Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Media – jewish domination’ Category

 

 

[In this YouTube Hangout (No 1) Morgoth, who runs the blog Morgoth’s Review. talks with Gentleman Jim Crow and Theberton about the “Skeptics” war with the Alt-Right, UKIP, and the problems facing Whites in general with the invasion of non-Whites into our countries engineered by organized jewry KATANA.]

 

IMPORTANT NOTE:

This transcript is only a rough draft. Please confirm any of the text by listening to the actual audio.

 

If you would like to improve the accuracy of the transcript please leave any corrected text in the comments section. Thank you.

 

NOTE: Text in grey needs further proofing.

 

 

 

Morgoth’s Review

 

YouTube Hangout 01

 


 

Skeptics and Cucks

 


 

Click here for the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qct0g7MVhQ

 

 

 

Published on Jan 19, 2018

 

 

YouTube Description

First ever Morgoth’s review hangout discussing skeptics and cucks, with Gentleman Jim Crow and Theberton.

 

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(87 mins)

 

 

 

[00:02]

 

Morgs: Weekend hang out number one. And we’re gonna talk I’m with Theberton who does the YouTube stuff, Jim who polices the comments and other things through the blog, and it’s me Morgoth. We’re gonna have a general banter about the skeptic war, and, what else was on the table Jim?

 

Jim: The skeptic war, Henry Bolton and his business with his girlfriend.

 

Morgs: Right. Which I’ve done an article about. We’ll see how it goes. Maybe about the “shitholegate” as well. But the thing with the skeptic war was that we’ve got this little clip that I wanted to have a look at, okay. Get that up Theberton? The zulu? What’s he called? Are you there?

 

Jim: I’m here. I’m not sure, “Zulu“, or something like that [01:00] Uzalu” I’ve got on my tablet. He’s called “Uzalu“.

 

Morgs: Yeah I was expecting something, ….

 

Theberton: So, I’ve got the video, …

 

Morgs: Brilliant! There’s this skeptic kid. I don’t know anything about him. I don’t want to slag him off, you know, and call him names and stuff, but the thing is, that they’re engaging more and more with like us, the Alt-right, White nationalists, whatever you want to say it. And these debates, all these fucking videos keep popping up on YouTube. I’m just overwhelmed with content as they say. And this one popped up and, because it was a bit of a short one I had a bit of a click through it and I came across this question. Now, and I just thought in this [02:03] one question, it’s everything that I think is shit about the skeptic community. And why I’m happy that they’re being torn apart by nationalists. Let’s watch this. Can you play this, Theby?

 

Theberton: Yes. Let’s see if this works.

 

Interviewer:So can you please explain to me why Anglo-Saxons being a minority in England is not such a bad thing?

Skeptic [he sounds very much like Sargon]: I would say, depending on exactly how it happens, it could just be a neutral thing. If you think that there’s some sort of inherent quality in Anglo-Saxon DNA that can’t be found in other DNA, I would simply refer you to the fact that, you know, these things can change over time. If we select for the quality that we’re looking for, and you guys are right, then it will just be Anglo-Saxons. But if you’re wrong, it won’t just be Anglo-Saxons, but it wouldn’t matter, because you’re wrong about that. So I mean, it’s a pretty simple argument from the Alt-right.

 

[03:08]

 

Morgs: Right. So when your kid comes running home and says, “Daddy, why am I the only White person in the class?” show them that clip, and everything will just be honky fucking dory! Won’t it? I mean, what do you make of that Jim?
 

(more…)

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

 

 

[In this interview Andrew Hitchcock talks with Canadian-German Alfred Schaefer again, this time about the sudden arrest of his sister, Monika, in Germany, for the “crime” of making a 5 minute YouTube video entitled, “Sorry Mom, I was Wrong About the Holocaust“. Alfred makes an impassioned plea for people to support Monika and to spread the word about this ongoing  tyranny being brought about by organized jewry and their shabbos goy minions — KATANA.]

 

 

 

 

 

Andrew Hitchcock

 

with

 

Alfred Schaefer

 

How YOU Can Help

 

Monika Schaefer!

 


 

Click here for the audio:

https://cldup.com/8XDyvXPqQo.mp3

 

Click here for: Andrew Carrington Hitchcock webpage for this interview

 

 

 

Published on Jan 11, 2018

 

 

Andrew Hitchcock’s Description

The Andrew Carrington Hitchcock Show (534)

Alfred Schaefer – How YOU Can Help Monika Schaefer!

 

 

 

In today’s show originally broadcast on January 11 2018, EuroFolkRadio’s Andrew Carrington Hitchcock interviews Alfred Schaefer, for a show entitled, “How YOU Can Help Monika Schaefer!

 

We discussed:

— the circumstances surrounding Monika’s arrest at the Sylvia Stolz trial last week on January 3rd; how when Monika protested that she was a free Canadian citizen the state prosecutor said:

If you wanted to remain free you should have stayed in Canada!”;

— Monika’s experiences in Germany prior to her arrest; how Alfred has received absolutely no information from the German authorities regarding Monika’s condition, and has been unable to see or speak to her;

— how the German (((media))) are celebrating the abduction and persecution of Monika;

— how we can turn the abduction and persecution of Monika to our advantage;

— how Monika will be coping in prison; examples of the Jewish persecution of the White race;

— how Alfred is thrilled with the support Monika has been getting from around the world since her abduction and persecution;

— how there is no point raising the issue of Monika’s abduction and persecution with any political parties as they are all controlled by the same group;

— what YOU can do to help Monika;

— how YOU can contact Monika;

— Monika’s YouTube video, “Sorry Mom, I Was Wrong About The Holocaust,” which I played in its’ entirety on the show;

— how this YouTube video undid the hundreds of millions of dollars the Jews have spent over the years in indoctrinating the White race with their lies;

— how Adolf Hitler was incarcerated at the same prison as Monika in 1922;

— and many other topics.

 

You can write to Monika at the following address:

 

Monika Schaefer
Stadelheim Prison
Stadelheimer Straße
81549 Munich
Germany

 

Click Here To Listen To The Show

Click Here For Monika’s 5 Minute YouTube, “Sorry Mom, I Was Wrong About The Holocaust,” Which Is The Reason For Her Being Held in Solitary Confinement In Stadelheim Prison

Click Here For Stadelheim Prison’s Facebook Page

Click Here For The New, “We Are Monika,” Website

Click Here For Monika’s Website

Click Here For Alfred’s YouTube

Click Here For The Andrew Carrington Hitchcock Show Archive Where You Can Listen To Or Download All My Shows

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(57 mins)

 

 

[00:25]

 

You are listening to TBR radio, brought to you by The Barnes Review.

Now the Andrew Carrington Hitchcock Show with your host, Andrew Carrington Hitchcock.

 

 

Andrew: Hello everybody. Today’s show was booked to record, and it was booked to record with my good friends, Alfred and Monika Schaefer. Now unfortunately Monika can’t be with us, because she has been jailed in Germany, for producing the video, which was an apology to a mother, entitled, “Sorry Mom, I was Wrong about the Holocaust”. So I just have Alfred with me today. Now, I’m recording this January the tenth, and I’m actually broadcasting the very last show I recorded with Alfred and Monika, tomorrow, January eleventh. Now that might change and I might end up broadcasting this show tomorrow, and delaying that one, depending on how it goes. I’ve had a discussion with Alfred before hand. We’re going to see.

 

So I’m going to bring him up right now. Alfred are you with me?

 

Alfred: Yes Andy, and thanks for calling me up and I’m glad this is taking place now.

 

Andrew: Absolutely! Well either way, I mean, if we decide to put this out in a couple of weeks like we have been doing, then I can always release this. I’ll think of a way that I can release this early anyway, so, … Yeah, I’m all up in the air with this folks, because we don’t know where it’s going to go., but I think the best thing to do now is to hand over to you Alfred, and can you explain exactly what happened, from where Monika was staying with you for Christmas, and just after, and now is suddenly in jail in Munich.

 

Alfred: Yes, okay. It’s been precisely one week ago, that’s on the third of January, that Monika was arrested, as a quiet observer watching the bizarre Inquisition hearings against Sylvia Stolz in Munich. And that was done, … First of all, to get into the courthouse we had to pass all kinds of security clearances. And we went in there and watched the proceedings, and then within about forty minutes into the proceedings, the snake of a state prosecutor ordered an unplanned break, and said:

 

We’re going to reconvene here in the about twenty minutes.

 

So we say, “Oh well, let’s go out and stretch our legs a little bit, in the hallway.” So we step out into the hallway, and there was another snake of a state prosecutor, came up with three heavily armed thugs and they say:

 

[03:04]

 

Monika Schaefer?

 

In German, of course, and she says “yes” and she [state prosecutor] says:

 

You are herein detained”.

 

And they took her off to the side a bit, and slapped handcuffs on her. And when she protested:

 

Wait! You can’t do that! I didn’t do anything wrong! I’m from Canada. I’m a free citizen!

 

Then the snake of a prosecutor said:

 

If you wanted to stay free, you would have stayed in Canada!

 

So that was how the arrest proceeded. And then after going back into the court room, Sylvia Stolz’s lawyer came to me and he whispered in my ear, and he says:

 

Alfred, you had better get out of this room here, because we don’t know what they’re going to do to you.

 

And so I just got my jacket and left the courtroom. Waited outside, it was raining pretty miserably and then Henry Hoffenmyer came out after a while, and we just waited, basically in this car, until the proceedings ended. And then we could communicate with Sylvia Stolz and her lawyer, and a few other people.

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

 

 

[Arya Sattya, a British woman, gives a short, but very good, critique of the recent debate hosted by Andy Warski, between Richard Spencer and Sargon of Akkad, among others. Although she disagrees with some aspects of Spencer’s views, she is highly critical of Sargon for his lack of sincerity and constant naysaying about the viability of having White only ethno-state. She goes through several of Sargon’s “arguments” pointing out the “pipul” or hair-splitting, nature of many of them  KATANA.]

 

_______________________

 

 

Arya Sattya

 

Richard Spencer vs Sargon of Akkad

 

Debate Roundup

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Click the link below to view the video:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2DZSzxHZvY

 

 

YouTube Description

 

 

Published on Jan 5, 2018

 

This is a discussion of some of the points brought up in the debate between Richard Spencer and Sargon of Akkad on Warski live.

 

Please like, comment, share and subscribe!

 

 

 

 

This video is not intended to encourage or condone hatred or violence.

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(12:09)

 

[Music]

 

[00:12]

 

 

Hello.

 

I just wanted to talk about some points that came up in the debate last night on Andy Wolski’s channel with Richard Spencer, Sargon of Akkad, Styxhexenhammer666, but also included other people like, Millennial Woes, and so on. The stream at it’s highest, had over 13,000 people watching live, and at one point reached the point of being the number one most watched stream in the world on YouTube.

 

It was a really interesting debate, and I think all this really goes to show just how many people are starting to get interested in the ideas of the so called, “Alt-Right” and just how much progress the movement is making as a whole. I really recommend going on watching it now, if you haven’t already. But I’ll put a link in the description.

 

With regards to the debate itself, I’d like to start off by saying that there are lots of points of disagreement I have with Richard Spencer, and I do think that it’s highly likely that he is, to some extent, “controlled opposition“, which I think I’ll discuss in another video.

 

But, there are also a lot of things I do agree with him on. And I thought that he performed exceptionally well in the debate. There were various polls done afterwards and it was in my opinion too, that he comfortably won the debate.

 

So, it started off with Richard Spencer calmly stating his points, and Sargon just shouting over him and coming across as incredibly impatient, for seemingly no reason at all. The first major point was about whether to adhere to abstract principles, or real-world pragmatic concerns, which Sargon just couldn’t seem to understand at all. The worlds described by Locke*, that he always seems to harp on about, was ultimately one invented for and by White people in countries that were overwhelmingly White. The United States itself was explicitly invented by, and for, White people. Which Richard Spencer mentioned at a later point in the debate, when he spoke about the 1790 Immigration Act**, which explicitly welcomed White people of good character. Sargon here is making what one might call the “Enlightenment fallacy” which I think I want to expand on in a video of itself.

 

[* John Locke, (born August 29, 1632, Wrington, Somerset, England—died October 28, 1704, High Laver, Essex), English philosopher whose works lie at the foundation of modern philosophical empiricism and political liberalism. He was an inspirer of both the European Enlightenment and the Constitution of the United States. His philosophical thinking was close to that of the founders of modern science, especially Robert Boyle, Sir Isaac Newton, and other members of the Royal Society. His political thought was grounded in the notion of a social contract between citizens and in the importance of toleration, especially in matters of religion. Much of what he advocated in the realm of politics was accepted in England after the Glorious Revolution of 1688–89 and in the United States after the country’s declaration of independence in 1776.

The next major point was about the rights of individuals, versus, the rights of groups. I don’t think that these things are mutually exclusive at all. I think that most people want to live under a State that exists for their interests, and that protects the rights and freedoms of the individuals within that State. But that State is a group identity.

Source: https://www.britannica.com/biography/John-Locke]

 

[** Naturalization Act of 1790

The original United States Naturalization Law of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat. 103) provided the first rules to be followed by the United States in the granting of national citizenship. This law limited naturalization to immigrants who were free White persons of good character. It thus excluded American Indians, indentured servants, slaves, free blacks and later Asians although free blacks were allowed citizenship at the state level in certain states. It also provided for citizenship for the children of U.S. citizens born abroad, stating that such children “shall be considered as natural born citizens,” the only US statute ever to use the term. It specified that the right of citizenship did “not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_of_1790]

 

I personally want to live under an ethno-state that protects my freedom as an individual and acts in my interests. And I want that to be an ethno-state for, and by my group. Respecting individual and group rights is not mutually exclusive, which Sargon seems to go out of his way to pretend to not understand at all. It’s about finding a balance between Authoritarianism that’s necessary for a state to function, and Libertarianism which stands up for the rights and freedoms of people within the state.

 

 

[02:51]

 

 

The point that Richard Spencer was making was about how we already have States that restrict our freedoms, and Sargon doesn’t have a problem with that now. So, Sargon despite his constant waffling on about abstract principles that originally emerged more as descriptions of States inhabited by White people, than prescriptive ideals, he does understand that in the real world we do have to restrict some freedoms, and we do have to find a balance between authoritarian and libertarian ideals. We do have to find a balance between the rights of the individuals and the preservation of the group as a whole, which they exist in.

 

I think it’s all somewhat hypocritical, when, as some have pointed out, Sargon himself started an online poll to ban social justice causes in the universities. Surely this goes against some of Sargon’s beloved principles?

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

 

[In this interview Millennial Woes talks with Morgoth, who runs the blog Morgoth’s Review. [To be continued]   — KATANA.]

 

 

 

[48/104 Minutes Now Complete]

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millennial Woes’

 

Millenniyule 2017, No. 66

 

with

 

Morgoth

 


 

 

 

Click here for the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_anw3F8R_w

 

 

 

Published on Dec 28, 2017

 

 

YouTube Description

Streamed live on Dec 28, 2017

[This video is not intended to condone violence or hate.] [This project is my livelihood.
Please see http://www.millennialwoes.com/donate. Thank you.]

 

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(104 mins)

 

 

[00:00]

 

 

Woes: Hello, and welcome to the final episode of Millenniyule 2017. This is number 66, and it’s with Morgoth, from Morgoth’s Review. How would you describe it? A British nationalist blog? Welcome to the channel again Morgoth! You’ve been on twice before, I think this is the third time, and I’ve been looking forward to it. So, welcome!

 

Morgs: Hello. I don’t want to trigger the dog with words.

 

Woes: Which words would trigger the, … All right, yeah, I get it. Okay, right. So tell people how would you describe your blog?

 

Morgs: What I try to do is analyze pop culture, mainly, and if something is going off, I’ll have the odd rant about a terrorist attack, something like that. But, the main content, as they call it these days, on the blog, is breaking down movies and pop culture, or something that’s appeared on the television. Because I discovered Counter-Currents and I saw an article by Greg Johnson, and it was about how you could take all of the propaganda machine, and then turn it on it’s head. You could use the weight of it and turn it back on it, if you critiqued what you are actually seeing. And it was it’s quite powerful.

 

And I was amazed that, … Going back six years that Counter-Currents have a movie section, I’ve never seen that before. And I thought that was the best thing in the world to have a movie section on a White nationalist site.

 

Woes: Yeah.

 

Morgs: And so I loved that! I thought that’s the way to go.

 

Woes: Radix did the same thing on their Vanguard podcasts. And then Alternative Right, the blog spot, they do similar stuff now and then. Other people asked me to do as well, but I never have enough time.

 

Morgs: Yeah, well I don’t a lot of stuff around demographics and race and things like that. Instead I’ll do like a thousand word article on the shitty new Star Trek diversity things they got. Everybody says it now, well I was there on the original Alternative Right site going back about six years. And one of the best articles that I read there, was one on the “Borg”. And again you think well this is great, because if they’re breaking down pop culture in a way that I haven’t seen before. And I think bright young men love that kind of thing, because they are starting to understand, … Because everybody’s being force-fed this pop culture and you can turn it back on it. You can use the weight of it to attack it!

 

 

[03:02]

 

 

It’s what I left have been doing to us, to White Christian society for last fifty years. It’s critique. You break it down. You don’t have to actually put anything positive there, you just rip everything down!

 

Woes: [laughing]

 

Morgs: It’s great fun! It’s great fun, because it gets it out of your system. Like these diversity adverts. Last year I did a blog post on the diversity adverts for that Christmas. Diversity adverts that came out last year. And this year I didn’t even bother, because everybody was at it!

 

 

Woes: Yeah. I did a video on that. So did Mark Collett. Oh god, who else did it? There were quite a few, because this year it was unbelievable!

 

Mark Collett — Christmas Adverts – Multicultural Propaganda — TRANSCRIPT

 

Morgs: Yeah. And we can get into later, because I’m gonna try and get a YouTube channel off the ground next year, soon. And one of the first things I was gonna do was what’s actually going through the head, of “John Bull” out in Zombieland, when he sees these diversity Christmas ads? What’s he actually thinking? Because he knows, his gut is telling him that there’s something wrong! But his brain is saying:

 

But you can’t mention it, because then you’re gonna be evil!

 

And you can get really into the problem just on that, just on the diversity ads. And your average bloke sitting there watching it, with a wife and kids, and he’s gonna think:

 

Well I’m bummed off here! I’m out of the fuckin equation! Where am I in the Marks and Spencers diversity ads?

 

And he isn’t! He’s gone! But if he mentions it, then he’s a “racist”. So he’s got this kind of problem:

 

It’s not right, but I can’t talk about it!

 

And I think another thing I’ll to do is to look into the morality of “Holocaustianity”. Because when it comes down to, that’s what we’re talking about. There you’ve got, …

 

Woes: Define that for me.

 

Morgs: Well, it’s something that’s been, … We don’t talk about it as much anymore, but I think earlier people in White nationalism talked about a more than it gets talked about now. You don’t even have to get into the “Holocaust” of World War Two. It’s the way it’s been used to chain White racial consciousness and ethnic feeling to pure evil! Literally! It’s a religion! It’s pretty much just a religion, …

 

Woes: It’s so useful. I mean, it can be invoked at any time. I watched an episode of Question Time, no, I didn’t watch the whole episode, I just saw a clip of it on YouTube. I cannot watch Question Time anymore! I haven’t watched a full episode for about five years now. But I saw a clip and it was Simon Schama.

 

 

[06:01]

 

 

It was around about at the end of 2015 — you can see where this is going. It was around the end of 2015 and everyone was talking about the migrant crisis. And he said — I can’t remember the words he used, or the point that he made — he basically said that people who don’t want the migrants coming in to Europe, like all these migrants coming in from Africa and the Middle East, people who don’t want that are basically wanting another “Holocaust”!

 

Morgs: Yeah. Well how it works is that, and again you don’t even have to get into the nuts and bolts of the “Holocaust” itself — I’m not that interested in that. But how it’s set up like a religion, is that the six million died for the sins of European racists. And Adolf Hitler is Satan, and now Europeans have to reject the evil forever to find salvation and moral purity and everything like that.

 

And you can see it. The further that you are, let’s say a kind of UKIP tier, or something like that, a kind of conservative like Jacob Rees-Mogg, then you’re more towards pure evil, than say, Yvette Cooper — who I want to talk about in a minute. And so the social justice warriors see themselves — or a lefty, you know, your typical kind of lefty — they actually, within this religion, this moral paradigm, they actually see themselves and think of themselves as being good! Because, within that moral system they are!

 

And so the more that you turn your back on White identity and embrace the “other” the better person you are. That’s how it works. And when one you understand that, you understand a lot about the shit that were are in!

 

And to get back to the diversity adverts, if John Bull out in Zombieland starts to ask the wife:

 

Well, what the fuck’s going on here! I’m not even in these adverts! There’s nothing representing me. There’s a black fella there!

 

A big jump towards being pure evil! And somehow, or other, we’re gonna have to break that! We’re gonna have to destroy it, somehow, or other.

 

[Click image to enlarge]

 

Woes: Yeah. And I mean, the scary thing for John Bull is that he’s not there in those adverts. But also implicit in that, is the fact that he won’t be there in the future. You know, this is it now. It’s the same thing with the “diversity barriers[concrete blocks protecting pedestrian areas]. Every Christmas now it’s going to be like that. Every Christmas market, because they’re never going to calm down. So, …

 

Morgs: Imagine the diversity adverts in 20, or 30 years time. When like now they’ve got the White woman and she’s just a sort of half-caste breeding factory, but then in 20, or 30 years time she’s just gonna be this sad old granny slumped in the corner, pissed [drunk]!

 

 

[09:08]

 

 

And then with all of these complete racial aliens running around. [laughing] It’s not like the nicest of futures! It’s okay now when she’s being romanced on the train by this nice black man! But her future is shit as well!

 

Woes: Oh yeah! Yeah! We don’t need to paint that in very detailed strokes, because it’s just so, it’s so fucking grim, you know! Yeah, the beautiful White girl today who’s flirting with a black man on the train! It’s a bit exotic, it’s a bit exciting, it would annoy daddy! Well her future is, she’s going to be surrounded by, first of all, lower IQ half-caste kids, and then even lower IQ, god knows what, grandkids! And, you know, the security that she could have had from having a White family is just going to be totally gone!

 

 

 

Morgs: Yes. And she’s gonna sit there, a kind of old flabby wreck, just getting a drunk in the corner, and farting, and just thinking:

 

Ah shit! Look at that! Look at this!

 

That’s what’s being promoted. The White man’s the first to go, but the lot for the White woman is not that nice, either. It really isn’t.

 

Woes: No. The statistics actually for mixed-race, like for a White woman to marry a black guy, the statistics are terrible. I saw them the other day, a summary of them. And the amount of violence, the frequency of divorce, the frequency of being on welfare, it’s, … The thing that they paint, these fucking Christmas adverts, a sort of ideal romantic relationship where it just works, you know. And he’s middle-class as well! It just goes swimmingly.

 

Nothing could be further from the truth! The reality of them of this, is frequently sordid and miserable, and poverty-stricken, and violent! So it’s disgusting! I mean, this is the kind of thing where you actually realize that the social conditioning is not only immoral, not only irresponsible in the grand scheme of things on the macro level, it’s also very cruel and irresponsible and immoral towards each of these individual women who’s being inveigled into doing this, to herself.

 

Morgs: Yeah. I mean, I don’t really want to go on about with diversity adverts, because like I say, everybody’s been on about it. But, you can see that, because before we went on, we were talking about Yvette Cooper. And I don’t know if many people have seen it, because I haven’t seen that before, where she was on a Common Select Committee.

 

 

[11:55]

 

 

 

Woes: I know. I should just introduce this for the non Facebook. Yvette Cooper, a Labour politician. She was up and rolling with [Tony] Blair, either cabinet, she was one of Blair’s fuckin babes in the late 90s, which is, you know, amazing to think of nowadays. And she’s just running these god-awful “champagne socialists” and she was in some sort of meeting in the House of Commons, governmental, with presumably representatives of YouTube.

 

Morgs: Yeah, I thought was strange as well. But basically this little video, I mean, I wish I’d seen it before, but this little video has Yvette Cooper on a Common Select Committee complaining really, like bollocking these bosses of YouTube saying:

 

I’ve just seen White genocide videos on your platform! [Morgs laughing]

 

For some reason YouTube has been recommending Red Ice, …

 

Woes: It’s hilarious really! [laughing] The algorithm has somehow recommended Red Ice videos to Yvette Cooper, who is just the worst champagne socialist. It’s hilarious to think that somehow, got this badly! [laughing loudly]

 

Morgs: Especially, because like, say 15 years ago, she had a bit of a kind of cute pixie look about her, but now it’s kind of sour, and she just looks like a vindictive bitch! And then, …

 

Woes: Yes!

 

Morgs: You know, the eyebrows used to be kind of cute, and now she’s just like a sour bastard! But, the funny thing is she’s actually seen, she’s actually watched videos on White genocide and she’s fucking furious about it. [laughing]

 

Woes: Because she’s emboldened it! She’s fucking doing it!

 

Morgs: She was probably in the fucking videos!

 

Woes: [laughing loudly] That’s why they were recommended to her! [laughing loudly]

 

Morgs: Because, I mean, I posted on the blog before. I spent Christmas day, it was a big family get-together at me mother’s house, and they put this YouTube kind of mix on, and so we saw what like my mother watched on YouTube. And it was like Val Doonican’s Greatest Hits and Karen Carpenter the Tragedy! Really bland mother’s kind of stuff. It wasn’t fucking White genocide videos! She wasn’t being recommended that!

 

So, what’s Yvette Cooper actually watching that’s making the YouTube algorithms show White genocide videos on her face? [Woes laughing] I wonder if she’s been Googling, going into YouTube and search like, “New Labour, Tony Blair, genocidal bastards, or anti-White”, or something like that? And she’s gonna get it! [Woes in a fit of laughing] New Labour on the working class, and then a fuckin video on White genocide pops up! And so she’s seen this, and she’s gone fucking berserk about it! She wants that down! She wants that shut! She wants that out! Out of it! But she supported, …

 

 

[15:09]

 

Woes: Well it’s disgusting, because, first of all, she was moaning that it was being recommended to her, but then that rapidly transformed into her moaning that it was on the website at all. That it was on YouTube at all! She was saying to them you have not taken it down. And I thought you fucking dummy! You know, how dare you! And when I shared it on Twitter I said:

 

And sometimes one can forget just how appalling British politicians are!

 

Because I was really disgusted, thinking this fucking bitch would actually want my channel to be deleted, you know. Just, because it’s contrary to the message that she wants the public to get!

 

Morgs: Yeah!

 

Woes: What a fucking bitch!

 

Morgs: The thing is, leaving Red Ice aside for a minute, because they are well-known, but there is a lot of White genocide videos now, and they’ve got like hundreds of thousands of hits. And they tend to be like, five to ten minutes long, where you see hordes of Africans, Muslims, just swarming towards Europe. They’re climbing over fences, you get newspaper clippings of rape statistics, and bomb attacks, and everything like that. And then you’ll see like certain, (((you know who’s))) [laughing] talking about how wonderful it all is.

 

And Yvette Cooper, her colleagues, anyway, definitely Tony Blair, would have been in the videos! But her constituents, the people a lot she supposed to represent, are watching it. And her a reaction of that is not to say:

 

Oh, hang on a minute. Hang on a minute! I represent a demographic who think, and a lot of them, not all of them, maybe not even not many of them, but some of them think there’s a concerted plan to blend them, breed them out and replace them in their own country.

 

I mean, she should be saying to another Common Select Committee:

 

Yeah look! There’s something going on out there, in normie-land and we have to get on top of this situation, because they think we’re fucking scum! They think we’re trying to bump them off!

 

But no! No! She just wants to remove the videos!

 

Woes: Yeah! That is why it was so infuriated for me to see that. You just want to delete this! You want to censor this. Because that’s inconvenient for you.

 

Morgs: Yeah! It doesn’t solve the problem.

 

Woes: It’s the height of arrogance to address the symptoms of something rather than the problem, which you yourself are creating. Nothing, I don’t know what could be more arrogant than that!

 

Morgs: Another thing, it means that she doesn’t have much faith in the arguments that she can put forward.

 

 

[18:02]

 

 

So they’ve got all of the media, all of the political class, they’ve got academia, they’ve got big business, they’ve got the bosses of these companies, YouTube, Twitter, Facebook. They’ve got them, more or less, on their side, and it’s not enough! They still can’t win the fucking argument!

 

Woes: Yeah! [laughing]

 

Morgs: Can she not make a documentary to say why we are not [promoting White genocide], you know, going up on Coronation Street adverts? Thirty second advert?

 

Okay White people, this is why you’re not being genocided and everything’s okay!

 

[laughing]

 

Woes: Well, you know, what she should do is offer to be interviewed by Red Ice, and she can prove them wrong! She can just, you know, defeat them in arguments and statistics and facts. But, of course, she won’t do that. She’ll try to get them deleted! Or barred in Britain. That’s more likely. That is what she’ll try to get YouTube to do.

 

I mean, it really just fucking disgusts me! Because that’s a fucking government politician, pressuring YouTube to censor this in their in her own country! It’s reprehensible!

 

Morgs: The people she represents are making very, … I don’t know how you put it, but they’re interested. Very interested in the idea that people like her, who move in her circles, are actually trying to bump them off, to get rid of them, in one way, or another. Now that’s a fucking hell of a serious allegation! It’s tantamount to accusing her and her political clique of high treason!

 

And that will open Tony Blair, … That was still on the books for being a hanging offence in England.

 

Woes: On high treason. Yeah, sorry you cut it out there for a minute. Are you on WIFI, by the way?

 

Morgs: Yeah.

 

Woes: All right. Okay, just wondered. It’s great. Your voice is cutting in and out sometimes.

 

But yeah, it’s tantamount to accusing them of treason. Yes it is! I they are guilty of treason! I think they should stand trial. I think the entire Blair cabinet should stand trial for treason against the British people! Treason against the British state! Fundamentally endangering the existence of the British people. I think this should all be on trial for that.

 

Morgs: I mean, it’s funny, …

 

Woes: Maybe one day they will be.

 

Morgs: If you’re like me, and I’ve been in this for nine, or ten years now, and there’s lots of juicy little facts which fall, by the wayside and you don’t see them brought up anymore. Like Tony Blair, pretty much as soon as he got the power and before he opened the gates, the death penalty for high treason, … I mean, it was only in theory anyway, it wasn’t actually gonna happen. But, you’ve got the biggest traitor in modern British history abolishes the last kind of “bits and bobs” of the hanging for treason [law], just before he actually commits the biggest act of treason, ever!

 

 

[21:10]

 

 

And to put that into perspective, when the John Major government, which in 1997 immigration was rolling between 30 to 40,000. And that was in total. They didn’t like, you know, fuck around with the numbers, the way they do now. So it’s like net, and they count how many people go out. So we had 30 to 40,000 people coming in the country in 1997, and within a couple of years of Tony Blair, the New Labour Party, which was dominated by a (((certain group))) you had what, about 300,000? So it was ten times the amount within just a couple of years.

 

Woes: Yeah. I mean, Mandelson* actually said that they were putting people out there into, you know, I think it was Pakistan. He said that they actually sent people out there to advertise that you could move to Britain.

 

[* Peter Benjamin Mandelson, Baron Mandelson (born 21 October 1953) is a British Labour politician, president of international think tank Policy Network and Chairman of strategic advisory firm Global Counsel.

He served as Member of Parliament (MP) for Hartlepool from 1992 to 2004, and held a number of Cabinet positions under Prime Ministers Tony Blair and Gordon Brown. He was the European Commissioner for Trade between 2004 and 2008.

 

Blair with Mandelson (click image to enlarge)

 

Mandelson was one of several key individuals responsible for the rebranding of the Labour Party as New Labour before it’s subsequent victory in the 1997 election. He resigned twice from the Cabinet before leaving Parliament to take up an appointment as a European Commissioner. He later rejoined the Cabinet for a third time after being created a Life Peer, sitting on the Labour benches in the House of Lords.

Peter Mandelson was born in Hampstead Garden Suburb, Middlesex, on 21 October 1953, the son of Mary Joyce (née Morrison) and George Norman Mandelson. His father’s family was Jewish; his grandfather had founded the Harrow United Synagogue. His father (known as Tony) was the advertising manager of “The Jewish Chronicle”.

Mandelson is gay, and he is said to be ‘intensely private‘ about his personal life.

He has lived with his life partner Reinaldo Avila da Silva, a Brazilian-British translator, since March 1998. The couple live in a house in Regent’s Park, London, bought for £7.6 million.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Mandelson]

 

Morgs: Yeah, because Britain wasn’t known as being an immigrant country. So, your average bloke out there in Pakistan, or wherever, he didn’t think that there was any chance of him coming to Britain, or a very small chance. But, Britain wasn’t open. Britain wasn’t an immigrant nation.

 

Source: Mandelson — Immigrants: We sent search parties.

 

And they just concocted all of these lies in the last 20 years! So there wasn’t the infrastructure of bringing masses amounts of people into Britain. It just wasn’t an issue. Going into the 1997 election, I mean, I was just a young fella at the time, but it was the first time I could vote and the issue was the minimum wage. And everybody was tired of the Tories. The Tories had been in forever.

 

Woes: Yeah, they’ve been in for 18 years at that time.

 

Morgs: Yeah. I mean, and you can shit on them and Thatcher and everything like that, but there’s a bit of a theory that they did kind of [help?], just a little bit from what was going on elsewhere. You know, I wouldn’t say my name for that, because you could be shot down in flames. But I do get the sense that we had it good with the Tories and we didn’t know how good.

 

Because, remember when the poster went around of Tony Blair, was like the devil? With the evil eyes, …

 

 

Woes: Yes, yes.

 

Morgs: And it was a kind of the old Tories and they were saying:

 

You don’t know what’s coming! You don’t know!

 

I mean, I think they were, the old Tories, were under pressure from other areas, the (((money power))) and things like that. And they didn’t hold it all off, but they kind of dragged their heels in the globalist project. And then it was, I don’t know, I’ve got a little pet theory that when Tony Blair came in, it was like, “we’re gonna have to catch up! We’re gonna have to, …

 

 

 

[24:04]

 

 

Woes: There’s a very interesting thing, I mentioned this at least once before on the channel, there’s a series called “Bill Brandt” from 1975, or six. And it’s a crap boring drama, but it’s about a Labour politician, he’s a sort of firebrand and I think he calls himself a left-wing reactionary, or something. And then, what’s interesting is just that it shows the Labour Party at a moment in transition, like the middle 70s you had old boring, sort of dry Michael Foot types, and then you had a young young generation, who I mean, literally they’re like 20, 22, 25 generation coming up, who had, you know, imbibed the new left, cultural Marxism, for the very first time at the universities.

 

You know, in the late 60s early 70s. And they were all about queer rights, and women’s rights, and lesbians, and all that. And, of course, immigration. You’ve got this very interesting transition point between the Old Left and the New Left but, of course, that didn’t really take hold for another 20 years!

 

Morgs: Yeah.

 

Woes: Because they had to get into the party work, their way up the ranks, but I think Tony Blair was first elected in 83, wasn’t he? Something like that. And so it took time. They were there in the party from the mid seventies onwards, but they weren’t gonna actually been able to do anything with it and reshape the country for another 20 years. But they got in and they did.

 

Morgs: Oh well, it was insane, because I lived away at the time. And I came back and like, I come from quite a big family, and my youngest brother was still in school, and he was coming home, and this was a year into New Labour. And he was coming home from school and he had prizes, even though he’d come last! He had awards for being the last in races! In the sprints, and the marathons and stuff, cross-country. And my dad, was saying:

 

I don’t understand any of this! He shit at running and they’re still giving him awards? What’s the awards for?

 

Woes: This is the “all must have prizes” literally!

 

Morgs: Everybody must have prizes. You could see it slowly creep in!

 

Woes: And yes, actually, that reminds me, I should have said this. In the middle 80s there’s a fascinating documentary on YouTube and I think at some point I’m going to make a video, just playing it and commenting on it throughout. It’s only about 20, I don’t know, maybe 15 minutes long, maybe shorter than that.

 

And it’s about the “Looney Left” in the middle eighties in London. And this thing, I said earlier that it took them 20 years, before they could actually start doing stuff, but that’s not true, because at the lower level and the council’s and stuff, they did, I mean, that’s like 10 years after the mid 70s, and they were doing stuff.

 

[27:01]

 

I mean, the “Looney Left” thing is real. The thing about “Baa Baa Rainbow Sheep”, [Morgs laughing] that turned out to be a story, yeah that was tabloid a tabloid invention. And, of course, therefore it said that the the whole Looney Left thing was a tabloid invention, but it wasn’t. It was absolutely real! And now what you had, I mean, people won’t know what I’m talking about, some people, … Well do you want to describe the Looney Left thing, or will I do this?

 

Morgs: In the 80s? I don’t know about them in the 80s.

 

Woes: Well, yeah, it was mainly in London, as far as I know. You had Left-wing local councils, so they’re not at the government, or not the national government level, but they’re at the local government level, and local education authorities, that sort of thing. And that was when they started injecting what we would know called “cultural Marxism” into the society at large, into culture.

 

And they started worrying about, … Well I suppose you could say it was the start of “political correctness”, actually becoming a sort of creed in daily life, you know?

 

Morgs: Yeah.

 

Woes: And so, it’s fascinating to see it now, because you tend to think this stuff started much later, but actually it didn’t! It was there at the fucking height of Thatcher’s government!

 

You know, you’ve got to remember, that was the height of her popularity. And people tend to think of Britain in the 80s as I sort of Right-wing, very hard Right country at the time. But no! Because this is what the Left do. While the Right are busying themselves at the national level, the Left are dissolving things below that, at the levels below that. Sort of unawares. So the Right think they’re triumphant and they’re controlling everything, but actually the Left are working below decks, fucking things up!

 

I mean, I guess that you could say the same thing has happened now, or is happening. I mean, look at Donald Trump’s in power in America and the anti-fa professors are going fucking berserk with the students.

 

Morgs: Well, it’s why I’d be wary of White knighting for the Tory government. I mean, on the one hand I can see that there were probably elements who are aware that they had to protect Britain for as long as possible from the (((wider globalist project))), but I think they were, a bit like the elves from middle-earth. They knew they were in the long defeat!

 

And then when Thatcher’s new liberalism just smashed communities to pieces. And you can’t you can’t defend that in the long run. You can’t defend it, because then when I Left did come in, they picked towns and steel worker, mill towns in the north, which were just absolutely hammered! And talk of anything else, what they did have was a glut of cheap house council houses, which was just stuffed full with Muslims.

 

 

 

[30:04]

 

 

And we had our first major grooming scandal, here in Newcastle this year. I did like a two-part article on it. And I mean, even before the Muslims, the mass immigration, started to arrive in the West End of Newcastle it was well known for being a shithole. I mean, I remember back in the day when I used to go out in Newcastle on a drink and stuff, there was a kind of urban myth went around that somebody drove his car to Newcastle, and then he got shit-faced drunk and he couldn’t drive home. So he swapped his car for somebody’s flat! [home unit] . Like a 300 pound car for a flat in the Newcastle West End, where this happened. It’s absolutely dire! And it already was. They were already on their last legs, and then what we did was just dump the Third World on top of them!

 

And I came back about 2002 to visit somebody in hospital. I said it before about me brother, getting awards for coming last! And then I came back and I went to the hospital and they had this, it used to be a bingo hall and it had been converted into an African Women Support Center! And I thought, well I don’t know what the fuck is that? Basically, that was really my reaction! Was, just what the fuck is that? African Women Support Center in the West End of Newcastle!

 

And it was the New Labour project kicking in. Because it didn’t happen overnight. I really wanted to get like a big [blog] post out about this, because it’s 20 years this year that has passed since the New Labour got in. And I did want to do like a few posts on it but I never got the time. But you could see it took a couple of years to trickle in and then you started to see weird community centres that didn’t make sense. What is that? What does that mean?

 

Woes: Yes, of course, yeah I’m here. I’m listening to everything you’re saying.

 

Morgs: There’s a writer now for New Statesman called John Harris. And he has written a book about the Britpop era. I mean, we could do a hangout all about this, just on it’s own, one day. But he’s written a book about the Britpop era, and Oasis and the Blur and everything like that. And he’s a complete champagne socialist twat! From fucking Chelsea, or somewhere in London. And it was in the New Statesman’s long-lead section and it was a good piece. I mean, I haven’t read his book, but I don’t really need you, because they’re flogging it like fuck in the New Statesman.

 

 

 [33:00]

 

 

 

And I just kept reading it, reading it, and he was going on. It was an interesting thing that you got this tension between Blur and Oasis which was kind of like the working-class North against the pampered South. And he got into a quite a lot and coming towards the end he said the one thing we have to look back on about the Britpop era and “Cool Britannia” and what it all meant, was that it was just so bloody White!

 

And I thought, there you’ve got it! There you’ve got the fucking cancer!

 

Woes: So what was he saying that, you know, was he sort of guilting that it was a White thing?

 

Morgs: Yeah. It was not inclusive, because what you could reasonably think of as being part of that, you had “Massive Attack” at the time. Which was this kind of, forgot what they called it now, xxxx were another, Beth Gibbons, she had a beautiful voice and xxxx came out of Bristol, and it was a sort of ambient gentle hip-hop thing that went on.

 

Woes: Yeah, yeah. I mean, they were good groups.

 

Morgs: The Britpop scene which came in with Blair was like entirely White! And it’s actually really tragic, because they and it’s the Britpop thing wafted, they kind of loved Blair. They were like:

 

Oh, we’re finally gonna beat these Tories and we’re gonna move off this new tomorrow.”

 

And they went and then Noel Gallagher’s snuffed coke off the back of Blair’s toilet in 10 Downing Street. And it was all just a total lie! They were playing us like a fucking fiddle! Because they thought they were in a kind of counterculture, but they weren’t! It was a sort of, the globalists were playing them for the counterculture. It was controlled!

 

Woes: Yeah. Well I remember at the time people saying it was kind of low-grade for a political party to affiliate itself with pop groups, you know, rock music, but again it was a baby boomer thing wasn’t it? I mean, it was really the first baby boomer government to be honest. And that’s their thing, rock and roll was their thing.

 

Morgs: Yeah. And films came out, like “Trainspotting” and it was all the Brits are gonna come, and beware Hollywood. And there was this general sense of a British identity, but it was synthetic! And it was bullshit! And it was kind of toothless, and it didn’t have any kind of backbone. And you have Geri Halliwell wearing this, she looked like a prostitute wearing the Union Jack, it says everything about it. Because really it was just waiting to get fucked!

 

 

[36:07]

 

 

Then it got fucked three years later as soon as Blair and his heavily dominated government of a certain ( ( (ethnic group) ) ) set about bringing the immigrants in. And then the party was definitely over! Then it was “hate speech” laws! And “watch what you are saying” or you’re going to get fired. And by fucking God did they kill the party!

 

Woes: Well indeed. This is the whole thing about the New Left totally shitting on the concerns of the Old Left. In the end it doesn’t matter the plight of the working class does not matter to the New Left.

 

Morgs: Yeah.

 

Woes: They’ll willfully ignore them and even make things worse for them, much worse!

 

Morgs: Yeah. And you can see that kind of transition with say Oasis being the working-class chad, and Blur being the middle class champagne socialist virgin! I mean, even back then that’s like a meme going around. Now even back then it was apparent. And now the disconnect has become xxx 20 years later. The disconnect is to the point where it’s a crisis! It’s a crisis! It’s where even a copper says; “take the shit down!” And people, the demographic who would have been on the racist side of this, say 20 years ago, now they’re a threat to the system.

 

Woes: It’s also worth saying that it was that demographic, the racist demographic, who voted for Brexit. And someone just pointed out in the live chat, that Noel Gallagher, was it Noel or Liam? I can’t remember. Noel Gallagher was pro-Brexit. Then you’ve got Tony Blair, who’s saying that he’s going to come back into politics, in order to reverse, or cancel Brexit.

 

Morgs: Yeah.

 

Woes: You couldn’t get such a more disgusting betrayer than Tony Blair!

 

Morgs: And that was a thing of Noel Gallagher saying about Muslims, about the bombing. And he was saying, look, that went round on Facebook and social media and stuff a few weeks ago, where you saying:

 

Look at our kids in London

 

And he was literally calling the government cunts! He said they’re not gonna change it. They didn’t change it. The next government’s not gonna change it! My kids are on public transport, because of these fuckers! You know, their lives are in threat. And so that divide that, I just find it interesting, that even we go back 20 years ago where you can see that it was a little bit of fun and games, the Blur-Oasis thing.

 

Woes: Well exactly! In contrast to today nothing really mattered back then! In retrospect it all was quite trivial!

 

 

[38:51]

 

 

Morgs: I was going out and getting pissed and smoking dope! And life was a fucking great party! I was late teens, and you look at it now and what you can see is that the seeds of that kind of friction have become now, where they see I’m in the racist camp.

 

This massive swarm of orcs at the gates of the metropolis, trying to burn them alive!

 

And creating blogs to try and get hits to wake people up and turn them against the elites!

 

Woes: Yeah! [laughing]

 

Morgs: And that basically is the problem.

 

Woes: [laughing] Ironically enough I wasn’t an Oasis fan, I was Pulp! [laughing] You know, what can I say?

 

 

Morgs: He’s a raging Leftie, Jarvis Cocker, he’s a wanker!

 

Woes: I know. I know. Ironically, his mother as a Tory counselor.

 

Morgs: Well, he’s supported by the UEF something, I don’t know I’ve kind of lost track of a lot of them, to be honest.

 

Woes: I mean, I never really liked Blur, to be honest. They had a few good songs. But I mean, Damon Albarn was always an obvious mommy’s boy, you know. And, of course, he was with Justine what was her name from Elastica? Justine Frischmann, who was a jewess, of course.

 

 

Morgs: Oh?

 

Woes: That’s a funny thing about, …

 

Morgs: Yes, she was, wasn’t she? Yeah, it’s like that’s the biggest letdowns since xxxxxx. [Woes laughing uproariously]

 

Woes: Also there was a cute girl, …

 

Morgs: Isn’t it xxxxx when that happens?

 

Woes: Yeah, I know, I know. Well there’s, what’s her name? There’s a there’s a really gorgeous English actress, I forgot her name. It’s Rosie Huntington-Whiteley! and she’s jewish! She’s gorgeous, an “English rose” kind of look.

 

 

Anyway, the funny thing is, there’s another Britpop group called Sleeper, and they had a female lead singer. Yeah, she’s jewish as well!

 

 

Morgs: Jesus!

 

Woes: This is why we need our own people, we need our own groups, our own talent, so that so that this doesn’t happen so much in future, you know.

 

Morgs: Yeah, I mean, we’ve talked about all this, I was gonna have that guitar xxxx from the Stone Roses as my YouTube channel, but I’ll get flagged [for copyright violation]. Because, there was the Manchester versus London Chelsea thing well, wasn’t it?

 

 

I was watching the videos from like the Stone Roses, Oasis and stuff, and I do like that kind of working-class swagger! Where they’re not cucks! They’ve never been to university, fuck all. They’re racists, you know, they’re racists, they don’t give a shit! And I like that. I like that kind of masculinity, that working-class kind of “fuck you” attitude.

 

 

[42:05]

 

 

 

And I think it’ll be great to bring some of that back in a kind of nationalistic Alt-Right way.

 

Woes: Yeah, yeah. Definitely! I mean, the alternative is that they just remain completely cowed by Islam, like the men in Rotherham, you know, who are afraid to do anything to protect their own daughters and sisters.

 

Morgs: Yeah.

 

Woes: That’s horrendous.

 

Morgs: I mean, you can wax lyrical about working-class masculinity, but they’ve behaved like absolute fucking faggots. But I mean, what do you do? I think it goes back to, “it’s evil to say anything about it!” And they are really, really atomized. It was the same story in the West End of Newcastle, that plays itself out everywhere. Where the pubs have been closed, the social clubs have been closed, so there isn’t any action, even if you leave aside the political correctness and the traumatized “your Nazi” and all that. And then there isn’t actually another a bunch of White men to round up and do what you have to do, whatever that would be. Because that they don’t have a social group. They sit in their house were their missus and drink wine! And watch X-Factor. And what goes on out beyond the door they don’t know!

 

And I’m not gonna make excuses for them. I’ve spent years trying to wake them up.

 

Woes: I think they need permission. I think, you know, this is gonna sound really snobby, but I think they won’t do it until they feel that the middle class are on their side.

 

Morgs: Well I agree! I ended up, in my two-part article on the Newcastle grooming scandal, I basically said:

 

Look, they’re not going to do it on their own. They don’t know how, they wouldn’t know how to organize anything.

 

If they thought they had organization and direction, they’ll do! They’ll do what needs to be done. But until then, they’re happy to sit playing Fifa on the PlayStation and smoke dope. And that’s shit! It’s just, …

 

Woes: It’s horrendous! I mean, if you’re playing Fifa on the PlayStation and smoking dope, while your sister is being groomed by Pakistani Muslims, I mean, there are no words for that really! It’s just absolutely fucking tragic!

 

Morgs: Yeah, yeah. I’m not gonna play the “working class hero card”. I’m not gonna defend them. I’m tired of it. I will work with them, and every day I know exactly the type, and they are aware of what’s going on. And their attitude is:

 

It’s not going to happen to us. We won’t let that happen!

 

[45:11]

 

But I’m sure all your working-class men in other towns said that as well. I mean, the funny thing is that a lot of them are really fucking tough, as an individual, when you look at them. You’ve got to kill them! It’s a kind of off topic, but a couple of months back and I saw one of them, full of tattoos, obviously really, a huge, physically huge.  and my dog came and snapped at his dog, and he had this big stupid fucking, … They all do, they like a kind of Rottweiler Pitbull crossbreed thing. And he said:

 

You know, the next time I’m gonna fucking” — because I’ve got a smaller terrier — and he said:

 

You know, the next time, I’m gonna kick your dog all over this fucking park!

 

Look! Your the daft cunt! You can’t control your dog mate! You’ve got a big stupid fucking savage thing on the end of that chain! And he was ready to dig in! He was ready to go! That would have been a fight to the death!

 

And you see this all of the time. People are going to hospital and they’ve got fractured skulls and jaws for nothing! And I’m sure he would have been a tough lad, a kind of, “well, yeah, whatever”. And I kinda let it go, because getting on a bit! I’ve grown out of all of that.

 

But the problem is, they’ll be a bunch of Muslims come in, and he doesn’t understand what the bigger picture. He only sees himself as being a tough guy, which he probably is, I didn’t find out. But he is totally blind to the bigger picture, and about how the groups work. And that he’s not going to be a match for seven scrawny lads from Pakistan with knives and machetes! And there that’s not even taking into consideration the PC police.

 

Woes: Well you’re talking about a future scenario in which the PC police have become irrelevant. Which I think is going to happen eventually. And we will be left with a straightforward conflict between us and the Muslims in Britain. That’s eventually going to happen. The champagne socialists are going to fuck off to wherever, to their gated communities, and now I think they will give up on this, because they’ll realize:

 

Okay, we’ll created this enormous fucking shitstorm! We’ve got no idea what to do about it! Whenever we say something they despise and loathe us, so let’s just get out while we can and leave the working class to it.

 

 

[48:01] IN PROGRESS

 

I think that’s probably going to be some version of what happened and at that point there will be no political correctness, but there will be very large numbers of Muslims in Britain who have a collective identity and they will be up against mainly the working class who aren’t who are atomized and that is the massive danger that we have to avert it’s funny, because then we go back with that Cooper and the I think if we’re honest about it the kind of, because I think I spend more time on YouTube and you definitely do then Yvette Cooper and the algorithms do care if this kind of straightforward wager save video would take her at her word that’s actually catering to working-class White men after our I would see it I would say based on what they’re looking at it will be like Tommy Robinson make chases are Muslim roam the mosque type of stuff and then that is linked on to White genocide I dual actually it’s a weird thing, because they, because of what I’m into I don’t actually get that I don’t actually get bombarded with White genocide type videos so and I think it says a lot about what the algorithms are catering to yeah yeah I it’s I mean, you don’t know what the algorithms God knows how complicated they are, but I am I would love to know why it pegs those for a vet Cooper yeah what was the event Cooper watching which made lots of weight genocide videos pop up on her as she called her timeline I mean, it is as if is it’s like a it’s like she’s betraying her guilty conscience like she’s gone onto YouTube and looked for this stuff at some point worrying about what the public are thinking and see him to each other and then she’s gone on again and it’s and it’s recommended more similar stuff and then she she decides to be outraged by that I mean, it really is just absolutely disgusting to think that she would be outraged that this stuff was on YouTube that people are seeing this stuff instead of being outraged that she and her own fucking colleagues created this situation yeah all she she went like a know — all everybody’s so happy in the diverse utopia me and you believer of creative let’s just check in about there’s lots of nice videos like hands are on Burnley and having Lewis summer picnics which are diverse and then there’s a kind of White genocide thing pops up with one of those infographics of just endless people coming in the Europe yeah well I wonder what she thinks when she sees that I mean, are we talking about someone who’s so ideological that she’ll see that and just switch off from it, or are we talking about someone who’s still got enough of her humour and it’s your life that when she sees a graphic like that she she has a she has some guilt and that would be and love to I’d love to fucking interrogate her and say to her have you any idea are you actually conscious of what you have done to your country you fucking bitch!

 

[51:25] IN PROGRESS

 

Morgs: She well if it was a video and it was about seeing how hard blacks have it in Britain and that there was a significant proportion or, you know, a sizable amount of people among the black population of Britain thought that there was a plan to bump them off then to get rid of them by in a White privilege, or what about was the White elites all yes then she would be like, you know, the black population have these concerns and we really need to start addressing them we really need to get on top of this position and me tell them everything’s gonna be alright and tell them that these arguments are not really true and we’re doing what we can, but then when it’s something similar coming from the White people whom she represents it’s shut it down well exactly and if she did put together some programs to reassure the fight people who are watching this up it would all be a pack of fucking lies, because I’m really I being replaced it would be like one of those chrome TV video is where everybody just pile it on it to debunk it and terabits internal means and fucking yeah you should start a YouTube channel of her own and Bank my White genocide myth is that I mean, I know the Guardian I’ve got like a YouTube channel I don’t watch it I don’t think when people do watch it Jules put some video on some names, but it will be funny wondering if they did like thriii man, or labour support and this is why my channel 3 was out I’m going to deep link White genocide videos and then you could get somebody like whether they’re Chia to like spend three hours going down bullshit and then it would be a back-and-forth and then eventually we’d find out that, you know, all these new labor types had set up a private discord to Docs us all they get to see you your tubing and below them can you explain messes what she said can you explain me why this content is still on your platform what do we have to do to get this stuff taken down! ?

 

[54:02] NEEDS PROOFING

And you think and if this blonde tart sitting there from YouTube most you think Jesus Christ what a bitch what about freedom of speech she Frank I hope that’s what she was thinking I know cuz she might have been thinking oh god yes we she’s absolutely right how can we be prevailing this filth on our platform we’ve got to we’re gonna stop it I’m gonna delete all these videos and these channels these peddlers of evil and hate, you know, that may be what she was thinking something obviously less less verbose than that but, you know, what if she did does go along with it what if she goes back to YouTube and says the bless us government have these concerns and they’re absolutely right to have these concerns above God to just either ban these channels in pressing lightly abandom in other countries in Europe I would actually just delete them now it could come to that I wouldn’t be surprised I mean, it’s all, you know, it’s like he’s loose rules everywhere are always very vague and he you might think that you’re on the right side of them and then they just decide one day you’re not on the right side of them anymore so, you know, you’re fucked it’s funny that, because I was talking on Skype, or we got to back I know it was like well Steen was the air of the new hope and 2017, or was the Empire Strikes Back and everybody’s been censored every it’s the great shutdown everybody’s just being routed from all Umayr platforms, but okay and it is for a it kind of isn’t like your still hope there’s beans losses on Twitter and my blog still hope and when not we’re not doing that bad and it’s like we’re not being really censored the daily stoma has had fuckin a lot of shit so I really you ought to see a lot, but by and large the great shut down well we’re doing okay um and you can now I mean, that Levi Cooper thing they’re just becoming hysterical it slits like well why aren’t you shooting this shit down shut it down it’s not being shot down well why don’t they tell the audience tell the people who read my blog, or watch all videos on water why don’t they put a counter-argument is, you know, on the public space to say well these people are bullshit debunkers bonkers I will piss on a public invitation right now to a vet Cooper, or any any similar politician if you want to come on my channel for a hangout and we can talk about what you’ve done to the country I will be glad to interview you so that’s just I want to put that out there it’s out there now and well, you know, obviously nothing will ever happen, but I want I said I would love I would love the opportunity to have one of these cunts on my channel these were these traitors!

 

[57:06] NEEDS PROOFING

It would be wonderful, because honestly they would have no fucking chance I mean, not, because I’m a good debater just, because they’re full of lies yeah well the first thing you’d have to deal with was the fact that multicultural it was never put a vote we never asked for it and anybody who raise any objections was shouted down and in Enoch Powell’s time so he won’t like, but 1968 it was about 83% wanted me I think it was just about back there and it was just like stop it just stop it altogether zero immigration and it was 83% I think it was I thought it was 74% who they did a poll someone did a poll I think it was Gallup poll look I may be wrong, but I believe the number was 74% of the British public who were polled agreed with Enoch Powell’s “River of Blood” speech have changed, because we were ignored and you get up to now and the pools which come out now are like 70 see it’s Iran, but no more like suddenly far 5% you consider that like 20% of there are threats in 15 to 20% of the population is immigrant it means the percentage of Whites who wander born fewer immigrants has actually increased since Enoch Palestine mmm-hmm that’s interesting that’s really interesting given the propaganda yeah and well I mean, this is where we get back to the “Holocaust” yell anything, because what I’m trying to do with the blog a lot is to it’s a it’s about raising why creation, or consciousness and then seeing how it manifests itself in the mean, you know, in what’s going on in the world and what’s going on in the culture and what’s being, because the people in the media Yvette Cooper they know they know that it’s bubbling the northerners rising and they’re looking for ways to hem it in and obviously in 2016 we’ve got brexit and Trump and people will say well Trump’s a shill and he’s a controlled opposition and all of that guy thing and I and my points like maybe he is I don’t know, but the point is we got to a point where the weights were willing to go that extra step and that’s a good thing and it’s hard to keep track of these things and I do it is there a kind of silver bullet, or is it just this grinding process of breaking things down in the media and like I say a kind of critique and a never-ending critical theory of the mainstream culture around you, because it’s a gift.

 

[60:14] NEEDS PROOFING

Zz yeah and I think that kind of critique that’s a sort of treat for the more cerebral types who enjoy such things and that’s great and I think it’s absolutely essential, because that keeps them engaged it keeps them interested it gives them something to — it gives them a way to grapple with the situation and, you know, that means that they are going to be evermore well it just maintains their commitment to the cause I think, but also it’s useful, because the more we do that the more people we convert okay we’ll get some wet this is what again I’ve said it before this is why I did the wet nil speech in me, because I thought that’s a good way to reach people who would never look for some lip for an eighth no nation Ellis channel they would never look for ethno national, you know, this type of people I’m talking about Artie, you know, that kind of stuff they may well look for a lecture about worth nil and I yeah and the find my channel I know I think we should all let anyone who’s got who’s good at talking about culture and Arts and Media should be doing channels like that, because it’s a very good way to get to attract the types of people that we need in this movement yeah I mean, obviously I’ve got a lot of posts and the tags and in the headlines I am really into popular culture I mean, the Star Trek I’ve got one up now on the film Trading Places from the nineteen eighties where he it was basically the it was a John John Landis and yeah you don’t need to look it up I know it’s thinking he is and so I don’t want to get your channel shut down and it was really it was saying it’s ridiculous cartoon of wasp America in the early eighties and then what we did was SWAT on me literally swapped an upright the White man with Eddie Murphy a kind of cat, or black guy and they swapped them around and it was a nature vs. Nurture argument so they were saying well what would happen if we swap them more wrong is it all just and what, you know, is it is the breeding as they really say at least the two jokes the applause is it the breeding of the O’s the wasps, or is it nurture I can’t come the blacks Lerner and things like that and it’s really interesting to look at, because that what they’re doing is attacking wasp culture and they’re seeing that it’s elitist and that it’s and White privilege you see a kind of embryonic White privilege in there.

 

[63:01] NEEDS PROOFING

And when you zoom it out it really is a vicious attack on elite White America which wasn’t even in 1983 when it came out it wasn’t even that White anymore if if, you know, what I mean, though the people on the stock markets and Wall Street another group primarily they were running the show it didn’t really have much to do with wasp America and so you see that it’s actually this ethnic kind of attack and yeah and if we were that dominant we wouldn’t have these countless films like that wouldn’t really exist it’s the same way that White privilege if I mean, if White privilege a privilege existed we wouldn’t have White privilege being taught in universities yeah we wouldn’t yeah exactly people wouldn’t be hearing about it, because we would have the privilege to suppress such things yeah I mean, I’m a racist White man and I’m gonna stop you doing that in the university exactly so it’s probably some other group that has the privilege at least in within academia and media yeah to be continued I guess um, but yeah there was something he said about the well I nature versus nurture that has become a massive thing I mean, that this whole thing with Croton that lately the skeptic community was all based on that it you can’t prove it’s nature therefore it probably is not sure, or we should assume it is, because that allows us to be as open-minded as possible um, you know, there is an assumption that you should be as open-minded as possible even to the detriment of your own group which again is it’s really isn’t it, but yeah with regard to I haven’t read your article on trading places yet, but one a similar thing that I really loved was the article you wrote about Saving Private Ryan and I think you said that you based on a YouTube video I can remember yeah I did it was them it was Rob we it’s Rob eager and he’s had a beauty channel gold for the ages and he dismantles films he got a little bit lost in stanley kubrick I got a bit boring, but when he hits the moggy hits the mark and see him Private Ryan he analyzed that not an article on earth it’s actually oh yeah I am he it was the way the German soldiers were demonized and as opposed to the American soldiers in Saving Private Ryan and that was it did it likes Spielberg did lots of little things to ensure the audience would not empathize with the German soldiers yeah, but we’d empathize with the German they’re American soldiers and I was known to the one I thought was the most sort of amazing really was that the German soldiers all had shaved heads the American soldiers all had a mop of, you know, that boyish here yeah and I thought wow I don’t even know what to say until it’s pointed out and then you realize fuck I mean, that’s not even yes far as I know that there’s that’s not historically accurate um well it it’s basically universal throughout the film and it does have that effect.

 

[66:32] NEEDS PROOFING

Morgs: Well it was the age as well the age of the Germans saw I mean, another thing was that the German soldiers when they got shot em they didn’t scream out in pain, but when the Americans got wounded the arrives around on the ground in absolute agony and you saw bits of like ligaments and muscles hanging out their bodies the most famous parts the star of the film where that’s really blasted an ear brain whereas when the film moves on to kill lots of Germans the first thing is the German soldiers themselves are in the late 30s and early 40s the actors and they’ve got this really weathered manly tough look about them and they’ve got I mean, they’re literally skinheads whereas the Americans you’ve got Matt Damon and at that time I think he would have been about 22 and he’s got this kind of big mop of blond hair and they’re all very kind of individuals you can tell one part from the other very easily and they’ve all got their own stories and it goes on long it’s very cleverly done yeah they’re the German soldiers you never hear anything about any of them like their background their story I don’t think he even knew their names there’s a strange thing I mean, and there’s somebody who’s probably listening list called Aaron Kasparov and he did a video of an article allocated which I thought was brilliant and an old order now about how White’s became brainwashed and “Holocaust” propaganda played a large role in that just cut along with the there’s the topic and if you see it this is true if you see it as somebody it might be less true now in the, you know, because of the internet, but I’m Generation X and then if you go to the Millennials it’s pretty true that if you say what was the first time he ever saw a picture of a naked human body well they’re probably gonna think it was maybe a woman topless on the beach, or something like that something kind of benign and I’m not talking about, you know, real life where your mother you’re a little child me and other gets all the bath, or something it’s what is the first time you ever saw a naked human being in a picture, or on television and it’s almost always the cast yeah that it’s a pile of dead bodies from a concentration camp.

 

[69:09] NEEDS PROOFING

And that there’s a lot of reasons behind that and, you know, a certain group in America I wanted to get poem published in the 1960s and the Catholic Church actually warned up on the one that round and said no we’re not gonna do it and then they came back and they said well what about these “Holocaust” things we want to show the reality of the “Holocaust” and yeah it is naked bodies, but it’s a horrible thing and yeah they were guilt-tripped and there was a well okay we’re not gonna put up a fight against that that, you know, you’ve obviously suffered, but the result of that was that the European body in a naked foam and European nakedness White nakedness, because that’s what it looks like there was pile of bodies they look like piles of dead White people naked and that’s the first image that most Europeans today see of a naked European ground is a pile of dead and it’s imprinted and another thing is that you’ll find about movies about the “Holocaust” this is why understanding culture and understanding the general culture is so important to break down and analyze, because this is the fucking a lot which is killing us, it’s psychologically another thing that you’ll notice about “Holocaust” movies is that there’s like a huge amount of kind of soft porn and in general nakedness in the films I mean, Schindler’s List as like extensive love scenes and quite quite hard Carlos teens with Liam Neeson of his girl and then Ralph Fiennes and his lover at a time you’ve got Kate Winslet who there was a phone called the reader where she’s a teacher and she’s like a this lengthy bath scene and the love scene what they’re doing is again and again and again they’re connecting the naked European form to horror and death this is a kind of it’s disgusting! It’s absolutely disgusting when you think of it, because that it means when you look at the nakedness of the European form, the European body are as an object of beauty in and of itself then you instantly go back to horror death concentration camps Nazis evil hitless it and we and we need to get over this we need to find a way to break through this and I mean, this is why I’m quite I’ve got quite a lot of contempt from follow the classic liberal skeptic kind of community. I think they’re just a bunch of bullshitters really.

 

[72:03] NEEDS PROOFING

Because they pretend that they’re free think as a need to understand any of this have V operate within the morality that this kind of fog hands down and instead about me a tacos the attack was for pointing it out well indeed that this is the thing that I’ve gone over this extensively so I don’t want to labor here, but they pretty they claim to be objective and rational when they are not and they are actually very ideological well it’s not just the YouTube community, because I know that being homage and I don’t really wanna repeat what everybody else a, but even if you follow their that the how would you put it the kind of wider classic liberal way of looking at it with Richard Dawkins and sam Harris they’re all inside of this bubble and what irritates me is that they all think they’re so fucking rational I’m so open-minded and they’re not they’re not at all I mean, that there are none Richard Dawkins a while back a few weeks ago where he said and I mean, this is a story in itself so it started on Twitter where somebody said somebody called right-wing rebel who was a Twitter account obvious kind of American patriot conservative free guns free speech type there were conference in Africa to about elephant conservation and this Twitter account said it’s a shame II did care about babies as much is he care about dead elephants, because Dawkins has kind of really opal abortion his fame and what worried what he’s done there and then he replied this and a full blog post and his idea was at the human baby well it doesn’t actually feel it doesn’t have any empathy and so it’s irrational to have it to hold it more dear than add an elephant, or an a live elephant Allah and it seemed that clever argument, because it’s purely rational, because the elephant does haven’t a fee it does feel and it does fear and a human baby in the mother’s womb doesn’t it doesn’t have any memory it doesn’t have any friends and blah, blah, blah and dolphins even used the word speciesism he said this right-wing rebel America was the speciesist the well-being of an unborn human baby over the well-being of an elephant and he another strether enough oh this is fucking mental!

 

[75:02] NEEDS PROOFING

Because everything that talk and subscribes to the elephant empathy taken care of it’s young it feels fear you can ascribe that to the common right so now we now he’s in a bad situation, because now he’s saying that we should care about a rat more than a human baby that hasn’t been born he’s rationalized himself in a fucking lunacy and he even in his own day job he can’t get himself out of this, because what he has argument is to say well why the human baby can’t feel the human baby is nothing it doesn’t have any friends it does not many empathy it doesn’t feel, but he’s already debate his own argument in his entire life’s work, because he wrote a Selfish Gene I feel bad baby than what I do for a fucking elephant, or a rat, because I’m selfish my genes are selfish I protect my own and he’s debunked and they’ve got this problem where on the one hand the door let’s see it all and is, but they all come from there this new atheist crowd sceptics all of it is where you say well it’s all rational and if we have it’s evolution and we have to go for laws of nature and if you when they talk and the Christians they’ll say I don’t give a flying fuck if your feelings are hurt by this I don’t care that it debunks your religion and your theology, but then all of a sudden they turn when you realize where that’s all heading they turn on a kind of liberals and see if what Dawkins on Twitter I talk about open borders and tolerance and diversity even though it flies in the face of every one of his fucking scientific principles you it’s ever shade and I can’t stand these people are really, because Dawkins knows and they’ll see if they sell it to the Christians for years on end we have to abide by the laws of nature we have to go if evolution that’s the facts and I don’t care if it hurts our feelings well okay so see if racial nationalism is just the selfish gene in political fall when it comes down to it it’s not very pretty it’s not very nice, but that’s what it is and then all of a sudden darkness thinks oh shit if I continue on thinking like this if I put my scientific principles and understanding into political form I’m going to look like I’m gonna be like a fucking Nazi so then he kind of lead they do like a kind of somersault and then they said oh well now and this is the occupant where well we’re humans so we have to overcome these barriers we have to write we are rational and we can write we can rationalize, or away into waging war on nature a overcometh vote down brexit and open doors and multiculturalism cannot be done.

 

[78:15] NEEDS PROOFING

Yeah yeah I think this is something that you okay yeah I think this is something that needs to be laid I’m very clearly for people, because it is our glaring contradiction view I mean, as you say it’s interesting, because it does go hand in hand with the progressivism in effect with whatever you call a gala telling us and it’s that same political thing and is tied to well the nihilism that the new atheist crowd peddle yeah and so you get you rationalize yourself into a situation where you can’t say I want my own biological genetic group to have let’s just say in Britain we, because we’ve got an island and it’s easy so we’ve got this island and what we were all pretty genetically similar and it was in our interest to hold this territory for ourselves you cannot use a selfish being argument at all to say that we should have immigrants it can’t be done so then what they have to do is rationalize themselves just to feel like just, because it will go down well it’s walking swanky dinner parties in Chelsea oh well we have to overcome this division why well, because it’s nice it’s a hold on a minute this is just gone an irrational lalalala this is what you hated the Christians for this is why you hated religion, because it feels nice I don’t get and this is where the mean came from oh I don’t give a shit about your feelings how many planks of wood does make to make doors awk oh I don’t know well fuck your feelings and now that doing is seeing themselves well sorry new atheist I don’t give a fuck about your feelings I want a knife no see it yeah it’s as simple as up yeah I mean, I wonder how relevant they are, because I mean, they’ve kind of morphed into the skeptics like that community yeah what I would say about the New Atheism thing in and off itself is I think it’s irrelevant it’s sort of obsolete no, because it’s so fucking empty it’s so nihilistic and I think that we’re heading into well basically where I think we’re heading anti-religious time, because and this is what progressivism this is the purpose it serves for people though and there’s Islam and people respect Islam which is very interesting, you know, and the very same people were talking about have a sort of, or their post rate themselves before Islam I find that fascinating as well.

 

[81:11] NEEDS PROOFING

And yes you could say that’s for also for racial reasons it’s the sort of thumb they know that Islam is strong and they know that they are weak so there are prostrating themselves before it, but as that, but I also think that it’s just a general fascination with religion the idea that people could actually believe in something and this is a huge danger actually, because a lot of Western White atheists well find themselves being attracted to Islam I think for that reason, because their lives are so fundamentally hollow spiritually I mean, I finished the article I did on Dawkins where we just found it grotesque the idea that you couldn’t I found a grotesque and I found that, but he was a total hypocrite, but I I’d known I’d known this for a long time about the atheist crowd and I’m talking about this, because it is the kind of wellspring of skepticism and classic liberalism in many ways so now you’ve got Jordan Peterson and sam Harris and all these kind of gatekeepers and it’s at your care it’s great to see the skeptics being shot down in flames, but there’s bigger ones out there is these bigger pieces I need to be so in and replaced with an overt nationalistic political philosophy, because we are more honest than we are I’m a more consistent I we’re not going to cook it out, because if, you know, that was an there’s a thing on YouTube and it’s going back for 10 to 12 year as well all the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse and it’s got Christopher Hitchens Dawkins Daniel Dennett and sam Harris on and they’re all sitting there own stroking each of us cops about how rational they are and about how will they even care about your feelings and we’re going to pursue the truth no matter where it leads and that’s what matters the truth always the truth the scientific truth and we don’t care for pisses you off and then Hitchens is pissed and he says well what about if the bell curve turns out to be true and the older and it takes a couple of seconds and you can watch this and they all look down and they all well, you know, and they just moved the conversation quickly on began I a Batman it’s gone my ten years I didn’t know what the bell curve was and so I had a quick Google search of it no it’s racial this part is an IQ and I thought you fucking frauds you fucking liars here you are sitting telling us don’t care we don’t when Oakland incorrect we it’s always wrong science all right would you and then piss top fucking trot, but the bell curve and you all shit your pants and I just that was me don’t know I thought fuck you guys I’m out!

 

[84:10] NEEDS PROOFING

Yeah well again is this cowardice they will they’re the gleefully destroy things as long as they have the permission of the cultural elite to destroy those things and also the rest of the sadism involved now I don’t think, you know, when they say I don’t care about your feelings I think that’s not quite the whole truth I think they do enjoy hurting people there is a sadism in the new atheist he does he does kill about the feelings that people have he wants them to be upset I think there is a tremendous egotism in that whole thing yeah yeah I mean, but even though I find I find that kind of meme I don’t care about your feelings now I think that’s like a real in and that kind of thing because, you know, where I am you go to a pub and you look along with somebody’s girlfriend and, you know, there’s a kind of exchange and you still look I don’t give a shit about your feelings, but you could somebody’s gonna kick your teeth in you it doesn’t work like that you can’t you can’t go up to Muslims, or jews and say it well, you know, what it is I don’t give a fuck about your feelings, because they’re gonna destroy you at the end of it here, but it’s phrased in such a way about the person who says you’ve hurt my feelings is a victim I’m the kind of snowflake in reality the person whose feelings you’ve just offended I’m gonna chop your fucking head off well exactly bitch is the ones that they can yeah it’s very typical and I think Christians have not stood up for themselves they haven’t stood up for their beliefs well I mean, a video about this years ago in the first year of the channel saying it’s a sad thing that you just see Christians giving in and, you know, I know that there’ll be people in there are people in the life chancing they don’t like Christianity that Christ cocks and all that, but it is still it doesn’t really matter whether you like her, or not it was still a belief system IR unifying that bonded people together and gave them spiritual strength in the West and it’s I don’t think you should celebrate their being deconstructed even if you think you’ve got a better alternative to it you should not celebrate the destruction of this thing, because it might well leave us completely fucking naked no, but I like Christian more than I like the new atheist crowd on this kind of X this lying Russian bullshit which is going to demand that I have the similar MAPI for atella elephant, or Iraq than for a human baby, because it’s obviously ridiculous and based on lies.

 

[87:00] NEEDS PROOFING

Our job I’m happier with Christianity the more I am of that, but in the end I think I’m more than each in time, because I’ve never known anything except fucking hardship that’s it it’s them, but no one I’m not even really really religious, but the more I look into this stuff yeah the closer I come the thing and well it’s not that bad, but I am I am well aware of the White nationalist critique of Christianity on it is pretty damning so I always say, or not to be I’m an agnostic I’m not I do really oh cool one way of the other another one one thing I’ll say about is them just to kind of finish it off no no that, because I was in the New Atheists coffee and it was good a few years ago he went on one who was horrible Sunday morning programs these DPA programs again it’s another reason why you need to understand and deconstruct this shit and there was it set up in a certain way where the idea was women’s rights in Islam and how that’s affecting people in the UK they’ll never say it Britain they would just say UK, you know, stare ayah so he’s like a cone resume yeah yeah and so Dawkins is facing off in the really isettas hope is that they’ve got a few plants in the audience who can ask strategic questions loan it and then we had Dawkins and they had this kind of like cartoon figure of an extremist Muslim with a big beard and he’s kind of fat from the owner benefits and he’s wearing his pajamas Lola and then he turned the tokens and he said and then this clips probably on YouTube and he took until Darwin’s on he said yeah well all your women this is important all your women they’re all just holes and they’re running around half naked and doing whatever they want and dorgon’s replied and he said they’re not our women and what you ha ha yeah anything are you fucking Turkey, because what is body it’s that individualist bullshit what’s God on there I wonder too bad that was gonna go what’s happening the Muslim is the Muslim is calling door ends out as being a cook, because the Muslims kind of right the Muslims kind of right Western White women are out of control and from his in his culture beyond and Dawkins has has kind of unset to this by single than, or ours.

 

[90:07] NEEDS PROOFING

Again it’s like yeah he has been accused of not keeping control of his women he replies by saying not only have I not kept control of them they’re no it’s my women so you can’t even I mean, he’s cut and then he’s been and then he’s cuts himself it’s amazing and, because what he’s doing is saying well we’re all individuals they can do whatever they want, but the Muslim was just thinking and he’s looking he’s sitting there with a big fucking grin on his face, because he’s thinking well, you know, what it is I’ve already got my woman, but I’m gonna take your women as well now, because don’t dorgon’s has disavowed his own woman and what’s worse than that if we get back to his kind of scientific work then after I’ve read I’ve read the ancestors em what’s a cool to be the unsexiest healed Dorgan spooky ancestor steel where you trees fuck and I’ve averaged two thousand pages of this prick telling me about the zebra finch the meals are preference needs the females are roughage it goes on and on and on throughout nature and then all of a sudden, because he’s on television and he’s a liberal he disavows it he disavows at all he hasn’t got any women he hasn’t got any fucking females ah oh god it’s just I haven’t got women they’re not our women, you know, it’s so full you just like I don’t think I even hate them it’s just like get the fuck off the stage get the fuck out of the way you stupid old dinosaur you silly old cunt this big pile of liberal dollop of shit we as nationalists should be driving through this shit like a coach and horses this is just waiting to be taken down now it’s, you know, the sceptics on YouTube are sort of that they’re kind of like little offshoots of it but, you know, let’s go for let’s go for let’s take a whole fucking two let’s rip and hold down, because that’s what it’s gonna take, because the gatekeepers, because they’re telling White people oh well if we’re all just individuals it’s not it’s not just Sauron on YouTube and all of that so there’s a much broader thing and it all needs taken down, but also just individuals we don’t have any women it’s you it’s you crazy Muslim with your big beard you are the problem and the Muslims just sitting there thinking Jesus Christ what a fucking faggot!

 

[92:57] NEEDS PROOFING

 

Ha ha ha indeed he just bared his his weakness he’s just displayed it to the Muslim who well, of course, be completely it’s, you know, and then what was all these programs, you know, on that one as well they’ve got like this kind of feminist Muslima in the audience and she stands up and disavows that the kind of masculine Putney are Muslim Lucas, but they’ve got telling Richard Dawkins what women are remote control and she says and so this plant this kind of Muslim obsessed GW feminist plant stands up and she says well, you know, what it is it’s, because of people like you Muslims have a bad name and Muslim women like me we are free and we do what we want and again he’s it’s like he’s sitting there the Alpha thinking do you don’t know you fucking don’t so he’s caught he’s got a Muslim feminist on one side and Richard Dawkins on the earth to serve on his own woman and he knows they’re all full of shit yeah well I suppose I mean, even the westernized Muslim women I believe will completely fall into line once the shit hits the fan oh yeah, but the purpose the purpose of having the feminist sjw Muslima on the program is so that John Bull zombie sitting out in la-la land looks at it and he’s there and, you know, he gets the scary fat Muslim thought benefit Muslim with his pajamas on and then from out the audience he gets like that the young Muslim woman who stands up sees you don’t control us we control our own destiny and then like John Bull and Zombieland thinks oh oh, you know, what it’s gonna be okay look at this modern feminist Muslim I was shitting myself when I saw the bollards going up in the terrorist attacks and the grooming gangs and the hundred and fifty billion dollar budget for terrorism in the country, but now that this little feminists gonna stir up and said hey you won’t control us, it’s gonna be okay we’re gonna survive the Muslims that’s the purpose of yeah is to show that Islam is being cocked by the West Islam is being dissolved by the same nihilistic forces that dissolve Christianity so don’t worry yeah yeah they’re not gonna kill us all yeah it’s gonna be okay a Muslim a Muslim girls startup and fault for a Muslim pantry RV, but the Muslim Patriarca is rock-solid yeah yeah it is and I think it and this is a seriously unnerving fact, you know, because we are not we are not solid we need to get fucking solid, you know, individuals and communities especially as communities to be honest so mr. Fat fat on my taxpayer money is selling them’s pajamas just laughing at this fucking weakness!

 

[96:12] NEEDS PROOFING

 

On the one hand he’s got the White guy Richard Dawkins disavowing his own wall may not lie women now everybody’s and then he’s got this stupid little Muslim teenage girl just talking shit and he thinks this is it this is ours this is ours yeah and we’ve got to make sure that it isn’t theirs I mean, this is a very important thing to emphasize because, you know, and this is the final millennial of the year 2017 I don’t want to end it with despair because, you know, this is essential this is a the fight of our lifetimes the battle that we are going to be involved in whether we like it, or not and for that reason I would say that it’s better to be optimistic than the not certainly about this about this we know we have to have a positive attitude this see I’m always nervous about using the word positive, because it’s, you know, the pause, but we have to have an optimistic attitude about yeah and I think that the yeah, because otherwise and the well more stone, you know, if we believe that we’re gonna fail then we will fail as simple as that so we have to believe even if we turn out to be wrong we have to believe that we are going to win ya know we’re gonna succeed I’m let’s take down let’s take down liberal liars this is my final parting shot look 2017 let’s destroy liberal liars and we’re going to talk about and again this time next year oh yeah will will assuming that my channel survives until this time next year I say that every year, but who knows and if it does get taken down I guess I’ll just start another one, but um yeah I think there is reason for optimism I mean, it’s not entirely of a rational fake it till you make it thing clearly National feeling is on the rise throughout Europe and America and I also think that as a component of that so that it’s still embryonic just now, but it will grow just as the nationalist the Civic nationalist thing was an embryo ten years ago and now it’s far more widespread far far more widespread than it was and within that is the embryo of ethno-nationalism and I think, you know, the developments of the last few months have seen far more mainstream normy types of people becoming involved and that’s becoming voices in this movement and I as I’ve said before I think that is a fantastic sign.

 

[98:55] NEEDS PROOFING

 

Morgs: Okay I think we have to look at it and in a and aware that we are rats in one of those circular mirrors and the atman rationalist we all right if you want to call out whatever we are on the ultra most sort of contours of the mears, but then we’ve still got lots of people lots of other rats it’s terrible now that’s yeah it’s actually terrible way to pull it, but okay I’ll go with and we need to break down and get them finding their way to us as fast as possible we need a prayer kick down them ears and show them the way to our where we are as fast as possible and that’s why I talked about “Holocaust” reality, because that’s key and, you know, people god problems with daily storm and they’ve said this up yeah, but one way you can do it which you’ve got to be in America for is to take it full on and just shit all over the entire morality both together that comes with costs, but there’s other ways around it explain it at people at just explain the paradigm just explain how it works good, but Hitler evil and that White racial consciousness has been shackled to Hitler as Satan we need to snap that we need to break it and move on yeah and so and the way to do that is to have as many voices doing this stuff as possible, because that, you know, that will create it’s own competition it will create it’s own ecosystem and, you know, I think we’ve seen with just this millennial last year it was twenty four this year that’s been 63f week sixty two if we discount the non identitarian guess that I’ve had so we’ve gone from 24 to 62 and that’s clearly fantastic, because it shows how the movement has grown and I think that we need more and more and more and I think we also need to concentrate things like there should be main channels major channels major outlets that we concentrate power in towards to keep them strong to keep them resilient, but I also think that the more voice is the better and so what I would say to people at the end of this season of millennial is it would be nice to have another sixty two channels on next year that podcasts blogs and so on next year people who have not appeared on this one, because they haven’t even started yet I would like you to start and I’d like you to create something and I’d like you to really try don’t do it by half-measures don’t do it and some lazy wait really put your all into it and do your best, because after all what’s at stake here is Western civilization in the future of the White race so don’t fuck around!

 

[101:49] NEEDS PROOFING

 

Yeah I’ll just like to say it before we wind it down that somebody’s making a blog I’m happy to post articles some more was reviewed higher your blog yeah and also you’re going to start your own channel and I think when you’ve done that when you when you’ve got a few videos up you could come back on my channel and sort of to advertise it for people that people know that you’ve got your own channel 9 so I don’t know maybe in a few months from now yeah yeah okay I will oh how I’m actually what I’m my YouTube channel is actually gonna look like I don’t know I think it’s gonna be mouki 10 minute videos nothing nothing fancy effects just me talking about events of the day as oh my god right okay all right well um so we end up there yeah um screw me and take care and Happy New Year everybody okay would you like to leave them with some encouraging words Morgoth hit them hard and hit them often okay all right Thank You Morgoth and this is the end of millennial 2017 I hope you’ve enjoyed it and I hope it’s been used to the community I think it has been and I’ll probably do the same thing next year who knows maybe it’ll be a bit different I’m not sure so okay I’ll put up a few more videos in a few days from now, but that’s it basically so I suppose I should just end it thank you for listening thanks for staying with me thanks for supporting me it’s been a hell of a year and I will need your continued support next year I will be here for you so thank you alright wait millennial 2017 is over thank you for listening.

 

 

 

 

[103:54]

END

 

 

============================================

 

PDF Notes

* Total words = 17,000

* Total images = xx

* Total A4 pages = xx

 

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

 

(Available later)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Version History

 

Version 8: Jan 6, 2017  — Did 6 more minutes of proofing. Total proofed = 48 mins.

 

Version 7: Jan 5, 2017  — Added 5 images. Did 3 more minutes of proofing. Total proofed = 42 mins.

 

Version 6: Jan 4, 2017  — Did 3 more minutes of proofing. Total proofed = 39 mins.

 

Version 5: Jan 3, 2017  — Added 2 images. Total proofed = 36 mins.


Version 4: Jan 2, 2017  — Did 6 more minutes of proofing. Total proofed = 36 mins.

 

Version 3: Jan 1, 2017  — Added 4 images. Did 12 more minutes of proofing. Total proofed = 30 mins.

 

Version 2: Dec 31, 2017  — Added 5 images. Did 12 more minutes of proofing. Total proofed = 18 mins.

 

Version 1: Dec 30, 2017  — Published post. Total proofed = 6 mins.

Read Full Post »

 

[In this video, Probing the Holocaust — The Horror Explained Part 1” some of the most iconic propagandistic film footage used to convince the post-war public that the Germans had carried out an extermination policy against the jews (and others), is analysed in the context of those camps and their conditions that prevailed as the war came to an end. The truthful explanation reveals that the public has been deeply manipulated and deceived by the explanations given in that footage.

This video, although dealing with only one part of the “Holocaust” narrative, forms part of a larger analysis by Revisionists that proves beyond doubt that the “Holocaust” is in fact an ongoing hoax of world historic proportions.

 

For people new to this view, one question that usually comes forward is; how? How could something so massively accepted by the media, governments, churches, academia, and so on, be false, a hoax? The answer is that the alleged victims of the “Holocaust“, the jews, are in fact the very people, as in “organised jewry“, that run our governments behind the facade known as “democracy“. In other words the alleged victims are the very perpetrators of this ongoing hoax of world historic proportions. These people were the “behind the scenes” instigators of both World Wars, and many other wars and false flags, right up to now.

Another question is; why? Why would organised jewry need to create such a hoax, known as the “Holocaust“? The answer is that it:

1) Fulfils jewish religious prophecy of a “Holocaust” or “burnt offering” of six million jews. This will then apparently lead to the return of a jewish Messiah and the establishment of jewish rule over the world.

2) Provided a sympathy pretext for the establishment of the jewish State of  Israel despite it resulting in the Palestinians being dispossessed of their lands through terror.

3)  Demonizes any form of  White nationalism. At first only the “Nazis” were blamed for the “Holocaust“, but then all Germans were, and now the blame for the “Holocaust” is placed on all Whites. Any White group, political party, organisation, etc., that attempts to look after White racial interests by, for example, rejecting mass non-White immigration, is implicitly, or on a sliding scale, explicitly accused of being “Nazi“.

Organized jewry uses their hoax “Holocaust” as a shield against any criticism of their world-wide aggression, and also as a sword to attack and guilt-trip Whites into not defending their right to exist and reject the takeover of their countries by the Third World.

The “Holocaust” needs to be exposed for what it is, a diabolical lie of historic proportions. It also needs to be exposed because that lie is being used by organised jewry as a major part of their arsenal of psychological weapons to genocide Whites out of their homelands and out of existence in the long term KATANA.]

 

_______________________

 

 

Probing the Holocaust

 

The Horror Explained

 

Part 1

 

By

 

Germar Rudolf, Eric Hunt

 

Dec, 2017

 

 

Contents

 

 

__________________________

 

 

The Horror Explained

 

Abstract

 

 

 

The Holocaust” is widely known as the murder of six million Jews by Nazi Germany, many if not most of them in gas chambers deceptively disguised as shower rooms.

 

We have all seen the terrible imagery of dead prisoners taken after concentration camps were liberated. This documentary reviews some of the most memorable of these images, which were taken in camps such as Dachau, Nordhausen and Bergen-Belsen. A closer examination of this imagery we’ve all been exposed to reveals a very different story than what we were made to believe. Surprisingly, a large number of the bodies we were shown were the direct result of Allied bombing and strafing attacks, rather than victims of a systematically planned Nazi exterimnation policy.

 

Probing the Holocaust: The Horror Explained (Part 1) presents surprising information which shed a new light on the horrific imagery and enables many viewers for the first time to truly understand what transpired in Germany during and at the end of the war. Watching this presentation with an open mind will surprise you and leave you asking questions of your own.

 

Download this video documentary:

 

 

Download subtitle files:

 

 

__________________________

 

 

Copyright Notice: This movie has been released to the public domain for educational purposes only. It may be copied and distributed free of charge only. No commercial use is permitted. If copied and distributed, no changes to the movie are permitted without the prior written consent of the author/director of the movie.

 

Note: This video replaces Eric Hunt’s Questioning the Holocaust: Why We Believed, Part 1, which had a number of quality issues.

 

 

To watch the video over at Inconvenient History please click here:

 

Probing the Holocaust: The Horror Explained 

 

 

Transcript

(96:40 mins)

 

 

It’s something we were told throughout our entire lives: Six million Jews, and large numbers of non-Jews, were murdered by the Nazis:

 

[Clips from various film footages:]

 

“Eleven million people died in Nazi Germany’s death camps. Six million were Jews.”

 

 

“An estimated six million Jews were killed during World War II.”

 

 

“Hitler murdered six million Jewish people”

 

 

“six million Jews”

 

 

“six million died”

 

 

“six million people crying from the grave…”

 

 

The term Holocaust commonly refers to the systematically planned and executed extermination of six million Jews by Nazi Germany during World War Two. Mainstream historians agree that, of these six million Jews, approximately three million were killed in gas chambers.

 

 

The vast majority of them, they say, were killed or died in six extermination centers in Polish territory. Here is a break-down of these three million alleged gas chamber victims by each of the six camps.

 

Camp Jewish Gas Chamber Victims
Auschwitz/Oświęcim 900,000*
Treblinka 900,000
Bełzec 500,000
Sobibór 210,000
Kulmhof/Chelmno 240,000
Lublin-Majdanek unknown (thousands)*
Total: 2,750,000 + thousands
* The total Jewish death toll of these camps is higher than the number given due to deaths resulting from other causes (diseases, exhaustion, executions etc.)

 

 

These numbers are an average of figures found on the websites of two of the most reputable Holocaust research institutions, the US Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C., and the Yad Vashem Museum in Jerusalem.[1]

 

 

The Holocaust is so important that the United Nations even decided to create a dedicated memorial day for it. Every January 27th, the day when the infamous Auschwitz Camp was occupied by the Soviet Red Army in 1945, the whole world is reminded to commemorate the victims of the Holocaust.[2]

 

 

 

In 2017, on the occasion of this International Holocaust Remembrance Day, the White House under U.S. President Donald Trump released this statement:[3]

 

 

[It is with a heavy heart and somber mind that we remember and honor the victims, survivors, heroes of the Holocaust. It is impossible to fully fathom the depravity and horror inflicted on innocent people by Nazi terror.

Yet, we know that in the darkest hours of humanity, light shines the brightest.‎ As we remember those who died, we are deeply grateful to those who risked their lives to save the innocent.

In the name of the perished, I pledge to do everything in my power throughout my Presidency, and my life, to ensure that the forces of evil never again defeat the powers of good. Together, we will make love and tolerance prevalent throughout the world.]

 

Stop the video to read it, if you like. There is nothing unusual about the statement, except maybe the fact that Jews aren’t mentioned in it. That triggered quite some vitriolic reactions, for instance from Jonathan Greenblatt, the current head of the Jewish Anti-Defamation League. He tweeted on that same day that Trump did not even mention Jews,[4] which triggered a deluge of similar attacks on the U.S. President for not having expressly mentioned the six million Jewish victims of the Holocaust.[5]

 

 

The White House countered a day later that it wasn’t just Jews who died in the Holocaust, but that five million gentiles were killed, too,[6] who also deserve equal remembrance, referring to an article which had appeared two years earlier in the Huffington Post.[7]

 

 

That in turn unleashed a series of attacks on the president and that 2015 article, claiming that this “five-million-gentiles” victim figure is bogus and vastly over-inflated. Among those, I may quote here The Times of Israel’s take on this death toll:[8]

 

 

It’s a statement that shows up regularly in declarations about the Nazi era. […] It is, however, a number without any scholarly basis. […] The ‘5 million’ [non-Jewish Holocaust victims] has driven Holocaust historians to distraction ever since Wiesenthal started to peddle it in the 1970s. […]

Yehuda Bauer, an Israeli Holocaust scholar […], said he warned his friend Wiesenthal […] about spreading the false notion that the Holocaust claimed 11 million victims – 6 million Jews and 5 million non-Jews.

‘I said to him, ‘Simon, you are telling a lie,’’ Bauer recalled in an interview Tuesday. ‘He said, ‘Sometimes you need to do that to get the results for things you think are essential.’

[…] Wiesenthal […] told them that he chose the 5 million number carefully: He wanted a number large enough to attract the attention of non-Jews who might not otherwise care about Jewish suffering, but not larger than the actual number of Jews who were murdered in the Holocaust, 6 million.

It caught on: […]

Deborah Lipstadt, a professor of Holocaust studies at Emory University in Atlanta, wrote in 2011 […] ‘this number is simply inaccurate, in fact made up […].’

 

 

Deborah Lipstadt went over the top, however, by accusing Trump of flirting with Holocaust denial.[9]

 

So, here we seem to have a case where a prominent Jew, the late Simon Wiesenthal, inflated the number of Holocaust victims for political purposes.

 

But did Wiesenthal really invent that number? And was he the only one exaggerating numbers?

 

During and right after the end of the Second World War, a number of war propaganda movies were filmed with the support or even under the control of the U.S. government. Throughout these propaganda movies, there are many references to the thousands and even millions of victims of National Socialist barbarism – yet none of these films ever single out Jews as the primary victims of a “Holocaust.”

 

 

[05:11]

 

The most infamous among those propaganda movies was titled Die Todesmühlen,[10] which was designed for, and eventually shown to, German audiences as a tool for shock-and-awe re-education. It was later also released in an English edition: Death Mills.[11] Both movies mention as the death toll of National Socialist persecution 20 million without making any specific reference to Jews:[12]

 

But these eleven hundred were a small fraction of the twenty million men, women and children murdered by the Nazis. 20 million human beings, equal to the population of 22 American states. 20 million corpses.”

 

In fact, the narrator insists that the victims were:

 

of all the nations of Europe, of all religious faiths, of all political beliefs, condemned by Hitler because they were anti-Nazi.[13]

 

This is only the most prominent example. There are more which highlight that death toll claims of National Socialist persecution have a history of exceeding the six million, and that Jews have been mentioned with regularity as only one among many victim groups.

 

This issue is also not just a matter of journalists and propagandists making up wild figures. In 2015, in a book about the forensic examination of mass-murder locations of the Holocaust, a British archaeologist who has been working with the leading scientists in the field for several years wrote, quote:[14]

 

The exact number of people killed during the Holocaust remains unknown. Some scholars have suggested a figure of around 11 million. Of these, it is estimated that approximately six million Jews were killed but the number of Roma, Sinti, disabled people, political prisoners and others killed cannot be estimated with complete certain[t]y.

 

She provides no source for that claim, though. So maybe she merely repeated what she had heard through Wiesenthal’s grapevine? But is it really Wiesenthal’s? Interestingly, the very same Washington Holocaust Museum that, according to just-quoted article in The Times of Israel, issued a statement on Trump’s text emphasizing the centrality of the annihilation of the Jews to the understanding of the Holocaust, had announced in 2013 in a press release that their research has revealed that:

 

The Nazi Holocaust may have claimed up to 20 million lives,

 

while leaving the 6-million Jewish death toll basically unchanged.[15] This would mean that as many as 14 million non-Jews died in the Holocaust, not just five.

 

I may also point out that 20 million is not the ceiling of death-toll estimates. For instance, an article of Sept. 21, 1992, from Germany’s most prestigious daily newspaper, the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (p. 13), illustrates in a very useful manner the kind of topic we are dealing with and the problems that are related to it. The title of the article translates to “Traces of the Crime; Shoes, Shoes, even Children’s Shoes.” It is a report written by a student about his visit to the Stutthof concentration camp not far from Danzig, in postwar Poland, that has been turned into a museum. The author, in his fourth sentence, states that he cannot imagine what an extermination camp might look like and talks of, quote, “installations in which ‘6 million Jews and a total of 26 million detainees […] were killed,’” unquote. So here we have a combination of the general 20 million victims plus six million Jews.

 

At the end of his account the author writes that he found himself facing, quote;

 

the remains of the most brutal genocide, the highly modern killing machines of the time, the cruelest crime of humanity,” unquote

 

By putting things that way, one of the most highly regarded newspapers in the world has given its definition of the Holocaust. The annihilation of a total of 26 million people by the National Socialists in ultra-modern killing machines is the cruelest crime in the history of humanity.

 

So, how many victims were there now? Six million Jews plus a few others, or eleven in total, or twenty, or even twenty-six million?

 

At most one of these figures can be correct, but with all this speculation going on, it may turn out that they are all wrong. But if that is so, what is the truth? Can you tell?

 

One thing is for sure: we obviously cannot believe everything we hear about the Holocaust, because the things we hear often contradict one another.

 

[09:56]

 

Let’s start at the beginning, with the documentary “Nazi Concentration and Prison Camps” that the Americans introduced during the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg in 1945 as proof of Nazi atrocities. Psychologically speaking, it was one of the most powerful pieces of evidence submitted, because a picture tells more than a thousand words. Here are some scenes about the Dachau Camp. Dachau was one of the first major camps the Americans captured toward the end of the war:[16]

 

Hanging in orderly rows were the clothes of prisoners who had been suffocated in a lethal gas chamber. They had been persuaded to remove their clothing under the pretext of taking a shower for which towels and soap were provided. This is the Brausebad, the shower bath. Inside the shower bath, the gas vents.

 

Actually, what you are seeing here are not gas vents but recessed light fixtures.

 

On the ceiling, the dummy showerheads. In the engineer’s room, the intake and outlet pipes. Push buttons to control inflow and outtake of gas. A hand valve to regulate pressure. Cyanide powder was used to generate the lethal smoke.

 

Interestingly, on August 19, 1961, a letter to the editors by German mainstream historian Martin Broszat was published in Germany’s biggest weekly newspaper Die Zeit stating, among other things:

 

Jews or other inmates were gassed neither in Dachau nor in Bergen-Belsen nor in Buchenwald. The gas chamber at Dachau was never fully completed and taken into ‘operation.’

 

On January 24, 1993, the famous Nazi hunter Simon Wiesenthal wrote in a letter to the editors of the U.S. military magazine Stars and Stripes in the same vein:

 

A gas chamber was in the process of being built at Dachau, but it was never completed.

 

Thus, between the 1960s and late 1990s, the Dachau Museum had a sign displayed inside the Dachau gas chamber stating:

 

Gas Chamber, disguised as a shower room never used as a gas chamber.

 

Today, however, this sign is no longer there. Instead, a less-visible text on a sign outside that room states:

 

Gas chamber

This was the center of potential mass murder. The room was disguised as ‘showers’ and equipped with fake shower spouts to mislead the victims and prevent them from refusing to enter the room.

 

Currently, the US Holocaust Museum itself admits, quote:[17]

 

There is no credible evidence that the gas chamber in Barrack X was used to murder human beings.

 

Barrack X was the official name for the crematorium building where that sinister room was located.

 

One of the leading books by mainstream historians on the gas chamber question, the 1993 collective tome Nazi Mass Murder, states on page 202:[18]

 

It has not yet been conclusively proved that killings by poison gas took place at the Dachau concentration camp.

 

And on page 203, we read:

 

But during the trial there was only one witness, a Czech physician assigned to care for the prisoners, Dr. Frantisek Blaha, who declared that experimental gassings had taken place in the Dachau gas chamber.

 

Blaha signed an affidavit on January 9, 1946, in which he described his experience with the Dachau gas chamber. It is in German, but an English translation was read into the record during the Nuremberg Tribunal as follows:[19]

 

Many executions by gas or shooting or injections took place right in the camp. The gas chamber was completed in 1944, and I was called by Dr. Rascher to examine the first victims. Of the eight or nine persons in the chamber there were three still alive, and the remainder appeared to be dead. Their eyes were red, and their faces were swollen. Many prisoners were later killed in this way.

 

And that’s it. If Blaha was the only witness on trial testifying about the gas chamber, and if he had no experience whatsoever about the gassing procedure, then how did the American documentary makers know that the victims;

 

had been persuaded to remove their clothing under the pretext of taking a shower for which towels and soap were provided?

 

Only a few days after the liberation of the Dachau Camp, a number of U.S. Congressmen visited the camp. Here they are shown inside the gas chamber. And this is footage taken in 2016. As you can see, the ceiling of that room is rather low. In fact, the room is roughly 2.15 meters or seven feet high. Why do I mention this? Because an official U.S. commission investigated what had transpired at Dachau, and in a report to the U.S. Congress dated May 15, 1945, compiled by David Chavez, we read, among other things, that in this room “the ceiling was some 10 feet in height[20]

 

[15:32]

 

How can anyone confuse seven feet with ten feet? But that’s not all, because that report continues as follows:

 

The supply of gas into the chamber was controlled by means of two valves on one of the outer walls, and beneath the valves was a small glass-covered peephole through which the operator could watch the victims die. The gas was let into the chamber through pipes terminating in perforated brass fixtures set into the ceiling.

 

However, the ceiling did NOT have brass fixtures, but merely zinc-plated iron showerheads. Furthermore, as can be seen in this photo of a spot where a showerhead had been removed by the Americans as a piece of evidence, these were merely fake showerheads – or rather watering can rosettes such as this – that were not connected to anything. Already the documentary we watched earlier said that there was:

 

A hand valve to regulate pressure.

 

But there’s a problem. Zyklon B, which was allegedly used for the murder, was not a gas under pressure that could be fed into pipes. It consisted of gypsum pellets soaked with liquid hydrogen cyanide, the active ingredient in Zyklon B. When such a can was opened, its poison evaporated slowly.

 

In addition, from many cases of accidental poisoning with hydrogen cyanide, and from executions with that poison as they were carried out in several U.S. states during the 20th century, we know that the victims Blaha claimed to have examined cannot have succumbed to Zyklon B. Such victims do not have red eyes. They do not have swollen faces. Actually, if they show any symptoms, it is a pinkish-reddish discoloration of their skin as shown here.

 

It is clear that the Americans, when making their documentaries and congressional reports, were jumping to a lot of conclusions, contradicting each other and the material facts in the process. But what’s the truth here?

 

The tubing shown in the American documentary is really impressive. Such heavy tubing with cast-iron hand valves are commonly used for piping large amounts of chemical liquids or pressurized gas. The design of this tubing was investigated by the French officer Capitaine Fribourg a week after the camp’s liberation. Here is a sketch drawn by him showing how the piping worked. According to this, fresh air was sucked in through this intake vent, which protrudes through the roof. This intake pipe is subsequently led through a heat exchanger located over the gas chamber in the building’s attic. Here, the air is heated by the building’s hot-water heating system. After that, the now-insulated pipe is split into two and led out of the attic area into the room behind the gas chamber, where both pipes are led in a semi-circle, each of which equipped with the hand valves shown. Leading back into the attic area over the gas chamber, Fribourg shows the pipes being merged back into the outgoing pipe, but that would make no sense at all, because then the air would go nowhere. Therefore, that’s a mistake. In fact, a report compiled by German architect Axel Will in the early 2000s, a copy of which we received from the Dachau Museum, described in detail that the layout actually looks like this. Will wrote:

 

Air is drawn in via a pipeline of 400 mm diameter extending over the roof, and is then led through a steam-operated heat exchanger. The pipeline is insulated behind the heat exchanger. It is split into two lines by means of a y-branch pipe, and leads with two pipes of 200 mm diameter into the room adjoining the gas chamber. There the airflow can be adjusted with a valve each. Both these and the other two valves of the ventilation system are made of massive cast iron and carry a $ sign in a circle. Such valves are common in gas pipelines but not in ventilation systems.

Behind the valves both pipelines are again led back into the attic area above the gas chamber and merged back together into one pipe. This pipe enters a sheet-metal shaft, which again goes through the adjoining room and leads the heated air to the air intake at the floor of the gas chamber.

This sheet-metal shaft is not insulated. This raises questions. Design logic suggests that this shaft would be the suitable location to add substances [such as Zyklon B] to the heated air prior to entering the gas chamber. The examination of the sheet-metal shaft has so far not revealed any opening for such a manipulation. Yet the missing insulation points to such a possibility.

 

 

[20:13]

 

So much from architect Will.

 

The air exhaust system starts with two openings in the ceiling. From there, the two non-insulated exhaust pipes merge into one, and are led toward the wall to the room behind the gas chamber, where the pipe splits up into two again. Then it is led outside in a semi-circle equipped with two hand valves, and led back into the attic area, where it is merged again into one pipe, as can be seen in this photo taken in the attic of that building. Then that merged pipe is fed into the electric blower that drives the whole operation, here visible in another attic photo, and from there out the exhaust chimney, which exits the roof here.

 

Now, if that gas chamber was meant to be operated with Zyklon B, it would have been smart, as architect Will correctly suggested, to equip the sheet-metal shaft running down the wall of the adjacent room with some trap door – hinted at here with blue lines – allowing for Zyklon B to be inserted into some kind of basket inside the shaft, hinted at here with the red meshwork. That way, the constant stream of warm air would have evaporated the poison gas quickly and would have spread it out inside the room rapidly. But, as architect Will correctly observed in his report, there is no trace of any provision to that effect.

 

So, the poison was neither administered using the false showerheads, as the congressional report claimed, nor using the ventilation system, as the U.S. documentary that was shown during the Nuremberg Tribunal suggested. But how else could it have been done? Here is the story as we are told today:

 

they would pour Zyklon B down these slots right here, and onto the floor.[21]

 

Rocks with Zyklon B could be inserted from the outside[22]

 

Here are some photos of these slots from the inside and from the outside. So, the entire sophisticated ventilation system did not serve any other purpose than moving air around. Why then was it so complicated? It makes no sense at all! It would have been much easier to simply feed the heated air directly into the shaft going into the chamber, as shown here, and to feed the exhaust pipes directly into the blower, using the blower’s speed to adjust for any needed change in air volume. For now, this entire ventilation system seems to be a nonsensical mystery.

 

But that’s not the only one. Fact is, that neither the congressional report nor the postwar documentary mentions these Zyklon B slots. In fact, David Chavez, the main author of the congressional report, had compiled an earlier version of this report that did not get submitted. It stated:[23]

 

 

Gas Chamber. Gas tight doors. Wooden shed believed to contain pump or compressor.

 

 

This wooden shed located just outside the alleged gas chamber can be seen in many photos and film footages shot right after the liberation. It was located where today the two Zyklon B slots are located. But according to Chavez, it did not contain any slots, but rather some not clearly identified equipment.

 

The French officer Capitaine Fribourg describing the facility on May 25, 1945 as he claims to have seen it on May 5, 1945, hence, a week after the camp’s capture by the Americans, also mentioned the wooden shed as follows:

 

Right next to the shower room, adjacent to the building, is a palisade some 2 meters high fencing off a space of 2 m wide. It was not possible to get inside due to the presence of a pile of decomposing corpses stacked up against the palisade.

 

and

 

behind the palisade is said to have existed or exists a compressor group (?)

 

He also described two slots in the wall obscured by this shed from the outside as follows:

 

At about 75 cm from the ground, 2 hoppers connect the shower room with the outside (palisade side). Each hopper ends on the inside with a grate, and on the outside with a movable shutter system.

 

That’s also what we see there today. Fribourg even included those hoppers in one of his sketches.

 

If we look at the outside of this wall in that location today, we can see these strange features. It may have been the electrical outlet for the device operated in that shed.

 

Looking closer at the Zyklon-B slots, we notice that the mortar around them is not original. The original mortar used to build Barrack X contains coarse gravel rather than sand, while any mortar used around the Zyklon-B slots, and on later repairs and patch-ups, as we can see them here, are made of mortar containing fine sand. Here we can even see how some of the new mortar flowed over the old mortar.

 

[25:01]

 

On the inside, it is apparent that the tiles around those slots have been damaged. In fact, a simple test with the finger nail shows that these rough surfaces aren’t even tiles. They are plaster made to look similar to the tiles around them.

 

In other words, those slots are not part of the original building. They were added later on by hacking holes through the existing wall.

 

Who did that change, and when was it done? Chavez didn’t mention them, and neither did the U.S. documentary on Dachau of May 3rd. Fribourg saw them two days later, but he did not claim that they were used to throw in Zyklon B. That wouldn’t have been a good idea anyway, because a large amount of the gypsum pellets would have gotten stuck on the grill on the inside. But what were those slots used for? Or is it a post-war forgery?

 

And if that is so, what else is?

 

Here is one hint. This footage was recorded on October 25, 2017 from the website of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. When searching their video archive for the term “gas chamber” the first result is this video. It’s titled “Exhumation; inspection of gas chambers; Lt. Hodges.

 

This is footage taken after the liberation of Paris of an alleged “Gestapo Torture Chamber” near the Eiffel Tower. In the description, we read:

 

World War II interiors of gas chamber used by the Germans in the execution of prisoners. Demonstrating method of securing prisoners in gas chambers. Various Close-ups, pipes leading into room.

 

And;

 

hand prints and scratches dug into cement wall of gas chamber by the victims.

 

Here are those ominous pipes. They are rather fancy, but not very functional. Most of all, they would have been within reach of the victims, and wouldn’t have survived very long, because they would have been demolished very quickly. Also notice all those windows illuminating this room. How long would those window panes have lasted if the victims inside trashed the place and tried to break out?

 

For that footage, they even pumped some innocuous, but dramatic-looking smoke through the pipes.

 

Here are the handprints in the cement, allegedly created by gassing victims during their death throes. Needless to say, handprints can only be made in fresh mortar, and only insane people would use a room as an execution chamber whose walls had just been plastered.

 

These gas pipes and handprints are not evidence of Nazi atrocities, they are evidence of a deliberate Allied psychological warfare campaign to demonize the defeated Germans. Because this hoax is so obvious, no mainstream historian has ever taken that claim seriously. That does not prevent the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum from presenting it to an unsuspecting audience, though. Unfortunately, most people just accept whatever the government, media, or religion tell them to believe.

 

So, what was necessary for the Americans, who had liberated Paris several months earlier, to create that footage? First of all, they must have had a plan. Then, they must have had at their disposal the necessary hardware to create the film set: pipes, smoke-generating devices, and some workers able to install that hardware and to create a cement wall with handprints.

 

In contrast to that utterly unknown Gestapo torture chamber in Paris, Dachau was one of the best-known German concentration camps. It was the first one to be opened right after the Nazis came to power. When the Americans finally moved in in April 1945, this camp had dominated the fantasy of Nazi opponents for more than a decade. So, did the American psychological warfare executives have a plan? You bet they did! And did they come with hardware and workers to put that plan into action? If they did it in Paris in January 1945, they surely were even more likely to pull it off at Dachau, which was a much more promising propaganda stage.

 

So, let me ask again: why are these fanciful pipes in Dachau so impressive and even intimidating, but at the same time so completely useless and pointless?

 

Before we jump to conclusions, let’s look at some wartime documents. First, there are the two photos shown earlier taken some time in 1944. On both, we can see the ventilation chimney that’s part of the gas chamber’s aeration system. So at least that exhaust chimney was built by the Germans prior to the end of the war. Next, among the few original documents available on that building, there are two blueprints of special interest. This one shows a cross section through the gas chamber. It shows that the ceiling is indeed only some 7 ft high, not 10 ft, as the rest of the building.[24] Next, a section enlargement of this document shows the floor plan of the gas chamber.[25]

 

[29:51]

 

As we can see, both doors are 90 cm wide and consist either of two doors each, one opening inward, the other outward, or of a swinging door. Either way, such an arrangement would not have been suitable for a gas chamber, as swinging doors could neither be made gas tight nor panic-proof, and in case this layout consisted of two doors, the inner one opening inward could not have been opened if dead bodies were piled up against it inside the chamber. Such an arrangement is actually common for morgues. For instance, the blueprints of the morgue in the old crematorium at Auschwitz show the same type of door design.

 

Today, this room is equipped with two heavy steel doors of the type that were quite common for air-raid shelters. The doors are one meter wide and set in steel frames. The same doors are shown in the U.S. footage recorded on May 3, 1945, hence just five days after the camp was captured by the Americans. They were therefore most likely built in there long before the Americans arrived. Also, one of the walls actually consists of two layers with a hollow space in between, which is typically used as insulation, something also seen at the above-mentioned Auschwitz morgue.

 

Hence, it looks like this room was initially meant to serve as a morgue. In fact, the striking feature of this building is that, if we discard the idea that this alleged gas chamber served as a morgue, this building has no other room of a suitable size equipped with a ventilation system.

 

But if that is so, what about the weird, oversized piping? And what about those heavy doors? And what about the shafts on the outside, evidently added after the building was completed?

 

And what about the peephole in the rear wall which Capitaine Fribourg described in his report? He even drew a sketch of it. It slanted rather steeply downward, hence it wouldn’t have allowed anyone to see anything except for maybe the feet of a few people standing or lying close to that hole.

 

The hole inside that gas chamber that is said to have been the other end of that peephole can be seen to this day, although it is way higher than what Fribourg reported, who in his sketch placed the peephole below the second little port visible on that wall, close to the floor. Today, neither the peephole’s exit nor the switches are visible in the adjoining room. The switch panel and switch box are shown in the footage recorded on May 3, 1945 for the U.S. documentary. But that documentary neither shows nor mentions that peephole. There is, however, a photograph of that area from May 1945 showing not only the switch panel and switch box plus some of the insulated pipes and hand valves, but also a crude opening in the wall just beneath the switch panel. If we compare that image with a still of the footage just shown, we see:

 

a) that the lid of the switch box to the left has disappeared;

b) and more importantly, the upper, rugged edge of the hole in the photo should also be visible in the still, but it isn’t. Therefore, somebody must have hacked that hole in there after the documentary was shot.

 

Here is how that hole looks on the inside, seen from the gas chamber. It does indeed angle upward. In the background you see bricks and mortar used by the museum to close up that gaping hole in the adjoining room. Inside this tube runs an electric cable put in there when the room was prepared as a museum exhibit.

 

What we see here is the fact that, since the camp’s liberation on April 29, 1945, quite a few people seem to have tampered with the evidence of this suspected crime scene. It’s difficult to assess what this hole was really used for. A peephole, however, would have been installed in the doors, as was and is common for air-raid shelter doors, rather than hacked through a thick brick wall, and it most certainly would not have slanted downward.

 

So, is the Dachau gas chamber a post-war fraud? Considering that the camp was liberated on April 29 and that the gas chamber was inspected by four members of the U.S. Congress only 3 days later, on May 2nd, this seems to be not enough time for a major fraud.

 

In fact, there is evidence pointing in a different direction. Most importantly, there is a letter in the German Federal Archives by Dr. Sigmund Rascher to Heinrich Himmler dated August 9, 1942, which reads:[26]

 

As you know, the same facility as at Linz is being built at the Dachau concentration camp. Since the ‘transports of invalids’ end up in certain chambers anyway, I ask whether the effect of our various combat gases can be tested on people who are destined for that anyway? So far, all we have are experiments with animals, or reports on accidents during the production of these gases. Because of this paragraph, I am sending my letter marked ‘Secret.’

 

Dr. Rascher was the infamous doctor who conducted medical experiments on inmates at Dachau, which were among the crimes prosecuted by the American occupational powers after the war in the famous “Medical Case” of the Nuremberg Trials of War Criminals. While there was plenty of evidence for a variety of experiments on human guinea pigs such as exposure to low air pressure and extended submersion in cold water, tests of combat gases at Dachau were not among the charges. There was simply too little evidence to make that case.

 

[35:16]

 

We may speculate that Dr. Rascher had indeed tried to re-rig the morgue of Barrack X for the potential testing of combat gases, with those shafts perhaps simply serving as air-intake shafts for a better ventilation, since the room had no windows. But since Dr. Rascher was arrested by the German police in April 1944 and eventually executed for a number of crimes, child abduction and murder among them, that project, if it ever existed, ended up being abandoned at that point at the latest. When the Americans arrived a year later, the room was nothing more than a morgue, filled with the victims of diseases and malnutrition, which could not be cremated due to the lack of fuel.

 

For the time being, any answer to the question what these strange objects were meant for remains speculation to a large degree, because almost the entire original paperwork regarding the planning and construction of that building – cost estimates, progress reports, blueprints, invoices etc. – have disappeared from the Dachau camp archives. Only a few, not very informative documents are left, such as the ones we just saw plus a few others. So, either the Nazis destroyed them because they had something to hide, or the Americans confiscated and/or destroyed them, because they wanted to prevent anyone from figuring out what that room really looked like and was used for.

 

At Dachau, imagery of a gas chamber disguised as a shower room was driven into our minds.

 

Dachau is where the world came to believe the rumors and saw what we believed to be evidence of well-engineered German machinery, capable of gassing with precision and efficiency.

 

So, if that gas chamber wasn’t what we are told, or at least wasn’t used at all for mass executions, why were there massive amounts of clothes hanging in its vicinity when the Americans arrived?

 

Hanging in orderly rows were the clothes of prisoners, who had been suffocated in a lethal gas chamber. They have been persuaded to remove their clothing under the pretext of taking a shower for which towels and soap were provided.

 

Actually, these are clothes airing outside the Dachau disinfestation chambers. The narrator merely claims that this is the clothing of homicidal gas chamber victims. Then they deceptively cut to the shower room door, making the viewer believe they are the same door; the one with the obvious written gas warnings on it and the supposed gas chamber, disguised as a shower room, designed to trick those entering.

 

The hoaxers showed film of these disinfestation gas chambers for fumigating clothing, located at the end of the building. They claimed these doors, clearly marked with warning signs and skull and crossbones, were used to gas prisoners.

 

This is where the disinfestation chambers are and the doors clearly marked with warnings. But the “shower room,” the alleged gas chamber, is located a few rooms away. The deception was to trick the average viewer into thinking, the clearly marked delousing chamber door with skull and crossbones located at the end of the building was the same as the shower room door. This dirty deception continues to this day.

 

For example, take this 2012 documentary on Dachau by filmmaker Levi Mierau. After showing the gas chamber and describing how it allegedly worked, he, too, deceptively cuts to the disinfestation chamber while continuing his narration about homicidal gassing. Watch it:[27]

 

A door labeled shower bath went into a large room, which is meant to deceive, since the room was not actually a shower room but a gas chamber. The room consisted of outlets in the walls, floor and roof.

 

Stoooop! Outlets in the floor and roof? These showerheads weren’t an outlet for anything, and those six drains in the floor are actually real drains, which indicates that the room was originally designed to handle a lot of water, not gas.

 

Fast forward a few seconds, we have this footage:[28]

 

Rocks with poison gas pellets named Zyklon B could be inserted from the outside. Since the gas chambers were only built during the camp’s last months, only seven were killed in the gas chambers used as test subjects.

 

So, while showing the disinfestation chambers, Levi deceptively talks about gas chambers, in the plural, used to kill seven people.

 

[39:50]

 

The same kind of deception is committed by the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum on its website (capitalization added):

 

View of THE door of THE gas chamber in Dachau.[29]

An American soldier stands outside of THE gas chamber in Dachau[30]

View of THE door to THE gas chamber at Dachau next to a large pile of uniforms.[31]

THE door to THE gas chamber in Dachau. It is marked ‘showerbath.’[32]

View of THE door to THE gas chamber in the Dachau concentrations camp. A sign above it identifies it as a shower.[33]

 

The US Holocaust Museum uses the singular “the” to imply, both of these doors were the same door of the same homicidal gas chamber, disguised as a shower room.

 

They show the outside of the clothing fumigation chamber doors, located at the end of the building, then show the inside of the shower room door, located all the way over here. There are four disinfestation chambers, not one.

 

But they chose photographs which show one door and used the singular “the” and mix it with images of the shower room. You can see the disinfestation chambers had warnings not to enter and marks designating when clothing fumigations started and when it was safe to open the doors again.

 

Here they refer to this as “a” gas chamber,[34] of course ignoring that it was one of the four used to delouse clothing.

 

The photograph’s caption reveals the early propaganda lies, still perpetrated today.

 

Gas Room – People were hung up in here.

 

These hooks were not used to hang people in gas chambers. They were just hooks for clothing, of course.

 

View of the hooks outside the door to the gas chambers in Buchenwald.[35]

 

First, this isn’t even Buchenwald. This is a photo of a Dachau delousing chamber.

 

The original caption reads:

 

Buchenwald was the home of Ilse Koch, wife of the commandant. She was known as the ‘bitch of Buchenwald,’ an insult to every dog who ever lived. She had her inmates tattooed in various designs, then had them killed, then skinned and their hides tanned to make book bindings, lamp shades, and other articles. I saw these things! One story has it that she enjoyed sexual intercourse with her victims – this may be apocryphal. These ‘meat hooks’ were used on the bodies of humans!

 

Just about every claim in this miscaptioned photo is false. This example illuminates the typical hysterical propaganda common at the time and still repeated today by a government-funded institution. In reality, these alleged “meat hooks” are just hangers for clothes to air out after passing through the fumigation chambers.

 

This complex machinery sure looked like it would be something we’d expect in German-designed death chambers. But because this equipment could NOT be used to introduce Zyklon-B fumes into the chamber, today we are told the Germans instead just dumped the pesticide pellets onto the room’s floor through these vents in the outside wall. This is quite odd, because the disinfestation chambers right down the hall actually did have advanced specially designed mechanisms to properly heat and circulate cyanide gas from the Zyklon B pesticide pellets.

 

This was called the DEGESCH circulatory device made by the manufacturer of Zyklon B.[36] A member of a clothing fumigation crew would put a can of Zyklon B into the holder. A built-in can opener operated from the outside with a crank would open the can. The pellets would drop down a chute into a basket where hot air would be blown through to speed the release of cyanide gas from the pellets. The pesticide would be spread throughout the clothing fumigation chamber, and when finished, the gas would be removed from the chamber and fresh air blown in.

 

One should be very skeptical upon learning that today the official story is that the Germans, rather than using something like this specially designed device used in the clothing delousing chambers right down the hall, simply poured Zyklon B pellets through holes in the wall. Such a procedure would have been very detrimental, because once those pellets were inside the room, they could not have been removed, unless the room had been cleared of all the corpses. Since Zyklon B releases its poison for an hour or more, depending on temperature and humidity,[37] this means that any effort to swiftly ventilate the room after an execution would have been in vain.

 

Hence, these shafts, if they were added during the war within the framework of Dr. Rascher’s testing frenzy, may simply have been designed to assist the ventilation of that room.

 

Anyway, this is not exactly the advanced German engineering we are constantly propagandized with, is it?

 

In the face of overwhelming evidence that this room was never used to gas anyone, mainstream historians now claim that the inmates employed to build this gas chamber managed to sabotage its completion by dawdling on the job for some three years, or so we read in the original French edition of Paul Berben’s “official history” of the camp, quote:[38]

 

The Dachau gas chamber, however, never functioned because to a certain extent, it seems, of sabotage carried out by the team of prisoners given the job to build it.

 

[45:13]

 

So, the narration of the Nuremburg trial evidence film “Nazi Concentration Camps” was completely wrong. This clothing did not belong to inmates suffocated in the gas chamber. This was just clothing which passed through the real gas chambers for delousing clothes and was airing out.

 

This deceptive narration of the Dachau segment is an important part of the falsehoods in the Nuremberg trials film evidence center piece.

 

This bizarre practice of calling shower rooms gas chambers continues to this day. We can see on the website of Israel’s Holocaust Museum “Yad Vashem” a photograph of the actual inmate shower room at the Dachau Camp captioned:

 

“A gas chamber after the liberation.[39]

 

This is just another real shower.

 

Flossenbürg, Germany, Gas chambers, which were called showers.[40]

 

This claim is repeated on the “HistoryWiz” web site “The Final Solution”. The photograph is captioned:[41]

 

The final destination for those who could not work, the gas chamber – here, the gas chamber at Flossenburg.

 

The hoaxers pulled the same old trick angle in the camera to block out the many windows of this real working shower room. The top official authorities today concede this room was a real shower, never used to gas anyone. Moreover, no mainstream historian has ever claimed that there was a homicidal gas chamber at the Flossenbürg Camp.

 

This doesn’t stop Israel’s Holocaust Museum and others from spreading gas shower nonsense. The “HistoryWiz” website presents an important quote:

 

To be ignorant of history is to remain always a child. – Cicero

 

That certainly holds true for those who childishly and ignorantly believe showers were gas chambers.

 

A major reason we believed in the stories of the showers of death is the terrible images of corpses taken at the end of the war. But those horrific images of emaciated and dead prisoners are not proof of an extermination program.

 

This special presentation of the Oprah Winfrey Show is brought to you with limited commercial interruption. It is supported in part by the new AT&T, committed to education.

I am here in Poland at the Auschwitz death camp, where it is estimated that 1.1 to 1.5 million people perished here in the Holocaust.

 

At an early age, you were probably already exposed to a program like this.[42] Documentaries such as this one are specifically aimed at young people. You can even see this copy was taken from a website called “School Tube”. Videos like this shock their audience by showing atrocious imagery which, if it were fiction, would be rated unsuitable for children.

 

That evil has a name: The Holocaust. A systematic mass murder meticulously planned and executed by Nazi Germany that brutally wiped millions of people off the face of the earth. More than six million of those human beings were Jewish.

 

But since this imagery is real, it is not rated unsuitable for children, although it is even more traumatizing exactly because it is real. However, hardly anyone, let alone a child, has the ability or experience to analyze the context of this imagery. This horrific film footage of emaciated corpses is presented with no context other than the claim that they are proof of a systematic extermination policy.

 

The Holocaust. A systematic mass murder meticulously planned and executed…

 

These images, however, were taken at the very end of the war. Mainstream historians claim, however, that any extermination activity had ceased in those camps in October of 1944 at the latest, based on an affidavit by German SS officer Kurt Becher, in which he quoted an order allegedly issued by Himmler in September of 1944 as follows:[43]

 

I prohibit any annihilation of Jews with immediate effect, and on the contrary order the nursing of weak and sick persons. I hold you (with this, Kaltenbrunner and Pohl were meant) personally responsible for this, even if this order is not strictly followed by subordinate departments.

 

Both Kaltenbrunner and Pohl were top officials of the concentration camp system. No trace of that Himmler order has ever been found, but that’s beside the point I want to make here. When we look at what was really going on in those camps, we are in for a surprise. Here is a chart showing the number of inmate deaths at Dachau as recorded first by the German authorities and then by the Americans. It clearly shows that mortality exploded at a time when Hitler’s extermination policy is said to have been abandoned. The same happened at the Bergen-Belsen Camp, where mortality exploded only in early 1945, as can be seen from this chart exhibited today at the Bergen-Belsen museum.

 

[50:12]

 

The reason for that was severe overcrowding combined with the disastrous collapse of food and water supplies as well as medical care and hygienic measures, which taken together caused malnutrition, starvation, and fatal diseases such as typhus and dysentery to spread out of control.

 

In those months, the Allies bombed Germany’s entire infrastructure to smithereens, including the supply lines into the camps. Shipments of medicine, sanitation supplies and food into the camps, power plants and water treatment plants were systematically bombed, and in some cases, they even bombed the actual camps. Not only Jewish concentration camp prisoners struggled and perished during the final months of World War II. For months upon months, the German civilian population was the target of an unprecedented fire-bombing campaign by the western Allies. From Hamburg to Dresden, tens of thousands of innocent German civilians were deliberately targeted and murdered. Women and children were burned alive, and terrified families suffocated from poison gas in bomb shelters. They don’t ever show you these pictures, do they? You should ask why, though.

 

Anyway, many Germans who survived became refugees running for their lives, and also struggled to feed themselves.

 

In the east, German civilian populations were also fleeing the invading Soviet army which was torturing and murdering civilians en masse. The Red Army raped untold numbers of German women from young children to the elderly.

 

Using these horrific images, the catastrophic last days of a collapsing Germany surrounded on all sides and bombed to smithereens, as proof of deliberate extermination camps is the dirty trick that is the main reason people believe in the Holocaust.

 

It’s why many react strongly against those critically investigating mainstream Holocaust claims. After all, we all saw the bodies, right? These images were taken in camps liberated by the western Allies, primarily Dachau, liberated by the Americans, and Bergen-Belsen, liberated by the British – camps which are today admitted, even by mainstream historians, not to have served as extermination or death camps.

 

Today, all of the so-called death camps or extermination camps are claimed to have been in Polish territories conquered by the Soviet Union.

 

Early witnesses originally claimed these western-liberated camps also had homicidal gas chambers, disguised as shower rooms. However, British and American doctors performed thousands of autopsies on some of the corpses the Allies discovered in those camps.

 

Russell Barton, an English medical student who had spent a month in Belsen after the camp’s liberation and had investigated the reasons for the camp’s disastrous conditions toward the end of the war, stated, quote:[44]

 

German medical officers told me that it had been increasingly difficult to transport food to the camp for some months. Anything that moved on the autobahns was likely to be bombed. […]

I was surprised to find records, going back for two or three years, of large quantities of food cooked daily for distribution. I became convinced, contrary to popular opinion, that there had never been a policy of deliberate starvation. This was confirmed by the large numbers of well-fed inmates. […] The major reasons for the state of Belsen were disease, gross overcrowding by central authority, lack of law and order within the huts, and inadequate supplies of food, water and drugs.

 

 

[53:46]

 

Here is an interview Dr. Barton gave to the late Ernst Zündel some ten years after this article had been published:[45]

 

You were on the scene in Belsen as a young man.

Yes. I went with a group of medical students. We arrived in Belsen on May the second 1945, and I first went to the camp on May the third. Himmler ordered the camp to be ceded on April 11th in order to stop typhus, which was an epidemic spreading throughout Europe. The British came in; a tank division came in on April the fifteenth at three o’clock, and they did their best to segregate the typhus[-infected] and the dying from the other.

How many people were in the camp at the time when the British took over the camp?

I think there were about fifty-seven or sixty thousand. The British bombed everything, and the Americans, that moved on the roads. So getting food there was extremely difficult. The water supplies became contaminated with sewage, and the administration in the camp more or less broke down. The distribution of food in the individual huts was left to the inmates, and the inmates, we found out – we were fooled at first, but this was after May, after I got there. The inmates… one particular group was in control; they would take what they wanted and then leave whatever food there was left to the rest of the hut. So that meant, perhaps ten powerful people would gobble everything, and three hundred and fifty would have whatever was left. There were, I’d say, all nationalities, mainly Polish and Russian. Most of them were Jewish.

Were there men and women?

Yes, there were men and women, and children.

And were they segregated?

Segregated.

Segregated camps. And that was still segregated when you got there?

Yes.

Even, let’s say, if the German camp administration had made maximum effort, and had been given everything at hand, could they have prevented this?

There was no cure for typhus at that time. The British put DDT, which is an insecticide, over everything and everybody, and in that way, I think, the typhus was contained. But it was a great danger. People don’t realize it was typhus. It was… I supposed 50, 60 percent of the people died of typhus.

Why are these bodies naked? I mean, some of them are so emaciated. Why don’t they have their clothing on?

Well, they did. When they were pushed outside the huts, they had clothing on. But clothing was so scarce – everything was scarce – that the inmates would immediately rush out and take all the clothing off, because it was a pity to waste it. That’s why they were naked.

Did you see, when you got there two weeks after the British army took over, any evidence of gas chambers, the way propaganda has said that the Germans had in these camps? Or was there any claim made to that effect?

No. I don’t think it was ever thought there was a gas chamber in Belsen-Bergen. People were dying at 500 a day, by the way, a rate of 500 a day.

Even under British administration…

Under British administration, yes. And what was happening mostly, the English soldiers were giving people their food, people half starved, had very thin stomachs. The stomachs would burst, and they’d die. The inmates said that the conditions there, this is what inmates said, that conditions weren’t too bad until the end of ’44. And then this mass immigration… But by the time they put in another 50,000, fully 50,000, of course…

Were you there during the time when the bulldozers were actually putting these bodies in the graves, in these long trenches that we’ve seen?

The bulldozers… the bodies were being thrown in. They would put… a truck went around every day and picked up the bodies outside the hut, and then they would take them to where the bulldozer had dug the grave, and they would throw them into the grave.

You are a man born in England. You published this article, I believe, for an English publication. And the London Times picked up on what you have published here?

That’s right. This was published in November 1968. I was asked to write it. I was solicited. I had no intention of so doing.

Nobody ever interviewed you from any German magazines or papers?

Oh no. No, no.

To this day?

Not to this day.

Did anybody ever, officially from Germany, come and contact you for a kind of historical documentation, of the [???German Federal] archives in Koblenz and places like that?

No.

No. Never?

Never.

 

Similar to this is the account given by Dr. Charles Larson, a U.S. forensic pathologist working for the U.S. Army’s Judge Advocate General. Right after the war, Dr. Larson performed autopsies on hundreds of victims in some twenty former concentration camps. In 1980, a newspaper article appeared reporting about his wartime experience. We read there:[46]

 

Larson has talked little publicly about the war experience. One reason for his silence has been that his autopsy findings conflicted with the widely held belief that most Jews in Nazi camps were exterminated by gassing, shooting or poisoning.

What we’ve heard is that 6 million Jews were exterminated. Part of that is a hoax,’ Larson said. […]

Never was a case of poisoning uncovered, he said.

 

 

[59:27]

 

Larson’s biographer wrote the following about this episode, quote:[47]

 

In one grave the bulldozers uncovered an estimated 2,000 bodies, many of which were subjected to autopsy examination by Major Larson. All of those autopsied had died of various conditions such as emaciation with starvation, tuberculosis, typhus or other infectious diseases.

For the next ten days, many nights with only an hour or two of restless sleep, Larson worked among the dead. He performed about 25 autopsies a day and superficially examined another 300 to 1,000 bodies. He autopsied only those bodies that appeared to have died questionably. ‘Many of them died of typhus,’ Dr. Larson told me recently.

At Dachau Larson’s work – the profile of the prisoner population that his autopsies projected – indicated that only a small percentage of the deaths were due to medical experimentation on humans. It indicated that most of the victims died from so-called ‘natural causes’ at the time; that is, of disease brought on by malnutrition and filth which are the handmaidens of war.

 

Today, these particular camps are admitted not to have had homicidal gas chambers at all. So, none of the corpses seen in these images were gassed. What you see in these images are prisoners who died from disease, as well as a lack of appropiate food, water and medical supplies. A large part of their condition was due to the Allies bombing supply lines to the camps.

 

Allied fighter planes even bombed and strafed trainloads full of prisoners as they were being evacuated to different camps. Those prisoners who weren’t hit by bullets or bombs were without appropiate supplies for days until arriving at their destinantion.

 

The liberation of Dachau concentration camp is dramatized in the film Shutter Island. The Americans liberating Dachau came across what became known as “The Dachau Death Trains”. They saw bullet holes in the sides of the trains and dead prisoners inside in terrible condition, believing the Germans locked starved prisoners inside the trains, then machine gunned them, the Americans turned their fury to the capture of German guards.

 

The guards surrendered, we took their guns, and we lined them up. It wasn’t warfare, it was, it was murder!

 

Many of the German guards who surrendered the camp had only recently been transferred to the camp in the final days of the war. Some were just teenagers from surrounding towns. Ironically, this young German guard even looks like the young DiCaprio. This young German was not a deliberate holocauster of Jews or anyone else but a young man tragically swept into the final days of the most brutal war in the history of mankind. The German soldiers surrendered, and with their hands up, the Americans shot dozens of captured unarmed German guards. And it didn’t happen in the heat of the moment either, as this movie suggests. In fact, the Americans actually brought the guards to the camp’s coal yard, got a heavy machine gun from their vehicle and brought it into position, and they had their army photographers take pictures of the event, as this photo and others prove. It was a war crime. The Americans played judge, jury and executioner. They even dragged German soldiers from a nearby hospital and shot them, even though they had nothing to do with the camp at all, let alone the death trains. Here is the testimony of one of the Americans involved in this murder:[48]

 

I was not prepared for what I saw in Dachau. Nothing could prepare you for that. Nothing could prepare you for that type of slaughter that was carried on in that camp. […]

I never liked to see people killed unnecessarily, no matter what their stripe is or what they have done. We did kill some people there that I consider unnecessarily. However, given the circumstances, while I am sorry about it, it was just one of those things that no one could control. Actually, the people that we killed died a much easier death than the people that they tortured and killed as we subsequently found out. Torture and hangings and executions in various manners was a daily occurrence. So, in a way, we were kinder to them than they were to the people that they murdered.

 

 

[65:05]

 

The only problem is that the people he helped to kill were not those who had run the camp for many years.

 

But evidence has come to light that the Germans did not lock prisoners inside the trains and machine gun them.

 

The bullets which tore through the trains full of prisoners were not German bullets but in fact the result of Allied war planes strafing the trains.

 

Here is a Jewish former prisoner talking about the Allies bombing and shooting his train, killing prisoners on the way to Dachau, explaining their condition:

 

I was ordered to go march out to the railroad station back into the cattle cars, but this time they had open wagons and regular cattle cars. But the only difference it was that the railroad tracks, on one track, the Nazis were retreating with the heavy artillery, ammunition and all their hardware. In another track the concentration camp inmates in the train load. The Nazis were hoping maybe because we are there they will not be bombed.

It would have been a short trip, but it took us almost three days to get to Dachau. What had happened, we got hit by air raid. They bombed the both of the tracks, they machine gunned our train. And in the train were I was sitting – this time it wasn’t so loaded – we were all squatting down. Both of the fellows beside me got hit by machine gun fire. And I just, days… by then the guards were gone. We opened the railroad car and stumbled out of the car and walked into the woods in nearby, and hid there. Remember going out on the fields and dug off some potatoes for food. But they came back next morning or a day later with dogs, gathered us together and ordered us back to the railroad cars. They never removed the bodies. This is how we arrived to Dachau.

 

This Jew’s train was bombed and shot by Allied planes. The prisoners the Allies killed were left inside the train. Prisoners who weren’t blown up or shot by the Allies suffered further malnutrition, in part due to the bombing of train tracks, delaying their journey.

 

The Allies were directly responsible for killing many on these death trains. Bullets from Allied air planes tore through the bodies of those prisoners shortly before the American infantry arrived at Dachau. American infantry, ignorant of the role of Allied bombing and strafing runs contributing to the deaths of the prisoners inside the death trains, put the blame on the Germans.

 

They lined the unarmed, surrendered German guards against a wall and executed them, committing a war crime, which has gone unpunished to this day. Misunderstandings, propaganda, falsehoods, blind patriotism, mistakes, rushing to judgement. How else could millions be driven to killing their own people, themselves essentially?

 

“It wasn’t warfare, it was murder.

 

The Allies also directly bombed concentration camp prisoners, and today we are told this is proof of a German planned Holocaust.

 

This is another segment from the American propaganda film “Nazi Concentration Camps” which was shown at the Nuremberg Trials.

 

The slave-labor camp at Nordhausen liberated by the Third Armored Division, First Army. At least three thousand political prisoners died here at the brutal hands of SS troops and hardened German criminals who were the camp guards. Nordhausen had been a depository for slaves found unfit for work in the underground V-bomb plants and in other German camps and factories.

 

A deceptively captioned image of Nordhausen appears in Steven Spielberg’s The Last Days companion book. We see American solders walking past corpses strewn on the ground. The caption reads:

 

The horrific scene of mass annihilation within the Nordhausen concentration camp.

 

Let’s look closer at the photograph. We can see the buildings have been bombed. Testimony of former prisoners shows they were lucky to survive Allied bombing attacks.

 

This Jewish former prisoner and doctor describes prisoners laying in the camp hospital, sick of tuberculosis in the final days of the war.

 

And there I had over 4 thousand prisoners laying on tuberculosis. Sick. What are you doing? It’s tuberculosis. No medications, nothing, hardly food, it was very meager already. The Germans didn’t have to eat.

 

 

[70:18]

 

This former prisoner and doctor described conditions in the camp in the final days of the war. Sick prisoners didn’t have enough supplies. However, he points out the Germans themselves also didn’t have enough even to eat. Clearly, the Germans could have killed the sick prisoners at any time, yet instead treated them in hospitals.

 

And all of the sudden, it was April 3rd at 3 o’clock, alarm, and American air force over us, and dropped the bombs just on our camp. And the whole camp was entirely destroyed. And out of this four thousand people, we were 200 survived. Because they died there. They were in the camps, you know. Hanging in the ceiling, their bodies and… It was awful. It was burning days and days. We were still…, the nurses, the doctors, the administration people, the working administration… we ran away.

 

And the Americans made a mistake because they didn’t know this is a concentration camp. They knew it is a military camp. They emptied the military the month before and in January they put us in, you see. So, they didn’t know. So, they came back at 9 o’clock in the morning and hit the whole city. The whole city they flattened. We ran away in the wood, in the fields, and when they emptied the planes, they came and strafed us with machine guns. They didn’t know who it is. They are Germans, you know. And we went into the woods, and we remained about a week in the woods. And we ate only the raw potatoes.

 

British Royal Air Force bombed the camp, full of sick prisoners. They turned around and shot survivors running for their lives. They flattened the nearby town, full of innocent German civilians.

 

The British are primarily responsible for the scene of, quote, “mass annihilation.” But images of Nordhausen recently bombed and strafed by British planes are still used today as proof of a deliberate German-planned Holocaust.

 

And it’s important to note that most of those seen in this photograph aren’t even Jews but primarily non-Jewish political prisoners, including Poles, Russians and Jehovah’s Witnesses. These majority non-Jewish victims of Allied bombing at a former labor camp are used to sell a supposed Jewish Holocaust.

 

The Oprah program deceptively used two shots of the aftermath of the British air raid at Nordhausen.

 

More than six millions of those human beings were Jewish.

 

This victim of the Allies blowing up and strafing sick prisoners at Nordhausen being carried over rubble was in fact likely not Jewish. So, we’re looking at someone who is both not killed by the Germans but by the British and who is likely not a Jew.

 

Here is another clip of Nordhausen. The prisoners of the camp for seriously ill prisoners were blown up and shot by the British, and were buried in this mass grave. The soldiers standing at the edge are Americans. But we are led to assume they are Germans, standing at attention after a job well done.

 

“[…] that brutally wiped millions of people off the face of the earth.”

 

Actually, the British brutally wiped these prisoners off the face of the earth. The Germans put them in a camp with doctors and nurses.

 

What’s incredible is that you were shown these images as proof of an organized, planned, systematic extermination program going according to plan.

 

A systematic mass murder meticulously planned and executed …

 

…when in reality, this was the result of the total disorganization and utter chaos of a collapsing Germany which was still being bombed relentlessly into submission.

 

Rather than do the right thing and accept blame for what could be said is accidental collateral damage based on faulty intelligence, the Allies instead just blamed the Germans. Images of a camp full of sick prisoners bombed and strafed by British planes at Nordhausen are used as proof of a systematic, planned German extermination program. However, every single mostly non-Jewish prisoner in this imagery was killed due to a British bomb or bullet.

 

The editing of the film “Nazi Concentration Camps” was supervised by Budd Schulberg, born Seymour Schulberg, son of the head of Paramount Studios. Schulberg was Jewish and a member of the communist party USA until 1939.

 

[75:03]

 

All of these dead were murdered with British bombs or bullets. Yet no mention is made of that. Schulberg claims they died at the brutal hands of Germans.

 

At least 3 thousand political prisoners died here at the brutal hands of SS troops and hardened German criminals who were the camp guards.

 

This is a total lie and inversion of history. The final shot of the “Nazi Concentration Camps” film shows footage of a prisoner at Nordhausen who had his head blown off.

 

A prisoner account describes exactly how this happened and who is responsible:[49]

 

THE APRIL 3 BOMBING. The accounts refer first of all to the Tuesday, April 3 bombing: ‘Right from the first blast, I took shelter under the concrete staircase of the Revier. A bomb hit the Block and the staircase was demolished. I ran to the middle of the camp, to a shelter dug right into the ground, where there were already a dozen civilians, women, children, and also an SS man – as green from fear as his uniform – who could only stammer: ‘Schrecklich! Schrecklich!’ (Horrible! Horrible!) And indeed, it was not a pretty sight; corpses every five or six yards, headless or their innards ripped open.

 

Today, images of Nordhausen are widely used as proof of a Jewish Holocaust. Why is this particular image so popular? The bodies of those blown up or shot by the British, then pulled out of craters or the rubble of buildings and lined up in ordered rows by the Americans are meant to imply an orderly German method of mass murder. Apparently, they want us to believe the Germans lined all these prisoners up here in neat rows and shot them where they stood. If these dead people were German soldiers, the Brits would pat themselves on the back for a job well done. Instead, the Allies just blamed their bombing and shooting screw up on the Germans. What a horrific scam, pulled right in front of our very eyes. Imagery of tragic deaths which were the direct result of the Allies’ actions are cynically exploited to sell a lie.

 

[Footage showing historian Stephen Ambrose:]

 

Adolf Hitler was pure evil. And he was in command of the most advanced technology and the best-disciplined people and the best-educated people in the world.

In the wrong hands, technology helped turn Europe into a slaughter house. This was a war that was also a crime.

Eisenhower, when he first encountered concentration camps, was shocked and surprised. He hadn’t been told about it. His immediate reaction was, ‘This is so horrible that there will inevitably become a revisionist movement some day to say ‘this never happened; this is propaganda; this is a figment of wartime imagination,’ so he insisted that every GI who could be marched through those camps and he said ‘bring your cameras with you.

 

This is a classic quote used to attempt to refute revisionists. Eisenhower said, there would be deniers in the future, so he ordered witnesses march through camps and film them. No one denies these are real bodies. But the false analysis of their cause of death deflecting all blame onto Germans is the propaganda. Every single shot in this news segment was taken at Nordhausen. All of the footage of murdered prisoners in the sick camp at Nordhausen shows prisoners blown up or shot by the British.

 

This is another example of the propaganda formula: supposed expert, deceptive imagery, plus calling those who question it evil haters. It turns out this master historian was later accused of plagiarism throughout his entire career.[50] He even lied about spending hundreds of hours with Eisenhower and meeting with him daily. Official records show he spent five hours on the record with Eisenhower. This is the mentality of these master historians, promoted to the forefront of the monopoly media. There was no plan to turn these prisoners into this condition. This was the result of the catastrophic end to the war. Not everything going perfectly according to an evil plan.

 

Up until this time these images of a bulldozer dumping naked emaciated corpses into a mass grave at Bergen-Belsen were the most horrifying imagery in the history of film. This film footage was shown to our grandparents’ generation on a big screen. It has been shown to you at a young age. What are you to believe? Some programs such as the Oprah presentation lead one to assume this is a German driving this bulldozer, making his quota of gassed Jews for the day, rather than a British solder pushing epidemic typhus victims into a mass grave.

 

[80:05]

 

Until the end of the war, Bergen-Belsen was not a death camp were Germans deliberately starved to death and murdered prisoners. In fact, it was originally designated as a recuperation camp, or Krankenlager, where sick prisoners were sent to improve their health. It wasn’t such a terrible place until the final days of the war, and there is evidence to prove it. Rose Kahn, a Hungarian Jew, was transported from Auschwitz to Bergen-Belsen in the summer of 1944. Before Auschwitz was abandoned, and Bergen-Belsen was severely overcrowded, she describes Bergen-Belsen as not such a terrible place.

 

So, when we arrived to Bergen-Belsen, and they told us to get out, and the Nazis came with those big, big dogs, with their wolves, and they asked us who cannot walk, is sick, should tell ‘em, so they gonna put us on a bus. I was afraid to say it. I couldn’t walk, but I didn’t say it. And if I would say, would been good, because this was not a bad place. This was not at that time, at that time.

So in other words it wasn’t a trick?”

No, no.

They really would have taken you by bus.

Yes, yes, yes.

I think you were right, though.

Yes, but I was so afraid, so my mother and my friends were holding me. We had to walk a few miles, quite a few miles to it. And we arrived there, and we lived in tents and straw, we slept on straw. And we weren’t treated badly. No, it wasn’t too bad over there. We were given nice meals. What happened? They wanted us strong to send out to work, so they didn’t want weak and sick people.

 

Witnesses such as this help prove that Bergen-Belsen was not a specially designed death camp whatsoever. Before the catastrophic end of the war, prisoners were routinely fed and decently cared for.

 

The major trick of the Holocaust promotion industry is to show these horrible images of emaciated bodies and make you believe that prisoners were always like this. That the Germans immediately starved them to death, and this deliberate starvation had been going on for years as part of their plan of extermination. However, witnesses such as this and others prove that at times the concentration camps were not so terrible.

 

This was not a bad place. This was not at that time.

 

It was only as Germany was losing the war, surrounded on all sides by a terror bombing campaign from the west and marauding Soviets in the east, that conditions in camps such as Bergen-Belsen deteriorated disastrously.

 

And then we stayed there until they started to build barracks for all the other Auschwitz people when Bergen-Belsen became hell.

 

Bergen-Belsen became hellish at the very end of the war. The major cause of this was the Allied bombing campaign. As the Allies fire-bombed German civilian population centers, burning innocent men, women and children alive and shot at or bombed just about anything that moved on roads or train tracks, even the Germans themselves had trouble finding enough to eat at the time.

 

[Camp survivors interviewed:]

 

…hardly food, it was very meager already. The Germans didn’t have to eat.

Food didn’t improve very much because, simple reason, they didn’t have very much themselves, so…

Did the civilians try to help you at all? Did they trade goods for things?

It’s as I say, we had almost everything what we wanted, from the soccer teams, from the civilians, from outside civilians.

 

The spread of deadly diseases and severe overcrowding exacerbated the entire situation. Prisoners from areas in the east which were now being overrun by the Soviets were hastily evacuated west. After days or weeks journey, often on foot, they wound up in these overcrowded camps full of deadly diseases. And because the German infrastructure was being destroyed, this was catastrophic.

 

In early February 1945, a large transport of Hungarians were admitted to Bergen-Belsen while the disinfestation facility was out of order. As a result, typhus broke out and quickly spread beyond control. The hot-air delousing machine sometimes failed to work for several days. The worst killer was typhus. But typhoid fever and dysentery also claimed their lives.

 

There was a breakdown in order and communication throughout the German system as the Germans were losing the war and fighting for their survival. Trainloads of food were destroyed by Allied planes. At Bergen-Belsen, the final factor which guaranteed mass casualties was in the final weeks of the war: The Allies bombed the power plant which supplied electricity to the facilities that pumped water to the camp.

 

[85:12]

 

 

Water too had been cut off. And so, the water cart was the most important thing to arrive. There had be no water supply for six days. The Germans pleaded it had been cut.[51]

 

The electric plant which powered pumps supplying water to Bergen-Belsen was not cut by some unnamed force. It was blown up by the British. A destroyed system for providing clean water to the camp compounded already disastrous hygiene and medical conditions. Clean water, necessary to shower prisoners, wash clothing and treat dehydrated typhoid fever, dysentery and typhus patients was indeed cut off by British bombs.

 

One might ask why all the inmates surviving were not removed out of the camp altogether to a large town, for example, where there would be feeding and housing facilities. The answer is simply the dread word – typhus.

A mobile bacteriological unit and all medical aid possible together with 90 medical students from London hospitals were rushed to the spot to deal with it.

Lack of soap and water brought lice to the inmates, and lice carry typhus. To get rid of typhus, one must first get rid of lice, so contaminated patients were removed from their huts and put through a laundry process.

 

The British struggled to remedy disastrous conditions in Bergen-Belsen after liberation. Many thousands died after liberation. In the end, the British burned the wooden barracks, as they became infested with deadly epidemic-typhus-carrying body lice. Images of the disastrous situation at Bergen-Belsen are fraudulently used to portray a deliberate German extermination policy.

 

These post-liberation images of Bergen-Belsen as well as Dachau and Nordhausen have become symbols of German barbarism. But these people were victims of the larger war, not a deliberate German extermination plan. The Germans did what they could to keep people alive, and in some cases contacted the Red Cross for assistance and even turned over some camps to them. The shameful truth hidden amongst this Holocaust propaganda is that not only were none of these people gassed, but the Allies played a major role in their deaths.

 

As terrible as these images of emaciated prisoners are, images of union prisoners of the American confederate civil war camp Andersonville show liberated prisoners also appeared in a similar condition. What happened at Andersonville was a complete breakdown in hygiene measures due to inadequate sanitation facilities. Toilets in the overcrowded camp didn’t drain properly, exposing prisoners to filth and disease, in particular dysentery. Symptoms of dysentery include diarrhea and rapid weight loss. In extreme cases, patients may pass over a liter of fluid per hour. It’s easy to see how someone who is repeatedly defecating, vomiting and urinating would quickly lose body weight, especially if food supplies, medicine and water became scarce.

 

At Andersonville, as overcrowding increased, so did the death toll. The confederates also lost the war in a catastrophic way much like the Germans. So, there is a direct correlation between the images of Andersonville prisoners and the so-called Holocaust images.

 

Now, these people at Andersonville aren’t Jews, and never has anyone alleged the South aimed for a total genocide of Northerners. The photographs of Andersonville and for instance Bergen-Belsen are quite similar and correlate with the breakdown in hygiene, overcrowding, the spread of disease and one side of the war losing catastrophically. What you see in these images at Bergen-Belsen is primarily the result of typhus.

 

Typhus is a disease carried by the body louse which is similar to head lice. But body lice prefer to attach themselves not to the scalp but to the inner seams of clothing. Typhus was responsible for the deaths of millions throughout history. Typhus epidemics routinely occurred throughout Europe during war time. During World War I, more than three million people died from typhus.

 

What you see in these images are primarily typhus epidemic victims. The Germans did not intentionally starve them to death. We can see several people liberated from the camps. Although not in pristine condition, some appear well fed, some even fat. They simply didn’t have disease. The Germans in fact tried to stop the spread of disease. The insecticide Zyklon B was a pesticide used to kill these deadly typhus-carrying body lice.

 

[90:02]

 

There is nothing inherently murderous about Zyklon B. In fact, Zyklon B was used on the Mexican border to gas the clothing of Mexicans crossing the border. The delousing process went like this:

 

Prisoners entering a camp would strip their clothing and get a haircut to prevent any areas where deadly typhus-carrying body lice could thrive. Then they would take a hot shower. At the same time, their clothing would be put into specially designed fumigation chambers where fumigation crews would use the insecticide Zyklon B to kill deadly typhus-carrying body lice.

The prisoners would then be given clean, lice-free clothing, and enter the camp. It is easy to see how this life saving delousing process involving real fumigation chambers for clothing and real showers was misconstrued into wartime propaganda about showers of gas by prisoners spreading rumors as well as Soviet propaganda artists deliberately framing their enemies.

 

One of the final exhibits at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C. sums up the importance of the information presented in this video.

 

Museum visitors are bombarded with film clips taken after the Allies captured concentration and labor camps. These films are meant to represent proof of a deliberate German extermination policy. But you have now seen many of these clips, explained and debunked.

 

Near the end of the museum’s main exhibit two banks of three video monitors flanking a fallen Nazi flag play film footage taken after camps were captured by the Allies.

 

Each of the three monitors is dedicated to one of the three major Allied powers: the Soviet Union, United States and Great Britain.

 

On this screen is US Army footage taken at Nordhausen, Dachau and Buchenwald. The caption reads:

 

Local German civilians are ordered to tour Buchenwald Concentration Camp.

 

This is an American army official gathering Germans around the supposed human-skin lamp shade and the table filled with propaganda props. Visitors are shown the Dachau death trains full of victims of Allied bombing and strafing attacks. Majdanek, the outside of a real shower facility, “Bath and Disinfection II,” and the inside of “Bath and Disinfection I” showing the real, working shower room. Again, the camera is angled away from the many windows. The caption reads:

 

Soviet Army officers inspect chambers where prisoners were killed by poison gas.

 

Today, every serious mainstream historian acknowledges this wasn’t a gas chamber with fake shower heads, it was a real working shower room designed to keep prisoners alive and free of disease.

 

Again, the bulldozer pushing epidemic typhus victims into a mass grave at Bergen-Belsen. A disaster, but not deliberate or planned.

 

On the last television screen, we’re shown footage of Nordhausen bombed to smithereens by 500 British warplanes over two days. Much like at the Nuremberg trials, the final shot we are shown before moving on to the exhibit on post-war trials is the victim of British war planes at Nordhausen with his exposed brains.

 

How sick to show gory imagery of Allied air attack victims as proof of the evilness of Germans.

 

Mothers rushing their children past this section never question the context of this imagery. This is powerful, trauma-based mind control used to brainwash, not by using logic and facts, but by searing these horror images into a captive audience’s mind, and manipulating emotions with mendacious narrations.

 

Real shower rooms, phony planted evidence like this lamp shade, and victims of Allied bombing are not proof of a genocide using gas chambers, disguised as shower rooms. We were manipulated, misled and lied to.

 

We were shown images taken during the final days of a destroyed and collapsed Germany as proof of a systematic, planned extermination program. Upon further investigation by the western Allies, these claims of extermination camps equipped with homicidal gas chambers in western-liberated camps have fallen by the wayside.

 

However, the powerful imagery of these western-liberated, overcrowded, disease-infested camps, devastated due to the Allied bombing campaign in the final months of the worst war in the history of mankind is still used to brainwash the public as proof of an extermination program of gas chambers disguised as shower rooms in camps captured by the Soviet Union.

 

In Part 2 of this documentary, we will explore some aspects of the most infamous of these camps: Auschwitz.

 

 

[94:55]

 

 

Disclaimer

 

This documentary is not meant to whitewash the National Socialist regime of Germany from any of its undisputed wrongdoings. Imprisoning people without proper due process is a crime. Any authority committing such a crime ultimately bears responsibility for those in its custody.

 

However, this crime was not only committed by the German authorities prior to and during World War II, but during the war also by the U.S. authorities who imprisoned many Japanese Americans as well as Italian and German immigrants. The biggest criminal in this regard, however, was the US’s most important ally of the Second World War, the Soviet Union, where millions were imprisoned and ultimately murdered prior to, during and after the war.

 

Unfortunately, this crime of unlawful incarceration is today again committed by U.S. authorities in Guantanamo Bay and other similar facilities.

 

[95:52]

 

__________________

 

Holocaust Handbooks, the world’s leading book series critically exploring what the powers that be don’t want examined. Mermerizing, comprehensive presentations, such as Lectures on the Holocaust, as well as cutting edge research results, such as The Real Case for Auschwitz. Read most of our books free of charge at holocausthandbooks.com, where you can also watch our riveting documentaries. All this high quality content was made possible by viewers like you. Please consider making a donation to help us create more of this content. We can’t do it without you! Thank you.

 

 

[96:28]

 

 

 


 

 

Notes

[1]

As of Oct. 2017, the following were found online (U = USHMM, Y = Yad Vashem): Auschwitz (U = “over 960,000” total, Y = “more than 1,100,000” total); Belzec (U = approximately 434,500, Y = 600,000); Sobibor (U = “at least 170,000”, Y = 250,000); Treblinka (U = “between 870,000 and 925,000”, Y = 870,000); Majdanek (U = “unknown”, “Between 89,000 and 110,000” “Most succumbed to starvation, disease, exposure, and the effects of physical torture or back-breaking labor performed under threat of violence”, Y = no number, total Jewish death toll “60,000” (Kranz), “200,000” (Łukaszkiewicz)); Chelmno (U = “at least 152,000”, Y = 320,000).

[2]

www.un.org/en/holocaustremembrance/docs/res607.shtml

[3]

Donald Trump, “Statement by the President on International Holocaust Remembrance Day,” Jan. 27, 2017; www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/01/27/statement-president-international-holocaust-remembrance-day (accessed on Oct. 4, 2017)

[4]

https://twitter.com/JGreenblattADL/status/825029350126936064 (accessed on Oct. 4, 2017).

[5]

The Guardian, Jan 27, 2017; www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/27/white-house-holocaust-remembrance-day-no-jews; Commentary, Jan 28, 2017; www.commentarymagazine.com/politics-ideas/the-white-house-holocaust-horror/;

[6]

Jake, “WH: No mention of Jews on Holocaust Remembrance Day because others were killed too,” CNN, Jan. 28, 2017; http://edition.cnn.com/2017/01/28/politics/white-house-holocaust-memorial-day

[7]

Louise Ridley, “The Holocaust’s Forgotten Victims: The 5 Million Non-Jewish People Killed By The Nazis,” The Huffington Post, Jan 27, 2015; www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/27/holocaust-non-jewish-victims_n_6555604.html; for more see Hadding Scott, “Anti-Gentiles Deny the 5 Million!,” Inconvenient History, Vol. 9, No. 2, spring 2017; www.codoh.comhttps://www.inconvenienthistory.com/9/2/4239/

[8]

Ron Kampeas, “‘Remember the 11 million’? Why an inflated victims tally irks Holocaust historians,Jewish Telegraph Agency, Jan. 31, 2017; www.jta.org/2017/01/31/news-opinion/united-states/remember-the-11-million-why-an-inflated-victims-tally-irks-holocaust-historians/; The Times of Israel, Feb. 1, 2017; www.timesofisrael.com/remember-the-11-million-why-an-inflated-victims-tally-irks-holocaust-historians/

[9]

Deborah Lipstadt, “The Trump Administration’s Flirtation With Holocaust Denial,The Atlantic Monthly, Jan 30, 2017; www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/01/the-trump-administrations-softcore-holocaust-denial/514974/

[10]

https://youtu.be/OxJZBrtFD6Y

[11]

Best resolution in two parts: https://youtu.be/6wJDlh5ozEY & … https://youtu.be/BQ0m-0AZ-m0

[12]

Ibid. starting at 1 min 23 sec.

[13]

Ibid. starting at 1 min 59 sec.

[14]

Caroline Sturdy Colls, Holocaust Archaeologies: Approaches and Future Directions, Springer, Cham, 2015, p. 3, footnote.

[15]

Matthew Day, “Nazis may have killed up to 20m, claims ‘shocking’ new Holocaust study,” Daily Telegraph, March 4, 2013; www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/9906771/Nazis-may-have-killed-up-to-20m-claims-shocking-new-Holocaust-study.html

[16]

https://youtu.be/_pQJ42ONPDo; starting at 45:18; see the authentications and explanation: IMT Document PS-2430: Nazi Concentration and Prisoner-of-War Camps: A Documentary Motion Picture, film shown at the Nuremberg Trial, 29 November 1945, IMT, XXX, p. 470;

[17]

www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005214

[18]

E. Kogon, H. Langbein, A. Rückerl (eds.), Nazi Mass Murder, Yale Univ. Press, New Haven/London 1993.

[19]

Document PS-3249, IMT, Vol. 32, pp. 57-64, here p. 62, quoted in IMT, Vol. 5, pp. 172f.

[20]

Document 159-L, IMT, Vol 37, pp. 605-627, here p. 621.

[21]

Dachau Concentration Camp”; https://youtu.be/pIxOQdeCWX0; 18:00-18:05

[22]

Levi Mierau, “Dachau Concentration Camp,” Documentary, Part 2; https://youtu.be/MQvB3sLER34; 6:55-7:01

[23]

U.S. National Archives, Dachau Trial (Trial of Martin Gottfried Weiss), M1174, Reel 1, microfilm page 000135.

[24]

Nuremberg Document NO-3886.

[25]

Nuremberg Document NO-3887.

[26]

NS 21/319.

[27]

Levi Mierau, “Dachau Concentration Camp,” Documentary, Part 2; https://youtu.be/MQvB3sLER34; 6:00-6:13.

[28]

Ibid., 6:54-7:23.

[29]

https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/pa1154600

[30]

https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/pa23334

[31]

https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/pa1166433

[32]

https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/pa1058759

[33]

https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/pa1158576

[34]

https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/pa1174716

[35]

https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/pa1168298

[36]

Ludwig Gassner, “Verkehrshygiene und Schädlingsbekämpfung,” Gesundheits-Ingenieur, 66(15) (1943) pp. 174-176.

[37]

See Richard Irmscher, “Nochmals: ‘Die Einsatzfähigkeit der Blausäure bei tiefen Temperaturen,’Zeitschrift für hygienische Zoologie und Schädlingsbekämpfung, 34 (1942), pp. 35f.

[38]

Paul Berben, Histoire du camp de concentration de Dachau, 1933-1945, Comité international de Dachau, Brussels 1968, p. 12.

[39]

Yad Vashem Archives, 1211/28, item ID 38051.

[40]

Yad Vashem Archives, 4029, item ID 57452.

[41]

http://www.historywiz.org/finalsolution.htm

[42]

www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IJ4mpCDVpE

[43]

3762-PS; IMT, Vol. 33, p. 68.

[44]

Russell Barton, “Belsen,” in: History of the Second World War, 109 (1975), pp. 3025-3029; cf. Barbara Kulaszka (ed.), Did Six Million Really Die?, Samisdat Publishers, Toronto 1992, pp. 175-180; www.vho.org/aaargh/fran/livres3/KULA.pdf (different pagination).

[45]

https://youtu.be/v8vGpqQBpNU

[46]

Jane Floerchinger, “Concentration Camp Conditions Killed Most Inmates, Doctor Says,The Wichita Eagle, April 1, 1980, p. 4C.

[47]

John D. McCallum, Crime Doctor, The Writing Works, Mercer Island, Wash., 1978, pp. 57-60, 69.

[48]

Levi Mierau, “Dachau Concentration Camp,” Documentary, Part 1, 5:32-5 :49 (https://youtu.be/cCi_PLl-rJs); Part 3, 0-1:03 (https://youtu.be/Xpnl-YyafI).

[49]

André Sellier, A History of the Dora Camp: The Story of the Nazi Slave Labor Camp that Secretly Manufactured V-2 Rockets, Ivan R. Dee, Chicago, 2003, p. 291.

[50]

David Plotz, “The Plagiarist: Why Stephen Ambrose is a vampire,” Jan. 11, 2002; www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/assessment/2002/01/the_plagiarist.html.

[51]

Memory of the Camps”, Alfred Hitchcock “documentary”; https://youtu.be/DY9y7cmmmFQ.

 

 

 

============================================

 

PDF Notes

Version 1 —

* Total words = xxx
* Total images = xx
* Total A4 pages = xx

 

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

(Available later)

 

 

 

 

Version History

 

Version 2:

 

Version 1: Dec 28, 2017  — Published post.

Read Full Post »

 

 

[Mark Collett, 37, is a British political activist and former chairman of the Young BNP, the youth division of the British National Party (BNP), and was director of publicity for the party. He has recently written a book, “The Fall of Western Man“, available in printed form and as a free PDF download.

Here he presents his case for the need to build a viable movement for change, a movement beyond the current alternative media and social media networks, that spreads our message and ensures that we win power away from the traitors. For if we don’ do that, Collett warns:

… the most likely outcome , … is that Britain and Europe will become Islamic Republics.

After discussing the often counter-productive nature of street marches and accompanying bad media response, he proposes that:

… we must take our message directly to the people.

And that means community politics, enabling nationalists to emerge as community leaders, leading them to eventually form the people that will take over from the existing politicians. In other words, a ground-up, grass-roots type of movement that wins the peoples’ hearts and minds.

As an example, rather than getting together 200 people to stage a demonstration in the town centre, he suggests that they form 50 four man groups that go out and set up tabletop stalls, leaflet estates, and speak to people directly. He sees this as being far more effective in recruiting new people into our movement, all without the trouble that demos bring — KATANA.]

 

 

_______________________

 

 

Mark Collett

 

What We Must Do To Win

 

 

 

 

 

 

Click the link below to view the video:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6eAkdkNJIk

 

 

YouTube Description

 

Published on June 15, 2017

A frank discussion about how we can win. Marches and demonstrations are not gaining the movement any political influence, to do that we need to engage in community politics and build a support base that can one day be mobilised to vote out the traitor politicians.
Tommy Robinson Exposes Police Collusion with the Left & Antifa

My book, The Fall of Western Man is now available. It is available as a FREE eBook and also in hardback and paperback editions.

 

The Official Website: http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/

 

FREE eBook download: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3cc…

 

Hardback Edition: http://www.lulu.com/shop/mark-collett…

 

Paperback Edition: http://amzn.eu/9LaS7HN

 

PLEASE NOTE: If you wish to debate with me in the comments about anything I have said, I welcome that. However please listen to the complete podcast and ensure you argue with the points I have made. Arguments that simply consist of nonsense such as “what gives you the right to judge” or “I’m a [insert religious affiliation] and you should be ashamed of yourself” or other such vacuous non-arguments will simply be ridiculed.

 

 

 

__________________________

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(16:05)

 

Firstly, I would like to thank everyone who has supported myself and this channel since it started. I try to answer every message and reply to comments, but I’m getting more and more of them, so if I didn’t reply to your message, or comment, please don’t think I’m being rude. I genuinely appreciate your support.

 

One thing I have noticed about the comments and messages I receive, is more and more people are asking what they should do, or what direction the movement should take in order to win. And let’s face it, that’s all that matters, that we win. It’s no good just making YouTube videos, or sharing memes on Facebook and Twitter. We have to have a viable route to victory!

 

Now that’s not to throw shade on YouTubers, or content creators. I’ve said repeatedly that building an alternative media is an important part of what we need to do in order to achieve victory. Over the past few weeks I’ve had the pleasure of working with numerous other content creators. I’ve appeared alongside Tara McCarthy on her excellent YouTube channel. I appeared on Red Ice TV with Henrik, and on National Bugle Radio with Patrick Slattery. And, of course, I appeared on the David Duke show on Rense Radio, as I do every Friday. All of these appearances are listed on my channel, and if you get the time please, have a listen and support these people and their work.

 

This alternative media has played a key role in breaking the vise-like grip of the mainstream media. For the first time since the advent of television and the growth of the mass media, more people are watching and listening to podcasts, like this, than are watching terrestrial television. Viewing figures for YouTube documentaries and shows now regularly exceed actual television viewing figures. And that is great news. This has allowed those within our movement to take our message of truth, directly to the people, on a greater scale than ever before. And it has allowed us to respond instantly to major incidents, like the recent terror attacks. But more so, it has allowed us to actually expose the mainstream media.

 

On my recent appearances on the David Duke show, and on Red Ice TV, I spoke of the way CNN and other media outlets had stage-managed groups of so-called “moderate Muslims” to make it look like there was a spontaneous protest against terrorism by the Muslim community. In fact, the whole event was carefully choreographed and put together to fool the public! And the alternative media has given us the power to expose these things. At one-time that fake news would have been broadcast by the mainstream media and gone unchallenged. Not anymore! Now the expose of that scene has been seen by millions, and no doubt discussed and disseminated by millions more.

 

We have built something that is necessary, and that has been so powerful in not only spreading our message, but in connecting us to one another. But despite my high praise for the alternative media and those using social networks to spread our message, that alone is not going to win us power. We need to go further, and we need to build a viable movement for change. One that can take power away from these traitor politicians and return it to people who have our nation’s and our people’s best interests at heart.

 

[03:31]

 

Because, for all the great media that we can produce, if we don’t have a way to get rid of those people who flood our country with immigrants, if we can’t remove those brainwashing our children in schools, and if we can’t wrestle power from those who are the architects of multiculturalism, then all the YouTube videos in the world won’t help! We will die out! And our homelands will be handed away on a plate to those from the Third World and the Middle East. And the most likely outcome of that is that Britain and Europe will become Islamic Republics.

 

So what do we need to do? Well, at the weekend there was a large march in Manchester, led by Tommy Robinson. And it was very well attended! From the pictures it looked as if there were well over 2,000 people there. And believe me, what I am about to say is NOT an attack on the many good people who attended the event! It certainly isn’t an attack on Tommy Robinson, who was very smartly presented and gave an excellent speech. Also, as an aside to this, Tommy put a superb video, to which I have placed a link in the description below, where he exposed how the police actively work with anti-fa and the left to ensure the maximum amount of disruption possible at these demos.

 

Make no mistake! The state are complicit in attempting to ensure that all these marches and demos end in violence! And they work hand in hand with the so-called “revolutionaries” on the Left to achieve this. So whilst I commend Tommy Robinson and the hundreds of good people who attended the March in Manchester last weekend sadly it was yet again spoiled not just by the left and the police, but by people who are supposedly on our side! Who behaved in a manner that was not only disrespectful to Tommy Robinson and the hundreds who turned out for a peaceful march, but their behavior was also disrespectful to the victims of Islamic terrorism that the March took place to honor and remember.

 

I saw images of people drinking, putting their middle fingers up at the left, and screaming aggressively. All of these images are exactly what we DON’T need! Firstly, no one should be bringing crates of lager to these events! No one should be on these marches walking down the streets with cans of beer in their hands. This march was to remember the little girls murdered at a concert. It wasn’t a football match, and getting drunk and rowdy, certainly wasn’t a fitting memorial to those victims.

 

[06:12]

 

Then, there was a picture of a man holding up a severed pig’s head! Now I don’t know this individual, and I can’t imagine what he was thinking. But whatever thought process led him to believe that such an action was both acceptable and a good way to honor the victims of terrorism, was flawed, to say the very least! These actions led to, probably, some of the most embarrassing and repulsive images of a nationalist demo that I have ever seen! And culminated with a man actually taking a bite out of the pig’s head! Much to the pleasure of the press, who were present.

 

 

Now again, let me underline what I have said earlier. I am NOT attacking the good people on that march, and I am certainly not attacking Tommy Robinson, or those who organized the event and tried to get people off their bottoms and out doing something.

 

But getting people out and doing something, is all well and good, but it must be conducive to building a healthy and righteous movement. And crucially, it must also, actually be effective at gaining power! And unfortunately, that march, whilst filled with hundreds of decent people who were well-intentioned and willing to do something, ended up giving our enemies dozens of pictures that portray the event as a drunken and violent affair. And worse still, that whole severed pig’s head. Boy! Was that an own goal of epic proportions! And it will be used time and time again, by the press to malign our message.

 

Now, before anyone says the Left provoked, or started any of the violent outbursts, I am well aware that is the case. And I understand the frustration and anger felt by Patriots on marches when they are being heckled, and abused, and taunted, by the left. However, reacting to those taunts by throwing cans, screaming obscenities, and throwing up middle fingers, is what the Left wants, because, their friends in the media then have all the ammunition they need to make us look like the bad guys!

 

Finally, on the subject of marches, and this is the crucial point, I honestly don’t believe they change anything. This country has seen huge marches in our capital. We saw over 400,000 members of the Countryside Alliance march through London in 2002, to protest against the proposed hunt ban. Did that change anything? No! The Blair government still banned hunting. We saw over one million people march through London in 2003, again war in Iraq. Did that stop the war? No! The Blair government still took us to war.

 

[09:00]

 

Both of those marches numbered far in excess of any march that has ever been organized by nationalists, and neither achieved anything! These marches are a great way for people to vent their frustration. But ultimately, once everyone has gone home, any positive energy built up at such an event is gone! It’s lost! These events do not leave a lasting impact, and have never influence government policy making.

 

We need to engage in activities that leave a lasting impression, and that actually build something of worth that can allow us to wrestle power from the internationalists and the political elite!

 

So what do I propose? Well, quite simply, we must take a message directly to the people. We must bypass the police, bypass the Left, ditch the lager, and get serious! And I believe the only way forward, is through making a serious effort to rebuild what we have lost. And that means, community politics! It means going out leafleting, speaking to people, and engaging with the public in a non-confrontational manner.

 

And this may put some of our people off from actually doing anything, because it’s not going to be fun! It’s not going to be lager and a sing song! It’s going to be hard work! It’s going to be dressing smartly! It’s going to be projecting the correct image! And it’s going to be speaking to people on the streets, on housing estates, and in town centers. It’s going to be working to identify people who agree with us and building a genuine movement for change.

 

Now, before anyone starts talking about elections and the merits, or drawbacks of the electoral road, I am NOT for one minute suggesting that we take part in general elections, or stand in parliamentary seats. At least not for the foreseeable future. These elections tend to work on a two-party basis, and the limits for spending, mean that the establishment parties can easily out spend any nationalist party, or group.

 

What I am talking about, is using local council elections and by-elections as campaigning tools. And I’m not even necessarily talking about winning those seats, at least not immediately. I am talking about using the electoral process on a local level to spread our message and engage with communities. I’m talking about working on community politics and local issues to help people, and draw people together around our cause. I want nationalists to be able to emerge as community leaders! People who are seen as trusted individuals and pillars of their community!

 

[11:56]

 

You see, if we are ever going to stand a chance of winning, as stated earlier, we must have a plan as to how we are going to remove the politicians and replace them with nationalists. People who have the interest of our people and our homeland at heart! And the only way to do that, is politics! But there is another aspect to this. And that is reversing the damage that’s being done to our communities. One of the reasons indigenous Europeans have been losing ground to immigrants, is because we have lost our sense of community. We are no longer a cohesive group. We no longer think of the good of our neighbors.

 

However those who have come to our lands, the immigrants, are cohesive! They value the idea of a strong and cohesive community. And that is why they have been so successful in importing their own culture, traditions, and ways of life, and have slowly managed to completely take over whole areas. Sometimes transforming entire towns and cities!

 

We need to rebuild our shattered communities! But once they are rebuilt, we need to be in a position from which we can lead those communities in the right direction. And the only way to do all of this, is to engage in community politics. Which will be hard work, and will take time. But it’s something we must do! But despite it being hard work and taking time, it is a good use of our time! Just imagine a group of 200 nationalists, all gathered together in a town centre, cordoned off by police, and with a noisy left-wing counter-demonstration next to them. Then imagine, those 200 people split up into 50 separate groups of four people. All out with tabletop stalls in small towns, or leafleting estates, or knocking on doors and talking to people. One of those two events will end up in negative press and few members of the public, if any, will actually be reached. The other of those two approaches would reach thousands and thousands, and would recruit new people to our cause without any trouble, or police, or any left-wing intervention.

 

What’s more, the community minded approach would start to build dozens of small support bases for our cause all over the UK. A network of patriots who could act as one! And ultimately, if managed correctly, could grow in size and potentially begin to seize power from the politicians who have betrayed us!

 

We need a sensible approach! We need an approach that can win power! Not one that leads us down a road of confrontation, and arrests, and fights with the Left. We need to rebuild our communities. And we need to lead those communities!

 

[14:58]

 

I’m not saying this will be quick, or easy. In fact, I’m saying this will be hard work! And it will take time. But if you genuinely believe your people and your nation are worth saving, then that hard work is surely a sacrifice worth making? Because we can march around in circles and fight the Reds all day, but if we don’t have path to power, all that will just be a political sideshow as the establishment continue their genocidal policies of mass immigration and multiculturalism.

 

Thank you for listening.

 

If you enjoyed this podcast, please help spread the message by liking and sharing it on social networks. If you want to hear more from me, please hit the subscribe button, as new videos are posted every week. You can also read my book “The Fall of Western Man”. It’s available as a free ebook and in both hardback and paperback, and all the links are in the description below.

 

 

Finally if you want to join in the discussion with me feel free to add me on Facebook, and you can now follow me on Twitter as well. Everyone’s welcome.

 

[16:05]

 

 

 

END

 

 

============================================

 

PDF Notes

Version 1 — xx

* Total words = xxx
* Total images = x
* Total A4 pages = xx

 

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

(Available later)

 

 

 

 

 

Version History

 

Version 2:

 

Version 1: Dec 14, 2017  — Published post.

Read Full Post »

 

 

[Here is the transcript of a video that provides good background information about who is really behind Donald Trump, naming names. The video came out in January 2017 and gets to the point straight away. That is, Trump is a creation of organized jewry. He’s their man, and the idea that he is some sort of loose cannon challenging the “system“, the “establishment“, is simply wishful thinking by most of those that support him. How could it be otherwise?

The video discusses the “media versus Trump” narrative, rightfully describing it as a contrived and scripted “battle” for the demoralized White populace that seeks a way out of the corrupt political system.

It then discusses those who believe that Trump will deliver on his hinted promise that he will get to the bottom of 9/11, and why that is most definitely a lost cause, since his patrons were the very perpetrators of 9/11.

Next, the video presents (over 10 minutes) the very long list of Ashkenazi jews that directly surround Trump. The tip of the “jewberg“, so to speak.

The last five minutes deals briefly with more about how the jewish media “works” with Trump in this charade, saying:

The bottom line is, you cannot be anti-establishment, anti globalist, and be pro-zionist, pro-Israel!

The videos concludes with Trump’s hypocrisy in regard to Hillary Clinton, both pre-election and post-election, where she is transformed from an evil criminal, a monster, deserving jail, into Trump’s trademark, “terrific person” schtick KATANA.]

 

[Further comment: For those who voted for Trump, or supported him, don’t take this criticism of him as a tool of organized jewry, personally. I’ve been hoodwinked most of my life with the jewish-run political left/right puppet show, but have managed to get over it. You can do so, also — KATANA.]

 

_______________________

 

 

Trump IS the Swamp!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Click the link below to view the video:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCSUdSv9Dzo

 

 

YouTube Description

 

Published on January 21, 2017

 

Source:

“TruthMediaRevolution” Channel:

TRUMP IS THE SWAMP: Trump’s Jewish Elite MAFIA and The 5 Dancing Israelis (2017)

 

 

__________________________

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(23:47)

 

 

[00:07]

 

 

There is absolutely no doubt that Donald Trump is supported, owned, and operated by the Zionist jew power structure. It is a verifiable fact! It is a fact the mainstream media and mainstream alternative media alike, will dare not touch. Anyone ignoring this fact and not exposing this, is either incredibly naive, or bought and paid for, to sell you disinformation.

 

 

Donald Trump is absolutely, surrounded by, and has appointed psychopathic neo-cons and Rothschild Zionists! Yet many are in delusion and denial, largely in part due to their desperate desire for a savior. And this is what the elite have counted on. It is through this desperation and demoralization of a collective consciousness, sick and tired of a corrupt system and government, they were able to once again, to pull off another dog and pony show and manipulate people into believing that, once again, things could be different this time, through the obsolete and meaningless system of voting. Hope and Change 2.0.

 

 

Unfortunately this is just another case of:

 

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss!

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »