Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘National Socialism – Philosphy’ Category

 

[ John Friend of The Realist Report interviews German-Canadian activist Monika Schaefer on her awakening to the destructive activities of organized jewry and its ongoing plan of genocide against Whites. Having spent her entire adult life involved in various environmental causes it was only in the last few years that she  became aware that 9/11 was an “inside job” carried out by organized jewry.

One thing led to another, and she then became aware of revisionism and that the “Holocaust” is a diabolical hoax perpetrated by the usual suspects against Germans in particular and Whites in general.

She went public with her views in June 2016 with the release of a short video titled, “Sorry Mom, I was Wrong About the Holocaust“. Despite being a prominent, well respected individual of long-standing in the “Gingerbread Town” of Jasper, Alberta, she has faced social ostracism and a process of “ritual defamation” from leading members of the community — KATANA.]

 

 

 ATTENTION READERS!

 

Volunteers are needed to help complete this transcript.

 

Please step forward and do your bit!

 

[ 25/89 mins, now complete!]

 

Always leave a message in the comments BEFORE starting on a time-slot.

 

 

Why Bother with Transcripts?

Occasionally, people ask if having a transcript is really necessary (considering all the work involved) when people can just listen/watch the audio/video.

 

Here are some reasons. If you can think of any more or would like to elaborate on the ones here please leave a message in the Comments.

 

Some of the advantages of a transcript are as follows:

 

You are able to read the whole presentation with full accuracy at the speed that you can read, which is generally a lot faster than listening to the audio or watching the video.

Some speakers, with strong accents or idiosyncratic speech habits, are often difficult to follow.

You can easily scan the text and zoom into what interests you in a non-linear manner.

You can easily quote verbatim from the text when making comments about the text.

You can print out a hard copy for future reference.

When you listen to an audio or watch a video you tend to forget much of the points made, etc. Having it in writing allows you to refresh your memory quickly and accurately.

Transcripts lend themselves to be available off-line and spread via hard copies.

Transcripts can make it easier to create accurate translations of the material which can in turn be used to create video and audio versions.

Video and audio files often become unavailable, for many reasons including censorship (on Youtube, etc.), technical causes due to lack of equipment or power.

Video and audio files are many times larger than a text file of the same material, sometimes hundreds of times larger. In many cases presenting the information in video or audio format has no worthwhile advantage over a text file. Of course there are may cases where the opposite is true.

Other?

 

That all said, a transcript is often no substitute for an audio/video file and vice-versa. They are complimentary to each other.

 

_________________________

 

Readers, please:

  • BEFORE starting, indicate in the COMMENT section the time slot that you are willing to complete. For example:    >>> I will do 15:00 to 20:00 <<<
  • If available copy the rough transcript, the “NEEDS PROOFING” text, into a text editing program and while listening to the audio make any corrections required.
  • Every minute of transcription will take you about 5 minutes or more to complete accurately.
    • Doing even 1 minute is helpful!

  • As a double-check, please look at the COMMENTS to see whether anyone has indicated they are already doing a particular time-slot. (Comments are automatically posted. There is always some delay in the Transcript Progress Chart being updated in the actual post.)
  • Time slots that I know are being worked on will be marked as “IN PROGRESS” in the post so as to help avoid duplication of effort. Always check the COMMENTS though.
  • If you have little time, don’t worry or fuss about typos, spelling, punctuation, etc. I can clean it up.
  • If something is unclear put your best guess followed by some question marks, e.g., “He said that xxx ??? thought this, …” Don’t spend time trying to figure it out.
  • Please enter the transcript in the comment section with the times. I will then copy it (after proofing it) into the post.
  • Another way to help if you don’t have time to do any transcription is to point out any errors.

Thank you.

 

 

The Realist Report

 

On this edition of The Realist Report, we’re joined by Monika Schaefer, a courageous activist and truth-seeker openly exposing the fake Jewish “Holocaust” narrative and other extremely controversial topics. Monika’s brother, Alfred, was recently a guest on The Realist Report.

 

In this podcast, Monika and I discuss her background, education, and upbringing before moving on to address her awakening process to the lies endlessly promoted and perpetuated by the mainstream mass media, Hollywood, modern educational establishment and virtually all Western governments pertaining to the alleged Jewish “Holocaust” during WWII. Monika gives us her take on the fake “Holocaust” narrative and offers her perspective on Adolf Hitler and National Socialist Germany. We also address a number of other important topics in this podcast, including the reality of Jewish power and influence in the Western world, the systematic promotion of policies designed to genocide the White race, 9/11 and the “Global War on Terror,” and related matters.

 

Check out Monika’s website and her great video Sorry Mom, I was wrong about the Holocaust:

 

The Realist Report.com
http://therealistreport.com/the-realist-report-monika-schaefer/

 

DOWNLOAD AND LISTEN TO THE INTERVIEW HERE:

 

 

The Realist Report

 

Interviews

 

Monika Schaefer

 

Published on May 17, 2017

 

TRANSCRIPT

(89 mins)

 

[00:55]

 

 

John: All right folks, welcome back to another edition of The Realist Report. This is your host John Friend. The website is The Realist Report dot com, where you can find an extensive archive of these podcasts, as well as other radio broadcasts I’ve participated in. You can also find all of my articles and blog posts, a contact page with my personal email address, my Twitter feed — which is embedded on the right hand side of the website, and all sorts of other useful information and links. I am a regular reporter for American Free Press, America’s last real paper. And I also contribute to the Barnes Review, a bi-monthly history magazine, affiliated with American Free Press. Both publications are worth subscribing to and I highly encourage listeners to do so, if they are not already. Visit American Free Press dot net and Barnes Review dot org, for more details.

 

All right, with that said, I’d like to introduce my special guest this evening. Monika Schaefer is joining us for the very first time. Monika is a courageous activist and truth seeker who has openly and quite publicly challenged a number of taboo topics in modern Western society, including the fake jewish “Holocaust” narrative, which is endlessly promoted and perpetuated by the educational, media and political establishment, here in the West.

 

Monika, thank you so much for joining me! How are you this evening?

 

Monika: Hello John! Thank you so much for having me on! And I am doing very well, thank you, very much. And I honestly thank you for all the good work you do! Yeah, I’ve been listening to your podcasts for a while and reading some of your articles. And I think you do excellent work!

 

See here for the interview with Alfred Schaefer.

 

John: Thank you very much, I really appreciate it. And, you know, it’s funny I feel like I know you although we’ve never actually spoken. Maybe it’s, because I’ve interviewed your brother Alfred a couple times now, here on The Realist Report? And I’ve seen some of your video, a couple which we’ll talk about in this podcast. Yes, but I don’t know, I just have this strange feeling that somehow we know each other but, I know we actually don’t. So, it’s great for you to finally be here and, you know, we can kind of get to know each other in real life I guess, or at least over the Internet, as best we can.

 

Monika: Yes, and I had that sensation too! Yes, that’s right, just from listening to your talk with a number of people and so, it does feel like we know each other probably, because we’re on the same page on a lot of these issues, I think.

 

John: Yes, I think so. And your brother’s always great talking to. I actually recently interviewed him just a couple of weeks ago. And we dealt with a number of topics that I’m sure we’ll be getting into, in this podcast. So I guess, just to get started, could you kind of tell us a little bit about your background, your education and your upbringing. And perhaps, maybe your professional experience, if you feel that is relevant. Let’s kind of start there, just kind of introduce yourself, please.

 

 

[04:27]

 

 

Monika: Sure. I grew up in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada and my parents came from Germany in the early 50’s. And I was born in 1959, the fourth in a family of five children. And we grew up in a very, I would say, traditional German household, you know, the way we celebrated certain times of year, in a very German style. Like Christmas, you know, we had the real candles on the tree and that kind of thing. And something that I really feel, that affected us deeply was our parents’ love of nature. Even though we grew up in the city we were very, very connected to the natural world. We had a huge vegetable garden always, and we put great value on going for walks, like as a family. We would go for walks in the river valley and just really appreciate nature. That went very, very deep.

 

Transcripts of Red Ice Radio’s interview are here: Part I and Part II

 

And yeah, as I was growing up, you know, learning in school, the usual things that we were learning in those days, in the sixties and seventies. And I had, like Germar Rudolf — and you interviewed him recently — and he talks about his very developed sense of justice. I could relate to that when he spoke of that. I feel that applies to me, too. I started to become an activist in environmental things and social justice things, very, very early in my life. Like during my teen years. And then all through my adult life I was very much an activist. And it was always on environmental things and also peace issues.

 

But, I have to say it wasn’t until about 2011, I started to really understand how the world was working. But before that, I’ll just talk a little bit about my activism. I actually did get involved in politics. I ran as a candidate for the Green Party of Alberta first and then the Green Party of Canada, in several elections. I just felt that the Green Party was the one political party whose principles and values meshed with my own!

 

 

But that has now changed drastically! In fact, Elizabeth May, the leader of the Green Party Canada, she did a very public condemnation of me last summer, after my video! And this is why we’re talking today, you and I, on this podcast. The video that I created, and my brother produced it, is called, “Sorry Mom I was Wrong About the Holocaust”. And it’s a very short video, under six minutes. And in it I basically tell the world that the “Holocaust” is a lie! And that unleashed a set of events in my life that basically has changed my life! [laughing]

 

John: Yes, I can only imagine. You know, real quick, I hate to interject, but let me just make two brief comments. Number one, I actually have never interviewed Germar Rudolf.

 

Monika: Oh!

 

John: Although I would love to, I would really like to. I just, I never have. I’ve heard him be interviewed a number of times. I know he’s been on Dr David Duke’s program every once in a while. I’ve also heard him interviewed on Jeff Rense’s radio program I believe, and Red Ice Radio.

 

Monika: It was the Red Ice Radio.

 

John: Yeah OK.

 

Monika: I mean, you know, I was mixed up John.

 

John: No, no, it’s totally fine. I just wanted to state that for the record. I’ve never interviewed him although I would love to. I think we’d have a great conversation, he’s really, I mean, the expert when it comes to the “Holocaust”.

 

One other comment I wanted to make; you had said how you, ever since you were a child really, and it’s probably a result of your upbringing, but also maybe something innate in you. You have this very, deep sense of truth and justice, and you just sort of want what’s right. And want to pursue the truth wherever it leads. And that’s exactly the type of person that I am! It’s maybe hasn’t been the wisest thing to do, considering the world we live in. But it’s just something that I just have to do. Again I think it’s something that is innate in myself, in maybe certain other people, like yourself. Do you think that this is something that’s maybe more prevalent in certain people, or something that’s kind of instilled, or innate again in certain people, rather than others?

 

[09:47]

 

Monika: Oh my goodness, that’s a big question! I think a lot of people have this sense of justice and wanting to do what’s right. Perhaps some of that gets, I don’t know, squelched out of us. Maybe it’s in our education system and it’s a very demoralizing education system that we have. And there are certain things that create, well, or work towards “anti-creative zombism” if you want to call it that, in our education system. That maybe kicked that out of us? But anyway, … I think a lot of people power have it but we are fed wrong information, then we can’t even seek justice. We don’t know what justice is!

 

And so, psychological warfare is something that I do want to talk about. And that is the most dangerous weapon being used against us and that can ruined any, you know, sense that we can seek justice. People can still have that desire for who are doing what’s right and doing what’s just. But what I’m experiencing, for example, in this “ritual defamation” that’s being done against me, is that probably a lot of people who are treating me very badly, think that they are doing the right thing! Some of them probably know very well that they are not and that they are actually, you know, deceivers and liars, but I think a lot of the people just get swept along, thinking that they are being righteous, when they are treating me badly, because I have done a “taboo” thing and that is, I have challenged this story, the “Holocaust” myth.

 

Elements of a Ritual Defamation (click image to enlarge in new window)

 

John: Yeah, I think so. And I think certainly our modern hyper-capitalistic, hyper-individualistic society, you know, it doesn’t reward this sort of behavior this sort of sense of honor and truth and justice. You’re not going to get very far if you’re this type of person, at least it seems like it. The system is kind of designed that way, any ways. There certainly are exceptions and it’s not impossible to operate in a system and still have this sense of truth and justice. But it does make things very challenging. And so, that’s one point.

 

Then also, I think you’re right as far as, you know, sort of psychological warfare is concerned. I think there is an attack on our minds and really, you know, the way the media works and the way the educational system works. It’s designed to attack this and to undermine this. And it’s very sad! It’s very, very harmful, it’s been very detrimental to our society, certainly.

 

Monika: Absolutely! I mean, I think that the teachers in the schools, when they are teaching wrong things to the children, the teachers just don’t know that. They are also indoctrinated and mind contaminated by the books that they have read and by the education they received. So it’s generation after generation that gets deceived. But that is the worst weapon of all, because what happens is we become agents of our own destruction.

 

 

And that is something that is written in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. That the “goy” will become, “agents of their own destruction”. And that is just the most tragic aspect of all of this! It’s a much worse enemy to have, you know, psychological warfare and the “chameleon within the gate”. You know, that is destroying us, within our own societies by giving the wrong curriculum and bad curriculum and teaching the wrong things to the children. Teaching lies, basically. That’s a much more dangerous enemy then the enemy comes with the cannons or the guns and the open warfare. I mean, that might be destructive in the moment and it might lead to, you know, it death of people and destruction of places, however, people can recover from that.

 

Now with psychological warfare, that’s difficult, really. Can we recover from that when we have been so misled and contaminated and our minds have been polluted and our spirits have been crushed?

 

 

[14:43]

 

 

John: Indeed. That is very well said. You’re totally right about that.

 

And the last part I did, I spoke with Pete Papaherakles, and we were talking about the “Trivium” of education. And, you know, basic logic and critical thinking. And sadly our society these days, people just really don’t know how to use their brain. They don’t know how to evaluate information. They don’t know how to discover what the truth actually is. And that’s really a big problem! It’s that, you know, you try to talk about a subject like the “Holocaust”, for example, and you just ask someone, … And this is what I do regularly, you know, when this comes up, like in a personal conversation, or like, if I’m talking to a friend, or something, I’ll just say:

 

Why do you believe the ‘Holocaust’ narrative”?

 

I mean, what evidence and proof is there to demonstrate that this actually happened? Let’s examine that evidence and see if it stands up to scrutiny. And, you know, it’s very difficult for people to do these, like simple things. And I think there’s reasons for that. I think, you know, most people again, simply really don’t know how to think critically and use their brain to evaluate information.

 

But also, I think a lot of the, … Certainly when it comes to the “Holocaust”, but also other very traumatic events, game changing events in our history, but especially the “Holocaust”, the propaganda used to promote, to perpetuate this myth, is very exploitative. And it really is a form of psychological warfare, you know, again another topic we can talk about, and a topic that I spoke with your brother about.

 

So I mean, I think there’s multiple factors at play here, but those are really the two main ones. As you know, most people simply just don’t know how to properly use their brain, to use the “Trivium”, to use critical thinking. And also the propaganda associated with a lot of these events is systematically designed to exploit us on very base emotional and psychological levels.

 

Monika: Yes! You’re hit the nail on the head. So it not only are people not able to use logic, but this subject is absolutely taboo to even question. So, I’ve had people tell me, even if they were trying to remain friendly to me, they would say:

 

Well Monika, this topic is it just off limits! I’m not going to discuss the ‘Holocaust’ with you! I’m not going to debate it with you! But I’ll still, you know, be your friend.

 

But I mean, those people, they kind of go by the way side anyway. They’ve been more and more affected in this small town of 5,000 people. It has gotten worse, not better, over the year. But this topic is, … You just cannot debate it! Because we’ve been trained that if you even question it, then you are automatically “a hater”!

 

I mean, this is bizarre! There is no logic in that, John! Like, how can that even make sense, that if you say that there was no deliberate extermination plan, and that means less people died, that you are a hater! ? Now to me, that is the most bizarre leap of logic, you know? Can you explain that?

 

John: No you can’t explain it logically, because it’s not a logical argument. It’s a ridiculous argument and there’s no logic involved at all. It’s all pure emotion, all emotion.

 

Monika: Yes, that’s right.

 

John: And that’s the thing, that especially the holocaust. But I mean, other events as well, 9/11, for example. Although I do think that the fake “Holocaust” narrative and, you know, World War Two generally, you know, this idea that Hitler was this evil monster, who wanted to take over the world. And he had, you know, his master race and all this other nonsense. This is really, you know, sort of the most taboo and most controversial topic in all of society. And, of course, it relates directly to jews, so if you start talking about Jews your equated with Hitler, you’re equated with the Nazis and you’re a racist, you’re anti-Semitic and all these other weaponized buzzwords are thrown at you. Again, logical fallacies, all of them! You know, none of this is factual.

 

Monika: All of it!

 

John: Yeah, exactly!

 

 

[19:23]

 

 

Monika: It’s the biggest weapon yet! I mean, if it wasn’t for this success this big, huge, mess of the “Holocaust”, there’s no way they would have had the audacity to do something like 9/11.

 

And 9/11, I mean, that was actually what triggered me to wake up! And it didn’t happen right away. I kind of knew something was wrong with it, but it wasn’t until about ten years after 9/11, that I started to investigate it and figure it out. And that was a really hard door to go through, because it just meant that, they’re lying to us! Like that’s a huge thing to lie about, right? That’s not just a little money scandal. I mean, you always hear about little scandals, this and that, that seem big when they talk about them, like political scandals. But, you always just think, okay, well, they have corruption in this and that, but you just can’t imagine they would lie about something so big. But once you figure that out, that turns your world upside down!

 

And it was after that, that I started to figure out the “Holocaust”. And at first I really resisted it. I mean, that just, how could there be such a big lie? How could that be?

 

And just to go back to what I briefly said in my video. It was an apology to my parents. To my mother in particular. Because when I was a teenager, and again this comes back to this deep sense of justice that I had, and we were learning all those horrors about Hitler and the “Holocaust”. And so, there I was, telling my mother, saying things like:

 

Mom, why didn’t you stop this from happening? If you had just got together with all your friends and your relatives, you could have done something about it!

 

I mean, that was ridiculous, to say such a thing! But there I was, holding her to account, you know, she was culpable! And I’m sure that there was a whole generation of us that, you know, it caused a real generation gap. A rift between the generations of Germans. That, oh! These parents of ours, or the grandparents, oh, they were monsters, you know! Like this what happened.

 

And so, there I was, reprimanding, or holding her to account for not having tried to do more! I mean, she was just a teenager in a war anyway, so that was pretty ridiculous just on that count. And then all these years later, and this is after both parents have died, that I figured it all out and I just regretted that so much! And I told Alfred one day on the phone, I said:

 

Boy, I wish I could say sorry!

 

And he just grabbed onto that and said:

 

Oh! Yes! That’s very significant!

 

Yes, so then, …

 

John: That’s the video we’re making right there! Do it!

 

Monika: Yeah, exactly!

 

John: Well, you know, speaking of your video. At least on Alfred’s channel, I don’t know if this is, I’m sure it’s been viewed on other channels. I’m sure you can find this exact same video on other channels. But just on his channel alone, it’s been viewed over 130,000 times! So this has made quite an impact. And this was, June 17th, 2016. So, a little under a year ago.

 

And it’s a short, very powerful video. I’d assume most people listening to this podcast have seen the video, but if you haven’t, I will have a link to it. In fact, I just embed it in this post, you’ll find it right on my website. It’s six minutes total, just under six minutes. Take the time to watch it. It’s very good, it’s very powerful, it’s very just straightforward and like, look “Sorry Mom, I was wrong and here’s why. And here’s why it’s important!” And it’s very good. And yeah I just really like this video, especially when it first came out. And again, it made quite a splash, you know, all these waves, …

 

Monika: Yeah, It struck a chord John, because there are other people who went through that similar experience. Like what I said, that they were disgusted with their parents’ generation. Which is just such a sad thing that has been done to the German people.

 

Okay, about the video, you mentioned, that this is just on Alfred’s site. You’re right there’s a lot more views even then that. Because I made a German version, an original German version, I speak German fluently. So that is called, “Entschuldigung Mama, ich hatte Unrecht was den Holocaust betrifft” in case you have German listeners. So you could look that up too.

 

And then also the English version was translated into three languages, within the first four days. Not that we did this, others did this. So, French Spanish and Swedish, I believe. And then these people sent us the links to those at the time. People are just kind of, … Like I say, it really struck a chord. It was just brief, it’s short, so it’s easy to watch and this thing, you know, about the parents and just saying sorry to Mom, you know, reprimanding her for not doing anything to stop these things! And then figuring out it’s all a lie! Oh my goodness!

 

John: Now, I’m curious. There’s quite a substantial population of Germans in Canada, correct? That came over right after the war?

 

 

[25:02] IN PROGRESS

 

 

Monika: Definitely! Yes a lot of Germans.

 

John: I’d imagine maybe even more so, you know, they came here to America I don’t know that for sure, but it seems like there’s quite a few that came directly after the war.

 

Monika: Yes tension Canada I mean, you know, yes and through the fifty’s to that when my parents came I think there were a lot of people coming from Germany and my parents came in 1951 and 52, respectively. Yes I think that’s a lot of people left Germany I mean, Germany was destroyed and also you had the expellees from the eastern territories. That eastern, you know, it looks to Sudentenland, East Prussia. All these different territories that were German for hundreds of years and then, you know, in Germany like shrunk after World War One. And World War One led directly to World War Two. These are things have learning a lot about now and really going to be a good education a big learning curve. And I met some of those expellees, people who were forcibly expelled. And this is a story that we certainly did not learn about in school. I think probably a lot of your listeners do understand about this, but millions of Germans died after World War Two was over.

 

And many of them died as they were being pushed out of those eastern territories and many were murdered many starved many women and girls, you know, young girls up to old women were raped. It was brutal what they went through. And I met a few German expellees who were children at the time — when I went to Toronto last summer to speak there — and I have to say that was just so impacting on me. I mean, it was a very impactful experience for me to meet these people!

 

John: Right, you know, I can imagine. Now, of course, you had mentioned you guys were really tart anything like this perspective the German perspective of World War Two I’m assuming anyways, when you’re growing up in Canada. Your parents parents didn’t talk about it?

 

Monika: Well there were some things that my parents did talk about, but I don’t remember the stories of expellees. But what my mother did talk about over and over again was Dresden. She wasn’t there, but she knew all about it. And Dresden was the real “Holocaust”! The “Holocaust” of German civilians, women, children and injured soldiers were there in hospitals. And also war refugees. The city had no military installations and that it had no military targets there. And it had the most beautiful architecture!

 

And actually the German people started to believe that oh nobody ever promised me and it was aired for most of the war and in February 1945, 13th. I believe, it started, or maybe it started on the 11th, I’m not sure now [The bombing started at 10:14 pm, on Tuesday the 13th] . The bombing began and it was incendiary bombing. It was purposely to start fires and many, many, many people died there, and then they paused [the bombing] and then people, as they were coming out of, you know, the bunkers and whatnot, it’s a survived to tell they were getting stuck in the wall him and then the bombing started. It was just brutal it was sheer and utter revenge from the allies! And they knew this city was full of refugees and women and children and that it was there was no military there.

 

John: Right.

 

Monika: It was absolutely a crime and crime against humanity that and, of course, there were other cities as well which were bombed like that too, but Dresden is the one that my mother talked about when we were growing up. And yet I didn’t learn about the people who were expelled.

 

John: Well Monika as, you know, Germany had to perish! Which is actually the title of a book,

 

Monika: Yes.

 

John: Written by a jew. So this is the thing that’s so amazing that when I was really getting this information, it became more and more clear the more research I did that literally the entire official narrative were to is truly the exact opposite. I mean, it in it’s very easy to demonstrate this. I mean, we have sources of jewish individuals in America, in Russia, literally calling for the extermination, you know, I wish and the genocide of the German nation. The destruction of the German nation, of the German people. Openly calling for this and looks they wrote in all the sea papers that they, you know, foreign governments and have them implement essentially, you know, in propaganda I mean, you name it, we can go on and on there’s many sources that demonstrate this. And yet you can’t find one single legitimate source demonstrating that Hitler, or the National Socialist government wanted to let alone implement it, a systematic plan to exterminate, to murder European jews. It’s just not even true! There’s nothing to substantiate it, aside from jewish propaganda, jewish lies.

 

 

[30:50] NEEDS PROOFING

 

 

Monika: That’s exactly right! Everything has been turned on it’s head. I mean, in the beginning when I was starting my my learning about all of this, you know, I realized some things were upside down and turned on their head but, you know, people would say yeah everything’s on it’s head. And I would say, well maybe that’s just a figure of speech, but it really is that way the more I learn the more I realize that everything is on it’s head upside down inverted, but thanks for bringing up that Germany must perish by stander Hartman he wrote that in 1941 and it literally is a genocidal plan, where all the German people should be wiped off the face of this earth and supposedly through a humane method of forced sterilization. Now why I wanted to bring this up, and thank you for already bringing it into the conversation. I wanted to talk briefly about Arthur Topham.

 

Now Arthur Topham is now silenced by law. He has been sentenced to a ten-year ordeal with the criminal justice system intended for the period he speech under under the speech laws in the Criminal Code of Canada. And he had a website called, “The Radical Press”. And it actually started out as a paper, hard copy, magazine in the late 90’s and then he went online. And it went only online for a number of years. And he it was dragged through the court system for ten years and it was just utter harassment and basically jews who didn’t like the things that he was exposing and the truth that he was talking about and the lies that he was exposing.

 

Now he ended up getting convicted by jury. Guilty on one charge and not guilty on the identical charge for it at different time periods, for publishing this on his website. And in Canada the jury cannot divulge what exactly was the rationale for the guilty verdict, but we can surmise that it was for the parody that Arthur Topham did, called, “Israel Must Perish”., but this was not his words. What he did, is he took the book “Germany Must Perish” and he took a section of that and duplicated it, word for word. But he replaced the title, the word “Germany” with “Israel” and replaced “Germans” with “jews”. And basically this was drawing attention to the genocidal original book “Germany Must Perish”. And he did make it clear that this was a satire, that the books were side by side on his website and there was a preface that talked about satire. And this was all explained in the court. I was there for part of it, evidently the jury was overwhelmed by, I guess, the indoctrination that we’ve all been subject to and this was all just too much for them. But he was found guilty.

 

Now what I really want to tell your listeners and just make sure that this is clarified is the lies that they now are telling our top minute press when he cannot defend himself. Because if he did he would go straight into jail. He’s now on and basically house arrest so he’s not in jail, you know, it’s been, you know, sentenced, but part of the sentencing this is their website came down and he’s not allowed to speak publicly. So when they say lies about him, for example, that they will say that Arthur taught the coals that sterilization of jews, but they don’t put it into context of this parody, this satire of “Germany Must Perish”, then that is a lie! That is an outright lie! And I want to set the record right here so.

 

 

[35:16] NEEDS PROOFING

 

 

John: You know, I’m glad you have been able to do that, because as you mentioned Arthur can’t even speak for himself. It’s ridiculous.

 

Monika: Exactly! So anyway thank you for the opportunity to set that straight that, you know, here they are lying about the top and when he can even speak in public and they think darn well know that so it’s just absolutely malicious.

 

John: It, you know, it truly is speaking of well wishers activities carried out by governments against St Michael’s problem. I just wrote an article for American Free Press and it should be published with these words it should be published in this week’s edition. So I think they published Friday Friday morning. So it should be in the coming edition of American press and it’s about Ernst Zundel. I’m sure you’re familiar with?

 

Monika: Absolutely!

 

John: Right. Yeah he lived in Canada for a number of years. I’m sure most people here if you’re not simply Google the man is a watchman. Yes it is venting a lot but, you know.

 

Monika: Yeah I think, in fact, one of those three videos at the end of my six minute video and I put three recommendations to the listener. Just, you know, I thought OK I’ll just give the listener something that if this is all really blowing their mind and they want to know what they want to know where am I coming from and I get three titles that video. The first one is called “Off Your Knees Germany!” and it’s first son told the story of what he went straight and in the courts and it was one of the first things that kind of caught me turning my mind around the “Holocaust” story was watching that video. It’s ninety minutes long so an hour and a half and I would say, you know, it’s going to be a very, very worthwhile ninety minutes.

 

John: Right I think oh yeah I’ve seen. Scenes I’ve probably I think I’ve watched all of the, you know, major documentaries that they put together and there are certainly worse watching for sure. Very eye opening very revealing very informative and I mean, if you’re not outraged after after seeing those just understanding what they’ve gone through, you know, what Arthur top and he’s gone through what many people. Know people are being persecuted all over the world for challenging the fake “Holocaust” narrative, that’s absolutely ridiculous.

 

But speaking of Zundel, the article that I wrote was about how he was just denied entry into the United States. Was deemed inadmissible by the United States federal government. In particular I think it was Office of Appeals I believe of the Department of Homeland Security and they cited his revisionist activities, his educational activities, his political views. Which are all very well documented and very scholarly sourced and entirely legitimate perspectives that he’s offering. And yet he’s deemed inadmissible. Meanwhile, we have millions of illegal aliens overrunning our country. Our government is systematically facilitating refugee resettlement of people we don’t even know how they are! You know, just washed up on our shores. Were supposed to give them free everything, free housing, free, you know, education, free health care, welfare, you name it, it’s I mean, it’s so incredible what is going on! It’s like I can’t even comprehend it sometimes.

 

Monika: Yeah. Well we see the agenda of who is actually running the country. I mean, I think it was it a real sure all, or was it not, you know, basically just said, “don’t worry about what Americans think about this, or that we are doing. We run America and they know it!”

 

Yes, anyway Ernst Zundel being kept out and are they actually citing his political views, because it’s not six case then just. That’s the end of the First Amendment and then meant in this in the United States freedom of speech is it not like I think that it’s incredibly. Like it’s very scary very, you know, if that’s what’s going on and look at, you know, stage we’re still kind of, you know, that we’re looking to you guys down there for keeping some semblance of being able to speak freely still. But, you know, this is really really bad. This is somebody being kept out for their political views.

 

 

[40:03] NEEDS PROOFING

 

 

John: Yeah Oh absolutely! Yeah and this is basically openly admitted in the ruling that they released. And it’s interesting, because this was reported on by The Washington Post back in April almost a month ago. And in the appeal here it was essentially. He was denied entry and then they were determining if they could grant him a waiver. Which they did not. They ended up denying.

 

Monika: I tnk she can’t go to Germany, because she would be thrown in jail immediately there and he can’t come to the state sensibly and also to meet, you know, or to it’s really really sad!

 

Zx it’s I mean, it’s very, very tragic. In the ruling here they say, you know, when they when they go to deny the waiver negative factors in his case including his long history of inciting racial ethnic hatred. It also goes on to say the record shows that the applicant is a historical revisionist and denier of the “Holocaust”, distributing writings, books, tapes, broadcasts to promote his views. The record further indicates that these publications agitated for aggressive behavior againstjj!

 

Monika: Oh my goodness!

 

John: Right yeah all of these I mean, it’s true that he absolutely was a historical revisionist in this and “Holocaust” in Iraq I guess at all so it’s so basically not, but yeah who do I think.

 

Monika: So that basically says oh that’s illegal in United States!

 

John: Right. Now get this they also say this the applicant has been a leader in these activities for decades. And has shown no regret, or remorse for his action,

 

Monika: Of course, not! Because we’re here.

 

John: Because I know that’s a thing it’s like oh maybe perhaps if he were to bow down to the jews they would forgive him. Because if he were to renounce his views, then just maybe, maybe. Yeah it was so outrageous!

 

Monika: The laws this is the part I am absolutely dumbfounded that people don’t wake up to this absurdity! That if there are laws to restrict you from saying certain things. Then doesn’t that raise a red flag for people? Doesn’t that show them that there’s something to hide? That maybe there’s something that they’re lying about?

 

You know, what really gets me I mean, I think long should tell the look there’s something wrong with the official story, you know, it’s exactly the opposite for some people. Because when I raise this issue about the laws, it’s incredible that some people will say, “well you see? You’re wrong” when it comes the laws through, but your problem. Now isn’t that bizarre So that’s kind of a circular saying, … I mean, you could make any kind of a law like stop breathing and then if you breath, “Oh! Like we better throw you in jail, or you just broke the law!” I mean, it is just absurd!

 

John: I mean, I agree. It’s totally ridiculous!

 

You know, Monika, I want to get back I want to talk about, basically how you what led you to search questioning the “Holocaust” and kind of like, your wake up process, so to speak, and maybe you could describe like some other topics maybe research, or what would you just start questioning, you know, doing research into the fake “Holocaust” narrative?

 

Monika: Well I have to credit my brother for basically introducing me to this notion and this idea. And so I was thinking over there and I think twenty thirteen, Christmas time. And this was, you know, already a couple of years after figuring out 9/11 and I really have been so open about that.

 

John: So is it fair to say that 9/11 was like your big sort of wake up call? What led you to question everything?

 

Monika: Yes.

 

John: Okay, and that, yes. That’s exactly how I was, I mean, before I was really getting into 9/11 I was very anti-war and I totally recognized how corrupt the government was, how you were lied to I mean, I was sort of aware these sort of broader systemic issues. How corrupt everything was. I just didn’t really understand the extent of it. How deep it actually went and I certainly didn’t understand who was truly behind it all.

 

Monika: Exactly!

 

 

[45:00] NEEDS PROOFING

 

 

John: And once I was like that it’s a 9/11 yeah yeah and that’s seems like that’s pretty pretty common for a lot of people they start questioning 9/11 and that everything opens up to them.

 

Monika: No, that is interesting that’s interesting about that John and there are definitely a lot of people 9/11 was that door that they first went through and then started uncovering these other truths that, you know, in this journey of mine over this past year many people have contacted me from all over the place and so I’ve struck up some dialogues with a lot of different people. And what has surprised me is that for quite a few people other things woke them up.

 

Like, for example, some people who started learning all about our financial system and how. It was, because of things that happened in their personal lives that, you know, they got basically, you know, that at the end of a deal. And then they started digging and looking into that other than for, or others it was actually the topic of just that why is everything against White people? And this is sort of the taboo subject that we could get into, but for me that was not a starting point at all. Now it kind of to understand is that oh it’s this and goal is to basically get rid of us and replace us.

 

John: Right, right.

 

Monika: And our and oh my goodness that didn’t come into my realizeation until well after I start figuring out all these other things. The “Holocaust” is the ultimate weapon to use against us. Because you see there’s this thing that people will have this weird logic that says oh well if you are denying that this happened then the next thing that happens is you’re going to just want to kill everybody. Like you’re going to do a “Holocaust” again, or something like that. Like this is the logic that’s being used against us. So this is the ultimate weapon. Meanwhile, it’s the opposite is happening.

 

John: Yeah!

 

Monika: And I mean, there’s lots and lots of evidence that one of the really clear quotes that I have used is no well eight matches and you probably have that on your your page of what’s there, but I mean, I’ll just read this and have it for me here no well it’s not yet a Harvard professor, you know, it’s cool and respected Harvard professor he says:

 

“The goal of abolishing the White race is, on it’s face, so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition, other than from committed White supremacists.”

 

OK, I finished the quote so think about that so if you merely don’t want to be destroyed then you are a White supremacist! Can you imagine this being said. Japanese people who wish to see their culture and their traditions preserved and who wish to see Japanese grandchildren? “Oh they must be Japanese supremacists”! Or can you imagine this being said about, maybe. Let’s just pick a country and in Africa, like Senegal. The Senegalese people, if they don’t want to be destroyed:

 

“Oh well, they must be black supremacists!”

 

I mean, that’s absurd.

 

John: It’s I sure is truly absurd you’re totally right. And see like a basic observation like that. It’s so obvious that what you’re saying is true and yet this is very rarely pointed out to people. I mean, well any you have to you have to point out like a basic observation like to get people to start thinking and in many cases at least OK.

 

Monika: Yeah and also is this conflating a different concept so if you have cry in your people and you love your people you could call it, you know, maybe nationalism White Nationalism, or whatever, but people will instantly just say well it’s White supremacist. And if you correct them insane, or like nationalist, or nationalism, or that you have probably right now that’s a White supremacist. Like this is this instant leap the people will make this, because they’ve been trained to make that leap. They’ve been trained by our media and oh, you know, the movies and the indoctrination I mean, that’s basically, you know, how we’ve been poisoned in the mind.

 

 

[49:34] NEEDS PROOFING

 

 

John: Right. No you’re right it is it is it. I’m questioning your exactly right that’s best way to describe it I think well in jews have always jews and communists and Marxists and those are all pretty much the same thing yeah, because if you’re a if you’re a Marxist, or a communist you’re basically your mind has been poisoned by jews and I mean, Marxism and communism really are in my view rational coherent political philosophies there are jewish schools. Ains to destroy White Christians societies and to take all our wealth and to, you know, create this jewish plutocratic that dominates ID and that’s certainly what we have in the United States. But the jews in communist they’ve left us they’ve always tried to attack any form of White racial identity I mean, going back to the late eighty’s early ninety’s. And they were successful back then, because White people were still it’s sort of healthy, you know, Yeah actually, you know, they could think properly most of us, but really I think a lot of this is a result of the fake “Holocaust” there is and I say it in the official narrative of work to see and this is a point that I was speaking with your brother about and I try to emphasize this, you know, when I talk about these subjects, because I think it’s so important the official “Holocaust” narrative and I think it’s so important to the White struggle and I lot of people dismiss this, or downplay it, or think it’s hard when it might you it’s absolutely central to our struggle doing head on not only with the fake “Holocaust”, but all of it.

 

Monika: Yes.

 

John: You know, being able to say look, you know, Adolf Hitler was not this evil monster, in fact, he was like the most righteous honorable leader you seen in generations. I mean, we should be able to say that openly and proudly.

 

Monika: Yes.

 

John: Not even hesitate not even flinch Anyways the point that I was trying to make is the whole across America it discredits and truly do you which is this White, or any form of White racial identity and I mean, it’s not the only thing that defies discredit it’s White racial identity I mean, the jews have literally half. WHITE I don’t know if your cultural Marxism. If you identify as that White person and you concern yourself with the interests of, you know, White people broadly speaking you’re considered this irrational bigot who hates jews in is a racist White supremacist, but you’re not of this a lot of this goes back to the “Holocaust” so on the one hand it really serves to do with Jim I’s White identity on the other hand. It’s use to strengthen jewish identity. And there’s public opinion polls done by jews done by, you know, sort of legitimacy organizations like PEW research center. They do polls on jewish identity and what do you jews identify what is the central factor in jewish identity in which you believe it’s the “Holocaust” I mean, it really is so it strengthens jewish identity and it is also created this enormous. Economic political social racket! Think about all these “Holocaust” museums think about all the body. From this fake story think about all these books that have been written about the “Holocaust”, all these memoirs, all these documentaries, all these Hollywood, still I mean, it truly is a gigantic racket!

 

Monika: Yes John, you have hit it right, you know, hit the nail right on it’s head with what you’re saying here. So this identity thing, that is exactly right. In most that’s the biggest identity existing for the series is the “Holocaust”, but also that they have been persecuted through the ages. They’ve always been persecuted and they’ve always been, you know, a hated this is their identity they’re taught from the day they’re Lcrimer and, you know, I think that most jewish people like street level jewish people are they. Kind of get double dose of indoctrination, but this is their identity, so that’s what they are tolerate from when they’re ornaments I do have, you know, a very nice friend who is really trying her best to wrap her head head around. What I’m saying and she asks very intelligent questions and so I take a lot of time in trying to answer her. And one of the things she says is that, you know, she has a jewish friend and has relatives that she lost in the war and so, and this thing the boat being persecuted like that is how she is and that is exactly it that’s their identity, but here’s the thing that I hate that I like to tell people a little story I mean, a little story, it’s a little allegory for this persecution it is true that Tom That shows have been tricked out, you know, we know it probably at least a 109 times from different countries, or regions in the last two thousand years, but there’s a missing part of the picture that we’re not taught about that.

 

 

[55:09] NEEDS PROOFING

 

 

So let’s say John you go you like to order up the bar and you come home one evening and you’re very upset, because that the bouncer keep you out and I sympathize with you and the next evening you go to another bar and then you get kicked out again and you come home and you complain at that bouncer it was just unfair as well and, you know, and it was just completely uncalled for and again, sixth time and you’re kicked out from different places and each time you’re crying over being discriminated against and those boundaries are treating you so unfairly. And they are just so hateful towards you and I am getting really skeptical about what’s going on and I’m I just. I asked you. Very politely what is it that you are doing to yourself. And then you saying really angrily Oh. Those people just hate it people with, I don’t know XYZ there and they are all anti-XYZ said and then you start lobbying to make laws against anti-XYZ that is I’m not and that’s basically the story I mean, really like him people I just say well what is it that she hasn’t been persecuted, or all these thousands of years it may be that they’ve been doing things wherever they go that wasn’t good I mean, Jesus Christ then moneylenders that temple and I mean, one could believe that story, or not believe it maybe it’s also and that, or an allegory, but there it is that’s the story that the money lenders were kicked out of the temple.

 

John: Right exactly. Well see that’s the thing I mean. Just. Dealing rationally and truthfully about jews and their agenda and their criminal activities and their subversive activities I mean, this is considered anti-Semitism like literally telling the truth about the jews stating basic facts as you mentioned, you know, they literally how we can document this they literally have been thrown out of over one hundred countries just in modern history and I’m bringing this up, you know, talking about the reality of jewish supremacy and jewish power in the United States in the Western General reality, you know, the Israeli occupation of Palestine I mean, it in the terrorism. It’s all the criminality. I mean, we can go on and on and on and yet you knew we could. We document all these things fact by what I try to do on my website by using jewish sources from, you know, explicit we jewish news outlets that document this and talk about this in some cases brag about it. And yet if you bring it up you’re called an anti-Semite.

 

Monika: Yeah it’s not bizarre!

 

John: I mean, it’s like it’s the most it truly is the most like we’re well we think you could think I mean, this is George Orwell, but in reality. This kind man and a force like you can even can even tell the truth like literally tell the truth using jewish explicitly jewish sources to make your points without the regime’s eyes it’s so childish it’s I mean, I don’t know it’s really.

 

Monika: Yeah. Probably most of your listeners know this, but it’s just something I learned pretty recently, but George Orwell he was actually and my six agent and so he knew and this was his warning to the world like, you know, what when we read them when we were teenagers we saw that this was just really, you know, horrific science fiction, you know, a bearing on reality, but he knew and he was trying to give the world a warning.

 

John: Right I think so yeah I’ve heard I’ve heard that he was connected British television’s although I can’t say totally verify that for myself either way the book is certainly worth reading generally it’s good piece of literature.

 

 

[59:40] NEEDS PROOFING

 

 

Monika: So one of the things that people always say well besides saying well we’re not like this with you and there’s no way, you know, you can’t talk about this limits taboo subject, but if they do say anything about it they’ll say there’s Murrays of evidence mountains of evidence it’s the most well documented. Bent in the history of mankind and then I’ll also say and there’s all those eyewitnesses and what about the survivors OK So first of all of all those mountains of evidence that they don’t present there is not some evidence they just keep repeating that mantra and then when you do look into the evidence it’s actually the opposite, you know, I just read a book called The Great “Holocaust” trial by Michael Hoffman and that is about the one nine hundred eighty five that’s the first to Ernst Zundel “Holocaust” trials that took place in Toronto in Canada. And I mean, reading that book that should be mandatory curriculum in the schools, but I’m sure it would never be allowed into this who of that book, because what came out in that trial was just most astonishing, you know, evidence and evidence that basically the “Holocaust” did not happen as it as they say it happened and, you know, there were reports in the media, but the thing is even though there were reports in the media that they were reporting what was going on and yet the way they reported it. As a young. Woman in my early twenty’s at the time I just it was kind of background noise for me and I just kind of assumed that tourists and all of you must be a bad man, or something, but I didn’t really pay much attention to it and I regret to say that perhaps if I had paid more attention to what they were actually saying I might have looked into this more deeply but, because of how they were, or training him in the mainstream media. He was just kind of a, you know, a bad man in my mind so you see this is how they can do it even when they were kind of to report what was being brought out in the trial. Which was stuff like, you know, real Hilberg though they may be jewish “Holocaust” historian at the time he was the main. Witness for the prosecution side. I mean, when it was brought into the court that there were were no other documents that said that there was a plan for the extermination of the jews there was not a single document to that effect and he actually said in the court.

 

That yes it is incredible there must yes there are lists. And meeting of the minds needs.

 

John: Exactly. So well he’s literally conceding points to the revisionists openly in court. Yeah it’s amazing I haven’t read the book I should gosh I really should. I’m familiar with your talk about.

 

Monika: Yeah it’s easy to read it’s very short it’s a skinny book a new edition Timo that’s longer I haven’t read the new editions so I think he probably adds stuff I’m not sure exactly I have it in my possession I haven’t read it yet, but maybe the next trial I don’t know. Yet, but then the other part of it about eyewitnesses that just is a conversation starter, because people feel worried that they’re going to insult the memories or, you know, it something about that like that’s how we can train to just you dare not disrespect.

 

John: Yeah yeah exactly it’s a form I mean, this is like a psychological aspect of the “Holocaust” it’s disarray Viber testimony as well as the photographs.

 

Monika: Yes the photographs.

 

John: People either like can even talk about it like we just can’t talk about the surge, or bring up the survivors as you mentioned, or the bringing up the photographs what about all these dead bodies how does that.

 

Monika: Exactly. What does that prove? Through the halakhah I mean, one is that we went to step through how does a pile of dead bodies prove gas chambers and secondly who are those dead bodies some in some cases those dead bodies may not have even been, you know, jewish dead bodies like the might of some of them were were possibly German jet bodies after the war, because some of these photographs didn’t come out until years after the war so and I’ve seen some documentation about a lot of doctored photographs as well like. I’m not talking about get bodies now I’m talking boat where two identical photos. Are side by side and the one there’s been something inserted into it like perhaps a hanging body and then, you know, of a soldier a German soldier standing there with a grin on a stage something, you know, just crazy things when it just doctored photos and, you know, made lies out of them.

 

 

[65:04] NEEDS PROOFING

 

 

Anyway, but doesn’t dead bodies do not prove extermination of jews and gas chambers. Especially so that when and then the survivors, you know, I do have actually a story about. Fits and I wish that survivor who lived in this little town of Jasper and we were actually good friends he liked music and I’m a musician and so we we ended up spending times together at sing a longs and that kind of thing and I invited him over to my home is when I still believed in the whole “Holocaust” story and I was doing, quote, unquote, the right thing and, you know, wanting my daughter to get to be educated about it and all this and I had him in his way for over to give that talk, because he had gone into the schools quite a lot and given that talk about the whole, you know, he. That’s experience he did have the, you know, the tattooed number on his arm and everything. Anyway so it became over and we had a nice dinner and after dinner cleared away the dishes and then he read his talk and he explained that it was easier that way so he got a prepared talk that he read and we listened to end then at the end which. I just remember feeling some sense of disappointment, because I didn’t really hear any of the details about what we thought had happened in those camps and remember this was years ago when I still fully fully believed in the whole US. Now I don’t think that he was. Ever purposefully deceiving anybody and I think he had come to believe all those stories too and he was a very, very good man. He’s dead now, so right past tense. He and his wife they were lovely lovely people and the thing is I think he was a very honorable man, because he didn’t make up stories so when I see I was slightly disappointed at the end the top, because you’re I had this Hollywood version as, you know, filed this way file that way and, you know, the lineups of people and just horrible scenes and that kind of thing well he didn’t describe any of that well probably he didn’t describe any of that, because he did not see that kind of thing.

 

So I mean, now in retrospect it’s just also very, very interesting for me, because I really I realized well yeah he didn’t see those things, because it didn’t happen those things that are, you know, Hollywood version of the “Holocaust” and he didn’t talk about any belching chimneys, or anything like that great he just talked in more general sense of how he ended up in the camp you also made several times made statements about how he did not come to hate the Germans that he was Polish, by the way, he. Not commie then Germans, in fact, he married one, because his wife was a German and he met her afterward in Germany and I don’t he was also not jewish so he was and he had worked for the underground, or something like times and he also says that there were many other people other than choosing that have made that very clear in his talks so in retrospect when I think littlest things I think well, you know, I knew that, you know, nice he told me all those things and.

 

John: Well I think you’re right I do think that a lot of jews a lot of “Holocaust” survivors I think there is there are a lot of them. Really do buy into the fake story that the organized jewish community has created and I mean, that the origins of the story it’s really a combination of the jews in the British government the American government I mean, they were making up these atrocities stories about the Germans to demonize them and to garner support, you know, to go to war against them basically was black propaganda that became institutionalize So a lot of these people actually do believe the stuff. But getting back to what you’re saying about this guy who was actually kind of like telling the truth I had you seen that video on You Tube called the “Holocaust” survivors who tell the truth?

 

Monika: I think I have yeah.

 

John: It’s kind of it reminds me of what we’re explaining here it’s so many people who are legitimate all cortical “Holocaust” survivors they provide testimony that’s actually truthful, but basically diplomas like the official narrative right, but yet they still believe in yeah, you know, they talk about oh, you know, we went into we went into the gas chambers and all the sudden. There was a shower taking a shower which is, I mean, that this truth is like sort of what happened, you know, and a lot of the stuff one of the “Holocaust”. It was basically rumors floating arounf.

 

Monika: Yes.

 

John: And, you know, spreading, you know, gossip starts rumors start this when it was in this became institutionalize.

 

 

[70:15] NEEDS PROOFING

 

 

Monika: Absolutely there was a whisper campaign things were deliberately begun and deliberately spread so you call it the rumor mill, or a story but, you know, at that time I think they actually call them whisper campaigns, or something like that and like that you mention the black propaganda and yeah that was a huge part of the war was. Well first of all you had to get the world to hate Germans and Germany and now been going on for decades before World War Two already. I mean, I think already in the lady this campaign of hatred towards Germans had begun?

 

John: Yeah it’s certainly had. Monika we are over an hour now.

 

Monika: Yes.

 

John: And we have a limited that’s yeah we wanted to keep it to under an hour and a half, or about an hour and ten minutes, or so in this I do have a couple sort of big questions I want to ask and I think it’s probably in the city’s time to address. And I definitely want to do so. The first one is. In these first two they’re kind of related, but the first one is based on your research into the alleged “Holocaust” story I should say the fake “Holocaust” soring this be serious it is FAKE Yeah. What are the main conclusions that you’ve come to like if you wanted to make the most important points to someone about, you know, you know, the research you’ve done in the conclusions you come to what would you tell them.

 

Monika: Yeah well I think that the ultimate goal for the Organized jewry I’ll call it like the globalists is to rule the world! One world government. And they’ve been telling us that for quite a while actually I remember when I was at university in the 80’s remember receiving some kind of postcards, or again a material that actually said one world government and was exposing these great ideas about just, you know, having one will government and he says they said in this in this propaganda literature and I have no idea who was behind this and the border was and it’s coming, but anyway that is the goal is for it chooses to have this dominion, or we’re all the world and all in all that they’re well. On everything and enslave the rest of us and I think they want to annihilate a lot of us and that’s I mean, the “Holocaust”. That they call a cost is a big part of their equation, because it’s their weapon that you use against us when we start to point out any of the things that are going on with White genocide and when I first heard that term, I thought what are you talking about, you know, but it really is the goal and I think it’s, because Europeans have stood up to the jews and that they have been the biggest obstacle to jewish domination over the years that the European people have been able to stand up to the jews over time and that’s why they are trying to get rid of the European people so that would be right yes.

 

John: OK Very good I mean, I certainly agree to the “Holocaust” narrative is probably the number one weapon used by the jews to advance their agenda to advance their interests to do it utilize our interests and, you know, to discredit the notion that, you know, we can even identify as White people and have interests.

 

I mean I totally agree with you and I guess just to emphasize that. I don’t understand how we could really ignore this issue how we could ignore, or downplay the “Holocaust” ignore, or downplay revisionism and doing seriously and truthfully with the “Holocaust” with World War Two when literally it is constantly brought up and you buy jews as a weapon against us all day long! Every single day! I could point this out Gosh I wish I had the time to do what I used to kind of do it when I was writing more of my website, but I mean, literally Monika not even exaggerating and I could highlight and write a blog post I could probably do three, or four. Different articles appearing in the jewish press appearing in newspapers like Times of Israel the jewish Daily Forward tablet magazine the jewish how it recreation I mean, just open the talking about the “Holocaust” and using it to advance jewish interests. Harming Our interests I just don’t understand how it can be avoided and I mean, I can certainly not going to get it, but I would argue that it’s very central to our struggle and I think yeah.

 

 

[75:22] NEEDS PROOFING

 

 

Absolutely I mean, I’m kind of laughing at this end of it when you’re talking about yes every day you’re right it’s not a laughing matter is this so so serious, but the fact that it is twenty four seventh’s in all the different media I like whether it’s radio whether it’s movies whether it’s well I don’t watch TV, but just anything it’s always brought up even if in a movie it vote something completely different, but somewhere in the movie the whole apostle come up, or it will be invoked and, you know, what is the most ironic. Thing about it is some people when they are maybe well meaning. It towards me, you know, just say how do you do well on this thing that was so long ago it’s not relevant it’s not relevant and I just he said.

 

John: Yes exactly that’s when I was saying.

 

Monika: How can you not relevant well. Yet this Harare action against me that contradicts that statement that they’re making that it’s not relevant, of course, it’s relevant if it wasn’t relevant they would never cared about my many and I mean, that’s something that we don’t talk very much, but I don’t want to get into are eight now, but that’s this ritual defamation process and I actually just briefly say like I live in a town of five thousand and I think it’s kind of like a textbook case of where ritual defamation is being carried out, because this town is kind of like a little bubble I think if you live in a big city. People are more anonymously, but each temptin a town of five thousand, or so oh my goodness they have unleashed a storm against me here, but I don’t want to get into that right now, but it’s just been a most interesting thing and I do kind of make my observations and I, you know, I can write about it and I do write about it a little bit, you know, probably maybe make a ring to my free speech morning to website which this. Cast I would assume?

 

John: Absolutely!

 

Monika: They have a you had a you had another question for me and so to hear what that was.

 

John: Yeah now that you brought that up that was actually something I mean, just the reaction. Amongst people. Because I mean, we sort sort of I don’t want to say similar experience I guess it is kind of I mean, I’ve been doing this very public for a long time I mean, I wouldn’t bring it up with people people would have to find out. Simply by me as if that’s like a. Task to do but, you know, I didn’t really bring it up and, you know, it’s cause a lot of problems professional we and friends. Other relationships. So I guess I’m just curious sort of your reaction you have in a small town I don’t live in a small town by any means. But could you maybe just give us insight to your experience and sort of what’s happened to your friends, or acquaintances.

 

Monika: Yeah I mean, I still have some friends seven happy to say and there are people who have stuck by my side, you know, it through six and then even if they don’t get into this topic, or don’t research it so they probably don’t even agree with me, but they have remained my friend so I don’t want to make it sound like I have zero friends here in this town however if the general sentiment against me is just it’s this role and I am banned from certain places like that there is that in most actives venue for music and happenings happens to be the Legion and Legion This is I guess they operate sort of like a private club and they have banned me from entering and a lot happens there like a lot of live music I used to be in there a lot with not just listening to musicians who are coming to town, but also playing there a lot so that’s.

 

John: That is so pathetic!

 

 

[79:43] NEEDS PROOFING

 

 

Monika: It is and last summer I didn’t get a busking license I was not allowed to have a busking license. A busking is when you put your case out in front of you when you playing music like, you know, public place and then passers by can throw a coin in if they want to like, you know, if they like your music, or whatever they can show their appreciation by throwing some money into your your music case. And this was the first time that busking became a sanctioned activity in Jasper and I was one who bought me for eight years already and then ironically I was denied at busking permit last summer for my, quote, unquote, public proclaiming. They say might my political, my non-inclusive you like this is just unbelievable and, you know, when I want to not lose.

 

John: They’re the ones excluding the.

 

Monika: Exactly until I’m just to give them back up so I have given my music terribly to this town for thirty five years basically the whole time I’ve been living here in terms of, you know, playing at fundraisers, or playing for in the school is, or playing for the seniors, or playing all over the place for free, because I just have the enjoyment of doing that, but I also play professionally and teach and all that, but I had been giving and donating that my time and my music for decades and then when it came time to get busking permit me that now we’ll see how that goes this summer, but that’s still a question mark I have to say so I can’t report on that yet, but anyway so there’s I’m sure there’s things that happen I mean, people well all kinds of letters to me in articles in the main paper and there’s two papers here and both have had their various sort of different things in the papers about me and one paper the main one that weekly went Oh my goodness they are treating the research hostility and I have not had the right of reply. Basically in terms of this subject and it’s, you know, in. Right all kinds of slanderous that was about me. That’s that’s been it has had it’s effect people sometimes they look at me with fear and then I just greet them in a friendly way and then the fear dissipates, but actually some of the worst is that the young the high school kids and I live right across the high school and I’m telling you sometimes the young things at me that are just they only do this when they’re in groups I have had, you know, people do this when they’re by themselves facing and one time I turned around when there was a group of them behind me are on bicycles hours by bicycle and somebody shouted something like I don’t know that’s your Hitler I don’t know what they showed that just something very hostile and I turned around and faced them and I said in a silly talk about an he had fear in their eyes and I tried to engage them that was impossible and then zoomed off ahead and turned off as you can follow us you follow us to the Legion I mean, I was just kind of laughing in the night here at the wheels of laughter like I could hear them blocks away!

 

And then there’s other times when people drive and they stick their heads out the window and just shout obscenities at me I mean, just absolutely crazy this kind of thing! But I have to say there are others who. They say greet me in a very friendly way there isn’t anybody in this town and doesn’t know about this, you know, controversial issue since since this is happened to me and, you know, me grinning at all I guess what that video and but, you know, when I’m seeing people downtown, or in a grocery store I don’t bring this up, in fact, I don’t want to bring it up, because I just want to live a normal and I repeat go and talk about other things like, you know, talk about mundane things, or talk about music, or gardening, or ever and I just try to be friendly and I am a friendly person I’m pretty gregarious and just try to normalize the situation and sell it to a certain extent does work and people see that they sort of feel reliefs after I speak about something else they feel relief any They want to talk to me about, you know, other subjects, or whatever so that they can see that OK she doesn’t just go around her little Arnold a lot and start talking about, you know, the holohoax posts, you know, those National Socialist Germany, or whatever like Anyway it is quite an interesting situation here there are people who are just dearly love to chase me out of town and they have sent me all kinds of messages to that effect and he messages and whatnot that Anyway I’m sure that anybody who talks about these things openly has that kind of reaction to them too, but I guess in this size of the town it is very interesting and so I kind of tell a story we have to have.

 

 

[85:08] NEEDS PROOFING

 

 

John: Well I’d love to come hang out with your Asperger’s at.

 

Monika: Jasper Yes I was just really very alert. That you probably heard of them.

 

John: I’m sorry, but I have not.

 

Monika: Yeah that’s OK That’s OK, but these were in the Rocky Mountains.

 

John: Yes Or like directly north of Colorado basically like if you were to keep from. Following the right now,

 

Monika: So that kind of goes north west. Northwest East so but, you know, we’re in the same MO range that. The Colorado Rocky Mountains are that’s the same mountain range and it’s beautiful here. It’s just absolutely beautiful.

 

John: Oh, I believe it.

 

Monika: You know, it’s a little bit of a fairy tale town, because it isn’t it’s own bubble and a friend of mine calls it gingerbread town so I kind of laugh about that. And I call it, “Gingerbread Town” and people don’t like it when you rock the boat, because they might get a little bit wet, you know. So anyway I do have a big smile on my face and I’m doing very well and I’m a happy person. I’m much happier since I figured out the truth about things which maybe that sounds strange to people, because it is so dark these things that we’re learning and yet it lifts something off your shoulders a little bit. It lifts your spirit. It’s better to know the truth and to do something about it than to not know the truth. And the BEEN Wilner by all the turmoil in the world in the war isn’t this in there that is going on nothing makes sense. Now things make more sense to me and I can understand things better and anyway I’m doing my best to do something about it.

 

John: God bless you! That’s exactly not that’s exactly how I feel I mean, that’s exactly, you know, what I just want to know how that really works and what’s really going on you can get a pretty good idea this. Now I’m just trying to do some of us make it better that’s really.

 

Monika: Yes Well it has been such a pleasure talking with you John and I know that we’re not listening to you talk before that’s how I felt that we were really kindred spirits.

 

John: Yes I think so I can. Give you one of these days I’ll make it up there to visit Canada I’ve never been to Canada I’ve been to Mexico I’ve been to South America and Europe, but never been to Canada. These days get up there well have a good old time.

 

Monika: Oh yeah.

 

John: You make all sorts of friends in Jasper.

 

Monika: Yeah yeah that’s great.

 

John: OK Monika I will go ahead and this is go ahead wrap it up. There’s been a very good conversation. I’d love to do it again in the future.

 

Monika: I sure would be John I am sure it will stay in touch.

 

John: OK Very good I will have a link over to your website as well as. That we’ve been discussing sorry Mom costs. Monika Schaefer thank you so much. I really appreciate it I will talk to you soon.

 

Monika: Thank you John.

 

John: OK good night.

 

Monika: Good night.

 

 

[88:28]

END

 

 

 

 

 

============================================

 

Click to download a PDF of this post:   (not yet available)

 

 

Version History

 

Version 3: May 22, 2017  — Added 10 minutes of transcript. Total transcript complete = 25 mins.

 

Version 2: May 21, 2017  — Added 10 minutes of transcript. Added images. Total transcript complete = 15 mins.

 

Version 1: Published May 20, 2017  — Added first 5 minutes of transcript.

Read Full Post »

 

Here is the English transcript of a speech given by Horst Mahler on Jan 9, 2017 on the genocidal “mission” that organized jewry is engaged in against non-jews, especially Whites and in particular Germans, and the need to fight back through exposing this diabolical “mission” to all — KATANA.

NOTE: 

Text Source: 

https://archive.org/details/WEAREFIGHTINGTOWINCorrected

A video of this speech is available here for download:

https://archive.org/details/HorstMahlerWeAreFightingToWin

 

 

 

Horst Mahler

 

We are Fighting to Win

 

 

Jan 9, 2017

______________________

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

 

 

 

 

 

Friends, ladies and gentlemen!

 

Of course I’m particularly pleased to be close to Mannheim when being among you because this has a certain meaning. A lot has happened, and there is a completely changed situation. Seven or eight years ago, one could not have imagined this. This means, we should assess the current situation within our possibilities to see where we stand; and I think, we still have a lot to learn. There has been a lot of movement causing many in our circles to be enthusiastic and even euphoric, and they now want to be freed by Trump or Putin.

 

Movement is good and important but can also go into the wrong direction. Do we have a direction in this movement? The enemy has long prepared for the situation we are suffering today and plays a significant part in the mix of things we see. Perhaps it has not yet really sunk into our consciousness: The war aim No.1, committed to by Stalin and Roosevelt, was the liquidation of the German people through mixing them with masses of peoples of alien cultures. This program has been played out for over 70 years and has now reached a point where one can speculate: Are they so sure of their success that they drop all their respect and masks? Or are they in a panic because they sense that their calculations are not panning out 100 percent?

 

What’s important for us is that we have our own position in this movement and its development. Much is said about unity, and calls for some kind of actions are plenty, but it’s never clear what is really meant. Are we united, or are there significant differences of opinion in the situation we are in that could lead us into a disaster? I believe we still do not even really comprehend the enemy we are dealing with. This enemy is not only our enemy since 1939 but for hundreds of years. This enemy thinks in view of thousands of years and has a clear vision of his goal. The enemy believes to be striving for this goal by divine order and so is completely free from every scruple and any kind of human stirring. He wants to obey his God. His God says to the Jews:

I am angered by all the heathen and their masses (that’s their warriors). I will give them up to their slaughter so that their corpses stink up to heaven and the mountains flow with blood.

 

It’s not written in a cheap novel; it’s written in the Old Testament. It is an announcement by a major prophet of these people, Isaiah, along the lines of Moses.

 

I am arguing from the assumption that what is written in the Bible is believed. For only this makes the difference: what people believe moves them, and not whether it developed this way. Their belief moves mountains. And there it says that Moses is commanding this small tribe, the Jews, to exterminate, destroy, and murder, in the true sense of the word, many tribes greater than their own. And then he advises moreover:

But do not do this too quickly. For if you work it too swiftly, then wild beasts will move in again to occupy the space freed by murdering. Do it slowly and gently!

 

And then there is one of their fundamental principles:

Let these crimes appear as good deeds, and see to it — with all these nasty works I command you to do to the peoples — that no shadow falls upon Yahweh.

 

This is the order: Through hypocrisy, lies, and deception, commit the worst crimes with the aim to destroy humanity as a whole, with the exception of the chosen people. This has a very concrete reason. We still don‟t comprehend this! This is not some kind of fantasy or mental illness, but as our German philosophers found out, a world historical development for the Jews; and world history is under the influence of reason for the Jews, as it is for us. But it is a development.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

eric-hunt-debates-fritz-berg-cover

 

[Ryan Dawson of the Anti-NeoCon Report hosts a long (nearly 4 hours) and often heated debate between Eric Hunt and Fritz Berg on what happened to all the “missing” jews during the alleged “Holocaust” of WWII.

Eric Hunt, a producer of revisionist videos, in an unexpected change of conviction has recently revised his own revisionist views and now believes that in fact, jews and others were mass murdered in gas chambers and also shot in large numbers in the East.

Fritz Berg strongly supports the revisionist position that no homicidal gassings occurred what-so-ever and that any shootings of jews in the East were legitimate actions taken against partisans and their supporters — KATANA.]

 

_______________________

 

 

ATTENTION READERS!

 

Volunteers are needed to help complete this transcript in a timely manner.

 

Please step forward and do your bit!

 

[90/231 mins, now complete!]

 

Always leave a message in the comments BEFORE starting on a time-slot.

 

 

 

Why Bother with Transcripts?

 

Occasionally, people ask if having a transcript is really necessary (considering all the work involved) when people can just listen/watch the audio/video.

 

Here are some reasons. If you can think of any more or would like to elaborate on the ones here please leave a message in the Comments.

 

Some of the advantages of a transcript are as follows:

You are able to read the whole presentation with full accuracy at the speed that you can read, which is generally a lot faster than listening to the audio or watching the video.

Some speakers, with strong accents or idiosyncratic speech habits, are often difficult to follow.

You can easily scan the text and zoom into what interests you in a non-linear manner.

You can easily quote verbatim from the text when making comments about the text.

You can print out a hard copy for future reference.

When you listen to an audio or watch a video you tend to forget much of the points made, etc. Having it in writing allows you to refresh your memory quickly and accurately.

Transcripts lend themselves to be available off-line and spread via hard copies.

Transcripts can make it easier to create accurate translations of the material which can in turn be used to create video and audio versions.

Video and audio files often become unavailable, for many reasons including censorship (on YouTube, etc.), technical causes due to lack of equipment or power.

Video and audio files are many times larger than a text file of the same material, sometimes hundreds of times larger. In many cases presenting the information in video or audio format has no worthwhile advantage over a text file. Of course there are may cases where the opposite is true.

Other?

That all said, a transcript is often no substitute for an audio/video file and vice-versa. They are complimentary to each other.

 

_________________________

 

Readers, please:

  • BEFORE starting, indicate in the COMMENT section the time slot that you are willing to complete. For example:    >>> I will do 15:00 to 20:00 <<<
  • Every minute of transcription will take you about 15 minutes to complete accurately.
    • Doing even 1 minute is helpful!

  • As a double-check, please look at the COMMENTS to see whether anyone has indicated they are already doing a particular time-slot. (Comments are automatically posted. There is always some delay in the time-slot status being updated in the actual post by me.)
  • Time slots that I know are being worked on will be marked as IN PROGRESS in the post so as to help avoid unnecessary duplication of effort. Always check the COMMENTS though.
  • If you have little time, don’t worry or fuss about typos, spelling, punctuation, etc. I can clean it up.
  • If something is unclear put your best guess followed by some question marks, e.g., “He said that xxx ??? thought this, …” Don’t spend time trying to figure it out.
  • Please enter the transcript in the comment section with the times. I will then copy it (after proofing it) into the post.
  • NOTE: Comments with MORE than 3 URLs are automatically treated as SPAM by this WordPress system. So in those cases change the 4th or more URLs from, e.g.: “abc.com” to “abc . com”.
  • Another way to help if you don’t have time to do any transcription is to point out any errors, however small.
  • Remember that old adage, “Many hands make light work“.

Thank you.

 

____________________

 

 

Here is the full Hunt/ Fritz debate on the Holocaust. This is for ANC members This debate is specifically on the question of transit camps and gas chambers. If there were transit camps, then where are the records of where all these prisoners said to have shipped east ended up? If there were gas chambers…

This content is for VIP Subscriber and VIP Subscriber (yearly) members only.

 

http://www.ancreport.com/podcast/holocaust-debate-eric-hunt-vs-fritz-berg/

 

 

Free download of the mp3 audio file  –

 

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B7NKRD5j08vYWU5vbnVvUlBEODA

 

Questioning “The Holocaust” (Eric Hunt’s website):

Debate with Friedrich Paul Berg (Updated with download link)

 

 

Audio files (split into 4 parts) also available here at archive.org:

 Holocaust Debate – Eric Hunt vs Friedrich Berg – Parts 4 of 4

 

 

ANC Report

 

Holocaust Debate

 

Eric Hunt vs Fredrick Berg

 

 

Published on Feb 26, 2017

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

 

[00:00]

 

 

Ryan: What I thought was going to be a one hour debate, or planned, ended up being about three and a half hours.

OK, this is Ryan Dawson of ANC Report, the Anti Neo-con Report. We’re usually covering the antiwar thing, the anti neo-con material. We often get into “hidden history” and sometimes conspiracy, … Not that wacky Jonestown kind. But today’s topic is one of the more taboo, if not the most taboo topic on the Interwebs, and that’s the “Holocaust“. There’s a lot of exaggerations in both directions about the “Holocaust“. Over exaggerating it, maybe under exaggerating it.

And we have two revisionists on today, one revisionist is Eric Hunt who’s been on the program before. He has recanted some of his views and he will be explaining that. And here to debate him is Fritz Berg, or Friedrich Paul Berg of the website, Nazi Gassings dot com. Also Eric Hunt’s web site, Questioning the Holocaust dot com. And you can see his long, well recanting on that, as well as other information.

So gentleman, I’m going to give you guys the floor. Hopefully I won’t have to jump in too much. I do want to make it clear to everyone that the point of this is to get at the truth where this is never supposed to be something dogmatic and I hope people will refrain from accusations, saying somebody is anti German, or anti-jewish. The idea here is just to get at the truth of the matter, based on the best evidence available.

So Eric, I will start with you, because you were a revisionists who is now revised your revisions and you’re catching some flak for that. So I’ll let you explain your position and then I’ll let Fritz respond.

 

Eric: All right, thanks. First up I’d like to thank Fritz Berg for agreeing to debate. Fritz has never been afraid to defend his views and has debated Roberto Muehlenkamp, who accepts the garssing claims and has repeatedly asked to debate revisionist Fred Leuchter. Surprisingly it’s the revisionists like Leuchter, dodging the debate, not those defending the claims of mass gassing and shooting such as Muehlenkamp. I recommend for listeners to listen to the Berg-Muehlenkamp debates. It is my opinion Mr Muehlenkamp presents entirely logical arguments and overwhelming evidence in favor of mass gassings having occurred. We will likely not be repeating many of the same arguments from those debates here today.

 

Fritz has and is operating in the supposed spirit of the revisionists who claim to desire open debate on the Holocaust and Fritz should be commended. It’s very telling that no other top revisionist scholars, as they claim, has so far agreed to debate me upon publishing my controversial findings in an article titled “The End Of The Line” available to read at: Questioning the holocaust dot com. This exposes the hypocrisy of those claiming they simply desire open debate on the subject. I put forward that this clique of SS mass murder deniers instead want to spread their extreme, indefensible, illogical denialist falsehoods in their safe little echo chambers. I’ve determined the behavior of this community is more consistent with a religious cult like the Jonestown cult you mentioned in your opening, than something claiming to be related to science. And I’m hoping to tell people listening not to drink the Kool-Aid.

 

For those who claim to oppose censorship, both Fritz and I have been banned from the Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust forums. I have determined even before coming to this conclusion that [that forum] is paradoxically the most closed forum which claims to debate the “Holocaust“. And I have heard Fritz say the same throughout the years. I want to make it clear I’m not here to totally put down, or insult revisionists. One reason revisionists haven’t been debated more often is, because the “Holocaust Industry”, as Norman Finkelstein calls them, really does engage in many hoaxes. “Mini”, I meant to say, mini hoaxes, small hoaxes, propaganda, exaggeration and willingly spreading falsehoods. The blind believers repeatedly defend indefensible and scientifically impossible eyewitness accounts. Often these accounts are forced upon the American public, especially on naive schoolchildren.

 

eric-hunt-debates-fritz-berg-3178-elie-weisels-flaming-pits

[Image] An illustration of one of Elie Weisel’s sadistic tall tales as described in his mostly fictional book, “Night“.

 

eric-hunt-debates-fritz-berg-elie-wiesels-book-night-cover

 

I’d like to talk briefly about some of the things I’ve done and what I stand behind. Elie Weisel’s fictional tale of walking to the edge of a flaming pit of fire at the entrance of Auschwitz Birkenau, where dump trucks full of babies were dumped alive for no reason other than dramatic effect, during that titular night, is forced upon naive school children.

 

[05:04]

 

These children don’t know the flaming pit never existed, as all eyewitnesses confirm, including Weisel’s own sister. The fire and atrocity invention is just a lame literary device by a Jewish poet to represent entering into the hell of Auschwitz.

 

Realist Report Interview Eric Hunt - 1806 The Last Days Spielberg

 

My exposé on Steven Spielberg’s 1999 Academy Award winning “Holocaust” documentary, “The Last Days” is one for the ages, which I’m very proud of. To investigate in particular that film star survivor, Irene Zisblatt’s false testimony, I did what any skeptical researcher should do. I investigated her claims, bought her book and read it. I found the book to be almost total fiction and saw ways to prove it. I followed the evidence trail to Stanford University to watch her video testimony, recorded for Steven Spielberg’s Survivors of the Showa a Visual History Foundation. In this video testimony Zisblatt seems to invent in real time new fake atrocity stories, one after the other. Zisblatt claims she was selected to become a lampshade, because of her smooth skin! She claims the Nazis tried to change the color of her eyes. Zisblatt claims that Dr Mengele removed her Auschwitz tattoo in excruciating experiments. Despite being on a list of Jews quickly transited through Auschwitz to other labor camps, never given a tattoo. Zisblatt claims to have escaped from inside Auschwitz Birkenau Crematoria III gas chamber. She claims a boy then threw her over an electrified barbed wire fence, naked, onto a train where she escaped. That train would have been at least one hundred feet away from the fence.

 

Realist Report Interview Eric Hunt - 1805 Last Days of the Big Lie

 

Zisblatt’s calling card claim of repeatedly defecating and swallowing diamonds for a year and a half pales in comparison to her other outrageous lies! Steven Spielberg produced other falsehoods in that Oscar winning documentary, including featuring a discredited African American soldier who already falsely claimed to have liberated Dachau in a previous propaganda film, “Liberators”, which was withdrawn from public airing, as a hoax. As a result of sharing Zisblatt’s testimony to the world, rather than have the evidence looked at in a major examination of this outrageous false testimony, shown to children and even the US Congress, I was instead banned from Stanford University libraries!

(more…)

Read Full Post »

mogv-part-13-cover

 

[Part 13]

 

[Benton Bradberry’s 2012 book, “The Myth of German Villainy” is a  superb, must-read, revisionist look at how the German people have been systematically, relentlessly and most importantly, unjustly vilified as the arch criminal of the 20th century. Bradberry sets out, cooly and calmly as befits a former US-Navy officer and pilot, to show why and how the German people have been falsely accused of massive crimes and that their chief  accuser and tormenter, organized jewry is in fact the real party guilty of monstrous crimes against Germans and the rest of the world.

Part 13, starts with an outline of the dire conditions in Germany prior to the National Socialists taking power. After taking power international jewry launched a world-wide trade boycott against Germany and cut off funding from international jewish banks. In part response Hitler asked the German people to give him 4 years of emergency dictatorial power (Enabling Act) to solve the problems that confronted Germany.

What Hitler intended was a total revolution.

The people,” he said, “were not put here on earth for the sake of the economy, and the economy does not exist for the sake of capital. On the contrary, capital should serve the economy, and the economy in turn should serve the people.

In the section, “Night of the Long Knives” Hitler finally takes action against the SA’s Chief of Staff, Ernst Rohm and his close associates that were causing the Party to lose support from industry and military leaders, in addition to threatening a possible coup against Hitler. Hitler was praised in a Daily Mail article for saving his country.

In the section, “1934 Annual Nazi Rally at Nuremberg” Hitler proclaimed the “thousand year Reich”. The Nuremberg Rally was held annually in September until 1938 to show the world and energize the nationalistic pride of the German people and their support for National Socialism.

In the section, “Hitler Revives the German Economy” the dramatic and probably the greatest economic turnaround in history is described. The world’s first superhighway system, the “Autobahn,” was a shining example of National Socialism’s economic policies at work. Mass production of the Volkswagen, which literally means “people’s car,” was another. Germany got around the jewish trade boycott and capital strangulation using a barter system that helped the economy flourish.

Finally, in the section, “Hitler Becomes the Most Popular Leader in the World” the praise and admiration of foreign statesmen and prominent personalities for the success of Germany under Hitler and the National Socialists is described. Even that traitorous tool of international jewry was moved to say:

One may dislike Hitler’s system and yet admire his patriotic achievement. If our country were defeated I should hope we should find a champion as indomitable to restore our courage and lead us back to our place among the nations.Winston Churchill, 1935

— KATANA.]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOTE: The author has very generously given me permission to reproduce the material here — KATANA.

 The book can be bought at Amazon here: The Myth of German Villainy

 

 

 

The Myth of

 

German Villainy

 

by

 

Benton L. Bradberry

 

 

 

 

 

Contents

Preface  

Chapter 1   –   The Myth of Germany as an Evil Nation

Germany’s Positive Image Changes Overnight 

Chapter 2   –   Aftermath of the War in Germany

The Versailles Treaty

Effect of the Treaty on the German Economy

Was the War Guilt Clause Fair?

Did Germany Really Start the War?

Chapter 3   –   The Jewish Factor in the War

Jews at the Paris Peace Conference

Jews in Britain

Chapter 4   –   The Russian Revolution of 1917

Bolsheviks Take Control

Jews and the Russian Revolution

Origin of East European Jews

Reason for the Russian Pogroms Against the Jews

Jews leave Russia for America

Financing the 1917 Revolution

Jews in the Government of Bolshevik Russia

Chapter 5   –   The Red Terror

Creation of the Gulag

Bolsheviks Kill the Czar

Jews as a Hostile Elite

The Ukrainian Famine (Holodomor)

Chapter 6   –   The Bolshevik Revolution Spreads throughout Europe

Jews in the Hungarian Revolution

Miklos Horthy Saves Hungary

Jews in the German Revolution

The Sparticist Uprising in Berlin

Jewish Bolsheviks Attempt to Take Italy

Jewish Bolsheviks Attempt to Take Spain — The Spanish Civil

War

Czechoslovakia in Danger of Communist Takeover

The Comintern’s Aim? World Domination!

Chapter 7   –   The Nation of Israel

History of the Expulsion of Jews

Chapter 8   –   Jews in Weimar Germany

Jews Undermine German Culture

Chapter 9   –   Hitler & National Socialists Rise to Power

The 25 Points of the National Socialist Party

Chapter 10  –  National Socialism vs. Communism

National Socialism

Jews Plan Marxist Utopia

Chapter 11  –  Jews Declare War on Nazi Germany

Text of Untermeyer’s Speech in New York

The Jewish Persecution Myth

Effect of Boycott on the German Economy

Jewish Exaggerations are Contradicted by Many

Chapter 12  –  The Nazis and the Zionists Actually Work Together for

Jewish Emigration out of Germany

The Nuremberg Laws – 1935

The Zionist Movement

Chapter 13  –  Life in Germany Under Hitler

Night of the Long Knives

1934 Annual Nazi Rally at Nuremberg

Hitler Revives the German Economy

Hitler Becomes the Most Popular Leader in the World

Chapter 14  –  Hitler Begins Reclamation of German Territory

Chapter 15  –  The 1936 Olympics

Chapter 16  –  Anschluss”. The Unification of Austria and Germany

Austrian Economy Revived

Austria’s Jews

Chapter 17  –  Germany Annexes the Sudetenland

Chapter 18  –  War with Poland

The Polish Problem

Hitler’s Proposal to Poland

Kristalnacht

German-Polish Talks Continue

Jews Influence both Roosevelt and Churchill

British and American Political Leaders Under Jewish Influence

Roosevelt’s Contribution to Hostilities

Lord Halifax Beats the War Drums

Germany Occupies Bohemia and Moravia

Roosevelt Pushes for War

Anti-war Movement Becomes Active

Poles Murder German Nationals Within the Corridor

Chapter 19  –  The Phony War

Russo-Finnish War

The Norway/Denmark Campaign

German Invasion of Denmark and Norway

Churchill Takes Chamberlain’s Place as Prime Minister

Chapter 20  –  Germany invades France Through the Low Countries.

The Phony War Ends.

Churchill the War Lover

The Fall of France

Hitler Makes Peace Offer to Britain

Chapter 21  –  The Allied Goal? Destruction of Germany!

Chapter 22  –  Germany as Victim

Rape and Slaughter

Jewish Vengeance

The Jewish Brigade

Chapter 23  –  Winners and Losers

Bibliography

 

 

 

Chapter 13

 


Life in Germany

 

Under Hitler 

 

 

 

 

When Hitler came to power, Germany was hopelessly bankrupt and deeply in debt. The Treaty of Versailles had imposed crushing reparations requirements on the German people, demanding that Germany pay all the costs incurred by the Allied nations during the war. This was totally unrealistic because the combined costs of the war totaled three times the value of all property in Germany, completely beyond Germany’s ability to pay. At the same time that the Treaty required Germany to pay these unrealistic reparations, other measures in the Treaty, i.e. taking her coal mines, her merchant fleet and her richest farmlands and giving them to other countries, reduced her ability to pay even further. As unrealistic as these demands were, France nevertheless demanded that they be paid, and paid on time, and then sent the French army in to occupy the Rhineland for the purpose of enforcing these reparations payments. The German army was limited by the Treaty to only 100,000 men, too small to resist an invasion, or to even effectively police the country.

 

Germany was in a double bind. She had no choice but to pay the reparations, but pay with what? To meet the scheduled payments, the German government resorted to printing money, which, predictably, created inflation. Once inflation began, private currency speculators jumped in to try to make money off the inflation by selling the mark short. This caused the German mark to plummet in value, setting off an inflationary spiral which quickly zoomed out of control. The Jews totally dominated finance and the financial markets in Germany, and nearly all of these currency speculators were Jews. Their role in setting off the inflation received wide publicity and was therefore well known by the German people. The inflation went out of control, to the point that at its worst, a wheelbarrow full of marks could not buy a loaf of bread.

 

mogv-part-13-2330-sweeping-up-worthless-german-marks

Sweeping up worthless German Marks during the 1923 hyper inflation.

 

The thrifty German middle class who had always been careful savers, were ruined en masse by the inflation, as their life savings simply evaporated before their eyes. The value of the mark decreased so rapidly that prices were adjusted upwards several times a day. To compensate, employers began to pay their employees twice a day. With their pay in hand, these poor German people literally ran to a store, any store, to purchase almost anything of value before the price was adjusted upwards again. Almost any item or real asset was preferable to their handfuls of marks which were losing their value by the hour. This wild consumer spending set off an economic boom in Germany for a time, though that soon deflated. Due to the velocity of the inflationary spiral, prices went up so fast that people could not buy enough food with the wages they earned. They began desperately selling off all their personal possessions just to buy enough food to keep themselves and their families alive as wages and salaries lagged far behind the rapidly increasing prices. Pawn shops proliferated. Countless homes, farms and commercial buildings were lost to private banks. Those with access to foreign capital, especially dollars, began buying up property all over Germany for pfennigs on the mark. The private banks and the pawn shops were owned almost entirely by Jews, and the Jews were the ones who had access to foreign capital.

 

The Jews, as a result, grew rich off the inflation, while ordinary Germans were reduced to living in hovels, and in many cases, starving to death.

 

According to the British historian Sir Arthur Bryant in “Unfinished Victory,” 1940:

It was the Jews with their international affiliations and their hereditary flair for finance who were best able to seize such opportunities. They did so with such effect that, even in November 1938, after five years of anti-Semitic legislation and persecution, they still owned, according to the Times correspondent in Berlin, something like a third of the real property in the Reich. Most of it came into their hands during the inflation. But to those who had lost their all this bewildering transfer seemed a monstrous injustice. After prolonged sufferings they had now been deprived of their last possessions. They saw them pass into the hands of strangers, many of whom had not shared their sacrifices and who cared little or nothing for their national standards and traditions.

The 1923 inflation resulted in the largest transfer of wealth from one group to another ― that is, from the Germans to the Jews ― in all of German history, and, as might have been expected, feelings of bitter resentment developed toward the Jews because of it.

 

As if this were not enough, the inflation was soon followed by a global depression which hit the already fragile German economy especially hard. Germany’s unemployment rate at the depth of the depression was the highest in Europe at 30%; even higher than that of the United States, which stood at 24%. Germany’s depression was not just worse than America’s Great Depression, it was much worse. Anguished parents in Germany watched helplessly as their children starved to death. People lost their homes. Shanty towns of hovels constructed of shipping crates and the like sprang up all around Germany’s cities and in the forests. To keep alive, they made communal pots of soup out of anything they could scrounge up, such as turnips, potatoes, and even grass.

 

By the beginning of 1933, the misery of the German people was virtually universal. At least six million unemployed and hungry workers roamed aimlessly through the streets looking for anything to eat or any way to earn a few pfennigs with which to buy food. The government paid unemployment benefits, but only for six months, after which, nothing, and what it paid was pitifully inadequate. These unemployed men had families to feed, so that altogether some 20 million Germans, a third of the population, were at the point of starvation.

 

 mogv-part-13-2331-line-at-the-unemployment-office-in-hanover-germany-in-1930

Line at the unemployment office in Hanover, Germany in 1930

 

The cost of welfare amounted to 57% of the total revenue taken in by the government. The entire society was at the point of collapse. Those lucky enough to still have jobs were not much better off, as their salaries and wages had been sharply reduced. The intellectuals were hit as hard, or harder, than the working class. The unemployment rate of university graduates was 60%. Well educated people could be seen on the streets of Berlin with signs on their backs saying they would accept any kind of work. But there was no work. Hardest hit of all were the construction workers, 90% of whom were unemployed.

 

Farmers had also been ruined by the two economic disasters; the inflation followed a few years later by the depression. Many had been forced to mortgage their homes and land, but then, when the economy “crashed,” the value of real estate declined to the point that by 1932, to use the parlance of today, they were “under water” in loan to value ratio. Those who could not meet the interest payments saw their homes and farms auctioned off, the result of which was that those with access to foreign currencies (again, mainly Jews) grew rich off the misery of the hapless ordinary Germans. In 1931 and 1932, 17,157 farms, with a combined total of 1.15 million acres, were liquidated in this way.

 

Germany’s industries, once the envy of the world, saw drastic reductions in production. Thousands of factories had closed down, resulting in a 50 percent decrease in gross industrial production compared to what it had been in 1920. Exports had also dropped by an astounding 75 percent. Germany’s central bank, the Reichsbank, was in danger of collapse due to the growing number of outstanding loans going into the red, while at the same time foreign loans were being called in.

 

It was estimated during that time that no more than around 100,000 people in all of Germany were able to live without financial worries. Germany was a nation of 65 million people living in gut-wrenching misery caused by a variety of problems, including the imposed burdens of the Versailles Treaty, industrial stagnation, horrific unemployment, and serious political instability. The situation became so bad that between 1929 and 1933 some 250,000 Germans committed suicide out of despair and hopelessness. The birth rate in Germany dropped from 33.4 per thousand to just 14.7 per thousand. Even this birth rate was achieved only because of the higher birth rate in the countryside. In the 50 largest cities, there were more deaths than births. In Berlin, deaths exceeded births by 60 percent. This morass of misery caused many to submit to the allures of Communism, making a Communist takeover of the country a real possibility. The Weimar government proved itself totally incompetent to deal with this multiplicity of crises, with its various factions squabbling impotently as Germany teetered on the brink of disaster.

 

Germany’s situation was further aggravated by the unrestrained competition of its 25 regional states whose governments were often in direct conflict with policies of the central Reich government. These states, such as Bavaria, Prussia, Wurttemberg and Saxony, had ancient origins, and only a few years before, that is, before the 1871 consolidation of Germany, they had been independent, sovereign monarchies. Not surprisingly, they jealously guarded the power and privileges which still remained. Germany was a federation, with a weak central government and each of the 25 states was still ostensibly sovereign. Getting them to work together for the greater good of Germany was nearly impossible. Germany had become a country that was ungovernable.

 

 mogv-part-13-2332-march-21-1933-hitler-strolls-toward-the-garrison-church-in-potsdam

March 21, 1933, Hitler strolls toward the Garrison Church in Potsdam (Suburb of Berlin) for a ceremony to open the new Reichstag session. Hitler became Chancellor in January, 1933.

 

These were the conditions that existed in Germany when Hitler and the National Socialists came to power in 1933. But as if the situation were not bad enough, conditions were made worse by the worldwide Jewish boycott of German goods which immediately followed Hitler’s election to the Chancellorship. The immediate result of the boycott was a precipitous 10% drop in German exports, which were already disastrously low, which then threw even more people out of work. The boycott also attempted to strangle the German economy by cutting off funding from international Jewish banks. International Jewry had declared war on Germany with the intention of undermining and destroying the already fragile German economy in order to discredit and destroy the National Socialists (Nazis) who had just been elected into office. Germany was already at the point of collapse, and the boycott might well have been the proverbial straw that broke the camel’s back.

 

After assessing the situation, Hitler gave a speech to the German people in which he said that the difficulties facing Germany were so dire that he needed emergency dictatorial powers in order to confront them:

German people, give us four years time, after which you can arraign us before your tribunal and you can judge me!

 

mogv-part-13-2333-hitler-speaks-to-the-german-people-and-asks-for-4-years-of-dictatorial-power

Hitler speaks to the German people and asks for 4 years of dictatorial power to cure Germany’s ills.

 

The Reichstag responded overwhelmingly. On March 23, 1933, the Reichstag voted 441 to 84 to pass the Enabling Act into law, which gave Hitler the 4 years of emergency dictatorial powers he said he needed to resurrect Germany’s economy.

The great venture begins,” Hitler said. “The day of the Third Reich has come.

 

Hitler knew from the start that the task he had set for himself would be immense and difficult to accomplish. He knew that Germany would have to be transformed from top to bottom, beginning with the very structure of the state. The old class structure would have to go and a new German society, imbued with a new civic spirit would then take its place. He also intended to free Germany from foreign hegemony (the Versailles Treaty) and to restore German honor in the world. But the first and most immediate task would be to put the six million unemployed back to work.

 

Hitler intended not only to put men back to work, but to give prestige and honor to the concept of “work,” itself. Germany had traditionally been stratified by “class,” with a privileged class at the top, including the industrialists, and the working class at the bottom, who were considered by the upper class to be nothing more than “instruments of production.” In the eyes of the capitalists, “money” was the important element in a country’s economy. To Hitler’s way of thinking, that conception was upside down. Hitler believed that “money” was only an instrument, and that “work” was the essential element in an economy. Work was man’s honor, blood, muscle and soul, Hitler believed.

 

All work which is necessary ennobles him who performs it. Only one thing is shameful ― to contribute nothing to the community.”

Nothing falls into a man’s lap from heaven. It is from labor that life grows.

Social honor recognizes no distinction between the employer and the employed. All of them work for a common purpose and are entitled to equal honor and respect.” Adolf Hitler

 

Hitler wanted to put an end to the class struggle and to reestablish the priority of the human being as the principle factor in production. Germany could do without gold to finance industry, he believed. In any case, Germany was broke and didn’t have any gold. Other things could be used to finance industry, and he would find them, but “work” was the indispensable foundation for industry and for the economy. The worker had been alienated from society in Germany because he had traditionally been treated with disdain and contempt. Hitler believed that to restore the worker’s trust in the fatherland, he would from now on have to be treated as an equal, not as a socially inferior “instrument of production.” Hitler argued that under previous so-called democratic governments, those who ran these governments failed to understand that in the hierarchy of national values, “work” is the very essence of life. Mere matter, either steel, or gold, or money of any kind, is only a tool.

 

What Hitler intended was a total revolution.

The people,” he said, “were not put here on earth for the sake of the economy, and the economy does not exist for the sake of capital. On the contrary, capital should serve the economy, and the economy in turn should serve the people.”

 

It would not be enough to reopen the thousands of closed factories, put the people back to work and continue with business as usual. Unless things were drastically changed, the workers would remain, as they had been before, nothing more than living machines, faceless and interchangeable. Hitler was determined to establish a new moral balance between the workers and capitalism. He was determined that capital was to be used in its proper function as a tool to facilitate what the workers create with their labor.

It will be the pride of my life,” Hitler said, “if I can say at the end of my days that I won back the German worker and restored him to his rightful place in the Reich.”

Hitler knew that such a revolution could not be achieved as Germany was presently structured. The 25 different states that made up Germany continued to compete with each other and to initiate policies that conflicted with those of the central government in Berlin. No coherent national program for economic recovery could be initiated as long as this condition existed. The revolution could also not succeed as long as there were dozens of political parties and thousands of deputies of every conceivable stripe, all squabbling and competing with each other. There would have to be centralization and control if the revolution were to succeed. There were also the Communists who continued assiduously in their efforts to undermine the German state and turn it into a Russian style Soviet Socialist Republic. The Communists would also have to be dealt with.

 

Hitler took a series of steps to secure absolute power over Germany which was necessary to impose a coherent recovery program. First, he abolished the independent local governments of the 25 states in Germany and replaced them with Reich Commissioners answerable only to Hitler and the National Socialist regime.

 

mogv-part-13-2336-jewish-prisoners-at-dachau-1938

Jewish prisoners at Dachau, 1938.

 

Then he cracked down on the Communists. The SA and the SS rounded them up by the thousands and locked them up in the newly constructed “re-education center” at Dachau near Munich ― later called a “concentration camp.” 78% of the membership of the Communist Party in Germany was Jewish. Therefore, to arrest a Communist was almost always to arrest a Jew. It was not that Jews were being singled out for arrest because they were Jewish. They arrested the Communists who almost all happened to be Jews. Hitler saw the Communists as enemies of the German people.

 

By centralizing federal power in Berlin, and by locking up the Communists, Hitler put an end to the constant squabbling and working at cross purposes among the states and began to create rational, consistent policies and programs necessary for national recovery. Step by step, Hitler implemented his plan.

 

On May 2, 1933, Hitler outlawed the trade unions and ordered the SA to arrest the trade union leaders, who also happened to me mostly Jews. These too went to Dachau. Hitler then established the “German Labor Front” as the only labor organization allowed in Germany, and placed Dr. Robert Ley in charge. Ley, an intelligent and industrious man, had been an aviator in the war and worked as a chemist before joining the Nazi Party. Ley confiscated the money of the labor unions and used it to fund his “Strength Through Joy” program, a broad-based program to improve the working and living standards of Germany’s workers. As part of his program, Ley ordered two new cruise-liners to be built which were used to take German workers on foreign holidays. In 1938 an estimated 180,000 people went on cruises to places such as Madeira and the Norwegian fjords. Others were given free holidays in Germany.

 

 mogv-part-13-2340-hitler-with-dr-robert-ley-new-head-of-the-german-labor-front

Hitler with Dr. Robert Ley, new head of the German Labor Front.

 

The Strength Through Joy program also built sports facilities, paid for theatre visits, and financially supported travelling cabaret groups. Although the German worker paid for these benefits through compulsory deductions, the image of people being given holidays and subsidized entertainment was of great propaganda value for the Nazi government. It also vastly improved the lives of German workers.

 

The Strength Through Joy program also subsidized the development of the People’s Car, known as the Volkswagen. The American auto maker, Henry Ford, was an enthusiastic supporter of Hitler in his plan to reshape the German culture in favor of the working man. In fact, Hitler said, in 1931, “I regard Henry Ford as my inspiration.” Hitler’s (and Ley’s) mass production of the Volkswagen car was modeled on Ford’s formula of mass production, low prices, and high wages for workers. Ford also shared Hitler’s opinion of the Jews.

 

By abolishing the labor unions, Hitler was able to hold down wages to give industry a chance to prosper and grow. It has been said that labor unions are in the business of extortion. They extort ever higher wages out of factory owners by strikes and threats of strikes, by slowdowns and often by sabotaging machinery and equipment, all of which is extremely deleterious to industrial growth and development. The aims of labor unions can be summed up by a comment made by the American labor leader, Samuel Gompers. When asked what the labor unions wanted, he said, “More.” Even though self-defeating in the end, labor unions never stop demanding ever higher wages and benefits, until eventually they put the company out of business. By outlawing the labor unions and establishing the government controlled “German Labor Front,” Hitler was able to maintain a fair wage level for all German workers, not just the members of trade unions, and at the same time to end the strangulation effect of the trade unions on German industry.

 

On July 14, 1933 the Communist Party and the Social Democrat Party were banned. Party activists still in the country were arrested and sent to the concentration camp. Hitler decided that while they were at it, they would clean up Germany in other ways, as well. The Gestapo began arresting and incarcerating beggars, prostitutes, homosexuals, alcoholics and anyone who refused to work, or who was “work shy,” as they put it. A law was then enacted banning all political parties except for the Nazi Party.

 

All of these measures were met by hysterical propaganda diatribes in the international Jewish press in which events were exaggerated out of all proportion to their actual significance. Labor unions, the Communist party and all other left-wing movements and organizations had been specifically targeted by Hitler and the Nazis as “enemies of the German people.” As Jews were highly disproportionately represented in the labor unions and all other left-wing movements and organizations, they were disproportionately arrested and incarcerated at Dachau. This was described in the international Jewish press as an attack upon the Jews.

 

The Nazis were accused of specifically singling out and arresting Jews, simply because they were Jews. In reality, there was, at this time, no specific Nazi program to target Jews, per se. Nevertheless, international Jewry made the most of this opportunity in their anti-German propaganda campaign.

 

 

Night of the Long Knives

 

The greatest threat to Hitler’s survival during the early years of the Third Reich came from the SA, a huge and powerful organization within the Nazi Party, around 3½ million strong, led by its Chief of Staff, Ernst Rohm[The SA (Sturmabteilung), literally Storm Detachment/Assault Division, functioned as the original paramilitary wing of the Nazi Party (NSDAP). Also known as the “Brownshirts” and “Storm Troopers”.] The SA was largely responsible for putting Hitler into power, but now in power, things changed. If he was to succeed in implementing his programs, Hitler now needed the support of the industrial and military leaders. The German General Staff despised and detested the SA. The Industrialists who had financed Hitler, also detested the SA and saw them as a dangerous bunch of hooligans. Rohm had made matters worse for himself by indiscreet remarks about absorbing the German army into the SA with himself as the commander. The SA was at that time much larger than the Army. This further set the General Staff’s teeth on edge.

 

Several of the SA leaders, including Rohm, had also been vocal about their socialistic, anti-capitalist sentiments, which neither Hitler, the industrialists nor the army approved of. The SA Brown Shirts were also not very popular with the average Germany citizen because of their gangster-like, thuggish behavior. Critical and derisive remarks made indiscreetly by Rohm about Hitler, personally, also got out. Rohm began to be seen as a “loose cannon” whose loyalty could no longer be trusted, and who might even be a threat to Hitler’s leadership. General von Bloomberg and President Paul von Hindenburg advised Hitler that he had to do something about Rohm and the SA or they would no longer be able to support him. The industrialists were telling him the same thing. Both Hermann Goering and Heinrich Himmler had already been warning Hitler of a possible coup by Rohm’s SA against Hitler, himself. Hitler finally decided that he had to act against Rohm and the SA.

 

Hitler began by ordering all the SA leaders to attend a meeting in the Hanselbauer Hotel in the city of Wiesse. There was no explanation of what the meeting was about. Meanwhile Goering and Himmler were drawing up a list of political enemies outside the SA whom they wanted eliminated. On June 29, 1934, Hitler, accompanied by the SS, arrived at Wiesse where he personally arrested Ernst Rohm. During the next 24 hours 200 other senior SA officers were arrested on their way to Wiesse.

 

mogv-part-13-3068-hanselbauer-hotel-in-the-city-of-bad-wiessee-where-rohm-was-arrested

[Add. image — Hanselbauer Hotel in the city of Bad Wiessee where Rohm was arrested.]

 

Several were shot as soon as they were captured but others were taken into custody for further consideration. Hitler personally liked Rohm and decided to pardon him because of his past services to the Nazi movement, but both Goering and Himmler argued against it, advising Hitler that he was making a dangerous mistake. Hitler finally relented and decided that Rohm must die, but insisted that he be given the chance to commit suicide. When Rohm refused, he was shot by two SS men.

 

mogv-part-13-2340-chief-of-the-sa-ernst-rohm

Chief of the SA, Ernst Rohm

 

All together, around 77 of these “unreliables,” including Rohm, were “officially” shot, putting an end to all opposition to Hitler and the National Socialists. Unofficial estimates of the number executed range much higher, however. In a speech following the executions, Hitler explained his actions to the German people.

In this hour I was responsible for the fate of the German people, and thereby I became the supreme judge of the German people. I gave the order to shoot the ringleaders in this treason.”

 

The Night of the Long Knives was a turning point in the Nazi regime, making Hitler the supreme, unchallenged ruler of Germany.

 

An article in the Daily Mail of London was full of praise for Hitler’s actions.

Herr Adolf Hitler, the German Chancellor, has saved his country. Swiftly and with exorable severity, he has delivered Germany from men who had become a danger to the unity of the German people and to the order of the state. With lightening rapidity he has caused them to be removed from high office, to be arrested, and put to death.

The names of the men who have been shot by his orders are already known. Hitler’s love of Germany has triumphed over private friendships and fidelity to comrades who had stood shoulder to shoulder with him in the fight for Germany’s future.”

Daily Mail, London, July 2nd 1934.

 

Victor Lutze was appointed to head the SA in Rohm’s place. Under Lutze, the SA gradually dwindled and lost its power as the SS under Himmler grew rapidly to take its place as the dominant force in Germany.

 

mogv-part-13-3069-sa-stabschef-viktor-lutze

[Add. image — SA-Stabschef Viktor Lutze (28 December 1890 – 2 May 1943) was the commander of the SA, succeeding Ernst Röhm as Stabschef. He died from injuries received in a car accident. Lutze was given an elaborate state funeral in Berlin on 7 May 1943.]

 

On August 2, 1934, President von Hindenburg died and Hitler took over the office of President and thereby became Commander in Chief of the army. Hitler, thereafter called himself the “Fuhrer,” or leader.

 

On August 19, 1934, an election, called a “plebiscite,” was held in which the German people could express either their approval or disapproval of Hitler and his regime. About 95 percent of registered voters went to the polls, and 90% of them voted for Hitler. The election was internationally supervised, and by all accounts, was a fair and open election without voter intimidation of any kind. Hitler now had the overwhelming support of the German people.

 

 

1934 Annual Nazi Rally at Nuremberg

 

The Nazis held their annual rally at Nuremberg in September, 1934, just two weeks after the plebiscite, during which the Fuhrer’s grand proclamation was read:

The German form of life is definitely determined for the next thousand years. The Age of Nerves of the nineteenth century has found its close with us. There will be no revolution in Germany for the next thousand years.”

 

The Jewish American journalist William L. Shirer (“Inside the Third Reich”) attended the rally to see what Nazi pomp and pageantry was all about. He wrote:

I am beginning to comprehend some of the reasons for Hitler’s astounding success. Borrowing a chapter from the Roman Catholic Church, he is restoring pageantry and color and mysticism to the drab lives of 20th century Germans. This morning’s opening meeting…was more than a gorgeous show; it also had something of the mysticism and religious fervor of an Easter or Christmas Mass in a great Gothic cathedral. The hall was a sea of brightly colored flags. Even Hitler’s arrival was made dramatic. The band stopped playing. There was a hush over the thirty thousand people packed in the hall. Then the band struck up the Badenweiler March, … Hitler appeared in the back of the auditorium and followed by his aides, Goring, Goebbels, Hess, Himmler and the others, he slowly strode down the long center aisle while thirty thousand hands were raised in salute.”

 

To Shirer, the intoxicating atmosphere inside the hall was such that;

every word dropped by Hitler seemed like an inspired word from on high.”

 

mogv-part-13-2341-the-1934-nazi-rally-at-nuremberg

The 1934 Nazi rally at Nuremberg during which Hitler proclaimed the “thousand year Reich.

 

In his speech before the Nuremberg Rally, Hitler absolved the SA Brown shirts from any complicity in the events precipitating the blood purge (Night of the Long Knives) which had just occurred, and acknowledged their unwavering loyalty to him and the party. The 50,000 Brown shirts assembled for the occasion responded with a full throated chorus of “Seig Heils.” There was no longer any question of SA loyalty.

 

The Nuremberg Rally was held annually in the month of September until 1938 when it was suspended. The Rallies were intended to show the world a German nation-state in lock step with its leader and his ideology. They also energized the nationalistic pride of the German people. Hitler obtained the services of the German film actress and director, Leni Riefenstahl, to make a documentary of the 1934 Nuremberg rally.

 

mogv-part-13-3000-mass-gymnastics-at-the-nuremburg-rally-during-day-of-community

Mass gymnastics at the Nuremburg Rally during “Day of Community.” Hitler and the National Socialists promoted unity, discipline, health and vigor for the German “volk.” [Adolf Hitler watched the huge demonstrations given on the Zeppelin Field, Sep 8, 1938.]

 

Leni Riefenstahl had made a name for herself in the German film industry by appearing in a series of so-called mountain films directed by Arnold Franck. In these films, she played the part of a prototypically fit and healthy German girl with a properly Aryan face. This film genre would soon become associated with the nationalistic aspirations of the emerging Nazi party. She went on, in 1932, to write, direct and perform in her own mountain film, “The Blue Light.

 

mogv-part-13-2357-hitler-with-leni-riefenstahl-at-nuremberg

Hitler with Leni Riefenstahl at Nuremberg

 

Despite her lack of experience, the film was remarkably sophisticated in its visual effects. In the whiteness of its snow and the robust Teutonic energy of its heroines, The Blue Light was a celebration of the spirit and vitality of the Aryan Volk, a theme which was central to Nazi ideology.

 

It was no accident that Riefenstahl was hand-picked by Hitler to direct a series of documentary films that would cast National Socialism in a favorable light. The first and most influential of these films was Triumph of the Will, which was shot in commemoration of the 1934 rally at Nuremberg. This film has been called the most dazzling and successful propaganda film ever made.

 

 

Hitler Revives the German Economy

 

In a very short period of time, Hitler engineered what was and remains probably the greatest economic turnaround in history. People went from starving to full employment, and became so prosperous that ordinary workers were given vacations abroad, paid for by the German Labor Front, the government’s labor organization. Germany went from hopelessly bankrupt to massively restoring, and even expanding, its infrastructure. The world’s first superhighway system, the “Autobahn,” was a shining example. Mass production of the Volkswagen, which literally means “people’s car,” was another. General Eisenhower was so impressed by the German Autobahn system that when he became president years later, he initiated the superhighway system for American ― a direct replication of the German Autobahns. Hitler also pursued a policy of “autarky,” meaning, national “self sufficiency.” That is, Germany would limit imports and produce its own consumer goods, in so far as possible. Hitler transformed Germany from a seemingly irreversible deep depression into the most vibrant economy in Europe.

 

mogv-part-13-2358-the-volkswagen-peoples-car-begins-mass-production

The Volkswagen (people’s car) begins mass production.

 

Hitler’s government had reduced unemployment from 6,014,000 in January 1933, when he became Chancellor, to less than 338,000 by September 1936. At the same time, wages also dramatically increased. German trade was prospering, and deficits of the cities and provinces had almost disappeared. Contrary to official historiography, expenditures for armaments had been minor up to this point, and played no part in Germany’s economic recovery. That came later.

 

Unemployment was eliminated at first, primarily by increased government spending on public works. Germany’s basic infrastructure, such as railways, roads, and public building projects, were improved and expanded. There was also indirect government support to private works projects. At the same time, taxes were sharply reduced to create an incentive for hiring more workers. The effect was an injection of increased wages into the national economy, followed by increased consumer spending, which itself led to job increases. Hitler’s policy of “autarky” (national self-sufficiency) had the effect of creating “wealth creating” jobs in manufacturing which was necessary to sustain long term economic growth. By 1936 there was a labor shortage, especially in the building and metallurgical trades.

 

mogv-part-13-3001-charles-lindbergh-in-germany-inspecting-german-aviation

[Add. image — Charles Lindbergh in Germany, inspecting German aviation.]

 

Charles Lindbergh and his wife Anne Morrow Lindbergh travelled widely in Germany at this time. In his book Autobiography of Values, Charles Lindbergh wrote:

The organized vitality of Germany was what most impressed me: the unceasing activity of the people, and the convinced dictatorial direction to create the new factories, airfields, and research laboratories…

 

His wife drew similar conclusions.

 

… have never in my life been so conscious of such a directed force. It is thrilling when seen manifested in the energy, pride, and morale of the people―especially the young people,” she wrote in “The Flower and the Nettle.”

 

To counter the effects of the international Jewish boycott of Germany, including the financial strangulation, Hitler simply went around the international bankers by creating a new currency issued by the German government instead of borrowing it from the Jewish owned central bank. This new currency was not backed by gold, but by the credibility of the German government. The new mark was essentially a receipt for labor and materials delivered to the government. Hitler said:

For every mark issued, we required the equivalent of a mark’s worth of work done, or goods produced.”

 

The government paid workers in these new marks and the workers spent them on other goods and services, thus creating more jobs for more people. In this way the German people climbed out of the crushing debt imposed upon them by the international bankers (read, Jewish bankers). Within two years Germany was back on her feet again. It had a solid, stable currency with no debt and no inflation.

 

Germany even managed to restore foreign trade, despite the international bankers’ denial of foreign credit to Germany and despite the global boycott by Jewish owned industries and shipping. Germany got around the boycott and the capital strangulation by exchanging equipment and commodities directly with other countries using a barter system that cut the bankers completely out of the loop. The Jewish boycott actually boomeranged. While Germany flourished ― because barter eliminates national debt, interest on the debt, and trade deficits ― Jewish financiers were deprived of the money they would have earned on these activities. This, of course, only intensified international Jewry’s determination to undermine and destroy the Nazi regime.

Through an independent monetary policy of sovereign credit and a full employment public works program, the Third Reich was able to turn a bankrupt Germany, stripped of overseas colonies, into the strongest economy in Europe within four years, even before armament spending began.” (Henry C.K. Liu, “Nazism and the German Economic Miracle,” Asia Times — May 24, 2005)

 

 

Hitler Becomes the Most Popular

 

Leader in the World

 

The German economic miracle did not escape the notice of foreign leaders who heaped praise on Hitler at every opportunity. David Lloyd George, Prime Minister of Britain wrote:

I have now seen the famous German leader and also something of the great change he has affected. Whatever one may think of his methods ― and they are certainly not those of a parliamentary country, there can be no doubt that he has achieved a marvelous transformation in the spirit of the people, in their attitude towards each other, and in their social and economic outlook.

He rightly claimed at Nuremberg that in four years his movement had made a new Germany.

It is not the Germany of the first decade that followed the war ― broken, dejected and bowed down with a sense of apprehension and impotence. It is now full of hope and confidence, and of a renewed sense of determination to lead its own life without interference from any influence outside its own frontiers.

There is for the first time since the war a general sense of security. The people are more cheerful. There is a greater sense of general gaiety of spirit throughout the land. It is a happier Germany. I saw it everywhere, and Englishmen I met during my trip and who knew Germany well were very impressed with the change.”

One man [Hitler] has accomplished this miracle. He is a born leader of men. A magnetic and dynamic personality with a single-minded purpose, a resolute will and a dauntless heart.

He is not merely in name but in fact the national Leader. He has made them safe against potential enemies by whom they were surrounded. He is also securing them against the constant dread of starvation which is one of the most poignant memories of the last years of the War and the first years of the Peace. Over 700,000 died of sheer hunger in those dark years. You can still see the effect in the physique of those who were born into that bleak world.

The fact that Hitler has rescued his country from the fear of repetition of that period of despair, penury and humiliation has given him an unchallenged authority in modern Germany.

As to his popularity, especially among the youth of Germany, there can be no manner of doubt. The old trust him; the young idolize him. It is not the admiration accorded to a popular leader. It is the worship of a national hero who has saved his country from utter despondence and degradation.

To those who have actually seen and sensed the way Hitler reigns over the heart and mind of Germany, this description may appear extravagant. All the same it is the bare truth. This great people will work better, sacrifice more, and, if necessary, fight with greater resolution because Hitler asks them to do so. Those who do not comprehend this central fact cannot judge the present possibilities of modern Germany.

That impression more than anything I witnessed during my short visit to the new Germany. There was a revivalist atmosphere. It had an extraordinary effect in unifying the nation.

Catholic and Protestant, Prussian and Bavarian, employer and workman, rich and poor, have been consolidated into one people. Religious, provincial and class origins no longer divide the nation. There is a passion for unity born of dire necessity.

The divisions, which followed the collapse of 1918, made Germany impotent to face the problems, internal and external. That is why the clash of rival passions is not only deprecated but temporarily suppressed.

I found everywhere a fierce and uncompromising hostility to Russian Bolshevism, coupled with a genuine admiration for the British people with a profound desire for a better and friendlier understanding of them. The Germans have definitely made up their minds never to quarrel with us again, nor have they any vindictive feelings towards the French. They have altogether put out of their minds any desire for the restoration of Alsace-Lorraine.

But there is a real hatred and fear of Russian Bolshevism, and unfortunately it is growing in intensity. It constitutes the driving force of their international and military policy. Their private and public talk is full of it. Wherever you go you need not wait long before you hear the word ‘Bolshevism’, and it recurs again and again with a wearying reiteration.

Their eyes are concentrated on the East as if they are watching intently for the breaking of the day of wrath. Against it they are preparing with German thoroughness.

This fear is not put on. High and low they are convinced there is every reason for apprehension. They have a dread of the great army, that has been built up in Russia in recent years.

An exceptionally violent anti-German campaign of abuse printed in the Russian official Press and propelled by the official Moscow radio has revived the suspicion in Germany that the Soviet Government are contemplating mischief.” ― David Lloyd George, Daily Express, 9/17/1936

 

Winston Churchill, who would later become Hitler’s most obstinate enemy when German economic power began to again challenge that of Great Britain, had this to say in 1935 ― (before he became the front man for the Jewish Focus Group):

In fifteen years that have followed this resolve, he [Hitler] has succeeded in restoring Germany to the most powerful position in Europe, and not only has he restored the position of his country, but he has even, to a very great extent, reversed the results of the Great War… the vanquished are in the process of becoming the victors and the victors the vanquished … whatever else might be thought about these exploits they are certainly among the most remarkable in the whole history of the world.

… and the achievement by which the tables have been turned upon the complacent, feckless and purblind victors deserves to be reckoned a prodigy in the history of the world and a prodigy which is inseparable from the personal exertions of life thrust on a single man …

Those who have met Hitler face to face in public, business, or on social terms, have found a highly competent, cool, well-informed functionary with an agreeable manner, a discerning smile and few have been unaffected by a subtle personal magnetism.

Nor is this impression merely the dazzle of power. He exerted it on his companions at every stage in his struggle, even when his fortunes were in the lowest depths …

One may dislike Hitler’s system and yet admire his patriotic achievement. If our country were defeated I should hope we should find a champion as indomitable to restore our courage and lead us back to our place among the nations.” ― Winston Churchill, 1935

 

Douglas Reed, British journalist, playwright, novelist and author of many books about Europe between the wars and after World War Two provided the following observation about the economic transformation of Germany under Hitler:

Germans in their country are not less well cared for than the English people in theirs, but better. You are faced with a country immensely strong in arms and immensely strong in real wealth ― not in gold bars in a vault of the national bank, but industry, agriculture, the thrift and energy of the work people, and the conditions of life they enjoy.

In Germany now they have a mighty organization, equipped with full powers, for improving the lot of the work people in factories and workshops. Their engineers and social workers and artists go into the factories and see what needs to be done. They say that a shower room, recreation room, a restaurant, a medical clinic, a dental clinic is needed and these are provided. They have a civic sense, a social conscience, a feeling of the community of German mankind ― in spite of the bestial concentration camps ― which you lack.

 

John L Garvin, editor of the London Sunday paper, “The Observer,” wrote:

Last May, I returned, bringing my family for another sojourn, after two years spent in other European countries. I found a Germany which has advanced miraculously from the point of 1933. I found political solidarity, a wholesome tone in the life of city dweller and country dweller alike.

I found living costs materially reduced and an unmistakable optimism on every hand. In every quarter I found the same answer to my questioning: Profound belief in the genius of the Leader, love and admiration for him as an individual. My observations have covered a wide range of social classification.

I have talked with the humblest type of laborers, with merchants, professional men. I have yet to discover a dissenting voice to the question of loyalty to the Fuehrer. My two young daughters are attending German public schools and are receiving an education which in thoroughness could be equaled in few countries.

 

And this from Lord Lothian, British Ambassador to Washington, written June 29, 1937:

I think that it must be admitted that National Socialism has done a great deal for Germany. It has undoubtedly cleaned up Germany in the ordinary moral sense of the word. The defeatism, the corruption so manifest a characteristic in the days after the war has disappeared, at any rate from public view. It has given discipline and order and a sense of purpose to the great majority of young people who in earlier days did not know where to go or what they were living for.

 

In an article which appeared in the New York Times on July 12, 1935, John H. Holmes, Pastor of Community Church wrote:

The spectacle of Germany today is a tremendous experience. Fifteen years after the war in which the allied powers thought they had destroyed her, Germany is on her feet again. As compared with 1922 and 1931, when I last saw Germany, the change is miraculous. The people are confident, enthusiastic and courageous. They have recovered their morale. In 1931 the German people were going to pieces. But now they are themselves again, no doubt about that! The masses of the people are increasingly with Hitler. I have been fooling myself all along that this was not so, but now I know it is so.

 

In his book, Defense of Germany, British scholar G.E.O. Knight wrote:

Last July, feeling that the Press of this country was willfully lying and conducting a political campaign against Germany, I resolved to go to Berlin and make free and independent investigation. I was determined to do pretty much as I pleased when I got there, and no one interfered with my movements.

I found Germany, comparatively speaking, a free country, much freer than some of its neighbors. My own views were not always acceptable to my many friends, among whom I can count Jews and Gentiles, Nazis and Communists, Democrats and Socialists. Soon I found that being a Nazi does not preclude one holding views that few Labor men in my own country would dare to express to their ‘comrades’ of the national Labor Party.

 

The general improvement in the standard of living of the German people under Hitler’s regime put Germany well ahead of all other nations at that time, including the United States. The Nazi regime implemented a viable social security program for retirement. The working conditions were drastically improved, and the German people were provided opportunities for leisure and recreation after work. The same level of prosperity and social benefits for all its citizens have rarely been achieved anywhere in the world, either before or since then.

 

German society under Nazi rule was also very democratic, with regular elections of representatives to a legislature. It was not democratic in the same sense as in the United States today. The German form of democracy, as an expression of the popular will, was assured by the right to organize plebiscites to express the desires of the people.

The result of the revolution [National Socialist revolution] in Germany has been to establish a democracy in the best sense of the word. We are steering towards an order of things guaranteeing a process of a natural and reasonable selection in the domain of political leadership, thanks to which that leadership will be entrusted to the most competent, irrespective of their descent, name or fortune. The memorable words of the great Corsican [Napoleon] that every soldier carries a Field Marshal’s baton in his knapsack, will find its political complement in Germany.” ― Adolf Hitler

 

In England, under democracy, you do not put experts in charge of your affairs, but distribute favors among men of a small class without especial qualification for the posts they receive. This is the misuse of democracy in the interest of class, the betrayal of democracy, and it is the cause of our woes, past, present and to come.” ― Douglas Reed, in “Disgrace Abounding

 

What the German nation has ardently desired for centuries is henceforth a reality; one single, fraternally united people, liberated from the mutual prejudices and hindrances of past times.” ― Adolf Hitler

 

The will of the people is the will of the government, and vice versa. The new political structure raised in Germany is a kind of ennobled democracy; i.e., the government derives its authority from the people, but the possibility of misinterpreting the peoples will or of sterilizing it by the intervention of parliamentary methods has been eliminated altogether.” ― Dr. Joseph Goebbels

 

The movement was consolidated together in one Reich a people who were hitherto kept in disunion but various lines of division… religious divisions, class divisions, professional divisions, political divisions and the territorial divisions into the various autonomous federal states. This unification is now an historical fact. Nationalism has founded a genuine folk community.

Formerly the votes of the people were distributed among several political parties. Eventually the number of these parties came to thirty-six. They had no great common platform to offer to a people who were struggling to live. They carried on their political campaigns against one another in a quarrel over paltry and selfish issues.

Today the people of Germany vote for one leader and one party in a consolidated unity that has never before been dreamed of. Following the disappearance of the political parties, which fought only for their own ends and kept the nation divided, great and common vital problems were presented to the people so that they might understand which ideals were worth striving for and for which sacrifices would have to be made. The whole of Germany was aroused to struggle for these great questions which are of vital importance to a nation’s existence. Rudolf Hess

 

“The parliamentary principle of decision by majorities only appears during quite short periods of history, and those are always periods of decadence in nations and States.” ― Adolf Hitler

 

… Hitler has repeatedly taken the opportunity of consulting the nation and has each time obtained its wholehearted approval of his policy and methods of government.” ― Cesare Santoro, “Hitler Germany, Vivisection

 

I myself was and still am a child of the people. It was not for the capitalists that I undertook this struggle; it was for the German working man that I took my stand.” ― Adolf Hitler

 

 

The following photos show Hitler interacting with the German people, especially children. Hitler is the most popular national leader in the world at this time.

 

mogv-part-13-2360-hitler-receiving-flowers-from-girl

 

mogv-part-13-2362-hitler-laughing-with-man-in-garden

 

mogv-part-13-3024-montage-hitler-receiving-flowers

 

mogv-part-13-2369-baby-touching-hitlers-face

 

mogv-part-13-3038-hitler-meeting-four-brothers

 

mogv-part-13-3016-hitler-receing-flowers-from-boy

 

mogv-part-13-3028-montage-hitler-reading-getting-flowers-from-girls

 

mogv-part-13-2371-hitler-leaving-a-church 

 

 Contrary to the propaganda, Hitler was a Catholic and a Christian believer. Here, he is photographed leaving the Marine Church in Wilhelmshaven.

 

It has been made out by those whose intent was to slander and smear Hitler that he was an atheist, an occultist, that he believed in astrology, that he engaged in pagan ritualism, etc., ad nauseam. The History Channel is currently running a documentary asserting these very absurdities. But this is how Hitler described his beliefs in Mein Kampf.

First, I believe in Almighty God… and I solemnly declare that Almighty God has chosen me for this task.” He said further, “We wish to fill our culture once more with the spirit of Christianity – but not only in theory.

 

Hitler saw Christianity as an essential cultural institution for Germany:

The German Government, which regards Christianity as the unshakable foundation of the ethical life of the German nation, attaches the greatest importance to the maintenance and development of friendly relations with the Holy See [The Pope]. The national government regards the two Christian confessions [Protestantism and Catholicism] as the most important factors of the maintenance of our ethical personality. The Government will adopt a just and objective attitude towards all other religions.” ― Adolf Hitler

 

In numerous utterances by Adolf Hitler and about Adolf Hitler, he hardly comes across in the way he was described above. In his 25 Point Speech of 1920 (point 24), Hitler said:

“The Party as such advocates a positive Christianity without binding itself to any particular church.

In this hour I would ask of the Lord God only this: that, as in the past, so in the years to come, He would give His blessing to our work and our action, to our judgment and our resolution, that He will safeguard us from all false pride and from all cowardly servility, that he may grant to us to find the straight path which His Providence has ordained for the German people, and that He may ever give us the courage to do the right, never to falter, never to yield before any violence, before any danger.” ― From a speech by Adolf Hitler.

 

I believe in the Holy German people inside and outside the German frontiers. I believe in Adolf Hitler, who by the grace of God, was sent to give the German people faith in themselves once more.” ― German Faith Movement.

 

Adolf Hitler gave us back our faith. He showed us the true meaning of religion. He has come to renew for us the faith of our fathers and to make us new and better beings… just as Jesus Christ made his twelve apostles into a faithful band to the martyr’s death whose faith shook the Roman Empire, so now we witness the same spectacle again. Adolf Hitler is the true Holy Ghost.” ― Hanns Kerrl. German Minister for German Affairs.

 

It was international Jewish propaganda that made Hitler out to be an atheistic, murderous monster. His Nazi regime did not persecute the German people, nor deprive them of their rights. On the contrary, as can be seen by the statements and comments of world leaders at that time, Hitler devoted his life and all his energies toward improving the lot of his German people, and the German people responded with an outpouring of love and devotion for their Fuhrer rarely seen in history. The police actions of his regime were directed against the enemies of the German people, which included the Communists and other Leftist organizations whose members were generally not ethnic Germans. Both Hitler and the German people saw what the Jews in Russia had done to that country, and knew that they intended to do the same to Germany if they ever got the chance. Hitler had these leftist revolutionaries rounded up and locked away to make sure they never got the chance. That the vast majority of these people were Jews was only coincidental. They were locked away because they were Communists and revolutionaries, and therefore a dire threat to Germany. Judging by what they did in Hungary, Italy and Spain, he had every justification for his actions.

 

The international Jewish press blew these events all out of proportion and accused the Nazi regime of “persecuting” the Jews in Germany for no reason except that they were Jews. They repeatedly and relentlessly accused the Nazi regime of the intent to “exterminate” the Jews, beginning with the Untermeyer Speech in New York in 1933. That simply was not true. Most Jews lived unmolested in Germany right up until the beginning of World War II, and a great many lived unmolested in Germany right through the war. It was the Communists, who happened to be Jews, who were harshly dealt with. A number of German Army officers, including a couple of field marshals, Field Marshal Erhard Milch, for example, were Jewish. Milch oversaw the development of the Luftwaffe.

 

At the same time that the comments and observations of statesmen, historians and journalists presented above in this chapter were being made describing Germany as a land of happy, prosperous people with a benign government dedicated to their well being, international Jewry continued its virulent anti-German propaganda campaign portraying Germany as a charnel house of repression, brutality, and murder. In March, 1935 the National Council of Jewish Women in New York City proclaimed Hitler a “world menace.” At precisely the same time in Germany, Julius Streicher, publisher of “Der Sturmer” newspaper, was comparing Hitler to Jesus Christ. A professor Hauser made the news by declaring that God had revealed himself to Germany through Hitler, and Dr. Reinhardt Krause declared that Hitler alone had “God’s order” for the Germany nation. The National Socialists claimed that the international hostility toward Hitler was entirely Jewish inspired. While the German people adored Hitler and saw him as the savior of Germany, many outside Germany had been conditioned by Jewish anti-German propaganda to regarded him as a menace to mankind.

 

Hitler had been elected in large part on his promise to reclaim territories taken away from Germany by the Versailles Treaty, and to create a single German state to include all German people. British, French and Soviet leaders refused to recognize Germany’s aims as legitimate, but chose instead to regard Hitler’s revanchist goals as international aggression.

 

Representatives of Britain, France and Italy met at an Italian village (Stresa) on April 11, 1935 to reaffirm their opposition to Germany absorbing Austria or the Sudetenland of Czechoslovakia. Hitler denounced these reaffirmations as hostile to Germany, declaring that his aims were legitimate and that Germany did not want another war. He spoke of the absurdity of war and of the “follies” of the past. Wars of revenge, he said, were out of date. “A deliberate maker of war may have been a patriot in the old days,” he said, “but today such a person would be a traitor.” “We are not imperialists,” he added, and said that all the German people wanted was “equal rights for all,” and its honor restored.

 

All the German people wanted, he said, was to be treated like everyone else, and among other things, that meant the return of German territory.

 

Despite the dogged anti-German propaganda, there remained support for Hitler’s aims from reflective, thoughtful men. On June 6, 1935, Britain’s leading cleric, the Archbishop of Canterbury, expressed sympathy for Germany’s position among nations, declaring that Germany;

“… must be recognized as a nation entitled to an equal place among other nations.”

 

Yet, the average American or Englishman was made to believe that Germany was a world menace and should be controlled and held in check. They were made to believe through the Jewish controlled media that Germany was an evil, brutish country with an oppressive, totalitarian government that kept a terrified population under strict control with secret police forces and concentration camps. Nothing could have been further from the truth.

 

The “holy war” declared on Germany by international Jewry continued relentlessly, and the propaganda campaign of deliberate lies, smears and misrepresentations was succeeding in turning the world against Germany. The contrast between life inside Germany as it actually was, and the way in which it was depicted in the International Jewish press could not have been greater.

 

Following is a series of photographs taken during the Nazi period showing the Germans to be a clean-cut, handsome, intelligent and civilized people, not unlike those of any other European country at the time.

This was the real face of Germany during the Nazi period

 

mogv-part-13-3034-montage-german-officer-and-soldiers

 

A German army officer and a soldier (above). A young soldier (below  left) and a young German officer (below right).

 

mogv-part-13-3035-german-officer-with-dog-wearing-cap

A German Officer and his dog

 

mogv-part-13-3044-young-men-of-the-hitler-youth-movement

 

Young men of the “Hitler Youth” Movement (like the Boy Scouts).

 

mogv-part-13-3045-young-women-of-the-nazi-youth-movement

Young women of the Nazi Youth Movement (Girls’ equivalent of the boys’ Hitler Youth).

 

mogv-part-13-3046-more-german-youth-movement-girls

More German Youth Movement Girls

mogv-part-13-3067-german-farm-girl-1930s-german-city-boy-of-the-1930s

German farm girl, 1930s. German city boy of the 1930s

 

mogv-part-13-3049-a-1930s-german-street

A 1930s German street (before it was bombed)

 

mogv-part-13-3051-german-public-swimming-pool-%e2%80%95-1930s

German public swimming pool ― 1930s

 

mogv-part-13-3053-strolling-the-children

Strolling the children.

 

mogv-part-13-3054-an-elegant-german-couple-of-the-1930

An elegant German couple of the 1930s.

 

 

Below is the face of Germany as depicted in Jewish propaganda.

 

mogv-part-13-3065-propaganda

 

mogv-part-13-3066-propaganda

 

mogv-part-13-3059-propaganda

 

mogv-part-13-3062-propaganda

 

Propaganda” Nazis

 

 

 

 

[END of Part 13]

 

______________________________

 

 

PDF Notes

Total words = 11,782

* Total pages = 75

*Total images = 46

 

*Note: Images not in original book are indicated as “Add. image” (Additional image).

*Text in [square brackets] is not part of the original book.

*Special thanks to reader “mblaine” for providing the text for this book.

 

 

======================================

 

Click to download a PDF of this post (11.0 MB).

 

the-myth-of-germany-villainy-part-13-life-in-germany-under-hitler

 

mogv-part-13-cover

 

___________________________

 

Click on a link to go to another part:

 

Part 01 — Cover text; About the Author; Preface; Chapter 1: The Myth of Germany as an Evil Nation

Part 02 — Chapter 2: Aftermath of the War in Germany

Part 03 — Chapter 3: The Jewish Factor in the War

Part 04 — Chapter 4: The Russian revolution of 1917

Part 05 — Chapter 5: The Red Terror

Part 06 — Chapter 6: The Bolshevik Revolution Spreads throughout Europe

Part 07 — Chapter 7: The Nation of Israel

Part 08 — Chapter 8: Jews in Weimar Germany

Part 09 — Chapter 9: Hitler and National Socialists Rise to Power

Part 10 — Chapter 10: National Socialism vs Communism

Part 11 — Chapter 11: Jews Declare War on Nazi Germany

Part 12 — Chapter 12: The Nazis and the Zionists Actually Work Together for Jewish Emigration out of Germany

Part 13 — Chapter 13: Life in Germany Under Hitler

Part 14 — Chapter 14 & 15: Hitler Begins Reclamation of German Territory; The 1936 Olympics

Part 15 — Chapter 16: Anschluss” The Unification of Austria and Germany

Part 16 – Chapter 17: Germany Annexes the Sudetenland

 

See also:

 

The Myth of German Villainy: Author Ben Bradberry Interview — TRANSCRIPT

 

 

_____________________

 

 

Version History

 

Version 3Dec 26, 2016 — Added 2 additional images. Added my introductory summary. Added PDF for download.

 

Version 2Dec 25, 2016 — Added missing images.

 

Version 1Dec 24, 2016 — Created post.

Read Full Post »

ramzpaul-alt-right-rip-cover

 

 

[In these two latest videos Ramzpaul explains why he has dropped his support for the Alt-Right “label” after Richard Spencer failed to disavow the movement’s “Nazi” element following the NPI Conference, where some attendees gave “sieg heils” when Spencer raised his glass and declared loudly, “Hail Trump! Hail our people! Hail Victory!”  

 

Although Ramzpaul makes many good points on some side issues I think he’s making a mountain out of a molehill out of this whole incident by declaring the Alt-Right’s “brand” toxic because of it.

 

More seriously though, is Ramzpaul’s belief that the website, “The Daily Stormer” which has recently claimed to be Alt-Right, is in fact fake opposition, funded by the ADL.

 

But then in that case, what about Amren, which Ramzpaul does support, and its leader, Jared Taylor, who attended the conference and is openly pro-jew? The very people whose organizations are behind our on-going destruction! Is Amren also fake opposition, funded by the ADL, Ramzpaul? —  KATANA]

 

 

 

 

 

RAMZPAUL

 

ON

 

Alt-Right — RIP

 

&

 

“Sieg Heiling”

 

Published on Nov 23 and 19, 2016

 

ramzpaul-alt-right-rip-video-1

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8HBLX_khwQ

 

Description

 

Published on Nov 23, 2016

 

Donald Trump disavows the Alt Right after Roman salutes are featured at the NPI conference.

After NPI’s Roman Salutes,  President elect Trump was forced to disavow the Alt Right. Most normal people can support the Alt Right ideas of self-determination, protection of borders, good trade deals, America First, etc. But normal people can’t support anything that is associated with Nazism.

In my discussions with Brietbart I explained the tension between the Alt Right versus the 14/88 crowd. In general, Breitbart was sympathetic to the ideas of the Alt Right as I described them.

However, they obviously did not support the 14/88 notion of the Alt Right.

Eventually, the 14/88 crowd won this battle once Richard Spencer was associated with Nazism. Of course, I don’t think Richard is a Nazi. But it does not matter at this point. Whenever the Alt Right is discussed in the media, they will show the Roman Salute clip over and over. And as Richard is the self proclaimed leader of the Alt Right, the brand is now impossible to rehabilitate.

But it really doesn’t matter at this point. The Alt Right was a phenomenon that helped launch Trump into the White House. Now that he has been elected, there is no need for the “alternative” label. We are now the Trump Right.

 

http://www.returnofkings.com/76454/what-is-the-alternative-right

 

___________________

 

 

Alt-Right — RIP

 

TRANSCRIPT

 

[5:37]

 

 

 

Hey guys. First of all I’m still in the process of moving back home. I don’t know my final location, but, so I don’t have my camera equipment. But I thought I had to discuss this whole thing that blew-up with Richard Spencer and the NPI and the Alt-Right. And, first of all what was reported was outrageous. Because supposedly Richard said that he asked the question, “Are Jews even human?” He didn’t ask that and in his speech he said, “Are Republican strategists even human?”. It was a joke! He wasn’t talking about Jews. So, CNN had lied there. And there’s supposedly the, you know, the Roman salute that happened. All Richard did was he had a glass and did a toast, “Hail Trump!” at the end. Big deal! We say “Hail To the Chief” for the president. It shouldn’t be that big of an issue. But unfortunately, we have some people that intentionally got up and did the Roman salute, a couple times, I guess there before and they did that and tweeted it.

 

ramzpaul-alt-right-rip-2442-richard-spencer-raising-his-glass

[Image] Richard Spencer raising his glass while announcing, “Hail Trump! Hail our people! Hail Victory!” at the NPI Conference 2016.

 

And yeah, at that point, Donald Trump had to disavow the Alt-Right. Because, you can’t hang on to something that’s Nazi. You just can’t! Because Naziism, it was seventy years ago. It’s just a brand that doesn’t translate well. It scares people. And if you’re going to do a seig heil, it’s over! It’s really over! And so, the truth, it doesn’t really matter what happened with NPI and with Richard Spencer. It’s a perception. And whenever they think about the Alt-Right now, people are going to think about the Romans salute! [laughing] And I won’t even do it now otherwise they’ll use my image.

 

ramzpaul-alt-right-rip-2439-audience-members-giving-nazi-salute

[Image] “Hands up” at the NPI Conference 2016.

 

And yeah, that’s not fair, but politics is not fair. So now the Alt-Right brand is damaged. It’s associated with Naziism. And normal Americans aren’t going to support that. Which is a shame, but it’s really OK, you know. Why am I saying it’s OK? For a period of time before Trump got elected, the Alt-Right really grew. And part of the reason — I’m a little of the reason, just hang on — I did an interview with Milo and I spoke to him briefly. He’d use a lot of my quotes with Breitbart when they talk about, “What is the Alt-Right?” And I did some also some articles for “Return of the Kings”, some videos. And I try to explain what the Alt-Right is. It’s not traditional conservatism, which is about low taxes and open borders, but it’s also not 14/88, about neo-Nazis and all that shit! It’s about having an identity. That all people, jews, White people, Chinese — we all have an identity and we all have the right to live and of self-determination. That’s a core.

 

There’s other issues too with trade and so forth, but that was basically the core. It’s not like this Nazi hate ideology! And, you know, what? Most people can really get on to that. Most people are like:

Yeah, I’m tired of political correctness. If other groups have identity, why can’t we? Why can’t we all have nationalism?

 

And it really resonates with people.

 

And it did with Breitbart. And I know, because Milo published it and Steve Bannon saw that. And that’s why Steve Bannon, Trump’s Chief of Staff now, was on board with the Alt-Right. Because it’s something you can defend! But what happened is, immediately the enemy primarily and I’ll say it, I’ve said this before. I think Daily Stormer, to be honest, is a fake opposition. I think is funded by the ADL. And I’m not going to get into debates, why. I think that, I really do. And initially this Daily Stormer, they were opposed to the Alt-Right. But when they saw that it was getting on, they changed their strategy. And I said “they”, because I don’t think it’s just Andrew Anglin [laughing] that is in charge of it. I’ve heard his interviews. I think there’s a whole group that works on that website. And they decided to repurpose it, or try to co-opt the Alt-Right, to say:

Hey! The Alt-Right is all about Naziism, of 14/88”.

 

And they were so good at that, they were basically able to say:

Hey! 14/88 and Naziism, that is the core of the Alt-Right, and the rest of you are trying to co-opt what we’re doing!

 

Which was nonsense. But that was their strategy. And, but there was a lot of tension there between it. But still the ones that looked at the Alt-Right is not being Naziism, but being [about] identity, about being nationalism, were able to win the day initially up to the election. Then right after the election, … Yeah, finally because of the Richard Spencer thing that blew apart, now it is associated with Naziism!

 

But it’s OK! It doesn’t matter. It would be kind of like you’re playing a basketball game and you’re winning by two points, at the last second the guy shoots it, and it’s a three point shot. And you go, “Oh no! We lost!” But no, the game ended before the three pointer went in! And that’s kind of what happened.

 

We kind of won. We won, we got Trump in! So that’s fine.

So, I no longer identify as Alt-Right, just because, there’s no way of rehabilitating that whole image of what the Alt-Right is. It’s, I mean, good for Daily Stormer, I guess. They got it associated with Nazism and they’ve kind of quit that now. They’re trying to associate Republicanism with Nazism! [laughing] That’s their new strategy. Good luck with that!

 

ramzpaul-alt-right-rip-2446-daily-stormer-banner

[Image] The Daily Stormer, “America’s #1 Most-Trusted Republican News Source”.

 

That’s OK, because I want to look at the Alt-Right now instead of it just being the Right. There’s no need to have the “Alt” label anymore.

We have Donald Trump. People like me that support borders, that support immigration controls, that are opposed to globalism and free trade, we have our man in office now. We don’t need to call ourselves, “Alt-Right”.

 

So, I’ve given up the label, but I still support self-determination and nationalism for all! I’ll talk to you guys later.

 

[5:37]

 

END

 

 

_______________________

 

 

ramzpaul-alt-right-rip-video-2

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHKU1n5kTWQ

 

Description

 

Published on Nov 29, 2016

 

A response to Richard Spencer’s video addressed to me:

https://youtu.be/zbQhie3ApyE

 

Richard Spencer created a video (see link above) that addressed me concerning many topics concerning the Alt Right. This is my video response to cover some of the common questions that people have raised that include:

 

1. What is Nazism

2. Punching to the Right

3. Disavowing

4. Cucking

5. Brand identity

6. Boundaries needed for a movement

 

From the list above, #6 is key. The idea that you can have a movement that has NO boundaries is insane. Yet, because some people have been fooled with the mantra “never punch to the right” and “never disavow” we now have the Alt Right brand associated with Hollywood Nazis. And as the mainstream media looks at Richard Spencer as the leader of the Alt Right, the fact that he won’t explicitly disavow Nazism is fatal to the movement.  The serious thinkers have been replaced with Hal Turner and Andrew Anglin types.

 

I think Richard is intelligent and quite eloquent. But I fear his message will be muted and he will become the new David Duke for his generation – pulled out every 4 years by the media to try to discredit the politician he endorses.

 

I recommend that Spencer should explicitly disavow that the Alt Right has any connection with Nazism. If he refuses to do so, the Alt Right brand will remain toxic and attract only the kook element.

 

 

The Alt-Right and Boundaries

 

TRANSCRIPT

 

 

 [11:42 min]

 

All right. This is going to be my last video about the “Richard Spencer, sieg heil” case.

 

But I want to do some clarification. And is going to be a little bit more in depth, because there’s a lot of questions about, you know, what is a Nazi, is it National Socialism, is it Hitler, is something new? What’s a Hollywood Nazi? And there’s a lot of ideas like:

 

Hey dude, you can never punch right! Never punch right!” or, “Never disavow, don’t disavow! The left doesn’t do that!” or, “They’re going to call you a Nazi anyway, so why do you fight it?

 

So, there’s all these things I just want to discuss a little bit.

 

Part of the problem whenever the word “Nazi” is thrown out, is like, “What’s really meant by that term?” Because it’s really so ill defined now. And, so I thought it was good to take a step back, you know, to understand there’s basically three categories that sort of fit the word “Nazi”.

 

The first one is National Socialism. National Socialism is not a political party. It’s a ideology. It’s an economic system, sort of like Socialism is, or Marxism. You know, for example, you can have Marxists, but there’s a lot of different political parties that may adopt Marxism, the same way with National Socialism. And National Socialism is really not about concentration camps, the Holocaust, jews. No! It’s an economic policy. It’s, for example, if you believe in single payer health care. That was a National Socialist policy. Protecting the environment was very important to the National Socialists. Protecting the workers through good trade deals. That was National Socialist. That’s all it is, and that they don’t really have any symbols as an ideology, like Capitalism, or Communism.

 

Then, in the 30’s, 1933 to 1945, just twelve years, just twelve years! That’s all it was in Germany. You had a political party that advocated National Socialism. And they were called the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. What we now know as the Nazis. Adolf Hitler and all that. And as a political party, like the Republicans and the Democrats, you had the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. And the Republicans, they have the elephant as their kind of symbol, the Democrats has a donkey. Well, the National Socialist German Workers’ Party had the swastika. That was it! It didn’t have anything to do with the National Socialism ideology. It had to do with that specific political party. And they also used the Roman salute, which became the Nazis salute, and so forth. And it was headed by Adolf Hitler.

 

That was in a sense the Nazi that ended in one 1945. And it was over! It was specifically German. So where is National Socialism, the economic policy, or the ideology, you could export to various countries — even Hitler thought that. But National Socialism German Workers Party, it makes absolutely no sense to export, because it’s just for Germans! So using a swastika elsewhere, especially like the Slavic areas, is stupid! It makes no sense! That party is dead. So the Nazis the real Nazis are all gone. They don’t exist anymore.

 

But we have this thing called, “neo-Nazis”. And neo-Nazis, they’ve really started after WW II and almost all of them, like, I posted the link before, have been false flag, heavily Jewish funded, or government funded organizations. And you can ask, “Why would they want to fund something like that?” Well, it’s to discredit nationalist organizations. Because after the war the National Socialist German Workers Party, the Nazis, were really demonized and that’s part of the propaganda. And some of it was justified, some probably wasn’t. But that’s not up for debate. What happened is they were made out to be the devil and it’s got all the worse. So they’re looked at, like Satan now! The worst thing imaginable. So what happened, these groups, they fund these neo-Nazis and then the neo-Nazis — and then this happened through the 70’s and the Illinois Nazis, headed by a Jewish guy, in the 90’s there was a guy named David Wolf something, that was a famous Nazi, he was fake, a Jew.

 

Recently we had Hal Turner, the big Nazi, he turned out to be a Federal informant, and you have groups like Daily Stormer, that I believe are fake and they are doing the same thing. And what they’re, … The goal of the neo-Nazis are is to attach themselves — because they know they’re toxic and 99.9% of people are opposed to them — they attach themselves to a movement they want to discredit. And, for example, originally that the Daily Stormer they attach themselves to Donald Trump and it’s not because they like Donald Trump, it’s because they wanted to discredit him. So the mainstream media can say:

Look at these evil Nazis are supporting Donald Trump! Do you want to support someone that’s supported by Nazis?

 

See, that was the psychology they were using. And it is pretty effective. And that happened with the Alt-Right too, the Daily Stormer was originally opposed to the Alt-Right, but when they saw it was gaining momentum, they decided to try to cut it off, by saying:

No! No! The Alt-Right, it’s all about Nazis! If you’re not a Nazi you’re Alt-Right!

 

They started to push that. Now they’re trying to tie it to Republicanism.

 

But the goal of neo-Nazis is just to discredit normal identity nationalist movements. And not to say, … I’m sure some people are very sincere. There are some sincere neo-Nazis, but in general Neo Naziism has nothing to do with the original National Socialism. I mean, if you go to sites like the Daily Stormer, they don’t really talk about the ideology of National Socialism, or the economic policies, they say the word “kike” over and over. But the original National Socialism wasn’t about saying, “kike, kike, kike, kike, kike, kike!” It had to do with something deeper. And it has nothing to do with the old Nazis of Adolf Hitler. They just use the same symbols, but it is really not related at all.

 

So, you have the three different groups. You have national socialism, which is the ideology. You have the National Socialist German Workers’ Party that was in Germany and then you have these Hollywood neo-Nazis that are mostly fake!

 

One of the things that just bugs me, it’s so frustrating! You hear this all the time is, like, “Dude! Never punched to the right!” Or, “Never disavow!” I mean, that is just retarded! It really is! [laughing]

 

Because, just think about it logically, right! If you can never punch to the Right, which means never criticize someone to the supposed right of you. That is the most extreme positions are beyond criticism! Right, just think of a thought experiment, the most the extreme Right-wing stereotypical position. I don’t know, anyone that doesn’t have blue eyes or blonde hair should be put to death! ! That’s pretty extreme! And so, anyone trying to criticize it, you behave:

Dude! Dude! Don’t push to the right! Don’t push to the right!

 

You see how stupid that is? And the guy has a psycho position could say:

But why? You believe people with brown eyes should be able to live? What are you, a cuck? Cuck, cuck!

 

See, this is just insane!

 

What you need to do as any organization is have a circle, a boundary. Yet, you can cuck, and what does cucky means, is you have your principles and you compromise your principles to try to appease the left. God knows, the mainstream Republicans have done that so much they have cucked on that. They’ve taken their principles, they betrayed them. That is wrong. That is cucking! But holding to your principles is not cucking! So you don’t have to support these neo-Nazi, Hollywood Nazi types, otherwise you’re a cuck. In effect if you don’t draw the boundary, you’re screwed. Because they’re going to taint your brand, which we saw with what happened in the Alt-Right.

 

So you do need to punch right when needed.

 

Now, the Left, they will punch right, left, if they need to, if they’re pressed on it by the Press. But they usually aren’t. That’s why they usually don’t punch left. But if they were pushed on it, they would. You know they would! And, for example, the whole idea too, that:

Hey they’re going to call you Nazis, anyway, so you might as well just be a Nazi”.

 

That’s another argument, I hear. Well, again that is stupid! And I use an analogy. There’s the pick up artist community, of guys that try to seduce women, or whatever, into bed. I’m not saying that I agree with it or disagree with it, but the feminists always call them rapists! “Rapists! You’re a rapist!” Which is not, which is absurd! They are not rapists. They try to charge people. That’s not the same thing as rape. But should, by that logic, should they say:

Well, hey, these feminists are going to call us rapists anyway, so we should self identify as a rapist!

 

That’s stupid! No you don’t want to do that! It is the same thing with this “agree and amplify”. That could be a good strategy at times, but not like someone accuses you of being a child molester of an eight year old girl. You don’t want to “agree and amplify” and say:

No! No! No! You’ve got that wrong! I rape four year olds!

 

So that’s just dumb! You’ve got to have some maturity with this. So, as an organization including the Alt-Right, or whatever organization you have, you got to exclude people on the left, or the right. If you don’t exclude anyone on the right, then you’re just going to be, you’re going to lose it! Because the clowns are going to take over and define your movement. That’s what has happened in the Alt-Right.

 

Now, the sad thing is, I don’t disavow Richard Spencer, because — I’ll find this interview and I’ll link to it. He did after the conference and — the man really is brilliant. He’s eloquent. He has really interesting things to say. But, what’s really sad, is that is not going to be heard anymore because of his refusal to disavow these Nazi types. And it’s not that hard to say, to disavow. And, you know, he, I think he said:

It has bad optics, but I’m not going to disavow, or anything like that.

 

Well, if you don’t do that, then you’re always going to be associated with Nazis. And you could say:

Well, I don’t care they could all be associated with Nazis”.

 

But 99.9% of the populace does care, and they won’t take your message seriously. And every time you’re introduced, you’re going to be introduced as a Nazi sympathizer with the “sieg heiling”. And again this has nothing to do with Naziism back in the 30’s. I’m talking about this Hollywood neo-Nazi, Daily Stormer version. You’re always going to be tainted with that, and no one is going to take you seriously.

 

And it causes also problems for the people that attended the convention. I kind of feel sorry for them, because whenever you’re attending convention you assume there’s going to be certain protocols. I’ve spoken at Amren, American Renaissance, and one of the things I’m confident of, is Jared Taylor is never going to turn [it] into this “sieg heil” fest. Because it would be embarrassing, that would taint me. And the same thing with the people that spoke at this now, they’re all have this on their hands and they have to say:

Hey! I didn’t have anything to do with this!

 

So, you’ve got to really think what you’re doing and look at the image of your brand, and you’ve got to have a brand that will appeal to people.

 

ramzpaul-alt-right-rip-2440-3-npi-attendees-giving-nazi-salute-at-bar

[Image] “Exuberant” attendees going all Roman on us. Actually the guy on the left kind of looks like Ramzpaul!

 

Now, White identity, self-determination, really all those things are winning points. Trade, the whole idea of the Alt-Right really sells to people. But once you mix into it the “sieg heiling” you just lose it! You just lose it.

So, what Richard, I wish he would have said is:

Hey, I gave a speech, some people, four, or five people did this ‘sieg heil’. We can’t control what people do. I do not approve of this. We are not a Nazi organization. We disavow any Nazi influence, that’s not we’re what we’re about.

And if you just said that, it would have ended it. Because people, yeah the Leftist still would have been mad, but who who gives a shit about them, but normal people would have looked at it and said:

Yeah, well that makes sense, you know, you can’t control what your audience does. He disavowed the people who did that sort of thing, that sort of behavior.

That’s the end of it. But if you don’t disavow it, you just try to play the game, like:

It was just, they’re just trying to have fun, it’s bad optics”.

People are not going to buy it.

So, I think that is the last thing I’m going to to say on the same subject.

Talk to you guys later.

 

[11:42]

 

 

END

 

 

_________________________

 

============================================

 

Click to download a PDF of this post (1.2 MB):

 ramzpaul-alt-right-rip-and-sieg-heil-transcripts

 

ramzpaul-alt-right-rip-cover

 

Version History

 

Version 1: Nov 30, 2016 — Published post. Added PDF for download.

Read Full Post »

mogv-part-10-cover

 

[Part 10]

 

[Benton Bradberry’s 2012 book, “The Myth of German Villainy” is a  superb, must-read, revisionist look at how the German people have been systematically, relentlessly and most importantly, unjustly vilified as the arch criminal of the 20th century. Bradberry sets out, cooly and calmly as befits a former US-Navy officer and pilot, to show why and how the German people have been falsely accused of massive crimes and that their chief  accuser and tormenter, organized jewry is in fact the real party guilty of monstrous crimes against Germans and the rest of the world.

In Part 10, the profound differences between Communism and National Socialism are described. Under jewish communism there were no private rights or property and the economy was controlled through “central planning”, while NS supported both private and property rights, upheld Western and Christian values, and guided the economy.

NS was, besides its dedication to the well-being of the German people, a counter-movement against jewish communism. It embodied the philosophical ideas from a variety of popular writers and thinkers of the 19th and early 20th centuries and emphasized the concept of das Volk (the people as a national race), which required the subordination of the individual to the “community,” as well as “faith in the leader”.

In contrast, communism was dedicated to the very destruction of Western, Christian society, murdering upwards of 40 million of Russia’s best people and attempted to carry out similar policies throughout Europe in the name of creating a so-called, “Marxist Utopia”. To create this “Utopia”, Bolshevik Jews unleashed the greatest bloodbath in history, far exceeding anything the Mongols did, and incomparably worse than anything the “notorious Nazis” allegedly carried out —  KATANA.]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOTE: The author has very generously given me permission to reproduce the material here — KATANA.

 The book can be bought at Amazon here: The Myth of German Villainy

 

 

 

The Myth of

 

German Villainy

 

by

 

Benton L. Bradberry

 

 

 

 

 

Contents

Preface  

Chapter 1   –   The Myth of Germany as an Evil Nation

Germany’s Positive Image Changes Overnight 

Chapter 2   –   Aftermath of the War in Germany

The Versailles Treaty

Effect of the Treaty on the German Economy

Was the War Guilt Clause Fair?

Did Germany Really Start the War?

Chapter 3   –   The Jewish Factor in the War

Jews at the Paris Peace Conference

Jews in Britain

Chapter 4   –   The Russian Revolution of 1917

Bolsheviks Take Control

Jews and the Russian Revolution

Origin of East European Jews

Reason for the Russian Pogroms Against the Jews

Jews leave Russia for America

Financing the 1917 Revolution

Jews in the Government of Bolshevik Russia

Chapter 5   –   The Red Terror

Creation of the Gulag

Bolsheviks Kill the Czar

Jews as a Hostile Elite

The Ukrainian Famine (Holodomor)

Chapter 6   –   The Bolshevik Revolution Spreads throughout Europe

Jews in the Hungarian Revolution

Miklos Horthy Saves Hungary

Jews in the German Revolution

The Sparticist Uprising in Berlin

Jewish Bolsheviks Attempt to Take Italy

Jewish Bolsheviks Attempt to Take Spain — The Spanish Civil

War

Czechoslovakia in Danger of Communist Takeover

The Comintern’s Aim? World Domination!

Chapter 7   –   The Nation of Israel

History of the Expulsion of Jews

Chapter 8   –   Jews in Weimar Germany

Jews Undermine German Culture

Chapter 9   –   Hitler & National Socialists Rise to Power

The 25 Points of the National Socialist Party

Chapter 10  –  National Socialism vs. Communism

National Socialism

Jews Plan Marxist Utopia

Chapter 11  –  Jews Declare War on Nazi Germany

Text of Untermeyer’s Speech in New York

The Jewish Persecution Myth

Effect of Boycott on the German Economy

Jewish Exaggerations are Contradicted by Many

Chapter 12  –  The Nazis and the Zionists Actually Work Together for

Jewish Emigration out of Germany

The Nuremberg Laws – 1935

The Zionist Movement

Chapter 13  –  Life in Germany Under Hitler

Night of the Long Knives

1934 Annual Nazi Rally at Nuremberg

Hitler Revives the German Economy

Hitler Becomes the Most Popular Leader in the World

Chapter 14  –  Hitler Begins Reclamation of German Territory

Chapter 15  –  The 1936 Olympics

Chapter 16  –  Anschluss.” The unification of Austria and Germany

Austrian Economy Revived

Austria’s Jews

Chapter 17  –  Germany Annexes the Sudetenland

Chapter 18  –  War with Poland

The Polish Problem

Hitler’s Proposal to Poland

Kristalnacht

German-Polish Talks Continue

Jews Influence both Roosevelt and Churchill

British and American Political Leaders under Jewish Influence

Roosevelt’s Contribution to Hostilities

Lord Halifax Beats the War Drums

Germany Occupies Bohemia and Moravia

Roosevelt Pushes for War

Anti-war Movement Becomes Active

Poles Murder German Nationals within the Corridor

Chapter 19  –  The Phony War

Russo-Finnish War

The Norway/Denmark Campaign

German Invasion of Denmark and Norway

Churchill Takes Chamberlain’s Place as Prime Minister

Chapter 20  –  Germany invades France Through the Low Countries.

The Phony War Ends.

Churchill the War Lover

The Fall of France

Hitler Makes Peace Offer to Britain

Chapter 21  –  The Allied Goal? Destruction of Germany!

Chapter 22  –  Germany as Victim

Rape and Slaughter

Jewish Vengeance

The Jewish Brigade

Chapter 23  –  Winners and Losers

Bibliography

 

 

Chapter 10

 


National Socialism vs Communism

 

 

 

 

German National Socialism has usually been characterized as a right wing ideology while Communism is said to occupy the extreme left of the socio-political spectrum. This is the traditional view. But there are those today who say that Hitler’s obsessive hatred of Communism was disingenuous because German National Socialism was essentially no different from Communism. Both were totalitarian Socialist creeds. But this is a superficial observation, and the terms, “right” and “left” are insufficient to describe the two systems. It is true that National Socialism contained aspects of socialism, as its name implied, but the differences between National Socialism and Communism were profound.

 

The most obvious difference was that National Socialism supported the concept of private property and a market economy, while Communism abolished private property and the government controlled the economy through “central planning.” Under National Socialism the means of production was for the most part in private hands, albeit, “guided” by the state.

 

Under Communism all private property, including farmland, manufacturing, or the means of production, and even private housing, were seized by the state. The only similarity between the two systems was that both were totalitarian in nature, though, between the two, National Socialism was considerably more benign. Under National Socialism, the private rights of “citizens” were respected and protected, while under Communism there were no private rights.

 

mogv-part-10-2238-communism-capitalism-and-national-socialism-compared-ver-2

[Add. image — Communism, Capitalism and National Socialism compared.]

 

Hitler had this to say about the meaning of “Socialism” for Germany, as printed in an article in the UK’s “Guardian, Sunday Express,” December 28, 1938:

Socialist’ I define from the word ‘social’ meaning in the main ‘social equity’. A Socialist is one who serves the common good without giving up his individuality or personality or the product of his personal efficiency. Our adopted term ‘Socialist’ has nothing to do with Marxian Socialism. Marxism is anti-property; true socialism is not.

 

Marxism places no value on the individual, or individual effort, or efficiency; true Socialism values the individual and encourages him in individual efficiency, at the same time holding that his interests as an individual must be in consonance with those of the community. All great inventions, discoveries, achievements were first the product of an individual brain. It is charged against me that I am against property, that I am an atheist. Both charges are false.” Adolf Hitler.

The two systems were also different in their aims. National Socialism under Adolf Hitler was a revolutionary movement in “defense” of Western, Christian civilization, while Communism was a revolutionary movement dedicated to its “destruction.” Harold Cox, Member of Parliament in Britain at the time, and a classical liberal scholar, wrote:

What Socialists (Communists) want is not progress in the world as we know it, but the destruction of that world as a prelude to the creation of a new world of their own imagining…Their ethical outlook is the direct reverse of that which has inspired all great religions of the world…and they deliberately make their appeal to the passions of envy, hatred and malice.” Harold Cox.

 

mogv-part-10-2233-harold-cox-1859-1936

[Add. Image — Harold Cox (1859 – 1936).]

 

The Communist Jews who took control of Russia did their utmost to destroy the traditional Christian culture of Russia and they murdered upwards of 40 million of Russia’s best people. It has been said that the average IQ for Russia was lowered several points by this slaughter of the “intelligentsia” and all the other successful, achieving people in Russia.

(more…)

Read Full Post »