Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Anti-Defamation League’ Category

patrick-grimm-how-the-jewish-supremacists-wrecked-america-cover

 

[Patrick Grimm wrote extensively during 2007 and 2008 exposing and warning the world about the dangers and machinations of organized jewry and its nation wrecking activities. Here is a two part series that he wrote that lists the numerous ways that they are destroying our countries — KATANA.]

 

 

 

_______________________

 

 

Patrick Grimm

 

There Must Be 15 Ways

 

To Destroy

 

Your Country:

 

 

How the

 

Jewish Supremacists

 

Wrecked America

 

 

 

2007

 

 

I have updated my listing of ways that the Jewish supremacists are wrecking America. This list provides a good introduction to those neophytes just immersing themselves in the world of the anti-Zionist and anti-Jewish supremacist movement, and shows them the countless ways Jewish extremism negatively affects our country. It’s a quick and handy primer to enlighten and educate our people (European-Americans), preparing them for this noble struggle for survival they must choose to fight if they are truly desirous of having a future life upon this planet for their children and grandchildren. Supremacist Jewry is killing us; it is killing our soul, killing our spirit, killing our will, killing our pride and killing our nation. Its policies are killing our people. We must make this clear and present the ugly reality and the unpleasant truth in an easy-to-understand format. I believe this list is a good step in that direction.

 

1.

 

They have destroyed our pride in our history, and a nation that loses its sense of history soon ceases to be a nation.

 

2.

 

They have labeled our beloved Founding Fathers as “racists” and “white slavers, ignoring the great representative republic that these men constructed.

 

3.

 

They have promoted multiculturalism, celebrating every culture — no matter how backward and barbaric — except for Western white European culture. As Jewish Marxist intellectual thug Susan Sontag stated in a poisonous rant “The white race is the cancer of humanity.

 

4.

 

They have driven our Christian faith and heritage from the public square by utilizing their countless criminal cadres of ADL and ACLU Communist lawyers. Our children will soon grow up in a society wiped clean of any vestiges of the Bible, Christ or the cross. However, the menorah is still allowed in the White House for Hannukah celebrations. In fact, the Jewish religion is the only faith that can’t be mocked openly in Hollywood entertainment.

 

5.

 

They have torn our borders open, permitting, indeed cheering, the Third World dregs who will soon replace us as the majority. The Javitzes, the Lautenbergs and Cellers meticulously designed the legislation (Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965) that will genocide us. They have done all this while simultaneously — and with no sense of irony supporting Israel’s “Jews-only” immigration policy.

 

6.

 

They have created, pushed and profited from pornography and perverse entertainment. The “Chosen” make up 90% of all American pornographers. The Hollywood they run has mainstreamed wife-swapping, common law marriages, pedophilia, scatology, licentious sex, drug and alcohol abuse and self-indulgence. Bestiality will be next on the list. In fact, they are already releasing a documentary portraying men who have sex with horses.

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 police-raid-and-my-confession-cover

 

[In this 35 minute video Alfred Schaefer, first describes the police raid on his home in Germany for his “forbidden thoughts“, and secondly how he had, in 2014, not yet escaped from the contamination of jewish “control words” and had used words like “Zionism” and “Nazi” without fully understanding their jewish origins, designed to deflect attention away from the jews — KATANA.]

 

 

 

Alfred Schaefer

 

 

Police Raid and

 

 

My Confession

 

 

 

police-raid-and-my-confession-3031-video

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8mBgMaLVPc

 

Click on the above link, or copy the link into your browser to watch the video.

 

Published on Nov 21, 2016

 

YouTube Stats

 

Jan 29 — Views: 2,668 – Comments: 105 – Likes: 192  Dislikes: 5

Jan 13, 2017 — Views: 2,473 – Comments: 107 – Likes: 177  Dislikes: 5

 

 

 

YouTube Description

 

 

German Ministry of Thought Control had the “Kriminal Polizei” raid my house to steal all of my computers and storage devices to search for “Forbidden Thoughts”.

This has presented us with a wonderful opportunity to help the “Kriminal Polizei” learn about the induced mental illness that many of them are suffering from.

 

__________________________

 

 

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

 

[35:12]

 

[00:00]

 

police-raid-and-my-confession-3030-video-title

 

Hello,

 

I’m Alfred Schaefer,

 

In part I of this video I want to tell you what happens to you in Germany if you commit the crime of thinking.

 

You heard me right, the crime of thinking.

 

In Part 2, I wish to make a long overdue confession. But first the police raid.

 

police-raid-and-my-confession-3031-video

 

The “German Ministry of Forbidden Thoughts” sent the “Kriminal Polizei”, which is like the FBI, to raid our house in order to steal all of my computers and storage devices. They suspected “forbidden thoughts” on these devices and were determined to find them. The raid took place on the 18th of August 2016 at 7:00 o’clock in the morning.

 

police-raid-and-my-confession-3032-glaring-hypocrisy

 

The website “Glaring Hypocrisy” phoned me on the day after this raid took place. Here is the beginning of this conversation. You can listen to the conversation in it’s entirety on their web site.

 

police-raid-and-my-confession-3033-glaring-hypocrisy-intro

 

police-raid-and-my-confession-3034-glaring-hypocrisy-intro

 

Glaring Hypocrisy: We only heard about the situation at about shortly before 5:00 pm London time. So, to be clear, when did the raid on your home actually take place?

 

Alfred: Yesterday morning. I was in the shower, and then I heard that the door bell rang. Normally I am always in the shower before Elfriede, my wife, but this time I slept a bit uneasy and I stayed in bed a bit longer and then I was in the shower at 7:00 o’clock when the door bell rang and, …

(more…)

Read Full Post »

ramzpaul-alt-right-rip-cover

 

 

[In these two latest videos Ramzpaul explains why he has dropped his support for the Alt-Right “label” after Richard Spencer failed to disavow the movement’s “Nazi” element following the NPI Conference, where some attendees gave “sieg heils” when Spencer raised his glass and declared loudly, “Hail Trump! Hail our people! Hail Victory!”  

 

Although Ramzpaul makes many good points on some side issues I think he’s making a mountain out of a molehill out of this whole incident by declaring the Alt-Right’s “brand” toxic because of it.

 

More seriously though, is Ramzpaul’s belief that the website, “The Daily Stormer” which has recently claimed to be Alt-Right, is in fact fake opposition, funded by the ADL.

 

But then in that case, what about Amren, which Ramzpaul does support, and its leader, Jared Taylor, who attended the conference and is openly pro-jew? The very people whose organizations are behind our on-going destruction! Is Amren also fake opposition, funded by the ADL, Ramzpaul? —  KATANA]

 

 

 

 

 

RAMZPAUL

 

ON

 

Alt-Right — RIP

 

&

 

“Sieg Heiling”

 

Published on Nov 23 and 19, 2016

 

ramzpaul-alt-right-rip-video-1

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8HBLX_khwQ

 

Description

 

Published on Nov 23, 2016

 

Donald Trump disavows the Alt Right after Roman salutes are featured at the NPI conference.

After NPI’s Roman Salutes,  President elect Trump was forced to disavow the Alt Right. Most normal people can support the Alt Right ideas of self-determination, protection of borders, good trade deals, America First, etc. But normal people can’t support anything that is associated with Nazism.

In my discussions with Brietbart I explained the tension between the Alt Right versus the 14/88 crowd. In general, Breitbart was sympathetic to the ideas of the Alt Right as I described them.

However, they obviously did not support the 14/88 notion of the Alt Right.

Eventually, the 14/88 crowd won this battle once Richard Spencer was associated with Nazism. Of course, I don’t think Richard is a Nazi. But it does not matter at this point. Whenever the Alt Right is discussed in the media, they will show the Roman Salute clip over and over. And as Richard is the self proclaimed leader of the Alt Right, the brand is now impossible to rehabilitate.

But it really doesn’t matter at this point. The Alt Right was a phenomenon that helped launch Trump into the White House. Now that he has been elected, there is no need for the “alternative” label. We are now the Trump Right.

 

http://www.returnofkings.com/76454/what-is-the-alternative-right

 

___________________

 

 

Alt-Right — RIP

 

TRANSCRIPT

 

[5:37]

 

 

 

Hey guys. First of all I’m still in the process of moving back home. I don’t know my final location, but, so I don’t have my camera equipment. But I thought I had to discuss this whole thing that blew-up with Richard Spencer and the NPI and the Alt-Right. And, first of all what was reported was outrageous. Because supposedly Richard said that he asked the question, “Are Jews even human?” He didn’t ask that and in his speech he said, “Are Republican strategists even human?”. It was a joke! He wasn’t talking about Jews. So, CNN had lied there. And there’s supposedly the, you know, the Roman salute that happened. All Richard did was he had a glass and did a toast, “Hail Trump!” at the end. Big deal! We say “Hail To the Chief” for the president. It shouldn’t be that big of an issue. But unfortunately, we have some people that intentionally got up and did the Roman salute, a couple times, I guess there before and they did that and tweeted it.

 

ramzpaul-alt-right-rip-2442-richard-spencer-raising-his-glass

[Image] Richard Spencer raising his glass while announcing, “Hail Trump! Hail our people! Hail Victory!” at the NPI Conference 2016.

 

And yeah, at that point, Donald Trump had to disavow the Alt-Right. Because, you can’t hang on to something that’s Nazi. You just can’t! Because Naziism, it was seventy years ago. It’s just a brand that doesn’t translate well. It scares people. And if you’re going to do a seig heil, it’s over! It’s really over! And so, the truth, it doesn’t really matter what happened with NPI and with Richard Spencer. It’s a perception. And whenever they think about the Alt-Right now, people are going to think about the Romans salute! [laughing] And I won’t even do it now otherwise they’ll use my image.

 

ramzpaul-alt-right-rip-2439-audience-members-giving-nazi-salute

[Image] “Hands up” at the NPI Conference 2016.

 

And yeah, that’s not fair, but politics is not fair. So now the Alt-Right brand is damaged. It’s associated with Naziism. And normal Americans aren’t going to support that. Which is a shame, but it’s really OK, you know. Why am I saying it’s OK? For a period of time before Trump got elected, the Alt-Right really grew. And part of the reason — I’m a little of the reason, just hang on — I did an interview with Milo and I spoke to him briefly. He’d use a lot of my quotes with Breitbart when they talk about, “What is the Alt-Right?” And I did some also some articles for “Return of the Kings”, some videos. And I try to explain what the Alt-Right is. It’s not traditional conservatism, which is about low taxes and open borders, but it’s also not 14/88, about neo-Nazis and all that shit! It’s about having an identity. That all people, jews, White people, Chinese — we all have an identity and we all have the right to live and of self-determination. That’s a core.

 

There’s other issues too with trade and so forth, but that was basically the core. It’s not like this Nazi hate ideology! And, you know, what? Most people can really get on to that. Most people are like:

Yeah, I’m tired of political correctness. If other groups have identity, why can’t we? Why can’t we all have nationalism?

 

And it really resonates with people.

 

And it did with Breitbart. And I know, because Milo published it and Steve Bannon saw that. And that’s why Steve Bannon, Trump’s Chief of Staff now, was on board with the Alt-Right. Because it’s something you can defend! But what happened is, immediately the enemy primarily and I’ll say it, I’ve said this before. I think Daily Stormer, to be honest, is a fake opposition. I think is funded by the ADL. And I’m not going to get into debates, why. I think that, I really do. And initially this Daily Stormer, they were opposed to the Alt-Right. But when they saw that it was getting on, they changed their strategy. And I said “they”, because I don’t think it’s just Andrew Anglin [laughing] that is in charge of it. I’ve heard his interviews. I think there’s a whole group that works on that website. And they decided to repurpose it, or try to co-opt the Alt-Right, to say:

Hey! The Alt-Right is all about Naziism, of 14/88”.

 

And they were so good at that, they were basically able to say:

Hey! 14/88 and Naziism, that is the core of the Alt-Right, and the rest of you are trying to co-opt what we’re doing!

 

Which was nonsense. But that was their strategy. And, but there was a lot of tension there between it. But still the ones that looked at the Alt-Right is not being Naziism, but being [about] identity, about being nationalism, were able to win the day initially up to the election. Then right after the election, … Yeah, finally because of the Richard Spencer thing that blew apart, now it is associated with Naziism!

 

But it’s OK! It doesn’t matter. It would be kind of like you’re playing a basketball game and you’re winning by two points, at the last second the guy shoots it, and it’s a three point shot. And you go, “Oh no! We lost!” But no, the game ended before the three pointer went in! And that’s kind of what happened.

 

We kind of won. We won, we got Trump in! So that’s fine.

So, I no longer identify as Alt-Right, just because, there’s no way of rehabilitating that whole image of what the Alt-Right is. It’s, I mean, good for Daily Stormer, I guess. They got it associated with Nazism and they’ve kind of quit that now. They’re trying to associate Republicanism with Nazism! [laughing] That’s their new strategy. Good luck with that!

 

ramzpaul-alt-right-rip-2446-daily-stormer-banner

[Image] The Daily Stormer, “America’s #1 Most-Trusted Republican News Source”.

 

That’s OK, because I want to look at the Alt-Right now instead of it just being the Right. There’s no need to have the “Alt” label anymore.

We have Donald Trump. People like me that support borders, that support immigration controls, that are opposed to globalism and free trade, we have our man in office now. We don’t need to call ourselves, “Alt-Right”.

 

So, I’ve given up the label, but I still support self-determination and nationalism for all! I’ll talk to you guys later.

 

[5:37]

 

END

 

 

_______________________

 

 

ramzpaul-alt-right-rip-video-2

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHKU1n5kTWQ

 

Description

 

Published on Nov 29, 2016

 

A response to Richard Spencer’s video addressed to me:

https://youtu.be/zbQhie3ApyE

 

Richard Spencer created a video (see link above) that addressed me concerning many topics concerning the Alt Right. This is my video response to cover some of the common questions that people have raised that include:

 

1. What is Nazism

2. Punching to the Right

3. Disavowing

4. Cucking

5. Brand identity

6. Boundaries needed for a movement

 

From the list above, #6 is key. The idea that you can have a movement that has NO boundaries is insane. Yet, because some people have been fooled with the mantra “never punch to the right” and “never disavow” we now have the Alt Right brand associated with Hollywood Nazis. And as the mainstream media looks at Richard Spencer as the leader of the Alt Right, the fact that he won’t explicitly disavow Nazism is fatal to the movement.  The serious thinkers have been replaced with Hal Turner and Andrew Anglin types.

 

I think Richard is intelligent and quite eloquent. But I fear his message will be muted and he will become the new David Duke for his generation – pulled out every 4 years by the media to try to discredit the politician he endorses.

 

I recommend that Spencer should explicitly disavow that the Alt Right has any connection with Nazism. If he refuses to do so, the Alt Right brand will remain toxic and attract only the kook element.

 

 

The Alt-Right and Boundaries

 

TRANSCRIPT

 

 

 [11:42 min]

 

All right. This is going to be my last video about the “Richard Spencer, sieg heil” case.

 

But I want to do some clarification. And is going to be a little bit more in depth, because there’s a lot of questions about, you know, what is a Nazi, is it National Socialism, is it Hitler, is something new? What’s a Hollywood Nazi? And there’s a lot of ideas like:

 

Hey dude, you can never punch right! Never punch right!” or, “Never disavow, don’t disavow! The left doesn’t do that!” or, “They’re going to call you a Nazi anyway, so why do you fight it?

 

So, there’s all these things I just want to discuss a little bit.

 

Part of the problem whenever the word “Nazi” is thrown out, is like, “What’s really meant by that term?” Because it’s really so ill defined now. And, so I thought it was good to take a step back, you know, to understand there’s basically three categories that sort of fit the word “Nazi”.

 

The first one is National Socialism. National Socialism is not a political party. It’s a ideology. It’s an economic system, sort of like Socialism is, or Marxism. You know, for example, you can have Marxists, but there’s a lot of different political parties that may adopt Marxism, the same way with National Socialism. And National Socialism is really not about concentration camps, the Holocaust, jews. No! It’s an economic policy. It’s, for example, if you believe in single payer health care. That was a National Socialist policy. Protecting the environment was very important to the National Socialists. Protecting the workers through good trade deals. That was National Socialist. That’s all it is, and that they don’t really have any symbols as an ideology, like Capitalism, or Communism.

 

Then, in the 30’s, 1933 to 1945, just twelve years, just twelve years! That’s all it was in Germany. You had a political party that advocated National Socialism. And they were called the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. What we now know as the Nazis. Adolf Hitler and all that. And as a political party, like the Republicans and the Democrats, you had the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. And the Republicans, they have the elephant as their kind of symbol, the Democrats has a donkey. Well, the National Socialist German Workers’ Party had the swastika. That was it! It didn’t have anything to do with the National Socialism ideology. It had to do with that specific political party. And they also used the Roman salute, which became the Nazis salute, and so forth. And it was headed by Adolf Hitler.

 

That was in a sense the Nazi that ended in one 1945. And it was over! It was specifically German. So where is National Socialism, the economic policy, or the ideology, you could export to various countries — even Hitler thought that. But National Socialism German Workers Party, it makes absolutely no sense to export, because it’s just for Germans! So using a swastika elsewhere, especially like the Slavic areas, is stupid! It makes no sense! That party is dead. So the Nazis the real Nazis are all gone. They don’t exist anymore.

 

But we have this thing called, “neo-Nazis”. And neo-Nazis, they’ve really started after WW II and almost all of them, like, I posted the link before, have been false flag, heavily Jewish funded, or government funded organizations. And you can ask, “Why would they want to fund something like that?” Well, it’s to discredit nationalist organizations. Because after the war the National Socialist German Workers Party, the Nazis, were really demonized and that’s part of the propaganda. And some of it was justified, some probably wasn’t. But that’s not up for debate. What happened is they were made out to be the devil and it’s got all the worse. So they’re looked at, like Satan now! The worst thing imaginable. So what happened, these groups, they fund these neo-Nazis and then the neo-Nazis — and then this happened through the 70’s and the Illinois Nazis, headed by a Jewish guy, in the 90’s there was a guy named David Wolf something, that was a famous Nazi, he was fake, a Jew.

 

Recently we had Hal Turner, the big Nazi, he turned out to be a Federal informant, and you have groups like Daily Stormer, that I believe are fake and they are doing the same thing. And what they’re, … The goal of the neo-Nazis are is to attach themselves — because they know they’re toxic and 99.9% of people are opposed to them — they attach themselves to a movement they want to discredit. And, for example, originally that the Daily Stormer they attach themselves to Donald Trump and it’s not because they like Donald Trump, it’s because they wanted to discredit him. So the mainstream media can say:

Look at these evil Nazis are supporting Donald Trump! Do you want to support someone that’s supported by Nazis?

 

See, that was the psychology they were using. And it is pretty effective. And that happened with the Alt-Right too, the Daily Stormer was originally opposed to the Alt-Right, but when they saw it was gaining momentum, they decided to try to cut it off, by saying:

No! No! The Alt-Right, it’s all about Nazis! If you’re not a Nazi you’re Alt-Right!

 

They started to push that. Now they’re trying to tie it to Republicanism.

 

But the goal of neo-Nazis is just to discredit normal identity nationalist movements. And not to say, … I’m sure some people are very sincere. There are some sincere neo-Nazis, but in general Neo Naziism has nothing to do with the original National Socialism. I mean, if you go to sites like the Daily Stormer, they don’t really talk about the ideology of National Socialism, or the economic policies, they say the word “kike” over and over. But the original National Socialism wasn’t about saying, “kike, kike, kike, kike, kike, kike!” It had to do with something deeper. And it has nothing to do with the old Nazis of Adolf Hitler. They just use the same symbols, but it is really not related at all.

 

So, you have the three different groups. You have national socialism, which is the ideology. You have the National Socialist German Workers’ Party that was in Germany and then you have these Hollywood neo-Nazis that are mostly fake!

 

One of the things that just bugs me, it’s so frustrating! You hear this all the time is, like, “Dude! Never punched to the right!” Or, “Never disavow!” I mean, that is just retarded! It really is! [laughing]

 

Because, just think about it logically, right! If you can never punch to the Right, which means never criticize someone to the supposed right of you. That is the most extreme positions are beyond criticism! Right, just think of a thought experiment, the most the extreme Right-wing stereotypical position. I don’t know, anyone that doesn’t have blue eyes or blonde hair should be put to death! ! That’s pretty extreme! And so, anyone trying to criticize it, you behave:

Dude! Dude! Don’t push to the right! Don’t push to the right!

 

You see how stupid that is? And the guy has a psycho position could say:

But why? You believe people with brown eyes should be able to live? What are you, a cuck? Cuck, cuck!

 

See, this is just insane!

 

What you need to do as any organization is have a circle, a boundary. Yet, you can cuck, and what does cucky means, is you have your principles and you compromise your principles to try to appease the left. God knows, the mainstream Republicans have done that so much they have cucked on that. They’ve taken their principles, they betrayed them. That is wrong. That is cucking! But holding to your principles is not cucking! So you don’t have to support these neo-Nazi, Hollywood Nazi types, otherwise you’re a cuck. In effect if you don’t draw the boundary, you’re screwed. Because they’re going to taint your brand, which we saw with what happened in the Alt-Right.

 

So you do need to punch right when needed.

 

Now, the Left, they will punch right, left, if they need to, if they’re pressed on it by the Press. But they usually aren’t. That’s why they usually don’t punch left. But if they were pushed on it, they would. You know they would! And, for example, the whole idea too, that:

Hey they’re going to call you Nazis, anyway, so you might as well just be a Nazi”.

 

That’s another argument, I hear. Well, again that is stupid! And I use an analogy. There’s the pick up artist community, of guys that try to seduce women, or whatever, into bed. I’m not saying that I agree with it or disagree with it, but the feminists always call them rapists! “Rapists! You’re a rapist!” Which is not, which is absurd! They are not rapists. They try to charge people. That’s not the same thing as rape. But should, by that logic, should they say:

Well, hey, these feminists are going to call us rapists anyway, so we should self identify as a rapist!

 

That’s stupid! No you don’t want to do that! It is the same thing with this “agree and amplify”. That could be a good strategy at times, but not like someone accuses you of being a child molester of an eight year old girl. You don’t want to “agree and amplify” and say:

No! No! No! You’ve got that wrong! I rape four year olds!

 

So that’s just dumb! You’ve got to have some maturity with this. So, as an organization including the Alt-Right, or whatever organization you have, you got to exclude people on the left, or the right. If you don’t exclude anyone on the right, then you’re just going to be, you’re going to lose it! Because the clowns are going to take over and define your movement. That’s what has happened in the Alt-Right.

 

Now, the sad thing is, I don’t disavow Richard Spencer, because — I’ll find this interview and I’ll link to it. He did after the conference and — the man really is brilliant. He’s eloquent. He has really interesting things to say. But, what’s really sad, is that is not going to be heard anymore because of his refusal to disavow these Nazi types. And it’s not that hard to say, to disavow. And, you know, he, I think he said:

It has bad optics, but I’m not going to disavow, or anything like that.

 

Well, if you don’t do that, then you’re always going to be associated with Nazis. And you could say:

Well, I don’t care they could all be associated with Nazis”.

 

But 99.9% of the populace does care, and they won’t take your message seriously. And every time you’re introduced, you’re going to be introduced as a Nazi sympathizer with the “sieg heiling”. And again this has nothing to do with Naziism back in the 30’s. I’m talking about this Hollywood neo-Nazi, Daily Stormer version. You’re always going to be tainted with that, and no one is going to take you seriously.

 

And it causes also problems for the people that attended the convention. I kind of feel sorry for them, because whenever you’re attending convention you assume there’s going to be certain protocols. I’ve spoken at Amren, American Renaissance, and one of the things I’m confident of, is Jared Taylor is never going to turn [it] into this “sieg heil” fest. Because it would be embarrassing, that would taint me. And the same thing with the people that spoke at this now, they’re all have this on their hands and they have to say:

Hey! I didn’t have anything to do with this!

 

So, you’ve got to really think what you’re doing and look at the image of your brand, and you’ve got to have a brand that will appeal to people.

 

ramzpaul-alt-right-rip-2440-3-npi-attendees-giving-nazi-salute-at-bar

[Image] “Exuberant” attendees going all Roman on us. Actually the guy on the left kind of looks like Ramzpaul!

 

Now, White identity, self-determination, really all those things are winning points. Trade, the whole idea of the Alt-Right really sells to people. But once you mix into it the “sieg heiling” you just lose it! You just lose it.

So, what Richard, I wish he would have said is:

Hey, I gave a speech, some people, four, or five people did this ‘sieg heil’. We can’t control what people do. I do not approve of this. We are not a Nazi organization. We disavow any Nazi influence, that’s not we’re what we’re about.

And if you just said that, it would have ended it. Because people, yeah the Leftist still would have been mad, but who who gives a shit about them, but normal people would have looked at it and said:

Yeah, well that makes sense, you know, you can’t control what your audience does. He disavowed the people who did that sort of thing, that sort of behavior.

That’s the end of it. But if you don’t disavow it, you just try to play the game, like:

It was just, they’re just trying to have fun, it’s bad optics”.

People are not going to buy it.

So, I think that is the last thing I’m going to to say on the same subject.

Talk to you guys later.

 

[11:42]

 

 

END

 

 

_________________________

 

============================================

 

Click to download a PDF of this post (1.2 MB):

 ramzpaul-alt-right-rip-and-sieg-heil-transcripts

 

ramzpaul-alt-right-rip-cover

 

Version History

 

Version 1: Nov 30, 2016 — Published post. Added PDF for download.

Read Full Post »

 kevin-macdonald-npi-2016-cover

 

 

[In this 50 minute speech (including Q & A) at the Nov, 2016 NPI Conference, Prof. Kevin MacDonald discusses the long term role of organised jewry in pushing multiracialism, multiculturalism in the United States and the West. Jewish money power is at the forefront of financing both the Democrat Party and the Republican Party and steering their respective policies towards jewish goals, despite growing grassroots opposition, especially towards Israel and its murderous apartheid policy towards the Palestinians. MacDonald also discusses how organized jewry is notorious for opposing free speech related to race, ethnicity and immigration, in other words, anything that interferes with the jewish goal of destroying homogenous White societies  —  KATANA.]

 

 

kevin-macdonald-npi-2016-video

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g93OfL1Fybc#t=493

 

Youtube Description

 

Prof. Kevin MacDonald gives an informative talk at NPI 2016 in Washington D.C. about organized Jewish influence. Q & A follows the talk.

 

_____________

 

 

Kevin MacDonald

 

NPI 2016 Conference

 

Published on Nov 22, 2016

 

TRANSCRIPT

[50:42]

 

[00:00]

 

 

Richard Spencer: I hope our next speaker won’t be insulted by the brevity of the introduction that I’m about to give.

 

There is no man on the planet who was done more for the understanding of the pole around which the world revolves than Kevin MacDonald! [audience applauds]

 

Welcome! They know who you are.

 

Kevin MacDonald [Kmac]: They know, oh, OK.

 

All right. It’s great to be here after such an exciting, inspiring victory for Donald Trump and I mean, I don’t think anybody really expected it, you know, watching that movie that Richard showed tonight, you know, he could be a hero of our people. And I think that’s what we would all hope and it could happen. I really do think it’s going to happen.

 

But tonight I’m going to talk about Jews. [audience erupts in laughter]

 

[Kmac laughing] it’s not that I relish doing this, but somebody’s got to do it! And it’s definitely a subject that should be addressed. The best that we can fairly, factually and realize, we’re not talking about all Jews. We’re talking about activist Jews, we are talking about the main thrust of the organized Jewish community, which is pretty easy to figure out.

 

kevin-macdonald-npi-2016-2692-edward-alsworth-ross

[Image] Edward Alsworth Ross (December 12, 1866 – July 22, 1951) was an American sociologist, one of first sociologists who pursued a comprehensive sociological theory. Regarded as a founder of sociology in the United States, he believed that the purpose of sociology was to bring about social reform, solving problems in human society. 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

Red Ice interviews Dr Andrew Joyce - COVER PART II

 

 

In this very informative audio interview (139 mins — Parts I & II) Henrik Palmgren talks with Dr. Andrew Joyce. We learn of Andrew’s gradual awakening to the Jewish Problem/Question while still at school. Since then he has been led to conclude that organized jewry is behind a genocidal plan to effectively destroy White countries through the importation of non-Whites, among other strategies. He concludes that we all have a duty to fight for White survival by spreading awareness of what is going on to as many people as possible — KATANA.

 

 

 

_____________________

 

 

Red Ice interviews Dr Andrew Joyce - AUDIO ART

https://redice.tv/red-ice-radio/the-history-of-jewish-influence

(NOTE: This link will take you to PART 1 ONLY.

You need to be a Red Ice MEMBER to listen to Part 2. BTW, I would encourage readers to become subscribers to Red Ice!)

 

 

 

Red Ice Radio

 

Dr Andrew Joyce

 


The History of Jewish Influence

 

Part 2/2

 

 

Published on Jun 1, 2016

Andrew Joyce PhD is a scholar, speaker and writer with academic expertise in immigration, ethnic and religious conflict, and philosophy. Andrew sits on the Editorial Advisory Board of The Occidental Quarterly and is a regular contributor to The Occidental Observer. He also serves the British Renaissance Policy Institute in an advisory capacity and will be producing and editing a new journal for BRPI. He is in the final stages of preparing for publication Talmud and Taboo: Essays on The Jewish Question.

 

Dr. Joyce joins us for another critical look inside the history and events that continually lead us back to the immense Jewish question. To begin, Andrew highlights his academic journey and how he arrived at tackling the vast obstacles embedded within our propagandized Western history to get to the truth of Jewish influence. We discuss their role during the Middle Ages as middleman merchants in close alliance with the elite powers that be, when the practice of usury transformed the means by which Europe was expanded and consolidated. Andrew explains some misconceptions about Jewish emancipations during the medieval period, many of which were influenced by the weakening of monarchal power and the rise of parliamentary democracy in host nations. Then, we consider how the Jewish proclivity of exploiting weaknesses within the flawed democratic system, their fierce ethnocentricity, and deep fear of being racially and genetically disseminated has compelled them to intensely strategize against gentiles. Andrew talks about the cycle of greed within the monarchy system that led to numerous Jewish expulsions and the clever maneuvers that repeatedly brought them and their money back into the untouchable ruling elite fold. We also look at the current calamity of governmental errors driving Europeans to extinction and how Jews have contributed in shaping the demographic suicide of the West.

 

In the members’ half, we address the concern that there tends to be an unhealthy obsession with the JQ and how we can study our own weaknesses in terms of damaged ethnic cohesion in balancing this weighty issue. Dr. Joyce stresses that we must find rational ways to communicate to the average citizen how our deprived sense of historical peoplehood coupled with the barrage of guilt inducing MSM and academic programming is leading us to the slaughter. We talk about the great power of face to face persuasion and leading by example, along with using humorous memes and trolling in encouraging our folk to adopt a sense of nationalistic pride.

 

Then, Andrew illuminates how Jews have used a backdoor trial and error approach to slowly infiltrate special interest groups aiming to clamp down on freedoms to criticize detractors, and we look at what a massive cultural shift might look like if Whites can employ that same diligence in reversing the pathologically blind response to their destruction. Further, we discuss the immense responsibility that lies in safeguarding the inheritance of our future generations, which ultimately requires a strong ethnic brotherhood standing in radical resistance to the invading cultures that have no place within our own. At the end, we get into the idea that everything happening now with the push for multiculturalism in the West is just history repeating itself, and if we are to reverse this creeping genocide we must bring more awareness, raise the stakes, and adapt an attitude of total success.

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

 

[00:00]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Henrik: Welcome back ladies and gentlemen. We’re talking with Dr Andrew Joyce about his work on jewish history, jewish influence and, of course, of why we should take an interest in the subject, if we care about our own survival, our genetic survival, and the survival of our culture, our civilization. We’ve tried to really just kind of give an overview picture of some of the history of the relationship here between the jews in Europe and, of course, our relationship to that and how this is playing out in the modern age. I hope we can speak some more about this later, about what is happening right now and how we are being, you know, uniquely targeted in this way.

But one of the thing I wanted to ask you about, Andrew, before we kind of proceed, if you will. And I don’t mean to take things off topic here, but, do you think that there is a, how do I put it, a kind of paranoia to a certain extent that seems to comfort some that are highly focused on this issue alone. I mean, you seem very well balanced, you have an ability to be objective, rational, scientific when you look at this subject.

And I know there is that is a concern here too, as people are usually not even willing to look at the subject, so I hate to criticize those who do look at the subject, but if I would have any critique, it would be that I feel that some people, it’s almost like they see an omnipotence, almost a metaphysical nature to the power and the influence that Jews hold as a group, and with that there seems to be almost kind of a paranoia over the issue. I’m not sure if you agree with that, or not, but do you think that, you know, that approach, or attitude to the subject is something that serves us good at the end, or not? I would propose that people adopt a more of an attitude that you hold, which is more objective, more cold, it’s not so emotional, if you will. I don’t know if you have any comments on that Andrew?

 

Andrew: The first thing that I would say Henrik, is that I agree with you that there seems to be, if you want to call it, an obsessive quality to a lot of what has been produced by our people in relation to the jews. Not just recently only the last fifty years, you know, under the kind of conspiracy theory umbrella, or metaphysical sense, but really going going back centuries.

As I mentioned before, when I when I first got into the subject and I was reviewing large amounts of literature, I encountered large amounts of literature that was shoddy, that was full of hyperbolic argument, right the way through to, you know, extreme fantasy along the lines of saying, you know, jews were demonic. That they were almost supernatural beings. That they had this kind of omnipotent power and, you know. All these different ways of interpreting what was happening. As you go back further in time, you go into Europe, it held different mentalities and existed in a different concept of the world that we don’t have. It was more religious, people then lived closer to death., you know, they didn’t live so long, so the entire perception of the world of life, and of the life beyond was different and much more immediate. And it tended to shape how people viewed their day to day interactions. Now over time some of the older superstitions and traditions and more fanciful ways of seeing the world have slowly dissipated. But, I agree with you that there is an esoteric element to the Jewish Question, only to the extent that esoteric may mean, “hidden knowledge”.

 

Henrik: Yep.

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

Red Ice interviews Dr Andrew Joyce - COVER PART I

 

 

[ In this very informative audio interview (139 mins) Henrik Palmgren talks with Dr. Andrew Joyce. We learn of Andrew’s gradual awakening to the Jewish Problem/Question while still at school. Since then he has been led to conclude that organized jewry is behind a genocidal plan to effectively destroy White countries through the importation of non-Whites, among other strategies. He concludes that we all have a duty to fight for White survival by spreading awareness of what is going on to as many people as possible — KATANA]

 

 

 

_____________________

 

 

Red Ice interviews Dr Andrew Joyce - AUDIO ART

https://redice.tv/red-ice-radio/the-history-of-jewish-influence

 

Red Ice Radio

 

Dr Andrew Joyce

 


The History of Jewish Influence

 

Part 1/2

 

 

Published on Jun 1, 2016

Andrew Joyce PhD is a scholar, speaker and writer with academic expertise in immigration, ethnic and religious conflict, and philosophy. Andrew sits on the Editorial Advisory Board of The Occidental Quarterly and is a regular contributor to The Occidental Observer. He also serves the British Renaissance Policy Institute in an advisory capacity and will be producing and editing a new journal for BRPI. He is in the final stages of preparing for publication Talmud and Taboo: Essays on The Jewish Question.

 

Dr. Joyce joins us for another critical look inside the history and events that continually lead us back to the immense Jewish question. To begin, Andrew highlights his academic journey and how he arrived at tackling the vast obstacles embedded within our propagandized Western history to get to the truth of Jewish influence. We discuss their role during the Middle Ages as middleman merchants in close alliance with the elite powers that be, when the practice of usury transformed the means by which Europe was expanded and consolidated. Andrew explains some misconceptions about Jewish emancipations during the medieval period, many of which were influenced by the weakening of monarchal power and the rise of parliamentary democracy in host nations. Then, we consider how the Jewish proclivity of exploiting weaknesses within the flawed democratic system, their fierce ethnocentricity, and deep fear of being racially and genetically disseminated has compelled them to intensely strategize against gentiles. Andrew talks about the cycle of greed within the monarchy system that led to numerous Jewish expulsions and the clever maneuvers that repeatedly brought them and their money back into the untouchable ruling elite fold. We also look at the current calamity of governmental errors driving Europeans to extinction and how Jews have contributed in shaping the demographic suicide of the West.

 

In the members’ half, we address the concern that there tends to be an unhealthy obsession with the JQ and how we can study our own weaknesses in terms of damaged ethnic cohesion in balancing this weighty issue. Dr. Joyce stresses that we must find rational ways to communicate to the average citizen how our deprived sense of historical peoplehood coupled with the barrage of guilt inducing MSM and academic programming is leading us to the slaughter. We talk about the great power of face to face persuasion and leading by example, along with using humorous memes and trolling in encouraging our folk to adopt a sense of nationalistic pride. Then, Andrew illuminates how Jews have used a backdoor trial and error approach to slowly infiltrate special interest groups aiming to clamp down on freedoms to criticize detractors, and we look at what a massive cultural shift might look like if Whites can employ that same diligence in reversing the pathologically blind response to their destruction. Further, we discuss the immense responsibility that lies in safeguarding the inheritance of our future generations, which ultimately requires a strong ethnic brotherhood standing in radical resistance to the invading cultures that have no place within our own. At the end, we get into the idea that everything happening now with the push for multiculturalism in the West is just history repeating itself, and if we are to reverse this creeping genocide we must bring more awareness, raise the stakes, and adapt an attitude of total success.

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

 

[00:00]

 

 

 

 

 

Henrik: Welcome, this is Red Ice Radio. I’m Henrick. I hope you have had a good day so far. Thank you for tuning in. It’s always a pleasure to have you with us. We have some good company over the weekend. Some friends that came for a visit and we decided to take Monday off. A much needed break, since we seldom take them, and extend the weekend a bit and charge up the batteries, as we are gearing up to start our new live show, exclusive for members, this coming Saturday. So definitely don’t miss that! Information and details, will be on Red Ice Members dot com slash live. We also put some details on the main site to Red Ice dot tv. Just go to forward slash live, or click on upcoming stream at the top of the site, or from the menu if you’re on a mobile device.

Switching over to today’s show we have Dr Andrew Joyce with us. He’s a scholar, a speaker and a writer with academic expertise in immigration, ethnic and religious conflict and philosophy and sits on the editorial advisory board of The Occidental Quarterly and is a regular contributor to The Occidental Observer. He also serves the British Renaissance Policy Institute, in an advisory capacity and will be producing and editing a new journal for them. He’s also in the final stages of preparing for publication of his book, “Talmud and Taboos: Essays on the Jewish Question”.

And that’s what we’re going to talk about here today.

 

Red Ice interviews Dr Andrew Joyce - 2107 Anvil and Hammer Quote

 

 As Andrew puts it, “The anvil that has worn out many hammers!

But I urge you to check out our, “New to Red Ice” section on the website. And search in our archives if you want to get a better understanding, both why this is an important question, and also we can put Judaism, Jewish influence and their ethnic interests in context and in relation to our own interests. There really isn’t any reason why this should be an untouchable topic, as some people propose. We would to do same and we do, with any other group that has clashing interests with our own. So stick around. I hope you learn something new.

Welcome Dr. Andrew Joyce. It’s a pleasure to have you here. Thank you so much for coming on Red Radio today!

 

Andrew: Henrik, it’s an absolute pleasure to be here. I’m a big fan of the show.

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

[In this very good essay Thomas Dalton outlines the case for his forthcoming translation of Mein Kampf. He also gives a concise summary of Hitler’s position on the major topics of Racial Theory, Religion and Jews. Lastly, Hitler’s legacy is discussed.]

 

Rethinking Mein Kampf - COVER - Ver 2

 

 

Rethinking Mein Kampf

 

Thomas Dalton

 

 

http://www.inconvenienthistory.com/archive/2016/volume_8/number_1/rethinking_mein_kampf.php

 

Contents

 

Preface

A Most Consequential Work

Origins and Context

November Revolution, and a New Movement

Chapter Synopses

Why a New Translation?

Some Contentious Topics

Racial Theory

On Religion

On the Jews

Hitler’s Legacy

BIBLIOGRAPHY

25 Points of the NSDAP Program

Version History & Notes

 

 

Preface

 

On 1 January 2016, Mein Kampf came out of copyright. It has now been 70 years since the author’s death, and by international copyright law, legal protection for the book has expired. Thus it is perhaps a good time to reconsider and reexamine this most notorious work—and perhaps to banish some of the many myths surrounding it to history.

 

In fact, we are long overdue for a revisionist treatment of this work. In my experience, very few people really understand what’s in it. The common man, even the well-educated one, likely knows little more than the title and the author. Revisionists who work on the Holocaust or either of the world wars often bypass the book completely, as if it had no relevance at all; most likely, they have never read it. Traditional journalists, academics, and alleged experts frequently display their ignorance by taking passages out of context, overlooking key facts, or simply failing to cite the author appropriately. More generally, the mainstream approach to Mein Kampf seems be rather similar to its tactics with regard to Holocaust revisionism: ignore, censor, or disparage. It is simply too problematic to discuss this work in a fashion that might lead readers to ask tough questions, or to seek out the book itself.

 

A large part of the reason for the book’s obscurity is the sorry state of its many English translations. These will be discussed and critiqued below. This is also one of the reasons that I am currently working on a new, parallel German-English translation—the first ever, in fact. I will attempt to remedy many of the shortcomings in current versions, and provide something of a revisionist perspective on the entire work. In the present essay, I examine the translations, discuss some main themes of the book, and argue for its relevance in the present day.

 

 

A Most Consequential Work

 

 

Mein Kampf is the autobiography and articulated worldview of one of the most consequential and visionary leaders in world history.  It is also one of the most maligned and misrepresented texts of the 20th century. There have been so many obfuscations, deceptions, and outright falsehoods circulated about this work that one scarcely knows where to begin. Nonetheless, the time has come to set the story straight.

 

That Adolf Hitler would even have undertaken such a work is most fortunate. Being neither a formal academic nor a natural writer, and being fully preoccupied with pragmatic matters of party-building, he might never have begun such a major task—were it not for the luxury of a year-long jail term. In one of the many ironies of Hitler’s life, it took just such an adverse event to prompt him to dictate his party’s early history and his own life story. This would become Volume One of his two-part, 700-page magnum opus. It would have a dramatic effect on world history, and initiate a chain of events that has yet to fully play out. In this sense, Mein Kampf is as relevant today as when it was first written.

 

Rethinking Mein Kampf - the book

[Image] Display of Copies of Hitlers Mein Kampf – Documentation Center in Congress Hall – Nuremberg-Nurnberg – Germany
By Adam Jones, Ph.D.

 

Perhaps the place to begin is with the rationale for the book. Why did Hitler write it at all? Clearly it was not a requirement; many major politicians in history have come and gone without leaving a personal written record. Even his time in prison could have been spent communicating with party leaders, building support, soliciting allies, and so on. But he chose to spend much of his stay documenting the origins and growth of his new movement. And this was a boon to history as well as to understanding of the human spirit.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »