Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Muslim’ Category

 

 

[Mark Collett, 37, is a British political activist and former chairman of the Young BNP, the youth division of the British National Party (BNP), and was director of publicity for the party. He has recently written a book, “The Fall of Western Man“, available in printed form and as a free PDF download.

 

Here he presents the case, that the claim that Assad’s legitimate government, once again, “gassed” rebel held territory is absurd and nonsensical, given that the Syrian government has everything to lose by such an act. They’ve virtually destroyed the ZOG [Zionist/jew Occupied Governments, aka, all Western governments] backed proxy terrorists, and crossing that ZOG imposed “red line“, would be a stupendous act of national suicide, as it would be an open invitation for Syria’s destroyers to come out in the open and destroy Syria overtly, rather than covertly.

 

The reality is that any such gas attack, if it even happened, was carried out by ZOG’s proxy forces for the purpose of justifying overt ZOG destruction of Syria using our blood and treasure for the purpose of creating a “Greater Israel“, and later the creation of a Jew World Order tyranny.

 

We need to inform ourselves, and others, that virtually everything of significance put out by the MSM [Main Sewer Media] is a lie, whether by omission, or commission, for the over-arching goal of creating that JWO.

     KATANA]

 

 

 

_______________________

 

 

Mark Collett

 

Assad Didn’t Do It

 

 

Faked Syrian Gas Attack

 

 

 

 

 

 

Click the link below to view the video:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2E4PhwCESU

 

 

YouTube Description

 

Published on April 12, 2018

The recent alleged ‘gas attack’ in Syria is being used by Western governments & the establishment media as a reason to go to war in the Middle East, however those beating the drums of war have failed to provide any evidence to show who was behind the incident. When analysing the situation in Syria, common sense dictates that the only people who stood to gain anything from carrying out such an attack would be those who wish to fan the flames of war and see Western powers attack the Syrian government forces.

Wars for Israel Drive Mass Immigration into Europe https://youtu.be/Eqain8VShmg

My book, The Fall of Western Man is now available. It is available as a FREE eBook and also in hardback and paperback editions.

 

The Official Website: http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/

 

FREE eBook download: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3cc…

 

Hardback Edition: http://www.lulu.com/shop/mark-collett…

 

Paperback Edition: http://amzn.eu/9LaS7HN

 

PLEASE NOTE: If you wish to debate with me in the comments about anything I have said, I welcome that. However please listen to the complete podcast and ensure you argue with the points I have made. Arguments that simply consist of nonsense such as “what gives you the right to judge” or “I’m a [insert religious affiliation] and you should be ashamed of yourself” or other such vacuous non-arguments will simply be ridiculed.

 

 

 

__________________________

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(16:05)

 

[00:00]

 

 

Usually when I produce these podcasts they are full of facts and press clippings and references. But today we are going to do things a little differently, because as the media, the press, and our foolish and inept Prime Minister, Teresa May, have not presented any evidence whatsoever to prove that President Assad’s forces have used chemical gas in Syria. We are going to look at this issue from a point of common sense. And we are going to assess whether it was likely the President Assad’s forces would have carried out this alleged gas attack, or maybe, just maybe, this attack was either faked, or carried out by other groups, or nations, desperate to bring Western powers into the war in Syria.

 

 

Now earlier, I urged for the use of common sense when dealing with this issue. However when analyzing this alleged gassing we will be applying an ancient European legal saying.

 

[01:00]

 

 

That saying is “cui bono” which is a rhetorical Latin legal phrase used to imply that whoever appears to have the most to gain from a crime, is probably the culprit. A literal translation of “cui bono” is; “to whom is it a benefit?

 

 

Now before we look into who stands to benefit the most from this incident, it is important to note that the British state, and the establishment media, have not presented any evidence to prove that President Assad’s forces had anything to do with this latest supposed chemical attack! So as there is no evidence, and there is only conjecture, let’s start by assessing the situation in Syria before we go any further.

 

 

Essentially, Assad has won the war a war that began all the way back in 2011. A war that was meant to topple him and his regime. And a war that was enthusiastically supported by the Western media and Western leaders, who [02:02] cheered from the sidelines for those who attacked the Syrian regime.

 

(more…)

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

 

 

[In this long (151 minutes) YouTube Hangout hosted by Andy Warski and JF, Mike Enoch debates the self identified jew, Halsey English on the topic of White advocacy and jewish power.

In many heated exchanges Enoch takes the correct position that organized jewry is a hostile “elite” that needs to be expelled from Western countries, while Halsey attempts to argue, in an almost legalistic, hairsplitting “jewy” manner, that while some jewish groups may have excessive power, jews as a whole are not the cause of White racial and cultural displacement. Yeah, right.

A bizarre part of this “debate” are the many abusive comments that Halsey directs at Enoch, calling him a lying fraud!   KATANA.]

 

NOTES

 

 — If you would like to improve the accuracy of the transcript please leave any corrected text in the comments section. Corrections to misspelled names, etc., is encouraged. Thank you.


 

 

 

 

 

Halsey

 

VS

 

Mike Enoch

 

 


 


 

 

Click here for the video:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzE9vfiLU9Q

 

 

 

Published on Feb 14, 2018

 

 

YouTube Description

 

Halsey Vs. Mike Enoch

 

 

49,668 views

 

 

Streamed live on Feb 14, 2018

 

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(151 mins)

 

 

 

[00:01]

 

Warski: What is going on everyone? Welcome back to another Warski Live. I’ve a new setup still in alpha phase. We’re getting the light fixture fixed as well. But this is part one. But, of course, joining me up it’s still in an out.

 

JF: Hello Andy! I think you were the only show that gets worse with time, visually!

 

Warski: Why you think it’s worse?

 

JF: I mean, I don’t know what’s happening here. You look like you have an eight-bit background that just bugged and then everything became black.

 

Warski: Yeah. Well that’s supposed to light up. But then when I turned it on, it over exposes everything and is a mess. So I have to get a friggin dimmer installed. Yeah believe me it’s a, it’s been a hectic day for me.

 

JF: A great debate on the way. Before, I’d like to hear Mike Enoch on the case of the lawsuit against you. I think it’s an important issue regarding free speech and I’d like to hear what’s happening with this.

 

Mike: Yeah thanks. Thanks for giving me the opportunity. I know we have a big audience here and I just want to make an appeal. I know my politics are controversial and this goes beyond my individual politics, or the politics of the people that attended the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville this summer.

 

There’s a lawsuit against us that is essentially an attack on the First Amendment and free speech and internet privacy as well. So these are they’re very powerful and wealthy lawyers that have taken this case and they have attempted to allege some kind of broad-based conspiracy. But, in fact, as they have admitted if you look at press reports about this lawsuit there was something in the New York Times yesterday. There have been various reports on it. They are essentially admitting that they are [02:01] attempting to use the court to shut down the Alt-Right.

 

To shut down political opposition. The New York Times article yesterday has the lead attorney in the case Reberta Kaplan, who is a very wealthy and powerful jewish lesbian, who has is attempting to shut down the Alt-Right, by her own admission. She is, this is a strategic lawsuit, quote of her “This is a strategic lawsuit”. Integrity First for America which is the group fundamental ng the lawsuit which is a group of about twelve very wealthy jewish lawyers, are admitted that this is a political lawsuit, because the government has not done enough to silence the Alt-Right. This is in the New York Times. They’ve admitted all these things.

 

Basically they are admitting they do not have a case before the court and this is purely an attempt to intimidate and silence the defendants. And it goes beyond us. You might say, all right, well tough! Look you went up against the wrong people. But it goes beyond us. As part of [03:00] this process. There’s a subpoena issued [03:02] to Twitter. Twitter is a third party they want information on people that’s tweeted certain hashtags. They want all personal identifiable information including email address, IP address, MAC address, for people that may have tweeted certain hashtags. Unite the Right, Free Cantwell, among others.

 

Now again, you might think I don’t care about these guys. They did something dumb. They went up against the most powerful group of people in the world, and that’s stupid. Maybe so, but if it’s us first, it’s gonna be you next. We’re out here running cover for you, for free speech. And I think we need to get campus free speech groups, the ACLU, any Pro First Amendment group, any Pro Electronic Privacy group, because there is no reason why a person that tweeted out a certain hashtag would add to their case. Like they are alleging something that’s non-existent. They don’t have a valid cause of action before the court and they know it. So if they get these subpoenas granted that’s [04:01] all that they want. So this is in case of Electronic Privacy, your right to privacy on the internet, your right to free speech and this is what these people are attempting to squash.

 

And I think it’s really very important that everybody gets behind, one in condemning the lawsuit, exposing the lawsuit as was it is. And I’m not asking you to support us. I understand that’s a step that many people don’t want to take. I simply want you to support the principle. Support the principles of electronic privacy and anonymity on the Internet. The right to use Twitter without being subjected to potential political witch hunts based on hashtags that you might tweet. And frankly the right of anybody to speak their mind without suffering this kind of “lawfare”. It’s important to note there is no criminal complaint. This is a civil complaint. JF, I know you’ve talked about the abuse of civil courts before. There’s no criminal complaint here, it’s a civil complaint. Why? Because a standard of evidence for a criminal complaint is much higher. They don’t expect to win this case?

 

They [05:00] merely want to use the case as a vehicle to get as much information on as many users of the Internet as they can. And I know that amongst those people that have tweeted the hashtags that they’re looking for are people that are not Alt-Right. People that might be pro Trump. People that might be critical of Israel. These are very serious First Amendment issues they cut to the heart of our rights as Americans. And I think every decent freedom-loving American of any race of any political affiliation needs to come out against this website. Call it for what it is. Understand what’s going on. And we need to light a fire under the butts of all the free speech organizations and Electronic Privacy organizations to come out against this!

 

JF: It’s indeed a very worrying story and, in fact, it’s part of a tendency to use civil courts as instruments of abuse and instruments of quasi police investigation. When they cannot [06:00] get the police to investigate, because there’s nothing to investigate, people are increasingly using in our country the civil courts as a as a bypassing of the law. And, in fact, it makes private agents and judges of civil courts in this country, essentially police investigators, judges at the same time, and agents of this state. It’s absolutely worrying and I fully support you in that.

 

Mike: Yeah, and it’s honestly in my opinion it’s an insult to the integrity of the court. I mean, these people are basically saying:

 

We don’t respect this court we don’t respect this court as a means for citizens to redress damages against each other. We use is this is a course nothing but a political vehicle. It’s just a tool we just want to use subpoena power to get information on our enemies. We don’t care that we’re not gonna win.

 

They’re not gonna win. I mean, they have no complaint. The complaint they’re making is emotional distress. That’s been struck down many times. Anyway, well let’s move on.

 

JF: So your message has been put forward. Andy today we have an amazing debate [07:02] have you been expecting as much excitement as me?

 

Warski: Oh yeah! The Valentine’s Day Massacre. Is that what we dubbed this?

 

JF: Yes. Tell your girlfriend it might be the last!

 

Halsey: Can I comment on the lawsuit?

 

JF: Yes.

 

Halsey: There’s one thing that I don’t seem to understand about why we would want to fight against this lawsuit. And just so, you know, I think that an attack on free speech is something that should be defended. I would donate to the group fighting against the lawsuit myself.

 

Mike: I’m not asking for money, I’m just, ….

 

Halsey: No I’m not. I’m not putting words in your mouth. Don’t worry! We’ll have plenty to today, ..

 

Mike: You’ll put words in my mouth later! I get it.

 

Halsey: Let’s agree to disagree later? Okay, what I’m saying is that a court case cuts both ways. And everything they can subpoena we can subpoena as well and anybody can subpoena the government’s decision-making process, the police records, the orders from town from Terry McAuliffe. If anything I would think this is going to turn out more [08:01] like the Moller lawsuit. It’s going to [08:02] turn out that they want Twitter names of people who nobody gives a shit about, when at the same time we could get information about people that actually we do give a shit about. So I don’t think that it’s such a bad thing that the lawsuit is going forward. I just think it has to be played right, and it can be actually a very good thing for our side.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

 

[NOTE: This is a re-post of what I wrote one year ago. I will add updated material here, later.

Three building (WTC 1, WTC2 and WTC7) on 9/11 were destroyed by controlled demolition. Over 2,900 architects and engineers have come to that conclusion. Just look at the pictures below. The only people capable of doing that and many other necessary steps were (((insiders))), not 19 Arabs. Any Arabs present were mere diversionary patsies in this massive crime, that has since killed millions, carried out by organized jewry for the purpose of creating, via a War OF Terror,  a Jew World Order — KATANA]

 

 

Organized jewry Did 9/11

 

The 16th Anniversary, 2017

 

 

The Basics

 

 

When any crime is committed the most important thing is obviously to find out who did it. How the crime was committed and why it was committed are usually secondary issues unless those aspects are critical in determining who did the crime.

 

With 9/11 the “Who did it” part can be easily figured out by looking at only “one event” that occurred that day. That “one event” is the method used in the destruction of the World Trade Center’s twin towers, WTC 1 (north tower) and WTC 2 (south tower) . We can also include the destruction of WTC 7 as part of that.

 

The official story that these three buildings were destroyed by the consequences of aircraft hitting two of the buildings is childish for anyone not mesmerized by “authority figure” pronouncements.

 

It should be obvious to anyone with average intelligence and commonsense that the buildings were brought down by some form of controlled demolition. Look at the pictures and look at the videos. There are also over 2,900 architects and engineers who have stepped forward and risked their careers and reputations by defying the official story and going public in supporting this commonsense view.

 

Once you understand that some form of controlled demolition was carried out on the twin towers on 9/11, then that is basically all you really need to know about the events of that day. The reason I say that is because the ONLY group of people capable of carrying out a controlled demolition of those buildings and subsequently covering up that crime, MUST be a group that is IN CONTROL of the US government and the media.

 

Any honest and informed person of politics will of course understand that the US government is, behind the scenes, fully controlled by ORGANIZED JEWRY. The politicians on both sides are mere puppets taking turns to do the bidding of organized jewry and those non-jews (shabbos goys) that have been co-opted.

 

Now, there are several other roads one can take about 9/11 that will lead to the same conclusion.

 

But the “controlled demolition road” is very simple and obvious, so I would recommend that.

 

We do not really need to know any of the details of that event, for example, what kind of explosives, whether there were planes or not, whether they were remotely controlled or how they were piloted, how many “terrorists” were involved, what happened at the Pentagon, what happened at Shanksville, and so on, ad nauseum?

 

All we essentially need to know about 9/11 is that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition, and that the only group capable of carrying out that, and the subsequent cover-up, has to be in control of the US government: in other words, ORGANIZED JEWRY!

 

Why did ORGANIZED JEWRY carry out 9/11?

 

It was to create the pretext, a new “Pearl Harbor” in their words, to launch The War OF Terror against the rest of the world, starting with the Middle East, but eventually expanding to include anyone or any entity that opposes the establishment of a world tyranny known as the Jew World Order.

 

Case closed, as they say.

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »