Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Muslim invasion’ Category

 

[Blindlight, aka, Joseph Sigur, is a no-nonsense blogger dedicated to:

 

Specializing in outing jews pretending to be goy and their ‘rich race’ sidekicks.

 

Here he takes “Lauren Rose”, the young, pretty, co-host of JF’s Youtube channel, to the woodshed, for a well-deserved spanking, for dissing Patrick Little’s recent run for the Californian Senate seat.

 

She has called Patrick Little a “loser” for failing to win against the jew, Dianne Fienstein, the Democrat incumbent. Besides misusing English, whereby, in her mind, losing in a race makes you a failure in life, she also comes out in favor of not naming the jew, all because it will frighten normies away.

 

As Sigur rightly points out, her position can be likened to being content to just re-arrange the deck chairs on a ship that is sinking, rather than alerting people about the need to plug the leaks, while also finding the culprits that are making those leaks, aka, organized jewry.

 

Her coming out so strongly against Patrick Little, just like Nick Fuentes, raises suspicions about her real motives, since her stated reasons smell of “concern trolling” and are wrong, if you are serious about solving the ongoing, deliberate, destruction of the West by organized jewry, and its goy helpers.

 

Is it simply attention whoring, youthful bravado mixed with ignorance, or has she been put up to it? Whatever it is, it effectively causes her to be “working for the jews” and against our interests.

 

It also damages JF’s credibility, in that his choice of “eye candy” as his co-host, has turned out not so sweet, after all, especially when you consider her sway over her male, beta orbiting audience.

 

— KATANA]

 

_______________________

 

 

Blindlight

 

Takes

 

Lauren Rose to the “Woodshed”

 

Over Patrick Little Comments

 

Jun 20, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

Click the link below to watch the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BqMBGRci1sc

 

 

YouTube Description

 

Published on Jun 20, 2018
This is the excerpt I critiqued concerning Lauren:

 

__________________________

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(15 minutes)

 

 

[00:00]

 

 

Sigur: Okay, back after a couple of days off.

 

I’ve seen the GF live stream, that’s the French guy. JB, or whatever his name is. I’m not real sure. I’ve always had trouble remembering his initials.

 

He has taken on a woman named “Lauren Rose“. Which interestingly, somebody came on to one of my videos and said, “Lauren likes me”. And he must have been facetious. I never saw the source of why he said that. And I really haven’t paid much attention to Lauren Rose. I looked at her, and I saw her as one of the typical women that came out during the Trump campaign, that don’t ever talk about jews.

 

And most of you will remember, I say:

 

If you don’t talk about jews, you can only move deck chairs [like that saying goes about the Titanic]. You can’t find the leak!

 

And so, when anybody says that it’s impractical to talk about jews, we understand that educating the public about jews is going to be a tough battle! But it has to be done! If you don’t you just want to move deck chairs on the intentionally sinking ship, that the jews have all of us on.

 

 

So Lauren addressed the Patrick Little issue, and when she came back on JB’s [JF’s] after a few days off, apparently. And that caught my eye, I just stumbled into it. I’ve not seen her individual channel, nor seen any other comments she’s made about this issue. But she did say some things that seemed, … Well number one, it reminded me a little bit of Nick Fuentes, just a little bit more deftly put. She said:

 

(more…)

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

 

[Luke Ford, an Australian living in the USA, who “converted” to Judaism in 1993, interviews Tanstaafl from the Age of Treason blog on the subject of the Jewish Question, aka, Jewish Problem.

KATANA]

 

_________________________

 

 

 

Watch the video here:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2laXMYmRAY

 

 

 

Luke Ford

 

Streamed live on Mar 27, 2018

 

 

Jonny Anomaly writes: On the alt-right, it has become fashionable over the last few years to recycle a trope from 1930s Germany: “The Jewish Question” (to which the Holocaust was supposed to be “The Final Solution”).

 

The contemporary version of the question concerns why Jews have so much influence in cognitively demanding occupations, including science, medicine, law, and politics. Although the “JQ” (as alt-righters call it) has a mundane answer, many subscribe to elaborate theories to account for the fact that most Jews don’t conform to the stereotype alt-righters expect them to.

 

For example, when a scholar documents the fact that 4 out of the 10 speakers at an inaugural white nationalist conference were Jewish, along with a vast array of other evidence that conflicts with alt-right dogma, the predictable response by people in the grip of an ideology is that Jews do this to create a smokescreen: it provides cover for all of the other Jews who plot against white nationalists.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Luke Ford

 

JQ Debate

 

with

 

Age of Treason

 

 


 

 

Published on Mar 28, 2018

 

TRANSCRIPT

(140 mins)

 

 

CONTENTS

 

Introduction — Tanstaafl’s Journey on the JQ

A Personal Disclosure

The White Network

Consequences for Your Marriage?

Growing Up in New York

The jewish Grandfather

Hitler’s Struggle and Yours

On Circumcision

Reading MacDonald

Jewish Crypsis and Parasitism

On Finding Support

How Your Work Differs from Others

An Existential Threat

Mein Kampf and National Socialism

Jewish Crypsis — Spain and Portugual

Jewish Crypsis — Today

“In Your Face” jews and “Down-low” jews

Ford’s Critique of Critics of jews

Tan’s Response

Complicating Things as jewish Camouflage

Jewish Gaslighting

Ad Hominem — Cofnas vs MacDonald

Jewish Deception and Coverups

Cofnas’ Critique and Your Respect for MacDonald

Cofnas — MacDonald’s Evidence is Counter-evidence

Any Factual Errors in Cofnas’ Work?

Cofnas Call MacDonald a “Bad Person”

Jews “Didn’t Du Nuffin!”

Ford — So Criticism of Scholarship is a Personal Attack?

Cofnas — Worried About MacDonald’s Work

Cofnas Doesn’t Prove His Case

Ford — Does Cofnas Screech “Anti-semitism”?

I Always Write “Anti-semitism” with Sneer Quotes

Whites Have Not Taken Their Own Side Hard Enough

You are Arguing Like a jew, Luke!

Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy

Jews Marrying Non-jews

Ford — So anything jews Do is Group Evolutionary Strategy?

Jews Always Arguing About What’s Best for the jews!

“Jews are Not a Monolith” — A Silly Statement!

The Root of jewing is: “Is it Good for the jews?”

Culture of Critique’s Chapter 7 on Immigration

Open Borders for Israel is My Attitude

Jews Not Threatened in a Multi-ethnic Society

Jews and the Second World War

Being Evidence Based

School Shooting in Florida

Does MacDonald’s Model Have Predictive Value?

Jewish Out-Marriage One Half of the Parasitism

Whatever jews Do is Bad Because They are the Enemy!

Do White People Have Agency?

Luke, You’re Not Making Honest Valid Arguments

Would You Describe jews as Ethnocentric?

Jews Moralize to Whites to Convince Them That What is Good for Whites is Bad

Fifteen jewish Intellectuals

Whites Don’t Recognise That jews are at War with Them!

Jews Behaving as “Nazis”

Intersectional jewing — Where One jew Agenda Conflicts with Another jew Agenda

Intersectional jewing — Promoting Reich, Pinker and Cofnas as Being Against “anti-racist” jewing

Why are Whites Unable to Overcome the jews?

Super Chats — What Should White Guys Do to Spread Awareness of the JP?

Ford — Are You a Leader?

Comments — Are All jews In On It?

Comments — Is Monomania on the JQ Better Than White Improvement?

Do jews Control the Weather?

Comments — How are Whites to Speak on jew Influence Without “anti-semite’ Being Shrieked

Jews are the Enemy Whatever They Do?

Is Steve Miller Anti-White?

Are You an Unhappy Guy?

Things That Make You Happy?

Reflections on This Interview

What Does It Mean To Be a jew?

Ford’s Fundamental Misunderstanding of Judaism

Do You Believe in Universal Morality?

Ford’s Journey To judaism

A jew Told Ford That you Can’t Convert To judaism

Ford Hasn’t Fooled jews

On Ford Being Rejected By his Peers at School

Ford As Cover Article in “The jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles”

Lawrence Auster Admitted That jews were Responsible for Open Borders

On Ford’s Hatred of jewish Organizations That are for Open Borders

Ford — Do You Thinks I’m Delusional?

How Ford Can Help Whites by Blowing the Whistle on Jews

END

NOTES & LINKS

PDF NOTES

Version History

 

 

 

Introduction — Tanstaafl’s Journey on the JQ

 

Ford: Hey, I’m Luke Ford. I’m here with the Age of Treason blogger, Tanstaafl. Tan, you’ve been blogging for quite a long time. Tell me about your evolution, in particular on the JQ.

[background sound]

 

Tan: Sorry let me mute that.

 

Ford: And here with Tanstaafl*, so we are going to get that microphone problem taken care of, and then we are going to discuss Nathan Cofnas’ critique [of Kevin MacDonald’s book “The Culture of Critique].. So Tan, take it away! Tell me when you started blogging. Tell me about the evolution of your journey on the JQ.

 

[* A pseudonym using the acronym for “There Ain’t No Such Thing As A Free Lunch“. The phrase and the acronym are central to Robert Heinlein’s 1966 science-fiction novel The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress.]

 

Tan: Right. I started in 2005. I started blogging, and that was after I had spent about twenty years, maybe, of not paying attention, being fed up with politics, mainstream politics, and ignoring it, focusing on my career. But in 2005, I think, it was Hurricane Katrina that triggered me, the racialization of that. It was sort of a “Trayvon Martin” experience that many people experienced years later. I experienced during the Katrina thing.

 

And so I started blogging. I had been talking to friends before that privately, and I just basically took it public. And moved through pretty quickly neo-conservative thought, which attracted me at first, because it seemed like a more serious approach to politics, than plain old conservative politics. And then I ran into someone named Lawrence Auster. You might be familiar with [him] — that might have been where I came across you.

 

 

And it was really Lawrence Auster, reading Lawrence Auster, that made me aware that there was something going on with the jews. Auster himself was a jew, was a convert to Christianity. But what I noticed over time with him was that he was hyper-sensitive to criticism of the Jews. He indulged in it himself, but it was always from the point of view of “What’s good for the jews?” He thought that the jews, in various ways, he criticized them for not doing what was best for themselves.

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

[Luke Ford, an Australian living in the USA, who “converted” to Judaism in 1993, interviews Kevin MacDonald and his response to a recent critique of his highly ignored (by academia), yet important book, “The Culture of Critique“, by the 30-year-old, academically unknown, New York jew, Nathan Cofnas. Cofnas was scheduled to come on with MacDonald, but was unable to, due to time zone differences, as he’s in England, studying at Oxford. 

 

Ford plays somewhat of a devil’s advocate on behalf of Cofnas, quoting some of Cofnas’, yet to be released, responses to MacDonald’s 18,0000 word response to Cofnas’s critique.

 

This transcript covers  the first 71 minute part of the Youtube video with MacDonald, and not (currently) the remaining part of the total 220 minute video, where Cofnas does appear in the last third of it.

 

Overall, my take is that, it’s all a storm in a teacup, with very weak tea being dished up by Cofnas.

 

Now, the most likely reason that until now there has been, apparently, no proper academic response to MacDonald’s work, is because its main ideas are true and significant. So what was the message that has been sent out by organized jewry to academics? For over 20 years, it’s been, “Kill the message by totally ignoring it!

 

MacDonald’s main point in his book is that jews, just like other human groups, act as a group to advance their interests often at the expense of other groups. Since organized jewry has maneuvered itself into being the most powerful group in Western societies, it has, and is wrecking utter destruction upon us! Especially by engineering the flooding of every White country, from New Zealand to Norway, with non-Whites, in order to racially and culturally destroy us! And part of the jewish group evolutionary strategy, to use Kmac’s terminology, is to prevent Whites from waking up to what they are doing to us, and responding in kind.

 

So, this interview is interesting, in that we get to see Kmac defend his book, his position, in his mild-mannered, yet strong way, against a young upstart jew making a name for himself. Cofnas fails, but rest assured, that another jew, defending their tribal war against Whites, will step into the breach and fire away.

 

Organized jewry is at total war with Whites, attempting to genocide us through whatever means. Kmac has helped us in exposing that, with his academic work, so we should all join together in supporting him, and others like him, in what ever way we can.

 

KATANA]

 

_________________________

 

 

Watch the video here:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARhqt38bMZA&t=8271s

 

 

 

Luke Ford

 

Streamed live on Mar 20, 2018

 

 

Kevin MacDonald joins me on my YouTube channel at 7pm tonight (Nathan Cofnas might come along to keep things lively) and Richard Spencer joins me at 5pm Wednesday (CA time). Nathan Cofnas joins the show here:

 

 

 

Nathan Cofnas responds: “Just read it. Pretty much what I expected. He repeats his arguments in more or less the same style, doesn’t address my arguments head on and in some key cases just ignores them. Probably I will publish an annotated version of the PDF.”

 

 

http://quillette.com/2018/03/15/alt-r…

 

 

 

Luke Ford with

 

Kevin MacDonald

 

vs

 

Nathan Cofnas

 

on

 

“The Culture of Critique”

 

 

Published on Mar 20, 2018

 

TRANSCRIPT

(71 mins)

 

 

 

Ford: And we’re back! Just trying to work out the technical difficulties and get Kevin MacDonald back in here. I hope the audio’s better. Sorry about these technical difficulties, but these things happen. And now maybe this time we’ll hear Kevin loudly and clearly. So I think that’s the important thing. So, sorry about that and we’re gonna get Kevin in here any second. So we’re talking about his response to the Nathan Cofnas critique of “The Culture of Critique”. And Kevin says:

 

I have a particular complaint, because of Steven Pinker’s not [?] antiscientific approach to my work, in part responsible for my spending the last 20 years in the intellectual wilderness.

 

Wow that is very honest! That’s kind of hot on the sleeve! That’s transparent honestly! It’s not like beating around the bush! That is just laying it down.

 

[01:00]

 

Nevertheless, Pinker has moved the scientific and popular reception of behavior genetics of evolutionary perspectives forward. See, for example, his withering criticism in the “Blank Slate of three of the figures discussed in Chapter two of “Cultural of Critique“, Stephen Jay Gould, Lewontin, and Rose.

 

And for all I know he is pursuing a tactical strategy of gradualism by supporting ideas that are still regarded with extreme hostility in large swaths of academia and the media, in the hope that things will eventually change. Though his recent work “Enlightenment Now” is not encouraging in that regard. The rest of Cofnas’ conclusion is simply name-calling — no need to respond.” says Kevin.

 

[02:01]

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

[ Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán gave a speech on Mar 15, 2018, in Budapest at the commemoration of the 170th anniversary of the Hungarian Revolution of 1848.

 

With only weeks to go before a general election, Orban used the occasion to warn the nation of the threat posed by (((Globalists))) represented by such persons as (((George Soros))) who are intent on destroying Hungary, racially and culturally, by flooding the country with non-Whites — KATANA.]

 

 

_________________________

 

 

 

 

Viktor Orban

 

Speech on the 170th anniversary

 

of the Hungarian Revolution

 

of 1848

 

 

Published on Mar 16, 2018

 

TRANSCRIPT

 

 

 

 

I welcome you all on Hungary’s celebration of freedom! I greet those taking part in the Peace March. It is with special esteem that I greet our Polish friends. Our closeness is natural, and our embrace is a source of strength. In the time of our forefather Kossuth, it was written that:

 

Hungary and Poland are two imperishable oaks which have grown two separate trunks, but whose roots have intertwined. Therefore the existence and strength of one is the precondition for the life and health of the other

 

It is no different today: if Poland is strong, then Hungary cannot be lost; if we are strong, we can help our Polish friends. Therefore the Peace March is not simply a rally for the cause of our country, but also a stand we take alongside Poland. Honour to Poland! Honour to Hungary!

 

Once again, Fellow Celebrants, the day has come which lifts the heart of every Hungarian. The day on which, in the great book of world history, a word was written in the Hungarian language: that word was “Freedom”. On this day multitudes come together for us to honour the brave and bow our heads in memory of the heroes.

 

Today, in particular, we have come together in large numbers. In addition to our show of respect, there is now a special reason and a special goal. Barely more than three weeks from now we will again decide the fate of Hungary. And what is at stake in this election is not merely a four-year term. I knew that there would be many of us here, and I knew that here I would see determined faces. This is exactly what we need today: seriousness and determination.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

[ John Friend of The Realist Report interviews Paul Nehlen, a  candidate running against supercuck Paul Ryan in his home State of Wisconsin.

 

Paul describes his background as someone who has worked their way up from the shop floor, to engineer, and manager of many manufacturing businesses in the States and worldwide.

 

He goes on to describe his awakening to race realism, and more recently, and most importantly, his red-pilling on the role of organized jewry and their genocidal intentions against the White race — KATANA.]

 

 

_________________________

 

 

 

 

The Realist Report

 

On this edition of The Realist Report, we’re joined by Paul Nehlen, a Republican candidate for Congress in the state of Wisconsin who is running against GOP incumbent Paul Ryan. In this podcast, Nehlen and I discuss his background and career, his decision to get involved in politics, racial realism, the Alt Right, President Trump and much more!

 

Below are relevant links for this program:

 

 

Subscribe to The Realist Report today, and support independent media!

Did you enjoy this program? Consider donating to The Realist Report to help us continue producing podcasts. Enter your email below and donate $10 now!

 

 

 

DOWNLOAD AND LISTEN TO THE INTERVIEW HERE

 

 

The Realist Report

 

Interviews

 

Paul Nehlen

 

Published on Mar 13, 2018

 

TRANSCRIPT

(66 mins)

 

 

 

John: All right folks. Welcome back to another edition of the Realist Report. This is your host John Friend. The website is the Realist Report dot com, where you can find an extensive archive of these podcasts, as well as other radio programs I’ve participated in over the years. You will also find all of my blog posts and articles, a contact page, my Twitter feed, which is embedded in the right hand side bar of the website, and many other useful and important links. I am a regular reporter for American Free Press. America’s last real newspaper. And I also contribute to the Barnes Review, the bi-monthly history magazine affiliated with the American Free Press. I encourage our listeners to subscribe to these fine print publications, if you are not already. Check out American Free Press dot net, and Barnes Review dot org, for all of the details.

 

All right! With that said, let me introduce my special guest today. It is my honor to have Paul Nehlen on The Realist Report, today! Mr Nehlen is currently running for Congress in Wisconsin against Paul Ryan. The GOP incumbent Congressman. Mr Nehlen, welcome to the program sir! How are you today?

 

[01:53]

 

Paul: I’m doing great! Thanks for having me on, John.

 

John: Thank you so much for coming on. I contacted you actually a few weeks ago, maybe close to a month ago. And I’ve been following your campaign very closely going back to when you first ran in 2016. And I was following you on Twitter, I’ve been following your campaign website. And I know you’ve basically been kicked off of Twitter, from what I understand. I’ve been very impressed with your campaign, especially the campaign you’re currently running. So, I’m curious how, because I actually reached out to you and then you followed up with me just recently. So I’m curious, how did you hear about my website, or are you just responding to my original email?

 

Paul: Yeah. No, I somehow came across something that you had worked on and we actually have a mutual contact. And I said, you know, I ought to reach out to him, in that context. So yeah, you probably ought to. I bet he’d have you on. And I don’t know what happened to the email that you sent to me. It must be got by me. So I apologize for that. But was glad that we were able to connect, and so, yeah, I’m glad to be here.

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

 

[In this long (151 minutes) YouTube Hangout hosted by Andy Warski and JF, Mike Enoch debates the self identified jew, Halsey English on the topic of White advocacy and jewish power.

In many heated exchanges Enoch takes the correct position that organized jewry is a hostile “elite” that needs to be expelled from Western countries, while Halsey attempts to argue, in an almost legalistic, hairsplitting “jewy” manner, that while some jewish groups may have excessive power, jews as a whole are not the cause of White racial and cultural displacement. Yeah, right.

A bizarre part of this “debate” are the many abusive comments that Halsey directs at Enoch, calling him a lying fraud!   KATANA.]

 

NOTES

 

 — If you would like to improve the accuracy of the transcript please leave any corrected text in the comments section. Corrections to misspelled names, etc., is encouraged. Thank you.


 

 

 

 

 

Halsey

 

VS

 

Mike Enoch

 

 


 


 

 

Click here for the video:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzE9vfiLU9Q

 

 

 

Published on Feb 14, 2018

 

 

YouTube Description

 

Halsey Vs. Mike Enoch

 

 

49,668 views

 

 

Streamed live on Feb 14, 2018

 

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(151 mins)

 

 

 

[00:01]

 

Warski: What is going on everyone? Welcome back to another Warski Live. I’ve a new setup still in alpha phase. We’re getting the light fixture fixed as well. But this is part one. But, of course, joining me up it’s still in an out.

 

JF: Hello Andy! I think you were the only show that gets worse with time, visually!

 

Warski: Why you think it’s worse?

 

JF: I mean, I don’t know what’s happening here. You look like you have an eight-bit background that just bugged and then everything became black.

 

Warski: Yeah. Well that’s supposed to light up. But then when I turned it on, it over exposes everything and is a mess. So I have to get a friggin dimmer installed. Yeah believe me it’s a, it’s been a hectic day for me.

 

JF: A great debate on the way. Before, I’d like to hear Mike Enoch on the case of the lawsuit against you. I think it’s an important issue regarding free speech and I’d like to hear what’s happening with this.

 

Mike: Yeah thanks. Thanks for giving me the opportunity. I know we have a big audience here and I just want to make an appeal. I know my politics are controversial and this goes beyond my individual politics, or the politics of the people that attended the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville this summer.

 

There’s a lawsuit against us that is essentially an attack on the First Amendment and free speech and internet privacy as well. So these are they’re very powerful and wealthy lawyers that have taken this case and they have attempted to allege some kind of broad-based conspiracy. But, in fact, as they have admitted if you look at press reports about this lawsuit there was something in the New York Times yesterday. There have been various reports on it. They are essentially admitting that they are [02:01] attempting to use the court to shut down the Alt-Right.

 

To shut down political opposition. The New York Times article yesterday has the lead attorney in the case Reberta Kaplan, who is a very wealthy and powerful jewish lesbian, who has is attempting to shut down the Alt-Right, by her own admission. She is, this is a strategic lawsuit, quote of her “This is a strategic lawsuit”. Integrity First for America which is the group fundamental ng the lawsuit which is a group of about twelve very wealthy jewish lawyers, are admitted that this is a political lawsuit, because the government has not done enough to silence the Alt-Right. This is in the New York Times. They’ve admitted all these things.

 

Basically they are admitting they do not have a case before the court and this is purely an attempt to intimidate and silence the defendants. And it goes beyond us. You might say, all right, well tough! Look you went up against the wrong people. But it goes beyond us. As part of [03:00] this process. There’s a subpoena issued [03:02] to Twitter. Twitter is a third party they want information on people that’s tweeted certain hashtags. They want all personal identifiable information including email address, IP address, MAC address, for people that may have tweeted certain hashtags. Unite the Right, Free Cantwell, among others.

 

Now again, you might think I don’t care about these guys. They did something dumb. They went up against the most powerful group of people in the world, and that’s stupid. Maybe so, but if it’s us first, it’s gonna be you next. We’re out here running cover for you, for free speech. And I think we need to get campus free speech groups, the ACLU, any Pro First Amendment group, any Pro Electronic Privacy group, because there is no reason why a person that tweeted out a certain hashtag would add to their case. Like they are alleging something that’s non-existent. They don’t have a valid cause of action before the court and they know it. So if they get these subpoenas granted that’s [04:01] all that they want. So this is in case of Electronic Privacy, your right to privacy on the internet, your right to free speech and this is what these people are attempting to squash.

 

And I think it’s really very important that everybody gets behind, one in condemning the lawsuit, exposing the lawsuit as was it is. And I’m not asking you to support us. I understand that’s a step that many people don’t want to take. I simply want you to support the principle. Support the principles of electronic privacy and anonymity on the Internet. The right to use Twitter without being subjected to potential political witch hunts based on hashtags that you might tweet. And frankly the right of anybody to speak their mind without suffering this kind of “lawfare”. It’s important to note there is no criminal complaint. This is a civil complaint. JF, I know you’ve talked about the abuse of civil courts before. There’s no criminal complaint here, it’s a civil complaint. Why? Because a standard of evidence for a criminal complaint is much higher. They don’t expect to win this case?

 

They [05:00] merely want to use the case as a vehicle to get as much information on as many users of the Internet as they can. And I know that amongst those people that have tweeted the hashtags that they’re looking for are people that are not Alt-Right. People that might be pro Trump. People that might be critical of Israel. These are very serious First Amendment issues they cut to the heart of our rights as Americans. And I think every decent freedom-loving American of any race of any political affiliation needs to come out against this website. Call it for what it is. Understand what’s going on. And we need to light a fire under the butts of all the free speech organizations and Electronic Privacy organizations to come out against this!

 

JF: It’s indeed a very worrying story and, in fact, it’s part of a tendency to use civil courts as instruments of abuse and instruments of quasi police investigation. When they cannot [06:00] get the police to investigate, because there’s nothing to investigate, people are increasingly using in our country the civil courts as a as a bypassing of the law. And, in fact, it makes private agents and judges of civil courts in this country, essentially police investigators, judges at the same time, and agents of this state. It’s absolutely worrying and I fully support you in that.

 

Mike: Yeah, and it’s honestly in my opinion it’s an insult to the integrity of the court. I mean, these people are basically saying:

 

We don’t respect this court we don’t respect this court as a means for citizens to redress damages against each other. We use is this is a course nothing but a political vehicle. It’s just a tool we just want to use subpoena power to get information on our enemies. We don’t care that we’re not gonna win.

 

They’re not gonna win. I mean, they have no complaint. The complaint they’re making is emotional distress. That’s been struck down many times. Anyway, well let’s move on.

 

JF: So your message has been put forward. Andy today we have an amazing debate [07:02] have you been expecting as much excitement as me?

 

Warski: Oh yeah! The Valentine’s Day Massacre. Is that what we dubbed this?

 

JF: Yes. Tell your girlfriend it might be the last!

 

Halsey: Can I comment on the lawsuit?

 

JF: Yes.

 

Halsey: There’s one thing that I don’t seem to understand about why we would want to fight against this lawsuit. And just so, you know, I think that an attack on free speech is something that should be defended. I would donate to the group fighting against the lawsuit myself.

 

Mike: I’m not asking for money, I’m just, ….

 

Halsey: No I’m not. I’m not putting words in your mouth. Don’t worry! We’ll have plenty to today, ..

 

Mike: You’ll put words in my mouth later! I get it.

 

Halsey: Let’s agree to disagree later? Okay, what I’m saying is that a court case cuts both ways. And everything they can subpoena we can subpoena as well and anybody can subpoena the government’s decision-making process, the police records, the orders from town from Terry McAuliffe. If anything I would think this is going to turn out more [08:01] like the Moller lawsuit. It’s going to [08:02] turn out that they want Twitter names of people who nobody gives a shit about, when at the same time we could get information about people that actually we do give a shit about. So I don’t think that it’s such a bad thing that the lawsuit is going forward. I just think it has to be played right, and it can be actually a very good thing for our side.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

[Millennial Woes gives a humorous and informative speech on what it takes to be a man in 2017. Delivered at an Erkenbrand pre-conference dinner in Rotterdam, Netherlands, on Oct 13, 2017 — KATANA.]

 

_______________________

 

 

Millennial Woes

 

To Be a Man in 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Click the link below to view the video:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzMsWM1N9mU

 

 

Description

 

Published on Oct 21, 2017
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compete… [This video is not intended to condone violence or hate.] [This project is my livelihood. Please see http://www.millennialwoes.com/donate. Thank you.] ALTERNATIVE CHANNELS: http://www.vid.me/millennialwoes http://www.bitchute.com/channel/mille… http://www.minds.com/millennialwoes

 

 

 

 

__________________________

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(16:00)

 

 

Organizer: Millennial Woes will be doing a little broadcasting.

 

Woes: Alright, this is not going to be as serious as the other two talks, so I hope that’s that’s alright. I thought it would be appropriate to talk about what it takes to be a man in this year, in 2017. And this is based on the quote from Robert Heinlein, which I’ll read out now.

 

A human being should be able to change a diaper; plan an invasion; butcher a hog; conn a ship; design a building; write a sonnet; balance accounts; build a wall — “no comment”; set a bone; comfort the dying; take orders; give orders; cooperate; act alone; solve equations; analyze any problem; pitch manure; program a computer; cook a tasty meal; fight efficiently; and die gallantly! Specialization is for insects! [laughter]

 

 

Now in 2017, however, a man must be able to start an online poll that won’t be hijacked by bots; write a small software utility from scratch; code a working web page; get a public figure to retweet his pithy one-liner; [laughter] PTO skeptic — I hope you’re all aware of what’s skeptics are, terrible life forms; shelter a fellow goy in his hour of need; [laughter] withstand a demonization campaign by his nation’s tabloid media, for example; not have any skills, because they don’t teach us any, yet still have self-respect; [laughter] acquire skills and improve them, yet never get complacent; organize a local group of flashy goys; [laughter] convert Bitcoin to cash; archive a SoundCloud channel before it gets shut down; [laughter] one must understand the importance of group averages; one must understand that proportions matter just as much as absolute numbers; one must be capable of both logic and rhetoric and know that it’s not about the opponent, but the spectators.

 

A man in 2017 must be able to do a 23andme test, and pass; [laughter]

(more…)

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »