Really?

 

Hadding: On television he’s very toned down. You don’t, you don’t get the shameless promotion of jewish interests on his television shows, that he used to do on the radio.

 

Jim: Did he ever talk about the “Holocaust” or anything like [it]?

 

jim-rizoli-with-hadding-scott-3160-simon-wiesanthal-and-elie-wiesel

 

Hadding: I’m sure that he had Simon Wiesenthal on there and Eli Weasel. But at that point I wasn’t really suspicious about the Holocaust. I believed in the Holocaust until the late nineteen eighties. I started to have some questions about it in the late nineteen eighties. All right? Before I started to question the Holocaust. I had become interested in psychology. And I read a lot of psychology books, and one of the books I read was by a Scottish psychiatrist named R. D. Laing. And R. D. Laing labeled and demonized, obviously Adolf Hitler and the National Socialists.

 

jim-rizoli-with-hadding-scott-3165-r-d-laing-quote

 

So, because of R. D. Laing I was open to the idea that Adolf Hitler and the National Socialists might have their own story. That what they did does not seem crazy, right? What they supposedly did, right? So, before I arrived at questioning the Holocaust, I arrived at the position of trying to understand why this happened. What did the jews do to bring this on them? Right? That seemed to me a logical question. Now, I did know from having been exposed to Larry King and also some other experiences with jews, that it was entirely possible that there was exaggeration and distortion. But I still believed the “Holocaust” must have had at least some truth in it.

 

It was not until about 1992 that I was convinced that the Holocaust was false. I had started listening to short wave and the alternative media on short wave. Like Radio Free America with Tom Valentine, and I stumbled across also the American Dissident Voices radio program, which was usually Kevin Strong. But once a month Dr Pierce would make a broadcast. And I wrote to them because I was very interested in the fact that the way Dr Pierce talked about racial problems was very similar to the way that I talked about these things. And he presented a rational discussion of these things.

 

[10:16]

 

And I was certainly already open to the, … I knew from listening to Larry King that jews had a lot to do with these problems. That jews in the media push for racial equality! And I ordered books and magazines from them, and one of the magazines that I ordered was an issue of National Vanguard magazine from 1989. It had Adolf Hitler on the cover, it was the one hundredth birthday of Adolf Hitler issue of National Vanguard magazine. And that magazine had an article in it called, “The Evidence of the Prussian Blue”. I had heard and read before that before the Zundel Trial. I heard Ernst Zundel interviewed on Radio Free America with Tom Valentine.

 

jim-rizoli-with-hadding-scott-3167-robert-faurisson-closeup

 

I had read an article by Professor Robert Faurisson that somebody that reproduced. But, I wasn’t sure about how much of what they said I should believe! I didn’t know who Robert Faurisson was. He could have been a crazy man, for all I knew. He said that there was no chemical residue in the gas chambers and there should have been chemical residue in the gas chambers. Well, that’s a valid argument, but, it seems to be a valid argument, but I don’t know who is Robert Faurisson, what is his expertise? How can I be sure that there really should have been residue there. He just says that there should have been. How do I know it?

 

But with Dr Pierce, when I read it from him, I believed him, because he had a lot of credibility with me, because he spoke my language. I mean, in terms of how he talked about race and racial issues. And he also was a physicist, you know, he would know things like whether there should be cyanide residue in the bricks. You couldn’t fool him on these things and I knew he was a man who consistently told the truth. Therefore, when I read this very concise presentation about the Leuchter Report, from Dr Pierce, I was convinced. And he presented it very concisely. He talked about the blue staining in the bricks which was in the delousing chamber at Birkenau but not in Krema one in Auschwitz [I] nor in any other Krema’s [crematoria]. And this convinced me!

 

jim-rizoli-with-hadding-scott-3168-leuchter-reports-book-cover

 

Jim: So that was a good awakening for you, to see that. Now how did you pursue it after that?

 

Hadding: I didn’t do very much was Holocaust revisionism after that until about 2002, 2003. During the propaganda for, war against Iraq. Because it was very clear at that time that Hitler comparisons and the invocation of the “Holocaust” played a very large role in this anti-Saddam Hussein propaganda. Saddam Hussein was supposed to have gassed the Kurdish, the Kurds, he’s supposed of gassed Kurds, Kurdish civilians, for no reason! It was just an unprovoked gassing of these poor Kurdish civilians! That Saddam Hussein was supposed to have done for no reason. And this was supposed to make Saddam Hussein like Hitler. And he wanted to conquer the whole world like Hitler, right? So they were all these comparisons of Saddam Hussein legend, which I knew to be false by that point about Adolf Hitler.

 

jim-rizoli-with-hadding-scott-3153-hitler-and-time-mag

 

And I wrote some articles, in early 2003, before the US invasion, in which I debunked the propaganda about Saddam Hussein. It was not true that Saddam Hussein had gassed any Kurdish civilians! This was a story that originally had been put out by the Iranians. Because what happened was that the Iranians were attacking this town in northern Iraq called Fallujah and there was nobody in the town. But then some Kurdish rebels went into Fallujah and the Iranians thought they were Iraqi soldiers and shelled them with cyanide canisters. And the Iranians accidentally killed these Kurds in Fallujah. What happened aft the Iranians went Fallujah and saw the dead Kurds is that they blamed it on the Iraqis. And they called in journalists to see what happened there and they said, “Look what the Iraqis did!”

 

[14:48]

 

If you read the early reports about this incident you can tell that they’re somewhat skeptical. The reports are somewhat skeptical what the Iranians say. The Iranians said there were five thousand dead Kurds killed by the Iraqis. The reporters said that they saw one hundred or so, bodies. This is the kind of initial reporting on Fallujah. But what happened after, Iraq came out of the war much stronger, as a sort of a regional superpower. jews started in with their anti-Saddam Hussein propaganda. It happened on September first, 1988.

 

There was an article, a news article and also an editorial by William Safire in the New York Times. In which William Safire mentions that this cyanide gas had been used to kill the Kurds at Fallujah was the same gas used at Auschwitz! George Herbert Walker Bush also made an explicit Hitler comparison. Compared Saddam Hussein to Hitler. And Saddam Hussein also returned the comparison, comparing George Herbert Walker Bush to Hitler! Everybody that you want to motivate people to attack apparently is just like Hitler.

 

jim-rizoli-with-hadding-scott-3171-soldiers-gulf-war-2

 

So we have this war in 1991, but I’m perfectly willing to believe the Iraqi side of the story that April Glaspie, that the Kuwaitis provoked the Iraqis and that April Glaspie told them that the USA wouldn’t care if they invaded Iraq. Also I found out the CIA had made a fake satellite photograph showing Iraqi tanks on the Saudi border to try to get the Saudis to support the whole project of invading Iraq, attacking Iraq. Which echoes, of course, the fake CIA photograph that was published in Life magazine of the fake aerial photograph of Auschwitz that was published in Life magazine, I think in 1977. That showed doctored photographs of Auschwitz with people lined up for the gas chamber.

 

Jim: I’d like to see that picture.

 

Hadding: Yeah! Well that’s online. You just do a search, “Life magazine Auschwitz”. You’ll find it. Actually, it had people standing on the corner of buildings in these lines that were lined up, to go into the gas chamber. It was a kind of sloppy alteration. And they also put in a wall to hide people, so that they could pretend these people going to be gassed were not seen by people outside of the camp. There was there was no such wall.

 

Jim: Right.

 

Hadding: Anyway, so this anti-Saddam Hussein propaganda about the gassed Kurds went on for fifteen years, until we had the invasion and overthrow of the Iraqi government in 2003. Really the gassed Kurds story was the basis of the whole propaganda. Because this is an observation that I’ve made about how propaganda works. Most people are so overwhelmed with information that they can’t bother to check everything that they hear, or even very much of what they hear. So what people will do, is that they will take a few bits of information that they’ve heard and that they believe and they’ll construct a picture based on assumptions. So basically they try to see a pattern and fill out a picture based on that. In Gestalt psychology this is called “reifications” where you have a few, a few hints about what a shape might be and you can imagine that the shape is there. That’s called “reification”. It literally means “making the thing”, “thing making”.

 

jim-rizoli-with-hadding-scott-3174-saddam-hussein-press-conference

 

So this tendency of people to fill out their knowledge gaps with imagination is exploited in propaganda. And the biggest way that they do this, is by misinforming people about somebody’s character. Once it was spread that Saddam Hussein had gassed the poor Kurds and had done it with no cause, people would believe that he could do anything! All right, this is a crazy man! A man who might very well have been involved in the 9/11 attacks! You couldn’t really convince people that he wasn’t involved in the 9/11 attacks, because that would that would require checking the evidence and most people will never do that. But it would fit, … If people implied that he might have been involved in the 9/11 attacks they were very ready to believe it, because of what they had been told about Saddam Hussein’s character. And this is something that has to be addressed is also in regard to the Holocaust.

 

jim-rizoli-with-hadding-scott-3175-character-assassination-logo

 

One thing that a lot of people in Revisionism seem to do, they seem to focus on these details about gas chambers and crematoria and they don’t really look at questions like, “What kinds of people were these that were accused of doing these things?” “What is the character of the people making the accusations?” That’s extremely important!

 

[20:12]

 

Now, since 9/11 and actually since the late 1970s when people started becoming critical of the state of Israel, but especially since 9/11, there’s a lot less trust of jews, because a lot of people noticed after 9/11 that there was a lot of dishonesty.

 

I just had a conversation yesterday with a leftist. I asked him privately if you believed in the Holocaust. And he said he wasn’t sure, but he doesn’t trust jews. This guy’s a leftist! He says he doesn’t trust jews! Right? Because he doesn’t trust jews, he’s open to the possibility that the whole cause could be a big lie. Right? That’s very important! And this is something that has to be addressed if you’re trying to say that there was no Holocaust, while maintaining, “Oh yes! The Nazis were these horrible people!” you’re not going to be very convincing.

 

Jim: The big thing for you to understand how a lie could be propagated upon us and not be true, and I understand that too, … And I do I do believe you, what you say there about this psychology of this all too. There’s a lot more involved than that. That a lot of people don’t get into. I mean, I don’t get into it, because it’s hard, it’s hard to deal with that aspect of it, unless you show pictures [laughing] ., you know, what I mean? I mean, you know, people, you could talk psychology all you wanted but it seems like it only resonates with a certain type of people, the psychology aspect of it. I mean, I think it’s a good aspect of it. Just like, what’s her name, Elizabeth Loftus. Is that her name? She’s the one that talks about the false memory syndrome. Have you ever hear of her?

 

jim-rizoli-with-hadding-scott-3176-elizabeth-loftus-false-memory-syndrome

 

Hadding: Yeah.

 

Jim: So I mean, she was saying, …

 

Hadding: I’ve heard of False Memory Syndrome.

 

Jim: Yeah. Well anyway, that’s, I think that’s who she is. And she’s the one that, you know, she went at it from that aspect. But she didn’t get into the “Holocaust”. She just gets into it from other people in life, but being a jew, she didn’t want to deal with that topic of the Holocaust, because obviously, you know, the tribes she belongs to, the tribe and that’s not going to be too good for her. So that’s why she never, … But that is an interesting topic if you ever wanted to find out about her. I think it’s Elizabeth Loftus.

 

jim-rizoli-with-hadding-scott-3178-cognitive-dissonace-leon-festinger

 

Hadding: Well I’ll tell you another psychologist who wrote something that casts a lot of doubt on the Holocaust is Leon Festinger. He wrote “A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance”. This was published in 1957. And you really have to wonder what Festinger had in mind.

 

jim-rizoli-with-hadding-scott-3179-cognitive-dissonace-quote

 

It’s irresistible to make the analogy, jews hearing the rumors in Auschwitz, or someplace like that. If they were, … If they had a bad conscience, if they really hated the Germans, if they were communists and had bad intentions and had been locked up in this camp. But were being treated way better than they expected, or way better than seem justified. They would be disposed to believe the same kind of rumors that these Japanese interned in these American camps believed. They had this rumor that they were being secretly killed and it was the same rumors that the jews had.

 

Jim: Can I ask you this about your relationship with Carolyn Yeager doing that real, you know, I guess it want on for what, months? Your thing about Henry Ford.

 

jim-rizoli-with-hadding-scott-3180-henry-ford

Hadding: Yeah, it was some 50 chapters.

 

Jim: Wow! So how long did that go on for?

 

Hadding: It was about a year, I guess.

 

Jim: Yeah, my brother, … I mean, the reason I know about that, is my brother Joe, he takes the mp3s and he listens to them when he drive. So he told me all about it and, you know, it’s a great way of understanding, or actually getting the book in without reading it, you know. Because sometimes people, they can’t read. My brother he, … And I do too. When I get on the plane I take mp3s and listen to them as I fly. You know, right now I’m listening to “The Myth of German Villainy”. Are you familiar with that book?

 

jim-rizoli-with-hadding-scott-3181-the-myth-of-german-villany-montage

 

Hadding: No. Who wrote that?

 

Jim: Oh my goodness! Ben Bradberry. You have to get that book! If you want to understand World War Two, and prior to World War Two, World War One, and even prior to that from the 1850s on, what happened with Germany and the whole ten yards, you have to, … You have to read that book. Because you’ll get the best education on what really happened. And I think of all the books I’ve ever read, that probably has been the best one.

 

jim-rizoli-with-hadding-scott-3182-benton-l-bradberry

[25:14]

 

I interviewed him actually, Ben Bradberry. You could probably do a search for it on You Tube “Ben Bradberry Jim Rizoli interview” But he’s been he’s been interviewed by Red Ice and Rense and all these other people, too. So he’s a phenomenal writer and the book, … I don’t even know how he wrote his book. There’s so much in this book. It’s like how does anybody get into so much information and put it into a book? I just can’t even comprehend it. But he did it. So, yeah, if you ever get a chance definitely read that. I actually have it all online as a mp3 that I downloaded on the site, the archive site [https://archive.org/details/MRTAPMAN_gmail_MGV] that people can download it and listen to it, like I’m listening to it. But it’s like, how many hours, my goodness, I think it’s fourteen hours just audio. So it’s pretty long. But, I do recommend that.

 

But anyway, getting back to Carol Yeager. Have you done any more stuff with her, or what?

 

Hadding: She’s not doing very much these days, so she just posts articles on our blog, occasionally. She has this website called, January 27 [http: //jan27.org], you know, the “Holocaust” Revisionist Commemoration on International “Holocaust” Remembrance Day. I just wrote an essay for that.

 

jim-rizoli-with-hadding-scott-3183-carolyn-yeagers-jan27-org

 

Jim: Yeah, I saw that. It’s not Jan27.org is it? Is that it? Oh, that’s her site, then OK, all right

 

Hadding: jan27.org

 

Jim: Right. That’s a real good site there. So she basically, she hasn’t been doing much with, you know, online interviews and stuff anymore?

 

Hadding: I haven’t heard her do an interview in months.

 

Jim: Oh, OK. I mean, I know I was on her show some years ago. But I haven’t really heard much about her since, you know.

 

What do you think about, … Here’s something that we’ve been discussing here, Diane and I. We’ve been discussing what’s happening in the revisionist movement. A lot of people, well not a lot, but some pretty high ranking people in the movement are kind of recanting! They have [moved??] now. Like for instance Eric Hunt. You know, what do you think about what’s going on there?

 

Hadding: Well, Eric Hunt, I don’t know if it’s really “high ranking”. He’s got notoriety because he makes videos in which, I mean, he’s prominent, because he makes videos, …

 

Jim: Right.

 

Hadding: I think mostly, … Honestly I don’t pay a lot of attention to what other people do, but I’m sure mostly in his videos he summarizes other people’s findings.

 

Jim: Right.

 

Hadding: With Cole, he had an argument, …

 

Jim: Oh! David Cole, yeah, yeah, …

 

jim-rizoli-with-hadding-scott-3184-hadding-scott-article-semi-revisionism-is-dead

 

Hadding: And apparently he felt badly about his performance in the argument with Cole. And he felt he had been defeated, I guess. He said, “We really need to prove that those jews weren’t killed in the Action Reinhardt Camps!” Well, wait a second. The burden of proof is on the accuser, you know. That’s one of the reasons why I wrote this essay called, “Semi-revisionism is Dead [https://jan27.org/semi-revisionism-is-dead] .

 

Jim: Yeah, I read it and it was excellent. I thought it was very good, but I think, … You know what’s happening with this conversation, OK, what I’m noticing anyway, is these, … I call them the “Holocaust”-hucksters and what they do is they turn the conversation on us, to prove something that didn’t happen!

 

Hadding: To prove it didn’t happen!

 

Jim: I mean, it’s like, how do you do that!? How do I prove something didn’t happen!? And their biggest thing is [laughing] if you ever get in the conversation is, “Where did the jews go if they weren’t executed?” and I’m saying to myself, “Who cares? I don’t care where they went!” they weren’t killed, that’s all I care about, you know. So that’s my, you know, my take on that. But, you know, now he in his last article I just saw, he writes all about, you know, the Reinhardt Camps and that people were killed in those camps, because, you know, “Where did they go if they want were killed?” And the thing that really bothers me is they make all these assumptions that, you know, the jews had to go somewhere if they weren’t killed, but they forget all the other information showing how ridiculous the hoax is!

 

Hadding: That’s right.

 

Jim: I mean, I don’t get it! I don’t understand how this guy can even look at himself in the mirror and think, “Well gee! Let’s talk about those Reinhardt Camps and, you know, find out where they get all that wood?” You know, how they do all this, you know, those, … How they burnt all these bodies just with lighting a match to a body and the whole body just incinerates, you know, “puff” and the whole pile goes up [laughing] just, you know, just like that! Yeah, I don’t know. I just get so aggravated when I hear it.

 

[30:12]

 

But then, you know, I hear David Irving, he’s kind of capitulated not??? . Mark Weber, you know, he’s the same way, you know, he basically says, “While I think that millions of jews were killed, …” but he doesn’t get into how it happened. He just said it happened.

 

Hadding: I thought you humiliated Mark Weber by asking him, “How were they killed?” and he couldn’t answer that.

 

Jim: I mean, how do these guys show their face!? I mean, how do you, how do you make, … I mean, you know, I use a lot of IHR [Institute of Historical Review] material and, you know, the old stuff. And, you know, I’m always using it and then I talk to a guy that can’t even give me two facts that show that it happened! And that, you know, David Cole is the same way, you know. So yeah you got David Irving, David Cole and obviously, you know, Mark Webber and now we get Eric Hunt. You know, who’s next? You know, that goes, …

 

Hadding: Irving, Weber and Cole all have different motives. David Irving, he wants to have his career back, right. I don’t think he’s going to get it, but that seems to be, … I mean, that’s what somebody opined, somebody very well informed and prominent and famous, opined to me in 1996 when the “Goebbels: Mastermind of the Third Reich” came out. David Irving wants his career back. So that is why David Irving is espousing this semi-revisionism the continues the demonization of Goring and Goebbels and Himmler, .. But not Goring, but Himmler and Goebbels. But it’s really a reversion to the position that he had in the 1970s. That was always his position. That he constructed this drama where Hitler was doing good things and he had these evil men around him that were harming jews behind his back.

 

Jim: Right.

 

Hadding: But this is the kind of drama that David Irving has constructed. And really he’s just gone back to that. Mark Weber has a different motive, I think he just wants to avoid Holocaust revisionism and not discuss it to the extent that he can avoid it.

 

In the case of David Cole, … David Cole got involved in Holocaust revisionism only after the 1988 False News Trial when the Leuchter Report appeared and Leuchter testified and David Irving testified on behalf of Ernst Zundel. The holocaust industry was, in general, was in retreat at that point. And you could see this for example in Yehuda Bauer, his letter to The New York Times. An article about Yehuda Bauer to The New York Times followed by a letter from Yehuda Bauer, talking about the need to lower the death toll at Auschwitz, because those neo Nazi holocaust deniers, “They can count, you know!” They realized that they were under a lot of scrutiny and criticism and that they needed to make revisions themselves to try to save their holy myth. And this is when David got involved! By his own account it was 1989 when he got involved. And the first time that the world heard anything about David Cole wasn’t until 1992. David Cole as a “Holocaust” revisionist.

 

By that time it was the period when Holocaust revisionism appeared to be this great chariot leading to victory, right? And, you know, that’s what David Irving clearly believed in 1988. He believed that revisionism would prevail within, he said, five to ten years. And then the history books could be rewritten. Well it didn’t turn out that way.

 

Jim: Right.

 

Hadding: But during that time David Cole got involved. He endorsed the findings to the Leuchter Report. And he made this video at Auschwitz, where he basically duplicated what other revisionists had already done. There’s really no new information, I don’t think, in Cole’s Auschwitz video. It is very well done, you know, it has a nice tempo to it and has good audio and it’s watchable. All right? But David Cole was basically just putting a jewish face on what others had already discovered.

 

Jim: Right.

 

Hadding: That’s what he was doing. It’s jewish damage control!

 

Jim: Right. I know Mark Weber, you know, I don’t know, maybe, you know, this, or not. I don’t know, but he inherited a lot of money, you know, in a settlement he got, you know, he actually inherited like, for the IHR.

 

Hadding: Carto.

 

Jim: Yeah and all that. He got several million dollars out of that. I mean, did, you know, that?

 

[35:12]

 

Hadding: Well, I knew that there was this woman, I think, left a lot of money to the IHR.

 

Jim: Yes, she was part, …

 

Hadding: ??? And Carto had embezzled it and, …

 

Jim: Yeah, there’s a whole story there. But the bottom line was, the end result, was he inherited seven, I think seven and a half million dollars that went to IHR and that’s the reason why you don’t hear Mark Weber saying anything anymore. Because he’s got so much money that he’s just sitting on it and just waiting to retire and live happily ever after. So, and he’s not doing anything! No new books, no new writings, nothing! Because he’s pretty well set for life, now. I mean, that’s what I get out.

 

Hadding: Well, from what I see apparently he’s perfectly happy to travel and give a speech against the Zionist jewish power!

 

Jim: Right.

 

Hadding: He’s apparently happy to talks about Palestinians, but he doesn’t want to talk about the “Holocaust”.

 

Jim: Right. Well, that’s the point, you know, why, because he’s still, he’s still reaping money. He’s getting money that’s coming in from people that still donate to his cause and, you know, he, like I said, he doesn’t want to upset the apple cart with the, you know, maybe some of the jews even contribute to his cause that want him to keep quiet, you know, what I mean? [laughing].

 

Hadding: Who knows?

 

Jim: So I think, oh yes, I think, you know, I think that’s part of the issue there with him. But that’s sad because, you know, Germar Rudolf, he wrote a really good article about that. About what happened with all that. I just read that, I think the other day, you know, the whole relationship about revisionism and how money corrupts. And it sure has, because it keeps revisionism from doing more. Because, you know, if they have a lot of money they don’t have to do anything. And Germar, I think Germar out of all the revisionists, he’s the one I think is the top one now, you know, that’s really doing something and, you know, trying to make this work. Germar. I mean, he’s, that’s my opinion anyway, you know. I don’t know any other one that’s that’s doing anything as much as Germar.

 

Hadding: Oh sure. Faurisson some years ago referred to the amazing energy of Germar Rudolf, or something to that effect.

 

Jim: Yes, it’s phenomenal what he’s doing. And, you know, we interviewed, we went down to Pennsylvania and interviewed Germar and he was really a good man. I really like him and I just hope he can, … I mean, what really bothers me is you get these inheritances that come in to these organizations and you think the IHR would throw some money his way, you know, because of all the work that Germar has done, you know. But no, he doesn’t get anything from anybody. You know, he’s just poking along. It’s just sad! I hate to see that happen but, you know, it’s happening, you know. Anyway, but that’s, …

 

Hadding: Well, I don’t think. I just want to clarify. I don’t think that receiving money is what’s wrong with Mark Weber, all right. Mark Weber, I mean, this is according to Faurisson’s account. Mark Weber is a weak man! He’s a weak man. He’s not very brave. When they were in, I think, in Germany and police had detained Ernst Zundel. They were going to have, … I don’t remember the story now, but they were in Germany and they are in danger of being arrested and Mark Weber’s teeth were chattering!

 

Jim: Right.

 

Hadding: But, you know, Mark Weber he’s not a, just look at him. He does not convey strength.

 

Jim: Yeah, he at that point that you are talking about, I’m going to use a term that, there’s no other way I could use it any differently, … He was ready to shit his pants! OK! Because [laughing] he was so afraid of getting arrested and that’s what happened with him. So yeah. But, you know, I look at Fred Luechter and, you know, hey Fred, you know, he took it. I mean, he, you know, he was going to go to jail too and he hung in there. He eventually got out of there which was the smartest thing to do too. But if he goes back there, they’re going to put him in jail [laughing] So, you know, Fred hung in there and he’s, you know, he’s not going back on any of his views about how things were done in the, you know, the Luechter Report and all that. And he suffered more than anybody, you know. So, you know, when I see these people talking about suffering like Eric Hunt, you know, my whole life has been topsy turvy by this and that. I just say, please!

 

jim-rizoli-with-hadding-scott-3185-fred-leuchter-with-jim-rizoli

 

Hadding: So you think that’s why he’s backing away from this?

 

Jim: Well, that’s what I think. I think even Germar said that too. But you got to understand too with David Cole, you know, they threatened David Cole. They had a hit on him, to kill him. You know, he was supposed to, he was going to be killed.

 

[40:11]

 

Hadding: Yeah, it’s an interesting thing, they didn’t kill him, did they?

 

Jim: No, no, I know, yeah, because he talked to, what was his name?

 

Hadding: Irv, …

 

Jim: OK, OK. Irv Ruben, at the time anyway. He went to jail. He actually end up going to jail, but he actually end up talking to him and as far as I understand, the story what Cole said, he ended up paying him money or something, not to do anything to him. That’s the story that I heard. I thought I heard from Cole, when I was listening to one of Cole’s audios, videos, like we are doing now. So, the point is it seems like a lot of these people might have been threatened, you know, I can understand that would cause a problem with you, but, you know, we’ve all suffered. I mean, I lost a business, because of the jews. So I mean, that’s life. You just get on and, you know, I know I didn’t stop. I actually got more, I got more involved with it. I didn’t get less involved in it, because now I have the time to put to it! You know, that’s that’s what I feel is important, you know, use your time wisely. And I think that’s what we all have to do you know.

 

Hadding: Well Irv Ruben has been dead for years now. I don’t think that Irv Ruben is the reason for what David Cole is doing now. I presented in my essay, “Semi-Revisionism is Dead” background that would support the interest that David Cole was never really interested in debunking the Holocaust, as such. That is never what he wanted to do. He tried, like Yehuda Bauer, he wanted to revise it to keep it alive.

 

Jim: Right.

 

Hadding: That’s my thesis.

 

Jim: Well, he got [???] too. After all that he ended up working for the “Holocaust” museum, or whatever. Somebody involved with that and he was doing videos for them. According to what David Cole says now. I’m telling you what David Cole said. After he went into hiding, he ended up doing stuff for the opposite cause, here. And doing videos and research for the pro-holocaust people.

 

Hadding: As Stein?

 

Jim: Yeah as Stein.

 

Hadding: OK.

 

Jim: Yeah, he changed his name. And then, you know, that’s what happened there. I mean, well, you know, what are you going to do? I really don’t care about him. I have no interest. I would like to interview him though and really hit him with, you know, some really tough questions, but I don’t know if that’s ever going to happen, you know. I’m not really worry about it.

 

So what, … Do you have like a website, do you like, have a blog site or anything like that?

 

Hadding: Yes, my main blog is The National Socialist Worldview. Its National hyphen Socialist hyphen Worldview dot blogspot dot com [http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com].

 

jim-rizoli-with-hadding-scott-3186-degrelle-with-hitler

 

Jim: Oh OK. That’s good. So we can go to that and see what’s going on with you. Like you post things there all the time, or something, or keep it up?

 

Hadding: Yeah. I try to post at least one thing a week but, you know, sometimes it’s only one thing a month. If I get working on something for CODOH it might keep me from posting on my blog for a while.

 

Jim: Yeah. So explain to me a little bit about CODOH. So you do stuff with them and who is running CODOH now?

 

Hadding: Germar Rudolf!

 

jim-rizoli-with-hadding-scott-3187-germar-rudolf-montage

 

Jim: OK. So Germar is running it and how’s that going?

 

Hadding: It’s a good gig., you know, I wasn’t really, … It pays a little less than the Occidental Observer, but the Occidental Observer won’t publish my stuff anymore. And I get published much more regularly on CODOH than I could on the Occidental Observer. I use this to pay my bills.

 

Jim: Right, right. Who runs the Occidental Observer?

 

Hadding: That’s Kevin MacDonald. MacDonald is afraid of, seems to be afraid of, that subject.

 

Jim: Well, you got to understand that if he takes that topic on he’s going to be dead, just like Irving!

 

Hadding: Well, he’s retired, so what does he have to lose?

 

Jim: Oh, is that what it is. OK, well I can understand that. So, well that’s good. So, I mean, I just started going to the CODOH site looking up more things. I mean, that’s a great site. I mean, a lot of information there, you know. We, you know, we’re revisionists, I mean, we have a tremendous amount of information out there, you know, the “Holocaust” handbooks. I mean, my goodness. I mean, there’s so much stuff there. The problem is the majority of people out there don’t get to see it because, you know, you can’t get it out there. I mean, you know, you have to look for it deep down in the Internet to find it. But it’s there if people, you know, want to look at it, you know. We can we can definitely look at it.

 

[44:51]

 

So, basically, you know, you’re just biding your time. Just, you know, writing things as they come. I mean again we, you know, we enjoy what you write. I mean, you know, you’re a good writer. You know, you have a nice, you know, style and insight. I would say about things and I think that’s important that people, you know, see that stuff. I mean, that article you wrote about, you know, the three revisionist, what was it, three revisionist you took up?

 

Hadding: Yes, “Semi-Revisionism is Dead” is the name of it.

 

Jim: Yes, that was a super article! That was a great article, you know. So anytime you get something, you know, a new, .. Well you send them my way anyway, so we get what you’re doing now. So that’s important.

 

Well, anything else you have you like to, … What do you think, what do you think the future is for us? You know, the movement, you know, revisionism, the truth movement and all that?

 

Hadding: I think that we have some people falling away from Holocaust revisionist right now that maybe hadn’t really thought through their position very well initially. Maybe their commitment wasn’t very deep to begin with. So I wouldn’t worry about that too much. I just worry about what I’m doing and trying to make sure what I’m doing the right thing. And keep doing it. And as long as I can get by and pay my bills and have enough to eat while I’m doing the right thing that is what I keep doing.

 

Jim: Right, right. Well, I agree. I’m the same way. You know, I was saying to Diane, I was saying I don’t, I really don’t care what anybody even the revisionist views are! I know common sense! You know, me I can read and I can understand common sense and if someone wants to go back on common sense and go to stupidity and believe things that just can’t happen I mean, that’s that’s up to them! I just feel sorry for them that they can’t stick it out and do what’s right.

 

But, well look, I really appreciate that you came on with us today. Again you contribute a lot to the cause! I just want to let, you know, that, OK!

 

Hadding: Thank you very much.

 

Jim: Yeah, I mean, you’re a good man and, you know, keep continuing on and don’t let anybody discourage you. I know financially, you know, things could be better, but it could be like that for all of us to, I suppose. But the truth is the truth! And no matter what the topic is you’ve got to let people know about it. I don’t care what the consequences are, you’ve got to just let everybody, you know, deal with it and go along with it, you know.

 

Well look, Hadding, thank you very much for our interview. Good luck with what you’re doing and, you know, another time we’ll probably try to talk to you again when something else comes up that, we know, we can talk about too.

 

Hadding: All right. Well, thank you very much.

 

Jim: All right. Bye now!

 

jim-rizoli-with-hadding-scott-3188-request-for-donations

 

jim-rizoli-with-hadding-scott-3189-voltaire-quote

 

[47:40]

 

END

 

 

============================================

 

 

PDF Notes

 

* Total words = 7,849

* Total Images = 27

* Total pages = 29

 

Click to download a PDF of this post (2.0 MB):

Jim Rizoli Interviews Hadding Scott 2017 — TRANSCRIPT

 

 

jim-rizoli-with-hadding-scott-cover

 

 

Version History

 

Version 3: Mar 14, 2017  — Added PDF of post for download.

 

Version 2: Feb 23, 2017  — Added 25 images.

 

Version 1: Feb 20, 2017  — Published post.

Read Full Post »

white-world-awake-cover

 

 

[In this new book, by a well-known “Holocaust” Revisionist, Jurgen Graf, the planned “slow-motion” extermination of the White race by the globalists (aka, Organized jewry) using the socially engineered below replacement birth rates, mass Third World immigration and various other methods is described. In the introduction Graf talks about how he became involved in “Holocaust” revisionism and how the “Holocaust” is used to demoralize and guilt Whites into passively accepting their racial and cultural destruction — KATANA.]

 

 

[NOTE: The following excepts are provided to encourage readers to purchase the book. Please support the author and his work by purchasing the book at Barnes Review or as an e-book at Amazon.]

 

_______________________

 

 

White World Awake!

 

Stopping the Planned Extermination

 

of Our Volk

 

 

By JURGEN GRAF

 

TRANSLATED by DR. FREDRICK TOBEN

EDITED by JOHN R TIFFANY

Copyright 2016 by Jurgen Graf &

THE BARNES REVIEW

 

 

ISBN 978-1-937787-32-5

FIRST US EDITION, 2016

Published by:

THE BARNES REVIEW

16000 Trade Zone Avenue #406 Upper Marlboro, MD 20774 PEACE BOOKS P. O. Box 3300

Norwood SA 5067 Australia

 

Ordering more copies:

Order more copies of White World Awake! Stopping the Planned Extermination of Our Volk (softcover, 540 pages, $35 plus $5 S&H) from THE BARNES REVIEW 16000 Trade Zone Avenue, Unit 406, Upper Marlboro, MD 20774.

TBR subscribers may take 10% off the list price. Call 1-877-773-9077 toll free to charge copies to Visa, MasterCard, or Discover.

See more books and videos online at www.barnesreview.com.

 

Subscriptions:

A subscription to THE BARNES REVIEW historical magazine is $46 for one year (six issues) and $78 for two years (12 issues) inside the US. Outside the U.S: Canada/Mexico: $65 per year. All other nations: $80 per year sent via air mail. Send payment with request to TBR, 16000 Trade Zone Avenue, Unit 406, Upper Marlboro, MD 20774. Call TBR toll free at 1- 877-773-9077 to charge. Order online at www.barnesreview.com. See a special subscription offer at the back of this volume, or call toll free number above and ask for best current subscription offer.

 

Reproduction Policy:

Portions of this publication may be reproduced without prior permission in critical reviews and other papers if credit is given to author, book title is listed and full contact information and subscription information are given for publishers as shown above.

Original Australian ISBN 978-0-994198-30-3

WHITE WORLD WORLD Awake!

Stopping the Planned Extermination of Our Volk

BY JURGEN GRAF

THE BARNES REVIEW 2016

 

 

AUTHOR’S DEDICATION

To my mother Valentina Ivanova, dedicated with love and gratitude.

— JORGEN GRAF

September 2016

 

PUBLISHER’S DEDICATION

This book is dedicated to the White race, whose very existence is on the brink of extinction. It is our hope that this book’s contents in some way can help to make more people aware this disturbing situation and work together to make it a prominent public issue. Certainly the loss of any individual race on this planet is a great tragedy, but the extinction of a race with such a noble and prolific history such as ours would be globally catastrophic.

— THE BARNES REVIEW

September 2016

 

From the Publisher

 

White World Awake!

Stopping the Planned Extermination of Our Volk.

 

Western civilization is in desperate peril. White people — our volk — are in trouble. The question of the day — and very likely the question of the millennium — is whether Europe will survive—and with it its American, Canadian, Australian and South African cousins — and, if so, how?

 

Seeking to answer those questions is a very important new book, White World Awake! Stopping the Planned Extermination of Our Volk. Those who seek the truth will find the truth in the pages of this book, and those looking for a practical plan of action will find that as well.

 

For too long, observes the author, White people have fought among themselves. The European Union and NATO are failed efforts to correct that situation. Europe faces an existential threat with tsunamis of unassimilable Africans, Middle Easterners and Asians swarming in. Russians, Britons, Frenchmen, Germans and Poles, Serbs and Croats, Romanians, Finns and Greeks, Spaniards and Hungarians are all in the same rickety boat.

 

The time has come for Europe to speak with one nationalist voice on military and foreign policy matters, while it is equally necessary for each nation and ethnic group to preserve its distinctive language and culture, and for historical injustices to be discussed openly.

 

A Eurasian Federation is proposed, which, like Old America, will not interfere in other parts of the world except to provide humanitarian aid and ensure the safety of such places as Armenia and Georgia against any immigration threat.

 

Traitor politicians who see no problem in allowing Europe and other White nations to be transformed into mixed-race caliphates — a dream of the mysterious Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi — will be voted out of office.

 

Many of the solutions apply equally to the rest of the White World. “Close the borders! Stop the flood!” is key not only for Europe, but America and all other White areas of the world. Thus Graf lays out a practical 10-step program to stop the genocide of the West starting with Europe, the cradle of White Western civilization.

 

This is a book that needs and deserves to be in the hands of every concerned person who cares about the future of the Western world.

 

__________________

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Introduction: How to Become a Dissident ……………… 7

1 The Red Bird from the Danube Delta ………………… 39

2 Conspiracy Theories? …………………………………….. 55

3 The Plan ……………………………………………………………………….. 71

4 Intelligence and Development ……………………………………… 93

5 The Blessings of Multiculturalism ………………………………….. 109

6 Battle of Ethnicities and Cultures ………………………………….. 133

7 The Cost of Suicide ………………………………………………………. 159

8 The Plan to Destroy Sweden …………………………………………. 171

9 The Decline of the U.S.A. ………………………………………………. 185

10 Two Types of Weights and Double Standards ………………. 199

11 The Destructive Principle ……………………………………………… 211

12 The Foundation of the New World Order ……………………… 237

13 Homosexual Propaganda & Gender Mainstreaming ……… 319

14 Infanticide in the Mother’s Womb ……………………………….. 337

15 The Locusts by Thomas Brookes …………………………………… 345

16 The Battering Ram of the New World Order ………………….. 365

17 The Ukrainian Scenario ………………………………………………… 401

18 The Henchmen ……………………………………………………………. 445

19 What to Do? …………………………………………………………………. 473

20 After the Storm ………………………………………………………….… 489

21 Afterword: Coloring the White World ……………………………. 505

Bibliography ……………………………………………………………………….. 522

Name Index ………………………………………………………………………. 531

 

 

white-world-awake-jurgen-graf-color

Jurgen Graf

 

 

INTRODUCTION

 

How To Become a Dissident

 

C’est quily a de terrible quand on cherche la verite, c’est qu’on la trouve.

 

The terrible thing is that those who seek the truth will find the truth.

— French biologist and scientist FELIX LE DENTEC (1869-1917)

 

 

When, at age 62, I reflect on my life, it appears to me that the first 35 years were nothing, but a preparation for future tasks. I still thank my teachers at the Basel Humanist High School, who gave me a general education. In my following education I obtained language qualifications that became indispensable to me. Since my 9th, or 10th year, I have always had a passionate interest in politics and history, and this interest was to determine my life’s journey. Early in life, in matters of national defense and foreign affairs, I was right wing, where “‘right wing” was essentially “‘anti-communist.” I had not quite consciously experienced the 1956 Hungarian uprising, but the construction of the Berlin Wall and the Cuban crisis were indelibly imprinted on my consciousness. The Soviet tanks in Prague and Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s Gulag Archipelago, which I devoured, convinced me that the current battle was against eastern totalitarianism. Until the beginning of perestroika, I was firmly convinced of a …, perestroika, I was firmly convinced of a possibly inevitable Soviet occupation of Western Europe. Inevitably. my favorite politician was Franz Josef Strauss, the baroque Bavarian ancient colossus who incessantly warned Western civil society of the impending Red danger. Only sometime later was I able to revise my undifferentiated anti-communism and anti-Soviet Unionism- and as before in other matters — to correct my historical and world views.

 

At the same time, from the beginning I always stood left of center in social justice matters, and my anti-communism did not, for example, prevent me in the least from supporting the 1972 submitted Communist Party of Work initiative to grant a Volks pension, which was massively rejected at the referendum. The fact that on some points I could unhesitatingly support a right-wing and a left-wing position was proof for me that we lived in a dynamic democracy. I believed that there was no alternative to democratic capitalism; the deficiencies within the system would step-by-step be solved. All in all, I believed I was living in the best of all possible worlds.

 

However, quite early in my life that I realized that even this best of all possible political words could not do without a taboo, or two, of which the strongest concerned the topic of “the Third Reich and the Jews.” Just as in most European countries, in Switzerland during my childhood a pervasive anti-German climate was propagated by most of the media. During that time there were two daily newspapers in Basel: The left-wing National Zeitung was most noted for venomously inciting against Germans, while the right-wing Basler Nachrichten remained more reserved in its diatribe against Germans.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

worlds-first-anti-holocaust-convention-1979-cover-ver-2

 

[In this article, written for the Dec. 1979 edition of the revisionist journal, Instauration, an interesting account is given of the first ever, “Anti-Holocaust” convention, with speakers including: Robert Faurisson from France; John Bennett from Australia; Udo Walendy from Germany; Louis FitzGibbon from Britain; Arthur Butz and James Martin from the US. This was held in Los Angeles and organized by the Institute for Historical Review  —  KATANA.]

 

 

 

Instauration – Dec, 1979

 

The World’s First

 

Anti-Holocaust Convention

 

 

 

 

 

 

Text

 

 

World’s First Anti-Holocaust Convention

Instauration, Dec. 1979

 

A great and historic weekend — $50,000 offered for proof of gassing.

 

 

Labor Day weekend marked what may be the end of one historical epoch and the beginning of another — the end of the domination of the Six Million myth over the Western mind and the start of a new wave of historical revisionism that might well signal the reappearance of truth in history.

 

The Revisionist Convention of the Institute for Historical Review was held at Northrop Institute of Technology in Los Angeles. Speakers came from all over the world: Robert Faurisson from France; John Bennett from Australia; Udo Walendy from Germany; Louis FitzGibbon from Britain; Arthur Butz and James Martin from the US.

 

The proceedings began on Friday, August 31. Some of those present already knew each other. For the most part, however, the faces belonged to new converts to the anti-Holocaust cause. A significant proportion of the attendance were engineers — people with a liking for hard facts who instinctively resist overblown claims and sly innuendo. Also present were several physicists, a brace of computer programmers and one commercial airline pilot. The convention was dedicated to the memory of the founding father of revisionism, Dr. Harry Elmer Barnes, who passed into the realm of eternal history in 1968.*

*[Actually, Dr. Harry Elmer Barnes passed away on Aug. 25, I969]

worlds-first-anti-holocaust-convention-1979-2037-james-martin-left-with-harry-barnes-1954

[Image] James Martin (left) with Harry Barnes, 1954.

 

Saturday, the meeting began in earnest in the Northrop auditorium.

 

The delegates were formally welcomed by Willis Carto, one of the organizers of the Institute for Historical Review and the dynamic force behind Liberty Lobby. He then yielded to the permanent chairman George Resch, a libertarian investment counsellor associated with the Institute for Human Studies in San Francisco.

 

worlds-first-anti-holocaust-convention-1979-2033-willis-carto-at-the-podium

[Image] Willis Cartos (undated photo).

 

The first speaker was Dr. James Martin, life-long friend and colleague of Barnes, who presented a lively and informative chronology of revisionism. The only professional historian at the meeting, Martin remarked that we need not worry that very few present-day revisionists are professional historians. After all, not one of the Holocaust promoters is! Martin asserted many modern historians privately accept the truth of the revisionist argument, but are afraid to come out and say so. “There are two ‘Six Million’ atrocity stories,” Martin stated:

In Soviet propaganda the gassed six million are Slavs, not Jews. The Kremlin uses the myth to buttress the Soviet policy of keeping Germany divided and disarmed.

 

Dr. Arthur Butz, author of The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, presented a fascinating account of developments in the revisionist field since publication of his book in 1976.

 

worlds-first-anti-holocaust-convention-1979-2041-dr-arthur-butz-and-his-book-the-hoax

[Image] Dr. Arthur Butz, author of The Hoax of the Twentieth Century.

 

Butz described the continuing persecution of individuals in Europe who dared to question the Holocaust. Manfred Roeder, the German attorney, was expelled from the German bar, prosecuted for writing the foreword to Thies Christophersen’s Auschwitz Lie, and had to flee the country. Christophersen himself was given a suspended jail sentence for writing the truth about Auschwitz and faces a further trial upon his return to West Germany.

 

worlds-first-anti-holocaust-convention-1979-2071-auschwitz-a-personal-account-cover

[Image] Thies Christophersen’s Auschwitz Lie with a foreword by Manfred Roeder

See: https://katana17.wordpress.com/2013/05/05/auschwitz-a-personal-account-by-thies-christophersen/

 

Butz also explained that Dr. Wilhelm Staglich, author of the recently published Auschwitz Myth and a retired Hamburg judge who served in an anti-aircraft battery at Auschwitz, has also been subject to legal attack. His pension was reduced by 20% for five years for contradicting death camp atrocity tales.

 

worlds-first-anti-holocaust-convention-1979-2060-dr-wilhelm-staglich-pics

[Image] Dr. Wilhelm Stäglich, (1916 – 2006) German judge and historian, was an important revisionist writer, most notably for his detailed study, Der Auschwitz-Mythos (The Auschwitz Myth). During the Second World War he served from mid-July to mid-September 1944 as an Ordonnanzoffizier (orderly officer) on the staff of an anti-aircraft detachment stationed near the Auschwitz camp. As part of his duties, he maintained contact with the SS camp command, and had unlimited access to the Auschwitz main camp, where the command was headquartered.

 

When he appealed, the judge ruled it was no good introducing the books, or articles of Butz and Faurisson as evidence, because Butz and Faurisson were pseudonyms! As for the German translation of the Hoax of the Twentieth Century, Butz said it has been placed on the Bonn government’s “Index“, which means that it may not be advertised, or sold to minors.

 

Butz went on to relate that late in 1978 a respected German historian, Professor Hellmut Diwald, had published his massive History of the Germans by Propylaen, a division of Axel Springer’s publishing combine.

 

worlds-first-anti-holocaust-convention-1979-2069-professor-hellmut-diwalds-book-history-of-the-germans

[Image] Professor Hellmut Diwald’s book “Geschichte der Deutschen” (History of the Germans).

 

On two pages, Diwald wrote some critical things about the Holocaust story. The press shrieked for censorship. Golo Mann, Thomas Mann’s half- Jewish son, declared:

These two pages are the most monstrous that I have yet to read in a German book since 1945.

 

The publisher responded to the clamor by recalling the first edition of the book and substituting an altered version in which the offending pages were rewritten. Springer promised that this was only the start of an extensive job of rewriting and that eventually the history would be “unrecognizable.

 

In the English-speaking world, Butz said, most of the efforts to suppress revisionism have been through the “curtain of silence” technique. But from time to time there had been official government intervention. Harwood’s work Did Six Million Really Die? was banned in South Africa at the behest of the Jewish Board of Deputies, which published an “Answer to Harwood” called Six Million Did Die. The German translation of Harwood’s book was placed on the German “verboten-for-young- peopleIndex in late 1978.

 

The Institute of Jewish Affairs in London published in the psychopolitical journal Patterns of Prejudice the only critique of Butz worthy of the name that has appeared anywhere in the world. In April 1977, Butz wrote the magazine Index on Censorship in London, which is supposed to defend academic freedom, and followed up his letter with a personal visit in the summer of 1977. No action was taken.

 

Butz concluded his lecture by underlining the unacademic behavior of academics toward the controversy. He gave as an example Professor Wolfe of New York University who wrote to the New York Times condemning a book which he called Fabrication of a Hoax. He demanded that Butz be brought up on charges of “academic incompetence.” Clearly, the man had never read the book and had only seen a New York Times mention of it, where the title had been incorrectly reported. In an afterthought, Butz philosophized:

I’ve never been able to understand the hostile reaction from Zionist groups. Jews should be elated to discover that large numbers of their people were not deliberately destroyed.

 

Next on the program was Udo Walendy, the German translator of Butz’s book, who gave his first English-language lecture. His subject was faked atrocity photographs, of which he showed many dramatic examples.

 

worlds-first-anti-holocaust-convention-1979-2056-udo-walendy-pics

[Image] Udo Walendy, born in 1927 in Germany, is one of the most prolific revisionist researchers, writers and publishers in the world. He has written numerous books and since the early 1970s has been publishing a German periodical called Historische Tatsachen (Historical Facts), so far encompassing over 110 issues — including the German version of Did Six Million Really Die? and the German language version of the first Leuchter Report.

 

Walendy, who had been fired from his teaching job, because of his political views, exhibited an enlargement of one widely reproduced photograph of supposed victims of Dachau gas ovens. When it was established that Dachau never had any gas ovens, investigation proved the picture actually showed German corpses collected after the saturation bombing of Dresden.

 

On Saturday evening the convention members were “entertained” with a variety of Holocaust propaganda films, including Genocide (Britain), The Nuremberg Trials (USA) and Nacht und Nebel (France). Butz, Walendy and Faurisson presented a critique of each film in turn, but it was not long before viewers themselves were able to decipher the routine formula of the films, since each used almost exactly the same stills and clips.

 

The “martyred Warsaw ghetto boy” (now alive, well and well off in Britain) appeared in the films looking as plaintive as ever. As Faurisson pointed out, the commentary did not state that he had been arrested in a crackdown on juvenile thieves.

 

worlds-first-anti-holocaust-convention-1979-2057-martyred-warsaw-ghetto-boy

[Image] “Martyred Warsaw Ghetto Boy”. This photograph, perhaps the most familiar Holocaust image, shows seven-year-old Tsvi Nussbaum as he raises his hands in Warsaw in 1943. After the war, Nussbaum moved to Israel, and then to the United States, where he worked as a physician in New York State.

* D. Margolick, “Rockland Physician Thinks He is Boy in Holocaust Photo on Street in Warsaw,” The New York Times, May 28, 1982, pp. B1, B6; P. Moses, “Haunting Reminder,” New York Post, Feb. 20, 1990, p. 5.; In 1978 a London businessman named Israel (Issy) Rondel claimed to be the “Warsaw ghetto boy.” See: J. Finkelstone, “‘Ghetto boy’ lives here,” Jewish Chronicle (London), August 11, 1978, pp. 1, 2.; C. Harris, “Warsaw Ghetto Boy: Symbol of The Holocaust,The Washington Post, Sept. 17, 1978, pp. L1, L9. This claim later proved to be untrue. See: E. Kossoy, “The boy from the ghetto,” Jerusalem Post, Sept. 1, 1978, p. 5.

Source: http://codoh.com/library/document/2499/

 

The audience searched in vain for shots and bodies piled up vertically/horizontally/pyramidically (depending on which Holocaust “expert” one reads) in gas chambers at Auschwitz. The gruesome shots came from Belsen, where thousands died of typhus epidemics, because no Zyklon B was available to disinfect the camp’s new arrivals.

 

worlds-first-anti-holocaust-convention-1979-2063-professor-faurisson-pics

[Image] Professor Faurisson. For more than 20 years, Robert Faurisson has been Europe’s foremost Holocaust revisionist scholar. He was born on January 25, 1929, in Shepperton, England. His father was French and his mother was Scottish. As a boy and young man, he attended schools in Singapore, Japan, and in France. He was educated at a Lycée in Paris, and at the renowned Sorbonne. For his views Faurisson has repeatedly been a victim of physical assault. Between November 1978 and May 1993 he was a victim of ten attacks, at least nine of them carried out by Jewish thugs. None of the criminal assailants in any of these assaults has ever been brought to justice.

 

Sunday morning, Professor Faurisson delivered an address on the fraudulent gas chambers at Auschwitz. He compared the alleged asphyxiation of inmates to the execution of murderers in American prison gas chambers, pointing out that it was the neutralization of the gas which posed the most problems. In the US a full hour must pass before the gas chamber can be opened. The prisoner’s body must then be hosed down by a clean-up squad wearing gas masks and rubber gloves. Fans expel the almost neutralized gas into the atmosphere, but even then the risk is still so high that the guards must come down from their watchtowers to avoid the possibility of receiving a fatal dose of gas. The gas chamber itself must be hermetically sealed.

 

worlds-first-anti-holocaust-convention-1979-2068-rudolf-hoess-in-uniform

[Image] Rudolf Höss (center) was born in Baden-Baden on 25 November 1900, the son of pious Catholic parents. Höss was appointed as the first Commandant at Auschwitz concentration camp on 1 May 1940 and held this position until 1 December 1943 (3 years, 7 months). Höss was arrested by British military police near Flensburg, Schleswig- Holstein, on 2 March 1946, tortured and then handed over to the Polish authorities just over two months later.  He was executed by hanging on 7 April 1947, next to the house inside the Auschwitz camp, where he had lived with his wife and five children.

 

Faurisson asked the delegates to compare these precautionary measures with the account of Rudolf Hoss, one of the commandants of Auschwitz. In his “confession” to his Polish Communist jailers, Hoss stated the gas chamber operators entered the chamber immediately (sofort) after gassing 2,000 jews, while eating and drinking (and therefore not wearing gas masks). Faurisson demanded:

What kind of super-powerful fan could have evacuated the room so efficiently that it even removed the hydrocyanic acid (gas) from the entire room, from the pockets of air in between the bodies and from the walls, clothing, hair and bodies?

 

He then asked the audience to compare the Hoss confessions with the reality of the structures at Auschwitz. With a series of slides, some of which he obtained from the Auschwitz museum staff, Faurisson showed that the structure which is currently represented as a gas chamber is nothing of the sort. The entry to the room is not a hermetically sealed steel door, as described in Holocaust tracts. The “peephole” so frequently described is not in the gas chamber door, but in the door of an adjacent anteroom. Since there is an ordinary glass window high up in the gas chamber, Faurisson wondered why those being gassed could not have smashed their way our, or at the very least smashed the glass to allow the gas to escape.

 

 

Resolution unanimously adopted at the Revisionist Convention

 

We, the speakers, delegates and officers of the Institute for Historical Review 1979 Revisionist Convention, meeting at Los Angeles this September 2, after reviewing the evidence that the Germans killed six million Jews during World War II in an unprecedented act of genocide, and considering both sides of this question, as well as the evidence of genuine atrocities, resolve the following:

 

WHEREAS the facts surrounding the allegations that gas chambers existed in occupied Europe during World War II are demonstrably false, and

 

WHEREAS the whole theory of “the Holocaust” has been created by and promulgated by political Zionism for the attainment of political and economic ends, specifically the continued and perpetual financial support of the military aggression of Israel by the people of Germany and the U.S., and

 

WHEREAS the constantly escalating level of “Holocaust” propaganda distributed by the mass media and government agencies is poisoning the minds of the American people, especially youth, and

 

WHEREAS we are conscientiously concerned that this strident hate propaganda is seriously impeding the necessary peace, unity, brotherhood and understanding that we desire among all the peoples of the Western World; now therefore,

 

BE IT RESOLVED we urge that the Congress of the US investigate the whole question of war guilt, military aggression in the 20th century, the relationship of private political and banking interests with military aggression, deceitful wartime propaganda masquerading as fact, the real responsibility for war, twisted history, the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials, proven atrocities and genocide, such as the murder of thousands of Ukrainians and Poles at Vinnitsa in 1937 and Katyn in 1940 and the truth of the alleged extermination of six million Jews in Europe during World War II.

 

 

Most astonishing of all, Faurisson showed pictures of the far end of the gas chamber where there is an open doorway, but no door! In fact, it appears there was never a door. The doorway leads to the crematorium where corpses were incinerated. How was it, Faurisson asked, that the gas stayed in the room and did not flow out and gas the incinerator workers? And how was it that the Germans used hydrocyanic acid, which is inflammable and explosive, so near the ovens?

 

At regular intervals along the gas chamber walls were the remains of partitions which had previously divided the room into segments. Puzzled by this, Faurisson took the original German plans of the room to a specialist in mortuary construction in Paris, who took one look at them and said straight away that the structure was obviously a morgue. Part of it had been built underground to keep the bodies cool.

 

worlds-first-anti-holocaust-convention-1979-2064-katyn-massacre

[Image]  Katyn Massacre (1977). Louis FitzGibbon (1925 – 2003), a British scholar and humanitarian, was active for years in publicizing the suppressed truth about the 1940 killing of thousands of captured Polish officers by the Soviet secret police. Although the facts about the massacre are now well established, during the 1970s his efforts on behalf of justice and historical truth were considered controversial because many people still endorsed the World War II claim by the Allied powers that the gruesome wartime killings had been carried out by German authorities.

Source: http://www.revisionists.com/revisionists/fitzgibbon.html

 

Next on the program was Louis Fitz-Gibbon, the English author of Katyn, and half-brother of the pro-Holocaust writer Constantine Fitz-Gibbon (who translated the Hoss “confessions”). Louis presented a film about the Katyn massacre produced by the Polish Ex-Combatants Association in Britain. He then described his personal quest for 10,000 other missing Poles not found at Katyn. The author described how he had finally found what he was looking for, in the form of a KGB document which gave all the horrifying and clinical details of a similar massacre.

 

The final speaker of the morning session was Dr. Austin App, an elder statesman of the revisionist movement. The theme of his talk was the injustice of postwar reparations which pumped untold billions of dollars and marks into Israel – all, because of an “imaginary crime.

 

worlds-first-anti-holocaust-convention-1979-2049-dr-austin-j-app-pics

[Image] Dr. Austin J. App (1902-1984) was a German-American scholar, was a major revisionist author and publicist. App was the author of more than a thousand articles, columns and book reviews, which appeared in a wide range of American and European periodicals, as well as of eight books.

 

In the afternoon the delegates reassembled to listen to Devin Garrity, head of Devin-Adair publishing house, who spoke about his life-long struggle against censorship in the publishing industry.

 

John Bennett, an Australian civil liberties lawyer, gave a short talk on what he had been up to down under, publishing his own flyers and sending Butz’s books to libraries and historians.

 

worlds-first-anti-holocaust-convention-1979-2051-john-t-bennett-pics

[Image] John T. Bennett (1936-2013) was for decades well known in Australia as a vigorous and outspoken defender of civil liberties and freedom of speech and inquiry. He is also known as a Australia’s leading revisionist writer and publicist.

 

Bennett was drawn into the controversy when Australian Zionists tried to force a Palestinian radio program off the air. In the course of defending the Palestinians’ right of free speech, he found the Butz book was being suppressed by the same crowd. Bennett quoted a real gem from one of his critics, a Dr. Rubenstein:

Were the Holocaust shown to be a hoax, the number one weapon in Israel’s propaganda armory disappears.

 

The convention ended with a dramatic announcement from Willis Carto. He said the Institute for Historical Review was releasing a press statement offering a $50,000 reward to any person, anywhere in the world, who could prove that Nazis had operated gas chambers to exterminate Jews.

 

News of the reward, Carto stated, would be forwarded to the publishers of so-called “witness testimony” with the request that the witnesses step forward to have their evidence examined by a panel of knowledgeable investigators. As of November 25, no claimants for the reward had shown up. Carto also announced that the Institute would soon be starting a new publication journal of Historical Review to provide a platform for revisionists from around the world and that the first issue in the spring of 1980 would contain transcripts of the papers presented at the convention.*

 

Before the convention disbanded, the delegates were unanimous in expressing their profound thanks to the organizers for their foresight and courage. They had reason to only a few years ago such a meeting on such a subject would have been unthinkable.

 

 

* Subscriptions to the Journal of Historical Review cost $20 per year. But as an introductory offer charter subscribers will only be charged $16 and will also receive at no additional charge Katyn by Louis Fitz-Gibbon. The address is Institute for Historical Review, P.O. Box 1306, Torrance, CA 90505.

 

 

END

 

 

======================================

 

Click to download a PDF of this post (2.6 MB).

 

worlds-first-anti-holocaust-convention-1979

 

worlds-first-anti-holocaust-convention-1979-cover-ver-2

 

 

 

_____________________

 

Version History

 

Version 3Sep 30, 2016 — Some minor additions to text. Formatting.

 

Version 2Sep 28, 2016 — Added 13 images. Fixed some typos, formatting. Added PDF for download.

 

Version 1Sep 28, 2016 — Created post.

 

Read Full Post »

David Duke for Senate - COVER Ver 2

 

[In this short video, the champion of Whites, Dr. David Duke, announces his intention to run for the US Senate. He gives a summary of why he is doing so and what he stands for —  KATANA.]

 

 

 

David Duke

 

 

Announces for

 

 

US Senate

 

 

 

David Duke for Senate - VIDEO

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJ97gEFBH5k

 

Click on the above link, or copy the link into your browser to watch the video.

 

Published on July 22, 2016

 

YouTube Stats

 

Jul 28 — Views: 284,016 – Comments: 6,833 – Likes: [-]  Dislikes: [-]
Jul 27 — Views: 275,447 – Comments: 6,748 – Likes: [Disabled]  Dislikes: [Disabled]
Jul 25 — Views: 241,463 – Comments: 6,075 – Likes: 3,582  Dislikes: 12,600
Jul 24 — Views: 213,516 – Comments: 5,060 – Likes: 3,302  Dislikes: 10,875

 

 

Description

 

 

Dr. David Duke announces for U.S. Senate

 

__________________________

TRANSCRIPT

 

[2:46]

 

[00:00]

 

After the great outpouring of overwhelming support, I’m proud to announce my candidacy for the United States Senate!

I believe in equal rights for all and respect for all Americans.

However what makes me different, is I also demand respect for the rights and the heritage of European Americans.

I passed the only Bill in America forbidding affirmative action programs that racially discriminate against the best qualified.

Thousands of special interest groups stand up for African Americans, Mexican Americans, Jewish Americans, et cetera, et cetera.

The fact is, that European Americans need at least one man in the United States Senate.

One man in the Congress who will defend their rights and heritage!

We must stop the massive immigration and ethnic cleansing of the people whose forefathers created America.

I was the first major candidate in modern times to promote the term and policy of “America First”.

We cannot have free trade without fair trade. We must protect American jobs and businesses.

We must have total campaign reform. It’s time to end all political PAC money and the control of politics by the oligarchs of finance and media.

We must enforce antitrust laws to break up the anti-American huge media conglomerates.

The New York Times admitted that my platform became the GOP mainstream and propelled Republicans to control of Congress.

They sold us out!

I’m overjoyed to see Donald Trump!

And most Americans embraced most of the issues that I’ve championed for years.

My slogan remains, “America First”!

I’ve always said, “Equal rights for all, special interest for none”.

I’ve always oppose these wars that lead our nation to disaster.

I’ve supported fair trade.

The people of Louisiana and America must have at least one man in the Senate, who will never surrender! Never give up! Never sell out to the special interests!

The time is now!

A revolution is coming in the United States of America, for the real people, the vast majority of the American people!

We are going to go against the special interests!

We’re going to free our country, and we are going to change the politics of America!

 

 

[2:46]

 

 

END

 

_____________________

Version History

 

 

Version 2: Jul 25, 2016 — Replaced the “Davy Crocket” cover image! Yes, it was looking kind of dorky. Updated YouTube stats.

Version 1: Jul 24, 2016 — Created post.

Read Full Post »

London Forum - Alfred Schaefer - COVER

 

[In this 42 minute video Alfred Schaefer, a Canadian of German origin, delivers one of the best talks ever at the London Forum, with no punches pulled in laying bare the jewish engineered plan behind the on-going destruction of our societies. Alfred discusses the fraudulent nature of many sacred cows held dear by our psychologically manipulated societies, with special attention to the so-called “Holocaust” and jewish engineered 9/11.

He brings up how organized jewry is responsible for the European civil wars, known as WWI and WWII. And how, jewish monopoly over information has sought to control us through psychological warfare that uses “control words” that inhibit us from thinking outside their imposed frames of reference.      —  KATANA]

 

 

 

The London Forum

 

 

Alfred Schaefer

 

 

Psychological Warfare

 

 

 

London Forum - Alfred Schaefer - VIDEO

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stfDl5x-wHI

 

Click on the above link, or copy the link into your browser to watch the video.

 

Published on July 20, 2016

 

YouTube Stats

 

Sep 9 — Views: 2,276 – Likes: 92  Dislikes: 7
Aug 8 — Views: 1,423 – Likes: 69  Dislikes: 4
Aug 2 — Views: 1,206 – Likes: 66  Dislikes: 3
Jul 29 — Views: 1,017 – Likes: 63  Dislikes: 3
Jul 25 — Views: 683 – Likes: 50  Dislikes: 2
Jul 23 — Views: 517 – Comments: (disabled) – Likes: 41  Dislikes: 2

 

 

YouTube Description

 

 

A psychological warfare expert will explain what it is all about, its principles, its rules and its methods.  Framing, inverting and projecting may seem abstruse, but Alfred Schaefer has the knack of making everything easy to understand.  The Enemy has been extremely successful at demoralising us using such warfare, so it is about time we started using the same techniques in order to wake our people up and to get them to fight for the cause of civilization. Cognitive dissonance, the “star gatekeeper” Noam Chomsky — not just your average linguistics professor — will all be discussed.

 

__________________________

 

 

Contents

 

Introduction — Growing up in Canada; the Cold War; JFK’s Assassination.

 

WW II — Parents war-time experience in Germany; the growing demonization of Germans.

 

9/11 — Justifiable Blowback?; the realization of the deception of 9/11; WTC 7; Christopher Bollyn.

 

Brainwashing/Contamination of the Mind — the “Holocaust” propaganda  of Auschwitz, Dachau; the tension between the provable historical facts and evidence vs artificial world of mind contamination with lies.

 

Jewish Controlled Money System — deception and crime: 19th century opium wars in China; the imaginary “Holocaust”; Stanley Kubrick’s moon landing production; and the event of 9/11.

 

Digital Technology — the Internet; the challenge to jewish control over information; the revisionists.

 

Winning People Over to Our Side — Monika Schaefer’s short video, “Sorry Mom, I was Wrong about the Holocaust”; her family’s shocked reactions to this video illustrative of the conditioning and the nature of our problem.

 

How the “Holocaust” Has Become the New Original Sin and a Forced Religion — How people have been turned into zombies; the need for all people, including jews to expose what is going on.

 

The Methods and Tools Used to Control Us — Weaponized control words such as “anti-semitism”, or “hate speech”, or not “politically correct”.

 

Demonization of Muslims — How 19 Muslims with box-cutters were blamed for 9/11.

 

The Increasing Police State — how we are being conditioned to accept the Thought Police and its demands to obey.

 

The Importance of Destroying the Holocaust Lie — How the “Holocaust” lie is used to suppress resistance to the rule of the jewish psychopaths; it is essential to expose the lie.

 

Decontaminate Yourself from the Control Words — Thought laws, hate speech all of these words are meaningless jabber that the parasite has engineered to our minds.

 

We Must Stand Up and Expel the Parasites and Traitors — They have brought war and the destruction of our homelands; they have brought in the hordes of invaders.

 

Noam Chomsky, the Hyped Up Gatekeeper of the Left — A traitor who acts as a Pied Piper in leading people away from the truth about 9/11 and the JFK assassination.

 

Conclusion — The very worst thing that could possibly happen to me is that anybody, someone out there, would denounce me as being a “Holocaust” believer!

 

________________

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

 

[41:59]

 

[00:00]

 

Jez Turner: The next speaker is a video producer who produces videos and disseminates the truth via the Internet. Some of the famous videos are, “9/11 Brainwashing and the Lies“, and “Sorry Mom, I was Wrong about the Holocaust”.

He has broken all the laws in Germany, and he’s waiting for the knock on the door!

Okay! He’s a brave man! He’s a German-Canadian, he is Alfred Schaefer!

 

Alfred Schaefer: It’s my great pleasure and honor to be here today to speak to you at the London Forum. But the focus of my speech, talk, will be how weaponized words are being used in a psychological warfare against us.

 

London Forum - Alfred Schaefer - 1911 Brainwashing via media

 

OK. First I’d like to say a few words about myself and what motivates me to do what I am now doing. Iv had a very privileged life, spending the first twenty-five years of my life in Canada, in a German family. We thought we were growing up in a perfect world. We could not even begin to imagine that anyone could possibly want to do us any harm. Just to the south, we have the great and powerful United States of America as our protector from the evil communist Soviet Union! Which was, of course, the biggest threat in our minds at that time. I will just recount some of my earliest moments, memories to give you an idea of how certain events helped shape my perception of our world.

I remember coming home from school as an eight year old in Edmonton, Alberta, when my mom told me that President Kennedy had been shot. I was in grade three at the time and this message did surprise me. It had the same impact on me, as if I had just watched a house burn down. It struck me, but there was nothing I could do.

 

London Forum - Alfred Schaefer - 1897 Real Death Camps of WWII

 

Over the years, Mom and Dad would occasionally recount horror stories of their wartime experiences. And in school they started feeding us as a steady diet of war stories that seemed to make a joke out of anything that the Germans did. My mom often talked of Dresden and how nobody could imagine that anyone would bomb this magnificent cultural gem of a city that was jam-packed with refugees and had no military, whatsoever! It seemed like the safest place to be. No normal person could perceive any danger in those circumstances.

But my dad recounted his time in one of the [Eisenhower] death camps along the Rhine [River] after the war. He told us how they had used spoons to dig in the dirt to make a hole, just to sleep in, and just how awful that was. He told us of how formerly fit young men were dying every day! I wish I could remember more of the details that he told us so many years ago, but we were not really interested. We were more interested in listening to the Beatles music and all the other things that were fashionable at that time. That was in the sixty’s and seventy’s. We didn’t care so much about war stories.

These were the years when the hippie movement seem to come out of nowhere, along with the rock’n-roll scene; flower power was the new mantra; Woodstock. And then there was the Apollo moon landing — the awe and pride that I felt when I looked up at the moon and imagined Neil Armstrong gracefully moving around on the moon! I spent many hours in awe just thinking about that!

In the meantime in Canada the Germans were being portrayed more and more as inept and mindless brutes. World War Two movies and stories were the big subject in those times. Of course, with these messages forming our impressionable young minds we turned our backs on our parents when they told us about their own experiences from those horrible war years.

Now fast forward to September 11, 2001. My first thought about that fateful day was:

Wow! Looks like the Americans got what they deserved for their blind subservient support of Israel!”

This is called, “justifiable blowback”. I was convinced that the Americans, surely got wind of this plot and let it happen, as this would justify more military spending and wars for Israel’s benefit.

 

London Forum - Alfred Schaefer - 1899 911 Jet Fuel - That's a good one

 

It took ten long years before I began to understand how deep the lies of this deception really are. In 2011, I watched a video of WTC 7 coming down and that jolted me to dig deeper. I felt compelled to do whatever I could to counter this suffocating blanket of lies.

 

[05:03]

 

This period led me to a very valuable encounter with Christopher Bollyn, who had just written the book, “Solving 9/11: The Deception that Changed the World”[Click link to download PDF book]. He identified many of the Jewish individuals and the role they played in this false flag attack! His work led him to be attacked himself by a team of heavily armed undercover police in front of his own home in Schaumburg, Illinois in August of 2006. The subsequent kangaroo court trial convinced him to go into exile, as staying in the United States would have resulted in certain incarceration and probable death.

 

London Forum - Alfred Schaefer - 1898 Solving 911

 

That was my luck in a way, since he was key in helping me greatly advance my understanding of how these deceptions are engineered. Without him having been in exile, I would never have met him.

To replace the false narrative which had been seared into my mind of what had supposedly happened on 9/11 with an understanding of the stark reality and that we now need to deal with, was a traumatizing transition for me to make. I did not sleep very well and this captured all of my attention.

Now let’s fast forward to this moment in 2016. We often think of “brainwashing”. But a more appropriate term from the condition of believing in false narratives would be “contamination of the mind”. The toxic lies contaminate our minds. They do not wash our brain!

 

Audience: Yes, yes.

 

Alfred: Brainwashing” sounds something clean and proper. “Contamination” better describes the induced mental illness that results from the toxins of the lies. That is why I will talk about contamination of the mind, rather than “brain washing”. I’ll give you an example of a symptom of this contamination of the mind. Several years ago, a couple of twenty-two year Canadian youngsters visited us in Germany. Instead of visiting the many rich cultural sites and engaging in the wonderful opportunities that Bavaria offers, such as the hiking, the museums, the castles, the artisans and so forth, the most important thing that they wanted to see was Dachau! Let’s have a look at what those German monsters did to those poor innocent Jews!

 

London Forum - Alfred Schaefer - 1915 Dachau Entrance

[Image] The entrance to Dachau after being taken over by the US Army.

 

Now, why would anyone want to waste their time to see some stage props with descriptions that have little, or nothing to do with historical reality? It’s like going to a Hollywood horror movie and thinking it is real! In the old days, if you are a good Catholic you would make a pilgrimage to the Vatican; if you are a good Muslim you would make a pilgrimage to Mecca. Nowadays, if you believe the lies that have contaminated our brains by the Jewish media, you make your pilgrimage to Dachau or to Auschwitz!

 

Audience: [applause]

 

London Forum - Alfred Schaefer - 1900 Buchenwald display lampshade

[Image] Propaganda display at Buchenwald Concentration Camp showing shrunken heads, pieces of tattooed skin and a lampshade claimed to be made from human skin (actually pig skin?). 

 

Alfred: That way, you have rounded up and completed your education about the shrunken heads, soap and lampshades. You fly deeper and deeper into the abyss of a fantasy world so remote and so detached from all reality! What this is leading to can be equated with the following scenario. Imagine two tectonic plates moving in opposite directions. They are locked together, but the stress on the fault line increases inexorably as the plates move. In fact, the rate of movement of the plates as now, in 2016, is noticeably accelerating. One plate is the plate of provable historical facts and of empirical evidence. The other plate consists of an artificial world of mind contaminated with lies, hatred, incitement, control words, fluoride, apathy gender confusion, fear and so much more!

 

Audience: [applause]

 

Alfred: Every day that this release of tension is delayed the greater will be the destruction as the pent-up energy runs it’s course. This is always the case with two moving tectonic plates snap at the fault line! Or another way to describe our present situation, is as follows. Imagine for a moment, we’re living in a large house. This house consists of what we have been led to believe is our reality. The entire house and it’s infrastructure has been built by a jewish controlled money system. This system has reached it’s present size, because it has depended on deception and crime of a magnitude that normal human beings find it difficult to comprehend. Just to name several of the more lucrative milestones of this jewish money system mentioned: 19th century opium wars in China; the imaginary “Holocaust”; Stanley Kubrick’s moon landing production; and the event of 9/11.

 

[10:01]

 

Now, a new variable has entered the equation. And this new variable is enabling us to see through what has really been happening. In other words we are now able to detoxify ourselves from the lies that we have been fed all of our lives from the day we were born!

The walls of this construction, this house of lies, are crumbling as we speak! As the crumbling progresses, more and more light comes in. Some people think they can hide deep inside this crumbling construct. Just “duck and cover” and all will be fine. But it does not work that way. This construct of lies is coming down, whether we like it or not!

 

Audience: [applause]

 

Alfred: This is a systemic and an exponential process. So no wishful thinking can stop it. Remember, we did not choose this scenario, we were born into it. It has been imposed on us! In the end, we will all find ourselves out in the open, in the bright light of the truth and reality. We will not be asked, if we like it, or not. It is what it is and we need the brightest and best to deal with this, in such a way that we can survive as a people on whatever it is we have left.

Prior to the new variable of digital technology appearing on the stage, those select individuals who did understand and tried hard to expose the lies, were hopelessly overwhelmed! They could not disseminate their message to the outside world on any scale that would have been a meaningful challenge to the jewish saturation control over all the information we were exposed to. Some of the names that come to mind are; Robert Faurisson, Fred Leuchter, Germar Rudolf, Ernst Zundel, William Luther Pierce and many, many more, I cannot possibly name them all here today.

 

London Forum - Alfred Schaefer - 2281 Faurisson Zundel Pierce Rudolf Leuchter Rizoli

 

Okay, that is a summary of our situation. We need to understand the tools and tricks that the enemy uses in order to help as many people as possible to understand and join our side. Our survival depends on our success! Each person that we win over is one more for us and one less for them. Let me give you an example of how this contamination of the mind and the induced mental illness can play out. Okay, so don’t be surprised, you might experience it yourself.

A couple of weeks ago my sister Monika and I visited old family friends in Germany. We have just uploaded Monika’s new video titled, “Sorry Mom, I was Wrong about the Holocaust”.

 

Monika Schaefer Interview - 1002 VIDEO Sorry Mom I was Wrong about the Holocaust

 

Audience: [laughter]

 

Alfred: This video, a very short video, six minutes long. In one month now, it’s got 50,000 views, and will get more [as of Aug 11, 2016, it has 86,065 views] .

 

Audience: [applause]

 

Alfred: This video consists of my sister apologizing to our deceased mother. I know how bad Monika felt for her blaming our parents for not stopping those “evil Nazis” for the “Holocaust”. And this video certainly helped her to now neutralize this false and imposed guilt. The people we visited are your typical “duck and cover” types. They always know how to evade inconvenient subjects and always look very righteous about their lives and their own opinions. To get them to watch the video at all, I had to use a little deceptive tricks myself and told them that we would like to show them a new video that we had just made. It was of Monika playing a violin. Monika warned them before we started:

But there is some talking in it is about Alfred’s favorite subject”.

So, we set the laptop up on the living room table and pressed the play button. Monika started playing her violin and then goes into her heartfelt apology to our Mom’s spirit, since she is no longer with us. When she comes to the line describing the gas chamber deaths and states:

Now I know why she did not know of these things! It’s because these things just did not happen!”

 

Audience: [loud applause]

 

Alfred: The female friend jumped up, screaming hysterically:

Not with us! Get out of this house! Now! Leave! We have our own opinions and you are not going to change this!”

The door slammed shut and her dad reinforced, what her daughter just screamed at us, saying:

We have known for a long time that Alfred is totally lost! But you Monika? How could you? How can you change? You cannot change our opinions and don’t even try!”

Okay, I might sound cold and callous now, but I will say it anyway. This entire episode affected me about as much as if I was watching a laboratory rat doing back-flips after having been trained to do so, when the particular control buttons are pressed!

 

Audience: [loud laughter, applause]

 

Alfred: I found this a valuable exercise to illustrate the nature of our problem. People who we would think are normal intelligent fellow human beings can be triggered to behave like conditioned laboratory rats, and at the push of a button do to back-flips, or to behave like a zombie.

 

[15:04]

 

I will now read you the translation from the letter that my sister Monika received a few days later from the sister of the zombie that tried to throw us out of the house.

 

Audience: [laughter]

 

Alfred: There was no, “Dear Monika” or “Alfred” just “Alfred and Monika”.

Yesterday, after consulting with my sister, we watched the video that you made, entitled, ‘Sorry Mom’. The statements that you made denying the Holocaust are lies! Absolutely abhorrent and revolting! You are engaged in sneaky criminal agitation!

People like you are responsible for spreading the reactionary National Socialist ideology in Europe that is leading to the spread of a hatred, instead of spreading peace to the world! With your lies you are spreading precisely that which you think you are preventing. And Germany will once again be hated in the world!

Because I came home too late yesterday and could not prevent my sister and my parents from watching your shameful campaign, I feel compelled to do what he is now necessary! As of immediately, I prohibit you from any further contact with me, or my family!”

End of letter.

Okay. Okay, that letter reminded me of an old James Bond movie when 007 had to deal with some apparatchik parroting the party line. She was fanatical and blind as the enemy would expect of it’s obedient little soldiers. A good zombie will not think, only obey.

 

Audience: [applause]

 

Alfred: What this illustrates is how this contamination of the mind turns what was once a normal human being into a seriously mentally ill and possibly dangerous zombie. What this person is doing is projecting her own characteristics onto anyone who is possibly threatening their belief system. Regardless of what the evidence shows. In fact, they stated their position quite clearly:

We have our own opinions and nothing you show us will change this”.

It has become a religious belief. It is as if the original sin of the Christians has been replaced by the original sin of the imaginary “Holocaust”. This is the foundation of the new and forced religion of our times!

A big problem that we need to deal with now, is how to prevent countless zombies like this woman, who really do want to be good people, from committing suicide, or going berserk when the truth does come crashing down in their face!

 

Audience: [applause]

 

Alfred: Their children, their colleagues, or someone will expose the evidence to them again at some time in the very near future. If their reaction to this one monumental lie is as I have just described it, then what will be the reaction of people like her, when almost everything they have been led to believe turns out to be a monumental lie! Those who react as this woman did are burdened with the additional weight of having behaved like a zombie when first confronted with something that can no longer be evaded.

All of us in this room here today, are here today, because we know that the world around us is not the world we are being told that it is, and that something is seriously wrong.! We have the advantage of already being farther along on the road to understanding what is going on, including any agent that might be with us.

Let me say a few words regarding Jews and those who are working for them, no matter where you come from, whatever your background, it is never too late to acknowledge the fact as you connect the dots of a more complete picture.

 

Audience: [applause]

 

Alfred: Come to the side of truth, no matter what it is and focus all your energy on extricating us out of this impossible situation that we now find ourselves in. We are all in this together! There are many very good people from all sides who have come to understand the truth and who are doing everything in their power to expose what is going on.

For example. Gerard Menuhin, the son of the world-famous Jewish violinist Yehudi Menuhin, recently wrote the book, “Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil”*. He writes:

The Holocaust is the biggest lie in history! Germany has no blame for the Second World War!”

 

London Forum - Alfred Schaefer - 1915 Tell the Truth Shame the Devil

 

—————

*[Have you ever asked yourself why the world won’t come to rest? Why your parents, grandparents or great-grandparents had to die in wars that never should have occurred in the first place? This book holds the answer . . .

Behind the scenes, events are controlled by a coterie of ethnic puppet masters who work their marionettes in high places out of public view. How did this world get to the dark place it is today? Who could have stopped it and what can we do today?

The book consists of three sections. The first section concerns Adolf Hitler, and the real causes leading up to the outbreak of WWII.

The second section enlarges on the activities of the real culprits, provides a historical overview of their progress, their nature, their power over finance and the media, and the methods by which they achieved it.

The third section concerns the First and Second World Wars (what the author refers to as “the Second Thirty Years War“), their conception, funding and inescapable continuity; current laws against freedom of expression, and the evolution of the Orwellian state; the importance of U.S. support for the Soviet Union throughout the Cold War, and Communism’s significance in the plan; the true origins of the enemy; Palestine’s occupation and its fate as an example of our common fate; plus much more.

The text is interspersed with “Memos from Today,” that emphasize its relevance by citing current events.

Hundreds of quotes are included from a wide range of authoritative sources, original and translated. The last pages of this manuscript comprise conclusions and predictions.

The author is the son of the great American-born violinist Yehudi Menuhin, who, though from a long line of rabbinical ancestors, fiercely criticized the foreign policy of the state of Israel and its repression of the Palestinians in the Holy Land.]

Source: Amazon

————————–

 

He also makes a case for Adolf Hitler being the only statesman in the modern era who could have liberated the enslaved people of planet Earth from the clutches of organized Zionism.

 

Audience: [loud, long applause]

 

Alfred: In other words, the lies are finished! The lemmings may not yet have noticed, but sooner than many people can imagine, they will. And when they do, they will do as lemmings do. They will all turn at once!

 

[19:57]

 

So, when we speak to people we must make it clear in everything we say and do, that holding onto the lies is, at best, very stupid, and at worst, high treason and will be dealt with as such! Britain’s foremost World War Two correspondent, Douglas Reed, predicted sixty years ago the very situation we now find ourselves in. He was writing about the, “behind the scenes” controlling of events and information by Jewish Zionists, or Rothschild agents.

 

Douglas Reed

[Image] Prolific author, Douglas Reed.

 

Now, I would like to go over some of the basic tools, or methods employed by the enemy. Understanding this helps us to become immune to this. If you were a scientist working on a cure for a particular disease, then the first thing that you must do is learn how the disease actually works. If you go back to before the second Jewish assault on Europe, known as World War Two, and look at the incitement that was taken place leading up to this assault, you will find many parallels with the incitement we see today that has been directed at Libya, Syria, Iran and Russia. Those countries that are in line for subjugation are vilified with labels describing the characteristics that could be an accurate description of the predatory parasite itself! A good example of this, is the imaginary Iranian nuclear weapons program that the Jewish controlled media has been screaming about while calling any reference to Israel’s proven nuclear arsenal and weapons program, “anti-semitic”!

 

London Forum - Alfred Schaefer - 2283 US Aircraft Carrier with Israeli Flag on to Iran

 

Audience: [applause]

 

Alfred: So, in a nutshell, all references to anything negative that describes the parasitic predator is framed as being “anti-semitic”. And we have been indoctrinated to believe that to be “anti-semitic” is worse than being a serial rapist, or murderer.

Another example of framing is, “Hitler gassed six million jews!” Hitler did not gas six million Zionists, Hitler did not gas six million communists, nor six million Neocons. No! He gassed six million jews! Jews must always be framed as the victims! They can do no wrong. If jews are framed with something bad then the accuser is framed as being “anti-semitic”, and if need be, an anti-semitic Holocaust denier! And that is the most lethal of these weaponized control words.

Any jews in power today may be framed, or labeled as “Zionists”. The label “jew” is not permitted by the Thought Police.

You can find books about communism that are hundreds of pages thick and the word “jew” will mark appear once! Yet, communism is an entirely jewish construct, just as our multi-party democratic system is a jewish construct!

 

Audience: [applause]

 

Alfred: All of these parties are controlled by jews. There are no exceptions. This statement alone will be countered with the weaponized control forward of “anti-semitism”, or “hate speech”, or not “politically correct”. These weaponized control words are designed to channel any and all of the thought away from this reality.

It is these weaponized control words that are paralyzing us and preventing our instincts for survival from kicking in. Understanding, immunizes us from their paralyzing effect. And that is the first step on the road to self-defense and self-preservation.

 

London Forum - Alfred Schaefer - 1915 The March of Tyranny

 

It is helpful now, in 2016 to learn how this thing, projection of characteristics works by looking back to the year 2001. The year 2001 has been seared into our minds by the pictures that we saw on the television screens and by the hysterical warnings we were pounded with, with regard to those “evil Muslims” who had taken down those two skyscrapers that were actually three skyscrapers. They did all this with box cutters. We were warned repeatedly how the Muslim terrorists who did this are hiding amongst us and have sleeper cells everywhere.

What’s interesting, is that if, you know, nothing about the Muslims and know nothing about the jews, then you can actually learn a great deal about the jews, just by paying attention to the warnings we were getting about the Muslims in the jewish media. Which is basically all the media. All these warnings about “sleeper cells” that are ready to spring into action when called upon. “Sleeper cells” is the perfect description of the jewish sayanim, who are jews who understand their first loyalty and who will do whatever it is asked of them, when a fellow jew ask for it. It will usually be something totally harmless, like renting a car for another agent, or putting someone up in the spare bedroom, because they have work to do in the area, or maybe provide them some useful intelligence.

The framing and projecting of these characteristics onto the Muslim population has the same effect on the Muslims as did the framing and projecting of the Holocaust myth onto the Germans after the great jewish assault on Europe, commonly known as World War One and Two.

 

[25:00]

 

Muslims keep quiet about the false accusations targeting them, because they fear the repercussions of those who believe these false accusations. And they don’t want to be blamed for these things, by talking about it.

Germans keep quiet about the false accusations targeting them, because they fear the “thought laws” that prohibit looking at the evidence and they don’t want to be blamed as being the very worst thing in the world you could possibly be, a “Holocaust” denier!

Many of the innocent jews keep quiet about the false accusations targeting the non-jews by their fellow jews, because the they either believe these lies themselves, or are afraid of the repercussions if they do open their mouths and be blamed for being a “self-hating jew“.

Another aspect of 9/11 that is seldom talked about is the following. After the jewish false flag attack of 9/11 we had all kinds of new security measures being imposed on us. Particularly in the area of transportation, with new screening devices at airports and ever more intrusive measures being imposed on us. Now about this, most of the security companies involved are jewish owned. Jews did 9/11, so they know very well that there is no danger whatsoever coming from any of the passengers who want to fly, since the passengers had nothing to do with any of these spectacles. So, besides making a lot of money in the security business, what other object could they have? I believe the most important objective of this entire exercise has been to condition the masses to submit to higher authority!

The objective was to change the relationship between the citizen and the state. The masses are being conditioned to grovel at the behest of anyone in a security uniform. Professors, doctors, teachers and engineers are being conditioned to grovel and ask no questions when a semi-illiterate brute in a uniform demands subservience.

 

Audience: [applause]

 

Alfred: This condition eventually permeates all layers of society. Those individuals who resist are weeded out. Even schools, those children who are inquisitive and energetic and independent thinkers are quickly isolated and put on medication. Where will any potential leaders come from if they are weeded out and sedated at an early age?

Our enemy is creating a mass of couch potatoes and lemmings with contaminated minds that are easy to control. Our friend who jumped up and scream at us in a hysterical fit is a good example of successful conditioning. Our enemy would be very proud of her! She could snitch on us and collect an award of a few shekels, or something, for denouncing a couple of Holocaust deniers. She continues to believe in the shrunken heads, soap and lampshades. But all of this has no future! She may become suicidal when she understands that she has become a useful idiot of the psychopaths.

So, our big challenge this is how to reach as many people as possible and help them come out of their trance-like condition. They have been conditioned to project onto others their own characteristics, and we have to reflect it back to them in such a way that they can see themselves for what they are. I always like to reassure them, that I too, was a zombie until quite recently. I think most of us in this room probably were and that’s and, you know, we come we come out of this condition and it’s a very liberating thing. Just as she accused us of being reactionary and engaged in sneaky criminal agitation, we need to stay calm and continue to expose the hard evidence, explaining over and over again the methods being used against us. We must never tire of repeating the message! Why does Coca-Cola tell you to drink Coca-Cola if they told you that one hundred thousand times before? Because they want to hard wire that message into your brain.

To undo the lies that have been hardwired into the brains of the contaminated minds of our fellow human beings is not done with a once over wipe. It would be like trying to wipe away a message that has been chiseled into a granite stone. That takes some time and hard work. It is a bit like if you plant a seed. You put some water on and stand back a bit, give it some time then come back and make sure it continues to get water and whatever else it needs to grow.

We can try to reach as many of the contaminated minds as possible, by understanding these aspects. To reach the psychopath, a psychopath is a different story. They cannot be. They can only be isolated and disarmed. When communicating with a psychopath, one needs to understand their characteristics in order not to be totally overwhelmed and defeated.

 

[30:01]

 

One of the most important characteristics is a fact that if you allow a psychopath to retain a single one of his lies, he retains all of his power over you. The psychopath will have you dancing circles around his lie, and your position will remain irrelevant. And that’s the whole purpose of the Holohoax law. That with that lie they will always have us and that’s why it has to come down!

In most functioning systems of justice, if the witness has been proven to deliberately be lying, his entire testimony is thrown out. There’s a reason for that. Now back to our psychopath and the imaginary Holocaust. The jewish people will always rule over us with this lie, if we let it stand, since any argument on anything can be brought down, if the Jew brings up this lie and have you dance around it. How can you talk about anything, if the jews simply declare that you a Holocaust denier? And that is that! You are banished and evil! Go to jail and be thankful it is only jail, soon it will be death!

 

Audience: [applause]

 

Alfred: Our greatest hope lies in the explosive increase in the number of people who are becoming aware of this “mother of all lies”! When this lie falls, as it will, then all the other Jewish lies will go down in the vortex that this creates. So we need to focus on decontaminating those who need decontamination.

These people have been demoralized. In this demoralized condition he can no longer make sense out of the facts. Their brains have been compartmentalized and facts no longer follow any logical process. Simple control words stop thought processes and trigger wild reactions. This is what we witnessed when we were hysterically screamed at by our friends for simply revealing a few truths.

Cognitive dissonance” is a term used to describe the condition of believing in two, or more contradictory concepts without question. It is cognitive dissonance, for example, for engineers to pretend that there is nothing wrong with three buildings coming down at free fall speed on 9/11, while always talking about two buildings. In his cognitive dissonance when these same people who cannot count to three believe they can count all the way to six million and believe that hoax!

 

London Forum - Alfred Schaefer - Jews blowing up 911

 

Audience: [loud applause]

 

Alfred: It is cognitive dissonance when no questions are asked when young healthy men in massive numbers are flooding into our countries and we are told they are refugees that need our help!

No healthy society would ever accept a single one of the things that I just listed!

So that, gives us a picture of just how dire our collective mental health is in our Western countries. Our brains have become so them contaminated by the demoralization that we now have ever more people who seem to be confused even about their own gender!

 

Dees - Transgender Bathrooms

 

This is the condition that had to be created for the final phase of our own extermination that we are now witnessing. The parasite that has taken us to this level is now desperately trying to ensure that we will be incapable of waking up to defend ourselves. That parasite is suffering from the delusion that it will succeed. But the likelihood of the parasite succeeding is as likely as a tapeworm that lives in your intestines succeeding in taking over your body by going into your eyes and ears and brain to in order to control you! You would fall over dead and that would be the end of the tapeworm.

In our case we are supposed to be a mass of soulless, dumbed down consumers too weak to think for ourselves. Whenever an individual does think and diagnose the problem, there are ready defenses that the parasite has constructed to neutralize these counterattacks. The weaponized control words are fired at the counter-attacker: Racist, anti-semite, Holocaust denier, politically incorrect, etc, etc, etc, or controversial to talk about.

You know, you have successfully decontaminated yourself when the control words they use against us have no more effect on you, than water running off the back of a duck! Any and all and control words need to be reduced in your mind to this level — no reaction whatsoever!

The only thing that is of any interest to us is facts! Opinions, thought laws, hate speech all of these words are meaningless jabber that the parasite has engineered to our minds!

Our only chance for surviving the imminent future, but understanding who we are and what we are. We are Europeans who have been tricked into massive European civil wars by this parasitic entity! There is absolutely no way, that we, as brothers and sisters would ever have carried out the unspeakable atrocities of the past centuries, if it were not for the total manipulation of our collective perception of what is going on, along with the insidious manipulation of our politicians turning them into traitors of their own people.

 

Audience: [applause]

 

[35:00]

 

Alfred: As digital technology helps us to decontaminate our minds from the toxins of the lies, our self-preservation instinct and our former spirit will kick in and we will deal with the traitors and neutralize the parasites. When we understand that we are be indigenous peoples of Europe, we will defend the land and the water and the resources of our ancestral homelands!

 

Audience: [applause]

 

Alfred: We cannot allow hordes of invaders into our lands.! We cannot allow the poisoning of our water by fracking for short-term monetary gain for some parasitic international oil companies.

 

Audience: [applause]

 

Alfred: After all is said and done, if we don’t stand up now and wake up our fellow brothers and sisters we will lose the only homeland that we have. It cannot be that British people have areas of their homeland that they can no longer go to, because the invaders have now declared these areas, “No go areas” for the indigenous people. This is the same for the French people, the Swedish people, or any European people. This is the first day of the rest of our lives and if we refuse to stand up, we stand idly by as we are being prepared for our own destruction.

OK that’s the part.

I was supposed to tell you a little bit about Noam Chomsky, the gatekeeper. Do we have time for that, or is the time up?

London Forum - Alfred Schaefer - 1942 Noam Chomsky - Left Wing Gatekeeper

[Image] Noam Chomsky, a jewish “intellectual” worshipped by the American Left, directs his followers to, “Move along. Nothing to see here!” when it comes to 9/11.

Okay, you know, Noam Chomsky is a guy who is hyped up. People here might not have heard about him that much. In Germany nobody has ever heard of him. But in North America, Noam Chomsky was a god like professor who was the gatekeeper for the Left. And it turns out that he was a complete treasonous traitor. He’s like an icon. There are so many books have been written and so forth. So I’m going to read this thing that I’ve prepared about Noam Chomsky.

Noam Chomsky was for us in North America like an icon. Many books were published in his name. These books were usually critical of Israel’s behavior as well as the US relationship with Israel. He may not even be known here in the UK. I know in Germany nobody has ever heard of him, but in Canada and the US he was “the man”. Everyone who considered themselves politically alert knew Chomsky and probably have a number of his books. In hindsight, it is clear why that is the case. He was set up all along to be the Pied Piper of all dissidents of official government policy in the US.

 

Monika Schaefer Interview - 1884 Pied Piper Chomsky

[Image] Noam Chomsky has acted as a gatekeeper by deceiving his followers through deflecting attention away from the true perpetrators (organized jewry) of 9/11.

 

He had been through the Tavistock Institute, which specializes in behavior control of the masses. This used to be called, “Wellington House” and this played a central role in shaping public opinion throughout the West, since a long time ago. Tavistock instructs the directions of the think tanks so much more. As a Pied Piper, his job was to lead his flock into the wilderness wherever the need arises. He has done this with the Kennedy assassination and with 9/11.

It was a video I saw in late 2013 where a student in a Florida university, asked “Mr Chump” what he had to say about WTC 7 at 9/11. His evasive response in this video clearly revealed that he was knowingly deceiving and betraying American students. This was so egregious and so enraged me, that I had to write him an e-mail expressing this anger.

Through a little bit of trickery I got a response from him the very next day. This exchange went back and forth for a few days and was the raw database for me for my first video titled, “9/11 Gatekeeper and Controlled Opposition” which I uploaded at the end of May, 2014. In fact, in his response to me he revealed many important aspects of what our opponent’s strategy is when dealing with us. Knowing this helps us to see through it and resist falling for it.

 

Monika Schaefer Interview - 1892 Gatekeepers VIDEO

[Image] 9/11 Gatekeepers and Controlled Opposition

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-bHcfxO5y8

 

Let me give you an example of what happened. To my question about him, what he feels in his heart when he sees the victims of 9/11 asking for a proper investigation, his reply to me was, and I quote — this was November 7, 2013:

It requires extraordinary arrogance for you, yo think that you have the right to speak for the victims of 9/11. You can, if you like, live with the illusion that you are part of a great mass movement, rather than a small and isolated claque, your problem not mine.

So this sentence reveals so much of their entire strategy we can see all the time. When they try to always isolate everyone who is exposing the truth as nut cases, individuals, and that just isn’t the case. We are a growing mass of people and we are growing exponentially and there is no stopping it!

 

Audience: [applause]

[39:55]

 

Alfred: Okay, I’ll just get through this here. Another thing about eyewitnesses. The lemmings often defend their position with the reference to, “What about the eyewitnesses?” Well, eyewitnesses, is one of those things. If you can fool someone to believe something and truly believe it, because you have fooled them into believing it. That’s how they drag these 95 year olds into courts in Germany, because you can tell any old person all kinds of things and they’ll actually believe it after a while.

You can tell a small child. You can see you can show a child a fake picture of something or, for example, a small child dining with Queen Elizabeth or something. And later tell them, you know, you had tea with Queen Elizabeth and they believe it. And they will really believe it, because they saw the picture and in their mind it and they’ll concoct all kinds of details, minute details about their imagination, imaginary dinner with the Queen. And that is what eyewitness accounts are. Well as we know, they are just fabrications. People who can give these accounts actually, might actually believe it, but that’s all it is. Bullshit!

 

Audience: [applause]

 

Alfred: Well, I’m going to close off with a final statement. Today in the year 2016, the very worst thing that could possibly happen to me is that anybody, someone out there would denounce me as being a Holocaust believer! The worse thing!

 

Audience: [long applause]

 

Jez Turner: He’s a thinker! … Alfred the fighter for truth. He’s Alfred the great! He’s Alfred Schaefer!

 

 

[41:59]

 

 

END

 

 

_________________________

 

NOTES

 

 

=====================================

 

Click to download a PDF of this post (5.0 MB).

 

London Forum – Alfred Schaefer – Psychological Warfare – TRANSCRIPT Ver 3

 

London Forum - Alfred Schaefer - COVER

 

 

_____________________

 

Version History

 

 

Version 9: Aug 9, 2016 — Added Contents list. Added image of Chomsky. Added Ver 3 of PDF.

 

Version 8: Aug 8, 2016 — Typos. Updated YouTube stats.

 

Version 7: Aug 3, 2016 — Added some missing words. Updated PDF to Ver 2.

 

Version 6: Aug 2, 2016 — Added cartoon image of transgender bathrooms.

 

Version 6: Jul 31, 2016 — Added cartoon image of jews blowing up the WTC on 911.

 

Version 5: Jul 30, 2016 — Added PDF for download.

 

Version 4: Jul 29, 2016 — Added more images. Typos and Formatting. Updated YouTube stats.

 

Version 3: Jul 27, 2016 — Added more images. Added audio times. Updated YouTube stats. Typos and Formatting.

 

Version 2: Jul 24, 2016 — Added 3 images. Added links. Updated my intro. Formatting.

 

Version 1: Jul 23, 2016 — Created post.

Read Full Post »

Monika Schaefer Interview - COVER Ver 2

 

[In this 53 minute interview Glaring Hypocrisy’s founding editors Sean Madden and Mufidah Kassalias talk with Monika Schaefer on the reaction she’s received since her YouTube video, “Sorry Mom, I was wrong about the Holocaust” was released on June 15.

In that short five minute video Monika Schaefer, a middle aged German-Canadian woman gives a belated, yet heartfelt apology to her deceased parents for the times when she reproached them and the German people for failing to stop the “Holocaust” from happening.

It has only been in the last couple of years that Monika has done the research and concluded that the “Holocaust” is, in fact, the: “Biggest and most pernicious and persistent lie in all of history!” Her parents knew nothing of the so-called “Death camps” for the simple reason that they did NOT exist, they were only labour camps.

In this interview Monika discusses how she came, with guidance from her brother, Alfred, to her revisionist views on the “Holocaust”, on 9/11 and other world events that have been engineered by organized jewry. Sean, Mufidah and Monika all agree there is an urgent need for people to “wake up” to the large scale deceptions that are being carried out against us all.

The reactions of her family, relatives, friends and the community in her small town of Jasper, Alberta, Canada are also discussed —  KATANA.]

 

 

 

 

 

 

Glaring Hypocrisy Interview

 

 

with

 

Truth-Teller Monika Schaefer

 

 

 

Click on the above link, or copy the link into your browser to listen to the audio.

Published on Jul 15, 2016

 

YouTube Stats

 

Oct 28 — Views: 2,280 – Comments: [disabled] – Likes: 53  Dislikes: 13
Jul 27 — Views: 1,677 – Comments: [disabled] – Likes: 40  Dislikes: 9
Jul 22 — Views: 1,253 – Comments: 180 – Likes: 34  Dislikes: 8
Jul 21 — Views: 1,161 – Comments: 149 – Likes: 33  Dislikes: 8
Jul 19 — Views: 1,043 – Comments: 100 – Likes: 32  Dislikes: 8
Jul 18, 2016 — Views: 860 – Comments: 101 – Likes: 30  Dislikes: 7

 

Description

 

On June 17, 2016, Monika Schaefer, a native-born Canadian citizen of German parents, posted a brief video to YouTube entitled “Sorry Mom, I was wrong about the Holocaust”.

This led to a fellow citizen of Jasper, Alberta (Canada) filing a complaint with the Alberta Human Rights Commission. Although we watched Monika’s video shortly after it was published to YouTube, we only learned of the formal complaint and general local backlash on Thursday July 14, the same day we recorded this nearly hour-long Skype interview with her.

We recommend you take the six minutes to watch Monika’s above video — so you can hear her in her own words, and get a taste of her love for music and life. You’ll then be well-equipped to listen to our below interview with this gentle yet courageous truth-teller who has managed to free herself from the stifling birdcage of countless Jew World Order lies so that truth itself can soar unhindered to the minds of many others.

 

 

Transcript

 [52:46 min]

 

 

[00:00]

 

Monika Schaefer Interview - 1001 Glaring Hypocrisy Founders

 

Sean: Welcome to the program. And so, we just found out about this today. Give us a little bit of background in terms of how this started playing out for you. We know that the video itself came out almost a month ago. And what what was the response during the past months in total, and then, when did this start sort of blowing up locally for you?

 

Monika Schaefer Interview - 1002 VIDEO Sorry Mom I was Wrong about the Holocaust

 

Monika: OK. Thanks so much and thanks for the opportunity to talk about it and also thank you for all the work that you are doing. Yeah, so it took only a few days after it was posted before I started to get some. Indication that the people in my small town were were reacting and it was just fine reached a fury of reaction.

So, because it was on Facebook and, you know, I have some local Facebook friends and I think it was quite surprised and shocked them and I did have some people terminate our friendship and others, you know, just saying they respect my right of free speech, but they don’t necessarily agree.

And then there were others who who made all kinds of comments under the Facebook postings that were really quite harsh towards me. And, you know, they think I’ve taken leave of my senses and basically think I have been put under the spell of some very, very bad people and that kind of thing! That type of argument I respond back and say, I am one hundred percent responsible for what I have done and for my views on this subject. So I’m not knowing that, you know, them to sort of peg this “blame” of what I’ve done on anybody else. And I mean I put “blame” in quotation marks.

 

Sean: Of course.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

The Holo Lie - 0000 COVER

 

[Horst Mahler describes the creation of the Nuremberg Trials by American jews and how the trials were kangaroo courts that lynched the Germans  — KATANA.]

 

 

The Holocaust Lie

 

Made in America

 

 

circa 2006

 

[Sourcehttp://www.adelaideinstitute.org/HomePage28April2009/holocaust_lie/holocaust_lie.htm]

 

 

No one denies that America and Germany incarcerated certain fractions of their populations under guard as war measures in the 1940s.  Americans like to forget that at least 120,000 Americans of Japanese extraction were rounded up and put in concentration camps in the western United States for the duration of the war.  However, they never permit the Germans to forget that Jews in German-controlled areas of Europe were treated likewise, though the reason was the same — a specific group was detained because some unknown fraction within it was a danger to the war effort and neither country was willing to risk letting it remain free for possible sabotage.  There is no dispute about this.  It happened.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »