Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Race – Mixing’ Category

 

[Quietly spoken YouTuber, Way of the World (WotW), reads Kipling’s poem, “The Beginnings” and then discusses how there’s a gradual awakening and a growing hatred  among Whites towards the (((globalists))) and their agenda to destroy our countries through mass non-White invasions. WotW emphasized to need for us to work together to resist this and to encourage the development of racial consciousness and solidarity among Whites — KATANA.]

 

_______________________

 

 

Way of the World

 

The Beginnings of Hate

 

 

 

 

Click the link below to view the video:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4NskBM0fCUA

 

Description

 

Published on April 22, 2018

 

 

 

WotW reads a poem that speaks to the dreadful potential of provoking our people. Please support this channel:

 

 

PayPal link on the homepage: https://www.youtube.com/WayoftheWorld1

 

Bitcoin18gJgGSsdgX5qhKvBApq8u4BB7mgsVBFHU
Ethereum 0xa3807dB086Ccd6f9Bcae853233f20B8F4FE2E096

 

LitecoinLhMh829QjDkJX9ypiSrAesauV2SDFWPapU

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(18:44)

 

 

The Beginnings” by Rudyard Kipling.

 

It was not part of their blood,
It came to them very late
With long arrears to make a good,
When the English began to hate.

They were not easily moved,
They were icy — willing to wait
Till every count should be proved,
Ere the English began to hate.

Their voices were even and low,
Their eyes were level and straight.
There was neither sign, nor show,
When the English began to hate.

It was not preached to the crowd,
It was not taught by the state.
No man spoke it aloud,
When the English began to hate.

It was not suddenly bred,
It will not swiftly abate,
Through the chill years ahead,
When time shall count from the date
That the English began to hate.

 

This is a poem that several of you have asked me to read, so here it is. It seems somehow to have been transformed by the internet into a version called “The Wrath of the Awakened Saxon”, but this is Kipling’s original.

 

It is a great poem, which, like all of Kipling’s work, is masterfully observed and executed, but which speaks to historical truths that conjure terrifying scenarios for our future. It’s about the way in which the English people come to hate. [02:00] How it is an unnatural condition for us, how it is slow to emergence, and slow to fade, considered, calm, chilling, in fact. I think we could say that this now also applies to most of the White peoples of the Western world who have seen their countries badly wounded by Third World immigration. Small wonder then that they interest in this poem and in Kipling’s work generally, has seen a huge, recent revival.

 

 

Since the end of World War Two most Western governments have followed a policy of multiculturalism, which is an idea whose credibility died long ago. Cultures and races manifestly have no interest in integration, and the stark division between communities causes only enmity and distrust. The one thing that multiculturalism has taught us is that tribalism is endemic to our species. The globalists created a space for their multicultural project in our formerly homogenous countries by teaching us to put other peoples and their cultures and religions above our own.

 

(more…)

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

 

[Millennial Woes gives a thought-provoking speech on the foolishness of following Jordan Peterson’s destructive advice that Whites should not embrace “collectivism“. Given at the recent Blue Awakening “Entnofutur II” 2018 Conference held in Tallinn, Estonia, on the 23rd of February, 2018. Includes Q & A Session  — KATANA.]

 

 

_______________________

 

 

 

Millennial Woes

 

“The Passion of Jordan Peterson”

 

Speech to Blue Awakening

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Click the link below to view the video:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3MvOSyE0ow

 

 

Description

 

Published on Feb 25, 2018

Hopefully this will serve to illustrate just how far Dr. Peterson is from the actual Alt-Right.

[This video is not intended to condone violence or hate.]

[This project is my livelihood. Please see https://www.millennialwoes.com/donate. Thank you.]

ALTERNATIVE CHANNELS:

http://www.bitchute.com/channel/mille…

http://www.minds.com/millennialwoes

 

 

 

 

__________________________

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(54 mins)

 

[00:35]

 

 

 

 

Organizer: We will continue with the conference. Our next speaker is probably the most famous person to speak here today. An English blogger, YouTube video maker, and well-known Alt-Right figure, Millennial Woes! Who will speak on, “The Passion of Jordan Peterson”.

 

[Applause]

 

[01:02]

 

 

Woes: Okay. Well first I’d like to thank Ruben for organizing this conference. I think the conferences are very important and very enjoyable for everyone. And I think that each one feels like a step forward, so it’s a very valuable thing. Also, before I start with what might seem like an attack on Jordan Peterson, I want to say that, … I do think that he does good work. I do think that he is valuable. And I don’t dislike him.

 

But he does annoy me, because he specifically attacks the Alt-Right and identitarianism, when he doesn’t need to. He makes unfair critiques of us, as well. And if he’s going to criticize us, I’d rather he was fair about it. But he doesn’t need to do this at all. So [02:01] therefore, I feel there’s a needs to defend ourselves against what he says. And really he is an individualist, that’s part of this big thing. And there are other an individualists who I will mention in this speech. Are you all familiar with Sargon of Akkad? [laughter] Good! I will briefly mention him, just to bring him, again it’s not personal, just want to bring in the ideas that are being shared nowadays on YouTube. Because YouTube has become a huge arena for a discussion, especially in the last few months with the “internet blood sports”.

 

 

So! Okay. Jordan Peterson was recently interviewed by Vice News. I think some of you will have seen that clip. It was a Chinese Vice journalist. Although I’m not sure if that’s actually relevant, because the White ones are just as anti White. And the Vice journalists said to [03:01] him:

 

One of the things you’ve talked about, a lot of times you talked to these young men who are flirting with far-right ideologies. (07:33) And you try and bring them back. What does that process like? How do you bring someone back from the far-right?

 

And Jordan Peterson replied:

 

Tell them a better story!

 

The journalist asks:

 

What is the better story?

 

And Peterson replies:

 

Grow the hell up! Take your place in the world. You’ve got something to contribute! Make a plan! Live as an individual! Stay away from the identity politics pathology! It’s just an excuse for failing to live your life in a respectable and noble manner! That’s a way better story than go wave your idiot far-right flag at some rally with some [04:00] pasty-faced morons! What kind of pathetic behavior is that? So it’s time to grow the hell up!

 

And that was John Peterson’s most recent comment on the Alt-Right and identitarianism. And I’ll deal with the meat of what he said, later.

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

 

[In this long (151 minutes) YouTube Hangout hosted by Andy Warski and JF, Mike Enoch debates the self identified jew, Halsey English on the topic of White advocacy and jewish power.

In many heated exchanges Enoch takes the correct position that organized jewry is a hostile “elite” that needs to be expelled from Western countries, while Halsey attempts to argue, in an almost legalistic, hairsplitting “jewy” manner, that while some jewish groups may have excessive power, jews as a whole are not the cause of White racial and cultural displacement. Yeah, right.

A bizarre part of this “debate” are the many abusive comments that Halsey directs at Enoch, calling him a lying fraud!   KATANA.]

 

NOTES

 

 — If you would like to improve the accuracy of the transcript please leave any corrected text in the comments section. Corrections to misspelled names, etc., is encouraged. Thank you.


 

 

 

 

 

Halsey

 

VS

 

Mike Enoch

 

 


 


 

 

Click here for the video:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzE9vfiLU9Q

 

 

 

Published on Feb 14, 2018

 

 

YouTube Description

 

Halsey Vs. Mike Enoch

 

 

49,668 views

 

 

Streamed live on Feb 14, 2018

 

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(151 mins)

 

 

 

[00:01]

 

Warski: What is going on everyone? Welcome back to another Warski Live. I’ve a new setup still in alpha phase. We’re getting the light fixture fixed as well. But this is part one. But, of course, joining me up it’s still in an out.

 

JF: Hello Andy! I think you were the only show that gets worse with time, visually!

 

Warski: Why you think it’s worse?

 

JF: I mean, I don’t know what’s happening here. You look like you have an eight-bit background that just bugged and then everything became black.

 

Warski: Yeah. Well that’s supposed to light up. But then when I turned it on, it over exposes everything and is a mess. So I have to get a friggin dimmer installed. Yeah believe me it’s a, it’s been a hectic day for me.

 

JF: A great debate on the way. Before, I’d like to hear Mike Enoch on the case of the lawsuit against you. I think it’s an important issue regarding free speech and I’d like to hear what’s happening with this.

 

Mike: Yeah thanks. Thanks for giving me the opportunity. I know we have a big audience here and I just want to make an appeal. I know my politics are controversial and this goes beyond my individual politics, or the politics of the people that attended the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville this summer.

 

There’s a lawsuit against us that is essentially an attack on the First Amendment and free speech and internet privacy as well. So these are they’re very powerful and wealthy lawyers that have taken this case and they have attempted to allege some kind of broad-based conspiracy. But, in fact, as they have admitted if you look at press reports about this lawsuit there was something in the New York Times yesterday. There have been various reports on it. They are essentially admitting that they are [02:01] attempting to use the court to shut down the Alt-Right.

 

To shut down political opposition. The New York Times article yesterday has the lead attorney in the case Reberta Kaplan, who is a very wealthy and powerful jewish lesbian, who has is attempting to shut down the Alt-Right, by her own admission. She is, this is a strategic lawsuit, quote of her “This is a strategic lawsuit”. Integrity First for America which is the group fundamental ng the lawsuit which is a group of about twelve very wealthy jewish lawyers, are admitted that this is a political lawsuit, because the government has not done enough to silence the Alt-Right. This is in the New York Times. They’ve admitted all these things.

 

Basically they are admitting they do not have a case before the court and this is purely an attempt to intimidate and silence the defendants. And it goes beyond us. You might say, all right, well tough! Look you went up against the wrong people. But it goes beyond us. As part of [03:00] this process. There’s a subpoena issued [03:02] to Twitter. Twitter is a third party they want information on people that’s tweeted certain hashtags. They want all personal identifiable information including email address, IP address, MAC address, for people that may have tweeted certain hashtags. Unite the Right, Free Cantwell, among others.

 

Now again, you might think I don’t care about these guys. They did something dumb. They went up against the most powerful group of people in the world, and that’s stupid. Maybe so, but if it’s us first, it’s gonna be you next. We’re out here running cover for you, for free speech. And I think we need to get campus free speech groups, the ACLU, any Pro First Amendment group, any Pro Electronic Privacy group, because there is no reason why a person that tweeted out a certain hashtag would add to their case. Like they are alleging something that’s non-existent. They don’t have a valid cause of action before the court and they know it. So if they get these subpoenas granted that’s [04:01] all that they want. So this is in case of Electronic Privacy, your right to privacy on the internet, your right to free speech and this is what these people are attempting to squash.

 

And I think it’s really very important that everybody gets behind, one in condemning the lawsuit, exposing the lawsuit as was it is. And I’m not asking you to support us. I understand that’s a step that many people don’t want to take. I simply want you to support the principle. Support the principles of electronic privacy and anonymity on the Internet. The right to use Twitter without being subjected to potential political witch hunts based on hashtags that you might tweet. And frankly the right of anybody to speak their mind without suffering this kind of “lawfare”. It’s important to note there is no criminal complaint. This is a civil complaint. JF, I know you’ve talked about the abuse of civil courts before. There’s no criminal complaint here, it’s a civil complaint. Why? Because a standard of evidence for a criminal complaint is much higher. They don’t expect to win this case?

 

They [05:00] merely want to use the case as a vehicle to get as much information on as many users of the Internet as they can. And I know that amongst those people that have tweeted the hashtags that they’re looking for are people that are not Alt-Right. People that might be pro Trump. People that might be critical of Israel. These are very serious First Amendment issues they cut to the heart of our rights as Americans. And I think every decent freedom-loving American of any race of any political affiliation needs to come out against this website. Call it for what it is. Understand what’s going on. And we need to light a fire under the butts of all the free speech organizations and Electronic Privacy organizations to come out against this!

 

JF: It’s indeed a very worrying story and, in fact, it’s part of a tendency to use civil courts as instruments of abuse and instruments of quasi police investigation. When they cannot [06:00] get the police to investigate, because there’s nothing to investigate, people are increasingly using in our country the civil courts as a as a bypassing of the law. And, in fact, it makes private agents and judges of civil courts in this country, essentially police investigators, judges at the same time, and agents of this state. It’s absolutely worrying and I fully support you in that.

 

Mike: Yeah, and it’s honestly in my opinion it’s an insult to the integrity of the court. I mean, these people are basically saying:

 

We don’t respect this court we don’t respect this court as a means for citizens to redress damages against each other. We use is this is a course nothing but a political vehicle. It’s just a tool we just want to use subpoena power to get information on our enemies. We don’t care that we’re not gonna win.

 

They’re not gonna win. I mean, they have no complaint. The complaint they’re making is emotional distress. That’s been struck down many times. Anyway, well let’s move on.

 

JF: So your message has been put forward. Andy today we have an amazing debate [07:02] have you been expecting as much excitement as me?

 

Warski: Oh yeah! The Valentine’s Day Massacre. Is that what we dubbed this?

 

JF: Yes. Tell your girlfriend it might be the last!

 

Halsey: Can I comment on the lawsuit?

 

JF: Yes.

 

Halsey: There’s one thing that I don’t seem to understand about why we would want to fight against this lawsuit. And just so, you know, I think that an attack on free speech is something that should be defended. I would donate to the group fighting against the lawsuit myself.

 

Mike: I’m not asking for money, I’m just, ….

 

Halsey: No I’m not. I’m not putting words in your mouth. Don’t worry! We’ll have plenty to today, ..

 

Mike: You’ll put words in my mouth later! I get it.

 

Halsey: Let’s agree to disagree later? Okay, what I’m saying is that a court case cuts both ways. And everything they can subpoena we can subpoena as well and anybody can subpoena the government’s decision-making process, the police records, the orders from town from Terry McAuliffe. If anything I would think this is going to turn out more [08:01] like the Moller lawsuit. It’s going to [08:02] turn out that they want Twitter names of people who nobody gives a shit about, when at the same time we could get information about people that actually we do give a shit about. So I don’t think that it’s such a bad thing that the lawsuit is going forward. I just think it has to be played right, and it can be actually a very good thing for our side.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

 

 

[Arya Sattya, a British woman, gives a short, but very good, critique of the recent debate hosted by Andy Warski, between Richard Spencer and Sargon of Akkad, among others. Although she disagrees with some aspects of Spencer’s views, she is highly critical of Sargon for his lack of sincerity and constant naysaying about the viability of having White only ethno-state. She goes through several of Sargon’s “arguments” pointing out the “pipul” or hair-splitting, nature of many of them  KATANA.]

 

_______________________

 

 

Arya Sattya

 

Richard Spencer vs Sargon of Akkad

 

Debate Roundup

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Click the link below to view the video:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2DZSzxHZvY

 

 

YouTube Description

 

 

Published on Jan 5, 2018

 

This is a discussion of some of the points brought up in the debate between Richard Spencer and Sargon of Akkad on Warski live.

 

Please like, comment, share and subscribe!

 

 

 

 

This video is not intended to encourage or condone hatred or violence.

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(12:09)

 

[Music]

 

[00:12]

 

 

Hello.

 

I just wanted to talk about some points that came up in the debate last night on Andy Wolski’s channel with Richard Spencer, Sargon of Akkad, Styxhexenhammer666, but also included other people like, Millennial Woes, and so on. The stream at it’s highest, had over 13,000 people watching live, and at one point reached the point of being the number one most watched stream in the world on YouTube.

 

It was a really interesting debate, and I think all this really goes to show just how many people are starting to get interested in the ideas of the so called, “Alt-Right” and just how much progress the movement is making as a whole. I really recommend going on watching it now, if you haven’t already. But I’ll put a link in the description.

 

With regards to the debate itself, I’d like to start off by saying that there are lots of points of disagreement I have with Richard Spencer, and I do think that it’s highly likely that he is, to some extent, “controlled opposition“, which I think I’ll discuss in another video.

 

But, there are also a lot of things I do agree with him on. And I thought that he performed exceptionally well in the debate. There were various polls done afterwards and it was in my opinion too, that he comfortably won the debate.

 

So, it started off with Richard Spencer calmly stating his points, and Sargon just shouting over him and coming across as incredibly impatient, for seemingly no reason at all. The first major point was about whether to adhere to abstract principles, or real-world pragmatic concerns, which Sargon just couldn’t seem to understand at all. The worlds described by Locke*, that he always seems to harp on about, was ultimately one invented for and by White people in countries that were overwhelmingly White. The United States itself was explicitly invented by, and for, White people. Which Richard Spencer mentioned at a later point in the debate, when he spoke about the 1790 Immigration Act**, which explicitly welcomed White people of good character. Sargon here is making what one might call the “Enlightenment fallacy” which I think I want to expand on in a video of itself.

 

[* John Locke, (born August 29, 1632, Wrington, Somerset, England—died October 28, 1704, High Laver, Essex), English philosopher whose works lie at the foundation of modern philosophical empiricism and political liberalism. He was an inspirer of both the European Enlightenment and the Constitution of the United States. His philosophical thinking was close to that of the founders of modern science, especially Robert Boyle, Sir Isaac Newton, and other members of the Royal Society. His political thought was grounded in the notion of a social contract between citizens and in the importance of toleration, especially in matters of religion. Much of what he advocated in the realm of politics was accepted in England after the Glorious Revolution of 1688–89 and in the United States after the country’s declaration of independence in 1776.

The next major point was about the rights of individuals, versus, the rights of groups. I don’t think that these things are mutually exclusive at all. I think that most people want to live under a State that exists for their interests, and that protects the rights and freedoms of the individuals within that State. But that State is a group identity.

Source: https://www.britannica.com/biography/John-Locke]

 

[** Naturalization Act of 1790

The original United States Naturalization Law of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat. 103) provided the first rules to be followed by the United States in the granting of national citizenship. This law limited naturalization to immigrants who were free White persons of good character. It thus excluded American Indians, indentured servants, slaves, free blacks and later Asians although free blacks were allowed citizenship at the state level in certain states. It also provided for citizenship for the children of U.S. citizens born abroad, stating that such children “shall be considered as natural born citizens,” the only US statute ever to use the term. It specified that the right of citizenship did “not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_of_1790]

 

I personally want to live under an ethno-state that protects my freedom as an individual and acts in my interests. And I want that to be an ethno-state for, and by my group. Respecting individual and group rights is not mutually exclusive, which Sargon seems to go out of his way to pretend to not understand at all. It’s about finding a balance between Authoritarianism that’s necessary for a state to function, and Libertarianism which stands up for the rights and freedoms of people within the state.

 

 

[02:51]

 

 

The point that Richard Spencer was making was about how we already have States that restrict our freedoms, and Sargon doesn’t have a problem with that now. So, Sargon despite his constant waffling on about abstract principles that originally emerged more as descriptions of States inhabited by White people, than prescriptive ideals, he does understand that in the real world we do have to restrict some freedoms, and we do have to find a balance between authoritarian and libertarian ideals. We do have to find a balance between the rights of the individuals and the preservation of the group as a whole, which they exist in.

 

I think it’s all somewhat hypocritical, when, as some have pointed out, Sargon himself started an online poll to ban social justice causes in the universities. Surely this goes against some of Sargon’s beloved principles?

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

[Millennial Woes gives a thought-provoking speech on the possible futures of Europeans at the recent Erkenbrand 2017 Conference held in Rotterdam, Netherlands, on the 14th of October, 2017. Attendance was approximately 240 people (according to Woes), double the previous year’s.

He presents the case for two likely outcomes: one the brutal, backward, ignorant, miserable future of a low IQ, mixed-race Islamic Europe, while the other is a shining future where Whites retake their lands, expel the invaders and build a Whitopia and the re-flowering of the greatness of Western civilization and all its wondrous creations.

Woes makes a call for action, for Whites to all make sacrifices for the common good and survival of our people  — KATANA.]

_______________________

 

 

 

Millennial Woes

 

One Hour From Now

 

Speech to Erkenbrand

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Click the link below to view the video:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XIu-GTSqBKM

 

 

Description

 

Published on Oct 22, 2017
My EPIC speech to Erkenbrand’s 2017 conference.
[This video is not intended to condone violence or hate, nor to advocate war. In it, I speak of a future war in Europe, because I believe that it is now inevitable and unavoidable. I wish it were not so. But if there is war coming, then we must prepare for it.]
[This project is my livelihood.

 

 

 

__________________________

 

CONTENTS

 

Introduction

1000 Years from Now, the Golden Age, 3017

500 Years from Now, 2517

200 Years from Now, 2217

100 Years from Now 2117

75 Years from Now, 2092

50 Years from Now, 2067

25 Years from Now, 2042

20 Years from Now, 2037

15 Years from Now, 2032

10 Years from Now, 2027

5 Years from Now, 2022

2 Years from Now

1 Year from Now

1 Month from Now

1 Week from Now

1 DAY from Now

1 Hour from Now

Conclusion

 

 

 

 

 

__________________________

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(65:54)

 

[00:00]

 

Introduction

 

Organizer: The next speaker needs no introduction for a lot of us, for some of us perhaps, ??? blogger, Millennial  Woes, Scottish blogger, speaks about identitarian issues. You can check out his YouTube channel, where he discusses in-depth philosophy and ??? issues of our time.

 

So, Mr Woes!

 

[loud applause]

 

Woes: Thank you, thank you. We are here to talk about the future of the European people, and the prospect of a new golden age. But we must also talk about our survival, which will enable that golden age, and be justified by it.

 

Before I go any farther, I want to see this is a speech that I’m gonna have to read off the screen an awful lot and I regret that, because this particular speech I would rather address it to every single one of you. I’d rather be looking at you while I speak, because I want to reach each one of you. And I mean, it for each one of you, but I’m gonna have to look at the screen an awful lot. I apologize. Just imagine that I am talking to each one of you, because I am.

 

Within the European context, the main threat to the survival of us and our culture, is Islam.

 

Without Islam, forming native White ethno-states within our countries might enable us to preserve our genetics and culture. It would not be dignified, to form ethno-states within the countries that should be ours, and are ours. it would not befit the White race to hide away like that, and I still wouldn’t be recommending it, but it might well enable us to survive — at least for a while.

 

But that is NOT the situation! We are dealing with Islam! And Islam will not stop at the border of an ethno-state. The old conservative slogan of “just leave me alone!”, “let me be free of this stuff you are doing“, is nowhere near enough to address this situation.

 

To save time, I will not go into the factors in detail about why I think Islam is on the rise, demographically and so on. There’s a lot to be said about it, and I did originally have a lot written, but I’ve cut it out for time reasons. I will only say that Muslims have higher birthrates than us, and stronger spiritual will, than we currently have. They believe in themselves. Therefore, the best we Europeans can expect is, not peaceful coexistence with Islam in Europe, but to be peacefully taken over and absorbed by Islam in Europe. That’s what we are facing. Of course, it is insane to believe that this process WILL be peaceful, but that’s another matter.

 

So, what are the forces that are allowing this fate to close in on us, every single day?

 

Our cultural paradigm — of equality, egalitarianism and atomised individualism — prohibits us from objecting to the takeover of us by Islam. It ensures that we see OURSELVES as individuals, but allow other peoples, and allow other peoples to see themselves as peoples. It ensures that we lose our way, and stand in open-mouthed bafflement and amazement as other peoples refuse to lose THEIR way! It ensures that we are beaten, regardless of who beats us. But what allows this cultural paradigm to remain predominant in our society? The complacency of the White public!

 

 

[05:13]

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

[Millennial Woes gives a humorous and informative speech on what it takes to be a man in 2017. Delivered at an Erkenbrand pre-conference dinner in Rotterdam, Netherlands, on Oct 13, 2017 — KATANA.]

 

_______________________

 

 

Millennial Woes

 

To Be a Man in 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Click the link below to view the video:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzMsWM1N9mU

 

 

Description

 

Published on Oct 21, 2017
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compete… [This video is not intended to condone violence or hate.] [This project is my livelihood. Please see http://www.millennialwoes.com/donate. Thank you.] ALTERNATIVE CHANNELS: http://www.vid.me/millennialwoes http://www.bitchute.com/channel/mille… http://www.minds.com/millennialwoes

 

 

 

 

__________________________

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(16:00)

 

 

Organizer: Millennial Woes will be doing a little broadcasting.

 

Woes: Alright, this is not going to be as serious as the other two talks, so I hope that’s that’s alright. I thought it would be appropriate to talk about what it takes to be a man in this year, in 2017. And this is based on the quote from Robert Heinlein, which I’ll read out now.

 

A human being should be able to change a diaper; plan an invasion; butcher a hog; conn a ship; design a building; write a sonnet; balance accounts; build a wall — “no comment”; set a bone; comfort the dying; take orders; give orders; cooperate; act alone; solve equations; analyze any problem; pitch manure; program a computer; cook a tasty meal; fight efficiently; and die gallantly! Specialization is for insects! [laughter]

 

 

Now in 2017, however, a man must be able to start an online poll that won’t be hijacked by bots; write a small software utility from scratch; code a working web page; get a public figure to retweet his pithy one-liner; [laughter] PTO skeptic — I hope you’re all aware of what’s skeptics are, terrible life forms; shelter a fellow goy in his hour of need; [laughter] withstand a demonization campaign by his nation’s tabloid media, for example; not have any skills, because they don’t teach us any, yet still have self-respect; [laughter] acquire skills and improve them, yet never get complacent; organize a local group of flashy goys; [laughter] convert Bitcoin to cash; archive a SoundCloud channel before it gets shut down; [laughter] one must understand the importance of group averages; one must understand that proportions matter just as much as absolute numbers; one must be capable of both logic and rhetoric and know that it’s not about the opponent, but the spectators.

 

A man in 2017 must be able to do a 23andme test, and pass; [laughter]

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

[Jean-Francois Garié gives his running commentary on YouTuber, Mouthy Buddha and his stream of consciousness second thoughts on becoming “red-pilled” about the jews. Lots of thoughtful and often, untended, humorous commentary by both of them — KATANA.]

 

 

_______________________

 

 

 

 

 

 

A Pill Too Hard to Swallow

 

The Twisted Mind of Mouthy Buddha

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Click the link below to view the video:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZJhAS1z0fg

 

 

Description

 

Published on October 17, 2017

 

My comments on the recent audio by Mouthy Buddha. JF’s Main Website: http://jfg.world JF’s Twitch Channel: http://twitch.jfg.world JF’s YouTube Channel: http://youtube.jfg.world JF’s Twitter: http://twitter.jfg.world JF’s Gab.ai: https://gab.ai/JFGariepy JF’s Minds: https://www.minds.com/JFGariepy Community Discord: http://discord.jfg.world Community Reddit: http://reddit.jfg.world Paypal link: http://paypal.jfg.world Mouthy Buddha’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKEt… Original audio: https://mouthybuddha.bandcamp.com/tra… * Note: In the video, I assumed that the drug MouthyBuddha had consumed was marijuana, but he has indicated in the chat that it was other drugs he was addicted to, and that he has been sober for a year and a half.

 

 

 

__________________________

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(84:38)

 

Jean: So someone in the chat just said something that was really interesting to me which is at this point in civilization. If you haven’t yet learned to double down on your views, you’re a fucking moron! And here Mouthy Buddha just released a few hours ago, this state this audio statement where is essentially doing exactly what Trump wouldn’t do! He is backing off! He is hesitating. He is disavowing part of his YouTube contribution. This is following up on a series of videos that Mouthy Buddha has released. One of them he has withdrawn a few months ago.

 

It was about the jewish Question and it was making a point that, from his description, I have not seen the original video, because it’s been removed, but from his description that he does today, doesn’t seem to be alarming at all. And then, recently, within the last two weeks, he’s released a series of videos called “the jewish Question”, which are extremely high quality videos, in terms of graphics, and in terms of content. He does a fair description of certain views about the jewish people, that is relevant. It’s not encyclopedic. It’s not well defended, but it’s a fair representation of certain views on the jewish people.

 

And today, he released a statement which will give us an insight into the mind of “The Cuck”! Let’s hear what he has to say.

 

Mouthy: Okay, before I show you this long ass clip of me talking let me just kind of set you up a little bit.

 

Jean: So notice that in the audio clip he does a preparation audio clip. So he’s like:

 

I just recorded that, but I need to add some stuff”.

 

Mouthy: At the time that I made this recording I was in shock! So it sounds, it sounds stupid to call this a spiritual experience, but it kind of was, because there was very profound change in my consciousness!

(more…)

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »