[How Organized Jewry has taken control of the US government and subverted it as part of its goal of achieving world domination — KATANA]
[Click to enlarge]
Zion’s Trojan Horse
By Senator Jack B. Tenney
ZION’S TROJAN HORSE
A TENNEY REPORT
On World Zionism
By Senator Jack B. Tenney
Introduction by Col. John Beaty
Sons of Liberty P.O. Box 449
Arabi, LA 70032
Printed In the United States of America
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION By Col. JOHN BEATY ………………………………. 175
THE WANDERING JEW …………………………………………………. 177
In Dispersion From the Beginning …………………………………… 177
The Chosen People ………………………………………………………… 180
THE TERRIBLE POWER OF THE PURSE ………………………. 188
Jacob Henry Schiff ………………………………………………………… 189
The Rothschilds …………………………………………………………….. 190
The Warburgs ………………………………………………………………… 192
PRELUDE TO CONQUEST ………………………………………………. 193
The World Zionist Organization ……………………………………….. 193
Toward World Government …………………………………………….. 195
THE REVOLUTIONARY PROLETARIAT ……………………………….197
The Jewish Socialist Federation of America ……………………….. 197
The Socialist International …………………………………………………. 202
The National Workmen’s Committee …………………………………. 204
JEWISH REVOLUTION ………………………………………………….. 205
“WE ARE ONE PEOPLE” ………………………………………………….. 211
“Unity of Mind and Purpose” ……………………………………………. 211
The Copenhagen Manifesto ………………………………………………. 214
THE JEWISH NATION ………………………………………………………. 215
The International Jew at Versailles …………………………………….. 215
The Versailles Treaty ………………………………………………………….. 217
Second Meeting of the American Jewish Congress ………………. 218
CONQUEST OF THE JEWISH COMMUNITIES ……………………… 219
Groundwork for World Government ……………………………………. 219
First World Jewish Conference ……………………………………………. 221
The Constituent Session of the World Jewish Congress …….. 224
Mobilization of World Jewry ……………………………………………….. 226
THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS ……………………………………………… 228
AGITATION FOR WORLD WAR II …………………………………….. 236
ANTI-GENTILISM …………………………………………………………….. 239
CHANCE OR DESIGN? …………………………………………………….,. 246
By CoL. JOHN BEATY, author of
The Iron Curtain Over America
To be of major significance, a book on the current world scene must meet three requirements:
(1) It must be the work of a person who has been in an exceptional position for breaking through censorship and learning the truth;
(2) it must be full and complete and written fearlessly, with no effort to hide or gloss over the evil deeds of any faction or minority; and
(3) it must be written by one who is skilled in the writer’s art.
ZION’S TROJAN HORSE, by Jack Tenney, possesses the triple qualification.
(1) Ten years of arduous work in the California Senate as Chairman of the Committee on Un-American Activities has given Senator Tenney a great body of information on vital facts to which newspaper columnists and other political writers, and even academic historians, have no means of access. The reason is obvious. In his strategic position, Senator Tenney not only had opportunities denied to others for uncovering secret data; he even had the power to force the disclosure of much information which would under no circumstances have become known to a writer who was not in a similar position of government authority.
(2) An author’s incumbency in high office or in a strategic position does not, however, guarantee that his book is of major importance. Too many such personages have written books to throw a smoke screen over their own surrenders to political expediency or to alien pressure. Other authors have written books which purport to cover the history of the past half century or to deal with the foreign policy of the United States of America and yet, from fear of an alien minority, make no reference whatever to Middle East, Israel, Jews, Judaism, Khazars, or Zionism! These books name names, but never the names of such history-making Jews as, for example, the Rothschilds, Chaim Weizman, Samuel Untermeyer, Stephen A. Wise, and Louis D. Brandeis — much less the names of those Jews prominent in more recent times in atomic espionage; in the U. S. executive departments, especially Treasury and State; and above all, in the personal staffs of the last three Presidents of the United States.
Books that leave out such topics and such names are worse than useless. They are dangerous. They teach the reader to place the blame for the world’s perilous condition upon people of his own creed and kind, and not where it belongs — upon scheming alien manipulators. Such books present a picture as much distorted from the truth as would be presented by a history of the U. S. Revolutionary War which made no reference to taxation without representation, the Declaration of Independence, and the Continental Congress; and made no mention of Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, John Hancock, or other men prominent at the time in influencing public opinion.
But how, the reader may ask, can one tell without reading it whether a book by a seemingly authoritative author gives a full coverage of its subject? Fortunately, there is an easy test. Consult the index of each book which has attracted your attention. Make your own comparison, and back the book of your choice. The merest glance at the index of ZION’S TROJAN HORSE will show its full and fearless coverage of all phases of its vital subject.
(3) Whatever a man’s former position of authority and however full his coverage of his subject, he cannot have maximum effectiveness unless he writes well. Senator Tenney writes with a confidence and a zeal which the reader immediately senses and shares. Imbued by the emotion of the author, the reader is swept forward through the mass of details which fill the years between Karl Marx and the present. He is both fascinated and terrified by the climactic story of the growth of two tremendous forces, Communism and Zionism, so closely related in their objectives. The reader sees with the horror which can be induced only by superb literary writing how the aims of these two forces, Communism and Zionism, are alike hostile to America as a nation and to the Christian civilization of which our nation is the finest flower. The reader shares the author’s indignation at the subtle way in which Communism and Zionism have played Christian nations against each other in bloody conflict, and is appalled at the combination of subtle infiltration, brazen bullying, and everlasting propaganda with which these two alien forces have ridden rough-shod over the world and have demanded and secured in this country rights and privileges which involve the destruction of America and the degradation of the Christian West.
In Paradise Lost John Milton wrote the epic of the fall of man, a fall which was engineered by an alien intruder into the Garden. In ZION’S TROJAN HORSE, Jack Tenney has written of the fall of American man, and of American women, too, under the blandishments, the bribes, and the intimidation of alien intruders into our garden-spot, America. To read this great book is to arm yourself with knowledge. With your increased knowledge you will feel increased confidence and have a new power to go forth and defend your country, your ideals, and your faith.
DECEMBER 4, 1953
The League of Nations
The League of Nations may be said to have been founded by President Woodrow Wilson, although the idea was not original with him. Senator Henry Cabot Lodge, speaking at Washington, D. C., In May of 1916 before the League to Enforce Peace was more emphatic in his endorsement of the plan than was Wilson. Said Lodge:
“I do not believe that when Washington warned us against entangling alliances he meant for one moment that we should not join with other civilized nations of the world if a method could be found to diminish war and encourage peace.”
Said President Wilson:
“We are participants, whether we would or not, in the life of the world … every people has a right to choose the sovereignty under which they shall live … the small states of the world have a right to enjoy the same respect for their sovereignty and for their territorial integrity that the great and powerful nations expect and insist upon … the world has a right to be free from every disturbance of its peace that has its origin In aggression and disregard of the rights of peoples and nations … I say that the United States is willing to become a partner in any feasible association of nations formed in order to realize these objects and make them secure against violation.”
The League to Enforce Peace was supported and ultimately supplanted by other organizations whose sponsorship more definitely reflected the current left-wing, socialist and collective viewpoint. As has already been shown, the leading organizations of Jewry throughout the world were already on record for, and actually promoting, an international federation. The League of Free Nations Associations, although further to the left than the League to Enforce Peace, worked with the latter group, and was one of the first to endorse the League of Nations Covenant. The League of Free Nations Associations became the New York Foreign Policy Association after the war and oriented its activities toward the ultimate consummation of its original purposes.
That ultimate world government is one of the objectives of socialism was clearly revealed in the activities of the Fabian Society of England for the League of Nations Covenant. The Fabians worked closely with the League of Nations Society In propagandizing for an international organization. A League of Nations Society was also created in France.
The League of Nations Society was organized in London in May of 1915. It was the outgrowth of a series of meetings instigated by the Fabians. W. H. Dickinson, M. P., became the organization’s first chairman. He had been prominently identified with the World Alliance for International Friendship Through the Churches. In March of 1916 Theodore Marburg, who founded the League to Enforce Peace in the United States June 17, 1915, addressed the League of Nations Society and declared:
“that the objects of the League to Enforce Peace and the League of Nations Society were almost the same.”
By November 1916 the League of Nations Society boasted of 300 members.
In July of 1917 Lord Parmoor was a Vice-President of the Society. Noll Buxton, M. P., G. Lowes Dickinson, and L. S. Woolf were members of the Executive Committee.
In July of 1918 a letter of invitation to join a League of Free Nations Association was circulated. Among those who signed the invitation were Professor Gilbert Murray and H. G. Wells.
By November of that year the League of Free Nations Association and the League of Nations Society merged into a new organization -the League of Nations Union. On the first General Council of the Union were:
Lord Robert Cecil;
Professor Gilbert Murray;
J. H. Thomas;
J. R. Clynes;
H. N. Brailsford;
J. M. Kenworthy;
J. C. Wedgwood;
Miss Maud Royden;
and R. H. Tawney.
(Brailsford, in 1921, wrote a Preface to Trotsky’s “The Defense of Terrorism!’) ‘The Outline of History”, by H. G. Wells — “written with the advice and editorial help of Mr. Ernest Barker… and Professor Gilbert Murray” — made its first appearance in semi-monthly parts.
Its purpose is clearly evident now. In addition to its mental orientation toward atheism, socialism and internationalism, it attempts to lay the ground-work for a super-world government.
Douglas Reed describes Wells as;
“a disbeliever and sedentary pamphleteer in whose mind Inconsequent ideas scurried about from first reaction to second thought and later afterthought like riotous mob that surges forwards to destroy, reels backward at the word ‘police’, and then scatters and scuttles through the byways, throwing a random stone from aimless rage.”
Although he was ultimately to declare that he saw “the world as a jaded world devoid of recuperative power”, Wells envisioned the “world state” in his Outline of History as an inevitable historical development. “It will be based,” he declared;
“upon a common world religion, very much simplified and universalized and better understood. This will not be-Christianity nor Islam nor Buddhism nor any such specialized form of religion…”
Whatever else may be said of Well’s contribution to the “world-super-state” idea, his “Outline of History” became an important adjunct to the propaganda machine designed for the destruction of patriotism in Great Britain and the United States.
The League of Nations Union was supported in 1920 by donations. Major David Davies, M. P., made the largest contribution 14,737 pounds. Barons E. B. d’Erlanger ana F. A. d’Erlanger, and N. M. Rothschild and sons donated 3,000 pounds each. Other contributors were the Government of the Peruvian Republic, 1,000 pounds; F. Eckstein, 500 pounds; Sir M. Samuel, 210 pounds; Sir Carl Meyer, 210 pounds; and the Zionist Organization, 210 pounds.
Thus, socialists, pro-communists and Zionists, together with their stooges and innocents, promoted the League of Nations and laid the foundation for world government. One world war could not quite accomplish the ultimate objective. It is extremely doubtful that World War II achieved it.
World War III?
“The events of August, 1914,” wrote H. G. Wells, “seem to have taken President Wilson, like the rest of his fellow-countrymen, by surprise. We find him cabling an offer of his services as a mediator on August 3rd. Then, for a time, he and America watched the conflict. At first neither the American people nor their President seem to have had a very clear or profound understanding of that long-gathered catastrophe. Their tradition for a century had been to disregard the problems of the Old World, and it was not to be lightly changed… President Wilson and the American people were dragged into the war by this supreme folly (unrestricted submarine warfare of the Germans). And also they were dragged into a reluctant attempt to define their relations to Old World politics in some other terms than those of mere aloofness. Their thoughts and temper changed very rapidly…”
President Wilson declared that a durable peace must be “peace without victory.” Within a few days (April 6, 1917) Congress, at his direction, declared war on Germany. The President announced that it was a “war to end war” and that its purpose was to “make the world safe for democracy.” History is only now underscoring the tragic asininity of this double-talk. Peace and victory came November 11, 1918 and Wilson rushed to Paris and proceeded to lose both.
Marxism not only advocates the necessity for the destruction of religion in its quest for power but Marxists everywhere similarly work for the abolition of nationalism. “Religion” and “patriotism” are the outer ramparts of Christian civilization, and they must first be destroyed if the forces of Marxism are to conquer and dominate the world. Because patriotism and nationalism are the natural and logical result of the integrated family unit Marxism strikes also at the family. It too must be destroyed and its component parts reduced to the common collectivity. It does not stop, even here.
The dignity of man, his initiative, his individuality-all must be leveled to the common denominator.
Propagandists of the Socialist and Communist persuasion subtly attack “mother”, “home”, “heaven”, “the flag”, “fatherland”, and “patriotism.” These cherished and respected terms, together with the sacred things they represent, are made to appear ridiculous and “reactionary”; — obsolete remnants of tribalism perpetuated by sinister men who wish to plunge the world into frequent bloodbaths for the purpose of making money. To these propagandists the “elaborate inculcation” of these concepts into the minds of people constitute the process of “manufacturing” patriots. Such patriots, from the Marxian viewpoint, are “provincial”, mentally “immature” and “reactionary”. To organized Jewry patriotism is equivalent to nationalism; nationalism equivalent to fascism, — and fascism means “anti-Semitism.” This Jewish concept, of course, applies only to Gentile patriotism and has no references to Jewish nationalism.
Some “scientific” critics of patriotism advance the theory that nationalism is a form of overdeveloped “ethnocentrism” (regarding one’s own race as the chief interest and the center of culture) a Greek combining form that tends to give the entire subject a bad odor. By diagnosing the natural phenomenon as “ethnocentrism” the propagandist is enabled to elaborate upon the “malady” without fear of contradiction because he has thereby removed the subject from the realm of the simple and the knowable into the sphere of the pseudo-scientific and the conjecturaL He may therefore say that ethnocentrism is characterized by unreasonable antipathy and hostility toward all those who are not members of a given nation, and that such words as “alien” and “stranger” are synonymous to “enemy” in the mind of the ethnocentrist.
Most of the critics of patriotism are in agreement that nationalism is chiefly a menace to the Socialists, Communists, the Jews and other aliens who represent a disruptive element within a given country. Although they do not so frankly state it, the meaning is clear. The principle that all beleaguered individuals and groups tend to protect themselves when under harassment or attack — preservation is the first law of nature — is forgotten and brushed aside.
Both the Socialists and the Communists boldly proclaim their intention to destroy the freedom of the individual, to confiscate his property and regiment his life. Organized Jewry, either as an ally of the Marxists or as an independent nation within a nation, insists on maintaining an independent status with or without dual citizenship. The resultant resentment on the part of those who resist Communist and Jewish objectives is labeled “fascism” — which, of course, it is not. Nations have been acting very much the same in these respects ever since the beginning of recorded history.
These apostles of collectivity go much further In their incessant attacks upon the resistive powers of those they have marked for destruction. They preach that advocates of military preparedness and strong foreign policy are the “extreme nationalists” and the potential “Nazis” and “Fascists.” If the mental reflexes of a nation may be thoroughly conditioned in accord with this “line” — it will fail to resist when attacked and perish without lifting a finger in its own defense. If a nation’s leaders can be made to believe that fear of Communism is “collective paranoia”, and preparedness against the Soviet Union is “military megalomania” then the destruction of Western Christian Civilization may be achieved without too much physical exertion on the part of its enemies.
These defamers of patriotism apparently find nothing wrong with the individuals and groups — the Socialists and Communists who have publicly proclaimed their intention to destroy all nations — except the Soviet Union. To threaten the lives, property and freedoms of men everywhere appears to be a high virtue when practiced by Communists; to insist on remaining a nation within the nations of the world; to invade and steal a country; — these things appear to be idealistic when advocated and accomplished by organized Jewry and Zionists.
President Wilson’s “self-determination” and “political independence” for all nations are planks in the Wilsonian platform for world government that have been somewhat embarrassing to the propagandists of internationalism. To attack these fundamental principles of the Wilson formula is to endanger the prestige that Wilson represents in the drive for world power. If nations may reserve the right of self-determination and political independence — and these rights are protected by the concerted power of nations — it is quite obvious that world domination by any single group is impossible. So, with or without Wilson, “self determination” and “political independence” must be treated as sinister symptoms of “ethnocentrism” and thrown in the ash-can with “mother”, “home”, “heaven”, “flag” and “country.” When Wilson spoke of the “rights of small nations” he believed in the principle.
That he either had his tongue in his cheek, indulging in psychological warfare, or was exhibiting latent “fascist” tendencies is untenable. But, as all of these principles constitute formidable obstacles along the Marxist advance to world power the proponents of internationalism are determined to obliterate them from the minds of men.
Irrendentism may be said to be another road-block to the ideological conquest of the world. It is a word that is little used.
It refers to the principles, policy, or practice of a party, or of persons, who seek to reincorporate within their national boundary territory of which their nation has been deprived. It is, according to the “brain-washers”, another form of extreme nationalism unless applied to Zionism (although the definition does not cover the facts as they apply to Palestine). Like all other forms of nationalism, Irrendentism is conveniently considered a world peace disturbing nuisance (except in certain obvious cases, — the Soviet Union and Zionism) and it therefore is listed by the internationalists with the other “obnoxious” characteristics of nationalism.
Homogeneity — same character, like nature or kind — is another symptom of paranoia of the nationalistic mind according to the Marxist proponent of “one worldism”. The demand for homogeneity on the part of the people of a given country is always depicted as a persecution of minorities because of race, language or religion. The internationalist never recognizes the factors of allegiance, political assimilation or national solidarity, — except as they are manifestations of his own philosophy. The antagonistic, hostile activities of foreign-born anarchists, Socialists, Communists and Zionists, all working against the interest of the country of their adoption or refuge are not considered unusual, ungrateful or worthy of comment by Marxian propagandists. In countries such as the United States and Great Britain, where the discordant and unassimilable elements of the world have found freedom and hospitality, the cry against homogeneity has been greatest. It is not enough, of course, that these refugees find haven and freedom. They must of necessity continue to create the frictions that caused their expulsion from their native lands. It is not enough for them to become Englishmen and Americans with the freedom to exercise their particular religious beliefs; it is not enough to enjoy the rights of citizenship; they must destroy the homogeneous instincts of the majority so that their own minority homogeneity may pass unnoticed.
The United States has, in truth, been the melting pot of the world. It has successfully assimilated most of the nations of Europe.
The homogeneity that emerged was not so much of language, race, religion and culture as it was of a new and unique concept of freedom. The United States generously opened its arms to the oppressed of the world and most of those who came gratefully merged into the American pattern. Only the hordes of Khazar Jews, with their twin philosophies of Marxism and Zionism, have refused to assimilate. On the one hand they have insisted on being a separate people; a fragmentized nation in dispersion, and on the other hand they have sought to refashion the religion, the traditions and the customs of the land of their exile. Their members predominate among the revolutionary and subversive forces at work within the country and their names are always listed where treason and traitors are exposed. They seek, through every medium of propaganda, the universal acceptance of heterogeneity so that their failure to assimilate may pass unnoticed in the resultant dissonance.
The Comite des Delegations Juives aupres de la Conference de Paix sought to insure heterogeneity within nations through “minority” treaties between the new States carved out of Europe at the “Peace table” and the Allied Powers, and enforced by the international machinery of the League of Nations. The. first of these “minority treaties” was imposed upon Poland. Czechoslovakia was next (September 10, 1919), with Jugoslavia (September 10, 1919), Rumania (December 9, 1919), and Greece (August 10, 1920) following. The Treaty of St. German with Austria (September 10, 1919), the Treaty of Neuilly with Bulgaria (November 27, 1919), and Treaty of Lausanne with Turkey (July 24, 1923) contain clauses modeled upon the Polish treaty for the establishment of the principles of heterogeneity. Albania and the Baltic States were ultimately forced into line. Fifteen States in all were compelled to protect the indigestible elements within their frontiers, thus crippling their national development and insuring violent eruptions beyond the power of any international organization to control.
Under the provisions of these treaties the “minorities” were placed under the protection of the League of Nations as subjects of “international concern.” The Permanent Court of International Justice was given jurisdiction of disputes arising out of alleged infractions of the minority provisions.
When President Wilson arrived in Paris in January of 1919 he declared that the League is “the central object of our meeting” and, in spite of the attitudes of Lloyd George and Clemenceau he insisted that the Peace Conference take up the League of Nations proposal before considering political and territorial matters. Wilson headed a commission of nineteen which was able to present a tentative draft of the Covenant to the Conference on February 14.
President Wilson called it “a guarantee of peace.” On April 28, 1919 the document, with some revisions, was adopted unanimously by the Conference. The League of Nations was given official status on January 10, 1920.
One of the functions of the League of Nations (later to become an integral part of United Nations’ philosophy for the emergence of a super-world government) was the promotion of “international cooperation” in the fields of world health, labor, transportation, communications, finances, etc. Although the Covenant did not provide for or authorize their creation, the Council established commissions to deal with these objectives. The Economic and Financial Organization, Organization for Communications and Transit, International Office of Public Health (established at Paris) and the International Committee on Intellectual Cooperation were among the important permanent bodies created. The International Committee on Intellectual Cooperation coordinated the work of such sub-groups as the International Research Council, the Institute of International Law, the International Academic Union, etc. An International Institute of Intellectual Cooperation was established in Paris in 1924. The International Cinematographic Institute, together with innumerable committees of one kind or another, ultimately became known as the Intellectual Cooperation Organization.
Among others, the Advisory Commission on the Traffic in Opium and other Dangerous Drugs and the International Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Women and Children may be mentioned as salutary efforts on the part of the League to deal with international evils.
The International Labor Organization was the result of Article 23 of the Covenant of the League. Its primary purpose was the promotion of uniform labor legislation throughout the world. Its efforts, as might have been expected, were futile. The United States became a member by Presidential proclamation August 20, 1934. Isador Lubin was the first United States Government representative. The International Labor Organization was destined to survive the League fiasco and become an affiliate of the United Nations.
Although the Bank for International Settlements was not strictly a League of Nations organization its role in the over-all development of internationalism is important. It was created in 1930 to act as trustee and agent for the creditor governments in the collection and allocation of indemnity payments. Its stock of one hundred million dollars was underwritten by banks in Great Britain, France, Italy, Germany, Japan, Belgium and the United States. The United States Federal Reserve Banks were not permitted to participate.
By the end of 1938 the failure of the League of Nations was almost complete. Of the sixty-two nations that had once constituted its membership only forty-nine remained. With the close of 1940 it had ceased to exist. It had gone the way of its predecessors, the Holy Alliance, the Concert of Europe and the Permanent Court of Arbitration. It failed because humanity had not been reduced to its common denominator and because its machinery had not been designed for physical persuasion. “Mother”, “home”, “the flag”, “heaven” and “country” were yet too deeply rooted in the minds and hearts of the people. Another and, perhaps yet another, world catastrophe would be necessary before such “reactionary” concepts would be blasted from the breasts of human beings.
AGITATION FOR WORLD WAR II
Meanwhile organized Jewry’s campaign within the nations of the world and its continuous use of the rostrum in the Palace of the League of Nations at Geneva brought the world closer to new disaster. The internal affairs of German Upper Silesia were under attack in 1936 and 1937 and the conflict was sharpened considerably by Poland’s declaration that she would no longer be bound by the “minority treaty.”
The question of ten thousand Jews in the Free City of Danzig was the basis for considerable agitation before the League of Nations. The special status for the small Jewish population was a continuous sore spot. The imposition of special privileges led to natural resentment on the part of the people of Danzig, which was immediately attended by vigorous condemnation on the part of world Jewry. Resentment gave way to frustration and excesses.
The Government attempted to throw off the chains of the treaty.
Although the activities of the representatives of world Jewry before the League of Nations accomplished little or nothing for the Jews of Danzig the resultant publicity was grist in the mill for organized Jewry’s campaign against Germany throughout the nations of the world.
Meanwhile most of the Jews in the free city of Danzig had departed.
The annexation of Austria on March 11, 1938 was the signal for an appeal by the World Jewish Congress to the League of Nations for protection of that country’s one hundred and ninety two thousand Jews. Similar appeals were made from time to time both in behalf of the Jews of Austria and of Czechoslovakia. Hitler’s concern for his blood-brothers in the Sudetenland — similarly duplicated by organized Jewry’s concern for its own blood-brethern was a coincidence that appeared to pass unnoticed.
Poland — which contained the greatest Jewish population finally became the principal issue. The World Jewish Congress initiated a series of public demonstrations designed to arouse indignation throughout the world. A conference on the Polish Jewish question was organized by the American Jewish Congress in New York City January 31, 1937. Two thousand three hundred and ninety-six delegates representing eight hundred and thirty-five Jewish organizations attended. A similar conference was held in London on April 6, 1937 under the auspices of the British Section of the World Jewish Congress. Its one hundred delegates purported to speak for the religious, fraternal, Zionist and labor organization of British Jewry. The Canadian Jewish Congress staged a series of protest demonstrations during the same month. On June 1, 1937 the Federation des Societes Juives de France convoked a protest meeting in Paris. An “emergency conference” was called in New York City on June 10, 1937 attended by two thousand four hundred and sixty-two delegates from eight hundred and seventy organizations. A delegation of two hundred headed by Dr. Stephen S. Wise was dispatched to Washington with a memorandum addressed to the State Department. Why two hundred delegates were necessary is better guessed than explained. The memorandum recited the oppression of the Jews in Poland. Its presentation by Dr. Wise to Secretary of State Cordell Hull on July 12, 1937 was dramatized by a public declaration protesting the treatment of the Jews in Poland signed by one hundred and fourteen non-Jews in the fields of “religion, science, literature, and education.”
The World Jewish Congress stepped up its clamor during succeeding months. The Socialists, the Communists and left-wing groups added their voices. At the initiative of the Congress, meetings and demonstrations swept across the world. Declarations, manifestos, and petitions cluttered the streets and the desks of public officials. In Belgium seventy university professors, writers and social leaders, addressed statements of solidarity and protest to the Conseil des Associations Juives.
A protest, signed by twenty five French authors and college professors, supplemented a similar protested by the League of the Rights of Man. Resolutions, statements, protests and declarations multiplied through the wizardry of the World Jewish Congress: — a resolution from the Polish League of Peace and Freedom in Warsaw; a statement from the International League for Academic Freedom; a protest from the Institute of International Education; a declaration from the American Student Union; a resolution from the American Federation of Teachers, and others too numerous to mention.
In answer, Poland, in 1938, adopted a law providing that persons who had been abroad for a period of five continuous years would be deprived of their Polish citizenship and forbidden to return to Poland. Jews, among others, who had been absent from Poland more than five years were interned in a camp at Zbaszyn when they attempted to re-enter the country. The World Jewish Congress immediately intervened with the Polish Ambassadors in Paris and Washington. Dr. M. L, Perlzweig was dispatched to Warsaw to take the matter up with the Polish government. World War II intervened and German troops invaded Poland before Dr. Perlzweig was able to get down to cases with the officials of the government.
The World Jewish Congress used the efforts of the Rumanian government to throw off the shackles of Versailles to the best advantage along with its other activities. The Congress actually boasts of its successful efforts in “the early overthrow” of one of the Rumanian governments by stating that “it is no mere conjecture” that the “efforts of the World Jewish Congress were responsible.” As Rumania struggled with the handcuffs of the “minority” clauses of the treaty, organized Jewry capitalized on the “persecution of the Jews” within the country.
In January of 1938 the Prime Minister of Rumania declared that four waves of immigration had brought between 250,000 to 500,000 Jews into the country and the Minister of Foreign Affairs stated that Rumanian Jews were not entitled to a special status over other citizens. A Royal Decree of January 22, 1938 ordered the revision of the citizenship status of all Jews in Rumania.
The World Jewish Congress invoked the provisions of the “minority” treaty clauses before the League of Nations and dispatched strong protests to the French and British Foreign Ministers. Dr. Perlzweig in London, Marc Jarblum in Paris, and Dr. Kubowitzki in Brussels descended on the Foreign Offices of the respective governments. Dr. Wise was in constant communication with the White House in Washington. The Rumanian government was compelled to resign on February 10, 1938.
In May of 1938 the Hungarian government proposed to limit the number of Jewish employees in all branches of economy to twenty percent of the population. The WJC intervened. In Iraq, Uruguay and in all parts of the world where Jews resided the World Jewish Congress proceeded to tell their respective governments that their Jewish citizens were a peculiar people with very special and exceptional rights. There was no cessation in the outcry; no relaxation of the drums of war.
In the beginning organized Jewry had declared war on the central governments of Europe and had sought to impose its will on their people through treaty provisions and the machinery of the League of Nations. In the end they made their war a world war and involved most of the civilized nations in the conflagration.
In the end few would remember what it was. all about, how it started and why. No one would be certain who led the demonstrations, signed the declarations, made the protests and passed the resolutions. Men would march and men would die; battles would be fought that would take the names of nations and oceans; there would be sacrifice, tears, blood and sweat. But, when it was over the people of the world would not really remember very much about it. Some might recall that it had been frightful in the sacrifice of Christian blood and staggering in the waste of Gentile wealth.
Some might slowly learn that there had been no real victory and that the promised peace was to be as chimerical as had been the “war to end war” and the struggle to “make the world safe for democracy.”
Version History & Notes
Version 1: Published Jul 14, 2015
* The original text was part of a larger work, hence the page numbering starting from p. 175.
* Images not in the original document.
* Footnotes are not in the original document.
* Cover page is a modified version of the original.
Knowledge is Power in Our Struggle for Racial Survival
(Information that should be shared with as many of our people as possible — do your part to counter Jewish control of the mainstream media — pass it on and spread the word) … Val Koinen at