Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for January, 2018

 

 

[In this YouTube Hangout (No 2) Morgoth, who runs the blog, Morgoth’s Review, blog regular Jim, and Theberton, talks with YouTuber, Arya Sattya about how she came to be making YouTube videos, the battle between order and choas, Eastern religions, Japanese worldview, Nietzschean philosophy, the Alt-Right, Pat Condell, Counter Jihad, and Holocaustianity, on “Holocaust Remembrance Day” Jan 27 KATANA.]

 

NOTES

 

 — If you would like to improve the accuracy of the transcript please leave any corrected text in the comments section. Corrections to misspelled names, etc., is encouraged. Thank you.

 

— The tragic, yet funny, “Pat Condell” meme used on the cover, I believe, was originally created in 2015 by John Morlar. It mocks Condell’s constant focus on the Muslim invasion of Europe while studiously avoiding mentioning the cause, organized jewry, falsely portraying jews as a victimized group rather than the arch victimizers that they are. In other words, while Europe goes down he wants to save the very group that are behind sinking it!

 

 

 

 

 

Morgoth’s Review

 

YouTube Hangout 02

 


 

Merry Holocaustmas

 


 

 

Click here for the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzBg1k0aBVk

 

 

 

Published on Jan 27, 2018

 

 

YouTube Description

In our second ever hangout the wonderful YouTuber Arya Sattya joins us to discuss religion, and Holocaustianity on Holocaust remembrance day.

 

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(97 mins)

 

 

 

Morgs: Are we on?

 

Theberton: And we’re live.

 

Morgs: Okay, this is the Morgoth’s Review hangout number two.

 

And we’ve got a special guest, Ayra Sattya today. Hello Arya.

 

Ayra: Hello. Thanks for having me on.

 

Theberton: Do you want to introduce yourself Ayra?

 

Ayra: Yeah. I’ve just started a YouTube channel and I’ve got a Twitter as well just talking about I guess sort of all alts right stuff and philosophy, and things like that.

 

[01:01]

 

Theberton: How did you get into this kind of thing?

 

Ayra: I suppose I’ve been watching like, well YouTube for a long time, and I’ve been subscribed to like Millennial Woes for a few years. So just lots of things happening in the world and like in my life as well. And then watching all of the sort of Millenniyule streams over Christmas just got me sort of really motivated. So I start wanting to talk about it, so, you know, I started a channel and here I am.

 

Morgs: I think you jumped straight in on the Skeptic Wars, as well?

 

Ayra: Yeah. I’ve been watching it since like the beginning. So like even before it was like the Gamergate stuff I’ve been watching, like when it used to be about atheism and Christianity. And then it started moving into being about feminism and stuff. So, you know, I’ve been watching it [02:01] come from like the proto skeptic into the proper skeptic movement. And now they’re starting to trying to pivot towards being like classical liberals and things like that.

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

[Jan 27 is a day for honoring Revisionists who have sacrificed so much for exposing the diabolical lie known as the “Holocaust” to the world. The website “jan27.org” celebrates its 5th annual commemoration honoring Revisionists who have brought sanity to a central aspect of the “Holocaust”, namely the Auschwitzdeath camp” narrative. The theme of its new articles (see links below) this year is “Exposing the Allies‘ hate, murder and revenge against Germans”.

 

The “Holocaust” is a diabolical lie that has been used to  justify the creation of a criminal bolt-hole in the Middle East known as Israel, for the international criminal cabal known as “organized jewry“.

 

Even far worse, this demonstrable hoax, the “Holocaust“, is also used as a psychological weapon to bludgeon Whites throughout the West to give up on defending their own countries from the jewish engineered takeover by non-Whites.

 

The West is targeted for slow-motion racial and cultural destruction by organized jewry in order for it to achieve its messianic goal of a Jew World Order tyranny. And its foremost “shield and sword” is its historically false “Holocaust” narrative, particularly focused on Auschwitz.

 

The “Holocaust” consists of three core jewish lies:

 

BIG LIE 1: The Germans had a plan to kill all jews.

 

BIG LIE 2: They used gas chambers to kill many of them.

 

BIG LIE 3: They killed 6,000,000 jews.

 

So please use this day and more, to look into what the Revisionists have to say.

Your future and your children’s future depend on you doing something to expose this hoax of centuries — KATANA.]

 

 

 

[Image] “REVISIONISTS’ WORK MAKES [YOU] FREE”

Distinguished “dogs” of revisionism, from left to right: Robert Faurrison, Fred Leuchter, Fredrick Toben, Arthur Butz, Germar Rudolf, David Cole.

 

 

 

Help us celebrate sanity

 

 

Published by carolyn on Thu, 2018-01-25 10:12

 

Help us celebrate our Fifth Annual Commemoration honoring the Revisionists who introduced sanity to the Auschwitz “death camp” narrative.

 

January 27 is the day the world is told to bow down to remember the Auschwitz gas chamber myth and lie. We chose this day to tell a different story … our story of sanity, science and honest research.

 

We are the Jan27.org committee. So please … help us fight the old war propaganda! Stand up to the false narratives. Spread the word!

 

Spread our website Jan27.org and our new, special articles for 2018 to your friends and acquaintances. Our theme this year is “Exposing the Allies‘ hate, murder and revenge against Germans”.

 

We have two book reviews for the important new book by our great revisionist Carlo Mattogno – Commandant of Auschwitz: Rudolf Höss, His Torture and His Forced Confessions. What Höss was put through by the British who captured him defies description, and Mattogno covers every inch of it meticulously in his book.

 

We have a new article by Carolyn Yeager about how the U.S. Army allowed a diagnosed psychopath to carry out the hangings of the 10 “major war criminals” found guilty in the first military tribunal at Nuremberg, and of many other German victims of Allied (in)justice.

 

We have another new article by Hadding Scott, which should prove to be just as popular as his two previous articles written especially for our past commemorations, which we had to copyright because so many people were taking it entire for their sites as soon as it appeared. This one is based on Edwin Black’s book IBM and the Holocaust.

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

 

[In this British Channel 4 interview, cum debate/debacle, between a less than typical cucky [1] Canadian academic, Jordan Peterson, and the feminist host Cathy Newman on the female wage gap with men, we witness the total, cringe inducing, defeat of her position, as she shows continuously an inability to grasp simple points made by Peterson. In fact, she herself demonstrates a good example of a woman being put into a highly paid position, way above her ability, purely because of her gender.

Which is indicative that actually the wage gap is in females’ favour, as many of them are in positions much higher than they should be, purely for what they don’t have between their legs, in order to fulfill affirmative action quotas KATANA.]

 

 

Jordan Peterson

 

Debates

 

Cathy Newman

 

On the Gender Pay Gap

 


 

 

Click here for the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMcjxSThD54

 

 

 

Published on Jan 16, 2018

 

 

YouTube Description

Published on Jan 16, 2018

Channel 4 News’ full, fiery interview with clinical psychologist and professor Jordan B Peterson, whose views on gender have amassed great controversy – and a huge online following. He discusses the pay gap, patriarchy and his new book “12 Rules for Life.”

 

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(29 mins)

 

 

 

[00:02]

 

 

Newman: Jordan Peterson, you’ve said that men need to, quote, “grow the hell up!” Tell me why.

 

 

Peterson: Well, because there’s nothing uglier than an old infant. There’s nothing good about it. People who don’t grow up, don’t find the sort of meaning in their life that sustains them through difficult times. And they are certain to encounter difficult times. And they’re left bitter and resentful, and without purpose, and adrift, and hostile, and resentful, and vengeful, and arrogant, and deceitful, and of no use to themselves, and of no use to anyone else, and no partner for a woman, and there’s nothing in it that’s good!

 

Newman: So you’re saying, [2] I mean, that sounds pretty bad.

 

Peterson: Yes it is.

 

Newman: You’re saying there’s a crisis of masculinity. I mean, what do you do about it?

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

 

[In this YouTube Hangout (No 1) Morgoth, who runs the blog Morgoth’s Review. talks with Gentleman Jim Crow and Theberton about the “Skeptics” war with the Alt-Right, UKIP, and the problems facing Whites in general with the invasion of non-Whites into our countries engineered by organized jewry KATANA.]

 

IMPORTANT NOTE:

This transcript is only a rough draft. Please confirm any of the text by listening to the actual audio.

 

If you would like to improve the accuracy of the transcript please leave any corrected text in the comments section. Thank you.

 

NOTE: Text in grey needs further proofing.

 

 

 

Morgoth’s Review

 

YouTube Hangout 01

 


 

Skeptics and Cucks

 


 

Click here for the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qct0g7MVhQ

 

 

 

Published on Jan 19, 2018

 

 

YouTube Description

First ever Morgoth’s review hangout discussing skeptics and cucks, with Gentleman Jim Crow and Theberton.

 

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(87 mins)

 

 

 

[00:02]

 

Morgs: Weekend hang out number one. And we’re gonna talk I’m with Theberton who does the YouTube stuff, Jim who polices the comments and other things through the blog, and it’s me Morgoth. We’re gonna have a general banter about the skeptic war, and, what else was on the table Jim?

 

Jim: The skeptic war, Henry Bolton and his business with his girlfriend.

 

Morgs: Right. Which I’ve done an article about. We’ll see how it goes. Maybe about the “shitholegate” as well. But the thing with the skeptic war was that we’ve got this little clip that I wanted to have a look at, okay. Get that up Theberton? The zulu? What’s he called? Are you there?

 

Jim: I’m here. I’m not sure, “Zulu“, or something like that [01:00] Uzalu” I’ve got on my tablet. He’s called “Uzalu“.

 

Morgs: Yeah I was expecting something, ….

 

Theberton: So, I’ve got the video, …

 

Morgs: Brilliant! There’s this skeptic kid. I don’t know anything about him. I don’t want to slag him off, you know, and call him names and stuff, but the thing is, that they’re engaging more and more with like us, the Alt-right, White nationalists, whatever you want to say it. And these debates, all these fucking videos keep popping up on YouTube. I’m just overwhelmed with content as they say. And this one popped up and, because it was a bit of a short one I had a bit of a click through it and I came across this question. Now, and I just thought in this [02:03] one question, it’s everything that I think is shit about the skeptic community. And why I’m happy that they’re being torn apart by nationalists. Let’s watch this. Can you play this, Theby?

 

Theberton: Yes. Let’s see if this works.

 

Interviewer:So can you please explain to me why Anglo-Saxons being a minority in England is not such a bad thing?

Skeptic [he sounds very much like Sargon]: I would say, depending on exactly how it happens, it could just be a neutral thing. If you think that there’s some sort of inherent quality in Anglo-Saxon DNA that can’t be found in other DNA, I would simply refer you to the fact that, you know, these things can change over time. If we select for the quality that we’re looking for, and you guys are right, then it will just be Anglo-Saxons. But if you’re wrong, it won’t just be Anglo-Saxons, but it wouldn’t matter, because you’re wrong about that. So I mean, it’s a pretty simple argument from the Alt-right.

 

[03:08]

 

Morgs: Right. So when your kid comes running home and says, “Daddy, why am I the only White person in the class?” show them that clip, and everything will just be honky fucking dory! Won’t it? I mean, what do you make of that Jim?
 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

 

[In this interview Andrew Hitchcock talks with Canadian-German Alfred Schaefer again, this time about the sudden arrest of his sister, Monika, in Germany, for the “crime” of making a 5 minute YouTube video entitled, “Sorry Mom, I was Wrong About the Holocaust“. Alfred makes an impassioned plea for people to support Monika and to spread the word about this ongoing  tyranny being brought about by organized jewry and their shabbos goy minions — KATANA.]

 

 

 

 

 

Andrew Hitchcock

 

with

 

Alfred Schaefer

 

How YOU Can Help

 

Monika Schaefer!

 

 

 

Click here for the audio:

https://cldup.com/8XDyvXPqQo.mp3

 

Click here for: Andrew Carrington Hitchcock webpage for this interview

 

 

 

Published on Jan 11, 2018

 

 

Andrew Hitchcock’s Description

The Andrew Carrington Hitchcock Show (534)

Alfred Schaefer – How YOU Can Help Monika Schaefer!

 

 

 

In today’s show originally broadcast on January 11 2018, EuroFolkRadio’s Andrew Carrington Hitchcock interviews Alfred Schaefer, for a show entitled, “How YOU Can Help Monika Schaefer!

 

We discussed:

— the circumstances surrounding Monika’s arrest at the Sylvia Stolz trial last week on January 3rd; how when Monika protested that she was a free Canadian citizen the state prosecutor said:

If you wanted to remain free you should have stayed in Canada!”;

— Monika’s experiences in Germany prior to her arrest; how Alfred has received absolutely no information from the German authorities regarding Monika’s condition, and has been unable to see or speak to her;

— how the German (((media))) are celebrating the abduction and persecution of Monika;

— how we can turn the abduction and persecution of Monika to our advantage;

— how Monika will be coping in prison; examples of the Jewish persecution of the White race;

— how Alfred is thrilled with the support Monika has been getting from around the world since her abduction and persecution;

— how there is no point raising the issue of Monika’s abduction and persecution with any political parties as they are all controlled by the same group;

— what YOU can do to help Monika;

— how YOU can contact Monika;

— Monika’s YouTube video, “Sorry Mom, I Was Wrong About The Holocaust,” which I played in its’ entirety on the show;

— how this YouTube video undid the hundreds of millions of dollars the Jews have spent over the years in indoctrinating the White race with their lies;

— how Adolf Hitler was incarcerated at the same prison as Monika in 1922;

— and many other topics.

 

You can write to Monika at the following address:

 

Monika Schaefer
Stadelheim Prison
Stadelheimer Straße
81549 Munich
Germany

 

Click Here To Listen To The Show

Click Here For Monika’s 5 Minute YouTube, “Sorry Mom, I Was Wrong About The Holocaust,” Which Is The Reason For Her Being Held in Solitary Confinement In Stadelheim Prison

Click Here For Stadelheim Prison’s Facebook Page

Click Here For The New, “We Are Monika,” Website

Click Here For Monika’s Website

Click Here For Alfred’s YouTube

Click Here For The Andrew Carrington Hitchcock Show Archive Where You Can Listen To Or Download All My Shows

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(57 mins)

 

 

[00:25]

 

You are listening to TBR radio, brought to you by The Barnes Review.

Now the Andrew Carrington Hitchcock Show with your host, Andrew Carrington Hitchcock.

 

 

Andrew: Hello everybody. Today’s show was booked to record, and it was booked to record with my good friends, Alfred and Monika Schaefer. Now unfortunately Monika can’t be with us, because she has been jailed in Germany, for producing the video, which was an apology to a mother, entitled, “Sorry Mom, I was Wrong about the Holocaust”. So I just have Alfred with me today. Now, I’m recording this January the tenth, and I’m actually broadcasting the very last show I recorded with Alfred and Monika, tomorrow, January eleventh. Now that might change and I might end up broadcasting this show tomorrow, and delaying that one, depending on how it goes. I’ve had a discussion with Alfred before hand. We’re going to see.

 

So I’m going to bring him up right now. Alfred are you with me?

 

Alfred: Yes Andy, and thanks for calling me up and I’m glad this is taking place now.

 

Andrew: Absolutely! Well either way, I mean, if we decide to put this out in a couple of weeks like we have been doing, then I can always release this. I’ll think of a way that I can release this early anyway, so, … Yeah, I’m all up in the air with this folks, because we don’t know where it’s going to go., but I think the best thing to do now is to hand over to you Alfred, and can you explain exactly what happened, from where Monika was staying with you for Christmas, and just after, and now is suddenly in jail in Munich.

 

Alfred: Yes, okay. It’s been precisely one week ago, that’s on the third of January, that Monika was arrested, as a quiet observer watching the bizarre Inquisition hearings against Sylvia Stolz in Munich. And that was done, … First of all, to get into the courthouse we had to pass all kinds of security clearances. And we went in there and watched the proceedings, and then within about forty minutes into the proceedings, the snake of a state prosecutor ordered an unplanned break, and said:

 

We’re going to reconvene here in the about twenty minutes.

 

So we say, “Oh well, let’s go out and stretch our legs a little bit, in the hallway.” So we step out into the hallway, and there was another snake of a state prosecutor, came up with three heavily armed thugs and they say:

 

[03:04]

 

Monika Schaefer?

 

In German, of course, and she says “yes” and she [state prosecutor] says:

 

You are herein detained”.

 

And they took her off to the side a bit, and slapped handcuffs on her. And when she protested:

 

Wait! You can’t do that! I didn’t do anything wrong! I’m from Canada. I’m a free citizen!

 

Then the snake of a prosecutor said:

 

If you wanted to stay free, you would have stayed in Canada!

 

So that was how the arrest proceeded. And then after going back into the court room, Sylvia Stolz’s lawyer came to me and he whispered in my ear, and he says:

 

Alfred, you had better get out of this room here, because we don’t know what they’re going to do to you.

 

And so I just got my jacket and left the courtroom. Waited outside, it was raining pretty miserably and then Henry Hoffenmyer came out after a while, and we just waited, basically in this car, until the proceedings ended. And then we could communicate with Sylvia Stolz and her lawyer, and a few other people.

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

 

 

 

[Arya Sattya, a British woman, gives a short, but very good, critique of the recent debate hosted by Andy Warski, between Richard Spencer and Sargon of Akkad, among others. Although she disagrees with some aspects of Spencer’s views, she is highly critical of Sargon for his lack of sincerity and constant naysaying about the viability of having White only ethno-state. She goes through several of Sargon’s “arguments” pointing out the “pipul” or hair-splitting, nature of many of them  KATANA.]

 

_______________________

 

 

Arya Sattya

 

Richard Spencer vs Sargon of Akkad

 

Debate Roundup

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Click the link below to view the video:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2DZSzxHZvY

 

 

YouTube Description

 

 

Published on Jan 5, 2018

 

This is a discussion of some of the points brought up in the debate between Richard Spencer and Sargon of Akkad on Warski live.

 

Please like, comment, share and subscribe!

 

 

 

 

This video is not intended to encourage or condone hatred or violence.

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(12:09)

 

[Music]

 

[00:12]

 

 

Hello.

 

I just wanted to talk about some points that came up in the debate last night on Andy Wolski’s channel with Richard Spencer, Sargon of Akkad, Styxhexenhammer666, but also included other people like, Millennial Woes, and so on. The stream at it’s highest, had over 13,000 people watching live, and at one point reached the point of being the number one most watched stream in the world on YouTube.

 

It was a really interesting debate, and I think all this really goes to show just how many people are starting to get interested in the ideas of the so called, “Alt-Right” and just how much progress the movement is making as a whole. I really recommend going on watching it now, if you haven’t already. But I’ll put a link in the description.

 

With regards to the debate itself, I’d like to start off by saying that there are lots of points of disagreement I have with Richard Spencer, and I do think that it’s highly likely that he is, to some extent, “controlled opposition“, which I think I’ll discuss in another video.

 

But, there are also a lot of things I do agree with him on. And I thought that he performed exceptionally well in the debate. There were various polls done afterwards and it was in my opinion too, that he comfortably won the debate.

 

So, it started off with Richard Spencer calmly stating his points, and Sargon just shouting over him and coming across as incredibly impatient, for seemingly no reason at all. The first major point was about whether to adhere to abstract principles, or real-world pragmatic concerns, which Sargon just couldn’t seem to understand at all. The worlds described by Locke*, that he always seems to harp on about, was ultimately one invented for and by White people in countries that were overwhelmingly White. The United States itself was explicitly invented by, and for, White people. Which Richard Spencer mentioned at a later point in the debate, when he spoke about the 1790 Immigration Act**, which explicitly welcomed White people of good character. Sargon here is making what one might call the “Enlightenment fallacy” which I think I want to expand on in a video of itself.

 

[* John Locke, (born August 29, 1632, Wrington, Somerset, England—died October 28, 1704, High Laver, Essex), English philosopher whose works lie at the foundation of modern philosophical empiricism and political liberalism. He was an inspirer of both the European Enlightenment and the Constitution of the United States. His philosophical thinking was close to that of the founders of modern science, especially Robert Boyle, Sir Isaac Newton, and other members of the Royal Society. His political thought was grounded in the notion of a social contract between citizens and in the importance of toleration, especially in matters of religion. Much of what he advocated in the realm of politics was accepted in England after the Glorious Revolution of 1688–89 and in the United States after the country’s declaration of independence in 1776.

The next major point was about the rights of individuals, versus, the rights of groups. I don’t think that these things are mutually exclusive at all. I think that most people want to live under a State that exists for their interests, and that protects the rights and freedoms of the individuals within that State. But that State is a group identity.

Source: https://www.britannica.com/biography/John-Locke]

 

[** Naturalization Act of 1790

The original United States Naturalization Law of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat. 103) provided the first rules to be followed by the United States in the granting of national citizenship. This law limited naturalization to immigrants who were free White persons of good character. It thus excluded American Indians, indentured servants, slaves, free blacks and later Asians although free blacks were allowed citizenship at the state level in certain states. It also provided for citizenship for the children of U.S. citizens born abroad, stating that such children “shall be considered as natural born citizens,” the only US statute ever to use the term. It specified that the right of citizenship did “not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_of_1790]

 

I personally want to live under an ethno-state that protects my freedom as an individual and acts in my interests. And I want that to be an ethno-state for, and by my group. Respecting individual and group rights is not mutually exclusive, which Sargon seems to go out of his way to pretend to not understand at all. It’s about finding a balance between Authoritarianism that’s necessary for a state to function, and Libertarianism which stands up for the rights and freedoms of people within the state.

 

 

[02:51]

 

 

The point that Richard Spencer was making was about how we already have States that restrict our freedoms, and Sargon doesn’t have a problem with that now. So, Sargon despite his constant waffling on about abstract principles that originally emerged more as descriptions of States inhabited by White people, than prescriptive ideals, he does understand that in the real world we do have to restrict some freedoms, and we do have to find a balance between authoritarian and libertarian ideals. We do have to find a balance between the rights of the individuals and the preservation of the group as a whole, which they exist in.

 

I think it’s all somewhat hypocritical, when, as some have pointed out, Sargon himself started an online poll to ban social justice causes in the universities. Surely this goes against some of Sargon’s beloved principles?

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »