Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Leon Trotsky’ Category

 

 

[Hidden Empire was written by William Pelly in the late 1930s warning Americans of the threat that Organized Jewry posed by its plans for the takeover of America and world domination.

In Part 2 here, Pelly takes the view that Jesus should not be viewed as a jew because of his rejection of their beliefs and ways, and their subsequent hatred of the man whose philosophy has so seriously hindered the consummation of jewish plans for world dominion.

Next, the Talmud is condemned for all its horrifying contents that is both anti-Christian and anti-civilization.

In “Persecution” Pelly dismisses the notion that a whole people cannot be indicted for the acts of a few of those people, when those “few” people are the admitted and avowed spokesmen for that people. These leaders of jewry are descendants of a priestly group know as the Sanhedrin, now  called the Kahal, with its local governing bodies called Kehillah. All these world-wide jewish groups work together using all and any means to accumulate jewish power and dominance. This has resulted in rightful resistance from non-jews that the jews describe as “persecution” — when in truth it is merely “prosecution” of their crimes.

In “We Have Tarnished and Broken Their Power” various jews, and others, are quoted on how destructive they have been to non-jews —  KATANA.]

 

_______________________

 

 

Hidden Empire

by

 

 

William Dudley Pelley

 

circa 1939

 

Part 2

 

 

Contents

 

Part 1

William Dudley Pelley
Out of Their Own Mouths
“WHAT DO THESE HEBREWS HERE?”
INTRODUCTION

Part 2

WAS JESUS A JEW?
THE TALMUD CONDEMNED
“PERSECUTION”
“WE HAVE TARNISHED AND BROKEN THEIR POWER”

Part 3

THE WORLD MENACE FOR CENTURIES
THE ILLUMINATI
WAS LINCOLN A VICTIM OF THE PLOT?

Part 4

THE POWERFUL KAHAL
GERMANY
RUSSIA

Part 5

THE PROTOCOLS
RELIGION
PACIFISM

Part 6

MONEY
EDUCATION
INDUSTRY

Part 7

GOVERNMENTS
PROPAGANDA
CONCLUSION
WHAT TO DO?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

__________________________

 

 

 

 

William Dudley Pelley

(March 12, 1890 – July 1, 1965)

 

 

Bolshevik Revolution correspondent, Zionologist,
author and founder of The Silver Legion.

 

… By the end of the First World War, Pelley’s prestige was such that his publisher commissioned him as a foreign correspondent on assignment in Eastern Europe. With a generous expense account and the diplomatic rank of “consular courier” conferred upon him by the United States government, he shipped out for Russia in early 1918. To him, his assignment was a fun adventure, a well-paid lark and a chance to vacation overseas. It turned out to be something far more. Until his fateful voyage, Pelley was a happy-go-lucky, up-and-coming author, with no real convictions of his own. As he remembered years later, the experience transformed him “from a nondescript writer to a grim crusader.

 

For two years, he covered 8,000 miles by train and horse-back through Siberia, into the Ukraine, across the steppes of Central Russia, into the Far East and through Asia to Japan. Through all these extensive travels, he was a personal witness to the communist revolution. He saw peasant women crucified to barn doors and a schoolroom in which the teacher and all the students had been bludgeoned to death, their brains splattered against the blackboard. There where whole villages depopulated by murder, with corpses swinging from every lamppost and choking the nearby streams. These victims where rarely military personnel, nor politically involved in any way. They were common people, mostly farmers and factory workers. Such horrific sights, encountered wherever the Reds passed, almost unhinged his mind. But they were so commonplace, he gradually grew inured to the sea of blood through which he traveled daily.

 

He learned first-hand that communism was not an ideology, it was simply the organization of the worst criminal elements led by Jews to destroy society. This was no speculation. Virtually all the commissars he knew (some of whom he interviewed) where Jewish, while the majority of their activists where common murderers and perverts “liberated” from prison. They were motivated by hatred, power and revenge, nothing else. All their slogans about “Equality” and “Peace” where transparent rues to dupe thoughtless liberals among the Russian people, their victims.

 

Drunk with success, the Jews boasted openly of their plans for world conquest by fomenting the same kind of divisiveness in other countries. They told Pelley that Russia was just a stepping stone, a base for international subversion. Even their phony “communism” was utterly dispensable, just like their own followers, who they never hesitated to massacre on the slightest whim. Their long-range goal was one-world government, in which the masses became willing slaves, fueling an international economy with their genius and labor, while the Jewish people dominated all important positions of power.

 

“‘After Russia,’ one greasy commissar smirked at Pelley, ‘then Europe and later, America!’…

 

_____________________

 

 

WAS JESUS A JEW?

 

 

 

FOR INSTANCE, the world has accepted for centuries that our Beloved Lord Jesus was a Jew. But no where in the Bible is the statement made that Christ was a Jew. Definitely therein do we learn He was a Nazarene. Never were the Nazarenes known as Jews. Christ severely denounced the Jews, for their evil ways in no uncertain terms. Never did He address them as “My people.” As a matter of provable fact, the Jews disown Christ, refuse His leadership, refuse Christianity. The only reason they have ever claimed Christ to have been a Jew, was a childish idea they could thus turn aside the Gentiles indignation at their Jewish destructiveness.

 

The Jewish priesthood hated Jesus and betrayed him because of His outspoken opposition to their philosophy of life and because if His teachings were followed, their plans for world dominance that had already been formed for a few hundred years would be given a serious setback. Moreover, He was one of the despised Nazarenes, a Jew only in the sense that he was born in a Jewish province and was therefore a Jewish citizen. Why should a Nazarene, an outsider, set himself up as a higher authority on religious matters than the Sadducees and Pharisees and above all lay claim to being the Messiah foretold by Jewish prophets?

 

It simply couldn’t be tolerated, so He was betrayed and crucified.

 

The wise men of the Jews had been telling their followers that the world was to be delivered to them and that the Gentiles would he “their servants in the fields.” Jesus was becoming too popular and His teachings were weakening their propaganda. That must be stopped once and for all. So they plotted His death. But as the years rolled on and Christian teachings became more and more popular, a cleverly camouflaged program was worked out, essentially anti-Christian but which, by claiming that Jesus was descended from David, strengthened the position of the Jews as “The Chosen People,” and therefore entitled to tolerance by the followers of the Christ.

 

[Page 16]

 

Back of it all, however, was a hatred of the man whose philosophy had so seriously hindered the consummation of Jewish plans for world dominion.

 

It is this sort of background that enables us to understand the Jewish anti-Christ endeavors; we can understand why communism and socialism, secret societies of continental Europe, and all cults and organizations developed or sponsored by the Jewish Sanhedrin, have as one of their principal aims the elimination of the Christian faith; we can understand why Jewish writers have since slandered Jesus, saying that he was an illegitimate child; we can understand why Jewish writers put out the tale that the works of Jesus were no miracles of God, but instead were performed by the aid of a magic stone that Jesus concealed within a slit in his flesh.

 

Jesus had his own ideas about the Jews. He may have gone about speaking in their synagogues, but when he faced them as a race, he said with flashing eyes:

 

Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own, for he is a liar, and the father of it.

 

A few moments before this terrific indictment Jesus had likewise said (see the eighth Chapter of St. John, the 38th to the 45th verses):

 

I know that ye are Abraham’s Seed. .. but if ye were Abraham’s Children ye would do the works of Abraham. But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told ye the truth, which I have heard of God, this did not Abraham. Ye do the works of your father.

 

THE TALMUD CONDEMNED

 

STUDENTS of the Jewish Question run across astounding bits of history full of proof that the “Jewish Question” has been recognized as existing down through the centuries. In “The Original Mr. Jacobs.” the Minerva Press, in 1888, presented the findings of a trial instigated by the French King, St. Louis, 1215-1270, known as “The King Without Fear,” who determined to ascertain for himself the cause of the complaints and bitter animosities against the Jews.

 

[Page 17]

 

This great and good king, who had an inexhaustible love for justice, sought to know Wily the Jews were the object of the hatred of all. Upon the demand of Pope Gregory IX, whose attention was also called to this fact, he caused the Talmud to be examined in a solemn assembly, over which presided William d’Auvergue, and in which the Rabbis were invited to take part.

 

It was in Paris, in the beginning of summer, the 24th of June, 1240, when this memorable council took place. The Court of St. Louis was presided over on that day by Queen Blanche, Mother of St. Louis. A few volumes, covered with strange characters, attracted the attention of the curious, and it became known through Nicholas, a converted Jew, that the characters were Hebrew letters, and that the books were the Talmud.

 

But soon a more interesting spectacle attracted the attention of the assembly. Four Rabbis had entered the room. They were Jechiel, of Paris; Judah, son of David; Samuel, son of Solomon, and Moses, of Coucy, son of Jacob — the latter a famous orator known throughout France and Spain. They entered. sad and uneasy, into the palace of the King, while the assembled Jews scattered themselves about like a flock of sheep without a shepherd.

 

Every opportunity was given to the Jews to defend themselves, which they did with courage and ability. They, however, were forced to acknowledge that the Talmud contained precepts not only contrary to the good of Christian society, but of every civilized society. Passages were read which horrified the listeners.

 

The book said that Jesus Christ was plunged into hell, into ever-boiling mud; that the Divine Son of the Holy Virgin was the fruit of adulterous intercourse with a soldier named Pandara, and that the ministers were no better than howling dogs. Other passages were read that increased the fear of the Jews, and the indignation of the Christians. … St. Louis, the King, displayed an extraordinary amount of moderation. As Jechiel was trembling with fear, one of the officers of the King said, ‘Jechiel, who thinks of doing any harm to the Jews?’ The Talmud alone was condemned and all copies that could be found were cast into the flames.

 

[Page 18]

 

PERSECUTION

 

THERE are those who still cling to the archaic notion that a whole people cannot be indicted for the acts of a few. But when the “few” are the admitted and avowed spokesmen for a race, and no general protestation of their declarations concerning their whole people is forthcoming from that people, its organizations, its clergy, or its press, then the axiom is again just another bit of brick dust in the eyes of the gullible or unwary. Why else are leaders recognized or tolerated, unless they speak or act for great masses of individuals making up a “people”? If they speak and act without rebuke, then their utterances and behaviors must be accepted as having the approval of that people. And for such approval a whole race can be indicted!

 

History records, available to the public, make practically no mention of Jews, prior to something like 220 years before the advent of Christ. Even then they were a retrogressive clan, even old Ezra putting into the Lord’s mouth the criticism: “Thou art a stiff-necked people.” It was the Sadducee’s priest craft, organized as a Sanhedrin for purely temporal power, that proceeded to give the Jews a racial consciousness down to modern times. And terrible indeed has been the growth of that organized temporal power unto the present day. Instead of being a small religious oligarchy over a restive and non-social people in a corner of Palestine, as it was in the day of Christ, the Sanhedrin has now spread out and become worldwide, under a name which few Gentiles ever chance to hear — the Kahal!

 

[Page 19]

 

Wherever the Tribe of Judah has penetrated, there trouble has arisen for political authority. We have not the time in this article to trace a careful history of the Jews. It is enough to begin the story with the disgust of Titus, the Roman Emperor, who in 70 A. D. determined to blot out the Sanhedrin as an unhallowed power for political mischief in his empire, by scattering the Jews to the four corners of the world.

 

Again other commentators say:

 

The authority of the Jewish leaders in the time of August us had been widely extended by a learned but unscrupulous priesthood, over an ignorant, superstitious people. In that age while a struggle was going on between two rival sects, Pharisees and Sadducees, certain political clubs were formed which concealed under a religious mask the grasping aims of a clique.

 

These clubs were not slow to take advantage of their country’s misfortunes. A few years later during the siege of Jerusalem by Vespasian, they won, by the betrayal of the Jewish cause, the favor of the Roman Conqueror, and were subsequently entrusted by the Imperial Government, with the administration of Palestine.

 

Moreover, with the sack of Jerusalem, the destruction of the Temple, and the death of the patriotic leaders, the common people found themselves utterly dependent, in spiritual as well as civil matters, upon the same self-styled societies of the learned, which alone possessed the secrets of the priesthood and copies of the sacred texts. By interpreting, altering and augmenting the rules and rituals these texts contained, and by a system of espionage and assassination, the new rulers established a strict control over the daily lives of their co-religionists.

 

Having thus taken hold of the Jewish people through the medium of the Roman authority, this clique easily placed its laws above the Ten Commandments and formed a government whose control over its subjects was absolute. This government became known henceforth as the Sanhedrin!

 

The dispersion of the Jews which followed in 135 A. D., instead of destroying the Sanhedrin, served on the contrary, to set it on a new and firmer basis, on which it has continued ever since.

 

[Page 20]

 

Wherever Jewish immigrants settled, they founded communities apart under the direction of the fraternities, and held to the precepts of the Talmud. Each community had its local secret government, called Kehillah. The different aims of these communities always found themselves intimately related with those of the Central body upon which their existence depended.

 

So it was possible for the Jews to develop and operate a perfected system of espionage, which they still maintain. In olden days as now, they sent agents to watch over Jewish affairs at police stations and other agents were posted at the doors of shops, hotels, business houses, law courts, and even in private homes, to get advance information of all kinds. In this manner all kinds of things became possible, even blackmail, with which all sorts of political pressure could be brought to bear on Gentiles who had political influence in the Roman Government at that time. Hence, it is easy to understand the reason for the concentration of trade into Jewish hands, with all these instruments of political pressure and advance business information at their finger tips at all times.

 

There is a colloquial term that should always be coupled with the Dispersion. That is “Der Tag,” or “The Day of Redemption,” when World Jewry shall be gathered together again under one head, with all Gentile nations subservient to this world-wide Jewish empire whose governing seat is to be in Jerusalem. (Zion Movement.)

 

Millions of gullible Germans, as well as millions of gullible and illiterate Christians everywhere, thought back in 1914 that Der Tag meant the Day of Recognition for Germany as to her place in the sun as a nation. It was a phrase and a term art fully “sold” to the German people, or rather, put in their mouths. Really it was Hebrew in meaning, indicating — in the secret councils of Jewry — that having provoked and produced world war, with the white pariah nations thus engaged in slaughtering one another by the hundreds of thousands, the outcome could only mean the achievement by the Jews of an age-long goal: winning to the pinnacle of world-wide political and economic power.

 

[Page 21]

 

So the Germans, French, English and Russians went forth to fight this war of self-extermination, not knowing that in greeting Der Tag they were playing the game of Jewish world imperialists — as will be explained and authenticated more in detail further along. The true story of the rise of Hitlerism to power in Germany, how and why it could get the support of the whole German people and why the Jews are execrating it all over the world, is really the story of how the Germans discovered the Jewish influence about the Kaiser that worked to project the world war — not only from Berlin, but from Paris, London and Washington. Real Germans are smashing Jewish influence; weeding it out of Germany. Because of this setback to their plans, world Jewry is turning the full blast of its temporal power and control of instruments of publicity in all countries against Hitler to vilify, misrepresent, and destroy him. This too will be dealt with later.

 

The point to be registered here is, that from the Roman Titus through the long line of medieval monarchs to Queen Isabella and Ferdinand, wherever the Jews have won political or financial prominence in a country, seeds of disruption, unrest, and sedition have been sown to such an extent that in a greater or lesser degree monarchs have had to deal harshly with this people in consequence.

 

To counterbalance or suppress such unrest and sedition, one of three expedients has been resorted to: Jews have been expelled from such royal domain, or “dispersed,” or they have been confined in restricted areas called Ghettos with orders not to leave the same under pain of death, or they have been butchered in massacres called “pogroms.

 

Jewish publicists by the tens of thousands have trained the Christian public to believe that their “persecution” is chastisement inflicted on this people by God Almighty, and that it has resulted from the competitive cleverness of Jews, or religious prejudice, which Gentiles fear or resent. Delving soberly and clinically into the facts, we discover that persecution has come about from far different causes. Jews are everywhere persecuted, and have been persecuted consistently through the generations, as mass reprisals against their own behavior and their own predatory or seditious acts. We have ample admissions from Jewish authorities that this is so!

 

[Page 22]

 

 

WE HAVE TARNISHED AND

 

BROKEN THEIR POWER

 

DR. MUNZER, a Jew, in his book The Way to Zion, boasts:

 

We Jews have spoiled the blood of all the races. We have tarnished and broken their power. We have made everything foul, rotten, decomposed, and decayed.

 

The Jew, Dr. Weizman, in a pamphlet entitled “Great Britain, Palestine and the Jews,” states:

 

Here we are, just Jews and nothing else, a nation among nations.

 

The Jew, Isaac Adolphe Cremieux, the founder of the Universal Jewish Alliance, says:

 

Our nation is not a French one, nor English, nor Swiss, nor German. Nay, our union is Jewish and it is universal. Living in lands of dispersion, we cannot be concerned about the changing aims of those lands which are strange to us until the time when our own aims, both moral and material, are in danger. If you realize that in spite of your cover-nationalities that you form only one and the same people, if you believe that only Judaism constitutes the religious and political truth, then you will listen to our appeal and accept it.

 

The Jew, Maurice Samuel, on p. 155 of his book, You Gentiles, says:

 

We Jews, we the destroyers, will remain the destroyers forever! Nothing that you will do will meet our needs and demands. We will forever destroy because we need a world of ‘our own.’ …

 

The Jew, D’Israeli, in 1844, in his book, Coningsby, said:

 

The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.

 

Later, in his book, Life of George Bentinck (pp. 497-8), the same author says in regard to revolutionary outbreaks,

 

The influence of the Jews may be traced in the last outbreak of the destructive principle ill Europe. An insurrection takes place against tradition and aristocracy, against religion and property. Destruction of the Semitic principle, extirpation of the Jewish religion, whether in the Mosaic or the Christian form, the natural equality of man, the abrogation of property, are proclaimed by the secret societies who form proviso governments, and men of the Jewish race are found at the head of every one of them.

 

The people of God cooperate with atheists ; the most skillful accumulators of property ally themselves with Communists; the peculiar and chosen race touch the hand of all the scum and low castes of Europe. And all this because they wish to destroy that ungrateful Christendom which owes to them even its name and whose tyranny they can no longer endure.

 

[Page 23]

 

The Jew, Walter Rathenau, in Wiener Press, Dec. 24, 1921, said:

 

Only three hundred men, each of whom knows all the others, govern the fate of Europe! They select their successors from their own entourage. These German Jews have the means in their hands of putting an end to the form of any State which they may find ‘unreasonable.’

 

This sort of testimony is not manufactured propaganda to advance race prejudice from religious or economic spleen. It is the attestment of representative and responsible Jews themselves.

 

Wherever Jews are knotted together, in any country, there they are banded to bring about in some form or other the weakening of that country, that the world-wide Zionist government may eventually be actualized.

 

Mr. Charles Pinckney, one of the framers of the Constitution, published a diary for private distribution among his friends under the title: Chit-Chat Around the Table During Intermission.

 

[Page 24]

 

Says Mr. Pinckney in his little book [1]:

 

Dr. Benjamin Franklin, a venerable figure, weighed down by years and wisdom, leaned one hand on his staff, the other on the table and said, ‘There is a greater menace to these United States of America….’

 

This great menace, gentlemen, is the Jew!

 

In whatever country Jews have settled in any great numbers they have lowered its moral tone; they have depreciated its commercial integrity; have segregated themselves ; have not assimilated; have sneered at and tried to undermine the Christian religion upon which this nation is founded by objecting to its restrictions; have built up a state within a state, and when opposed have tried to strangle that country to death financially, as in the case of Spain and Portugal.

 

If you do not exclude them from the United States in this Constitution, in less than two hundred years they will have swarmed here in such great numbers that they will dominate and devour the land, and change our form of government for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives, our substance, jeopardized our liberty, and put into i t our best thoughts.

 

If you do not exclude them, in less than two hundred years our descendents will be working in the fields to furnish them substance, while they will be in the counting houses, rubbing their hands gleefully. I warn you, gentlemen, that if you do not exclude the Jews for all time, your children’s children will curse you in your graves! Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics. Let them be born where they will, or how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never be otherwise.

 

Mr. Franklin was well qualified to voice an opinion, because he had just returned from France where he had witnessed the early stages of the Revolution. While there he was able to perceive the diabolical influence that was throwing the country into turmoil.

 

It has not taken two hundred years for Benjamin Franklin’s prophecy to come true. Private Jewish statistics indicate there are over 12,000,000 Jews in the United States, where they control more than sixty-five percent of the vital interests of our country.

 

[Page 25]

————————-

[1] [There is some doubt about the authenticity of the Franklin quote. See discussion at this Stormfront link: https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t646261/ ]

============================================

 

PDF Notes

Version 1 —

* Total words = xxx
* Total images = xx
* Total A4 pages = xx

 

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

(Available later)

 

 

 

 

Version History

 

Version 2:

 

Version 1: Nov 23, 2017  — Published post.

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

 

 

[Hidden Empire was written by William Pelly in the late 1930s warning Americans of the threat that Organized Jewry posed by its plans for the takeover of America and world domination.

In Part 1 here, Pelly’s first-hand description of the horrors that the jewish Bolsheviks carried out in Russia is described. As a correspondent for an American publisher he traveled extensively throughout Siberia, Ukraine, Eastern Europe, etc., during the early stages of the jewish takeover of Russia.

A general introduction is then given to how organized jewry had subverted the American political system using their money power to control media, government and politicians.

He makes the point that one of the reasons why this jewish conspiracy to gain control is able to continue and expand, is that most ordinary Americans are not able to believe that such a thing is possible, because they they themselves could not conceive of doing such a thing:

The whole cabal is so colossal, and its underlying motives are so utterly foreign to anything in Christian psychology, that one becomes mentally befuddled before the recital has gone very far, and rejects the whole nefarious program as a nightmare of vicious minds.

Of course this same mentality afflicts us today as shown by the number of people who fail to comprehend, or simply do not want to comprehend, what should be very, very obvious now, that Organized jewry carried out 9/11. —  KATANA.]

 

_______________________

 

 

Hidden Empire

by

 

 

William Dudley Pelley

 

circa 1939

 

Part 1

 

 

Contents

 

Part 1

William Dudley Pelley
Out of Their Own Mouths
WHAT DO THESE HEBREWS HERE?
INTRODUCTION

Part 2

WAS JESUS A JEW?
THE TALMUD CONDEMNED
PERSECUTION
WE HAVE TARNISHED AND BROKEN THEIR POWER

Part 3

THE WORLD MENACE FOR CENTURIES
THE ILLUMINATI
WAS LINCOLN A VICTIM OF THE PLOT?

Part 4

THE POWERFUL KAHAL
GERMANY
RUSSIA

Part 5

THE PROTOCOLS
RELIGION
PACIFISM

Part 6

MONEY
EDUCATION
INDUSTRY

Part 7

GOVERNMENTS
PROPAGANDA
CONCLUSION
WHAT TO DO?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

__________________________

 

 

 

 

William Dudley Pelley

(March 12, 1890 – July 1, 1965)

 

 

Bolshevik Revolution correspondent, Zionologist,
author and founder of The Silver Legion.

 

… By the end of the First World War, Pelley’s prestige was such that his publisher commissioned him as a foreign correspondent on assignment in Eastern Europe. With a generous expense account and the diplomatic rank of “consular courier” conferred upon him by the United States government, he shipped out for Russia in early 1918. To him, his assignment was a fun adventure, a well-paid lark and a chance to vacation overseas. It turned out to be something far more. Until his fateful voyage, Pelley was a happy-go-lucky, up-and-coming author, with no real convictions of his own. As he remembered years later, the experience transformed him “from a nondescript writer to a grim crusader.

 

For two years, he covered 8,000 miles by train and horse-back through Siberia, into the Ukraine, across the steppes of Central Russia, into the Far East and through Asia to Japan. Through all these extensive travels, he was a personal witness to the communist revolution. He saw peasant women crucified to barn doors and a schoolroom in which the teacher and all the students had been bludgeoned to death, their brains splattered against the blackboard. There where whole villages depopulated by murder, with corpses swinging from every lamppost and choking the nearby streams. These victims where rarely military personnel, nor politically involved in any way. They were common people, mostly farmers and factory workers. Such horrific sights, encountered wherever the Reds passed, almost unhinged his mind. But they were so commonplace, he gradually grew inured to the sea of blood through which he traveled daily.

 

He learned first-hand that communism was not an ideology, it was simply the organization of the worst criminal elements led by Jews to destroy society. This was no speculation. Virtually all the commissars he knew (some of whom he interviewed) where Jewish, while the majority of their activists where common murderers and perverts “liberated” from prison. They were motivated by hatred, power and revenge, nothing else. All their slogans about “Equality” and “Peace” where transparent rues to dupe thoughtless liberals among the Russian people, their victims.

 

Drunk with success, the Jews boasted openly of their plans for world conquest by fomenting the same kind of divisiveness in other countries. They told Pelley that Russia was just a stepping stone, a base for international subversion. Even their phony “communism” was utterly dispensable, just like their own followers, who they never hesitated to massacre on the slightest whim. Their long-range goal was one-world government, in which the masses became willing slaves, fueling an international economy with their genius and labor, while the Jewish people dominated all important positions of power.

 

“‘After Russia,’ one greasy commissar smirked at Pelley, ‘then Europe and later, America!’…

 

_____________________

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

mogv-part-05-cover-ver-2

 

[Part 05]

 

[Benton Bradberry’s 2012 book, “The Myth of German Villainy” is a  superb, must-read, revisionist look at how the German people have been systematically, relentlessly and most importantly, unjustly vilified as the arch criminal of the 20th century. Bradberry sets out, cooly and calmly as befits a former US-Navy officer and pilot, to show why and how the German people have been falsely accused of massive crimes and that their chief  accuser and tormenter, organized jewry is in fact the real party guilty of monstrous crimes against Germans and the rest of the world.

In Part 05, the reign of mass murder and torture unleashed on the Russian people, called, “The Red Terror” following this jewish takeover is detailed. 

The real holocaust of the twentieth century was that which the Jews inflicted upon the Russian people during and after the Russian Revolution of 1917. This was one of the bloodiest episodes in history during which vast millions of Russian Christians were murdered. The aim of the new Jewish overlords was to completely eliminate the upper classes, or the possessing classes, collectively known as the bourgeoisie, including men, women and children. The most intelligent, most able, most high achieving segment of the population was wiped out, leaving a population of ignorant workers and peasants. Even the Czar and his family were murdered by the Jews” —  KATANA.]

 

 

 

 

NOTE: The author has very generously given me permission to reproduce the material here — KATANA.

 

 

 

 

The Myth of

 

German Villainy

 

by

 

Benton L. Bradberry

 

 

 

 

 

Contents

Preface  

Chapter 1   –   The Myth of Germany as an Evil Nation

Germany’s positive image changes overnight 

Chapter 2   –   Aftermath of the War in Germany

The Versailles Treaty

Effect of the Treaty on the German Economy

Was the War Guilt Clause Fair?

Did Germany Really Start the War?

Chapter 3   –   The Jewish Factor in the War

Jews at the Paris Peace Conference

Jews in Britain

Chapter 4   –   The Russian Revolution of 1917

Bolsheviks Take Control

Jews and the Russian Revolution

Origin of East European Jews

Reason for the Russian Pogroms Against the Jews

Jews leave Russia for America

Financing the 1917 Revolution

Jews in the Government of Bolshevik Russia

Chapter 5   –   The Red Terror

Creation of the Gulag

Bolsheviks kill the Czar

Jews as a Hostile Elite

The Ukrainian Famine (Holodomor)

Chapter 6   –   The Bolshevik Revolution Spreads throughout Europe

Jews in the Hungarian Revolution

Miklos Horthy saves Hungary

Jews in the German Revolution

The Sparticist Uprising in Berlin

Jewish Bolsheviks Attempt to Take Italy

Jewish Bolsheviks Attempt to Take Spain — The Spanish Civil War

Czechoslovakia in Danger of Communist Takeover

The Comintern’s aim? World domination!

Chapter 7   –   The Nation of Israel

History of the Expulsion of Jews

Chapter 8   –   Jews in Weimar Germany

Jews Undermine German Culture

Chapter 9   –   Hitler & National Socialists Rise to Power

The 25 Points of the National Socialist Party

Chapter 10  –  National Socialism vs. Communism

National Socialism

Jews Plan Marxist Utopia

Chapter 11  –  Jews Declare War on Nazi Germany

Text of Untermeyer’s Speech in New York

The Jewish Persecution Myth

Effect of boycott on the German economy

Jewish exaggerations are contradicted by many

Chapter 12  –  The Nazis and the Zionists actually work together for Jewish Emigration out of Germany

The Nuremberg Laws -1935

The Zionist Movement

Chapter 13  –  Life in Germany under Hitler

Night of the Long Knives

1934 Annual Nazi Rally at Nuremberg

Hitler Revives the German Economy

Hider becomes the most popular leader in the world

Chapter 14  –  Hitler Begins Reclamation of German Territory

Chapter 15  –  The 1936 Olympics

Chapter 16  –  Anschluss.” The unification of Austria and Germany

Austrian Economy Revived

Austria’s Jews

Chapter 17  –  Germany annexes the Sudetenland

Chapter 18  –  War with Poland

The Polish Problem

Hitler’s Proposal to Poland

Kristalnacht

German-Polish Talks Continue

Jews influence both Roosevelt and Churchill

British and American political leaders under Jewish influence

Roosevelt’s Contribution to Hostilities

Lord Halifax Beats the War Drums

Germany Occupies Bohemia and Moravia

Roosevelt pushes for war

Anti-war movement becomes active

Poles murder German Nationals within the Corridor

Chapter 19  –  The Phony War

Russo-Finnish War

The Norway/Denmark Campaign

German invasion of Denmark and Norway

Churchill takes Chamberlain’s place as Prime Minister

Chapter 20  –  Germany invades France through the Low Countries. The Phony War Ends.

Churchill the War Lover

The Fall of France

Hitler makes peace offer to Britain

Chapter 21  –  The Allied Goal? Destruction of Germany!

Chapter 22  –  Germany as Victim

Rape and Slaughter

Jewish Vengeance

The Jewish Brigade

Chapter 23  –  Winners and Losers

Bibliography

 

 

Chapter 5

 


The Red Terror 

 

 

mogv-part-05-2508-cheka-badge-red-background

 

[Add. image — The badge of the dreaded jewish run CHEKA.]

 

The Jewish controlled media uses the word “Holocaust” (with a capital H) today in reference to what purportedly happened to Jews at the hands of Nazi Germany during World War II. But the real holocaust of the twentieth century was that which the Jews inflicted upon the Russian people during and after the Russian Revolution of 1917. This was one of the bloodiest episodes in history during which vast millions of Russian Christians were murdered. The aim of the new Jewish overlords was to completely eliminate the upper classes, or the possessing classes, collectively known as the bourgeoisie, including men, women and children. The most intelligent, most able, most high achieving segment of the population was wiped out, leaving a population of ignorant workers and peasants. Even the Czar and his family were murdered by the Jews.

 

In order to bring about their new Marxist Utopia, the old Russian culture would have to be completely deracinated and replaced by the new Marxist culture. By the time the Bolshevik Jews completed the extermination of these classes, the “old” Russia portrayed in the novels of Tolstoy, Pushkin, Dostoyevsky, Chekov and Gorky simply did not exist anymore.

 

After gaining control of the state, the Jews began to extend their control to every corner of the Russian government and of Russian society. In order to overcome opposition and to subdue the Russian population, a secret police organization was established in December, 1917, called the “Extraordinary Commission for Combating Counter-Revolution and Sabotage,” known by its acronym, “Cheka.” At this time, a half dozen other political parties were in existence, in addition to the Bolshevik party, all of which were also controlled by Jews. One of them was the Socialist Revolutionary Party, or the Left S.R. party. When the Left S.R. party revolted against the Bolsheviks, the Cheka rounded 350 of them up and summarily shot them. Ironically, most of the members of the S.R. party were also Jews.

 

On August 17, 1918 a young military cadet assassinated the Jewish head of the Petrograd Cheka, Moisei Uritsky, in retaliation for the execution of his friend and fellow cadet. Soon afterwards, on August 28, 1918, the Jewess, Fanya Kaplan, a member of the Left S.R. Party, incensed over the execution of her fellow party members by the Cheka, nearly succeeded in assassinating Lenin. In reaction to these two events, the Bolsheviks began a bloody wave of persecutions which became known as the “Red Terror.”

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

Background to Treason:

 

The Balfour Declaration

William Pierce

Background to Treason - 0819

[Image] Arthur Balfour

 http://www.counter-currents.com/2014/06/background-to-treason-the-balfour-declaration/

 

Editor’s Note:

 

The following text by William Pierce is an excerpt from a longer text, “Background to Treason: A Brief History of U.S. Policy in the Middle East, Part 1: From the Exodus to the Balfour Declaration.” I simply removed everything before the discussion of the Balfour Declaration. Pay no mind to Pierce’s passing reference to the now thoroughly discredited Khazar account of the originals of Ashkenazi Jewry.

————————-

 

The middle of the 19th century saw a growing restlessness in the Jews of eastern and central Europe. The Industrial Revolution and all the changes in trade, transportation, and life-styles that came with it had broken up old patterns and created new opportunities, and the Jews began reorganizing themselves to take advantage of these.

 

They created two new movements: one, preaching internationalism and class warfare was directed primarily toward the Gentiles. It was Communism, and its principal founder was the Jew Karl Marx.

 

The other, directed toward the Jews only, preached Jewish nationalism and solidarity It was Zionism, and one of its first proponents was Moses Hess, a close associate and friend of Marx. Hess’s book Rome and Jerusalem, published in 1862, was one of the seminal documents of the Zionist movement.

 

 

Background to Treason - 0820

[Image] Moses Hess

 

The Zionists wanted to establish an exclusively Jewish national state, from which they could direct the activities of the Jews spread throughout the Gentile world — and eventually direct the Gentile world itself Toward this end groups of Jews from Europe began buying up land in Palestine and establishing Jewish colonies there in the 1870s and 1880s.

 

This colonization activity inevitably provoked the fear and resentment of the Palestinians, and in response the Turkish administrators took measures to limit the activities of the Zionists in Palestine. The Jews countered by seeking political allies among the Gentiles in England and Europe and looking for ways to bring pressure against the Turks.

 

To coordinate their moves they organized a Zionist Congress, which held its first meeting in August 1897, in Basle, Switzerland The leading figure at the first Zionist Congress was Theodor Herzl (1860-1904), whose book Der Judenstaat (The Jewish State), published in Vienna the year before, contained a cogent summary of the Zionist position.

 

Background to Treason - 0821

 [Image] Theodor Herzl

 

According to Herzl:

 

Every nation in whose midst Jews live is, either covertly or openly, anti-Semitic…. Anti-Semitism increases day by day and hour by hour among the nations; indeed, it is bound to increase, because the causes of its growth continue to exist and cannot be removed.

 

He saw this anti-Semitism, which arose naturally wherever the Jewish presence made itself felt, as a blessing, because it kept the Jews conscious of their unique status, prevented their assimilation, and united them in their efforts to overcome their Gentile hosts:

 

… [T]hus united, we suddenly discover our strength…. When we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat, the subordinate officers of the revolutionary party; when we rise, there rises also our terrible power of the purse.

 

Even before the Zionist Congress met, Herzl had been attempting to persuade the Turks to give the Jews free rein in Palestine. First he tried blackmail, hinting that he and his fellow Jews, by using their influence, could either silence or intensify the agitation against Turkey then being carried on in various European capitals by Armenian expatriates, who had their own grievances.

 

When the blackmail didn’t work, Herzl’s thoughts turned to war. He told his fellow Zionists at Basle that they might be able to achieve control of Palestine through a European war, if they played their cards right:

 

It may be that Turkey will refuse or will be unable to understand us. This will not discourage us. We will seek other means to accomplish our end. The Orient question is now a question of the day. Sooner or later it will bring about a conflict among the nations. The great European war must come. With my watch in hand do I await this terrible moment. After the great European war is ended the peace conference will assemble. We must be ready for that time.[1]

 

The other Zionist leaders fell in with Herzl’s war plans — which, it is well to note, were proclaimed to world Jewry 17 years before the actual outbreak of the war. As it turned out, the Jews were able to use the war just as they had hoped: from it they finagled a promise by the government of Great Britain to secure Palestine for them.

 

This promise, the so-called “Balfour Declaration,” has an especially interesting history, for it not only throws light on the crucial period during which the Jews first secured the control over the foreign policy of the United States which they still wield — that is, the period during which the American people lost their sovereignty, unknowingly yielding to an alien minority in their midst the power to choose which nations would be America’s friends and which her foes; to decide when there would be peace and when war, and how each war would be waged, whether to win or lose or draw — but it also brilliantly illuminates the general modus operandi which the Jews, spread out as they are among many nations, have long used in playing off one nation against another in order to attain their own ends.

 

It would hardly be possible to relate here every Zionist move in the 20 years between Herzl’s speech to the first Zionist Congress and the British government’s offer of Palestine to the Jews, even if all the moves were known. It must suffice, in laying the background, to mention a few key developments which made the Balfour Declaration possible.

 

First, the years immediately following the first Zionist Congress saw an enormous influx of Jews into the United States. Although U.S. immigration statistics prior to 1899 do not reveal the race or religion of immigrants, we know that in 1897 the total Jewish population of the United States was approximately 800,000 — and nearly half of those had arrived in the preceding decade. By 1914 the number had more than tripled, to some 2 1/2 million. The majority of the new immigrants came from Russia, where the Zionist movement was especially strong.

 

Background to Treason - 0825

[Image] The Jewish Immigrant publication

 

This tidal wave of Jewish immigrants made itself felt very soon in the economic and political life of the United States. Jewish ambition and energy, not to mention a predilection for those endeavors yielding quick gain, resulted in a phenomenally rapid growth in the financial power wielded by Jews in the country, and this power was put to immediate use in acquiring a political influence disproportionate to their numbers. Already in 1896, the year before Herzl’s speech, the New York Times fell into Jewish hands, with its purchase by Adolph Ochs. Thirteen years before that Joseph Pulitzer, the Jewish father of yellow journalism, had purchased the New York World. And in the years between 1897 and 1917 the Jews continued their acquisitions, building a very strong bridgehead in the news media for furthering their long-range goals.

 

Background to Treason - 0828

[Image] Adolph Ochs

 

Just as the Palestinians had reacted to the Jewish colonization of Palestine, so did White Americans react to the Jewish colonization of America. The politicians responded with their typical timidity and ambiguity to White demands for a halt to the flood of Jews. In 1897 the U.S. Congress enacted a law requiring proof of literacy before immigrants could be admitted to the United States. The law would have kept out most of the Jews from Russia and other parts of eastern Europe then pouring into the country, but it never had a chance to accomplish its aim, because President Cleveland vetoed it.

 

As the growing Jewish presence became more obnoxious to Americans, the pressure on the reluctant politicians to do something grew. Jewish political influence had also grown apace, however, and the Jews were able to counter every effort at legislation intended to keep them out of the country. President Taft vetoed another immigrant-literacy law early in 1913, just before leaving office, and President Wilson did the same thing in 1914.

 

Background to Treason - 0827

 [Image] Jewish immigrants leaving Ellis Island, 1915

 

The second major development leading to the Zionists’ triumph in 1917 was the election of Woodrow Wilson to the Presidency in 1912, and then his reelection in 1916. Wilson was entirely their man. From the time he took office in 1913 until he left it in 1921, he made hardly a decision without consulting his counselor and confidante, Louis Dembitz Brandeis.

 

Background to Treason - 0822

 [Image] Louis Dembitz Brandeis

 

Wilson was an ineffectual man, who, after failing to make a career for himself as a lawyer, retreated to the academy, teaching political science first at Bryn Mawr, then at Wesleyan, and finally at Princeton. He was also less than brilliant as an academician, but he possessed a rhetorical flair which he used to promote a hodgepodge of confused, liberal notions, thereby gaining for himself the backing of the liberal element among the Princeton faculty, who eventually boosted him into Princeton presidency. He was never very strong, and he suffered several major breakdowns, even in the relatively sheltered life of a professor.

 

Louis Brandeis (1856-1941), an enormously wealthy and successful Boston lawyer, was the son of Jewish immigrants from Bohemia. He was also the leader of the Zionist movement in the United States. In 1912 he headed the group which invited Nahum Sokolow, the Zionist leader from Russia, to speak in the United States. In 1914 he organized and became the chairman of the Provisional Executive Committee for General Zionist Affairs. But his Zionist leadership was something kept between himself and his fellow Jewish nationalists.

 

To the American public and the Democratic Party’s politicians he was a very clever advocate of “democracy,” who was involved in a number of celebrated legal cases on behalf of labor unions. His left-wing admirers in the press nicknamed him “the people’s lawyer.

 

Background to Treason - 0823

[Image] Woodrow Wilson

 

Wilson had also achieved something of a reputation as a champion of equality and democracy when, as president of Princeton University, he became embroiled in a fight to abolish Princeton’s exclusive student eating clubs, which he regarded as elitist and undemocratic. The ruckus caused by Wilson’s opposition to the eating clubs brought him to the attention of New Jersey’s Democratic Party political bosses, and they chose him as their gubernatorial candidate in 1910. They also introduced him to Brandeis, who took the weak, vain, professorial Wilson firmly in hand and guided him in all political matters (and many private matters as well) thereafter.

 

When Wilson became President he immediately offered Brandeis a position in his Cabinet, but the clever Jew chose instead to remain in the background, where his influence over Wilson would not become compromised by public scrutiny. Indeed, Brandeis was very wise in this decision, because when he did accept an appointment to the Supreme Court from Wilson in 1916, there was a great deal of public opposition.

 

Nevertheless, Brandeis became the first Jew to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court, and he did so without giving up his informal post as counsel to the President and general political “fixer,” as recent research has revealed. [2]

 

The third development which was essential to Zionist aims was the war itself and the impasse it had reached in the autumn of 1916. We dare not become involved in a history of the First World War here, but the main points relevant to our following of the Zionist trail are these: The principal antagonists were Britain and Germany One of the many countries fighting on the British side was Imperial Russia. One of the several countries on the German side was Turkey. In the west the antagonists were stalemated, facing each other in opposing trenches which stretched across the continent from north to south and unable to gain very much ground on either side without enormous losses.

 

The German Verdun campaign of 1916, the longest and bloodiest “battle” in the history of warfare, had failed to achieve any significant advantage for the Germans, and it was to cost them and their French opponents half a million casualties each before it finally petered out. The Franco-British Somme offensive, which followed the ebb of the German offensive at Verdun — and which cost the British 19,000 dead on the first day — proved equally inconclusive.

 

Background to Treason - 0829

[Image] The battle of the Somme took place between 1 July and 18 November, 1916, The British Expeditionary Force and the French Army conducted a joint offensive against the Germans, who had held much of the territory since 1914. When the battle had ended, the allies had advanced almost 10 km but were still 5 km from their major objective. More than one million casualties were suffered.

 

On the eastern front the Russian Brusilov offensive cost the Czar a million men and left him so weakened that the Germans thereafter held the advantage.

 

At sea German submarines were claiming an increasing toll on British shipping, and Britain was feeling the strain. The only hope British leaders could see for ending the stalemate was to bring America into the war. Otherwise, to continue the war would bankrupt them; they would be obliged to accept a compromise peace, without achieving their aim of crushing Germany as an industrial-commercial rival. The public sentiment in America was strongly against intervention in the war, and Wilson won reelection in November by campaigning as a pacifist. His campaign slogan was, “He kept us out of war.

 

 

Thus was the stage set. Now enter the Zionists.

 

The Jews had three principal aims: First, to break the Turkish hold on Palestine. Second, to obtain from whichever power replaced Turkey in Palestine the concessions they had been unable to obtain from the Turks. Third, to destroy Russia, an object of special hatred to them.

 

Until the fall of 1916 it was the third of these aims which manifested itself most noticeably in the Jews’ policy. It is well to remember that it had been Rus warriors, under Sviatoslav the Great, who in 965 had utterly smashed the Khazar Empire, and the Ashkenazic Jews, who made up virtually all of the Zionist leadership, had long memories. Even today Jews celebrate annually their triumphs over enemies thousands of years ago.

 

Furthermore, a parallel Jewish movement, Bolshevism, had made great strides in Russia, and Jews throughout the world, of whatever persuasion, wanted to see the Russians weakened to the point that the Bolsheviks could seize the nation. It was with this purpose in mind that Jacob Schiff, America’s richest Jew, financed Trotsky and his fellow Jewish Bolsheviks to the tune of $25 million. Later, after the downfall of Russia, Schiff opened his coffers to the Zionists.

 

Background to Treason - 0830

[Image] Jacob Henry Schiff (born Jakob Heinrich Schiff; January 10, 1847 – September 25, 1920)

 

Background to Treason - 0832

[Image] Leon Trotsky born Lev Davidovich Bronshtein (7 November 1879 – 21 August 1940) was a Russian Marxist revolutionary and theorist, Soviet politician, and the founder and first leader of the Red Army.

 

 

Toward the end of 1916, however, it was clear that Russia was in terminal condition. Although she still had vast armies in the field and even vaster reserves of manpower at home, from a strategic viewpoint Russia was whipped, and the Germans were already beginning to withdraw troops from the eastern front in order to bolster their strength in the west.

 

A good share of the credit for the Russian collapse belonged to the Bolsheviks, who were working furiously to undermine morale in the trenches and in the factories. They spread pacifist and defeatist leaflets among the troops and carried on in Russia’s cities much as they did more than 50 years later in America’s cities during the Vietnam war.

 

Until this point then, it had behooved the Jews to back Germany, and they did. Ultimately, however, their plan called for Germany — or, at least, Germany’s ally Turkey — to lose. So it was that in October 1916 the Jews made their offer to the British government: We will bring America into the war, if you will take Palestine away from the Turks and give it to us.

 

The story of this offer, its acceptance by the British government, and its aftermath has been told in several places and hinted at in many. Not in any of the “approved” history texts dealing with the First World War which are used today in American colleges and universities, of course, or in any “popular” treatments of the war to be found in newsstand paperbacks, but the interested reader can nevertheless find a number of unimpeachable, firsthand accounts, if he is willing to dig a bit in a large library. For example, Malcolm Thomson, the biographer of David Lloyd George, Britain’s wartime prime minister, writes on pages 273-74 of David Lloyd George, the Official Biography (London, 1949):

 

 Background to Treason - 0835

[Image] David Lloyd George, 1st Earl Lloyd-George of Dwyfor, OM PC (17 January 1863 – 26 March 1945) was a British Liberal politician and statesman.

 

. . . In the autumn of 1916, when the question of strengthening sympathy with the Allied cause was growing acute, an Armenian Jew, James A. Malcolm, who was giving expert help and advice to the Government about Middle Eastern matters, approached [Foreign Office Undersecretary Sir Mark] Sykes and urged that the Allies should capture the sympathies of American Jewry — at that time tending to favour Germany — by a declaration of support for the Zionist cause. Sykes saw the possibilities of the suggestion, and laid it before Lord Milner, who took it up with the Cabinet.

 

. . . Secret assurances were given to the Zionist leaders through Sykes that the British government would support their cause if the consent of their Allies could be obtained. A message to this effect was sent to Justice Brandeis, the American Zionist, who was a close friend of President Wilson, and the help of leading Zionists in all the Allied countries was mobilized.

 

Samuel Landman, secretary to Zionist leaders Chaim Weizmann and Nahum Sokolow in 1916, and later general secretary of the World Zionist Organization, narrates the events from firsthand knowledge in his booklet Great Britain, the Jews, and Palestine (London, 1936). [3] On pages 4-5 he writes:

 

During the critical days of 1916 and of the impending defection of Russia, Jewry, as a whole, was against the Czarist regime and had hopes that Germany, if victorious, would in certain circumstances give them Palestine. Several attempts to bring America into the War on the side of the Allies by influencing influential Jewish opinion were made and had failed. Mr. James A. Malcolm, who was already aware of German pre-war efforts to secure a foothold in Palestine through the Zionist Jews and of the abortive Anglo-French demarches at Washington and New York; and knew that Mr. Woodrow Wilson, for good and sufficient reasons, always attached the greatest possible importance to the advice of a very prominent Zionist (Mr. Justice Brandeis, of the U.S. Supreme Court); and was in close touch with Mr. Greenberg, Editor of the  Jewish Chronicle (London); and knew that several important Zionist Jewish leaders had already gravitated to London from the Continent on the qui vive awaiting events; and appreciated and realised the depth and strength of Jewish national aspirations; spontaneously took the initiative, to convince first of all Sir Mark Sykes, Under Secretary to the War Cabinet, and afterwards Monsieur Georges Picot, of the French Embassy in London, and Monsieur Gout of the Quai d’Orsay (Eastern Section), that the best and perhaps the only way (which proved so to be) to induce the American President to come into the War was to secure the co-operation of Zionist Jews, by promising them Palestine, and thus enlist and mobilise the hitherto unsuspectedly powerful forces of Zionist Jews in America and elsewhere in favour of the Allies on a quid pro quo contract basis. Thus, as will be seen, the Zionists, having carried out their part, and greatly helped to bring America in, the Balfour Declaration of 1917 was but the public confirmation of the necessarily secret “gentleman’s” agreement of 1916 made with the previous knowledge, acquiescence and/or approval of the Arabs and of the British, American, French and other Allied Governments, and not merely a voluntary altruistic and romantic gesture on the part of Great Britain as certain people either through pardonable ignorance assume or unpardonable ill-will [sic] would represent or rather misrepresent.

 

An interesting account of the negotiations carried on in London and Paris, and subsequent developments, has already appeared in the Jewish press and need not be repeated here in detail, except to recall that immediately after the “gentleman’s” agreement between Sir Mark Sykes, authorised by the War Cabinet, and the Zionist leaders, cable facilities through the War Office, the Foreign Office and British Embassies, Legations, etc., were given to the latter to communicate the glad tidings to their friends and organisations in America and elsewhere, and the change in official and public opinion as reflected in the American press in favour of joining the Allies in the War, was as gratifying as it was surprisingly rapid.

 

 

Background to Treason - 0834

[Image] Samuel Landman’s booklet (98 pages) Great Britain, the Jews, and Palestine (London, 1936).

 

Landman tells the same story in other places: for example, in a lengthy letter titled “The Origin of the Balfour Declaration” published in the  Jewish Chronicle (London, February 7, 1936; page 33).

 

A much more detailed account of the negotiations between the Jews and the British government in October 1916 is in Two Studies in Virtue (London, 1953), a biography of Sir Mark Sykes by his son, Christopher Sykes, who drew extensively on his father’s diaries and letters of the period. A few paragraphs excerpted here from pages 180-188 of that book suggest the essentials:

 

Background to Treason - 0836

 [Image] Colonel Sir Mark Sykes, 6th Baronet (born Tatton Benvenuto Mark Sykes; 16 March 1879 – 16 February 1919) was an English traveller, Conservative Party politician and diplomatic adviser, particularly about matters respecting the Middle East at the time of the First World War.

 

. . . One day in October of 1916 a certain Mr. James Malcolm came to visit Mark Sykes.. . . Sykes . . . [said] that he could see no end to the war. In France there was a military deadlock. At sea the power of the [German] submarine was growing; on land that of the Russian armies failing. . . . A decisive victory, or indeed a victory of any kind, seemed impossible without American participation on an enormous scale, and of that he saw little likelihood. . . . At this Mr. Malcolm took occasion to harangue his friend on the principles which should govern British foreign policy regarding the Jewish world. . . . He proceeded to tell him about Zionism. . . .

Mr. Malcolm . . . then told Sykes of a very curious and powerful influence which Zionists could exert. One of President Wilson’s closest advisers and friends was Justice Louis D. Brandeis, a Jew. . . . It was believed . . . that Wilson was attached to Brandeis by ties of peculiar hardness. . . . It followed that . . . a Zionist policy was in truth the way to capture American sympathy [for the Allies]. . . .

. . . [Malcolm then said:]

The question is, do you want the help of the Jews of the United States? The only way you can get that help is by offering Palestine to the Zionists.

. . . [After the British had agreed to the Zionist terms, the leader of the Zionist delegation, Nahum] Sokolow made a simple request, namely that the Zionist Committee should have facilities for communications abroad. He pointed out that since they were an international body this was especially needful to them, and he suggested that they should be granted governmental privileges, since they could thus attain their object while subjecting themselves to the needs of secrecy and censorship.

The next morning . . . [Sokolow] got what he asked for: it was agreed that the War Office and the Foreign Office would send Zionist letters and telegrams by way of [British] Embassies. . . . The news was given out to Jewish communities all over the world that in return for certain services the British Government . . . would satisfy the Jewish longing for Palestine . . .

A more general account is given by Professor H. W. V. Temperley in his six-volume work,  A History of the Peace Conference of Paris (London, 1924). Of the Balfour Declaration he writes (vol. vi, pp. 173-174):

 

That it is in purpose a definite contract between the British Government and Jewry represented by the Zionists is beyond question. In spirit it is a pledge that in return for services to be rendered by Jewry the British Government would ‘use their best endeavours’ to assure the execution of a certain definite policy in Palestine.

 

As Samuel Landman notes above, once the deal had been struck and the word sent out to American Jews;

 

the change in official and public opinion as reflected in the American press in favor of joining the Allies in the war was surprisingly rapid.

 

President Wilson, without blushing or skipping a beat, changed his tune from;

 

I kept us out of war” to “We must destroy German militarism in order to make the world safe for democracy.

 

Background to Treason - 0837

[Image] Thomas Woodrow Wilson (December 28, 1856 – February 3, 1924) was the 28th President of the United States from 1913 to 1921.

 

A detailed examination of the chicanery used by the “American” press and President to coax a reluctant nation into sending its sons off to die in Flanders’ fields and a thousand other foreign places, in order that, unknown to them, the Jews could satisfy their side of their deal with the British government, would take us far beyond the scope of this article. The various pretexts used for abandoning neutrality — such as Germany’s submarine blockade of Britain and the so-called “Zimmermann telegram” — are treated exhaustively in the “approved” textbooks on the war (although they are treated with utmost seriousness rather than as pretexts).

 

In brief, it was a matter of Wilson’s talking peace, even sending his personal factotum, “Colonel” Edward Mandell House, on supposed peace missions to the various belligerents, while actually seizing every opportunity to fan the flames of war. The scheme was to present an appearance to the public of his being forced, much against his will, to go to war in order to defend America’s honor. Because the war provided plenty of real opportunities for international “incidents” to occur, especially when Wilson took pains to see that Americans would be in harm’s way as often as possible, it was not overly difficult to generate the desired impression in the public mind.

 

For example, when a German submarine sank the British ship Laconia [4] on February 25, 1917, with the loss of three Americans who were aboard, Wilson and the press put on a great show of moral outrage at this act of German “barbarism,” treating it as an intolerable affront to American sovereignty.

 

Background to Treason - 0838

[Image] RMS Laconia was a Cunard ocean liner built by Swan Hunter & Wigham Richardson, launched on 27 July 1911.

 

It was a matter of exaggerating incidents which could have been ignored — or avoided altogether — if Wilson really had wanted to preserve American neutrality. The German submarine blockade of Britain was milked for all it was worth to generate anti-German sentiment among the American people, while the far more ruthless British blockade of Germany was quietly ignored. Wilson connived to assure that the former would yield pretexts for intervention, while he took measures to prevent American ships and citizens from running afoul of the latter. [5]

 

In any event, it is clear that Mr. Ochs’s investment in the New York Times yielded a handsome dividend to world Jewry, as did Mr. Brandeis’ years of patient counsel to the fawningly grateful and ever more dependent Woodrow Wilson.

 

The British formalized their intention to satisfy their side of the deal with the Jews by issuing the Balfour Declaration, which was in the form of a letter, dated November 2, 1917, from British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour to “Lord” Lionel Rothschild, who was recognized as the leader of the Jewish community in Britain. The brief document merely stated a resolution which had been approved by the British Cabinet:

 

His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.

 

Background to Treason - 0840

[Image] Lionel Nathan de Rothschild, OBE (25 January 1882 – 28 January 1942) was an English banker and Conservative politician.

 

The last provision, added at Jewish insistence, reveals the Zionists’ intention that Jews everywhere should be uniquely favored by being permitted to enjoy the citizenship, with full rights and privileges, of both the Gentile country in which they happen to reside at the moment and of their “national home” in Israel.

 

The reservation about not prejudicing the “civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine” was, under subsequent Jewish pressure, eventually ignored.

 

The Balfour Declaration provides an especially interesting example of the hypocritical cant which has characterized the statesmanship of both of the great English-speaking powers during the 20th century. Pious concern for the rights of the non-Jews in Palestine is expressed in a document which, in effect, is a promise by the British government to secure for the Jews land which belonged neither to it nor to the Jews. How did Mr. Balfour imagine that his government could accomplish that dubious feat without prejudicing the rights of the current owners of the land, who were in no mood to give it up willingly?

 

One is reminded of the British government’s claim in September 1939 that it was declaring war on Germany in order to protect the freedom of its ally Poland, which had been invaded by Germany — a claim which conveniently overlooked the fact that the Soviet Union had also invaded Poland. In 1945 the same British government, its earlier expression of concern for Polish freedom buried under a bushel of new cant about democracy and peace, obligingly agreed to its ally becoming an unwilling vassal of the Soviet Union.

 

Nothing, however, can quite match the unabashed brazenness of the hypocrisy Woodrow Wilson displayed in engineering the entry of the United States into the First World War — unless it was that displayed a generation later by Franklin Roosevelt, when he too talked peace and plotted war, at the behest of the same people Wilson had served.

 

Wilson’s campaign propaganda for the 1916 election emphasized his stance of non-intervention in the war then raging in Europe. Most of the press and the public were also against intervention. Then, after Wilson’s reelection — and the British-Zionist deal, concluded just a few days before the election — the press began a “surprisingly rapid” shift toward an interventionist stance. Wilson followed, calling for a declaration of war against Germany just five months after his reelection.

 

Background to Treason - 0839

[Image] A New York Journal headline marks the entrance of the United States into World War I, April 6, 1917.

 

Even before that, however, he and Brandeis had been planning war, and it was their secret assurances that the United States would be brought into the war that led British leaders to reject Germany’s peace offer of December 12, 1916. If that offer had been accepted, the lives of some three million White soldiers — including 115,000 Americans — Which were consumed in 1917 and 1918 would have been spared. Furthermore, the Second World War, which grew out of the unjust conditions imposed on Germany after the Allied victory, would have been avoided. And if Russia could have had peace in December 1916, she probably would have had time to stamp out the Bolshevik virus being spread among her soldiers and workers by the Jews, and Communism would have suffered a setback from which it might never have recovered. All of the grim and bloody consequences of Wilson’s switch in foreign policy stem from the Zionist influence in the U.S. news media and politics, which had been built up over the preceding two decades.

 

Background to Treason - 0824

[Image] WILSON’S campaign propaganda for the 1916 election emphasized his stance of non-intervention in the war then raging in Europe. Most of the press and the public were also against intervention. Then, after Wilson’s reelection — and the British-Zionist deal, concluded just a few days before the election — the press began a “surprisingly rapid” shift toward an interventionist stance. Wilson followed, calling for a declaration of war against Germany just five months after his reelection.

Even before that, however, he and Brandeis had been planning war, and it was their secret assurances that the United States would be brought into the war that led British leaders to reject Germany’s peace offer of December 12, 1916. If that offer had been accepted, the lives of some three million White soldiers — including 115,000 Americans — which were consumed in 1917 and 1918 would have been spared.

Furthermore, the Second World War, which grew out of the unjust conditions imposed on Germany after the Allied victory, would have been avoided. And if Russia could have had peace in December 1916, she probably would have had time to stamp out the Bolshevik virus being spread among her soldiers and workers by the Jews, and Communism would have suffered a setback from which it might never have recovered.

All of the grim and bloody consequences of Wilson’s switch in foreign policy stem from the Zionist influence in the U.S. news media and politics, which had been built up over the preceding two decades.

 

 

Upon reflection, may we not conclude that lying cant is what should be expected of any government which has degenerated to the point that it consists mainly of lawyers? And is not that the kind of government which must inevitably devolve under a system which gives the franchise to the credulous and the gullible?

 

It is the historians and the teachers, however, who most deserve our scorn. Everyone expects lawyers to lie; word trickery is their stock-in-trade. No lawyer committed to the truth could hope to earn a living. But historical scholars are supposed to be different. They are supposed to be indifferent to popular myths, always seeking the reality which lies beneath the facile explanations of governments and politicians.

 

The explanation for the reluctance of modern historians to write about the Zionist role in the First World War is this: In the immediate postwar years, the Zionist responsibility for America’s entry into the war was a valid topic for historical investigation and discussion, with even the Zionists freely admitting their actions. After all, America and Britain had won the war, and Germany was down and out. How could the truth hurt anyone?

 

Then in 1933 Germany, under Adolf Hitler, began getting back on its feet. Suddenly any discussion of the truth about the Zionist role in the last war became “anti-Semitic.

 

One man who was privy to every detail of that role was David Lloyd George. In 1938 the former British war secretary and prime minister wrote a two-volume book,  The Truth about the Peace Treaties. In that book he described the way in which Jews all over the world — in Germany and Russia as well as in America — immediately switched from a pro-German to an anti-German stance after the deal between his government and the Zionists was made. He pointed out the fatal consequences this switch had for the German war effort. And on page 1140 he noted:

 

The Germans themselves know that to be the case, and the Jews in Germany are suffering today for the fidelity with which their brethren in Russia and in America discharged their obligations under the Zionist pledge to the Allies.

 

Since the Second World War, any criticism of the Jews has been taboo, and even the historical scholars have feared to tread on ground where their discoveries might reveal the Jews in a a bad light. The consequences of this cowardice have been very costly indeed.

 

From National Vanguard magazine (December, 1982),  transcribed by Michael Olanich

 

http://www.counter-currents.com/2014/06/background-to-treason-the-balfour-declaration/

 

 

Notes

 

[1] American Jewish News (New York), March 7, 1919. A photographic reproduction of the pertinent sections from that publication and other Zionist documents may be found in Issue No. 48 of National Vanguard.

 

The reader should note that Herzl uses the expression “the nations,” both in this speech and in the excerpt quoted above from his book, as a code phrase: He gives it the same meaning it has in the Old Testament, as in, “I have this day set thee over the nations… to root out and to pull down and to destroy ” (Jeremiah 1:10) That is, “the nations” means “the goyim.

 

Harper’s Bible Dictionary (Madeleine S. Miller and J. Lane Miller, New York, 1959), has the entry: “nations, a term used by Hebrew writers for non-Israelites, outsiders, Gentiles, heathen.

 

[2] The Brandeis-Frankfurter Connection: The Secret Political Activities of Two Supreme Court Justices, by Bruce Murphy (Oxford University Press, 1982). Murphy, a political science professor at Pennsylvania State University, discovered an extensive file of correspondence between Brandeis and a Jewish law professor at Harvard University, Felix Frankfurter (1882-1965). From the time of his appointment to the Supreme Court in 1916 until his retirement in 1939, Brandeis paid Frankfurter to serve as his messenger and errand boy, so that Brandeis could secretly maintain all of his political contacts behind the cloak of judicial impartiality.

 

[3] http://libcudl.colorado.edu/wwi/pdf/i73443578.pdf

 

[4] RMS Laconia was a Cunard ocean liner built by Swan Hunter & Wigham Richardson, launched on 27 July 1911, delivered to the Cunard Line on 12 December 1911, and began service on 20 January 1912. She was the first Cunard ship of that name.

 

On the outbreak of World War I Laconia was converted into an armed merchant cruiser in 1914 and based at Simon’s Town, South Africa in the South Atlantic, from which she patrolled the South Atlantic and Indian Ocean until April 1915. She was then used as a headquarters ship for the operations to capture Tanga and the colony of German East Africa. She continued to serve on the East Africa station, before returning to Britain with a convoy in June 1916. She was handed back to Cunard in July 1916 and on 9 September resumed service.

 

On 25 February 1917 she was torpedoed by SM U-50 6 nautical miles (11 km) northwest by west of Fastnet while returning from the USA to England with 75 passengers (34 first class and 41 second class) and a crew of 217 commanded by Captain Irvine. The first torpedo struck the liner on the starboard side just abaft the engine room, but did not sink her. 20 minutes later a second torpedo exploded in the engine room, again on the starboard side, and the vessel sank at 10:20 pm. 12 people were killed, six crew and six passengers, including two American citizens, Mrs. Mary Hoy and her daughter, Miss Elizabeth Hoy, who were originally from Chicago.

 

Chicago Tribune reporter Floyd Gibbons was aboard Laconia when she was torpedoed and gained fame from his dispatches about the attack.

 

 

[5] The chicanery involved in the way Wilson and the press dealt with the blockades the belligerents imposed on one another is revealed especially well in Colin Simpson’s excellent and thoroughly documented book The Lusitania (Boston, 1972). That book in turn refers the interested reader to a number of other valuable sources.

 

Source: http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/06/background-to-treason-part-1/

 

======================================

 

PDF of this blog post. Click to view or download (1.7 MB). >> Background to Treason- The Balfour Declaration

 

 

Version History

 

Version 2: Dec 16, 2017 — Improved formatting.

 

Version 1: Published Jun 27, 2014

Read Full Post »