Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for February, 2016

[In this very good essay Thomas Dalton outlines the case for his forthcoming translation of Mein Kampf. He also gives a concise summary of Hitler’s position on the major topics of Racial Theory, Religion and Jews. Lastly, Hitler’s legacy is discussed.]

 

Rethinking Mein Kampf - COVER - Ver 2

 

 

Rethinking Mein Kampf

 

Thomas Dalton

 

 

http://www.inconvenienthistory.com/archive/2016/volume_8/number_1/rethinking_mein_kampf.php

 

Contents

 

Preface

A Most Consequential Work

Origins and Context

November Revolution, and a New Movement

Chapter Synopses

Why a New Translation?

Some Contentious Topics

Racial Theory

On Religion

On the Jews

Hitler’s Legacy

BIBLIOGRAPHY

25 Points of the NSDAP Program

Version History & Notes

 

 

Preface

 

On 1 January 2016, Mein Kampf came out of copyright. It has now been 70 years since the author’s death, and by international copyright law, legal protection for the book has expired. Thus it is perhaps a good time to reconsider and reexamine this most notorious work—and perhaps to banish some of the many myths surrounding it to history.

 

In fact, we are long overdue for a revisionist treatment of this work. In my experience, very few people really understand what’s in it. The common man, even the well-educated one, likely knows little more than the title and the author. Revisionists who work on the Holocaust or either of the world wars often bypass the book completely, as if it had no relevance at all; most likely, they have never read it. Traditional journalists, academics, and alleged experts frequently display their ignorance by taking passages out of context, overlooking key facts, or simply failing to cite the author appropriately. More generally, the mainstream approach to Mein Kampf seems be rather similar to its tactics with regard to Holocaust revisionism: ignore, censor, or disparage. It is simply too problematic to discuss this work in a fashion that might lead readers to ask tough questions, or to seek out the book itself.

 

A large part of the reason for the book’s obscurity is the sorry state of its many English translations. These will be discussed and critiqued below. This is also one of the reasons that I am currently working on a new, parallel German-English translation—the first ever, in fact. I will attempt to remedy many of the shortcomings in current versions, and provide something of a revisionist perspective on the entire work. In the present essay, I examine the translations, discuss some main themes of the book, and argue for its relevance in the present day.

 

 

A Most Consequential Work

 

 

Mein Kampf is the autobiography and articulated worldview of one of the most consequential and visionary leaders in world history.  It is also one of the most maligned and misrepresented texts of the 20th century. There have been so many obfuscations, deceptions, and outright falsehoods circulated about this work that one scarcely knows where to begin. Nonetheless, the time has come to set the story straight.

 

That Adolf Hitler would even have undertaken such a work is most fortunate. Being neither a formal academic nor a natural writer, and being fully preoccupied with pragmatic matters of party-building, he might never have begun such a major task—were it not for the luxury of a year-long jail term. In one of the many ironies of Hitler’s life, it took just such an adverse event to prompt him to dictate his party’s early history and his own life story. This would become Volume One of his two-part, 700-page magnum opus. It would have a dramatic effect on world history, and initiate a chain of events that has yet to fully play out. In this sense, Mein Kampf is as relevant today as when it was first written.

 

Rethinking Mein Kampf - the book

[Image] Display of Copies of Hitlers Mein Kampf – Documentation Center in Congress Hall – Nuremberg-Nurnberg – Germany
By Adam Jones, Ph.D.

 

Perhaps the place to begin is with the rationale for the book. Why did Hitler write it at all? Clearly it was not a requirement; many major politicians in history have come and gone without leaving a personal written record. Even his time in prison could have been spent communicating with party leaders, building support, soliciting allies, and so on. But he chose to spend much of his stay documenting the origins and growth of his new movement. And this was a boon to history as well as to understanding of the human spirit.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

[This is the last known video interview of Bradley Smith, an indefatigable proponent of free speech and a supporter and promoter of revisionists, in particular those that have concluded that the so-called “Holocaust” is in actual fact, the “Hoax of the Twentieth Century“.

Bradley sadly passed away at the age of 86, on February 18, 2016  — KATANA]

Bradley Smith - Cover Ver 2

 

Click on the above link, or copy the link into your browser to view the video.

Published on Dec 18, 2015

 

 

Jim Rizoli for the League of Extraordinary Revisionists interviews Bradley Smith — his 5th in the series.

 

YouTube Stats

 

Mar 24 — Views: 1,281 – Comments: 22 – Likes: 62  Dislikes: 6
Mar 13 — Views: 1,127 – Comments: 21 – Likes: 59  Dislikes: 6
Feb 23 — Views: 896 – Comments: 17 – Likes: 53  Dislikes: 5
Feb 20, 2016 — Views: 824 – Comments: 16 – Likes: 49  Dislikes: 5

 

 

 

 

_____________________

 

 

Jim Rizoli

 

Interviews

 

Bradley Smith

 

 

TRANSCRIPT — WITH IMAGES

 

00:00

UNDER CONSTRUCTION

86:40

 

END

 

 


 

 

TRANSCRIPT — TEXT ONLY

 

Jim: Hi everyone! Jim Rizoli here with Bradley Smith.

And we’re going to be talking to you today. He is one of The League of Extraordinary Revisionists that we have picked out to interview and we have only a few of them. So far, Bradley will be the fifth to be interviewed. And we have a few more we would like to talk to, but we’re very glad we have Bradley with us today.

You live where, Bradley, exactly?

 

Bradley: I live in Baja, Mexico.

 

Jim: OK, so you live in Baja, Mexico.

 

Bradley: Baja Norte.

 

Jim: Well that’s good. [laughing] We live in Massachusetts so, we are a little far away from you.

 

Bradley: I’ve never been there.

 

Jim: Oh, well, you should be glad!

But anyway, we’re very happy that we can interview you because I’ve been familiar with your writings for many years. What I really appreciated about you and your coming into the revisionist movement is you’re like me. I don’t write books. I read a lot. And I talk a lot. But you probably write a lot more than me. I do more talking than writing. So I depend on people like you to inform me of what’s going on, to see how it works.

 

Bradley: I depend on people like Faurisson.

 

Jim: Well, that’s what I’m saying. They have written everything about this. OK ,so I don’t have to write anymore. What else can you write. You know, we can just get the message out. I look at like yourself and myself as messengers. We’re the messengers.

 

Bradley: I agree.

 

Jim: So we’re good on that.

So Bradley, why don’t you tell us a little bit about your background first of all, your claim to fame, I suppose. But give the audience a little about your background, what you’ve done in your life and from where you come to where you are now.

 

Bradley: Well, listen. That’s a long story. Your assistant sent me a series of questions and she told me for the background, tell us a little bit about yourself, your family history and your education.

My Family History: I’m from a working class family in South Central Los Angeles, in the thirty’s, where they used to do the riots. When I hear all this talk about poverty now, … It never occurred to me a day when I was a child. The issue of poverty was never there. And we lived in a converted goat shed. The goat shed had been remade. This was in a lot, a regular lot behind a house in South Central. They had a goat shed. Well, they got tired of the goat, so they rebuilt the goat shed to be the kitchen and they added two rooms to the goat shed and a toilet. That’s where I spent my early years.

My character must have been initiated there! [laughing] I slept on the sofa until I was 11 years-old, and then we moved. My father was a boiler maker. My mother was a housewife. I had twin brothers when I was 5 years old, they were born. I still remember the day after, I remember them coming out of the hospital into the parking lot and my mother and father each had a baby. I didn’t understand that, because I didn’t understand that my mother had been pregnant. I had not understood that. As a matter of fact, I didn’t know what “pregnant” was!

So anyway, they managed to get the whooping cough and die a year later.

I remember my mother crying and so forth, but we didn’t go on about it for years.

Oh, by the way, they were both lapsed Catholics. The family was largely Irish and there was some German back somewhere, on my father’s side.

 

[05:00]

 

By the way, they grew up in the coal mines of Johnstown, Pennsylvania in the 1890s. My father went to work when he was 10 years-old, in the coal mines. That’s considered a crime against humanity nowadays. But in those days, it wasn’t. This stuff all seems normal to me.

My education: I have to say that I am a graduate of John C. Fremont High School in South Central Los Angeles. And then, it more or less went to the dogs! I didn’t want to go to school when I turned 18. When I turned 17, I graduated. I wanted to go into Marines, but my mommy wouldn’t sign for me. So when I was 18, I joined the Army.

And when I got out in early 1952, I thought to study creative writing at Los Angeles City College. I went to a few classes at night, but one night I showed up and I had to sneeze and I opened my jacket, to take out a handkerchief I had in there, and there was a gasp in the room. It was a classroom. There were probably 20 people there. There was a gasp there, because I had a 38-caliber revolver in a shoulder holster.

 

Jim: Wow! Oh my goodness!

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »


Y women destroy civ - COVER

 

[INTRODUCTORY COMMENT

This is an interesting, polished and provocatively titled, video that is right in terms of describing many symptoms, but is silent, and therefore fundamentally wrong, on the real causes of those symptoms — that is, the Organised Jewish disease that spawned them. It’s like a doctor describing the crazed behavior of a village who has had its well poisoned, without him talking about that fact.

 

It’s RIGHT that the “success” of women’s rights, women’s liberation and feminist movements have undermined and been very destructive to the West. The sum total of all the consequences of these movements and trends is that White birth rates are way below replacement levels, which mean that if those trends continue, WHITES will go EXTINCT!

 

It’s RIGHT that the “success” of women’s rights, women’s liberation and feminist movements have increasingly turned men into women and women into men. This results in both men and women being less able to resist the takeover of our lands by non-Whites.

 

It’s WRONG about the “cause” of women’s rights, women’s liberation and feminist movements. They have been deliberately engineered and forced upon the West, not by females in general, but instead by Organized jewry and their jewish female agents pushing these agendas through their total dominance of the Main Stream Media and other institutions of the West. Almost all the “leading lights” in feminism have been, and are jewesses. They even boast about it.

 

It’s WRONG about the “cause” of why men have seemingly gone along with all these changes. Male “tolerance” of this movement has been deliberately engineered and forced upon the West, not by males in general, but instead by Organized jewry and their jewish agents pushing these agendas through their total dominance of the Main Stream Media and other institutions of the West. Almost all the “leading lights” in supporting feminism have been, and are jews. They even boast about it.

 

It’s WRONG about the “cause” of why the West is being invaded by so-called Third World migrants or refugees. The “refugee invasion” has been deliberately engineered and forced upon the West, not by Whites in general, but instead by Organized jewry and their jewish agents pushing this agenda through their total dominance of the Main Stream Media and other institutions of the West. Almost all the “leading lights” in supporting and facilitating the invasion have been, and are jews. They even boast about it.

 

In CONCLUSION, it is Organized jewry that has been at the forefront of constantly pushing and promoting “Feminism” through their total dominance of the Main Stream Media and other institutions of the West, not White men or women. Feminism is just one of the jews multi-pronged strategies for destroying White societies.

 

The real people to blame are not the victims (both male and female) of massive long term and relentless jewish psychological propaganda that exploits all known weaknesses in both sexes, but rather Organized jewry that has an ages-long agenda to destroy Whites. They have set women against men and men against woman — the classic strategy of divide and rule to destroy.

— KATANA]

 

 

 

Click on the above link, or copy the link into your browser to view the video.

Published on Feb 17, 2016

 

Why Women DESTROY NATIONS * / CIVILIZATIONS – and other UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTHS

* UNINTENTIONALLY and/or INADVERTENTLY. Please watch the entire video, you may miss the gist if you don’t.

***The title is controversial only if you don’t watch the whole of the video.

 

YouTube Stats

 

Oct 17 — Views: 841,126 – Comments: 29,191 – Likes: 31,021  Dislikes: 6,931
Apr 2 — Views: 341,653 – Comments: 9,895 – Likes: 14,073  Dislikes: 2,648
Mar 13 — Views: 264,000 – Comments: 7,375 – Likes: 10,525  Dislikes: 2,084
Feb 28 — Views: 218,863 – Comments: 6,230 – Likes: 9,394  Dislikes: 1,880
Feb 26 — Views: 206,546 – Comments: 3,709 – Likes: 9,175  Dislikes: 1,820
Feb 25 — Views: 199,209 – Comments: 3,442 – Likes: 9,002  Dislikes: 1,786
Feb 24 — Views: 188,026 – Comments: 3,404 – Likes: 8,790  Dislikes: 1,726
Feb 23 — Views: 130,340 – Comments: 1,392 – Likes: 6,906  Dislikes: 1,210
Feb 22 — Views: 115,919 – Comments: 1,024 – Likes: 6,364  Dislikes: 1,039
Feb 21 — Views: 72,719 – Comments: 2,636 – Likes: 4,602  Dislikes: 605
Feb 19 — Views: 28,994 – Comments: 924 – Likes: 1,933  Dislikes: 136
Feb 19 — Views: 20,227 – Comments: 789 – Likes: 1,686  Dislikes: 124

Feb 18, 2016 — Views: 10,981 – Comments: 487 – Likes: 989  Dislikes: 65

 

 

 

_____________________

 

Why Women

 

Destroy Nations and other

 

Uncomfortable Truths

 

Video Published on Feb 18, 2016

 

TRANSCRIPT — WITH IMAGES

 

00:00

 

UNDER CONSTRUCTION 

18:36

 

 

 

END

 

 


 

TRANSCRIPT — TEXT ONLY

 

00:00

 

 

If women sexual preferences are liberated and go unchecked, they destroy civilizations.

If women are allowed to choose, harems form.

Screen Text: [HAREMS FORM]

If women are allowed a voice in matters that pertain to the safety of the nation, than that nation will die, inevitably.

[CIVILIZATIONAL COLLAPSE]

It’s as simple as that.

Once you realize this, you understand the entire basis behind civilized society.

[THE ENTIRE BASIS BEHIND CIVILIZED SOCIETY]

And if not, you’ll understand by the end of this video.

As this is a complicated subject, let me state briefly what I’m talking about in this video so you can follow along more closely.

[WOMEN ARE NOT CONCERNED WITH IN-GROUP LOYALTY]

Women do not, on an instinctual level, care very much about her tribe, nation or civilization. It’s in their nature not to.

[WOMEN ARE BIOLOGICAL CREATURES]

Women are biological creatures like all others and they seek to maximize their chances of having viable offspring.

[THE FEMINISATION OF THE WEST HAS BEEN A DISASTER]

This half-century-long experiment of women’s liberation and political enfranchisement has ended in disaster for the West. And the damage done to the West may be irreparable.

[WESTERN CIVILISATION MAY BE IRREPARABLY DAMAGED]

And the only solution would be a return to a more patriarchal society. And this seems highly unlikely.

I want you to hold onto this key thought as the meaning will become clear as this video progresses.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

Ted Nugent vs ADL - COVER

 

 

 

Click on the above link, or copy the link into your browser to view the video.

Published on Feb 11, 2016

 

http://www.davidduke.com

 

This video, Dr. David Duke, PhD and former member of the House of Representatives-LA completely and utterly refutes the vicious J. Greenblatt, ADL attack on Rocker Ted Nugent. It definitely answers the question of who is behind gun control in America and the hypocrisy of Zionists who have exactly opposite policies for their precious Israel than they do for America and the entirety of the Western World.

 

YouTube Stats

 

Apr 2 — Views: 37,477 – Comments: 340 – Likes: 2,278  Dislikes: 101

Mar 23 — Views: 35,693 – Comments: 366 – Likes: 2,248  Dislikes: 99

Feb 18 — Views: 22,707 – Comments: 384 – Likes: 1,824  Dislikes: 52

Feb 17 — Views: 20,653 – Comments: 333 – Likes: 1,727  Dislikes: 48

Feb 15, 2016 — Views: 15,540 – Comments: 240 – Likes: 1,518  Dislikes: 35

 

 

_____________________

 

David Duke on

 

Ted Nugent VS the aDL

 

Who is Behind Gun Control?

 

 

Video Published on Feb 11, 2016

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

00:00

 

 

Ted Nugent vs ADL - 627

Ted Nugent vs ADL - 628

Ted Nugent vs ADL - 629

Ted Nugent vs ADL - 630

Ted Nugent vs ADL - 632

 

 

Ted Nugent vs ADL - 633

 

Duke: The head of the Anti-Defamation League, the aDL, is Jonathan Greenblatt.

 

Ted Nugent vs ADL - 634

 

He recently condemned famous musician and gun rights activist Ted Nugent, for daring to say:

 

Ted Nugent vs ADL - 635

 

Who is really leading the push to take away American Constitutional gun rights?

 

I will quote Greenblatt directly:

(more…)

Read Full Post »

Duke on Trump, Cruz - COVER Ver 4

 

 

 

 

Duke on Trump, Cruz - Video

Click on the above link, or copy the link into your browser to view the video.

 

YouTube Stats

 

Mar 23 — Views: 71,956 – Comments: 450 – Likes: 2,812  Dislikes: 127

Feb 18 — Views: 41,513 – Comments: 343 – Likes: 2,203  Dislikes: 60

Feb 14 — Views: 36,533 – Comments: 439 – Likes: 2,074  Dislikes: 57

Feb 6, 2016 — Views: 7,508 – Comments: ?? – Likes:987  Dislikes: 18

 

_____________________

 

 

David Duke on

 

Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, Goldman Sachs

 

and the Zionist Oligarchs

 

Video Published on Feb 4, 2016

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

 

 

00:00

 Duke on Trump, Cruz - 619

Duke on Trump, Cruz - 620

Duke on Trump, Cruz - 621

Duke on Trump, Cruz - 622

Duke on Trump, Cruz - 623

Duke on Trump, Cruz - 624

Duke on Trump, Cruz - 625

Duke on Trump, Cruz - 626 - Goldman Sachs owns him

 

Donald Trump:

Goldman Sachs owns them! Remember that folks! They own him!

 

Duke on Trump, Cruz - 627 - billionaires

 

David Duke: Is Donald Trump right about Ted Cruz? And how much power do the billionaires of finance and media have in politics, party’s candidates and government?

I know the realities of politics. I’m David Duke. I’m a former elected Republican member of the House of Representatives in Louisiana. and I did something almost impossible! As a Republican I defeated an incumbent Republican Governor and I was way out-spent.

Today I exercise my fundamental human right of free speech and the right of every American to express his political opinion in this vital election for the next president of the United States. I say things few in politics would dare say. Not even, Donald Trump!

There are those who seek to ban free speech. Even political free speech. But I have the right to say it. And you have the right to hear it! Today I speak about Donald Trump Ted Cruz and Goldman Sachs.

And who controls America. For complete documentation of everything I say, you can go to David Duke.com. My website.

(more…)

Read Full Post »