Archive for the ‘Alt-Right’ Category


[ John Friend of The Realist Report interviews Paul Nehlen, a  candidate running against supercuck Paul Ryan in his home State of Wisconsin.


Paul describes his background as someone who has worked their way up from the shop floor, to engineer, and manager of many manufacturing businesses in the States and worldwide.


He goes on to describe his awakening to race realism, and more recently, and most importantly, his red-pilling on the role of organized jewry and their genocidal intentions against the White race — KATANA.]








The Realist Report


On this edition of The Realist Report, we’re joined by Paul Nehlen, a Republican candidate for Congress in the state of Wisconsin who is running against GOP incumbent Paul Ryan. In this podcast, Nehlen and I discuss his background and career, his decision to get involved in politics, racial realism, the Alt Right, President Trump and much more!


Below are relevant links for this program:



Subscribe to The Realist Report today, and support independent media!

Did you enjoy this program? Consider donating to The Realist Report to help us continue producing podcasts. Enter your email below and donate $10 now!







The Realist Report




Paul Nehlen


Published on Mar 13, 2018



(66 mins)




John: All right folks. Welcome back to another edition of the Realist Report. This is your host John Friend. The website is the Realist Report dot com, where you can find an extensive archive of these podcasts, as well as other radio programs I’ve participated in over the years. You will also find all of my blog posts and articles, a contact page, my Twitter feed, which is embedded in the right hand side bar of the website, and many other useful and important links. I am a regular reporter for American Free Press. America’s last real newspaper. And I also contribute to the Barnes Review, the bi-monthly history magazine affiliated with the American Free Press. I encourage our listeners to subscribe to these fine print publications, if you are not already. Check out American Free Press dot net, and Barnes Review dot org, for all of the details.


All right! With that said, let me introduce my special guest today. It is my honor to have Paul Nehlen on The Realist Report, today! Mr Nehlen is currently running for Congress in Wisconsin against Paul Ryan. The GOP incumbent Congressman. Mr Nehlen, welcome to the program sir! How are you today?




Paul: I’m doing great! Thanks for having me on, John.


John: Thank you so much for coming on. I contacted you actually a few weeks ago, maybe close to a month ago. And I’ve been following your campaign very closely going back to when you first ran in 2016. And I was following you on Twitter, I’ve been following your campaign website. And I know you’ve basically been kicked off of Twitter, from what I understand. I’ve been very impressed with your campaign, especially the campaign you’re currently running. So, I’m curious how, because I actually reached out to you and then you followed up with me just recently. So I’m curious, how did you hear about my website, or are you just responding to my original email?


Paul: Yeah. No, I somehow came across something that you had worked on and we actually have a mutual contact. And I said, you know, I ought to reach out to him, in that context. So yeah, you probably ought to. I bet he’d have you on. And I don’t know what happened to the email that you sent to me. It must be got by me. So I apologize for that. But was glad that we were able to connect, and so, yeah, I’m glad to be here.




Read Full Post »


[Millennial Woes gives a thought-provoking speech on the foolishness of following Jordan Peterson’s destructive advice that Whites should not embrace “collectivism“. Given at the recent Blue Awakening “Entnofutur II” 2018 Conference held in Tallinn, Estonia, on the 23rd of February, 2018. Includes Q & A Session  — KATANA.]







Millennial Woes


“The Passion of Jordan Peterson”


Speech to Blue Awakening








Click the link below to view the video:







Published on Feb 25, 2018

Hopefully this will serve to illustrate just how far Dr. Peterson is from the actual Alt-Right.

[This video is not intended to condone violence or hate.]

[This project is my livelihood. Please see https://www.millennialwoes.com/donate. Thank you.]












(54 mins)







Organizer: We will continue with the conference. Our next speaker is probably the most famous person to speak here today. An English blogger, YouTube video maker, and well-known Alt-Right figure, Millennial Woes! Who will speak on, “The Passion of Jordan Peterson”.







Woes: Okay. Well first I’d like to thank Ruben for organizing this conference. I think the conferences are very important and very enjoyable for everyone. And I think that each one feels like a step forward, so it’s a very valuable thing. Also, before I start with what might seem like an attack on Jordan Peterson, I want to say that, … I do think that he does good work. I do think that he is valuable. And I don’t dislike him.


But he does annoy me, because he specifically attacks the Alt-Right and identitarianism, when he doesn’t need to. He makes unfair critiques of us, as well. And if he’s going to criticize us, I’d rather he was fair about it. But he doesn’t need to do this at all. So [02:01] therefore, I feel there’s a needs to defend ourselves against what he says. And really he is an individualist, that’s part of this big thing. And there are other an individualists who I will mention in this speech. Are you all familiar with Sargon of Akkad? [laughter] Good! I will briefly mention him, just to bring him, again it’s not personal, just want to bring in the ideas that are being shared nowadays on YouTube. Because YouTube has become a huge arena for a discussion, especially in the last few months with the “internet blood sports”.



So! Okay. Jordan Peterson was recently interviewed by Vice News. I think some of you will have seen that clip. It was a Chinese Vice journalist. Although I’m not sure if that’s actually relevant, because the White ones are just as anti White. And the Vice journalists said to [03:01] him:


One of the things you’ve talked about, a lot of times you talked to these young men who are flirting with far-right ideologies. (07:33) And you try and bring them back. What does that process like? How do you bring someone back from the far-right?


And Jordan Peterson replied:


Tell them a better story!


The journalist asks:


What is the better story?


And Peterson replies:


Grow the hell up! Take your place in the world. You’ve got something to contribute! Make a plan! Live as an individual! Stay away from the identity politics pathology! It’s just an excuse for failing to live your life in a respectable and noble manner! That’s a way better story than go wave your idiot far-right flag at some rally with some [04:00] pasty-faced morons! What kind of pathetic behavior is that? So it’s time to grow the hell up!


And that was John Peterson’s most recent comment on the Alt-Right and identitarianism. And I’ll deal with the meat of what he said, later.



Read Full Post »



[In this long (151 minutes) YouTube Hangout hosted by Andy Warski and JF, Mike Enoch debates the self identified jew, Halsey English on the topic of White advocacy and jewish power.

In many heated exchanges Enoch takes the correct position that organized jewry is a hostile “elite” that needs to be expelled from Western countries, while Halsey attempts to argue, in an almost legalistic, hairsplitting “jewy” manner, that while some jewish groups may have excessive power, jews as a whole are not the cause of White racial and cultural displacement. Yeah, right.

A bizarre part of this “debate” are the many abusive comments that Halsey directs at Enoch, calling him a lying fraud!   KATANA.]




 — If you would like to improve the accuracy of the transcript please leave any corrected text in the comments section. Corrections to misspelled names, etc., is encouraged. Thank you.










Mike Enoch






Click here for the video:






Published on Feb 14, 2018



YouTube Description


Halsey Vs. Mike Enoch






Streamed live on Feb 14, 2018






(151 mins)






Warski: What is going on everyone? Welcome back to another Warski Live. I’ve a new setup still in alpha phase. We’re getting the light fixture fixed as well. But this is part one. But, of course, joining me up it’s still in an out.


JF: Hello Andy! I think you were the only show that gets worse with time, visually!


Warski: Why you think it’s worse?


JF: I mean, I don’t know what’s happening here. You look like you have an eight-bit background that just bugged and then everything became black.


Warski: Yeah. Well that’s supposed to light up. But then when I turned it on, it over exposes everything and is a mess. So I have to get a friggin dimmer installed. Yeah believe me it’s a, it’s been a hectic day for me.


JF: A great debate on the way. Before, I’d like to hear Mike Enoch on the case of the lawsuit against you. I think it’s an important issue regarding free speech and I’d like to hear what’s happening with this.


Mike: Yeah thanks. Thanks for giving me the opportunity. I know we have a big audience here and I just want to make an appeal. I know my politics are controversial and this goes beyond my individual politics, or the politics of the people that attended the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville this summer.


There’s a lawsuit against us that is essentially an attack on the First Amendment and free speech and internet privacy as well. So these are they’re very powerful and wealthy lawyers that have taken this case and they have attempted to allege some kind of broad-based conspiracy. But, in fact, as they have admitted if you look at press reports about this lawsuit there was something in the New York Times yesterday. There have been various reports on it. They are essentially admitting that they are [02:01] attempting to use the court to shut down the Alt-Right.


To shut down political opposition. The New York Times article yesterday has the lead attorney in the case Reberta Kaplan, who is a very wealthy and powerful jewish lesbian, who has is attempting to shut down the Alt-Right, by her own admission. She is, this is a strategic lawsuit, quote of her “This is a strategic lawsuit”. Integrity First for America which is the group fundamental ng the lawsuit which is a group of about twelve very wealthy jewish lawyers, are admitted that this is a political lawsuit, because the government has not done enough to silence the Alt-Right. This is in the New York Times. They’ve admitted all these things.


Basically they are admitting they do not have a case before the court and this is purely an attempt to intimidate and silence the defendants. And it goes beyond us. You might say, all right, well tough! Look you went up against the wrong people. But it goes beyond us. As part of [03:00] this process. There’s a subpoena issued [03:02] to Twitter. Twitter is a third party they want information on people that’s tweeted certain hashtags. They want all personal identifiable information including email address, IP address, MAC address, for people that may have tweeted certain hashtags. Unite the Right, Free Cantwell, among others.


Now again, you might think I don’t care about these guys. They did something dumb. They went up against the most powerful group of people in the world, and that’s stupid. Maybe so, but if it’s us first, it’s gonna be you next. We’re out here running cover for you, for free speech. And I think we need to get campus free speech groups, the ACLU, any Pro First Amendment group, any Pro Electronic Privacy group, because there is no reason why a person that tweeted out a certain hashtag would add to their case. Like they are alleging something that’s non-existent. They don’t have a valid cause of action before the court and they know it. So if they get these subpoenas granted that’s [04:01] all that they want. So this is in case of Electronic Privacy, your right to privacy on the internet, your right to free speech and this is what these people are attempting to squash.


And I think it’s really very important that everybody gets behind, one in condemning the lawsuit, exposing the lawsuit as was it is. And I’m not asking you to support us. I understand that’s a step that many people don’t want to take. I simply want you to support the principle. Support the principles of electronic privacy and anonymity on the Internet. The right to use Twitter without being subjected to potential political witch hunts based on hashtags that you might tweet. And frankly the right of anybody to speak their mind without suffering this kind of “lawfare”. It’s important to note there is no criminal complaint. This is a civil complaint. JF, I know you’ve talked about the abuse of civil courts before. There’s no criminal complaint here, it’s a civil complaint. Why? Because a standard of evidence for a criminal complaint is much higher. They don’t expect to win this case?


They [05:00] merely want to use the case as a vehicle to get as much information on as many users of the Internet as they can. And I know that amongst those people that have tweeted the hashtags that they’re looking for are people that are not Alt-Right. People that might be pro Trump. People that might be critical of Israel. These are very serious First Amendment issues they cut to the heart of our rights as Americans. And I think every decent freedom-loving American of any race of any political affiliation needs to come out against this website. Call it for what it is. Understand what’s going on. And we need to light a fire under the butts of all the free speech organizations and Electronic Privacy organizations to come out against this!


JF: It’s indeed a very worrying story and, in fact, it’s part of a tendency to use civil courts as instruments of abuse and instruments of quasi police investigation. When they cannot [06:00] get the police to investigate, because there’s nothing to investigate, people are increasingly using in our country the civil courts as a as a bypassing of the law. And, in fact, it makes private agents and judges of civil courts in this country, essentially police investigators, judges at the same time, and agents of this state. It’s absolutely worrying and I fully support you in that.


Mike: Yeah, and it’s honestly in my opinion it’s an insult to the integrity of the court. I mean, these people are basically saying:


We don’t respect this court we don’t respect this court as a means for citizens to redress damages against each other. We use is this is a course nothing but a political vehicle. It’s just a tool we just want to use subpoena power to get information on our enemies. We don’t care that we’re not gonna win.


They’re not gonna win. I mean, they have no complaint. The complaint they’re making is emotional distress. That’s been struck down many times. Anyway, well let’s move on.


JF: So your message has been put forward. Andy today we have an amazing debate [07:02] have you been expecting as much excitement as me?


Warski: Oh yeah! The Valentine’s Day Massacre. Is that what we dubbed this?


JF: Yes. Tell your girlfriend it might be the last!


Halsey: Can I comment on the lawsuit?


JF: Yes.


Halsey: There’s one thing that I don’t seem to understand about why we would want to fight against this lawsuit. And just so, you know, I think that an attack on free speech is something that should be defended. I would donate to the group fighting against the lawsuit myself.


Mike: I’m not asking for money, I’m just, ….


Halsey: No I’m not. I’m not putting words in your mouth. Don’t worry! We’ll have plenty to today, ..


Mike: You’ll put words in my mouth later! I get it.


Halsey: Let’s agree to disagree later? Okay, what I’m saying is that a court case cuts both ways. And everything they can subpoena we can subpoena as well and anybody can subpoena the government’s decision-making process, the police records, the orders from town from Terry McAuliffe. If anything I would think this is going to turn out more [08:01] like the Moller lawsuit. It’s going to [08:02] turn out that they want Twitter names of people who nobody gives a shit about, when at the same time we could get information about people that actually we do give a shit about. So I don’t think that it’s such a bad thing that the lawsuit is going forward. I just think it has to be played right, and it can be actually a very good thing for our side.


Read Full Post »


[Millennial Woes gives a thought-provoking speech on the possible futures of Europeans at the recent Erkenbrand 2017 Conference held in Rotterdam, Netherlands, on the 14th of October, 2017. Attendance was approximately 240 people (according to Woes), double the previous year’s.

He presents the case for two likely outcomes: one the brutal, backward, ignorant, miserable future of a low IQ, mixed-race Islamic Europe, while the other is a shining future where Whites retake their lands, expel the invaders and build a Whitopia and the re-flowering of the greatness of Western civilization and all its wondrous creations.

Woes makes a call for action, for Whites to all make sacrifices for the common good and survival of our people  — KATANA.]





Millennial Woes


One Hour From Now


Speech to Erkenbrand








Click the link below to view the video:







Published on Oct 22, 2017
My EPIC speech to Erkenbrand’s 2017 conference.
[This video is not intended to condone violence or hate, nor to advocate war. In it, I speak of a future war in Europe, because I believe that it is now inevitable and unavoidable. I wish it were not so. But if there is war coming, then we must prepare for it.]
[This project is my livelihood.









1000 Years from Now, the Golden Age, 3017

500 Years from Now, 2517

200 Years from Now, 2217

100 Years from Now 2117

75 Years from Now, 2092

50 Years from Now, 2067

25 Years from Now, 2042

20 Years from Now, 2037

15 Years from Now, 2032

10 Years from Now, 2027

5 Years from Now, 2022

2 Years from Now

1 Year from Now

1 Month from Now

1 Week from Now

1 DAY from Now

1 Hour from Now

















Organizer: The next speaker needs no introduction for a lot of us, for some of us perhaps, ??? blogger, Millennial  Woes, Scottish blogger, speaks about identitarian issues. You can check out his YouTube channel, where he discusses in-depth philosophy and ??? issues of our time.


So, Mr Woes!


[loud applause]


Woes: Thank you, thank you. We are here to talk about the future of the European people, and the prospect of a new golden age. But we must also talk about our survival, which will enable that golden age, and be justified by it.


Before I go any farther, I want to see this is a speech that I’m gonna have to read off the screen an awful lot and I regret that, because this particular speech I would rather address it to every single one of you. I’d rather be looking at you while I speak, because I want to reach each one of you. And I mean, it for each one of you, but I’m gonna have to look at the screen an awful lot. I apologize. Just imagine that I am talking to each one of you, because I am.


Within the European context, the main threat to the survival of us and our culture, is Islam.


Without Islam, forming native White ethno-states within our countries might enable us to preserve our genetics and culture. It would not be dignified, to form ethno-states within the countries that should be ours, and are ours. it would not befit the White race to hide away like that, and I still wouldn’t be recommending it, but it might well enable us to survive — at least for a while.


But that is NOT the situation! We are dealing with Islam! And Islam will not stop at the border of an ethno-state. The old conservative slogan of “just leave me alone!”, “let me be free of this stuff you are doing“, is nowhere near enough to address this situation.


To save time, I will not go into the factors in detail about why I think Islam is on the rise, demographically and so on. There’s a lot to be said about it, and I did originally have a lot written, but I’ve cut it out for time reasons. I will only say that Muslims have higher birthrates than us, and stronger spiritual will, than we currently have. They believe in themselves. Therefore, the best we Europeans can expect is, not peaceful coexistence with Islam in Europe, but to be peacefully taken over and absorbed by Islam in Europe. That’s what we are facing. Of course, it is insane to believe that this process WILL be peaceful, but that’s another matter.


So, what are the forces that are allowing this fate to close in on us, every single day?


Our cultural paradigm — of equality, egalitarianism and atomised individualism — prohibits us from objecting to the takeover of us by Islam. It ensures that we see OURSELVES as individuals, but allow other peoples, and allow other peoples to see themselves as peoples. It ensures that we lose our way, and stand in open-mouthed bafflement and amazement as other peoples refuse to lose THEIR way! It ensures that we are beaten, regardless of who beats us. But what allows this cultural paradigm to remain predominant in our society? The complacency of the White public!






Read Full Post »

[Millennial Woes gives a humorous and informative speech on what it takes to be a man in 2017. Delivered at an Erkenbrand pre-conference dinner in Rotterdam, Netherlands, on Oct 13, 2017 — KATANA.]





Millennial Woes


To Be a Man in 2017









Click the link below to view the video:







Published on Oct 21, 2017
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compete… [This video is not intended to condone violence or hate.] [This project is my livelihood. Please see http://www.millennialwoes.com/donate. Thank you.] ALTERNATIVE CHANNELS: http://www.vid.me/millennialwoes http://www.bitchute.com/channel/mille… http://www.minds.com/millennialwoes












Organizer: Millennial Woes will be doing a little broadcasting.


Woes: Alright, this is not going to be as serious as the other two talks, so I hope that’s that’s alright. I thought it would be appropriate to talk about what it takes to be a man in this year, in 2017. And this is based on the quote from Robert Heinlein, which I’ll read out now.


A human being should be able to change a diaper; plan an invasion; butcher a hog; conn a ship; design a building; write a sonnet; balance accounts; build a wall — “no comment”; set a bone; comfort the dying; take orders; give orders; cooperate; act alone; solve equations; analyze any problem; pitch manure; program a computer; cook a tasty meal; fight efficiently; and die gallantly! Specialization is for insects! [laughter]



Now in 2017, however, a man must be able to start an online poll that won’t be hijacked by bots; write a small software utility from scratch; code a working web page; get a public figure to retweet his pithy one-liner; [laughter] PTO skeptic — I hope you’re all aware of what’s skeptics are, terrible life forms; shelter a fellow goy in his hour of need; [laughter] withstand a demonization campaign by his nation’s tabloid media, for example; not have any skills, because they don’t teach us any, yet still have self-respect; [laughter] acquire skills and improve them, yet never get complacent; organize a local group of flashy goys; [laughter] convert Bitcoin to cash; archive a SoundCloud channel before it gets shut down; [laughter] one must understand the importance of group averages; one must understand that proportions matter just as much as absolute numbers; one must be capable of both logic and rhetoric and know that it’s not about the opponent, but the spectators.


A man in 2017 must be able to do a 23andme test, and pass; [laughter]


Read Full Post »




[Quietly spoken YouTuber, Way of the World (WotW), gently puts the boot into the Left’s empty rhetoric that never challenges the actual  ideas of nationalists, but just name calls, while only offering more degeneracy and destruction of our societies as originally formulated by jewish “intellectual” movements like the Frankfurt School. That we have truth on our side leads WotW to the conclusion that we will win — KATANA.]





Way of the World


Why the Alt-Right Will Win









Click the link below to view the video:







Published on October 3, 2017


WotW looks at the latest attempted hit-piece against the alt-right and why we mustn’t lose heart. Please support this channel at: https://www.patreon.com/wayoftheworld or by using the PayPal link on the channel homepage. https://www.facebook.com/wayoftheworld/ https://www.minds.com/WayoftheWorld https://www.bitchute.com/channel/wayo… https://gab.ai/WayoftheWorld https://vid.me/Way_of_the_World











So you probably saw the latest hit piece on the Alt-right from Right Wing Watch. It was the same old stuff we’ve seen before, profiling some of the leading voices of our movement, calling them extremists, and making compilations of quotations that frankly sounded, entirely reasonable. The piece also featured some other people who, whilst not in our movement, sometimes enter our orbit for various reasons, and who are laughingly called in the piece, “Enable of Hate”.



I’m afraid I couldn’t help, but belly laugh when I saw Sargon’s face staring back at me under that banner.



It’s just another day in “clown world”.



So this is just the latest piece of facile posturing, even against those who are simply willing to have a conversation with us and test the merits of our beliefs. I’ve said before that the left, at least those who are leading it and setting the agenda, know the threat we represent. The truth is pure poison to them. And they know we have it. And they know that once people are exposed to it, they will come our way. They are right to be scared and desperate.


Read Full Post »


[John Friend and Carolyn Yeager discuss the recent Greg Johnson vs Andrew Anglindebate” where the “Holocaust” and Revisionism were some of the topics discussed.

John and Carolyn then take Kevin MacDonald and Greggy to the woodshed for their failure to man-up and confront the fraudulent nature of the “holocaust industry” that the jews have placed, like a millstone, around the necks of Whites.

The Revisionists have systematically and conclusively proven that the “Holocaust” is the “hoax of the 20th century“. What stands in the way of this becoming general public knowledge is organized jewry’s stranglehold over our governments and media, etc.

Between this proven hoax and the public’s  lack of awareness stand two prominent members of the White movement, who for reasons explored by Carolyn and John, make excuses for evading this fact, or worst, pretend with word play that it still “happened“.

As Carolyn and John discuss, the fraudulent “Holocaust” is central to organized jewry’s strategy of guilt tripping Whites to prevent them into moving towards White nationalism by linking it negatively to racial awareness, that then leads to “Nazism” and the inevitable “gassing of six million innocent jews“.

As such, it is essential that the White movement comes to grips with exposing the Holohoax for what it is, so that this massive psychological weapon, roadblock, can be neutralized.

Meanwhile the jews continue on with their genocidal plans to destroy the White race — KATANA.]








The Realist Report


Carolyn Yeager


On the Johnson vs Anglin Debate





Click the link below to John’s blog post:


The Realist Report – Carolyn Yeager

Click the link below to listen the audio:




Or for a tidied up version of the audio, from Carolyn:





The realist Report Description


Published on Sep 6, 2017



On this edition of The Realist Report, we’re joined once again by Carolyn Yeager. Carolyn and I focus on the recent debate between Andrew Anglin and Greg Johnson which focused on the importance and relevance of historical revisionism in the overall pro-White struggle. Carolyn and I both agree that revisionism is an essential aspect of the struggle for the White race, as our historical narrative – especially as it pertains to WWII, Adolf Hitler, and the so-called “Holocaust” of “6 million Jews” – has been entirely weaponized against our people. We also address a number of other related issues in this very important podcast.

Below are relevant links for this program:

Subscribe to The Realist Report today, and support independent media!

Did you enjoy this program? Consider donating to The Realist Report to help us continue producing podcasts. Enter your email below and donate $10 now!












Voice over: You are listening to The Realist Report. And now your host, John Friend!


John: All right folks, welcome back to another edition of The Realist Report. This is your host John Friend. The website is The Realist Report dot com, where you can find an extensive archive of these pod casts as well as other radio broadcasts I have participated in, in the past. You can also find all of my blog posts and articles, a contact page, my Twitter feed, which is embedded on the right hand side of the website, and many other useful and important links. I am a regular reporter for American Free Press, America’s last real newspaper, and I also contribute to The Barnes Review, the bi-monthly history magazine affiliated with American Free Press. I encourage everyone listening to subscribe to both publications. Check out American Free Press dot net and The Barnes Review dot org for more details.


OK, with that said, let me introduce my special guest this evening. Carolyn Yeager is back once again to discuss a recent debate between Andrew Anglin and Greg Johnson. Which focuses on the importance and relevance of historical Revisionism in the overall pro-White struggle. A topic Carolyn and I have addressed in the past.


Carolyn, welcome back to the program! How are you this evening?


Carolyn: I’m just fine, John. Glad to be here.


John: Yes, good! I’m glad that you could join me. You wrote an article about this debate between Greg Johnson and Andrew Anglin which is over on Carolyn Yeager dot net. And I will link to it. I hope people go there and check it out. I think you have a lot of very important and good things to say about the debate. And really that’s going to be the main topic for this conversation. I will be honest, I did not listen to the entire debate. I think if you can find it on YouTube and you can also find it on, … There’s like a new alternative to YouTube from what I understand. I think it’s Bitchute, is that correct?


Carolyn: Yes.


John: Yes. You can find it [the debate] in multiple places. You have it linked on a couple of different, …


Carolyn: Yes. I have both of them linked.


John: Yes, over on your site. If you just Google it, you can find it. It’s been all over the place. It is a pretty interesting debate. Certainly worth checking out. Again I didn’t listen to the entire thing. I listened to most of it, and I mean, frankly I’ve basically heard what both Anglin and Johnson have to say about the subject, so it really wasn’t anything, …


[Image] The many faces of Andrew Anglin.


Carolyn: And then Anglin said, afterwards, that it wasn’t supposed to be a debate, but then afterwards they started calling it a debate. But I guess that was important to him, that he didn’t feel like he was in debate. You know, he wasn’t prepared, maybe, to debate anything. You know, but they did have interestingly pretty much opposing views when it came to “Holocaust” and revisionism, which is the part that I found interesting.


Read Full Post »

Older Posts »