Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Jordan Peterson’ Category

 

 

[Mark Collett, 37, is a British political activist and former chairman of the Young BNP, the youth division of the British National Party (BNP), and was director of publicity for the party. He has recently written a book, “The Fall of Western Man” available as a free download.

 

Here he gives a brief* overview of the “jewish Question“, actually the “jewish Problem“, focusing on organized jewry’s destructive agenda towards Whites and the West.

 

(* Appropriately I suppose given the topic, we get jewed out of half a minute, as it’s barely three and half minutes long, and not the full four minutes as touted 🙂

 

KATANA]

 

_______________________

 

 

Mark Collett

 

The jewish Question

 

Explained in Four Minutes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Click the link below to view the video:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNRwvar_QNA

 

 

YouTube Description

 

Published on Aug 24, 2018

 

An explanation of the role that the Jewish community have played in pushing multiculturalism and liberal social policy on Western civilisation.

 

 

You can now donate to my work via bitcoin:

326uEc4QyovcgT5S6mzMK8bh3SyukqPTV1

 

 

My book, The Fall of Western Man is now available. It is available as a FREE eBook and also in hardback and paperback editions.

 

The Official Website: http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/

 

FREE eBook download: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3cc…

 

Hardback Edition: http://www.lulu.com/shop/mark-collett…

 

Paperback Edition: http://amzn.eu/9LaS7HN

 

PLEASE NOTE: If you wish to debate with me in the comments about anything I have said, I welcome that. However please listen to the complete podcast and ensure you argue with the points I have made. Arguments that simply consist of nonsense such as “what gives you the right to judge” or “I’m a [insert religious affiliation] and you should be ashamed of yourself” or other such vacuous non-arguments will simply be ridiculed.

 

 

 

__________________________

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(3:24)

 

 

[00:00]

 

 

Jews have played a disproportionate role in industries and endeavors that have harmed Western society and undermined Western civilization. And they have been disproportionately involved in pushing anti-Western narratives.

 

 

 

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

[Millennial Woes gives a thought-provoking speech on the foolishness of following Jordan Peterson’s destructive advice that Whites should not embrace “collectivism“. Given at the recent Blue Awakening “Entnofutur II” 2018 Conference held in Tallinn, Estonia, on the 23rd of February, 2018. Includes Q & A Session  — KATANA.]

 

 

_______________________

 

 

 

Millennial Woes

 

“The Passion of Jordan Peterson”

 

Speech to Blue Awakening

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Click the link below to view the video:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3MvOSyE0ow

 

 

Description

 

Published on Feb 25, 2018

Hopefully this will serve to illustrate just how far Dr. Peterson is from the actual Alt-Right.

[This video is not intended to condone violence or hate.]

[This project is my livelihood. Please see https://www.millennialwoes.com/donate. Thank you.]

ALTERNATIVE CHANNELS:

http://www.bitchute.com/channel/mille…

http://www.minds.com/millennialwoes

 

 

 

 

__________________________

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(54 mins)

 

[00:35]

 

 

 

 

Organizer: We will continue with the conference. Our next speaker is probably the most famous person to speak here today. An English blogger, YouTube video maker, and well-known Alt-Right figure, Millennial Woes! Who will speak on, “The Passion of Jordan Peterson”.

 

[Applause]

 

[01:02]

 

 

Woes: Okay. Well first I’d like to thank Ruben for organizing this conference. I think the conferences are very important and very enjoyable for everyone. And I think that each one feels like a step forward, so it’s a very valuable thing. Also, before I start with what might seem like an attack on Jordan Peterson, I want to say that, … I do think that he does good work. I do think that he is valuable. And I don’t dislike him.

 

But he does annoy me, because he specifically attacks the Alt-Right and identitarianism, when he doesn’t need to. He makes unfair critiques of us, as well. And if he’s going to criticize us, I’d rather he was fair about it. But he doesn’t need to do this at all. So [02:01] therefore, I feel there’s a needs to defend ourselves against what he says. And really he is an individualist, that’s part of this big thing. And there are other an individualists who I will mention in this speech. Are you all familiar with Sargon of Akkad? [laughter] Good! I will briefly mention him, just to bring him, again it’s not personal, just want to bring in the ideas that are being shared nowadays on YouTube. Because YouTube has become a huge arena for a discussion, especially in the last few months with the “internet blood sports”.

 

 

So! Okay. Jordan Peterson was recently interviewed by Vice News. I think some of you will have seen that clip. It was a Chinese Vice journalist. Although I’m not sure if that’s actually relevant, because the White ones are just as anti White. And the Vice journalists said to [03:01] him:

 

One of the things you’ve talked about, a lot of times you talked to these young men who are flirting with far-right ideologies. (07:33) And you try and bring them back. What does that process like? How do you bring someone back from the far-right?

 

And Jordan Peterson replied:

 

Tell them a better story!

 

The journalist asks:

 

What is the better story?

 

And Peterson replies:

 

Grow the hell up! Take your place in the world. You’ve got something to contribute! Make a plan! Live as an individual! Stay away from the identity politics pathology! It’s just an excuse for failing to live your life in a respectable and noble manner! That’s a way better story than go wave your idiot far-right flag at some rally with some [04:00] pasty-faced morons! What kind of pathetic behavior is that? So it’s time to grow the hell up!

 

And that was John Peterson’s most recent comment on the Alt-Right and identitarianism. And I’ll deal with the meat of what he said, later.

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

 

[In this long (151 minutes) YouTube Hangout hosted by Andy Warski and JF, Mike Enoch debates the self identified jew, Halsey English on the topic of White advocacy and jewish power.

In many heated exchanges Enoch takes the correct position that organized jewry is a hostile “elite” that needs to be expelled from Western countries, while Halsey attempts to argue, in an almost legalistic, hairsplitting “jewy” manner, that while some jewish groups may have excessive power, jews as a whole are not the cause of White racial and cultural displacement. Yeah, right.

A bizarre part of this “debate” are the many abusive comments that Halsey directs at Enoch, calling him a lying fraud!   KATANA.]

 

NOTES

 

 — If you would like to improve the accuracy of the transcript please leave any corrected text in the comments section. Corrections to misspelled names, etc., is encouraged. Thank you.


 

 

 

 

 

Halsey

 

VS

 

Mike Enoch

 

 


 


 

 

Click here for the video:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzE9vfiLU9Q

 

 

 

Published on Feb 14, 2018

 

 

YouTube Description

 

Halsey Vs. Mike Enoch

 

 

49,668 views

 

 

Streamed live on Feb 14, 2018

 

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(151 mins)

 

 

 

[00:01]

 

Warski: What is going on everyone? Welcome back to another Warski Live. I’ve a new setup still in alpha phase. We’re getting the light fixture fixed as well. But this is part one. But, of course, joining me up it’s still in an out.

 

JF: Hello Andy! I think you were the only show that gets worse with time, visually!

 

Warski: Why you think it’s worse?

 

JF: I mean, I don’t know what’s happening here. You look like you have an eight-bit background that just bugged and then everything became black.

 

Warski: Yeah. Well that’s supposed to light up. But then when I turned it on, it over exposes everything and is a mess. So I have to get a friggin dimmer installed. Yeah believe me it’s a, it’s been a hectic day for me.

 

JF: A great debate on the way. Before, I’d like to hear Mike Enoch on the case of the lawsuit against you. I think it’s an important issue regarding free speech and I’d like to hear what’s happening with this.

 

Mike: Yeah thanks. Thanks for giving me the opportunity. I know we have a big audience here and I just want to make an appeal. I know my politics are controversial and this goes beyond my individual politics, or the politics of the people that attended the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville this summer.

 

There’s a lawsuit against us that is essentially an attack on the First Amendment and free speech and internet privacy as well. So these are they’re very powerful and wealthy lawyers that have taken this case and they have attempted to allege some kind of broad-based conspiracy. But, in fact, as they have admitted if you look at press reports about this lawsuit there was something in the New York Times yesterday. There have been various reports on it. They are essentially admitting that they are [02:01] attempting to use the court to shut down the Alt-Right.

 

To shut down political opposition. The New York Times article yesterday has the lead attorney in the case Reberta Kaplan, who is a very wealthy and powerful jewish lesbian, who has is attempting to shut down the Alt-Right, by her own admission. She is, this is a strategic lawsuit, quote of her “This is a strategic lawsuit”. Integrity First for America which is the group fundamental ng the lawsuit which is a group of about twelve very wealthy jewish lawyers, are admitted that this is a political lawsuit, because the government has not done enough to silence the Alt-Right. This is in the New York Times. They’ve admitted all these things.

 

Basically they are admitting they do not have a case before the court and this is purely an attempt to intimidate and silence the defendants. And it goes beyond us. You might say, all right, well tough! Look you went up against the wrong people. But it goes beyond us. As part of [03:00] this process. There’s a subpoena issued [03:02] to Twitter. Twitter is a third party they want information on people that’s tweeted certain hashtags. They want all personal identifiable information including email address, IP address, MAC address, for people that may have tweeted certain hashtags. Unite the Right, Free Cantwell, among others.

 

Now again, you might think I don’t care about these guys. They did something dumb. They went up against the most powerful group of people in the world, and that’s stupid. Maybe so, but if it’s us first, it’s gonna be you next. We’re out here running cover for you, for free speech. And I think we need to get campus free speech groups, the ACLU, any Pro First Amendment group, any Pro Electronic Privacy group, because there is no reason why a person that tweeted out a certain hashtag would add to their case. Like they are alleging something that’s non-existent. They don’t have a valid cause of action before the court and they know it. So if they get these subpoenas granted that’s [04:01] all that they want. So this is in case of Electronic Privacy, your right to privacy on the internet, your right to free speech and this is what these people are attempting to squash.

 

And I think it’s really very important that everybody gets behind, one in condemning the lawsuit, exposing the lawsuit as was it is. And I’m not asking you to support us. I understand that’s a step that many people don’t want to take. I simply want you to support the principle. Support the principles of electronic privacy and anonymity on the Internet. The right to use Twitter without being subjected to potential political witch hunts based on hashtags that you might tweet. And frankly the right of anybody to speak their mind without suffering this kind of “lawfare”. It’s important to note there is no criminal complaint. This is a civil complaint. JF, I know you’ve talked about the abuse of civil courts before. There’s no criminal complaint here, it’s a civil complaint. Why? Because a standard of evidence for a criminal complaint is much higher. They don’t expect to win this case?

 

They [05:00] merely want to use the case as a vehicle to get as much information on as many users of the Internet as they can. And I know that amongst those people that have tweeted the hashtags that they’re looking for are people that are not Alt-Right. People that might be pro Trump. People that might be critical of Israel. These are very serious First Amendment issues they cut to the heart of our rights as Americans. And I think every decent freedom-loving American of any race of any political affiliation needs to come out against this website. Call it for what it is. Understand what’s going on. And we need to light a fire under the butts of all the free speech organizations and Electronic Privacy organizations to come out against this!

 

JF: It’s indeed a very worrying story and, in fact, it’s part of a tendency to use civil courts as instruments of abuse and instruments of quasi police investigation. When they cannot [06:00] get the police to investigate, because there’s nothing to investigate, people are increasingly using in our country the civil courts as a as a bypassing of the law. And, in fact, it makes private agents and judges of civil courts in this country, essentially police investigators, judges at the same time, and agents of this state. It’s absolutely worrying and I fully support you in that.

 

Mike: Yeah, and it’s honestly in my opinion it’s an insult to the integrity of the court. I mean, these people are basically saying:

 

We don’t respect this court we don’t respect this court as a means for citizens to redress damages against each other. We use is this is a course nothing but a political vehicle. It’s just a tool we just want to use subpoena power to get information on our enemies. We don’t care that we’re not gonna win.

 

They’re not gonna win. I mean, they have no complaint. The complaint they’re making is emotional distress. That’s been struck down many times. Anyway, well let’s move on.

 

JF: So your message has been put forward. Andy today we have an amazing debate [07:02] have you been expecting as much excitement as me?

 

Warski: Oh yeah! The Valentine’s Day Massacre. Is that what we dubbed this?

 

JF: Yes. Tell your girlfriend it might be the last!

 

Halsey: Can I comment on the lawsuit?

 

JF: Yes.

 

Halsey: There’s one thing that I don’t seem to understand about why we would want to fight against this lawsuit. And just so, you know, I think that an attack on free speech is something that should be defended. I would donate to the group fighting against the lawsuit myself.

 

Mike: I’m not asking for money, I’m just, ….

 

Halsey: No I’m not. I’m not putting words in your mouth. Don’t worry! We’ll have plenty to today, ..

 

Mike: You’ll put words in my mouth later! I get it.

 

Halsey: Let’s agree to disagree later? Okay, what I’m saying is that a court case cuts both ways. And everything they can subpoena we can subpoena as well and anybody can subpoena the government’s decision-making process, the police records, the orders from town from Terry McAuliffe. If anything I would think this is going to turn out more [08:01] like the Moller lawsuit. It’s going to [08:02] turn out that they want Twitter names of people who nobody gives a shit about, when at the same time we could get information about people that actually we do give a shit about. So I don’t think that it’s such a bad thing that the lawsuit is going forward. I just think it has to be played right, and it can be actually a very good thing for our side.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

 

[In this British Channel 4 interview, cum debate/debacle, between a less than typical cucky [1] Canadian academic, Jordan Peterson, and the feminist host Cathy Newman on the female wage gap with men, we witness the total, cringe inducing, defeat of her position, as she shows continuously an inability to grasp simple points made by Peterson. In fact, she herself demonstrates a good example of a woman being put into a highly paid position, way above her ability, purely because of her gender.

Which is indicative that actually the wage gap is in females’ favour, as many of them are in positions much higher than they should be, purely for what they don’t have between their legs, in order to fulfill affirmative action quotas KATANA.]

 

 

Jordan Peterson

 

Debates

 

Cathy Newman

 

On the Gender Pay Gap

 


 

 

Click here for the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMcjxSThD54

 

 

 

Published on Jan 16, 2018

 

 

YouTube Description

Published on Jan 16, 2018

Channel 4 News’ full, fiery interview with clinical psychologist and professor Jordan B Peterson, whose views on gender have amassed great controversy – and a huge online following. He discusses the pay gap, patriarchy and his new book “12 Rules for Life.”

 

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(29 mins)

 

 

 

[00:02]

 

 

Newman: Jordan Peterson, you’ve said that men need to, quote, “grow the hell up!” Tell me why.

 

 

Peterson: Well, because there’s nothing uglier than an old infant. There’s nothing good about it. People who don’t grow up, don’t find the sort of meaning in their life that sustains them through difficult times. And they are certain to encounter difficult times. And they’re left bitter and resentful, and without purpose, and adrift, and hostile, and resentful, and vengeful, and arrogant, and deceitful, and of no use to themselves, and of no use to anyone else, and no partner for a woman, and there’s nothing in it that’s good!

 

Newman: So you’re saying, [2] I mean, that sounds pretty bad.

 

Peterson: Yes it is.

 

Newman: You’re saying there’s a crisis of masculinity. I mean, what do you do about it?

(more…)

Read Full Post »