Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Richard Spencer’ Category

 

[Andrew Anglin of Daily Stormer fame, has a debate, or conversation, with Sargon of Akkad. hosted by Baked Alaska, with input from Andy Warski. Here are a selection of clips that YouTuber, Kronos, has posted KATANA.]

 

Andrew Anglin

 

vs

 

Sargon of Akkad

 

Feb 2018 – Clips

 

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LZh6VzLhxU

 

Streamed live 16 hours ago

NEW MERCH: https://www.bakedalaska.tv JOIN THE DISCORD: https://discord.gg/K6bs4f4 ANDREW ANGLIN: https://gab.ai/AndrewAnglin https://www.dailystormer.name SARGON OF AKKAD: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-ye… REMEMBER TO SUBSCRIBE, COMMENT, SHARE, SMASH THAT LIKE BUTTON, AND SMASH THAT BELL BUTTON BTC Wallet: 1F3iu15DwhPRAyqJF1hMiDESRpxw8psSHk ETH Wallet: 0xC397fc134B6559030102b4BD48297c5C97d4d92A LTC Wallet: LhVG4QZ6GhNsyQhsZr7zV1af92gWxP6d19 GAB: https://gab.ai/apple TWITCH: https://twitch.tv/iambakedalaska FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/realbakedalaska INSTA: https://instagram.com/bakedalaska CASHME: https://cash.me/$realbakedalaska SNAPCHAT: realbakedalaska

 

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPTS

(Various mins)

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ChhZMWmXQE

 

 

Andrew Anglin vs. Sargon of Akkad

 

Anglin: So I guess my question to start with for [00:02] Sargon, would be, do you grant the moral premise that White people have a right to their own country, and you’re just saying that it’s impossible to make that happen?

 

Sargon: Well I said at the beginning that I didn’t really want to debate the talking points, because there’s no point!

 

Anglin: Then what do you want to talk about Sargon?

 

Sargon: Let me explain.

 

Alaska: Wait hold on. You agree, you agreed to a debate. I mean, and then, you know.

 

Sargon: I really want to talk to Andrew.

 

Alaska: So you just show up at a debate and you don’t want to debate them?

 

Sargon: Not really. It seems I’m with, ..

 

Alaska: Why did you contact and send me an email, …

 

Sargon: Let me explain.

 

Alaska: Okay go ahead.

 

Sargon: I don’t know how to contact, sorry contact Andrew?

 

Alaska: We have been emailing back and forth.

 

Sargon: Yeah, because you were in contact with Andrew.

 

Alaska: I know, so if you didn’t want a debate, you should have emailed me, and said, “hey I don’t really want a debate [01:00] can we have a different sort of dialogue”. But go ahead.

 

Sargon: I don’t want to bicker or anything. So when you said debate I figured you mean “talk about things from different perspectives”.

 

Alaska: Okay! Go ahead and talk!

 

Anglin: That’s what we can do. I’m not trying to have an aggressive debate!

 

Sargon: Let me talk a second.

 

Anglin: I think it’s I think it’s a good starting point. What I just said, that you went straight to logistics and, .. Embrace race realism. And then the moral right of White people. So go ahead.

 

Sargon: Okay. Listen right. The problem that I have with anything that the Alt-Right says, when it comes to the concept of an ethno-state, is that it is trying to strip away the ethnic heritage that I have inherited. Do you understand that?

 

Anglin: What? I don’t understand that? No. Always, is it the thing that you’re a quadroon?

 

Sargon: No.

 

Anglin: That’s not true Sargon.

 
(more…)

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

 

 

 

[Arya Sattya, a British woman, gives a short, but very good, critique of the recent debate hosted by Andy Warski, between Richard Spencer and Sargon of Akkad, among others. Although she disagrees with some aspects of Spencer’s views, she is highly critical of Sargon for his lack of sincerity and constant naysaying about the viability of having White only ethno-state. She goes through several of Sargon’s “arguments” pointing out the “pipul” or hair-splitting, nature of many of them  KATANA.]

 

_______________________

 

 

Arya Sattya

 

Richard Spencer vs Sargon of Akkad

 

Debate Roundup

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Click the link below to view the video:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2DZSzxHZvY

 

 

YouTube Description

 

 

Published on Jan 5, 2018

 

This is a discussion of some of the points brought up in the debate between Richard Spencer and Sargon of Akkad on Warski live.

 

Please like, comment, share and subscribe!

 

 

 

 

This video is not intended to encourage or condone hatred or violence.

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(12:09)

 

[Music]

 

[00:12]

 

 

Hello.

 

I just wanted to talk about some points that came up in the debate last night on Andy Wolski’s channel with Richard Spencer, Sargon of Akkad, Styxhexenhammer666, but also included other people like, Millennial Woes, and so on. The stream at it’s highest, had over 13,000 people watching live, and at one point reached the point of being the number one most watched stream in the world on YouTube.

 

It was a really interesting debate, and I think all this really goes to show just how many people are starting to get interested in the ideas of the so called, “Alt-Right” and just how much progress the movement is making as a whole. I really recommend going on watching it now, if you haven’t already. But I’ll put a link in the description.

 

With regards to the debate itself, I’d like to start off by saying that there are lots of points of disagreement I have with Richard Spencer, and I do think that it’s highly likely that he is, to some extent, “controlled opposition“, which I think I’ll discuss in another video.

 

But, there are also a lot of things I do agree with him on. And I thought that he performed exceptionally well in the debate. There were various polls done afterwards and it was in my opinion too, that he comfortably won the debate.

 

So, it started off with Richard Spencer calmly stating his points, and Sargon just shouting over him and coming across as incredibly impatient, for seemingly no reason at all. The first major point was about whether to adhere to abstract principles, or real-world pragmatic concerns, which Sargon just couldn’t seem to understand at all. The worlds described by Locke*, that he always seems to harp on about, was ultimately one invented for and by White people in countries that were overwhelmingly White. The United States itself was explicitly invented by, and for, White people. Which Richard Spencer mentioned at a later point in the debate, when he spoke about the 1790 Immigration Act**, which explicitly welcomed White people of good character. Sargon here is making what one might call the “Enlightenment fallacy” which I think I want to expand on in a video of itself.

 

[* John Locke, (born August 29, 1632, Wrington, Somerset, England—died October 28, 1704, High Laver, Essex), English philosopher whose works lie at the foundation of modern philosophical empiricism and political liberalism. He was an inspirer of both the European Enlightenment and the Constitution of the United States. His philosophical thinking was close to that of the founders of modern science, especially Robert Boyle, Sir Isaac Newton, and other members of the Royal Society. His political thought was grounded in the notion of a social contract between citizens and in the importance of toleration, especially in matters of religion. Much of what he advocated in the realm of politics was accepted in England after the Glorious Revolution of 1688–89 and in the United States after the country’s declaration of independence in 1776.

The next major point was about the rights of individuals, versus, the rights of groups. I don’t think that these things are mutually exclusive at all. I think that most people want to live under a State that exists for their interests, and that protects the rights and freedoms of the individuals within that State. But that State is a group identity.

Source: https://www.britannica.com/biography/John-Locke]

 

[** Naturalization Act of 1790

The original United States Naturalization Law of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat. 103) provided the first rules to be followed by the United States in the granting of national citizenship. This law limited naturalization to immigrants who were free White persons of good character. It thus excluded American Indians, indentured servants, slaves, free blacks and later Asians although free blacks were allowed citizenship at the state level in certain states. It also provided for citizenship for the children of U.S. citizens born abroad, stating that such children “shall be considered as natural born citizens,” the only US statute ever to use the term. It specified that the right of citizenship did “not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_of_1790]

 

I personally want to live under an ethno-state that protects my freedom as an individual and acts in my interests. And I want that to be an ethno-state for, and by my group. Respecting individual and group rights is not mutually exclusive, which Sargon seems to go out of his way to pretend to not understand at all. It’s about finding a balance between Authoritarianism that’s necessary for a state to function, and Libertarianism which stands up for the rights and freedoms of people within the state.

 

 

[02:51]

 

 

The point that Richard Spencer was making was about how we already have States that restrict our freedoms, and Sargon doesn’t have a problem with that now. So, Sargon despite his constant waffling on about abstract principles that originally emerged more as descriptions of States inhabited by White people, than prescriptive ideals, he does understand that in the real world we do have to restrict some freedoms, and we do have to find a balance between authoritarian and libertarian ideals. We do have to find a balance between the rights of the individuals and the preservation of the group as a whole, which they exist in.

 

I think it’s all somewhat hypocritical, when, as some have pointed out, Sargon himself started an online poll to ban social justice causes in the universities. Surely this goes against some of Sargon’s beloved principles?

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

[John Friend and Carolyn Yeager discuss the recent Greg Johnson vs Andrew Anglindebate” where the “Holocaust” and Revisionism were some of the topics discussed.

John and Carolyn then take Kevin MacDonald and Greggy to the woodshed for their failure to man-up and confront the fraudulent nature of the “holocaust industry” that the jews have placed, like a millstone, around the necks of Whites.

The Revisionists have systematically and conclusively proven that the “Holocaust” is the “hoax of the 20th century“. What stands in the way of this becoming general public knowledge is organized jewry’s stranglehold over our governments and media, etc.

Between this proven hoax and the public’s  lack of awareness stand two prominent members of the White movement, who for reasons explored by Carolyn and John, make excuses for evading this fact, or worst, pretend with word play that it still “happened“.

As Carolyn and John discuss, the fraudulent “Holocaust” is central to organized jewry’s strategy of guilt tripping Whites to prevent them into moving towards White nationalism by linking it negatively to racial awareness, that then leads to “Nazism” and the inevitable “gassing of six million innocent jews“.

As such, it is essential that the White movement comes to grips with exposing the Holohoax for what it is, so that this massive psychological weapon, roadblock, can be neutralized.

Meanwhile the jews continue on with their genocidal plans to destroy the White race — KATANA.]

 

 

 

 

_______________________

 

 

The Realist Report

 

Carolyn Yeager

 

On the Johnson vs Anglin Debate

 

 

 

 

Click the link below to John’s blog post:

 

The Realist Report – Carolyn Yeager

Click the link below to listen the audio:

 

http://therealistreport.com/?powerpress_pinw=4424-podcast

 

Or for a tidied up version of the audio, from Carolyn:

 

https://carolynyeager.net/system/files/Friend-Yeager_greggy_9-6-17.mp3

 

 

The realist Report Description

 

Published on Sep 6, 2017

 

 

On this edition of The Realist Report, we’re joined once again by Carolyn Yeager. Carolyn and I focus on the recent debate between Andrew Anglin and Greg Johnson which focused on the importance and relevance of historical revisionism in the overall pro-White struggle. Carolyn and I both agree that revisionism is an essential aspect of the struggle for the White race, as our historical narrative – especially as it pertains to WWII, Adolf Hitler, and the so-called “Holocaust” of “6 million Jews” – has been entirely weaponized against our people. We also address a number of other related issues in this very important podcast.

Below are relevant links for this program:

Subscribe to The Realist Report today, and support independent media!

Did you enjoy this program? Consider donating to The Realist Report to help us continue producing podcasts. Enter your email below and donate $10 now!

 

 

__________________________

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(80:11)

 

 

[00:38]

 

Voice over: You are listening to The Realist Report. And now your host, John Friend!

 

John: All right folks, welcome back to another edition of The Realist Report. This is your host John Friend. The website is The Realist Report dot com, where you can find an extensive archive of these pod casts as well as other radio broadcasts I have participated in, in the past. You can also find all of my blog posts and articles, a contact page, my Twitter feed, which is embedded on the right hand side of the website, and many other useful and important links. I am a regular reporter for American Free Press, America’s last real newspaper, and I also contribute to The Barnes Review, the bi-monthly history magazine affiliated with American Free Press. I encourage everyone listening to subscribe to both publications. Check out American Free Press dot net and The Barnes Review dot org for more details.

 

OK, with that said, let me introduce my special guest this evening. Carolyn Yeager is back once again to discuss a recent debate between Andrew Anglin and Greg Johnson. Which focuses on the importance and relevance of historical Revisionism in the overall pro-White struggle. A topic Carolyn and I have addressed in the past.

 

Carolyn, welcome back to the program! How are you this evening?

 

Carolyn: I’m just fine, John. Glad to be here.

 

John: Yes, good! I’m glad that you could join me. You wrote an article about this debate between Greg Johnson and Andrew Anglin which is over on Carolyn Yeager dot net. And I will link to it. I hope people go there and check it out. I think you have a lot of very important and good things to say about the debate. And really that’s going to be the main topic for this conversation. I will be honest, I did not listen to the entire debate. I think if you can find it on YouTube and you can also find it on, … There’s like a new alternative to YouTube from what I understand. I think it’s Bitchute, is that correct?

 

Carolyn: Yes.

 

John: Yes. You can find it [the debate] in multiple places. You have it linked on a couple of different, …

 

Carolyn: Yes. I have both of them linked.

 

John: Yes, over on your site. If you just Google it, you can find it. It’s been all over the place. It is a pretty interesting debate. Certainly worth checking out. Again I didn’t listen to the entire thing. I listened to most of it, and I mean, frankly I’ve basically heard what both Anglin and Johnson have to say about the subject, so it really wasn’t anything, …

 

[Image] The many faces of Andrew Anglin.

 

Carolyn: And then Anglin said, afterwards, that it wasn’t supposed to be a debate, but then afterwards they started calling it a debate. But I guess that was important to him, that he didn’t feel like he was in debate. You know, he wasn’t prepared, maybe, to debate anything. You know, but they did have interestingly pretty much opposing views when it came to “Holocaust” and revisionism, which is the part that I found interesting.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

 

[Ramzpaul gives his take on the “Alt-Right” given recent events including Charlottesville. His views are his mixture of “nationalism for all” and a “Boy Scout” call for restraint and good behavior by all concerned. He denounces the Daily Stormer as a likely ADL, non legit operation, and the Alt-Right as now being toxic. Ramzpaul toots his own horn in discussing his prominent role in establishing the Alt-Right and how it was taken over by the neo-Nazis, etc.. He urges people to distance themselves from the Alt-Right and to infiltrate the “system” but work legally, although using methods as if we were illegal. He ends optimistically by saying we will win once we get through these dark days. 

I think Ramzpaul’s allegations against the Daily Stormer are worthy of investigation, if only to confirm them as being false — KATANA.]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RAMZPAUL

 

The Alt-Right

 

What Went Wrong?


 

;

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8VYmY89_KUxx

Description

Thursday, August 17, 2017

The Alt Right – What went wrong?

 

Initially the Alt Right was a broad coalition of people who rejected mainstream conservatism. However, the movement was not involved with the old school 14/88 White Nationalism. It was fundamentally identity politics for our people without the neo-nazi baggage.

 

I published an article on January 5, 2016 that explained my vision of the Alt Right.

 

http://www.returnofkings.com/76454/what-is-the-alternative-right

 

Sadly, the movement was co-opted by the Hollywood Nazis once Richard Spencer aligned with the Daily Stormer after the infamous “Heilgate”.  I warned Richard about the dangers of associating with these Hollywood Nazis privately and in a video response to him. But he insisted on doing a podcast with Anglin the week after Heilgate.

 

 

 

At that time, The Right Stuff (TRS) also aligned with the Daily Stormer. Weev was involved with their web site administration and Anglin was a frequent guest. Based on that I knew it was impossible to rehabilitate the brand, so I ceased to call myself Alt Right.

The establishment has now used Charlottesville as an excuse to shut down anything remotely associated to the Alt Right. We are now witnessing Soviet tier censorship and clamp down on dissent.

 

 

 

[Image] Censorship of various websites. (Click image to enlarge)

 

___________________

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

 

[00:00]

 

 

Hey guys, has there been anything happening out there? I’ve been looking for a video subject, nothing I can see, …

 

Oh, oh, besides that! Looks like Trump may be part of a coup, overthrown, America’s breaking into civil war, we have a little Rubio saying it’s okay, to physically attack people that you disagree with politically! We have lynch mobs running out destroying our history! Other than that, I don’t know, there’s not much to complain about.

 

I don’t know! I laugh, because humor’s a kind of a defense mechanism. I’ve always used that since I was a kid and in some ways it’s funny, other ways it’s sad. But this is where we are and I guess you can predict it based on the how things were going, it would eventually reach this point. I actually thought it would happen if Hillary was elected. She was scary! She looked like a Trotsky, there was going to be massive bloodshed if she was elected and she was going to purge her enemies and throw them in concentration camps! And then when she lost there is like rage on the Left and they brought up this Russia conspiracy! They were just insane! And they’re continuing to be insane.

 

And we have Trump trying to stand up for Americans. I, … God help him! I mean, he’s kind of looks like alone now, but this is where we are. We’re in a situation that’s very dangerous. If you have the wrong views, not even if you have the wrong views, if you’re suspected of having the wrong views you can now literally, probably, be killed on the streets. This is what it’s become in America. And groups like the SPLC* [Southern Poverty Law Center] and the ADL* [Anti-Defamation League] have been pushing that. We’re going into, … we’ve pretty much lost the First Amendment, now.

 

I don’t see this as America anymore. Take that for why you will. So, yeah the “Black Pills”. Pretty much anything associated with the Right wing, especially the Alt-Right is now just being shut down, period.

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

a-woes-by-any-other-name-cover-ver-2

 

[Millennial Woes, a Scottish vlogger, discusses his recent doxing by the Main Sewer Media, Hope Not Hate and some low-life anti-fa types  — KATANA.]

 

_______________________

 

 

a-woes-by-any-other-name-video

 

YouTube Description

 

 

The story of the attack on me by the Daily Record (including ace reporter Alan McEwen), the Scottish Sunday Herald, and other low-brow newspapers, done in collusion with Hope Not Hate and some gormless Scottish antifa.

 

Part 1: 0:00:00
Part 2: 0:03:57
Part 3: 0:28:02
Part 4: 0:53:48
Part 5: 1:08:42
Part 6: 1:16:53

 

[This channel is my livelihood. Donations to http://www.paypal.me/MillennialWoes are appreciated, as are pledges on http://www.patreon.com/MillennialWoes and bitcoin donations to 1743rc3jnBaYL3piL9eeEHqbrXrroZLVWW. Thank you.]

 

[This video is not intended to condone violence or hate.]

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-AhMPTFRwPM

 

 

 

A Woes By Any Other Name

 

 

 

 

Published on Jan 21, 2017

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

 

 

[00:00]

 

 

a-woes-by-any-other-name-2878-woes-19th-jan-2017

 

Part One: Introduction

 

Hello. This video is going to describe what has happened to yours truly over the last few weeks. And it’s going to be quite an involved story, I’m afraid. I’ll try to be brief, but we know that, I don’t tend to do that successfully very often. Nonetheless, I will try. But before I get into what happened, first things first. I’ve got a few messages from various people. To my supporters. These are the most important people. Thank you very, very much for the help you’ve given me over the last seven days! Thank you for the donations which have been very generous and numerous and certainly have made my immediate future more navigable than it was before. And also, thank you for the countless messages of moral support and encouragement that you’ve sent. Well, … It would have been pretty awful without them, honestly. I would have felt quite alone without that, so thank you!

 

To the public. I do not hate. This is contrary to what you will have read about me in the press. These ridiculous articles that are being printed, or have been printed. I want to give you my side of things. You need to be able to see me as I am and not as these hack journalists portray me. I do not hate. I do not spew hate on this channel, or anywhere else. And I don’t, I don’t encourage hate either. And certainly not deliberately. I’ve no interest in doing that. I never have had any interest in doing that.

 

I mean, we’ll get into that later. Anyway, to the police, because I know that I’ve probably been reported for “hate speech” in the last few days. I mean, I expect so.

 

So on to the police. Honestly, it seems to me [laughing] that you have better things to do than investigate someone like me. I’m just a guy talking about the world and trying to do so honestly. And that’s all I’ve ever been doing on this channel. But, I know that you have to follow up on things. So, maybe I’ll be speaking to you soon.

 

To the Scottish Government and judiciary. I don’t believe I’ve said anything illegal on my channel and I don’t think it’s “hate speech”. That is just an infantile category, of course. But I don’t think that what I do qualifies as “hate speech”. However, if you do put me on trial —and this is not threat. This is just what I think is likely to happen. If you do put me on trial for “hate speech” I think it will backfire hugely on yourselves, for various reasons. I have international support. Tens of thousands of people I know will rally around and it will just look ridiculous to put someone like me on trial. However, I’ll go into in more detail in a future video. For now, let’s concentrate on what has happened recently in the last two weeks.

 

a-woes-by-any-other-name-part-2

 

Part Two: What Happened

 

OK, so we’ll start with our rundown, a chronological rundown of what happened, starting from the 19th of November last year, 2016. And with the NPI [National Policy Institute] gathering in Washington DC. This is my, the third conference I’d attended and everything was going just swimmingly — up until the end of Richard Spencer’s speech, when some people gave Nazi salutes in the audience.

 

a-woes-by-any-other-name-2868-woes-at-npi-conference

 

Now, I’ve talked about this before on the channel, briefly, but I think it’s worth emphasizing there were about, at least, three hundred people there, I believe, at that conference. And from the footage it looks like about four people did these salutes. I don’t know who they were. I saw one of them bragging about it on a forum.

 

[05:00]

 

I don’t know if they were leftist infiltrators. I don’t know if they were just young men drunk and showing bravado. And I don’t know if they were genuine neo Nazis. But what I do know is that they did not represent the majority of that audience, or anything like it. They’re a tiny minority.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

colin-liddel-stormerism-cover-ver-3

 

 

[Here’s the transcript of a short YouTube video by Colin Liddell from Alternative Right website on the banning of  the “neo-nazi” group  National Action in Britain. He also discusses The Daily Stormer   — KATANA.]

 

Discussing Stormerism in a Storm

 

 colin-liddel-stormerism-video

 

Youtube:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJXthTFF-iA

 

See also his blog post:

 

http://alternative-right.blogspot.com/2016/12/video-discussing-stormerism-in-storm.html

 

By Colin Liddell

Published on Dec 15, 2016

 

YouTube Description

 

While cycling along a Tokyo dyke in a storm — as you do — Colin Liddell, the Chief Editor of Alternative Right, discusses a recent debate about Stormerism (the tendency of some Alt-Righters to LARP as full-blown Hollywood Nazis). This is then linked to the recent banning by the British government of National Action, a group that employs Stormerist tactics. He also draws attention to the interesting fact that where Neo-Nazied Stormerist excesses are directly banned by the state, nationalist movements tend to do rather well, and where they aren’t they tend to do badly.

 

Greg Johnson’s “Punching Right” (with butthurt comments by (((Andrew Anglin))) ):

 

http://www.counter-currents.com/2016ed…

Article by Daniel Barge on the banning of National Action:

http://alternative-right.blogspot.com…

 

______________________

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

 

[09:24 mins]

 

[Note: For “stylistic” reasons Liddell chose to record this while riding a bike along a dyke on a stormy day, making it hard to hear some parts. Text has now been updated with the missing parts.]

 

 

Colin Liddell: Hello! Friends, followers and fellow fake fascists of the Alternative Right. This is Colin Liddell, the chief editor of Alternative Right.

 

And, here I am cycling along Tokyo’s flood defenses, on my way to one of my “normie” jobs. And as you can see the weather is a bit inclement today. So, I don’t think I want to talk for too long. But, you know, I’ve been a bit busy to make a video for a couple of weeks, so, and this is the first one for at least two or three weeks, I think. And it’s been a very kind of eventful sort of three weeks, as it always is in the Alternative Right. Never a dull moment.

 

There’s been a bit of a spat with The Daily Stormer and Andrew Anglin. And I think, well, you know, Greg Johnson wrote an article at Counter Currents called “Punching Right“, and I think anybody who was anybody in the ’punching right’ debate kind of pitched in, so that was kind of interesting, I think. I expressed my opinion there. I said, … I think one of my most interesting points was that the Daily Stormer lures people into a state of inauthenticity, having a fake position in private, having a different position in public life — whichever one is fake, whichever one is genuine who knows. Suspicions abound.

 

Anyway, it’s not a healthy way to be, to sort of believe something, or to be lured into believing in something that you can’t actually talk to normal people about! That is obviously a ghettoizing mechanism to prevent White nationalism, which is a natural ideology of most people, because it suits their interests. That’s obviously a ghettoizing device to stop White nationalism spreading. And it’s a kind of anti, … The left would see it as an anti-contagion device — and that’s a disease metaphor. So, we would not use that, obviously. We would see, we would see it more in terms of spreading enlightenment.

 

colin-liddel-stormerism-montage

 

See if I can just fix my hat here. No, no, the winds is keeping it there! Anyway, have a look around. There’s an interesting vista — some motorways over there, bridges, dredging the river, … And I’m actually cycling along a large dyke, which is relatively, relatively deserted. Just one, or two other lonely cyclists on their way to work at this early hour in the morning.

 

Anyway, back to the big debate, … Also, I think another thing that ties into this “punching Right” debate is the banning of this so-called “neo-Nazi group“, National Action in the UK. They were banned, I think just yesterday, by the Home Secretary who goes by the name of Amber Rudd, which is a soft sounding name especially for a Conservative. And anyway, they were banned. Now, National Action, they kind of dress up in scary costumes with skull masks and black ninja costumes and they wave their obviously very fascistic looking flags. And there is usually about, like, 10 to 20 of them. And if they stick around for more than five minutes the anti-fa usually give them a hard time. So they kind of pop up and they pop down a lot. And I’ve always seen them as a kind of cosplay neo-Nazi LARPy* group.

 

* A live action role-playing game (LARP) is a form of role-playing game where the participants physically act out their characters’ actions. The players pursue goals within a fictional setting represented by the real world while interacting with each other in character.

 

And so, I think banning them isn’t actually, you know, really it’s almost an irrelevance. But, I think the only significant point is that the state can use these little shock groups to justify clamping down on things like social media, more and more. It becomes permissible for social media to throw perfectly moderate and calm people off their platforms, because such groups exist!

 

And, you know, we saw that with, when Andrew Anglin was on Twitter. He was very active, and of course, you know, he sort of set a precedent for Twitter throwing people off. And then, they then used that power more recently against many members of the Alt-Right, including their Richard Spencer. And then, they kind of, you know, they retracted that suspension in the case of Richard Spencer. But, you know, it’s just something they can do any time they feel like now. And they can always justify it and back it up with:

Look at these neo-Nazi psychopaths spreading hatred and violence! And look what happened to Joe Cox and that poor jewish MP, Luciana Berger. She was sent hate mail and death threats!” blah, blah, blah!

 

And, because these politicians are women, it makes it all the more easy to ban those kind of extremist groups!

 

Now, I’m not too bothered by that, you know, because if you look at the one country that doesn’t have a lot of extreme censorship is America. OK, you can still lose your job, but for the most part, for the most part, it’s not really a problem, if you are financially independent.

 

[On his bike] I’m going downhill now, it’s getting a bit fast! Safety first!

 

Anyway, so as I was saying, … The one country, the one country that doesn’t have extreme censorship laws is the United States. And, “Wow!” by weird coincidence that is also the one country that doesn’t really have a healthy White nationalist movement. At least in electoral terms.

 

Whereas Europe, which has a lot if, you know, “thought crime” legislation and “hate crime” legislation and that bans little funny cosplay* groups like National Action. This area, or this collection of countries, that is where nationalism is doing much, much, better. Although, of course, in the UK, it’s in a period of abeyance at the moment after, following the collapse of the BNP a few years ago. But, if you look around Europe, they all have these very, very strict, you know, anti, you know, in inverted commas “hate laws” and various other forms of thought crime legislation and, … You know, nationalism is doing relatively well there!

 

* Cosplay: the practice of dressing up as a character from a film, book, or video game, especially one from the Japanese genres of manga or anime.

Austria — they almost elected somebody from the Austrian Freedom Party! They almost elected somebody from the Austrian Freedom Party, which is typically described as a hard line anti-immigrant party.

 

In France Marine Le Pen is, you know, again, very, very, you know, a cultural, she’s a cultural nationalist, I guess you could say, civic nationalist, not a religious a genuine ethno-nationalist, but still that’s a lot better than what America’s got. America’s got Donald Trump, and we’re still not really sure of, what we’ve got there. The omens are very, very mixed. He could turn out to be, you know, he could actually turn out to be a decent guy, a stand up guy, who wants to at least ensure the dominance of the Republican Party. Which would also mean deporting a lot of the illegals and securing the borders, and encouraging White people to have more kids. Or he could just be part of the whole the globalist system! A kind of reboot.

 

Anyway, I think that is plenty of thoughts to mull over.

 

So, from Tokyo, over and out!

 

END

 

 

============================================

 

Click to download a PDF of this post (1.1 MB):

 

colin-liddel-discussing-stormerism-in-a-storm-transcript-ver-2

 

colin-liddel-stormerism-cover-ver-3

 

________________

 

Version History

 

Version 3: Dec 19, 2016 — Added missing parts and made some corrections. Thanks to Colin Liddell for that. Added 1 image. Updated PDF (Ver 2) for download.

 

Version 2: Dec 17, 2016 — Added PDF of this post for download.

 

Version 1: Published post — Dec 16, 2016.

Read Full Post »

 realist-report-tanstaafl-2016-cover

 

[After a year’s break from blogging and interviews TANSTAAFL returns with this interview with John Friend at his The Realist Report site. I consider TANSTAAFL to be one of the most insightful commentators on the jewish problem, and in this interview he doesn’t disappoint with his take on what’s being going on in our movement to expose and rid ourselves of the organized evil jewish cabal that dominates our societies.

 

Topics include; the ongoing jew war on Whites, the meaning of “conspiracy theory”, kikeservatives, Twitter, the jewsmedia, Trump, Bannon, (((the echo meme))), Alt-Right, Richard Spencer, Greg Johnson, Jared Taylor, Hitler and National Socialist Germany, and White racial consciousness — KATANA.]

 

_______________________

 

 

ATTENTION READERS!

 

Volunteers are needed to help complete this transcript.

 

Please step forward and do your bit!

 

[ 65/115 mins, now complete!]

 

Always leave a message in the comments BEFORE starting on a time-slot.

 

realist-report-tanstaafl-2016-progress-chart-06

 

 

Why Bother with Transcripts?

 

Occasionally, people ask if having a transcript is really necessary (considering all the work involved) when people can just listen/watch the audio/video.

 

Here are some reasons. If you can think of any more or would like to elaborate on the ones here please leave a message in the Comments.

 

Some of the advantages of a transcript are as follows:

You are able to read the whole presentation with full accuracy at the speed that you can read, which is generally a lot faster than listening to the audio or watching the video.

Some speakers, with strong accents or idiosyncratic speech habits, are often difficult to follow.

You can easily scan the text and zoom into what interests you in a non-linear manner.

You can easily quote verbatim from the text when making comments about the text.

You can print out a hard copy for future reference.

When you listen to an audio or watch a video you tend to forget much of the points made, etc. Having it in writing allows you to refresh your memory quickly and accurately.

Transcripts lend themselves to be available off-line and spread via hard copies.

Transcripts can make it easier to create accurate translations of the material which can in turn be used to create video and audio versions.

Video and audio files often become unavailable, for many reasons including censorship (on YouTube, etc.), technical causes due to lack of equipment or power.

Video and audio files are many times larger than a text file of the same material, sometimes hundreds of times larger. In many cases presenting the information in video or audio format has no worthwhile advantage over a text file. Of course there are may cases where the opposite is true.

Other?

That all said, a transcript is often no substitute for an audio/video file and vice-versa. They are complimentary to each other.

 

_________________________

 

Readers, please:

  • BEFORE starting, indicate in the COMMENT section the time slot that you are willing to complete. For example:    >>> I will do 15:00 to 20:00 <<<
  • Every minute of transcription will take you about 15 minutes to complete accurately.
    • Doing even 1 minute is helpful!

  • As a double-check, please look at the COMMENTS to see whether anyone has indicated they are already doing a particular time-slot. (Comments are automatically posted. There is always some delay in the time-slot status being updated in the actual post by me.)
  • Time slots that I know are being worked on will be marked as IN PROGRESS in the post so as to help avoid unnecessary duplication of effort. Always check the COMMENTS though.
  • If you have little time, don’t worry or fuss about typos, spelling, punctuation, etc. I can clean it up.
  • If something is unclear put your best guess followed by some question marks, e.g., “He said that xxx ??? thought this, …” Don’t spend time trying to figure it out.
  • Please enter the transcript in the comment section with the times. I will then copy it (after proofing it) into the post.
  • NOTE: Comments with MORE than 3 URLs are automatically treated as SPAM by this WordPress system. So in those cases change the 4th or more URLs from, e.g.: “abc.com” to “abc . com”.
  • Another way to help if you don’t have time to do any transcription is to point out any errors.
  • Remember that old adage, “Many hands make light work“.

Thank you.

 

____________________

 

 

On this edition of The Realist Report, we’re joined once again by Tanstaafl of Age of Treason. To begin the program, Tanstaafl gives listeners an overview of what he’s been up to lately, including being banned from Twitter for making factual statements about Jews and their anti-White agenda. We move on to focus on the Jewish problem more generally, and the open and quite blatant war being waged on Whites by the organized Jewish community. We also discuss Trump’s election, the Alt Right, and related topics.

 

http://therealistreport.com/the-realist-report-tanstaafl/

 

The Realist Report

 

Interviews

 

TANSTAAFL — 2016

 

 

Published on Dec 8, 2016

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

 

[00:00]

 

 

 

John Friend: All right folks. Welcome back to another edition of the Realist Report. This is your host John Friend. Joining me today is TANSTAAFL, who maintains the excellent website Age of Treason. TANSTAAFL is one of the most insightful and articulate commentators in the alternative independent media today, especially when it comes to the jewish problem. A topic that we will be discussing at length during this podcast.

 

Tan thanks for joining me. How are you today sir?

 

John: Good! Well, you sound fine and, you know, if you’ve got to sneeze, or cough, or anything, …

 

TAN: I may! [laughing]

 

John: … Just put yourself on mute and I’m sure we can deal with it. Thanks for coming on the program. Last time you were on was actually a year ago, exactly. I was just looking at my website and one year ago, today. Well, I guess when I post this program, which will be technically tomorrow, December 7th. You were on and I’ve been wanting to or I had been wanting to interview you for a long time because I followed your work for a number of years and listened to pretty much all of your podcasts and you’ve been a big, you know, influence in my thinking, especially when it comes to racial issues and, of course, the jewish problem.

 

So, just to get started, could you talk about what you’ve been up to lately? I know you were recently shoahed from Twitter. So you are no longer on Twitter, but I see you’ve been blogging a lot lately so, why don’t you just tell us what you’ve been up to well.

 

TAN: Well, yeah, I wouldn’t call it a lot. I’ve actually been pretty inactive for the last year. Actually, it started even before I talked to you last. But, I’ve been active mostly on Twitter. I had stopped blogging so much. Before I had been in the habit of posting about once a week, once every couple of weeks, and it really dropped off to almost nothing. But Twitter is, … It wasn’t because I was not paying attention to what was going on and didn’t have thoughts. It was just because I was expressing myself mainly through Twitter. Which is really a different form of media. It’s like, it’s been called a “micro blog” and that is really a good description for it. So, instead of writing these long posts on a blog, you write little snippets of thoughts that fit in 140 characters and you can whip them off pretty quickly and in response to lots of different stories. So it’s becomes addictive! You know, you’re sitting there paying attention to what’s going on in the news, what everybody’s excited about and you have some insight into it, or you just want to bring it to other people’s attention and you comment on it. And the big problem with it, as I found out — I was well aware I was just wondering when it would happen — but I found out a couple of weeks ago right, you know, few weeks after the election. When Twitter decides that you’re too much of a problem, they can just delete your account and it’s as if you never existed.

 

So I don’t really plan on going back, as useful as I found it. Most of the value was, for me, in the besides sharing thoughts with other like minds, was, … What I found on Twitter was that basically the enemy is using it as a communication platform. Very similar to what they, what was uncovered back several years ago. I think 2012 election cycle. The journalist email list that they used to use back then — it might have been even 2008 cycle? I can’t recall now. It was quite a while ago. But basically before Twitter existed, the jews and the jews media and their fellow travellers used to communicate with each other via a private email list, that was invite only. But it was a massive number of people. And when it was uncovered and the e-mails were shared by somebody, it was shocking to a lot of people. That these people were colluding and, you know, coming up with a shared narrative about how to deal with certain scandals that broke. And we’ve seen it again in this election cycle with the Wiki Leaks thing, I mean there was there was a bit of that.

 

But every day on Twitter — and you don’t even have to have an account on Twitter — you can sign up. And the main reason to sign up is so you can make a list. But even if you don’t sign up for Twitter you can just go to these different accounts one by one and look at what they’re saying. It’s convenient when you make a list, because it basically mashes them all together. And that’s one of the first things I did after they kicked me off. I just created a dummy account so that I could create a list of all these jews media jews, so that I could see what they were chattering about, what they were screeching about today. And so basically it’s what they call that, “opposition research“?

 

[05:00]

 

John: Sure

(more…)

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »