Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘National Socialism’ Category

 

[In Part II here, I give further introduction and background to Monika and Alfred Schaefer, who are defendants in trials currently underway in Munich, Germany. Their crime is “heresy” — refusing to accept the State mandated lie, known as the “Holocaust”. Here I discuss how they came to realize the fact that the “Holocaust” is a diabolical lie.

 

As Monika concluded, the “Holocaust” is, in fact, the:

 

Biggest and most pernicious and persistent lie in all of history!” 

 

— KATANA]

 

 

 

 

The Holohoaxing of Our Minds

 

The Schaefer Trials

 

Part II

 

Sep, 2018

 

By KATANA

 

Published on Sep 16, 2018

 

In Part I, I discussed how Monika and Alfred Schaefer came, via understanding that Organized jewry carried out 9/11, to question and finally conclude the falsity of the “Holocaust“.

 

Now, of all the “politically Incorrect” things that one can think and say, “Holocaust denial” is the gold standard, heads and shoulders above ordinary, mundane things, like calling a black man a “nigger“, or even calling a jew, a “jew“. It’s beyond the pale, beyond any kind of human decency, apparently, to question the most “holy of holies“, the world’s greatest “sob story” in recorded history, so we are told, by “them“.

 

Alexander Solzhenitsyn, the Nobel Prize winning Russian author had a different view on that:

 

 

 

Alexander Solzhenitsyn, stated that the jewish ruled Bolsheviks killed 66 million people up to the death of Stalin. Yet we, the general public know very little of this enormous crime of crimes, whatever the numbers, because the perpetrators, Organized jewry, controls our media, our sources of information that determine our worldview.

 

 

It is these kinds of realizations that led Monika and Alfred down a “rational garden path” of further horrific realizations, leading to the almost, perfunctory, in hindsight, rejection of the “Holocaust” as a diabolical lie against Germany, and Whites in general.

 

 

[Image Text:

Debbie: Oh … I feel so guilty for being White! We enslaved the Blacks and crucified the Jews … I never want to have a baby …

What if it was another Hitler?

Boyfriend: … You’re right, Debbie.

Man with pipe (? Jew): … Jews have been terribly persecuted … The Jews suffered Holocaust after Holocaust throughout history. It would be a sin against them … We non-Jews are all guilty and owe Jews a lot.

See:

 

 

But what of the evidence that the “Holocaust” is a diabolical lie?

 

First off, we need define what the “Holocaust” actually is. There are various definitions with some broader or narrower than others, in terms of the time period and its scope, but it can be summarized as consisting of three beliefs, namely:

 

1) There was a plan to exterminate the jews.

2) Jews were exterminated in a systematic way using gas chambers, among other methods.

3) About six million jews were killed.

 

 

 

To deny or downplay any one of these three beliefs leaves one liable to being called a “Holocaust denier”.

 

Holocaust” revisionists, almost needless to say, do not deny that jews, as declared enemies of the German State by jewish organizations, were put in camps and made to work in order to help the German war effort. And yes, those images of skeletal, dead inmates, whether jews or non-jews, in Bergen-Belsen, and Dachau, at war’s end, are shocking!

 

Yet, they are only proof of appalling diseased conditions caused as a result of Germany being bombed back to the stone age by the Allies.

 

The first of the three beliefs, that there was a plan to exterminate the jews can be shown to be false, simply for the fact there is no evidence, documentary, or otherwise for it.

 

As for the notion that the Germans simply destroyed “the Order”, the documentary evidence, as the war was coming to an end, or even better yet, just made “the Order” something that was passed on verbally, and not in writing, the revisionist John Weir [a pseudonym, likely John Wear] explained why that explanation is completely nonsensical.

 

Written orders to kill Jews under Nazi control would have to have been issued. There is no way around it, since issuing an oral command would have created its own consequences.

 

Such consequences would have been as obvious in the historical record as any written order.

 

For example, any time someone with any authority passed through Auschwitz, or Treblinka, or any of the ‘extermination camps’, he would have asked what the meaning of the pyres piled high with dead bodies was. Such a visitor would ask to see the order which granted the camp administration the power and authority to wantonly kill camp inmates. When those in charge could not produce such documentation, because the order was oral, the requester would naturally have written to Berlin to request confirmation. Berlin would have to respond.

 

One would expect to find hundreds of such letters if the extermination camps were operating on oral authorization. These queries and requests for verification would have produced a paper trail which would have survived the war, since copies of this correspondence would have proliferated as they made their way through the Nazi bureaucracy, in duplicate, and triplicate.”*

 

[* See: The Plum Cake]

 

 

In the first Ernst Zundel Trial in 1985, in Canada, Raul Hilberg* the jewish author of “The Destruction of the European Jews” admitted under cross-examination by Doug Christie, the following:

 

Christie read out a portion of the article in which it quoted Hilberg:

 

If one looks at origins, one may go back through the centuries into antiquity to discover the building blocks of the destruction of the European Jews,” Hilberg said.

 

But what began in 1941 was a process of destruction not planned in advance, not organized centrally by any agency. There was no blueprint and there was no budget for destructive measures. They were taken step by step, one step at a time. Thus came about not so much a plan being carried out, but an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus — mind reading by a far-flung bureaucracy.

 

I said that,” admitted Hilberg.

 

[* Raul Hilberg (June 2, 1926 – August 4, 2007) was an Austrian-born Jewish-American political scientist and historian. He was widely considered to be the world’s preeminent scholar of the Holocaust, and his three-volume, 1,273-page magnum opus, “The Destruction of the European Jews“, is regarded as a seminal study of the “Nazi Final Solution” by mainstream (court) historians.]

 

 

So according to Hilberg there was no conventional “plan” resulting in a “cover one’s arse with a bureaucratic German paper trail” for exterminating millions of people, just an:

 

… incredible meeting of minds, a consensus — mind reading by a far-flung bureaucracy.

 

Yeah right! German officials engaged in “mind-reading” to convey orders to carry out the killing of six million jews! This is simply not credible at all.

 

It is this knowledge, this awareness, that caused Monika and Alfred Schaefer to decide to speak out, and warn, the world about organized jewry, and its past and ongoing crimes against humanity.

 

The second belief is that “gas chambers” were used to kill millions of jews.

 

The problem with this claim is that there is no physical evidence for it, other than an admitted “reconstructed” gas chamber at the main Auschwitz (I) camp, ruins of alleged gas chambers at nearby Birkenau (Auschwitz II), tortured confessions (e.g., Hoess and others) and “testimony” by jews.

 

 

Fred Leuchter, and Germar Rudolf, have proven that these so-called “gas chambers” show no evidence whatsoever of Zyklon B being present at levels even remotely consistent with killing people. Zyklon B was a pesticide used worldwide to prevent the spread of disease, to prevent deaths in the camps, not cause deaths.

 

[Image — Fred Leuchter holding up a copy of his “Leuchter Report” submitted to court at the 1985 Zundel Trial, on the alleged gas chamber of Auschwitz and other camps, during an interview with Jim Rizoli.

See: ]

 

It is this knowledge, this awareness that caused Monika and Alfred Schaefer to decide to speak out, and warn, the world about organized jewry, and its past and ongoing crimes against humanity.

 

[Image — The New York Times: Six Million jews, since 1869 (click image to enlarge).]

 

The third belief is that “six million” jews were killed. “Six million” is a kind of magic number for religious jews, and is the required number of jews needing to perish in a holocaust for some next phase of jewish beliefs to be fulfilled. From the late 1800s this figure has been bandied about by jewish organizations, hundreds of times, as the number of jews being persecuted, killed, starved, tortured, etc. It’s a symbolic number and that’s why it is so persistent, regardless of reality.

 

 

The number of jews who died during the war in camps and elsewhere, is likely in the few hundred thousand range. Mostly caused by Allied bombing of German infrastructure.

 

In any case, should you really care that much, given that 50 million or more died in their war? Their “elders”, Organized jewry, engineered WW I, the jew-Bolshevik “Russian” revolution, WWII, the spread of Communism, and the slaughter of untold tens of millions. They engineered many other wars, including the current “War OF Terror“, kicked off by their 9/11 false flag.

 

 

It is this knowledge, this awareness that caused Monika and Alfred Schaefer to decide to speak out, and warn, the world about organized jewry, and its past and ongoing crimes against humanity.

 

Finally, an important question that is not normally addressed by Revisionists, remains.

 

If the “Holocaust” is a hoax, a black propaganda leftover from WWII, how is it still promoted and believed by all Western governments and the media? Why hasn’t it been debunked by our historians and investigative journalists looking for the scoop of the century?

 

The answer is simple. The very people, the very power, organized jewry, that crafted the “Holocaust” narrative in 1945, are the very people that still rule us today, even more so.

 

The true “horror” of the “Holocaust” is not that it occurred, but rather, in knowing that it did NOT, in fact, occur, at all! Because, then one must realize that the fraudsters and promoters of the “Holocaust Lie” are in fact, in full control of our societies, today.

 

In most European countries it is illegal to question this given history, because to do so will make you realize it is a lie. Let that thought sink in. The “Holocaust” is, in very detailed and documented fact, the “Hoax of Centuries“. Many very serious and highly qualified people have established this beyond any reasonable doubt, whatsoever.

 

Back to Monika and Alfred Schaefer.

 

They both read the material available on 9/11 and rightly concluded it was carried out by organized jewry, by Israel, and jews, and jewish sympathizers in the USA.

 

They both read the Revisionist arguments on the “Holocaust” and rightly concluded its validity. There was no genuine “Holocaust”, except in the minds of jewish supremacists that saw it as necessary propaganda to create Israel, among other agendas.

 

It was also necessary to brainwash Whites to accept, through “guilt” their racial and cultural destruction, through mass Third World invasion, as part of the bigger jewish plan to create a Jew World Order.

 

Monika and Alfred will soon face the court in Munich, to hear judgement as to whether their truth-telling, or jewish lies, will prevail in Germany today. Expect lies to prevail, it’s been done before, …

 

 

 

(TO BE CONTINUED IN PART III)

 

See Part I here: The Holohoaxing of Our Minds — The Schaefer Trials — Part I

 

 

 

============================================

 

 

Prisoners of Conscience

Monika, Alfred, and other prisoners of conscience, can be written to, at the following addresses.

 

Alfred Schaefer
JVA Stadelheim
Stadelheimer Straße 12
81549 München
GERMANY

 

Monika Schaefer
JVA Stadelheim
Schwarzenbergstr. 14
81549 München
GERMANY

 

Jeremy Bedford Turner
A5544EE
HBS/A/1-11
HMP High Down
High Down Lane
Sutton
Surrey
SM2 5PJ
UNITED KINGDOM

 

Ursula Haverbeck
JVA Bielefeld-Brackwede
z. Hd. Ursula Haverbeck
Umlostraße 100
33649 Bielefeld
GERMANY

 

Gerd Ittner
JVA Nürnberg
Mannertstraße 6
90429 Nürnberg
GERMANY

 

============================================

 

 

See also:

 

 

Read Full Post »

 

[Fraser Anning, a new Senator in Australia, delivers a stunningly commonsense maiden speech declaring that Australia needs a “final solution” to the immigration crisis that is flooding Australia with non-Whites.

 

That solution is not the fake “gas chambers” imagery that the jewish controlled screeching media tries to conjure up with his “final solution” term, but simply a referendum asking ordinary Aussies whether they want their country transformed into something unrecognizable with mass non-White immigration, or NOT!

 

His political goals are:

* to break the oligopoly power of the banks;

* to get a better deal for working families and farmers;

* to achieve major infrastructure development in Far North and Western Queensland;

* to reduce immigration levels and restrict entry to those who will best assimilate;

* to restore personal freedom and free speech;

* to make affordable home ownership a national priority;

* to counter the growing threat of China both outside and within Australia;

* to slash runaway government spending and, with it, taxes on productive enterprises;

* to build coal-fired power stations to return us to the cheapest power in the world;

* to slash the regulatory burden that is crippling the general aviation industry; and;

* to take back our culture from the left-wing extremists.

 

If you were to ask a similar type of question to the inhabitants of India, China, Korea, Japan, various African countries, etc., whether they wanted their countries flooded with racial and cultural aliens, they would all resoundingly answer NO!

 

It is only in White countries under total jewish media control, that such a question is forbidden, because (((they))) know that the answer would also be a resounding NO!

 

Fraser Anning has demonstrated with his speech, if not in deed, that he is putting real Aussies, Whites, first, rather than being a toady to an (((alien force))) that is out to destroy White countries throughout the world. Let’s hope he carries through his rhetoric with real action.

 

UPDATE (Aug 20): The leader of Katter’s Australian Party (KAP), Bob Katter (which Anning now belongs to) is unfortunately pro-jew in the extreme, as can be seen in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nBP_Tze4bM

 

Katter appears clueless to the fact that the Muslim, and non-White, invasion of White countries has been engineered by organized jewry to racially and culturally destroy countries such as Australia and New Zealand.

 

KATANA]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Australian Senator

 

Fraser Anning

 

Rightly Calls for a

 

Final Solution

 

 

 

 

Click the link below to view the video:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnqVM8xxZtA

 

 

 

Published on Aug 15, 2018

 

 

CONTENTS

 

 

INTRODUCTION — A Nation is Made from Its People

MY BACKGROUND — Brought up in the Bush, Marriage, Children, A Variety of Jobs

A NATIONAL PARTY SUPPORTER — A Joh Bjelke-Petersen Man

JOINED KAP — Members Can Vote with Their Conscience

A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN — Australian Nationalist, Australia First

POWER OF GOVERNMENT — Needs to be Constrained.

QUEENSLAND IN THE SIXTIES TO EIGHTIES — The “Good Old Days” of a Shared Vision

THE PRE-WHITLAM ERA — The Family as the Basic Unit of Society

THE PRE-WHITLAM ERA — Consensus for a European Based immigration Program

THE WHITLAM ERA — A Cultural Conquest and an Insidious Silent Revolution

MARXIST ANTONIO GRAMSCI — The Long March Through the Institutions

DEGENERACY AND TYRANNY — Disguised as “Liberation” and “Compassion”

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS — Obedience to Tyranny

ONLY TWO GENDERS — The “Infinite Gender” Lie

DEFEAT THE CULTURAL MARXISTS — Roll Back Subversion of Australian Culture

SPECIFIC POLITICAL GOALS — Regarding: banks, families, infrastructure development, immigration reform, free speech, affordable homes, China, taxes, cheap power, aviation, taking our culture back

ROYAL COMMISSION INTO BANKING — Expand Its Terms of Reference

RURAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT — Water, Bradfield Scheme

INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT — Ports

IMMIGRATION — Stop the Flood of Un-assimilatable Immigrants

IMMIGRATION — Diversity is a Weakness Not a “Strength”

IMMIGRATION — Stop 457 Visas, Limit Family Reunion, and Student Visas

IMMIGRATION — Reflect European Christian Composition of Australia Society

IMMIGRATION — Muslim Immigration Not Compatible with Australian Society

IMMIGRATION — Muslim Immigration Increase Welfare Dependency, Crime and Terrorism

IMMIGRATION — Australians have the Right to Decide Who Comes to Australia

IMMIGRATION FINAL SOLUTION — A Popular Vote!

IMMIGRATION — Whitlam Never Asked Australians What They Wanted

IMMIGRATION — Excessive Immigration Reduces Home Ownership For the Average Australian

HOME OWNERSHIP — For Australian Citizens and Permanent Residents Only

AUSTRALIAN MANUFACTURING — A Re-establishment Via Pro-business Unions and Businesses as Occurred in Post-war Germany

GOVERNMENT SPENDING — Drastic Reduction, Welfare Reform

A CULTURAL COUNTER-REVOLUTION — Traditional Values, Free Speech, Restrict UN Treaty Power

A RECONQUEST OF OUR OWN COUNTRY — Take Back Australia from the Cultural Marxists

ETHNICITY IS NOT JUST SKIN DEEP — Let’s Defend Our Ethno-religious Identity

 

DEFEND WESTERN CIVILIZATION — Our Common Kinship, Or Fall Away to Ruin!

 

 

[NOTE: Clicking on an image will enlarge it.]

 

TRANSCRIPT

 

August 15, 2018

12:16pm

Senator calls for the “final solution” on immigration

Fraser Anning’s Full Speech:

 

 

 

INTRODUCTION — A Nation is Made from Its People

top

 

Thank you, Mr President. I am pleased to advise that this is finally my first speech. On 6 February 1890, Sir Henry Parkes, the man who was to become the “Father of our Federation”, spoke to assembled delegates at the Federation Conference in Melbourne.

 

 

He said:

 

And, in this country of Australia with such ample space, with such inviting varieties of soil and climate … and with a people occupying that soil unequaled in … nation-creating properties, what is there that should be impossible? … … … … we know the value of their British origin.

 

We know that we represent a race … for the purposes of settling new colonies, which never had its equal on the face of the earth. The crimson thread of kinship runs through us all.

 

The founding father of our Federation knew that it was not simply a bounteous land that makes a nation, but the common threads of inherited identity that unite its people.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

[In this YouTube Hangout, Morgoth, who runs the blog, Morgoth’s Review,  talks with Based British, who discusses his Orwellian like experience with “Prevent”, an anti-extremist government agency, following some tweets he’d made earlier this year.

 

KATANA.]

 

 

 

 

 

 

Morgoth’s Review

 

Discussing the Government’s

 

Anti-Extremism Agency “Prevent”

 

With Based British

 

 

 

 

 

Click here for the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1-VqRuqWGA

 

 

 

Published on Aug 5, 2018

 

 

YouTube Description

Young nationalist Based British was visited by the Government’s Anti-Terror agents ”Prevent’ for Tweets

 

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(55 mins)

 

 

 

[00:07]

 

Morgoth: Hello there everybody. I’m joined with Based British who recently had an encounter with the anti-extremism division of the British government which is called “Prevent”. And there was a live stream that went up on his Twitter account, which I thought was really interesting, because then you actually got to hear what these agents, like, where they were coming from, and what they were trying to do. So, how we doing Based British, alright?

 

Based: I’m doing very well, thank you very much. Just came back from a little day out with my family, so yeah I’m having a good day. It’s supposed to be nice weather today, so I’m in a good mood, yeah.

 

Morgoth: I’ve had a good day, as well.

 

[01:02]

 

Based: I’m in a good mood, that’s why I accepted this live stream, to come on.

 

Morgoth: All right.

 

Based: If you catch me any other day I would have been very, very hesitant.

 

Morgoth: All right. What I thought was interesting about, let’s, … How many times have Prevent been to your home?

 

Based: To my home? Let me think, they’ve been about, to the house I live in, about, let me think, twice. They’ve came in the house twice, at least. And I’ve seen them about three, or four times. So they came into the house twice and I’ve seen him three, or four times. And well, the first time they came was, I think it was early April. And they pretty much, you know, they knocked on the door, I opened it, I was like, I was very puzzled as to who these people were.

 

[02:00]

 

But at the same time I was kind of expecting something like this to happen, one day, and it finally happened, you know, that pretty much the “thought police” arrived on my door! So once again …

 

Morgoth: Was this, you know, posting on Twitter?

 

Based: Oh, what was that?

 

Morgoth: There they took an interest in you, because, like what you were posting on Twitter?

 

Based: Yes, from my Twitter post.

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

[In Part I here, I give an introduction and background to Monika and Alfred Schaefer, who are defendants in trials currently underway in Munich, Germany. Their crime is heresy — refusing to accept the State mandated lie, known as the “Holocaust“.

KATANA]

 

 

 

The Holohoaxing of Our Minds

 

The Schaefer Trials

 

Part I

 

Jul 2018

 

By KATANA

 

Published on Jul 31, 2018

 

 

Monika and Alfred Schaefer are Canadian-Germans, middle-aged siblings, currently being tried in a German court — and possibly facing years in jail — for an unspeakable crime!

 

And the crime? They sincerely expressed their opinions on YouTube, and elsewhere, in Germany!

 

And what was that opinion? They dared to question the most sacred, do not touch, belief of our age, the “Holocaust”, … Oh, the horror. The Horror! THE HORROR!

 

And it all began on a sunny day. On September 11, 2001, New York, the World Trade Center Towers and the WTC 7 building were all destroyed, right down to ground level. And over 3,000 architects and engineers have come to the conclusion that it was by some form of controlled demolition. (See: 911 – Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth) Just look at the pictures and videos of the event to come to that same conclusion.

 

 

 

The official story that these three buildings were destroyed by the consequences of aircraft hitting two of the buildings is simply childish for anyone not mesmerized by “authority figure” pronouncements.

 

 

The only people capable of doing that and many other necessary steps were (((insiders))) that control the US, behind the official curtain, not 19 Arabs. Any Arabs present were mere diversionary patsies in this massive crime, that has since resulted in the deaths of millions through the wars in the Middle East.

 

 

And who are these mysteriously insiders? Well, virtually all the key players involved in the planning, the execution, and the coverup of the crime, were jews, or supporters of jews, joined at the hip to the jewish-zionist agenda.

 

 

Christopher Bollyn an investigative journalist, in his book, “Solving 9-11 – The Deception That Changed the World” names every major player in the 9/11 conspiracy, again with nearly all of them being jews.

 

 

And for what purpose? 9/11 was carried out by Organized jewry to; justify a permanent War OF Terror that puts us all under a surveillance state, whereby anyone can be seen as a potential, or real “terrorist”; to launch wars in the Middle East to create a “Greater Israel” ruling over those destroyed countries; to lay the groundwork for creating a Jew World Order tyranny, over the world.

 

 

On the 30th of May, 2014, Alfred Schaefer released his first video, titled “9/11 Gatekeepers and Controlled Opposition”. Alfred, a former long-time employee of IBM, through email exchanges with Noam Chomsky on the subject of 9/11 — who Schaefer revered as a sort of left-wing guru of truth — came to conclude (quite rightly) that Chomsky was lying and, using his prestige and status, was acting as a gate-keeper to prevent knowledge of the central jewish role in 9/11, from coming out among his world-wide, adoring, lefty followers.

 

 

Monika Schaefer was a former employee as a warden in Canada’s Jasper National Park, environmental activist, candidate for the Green Party, a musician and a violin teacher.

 

Monika Schaefer in 2008

 

Through exchanges with her brother, also became aware that 9/11 was done by Organized jewry. She spent weeks feelings emotionally nauseous, as she came to terms with the implications of understanding that our “governments” are very seriously lying to us, and are beholder to a power greater than themselves.

 

It’s from such a shocking realization that doubts are then planted about other major events in recent history.

 

Monika and Alfred travelled that road of realization, a road that led them back to their childhood, growing up in Canada, experiencing the ridicule of being “German”, of being children of “Nazis”, who exterminated “six million innocent jews”.

 

 

Monika and Alfred, finally, despite a life-time of jewish dominated media brainwashing, were able to effect a dramatic change in their worldview as a result of understanding who did 9/11. Which brings us to the heart of the matter. They both committed the “unspeakable” crime of no longer believing the diabolical lie known as the “Holocaust”!

 

Monika announced her heresy to the world in June 2016 with the release of a short video titled, “Sorry Mom, I was Wrong About the Holocaust”, in both English, and in German.

 

 

In this short five-minute video, produced by her brother when they were both in Germany, she gave a belated, yet heartfelt apology to her deceased parents for the times when she reproached them and the German people for failing to stop the “Holocaust” from happening. Monika concluded that the “Holocaust” is, in fact, the “biggest and most pernicious and persistent lie in all of history!” And that her parents knew nothing of the so-called “death camps” for the simple reason that they did NOT exist, they were only labor camps.

 

 

On her return to her hometown of Jasper, Alberta, Canada, population 5,000, she experienced a process known as “ritual defamation” whereby she was ostracized by many of the residents, prominent town people, and “fair weather friends” for her “thought crimes”.

 

 

Alfred had already announced his heresy to the world, starting with 9/11. In July 2016, he gave a speech at the London Forum on “Psychological Warfare”, which I summarized as follows:

 

In this 42 minute video Alfred Schaefer, a Canadian of German origin, delivers one of the best talks ever at the London Forum, with no punches pulled in laying bare the jewish engineered plan behind the ongoing destruction of our societies. Alfred discusses the fraudulent nature of many sacred cows held dear by our psychologically manipulated societies, with special attention to the so-called “Holocaust and the jewish engineered 9/11.

 

He brings up how organized jewry is responsible for the European civil wars, known as WWI and WWII. And how, jewish monopoly over information has sought to control us through psychological warfare that uses “control words” that inhibit us from thinking outside their imposed frames of reference. — KATANA

 

 

Monika and Alfred have blazed a trail through an apparently impenetrable tangle of lies and deceptions, to discover the origin of the false reality we live under, and yet have found a way out of that false reality, based on seeking the truth, regardless of societal pressures to conform by believing lies.

 

The origin of the false reality, of the lies we live under, is that Organized jewry has sought to create a Jew World Order tyranny. To achieve that aim, it, using “Money Power”, has gained a monopoly over all the major forms of power in our societies including finance, media, politics, education, etc., to the point that it can create Word Wars, carry out false flags, flood our countries with the Third World to racially and culturally destroy us, rewrite history, accuse and demonize Whites of historic crimes, and most relevant to Alfred and Monika, charge the German people with a crime, the “Holocaust”, that never actually happened.

 

The real “Holocaust” that has been in progress for a long time, and is being ramped up today, is that being carried out on our minds by jewish supremacists, to Holohoax us to accept our racial and cultural genocide and the establishment of a Jew World Order tyranny.

 

On Jan 3, 2018, Monika, visiting Munich, Germany, was arrested and has been imprisoned ever since. Her brother has also been arrested this month (July, 2018), and both are now on trial for expressing their opinions, for committing “heresy“.

 

(TO BE CONTINUED IN PART II)

 

 

 

See Part II here:

 

 

============================================

 

 

Prisoners of Conscience

Monika, Alfred, and other prisoners of conscience, can be written to, at the following addresses.

 

Alfred Schaefer
JVA Stadelheim
Stadelheimer Straße 12
81549 München
GERMANY

 

Monika Schaefer
JVA Stadelheim
Schwarzenbergstr. 14
81549 München
GERMANY

 

Jeremy Bedford Turner
A5544EE
HBS/A/1-11
HMP High Down
High Down Lane
Sutton
Surrey
SM2 5PJ
UNITED KINGDOM

 

Ursula Haverbeck
JVA Bielefeld-Brackwede
z. Hd. Ursula Haverbeck
Umlostraße 100
33649 Bielefeld
GERMANY

 

Gerd Ittner
JVA Nürnberg
Mannertstraße 6
90429 Nürnberg
GERMANY

 

============================================

 

See also:

 

 

Read Full Post »

 

[Luke Ford, an Australian living in the USA, who “converted” to Judaism in 1993, interviews Tanstaafl from the Age of Treason blog on the subject of the Jewish Question, aka, Jewish Problem.

KATANA]

 

_________________________

 

 

 

Watch the video here:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2laXMYmRAY

 

 

 

Luke Ford

 

Streamed live on Mar 27, 2018

 

 

Jonny Anomaly writes: On the alt-right, it has become fashionable over the last few years to recycle a trope from 1930s Germany: “The Jewish Question” (to which the Holocaust was supposed to be “The Final Solution”).

 

The contemporary version of the question concerns why Jews have so much influence in cognitively demanding occupations, including science, medicine, law, and politics. Although the “JQ” (as alt-righters call it) has a mundane answer, many subscribe to elaborate theories to account for the fact that most Jews don’t conform to the stereotype alt-righters expect them to.

 

For example, when a scholar documents the fact that 4 out of the 10 speakers at an inaugural white nationalist conference were Jewish, along with a vast array of other evidence that conflicts with alt-right dogma, the predictable response by people in the grip of an ideology is that Jews do this to create a smokescreen: it provides cover for all of the other Jews who plot against white nationalists.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Luke Ford

 

JQ Debate

 

with

 

Age of Treason

 

 


 

 

Published on Mar 28, 2018

 

TRANSCRIPT

(140 mins)

 

 

CONTENTS

 

Introduction — Tanstaafl’s Journey on the JQ

A Personal Disclosure

The White Network

Consequences for Your Marriage?

Growing Up in New York

The jewish Grandfather

Hitler’s Struggle and Yours

On Circumcision

Reading MacDonald

Jewish Crypsis and Parasitism

On Finding Support

How Your Work Differs from Others

An Existential Threat

Mein Kampf and National Socialism

Jewish Crypsis — Spain and Portugual

Jewish Crypsis — Today

“In Your Face” jews and “Down-low” jews

Ford’s Critique of Critics of jews

Tan’s Response

Complicating Things as jewish Camouflage

Jewish Gaslighting

Ad Hominem — Cofnas vs MacDonald

Jewish Deception and Coverups

Cofnas’ Critique and Your Respect for MacDonald

Cofnas — MacDonald’s Evidence is Counter-evidence

Any Factual Errors in Cofnas’ Work?

Cofnas Call MacDonald a “Bad Person”

Jews “Didn’t Du Nuffin!”

Ford — So Criticism of Scholarship is a Personal Attack?

Cofnas — Worried About MacDonald’s Work

Cofnas Doesn’t Prove His Case

Ford — Does Cofnas Screech “Anti-semitism”?

I Always Write “Anti-semitism” with Sneer Quotes

Whites Have Not Taken Their Own Side Hard Enough

You are Arguing Like a jew, Luke!

Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy

Jews Marrying Non-jews

Ford — So anything jews Do is Group Evolutionary Strategy?

Jews Always Arguing About What’s Best for the jews!

“Jews are Not a Monolith” — A Silly Statement!

The Root of jewing is: “Is it Good for the jews?”

Culture of Critique’s Chapter 7 on Immigration

Open Borders for Israel is My Attitude

Jews Not Threatened in a Multi-ethnic Society

Jews and the Second World War

Being Evidence Based

School Shooting in Florida

Does MacDonald’s Model Have Predictive Value?

Jewish Out-Marriage One Half of the Parasitism

Whatever jews Do is Bad Because They are the Enemy!

Do White People Have Agency?

Luke, You’re Not Making Honest Valid Arguments

Would You Describe jews as Ethnocentric?

Jews Moralize to Whites to Convince Them That What is Good for Whites is Bad

Fifteen jewish Intellectuals

Whites Don’t Recognise That jews are at War with Them!

Jews Behaving as “Nazis”

Intersectional jewing — Where One jew Agenda Conflicts with Another jew Agenda

Intersectional jewing — Promoting Reich, Pinker and Cofnas as Being Against “anti-racist” jewing

Why are Whites Unable to Overcome the jews?

Super Chats — What Should White Guys Do to Spread Awareness of the JP?

Ford — Are You a Leader?

Comments — Are All jews In On It?

Comments — Is Monomania on the JQ Better Than White Improvement?

Do jews Control the Weather?

Comments — How are Whites to Speak on jew Influence Without “anti-semite’ Being Shrieked

Jews are the Enemy Whatever They Do?

Is Steve Miller Anti-White?

Are You an Unhappy Guy?

Things That Make You Happy?

Reflections on This Interview

What Does It Mean To Be a jew?

Ford’s Fundamental Misunderstanding of Judaism

Do You Believe in Universal Morality?

Ford’s Journey To judaism

A jew Told Ford That you Can’t Convert To judaism

Ford Hasn’t Fooled jews

On Ford Being Rejected By his Peers at School

Ford As Cover Article in “The jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles”

Lawrence Auster Admitted That jews were Responsible for Open Borders

On Ford’s Hatred of jewish Organizations That are for Open Borders

Ford — Do You Thinks I’m Delusional?

How Ford Can Help Whites by Blowing the Whistle on Jews

END

NOTES & LINKS

PDF NOTES

Version History

 

 

 

Introduction — Tanstaafl’s Journey on the JQ

 

Ford: Hey, I’m Luke Ford. I’m here with the Age of Treason blogger, Tanstaafl. Tan, you’ve been blogging for quite a long time. Tell me about your evolution, in particular on the JQ.

[background sound]

 

Tan: Sorry let me mute that.

 

Ford: And here with Tanstaafl*, so we are going to get that microphone problem taken care of, and then we are going to discuss Nathan Cofnas’ critique [of Kevin MacDonald’s book “The Culture of Critique].. So Tan, take it away! Tell me when you started blogging. Tell me about the evolution of your journey on the JQ.

 

[* A pseudonym using the acronym for “There Ain’t No Such Thing As A Free Lunch“. The phrase and the acronym are central to Robert Heinlein’s 1966 science-fiction novel The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress.]

 

Tan: Right. I started in 2005. I started blogging, and that was after I had spent about twenty years, maybe, of not paying attention, being fed up with politics, mainstream politics, and ignoring it, focusing on my career. But in 2005, I think, it was Hurricane Katrina that triggered me, the racialization of that. It was sort of a “Trayvon Martin” experience that many people experienced years later. I experienced during the Katrina thing.

 

And so I started blogging. I had been talking to friends before that privately, and I just basically took it public. And moved through pretty quickly neo-conservative thought, which attracted me at first, because it seemed like a more serious approach to politics, than plain old conservative politics. And then I ran into someone named Lawrence Auster. You might be familiar with [him] — that might have been where I came across you.

 

 

And it was really Lawrence Auster, reading Lawrence Auster, that made me aware that there was something going on with the jews. Auster himself was a jew, was a convert to Christianity. But what I noticed over time with him was that he was hyper-sensitive to criticism of the Jews. He indulged in it himself, but it was always from the point of view of “What’s good for the jews?” He thought that the jews, in various ways, he criticized them for not doing what was best for themselves.

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

 

[In this long (151 minutes) YouTube Hangout hosted by Andy Warski and JF, Mike Enoch debates the self identified jew, Halsey English on the topic of White advocacy and jewish power.

In many heated exchanges Enoch takes the correct position that organized jewry is a hostile “elite” that needs to be expelled from Western countries, while Halsey attempts to argue, in an almost legalistic, hairsplitting “jewy” manner, that while some jewish groups may have excessive power, jews as a whole are not the cause of White racial and cultural displacement. Yeah, right.

A bizarre part of this “debate” are the many abusive comments that Halsey directs at Enoch, calling him a lying fraud!   KATANA.]

 

NOTES

 

 — If you would like to improve the accuracy of the transcript please leave any corrected text in the comments section. Corrections to misspelled names, etc., is encouraged. Thank you.


 

 

 

 

 

Halsey

 

VS

 

Mike Enoch

 

 


 


 

 

Click here for the video:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzE9vfiLU9Q

 

 

 

Published on Feb 14, 2018

 

 

YouTube Description

 

Halsey Vs. Mike Enoch

 

 

49,668 views

 

 

Streamed live on Feb 14, 2018

 

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(151 mins)

 

 

 

[00:01]

 

Warski: What is going on everyone? Welcome back to another Warski Live. I’ve a new setup still in alpha phase. We’re getting the light fixture fixed as well. But this is part one. But, of course, joining me up it’s still in an out.

 

JF: Hello Andy! I think you were the only show that gets worse with time, visually!

 

Warski: Why you think it’s worse?

 

JF: I mean, I don’t know what’s happening here. You look like you have an eight-bit background that just bugged and then everything became black.

 

Warski: Yeah. Well that’s supposed to light up. But then when I turned it on, it over exposes everything and is a mess. So I have to get a friggin dimmer installed. Yeah believe me it’s a, it’s been a hectic day for me.

 

JF: A great debate on the way. Before, I’d like to hear Mike Enoch on the case of the lawsuit against you. I think it’s an important issue regarding free speech and I’d like to hear what’s happening with this.

 

Mike: Yeah thanks. Thanks for giving me the opportunity. I know we have a big audience here and I just want to make an appeal. I know my politics are controversial and this goes beyond my individual politics, or the politics of the people that attended the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville this summer.

 

There’s a lawsuit against us that is essentially an attack on the First Amendment and free speech and internet privacy as well. So these are they’re very powerful and wealthy lawyers that have taken this case and they have attempted to allege some kind of broad-based conspiracy. But, in fact, as they have admitted if you look at press reports about this lawsuit there was something in the New York Times yesterday. There have been various reports on it. They are essentially admitting that they are [02:01] attempting to use the court to shut down the Alt-Right.

 

To shut down political opposition. The New York Times article yesterday has the lead attorney in the case Reberta Kaplan, who is a very wealthy and powerful jewish lesbian, who has is attempting to shut down the Alt-Right, by her own admission. She is, this is a strategic lawsuit, quote of her “This is a strategic lawsuit”. Integrity First for America which is the group fundamental ng the lawsuit which is a group of about twelve very wealthy jewish lawyers, are admitted that this is a political lawsuit, because the government has not done enough to silence the Alt-Right. This is in the New York Times. They’ve admitted all these things.

 

Basically they are admitting they do not have a case before the court and this is purely an attempt to intimidate and silence the defendants. And it goes beyond us. You might say, all right, well tough! Look you went up against the wrong people. But it goes beyond us. As part of [03:00] this process. There’s a subpoena issued [03:02] to Twitter. Twitter is a third party they want information on people that’s tweeted certain hashtags. They want all personal identifiable information including email address, IP address, MAC address, for people that may have tweeted certain hashtags. Unite the Right, Free Cantwell, among others.

 

Now again, you might think I don’t care about these guys. They did something dumb. They went up against the most powerful group of people in the world, and that’s stupid. Maybe so, but if it’s us first, it’s gonna be you next. We’re out here running cover for you, for free speech. And I think we need to get campus free speech groups, the ACLU, any Pro First Amendment group, any Pro Electronic Privacy group, because there is no reason why a person that tweeted out a certain hashtag would add to their case. Like they are alleging something that’s non-existent. They don’t have a valid cause of action before the court and they know it. So if they get these subpoenas granted that’s [04:01] all that they want. So this is in case of Electronic Privacy, your right to privacy on the internet, your right to free speech and this is what these people are attempting to squash.

 

And I think it’s really very important that everybody gets behind, one in condemning the lawsuit, exposing the lawsuit as was it is. And I’m not asking you to support us. I understand that’s a step that many people don’t want to take. I simply want you to support the principle. Support the principles of electronic privacy and anonymity on the Internet. The right to use Twitter without being subjected to potential political witch hunts based on hashtags that you might tweet. And frankly the right of anybody to speak their mind without suffering this kind of “lawfare”. It’s important to note there is no criminal complaint. This is a civil complaint. JF, I know you’ve talked about the abuse of civil courts before. There’s no criminal complaint here, it’s a civil complaint. Why? Because a standard of evidence for a criminal complaint is much higher. They don’t expect to win this case?

 

They [05:00] merely want to use the case as a vehicle to get as much information on as many users of the Internet as they can. And I know that amongst those people that have tweeted the hashtags that they’re looking for are people that are not Alt-Right. People that might be pro Trump. People that might be critical of Israel. These are very serious First Amendment issues they cut to the heart of our rights as Americans. And I think every decent freedom-loving American of any race of any political affiliation needs to come out against this website. Call it for what it is. Understand what’s going on. And we need to light a fire under the butts of all the free speech organizations and Electronic Privacy organizations to come out against this!

 

JF: It’s indeed a very worrying story and, in fact, it’s part of a tendency to use civil courts as instruments of abuse and instruments of quasi police investigation. When they cannot [06:00] get the police to investigate, because there’s nothing to investigate, people are increasingly using in our country the civil courts as a as a bypassing of the law. And, in fact, it makes private agents and judges of civil courts in this country, essentially police investigators, judges at the same time, and agents of this state. It’s absolutely worrying and I fully support you in that.

 

Mike: Yeah, and it’s honestly in my opinion it’s an insult to the integrity of the court. I mean, these people are basically saying:

 

We don’t respect this court we don’t respect this court as a means for citizens to redress damages against each other. We use is this is a course nothing but a political vehicle. It’s just a tool we just want to use subpoena power to get information on our enemies. We don’t care that we’re not gonna win.

 

They’re not gonna win. I mean, they have no complaint. The complaint they’re making is emotional distress. That’s been struck down many times. Anyway, well let’s move on.

 

JF: So your message has been put forward. Andy today we have an amazing debate [07:02] have you been expecting as much excitement as me?

 

Warski: Oh yeah! The Valentine’s Day Massacre. Is that what we dubbed this?

 

JF: Yes. Tell your girlfriend it might be the last!

 

Halsey: Can I comment on the lawsuit?

 

JF: Yes.

 

Halsey: There’s one thing that I don’t seem to understand about why we would want to fight against this lawsuit. And just so, you know, I think that an attack on free speech is something that should be defended. I would donate to the group fighting against the lawsuit myself.

 

Mike: I’m not asking for money, I’m just, ….

 

Halsey: No I’m not. I’m not putting words in your mouth. Don’t worry! We’ll have plenty to today, ..

 

Mike: You’ll put words in my mouth later! I get it.

 

Halsey: Let’s agree to disagree later? Okay, what I’m saying is that a court case cuts both ways. And everything they can subpoena we can subpoena as well and anybody can subpoena the government’s decision-making process, the police records, the orders from town from Terry McAuliffe. If anything I would think this is going to turn out more [08:01] like the Moller lawsuit. It’s going to [08:02] turn out that they want Twitter names of people who nobody gives a shit about, when at the same time we could get information about people that actually we do give a shit about. So I don’t think that it’s such a bad thing that the lawsuit is going forward. I just think it has to be played right, and it can be actually a very good thing for our side.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

 

[Henrik of Red Ice Radio interviews Canadian-German activist Alfred Schaefer on the situation surrounding his sister’s arrest on Jan 3 this year, in Germany, for making a video called “Sorry Mom, I Was Wrong About the Holocaust“.

 

Part of the subversion of Whites has been achieved through the diabolical lie known as the “Holocaust” that is used by organized jewry as a “shield and sword” to draw attention away from its massive crimes against humanity, such as the instigation of the World Wars, 9/11, etc., while also instilling guilt and shame in Whites for their very existence.

 

Alfred is a tireless and impassioned “man on a mission” to alert all to the reality of our dire situation and the forces behind our looming racial and cultural destruction, if we fail to act! I would urge all readers to support Alfred in his work and to help him in exposing the Orwellian situation that his sister, Monika, finds herself in as a “thought criminal“, now locked up in a maximum security prison in Germany.

 

In Part 2 here (Part 1 is here), Henrik explains his thinking on how Red Ice should present such taboo topics as Revisionist material, and the role of organized jewry in our racial and cultural destruction, that Alfred discusses. Since Red Ice has a large and growing audience on YouTube, Henrik rightly concludes that despite wanting to get the truth out, they must avoid getting banned by YouTube by publishing certain material discussed here in the members section.

 

Alfred then talks about the use of “control words“, such as “extreme right wing“, “racist“, “anti-semitism“, etc., by our enemies to frame the debate in their favour. Organized jewry through its media domination have been relentless lying to us for the purpose of effectively genociding the White race through mass invasion of non-Whites, miscegenation and other means to drive the Whites into minority status.

 

He then talks about how the advert of digital technology has enable us to reclaim history and expose the lies that we have been feed. Despite the availability of the true history it is a traumatic process for most people to go through as they rid themselves of the lies that they have been brainwashed with all their lives. Alfred talks about how he overcame his fears to eventually come to conclude that Adolf Hitler was one of the greatest leaders that we have ever produced.

 

Henrik talks about how he has become “skeptical” about the so-called “Holocaust“, because of the many things that simply don’t add up, and as such is very interested to hear about what “Holocaust deniers” have to say. He goes on to say how the “Holocaust” is always talked about in an emotional way by the main stream media, leading him to conclude there is something “fishy” with the story.

 

Alfred goes on to explain how the people of the West have been, through psychological manipulation, reduced to the level of spiritual, emotional cripples, that have prevented them from resisting, so far, from being flooded with millions of the Third Word.

 

Henrik tells how that Red Ice has put everything on the line in talking about migration, the JQ, White genocide, etc., wherever the truth leads them. How jews like Barbara Spectre, Noel Ignatiev, Gregor Gysi, talk about the desirability of White population replacement.

 

Alfred describes how technological development has been used by jews to further their plans, for example with their control of Hollywood, the media, etc. The World Wars and what is happening now is the final phase of the “War of the jew” to dominate the world. And how our empathy, our jew induced feelings of guilt, pathological altruism, and so forth, is being used against us.

Much more is discussed, with Alfred and Henrik ending by urging listeners to write letters of support to Monika.

 

I would add that Monika’s imprisonment is a real expression of the war being waged against us and our freedom to exist. Her situation is symbolic of the repression that will only get far worst unless we stand up and fight back in any way we can, however small or large. So start sending cards and letters to Monika, and anything else towards helping her and our cause.

Write to Monika now, at:

 

Monika Schaefer
Stadelheim Prison
Schwarzenbergstr. 14
81549 München,
GERMANY

 

KATANA.]

 

 

 

 

Red Ice TV

 

Alfred Schaefer

 

Thought Criminal

 

Monika Schaefer

 

Arrested and Imprisoned

 

in Germany

 

 

PART 2

 

 

 

 

 

Click here for the video:

 https://wir-sind-monika.com/2018/02/01/alfred-schaefer-red-ice-part-2/

 

Published on Jan 27, 2018

 

 

Red Ice Radio Description

 

 Alfred Schaefer is a German producer whose videos are aimed at exposing the propagandistic nature of the mainstream media. His videos outline how the hostile elite that are in control of much of Western Civilization have managed to subjugate entire populations and their political leadership through psychological conditioning.

 

Alfred Schaefer joins Henrik for a discussion about the consequences of challenging the accepted view of the Holocaust. The program begins with Alfred describing what it was like to grow up in Canada with German ancestry amid an accusatory climate of Holocaust remembrance. He describes his sister Monika’s newly found skepticism of the prevailing historical view of the Second World War and her subsequent video productions. Alfred recounts how Monika was arrested in Munich because of her videos that challenged the prevailing mainstream consensus concerning the Holocaust while attending the trial of Sylvia Stolz, a lawyer on trial for so-called Holocaust denial. Henrik and Alfred discuss with incredulity how pursuing historical inquiry can lead to criminal charges and imprisonment.

 

[Please support Red Ice by becoming a member. It’s only through paid membership that they can continue to do their work, and cover such controversial topics such as the Holohoax — KATANA]

 

In the members’ hour, Henrik and Alfred talk about the fractured nature of facts surrounding the nature of the Holocaust itself and the need for further research. The conversation then addresses the migrant crisis and how it constitutes a threat to Western civilization and how it can be viewed as a destructive companion phenomenon to Holocaust guilt and other Leftist propaganda. The conversation turns to the free fall of the mainstream media, how people crave alternative media sources, and the importance of outlets like Red Ice. Henrik speaks to the risk involved with pursing the truth about the migrant crisis, its origins, and underlying motivators. The discussion then turns to the seeming contradictions of population replacement.

 

Henrik and Alfred go on to discuss the severity of the current geopolitical situation as an existential crisis; the importance of pursuing moderate solutions to avoid widespread conflict; and much more.

 

Help keep us ad free, sign up for a membership at https://redicemembers.com

You’ll receive full access to our extensive archives.

Stream or download over 1400 programs, including radio shows, videos TV segments & our live show Weekend Warrior.

♥ SHOW US SOME LOVE ♥ HELP US GROW

Donate: https://paypal.me/redice

Donate Bitcoin and other Cryptocurrencies: BTC: 15GFG2CVA6Ftq4w7dRuug9CQCsyrpeN1XG BCH:

1KVGWkLd5YuRxKNrVhExX8WiPCi4pGtey8 ETH:

0x90a0F323F58412eBfe086055831655A1c0D9E3B4 LTC:

Lc8aHwQ91EMr4dTcCcdNVLhBxTf5GUhPjP

More Red Ice TV & Radio: https://redice.tv/

Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/redicetv

Like us on Facebook: https://facebook.com/RedIceCreations

Listen to us on Spreaker: https://www.spreaker.com/show/red-ice…

Subscribe to our YouTube: https://youtube.com/user/RedIceRadio

RSS feeds: https://redice.tv/rss

 

 

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(64 mins)

 

 

 

[00:00]

 

 

Henrik: All right ladies and gentlemen, thank you for joining us here in the second segment at Red Ice Members dot com. We’re talking with Alfred Schaefer.

 

And I just want to take a moment and kind of explain a few things, not only about the topic, but kind of about the way that we have to think about how we address these kinds of topics now, as well. The first thing is, of course, that we were mentioned, Red Ice TV was mentioned by name in the British Parliament. It was a couple of weeks ago now, by a lady who brought us up, we’re in the record of the UK parliament right now in reference to, I think there had a discussion about hate and violence and how people turn to terrorism and stuff like that. And we came up as a horrible right-wing example of a channel that should be censored! And this lady [Yvette Cooper], I forget her name, now even. She was literally calling, she was sitting there with a representative from Google and talking about us specifically how, you know:

 

What do we need to do to make you censor these kinds of channels?

 

And not only since that point, but around that point, we realized that okay, what we have here with the YouTube channel, I think we just broke 170,000 subscribers recently. So it’s a good, you know, it’s a good platform. It’s a good way to get the message out. And just to be frank with everyone, I also feel at the same time that I know that certain topics are just a “third rail”! I know that they would lead to censorship. Part of me feels, I don’t want to hand their reasoning to them, or the way that they just can basically say, “Okay, let’s censor it! ” Because they’re talking about these “nonsense” topics.

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »