Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘jews — persecution by’ Category

 

 

 

[Here are two letters* from political prisoners Jez Turner in Britain, and Gerd Ittner in Germany.

 

Jez Turner shares his reply to a correspondent from a British university who asks him:

 

to explain world politics in 5 minutes in a way that an average student, not yet totally brainwashed, could grasp quickly and easily.

 

Jez was sentenced to one year in jail for his “hate crime” of “offending” jews by publicly stating they have too much power in Britain — his imprisonment being the very proof of his claims!

 

Gerd Ittner, gives a brief account of the various trials in progress in Germany, and the injustice of the system in jailing those that speak the truth.

—  KATANA]

 

*NOTE: Special thanks to Diane King for sharing these two letters. Please help support Jez and Gerd by sending them a card, or a letter.

 

 

 

_______________________

 

 

 

 

 

Jez Bedford-Turner

 

& Gerd Ittner

 

Letters from Prison

 

Nov 10, 2018

 

Published on Nov 12, 2018

 

 

 

LETTERS

 

 

Nov 10, 2018

 

Jez Bedford-Turner

A5544EE  E3-02,
HMP Wandsworth
Box 757, Heathfield Road,
London SW18 3HU.
ENGLAND

 

Dear Jim and Diane, always very glad to receive your bulletins and hear news from the outside world. I’m due to be released soon “on license,” which means that I have to agree to a whole list of restrictions which comprise the “license,” e.g.: internet ban, travel ban, public speaking ban, etc. We are still wrangling over what that will be exactly, but I’ve already told the authorities that if they are too restrictive, I will not sign and I would rather spend the remaining six months of my sentence in prison, i.e., living on a study sabbatical at Her Majesty’s Expense! Vamos a Ver (we’ll see) as the Spanish say!

 

A correspondent from a prestigious University recently asked me to explain world politics in 5 minutes in a way that an average student, not yet totally brainwashed, could grasp quickly and easily. No doubt after publishing my answer below he will get expelled, … I thought you and all your friends might enjoy the fruits of my efforts too!

 

Dear Student, There is nothing complex about understanding the political situation in the world today, but to understand it, one must first understand where power really lies and also understand the opposing concepts of “populism” and “the progressive agenda”.

 

With regards to any tribe, ethnic group, race, community, society, or nation state, “populist” can be classed as any policy, or attribute that is generally healthy in its effects. “Progressive, ” on the other hand, is any policy, or attributes as poisonous in its effects. There are, of course, many different types of poison, and similarly the progressive policies that comprise the progressive agenda are Legion. Some of the most prominent include: feminism, transgenderism, mass immigration, positive discrimination, free Marxist economics, globalization, urbanization, Marxism, individualism, feudalism, psychoanalysis, modern art and modern architecture, laws against free speech and expression, and the legislation and encouragement of gambling, drugs, blasphemy, obscenity, pornography, homosexuality, promiscuity, usury, divorce and abortion.

 

The jews in their own in-house journals openly boast of the power they have acquired (in key sectors such as: fractional reserve central banking, international finance, the mass media, Hollywood, the fashion industry, academia, the publishing trade, … and the major funders of political parties) and are proud of the way they’ve used this power to initiate, promote, and fund the progressive agenda. They probably give conclusive proof of their prime mover status and achievement in making societies, “progressive” particularly in the West (which can be defined as that part of the world were their power is supremely dominant).

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

 

[Alain Soral, a leading French dissident, talks about his association with Robert Faurisson and the impact that his Revisionist work had on him, awakening him to the power of organized jewry and their persecution of anyone who doesn’t bow down and worship their “Shoah”.

NOTE: The English voice-over in the video is provided by the talented musician Alison Chabloz, another admirer of the late Faurisson, and who expresses her disbelief of those historical lies through stinging satirical songs!

 

KATANA.]

 

_______________________

 

 

Alain Soral

 

My Homage to

 

Robert Faurisson

 

 

Oct 2018

 

 

 

Click the link below to view the video:

 

https://alisonchabloz.com/2018/10/29/alain-soral-my-homage-to-robert-faurisson/

 

 

Alison Chabloz’s Description

 

Published on October 29, 2018

 

Of the many moving tributes following the recent death of Robert Faurisson, the video below is one of the most pertinent I have seen so far. Using today’s technology — featuring a mise en scène and dresscode worthy of note and which would certainly have met with Robert Faurisson’s approval — Alain Soral regales viewers with his in-a-nutshell analysis of the crucial importance of historical revisionism and the inestimable contribution made by Robert Faurisson.

 

Alain Soral is the founder of Égalité et Réconciliation, the leading dissident publication in France with seven million monthly clicks. He is also head of the publishing house Kontre Kulture. Mr Soral kindly granted me permission to translate his incisive impromptu text and redistribute the video below with voiceover in English. You can find the original here.

Many thanks to all who continue to support the revisionist cause.

 

__________________________

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(19:24)

 

 

 

[00:31]

 

 

Well, it brings great sadness, as well as the end of an era. I could talk about this in different ways, but I’d like to use the occasion to try and make others understand how one might come to the Revisionist’s school of thought. Because this sensibility, which eventually leads to asking questions and to looking into the professor’s work, needs to be explained. I wish to emphasis that I’m sad that he’s gone. At the same time I’ve been in his company fairly often recently.

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

 

[Jim Rizoli, in Oct 2015, interviewed the now late Professor Robert Faurisson. Prof Faurisson, one of the “fathers” of “Holocaust” Revisionism passed away on Oct 22, 2018, aged 89.

KATANA.]

 

_______________________

 

 

Jim Rizoli

 

Interviews

 

Prof Robert Faurisson

 

Oct, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Click the link below to view the video on YouTube (may not be available in some locations):

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqRLnpJ_8ek&t=1838s

 

Also here on Bitchute:

 

https://www.bitchute.com/video/FbVcINOtox9k/

 

 

YouTube Description

Extraordinary Revisionists

Certain features have been disabled for this video
In response to user reports, we have disabled some features, such as comments, sharing, and suggested videos, because this video contains content that may be inappropriate or offensive to some audiences.

Jim Rizoli, Robert Professor Faurisson interview.

Published on Nov 9, 2015

 

 

__________________________

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(114:46)

 

 

[00:00]

 

[Intro song] No one knows what it’s like to be a bad man, feel the sadness, behind the light, …

 

[00:33]

 

Jim: It’s a pleasure to meet you! I’ve seen a lot of your videos. I read your information, and I’m just amazed to see what you’ve been through. And I have a lot of questions for you. And I would like to ask you all these questions I have laid out for me. And the first question I’d like to ask you is, I would think anyway that you are the “patriarch” of the revisionist movement! Wouldn’t you say that?

 

Prof Faurisson: Yes, with brothers, my friends.

 

Jim: Okay. [chuckling] All right. First of all, where were you born?

 

Prof Faurisson: So, I was born in England, near London, in a place called Shepperton.

 

Jim: OK. All right.

 

Prof Faurisson: I was born to a Scottish mother and a need a French father.

 

Jim: All right.

 

Prof Faurisson: My father was working in a shipping company, in Fenchurch street, London. Excuse me?

 

Jim: What year? The year you were born?

 

Prof Faurisson: Oh, 1929. After Jesus Christ!

 

Jim: [laughing] OK! So you didn’t know Jesus?

 

Prof Faurisson: I’m nearly 87.

 

Jim: 87! Oh, okay, very good! All right. Well, you are getting up there. That’s good! Where did you go to school?

 

Prof Faurisson: At the beginning it was in Singapore, in an English school. A beautiful English school! I think it was 1934, ’35.

 

Jim: OK.

 

Prof Faurisson: Then in Japan, in Kobe in an American school. And then I came back to France. And my mates would mock me because of my English accent! Our shores. So I decided not to speak English any more!

 

Jim: Okay.

 

Prof Faurisson: And that’s why I have to ask you to pardon me my poor and broken English.

 

Jim: I think you speak just fine! You speak better than half the people in my country. [laughing]

 

Prof Faurisson: Oh really!

 

Jim: Yeah! We have are some problems with people speaking English in my country!

 

Prof Faurisson: I understand.

 

Jim: Let me ask you this, about your education. Can you tell us about your education?

 

Prof Faurisson: So my education was really in France and only in Catholic schools.

 

Jim: Okay.

 

Prof Faurisson: And I have to say something which is perhaps sad for you. I don’t know. It happens that I am in [word unclear] but I’ve always been in Catholic schools.

 

Jim: OK.

 

Prof Faurisson: And especially in a Jesuit school in [word unclear].

 

Jim: Okay, all right.

 

Prof Faurisson: And then I was also in a Catholic school, a very famous one in Paris, called College [word unclear].

 

Jim: Okay. Very good.

 

The big question here is, how did the “Holocaust” issue come into play with you? When did you start, or how did you start getting interested in that issue?

 

[04:15]

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

[(Joe Duffy) an “honorary jewish” radio host, it appears, interviews (((Oliver Sears)))  a former trustee of the Holocaust Education Trust Ireland (HETI), on his “shocking” discovery of some neatly written graffiti on a wall opposite a movie theater that he was attending with his wife, to watch a movie made by another jew, Lenny Abrahamson.

 

Written on the wall were the words “KALERGI PLAN“, along with the so-called “Star of David” symbol.

 

Sears then attempts to describe what the “KALERGI PLAN” is, in such a way that Duffy takes it as meaning, it’s all about “another jewish genocide“.  Sears explains that, no, it’s actually about jews racially and culturally genociding Whites, although putting it more abstractly as:

 

… that the jews are trying to kill off the concept of the White nations.

 

Duffy then uses this as a springboard, not to discuss that stunning allegation, but rather to launch into a common-day conversation about  Sears and his family’s experience with the “Holocaust“, and how any criticism of jews, just means there’s another “Holocaust” around the corner, unless (((we))) suppress such speech.

 

In other words, unstated, if you resist jewish power that is destroying your country, then jewish power will destroy your resistance, in the name of the “Holocaust“. Resist “non-existent” jewish power, and you will then suffer destruction! BTW, the “Holocaust“, as those that have done the research know well, factually never happened. [2] Yes, there were camps, etc., but there were no gas chambers, no plan to kill all jews, and no six million. It’s diabolical propaganda. Sears, likely knows this.

 

Duffy rounds off the last few minutes of the propaganda conversation, by taking a call from a black woman who tells, what sounds like rehearsed, tearful stories of her “persecution” by the Irish in Ireland, that rightfully wants her type to leave.

 

The genocide of Whites and their dispossession of their own lands from them, is an ongoing plan being carried out by organized jewry. Kalergi was just one well paid “hired gun” whose job was to help bring that plan to effect.

 

Joe Duffy, as least shown by this interview, appears as a traitor, witting, or not, to his fellow Irishmen and Whites in general, by spreading jewish anti-White propaganda.

 

KATANA]

 

 

_______________________

 

 

Kalergi Plan

 

Graffiti Appears in

 

Rathmines, Dublin

 

Livelines with (Joe Duffy)

 

 

 

 

Click the link below to view the video:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i69YuX8Q5Gg

 

 

YouTube Description

 

 Oliver Sears, Former trustee of Holocaust Education Trust Ireland, talks to Joe Duffy about some graffiti he noticed opposite his local Omniplex cinema in Rathmines. Sears was going to to see Lenny Abrahamson’s new film ‘The Little Stranger‘ with his wife when he spotted the words “Kalergi Plan” in large black capitals sprayed on a wall opposite the cinema, together with a Star of David in the blue colour of the Israeli flag.

 

In a letter to the Irish Times, he wrote:

 

Saturday’s message was a new one for me and required a little digging. Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi was a count of Austrian, Dutch, Greek and Japanese extraction. He was the founder of the Pan-European Union and a strident advocate for European federalism.

 

His goal was to create a Europe that was ethnically inter-connected and heterogeneous. This was designed as an antidote to the rising forces of nationalism in Europe. He was also a committed pacifist.

 

It is with depressing predictability that this philosophy has been hijacked by far-right groups who have distorted the message and repackaged it as a Jewish conspiracy. A brief search online led me to Golden Dawn’s website, the Greek version of neo-Nazism, and a Dutch website of equivalent credibility, both promoting the Kalergi Plan.

 

Here, in their racist philosophy, Jews are attempting to dilute and “mongrelise” the purity of nations by encouraging the mass immigration of refugees to destabilise countries and in order to benefit financially.

 

https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/le…

 

Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi was a count of Austrian, Dutch, Greek and Japanese extraction. He was the founder of the Pan-European Union and a strident advocate for European federalism.

 

In his book Praktischer Idealismus (Practical Idealism), written in 1925, he describes the future of Jews in Europe and of European racial composition with the following words:

 

The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today’s races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals. […]

 

Instead of destroying European Jewry, Europe, against its own will, refined and educated this people into a future leader-nation through this artificial selection process. No wonder that this people, that escaped Ghetto-Prison, developed into a spiritual nobility of Europe. Therefore a gracious Providence provided Europe with a new race of nobility by the Grace of Spirit. This happened at the moment when Europe’s feudal aristocracy became dilapidated, and thanks to Jewish emancipation.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard…

 

Kalergi won the first Charlemagne Prize in 1950. It is a prize awarded for work done in the service of European unification and integratiion. Emmanuel Macron, Herman Van Rompuy, Donald Tusk, Angela Merkel and Tony Blair have also been winners of the prize.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlem…

 

After the Good Friday Agreement was signed in 1998 granting birthright citizenship to anyone born on the island of Ireland, pregnant women from all over the world flew into to Dublin to claim citizenship. Their numbers were so many, maternity hospitals begged the govt to do something.

 

A referendum on birthright citizenship was subsequently held in 2004. 80% of Irish voters voted to oppose the practice. According to the 2016 census, 3.3% of 12-14 year olds in Ireland are African, largely as a result of this period when birthright citizenship was allowed.

 

https://i.imgur.com/9oOmN0I.jpg

 

Dr Ronit Lentin, a Jewish associate professor of sociology,in Trinity College, Dublin was one of the voices opposed to stopping the practice, writing:

Instead of a language of ‘integration’ and ‘interculturalism’, I propose an interrogation of how the Irish nation can become other than white (Christian and settled), by privileging the voices of the racialised and subverting state immigration but also integration policies. Stage one of such interrogation would be to do all we can to defeat the citizenship referendum on June 11.

 

http://archive.is/m0OSm

 

A majority of Israelis oppose taking in refugees according to a recent poll.

http://archive.is/RdVCi

 

In January 2018, Israel said it would pay thousands of African migrants $3,500 to leave Israel, or face internment in a migrant detention camp in the Negev desert. The government says it wants to preserve Israel’s ethnic character

 

http://archive.is/NaquR

 

Broadcast: Sep 27, 2018 | RTÉ Liveline

 

https://www.rte.ie/radio/utils/radiop…

 

Full text of “Coudenhove-Kalerg Practical Idealism English Translation

 

https://archive.org/stream/PracticalI…

 

 

__________________________

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(12:58)

 

 

[00:00]

 

 

Joe Duffy: And Oliver Sears, you’ve come across an example in Dublin — I think it’s in the last few days — of “anti-semitism”. Oliver, good afternoon.

 

Oliver Sears: Hello Joe.

 

Joe Duffy: What did you come across, Oliver?

 

Oliver Sears: Well, I was walking to my local Omniplex, in Rathmines, with my wife.

 

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

[Luke Ford, an Australian living in the USA, who “converted” to Judaism in 1993, interviews Tanstaafl from the Age of Treason blog on the subject of the Jewish Question, aka, Jewish Problem.

KATANA]

 

_________________________

 

 

 

Watch the video here:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2laXMYmRAY

 

 

 

Luke Ford

 

Streamed live on Mar 27, 2018

 

 

Jonny Anomaly writes: On the alt-right, it has become fashionable over the last few years to recycle a trope from 1930s Germany: “The Jewish Question” (to which the Holocaust was supposed to be “The Final Solution”).

 

The contemporary version of the question concerns why Jews have so much influence in cognitively demanding occupations, including science, medicine, law, and politics. Although the “JQ” (as alt-righters call it) has a mundane answer, many subscribe to elaborate theories to account for the fact that most Jews don’t conform to the stereotype alt-righters expect them to.

 

For example, when a scholar documents the fact that 4 out of the 10 speakers at an inaugural white nationalist conference were Jewish, along with a vast array of other evidence that conflicts with alt-right dogma, the predictable response by people in the grip of an ideology is that Jews do this to create a smokescreen: it provides cover for all of the other Jews who plot against white nationalists.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Luke Ford

 

JQ Debate

 

with

 

Age of Treason

 

 


 

 

Published on Mar 28, 2018

 

TRANSCRIPT

(140 mins)

 

 

CONTENTS

 

Introduction — Tanstaafl’s Journey on the JQ

A Personal Disclosure

The White Network

Consequences for Your Marriage?

Growing Up in New York

The jewish Grandfather

Hitler’s Struggle and Yours

On Circumcision

Reading MacDonald

Jewish Crypsis and Parasitism

On Finding Support

How Your Work Differs from Others

An Existential Threat

Mein Kampf and National Socialism

Jewish Crypsis — Spain and Portugual

Jewish Crypsis — Today

“In Your Face” jews and “Down-low” jews

Ford’s Critique of Critics of jews

Tan’s Response

Complicating Things as jewish Camouflage

Jewish Gaslighting

Ad Hominem — Cofnas vs MacDonald

Jewish Deception and Coverups

Cofnas’ Critique and Your Respect for MacDonald

Cofnas — MacDonald’s Evidence is Counter-evidence

Any Factual Errors in Cofnas’ Work?

Cofnas Call MacDonald a “Bad Person”

Jews “Didn’t Du Nuffin!”

Ford — So Criticism of Scholarship is a Personal Attack?

Cofnas — Worried About MacDonald’s Work

Cofnas Doesn’t Prove His Case

Ford — Does Cofnas Screech “Anti-semitism”?

I Always Write “Anti-semitism” with Sneer Quotes

Whites Have Not Taken Their Own Side Hard Enough

You are Arguing Like a jew, Luke!

Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy

Jews Marrying Non-jews

Ford — So anything jews Do is Group Evolutionary Strategy?

Jews Always Arguing About What’s Best for the jews!

“Jews are Not a Monolith” — A Silly Statement!

The Root of jewing is: “Is it Good for the jews?”

Culture of Critique’s Chapter 7 on Immigration

Open Borders for Israel is My Attitude

Jews Not Threatened in a Multi-ethnic Society

Jews and the Second World War

Being Evidence Based

School Shooting in Florida

Does MacDonald’s Model Have Predictive Value?

Jewish Out-Marriage One Half of the Parasitism

Whatever jews Do is Bad Because They are the Enemy!

Do White People Have Agency?

Luke, You’re Not Making Honest Valid Arguments

Would You Describe jews as Ethnocentric?

Jews Moralize to Whites to Convince Them That What is Good for Whites is Bad

Fifteen jewish Intellectuals

Whites Don’t Recognise That jews are at War with Them!

Jews Behaving as “Nazis”

Intersectional jewing — Where One jew Agenda Conflicts with Another jew Agenda

Intersectional jewing — Promoting Reich, Pinker and Cofnas as Being Against “anti-racist” jewing

Why are Whites Unable to Overcome the jews?

Super Chats — What Should White Guys Do to Spread Awareness of the JP?

Ford — Are You a Leader?

Comments — Are All jews In On It?

Comments — Is Monomania on the JQ Better Than White Improvement?

Do jews Control the Weather?

Comments — How are Whites to Speak on jew Influence Without “anti-semite’ Being Shrieked

Jews are the Enemy Whatever They Do?

Is Steve Miller Anti-White?

Are You an Unhappy Guy?

Things That Make You Happy?

Reflections on This Interview

What Does It Mean To Be a jew?

Ford’s Fundamental Misunderstanding of Judaism

Do You Believe in Universal Morality?

Ford’s Journey To judaism

A jew Told Ford That you Can’t Convert To judaism

Ford Hasn’t Fooled jews

On Ford Being Rejected By his Peers at School

Ford As Cover Article in “The jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles”

Lawrence Auster Admitted That jews were Responsible for Open Borders

On Ford’s Hatred of jewish Organizations That are for Open Borders

Ford — Do You Thinks I’m Delusional?

How Ford Can Help Whites by Blowing the Whistle on Jews

END

NOTES & LINKS

PDF NOTES

Version History

 

 

 

Introduction — Tanstaafl’s Journey on the JQ

 

Ford: Hey, I’m Luke Ford. I’m here with the Age of Treason blogger, Tanstaafl. Tan, you’ve been blogging for quite a long time. Tell me about your evolution, in particular on the JQ.

[background sound]

 

Tan: Sorry let me mute that.

 

Ford: And here with Tanstaafl*, so we are going to get that microphone problem taken care of, and then we are going to discuss Nathan Cofnas’ critique [of Kevin MacDonald’s book “The Culture of Critique].. So Tan, take it away! Tell me when you started blogging. Tell me about the evolution of your journey on the JQ.

 

[* A pseudonym using the acronym for “There Ain’t No Such Thing As A Free Lunch“. The phrase and the acronym are central to Robert Heinlein’s 1966 science-fiction novel The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress.]

 

Tan: Right. I started in 2005. I started blogging, and that was after I had spent about twenty years, maybe, of not paying attention, being fed up with politics, mainstream politics, and ignoring it, focusing on my career. But in 2005, I think, it was Hurricane Katrina that triggered me, the racialization of that. It was sort of a “Trayvon Martin” experience that many people experienced years later. I experienced during the Katrina thing.

 

And so I started blogging. I had been talking to friends before that privately, and I just basically took it public. And moved through pretty quickly neo-conservative thought, which attracted me at first, because it seemed like a more serious approach to politics, than plain old conservative politics. And then I ran into someone named Lawrence Auster. You might be familiar with [him] — that might have been where I came across you.

 

 

And it was really Lawrence Auster, reading Lawrence Auster, that made me aware that there was something going on with the jews. Auster himself was a jew, was a convert to Christianity. But what I noticed over time with him was that he was hyper-sensitive to criticism of the Jews. He indulged in it himself, but it was always from the point of view of “What’s good for the jews?” He thought that the jews, in various ways, he criticized them for not doing what was best for themselves.

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

[Luke Ford, an Australian living in the USA, who “converted” to Judaism in 1993, interviews Kevin MacDonald and his response to a recent critique of his highly ignored (by academia), yet important book, “The Culture of Critique“, by the 30-year-old, academically unknown, New York jew, Nathan Cofnas. Cofnas was scheduled to come on with MacDonald, but was unable to, due to time zone differences, as he’s in England, studying at Oxford. 

 

Ford plays somewhat of a devil’s advocate on behalf of Cofnas, quoting some of Cofnas’, yet to be released, responses to MacDonald’s 18,0000 word response to Cofnas’s critique.

 

This transcript covers  the first 71 minute part of the Youtube video with MacDonald, and not (currently) the remaining part of the total 220 minute video, where Cofnas does appear in the last third of it.

 

Overall, my take is that, it’s all a storm in a teacup, with very weak tea being dished up by Cofnas.

 

Now, the most likely reason that until now there has been, apparently, no proper academic response to MacDonald’s work, is because its main ideas are true and significant. So what was the message that has been sent out by organized jewry to academics? For over 20 years, it’s been, “Kill the message by totally ignoring it!

 

MacDonald’s main point in his book is that jews, just like other human groups, act as a group to advance their interests often at the expense of other groups. Since organized jewry has maneuvered itself into being the most powerful group in Western societies, it has, and is wrecking utter destruction upon us! Especially by engineering the flooding of every White country, from New Zealand to Norway, with non-Whites, in order to racially and culturally destroy us! And part of the jewish group evolutionary strategy, to use Kmac’s terminology, is to prevent Whites from waking up to what they are doing to us, and responding in kind.

 

So, this interview is interesting, in that we get to see Kmac defend his book, his position, in his mild-mannered, yet strong way, against a young upstart jew making a name for himself. Cofnas fails, but rest assured, that another jew, defending their tribal war against Whites, will step into the breach and fire away.

 

Organized jewry is at total war with Whites, attempting to genocide us through whatever means. Kmac has helped us in exposing that, with his academic work, so we should all join together in supporting him, and others like him, in what ever way we can.

 

KATANA]

 

_________________________

 

 

Watch the video here:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARhqt38bMZA&t=8271s

 

 

 

Luke Ford

 

Streamed live on Mar 20, 2018

 

 

Kevin MacDonald joins me on my YouTube channel at 7pm tonight (Nathan Cofnas might come along to keep things lively) and Richard Spencer joins me at 5pm Wednesday (CA time). Nathan Cofnas joins the show here:

 

 

 

Nathan Cofnas responds: “Just read it. Pretty much what I expected. He repeats his arguments in more or less the same style, doesn’t address my arguments head on and in some key cases just ignores them. Probably I will publish an annotated version of the PDF.”

 

 

http://quillette.com/2018/03/15/alt-r…

 

 

 

Luke Ford with

 

Kevin MacDonald

 

vs

 

Nathan Cofnas

 

on

 

“The Culture of Critique”

 

 

Published on Mar 20, 2018

 

TRANSCRIPT

(71 mins)

 

 

 

Ford: And we’re back! Just trying to work out the technical difficulties and get Kevin MacDonald back in here. I hope the audio’s better. Sorry about these technical difficulties, but these things happen. And now maybe this time we’ll hear Kevin loudly and clearly. So I think that’s the important thing. So, sorry about that and we’re gonna get Kevin in here any second. So we’re talking about his response to the Nathan Cofnas critique of “The Culture of Critique”. And Kevin says:

 

I have a particular complaint, because of Steven Pinker’s not [?] antiscientific approach to my work, in part responsible for my spending the last 20 years in the intellectual wilderness.

 

Wow that is very honest! That’s kind of hot on the sleeve! That’s transparent honestly! It’s not like beating around the bush! That is just laying it down.

 

[01:00]

 

Nevertheless, Pinker has moved the scientific and popular reception of behavior genetics of evolutionary perspectives forward. See, for example, his withering criticism in the “Blank Slate of three of the figures discussed in Chapter two of “Cultural of Critique“, Stephen Jay Gould, Lewontin, and Rose.

 

And for all I know he is pursuing a tactical strategy of gradualism by supporting ideas that are still regarded with extreme hostility in large swaths of academia and the media, in the hope that things will eventually change. Though his recent work “Enlightenment Now” is not encouraging in that regard. The rest of Cofnas’ conclusion is simply name-calling — no need to respond.” says Kevin.

 

[02:01]

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »