Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for October, 2014

Heinrich Himmler

 

Speech about Homosexuality

 

to the SS Group Leaders

 

Given on 18 February 1937 in Bad Tölz, Germany

[Translated especially for  “Neues Europa” by G.F.H. ]

 

Heinrich Himmler on Homosexuality 322

 

When we took over power in 1933, we came across the gay clubs. The registered members totaled two million; conservative estimates by processing officials go as high as two to four million homosexuals in Germany. Personally I think the number was not that high because I do not believe that all those who were in the clubs really were personally homosexual. On the other hand, of course I am convinced that not all homosexuals were registered in the clubs. I estimate that there were between one and two million. A million is really the minimum which we must assume; that is the smallest and mildest estimate that is allowed in this matter.

 

I ask you to keep this in mind. We have in Germany according to the latest census probably 67 to 68 million people, which means, counting very roughly, about 34 million men. Therefore there are approximately 20 million sexually potent men (i.e. men over 16 years old). The estimated number may be off by a million, but that does not matter.

 

If I assume the number of one to two million homosexuals, it is clear that about 7 or 8 or 10% of the men in Germany are homosexual. If this remains the case, it means that our nation (Volk) will be destroyed (lit. “go kaputt”) by this plague. A nation will not endure in the long run if the balance and equilibrium between the sexes is disrupted in this manner.

 

Furthermore if you take into consideration the fact, which I have not yet mentioned, that, with the number of women remaining constant, we have around two million men too few (that many having died in the war), then you can imagine how the enormity of two million homosexuals and two million dead, therefore altogether of around four million missing from the number of men capable of having sex, upsets the balance of the sexes in Germany and is leading to catastrophe.

 

Heinrich Himmler on Homosexuality 323

[Image] Heinrich Himmler with his daughter, Gudrun Himmler.

 

I would like to go over with you a couple of ideas on the issue of homosexuality. Among the homosexuals there are those who take the view: what I do is nobody else’s business, it is a purely private matter. However, all things which happen in the sexual sphere are not the private affair of the individual, but impinge upon the life and death of the nation and mean world power or swissification. A people which has many children has the qualifications for world power and world domination. A people of good race which has too few children has a sure ticket for the grave, for insignificance in 50 to 100 years, for burial in two hundred and fifty years.

 

However, even apart from this number — I have taken up only the numerical issue — this nation can go kaputt from something else. We are a men-state (Männerstaat), and, with all the faults which this men-state has, we must staunchly hold on to it, for the constitution of the men-state is the better one.

 

There have also been in history women-states. You have surely heard of the word matriarchy. There were Amazon-states not only in fable but in fact. There were matriarchal constitutions in the friezes — especially among maritime peoples (lit. “Sea-peoples”). We can follow their traces and emergence even up to our time. It is no mere coincidence that Holland gladly lets itself be ruled by a queen and that in Holland the birth of a daughter, the Queen, is more welcomed than the birth of a son. This is no peculiarity, but derives from the ancient instincts of maritime peoples.

 

[Translator’s note: Among maritime peoples the men are often away at sea, and hence the women tend to be unusually independent, if not actually to rule. This tendency has been noted by observers of Iceland after the banking crisis in 2007. It was primarily the women there who rose up and demanded punishment of the bankers.]

 

For centuries, for millennia, the Germanic peoples and especially the German people have been officially ruled by men. This men-state, however, is now in the process of going kaputt on account of homosexuality. In the field of government I see the main error in the following: the state, the organization of the people, the army and whatever else is connected with state institutions, [people in] all these attain their positions based on merits, apart from human shortcomings [sc. of the selectioners]. Even the occasional quite unrealistic attainment of an official post after the “First“ (Einser) in the judicial examinations is nevertheless still a selection based on merit. The selection in this case is made according to merit because first the First is taken, and then the Bruckeinser [exam] and finally the Second [exam], etc., are taken.

 

In the positions of the state and the economy, in which women are employed, no honest man will be able to claim that the position is gained purely on the basis of merit. For be honest — there are only men here, therefore one can say it very calmly — in the moment when you choose a typist and you have two candidates before you, a very ugly 50-year old one who types 300 syllables [per minute], almost a genius in this field, and another who is 20 years old, racially sound (gutrassige), and pretty and who types only 150 syllables, you will — I would have to misjudge you all completely [sc. to think otherwise] — probably with earnest mien and a thousand moral justifications because the other is old and could so easily get sick and whatever, take the pretty young 20-year old candidate who types fewer syllables.

 

 

Heinrich Himmler on Homosexuality 326

[Image] Family man Himmler with wife Marga and children in 1935

 

Well, one can laugh, for this is harmless and proves meaningless because, if she is pretty, she will soon get married; and besides the position of stenographer is not crucial for the state; it now has others to choose from.

 

But in the moment when this principle, not to pick purely on merit — I want to say this now in all seriousness — an erotic principle, a male-female, a sexual principle takes root in the men-state from one man to another, the destruction of state begins. I will take an example from life. I want to emphasize that I say: from life. I want to interject here in this matter that I doubt that any place on the present inhabited earth has gained so much experience in the field of homosexuality, abortion, etc., as we have in Germany as the Secret State Police. I believe that we can really speak as the most experienced people in the field.

 

Councillor X is homosexual and is not selecting on the basis of the merit-principle the assessors that he needs for his office in the government. He will not choose the best lawyer, he will not say that assessor X may not be the best lawyer, but he has received a good score, has been in the practice [of law], and, what is much more significant, looks good racially and is ideologically in order. No, he does not take a well-qualified and good looking assessor, but rather seeks out the one who is also a homosexual. These people know each other with a glance across a room. If at a dance you have 500 men, within a half hour they have mutually picked out those who have the same disposition as they. How that happens, we normal people cannot at all imagine.

 

The councillor seeks out the assessor who has the worst score and who is also ideologically out of order. He does not ask about his performance, but recommends him to the director of the ministry for appointment. He praises him and justifies his recommendation in detail. The assessor is now hired, for it will never occur to the director of the ministry to ask for greater details and to examine the hiring more closely because from the outset as an old official he assumes that the councillor’s recommendation is based on merit. The idea that the assessor has been recommended due to the similarity of his sexual predisposition does not enter the head of a normal man.

 

It does not stop with these two because the assessor, who is now a governmental official, will proceed on the same principle. If in a men-state you have a man with such a disposition in any position of authority, you are sure to find there three, four, eight, ten or even more men of a similar disposition; for one draws in another, and watch out if there are one or two normal men among these people; they are basically damned, they can do what they want but they will be ruined. Let me give you an example of a comrade from this very circle, for whom it went like this. SS-Obergruppenführer von Woyrsch was present in Silesia at the time of his struggle with the homosexual SA-Gruppenführer Heines and the homosexual Gauleiter and Oberpräsident Brückner. Since he was the man who upset this wonderful accord, he was persecuted not because, as was said, he is not like us, but always on moral, political, ideological — National-Socialist grounds.

 

 

Heinrich Himmler on Homosexuality 332

[Image] Heinrich Himmler poses in a boat while holding an oar.

 

Homosexuality therefore undoes in the state every merit, every basis for merit, and destroys the state in its foundations. That is not all: the homosexual is a thoroughly mentally-ill man. He is soft, he is in every crucial regard a coward. I believe that he can be brave here or there in war; in the field of civil courage however they are the most cowardly men that there are.

 

Interconnected with this is the fact that the homosexual lies pathologically. He is not lying — to take an extreme example — as a Jesuit. The Jesuit lies for a purpose. He says anything whatever with a beaming face and knows that he is deceiving you. He has a moral foundation: for the glory of God; majorum dei gloriam. The end justifies the means. There is a whole moral philosophy, a moral doctrine that Saint Ignatius worked out.

 

The Jesuit therefore is lying and knows it; he does not forget for a moment that he is lying. The homosexual however lies and believes it himself. If you ask a homosexual about something: Have you done that? Answer: No. I know of cases where homosexuals interviewed by us said: with my sacred oath, in honour of my mother, or may I immediately drop dead here if this is not true. Three minutes afterwards, when with the help of our evidence we said to him, “Please, and this?” [this = the irrefutable evidence], he unfortunately did not topple over, but is still alive.

 

I never understood that in the beginning. In the years 1933-34 we approached these matters like ignorant fools because that was and is a world which to a normal man is so strange that he can hardly imagine it. Gruppenführer Heydrich and I and some other people had to really learn in the field and only thanks to bad experiences. I asked myself at the beginning if the fellows were lying. Today it is quite clear to me that they cannot help it. I therefore think no more of asking a homosexual: can you give me your word? I do not anymore because I know that I will get a false word. At the moment in which he says something with watery eyes, the homosexual is convinced that it is true. In my experience homosexuality leads to an absolute, I would almost say, mental insanity and madness.

 

The homosexual is of course the most appropriate object for every kind of extortion, firstly because he is himself liable to arrest, but secondly also because he is a soft fellow and thirdly because he lacks will and nerve.

 

The homosexual has besides — I will show you just a few things in this area — an insatiable desire to communicate in all areas, especially in the sexual area. You usually find that the one who gets caught then tells you uncontrollably all the names he knows. Since there is — I must speak from their point of view — no fidelity in the love of man for man, as there is otherwise fidelity among men, although homosexuals pretend to love each other. The homosexual tells everything unrestrainedly and does so in the hope that he can perhaps save his own skin thereby.

 

We need to be clear about this, if we continue to have this vice in Germany without being able to fight it, then that is the end of Germany, the end of the Germanic world. Unfortunately we do not have it as easy as our ancestors. With them these select few individual cases were of an abnormal kind. The homosexual, who was called Urning, was sunk in the swamp [literally].

 

The professors who find these bodies in the swamp are determined to not realize that in ninety out of a hundred cases they have before them a homosexual who with his robe and all was sunk in the swamp. That was not a penalty, but rather just the extinction of an abnormal life. That had to be removed, as we pull out nettles and throw them in a pile and burn them. There was no feeling of revenge, but the person in question had to go.

 

So it was with our ancestors. With us unfortunately that is, I have to say, no longer possible.

 

Within the framework of the SS I would like to explain very clearly the following. I stress this point: I know exactly what I am saying. This of course is not intended for leaders’ meetings, but you can repeat it conversationally in individual discussions with one person or another:

 

 

Heinrich Himmler on Homosexuality 333

[Image] Heinrich Himmler confers with SS officers while visiting the Flossenbuerg concentration camp. Heinrich Himmler is pictured on the left. To his right the camp commandant Karl Künstler, to the his right in the back the adjutant Ludwig Baumgartner.

 

In the SS today we still have about one case of homosexuality a month. In the entire SS in a whole year approximately eight to ten cases occur. I have now decided upon the following: in each case these people naturally will be publicly degraded, expelled, and handed over to the courts. Following completion of the punishment laid down by the court, by my orders they will be sent to a concentration camp, and they will be shot in the concentration camp while trying to escape. I will make this known by order to the unit to which the person in question belonged. I hope thereby finally to have done with persons of this type in the SS, so that we will at least keep pure the good blood which we have in the SS and the on-going recovery of the kind of blood which we are cultivating for Germany.

 

But this does not solve the problem for all of Germany. One should harbour no illusions about the following. If I bring the homosexual to court and have him locked up, the case then is not finished, for the homosexual comes out of prison just as homosexual as he went in. Therefore the whole issue is not cleared up. It is cleared up only to the extent that this vice has been denounced, in contrast to the years before our seizure of power. Although we had the paragraphs before the war, during the war, and after the war, in reality nothing happened. I can best make that clear by an example: in the first six weeks of our activity in this area in 1934 we brought more cases to court than had the entire police department in Berlin in 25 years. No one should come and say that the problem got big only because of Rohm. He of course was a big setback, but the problem flourished before the war, during the war, and even after the war.

 

 

Heinrich Himmler on Homosexuality 327

[Image] Portrait of Heinrich Himmler with his daughter Gudrun.

 

Now you see you can regulate everything possible with state and police measures. One can manage the prostitute problem which in and of itself is quite harmless in comparison to this other problem. That is a matter that by certain measures can be brought under sustainable control for a civilized nation. We will be exceedingly generous in this matter because one cannot, on the one hand, want to prevent all the youth from drifting toward homosexuality and, on the other hand, block for them every [sexual] outlet. That is madness. In the end every blocked opportunity to meet up with girls in big cities — even if it is for money — has therefore a big downside.

 

Amid all these considerations we must not forget that Germany has unfortunately become (up to two-thirds of it) an urban nation. The village does not have these problems. The village has its natural and healthy regulation of all these issues. There despite the clergyman, despite Christian morality, despite a thousand years of religious education, the youth climbs through the bedroom window of the girl. The problem is thus put in order. There are a few children born out of wedlock; a few of them are sprinkled about the village, and the minister is glad of it, for that gives him a topic for the pulpit. The boys do the same thing as before and — do not be fooled — as was done in our past. The whole theory which one has rightly built up that the Germanic girl, if she is unlucky enough not to get married until 26 or 30-years old, lived up to that time as a nun, is a myth. The blood laws, however, were strict, that no guy and no girl was allowed to mess around with someone of inferior blood. That law was relentlessly and strictly observed. Furthermore this was strict: marital fidelity. If that was broken by the woman, the death penalty was imposed. For from that there was a danger that foreign blood come in.

 

That was all natural; the social order then was clean and decent and acted in accordance with the laws of nature and not as our order today against the laws of nature.

 

As I said, the questions which belong to this sector can somehow be brought into order. The more that we facilitate early marriage, that our men can get married at the age of 25, the more the other problem decreases: it then takes care of itself.

 

The issue of homosexuality, however, cannot bring itself into order. Obviously I can — an issue that we often bandied back and forth — lock up all the male prostitutes in Germany and put them in a camp. This can be done forthwith. I only pose to myself the question: if I lock up 20,000 hustlers from the big cities, will I bring back to a normal way of life the maybe three or four thousands of these who are young enough (17 to 18) to be brought back by means of discipline, order, sports, and work; it has been done successfully in quite a number of cases. But the moment when the hustlers are not there — I am not going to lock up the homosexuals — then there is a risk that the millions of homosexuals will seek new victims for themselves. So this is a sword that cuts both ways.

 

 

Heinrich Himmler on Homosexuality 329

[Image] Portrait of Reichsfuehrer-SS Heinrich Himmler.

 

We will gather up all of these 17 to 18 years old boys, except for those who are already totally spoiled, and bring them into a camp. We will try to make these boys reasonable again, something which, as I said, has already been done successfully in a large number of cases.

 

All this does not solve the whole problem. The only solution I see is as follows: we cannot let the qualities of the men-state and the benefits of male society diminish through errors. We have overall, in my opinion, a much too strong masculinization of our whole life; this has proceeded so far that we militarize impossible things [sc. things that cannot be militarized], that we — I may say it openly here — can attain perfection in nothing, whether it is to line people up in formation or to organize them or to have them pack knapsacks. I feel as though I were witnessing a catastrophe when I see girls and women — especially girls — who march through the area with wonderfully well packed knapsacks. That can lead to trouble. I view it as a catastrophe when women’s organizations, communities of women, and women’s federations become active in an area; that destroys all feminine charm, all feminine dignity and grace. I view it as a disaster if — I am talking about things in general, for it does not apply to us [in the SS] directly — we foolish men want to turn women into logical instruments of thought and educate them in everything, which is only possible if we so masculinize them that in time the difference between the sexes, the polarity, disappears. Then the path to homosexuality is not far.

 

Heinrich Himmler on Homosexuality 331

[Image] Reichsfuehrer-SS Heinrich Himmler poses outside among other SS officers.

 

I see it as a disaster if, for example, just as in previous years it was the work of the students union — to pick out an example from the movement — to pack knapsacks wonderfully well and to drill. Clearly, I do not need a student’s union for that.

 

I recently spoke with the new student union leader and told him:

My dear Scheel, if I catch you doing military drills with your comrades, then you absolutely have me as an enemy. In student houses you have to work mentally and to lead intellectually and bring society into order.

 

I once saw a student newspaper — it was, I believe, the newspaper of the Saxon Student Association; on the front page of this newspaper for the mental work of young academics, eight men were shown who were lined up in two rows, while the spiritual leader checked the direction (Richtung). That in itself is the work of the non-commissioned officer, the sergeant, the company commander, or the battalion chief if he just has a tic to always check the direction.

 

However, this is definitely not the work of an intellectual institution. If we are told from abroad, “You can really be nothing more than military,” that is then partly not too inaccurate.

 

Heinrich Himmler on Homosexuality 334

[Image] Reichsfuehrer-SS Heinrich Himmler embraces his daughter Gudrun [probably outside their home in Gmund am Tagernsee].

 

The question now is posed: the SS says it is an order. The party also says it is an order. These claims are not at all mutually exclusive. We are very clearly and expressly a National Socialist order — and now comes the racial determination — of definitely Nordic men and a sworn community of their kin (Sippe). We are firstly a soldier order, not the, but a National Socialist soldier order, bound by rearing and blood to Nordic blood, a tribal community (Sippengemeinschaft), if you will. Previously one would have said: an association of nobles (Adelsgenossenschaft). I do not purposely use this expression. But I want to say by using it that our task has to do with the breeding and rearing of people (das Menschenzüchterische), while the task of the political order has to do with the political leading of the people.

 

The moment in which it is clear to me that the party is a political order, it must take on more and more a spiritual meaning [lit. “content”] and less and less a military meaning, that of packed knapsacks and falling in line, etc. That applies right down to individual nuances.

 

Heinrich Himmler on Homosexuality 335

[Image] Heinrich Himmler shoots a pistol while Kiermaier watches in the background.

 

I have spoken a lot about these things with party member Ley who has a great understanding of them. I asked him, for example, after the really beautiful rally of political leaders at Nuremberg: “Why do you give a command? I would not do it.” There were 100,000 political leaders on the field. They would have to be very well drilled soldiers, if the commands: Attention! Raise the flags! Lower the flags! Should be well carried out by 100,000 men.

Why do not you speak in speech like this: and now we raise the flags, and [now we] lower the flags!

 

It is exactly the same thing, but it is not an overly virile, soldiery, military form [of speaking]. Why do orders have to be given in such matters? These are just a few thoughts on this issue.

 

I come back to this point again. I said we are masculinizing all of life too much. I will cite a few examples, to which you can probably add some drawn from your personal experience and from experience with different children.

 

I view it as disastrous for a people when boys tell their mothers:

When we are marching in the Hitler Youth, see to it that you do not pass by. I would greet you, yes, but the others would laugh, I would then be considered a mama’s boy and a weakling.

 

I view it as disastrous for a people when a boy is ashamed of his sister and his mother or is directed to be ashamed of women, in this case of the women who are closest to him, of his mother and of his sister who is becoming a woman. When a boy who is in love with a girl is mocked more than the normal amount, is designated as not fully respectable and as a sissy, and if one says to him: a guy does not bother with girls, he won’t bother with them. There are then only friendships with other youths. Men dominate in the world: so the next step [lit. level] is homosexuality.

 

Heinrich Himmler on Homosexuality 321

[Image] Heinrich Himmler collects wild flowers with his daughter Gudrun and his wife Margarete.

 

These are the thoughts of Herr Blüher [a notorious pederast], which then prove that:

In general, the greatest form of love is not between man and woman; with that there are children; that is something animalistic. The greatest form is the sublimated love between man and man. It is only from this that the greatest things in world history have come about.

But that is the outrageous hypocrisy of these people who stake claim to Alexander the Great and Bismarck. There are no great men whom the homosexuals do not claim for themselves: Caesar, Sulla, etc.

 

I think Don Juan is not yet claimed, but otherwise pretty much all. That is now served up in palatable form to the young people who are already in a hugely masculinized movement and because of the men-camps have no opportunity to get together with girls. In my opinion we need not be surprised that we have gone down the road to homosexuality.

 

I see a fundamental change only through the following:

 

This is something particularly urgent for us in the SS: we absolutely must re-educate the SS man and boy — to the extent that we have influence on them — to become a chivalrous man or a young gentleman. That is the only way in which we can draw the line very clearly so that we do not fall into Anglo-Saxon and American conditions. I once told an English woman who had said that she found it terrible that men greet women first:

With you probably the hens do the courtship display around the rooster! Does this seem with you to be different from normal?

 

A consequence of the over-privileged woman is that in America no man any more dares to look at a girl, since otherwise he will be brought before the marriage court and made to pay for it. In America homosexuality is absolutely a defensive measure for the men because they have fallen into such slavery to the women. The woman can behave like an ax there: she just starts hacking away on something. She is never rebuked: the best example of a tyranny by women!

 

There is no danger among us, however, that the chivalry of the man be overplayed and exploited by the other side, since the women in Germany by habit and education are not inclined to do that. In any case we must educate our young always to be chivalrous men, men (Menschen) who stand up for women.

 

I recently said to a Hitler Youth leader:

You are usually so un-Christian, but your attitude toward women is the purest Christianity that is at all possible.

 

Heinrich Himmler on Homosexuality 337

[Image] Reichsfuehrer-SS Heinrich Himmler reviews members of the volunteer Norwegian legion of the Waffen-SS.

 

150 years ago someone at a Catholic university wrote a doctoral thesis with the title: “Does a woman have a soul?” From this the whole tendency of Christianity emerges: it is directed at the absolute destruction of women and at emphasizing the inferiority of women. The entire substance of the priesthood and of the whole of Christianity is, I am firmly convinced, an erotic union of men (Männerbund) for the erection and maintenance of this 2,000-year old Bolshevism. I reach that conclusion because I know very well the history of Christianity in Rome. I am of the conviction that the Roman emperors, who eradicated (ausrotteten) the first Christians, did exactly the same thing that we are doing with the communists. These Christians were then the worst yeast which the great city contained, the worst Jewish people, the worst Bolsheviks that there were.

 

The Bolshevism of that time had now the power to become great on the carcass of the dying Rome. The priesthood of the Christian church which later subjugated the Aryan church in unending conflicts goes on, since the 4th or 5th Century, to long for the celibacy of priests. It relies on Paul and the very first apostles who derogate the woman as something sinful and permit or recommend marriage as merely a legal way out of prostitution — that is in the Bible — and derogate the procreation of children as a necessary evil. This priesthood continues along in this way for several centuries until in 1139 the celibacy of priests is fully implemented.

 

I am furthermore convinced that the way out for the few who do not want to yield to this homosexuality, especially for the country parsons, the majority of whom — more than 50% — I estimate not to be gay, is to procure for themselves in confession the necessary married and single women; I assume that in the monasteries the homosexuality ranges from 90 or 95 to 100%.

 

If today the trials that concern homosexuality among priests went on again and if we would treat the priests as [we do] any citizen in Germany, then I would undertake to guarantee for the next three to four years 200 or more such trials. The realization of the trials fails to take place not because there is a lack of cases, but because we just do not have as many officials and judges as we would need to employ. Within the next four years very conclusive evidence will be produced — I hope — that the Church organization in its leadership, its priesthood, is for the most part a homosexual erotic men-union (Männerbund) that on this basis has been terrorizing humanity for the past 1,800 years, demands from it the greatest blood sacrifice, and has been sadistically perverse in its utterances in the past. I need only to recall the witch and heretic trials.

 

The attitude about the inferiority of women is a typical Christian attitude, and we also who have been national socialists up to this day — many even who are strict heathens — have unwittingly adopted this set of ideas. I know even today very many party members who believe they have to prove the special firmness of their worldview (Weltanschauung) and their own special masculinity through very rowdy and truculent behaviour toward women.

 

I recognize furthermore a certain tendency in our ranks to exclude women from all events and celebrations. These same people complain then about the fact that women cling here and there to the church, or are not absolutely 100 percent won over for National Socialism. They however ought not to complain since they treat women as second class citizens and keep them from all our inner life. No one needs be surprised then if they are not fully won over for this inner life.

 

We must be clear about that: the movement, the Weltanschauung has lasting stability if it is supported by the woman, for men comprehend all things with the mind, while the woman comprehends all things with feeling. The German woman, not the man, has borne the greater sacrifice of blood in the witch and heretic trials. The priests knew exactly why they burned 5,000-6,000 women: exactly because they emotionally held fast to the old knowledge and the old doctrine and emotionally and instinctively could not be dissuaded from them, while the man had already converted by logic and thought:

There is no point. We are going under politically. I adapt, I let myself be baptized.

 

I come back to our issue. I see in the whole movement an excessive masculinization and in this excessive masculinization the seedbed for homosexuality.

 

Heinrich Himmler on Homosexuality 338

[Image] Reichsfuehrer-SS Heinrich Himmler converses with two children who have just presented him with a bouquet of flowers.

 

I ask you now, if you have the opportunity to discuss these ideas in detail — but not before the entire officer corps — but to talk about these things with one man or another. Please make sure that our men — as it has been initiated by me — come together at the summer solstice celebration with the girls to dance. I think it absolutely is right that we now and then arrange a dance for the young candidates in the winter to which we now invite not girls who are in any way bad, but rather the very best, and where we give the SS-man the opportunity to dance with girls and to be happy and merry with them. I think this is particularly important for the single reason that [it helps to assure that] no one ever comes down the wrong road in the direction of homosexuality. That would be a negative reason. But I think it important also for a positive reason: we should not be surprised if this or that SS-man marries a completely wrong and racially worthless girl if we do not give the men the opportunity to get to know worthy, racially sound girls.

 

With the youth I see the need absolutely to take care that the boy of 16-17 years comes together with girls for a dancing lesson or some other event during communal evenings. The age of 15-16 years — that is a fact from experience — is the age at which the boy is on the tipping point. If he has a dancing lesson heartthrob or a childhood crush on some girl, he is won over, he has been drawn away from the dangerous plane [i.e. from the danger of tipping over]. In Germany we do not really need to be concerned — this is a serious question about which one has previously spoken only with laughter, witty remarks, and dirty jokes, but that, thank God, has stopped — that we bring the boy and girl together too early and encourage sexual intercourse.

 

No, in our climate, with our race and our people, it is the case that the 16-year old boy sees that [i.e. sexual intercourse] as his purest, cleanest and most ideal love, and [it is the case] that for him from the moment in which he is totally nuts about a girl — I must say it again clearly — a communal masturbating with mates, a communal friendship of a sexual nature with men or boys, is out of the question because he is generally shy before the girl. He is humanly bound (menschlich gebunden).

 

So in that moment the danger is past. We now need to give the opportunity for that to take place. We must put a stop to the whole tendency, which we have today in youth and which we may also have in the SS, to mock a man who walks with a girl, a man who is respectful toward his mother, and a boy who is gentlemanly toward his sister. That is the seedbed for homosexuality.

 

I thought myself obliged to speak to you once on these issues, my group leaders. This matter is deadly serious and cannot be solved with tracts and moral theories. Merely by saying:

God, are our people so bad? It is terrible that they have become so morally depraved,” one does not solve this issue.

 

If we answer this question with a Yes, then I must ask why are we still making an effort at all on this one point. Or we answer the question with a No; then we must admit that something in our people has been very wrongly directed in this area….

 

Gentlemen! A misguided sexuality brings about the craziest thing that the mind can imagine. To say we are animalistic is an insult to animals, for animals do not do such things. So, this question about properly guided sexuality is a question of life [or death] for every people.

 

Heinrich Himmler on Homosexuality 339

[Image] Heinrich Himmler and his daughter, Gudrun, visiting a concentration camp. Immediately to the right of Himmler is Karl Wolff.

 

 

—————————————————————-

 

 

PDF of this post. Click to view or download (2.3 MB). With images >> Heinrich Himmler – Speech about Homosexuality to the SS Group Leaders – Ver 2

PDF of this post. Click to view or download (0.3 MB). Top image only >> Heinrich Himmler – Speech about Homosexuality to the SS Group Leaders

 

 

Version History

 

Version 4: Dec 30, 2016 – Improved formatting.

 

Version 3: Jun 26, 2015 – Formatting of quotes.

 

Version 2: Nov 1, 2014 – Added images.

 

Version 1: Published Oct 31, 2014
Advertisements

Read Full Post »

Understanding the Jews,

 

Understanding Anti-Semitism

 

by Hervé Ryssen

Part 4

Paris, April 2012

 [Translated from French by Carlos Whitlock Porter]

 

 

Understanding The Jews 025

Table of Contents

 

Preliminary Remarks…………………………………………………….. 4

 

I. The Jewish Identity……………………………………………………. 5

Perfectly Well Integrated” 

Assimilation or Dissimulation?

Jewish Solidarity

A Community Closed upon Itself

The Jewish Mission

Human Rights

The Jews and “Humanity

Esperanto

 

II. Cosmopolitan Propaganda……………………………………….. 13

The Advocacy of Race-Mixing and the “Open Society” 

Making Whites Feel Guilty

Destroy the Local Elites

Anti-Christianity

The Blacks Are Going to Save Humanity

The Races Do Not Exist

Your Lying Eyes

 

III. The New World Order…………………………………………….. 24

High Finance in the Service of Democracy

War Against Islam

Wars of Liberation

 

IV. Historical Traumas…………………………………………………. 31

The Trauma of the “Shoa

The Whole World is Guilty

The Spirit of Vengeance

Communism under Lenin

Communism under Stalin

May 1968

 

V. Anti-Semitism…………………………………………………………. 43

An “Inexplicable Phenomenon

The Scapegoat Theory

Denying the Evidence

The Inversion of Reality

The Good Deeds of the Jews

The Jealousy of the Anti-Semites

Always Innocent

Anti-Semitism: An Illness

The Madness of Men

Accusatory Projection

Hatred of Humanity

 

VI. The Mafia……………………………………………………………… 55

The Great Swindles

International Pimping

The Organ Traffic

 

VII. The Destruction of the Traditional Family……………….. 66

The Defense of Homosexuality

Cross-Dressers and Transsexuals

Feminism

The Destruction of All Patriarchy

 

VIII. The Psychopathology of “Anti-Semitism”………………. 72

Rapists and Psychos

Sexual Crimes Against Children

 

IX. At Last: Psychoanalysis Explained…………………………… 75

The Myth of the Oedipus Complex

 

X. The Hysterical Sect…………………………………………………. 81

Need for Love

Jewish Art

The Jewish Prison

The Symptoms of Insanity

The Suicidal Jew

 

 

 

 

Preliminary Remarks

 

The following text is a summary of six books [1] written by Hervé Ryssen [2], published between 2005 and 2010, constituting the most important study on the Jewish mind ever published. All the quotations that you are about to read are precisely referenced in at least one of these books.

The present booklet consists for the most part of quotations from famous authors, with particular emphasis on well-known films. The number of references is nevertheless sufficient to enable the reader to observe the extraordinary homogeneity of Jewish cosmopolitan thought, over the centuries and across all borders.

 

 

VI

The Mafia

 

 

 

 

 

It is impossible to summarize the power of this Mafia in a few words, under pain of not being believed. We published a 400-page book on the subject in 2008, containing all the information the reader will ever need to prove that the Jewish Mafia is, by far the most powerful Mafia in the world.

 

Understanding The Jews Part 3 072

[Image] Hervé Ryssen’s 2008 book, The Jewish Mafia

Here we present a small glimpse of this octopus-like international power, engaged in all illegal activities: Ecstasy, heroin, cocaine, prostitution, gambling, porn, arms dealing, plus money laundering, through the agency, in particular, of the diamond industry.

The production and distribution of Ecstasy all over the world is entirely in the hands of the Jewish Mafia. In fact, all the dealers who have ever been indicted anywhere in the world — without a single exception — (see The Jewish Mafia, 2008) — have been Jewish criminals. And all of them were in possession of Israeli passports, for the simple reason that the State of Israel almost never extradites Israeli citizens.

Understanding The Jews Part 3 075

[Image] The various colors, shapes and designs of Ectasy.

Liberation, the daily newspaper, of 23 July 2001, in fact, informs us that the Israeli Mafia has “hijacked the market in synthetic drugs”. The 11 August 2001 issue of Le Figaro confirms this:

Ecstasy is the private hunting ground of the Israeli criminal underground”.

The synthetic drug called “Ecstasy”, which provides a sensation of power and well-being for a few hours, is a veritable chemical garbage can. Its effects, long term, are irreversible: memory loss, behavioural disturbances, sleep disturbances, loss of concentration, and brain damage in the children of drug-addicted mothers. But these complications are of no matter in the eyes of the dealers.

Holland is the most important producer in the world. The drug is produced there in dozens of clandestine laboratories. At the head of the traffic, we find Israelis linked to various “Russian” mafias, which organize the networks supplying Europe, the United States, Japan and Australia. Sometimes the dealers use young Orthodox Jews to smuggle the drug past border check points. For a long time, customs agents never even thought of suspecting these religious Jews in their black caftans, black hats and ringlets. Each of these “mules” transported 35,000 to 50,000 tablets per trip. These smugglers, who criss-crossed between Europe and the United States, were paid 1, 500 dollars per trip.

The Israeli daily newspaper Haaretz of 6 April 2003, confirms the role of these “Israeli” criminals:

Israel is the hub of the international Ecstasy traffic, according to a document published by the United States Department of State. These past few years, organized crime in Israel, linked to criminal organizations in Russia, has taken control of distribution of the drug in Europe, according to an official document. This document notes that the Israeli criminal groups have taken control of the Ecstasy traffic in North America. Over the course of the year 2000, 80% of all the Ecstasy sold in the United States originated from Holland, which is the largest centre of production.

The Arc, known as “the monthly of French Judaism”, published this information in May 2007:

Zeev Rosenstein, the most famous godfather of the Israeli milieu, has returned from the United States to complete a 12-year prison sentence for drug dealing”.

Rosenstein was sentenced for importing 850,000 Ecstasy pills into the United States. The weekly newspaper Marianne, on 18 August 2007, informs us that Rosenstein’s organization was active on four continents, and used,

small Latin-American gangs of smugglers for the distribution of his synthetic drug.

At a cost of production of 20 or 25 cents, one single Ecstasy pill, sold to a distributor for 2 dollars, who himself resells it in a discotheque for 10 or 15 dollars, or even 30-40 dollars, can feed quite a large family. What is more, if the discotheque belongs to you, this makes you “King of the Night”.

The reality of “accusatory inversion” is easily verified, for example, by the 1987 film by Gerard Oury, Levy et Goliath: Moise Levy, a Hassidic Jew and diamond dealer at Antwerp, has fallen out with brother Albert, a Parisian cafe owner, ever since the latter married a goy. Moise takes the train for France, where he is supposed to deliver diamond powder to the Renault factory, but he finds himself involved, despite himself, in a coke trafficking deal. The coke dealers and pimps here are tall, blond-haired “Aryans” with blue eyes, very wicked and very anti-Semitic, while the Jews are always very likeable and innocent.

The film Lethal Weapon (USA, 1987), shows the methods of these horrible drug traffickers.

Two cops — one white and one Negro — are assigned to arrest the evil-doers. The two cops are atrociously tortured in the basement of a night club owned by one of the dealers. But you shouldn’t be surprised: the bad guys here are Viet Nam vets, white men, as usual, with blond hair and blue eyes. The poor Jews are completely innocent. The film is signed Richard Donner.

The sequel to Lethal Weapon 2 (1989) is even more of a caricature: The two cops, who symbolize the triumphant multicultural society, are, this time, fighting a dangerous gang of South African drug dealers. The villains are all white — always Nordic, blond-haired and blue-eyed, and terribly, terribly racist. Richard Donner’s real name, let us note, is Richard Schwarzenberg. This information may be useful in understanding the messages disseminated through his films.

The film Blood Diamonds (USA, 2007) is a good example of media furtiveness whenever a Jewish criminal type is involved. The film only shows the role of the Jews in the diamond industry in one single image: an Orthodox Jew appears on the screen … for one-half second! The viewers are completely hood-winked. In his genre, the director, Edward Zwick, is a magician. You must realize, in fact, that the international diamond business, legal or illegal, is 100% in the hands of Jewish firms or dealers.

In the French film Taxi (1998), the dangerous criminals are Germans of the Nordic type, as stupid as they are wicked: a film by Gerard Pires.

In The Firm (USA, 1993), a young diplomat has just been recruited by a powerful law firm in Memphis. He gradually comes to the realisation that the company managers are in fact working for a terrible mafia gang in Chicago. All the lawyers present — about thirty of them — are white, Catholic and Nordic. They symbolize the American elite at its hypocritical best. The film is by Sydney Pollack, who also practises the technique of accusatory inversion. Thus it is that the Jews are always portrayed as innocent victims.

The Great Swindles

Not all swindlers are Jews, and not all Jews are swindlers. But, as Jacques Attali said, in 2002,

among Jews, as always, one never does anything by halves: if you’re going to be a criminal, you might as well as well be the best”.

And the fact is that the really great swindles are exclusively the work of the Jews. We will only present a succinct summary of a few: we advise you to read The Jewish Mafia (2008), to become aware of the details and juicy anecdotes linked to these scandals.

We know that since the signature of the Kyoto agreements, by virtue of the principle that “the polluter pays”, all industrialists must acquire “rights” to compensate for the environmental damage caused by their activity. In 2007, the opening of the financial markets to “carbon credits” attracted international swindlers.

In Paris, it was sufficient to supply a photocopy of your identity card to obtain the status of a “broker”. Between the fall of 2008 and 2009, a colossal embezzlement of VAT on the “carbon tax” permitted the crooks to steal 1.4 billion euros from the French taxpayer. Sitting in Parisian internet cafes, the swindlers, over the BlueNet CO2 exchange system, acquired tons of “CO2 equivalents” for non-existent clients, without paying tax, in foreign countries, with a click of the computer. They then diverted these quotas to different countries to cover their tracks, then resold their cargoes in France to polluting industries, such as cement plants and electricity producers, invoicing them for VAT at 19.6%, which they never paid over to the state. The money evaporated instantly into accounts in Lithuania, Montenegro, or Hong Kong or Cyprus. The brains of the operation, Gregory Zaoui, had begun his criminal career by fraudulently reselling jeans and portable phones. Justice sent dozens of letters rogatory to Israel. As a result, the Ministry of Finance was compelled to reduce VAT on CO2 to zero per cent to restrict the fraud. Europol estimated the extent of the fraud at 5 billion euros. Have you ever heard of this gigantic swindle? No, of course not. Which is quite normal, because these same people control our TV channels.

Here’s another recent scandal: In December 2008, it was revealed that approximately 400 complaints had been filed by tradesmen, merchants and associations in a single year. The swindlers solicited electronic listings by fax or telephone. The inquiries led to the indictment of four persons in France in the month of April, followed by about thirty people in Israel by early December, in which 700,000 euros worth of jewellery and luxury vehicles were also seized. You haven’t heard about this scandal? Perfectly normal.

In March 2008, another gigantic VAT fraud was revealed, the brain of which was a certain Avi Rebibo, “a Franco-Israeli”.

We also recall the Claude Lipsky affair, the “swindler of the century”, who was sentenced in 2007 for embezzling the savings of 450 French soldiers.

In 2006, the swindler Gilbert Chickli, who swindled the banks by telephone, fled to Israel with 23 million euros.

In 2001-2004, the scope of the “Sentier” money laundering scandal was estimated at one billion euros. The media, curiously, did not insist on these matters.

There was also the recent case of Jacques Crozmarie, president of the Cancer Research Association, who embezzled money from TV viewers. He was sentenced in 2000. The swindler only repaid 26% of the money entrusted to him by French citizens. He also manifested a classic example of phenomenal chutzpah, declaring before French TV cameras:

I had pocketed even a single penny I would be a criminal. But look at my representation expenses, they are nothing! I don’t even get my meals reimbursed when I eat at restaurants!

In the USA, swindles occur in mammoth proportions. In April 2010, for example, a business man was prosecuted for a pyramid scheme. On Wednesday 21 April, the regulatory agency for the American stock market, the SEC, announced that it was bringing proceedings against the President of a Florida investment fund, Nevin K. Shapiro, for a 900 million dollars “Ponzi-type” pyramid scheme.

The year before, in November 2009, another Ponzi-type pyramid scheme, mounted by the lawyer Scott W. Rothstein, amounted to a billion dollars, according to The Wall Street Journal. The star lawyer of Florida was accused of selling shares in extra-judicial agreements to investors, promising 2-digit returns.

In February 2009, a stock market fraud exploded before the London Stock Exchange, for the sum of 600 million dollars. The principal protagonist was a certain Abraham Hochman.

On 18 January 2009, we learn that a Florida business man, Arthur Nadel, disappeared with 350 million dollars he was managing. In 2006, there was the “Abramoff swindle” as well.

All these swindlers were small fry compared to Bernard Madoff. This New York financier was nicknamed “the Jewish Treasury Bond” by members of the Jewish-American community. But the returns which he distributed to his clients were not the result of financial investments: he simply collected funds from new investors and distributed them to old ones. In December 2008, his company went bankrupt, ruining thousands of savers, and, at the same time, numerous influential Jews. He stole the investments of the Stephen Spielberg Foundation and the Elie Wiesel Foundation. Fifty billion dollars disappeared! It was the biggest swindle in the history of the world.

But the Jewish mafia was even more powerful in Russia, after the collapse of the Soviet Regime. In the 1990s, a handful of “oligarchs” got their clutches on the near-totality of Russian wealth, creating a reign of terror in the streets of the big cities, while the little people suffered in silence (see the summary in The Jewish Mafia, 2008). It requires an understanding of the actions of these people — Mikhail Khodorkovsky, Roman Abramovich and other, Boris Berezovsky — to understand the anti-Semitism of many Russians. Starting in 2000, the new Russian President, Vladimir Putin began to clean house. Since then, Khodorkovsky is in prison, and his fellow Jews fled to Israel, London or the Cote d’Azur.

The Pavel Lungin film, Tycoon (2003), of course, shows none of this. This is the scenario: at the end of the 80s, Platon Makovsky and his friends, young brilliant university students, abandon their scientific studies to launch themselves in business. Platon became the richest man in his country. Alas, he is soon killed in an assassination. The people responsible for this cowardly murder — stock “bad guys” — are all Russian patriots, tall, strong, with blue eyes, who are swindling the people and will stop at nothing to eliminate Platon, the likeable billionaire. There is obviously no need to study “Pavel Lungin’s” family tree to guess which “Mafia” he belongs to…

 

 

 

International Pimping

This topic was the object of a long very well documented chapter in our book entitled The Jewish Mafia. Since the fall of the Berlin Wall, in 1989, tens of thousands of young women from Eastern Europe have been caught up by prostitution networks and sent to distant destinations.

The collapse of the USSR in 1991 led to a considerable impoverishment of the population. To attempt to escape from the misery and meet the needs of their young families, many young Russian, Ukrainian or Moldovan women answered attractive ads in newspapers. Unfortunately for them, these offers to work abroad proved to be traps laid by international pimps. The media remain extremely discreet on this subject. In the month of May 2000, however, a report by Amnesty International revealed the scope of the phenomenon and pointed the finger at the State of Israel, as the turntable of this traffic.

Here again, we shall only present a few recent incidents: on 20 September 2009, we learned that an international luxury prostitution network had been dismantled in Paris. Three people were charged with “aggravated pimping” and membership in a “criminal organization”. Young women from Eastern Europe had been coerced into relations with business men. The Nouvel Observateur spoke of a “couple from Narbonne”. The head of the network was said to be a 38-year old woman, manager of a clothing store, and “of Moroccan origin”. In the French press, usually, they explain that the persons responsible are “Lebanese”, “Russian”, “Chechen”, or “Armenian”. If the press never gives their names, it is because there is a good reason not to: in fact, one had to read the Egyptian newspaper Al Yom Saabeh to learn that this was the work of the Jewish Mafia.

In December 2008, at Limoges, information was received from an Israeli pimp, Moshe Suissa, adding:

Several thousand women were ‘sold’ to prostitution networks in Israel over the last four years, according to the inquiry of a Parliamentary committee. From 3,000 to 5,000 women were the victims of this traffic, which earned thousands of billions per year. According to a police inquiry, 120 persons were arrested for pimping in the past 15 years and sentenced to from 2 to 15 years in prison”.

Let us note that this is a question of 3 to 5 thousand women per year, most of them literally kidnapped in Russia, the Ukraine or Moldova, through deceptive newspaper ads.

Sergio Leone’s beautiful film One Upon a Time in America (1984), tells the story of Jewish gangsters arriving in New York from their native Poland at the beginning of the century. We see them dedicating themselves to smuggling alcohol and all sorts of other sordid rackets. They burglarize a jewellery store, liquidate their competitors, become nightclub owners, and do not hesitate to prostitute women of their own tribe. Later, their leader changes his identity in order to become a Senator.

Understanding The Jews Part 3 084

[Image] The godfather of the local mafia, in the Los Angeles of the 1950s: Meyer Cohen — “Mickey C.

In L.A. Confiential (USTA, 1997), a film by Curtis Hanford, after the novel by James Ellroy, Jewishness is shown with great discretion. The beginning of the film presents the godfather of the local mafia, in the Los Angeles of the 1950s: Meyer Cohen — “Mickey C., to his fan club”. He is, we learn, “the king of junk, racketeering and prostitution. He kills a dozen people per year” and makes big headlines.

Understanding The Jews Part 3 085

[Image] The film L.A. Confidential, based on a novel by James Ellroy

At the cinema, some cosmopolitan directors have also very classically projected the guilt of their fellow Jews upon others. In Roger Hanin’s film (real name: “Levy”), The Protector (1974), Nathalie, an 18-year old girl, disappears in the middle of Paris. To find her, her father, Samuel Malakian — a poor Jew — enters the White Slave trade directed by an aristocrat, Baron Metzger.

Take another look at the film Vice Squad, by “Jean Rougeron” (1987); Severine, 18 years old, falls into the hands of a pimp. Alarmed by her disappearance, her loved ones alert the vice squad. The inquiry orients the police to a White Slave network, the “Horsch” network. These villains kidnap girls to resell them to very rich foreigners.

These are all Nazis, Germans, tall, blond, with blue eyes.

In the same register, Steven Spielberg’s film on the slave trade, Amistad (USA, 1997), does not show the dominant role played by Jewish merchants in this tragedy (see the chapter in The Jewish Mafia) and throws all the weight of the ignominy onto Christians.

 

 

 

The Organ Traffic

The organ traffic was the topic of a scandal during the summer of 2009. On 24 July, in the United States, about forty local representatives and five rabbis were arrested in New Jersey, and several synagogues were searched. The authorities suspected the suspects of corruption, extortion, money laundering, and … organ trafficking. Rabbi Levy Izhak Rosenbaum was accused of persuading Moldovan donors to sell their kidneys for 10,000 dollars, so as to resell them for 16 times as much in the USA and Israel. “He targeted vulnerable people”, stated Mark MacCarron, substitute Federal prosecutor. Rosenbaum took care of all the formalities required to cover the donor’s trip to New York, where the operation took place. It turned out that Rosenbaum was the principal intermediary of Illen Peri, who remained in Israel, and who was the brains of the operation.

In January 2004, already, a retired Israeli army officer named Geldaya Tauber Gady was arrested in Brazil for his participation in an international organ trafficking network. He then explained to the court that the operation was financed by the Israeli government. The fact is that the Israelis do not donate their organs for religious reasons. Israel is thus the only country in which the medical profession does not condemn the illegal traffic in organs, and where no action is taken against physicians who engage in the practice.

In 2003, Ilan Peri, 52 years old, was indicted in a network discovered in South Africa. It had performed at least one hundred kidney transplants. The operations, which benefited the Israelis, had taken place at the Saint Augustine clinic in Durban. The donors, in turn, were poor Brazilians from the region of Recife, who were paid up to 100,000 dollars per kidney. But the rates dropped quickly: to 3,000 dollars.

Mike Levinski, an Israeli citizen, was the pioneer of the Moldovan network. The 15 February 2002 issue of Le Point, a weekly newspaper, provides some information on this traffic. We learn that the Moldovans, citizens of a small country located between Rumania and the Ukraine, were quite poor, and some of them were reduced to selling a kidney to survive. Israeli racketeers prospected on the spot, offering donors 3,000 dollars for their “pound of flesh”. The commission received by the racketeers amounted to 30,000 dollars per kidney, while the surgeon’s fees amounted to 100,000 to 200,000 dollars per operation. Donors and patients found themselves in Turkey in the clinic of Dr. Sonmez, who admitted practicing more than 500 transplants over the past 5 years, without ever being bothered by the Turkish police. The traffic was obviously extremely profitable, judging by the number of small ads of intermediaries published in the Israeli press.

The “donors” were not always aware of what was happening to them. After benign operations, for appendicitis or something similar, performed on young Moldovans, they woke up with scars in the wrong places. They were then informed that it had been necessary to remove a kidney which was not functioning properly, or that, as was the case with Serghei, an X-ray later revealed that their surgeon had simply stolen their kidney.

Nancy Scheper-Hughes, of the University of California, the specialist in this field, visited villages in Moldova where, she wrote;

20% of the adult men had been recruited to be kidney vendors”.

In December 2001, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported that the Rumanian ambassador in Israel had demanded to be received by the Minister of Social Affairs to discuss the topic of what was beginning to be a scandal in his country. On this occasion, we learn, he demanded explanations and had given the Ministry a list of children born in Rumania who had been brought to Israel to be adopted, “with all their organs inside their bodies”. It therefore seems that the adoption of Rumanian infants in Israel is perhaps not just a work of charity.

The “Rabbi Rosenbaum Affair” reopened the case. At the end of 2009, the Swedish journalist Donald Bolström, after an on-the-spot investigation, accused the Israeli army of taking organs from Palestinian prisoners. On the Internet, tongues loosened. Israeli doctors from the medico-legal legal institute of Abou Kabir were accused of having extracted the vital organs (heart, kidneys, liver) from young Palestinians killed by the Israeli army in Gaza or the West Bank. The bodies were sometimes returned to the families, stuffed with cotton and stitched up from top to bottom, but usually guarded in numbered tombs.

During an interview on the Al-Jazira TV channel, the former Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat accused the Israelis of murdering infants and young Palestinians so as to collect their vital organs for transplant purposes.

They murdered our children and used their organs like the recycling of spare parts. Why did the world remain silent? Israel benefits from this silence to intensify its oppression and terror against our people”, Arafat charged.

Over the course of this interview, which was held on 14 January 2002, Arafat showed photographs of mutilated children.

In early October 2009, it was revealed that the network of rabbi Rosenbaum was also operating in Morocco. Pr. Mustapha Khiarti, president of the National Foundation for the promotion of health and research and development, revealed that the network specialized in kidnapping children in Algeria. The operations were performed in Moroccan clinics located in Oujda. Rabbi Rosenbaum concerned himself with the financing to acquire the necessary equipment for the surgical operations, and the transport of the organs to New York.

In July 2009, we learned that at Bucharest, in Rumania, three persons had been arrested on charge of trafficking in human ova, this time. The two persons responsible for the Sabyc clinic, a father and son, were Israelis. Two other Israelis who worked in this clinic were also booked. The clinic paid the donors sums between 800 to 1,000 lei (approximately 190 to 238 euro), while Rumanian law strictly prohibited the payment for the donation of organs or cells. According to the Rumanian media, most of the recipients were Israelis. They paid between twelve and fifteen thousand euro for the performance of fertilization in vitro. The ovules originated from young Rumanian women in situations of social difficulty.

Accusatory inversion is seen here in a film called Dirty Pretty Things (Britain, 2002): Okwe is a poor black of Nigerian origin who lives in London, England. He is an illegal immigrant, and life is not easy. But he works hard to survive. He works as a taxi driver by day and receptionist at night, in a London hotel. But strange things start happening in the hotel, and Okwe discovers that the hotel where he works is just a front for an organ dealing operation, orchestrated by the person responsible for that floor, who exploits poverty-stricken immigrants. In exchange for a kidney, poor Third World immigrants are promised a passport or a visa: a kidney for a passport.

Understanding The Jews Part 3 081

[Image] The 2002 British film, Dirty Pretty Things.

The operation is performed in one of the suites in the hotel by inexperienced physicians. Persecuted by the immigration services (two white Englishmen — very evil people), Okwe does not dare report what he knows. So he attempts to dismantle the traffic by other means, assisted by a Turkish cleaning lady, a black prostitute and a Chinaman working in a morgue. The poor clandestine immigrants (“undocumented aliens”) are the victims of blackmail, pressure, rape and crimes, while the bad guys, once again, are whites. The film was produced by the director Stephen Frears, who is a “white man”, as you may have guessed…

See The Believers (USA, 1987). In this film (do doubt you were expecting this): at New York, young children are kidnapped and serve as victims of ritual sacrifice. The psychologist Jamison discovered the existence of a sect, Santeria, practicing a Cuban variant of voodoo. The film is by John Schlesinger, who is not a member of any voodoo sect …

In the film by Peter Webber, Hannibal Lector, the Origins of Evil (2007), which unveils the childhood of the cannibal psychopathic killer of The Silence of the Lambs we see, in one scene, that a child killer can also be a good Christian, who is anxious for his own children to go to church.

It may be a bit easier to understand now why Jewish intellectuals, as a whole, are fiercely opposed to the death penalty. It is not just the fruit of philosophical reflection, but, rather, of a well-understood self-interest.

Paris, April 2012

______________________________

Source: http://www.jrbooksonline.com/cwporter/ryssen1.htm

 

_______________________________

 

 

Footnotes:

[1] Books by Hervé Ryssen. http://herveryssen.over-blog.com/

 

Hervé Ryssen interview 1037

 

[2] Herve Ryssen’s latest book is Les Milliards d’Israël, Escrocs juifs et financiers internationaux [The Billions of Israel, Jews and international financial Crooks]

 

Hervé Ryssen interview 1040

 

Les Milliards d’Israël. Escrocs juifs et financiers internationaux

Notre nouveau livre intitulé Les Milliards d’Israël, Escrocs juifs et financiers internationaux (336 pages) sera disponible en librairie le 17 septembre 2014. Le livre pourra être acheté en prévente au mois d’août ou début septembre afin de payer l’imprimeur. Nous vous tiendrons au courant d’ici peu sur la démarche à suivre.

Pour les flics de la pensée et autres censeurs, sachez que le fichier est entre de bonnes mains, et que même s’il devait m’arriver un malheur, le livre serait publié de toute manière. Juifs, si vous avez peur des livres, c’est que vous avez sans doute des choses à vous reprocher !

A très bientôt, chers lecteurs, pour plus d’informations.

Hervé RYSSEN

PS : Je me demande si je ne vais pas dédier ce livre à Claire Lafoix, la présidente de la 17e chambre correctionnelle de Nanterre, qui m’a condamné le 9 avril 2014 à un mois de prison FERME, pour le simple port d’une bombe lacrymogène.

Il est vrai qu’elle entre en compétition avec les guignols de la 17e chambre correctionnelle de Paris, qui eux, m’ont condamné à deux mois de prison FERME pour une simple blague sur les moeurs de Bertrand Delanoë.

Auront-ils le courage de mettre un écrivain en prison ?

Sont-ils assez crétins pour aller jusque là ?

L’avenir nous le dira !

——————-

 

 

From Google Translate:

Our new book, The Billions of Israel, Jews and international financial Crooks (336 pages) will be available in bookstores on September 17 2014. The book can be ordered in advance in the month of August or early September via the printer. We will keep you posted shortly on how to proceed.

For the cops and other critics, know that the file is in good hands, and that even if a disaster should happen to me, the book would be published anyway. Jews, if you are afraid of books it is because you probably have something to hide!

See you soon, dear readers, for more information.

Hervé RYSSEN

PS: I wonder if I’m not going to dedicate the book to Claire Lafoix, the 17th president of the criminal court of Nanterre, who sentenced me April 9, 2014 to one month FARM prison for simply wearing a tear bombs.

True, it competes with the horns of the 17th Criminal Chamber of Paris, who themselves have sentenced me to two months in prison for simple FARM joke about the morals of Bertrand Delanoë.

Will they have the courage to put a writer in prison?

Are they fools enough to go that far?

The future will tell!

 

—————————————————————-

Click to go to:   Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 1

Click to go to:  Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 2

Click to go to:   Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 3

Click to go to:   Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 4

Click to go to:   Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 5

Click to go to:   Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 6 (last)

 

 

PDF of this post. Click to view or download (1.6 MB). With images>> Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 4

 

 

Version History

Version 1: Published Oct 30, 2014

Read Full Post »

Understanding the Jews,

 

Understanding Anti-Semitism

 

by Hervé Ryssen

Part 3

Paris, April 2012

 [Translated from French by Carlos Whitlock Porter]

 

 

Understanding The Jews 025

Table of Contents

 

Preliminary Remarks…………………………………………………….. 4

 

I. The Jewish Identity……………………………………………………. 5

Perfectly Well Integrated” 

Assimilation or Dissimulation?

Jewish Solidarity

A Community Closed upon Itself

The Jewish Mission

Human Rights

The Jews and “Humanity

Esperanto

 

II. Cosmopolitan Propaganda……………………………………….. 13

The Advocacy of Race-Mixing and the “Open Society” 

Making Whites Feel Guilty

Destroy the Local Elites

Anti-Christianity

The Blacks Are Going to Save Humanity

The Races Do Not Exist

Your Lying Eyes

 

III. The New World Order…………………………………………….. 24

High Finance in the Service of Democracy

War Against Islam

Wars of Liberation

 

IV. Historical Traumas…………………………………………………. 31

The Trauma of the “Shoa

The Whole World is Guilty

The Spirit of Vengeance

Communism under Lenin

Communism under Stalin

May 1968

 

V. Anti-Semitism…………………………………………………………. 43

An “Inexplicable Phenomenon

The Scapegoat Theory

Denying the Evidence

The Inversion of Reality

The Good Deeds of the Jews

The Jealousy of the Anti-Semites

Always Innocent

Anti-Semitism: An Illness

The Madness of Men

Accusatory Projection

Hatred of Humanity

 

VI. The Mafia……………………………………………………………… 55

The Great Swindles

International Pimping

The Organ Traffic

 

VII. The Destruction of the Traditional Family……………….. 66

The Defense of Homosexuality

Cross-Dressers and Transsexuals

Feminism

The Destruction of All Patriarchy

 

VIII. The Psychopathology of “Anti-Semitism”………………. 72

Rapists and Psychos

Sexual Crimes Against Children

 

IX. At Last: Psychoanalysis Explained…………………………… 75

The Myth of the Oedipus Complex

 

X. The Hysterical Sect…………………………………………………. 81

Need for Love

Jewish Art

The Jewish Prison

The Symptoms of Insanity

The Suicidal Jew

 

 

 

 

Preliminary Remarks

 

The following text is a summary of six books [1] written by Hervé Ryssen [2], published between 2005 and 2010, constituting the most important study on the Jewish mind ever published. All the quotations that you are about to read are precisely referenced in at least one of these books.

The present booklet consists for the most part of quotations from famous authors, with particular emphasis on well-known films. The number of references is nevertheless sufficient to enable the reader to observe the extraordinary homogeneity of Jewish cosmopolitan thought, over the centuries and across all borders.

 

 

V

Anti-Semitism

 

 

 

The Jews are hypersensitive to the slightest hint of anti-Semitism. The most insignificant bit of graffiti on a school yard wall is immediately noted, and the information is very quickly relayed to a rabbi. The slightest pushing or shoving incident in a door doorway triggers a deluge of protests.

 

Understanding The Jews Part 3 068

[Image] False-flag anti-semitic graffiti

Governmental ministers profess great indignation as loudly as they can, although the murder of a mere goy leaves them indifferent. That which has been called the “great Jewish intolerance of frustration” is in fact one of the characteristic traits of the entire Jewish community: they cannot tolerate the slightest criticism, the slightest remark perceived as “hostile”. They get hugely indignant, heaping calumny upon the person deemed guilty, never hesitating before the foulest slanders — something “anti-Semites” have always complained of, all down through the ages. To finish the job, they file lawsuits, unless the victim apologizes publicly.

The Marxists philosopher Jacques Derrida writes:

My vigilance, I think I can say, was without rest since the age of six, with regards to racism and anti-Semitism”.

He had in him, he said,

a nervous vigilance, an exhausting aptitude in sniffing out signs of racism, in the most discrete configurations and the noisiest denials”.

 

Understanding The Jews Part 3 027

[Image] Marxists philosopher Jacques Derrida

This obsession is an invariable characteristic of all “cosmopolitan” thinkers. In the Jewish community, there is a hyper-emotiveness, an anguish, even an in-born paranoia, which disposes the leaders of this community to man the battlements at the slightest sign of hostility.

The fact that almost the whole French government attends an annual dinner at the CRIF (Representative Council of Jewish Institutions of France) really ought to reassure them; but an atavistic, secular, disquiet appears to be a fundamental characteristic of Judaism, which explains why, throughout history, the Jews can always be heard complaining, once again, of a “renewal of anti-Semitism”.

 

Understanding The Jews Part 3 028

[Image] A CRIF annual dinner

It is moreover striking to observe that synagogues are the only places of public worship in which the faithful must barricade themselves behind bomb-proof doors. A foreign observer — a “Candide” — might legitimately ask here;

Hey, these people don’t seem to think that other people like them very much”.

Perhaps they have something on their conscience?

Anti-Semitism is useful, too. Disproportionately magnified by the media system, it permits the maintenance among the Jews of the entire world of a fragile identity, constantly under threat of disappearance through assimilation into the host country. Over-sensationalized anti-Semitism thus reinforces the cohesion of the community.
 

An “Inexplicable Phenomenon

Since Antiquity to most recent times, the Jews have been expelled everywhere, from all countries, both Christian and Muslim, many times over.

 

Understanding The Jews Part 3 029

[Image] Map showing expulsions just from 1100 AD to 1500 AD.

In his memoirs, Elie Wiesel is compelled to observe:

Jewish history describes a permanent conflict between us and others. Since Abraham, we are one side and the entire world is on the other.

And he asks himself:

Why so many persecutions, so much oppression? What have we done wrong to men so that they wish us so much ill? I will open myself to my masters about it, and yet again to my friends. We will try to understand. For the whole answer, my Masters made us read the Bible and reread the Bible, over and over again, the prophets, the martyrological literature.

For the Jews, anti-Semitism is quite simply inexplicable. Martin Gray, in For Those I Loved, wonders about this incomprehensible hatred:

Why this hatred against us, why the death, everywhere, threatening?

The poor Jews live “in the midst of rabid, insane beasts”.

The historian Paul Friedlander denounces “Hitler’s wild imaginings on the Jews”.

 

Understanding The Jews Part 3 030

[Image] The jewish historian Paul Friedlander

Why did Adolf Eichmann, a high Nazi official, feel the need to combat Judaism? Here is what Simon Wiesenthal has to say about it.

I was mistaken in searching the events of his early youth for the motivation for his conduct. There was no motive, no hatred. Eichmann was only a product of the regime”.

In his book entitled Discourse of Hatred, published in 2004, the French philosopher Andre Glucksmann writes:

Hatred of the Jews is the enigma of enigmas. This destructive passion, extending over the thousands of years, dresses according to the fashion of the day, is constantly reborn from the ashes of various fanaticisms which appear to motivate it … For the anti-Semite, the object of his aversion is like an unidentified flying object. He doesn’t know who or what he is talking about… the Jew is in no way the source of anti-Semitism; one must think of this passion in itself and by itself, as if the Jew which it pursues, without knowing anything about him, did not even exist”.

 

Understanding The Jews Part 3 035

[Image] Andre Glucksmann’s book Discourse of Hatred.

One cannot explain anti-Semitism”, confirms rabbi Josy Eisenberg.

Auschwitz exceeds my faculties of comprehension and our powers of analysis”, writes Raphael Drai in 1989.

Why the silence or the eclipse of God during this period of horror? Why? I do not know, despite the many books I have studied.

In his book entitled Hitler’s Willing Executioners, published in 1996, Daniel Goldhagen also pretend to be unable understand. The Holocaust is, according to him,

the most difficult event to understand in all of German history … The Holocaust and the change in sensitivities which it implies, defy explanation … Explaining the manner in which the Holocaust may have occurred is a very difficult task”, he writes in the introduction. “The history of anti-Semitism in the Germany of the 19th century is of a very great complexity”.

 

Understanding The Jews Part 3 039

[Image] Daniel Goldhagen and his book, Hitler’s Willing Executionioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust.

It is one of the most irritating and disconcerting facts of contemporary history”, writes Hannah Arendt in her book entitled On Anti-Semitism.

The famous Primo Levi expressed a similar view in If This Is A Man (1958).

A few historians, among the most serious ones (Bullock, Schramm, Bracher), recognize that they do not understand Hitler’s relentless anti-Semitism, and consequently, of Germany. Perhaps because what happened has not been understood, and even, should not be understood, in the measure that to understand is perhaps to justify… In the Nazi hatred, there is nothing rational: is it a hatred which is not in us, which is foreign to man … We cannot understand it”.

 

Understanding The Jews Part 3 054

[Image] Primo Levi and his book If This Is A Man – The Truce.

 

The Scapegoat Theory

In his book, The Psychiatry of Anti-Semitism (1952), Rudolph Loewenstein explains that anti-Semitism is “neither paranoiac nor phobic”, but is a matter of “mere criminology”. And he continues in a classical register:

The Jews have been the victims of sadism and political ambition and could be persecuted with impunity, pillaged and murdered. It has often happened to them to be hated for their very vulnerability. Man is very much attracted by the possibilities of slaking their instincts of cruelty against defenseless victims. … The Jews, a weak minority, to whom people attributed a ‘shadowy and formidable power’, offered the Nazi leaders ‘the punching bag they had long been looking for’”.

 

Understanding The Jews Part 3 057

[Image] Rudolph Loewenstein’s book, The Psychiatry of Anti-Semitism [aka, Psychanalyse de l’antisémitisme] (1952).

The Jews are thus said to be “collectively guilty” — all of them, even unborn children — for epidemics in the Middle Ages, for Communism, for capitalism, for the Death of Christ, for disastrous wars and equally disastrous peace treaties. All the evils of humanity, the Black Plague and the Atomic Bomb, are the “‘fault of the Jews’. We are the eternal scapegoats”. It should be noted here that Jewish intellectuals always pretend to be unable to understand why “anti-Semites” accuse them of promoting both Communism and capitalism simultaneously.

It should first of all be noted that “scapegoat” is a concept originating in the Torah. The “scapegoat” was an animal charged with all the sins of Israel, after which the Jews chased him out and to die in the desert. For a moment, one might almost have been inclined to think that Jewish intellectuals were “projecting” their guilt onto the “anti-Semites”…

 

 

Denying the Evidence

Jewish intellectuals seem compelled to deny all crimes, even in the face of the evidence. One could thus hear such and such a media personality rise up and raise a howl against the “myth of Jewish finance”. “People talk a lot about the ‘Jewish lobby’”, writes Pierre Birnbaum (2005), who adds:

The ‘Jewish lobby’ does not exist. This word belongs to anti-Semitic terminology”.

Above all, most Jewish intellectuals deny the overwhelming role played by their fellow Jews in the Communist tragedy. In If This Is A Man, Primo Levi writes:

Hitler’s idée fixe, for whom Judaism was confused with Bolshevism, had no objective basis, and even less in Germany, where it was notorious that the overwhelming majority of Jews belonged to the bourgeoisie”.

The historian Arkadi Vaksberg, in turn, calmly affirms (Stalin and the Jews, 2003):

The ‘excessive’ share of the Jews in the revolution, and the resulting consequences, is an idea which owes a great deal to the world of imagination, to myth”.

 Understanding The Jews Part 3 063

[Image] Arkadi Vaksberg’s book, Stalin and the Jews [aka, Staline et les Juifse] (2003).

 

 

The Inversion of Reality

They often prefer, not without a certain brass nerve — the famous chutzpah — to represent themselves as the first and foremost victims of Communism. Norman Cohn, Alain Brossart, Gabriel Eschenazi have expressed this idea.

Jacques Attali in turn attempts to make us believe that the Jews were persecuted in the USSR (The Jews, the World and Money, 2002). As early in 1920, he writes,

the teaching of Hebrew, a ‘reactionary and clerical language’, was prohibited … The annihilation of Russian Judaism is continuing”.

For their part, the writers Marek Halter and Samuel Pisar attempt to make us believe that in 1941, their evacuation to the East, in Tashkent, a country vacation spot, was a “deportation” (see The Planetary Hopes).

In his book Two Centuries Together, Alexander Solzhenitsyn became indignant about the remarks of this Simon Schwartz, who spoke of;

the legend of the influence of the Jews, and the false ideas as to the exaggerated role of the Jews within State bodies”.

According to him, the Jews simply had;

almost no possibility of survival, except by serving the State”.

One is ashamed to read that”, says Solzhenitsyn indignantly.

What is this situation of oppression and despair which leaves you no possibility of survival except in privileged positions?

Solzhenitsyn quotes Isaac Stern, who affirms with aplomb that the Jews were the first victories of the regime:

Soviet history”, he says, “is entirely marked by a constant determination to grind out and exterminate the Jews … Soviet power was particularly hard on the Jews”.

Louis Ferdinand Celine understood this trick very well:

The aggressor screams as he cuts your throat”, he writes. “The trick is as old as Moses”.

 

 

The Good Deeds of the Jews

Anti-Semitism is the result of the benefits brought to humanity by the Jews. These benefits are so great that they embarrass those who receive them, and awaken hatred against their benefactors among the recipients. In his Apology for Israel, Albert Caracco writes:

We are punished because we were beneficial and because good disturbs the order of things.

And again:

They will never pardon the Jews for the benefits to which they indebted to them.

George Tabori, Viennese writer, actor and film director, said the same thing (Jewish Portraits, 1989):

It was the Jews who formulated the laws… the Ten Commandments, the prescriptions of hygiene of Moses and others… these laws are a good thing, a reasonable thing, in a way a perfect moral code. But it is impossible to comply with them to the end. Hence results this feeling of a bad conscience, of permanent irritation against the Jews. They represent the Biblical law, and their very existence reminds Christians of the inaccessible ideal”.

In The Jews, the World and Money, (2002) Jacques Attali expresses this same idea that those who oppose the Jews are showing great ingratitude.

In 325, at the Council of Nice”, he writes, “Christian anti-Judaism was set up, founded on the hatred of those who had brought the Good Word. The hatred of him who had rendered service. We will find this much later in the relationship with money: the hatred of him who lends money to others after having had it supplied by his God”.

For the period of the Middle Ages, Attali attempts to make us believe that the Jews were not permitted to exercise any trade except that of usurers or money lenders, although in reality they practised these same professions from the remotest antiquity:

As they were forced into money lending to start with, they plunged themselves into it completely. To their greater misfortune. Once again, they will be useful and they will be hated for the services which they render. … The Jews are hated for having supplied them with their God and their money, because [the anti-Semites] hate themselves, because they can no longer do without either one”.

 

 

The Jealousy of the Anti-Semites

In Life and Destiny (1960), the Soviet novelist Vassili Grossman presents these explanations:

Anti-Semitism”, he writes, “is the expression of a lack of talent, of the inability to win in a struggle with equal weapons; this is true in all fields, in the sciences as well as in commerce, in handicrafts as in painting. It is also the manifestation of the absence of culture in the popular masses, incapable of analyzing the causes of their sufferings. Uncultured men see the causes of their misfortunes in the Jews and not in the social and governmental order. Anti-Semitism is the measure of religious prejudices which hover in the dregs of society… Everyday anti-Semitism is an anti-Semitism which causes no blood to flow. It attests to the existence on earth of envious idiots, reactionaries and failures.

 

 

 

Always Innocent

The Jews are always innocent of everything they are ever criticized for. In his book, The World of Yesterday (1944), the famous Stefan Zweig expresses the astonishment of his fellow Jews obliged to flee Hitler’s Germany:

The most tragic thing”, he writes, “in this tragedy of the 20th century, is that those who endured it could not discover the sense of it, or any fault on their part… What was the motive, what the sense, what was the purpose of this persecution?… No one could find the answer. Even Freud, the clearest intelligence of his time, with whom I often spoke in those days, found no explanation, found no sense in this nonsense”.

Communist criminals? Silly question: they weren’t really Jews; they were Communists! Saul Friedlander writes this way:

The essential thing, which anti-Semites forgot, was the simple fact that the Soviet Jews, on all levels of the system, were first and foremost Soviet citizens devoted to the ideas and objectives of the USSR and forgetful of their origins”.

The Jewish historian Gabriel Eschenazi in turn explains that the new Jewish leaders of Poland, in 1945, were not really Jews:

The ‘Jewish’ party leaders such as Jakun Berman, Hilary Minc or Roman Zambrowski had broken with their Jewish origins and defined themselves solely as Communists and Poles”.

Just because the Jews were “numerous at the top of the Party” and that they “occupied most of the positions in the central party” doesn’t mean that Communism was a Jewish dictatorship; those Jews weren’t really Jews at all!

We find ourselves faced by a new paradox”, writes Gabriel Eschenazi, “in becoming Communists, the Jews ceased to be Jews in the eyes of their milieu, but for the Poles, they became more’ Jewish’ than ever, and ‘Jews’ of the worst kind.

In this openly twisted genre, we may yet again cite the passage by Jacques Attali (The Jews, the World and Money):

They even accuse the Jews of being indirectly responsible for the Shoah: Hitler, according to certain German historians like Ernst Nolte, was only a response to Marxism and the Soviet Union. It suffices to add that Marxism and the Soviet Union are ‘Jewish Creations’ so that the persecution of the Jew becomes, supreme refinement, responsible for his own persecution!

Which cannot be true, of course, because the Jew, so to speak, is always innocent by nature. “Why did God persecute the innocent?” demands the psychoanalyst Rudolph Lowenstein.

Stephane Zagdanski (On Anti-Semitism), 1995), does not hesitate to write:

It is even precisely because they are the cause of none of the things of which they are accused that the Jews have been detested for so long and in so many places”.

We see that Solzhenitsyn was therefore right when he became indignant over the refusal of the great majority of Jews to shoulder their share of the responsibility for the Communist experiment. In this difficult exercise, one cannot help but notice the past mastery of every sort of intellectual contortion, each more astonishing than the last. After all, the Barnum, Bailey and Ringling Brothers travelling circuses and side shows will always be there to dazzle the hopelessly stupid goy hayseeds …

 

 

Anti-Semitism: An Illness

These personages confirm that anti-Semitism is an illness, at least in the mind of the Jews. In his monumental History of Anti-Semitism, the very serious Léon Poliakov exposes the pathological nature of German anti-Semitism after the defeat of 1918. For him, the explanation is rather simple: the Germans were seized by a rather common illness — the persecution syndrome — which may lead people who are afflicted with it to the most total insanity:

The day after the October Revolution”, he writes, “the remarks of a certain leaders of German destinies came close to delirium”, because “an uncertain number of Bolsheviks were of Jewish origins. … The frenzied tendency accentuated itself because it became obvious that Germany had lost the war”.

Understanding The Jews Part 3 066

[Image] Léon Poliakov’s book, History of Anti-Semitism.

For Daniel Goldhagen, the Germans were deeply infected:

The corpus of German anti-Semitic literature of the 19th and 20th centuries with its savage and hallucinatory texts on the nature of the Jews, on their virtually limitless power, their near-total responsibility for almost all the ills afflicting the world, is at this point so far removed from reality that the reader is obliged to conclude that it is quite simply the product of a group of pen pushers in an insane asylum … the beliefs contain elements proper to hallucinations.

In her study On Anti-Semitism (1951), the famous Hannah Arendt writes:

Anti-Semitism, as an ideology, remained, with rare exceptions, the prerogative of eccentrics in general and a few lunatics in particular”.

For her, anti-Semitism is an “insult to good sense”, a phobia of “illuminated people”. The famous Protocols of the Elders of Zion are the best illustration. The document is dismissed as a great forgery, a “grotesque” fantasy, an “incredible fairy tale”.

Norman Cohn confirms this: anti-Semitism was “reanimated and modernised in the 19th and 20th centuries by a handful of eccentric and reactionary Christians”, driven mad by a frenzied text: the famous Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion. The book is a collection of “ludicrous ideas”, of “ridiculous fantasies”. And Cohn adds:

There is a subterranean world in which pathological fantasies disguised as ideas are used by swindlers and half-illiterate fanatics to excite the ignorant superstitious masses”.

In The Fault of the Jews (2002), Guy Konopnicki writes:

One can never simply make the transition from a denunciation of capitalism to a denunciation of occult financial powers fomenting a world conspiracy. The people who trot out this obsession never express a single idea, apart from the most vulgar kind of anti-Semitism. It may be that this error is committed without their knowledge, but that is one of the properties of delirium”.

In 1974, in the last part of his History of the Jewish People, the rabbi Josy Eisenberg wrote (presumably without smiling):

We do not intend here to explain the roots of anti-Semitism. For clinicians, the individual or collective impulses which underlie anti-Semitism are only explained by recourse to psychoanalysis, a recourse which exceeds the limits of this book and our means of investigation”.

In March 2004, Jeff Jacoby, editorialist at the Boston Globe, dedicated a file to the resurgence of the “cancer of anti-Semitism in Europe”. Listen to what Abraham Foxman, the president of the ADL, said about Mel Gibson, director of The Passion of Christ, under the influence of alcohol, before excusing himself before the Jewish community under the effect of we know not what kind of pressure:

That he should seek treatment for his alcoholism is a good thing”, Foxman declared clearly, but “anti-Semitism is a disease of the non-Jewish brain, not of the Jewish brain. We are only the victims”.

 

 

The Madness of Men

Manes Sperber analyses the matter as follows:

The hatred of Jews”, he writes, “appeared to me at a very young age as an aggressive persecution delirium … like a frenzied fear of others … in his monomaniacal hostility [the anti-Semite] persuades himself that he enjoys an insurmountable superiority over those whom he hates, whom he must despise, as well as fear, because they are of a diabolical wickedness.

And Manes Sperber adds in passing:

While this hatred sometimes constitutes for us the worst of dangers, it is nevertheless your illness. It is the evil with which you are afflicted. Without doubt it has caused us indescribable sufferings, but we will continue to overcome it no matter what form it takes.

For Rudolph Loewenstein (Psychoanalysis of Anti-Semitism) the “frenzied beliefs relating to the Jews” have no basis in fact. One must therefore do everything possible to avoid a repetition of “frenzied crises of anti-Semitism”.

The thing is understood: anti-Semites are insane. Stalin, the tyrant, the executioner, the nationalist, proves quite useful in crystallizing the horrors of the Soviet regime. Stalin becomes the ideal “scapegoat” who can be accused of all evil. Elie Wiesel writes thus in his Memoirs (1994):

Stalin is insane, his hatred renders him insane”.

On the broadcast Everyone is Talking About It (6 May 2006), Elie Wiesel said, with regards to the Iranian President Ahmadinejad:

The religious head of Iran is insane, I mean pathologically sick: he is insane with hatred”. To which he added, logically: “His bomb does not threaten Israel, but the entire world”.

You’ve got it right: all those who oppose the plans of the Jews are “insane”.

 

 

Accusatory Projection

The mechanism of “projection” is quite common among Jewish intellectuals. Vassili Grossman (Life and Destiny, 1960) explains:

Anti-Semitism is the mirror of the defects of a man taken individually, of civil societies, of governmental systems. Tell me what you accuse the Jews of, and I will tell you what you are guilty of yourself”.

Raphael Drai, in Jewish Identity, Human Identity, 1995, thinks the same way:

The anti-Semite attributes to Jews precisely those intentions which are truest of themselves… The psychopathological dimension of such a construction is quite remarkable … the Jews depicted in the imagination are only projections … the ‘Judaised’ image is proper to the delirium of anti-Semitism”.

Manes Sperber explains that the anti-Semite hates,

— “in the Other” —

precisely those same defects from which he would most like to rid himself. He excuses them and conceals them more easily by imagining them grotesquely magnified in those whom he hates”.

 

Understanding The Jews Part 3 048

[Image] Anti-Semitism by Alexis Rosenbaum

In Anti-Semitism, published in 2006, Jewish “philosopher” Alexis Rosenbaum wonders:

Is anti-Semitism the expression of a neurosis?”, before explaining:

The mechanism of projection is regularly accompanied by an accusatory inversion. In fact, the Jews are blamed for precisely the same crimes which others would like to commit, too, or are preparing to commit, against the Jews themselves. … From the psycho-analytic point of view, this state of fact is symptomatic of the process of inversion between the victim and the torturer (or ‘projective inversion’). Thus, one persecutes the Jews because he imagines or convinces himself at once that he is exculpating himself and inculpating the target of his hatred.

Anti-Semitism”, he writes, once again, “is characterised … by a strong tendency to wild fantasy … [anti-Semites] construct theories of a measureless exaggeration … which are often very ingenious, but are in no way disturbed by the fact that none of the great accusations directed at the Jews has ever been supported by any evidence. Whether he is obsessed with the Semites or the Zionists, it is almost impossible to reason with him.

In 1959, Primo Levi, with regards to Hitlerian anti-Semitism, wrote:

It was no doubt a matter of a personal obsession, the roots of which remain unknown, even if he talked a lot about it. They said he was afraid he had Jewish blood in his veins since one of his grandmothers got pregnant while working in a house belonging to Jews; he felt this fear all his life; obsessed by purity, he feared he was not pure himself. Other explanations have been offered by psychoanalysts, explanations which explained everything, correctly: they said, they have said, that Hitler was paranoid and perverse, that he projected upon the Jews the characteristics of which he wished to rid himself.

Daniel Goldhagen writes as follows:

Anti-Semitism tells us nothing about the Jews, but a lot about anti-Semites and the culture which nourishes them”.

The “hallucinated accusations” of the anti-Semites are therefore just a mirror of anti-Semitism.

The Jewish intellectual, as we see, projects upon anti-Semites everything he feels guilty for, including his tendency towards “accusatory inversion”. Once we have understood this principle, it suffices simply to switch the terms “Jews” and “anti-Semites” to understand the roots of the problem. To gain a proper understanding of Jewish intellectuals, they must be read with a mirror.

We understand better now why the Nazis, on certain occasions, were permitted to burn the books of all the Jewish intellectuals, each more perfidious and perverted than the last. In the film Raiders of the Lost Arc (USA, 1980), we see a scene of this kind. One must however bear in mind at this point that Orthodox Jews have always burned the books of their adversaries within their own community. Thus the books of Maimonides were burnt by the rabbis in the Middle Ages, just as the books of the Hassidic Jews were burnt in the 18th century. On 20 May 2008, in Israel, New Testaments were burnt by Jewish students of Yehuda.

 

Understanding The Jews Part 3 044

[Image] Stéphane Zagdanski is a French novelist, essayist, and video maker born April 28, 1963 in Paris, France.

Here again is a beautiful example of accusatory inversion, from the pen of Stephane Zagdanski (2006). Listen to this:

Anti-Semitic logic is characterised by paranoid inversion”, writes Zagdanski. “… The privileged function of anti-Semitism is paranoid inversion, and the privileged language of inversion is calumny. Which explains why each anti-Semitic idea is the methodical contrary of the truth. … Each of the statements made by anti-Semitism”, he continues, “is a great neurosis. It would be a good idea to go see a psychoanalyst. … Anti-Semitism gets lost in obsessive calculations for the purpose of learning nothing about its own delirium”.

One need only switch the terms “Jew” and “anti-Semite” to understand that Zagadansky is sick himself.
 

 

Hatred of Humanity

It is, allegedly, quite simply impossible for individuals to derive rational nourishment from hostility towards Jews, and solely against the Jews, simply because there are no rational grounds for such hostility. Since they need to justify themselves, Jewish intellectuals always try to create confusion by representing Jews as the victims of intolerance, like Protestants, lepers, witches, foreigners and people who are “different”.

Since the Jews are just like everybody else, hatred of the Jews can only, therefore, be the symptom of a hatred of all of humanity! Here, Jewish intellectuals project onto a universal plane that which is, in reality, of concern solely to themselves. In For Those I Loved, the famous Martin Gray writes:

Here, at Treblinka, it was not just the Jews they killed, it was not just a particular race they were exterminating: the torturers wished to destroy Man”.

It is this way, and there is nothing anyone can do about it”, writes Elie Wiesel in his Memoirs: “The enemy of the Jews is the enemy of humanity. And vice versa. In killing Jews, the killer kills more than just Jews. He begins with the Jews: but he inevitably attacks other ethnic groups, religions and social groups. … By killing Jews, the killers were attempting to murder all of humanity”.

The analysis of Clara Goldschmidt, wife of the writer André Malraux, is very much in agreement:

Persecution”, she writes, “is less difficult to bear when one knows that it is totally unjustified and that, therefore, the enemy is transforming himself into the enemy of humanity”.

 Understanding The Jews Part 3 043

[Image] Jacques Attali’s book The Jews, the World and Money [aka, The Economic History of the Jewish People].

Jacques Attali also recalled the well-known rules of Judaism (The Jews, the World and Money, 2002, [aka Les Juifs, le monde et l’argent : histoire économique du peuple juif]),

To impose a very strict morality upon oneself, tolerating neither arrogance nor immorality, to create neither jealousy nor pretext for persecution”.

It was just about time for somebody to say that, in fact.

Paris, April 2012

______________________________

Source: http://www.jrbooksonline.com/cwporter/ryssen1.htm

 

_______________________________

 

 

Footnotes:

[1] Books by Hervé Ryssen. http://herveryssen.over-blog.com/

 

Hervé Ryssen interview 1037

 

[2] Herve Ryssen’s latest book is Les Milliards d’Israël, Escrocs juifs et financiers internationaux [The Billions of Israel, Jews and international financial Crooks]

 

Hervé Ryssen interview 1040

 

Les Milliards d’Israël. Escrocs juifs et financiers internationaux

Notre nouveau livre intitulé Les Milliards d’Israël, Escrocs juifs et financiers internationaux (336 pages) sera disponible en librairie le 17 septembre 2014. Le livre pourra être acheté en prévente au mois d’août ou début septembre afin de payer l’imprimeur. Nous vous tiendrons au courant d’ici peu sur la démarche à suivre.

Pour les flics de la pensée et autres censeurs, sachez que le fichier est entre de bonnes mains, et que même s’il devait m’arriver un malheur, le livre serait publié de toute manière. Juifs, si vous avez peur des livres, c’est que vous avez sans doute des choses à vous reprocher !

A très bientôt, chers lecteurs, pour plus d’informations.

Hervé RYSSEN

PS : Je me demande si je ne vais pas dédier ce livre à Claire Lafoix, la présidente de la 17e chambre correctionnelle de Nanterre, qui m’a condamné le 9 avril 2014 à un mois de prison FERME, pour le simple port d’une bombe lacrymogène.

Il est vrai qu’elle entre en compétition avec les guignols de la 17e chambre correctionnelle de Paris, qui eux, m’ont condamné à deux mois de prison FERME pour une simple blague sur les moeurs de Bertrand Delanoë.

Auront-ils le courage de mettre un écrivain en prison ?

Sont-ils assez crétins pour aller jusque là ?

L’avenir nous le dira !

——————-

 

 

From Google Translate:

Our new book, The Billions of Israel, Jews and international financial Crooks (336 pages) will be available in bookstores on September 17 2014. The book can be ordered in advance in the month of August or early September via the printer. We will keep you posted shortly on how to proceed.

For the cops and other critics, know that the file is in good hands, and that even if a disaster should happen to me, the book would be published anyway. Jews, if you are afraid of books it is because you probably have something to hide!

See you soon, dear readers, for more information.

Hervé RYSSEN

PS: I wonder if I’m not going to dedicate the book to Claire Lafoix, the 17th president of the criminal court of Nanterre, who sentenced me April 9, 2014 to one month FARM prison for simply wearing a tear bombs.

True, it competes with the horns of the 17th Criminal Chamber of Paris, who themselves have sentenced me to two months in prison for simple FARM joke about the morals of Bertrand Delanoë.

Will they have the courage to put a writer in prison?

Are they fools enough to go that far?

The future will tell!

 

—————————————————————-

Click to go to:   Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 1

Click to go to:  Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 2

Click to go to:   Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 3

Click to go to:   Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 4

Click to go to:   Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 5

Click to go to:   Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 6 (last)

 

 

PDF of this post. Click to view or download (1.8 MB). With images>> Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 3 – Ver 2

 

 

Version History

Version 3: Jan 19, 2015 – Expanded Table of Contents
Version 2: Added more images – Oct 28, 2014
Version 1: Published Oct 28, 2014

Read Full Post »

Understanding the Jews,

 

Understanding Anti-Semitism

 

by Hervé Ryssen

Part 2

Paris, April 2012

 [Translated from French by Carlos Whitlock Porter]

 

 

Understanding The Jews 025

Table of Contents

 

Preliminary Remarks…………………………………………………….. 4

 

I. The Jewish Identity……………………………………………………. 5

Perfectly Well Integrated” 

Assimilation or Dissimulation?

Jewish Solidarity

A Community Closed upon Itself

The Jewish Mission

Human Rights

The Jews and “Humanity

Esperanto

 

II. Cosmopolitan Propaganda……………………………………….. 13

The Advocacy of Race-Mixing and the “Open Society” 

Making Whites Feel Guilty

Destroy the Local Elites

Anti-Christianity

The Blacks Are Going to Save Humanity

The Races Do Not Exist

Your Lying Eyes

 

III. The New World Order…………………………………………….. 24

High Finance in the Service of Democracy

War Against Islam

Wars of Liberation

 

IV. Historical Traumas…………………………………………………. 31

The Trauma of the “Shoa

The Whole World is Guilty

The Spirit of Vengeance

Communism under Lenin

Communism under Stalin

May 1968

 

V. Anti-Semitism…………………………………………………………. 43

An “Inexplicable Phenomenon

The Scapegoat Theory

Denying the Evidence

The Inversion of Reality

The Good Deeds of the Jews

The Jealousy of the Anti-Semites

Always Innocent

Anti-Semitism: An Illness

The Madness of Men

Accusatory Projection

Hatred of Humanity

 

VI. The Mafia……………………………………………………………… 55

The Great Swindles

International Pimping

The Organ Traffic

 

VII. The Destruction of the Traditional Family……………….. 66

The Defense of Homosexuality

Cross-Dressers and Transsexuals

Feminism

The Destruction of All Patriarchy

 

VIII. The Psychopathology of “Anti-Semitism”………………. 72

Rapists and Psychos

Sexual Crimes Against Children

 

IX. At Last: Psychoanalysis Explained…………………………… 75

The Myth of the Oedipus Complex

 

X. The Hysterical Sect…………………………………………………. 81

Need for Love

Jewish Art

The Jewish Prison

The Symptoms of Insanity

The Suicidal Jew

 

 

 

 

Preliminary Remarks

 

The following text is a summary of six books [1] written by Hervé Ryssen [2], published between 2005 and 2010, constituting the most important study on the Jewish mind ever published. All the quotations that you are about to read are precisely referenced in at least one of these books.

The present booklet consists for the most part of quotations from famous authors, with particular emphasis on well-known films. The number of references is nevertheless sufficient to enable the reader to observe the extraordinary homogeneity of Jewish cosmopolitan thought, over the centuries and across all borders.

 

 

III

The New World Order

 

 

World Democracy”, “World Citizenship” and “World Government” are common expressions in cosmopolitan discourse. The expression “New World Order” was utilised for the first time by the American President George Bush in 1990, after the fall of the Soviet Union. The French President Nicolas Sarkozy used it in his speech before the General Assembly of the United Nations on 25 September 2007:

In the name of France, I call upon all States to unite to found the new world order of the 21st century, on this powerful idea that the common goods of humanity must be placed under the responsibility of all of humanity”.

Understanding The Jews 160

[Image] Nicolas Sarkozy

This is what permits us to conclude that the French President, Nicolas Sarkozy, is surely a hidden Jew, a “crypto-Jew”. His maternal origins are revealed by this one messianic statement, behind the facade of his Catholicism. George Bush was simply a “synthetic” Jew, who applied the program of his most influential advisors to the letter.

In 1945, the famous scientist, Albert Einstein, was one of the first major personalities in the modern world explicitly to demand the founding of a world government. This is perhaps one of the reasons why he is the object of such adulation, since his scientific aura has long since been seriously tarnished (cf. Les Esperances Planetaires, by myself, 2005).

Understanding The Jews 161

[Image] Albert Einstein

In his Dictionary of the 21st Century, Jacques Attali is very explicit. According to him, the New World Order must be capable of exercising an “implacable domination” if necessary.

An international peace organization”, he says, “will begin to be envisaged together with the initial discussions aimed at establishing a world government”. Globalization will finally come to term: “After the creation of European continental institutions, the urgent need for this type of world government will perhaps appear”.

This type of declaration does not prevent Jewish intellectuals, as a whole, from sobbing and screaming vociferously the moment anyone even mentions the famous Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion — a “forgery”, according to them, but one which magnificently describes the contemporary world.

Understanding The Jews 162

[Image] Jacques Attali and Emmanuel Levinas

This idea is confirmed by the philosopher Emmanuel Levinas (Difficult Freedom, 1963),

The very idea of a fraternal humanity, all united in the same destiny, is a Mosaic revelation”.

Jewish intellectuals always insist on the notion that fulfilment of their philosophy of world unification is “inevitable”, as if the program had been appeared in a book of prophecies — except that we don’t know which one; Karl Marx Lenin, Trotsky, and the Bolshevik revolutionaries in 1917 all said the same things!

 

 

 

High Finance in the Service of Democracy

Jewish financiers are the kings of Wall Street. Their undisputed financial supremacy is illustrated, for example, by an article in the 9 February 2006 edition of the newspaper Le Point, entitled “Steven Cohen, the Boss of Wall Street”. Steven Cohen, one reads, is the “star of the Stock Market”. He cultivates an aura of mystery and secrecy: The real “Boss of Wall Street” doesn’t even live in Manhattan, but rather, as a recluse in his house in Greenwich (Connecticut), surrounded by a wall four meters high. Steven Cohen, 49 years old, almost never appears in public…

Understanding The Jews 164

[Image] Steven Cohen

In 2005, he pocketed 500 million dollars! His secret: he knows everything before anybody else. His eyes riveted on his computer screens, he analyzes thousands of bits of data, throwing tantrums when the analysts of Wall Street don’t give him the most accurate information. Investors who entrust their money to him (4 billion dollars) pay dearly to do so: Cohen takes 3% of all capital in management fees (as against 1.44% on average charged by other funds), plus 3.5% of the profits (compared to 19.2% on average charged by other funds). Cohen “believes in total capitalism”: “You eat what you kill”, he tells his traders, who are rewarded according to performance.

Understanding The Jews 165

[Image] George Soros

The famous George Soros, a Jewish speculator of Hungarian origin, was also a star of Wall Street. He is one of the richest men in the world, and the symbol of international speculation. His personal fortune is estimated at 70 billion dollars. In 1992 he rose to the pinnacle of his glory by successfully pulling off one of the greatest financial coups of the century. In a few days, sensing the weakness of the British pound, he mobilised some ten billion dollars against the pound sterling. The Bank of England vacillated before his speculative assaults, and was finally compelled to devaluate and withdraw the pound from the European monetary system.

Soros became “The Man who Broke the Bank of England”, pocketing more than a billion dollars in a week.

Understanding The Jews 166

[Image] The Soros Foundation logo

George Soros is also a “philanthropist”. The Soros Foundationfor an open society” teaches “tolerance” and the “democratic values” of an “open society”. The billionaire finances cultural and scientific projects, and subsidises “the independent and democratic press”. In his last book, published in 2006 (The Great World Disorder), the speculator unveils a few bits of information on his role in the various recent “democratic” revolutions: the “Pink Revolution” in Georgia, in 2003; the “Orange Revolution”, in the Ukraine, in 2004; as well as in the bombardments of little nationalist Serbia.

In 1999, the person responsible for the mass bombing of Serbia was none other than Madeleine K.Albright”, who had been propelled into the State Department by Bill Clinton. “Albright” was in fact the family name of a husband whom she divorced, while the “K” referred to Korbel, a Jewish family from Czechoslovakia. At the Ministry of Defense, there was William Cohen, while a certain Samuel Berger occupied the strategic position of Head of National Security, etc.

Understanding The Jews 167

[Image] Madeleine K.Albright

Soros also took a position in favour of a military intervention against the Taliban in Afghanistan in 2001, for professing an “obscurantist” religion: “I supported the invasion of Afghanistan, Bin Laden’s country of residence and the location of the Al-Qaeda training camps”.

Soros, who is — naturally — very much concerned about “European” interests, is naturally the apostle of mass immigration and the entry of Turkey into the European Union:

With an aging population, immigration is an economic necessity”, he writes. “As the prototype of open world societies, Europe must welcome immigration and the adhesion of new members”.

It should furthermore be noted at this point that in 2010, the President of the IMF was a Zionist named Dominique Strauss-Kahn; and that the President of the World Bank is one of his fellow Jews, Robert Zoellick. The Federal Reserve Board, which contributed largely to the “sub-prime” crisis through its lax monetary policies, thus triggering a financial crash, was directed by the Jew Alan Greenspan until 2006, before being relieved by another Jew, Ben Bernanke.

Understanding The Jews 173

[Image] Dominique Strauss-Kahn (left), Robert Zoellick, Alan Greenspan and Ben Bernanke.

Here is the consortium of the eight private banks which own the Fed, the central bank of the United States. Rotschild, Lazard Brothers, Israel Moses Seaf, Kuhn, Loeb & Co., Warburg, Lehman Brothers, Goldman Sachs, Rockefeller. As for the Rockefellers, who pretend to be descended from Puritan Protestants, they are simply what is known as “synthetic Jews”.

In 2007, a study published by Vanity Fair, a large American magazine, shows that of the one hundred richest people in the country, more than half were Jews. Since they are very well organized and stick together, and since they own all the communications media, their influence over each and every government — one after the other — is incomparably greater than anyone else’s. There are poor Jews, of course, but it remains true nonetheless that Jews are greatly over-represented among the Earth’s billionaires.

An article in the 26 February 2008 issue of the Jerusalem Post informs us that the Jews are “the wealthiest religious group in the USA”, with 46% of them earning six-figure annual incomes, while only 18% of all other Americans earned that much. None of these considerations has ever deterred Jewish intellectuals from regularly complaining of “the odious prejudices of an earlier time”.

 

 

 

War Against Islam

The Western news media regularly accuse Christians for the role they may have played in triggering the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. But the Christians are only “scapegoats” here, since the people most highly responsible were obviously the Zionists, who are so influential in all American governments and in the media.

Understanding The Jews 174

[Image] Elie Wiesel

Ardent war-mongers like Elie Wiesel never hesitate to drape themselves in the great ideals of “peace and love” so as better to advocate war against Iraq in 1991: “It is not simply a question of helping Kuwait”, he said at the time, “it is a question of protecting the entire Arab world”. All Westerners were therefore to mobilize themselves against the:

Butcher of Baghdad”. “Against war, it is imperative to make war. Against the destructive force which it employs against humanity, it is necessary to oppose an even greater force so that humanity may live. It is a question of the security of the entire civilized world, of its right to peace, and not just the future of Israel… Thirst for vengeance? No: thirst for justice. And peace.

The Jewish lobby has been extremely powerful in all American governments for many decades. Many Jews — most of them former Left-wingers, having recently converted to “Neo-Conservativism” — were very powerful in the government of George W. Bush: Paul Wolfowitz was Secretary of State for Defense, after which he was appointed to the position of head of the World Bank. Richard Perle headed the management office of the Pentagon; Douglas Feith was the Vice-Secretary of Defense; Michael Rubin was in charge of Iran-Iraq, etc.

Understanding The Jews 179

[Image] Paul Wolfowitz (left), Richard Perle, Douglas Feith and Michael Rubin.

The Jerusalem Post of 25 April 2006 gloated:

After appointing Joshua Bolten secretary general of the White House, President George Bush has chosen another Jew, Joel Kaplan, as Bolten’s adjutant”.

Understanding The Jews 187

[Image] Joshua Bolten (left), Joel Kaplan and Michael Chertoff.

He also appointed other Jews as collaborators, such as the Secretary of State for the Interior, Michael Chertoff, the Adjutant Security Advisor Elliott Abrams and the pillar of the White House, Jay Lefkowitz, etc.

Understanding The Jews 188

[Image] Elliott Abrams (left), Jay Lefkowitz, Robert Kagan and William Kristol.

In issue number 1 of The Weekly Standard of 1 October 2001, Zionists Robert Kagan and William Kristol demanded action aimed at “regime change” in Iraq as soon as the Taliban in Afghanistan were defeated. The manipulation of information led the public to believe that Saddam Hussein, the “new Hitler”, constituted a terrible threat.

As soon as the problem of Iraq was settled and Iranian President Ahmadinejad came to be known as the spokesman for world resistance to the globalist empire, the war-mongering of numerous Jewish intellectuals was once again obvious. In France, Bernard-Henri Levy and his fellow Jews denounced the “Islamo-fascists of Teheran”.

Understanding The Jews 191

[Image] Bernard-Henri Levy (left), and Bernard Kouchner.

Minister Bernard Kouchner, apostle of the “right of intervention”, the dream of sending French soldiers to fight once again to defend Israeli interests. “Bringing democracy”, they call it — just another example of Westerners going to war against the “enemies of civilization” and “humanity”.

Israel, in fact, almost never fights its war except with other people’s blood.

Policy objectives are constantly inverted by obvious media propaganda. The famous American writer Norman Mailer, for example, assured us, in his book Why We Are at War (2003), that the only persons responsible for American imperialism were the Neo-con Christians.

Upon the fall of the Soviet Union, the chauvinist conservatives saw their chance to rule the world …

A perfect example of Freudian projection and a complete inversion of the truth.

Understanding The Jews 195

[Image] Norman Mailer (1923 – 2007).

Hollywood is naturally responsible for planetary propaganda. In the 1980s and 90s alone, we counted at least thirty films showing Arabs attempting to reduce the “free” world to servitude.

In Rules of Engagement by Willian Friedkin (USA, 2000), the American ambassador to Yemen is threatened by a crowd manipulated by Moslems. The latter are so contemptible that the audience applauds when American marines begin to massacre them.

Holy Union by Alexandre Arcady (1989) is pure caricature. The wicked Moslems who threaten democracy are depicted as ferocious animals. All French girls are depicted as seem destined to mate with Jews and Arabs.

Understanding The Jews 199

[Image] Movies: Rules of Engagement, Holy Union [aka, L’Union Sacree] and Curfew [aka, The Siege]

Again, in the same genre, we have: Curfew by Edward Zwick (USA, 1998), Delta Force, by Menahem Golan, (USA, 1986), Return to the Future, by Robert Zemeckis (USA, 1985), Black Sunday, by John Frankenheimer (USA, 1977), etc.

In Network (USA, 1976), we understand that the Arabs and their petro-dollars are purchasing America wholesale. An announcer calls upon TV viewers to revolt. This film, by Sydney Lumet, is an accusatory projection.

Understanding The Jews 205

[Image] Movies: Delta Force, Back to the Future, Black Sunday and Network

Since the second Intifada, in September 2000, and the incidents exploding in the French “suburbs” (immigrant slums), the Jews realized that the danger, for them, was no longer a question of “Extreme Right wingers”, but, rather, from Islam and young Afro-Maghrebin immigrants. This is what made many Jewish intellectuals rally to the “hard”, “liberal”, “pro-American” right: Andre Glucksmann, Alexandre Adler, Marc Weitzmann, Pascal Bruckner, Romain Goupil, Alain Finkielkraut, and the “Peruvian” novelist Mario Vargas Llosa, pursuing their objectives in a slightly different way: the problem now of “consolidating our multicultural society” which the Jews have worked so hard to create, but which now threatens to come apart at the seams.

 

 

 

Wars of Liberation

When the USSR entered the war against Nazi Germany in June 1941, all Jews, all over the world, were hysterical for joy. This is what Elie Wiesel had to say, through the persona of his protagonist, in his Testament of a Murdered Jewish Poet:

I welcome the opening of hostilities with open relief. I was not the only one. Listening to Molotov’s speech, I felt a powerful, immoderate, desire to shout for joy: Hurray! We were finally going to do battle against Hitler and the Hitlerites! Hurray! We are going to be able to give free reign to our anger… I would like to with my own people, in the midst of my own people, to congratulate them, to kiss them, to cry for joy like them, to cry for pride, to laugh with them, to sing like them, while emptying a few glasses…

And Wiesel continues:

No war in history had been welcomed with so much passion and fervour. Ready to offer ourselves, to do anything to vanquish the worst enemies of our people and of humanity”.

Understanding The Jews 208

[Image] Eli Wiesel’s novel, Testament of a Murdered Jewish Poet

At this point, we are reminded of a Roman Polanksi film called The Pianist (2001), in which a Polish Jewish family from Warsaw are reunited around an underground radio set, exploding with joy at the announcement of the French and British entry into the war: “Wonderful!

In the film by Ariel Zeitoun, Navel of the World (1993), we once again see Tunisian Jews delirious with joy at the announcement of the French declaration of war against Germany.

Understanding The Jews 211

[Image] Movies: The Pianist and Navel of the World [aka, Le Nombril du monde]

The “pacifist” Albert Einstein was transmogrified into a furious war-monger in 1933, following the accession of Hitler to power. The English, French and Americans were supposed to go off and fight to save “Democracy”. The Jews, as we see, are always working to establish “Permanent World Peace.

Everything here is a question of vocabulary. Everybody is for “peace”. After crushing their enemies, everybody is for “peace.

 

 

 

 

IV

 

Historical Traumas

 

 

The Trauma of the “Shoa

After the destruction of the Temple of Jerusalem by the Romans, the massacres and forced conversions of the First Crusade, their expulsion from Spain (and every other country in Europe), the pogroms of the Cossacks, etc, the misfortunes of the Second World War enabled the Jews to suffer a new “trauma”, universally conveyed, naturally, by means of their control of the media, a “trauma” which they generously offer to share with us for the benefit of all of humanity.

Understanding The Jews 212

[Image] Destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem by Francesco Hayez depicts the destruction of the Second Temple by Roman soldiers. Oil on canvas, 1867.

Relayed by TV and film, the continuing crisis of suffering and deafening lamentations has finally brought humanity on its knees, bewildered by so much hysteria.

Nevertheless, faced with certain extraordinary testimonies, a logical person can sometimes feel he has the right to ask whether these are not just Hollywood scenarios.

Understanding The Jews 215

[Image] Polish jew Simon Wiesenthal became Europe’s foremost Nazi-hunter (Photo: Luigi Caputo)

We find for example, a few terrifying anecdotes from the work of the famous Nazi hunter, Simon Wiesenthal. First, there is,

Tom Mix”, “whose favourite pastime was to ride through the camp on horseback and shoot and random at the prisoners”.

And here we have the SS killing baby Jews by,

throwing them against a wall”.

Understanding The Jews 216

[Image] Josef Mengele, second from left, relaxes with Auschwitz administrators in 1944.

And how about this:

Babies were thrown in the air like packages”. “I personally”, writes Wiesenthal, “took the testimony of a man who had seen Mengele throw a living baby into the flames. Another witness said that one day, Mengele killed a 14-year old girl by stabbing her with a bayonet”.

The following is an example of the horrors of which Dr. Mengele was capable:

Mengele sacrificed thousands of twins taken all over Europe, giving them painful injections to try to change the colour of their eyes” (“The Murderers Among Us”, 1967).

Understanding The Jews 219

[Image] Martin Gray’s book For Those I Loved [aka, Au nom de tous les miens]

Martin Gray, in For Those I Loved, says that, he removed the bodies from the gas chamber at Auschwitz immediately after the gassings, without even a gas mask, while the highly toxic hydrocyanic acid still impregnated the clothing and bodies of the victims:

Among the warm bodies, we found still-living infants. Just children, huddled against the bodies of their mothers. And we strangled them with our bare hands, before throwing them into the pit: and we risked our lives doing that, since we were wasting time … The butchers wanted everything to happen quickly.

One of his comrades had seen:

the Germans set fire to what had been a hospital in the ghetto, he saw them fracture the skulls of new-born babies against the walls, slit open the bellies of pregnant women, throw the sick into the flames. He saw it”.

Understanding The Jews 222

[Image] Wladyslaw Szpilman and his book, The Pianist.

Wladyslaw Szpilman also left a poignant testimony. His book, entitled The Pianist, published in 1946, tells the extraordinary story of a Jewish musician in the Warsaw ghetto. With his own eyes, he described how he saw the bodies of young girls:

They had been murdered according a method which was dear to the hearts of the Nazi occupants: held by the legs and thrown head first against the bricks”.

Elie Wiesel, in Night (1958), tells of his sojourn at Auschwitz between April 1944 and January 1945. In the original first edition, he never mentioned any “gas chambers”, which only appeared in the German version, Die Nacht zu Begraben, Elischa [aka, The Night Buried, Elisha]. Every time the word “crematorium” appeared in the original, the translator, Meyer-Clason, translated it as “gas chamber”.

Understanding The Jews 227

[Image] Left: Original Night cover, and the German version Die Nacht zu Begraben, Elischa

In the absence of any “gas chambers”, Wiesel saw what nobody else ever saw:

Not far from us, flames, huge flames, were rising from a ditch Something was being burned there. A truck drew close and unloaded its hold. Small children. Babies! Yes, I did see this, with my own eyes… children in the flames.

Understanding The Jews 232

[Image] Elie Wiesel’s three volume Against Silence

What Elie Wiesel saw is simply unheard-of. But what he heard is perhaps more so. In Against Silence (1985), he describes the massacres at Babi-Yar, in the Ukraine, where the Germans executed Soviet citizens, including numerous Jews:

Later, I heard from a witness that, during months and months, the ground never stopped trembling; and that, from time to time, geysers of blood had squirted forth”.

You gotta believe it!

In the April 2003 issue of Israel magazine, Fredric Sroussi wrote in all seriousness:

The Latvian Waffen SS officer Herberts Curkurs made a ‘hobby’ of throwing babies into the air and shooting them in the head, like a ball-trap.

Later on, we will see the reason for this obsession with babies and young children.

Understanding The Jews 235

[Image] Edmond Fleg’s book Why I Am a Jew

Edmond Fleg (Flegenheimer), in his book Why I Am a Jew also spoke of these atrocities:

These eviscerated women, old men buried alive, children thrown naked into the flames. I wanted to rise up and cry with all my heart, cry the martyrdom to the whole universe”.

This quotation may be found on page 45 of his book… which was published in 1928… that is, eleven years before the beginning of a Second World War!

Simon Wiesenthal also claims that the Germans transformed the Jews into bars of soap:

The crates bore the initials RIF — Rein jüdisches Fett … It was in the General Government and the factory was in Galicia, at Belzec. Nine hundred thousand Jews were utilised as the raw material in this factory, from April 1942 until May 1943.

 

Understanding The Jews 236

[Image] Lurid illustration and text on how to make soap out of a ? jewess.

Text reads: RENDING METHODS FOR HUMAN FATS  On the orders of the SS Command, experiments will be carried out to extract human fats for the industrial use of the Reich. The suggested methods are diverse. One possible manner of operation will be to create an assembly line of brass boxes, each large enough to contain a human being. These boxes will be cannalured [?] along the bottom with a catch basin in the rear. After placing a human in each box, it will be swung into an open flame. As fat blisters are formed on the skin, a guard will puncture them, allowing the fats to drain, to aid collection.

 

But, curiously, no historian has dared mentioned the “Jewish human soap” on TV and other “lampshades of human skin” since the end of the 1980s.

Understanding The Jews 261

[Image] Charles Kraft’s artistic response to jewish claims of jews being used for making soap.

The Treblinka survivor Yankiel Wiernik proposes other surprising details:

They soaked the bodies with gasoline. This cost considerable sums of money, and the result was not satisfactory: the male bodies simply did not burn… When they incinerate the bodies of pregnant women, their bellies exploded and one could see the embryos catch fire in the bellies of their mothers… The gangsters kept close to the ashes and were shaken by spasms of laughter. Their faces radiated a truly diabolical joy”.

Understanding The Jews 320

[Image] Ya’akov Wiernik testifies at the Jerusalem trial of Adolf Eichmann in 1961, the backdrop consisting of photographs of the model of Treblinka that he himself built in 1959. Wiernik testifies that he was at Treblinka from 23 Aug 1942 to 02 Aug 1943.

Happily, “survivors” coming back alive from the “death camps” are innumerable. Let us listen once again to Simon Wiesenthal, who wrote, after the liberation of the camps:

The survivors spread over through Europe in an immense measureless tide. People hitch-hiked, stopped jeeps for the short journeys or clung to carriages on the demolished railways, without windows or doors. Some took a seat in the overflowing hay carts, other started off on foot.

Nahum Goldmann, as President of the World Jewish Congress, conducted negotiations with Germany to estimate the amount of reparations to be paid to the Jews.

In 1945”, he writes, “there were almost six hundred thousand Jews, survivors of the German concentration camps, whom no country wanted to accept.

We are therefore fully entitled to ask whether these “extermination camps” were really “extermination camps” at all.
 

The Whole World is Guilty

Whenever one speaks of the Jews, it’s about their sufferings that one thinks of first of all. The Jews themselves, in fact, present their history as an “uninterrupted vale of tears”, without ever explaining the reasons for anti-Semitism. In The Difficult Good Fortune of Being a Jew (1978), Andre Neher recalls the phrase used by the philosopher Jankelevitsch:

Auschwitz is the failure of the thousand-year old adventure of human thought”.

Understanding The Jews 242

[image] Andre Neher and his book, The Exile of the World

In reality, Auschwitz was, above all else, a hard blow for Jewish thought.

The whole world, in any case, is guilty, and must expiate its crimes for what happened during the Second World War. All of humanity is guilty. It is a recurrent theme. It is what Elie Wiesel is so eager to tell us:

The world knew, and kept silent… Moscow and Washington were informed of what the killers were doing in the death camps. Why was nothing done at least to slow down their ‘production’? That no military airplane attempted to destroy the railways around Auschwitz remains for me a scandalous enigma. At the time, Birkenau ‘processed’ ten thousand Jews per day [at least! –Editor’s note]… But whether or not the Jews lived or died, whether they disappeared today or tomorrow, the free world were indifferent”.

The Allies were therefore “complicit”.

Martin Gray, in For Those I Loved, also reveals this same tendency to cast guilt on others:

The whole world allowed us to die… The whole world allowed us to be murdered”.

Note that the near totality of anti-Nazi films on the concentration camps during the Second World War were produced by Jewish film-makers: Sarah’s Key (2010), was directed by Gilles Pacquet-Brenner. In the film Amen, (France, 2002), the actor Matthieu-Kassovitz plays the role of a young Jesuit who, during the Second World War, attempts to awaken the Vatican from its torpor and incite Pope Pius XII publicly to denounce Nazi barbarism. The director, Constantin Costa-Gavras, interpreted the story in his usual style. In the same genre, Costa-Gavras also directed Music Box (USA, 1989).

Understanding The Jews 247

[Image] Constantin Costa-Gavras and his films Music Box and Amen

 

Understanding The Jews 254

[Image] A young Roman Polanski and his film Le Pianiste

The Pianist (2001) was directed by Roman Polanski; the film is full of summary executions and atrocities. Lucie Aubrac by Claude “Berri” (1997), is a film about the glory of the Jewish resistance member Lucie “Aubrac”. The Germans are as cruel as usual. Life is Beautiful (1997) was directed by Roberto Benigni. Schindler’s List (USA, 1994) tells the story of a German industrialist who saves deported Jews by employing them in his factory. Here again, the savagery of the Germans is in contrast to the weakness and innocence of the Jews. It is a Stephen Spielberg film.

Understanding The Jews 257

[Image] Stephen Spielberg and his film Schindler’s List

In Au Revoir, Les Enfants (France, 1987), the story takes place in 1944 in a religious boarding school in the Parisian suburbs. A kitchen boy reports to the police concerning Jewish boys hidden in the school. The bourgeois French are depicted here as hypocritical, bigoted villains. The director, Louis Malle, was nevertheless also a son of the grande bourgeoisie; but a Jew. Louis Malle’s father was the director of a red beet sugar factory owned by his wife’s family; the Beghin family. His film won a Golden Lion award at the Festival of Venice in 1987.

Understanding The Jews 258

[Image] Movie: Au Revoir, Les Enfants

The Boys from Brazil (USA, 1978), tells the story of a Nazi hunter in the 1970s who discovers a plot in Uruguay. The horrible Dr. Mengele, former torture-doctor at Auschwitz, is at the head of this diabolical conspiracy. He lives in a luxurious villa which is sufficiently well isolated to permit him to continue his perverse activities on genetics, and to reign over a troop of abject servants reduced to the status of slaves; this is the symbol of the White Man in all his arrogance. The film is by Franklin Schaffner.

Understanding The Jews 263

[Image] Franklin Schaffner and his film Boys from Brazil.

Let us mention Marathon Man (USA, 1976): a Nazi criminal takes refuge in Uruguay and later travels to New York to negotiate a diamond deal (the diamond industry is typically “Nazi”, as everyone knows). We recall a scene in which the Nazi tortures a Jew on a dentist’s chair (there are a lot of Nazi dentists, you know). The film is by John Schlesinger. One might also mention The Old Gun, aka Vengeance One by One by Roberto Enrico (France, 1975), in which German soldiers are unspeakably cruel.

Understanding The Jews 266

[Image] Marathon Man and his film Le Vieux Fusil (aka, Vengeance One by One).

In this third millennium, “Shoah education” becomes the new religion, and humanity is invited to genuflect before the People-Priest.

We also know that in Jewish eschatology, the day of the Redemption and the arrival of the Messiah must be preceded by great wars and catastrophes, which will be accompanied by great sufferings for the Jewish “people”. The Jews always use the same expression here: “the child-birthing pains of the Messiah”, they say. The Shoah, according to them, is therefore sent to confirm their “election”.

 

 

The Spirit of Vengeance

These indescribable sufferings do not therefore invalidate the mission of the Jews on earth. Quite the contrary. They confirm the unique destiny of the Jewish people and their universal vocation. Nahum Goldmann writes:

The Jewish people have always believed in its superiority (expressed in the classical phrase ‘The Chosen People”).

The famous Austrian Jewish writer Joseph Roth has expressed this absolute faith in the destiny of Israel (The Wandering Jews, 1927).

The pride of a man who knows that one day he will win … The contempt that the Eastern Jew feels for the unbeliever is a thousand times greater than any that is directed at him”, (p. 30).

Understanding The Jews 268

[Image] Joseph Roth’s book, The Wandering Jews

The Jews are little inclined to forgiveness and always intend to revenge themselves in one way or another. This, again, is a recurrent theme of Jewish literature, as the Palestinians have occasion to experience every day. The famous Shylock, in the Shakespeare play, incarnates these sanguinary instincts perfectly.

Understanding The Jews 273

[Image] Quentin Tarantino’s Inglorious Basterds

In the American and Soviet POW camps, after the war, German prisoners had ample occasion to experience the same thing as well. In 2009, the American director Quentin Tarantino left us a testimony in Inglorious Basterds: during the war, in Germany, a commando of Jews mercilessly liquidates Germans by stabbing them or beating them to death with baseball bats. Note that in one scene, at the end of the film, the beautiful blonde starlet falls into the arms of the projectionist, a Negro: this is a veritable obsession among the Jews. Tarantino’s film gives us a merely the slightest glimpse of what may well have occurred in the POW camps at the end of the war. Let us not forget that hundreds of thousands of German prisoners never returned from Allied prisoner of war camps — something the media never mention. In Hebrew, this is summarised in the formula Laassoth nekama bagoim: “Revenge yourselves upon the Gentiles”. The humiliation of the enemy then precedes the final victory.

 

 

Communism under Lenin

Many Jews played a considerable role in the Bolshevik revolution of October 1917. The aim of the revolution was not just the abolition of private property and the creation of a collective system, but rather, to “liberate” all of humanity — erasing tradition, religion, nationalities and all tradition, destroying all differences between men, so as to enable a perfect world to arise and flourish. It was necessary to “erase the past”, so that a “new man” might appear. In reality, the egalitarian fanaticism of Communism led immediately to a series of massacres. In total, over thirty million Russians and Ukrainians were liquidated by the criminal folly of their new masters in only thirty years. After the Maoist experiment in China, the Russian Revolution was, therefore, the second greatest tragedy in human history.

But where it is permitted, in the democratic countries, to denounce the horrors of Communism at the beginning of the 21st century, insisting upon the identity of its principal instigators is quite a different matter. Nevertheless, we know that Communism was a Jewish creation: Karl Marx was the grandson of rabbis; Lenin also had Jewish origins on his mother’s side; Trotsky, the head of the Red Army, was really named Bronstein; Kamenev, President of the Soviet of Moscow, was really named Rosenfeld; Zinoviev, the master of Leningrad, was named Apfelbaum; the first president of the Soviet Union was a Jew named Sverdlov; Karl Radek, the spokesman for Moscow in foreign countries, was named Sobelsohn, etc.

Understanding The Jews 281

[Image] (left to right, top to bottom) Karl Marx, Lenin, Trotsky, Kamenev, Zinoviev and Karl Radek.

On 27 July 1918, just after the execution of the Imperial family, a special law on anti-Semitism was promulgated, the conclusion of which was written by Lenin personally:

The Sovnarkom enjoins all its Soviet deputations to eradicate anti-Semitism. The authors of pogroms, those who propagate them, are declared outside the law”.

And at this time, placing anti-Semites “outside the law” meant shooting them purely and simply.

The Cheka, or Extraordinary Commission, instituted the Red Terror as soon as it was created, in September 1917, and pursued it until well after the Civil War. Starting in January 1918, “the death penalty, on the spot, without judgment and or instruction” was the rule. Then came the thousands of police raids in which thousands of perfectly innocent people were abducted and shot during the night or drowned in the rivers by the barge load. The Cheka became the principal nerve centre of the direction of the State.

Understanding The Jews 288

[Image] (left to right, top to bottom) Karl Liebknecht, Rosa Luxembourg, Bela Kun, Kurt Eisner, Ernst Toller and Eugen Levine.

The lists of prominent Jewish dignitaries under the Bolshevik regime is endless. The revolution that broke out in Berlin in 1918 was led by other Jews: Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxembourg. In Hungary, at the same time, Bela Kun took over as head of a revolutionary government which was composed almost exclusively of Jews. The triumph of Bela Kun encouraged the leftists of Bavaria. At Munich, the revolution had as its spiritual head a Jew named Kurt Eisner, who was himself replaced by an anarchist Jew named Ernst Toller. Then, the Red intellectuals took power, with Eugen Levine at their head, son of a Jewish merchant and a native of St. Petersburg.

Jewish historians always forget to mention the role of their fellow Jews in the atrocities which took place in Russia between 1917 and 1947. The truth nevertheless compels us to point out that the Jewish doctrinaires, Jewish functionaries and Jewish torturers bear a very great responsibility for the destruction of the churches, the pitiless repression against the population and the innumerable massacres which were committed at that time by the forces of the Soviet political police.

 

 

Communism under Stalin

The famous author Alexander Solzhenitsyn, after many others, has shown the implication of this community in his book entitled Two Centuries Together (2002).

Understanding The Jews 321

[Image] Alexander Solzhenitsyn

Stephane Courtois, the author of the famous Black Book of Communism, writes in the preface to the book by Arkady Vaksberg (Stalin and the Jews, 2003):

Great numbers of Jews gravitated into the spheres of power, to the point that in 1936, nearly 40% of the high cadres of the political police were Jews. And two of the men closest to Stalin, ‘the little father of the peoples’, Kaganovich and Mekhlis, were Jews”.

Understanding The Jews 293

[Image] Stephane Courtois, author of Black Book of Communism

The higher one ascended in the hierarchy, the greater the proportion of Jews one found.

At the beginning of the 1930s, the Soviet Union was directed by a triumvirate consisting of Stalin, Molotov and Kaganovich. Molotov, the number two minister in the regime after Stalin, married a Jewess named Polina Karpovskaya, who was a director with full responsibilities and a true Bolshevik.

Understanding The Jews 297

[Image] (left to right) Stalin, Molotov and Kaganovich

At this time, the regime planned a famine to liquidate the Ukrainian peasants. The number of deaths resulting from the famine of 1932 amounted to between four and five million, but “could be on the order of ten million”, writes the Jewish historian Simon Sebag Montefiore (“Stalin, the Court of the Red Tsar”, 2003). Fifteen million people were deported, and large numbers of them died during the collectivization. Cases of cannibalism were reported in the Ukraine and the Urals.

Lazar Kaganovich was the youngest of five brothers, three of whom were important Bolsheviks. It was he who put together the mechanisms of what became known as “Stalinism”. Lazar, the “Man of Iron”, was in charge of the administration of Central Asia before becoming the “Scourge of the Ukraine”, which he directed in the 1920s, before returning to Moscow in 1928 and becoming a member of the Politburo in 1930. He crushed peasant revolts from the north of the Caucasus to Western Siberia. He succeeded Molotov as First Secretary of Moscow and undertook to create a Bolshevik metropolis by dynamiting historical buildings and churches with the enthusiasm of a born vandal. After Stalin’s death, Lazar Kaganovich was never prosecuted for his participation in the extermination of the peasants, and died peacefully in his comfortable apartment in Moscow in 1991, at the age of 88.

Understanding The Jews 303

[Image] Genrikh Yagoda

Genrikh (Enoch) Yagoda, the head of the secret police, was another symbolic personage of the Stalinist regime. Half-bald, of short stature, but driven by pitiless ambition, Yagoda, a specialist in the art of poisoning people, was the son of a Jewish jeweller from Nizhny Novgorod. He frequented the house of Gorki, the President of the Writers’ Union. His great achievement, with Stalin’s support, was the creation of the vast economic empire of the gulags, with the use of slave labour. In the years 1931-32, the famous gulag of the “White Sea-Baltic Canal” project engulfed hundreds of thousands of Russian and Ukrainian peasants.

Understanding The Jews 298

[Image] Construction site of the Baltic-White Sea Canal (once called the Stalin Canal).

The great writer Alexander Solzhenitsyn relates that a newspaper edition dated August 1933 and dedicated to the completion of the canal, published a list of the award-winning recipients: modest medals for cement workers and carpenters; supreme medals — The Order of Lenin! — for six persons whose large-scale portrait individual photographs were published in large format. At the head of the collective, there stood Genrikh Yagoda, commissar of the NKVD; Matvei Berman, head of the gulag; Semyon Firin, head of the Belbaltlag camp; Lazar Kogan, head of construction; Yakov Rappoport, second head of construction; Naftaly Frenkel, head of the White Sea work site (and the evil genius of entire archipelago). And here, forty years later, Solzhenitsyn reproduced the portraits of these “Six Rascals” in his book The Gulag Archipelago:

They criticized me for having reproduced the portraits of the heads of the worksite of the famous White Sea-Baltic canal, and they accused me of selecting Jews. But I didn’t select anyone: I reproduced the photos of all the camp directors appearing in compilation published in 1936. Whose fault is it if they were all Jews? I took them as they were, without selecting anything, but the whole world was indignant. Anti-Semitism! And where were they when these same portraits were published in 1933 for the first time? Why didn’t they express their indignation then?

Understanding The Jews 310

[Image] (left to right, top to bottom) Genrikh Yagoda, Matvei Berman, Semyon Firin, Lazar Kogan, Yakov Rappoport and Naftaly Frenkel.

In 1934, the GPU metamorphosed into the NKVD (People’s Commissariat of Interior Affairs) with Yagoda at the head. Slutsky was at the head of the foreign department of the NKVD; he directed the espionage services. His adjutants were Boris Berman and Sergey Mikhailovich Shpigelglas. Once again, Yagoda supervised the first of the great Moscow show trials in the summer of 1936. Eleven of the sixteen defendants were Jews, but that only reflected their major presence among the old generation of Bolsheviks, whom Stalin had undertaken to liquidate. Genrikh Yagoda is, any case, the biggest criminal of the 20th century, since he was responsible for at least 10 million deaths.

Understanding The Jews 311

[Image] Lev Mekhlis

Lev Mekhlis was one of Stalin’s most loyal lieutenants. “Even Stalin called him a fanatic”, writes Simon Sebag Montefiore. With his halo of black hair and his pointed, bird-like face, Mekhlis, in his way, played as important a role as Molotov or Beria. Born at Odessa of Jewish parents in 1889, he left school at fourteen, and only joined the Bolsheviks in 1918. Appointed by the sole commissar in the Crimea, he distinguished himself for his cruelty during the civil war by executing thousands of adversaries. He became one of Stalin’s assistants and the confidante of all his secrets, working with a sick frenzy. In 1930, Stalin appointed him editor in chief of Pravda. Mekhlis was then promoted adjutant commissar for Defense and Head of the political administration of the Red Army.

In the years 1920 and 1930, many Russian members of the Central Committee and even of the Politburo had Jewish wives: Molotov (Polina Karpovskaya), Voroshilov (Gold Grobman), Bukharin (Esther Gourvitsch, then Anna Lourie). Stalin’s faithful cabinet director, Alexander Poskrebyshev, married a certain Bronislava Weintraub, a Lithuanian Jewess from an industrialist family who made a fortune in the sugar trade.

Understanding The Jews 312

[Image] Nikolai Yezhov

In September 1936, Nikolai Yezhov replaced Yagoda as the head of the secret police services and quickly became the most powerful man in the USSR after Stalin. He was one of Kaganovich’s protégés. Nikolai Yezhov was one of the greatest monsters in history. He it was, in fact, who, between 1936 and 1938, became the principal organizer of the Great Terror directed against party members and the “People of the Past”: aristocrats, priests, bourgeois, peasants, who had until then escaped the class terror. In fourteen months, more than seven hundred thousand persons were shot and millions of others were deported. Son of a forestry guard and a servant — this Russian — was a small, highly nervous man, thin and scrawny, measuring one meter fifty-one. Friend of the Jewish poet Mandelstam, he married a Jewess named Eugenia Feigenberg as his second wife. His wife’s best friend was “Bronka”, the wife of Poskrebyshev, Stalin’s cabinet director. The balance sheet of the Cheka’s victims amounts, pre-war, to at least twenty million deaths.

After his appointment to the post of People’s Commissar for the Interior, Nikolai Yezhov chose Matvei Berman as first adjutant. The latter kept his post at the head of the gulag at the same time. Another Jew, Mikhail Litvinov became the service head of the cadres of the NKVD. Isaac Shapiro, another loyal collaborator, was placed at the head of the secretariat of the NKVD. In December 1936, we find seven Jews among the ten departments of the glorious service of the GUGB of the NKVD (Secret Political Department).

Jewish artists were then praised to the skies by the regime. They regrouped around the writer Mikhoels. Isaac Babel rapidly became one of the most popular authors, with Boris Pasternak, Osip Mandelstam, Ilya Ehrenburg and Vassili Grossman. The hard core of Soviet cinema also consisted of Jews: Eisenstein, Dziga Vertov (Kaufman), Grigori Kozintsev, Leonid Trauberg, Grigori Roshal, etc.

We know that, after 1945, Jews were placed at the head of governments in Hungary, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Rumania. Matthieu Rakosi, who directed Hungary until 1953, was really named Matthieu Roth. He was the son of a Jewish grocer, and was “one of the most pitiless despots of the 20th century”, writes David Irving.

The four men who held real power in popular Hungary were all Jews. Besides Rakosi, the Jewish quartet consisted of Ernest Gero, who directed the economy of the country. Born Ernest Singer, it was he who charged Ramon Mercader with the assassination of Leon Trotsky in 1940. Michel Farkas was responsible for the army and defense. Born Wolf, he was an NKVD officer at Moscow and a former member of the International Brigades in Spain, like Gero. Joseph Reval, in turn, was appointed to run the nation’s culture. He was also the regime’s minister of propaganda.

The situation was equivalent in Rumania, where Ana Pauker established a fierce dictatorship. It was she who oversaw the first political trials from 1947 to 1949. During the period from 1950-52, she supported Stalin’s project for the “canal of death”: thousands of prisoners were compelled to work under inhuman conditions to construct a canal linking the Danube to the Black Sea.

Understanding The Jews 168

[Image] Ana Pauker on the cover of Time magazine, Sep. 20, 1948.

This was a veritable gulag in which 120,000 people died in two years. The historian Stephane Courteois mentions the case of Col. Nicolski, famous for his cruelty:

His real name was Grunberg. He was a KGB agent in Rumania. In 1948 he became the adjutant director of the sinister Securitate — the political police — personally responsible for thousands of murders, inventor of the terrifying “reeducation” experiment at the prison at Pitesti, Nicolski died peacefully, in his superb villa at Bucharest, on 16 April 1992.

Stalin’s “anti-Zionist” swing took place in 1948, after the creation of the State of Israel, supported principally by the United States. The Jews were then gradually evicted from the higher spheres of Soviet power. The process accelerated in 1952, with the “Doctors” trial, the dictator’s (enigmatic) death in 1953. Khrushchev had Beria executed, and the regime maintained its “anti-Zionist” line until the end.

it was inevitable that the USSR and the Communist states of Central Europe would be denounced by the Jews of the West. In The Confession (France, 1970), for example, Constantin Costa-Gavras shows the endless interrogations to which an “innocent” Zionist was subjected, at Prague, in 1951. The Jews, as we all know, are never guilty of anything; rather, they are always innocent.

 

 

May 1968

In 1968, we find the same individuals, animated by the same messianic faith. Of the four principal leaders of the events of May 1968, Daniel Cohn-Bendit, Alain Krivine, Alain Greismar and Jacques Suveageot, the first three were Jews.

Understanding The Jews 319

[Image] (left to right) Daniel Cohn-Bendit, Alain Krivine, Alain Greismar and Jacques Suveageot

At the Revolutionary Communist League, in the 1970s, the situation was summed up in a joke:

Why don’t they speak Yiddish at the political bureau of the Communist League? Because Ben-said is a Sephardic Jew.

In fact, Daniel Ben-said, a native of North Africa (and a Sephardic Jew), did not understand the Yiddish spoken by the other Trotskyite leaders, who were Ashkenazi Jews, natives of Eastern Europe.

An Israeli historian, Yair Auron, who published a book on this subject entitled Extreme-Leftist Jews in May 1968, confirmed this remark:

Of the twelve members of the political bureau of the League and its beginnings, ten others were Jews from Eastern Europe; there was one single non-Jew, and then there was Ben-said”.

Some people talked of a “shabbos goy”, that is, a goy employed to do minor jobs on the Sabbath, responsible for opening the doors and pushing the light switches on the Sabbath.

After the collapse of Communism, in 1991, Jewish intellectuals, all of them, and all over the world, worked tirelessly to set up “democratic” regimes — again, all over the world — and the constitution of a world government. It is quite obviously always the same plan: building the “Empire of Peace” (shalom), a “world without borders”, where men would be “free and equal”, and in which all identities will have disappeared forever — except for theirs.

In sum, Communism made its appearance a little too early, and perhaps a bit too brutally. It is to come about as merely the natural consequence of liberal globalism, of the planetary uniformity engendered by materialist society.

Paris, April 2012

______________________________

Source: http://www.jrbooksonline.com/cwporter/ryssen1.htm

 

_______________________________

 

 

Footnotes:

[1] Books by Hervé Ryssen. http://herveryssen.over-blog.com/

 

Hervé Ryssen interview 1037

 

[2] Herve Ryssen’s latest book is Les Milliards d’Israël, Escrocs juifs et financiers internationaux [The Billions of Israel, Jews and international financial Crooks]

 

Hervé Ryssen interview 1040

 

Les Milliards d’Israël. Escrocs juifs et financiers internationaux

Notre nouveau livre intitulé Les Milliards d’Israël, Escrocs juifs et financiers internationaux (336 pages) sera disponible en librairie le 17 septembre 2014. Le livre pourra être acheté en prévente au mois d’août ou début septembre afin de payer l’imprimeur. Nous vous tiendrons au courant d’ici peu sur la démarche à suivre.

Pour les flics de la pensée et autres censeurs, sachez que le fichier est entre de bonnes mains, et que même s’il devait m’arriver un malheur, le livre serait publié de toute manière. Juifs, si vous avez peur des livres, c’est que vous avez sans doute des choses à vous reprocher !

A très bientôt, chers lecteurs, pour plus d’informations.

Hervé RYSSEN

PS : Je me demande si je ne vais pas dédier ce livre à Claire Lafoix, la présidente de la 17e chambre correctionnelle de Nanterre, qui m’a condamné le 9 avril 2014 à un mois de prison FERME, pour le simple port d’une bombe lacrymogène.

Il est vrai qu’elle entre en compétition avec les guignols de la 17e chambre correctionnelle de Paris, qui eux, m’ont condamné à deux mois de prison FERME pour une simple blague sur les moeurs de Bertrand Delanoë.

Auront-ils le courage de mettre un écrivain en prison ?

Sont-ils assez crétins pour aller jusque là ?

L’avenir nous le dira !

——————-

 

 

From Google Translate:

Our new book, The Billions of Israel, Jews and international financial Crooks (336 pages) will be available in bookstores on September 17 2014. The book can be ordered in advance in the month of August or early September via the printer. We will keep you posted shortly on how to proceed.

For the cops and other critics, know that the file is in good hands, and that even if a disaster should happen to me, the book would be published anyway. Jews, if you are afraid of books it is because you probably have something to hide!

See you soon, dear readers, for more information.

Hervé RYSSEN

PS: I wonder if I’m not going to dedicate the book to Claire Lafoix, the 17th president of the criminal court of Nanterre, who sentenced me April 9, 2014 to one month FARM prison for simply wearing a tear bombs.

True, it competes with the horns of the 17th Criminal Chamber of Paris, who themselves have sentenced me to two months in prison for simple FARM joke about the morals of Bertrand Delanoë.

Will they have the courage to put a writer in prison?

Are they fools enough to go that far?

The future will tell!

 

—————————————————————-

Click to go to:   Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 1

Click to go to:  Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 2

Click to go to:   Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 3

Click to go to:   Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 4

Click to go to:   Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 5

Click to go to:   Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 6 (last)

 

 

PDF of this post. Click to view or download (8.5 MB). With images>> Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 2 Ver 2

 

PDF of this post. Click to view or download (0.5 MB). TEXT ONLY>> Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 2

 

 

Version History

Version 3: Jan 19, 2015 – Expanded Table of Contents
Version 2:  Oct 26, 2014 – Added images
Version 1: Published Oct 24, 2014

Read Full Post »

 Understanding the Jews,

 

Understanding Anti-Semitism

 

by Hervé Ryssen

Part 1

Paris, April 2012

 [Translated from French by Carlos Whitlock Porter]

 

 

Understanding The Jews 025

Table of Contents

 

Preliminary Remarks…………………………………………………….. 4

I. The Jewish Identity……………………………………………………. 5

Perfectly Well Integrated” 

Assimilation or Dissimulation?

Jewish Solidarity

A Community Closed upon Itself

The Jewish Mission

Human Rights

The Jews and “Humanity

Esperanto

 

II. Cosmopolitan Propaganda……………………………………….. 13

The Advocacy of Race-Mixing and the “Open Society” 

Making Whites Feel Guilty

Destroy the Local Elites

Anti-Christianity

The Blacks Are Going to Save Humanity

The Races Do Not Exist

Your Lying Eyes

 

III. The New World Order…………………………………………….. 24

High Finance in the Service of Democracy

War Against Islam

Wars of Liberation

 

IV. Historical Traumas…………………………………………………. 31

The Trauma of the “Shoa

The Whole World is Guilty

The Spirit of Vengeance

Communism under Lenin

Communism under Stalin

May 1968

 

V. Anti-Semitism…………………………………………………………. 43

An “Inexplicable Phenomenon

The Scapegoat Theory

Denying the Evidence

The Inversion of Reality

The Good Deeds of the Jews

The Jealousy of the Anti-Semites

Always Innocent

Anti-Semitism: An Illness

The Madness of Men

Accusatory Projection

Hatred of Humanity

 

VI. The Mafia……………………………………………………………… 55

The Great Swindles

International Pimping

The Organ Traffic

 

VII. The Destruction of the Traditional Family……………….. 66

The Defense of Homosexuality

Cross-Dressers and Transsexuals

Feminism

The Destruction of All Patriarchy

 

VIII. The Psychopathology of “Anti-Semitism”………………. 72

Rapists and Psychos

Sexual Crimes Against Children

 

IX. At Last: Psychoanalysis Explained…………………………… 75

The Myth of the Oedipus Complex

 

X. The Hysterical Sect…………………………………………………. 81

Need for Love

Jewish Art

The Jewish Prison

The Symptoms of Insanity

The Suicidal Jew

 

 

 

 

Preliminary Remarks

 

The following text is a summary of six books [1] written by Hervé Ryssen [2], published between 2005 and 2010, constituting the most important study on the Jewish mind ever published. All the quotations that you are about to read are precisely referenced in at least one of these books.

The present booklet consists for the most part of quotations from famous authors, with particular emphasis on well-known films. The number of references is nevertheless sufficient to enable the reader to observe the extraordinary homogeneity of Jewish cosmopolitan thought, over the centuries and across all borders.

 

I

The Jewish Identity

 

The Jews are scattered over all the countries of the world, on all five continents, but they reside principally in ethnically European countries. Most of them are of “Ashkenazi” origin, that is, from Central and Eastern Europe, which they left in successive waves starting at the end of the 19th century. A minority, also scattered over the entire surface of the globe, come from the Mediterranean basin: these are the so-called “Sephardic” Jews. But there are also a few black Jews in Ethiopia, called “Fallashas”, as well as Jews in India and China, for example, who claim to be “perfectly well integrated”. The Jews are not, therefore, a race.

Judaism is not only not a religion — or not only — since many Jews declare themselves atheists; and are nonetheless no less “Jewish” for it. Marxist Jews in particular, who form the ruling elite in Western countries, are fanatical militants for atheism, according to the doctrines invented by one of their own: Karl Marx.

What, then, is Judaism? Let us ask Nahum Goldman, founder of the World Jewish Congress. From 1956 to 1968, Nahum Goldman was both President of the World Jewish Congress and President of the World Zionist Organisation. In 1976, he published a book entitled The Jewish Paradox. When someone asked him for his definition of Judaism, Nahum Goldman replied:

There is no entirely satisfactory definition… I remember having spoken at a conference when I was a student, during which I proposed more than twenty definitions: Judaism is a religion, a people, a nation, a cultural community, etc. No one definition is absolutely correct.

All the Jewish intellectuals who have approached the problem respond in the same way: Judaism, they invariably say, is an “enigma”, a “mystery”. These terms reappear regularly in nearly all Jewish writings. “The Jewish people do not know what they are”, wrote the philosopher Alain Finkelkraut (The Imaginary Jew). They are “an enigma to the contemporary mind” (Bernard-Henry Levy); they are a “mystery”, a “deeply distressing phenomenon” (Jean Daniel);

The Jews have been a living question mark to their surroundings for two thousand years” (André Glucksmann).

And all this — they think — despite the fact that they are supposed to be “God’s Chosen People”. While this doesn’t mean a lot to a goy, it is of utmost importance to a Jew.

 

 

Perfectly Well Integrated

Jews almost always claim to be “perfectly well integrated” into the countries in which they live, and they usually declare themselves to be “patriots”. Their own statements nevertheless indicate that, behind a facade of national identity, they continue to feel very Jewish, profoundly concerned with the interests of the Jewish community and the State of Israel.

In 1968, Bernard-Henry Levy, a well-known “French” philosopher who is very fond of media hype, declared, with regards to his book entitled The French Ideology — which was intended to make the French feel guilty — that:

I am a ‘Frenchman and, as a Frenchman, like no other French philosopher, I took the risk of conducting this inquiry into black France.’”

Twenty years later, in another book entitled “Recidivists”, published in 2004, he wrote that he felt;

“an extreme attachment to Israel… I am a Jew, of course, through my link to Israel. I am a Jew when, like all the world’s Jews, my heart beats in unison with those of the threatened Israelis”.

And he continues:

“I am a Jew, I am a Jew through every fibre of my being. I am a Jew through my slips of the tongue. I am a Jew for the alimentary rules which I have imposed upon myself … I am a Jew through my writing style … I am a Jew through this invisible pact which links me to the Jews of the whole world … I am a Jew through my Messianic patience.”

Examples of this kind are not hard to find, since nearly all Jewish intellectuals have expressed this same paradox in the same terms. The word “paradox” reappears regularly in the writings of all Jewish intellectuals, all over the world, throughout all history: this is not an accident.

 

 

Assimilation or Dissimulation?

The Jews have long been accustomed to adopt the dress of the people amongst whom they live. They speak the language of the country without foreign accent; they appear to adopt the local mores and customs. But they live in a world of their own, cut off from the world of goyim — “cattle”, “non-Jews”. They conceal themselves beneath borrowed identities for centuries, wearing the identity of their host peoples by day and becoming Jews again at night.

Many Jews change their names or transform their original family names, mimicking the local language. Thus, “Minkowski” becomes “Minc”; “Shapiro” becomes “Chapiraud” or “Chapier”. The make-up job may be exaggerated to a greater or lesser degree: “Aaron” becomes “Nora”, “Nussenbaum” becomes “Rochebrune”.

The actor Kirk Douglas (“Demsky”) preferred a Scottish name. The head of the French diplomatic service under President Sarkozy, Jean-David Levitt, is obviously a “Levi”.

 

 

Jewish Solidarity

The Jews exhibit an instinctive solidarity with their own people. This inclination is easily verified in the praises heaped by journalists upon Jewish artists and writers, whom they never hesitate to describe as “a genius”, their work as “sublime”, “incomparable”, etc. We are all, in fact, well aware of the tendency of Jewish intellectuals to cry “genius!” upon the discovery of almost any work by a fellow Jew.

Thus it is that second-rate writers like Philip Roth, Imre Kertesz, Yasmira Reza or Jonathan Littell are elevated to the rank of “geniuses of humanity”, raking in literary prizes in the process. Kafka, of course, becomes “the greatest writer in German history”, while Vassili Grossman becomes “the Tolstoy of the twentieth century”. Ironically, it is precisely through this very tendency to heap exaggerated praise on each other that we infallibly recognise Jewish journalists behind their pilfered cognomens.

The famous writer Elie Wiesel heartily confirms the notion that the Jews are a nation apart, and that it is correct to consider them “strangers” living amongst “other peoples”. In his book, Testament of a Murdered Jewish Poet (1980), he writes explicitly:

Between a Moroccan businessman and a chemist from Chicago, a rag dealer from Lodz, and an industrialist from Lyon, a kabbalist from Safed and an intellectual from Minsk, there is a deeper, more substantial blood relationship than between two citizens of the same country, the same city and the same profession. A Jew is never alone”.

 

 

A Community Closed upon Itself

The Jews have always avoided mixing with the goyim. This is how they have always managed to survive over the centuries and persist where other civilizations have disappeared forever. The struggle against mixed marriages, in particular, is a constant priority. The Prime Minister of Israel, Golda Meir, declared:

The greatest danger threatening Jewish life comes not from anti-Semitism or persecution, but from assimilation and mixed marriages”.

Jewish intellectuals often repeat this slogan: the number of mixed marriages each year amounts to “several trainloads departing for Auschwitz”. Rabbis never tire of warning young Jews against this plague, while attempting to obtain from them the solemn promise to marry only another Jew.

On the other hand, it is very difficult for a goy to convert to Judaism. When a non-Jew wants to convert, it is the custom to discourage him, snub him, make him feel unwelcome. It is always simpler for a goyische woman to marry a Jew.

Jews live in the constant shadow of their own ghetto, associating with fellow Jews almost exclusively.

The ghetto is historically a Jewish invention”, writes Nahum Goldman. “It is incorrect to say that the goyim forced the Jews to separate themselves from their societies. By the time the Christians even noticed the existence of the ghettoes, the Jews were already living there.” This same truth has been expressed by many other Jews as well (see our History of Anti-Semitism, 2010).

In a book published in 1982 and prefaced by the Grand Rabbi of France, Ernest Gugenheim expresses this feeling of belonging: “Israel forms a united body into which its members are firmly welded”. Nahum Goldman cites the famous verse from the Talmud: “One single Jew is like all of Judaism”. This is why Jewish intellectuals often write “the Jew” to speak of the Jews.

Endogamous marriage is one reason for the amazing similarity in the facial characteristics of Jews all over the world. The very influential Alain Minc, for example, bears a very close resemblance to Paul Wolfowitz, one of the “hawks” in the American government during the Second Iraq War (2003). Elie Wiesel father bore an extraordinary resemblance to that of Bela Kun (Cohen), the leader of the Communist Revolution in Hungary in 1919. This explains the clichés observable in all “anti-Semitic cartoons” — particularly, cartoons published before WWII, when there was no plastic surgery and mixed marriages were less common.

In actual fact, however, the lugubrious warnings against mixed marriages issued by Jewish leaders the world over fail to prevent a significant number of Jews from marrying goyim. Sometimes their children are as Jewish as their parents, at least in spirit; but sometimes their Jewishness is lost, sometimes in the very first generation, if not later — a fact which fills the rabbis with anguish.

 

 

The Jewish Mission

The Jewish people consider themselves the bearers of a project governing humanity as a whole, a grandiose project which they have pursued for centuries, through and despite everything: the instauration on earth of universal and lasting peace. The notion of “peace”, in fact, lies at the very heart of Judaism: it is not by chance that this one word (“shalom”, in Hebrew) appears so frequently in the speech of all Jews, all over the world. It is not just a religious concept — one of a belief in God’s work in a distant future — but of a guiding principle which determines the commitments of Jews on a daily basis. It is in fact the Jews themselves, who, through their work, their actions, their involvement in politics, work each day for the construction of this “peace”.

In the perfect world which they believe they are creating, all conflict will have completely vanished from the face of the earth — particularly, conflict between nations. That is why, wherever they settle, Jews militate ceaselessly and untiringly for the elimination of all borders and the breakdown of all national identity. Nation states are the cause of war and disorder; they must, therefore, be hollowed out from within and without, and — in the long run — eliminated entirely, replaced by World Government, solely capable of bringing about the reign of human felicity and endless prosperity on Earth.

The aim is to unify the world by all means possible, levelling all cultural differences, which are believed to be the source of conflict. Jewish intellectuals, all over the world, work without letup for this ideal. Whether Left or Right, Marxist or liberal, believers or atheists, Zionists or “perfectly integrated”, Jews are the world’s most fervent advocates of this messianic global empire.

Judaism is, therefore, essentially a universalist political project, the objective of which is the unification of the world, as the prelude to global pacification. It is a long, difficult job, they admit, but the Jews are absolutely convinced that they can succeed in achieving this aim, obsessed, as they are, with the “Mission” entrusted to them by God. Or as the prophet Isaiah puts it:

The wolf will live with the lamb, the leopard will lie down with the goat, the calf and the lion and the yearling together; and a little child will lead them…” (Isaiah, XI, 6-9).

Contrary to Christianity or Islam, the Jews do not intend to convert others to Judaism; rather, the intend simply to persuade them to renounce their religion, their race, their identity, their family and all their traditions, in the name of “Humanity”, and “Human Rights”. This Global Empire, in fact, can only be built upon the ruins of great civilizations, using the human detritus produced by so-called “democratic societies” and the capitalist system.

Cosmopolitan” (i.e., Jewish) propaganda always aims at the dissolution of all ancestral values and identities, so as to eliminate the supposed “sources of conflict between men”. The Jews militate continually towards this goal. The Jews are a people of propagandists. It is not an accident that they have been highly successful in all of our contemporary media-obsessed “democratic” societies. When only the remaining Jews on Earth shall have preserved their faith and traditions, only then will they be finally recognised by all as “God’s Chosen People”. Only then will their long-awaited Messiah finally arrive and re-establish “the Kingdom of David”.

This Messianic “Waiting for Godeau” is the driving force of Judaism, since it obliges every Jew to struggle actively to “hasten the coming of the Messiah” (this is a very common expression). It is from this Messianic tension that the Jews derive their strength and energy. It is in fact the Jews themselves who, through heir militancy, their untiring egalitarian propaganda in favour of a “world without borders”, are fated to establish the world of “peace” to hasten the arrival of the Messiah.

 

 

Human Rights

The concept of “Human Rights” is a very effective weapon in advancing the idea of “world unification”. The “father” of the “Universal Declaration of Human Rights”, in 1948, was a certain René Cassin. It was he who was responsible for establishing the Constitution of the French Fifth Republic after the return of Charles de Gaulle in 1958. René Cassin was the President of the European Court of Human Rights, and was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1968. He was also a doctor honoris causa of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and President of the Universal Israelite Alliance from 1943 until his death in 1976. “Human Rights”, he said, are a “laicisation of the principles of Judaism”. This was confirmed by Grand Rabbi Jacob Kaplan:

To find the seminal sources of [the French Revolution of] 1789, one must go back beyond classical antiquity, to the Bible, the Torah and the prophets”. Rene Cassin also envisaged a sort of “Universal Ministry of Education”.

These projects were only concretised after the war, through the creation of UNESCO.

 

 

The Jews and “Humanity

It is interesting to note that Jewish intellectuals — who are always talking about “Humanity” — instinctively confuse themselves — the Jews — with “Humanity”.

Elie Wiesel writes as follows:

To save our people, we must save all of humanity”.

Kafka said:

Whosoever strikes a Jew knocks all of humanity to the ground”.

Nahum Goldman expressed the same idea this way:

It is in the interests of all of humanity that the Jewish people must not disappear”, he said, since the Jews are the bearer of “values which concern all of humanity”.

In his book Five New Lectures on the Talmud (1977) the philosopher Emmanuel Levinas projects Jewish singularity onto a universal level, and speaks of, “the suffering of Israel as universal suffering”.

Jacques Attali says the same thing in The Jews, The World and Money (2002):

A misfortune for the Jewish people is a misfortune for all men”, taking the same logic even further:

The disappearance of the Temple was also a tragedy for all non-Jews, since the Hebrews prayed for them: they know not what they have lost”.

Elie Wiesel was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in late 1986. In his “Oslo Speech”, pronounced on this occasion, he spoke — as was his custom — of “Hope”, of “Humanity” and “Peace” on Earth:

Jewish suffering should be of concern to all of humanity. The day will come when crimes against the Jews will be considered crimes against humanity, and crimes against humanity as crimes against the Jewish people”.

Under these conditions, “anti-Semitism” is not just a “Jewish matter”: it is a matter of concern to “Everyone”.

Understanding the Jews 1 - Elie Weisel 1986 Nobel

[Image] Elie Wiesel gives a speech after the Nobel awarding ceremonies on December 11, 1986.

 

Esperanto

The elimination of borders is an ideal to be attained, but the “open” society will only be viable on the condition of the annihilation of all instincts of race and local characteristics. The “pure races” must be “mixed” to dissolve all feeling of identity, which is considered likely to engender the resurgence of “Nationalism”. Languages themselves must disappear, to the benefit of one single common language.

This was the great ambition of Louis Lazaré Zamenhof. A young man descended from the Jewish aristocracy of Poland, his entire life was dedicated, from a very early age, to the invention of a language which was to be understood by everyone, based on common roots from most of the wide-spread languages.

 

Understanding the Jews 1 - Lazaré Zamenhof Esperanto

[Image] Esperanto: 150th anniversary of its creator Lazarus Zamenhof, December 16, 2009

This dream led to the publication of the founding work of Esperanto, Fundamento de Esperanto in 1887. Zamenhof explained:

If I were not a Jew from the ghetto, the idea of uniting humanity either would never have entered my mind, or would not have obsessed me so obstinately throughout my entire life”.

And he repeated:

My Jewishness was the principal cause for which I dedicated myself to one idea and to an essential dream, from my youngest childhood, the dream of uniting humanity.

 

 

 

 

 

II

Cosmopolitan Propaganda

 

There are different ways to “pacify” men and nations. Carpet bombing, or Soviet totalitarianism, is one way. But “liberal democracy” and the “consumer society” work much better.

 

The Advocacy of Race-Mixing and the “Open Society

Jews have always encouraged immigration into all the countries in which they have ever settled, not just because a multicultural society corresponds to their politico-religious plans, but also because the resulting dissolution of national identity protects them from any “nationalistic” upheavals. All Jewish intellectuals — absolutely without exception — are focused on this question of the “plural” society and are obsessed with ceaseless “anti-racist vigilance”, regardless of any other political differences. Immigration from the Third World is thus presented as “an economic necessity”, an “indispensable contribution”, an “extraordinary enrichment”, etc.

Jewish intellectuals exhibit a certain characteristic inclination towards enormous untruths.

They will tell you, for example, that immigration hasn’t really increased at all; on the contrary, it has never been so low! This inclination to treat the goyim like a load of simple-minded fools is called “chutzpah” (pronounced with a German-style guttural “r”). The demographer Gerard Noiriel, the essayist Guy Sorman, the sociologist Edgar Morin (Nahoum), the philosopher Alain Finkelkraut and diplomat Stephane Hessel, for example, became famous for these little exercises.

To the general public, this unceasing, indefatigable, planetary propaganda is most obvious in film production.

All Jewish film producers have released at least one or more films advocating race-mixing and the “multicultural society”.

Just watch the films by Claude Longmann, known as “Berri” (One Stays, The Other Leaves); Matthieu Kassovitz (Café au lait, White Nightmare);

Claude Lelouch (Itinerary of a Spoilt Child; Smic Smac Smoc);

Francois Luciani (The Man Who Came from Somewhere Else);

Edouard Molinaro (The Hearts of Men);

Gerard Oury — at the end of The Adventures of Rabbi Jacob, the Arab Slimane, naturally, marries Pivert’s daughter;

Robert Guédignan (Where the Heart Is).

Guédignan also produced Marius and Jeanette, in which the main character, Jeanette, lives alone in Marseilles with her two children, fathered by two different men. The older daughter has been duped by a cad who deserted her — a white man (naturally) — while her 12-year old is an African half-caste who “works very well at school”, etc.

Renaud Cohen is a small-time producer, but his film Once We Grow Up (2001) is rather eloquent: the main character, Simon Dadoun, is a thirty-year old Jewish journalist. He breaks up with his girl friend (a goy) and meets a Sephardic Jewess, like himself. The French, by contrast, are depicted as much inclined towards race-mixing: Both of Simon Dadoun’s friends, in fact, are interracially married: one to an Asian, the other to a Senegalese. The same film also defends lesbianism — again — in a highly “multicultural” context.

Or just watch the films by Bernard Stora (Another Life);

Giles Pacquet-Brenner (Gomez and Tavares);

Daniel Vignes (Fatou from Mali);

Dominique Baron (The Tress of Aminata);

Cedric Kahn (Too Much Happiness);

Nicolas Ribowski (Perigord Noir), etc.

In The Enchanted Parentheses (1999), by Michael Spinosa, the French are once again depicted as fated to mate with Blacks and Orientals. The producer also depicts adultery, Marxism, feminism, etc., with great indulgence.

American” Jewish film producers are obsessed with these same things as well. You really must see films like Roland Emmerich’s (The Day After Tomorrow, 2004), or Marc Forster’s (Monster’s Ball).

In Love Field (1993), Jonathan Kaplan tells the story of a beautiful blonde who leaves her idiot of a husband and falls in love with a Black.

In Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner (1967), a young beauty introduces her husband to her parents. Her husband is a Black, likeable, cultured, intelligent. His natural charm and niceness overcome the instinctive and vicious mistrust of her bourgeois white parents. The film, by Stanley Kramer, naturally won ten Oscar nominations.

You can go much further back than that if you wish:

West Side Story, by Robert Wise (1961), is a musical propaganda film in favour of the “multicultural society”.

In 1950, No Way Out told the story of a black intern in a hospital. It was a plea against “racism” by Joseph Mankiewicz.

Today, early in the 21st century, this propaganda is becoming even more extreme. The television series “Life’s So Sweet” shows young white women mating with Blacks, while young white men are depicted as homosexuals.

All the screen plays for the films listed above were written by Olivier Schulzinger; in fact, any time you see a white woman paired off with a Negro on the screen, you can be very sure that you’re watching something produced by the “Chosen Ones”. As we can easily see, the Jews are totally obsessed with race-mixing and ethnic mixing; but one must, of course, bear in mind that this “line of goods” is intended for “export only”.

 

 

Making Whites Feel Guilty

Cosmopolitan” film producers work untiringly to make Europeans feel profoundly guilty for their past, to make them ashamed of what they are. All these incessant “sensitisation” campaigns on topics like “slavery”, “colonialism”, the “looting of the Third World”, “global warming”, “Auschwitz”, etc., have one object — and one object only — and that is to bring about the advent of world government.

In “cosmopolitan” Jewish cinema, psychopaths and villains are invariably depicted as possessing typically Nordic traits, complete with blonde hair and blue eyes. This is not an accident. In The Crimson Rivers (2000), for example, Matthieu Kassovitz shows us dangerous “neo-Nazis” torturing and massacring innocent people.

Six-Pack (1999) is a film by Alain Berberian: a Parisian commissioner of police is anxious to capture a serial killer who has already killed and mutilated five young women. The “bad guys” (the chief of police, the psychopath) are played by Nordics, while the “good guys” (Commissioner Nathan, Inspector Saul), are, once again, are played by very typical Mediterranean-types.

American” film directors are animated by all these same hatreds. In Panic Room (2001), by David Fincher, three criminals break into a house. The gang leader is a white man, a very frightening, unpredictable, highly nervous person, who ends up with a bullet in the head. The second criminal — another white man — seems very calm, but is, in reality, an extremely dangerous psychopath and “mad-dog killer”. The third, a Negro, is intelligent and humane.

None of this is by accident.

See Runaway Jury, by Garry Fleder;

The Green Line, by Frank “Darabont;

Fatal Obsession, by Jonathan Kaplan;

Ragtime, by Milos Forman;

or Barton Fink, by the Cohen Brothers, and you will see that the “bad guys” are systematically depicted as white men, and white men only.

In Cop Land (1995), by the extremely sly James “Mangold (Goldman), the “bad guys” are all white cops, while on the other side of the river, in New York, the “multiracial” police are portrayed with the greatest sympathy.

In the comedy entitled Addams Family Values (1993) the characters whom the audience initially mistakes for the “bad guys” — real villains — are, in fact, very nice (with very black hair), while the “bad guys” are invariably blonde-haired children. The film is by Barry Sonnenfeld.

Mississippi Burning (1988) by Alan Parker, is an attack on the Ku Klux Klan. In a little village in the southern United States, the whites are all bigoted, racially-prejudiced cowards, narrow-minded, evil, and downright contemptible. The women are depicted as intimidated, bullied into submission, dreaming only of escape.

In Alien 3 (1992), a space ship crashes on a planet where the “Company” once built a penitentiary for dangerous criminals: killers, rapists, and psychopaths. The “bad guys” attempting to rape the heroine are, of course, all white, while the “good guy” who rescues her from this terrifying predicament is a huge Negro, the only mentally-balanced person among the prisoners: he’s the boss. This film was also produced by an “alien”: David Fincher.

In the 1960s, Jewish film makers did everything they could to make White people feel guilty. Just watch films like;

In the Heat of the Night (1967), by Normal Jewison (who won five Oscars for it);

The Cardinal (1963), by Otto Preminger;

or Wild River by Elia Kazan (1960).

In Betrayed (USA, 1989), Constantin Costa-Gavras denounces the paramilitary militia of the American “Extreme Right”: a beautiful young FBI agent, a woman, is ordered to infiltrate them. The main villain, “Gary”, falls quickly in love with her, and reveals his true nature as a dangerous psychopath with blue eyes. The “Right-Wing” militia groups, we learn, are supported by powerful financiers and major political figures!

Harping on this same ridiculous theme of “Fascism in the Service of Big Money” is a characteristic of several other films.

In The Inheritor, by Philippe Labro (France, 1972), the hero (Jean-Paul Belmondo) returns to the USA to inherit an industrial empire. He discovers that his father had been murdered by his father-in-law, the director of an industrial group who is also the financier behind a “neo-Fascist” party. At least that’s what the director — (Jacques Lanzmann) would like to have us to believe…

In A Billion Dollars (France, 1981), a journalist discovers that GT1, a multinational corporation, worked for the Nazis. Since his boss refuses to continue the inquiry, the journalist goes into hiding and the article is published by a small local newspaper. The big newspapers, of course, are entirely controlled by “fascists”. The film is by Henri Verneuil (Achod Malakian), who was not a “fascist”. … This is what is called “accusatory inversion”, i.e., “Freudian projection”.

 

 

Destroy the Local Elites

Cosmopolitan” propaganda is always aimed at destroying all local elites, whatever and wherever they are: encouraging the workers to revolt against their employers, the peasants against the lords. All authority is discredited, ancestral traditions are bespattered and ridiculed, and the “bourgeoisie” and “aristocrats” are always depicted in the darkest colours.

The Dead Poets Society was filmed in 1990. The film shows us an elite boarding school in the USA, an old and noble institution intended for the sons of high society. A literature professor upsets the lives of the students and dynamites the “dusty old values” of these “narrow-minded Christians”. This film, which invites us to reject traditions and norms, was directed by Peter Weir.

This is also the message of a film called School Ties by Robert Mandel (1992): The main character, “David Greene” joins one of the most prestigious preparatory schools in New England. His athletic and intellectual talents naturally make him the star of the institution in a few weeks. But to be accepted by his wealthy schoolmates, filled with anti-Semitic prejudice, and gain the love of a young girl from a good family, he is compelled to hide his Jewishness … until one day the truth explodes. At this moment, we understand that Christians are truly filthy people.

In the same genre, Marin Karmitz’s film, Blow for Blow (1971) is in the same genre: in a confectionary factory, the workers suffer intolerable and infernal working hours and conditions. A wildcat strike breaks out: the boss, kidnapped, humiliated and intimidated, is forced to capitulate. Like many of his fellow-Jews, Marin Karmitz made the transition from “Far-Left” to “Hard” “Liberal Right” early in the 21st century: the only problem now is how to “consolidate” the “multiracial society”.

The aggressiveness of cosmopolitan Jewish directors against the European world finds expression once again in The Servant (1963): a young English aristocrat, full of arrogance, hires a domestic servant in his service. The aristocrat quickly plunges into alcoholism and decadence, while the servant, highly dignified, comes to exercise an increasingly greater domination over his master. This tendency systematically to gravitate towards “inverted values” is very typical of the Hebraic mentality. The film is by Joseph Losey, based on a screenplay by Harold Pinter (Nobel Prize for Literature in 2005), who succeeded his fellow-Jew Elfriede Jelink.

The Middle Ages are always depicted in the darkest colours. We are told that the lords were always wicked and cruel: see The War Lord (USA, 1965). In the 11th century, the local lord notices a young peasant girl while out hunting. She is engaged to be married, and just as they are about to celebrate their nuptials, the lord enforces his jus primae noctis (an invention of French republicans in the 19th century). The film is by Franklin Schaffner.

The producer Rob Cohen manipulates the same story in his way in a “multicultural” sense in the film Medieval (USA, 2009): this is the story of a monk, a knight, a samurai, a Zulu, an Arab, a gypsy and a Viking — all in the Middle Ages!

The same contempt for traditional civilization may also be found in amusing cartoons, like Shrek (USA, 2001), once again. “Shrek” is a gentle, lovable ogre who lives in a remote forest. He confronts a dreadful dragon and rescues a beautiful princess. The king is a stubborn, ridiculous nabob (which is not in the European tradition at all) who wants to marry the princess, too, but Shrek, who has fallen in love with her, saves her from the coerced match in the cathedral in which the marriage is to be celebrated. The smashing of the stained glass window of the cathedral by the dragon, who forces his way inside, interrupting the forced nuptials, is supposed to be “symbolic”. Directed by Ted Elliott.

The Truman Show (USA, 1998) is a typical film: Truman is a man who is unaware that he only the unsuspecting star of a TV show. His surroundings are nothing but a set. All the people around him are actors, and he is the only one who doesn’t know it. The director’s intention was attack the papier maché society which serves as the stage set for Truman’s life: its hypocrisy, its false happiness. This hypocritical society is a WASP [White Anglo Saxon Protestant] society in which there are no drugs, no delinquency, no porn. In escaping from this world which is “closed, fragile, closed on itself”, Truman experiences the joys of indiscriminate sex, drugs and ethnic chaos. One could hardly expect any different from the director of the Dead Poets Society, Peter Weir.

Cosmopolitan” film makers do not just attack European culture alone. Wherever Jews settle, they set about to undermine, mock, ridicule and attack all local elites so as to replace them.

Here is a “Tamil” film: A Donkey in the Brahmin Ghetto (India, 1977). A donkey sneaks into a village enclave reserved for the superior caste of Brahmins and is adopted as a mascot. The donkey induces miraculous visions in the priests, and the animal quickly becomes an object of veneration. This sarcastic film is signed “John Abraham”, no doubt a pure-blooded “Tamil”.

Or take a look at Ankur [“The Seedling”] (India, 1974): in an Indian village, a peasant woman, servant to a property owner, is seduced by her patron. The patron commits a number of serious crimes against the peasants with impunity, but revolt is brewing … Shyam Benegal, the director, is, of course, a “Hindu”.

Judaism, we see, is a dissolving force in all nations in which it is introduced. The Jews like to “break down barriers”, “shatter taboos”, as they themselves very often say. Nahum Goldman, the founder of the World Jewish Congress, wrote very explicitly:

 

This is the way it is: Jews are revolutionaries for other peoples, but not for themselves”.

 

 

Anti-Christianity

Jewish worldwide cinema is also characterised by an anti-Christian messages. In television or at the cinema, Christians, and Catholics in particular, are most often depicted as bigots, narrow-minded and intolerant, even rapists and murderers. The Catholic clergy is regularly depicted as a haven for sadists and perverts of all stripes.

In Crimson Rivers (2003), a network of dangerous, terribly well organized, “neo-Nazis” has been detected. They set up their general headquarters in a monastery in Lorraine, linked by underground tunnels to the Maginot Line. The monks, who are fighting for a “White Christian Europe”, are in contact with highly placed European personages undermining the established order: they are everywhere, they own everything, but they are invisible. The film is signed Olivier Dahan.

Jean-Jacques Annaud’s beautiful film, The Name of the Rose (France, 1986), is taken from a novel by the world-famous Italian author Umberto Eco: the film is a crime drama set in a monastery in Northern Italy in the early 14th century. The film is littered with medieval clichés: all the monks, without exception, are abnormal. They grease their palms off the peasants who bring them their miserable harvests, while the peasants live in the filth and garbage tossed to them by the monks. The Catholic Church from top to bottom is just a perversion: the monks keep people in servitude and fear of the Devil, while jealously guarding the marvels contained in their Greek books which threaten to destabilise their power.

Of course, it all ends up in torture and the stake.

The film was produced with the collaboration of Jacques Le Goff, an historian of the Marxist school. If anyone cares to take a non-Marxist glimpse at the magnificent epoch which was the Middle Ages, one should read the short book by Regine Permond entitled Pour en Finir avec le Moyen Age (“Finishing Off the Middle Ages”), (1977).

Let us note that at no time during the entire film is there any question of a rose … The title is obviously intended for initiates in the Kabbala; in this regard, we note that the author of this tale, Umberto Eco, in 2005, also wrote the preface to a book entitled Messianic Mystics, in which he establishes a parallel between Hebraic messianism and Marxism.

Among Jewish American directors, anti-Christian hatred is expressed in the same manner. In Seven (1995), a Catholic sex pervert has undertaken to commit seven murders symbolizing his hatred of the seven capital sins: a film by David Fincher.

In The Shawshank Redemption (1994), the prison warden turns out to be the real villain; at the same time, of course, he is a very pious Christian. The film is signed Frank “Darabont.

In The Favour, the Watch and the Very Big Fish (1991), film maker Ben Lewin displays his disgust with Christianity.

In The Last Temptation of Christ, by Martin Scorsese (1998), Christ begins to dream of what his life could have been like with Mary Magdalene. We see Jesus make love to her. This film is an adaptation of a novel by Niko Kazantzakis.

In Agnes of God, by Norman Jewison (1985), The Verdict, by Sydney Lumet (1982), Papillon, by Franklin Schaffner (1973), Elmer Gantry, by Richard Brooks (1960), the Christian characters, priests and nuns, are regularly portrayed as villains.

Jewish film directors also appear to derive pleasure, in their films, from disrupting Catholic ceremonies. In the comedy In and Out (USA, 1997) for example, a marriage ceremony is taking place. At the very moment when they about to say “Yes” before the entire family and assembled congregation, the groom refuses, and announces in a low tone, with an air of resignation, that he is “gay”. Stupefaction! The ceremony breaks up in an uproar, and the couple quarrel violently in public. The film is directed by Frank Oz.

In Shrek (2001), the marriage ceremony is disrupted by a dragon who enters the church by smashing a stained glass window. In Sacred Union, by Alexander Arcady (France, 1989), a funeral is disrupted. In A Very Curious Girl, by Nelly Kaplan (1969), a Mass is disrupted.

The film Hair (USA, 1979) contains a sacrilegious scene set in a church: a group of long-haired hippies, high on acid, transform a marriage ceremony into a Black Mass, complete with ecstatic dances, as if they were all possessed by the Devil. In actual fact, however, these contortions resemble the ceremonies of Hassidic Jews more than anything else. The film director is the “CzechMilos Forman.

 

 

The Blacks Are Going to Save Humanity

Science fiction stories are always an excuse to glorify the unification of humanity and the intermingling of all races. In Independence Day (USA, 1996), by Roland Emmerich, the planet, attacked by extra-terrestrials, is saved by a Black and a Jew.

In The Fifth Element, a film by Luc Besson (1997), the President of the United States is Black.

In Deep Impact (USA, 1998), a gigantic asteroid is about to crash into the Earth. The planet is saved in extremis by the American President, who is Black.

In Bruce Almighty (USA, 2003), a Black plays the role of God. The film was directed by Tom Shadyac, based on a screenplay by Steve Koren. David Palmer, President of the United States in the TV series 24, is yet again played by a Black actor.

All this propaganda was no doubt intended to pave the way for the forthcoming election, by the American people, in November 2008, of the first Black President of the United States.

 

 

The Races Do Not Exist

Now it is much easier to understand why so many “scholars” assure us that “the races do not exist”. The world famous author Primo Levi became the eulogist of race-mixing (for the goyim only, of course). In order to cause the acceptance of the idea more easily, he started with the postulate that we are all racial mixed:

The Indo-European race is not pure, since nothing proves that it is”.

In February 2001, the Minister of Research, Roger-Gerard Schwartzenberg, stated:

The races do not exist”.

The September 2001 of the UNESCO Courier (publication of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization), contains lengthy claims in this sense:

The human genome has been decoded at last. The endpoint of this project invalidates the myth of races. Genetic research has established that we all descend from one same common ancestor, born in Africa.

The famous geneticist, Axel Kahn, who was one of the organizers of the World Congress “against racial discrimination, xenophobia and intolerance”, held in September 2001 at Durban, South Africa, confirmed:

All men are in fact of a great genetic homogeneity, since their common ancestor is very young in terms of the evolution of life; he lived more than 200,000 years ago in Africa.

You gotta believe it!

 

 

Your Lying Eyes

In the film Matrix, by Larry Wachowski (USA, 1999), human beings are entirely controlled by a computer program which dominates all their thoughts and their entire lives. They think that they exist, but in fact they are nothing but the slaves of machines. There remains only one small nest of resistance: Zion! The film is cram-packed with cabbalistic messages: the hero, Neo, is “the Elect”, the mythical liberator of humanity announced by the prophets, who will save “Zion”, as revealed by “The Oracle”. Human beings are depicted in the colours of a multi-racial society, while the “Matrix”, which intends to rule the universe, is represented by white men: three agents, led by one Agent Smith, who are, of course, very wicked, in their suits and ties. Once again, it is the whites who must bear responsibility for the real tyrants, since the matrix “really exists”; it’s the “matrix” that made this film.

Men in Black (USA, 1997) is a film which teaches us to welcome foreigners — all foreigners — even extra-terrestrials. We don’t know it yet, but there are already large numbers of them living among us; they have taken human shape. Members of a special governmental agency are responsible for regulating the flow of this “new kind of immigrant”, and to keep the existence of these extra-terrestrials secret so as to avoid alarming the population. Two super special agents, one Black and one White, are assigned to track down a hostile alien. The film was adapted by Barry Sonnenfeld from a screenplay by Ed Solomon. It was also produced by Steven Spielberg. All these directors and script writers are “extra-terrestrials disguised as human beings” and “agents of the Matrix”.

John Carpenter is the director of They Live (USA, 1988); the hero, Nada, thanks to special eye glasses, discovers that a small proportion of the population are composed of extra-terrestrials who look just like human beings. These aliens form an elite which governs the world through lies and corruption. These special eyeglasses also permit him to read subliminal messages on advertising panels, which order submission of all humans. They are everywhere, they own everything, you just can’t see it!

In Raiders of the Lost Arc (USA, 1980), by Steven Spielberg, we understand that the power of Yahweh is far too tremendous for us even to dream of resisting it.

Paris, April 2012

______________________________

 

Source: http://www.jrbooksonline.com/cwporter/ryssen1.htm

 

_______________________________

 

 

Footnotes:

[1] Books by Hervé Ryssen. http://herveryssen.over-blog.com/

 

Hervé Ryssen interview 1037

 

[2] Herve Ryssen’s latest book is Les Milliards d’Israël, Escrocs juifs et financiers internationaux [The Billions of Israel, Jews and international financial Crooks]

 

Hervé Ryssen interview 1040

 

Les Milliards d’Israël. Escrocs juifs et financiers internationaux

Notre nouveau livre intitulé Les Milliards d’Israël, Escrocs juifs et financiers internationaux (336 pages) sera disponible en librairie le 17 septembre 2014. Le livre pourra être acheté en prévente au mois d’août ou début septembre afin de payer l’imprimeur. Nous vous tiendrons au courant d’ici peu sur la démarche à suivre.

Pour les flics de la pensée et autres censeurs, sachez que le fichier est entre de bonnes mains, et que même s’il devait m’arriver un malheur, le livre serait publié de toute manière. Juifs, si vous avez peur des livres, c’est que vous avez sans doute des choses à vous reprocher !

A très bientôt, chers lecteurs, pour plus d’informations.

Hervé RYSSEN

PS : Je me demande si je ne vais pas dédier ce livre à Claire Lafoix, la présidente de la 17e chambre correctionnelle de Nanterre, qui m’a condamné le 9 avril 2014 à un mois de prison FERME, pour le simple port d’une bombe lacrymogène.

Il est vrai qu’elle entre en compétition avec les guignols de la 17e chambre correctionnelle de Paris, qui eux, m’ont condamné à deux mois de prison FERME pour une simple blague sur les moeurs de Bertrand Delanoë.

Auront-ils le courage de mettre un écrivain en prison ?

Sont-ils assez crétins pour aller jusque là ?

L’avenir nous le dira !

——————-

 

 

From Google Translate:

Our new book, The Billions of Israel, Jews and international financial Crooks (336 pages) will be available in bookstores on September 17 2014. The book can be ordered in advance in the month of August or early September via the printer. We will keep you posted shortly on how to proceed.

For the cops and other critics, know that the file is in good hands, and that even if a disaster should happen to me, the book would be published anyway. Jews, if you are afraid of books it is because you probably have something to hide!

See you soon, dear readers, for more information.

Hervé RYSSEN

PS: I wonder if I’m not going to dedicate the book to Claire Lafoix, the 17th president of the criminal court of Nanterre, who sentenced me April 9, 2014 to one month FARM prison for simply wearing a tear bombs.

True, it competes with the horns of the 17th Criminal Chamber of Paris, who themselves have sentenced me to two months in prison for simple FARM joke about the morals of Bertrand Delanoë.

Will they have the courage to put a writer in prison?

Are they fools enough to go that far?

The future will tell!

 

—————————————————————-

Click to go to:   Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 1

Click to go to:  Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 2

Click to go to:   Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 3

Click to go to:   Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 4

Click to go to:   Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 5

Click to go to:   Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 6 (last)

 

PDF of this post. Click to view or download (0.9 MB). >>Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism – Part 1 – Ver 2

 

 

Version History

 

Version 3: May 29, 2015 – Formatting. Added Ver 2 of PDF

 

Version 2: Jan 19, 2015 – Expanded Table of Contents

 

Version 1: Published Oct 22, 2014

Read Full Post »

Don’t Laugh!

 

It’s “Anti-Semitic”!

 

International Zionism’s Crusade Against Dieudonné

and The Global Jewish Assault

On Freedom of Speech

 

4 February 2014

 

By Jonathan Azaziah at Mask of Zion

http://www.maskofzion.com/2014/02/dont-laugh-its-anti-semitic.html

 

Dieudonne 136

[Image] Dieudonné M’bala M’bala: The anti-Zionist comedic genius that Organized Jewish Interests love to hate.

 

Is it not astounding, nay, the very apogee of mind-boggling, that “democracy”, the globe’s dominant political model, in which “freedom of speech” is a central if not foundational tenet, is vehemently and vitriolically doing all that it can, wherever its outposts are throughout the world, to silence, nay, eradicate, one particular criticism and ipso facto anyone who has the nobleness to promulgate the aforesaid criticism?

 

Imperialism”? Fire away! “White supremacy”? Have at it! “Capitalism”? Sky is the limit! “Dictatorship”? Here’s an appearance on “Democracy Now”! Malevolent social injustices like police brutality, political corruption, patriarchy, gentrification, environmental abuses, etcetera? By all means, preach and don’t stop preaching! But the moment an individual takes a deep breath, performs a swift trip around the earth in his or her mind, and sees with his or her mind’s eye that there is a common insidiousness, a parent evil if you will, that permeates every ill and injustice from north to south and east to west, and he or she then calls it out by name and slams it with a thunderous condemnation, that is when the Rubicon is crossed.

 

Mention Zionism, “Israel”, Judaism and the supremacy inherent to the religion-culture under the doctrine of “chosen-ness”, Jewish power or Jewishness in any “activist” circle, let alone any mainstream avenue, and you will be hexed and cast out quicker than you can even blink. The “Z”, “I” and “J” words are tantamount to career suicide at best and a terribly real threat to one’s life at worst.

 

Indeed, it was the 18th century French philosopher Voltaire who famously said,

To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.

Not only have the words never rang as true as they do in this current point in history, it is not without irony that Voltaire himself was considered to be a staunch critic of the Organized Jewish community of his time.

 

And on that note, we find ourselves in the thick of the case of Dieudonné M’bala M’bala, better known as Dieudonné or simply Dieudo to those who support him, the controversial, brilliant, wildly popular French-Cameroonian comedian who over the last decade or so has taken France by storm with his anti-Zionist, anti-establishment, pro-Palestine, pro-Resistance sketches and routines, much to the ire of International Jewry. Fined, ridiculed and banned on numerous occasions throughout the years, Dieudonné has trucked on steadfastly. It is integral to understand what has befallen him, as his ongoing struggle against his detractors is a microcosm of the global Jewish-Zionist assault on genuine, unmitigated freedom of speech.

 

Dieudonne 137

[Image] Nicolas Anelka performing the quenelle in solidarity with Dieudonné, and upsetting a whole lot of Zionists in the process.

 

 

Nicolas Anelka and The Quenelle: Jewish Hysteria Reaches A Fever Pitch

 

On December 28th, 2013, the legendary international football star and current West Bromwich Albion striker Nicolas Anelka, who won the World Cup with France in 2006 and has played with top clubs across Europe for almost two decades, set off a chain of events that he could not have possibly imagined would ever come to fruition. After scoring his first of two goals during that Saturday match, Anelka performed the “quenelle”, an anti-establishment gesture popularized by Dieudonné which essentially means “up yours”. Alarm bells began ringing across Jewish-Zionist power centers across the globe and before the grueling match which ended in a 3-3 draw was even in the books, Anelka was being deemed an “anti-Semite” in the international press. West Bromwich Albion coach Keith Downing blasted the accusations as “absolute rubbish” (1).

 

Utter ridiculousness aside, an investigation was immediately initiated by the FA (Football Association), and after a little more than 3 weeks, Anelka was charged with,

 “making a gesture that was abusive and/or indecent and/or insulting and/or improper”, as well as “an aggravated breach in that it included a reference to ethnic origin and/or race and/or religion or belief”.

 

He was punished with a 5-match ban (2). Additionally, Zoopla, a British property website owned by Jewish businessman Alex Chesterman and a main sponsor of West Bromwich Albion, cut its sponsorship of the club because it wouldn’t drop Anelka (3). Chesterman’s pressure is only the tip of the iceberg however, as the entire campaign against Nicolas Anelka was driven by the organized Jewish community, notably the Board of Deputies of British Jews and the Community Security Trust (4), a dangerous organization with connections to the international Zionist terrorist organization known as the Mossad (5).

 

Dieudonne 138

[Image] David Bernstein: the Jewish supremacist high roller that is “zionizing” British football.

 

It is by no means coincidental but rather part and parcel of the horror that has been inflicted upon Nicolas Anelka that the chairman of the FA is David Bernstein, a devout Jew who has repugnantly used his position to spread “Holocaust” propaganda wrapped in the garb of football to the UK’s youth (6), and an ardent Zionist who gleefully turned the “Football For All” platform into a whitewashing festival of the usurping “Israeli” regime’s genocidal existence (7). Equally critical to note is the fact that while are very few Jewish players in British football, Jews run the vast majority of the Premier League. Among these owners is Roman Abramovich (8), an obscenely wealthy Zionist gangster involved in “Israeli” blood diamond dealing and the ethnic cleansing of occupied Al-Quds (9). Point being? Nicolas Anelka adamantly denying that he is racist or “anti-Semitic” (10) is ultimately irrelevant due to the undeniable truth that the Jewish persons controlling British football have a Zionist agenda that is global in scope.

 

To add further insult to injury, Nicolas Anelka endured another dose of heavy embarrassment after Roger Cukierman, the president of CRIF (Representative Council of Jewish Institutions in France), initially stated that Anelka’s performing of the quenelle in that particular context was not “anti-Semitic” but then backtracked once it was clear that the football star would be charged, going as far to say that the usage of the quenelle was being “dangerously spread among our citizens and especially youth.” Zionist fanatic Cukierman continued on in a rabid tirade against Dieudonné (11), proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that “free speech”, “democratic ideals” and the truth above all else are of no concern to Jewish supremacists when their agenda is hanging on by a thread; all of those attributes aren’t merely denied but trampled upon with malice.

 

 

Onslaught On Dieudonné: World Zionism Mobilizes To Muzzle Him

 

Dieudonne 140

[Image] Dieudonné’s quenelle: feared by Zionists everywhere; embraced by the oppressed everywhere else.

 

Verily, Nicolas Anelka and his career are just collateral damage in this ongoing debacle. As the author of a recent venomous, hysterical editorial in the staunchly Zionist Jewish Daily Forward opined, “it is Dieudonné who is the true villain in this saga.” The piece, titled “Zoopla’ Joins Gibberish Feud Over ‘Quenelle”, goes on to take jabs at Anelka, label the quenelle as “neo-fascist” and viciously attack Dieudo for the “crime” of bringing Jewish-Zionist power to light and not making any bones about it in the process (12). And this is only the tip of the anti-Dieudonné iceberg. In the wake of the madness sparked by Anelka’s quenelle, an avalanche of hasbara was generated by Organized Jewry against the comedic phenom.

 

To name a minute few: The “Israeli” daily Ynet insanely labeled Dieudo a “modern day brown shirt” and lambasted the quenelle as a symbol of “modern day violent anti-Semitism” (13); the Jewish Daily Forward, in one of many attacks, notes that “the real danger is that Dieudonné is also pulling down the government’s shorts (14).” It isn’t the French regime that the Forward is worried about though, but the “Israeli”-blue-and-white-drenched hands behind it; Haaretz assailed Dieudonné for having “malignant influence (15)”; the Algemeiner gleefully carried the statements of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) which repeatedly condemned Dieudo (16), and along with the European Jewish Congress (EJC) and the umbrella group of Belgian Jewish organizations, CCOJB, played a key role in pressuring the French regime into cracking down on the French-Cameroonian star (17).Tablet Magazine, a most obnoxious Zionist rag owned by a brat of the immensely wealthy and powerful Newhouse family, published several hit pieces but one in particular glaringly stood out as it admitted that the quenelle is “hard to explain and harder to resist (18)”, thus exposing the intellectual bankruptcy of International Jewry and its agents.

 

Leading the campaign against Dieudonné have been the aforementioned CRIF, France’s AIPAC, and LICRA (The International League Against Racism and Anti-Semitism), the French version of the ADL. LICRA, which has been agitating against him for over a decade now since he first criticized Zionism, has special privileges under French law, and, in blatantly similar fashion to a powerful mafia, has been using one nonsensical pretext after another to justify lawsuits that would lead to his blacklisting (19).

 

The CRIF-LICRA campaign paid dividends as the mayors of Marseille, Tours, and Bordeaux banned Dieudonné from performing in their cities on January 7th, 2014 (20).

 

Dieudonne 141

[Image] Roger Cukierman: Head of the CRIF (the French AIPAC), and leading Zionist operator against Dieudonné.

 

Two days later on January 9th, 2014, a French court threw out the bans, much to the delight of Dieudonné and his fans. Unfortunately, victory was declared too soon however as CRIF revved up the pressure (21), and with Zionist lapdogs President Hollande and Interior Minister Valls leading the charge, the overturn of the bans was unprecedentedly flipped at the last minute by Conseil d’Etat, France’s highest court, just before a Dieudonné show in Nantes (22), hence removing him from as many public forums as possible under the banner of “anti-racism”, arguably the most legendary and deceptive mask of Zion in existence today.

 

Worse still, one of the hit pieces that targeted the anti-Zionist comic, penned by an IOF commander and fanatical settler for Zionist colony mouthpiece Arutz Sheva, blatantly attempted to link Dieudonné and his quenelle to the March 2012 attack on a Jewish school in Toulouse (23), which, ironically or maybe even deliberately enough, bore all the likenesses of a false flag attack (24).

 

It is of no coincidence that following this disgraceful accusation, along with the continuing siege led by the Jewish-Zionist Lobby in France, Dieudo was targeted by les Huissiers de Justice, the collection arm of the French Justice Ministry, which showed up at his door demanding that he pay some 100,000 euros that he allegedly owed for several thought crime convictions he had amassed through the years. A verbal altercation ensued between Dieudo and the bailiffs, and then shots were fired. Dieudo was called in for questioning the following day and a warrant was subsequently issued to comb his home. A “projectile device”, whatever that is, was discovered in the search. Extraordinarily dubious does not do justice to the description of this event, and this is confirmed by the bailiffs themselves who don’t know who fired at them (25).

 

Taking the supreme questionableness of this happening into consideration, and then coupling it with the genocidal Zionist entity being responsible for the horrors of 9/11 (26), the calamity of 7/7 (27) and the catastrophe of 26/11 (28), as well as the fact that there are numerous occurrences of Jews faking “anti-Semitic” crimes (29), it is not beyond the limits of Organized Jewry and its acolytes by any means to stage such an event to put the proverbial nail in Dieudo’s coffin.

 

Dieudonne 142

[Image] When Dieudonné is on stage, International Jewry begins to shake in its very bones.

 

Nevertheless, Dieudonné, a dedicated anti-Zionist and a man of faith who identifies himself as an “Islamic Christian”, has stood his ground and refused to go quietly into the night as his “chosenite” tormenters bombard him from every angle. He has decided to do what he has done since awakening to the evils of Zionism so many years ago (30): fight back. His supporters, in an operation they wittily titled “Triple Quenelle”, hacked three French pro-“Israel” websites, including the French Jewish Defense League, and replaced the hateful Zionist content with Dieudonné support messages (31); Dieudo himself confronted the allegations against Nicolas Anelka, rejecting the accusations of “racism” and “anti-Semitism” and calling the football legend his “brother in humanity”, “noble”, “hope” and “a prince (32)”; and in the best response of all, Dieudo returned to the stage in defiance of the Zionist-run French establishment, smashing a howling crowd of more than 5,000 in Bordeaux (33).

 

What makes this latest show so uniquely significant is that the crowd was not comprised of the usual downtrodden Black and Brown (especially Muslim) youth which have been Dieudo’s most loyal fans through the years, but White and working class (33). This terrifies the French establishment and its Zionist overlords. In their minds, the thought that not only the peoples of the lands they once colonized but their own European citizenry could become part of the masses supporting Dieudo is a dangerous development indeed. Not to be outflanked, Paris responded by intensifying its measures against the humorist, launching raids on his home, production company and other premises (34). Resistant still, Dieudonné fired back yet again by declaring that he will go to the UK to prove he is anything but “racist”, as well as to display his solidarity with Nicolas Anelka, but these plans aren’t happening either, as the UK regime has banned him from entering after declaring him “persona non grata (35).” Considering the Jewish origins of Prime Minister David Cameron himself, as well as the powerful Jewish-Zionist moneymen who secured his rise to power (35a), it isn’t even the tiniest bit surprising that this Orwellian action was taken.

 

Embedded in the marrow of the matter is that the Zionists are not up in arms over an academic. They are not gnashing their teeth over a politician. They aren’t throwing the geopolitical equivalent of a temper tantrum over a judge, an attorney general or a businessperson with substantial wealth and influence. They’re going ballistic over a comedian. A funnyman. The sort of personality that is supposed to have at least a wee bit of leeway when criticizing the rich and powerful in an open, democratic society, for the sole, simple reason that it is just comedy.

 

The Zionists don’t share this view though. They are hysterical because any criticism of their might and societal sway, be it Dieudonné’s laugh-creation or any other individual in any other venue, has the potential to obliterate their illusory fortress. Why? Because the society ruled by Zionism is not open or democratic but totalitarian and despotic in pluralistic garb; if you tear off the garb, then you tear down the system. When their monstrously deranged farces, from the Zionist regime itself to the “Holocaust”, get exposed for the fraudulent, sickening manifestations of Jewish arrogance that they are, which is exactly what Dieudonné has done and is doing, it is only a small amount of time and this time alone that stands between them and their overthrow.

 

 

Haters Will Be Haters When Facts Are “Anti-Semitic”: Why Dieudonné’s Ideology Frightens His Detractors And How The Accusations Against Him Hold No Weight

 

Dieudonne 143

[Image] Men of honor, men of dignity: Dieudonné with living legend Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, former President of the Islamic Republic of Iran and champion of all things truthful.

 

Analyzing the seemingly never-ending controversy instigated against Dieudonné and his quenelle would be incomplete without a proper explanation of the ideology that drives the man firstly, and the past accusations against him secondly. Understanding both will prove, monosemously, that what is happening to Dieudo is politically motivated by Jewish-Zionist interests through and through, and not some sort of duty that the French regime is abiding by to “fight hatred”, “stop incitement” or “subdue racism”.

 

Just watching Dieudo’s most recent interview with Sky News confirms that his ideological weltanschauung extends much farther than the ill-defined, watered-down realm of “anti-racism” and positions itself firmly on the pedestal of liberationism (32). From his comedy routines and films to his politics and the quenelle, Dieudonné believes that shaking off the shackles of slavery and remaining steadfastly defiant to keep them off and eventually overthrow the system run by the slave-owners’ descendants is the only way to fight. Spiritually speaking, he mirrors the thoughts of Hizbullah Secretary General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah and the Islamic Republic of Iran, and he, along with his friend and ally Alain Soral, a French anti-Zionist author and philosopher who has also been targeted by France’s Jewish Lobby, have ties to the Iranian-supported Centre Zahra (36).

 

Dieudo traveled to Lebanon in August 2006 to meet with officials and fighters from Hizbullah in solidarity with the Mouqawamah’s legendary, transformational triumph over the usurping Zionist entity in the 34-Day War (37). He’s also been to Iran on several occasions, including a November 2009 trip where he met with and was warmly greeted by the honorable former president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (38). He also worked side by side with Iran’s Haft Aseman Cinematic Company (HACC), Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance and Experimental and Documentary Film Center (EDFC) to produce several films (39). These meetings and projects only compounded Dieudo’s strong anti-Zionism and deepened his commitment to disseminating historical and political truths.

 

Dieudonne 144

[Image] Dieudonné with comrade Alain Soral in Lebanon just after the demonic Zionist aggression in the summer of 2006.

 

Based on this summary in isolation, it should be elucidative for all to see why Organized Jewish Interests fear the spread of Dieudo’s comedy to the Black, Brown and White youth of France: he is a proponent of the Iran-Hizbullah model for ideological liberation, and there is no greater obstacle to the Zionists’ quest for total control of the planet than the Resistance Axis, of which Iran and Hizbullah comprise 2/3. The very second that the Shah was toppled in 1979 by the Islamic Revolution led by Ayatollah Sayyed Ruhollah Khomeini, Iran became a target for International Zionism and its allies in the United States and the Gulf. To stop the Islamic Revolution from spreading, the Iran-Iraq War was initiated by Saddam Hussein on behalf of “Israel”, America, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, and since then, the onslaught on the Islamic Republic hasn’t stopped due to it being a beacon of hope, independence, sovereignty and resistance to the Empire and the hidden hands that pull the Empire’s strings (40).

 

Apart from Iran, nothing upsets International Zionism quite like Hizbullah. It is the only political movement on the face of the earth that is truly deserving of unequivocal backing, and one of the reasons why, if not the primary one, is because of its unwavering commitment to the Palestinian people and their sacred cause, which, for the record, is the dearest to the heart of Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah (41). The Mouqawamah was the only party of the Zionist-engineered Lebanese Civil War that defended the Palestinians. During the War of the Camps in particular, its moujahideen were martyred smuggling food to those under siege. In terms of Lebanese politics, it is the only organization that campaigns for Palestinian rights (42). All of Hizbullah’s actions have been in defense of Palestine, most especially its intervention in Syria (43).

 

Dieudonne 145

[Image] The Lebanese Islamic Resistance of Hizbullah is what keeps the leaders of the usurping Jewish supremacist entity awake at night.

 

Moreover, the Mouqawamah’s military capabilities and achievements continue to pile up by the day. Hizbullah’s strategic silence during the lead-up to what seemed like an imminent direct attack on Syria by NATO befuddled the intelligence services of both the West and the Zionist entity (44) and contributed to derailing the Empire’s war effort. The illegitimate “Israeli” regime has admitted that Hizbullah has power to bring the ports of occupied Haifa and Isdud, fraudulently called “Ashdod” by the Jewish occupiers, to an outright halt (45). Generals of the “Israeli” terrorist occupation army (IOF) have also revealed that Hizbullah’s rocketry is the 8th mightiest in the world (46), as well as the bitter truth that they cannot defeat the Resistance (47).

 

Most humiliating of all for the genocidal Jewish entity is what is now known as the “Labbouna Raid”, in which “Israeli” commandos attempted to carry out a reconnaissance operation in the Labbouna and Jall al-Alam areas of the South Lebanese village of Alma al-Shaab, only to be met by two expertly planted explosive devices which left them shocked, wounded and forced to retreat. The preemptive deterrence attack by the men of the Resistance showed the usurping Zionist enemy that even though they’re busy with its proxies on the Syrian front, their eyes are never, ever turned away from the primary aggressor (48). The foiling of the Zionists’ incursion affirmed that Hizbullah can handle, nay, triumphantly thrive on multiple fronts at once, no matter what is thrown its way. Dieudo, obviously, albeit from a different perspective, can relate.

 

Taking all of this in, it’s worth rehashing that the prospect of a talented, intellectually sound entertainer with familial ties to France’s indigenous and immigrant communities espousing the principles of victorious Hizbullah and indefatigable Iran alongside his own fiery as well as factual interpretation of Black liberationism is, for the Zionists, a recipe for total meltdown. Hence the repeated attempts by the French chapter of International Jewry to silence Dieudo with its favorite tool, its political meat-cleaver: “anti-Semitism”. Bottom line is though, none of the accusations put forth, in the legal arena or otherwise, hold any weight whatsoever. None.

 

On the 14th of June in 2006, Dieudo was charged with “defamation” and fined 4,500 Euros after stating that Arthur (real name: Jacques Essebag), a prominent French-Moroccan-Jewish television personality, “financed the ‘Israeli’ army which does not hesitate to murder Palestinian children (49)”. There is nothing even remotely inaccurate about Dieudo’s statement. Arthur is indeed a Zionist with family living in the usurping entity and had plans to tour there before the July War broke out (50). Thus, without exercising an exhausting amount of brain power, by the very definition of traveling to the occupying Jewish regime, to see family members who are land thieves, you are justifying its criminal existence with your money and supporting whatever it does.

 

Dieudonne 146

[Image] Remember this photo of Hala Abu Sabikha next time someone says that the Zionist regime’s terrorist army doesn’t murder children.

 

If that wasn’t enough to damn Arthur for the pro-“Israel” scoundrel that he is, let it also be shown for the record that he is in business with the godfathers of the illegal Jewish regime, the Rothschild family, in some sort of a laughable “ethical” coffee venture (51). As for the IOF murdering Palestinian children, well, it does, along with other Arab children too. One only needs to look at Operation Pillar of Cloud, Operation Cast Lead or the July War for the blatancy of IOF’s mass kid killing. If something more recent is needed, look no further than the psychotic, ritualistic murder of 3-year old Palestinian Hala Abu Sabikha, who was just standing outside her home with her two brothers when “Israeli” warplanes bombed illegally besieged Gaza in late December 2013 (52).

 

The 15th of November in 2007 saw Dieudo getting slapped with a fine of 5,000 Euros for calling Jews “slave traders”. Harsh? Possibly. Crude? Maybe. Direct? Without a doubt. But inaccurate? Not even close. The Nation of Islam’s Historical Research Department obliterated the myth of a nonexistent Jewish role in the Transatlantic Slave Trade and pulled back the curtains on one of history’s most forgotten chapters with its three must-read volumes, all derived solely from Jewish sources:

The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews Volume 1” (53), “The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews Volume 2: How Jews Gained Control Of The Black American Economy” (54) and “Jews Selling Blacks: Slave Sale Advertising by American Jews” (55).

 

Dieudonne 147

[Image] Dieudonné with a copy of “The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews Vol. 2: How Jews Gained Control Of The Black American Economy”; there is no Jewish myth that this brother isn’t willing to confront.

 

These books proved, unquestionably, that Jews did not have a role of prominence but a role of dominance; of preeminence; they were the movers and the shakers of the Transatlantic Slave Trade, the makers and the takers, the wheelers and the dealers. To deny it would be equivalent to denying the blue hue of the sky on a day when clouds aren’t present. Additionally, a recent Jewish Telegraph Agency piece confirmed that large swathes of Dutch Jewry were actively involved in slave trading (56), and a Jewish Daily Forward story from July 2013 confirmed that.

 

 “Most southern Jews defended slavery, and some went further, advocating its expansion (57).

 

June 26th, 2008 brought the next ludicrous fine on top of Dieudonné’s head, this time in the amount of 7,000 Euros for dubbing slamming the “Holocaust” as “memorial pornography”. Now, besides from the philosophical weight the remark carries, in which it implies that Jewish suffering has been granted primacy over all other sufferings and it is habitually used by Organized Jewish Interests in a pornographic manner to subvert, usurp, exploit, influence and corrupt in the name of “preserving the Jewish people” or “protecting ‘Israel’s’ right to exist”, there is, again, that pesky matter of evidence. Is there evidence to back Dieudonné up? The answer is an emphatic “yes”.

 

For two years straight, the demented, depraved “Israelis” have held a “Miss Holocaust Survivor” pageant (58), parading alleged “survivors” of World War II persecution around on a stage in a celebration of “Holocaust” myths and Zionism in general. Even more excruciatingly perverse are the Stalags, pornographic pocket books based made up of “Nazism”, sex and violence created by Zionist Jews who pretended to have translated the books from English to Hebrew to hide the fact that this sexual deviancy was “distinctly Israeli”. Once thought to be one of the societal secrets of the usurping Jewish entity, the Stalags are making a comeback (59). If that doesn’t define “memorial pornography” to the letter, I truly do not know what will.

 

February 27th, 2009 saw Dieudonné slammed with a whopping $75,000 fine after he blasted popular French-Algerian-Jewish singer and actor Patrick Bruel, stating that he was “practically an Israeli soldier. So when they bomb southern Lebanon and they kill Palestinian children, for him, it’s normal.” Dieudo also called him out for being “a product of this ultra-Zionist political system, he’s a super-militant… He has the superiority complex of certain Israelis (60).” There is a broken record to be heard here. Bruel is indeed an ultra-Zionist, and as is the case with all other ultra-Zionists, he cares not one bit for the Arab children murdered by his beloved criminal Jewish entity. Bruel has a longstanding musical relationship with the illegal occupation regime, performing there on many, many occasions, including as recently as last year (61), and has recorded music with “Israeli” occupation “artists” going back to 1996 (62).

 

Solidifying Bruel’s ultra-Zionist credentials are his performance at the noxious, malevolent “Tel Aviv” University (63), a horrific institution that has played an abyssal role in Zionist expansionism since the Nakba and is built on top of the ethnically cleansed village of Sheikh Muwannis (64), as well as his role in the cringe-worthy hasbara flick “O Jerusalem”, which whitewashes the Jewish terrorism of the Nakba and replaces it with the age-old Zionist narrative of “independence and victimhood” (65). Bruel and his tribalist cohorts can wax lyrical about “anti-Semitism” as much as they want. Facts are facts and all Dieudo did was lay them on the line for all to see.

 

Dieudonne 148

[Image] Dieudonné and Dr. Robert Faurisson (Holocaust revisionist): truth-telling birds of a feather flock together.

 

Rounding out the farcical actions against Dieudonné are the October 27th, 2009 case, in which he was hit with a fine of 10,000 Euros for “public insult of people of Jewish faith or origin” after doing a show which featured courageous “Holocaust” revisionist and truth teller Dr. Robert Faurisson, and the June 8th 2010, case in which the 47-year old activist-satirist was sentenced to another fine of 10,000 Euros for defamation after he criticized LICRA as a “mafia-like association that organizes censorship”. The Faurisson case is notably nitwitted as it does not vindicate International Jewry’s crusade against Dieudo and his remarks about Jewish-Zionist power but rather vociferously invalidates it, into oblivion even.

 

Faurisson’s views on World War II and even Zionism aside, Dieudo was charged, basically, for being in the company of someone not liked by Jews; someone that Jews find offensive because that person has an educated opinion different from theirs about a certain historical event. That’s all. There is nothing remotely “democratic” about this outrage. Flip the script now and imagine, just imagine, if Jewish-Zionist leaders and entertainers were charged for “public insult of people of Muslim faith or Arab origin” because they went palling around France with officials from the usurping Zionist regime? At least these charges would be rooted in validity as Arabs and Muslims indeed feel insulted by the existence of “Israel” and the genocide it has committed against the Ummah for more than six decades! Nonetheless, the undoubted response that would be unleashed by International Jewry over such a scenario is too astronomical to even theorize on what it may be.

 

The fatuity of the LICRA case is self-evident. It is really not in the realm, nay, the universe, nay, the very dimension of deniability that LICRA is not a “mafia-like association that organizes censorship”. If anything, Dieudo should be awarded for finding new synonyms for “mafia” and “censorship”, both of which are interchangeable with LICRA. It hasn’t just been Dieudonné who has had a target painted on his back by LICRA. The notorious Zionist pressure group also led a “free speech” assault on a dozen Palestine solidarity activists (66), and will certainly continue on its silencing spree in the name of “chosenite” interests whenever its latest violation of Dieudo’s most basic rights has ceased.

 

Dieudonne 149

[Image] Considering the brazen (and true) nature of the language on this cover, how demented is it that Dieudonné can be called “anti-Semitic” for simply pointing out the obvious?

 

Perhaps even more debunkable than the accusations that led to legal proceedings against Dieudonné are those that didn’t. While one could fill up the pages of a book series in compiling such remarks from rabid Zionist Jews and their lobby organizations, there are two, just two specifically that are most relevant to this study and most worthy of analytical dismemberment. An Arutz Sheva report from December 2009 sought to yet again conflate Dieudonné with “Nazism” because he established a working relationship with Iran and threw shots at Hollywood for being the “long arm of Zionist culture (67)”. But when it is known that Hollywood is controlled by Jewish supremacists, that Hollywood is inextricably linked with the genocidal Zionist regime, that Hollywood spreads ungodly, racist propaganda against Arabs and Muslims, that Hollywood uses celebrities as hasbara mouthpieces and that Hollywood is integral to the Zionist balkanization stratagem in the Middle East, Syria and Sudan in particular (68), how can his comment be taken for anything other than truth?

 

More prevalent than his Hollywood observation is Dieudo’s remark in a pro-Dieudonné film entitled “Is it allowed to discuss with Dieudonne?”, made by a journalist and a fan of his. The film earned him heavy condemnation from the Union of Jewish Students in Belgium (UEJB) and the European Union of Jewish Students (EUJS), mainly due to him declaring that “the biggest swindlers of the planet are the Jews (69).” As coarse as the anti-Zionist humorist’s comment may have been, pleasantry isn’t the issue at here; truth is. And truthful is precisely the word needed to sum up Dieudo’s proclamation.

 

Have the UEJB and EUJS not heard of the Rothschild family? Are the UEJB and EUJS not in the know about this fiercely demonic gang of Talmudic, Zionist bankers who funded British and French colonialism and imperialism, easily the greatest “swindles” of the modern era, which ravaged the African continent especially (70)? Have these Zionists not heard of Bernie Madoff, whose historic, infamous financial $50 billion “swindle” was deeply connected to “Israeli” intrigue on 9/11 (71)? Have these concerned Jewish students not heard of Scott Rothstein, the South Floridian Jewish lawyer who orchestrated a $1.2 billion ponzi “swindle” and sailed off into the sunset of flamboyance and mass political influence (72)? What about Irving Rosenfeld and Jordan Belfort? Are the UEJB and EUJS not aware of these tremendously immoral Jewish con men whose “swindling” lives are now blazing across the silver screen in Oscar-nominated glorifications of their exploits (73)?

 

Dieudonne 150

[Image] NY slumlord Menachem Stark: one of many, and many is indeed the word, Jewish “swindlers” across the globe.

 

Does the name Joseph Greenblatt ring any bells for the UEJP and EUJS? This Orthodox Jew ran a ponzi scheme worth tens of millions of dollars that “swindled” his own community before being caught and sentenced to fair amount of prison time (74). If they haven’t heard of Greenblatt, they must not have heard of Shervin Neman, a Persian Jew in Los Angeles who followed in Greenblatt’s footsteps by “swindling” members of his own “tribe” out of millions (75). Menachem Stark is another “swindler” of interest that the Zionist college-goers should be cognizant of. This Hasidic real estate developer was known to New York law enforcement as a “scammer” and a man who “f***ed over a few people”, and more than likely would have kept doing so if he didn’t wind up dead in a trash bin (76). And while we’re still in New York, let us not fail to mention the Jewish orchestration of a multimillion dollar “swindle” at the Metropolitan Council on Jewish Poverty (77).

 

And the “swindle” doesn’t even come close to ending there. It has been uncovered, in a matter most humiliating to International Zionism, its arms the UEJP and the EUJS and like-minded Jews worldwide, that Gilad and Omri Sharon, the sons of now dead war criminal Ariel “Butcher of Beirut” Sharon, kept their Zionist maniac of a father on life support after he fell into a coma because they wanted to pocket his three pensions for a handful of “swindler’s” endeavors (78). Arguably the most profane and geopolitically reverberating Jewish “swindle” of the last decade was that of the bankrupting of Iceland, something little-known to many astute analysts. Dorrit Moussaieff, the First Lady of Iceland, the Tchenguiz brothers, Simon Halabi, Moises and Mendi Gertner, all “Israeli” Jews (79), along with Major General Danny Rothschild, a former head of Israeli military intelligence (80), brought down Iceland’s economy in a mega-scam as a means of showing the world that all independent nations, no matter how stable, can crumble if International Jewry sticks its destabilizing hands into their coffers.

 

Aside from the economic decapitation of Iceland, and, of course, the ongoing Rothschild-financing of imperialism, there is no Jewish “swindle” that has affected the world more negatively, devastatingly really, than the existence of the cancerous thing known as “Israel”. Built on the myths of “making the desert bloom” and “a land without a people for a people without a land”, fortified under the mask of “independence” through the ethnic cleansing of upwards of 800,000 aboriginal Palestinians in the Nakba, and upheld by a powerful influential network spanning the globe and supported by the vast majority of World Jewry (81), the usurping Zionist entity represents the very essence of what a “swindle” is.

 

Dieudonne 151

[Image] International Jewry is the name… And “swindle” is the game.

 

Whether Dieudo’s detractors like it or not, Jews are indeed the world’s greatest swindlers, and even non-Jewish hyper-swindlers like Allen Stanford are intimately linked with the upper echelons of the Zionist Power Configuration (82), confirming that for one to “get in where he fits in”, to establish himself in the world of high finance, one must recognize and commit himself to serving the kingmakers, who, in this case, are Organized Jewish Interests. Truth be told, “swindling” is as Jewish as the Talmud itself. As evidenced by the aforementioned Jewish-made films about “chosenite” con men Rosenfeld and Belfort, or the phrase “memorial pornography”, which originated with “Israeli” historian Idith Zertal (83), Dieudo was fined, essentially, for saying what Jews have said and written themselves, simply reinforcing the fact that there is in place a global system of apartheid, or more aptly, “hafrada”, the Hebrew word for separation, which divides Jews from non-Jews.

 

It is not what Dieudonné said, or how he said it, but that he dared to even open his mouth in a challenging manner to begin with. The Zionist Power Configuration has no problem whatsoever with Gentiles, or “goyim” in Jewish eyes, speaking of Jewish wealth, power, influence and “achievement” in a positive light, offering up praises as if Zionism represented a “god” of sorts, but the moment a “goy” raises his voice in loud objection to the globe-spanning string-pulling of International Jewry, he will become a pariah faster than he can repeat the hideous myth of “6 million Jews died in the Holocaust and they are holier than the holiest of holies”.

 

Regarding Jews themselves, it is no issue for them to speak about their prowess as economic controllers, media barons and political subverters, as long as it follows a golden rule of being done “out of the earshot of the goyim” as Jewish-Zionist author JJ Goldberg so delightfully and bigotedly described it (84). Dieudonné defiantly broke this golden rule, and it is for this reason why International Zionism decided to drop the ax on his head. Not because its accusations against him hold any weight, but because his words do.

 

 

Conclusion: Football Jerseys, Holocaustianity and The Incoming Battle Between Silence and Defiance

 

Central to the war on Dieudonné is the always explosive topic of the “Holocaust”. In an interview with Iran’s Press TV in April 2010, Dieudo fired away,

In France, for example, we commemorate only one of the events that have caused suffering for people – the Holocaust. Other events where mankind has suffered injustice are completely overlooked. For example, slavery in French colonies, the Algerian war, and many other events are never mentioned. The Zionist lobby imposes an unequal competition, a hierarchy in the sufferings of different communities, which is completely obscene (85).

With that noted, another bang-on Dieudo barb comes to mind, this time in an interview quoted by the Zionist-owned New York Times in June 2012, “Our submission to the Shoah has come to such degree that it became a new religion (86).

 

Dieudonne 157

[Image] Pushed by Organized Jewish Interests down the throat of the world, “Jewish suffering” is meant to have primacy over and above all other sufferings on earth.

 

Taking it in an even more abyssal direction on this very point, while simultaneously noting the colossal hypocrisy of Organized Jewish Interests, the French-Cameroonian master of mockery and savant of sarcasm hit the game-winner at the buzzer in a 2013 interview with the Nation of Islam,

The Jewish Holocaust is like a trophy. In France one can caricature Prophet Muhammad, one can say the Pope of Rome is a pedophile, one can even say slavery did not exist. But you cannot contest the reality of the Jewish Holocaust. The Holocaust is a new god (87).

 

The name of this new religion that brother Dieudonné speaks of is Holocaustianity and the “god” of it is the mythical, almost sentient collective that can simply be referred to as “The 6 Million”. Challenging Holocaustianity is blasphemy; demanding proof of “The 6 Million” or innocently questioning why the number can certainly be increased if need be, as a means of praising “The 6 Million”, but never lowered, is punishable by death, both literally and figuratively in the form of character assassination. The priest class of Holocaustianity is International Jewry, and it indeed takes a “tithe” from the world in the form of “reparations” for the “The 6 Million”, extracted chiefly from European regimes that are brutally beaten over the head again and again with the most dangerous as well as effective weapon of guilt; manufactured guilt at that, for an event that did not even occur in the manner in which we are told it occurred. The “church” from which the “gospel” of Holocaustianity is “preached” is none other than the airwaves of the media controlled by the priest class, and the congregation to whom it preaches to is none other than the “goyim”, who sop up every bit of it in an unknowing ode to their masters.

 

As is the case with every religion, there are heretics and apostates. And quite frankly, to be heretical in the era of Holocaustianity is the most revolutionary, defiant, courageous, honorable, dignified and downright gutsy thing one can pride himself or herself on being. Furthermore, due to “The 6 Million” being invoked by Jewish neocons as the primary motivational factor that drove them to organize and implement imperial wars of aggression for Organized Jewish Interests (88), it is not only preferable or recommendable but obligatory to strip off your shackles of Zion and become a Holocaustianity Heretic. Humanity’s future depends on the categorical rejection of Holocaustianity’s self-proclaimed uniqueness and the overthrow of Holocaustianity’s “chosenite” priest class.

 

Dieudonne 152

[Image] The French people have had it with Zionist puppet Hollande and the entire Jewish plutocratic system. They want real change and all it is going to take is a single spark to set them off. Dieudonné just may be it.

 

Geopolitical designs are resting at the center of the ongoing clash between Dieudonné and the Zionist powers that be. Holocaustianity is used in France to justify its increasing pro-“Israel” policy in the Arab and Islamic world, a policy which Dieudonné openly defies, especially regarding Libya. The “Israeli” regime itself, through its Jewish Agency, one of its many ethnic cleansing arms, is also employing Holocaustianity, and Dieudonné’s challenging of it, to push Jews into leaving France for occupied Palestine and starting a new life as illegal colonists (89). The Gayssot Law, one of Europe’s several thought crime laws, is in place to silence Holocaustianity Heretics and uphold International Zionism’s stranglehold over France. But the French people, indigenous and immigrant alike, aren’t falling for the trickery anymore. Sick of the Jewish-Zionist plutocracy and its shabbos goyim, they’re rising up. The support for Dieudo and his comrade Alain Soral is blasting through the roof and a growing resistance is demanding the dissolution of the entire corrupted system (90).

 

As it was stated in the beginning of this essay, Dieudo’s hardships are “a microcosm of the global Jewish-Zionist assault on genuine, unmitigated freedom of speech.” Amid his fight from the French front, a handful of significant events unfolded that only amplify this point.

 

Dieudonne 153

[Image] Regardless of the ban slapped on its old jerseys, Palestino defied Organized Jewish Interests and maintained the map of historic Palestine on its new design.

 

In December, a football club in Chile called Palestino, founded by the large Chilean Palestinian community, unveiled jerseys in which the number one is shaped like the map of historic Palestine. After Jewish organizations within Chile went ballistic about it, the jerseys were banned by the Chilean football federation in a move that can only be described as “1984ish” (91). Leading the pressure internationally was, as one could expect, the ADL and its abhorrent head, Abraham Foxman (92). Palestino though, in the typically resistant fashion of the Palestinian spirit, has rebuked the ban, maintaining the map of historic Palestine, albeit in a different design, and defiantly declaring, “We are not at the mercy of what the Jewish community likes or dislikes (93).”How’s that for a quenelle?!

 

Dieudonne 154

[Image] The “anti-Semitic” cartoon banned by the Economist after pressure from the likes of the ADL.

 

Following the bullying of Palestino came a bizarre incident with the Economist, a magazine partly owned by the ultra-Zionist Rothschild family (94). The Economist published a story about threats to the interim nuclear agreement with the Islamic Republic of Iran, and with it, a picture of the US Congress shackling President Obama and ostensibly keeping him from completing the deal. Featured on the symbol of the US was the six-pointed star also found on the usurping Zionist entity’s flag. Despite the fact that this is an accurate rendering of the congressional symbol, and that the six-pointed star can also be found on the back of the American one dollar bill, the Zionist Lobby, led yet again by the ADL, threw a monstrous fit, shrieking that the cartoon is “anti-Semitic”, and the Economist pulled the cartoon (95). Authenticity be damned.

 

Lastly, right on the heels of the Economist scandal, came the Orwellian ordeal of Mohamed Salah, a massively talented Egyptian football star signed by the British club Chelsea, owned by the aforementioned Jewish-Zionist gangster Roman Abramovich. Prior to the closing of the deal, Salah had to clarify why he didn’t shake hands with an “Israeli” team several months prior, and also repudiate all anti-Zionist statements attributed to him (96). What his political sentiments have to do with his outstanding gift on the field is anyone’s guess, but what certainly can be assumed is the condition placed on Salah was not about football. It was about control, something the Zionists have in abundance and something that they want to preserve wherever it is.

 

Dieudonne 155

[Image] Zion has declared war on your thoughts… Will you obey? Or will you resist?

 

While Dieudonné, Palestino, a political cartoon in an elitist magazine like the Economist and Mohamed Salah may not seem like they have much in common, in all actuality, they are as interconnected as the sun, moon and stars. There is something happening in the world. Something horrifying. Something that threatens the very way that humanity functions. This is not some post-apocalyptic dystopian future flick pumped out by the filth factory known as Jewish Hollywood. This is not a science fiction novel. This is not a soothsayer feeding you an unhealthy dose of gloom and doom. This is real. This is true. This is now. Right now. International Zionism has declared war on your thoughts and there are only two choices before you: be silent or be defiant.

 

If Organized Jewish Interests can tell you what to laugh at, what to wear, what to draw and what to say, then the next logical demand that they will ask, nay, order you to abide by will be what to think. Already, the divisions are being ignited. The so-called “Palestine Solidarity Movement”, in a follow-up to their attack on anti-Zionist, anti-Jewish-supremacist thinker, writer and activist Gilad Atzmon (81), have already shown where they stand, condemning Dieudo as an “anti-Semite” (97), in perfect lockstep with the Zionists they claim to be fighting. As Dieudo himself brightly noted in the Press TV interview noted earlier in this essay,

What I’m trying to say is that Zionism is dividing humanity. It is trying to rule by making us fight one another. They have organized all the wars and organized all the disorders on this planet (85).

 

Clearly, this concept just soars over the heads of these “solidarity” activists. They are blind to the big picture.

 

Dieudonne 156

[Image] Dieudonné understands that liberationism is the only way… Are you with him?

 

Are you with him? Zionism is not just an enterprise that illegally and genocidally occupies the land between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. Zionism is an enterprise that has illegally and genocidally colonized the globe. And if we do not recognize it as such, we will not go the victorious way of Iran and Hizbullah, but the tragic way of states and movements before them that no longer exist because they were trampled under the jackboot of imperialism and its parent company, International Jewish Finance.

 

Decolonization is our aim. And it is achievable with every little act of resistance. But the question is: How can we liberate our lands if our minds aren’t liberated in totality first? Liberate your mind! Let go of your fear! Scream at the top of your lungs:

Down with Holocaustianity! Down with Zionism! Down with Jewish supremacy! Down with ‘Israel’ and its imperialism! Down with the bankers led by the Rothschild clan and their capitalist disease! Down with slavery and oppression everywhere!

 

Once you’re done screaming, scream just a little more. Then a little bit more after that. Scream ‘till your voice is gone. But don’t you worry at that point, because there will be an army to your front, back, left and right, screaming just as loudly as you. If we all put our voices together, in a cacophony of resistance, there is nothing that humanity’s most terrible tyrants will be able to hold on to when the organic winds of change blow them away.

 

In unison with our ancestors, in honor of the martyrs who will undoubtedly fall on our chosen path of defiance over silence, and in solidarity with Dieudonné M’bala M’bala, let our screams shake the world.

 

 

~ End ~

 

 

 

Sources:

 

(1) Downing Denies Anelka Anti-Semitism by ESPN

(2) Nicolas Anelka: FA Charges West Brom Striker Over Gesture by BBC

(3) Zoopla To End West Brom Sponsorship Over Nicolas Anelka’s Quenelle Gesture by Sky Sports

(4) Jewish Community Urges FA To “Follow Through” On Anelka by Jewish News

(5) EI Exclusive: UK Charity With Mossad Links Secretly Denounced Anti-Zionist Jews To Government by Asa Winstanely, The Electronic Intifada

(6) David Bernstein: It’s Been A Game Of Two Halves by Simon Round, The Jewish Chronicle

(7) Israel And The UK Celebrate “Football For All” by Israeli Embassy London

(8) The Life And Rise Of Jews In Our Game by Patrick Barclay, London Evening Standard

(9) What Do Susan Sarandon, Alan Dershowitz And The Russian Mob Have In Common? by Richard Silverstein, Tikun Olam

(10) Nicolas Anelka faces Lengthy Ban After Controversial Quenelle Gesture by Sachin Nakrani, The Guardian

(11) Nicolas Anelka Receives Blow To Defence of Quenelle Salute by The Guardian

(12) ‘Zoopla’ Joins Gibberish Feud Over ‘Quenelle’ by Eddy Portnoy, The Jewish Daily Forward

(13) France’s Potential Breakdown by Riccardo Dugulin, Ynet

(14) How ‘Quenelle’ Salute Creator Dieudonne Built Bridge To Anti-Semitic Far Fight by Robert Zaretsky, The Jewish Daily Forward

(15) The Soccer Star Who’s Putting The Cool Back In Anti-Semitism by Anshel Pfeffer, Haaretz

(16) ADL Praises France For Crackdown On Anti-Semitic Comic Dieudonné by The Algemeiner

(17) Jewish Groups Praise French Government’s Commitment To Combat Anti-Semitism by The European Jewish Press

(18) Despicable Meme: Why The Quenelle Is the Grumpy Cat Of Anti-Semites by Liel Leibovitz, Tablet Magazine

(19) The Bête Noire Of The French Establishment by Diana Johnstone, Counter Punch

(20) French Cities Ban Comedian Dieudonné Over Nazi-Style ‘Quenelle’ Salute by The Algemeiner

(21) “Quenelle” Comic Dieudonne Wins Court Battle On Ban Over “Nazi” Gesture by The Jewish Daily Forward

(22) French Court Upholds Ban on ‘Quenelle’ Comic Dieudonné’s Shows by The Jewish Daily Forward

(23) Op-Ed: The Significance Of The Quenelle Gesture by Ron Jager, Arutz Sheva

(24) French Terror Attack: All The Hallmarks Of An Intelligence Psy-Op And False Flag by Kurt Nimmo, Empire Strikes Black

(25) Anti-Semitic Comedian Dieudonné In Hot Water With French Authorities by Vladislav Davidzon, Tablet Magainze

(26) The 9/11 Delusion: Israel’s False Flag, Jingoism And Inhumanity by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion

(27) 7/7: The Terror Drill, The Military Explosives And The Israeli Connection by Martin Iqbal, Empire Strikes Black

(28) 26/11: Mossad Terrorizes Mumbai by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion

(29) Jewish People Caught Framing Gentiles For “Anti-Semitic” Hate Crimes by Gilad Atzmon, Deliberation

(30) Israel Lobby Commits Major Blunder In France: Tries To Silence A Comedian And Dieudonné Strikes Back! by Radio Islam

(31) Dieudonné Backers Hack French Jewish Websites in “Operation Triple Quenelle” by The Jewish Daily Forward

(32) Exclusive: Dieudonné Breaks Silence On Quenelle by Sky News

(33) An Act Of Cruelty: An Audience With Dieudonné M’Bala M’Bala, The Man Behind The Quenelle Salute by John Lichfield, The Independent

(34) France Intensifies Crackdown On Comic Dieudonné by The Global Post

(35) Dieudonné M’Bala M’Bala: French Quenelle Comedian Banned From UK by Kim Willsher In Paris

(35a) All In The Family: David Cameron’s Jewish Roots And The Coreligionists Who Brought Him To Power by Martin Iqbal, Empire Strikes Black

(36) Is A New Revolution Quietly Brewing In France? by The Vineyard Of The Saker

(37) Face To Face With Dieudonné by Press TV

(38) Controversial French Comedian Asks Tehran For Clemency In Stoning Case by RFI

(39) Iranian, French Companies Team Up For Film Version Of Dieudonné Play by The Tehran Times

(40) Ofergate: The Latest Zionist Propaganda Blitz Against Iran by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion

(41) Smile And Let Them Die Of Rage! by Ibrahim al-Amin, Al-Akhbar English

(42) The Case Of Uri Avnery I: “Shukran, Israel” Analyzed And Refuted by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask Of Zion

(43) If Syria Falls, So Will Palestine, Hezbollah’s Nasrallah Warns In Speech by Jack Khoury, Haaretz

(44) Syria Attack: Where Does Hezbollah Stand? by Ibrahim al-Amin, Al-Akhbar English

(45) IDF Concerned Hezbollah Could Bring Israeli Ports To A Halt by Yoav Zitun, Ynet

(46) Israeli Generals: Hezbollah Rocketry Power Is Eighth in the World by Al-Manar

(47) Israeli General: We Cannot Defeat Hezbollah by Yahya Dbouk, Al-Akhbar English

(48) The Lowdown On Hezbollah’s Ambush in South Lebanon by Ibrahim al-Amin, Al-Akhbar English

(49) Dieudonné renonce à faire appel de sa condamnation pour diffamation envers Arthur by La Depeche

(50) French TV Host Arthur Cancels Israel Tour by Shirli Sitbon, Ynet

(51) An “Ethical Coffee” Challenge To Nespresso Heats Up by Gabrielle Serraz, World Crunch

(52) Israeli Airstrike Kills Three-Year-Old In Gaza by Al-Akhbar English

(53) The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews Volume 1 by The Nation Of Islam’s Historical Research Department

(54) The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews Volume 2: How Jews Gained Control Of The Black American Economy by The Nation Of Islam’s Historical Research Department

(55) Jews Selling Blacks: Slave Sale Advertising by American Jews by The Nation Of Islam’s Historical Research Department

(56) How Culpable Were Dutch Jews In The Slave Trade? by Cnaan Liphshiz and Iris Tzur, Jewish Telegraph Agency

(57) Jews Mostly Supported Slavery — Or Kept Silent — During Civil War by Ken Yellis, The Jewish Daily Forward

(58) 94-Year-Old Wins Second Annual Miss Holocaust Survivor Contest by Sammy Hudes, The Jerusalem Post

(59) Israel’s Unexpected Spinoff From A Holocaust Trial by Isabel Kershner, New York Times

(60) Quebec Court Fines Dieudonné $75,000 For Defamation by Janice Arnold, The Canadian Jewish News

(61) French Singer Patrick Bruel Lines Up An August Tel Aviv Concert! by IGoogledIsrael

(62) French Singer Patrick Bruel In Israel by IsraCast

(63) Lee Zeitouni Activists Disrupt French Singer’s Show by Yoav Malka, Ynet

(64) Tel Aviv University’s Role In Settler-Run Archaeological Dig “Playing Into Hands Of BDS,” Israeli Academics Complain by Ben White, The Electronic Intifada

(65) We’ve All Been Veiled From The Truth by Robert Fisk, Information Clearing House

(66) In Blow To Israel, French BDS Activists Acquitted Of Crime In Calling For Boycott by Ali Abunimah, The Electronic Intifada

(67) Iran’s New Anti-Israel Ally: French Comedian Dieudonne by Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu, Arutz Sheva

(68) Natalie Portman Shills For The Zionist War Machine And Spews Lies On Syria: Jewish Hollywood’s Power In Action by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask Of Zion

(69) Jewish Students Denounce Brussels University Debate On French Controversial Comic by The European Jewish Press

(70) The Zionist Infestation Of Africa: Zimbabwe To Uganda, Congo To Somalia And Beyond by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion

(71) James Crown: The Israeli Connection In The Madoff Scam by Christopher Bollyn

(72) How Scott Rothstein Rode $1.2 Billion Ponzi Scheme To Wealth And Power by Warren Richey, The Christian Science Monitor

(73) Jewish Con Men Shine In Oscar Nominations by Tom Tugend, The Jewish Journal

(74) Orthodox Jew Sentenced In $32 Million Ponzi Scheme by Shmarya Rosenberg, Failed Messiah

(75) SEC Halts Ponzi Scheme Targeting Persian Jews In LA by The Times Of Israel

(76) Kidnapped Developer’s Body Found In Dumpster by Larry Celona, Laura Italiano, Natasha Velez and Jamie Schram, The New York Post

(77) Two More Charged In Met Council Scam by The Jewish Journal

(78) Israeli Sources: Sharon Kept In A Coma For 8 Years So His Sons Could Collect His Three Pensions by Wayne Madsen, The Wayne Madsen Report/The Ugly Truth

(79) Iceland — The Hallmarks Of An Israeli Operation by Christopher Bollyn

(80) Israel’s Danny Rothschild And The Plundering of Iceland by Christopher Bollyn

(81) The Tribal Nexus: Zionists And “Anti-Zionists” Unite To Ensure The Survival Of “Israel” by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion

(82) The Zionist Mega-Scams of 9/11, Bernard Madoff And Allen Stanford by Christopher Bollyn

(83) Dieudonné And The Uses Of Anti-Semitism by Diana Johnstone, Counter Punch

(84) American Jews Cannot Conduct a Discussion of Jewish Power Out of Earshot of ‘the Goyim’ by Philip Weiss, Mondoweiss

(85) French Comedian Dieudonné M’bala M’bala on Zionism by French Dissidents

(86) A French Jester Who Trades in Hate by Maia de la Baume, The New York Times

(87) Tony Parker, The ADL And The French Farrakhan by Tingba Muhammad, Nation of Islam Research Group

(88) The Accusation Of “Anti-Semitism” I: Zionism, “Jewish Israelis” And Revisionism by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion

(89) Blasphemy In Secular France by Diana Johnstone, Counter Punch

(90) State Repression In France Only Makes The Resistance Grow Stronger by The Vineyard Of The Saker

(91) Chile Bans Palestino Football Club “Anti-Israel” Shirt by BBC

(92) ADL Urges FIFA Action Over Chilean Team’s Jersey by Elad Benari, Arutz Sheva

(93) Chilean Soccer Team Defies League, Retains Palestine On Jersey by Ira Glunts, Mondoweiss

(94) The Rothschild Who Plans To Make Big Business Honest by James Ashton, The Independent

(95) ‘Economist’ Pulls Cartoon Showing Obama Shackled To Congress Bearing Star Of David by Philip Weiss, Mondoweiss

(96) The Handshake Saga Of New £11m Chelsea Signing Mohamed Salah by Sam Wallace, The London Evening Standard

(97) Dieudonné Is An Anti-Semite And Should Be Rejected From The Pro-Palestinian Community by As’ad AbuKhalil, The Angry Arab News Service

 

—————————————————————-

 

 

PDF of this post. Click to view or download (5.5 MB). >>International Zionism’s Crusade Against Dieudonné

 

 

Version History

 

Version 2: Jan 7, 2017 — Improved formatting.

 

Version 1: Published Oct 19, 2014

Read Full Post »

Hervé Ryssen interviewed

 

By Margaret Huffstickler

 

Hervé Ryssen explains Judaism is not a faith but the geopolitical project of a hysterical, incestuous master-race cult.

Hervé Ryssen, born in 1967, is a French writer and activist who specializes in Judaism as a geopolitical project, and graduated from the famous Sorbonne in Paris. He was fired for his views as a high school history teacher and became a militant with the Front National and then other groups. In 2003, he threw a pie in the face of a famous Catholic priest who, on television, had condoned illegal immigrants occupying his cathedral. He has been constantly fined and given prison sentences for denouncing Judaism, and especially the practice of incest in Jewish families, which he says makes Jews suffer from both inbreeding and hysteria. He is known for his definition of Judaism as a political project of world domination over a planet of uniform slaves. His website: http: //herveryssen.over-blog.com/

Interview by Margaret Huffstickler in Paris for The Barnes Review magazine (httpt: //www.barnesreview.org)

 

 

 

 Hervé Ryssen interview 1031        Hervé Ryssen interview 1033

 

 

TBR: Hello, Hervé Ryssen. Between 2005 and 2010, you published five major books on Judaism. We are in the age of the Internet, videos and blogs, but you persist in writing books. Why? Do young people in France still read?

HR: From 2005 to 2010, I actually published six, six major books [1] [2] on Judaism, which are the fruit of my research on the subject. It was in 2004 that I began systematically, voluminously, and daily to read Jewish authors, to devour books written by Jewish intellectuals, philosophers, sociologists, novelists, historians, etc. I realized that their thinking was extraordinarily uniform. Whether they were religious Jews or atheists, liberals, socialists or communists, Zionists [committed to Israel] or “fully integrated” [supposedly committed to their host country] I found in every epoch — and regardless of nationality or language of origin — the same ideas, the same paradoxes, and the same messianic expectations.

As as I advanced in my reading, I sorted into chapters everything appertaining to the same Jewish subjects. After completing the first book back in September 2005, I found that I still had many more things to say, and so I continued to document my findings in new books… until I realized now that I have completely covered the subject of Judaism.

All my books are very well-documented and factually unassailable. Moreover, none have triggered prosecution [Ed: unlike his interviews] and in order to avoid this, I had to do exhaustive research and follow strict procedures. In France, for many decades, the only available “judeo-skeptic” books were old compilations of quotes from the Thirties and these never clearly understood or explained the global political project of Judaism or the pathological nature of this sect. So to go beyond mere quotes, I had to do a great deal of work analyzing Jewish texts and also bringing the progress of the Jewish project up to our times.

I believe the message has been received, because I estimate that at least 15,000 people have read at least one of my books. And I also know that reading one of these books tends to make the reader into a fanatic! That’s not so bad for just a few years’ time. I am thinking of Freud, who had sold only 700 copies of his first book after ten years.

 

 

TBR: For decades, writers and activists have indulged in “anti-Zionist” talk and agreed on the hatred of Jews toward gentiles. But you think the Jews have not only negative attitudes and feelings, such as resentment, toward gentiles, but also a kind of concrete geopolitical plan. What exactly is their plan?

HR: To understand and explain Judaism, one must always begin with the idea that Jews are obsessed with a vision of “peace” on earth (“shalom”) as depicted by their prophets. This is because they are convinced that only when peace reigns over all mankind, only then will their messiah finally come and establish the new kingdom of David, which will mean their absolute domination of the planet earth.

In order to achieve this peace which they envisage, they feel they must remove all possible sources of conflict, that is to say, they must eradicate all the differences between people, because differences for them cause conflict. The Jewish theorists who gave birth to communism wanted to abolish social classes, but not just that. They sought to also liquidate all religions, all national borders and even all separate nations.

So the current globalism means we must do away with separate races, hybridize humanity and create a one-world government. And feminism, which is also Jewish in essence, intends to abolish all differences between the sexes. We see that all this massive trend springs from one single project, the “pacification” of humanity by making everyone exactly the same. And every committed Jew works daily to carry out this project.

When there is nothing left on earth but individuals without any roots, sans racial identity or pride, deprived of any religion, and existing only to be a consumer, the Jews — who, however, will have kept their own traditions and identity — will be recognized by all as “God’s Chosen People.

You see, Judaism is, first and foremost, a political project of world unification under the rule of the Jews. It is also, as we have seen, a sophisticated worldwide war machine, deployed against the rest of humanity so it obeys.

How does one recognize a Jew?

By what he says, how he writes, and what he does.

The Jew wants a world without borders and a global government. It all starts with this one goal.

It is very rare, I have found, that committed Jewish intellectuals ever clearly express their true goal and idea, but it forms the background of their every thought. But nowadays, with the power the Jews have acquired in recent decades, some feel bolder and more arrogant, and sometimes they let their goal slip out unintentionally, especially in certain novels, non-fiction books and articles which however are put out only by small Jewish publishers and are intended only for an audience within the Jewish community. In these works that we gentiles are not supposed to read we find the most extraordinary pearls.

One that we discovered in the April 2003 issue of Israel Magazine is too beautiful not to be mentioned. This is a monthly magazine in color, sold in French kiosks. Dr. Yitzhak Attia, the “director of French-language seminars at the International School for Holocaust Studies of Yad Vashem” in Tel Aviv, used very explicit language here, writing with a clarity unusual among Jewish intellectuals:

Even though our reason shouts out with all its might the absurdity of this confrontation between a small people as insignificant as the people of Israel and the rest of humanity, … as absurd, as incoherent, as monstrous as it may seem, we are engaged in close combat between Israel and the Nations, and it can only be genocidal and total, because it is a question of our respective identities.

You have read that right: Attia of Yad Vashem writes that between the Jewish people and the rest of humanity, the battle can only be “genocidal and total.

The Jews, therefore, inevitably trigger the hatred against them, and it is as old as Judaism itself.

 

 

TBR: What do you think are the main characteristics of the Jewish mind?

HR: If one adopts the perspective of the Jewish public, we note first that the history of Judaism is depicted as a succession of tragedies. From the Exodus out of Egypt all the way to Auschwitz, passing through the destruction of the Temple and the ravages of the Cossacks, Jews present themselves as an eternally persecuted, unjustly persecuted community.

Now, if you look closely, dissecting their texts, I can assure you that there is also great pride taken in belonging to the “Chosen People” and no less contempt for the traditional cultures of the goyim.

 

Hervé Ryssen interview 138

[Image] Bernard-Henri Lévy, Emmanuel Levinas and Alain Minc

Major French-Jewish writers such as Bernard-Henri Lévy, Emmanuel Levinas and Alain Minc have declared their distaste for our indigenous, deeply-rooted cultures. This is associated with a deep desire for “revenge” (an ever-present Jewish theme) and an absolute faith in the final Hebrew victory over mankind.

This ferocious state of mind is however usually embedded in egalitarian phrases advocating “tolerance,” “human rights” and “universal brotherhood.” At other times, their goals of domination and revenge are expressed much more frankly.

 

Hervé Ryssen interview 1036

 

TBR: Your second book is entitled Psychanalyse du judaïsme, (2006) [“Psychoanalysis of Judaism”]. Could you tell us the connection between the Jews and “psychoanalysis”?

HR: After writing Espérances planétariennes, [The Planetary Hope] I recognized, without being able to explain it, what seemed to me to be an “abnormality.” I noted especially how Jewish intellectuals are in breathtaking denial about their co-religionists‘ roles in the Bolshevik regime. The truth, as Solzhenitsyn revealed, is that many Jewish theorists, civil servants and torturers played an absolutely overwhelming role in this tragedy that remains, with thirty million dead, the most terrible crime in the history of mankind.

 

 Hervé Ryssen interview 1035

 

And yet almost all Jewish intellectuals still refuse to shoulder their responsibilities and do their mea culpa. Their impossible contortions to prove otherwise are a dazzling example of “chutzpah.”

One observes constantly their efforts to deny the obvious, to reverse roles, and finally to place all blame on others. One thinks, for example, of the role of the influential Jews surrounding George W. Bush in advocating the invasion of Iraq in 2003, or the key role of Jews in the African slave trade. And what about the “Russian mafia” we hear of constantly, of which nothing but the name is Russian?

While systematically obscuring these sensitive issues, the media exaggerates disproportionately any incident of anti-Semitism, causing at regular intervals “an uproar in the community.” There is indeed, in this community, an emotional fragility, a need to dramatize, that sometimes takes the form of outright paranoia. Beside that, there is also a great nervousness whenever “the community” is criticized. Medical diagnosis emphasizes this “great intolerance of frustration.

The fact is that the Jewish soul is pathological. A number of Jewish intellectuals (such as Philip Roth, among others, with his Portnoy’s Complaint), have confided in us their anxieties. They talk about the “mystery” of Judaism without understanding the nature of the evil that underlies it. Judaism is for average Jews themselves an “enigma” that they fail to solve. Bernard-Henri Lévy (photo) says it is “one of the deepest mysteries facing contemporary consciousness.

I must say their situation is unique in all humanity. The truth is that after 3,000 years they still sometimes feel very alone in this world. Put yourself in their place: for centuries, they were expelled from almost all the countries where they settled, and nevertheless — they will not budge on this — they believe themselves to be the “chosen people” of God and to have from Him a “mission” to transform this earth. Elie Wiesel has repeatedly referred to the “dramatic solitude of this people with a universal vocation.

 

 

TBR: What is your own take on this “mystery of Judaism”? And above all: what is its relationship with Freud and psychoanalysis?

HR: Freud had already thought about the Jewish enigma in his time, in studying his own personal and family case history, but he then projected his discoveries about the Jews onto the “universal” plane, beyond the Jews onto humanity as a whole. “Projection,” it must be said, is indeed a Freudian concept, as well as typically Jewish. We have already seen this tendency to systematically reverse roles and invert situations.

 

Mad Max

[Image] Mel Gibson as Mad Max

This also explains why Jewish intellectuals, in their entirety, accuse anti-Semites of being “mentally ill.” Note what Abraham Foxman, the president of the Anti-Defamation League in the U.S., said about Mel Gibson, director of The Passion of the Christ, who had made remarks considered “anti-Semitic” under the influence of alcohol before apologizing abjectly to the Jewish community under the influence of who knows what pressures.

Treating his alcoholism is a good thing,” Foxman said in substance, “but he also needs to treat his anti-Semitism.

Hervé Ryssen interview 1039

 

You understand. Anti-semitism, to them, is a “disease.” Jewish comments along these lines are legion. And we can understand, reading them, why opponents of the Judeo-bolsheviks were locked up in mental asylums in the USSR and other Stalinist countries.

So Freud was projecting his own Jewish pathology onto the universal level, where it did not belong. As for pathology, it is not for nothing that he began his career working on the phenomenon of hysteria. In this condition, countless symptoms are found that mimic perfectly those I can detect in the behavior and discourse of these cosmopolitan [jewish] intellectuals. The similarities are truly amazing: depression, introspection, anxiety, paranoia, constant state of vigilant arousal, selective amnesia, confabulation, sensitivity to the opinions of others, egocentrism, tendency to self-dramatize, the narcissistic inability to observe others, intolerance to frustration, megalomaniacal delusions, etc. Every trait of hysteria is found in these committed Jewish writers, just as hysteria is described by Freud himself.

Back when I wrote Espérances planétariennes I first noticed, without being able initially to understand why, that the horrific issue of incest — parents having sex with their own children — returned hauntingly and mysteriously in the writings of some Jewish intellectuals, such as Jacques Attali, Isaac Bashevis Singer [a Nobel laureate] , Stéphane Zagdanski … as if they had something to hide, some tribal secret.

Hervé Ryssen interview 142

[Image] Jacques Attali, Isaac Bashevis Singer and Stéphane Zagdanski

I continued my research on this subject, and what I discovered is very enlightening, because incest is extremely traumatizing — and incest triggers hysteria. I think I am the only writer to bring up this huge issue of the Jews and the widespread practice of incest.

 

 

TBR: You do realize that your work may be highly offensive to members of the Jewish community?

HR: Well, Jewish intellectuals have never been shy about offending others, and writing their “psychoanalyses of the anti-Semites” that call their opponents “paranoid,” “pathological” and “crazy,” with opinions that are “repulsive.” This propensity to insult and slander others is one of the traits of the cosmopolitan intellectual.

 

Hervé Ryssen interview 143

[Image] Eli Wiesel

Here, for instance, is what Elie Wiesel said on TV about Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad:

The religious leader of Iran is crazy, I mean pathologically ill; he is mad with hatred.” (May 6, 2006).

To this he added, with impeccable logic:

His bomb does not threaten Israel, but the entire world.

 

Hervé Ryssen interview 144

[Image Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

Now there is some projection for you! Yes, you understood it right — all those who oppose the plans of Jewry are “crazy,” and Iran threatens the world, not Israel, so we have a duty to fight their enemies. So should we now go to war in Syria or Iran?

My point is not to insult the Jews. I just think that the accusation of “the perfidy of the Jews,” as it was denounced by the Church and all major Western thinkers throughout the ages, does not come close to describing the real bedrock of the Jewish personality.

And although no statistics are available, I can tell you that my research suggests there is a very high rate of suicide in this community, and it seems the Jews need to exorcise their “dybbuk,” their demon, as they say!

 

 

TBR: How can one resolve the dispute between the Jews and the rest of humanity?

HR: We must once again repeat; Judaism is first and foremost not a religious faith but a political project of world unification. Its plan is to eradicate all the differences between individuals and peoples in order to achieve an absolute and definitive peace, because this “peace will be conducive to the advent of their Messiah. One must crush and grind into one single powder all the nations, races, religions, and civilizations of the earth, raze everything that is different or unique to the ground, and leave behind only a human mass which can then be coagulated into a vast planetary workforce for them. Everyone must be exactly the same, except for the Jews.

Thus, the essence of Judaism is drastic — to destroy everything that is not Jewish. They are indeed “enemies of humanity,” just as they were regarded even back in the days of the ancient Greek and Roman thinkers. Now, if you do ever find that rare Jew who defends the white race, who supports ethnically homogeneous and independent nations, and advocates the patriarchal family, etc., it means only that he is no longer a committed Jew, that he has left his Judaism behind, or that he lives in its margins. I have written about that phenomenon too in my books, the Jews who reject Judaism.

This is why great thinkers throughout history have warned men against, in Latin, the detestanda secta, “the sect one must detest.” Under these conditions, combating Jewish nihilism is the duty of every human being, for we can be well assured that they will not halt their activities on their own. They are like infernal machines that will stop only when smashed!

When faced with the project of total Jewish destruction of all cultures and nations, it is perfectly legitimate in turn to contemplate the annihilation of Judaism — at least in its spirit — in order to save and liberate mankind.

This goal however is probably not very “Christian.” The Church, indeed, has always protected the Jews as the “witness people” of the victory of Christianity, a people who must be preserved to be converted in some coming “end times.

The Church has never changed its position on the Jews. Throughout history, it has always wanted the Jews to be respected in their peoplehood and their religion, but still she wanted them to be kept down, in a state of submission, powerlessness and isolation, in order to prevent them from harming others. (See our Histoire de l’antisémitisme [History of Anti-Semitism], 2010).

 

 Hervé Ryssen interview 1038

 

Until the French Revolution of 1789, Jewish power was contained in this way for centuries. But then it was unchained. The fact is that our history is very hectic, and Jewish power required a constant effort over the centuries to be contained, which even before 1789 did not prevent Jewish financiers from being guilty of causing many wars and misfortunes.

 

Hervé Ryssen interview 1029

In my most recent book, La guerre eschatologique [The Eschatological War] ( 2013), I showed that according to the doctrine of the Church, the Jews must endure “until the end of time,” and yet their final conversion to the “true religion” of Christ will owe nothing to the work of Christians. But now, at a time when European civilization and nations around the world are threatened with death by the cosmopolitan venom, the old Church doctrine of “charitable segregation of the Jews” has shown its shortcomings.

You do not keep a basket full of writhing snakes around in your home!

Within Catholicism, only the Scottish theologian Duns Scotus opposed Judaism with an ideological and religious force that could have confronted it victoriously. Duns Scotus (1266-1308), a professor at Oxford, was one of the most remarkable minds of the Middle Ages and the pride of the Franciscan order. He went further than St. Thomas in proposing a solution to the Jewish problem. It was not on the basis of segregation, but of the utter destruction of the sect.

Hervé Ryssen interview 145

[Image] Scottish theologian Duns Scotus

Unlike canonists and theologians of the thirteenth century — with Thomas Aquinas at their head — who believed Jewish children should not be baptized against the wishes of their parents, Duns Scotus believed it was the very duty of kings to take Jewish children away from their parents, to rescue them, and to baptize and raise them as Christians.

And readers of our books know that this salutary measure would also have broken the horrific chain of incest, a sexual crime that goes forward from generation to generation among the Jews.

When faced with the old argument that we need to preserve the Jewish people intact anticipating their conversion to Christ in the far-off end times, the Franciscan replied that;

for this it is sufficient to preserve just a small number of them, but isolated out on an island.

We must never lose sight of the fact that Judaism is not a religious faith or a race, or an ethnic people who eat bagels. It is primarily a commitment, a mindset, an ideology and a project of world Jewish domination over a slave planet. And so it is primarily through the mind that this evil mindset must be destroyed.

When a Jew is sincerely converted to Traditional Catholicism, for example, his Judaism, his hate and his desire to dominate others and wreak vengeance is destroyed within his heart. Judaism can in fact be rendered harmless in a peaceful manner.

For example, here a few commonsense measures for a future anti-Jewish program:

We must begin by dissolving the major Jewish-Zionist organizations across the country. It will be established by law that any statement or written work, book, television program or film that glorifies immigration, miscegenation, adultery or homosexuality be punished by a prison sentence.

Likewise, all writings calling for the establishment of a world government will be punished with imprisonment and a revocation of citizenship. Any incitation of Westerners to engage in a Middle Eastern war against the Muslim world will be punished as well with a prison sentence. In this way, militant Judaism is sidelined.

Further measures will be needed to put an end to the Jewish menace once and for all. It will obviously be necessary to forbid any rabbinical teaching, to close Jewish schools and synagogues because they teach hatred, and to separate children from their parents early enough to prevent the horrors of incest, which is all too frequent among the members of the sect, an atrocity which generates the characteristic pathology called hysteria in the Jews.

Children from Jewish families must receive instead a quality education, inculcating all the basic Indo-European, Greco-Roman values. Jewish youth in the process of healing will be encouraged to engage in projects that show solidarity with others, and work with other American and European children who are out in contact with nature, fresh air, animals, woods and farms.

And the most fragile young elements of the sect will receive the best care in specialized psychiatric hospitals.

After three or four generations, Judaism will have completely disappeared. We will organize, in the meantime, an international trial for the crimes of Judaism against peace and humanity, and repudiate once and for all this disastrous, mankind-hating cult.

 

 

TBR: When I interviewed the Catalan Revisionist author Joaquin Bochaca, he had a somewhat pessimistic view of the future. In fact, he compared the work of truth tellers to someone on a sinking ship who writes a final note and stuffs it in a bottle for posterity to find. What is your opinion? Do you think it is not too late to prevail against the forces that seek to enslave humanity?

HR: Au contraire. In my book La guerre eschatologique [The Eschatological War] , when speaking of psychological warfare, I took the example of a reader who expressed his disappointment in poor election results in 2007 by the Front National here in France [then led by Jean-Marie Le Pen] . In a nationalist newspaper he wrote in these terms:

I am desperate, my friends. … the Front National has lost three quarters of its electorate in France. … I tore up my voter registration card. Hope is dead; I no longer believe in anything. We are disarmed; we are done for.

My comment in the book was:

After reading this kind of defeatist prose, I ask three questions. First, is this guy really a supporter — or an enemy infiltrating our ranks? Secondly, was the letter editor of this newspaper paid to publish it? And thirdly, should this defeatist be shot now or wait until later?

The last line is no doubt a little exaggerated, but everyone understands what I mean. The war our enemies are fighting against us is first and foremost a psychological war.

For centuries, when we Europeans were fighting among ourselves, each side gathered his men and they lined up openly in front of their opponents on a battlefield. The prince who was the winner grabbed some of the conquered territories, and it all ended there.

Jews, though, do not fight in this way. They act by stealth and deceit, through the media which they control; and all their work has one design — to demoralize others, to blame the white man and paralyze him with a guilt trip so that he will fall to his knees and submit, begging the Jews’ forgiveness.

So through their films, their newspapers and television they have constantly portrayed our Western history as one long succession of crimes: torture under the Roman Empire, the Inquisition, the pogroms of the First Crusade, colonization and pillage of the third world, etc. … So today our teenagers leave school unconsciously feeling the urge to obliterate their own race in a great, universal program of miscegenation. All races must merge, then the evil white man is gone.

To be demoralized, faced with the ugliness of the modern world is to submit to the enemy. Obviously there are many reasons to be pessimistic if we look at our environment, if we turn on the TV, if we observe the statistics about unemployment, crime, immigration, etc. …

But this is exactly what our enemies want — to destroy our morale so that we give up defending ourselves, we fold up our tents and we abandon the field.

Sarcastic graphic by Ryssen on his site:

If a Jew says it, it must be true. ‘Anti-semitism is not freedom of speech but a crime.‘ — Haverim Collective. 

Hervé Ryssen, 100% anti-semite.

 

Hervé Ryssen interview 1034

 

Consequently, we must consider that everything that demoralizes the enemy, is good, and everything that demoralizes and demobilizes us must be combated with the utmost energy, mercilessly censored, and totally rejected.

To paraphrase Carl von Clausewitz, we can say that “literal war is only the continuation of psychological war.

 

TBR: Thank you, Hervé Ryssen.

_______________________________

 

 

Footnotes

 

[1] Books by Hervé Ryssen. http://herveryssen.over-blog.com/

 

Hervé Ryssen interview 1037

 

[2] Herve Ryssen’s latest book is Les Milliards d’Israël, Escrocs juifs et financiers internationaux [The Billions of Israel, Jews and international financial Crooks]

 

Hervé Ryssen interview 1040

 

Les Milliards d’Israël. Escrocs juifs et financiers internationaux

Notre nouveau livre intitulé Les Milliards d’Israël, Escrocs juifs et financiers internationaux (336 pages) sera disponible en librairie le 17 septembre 2014. Le livre pourra être acheté en prévente au mois d’août ou début septembre afin de payer l’imprimeur. Nous vous tiendrons au courant d’ici peu sur la démarche à suivre.

Pour les flics de la pensée et autres censeurs, sachez que le fichier est entre de bonnes mains, et que même s’il devait m’arriver un malheur, le livre serait publié de toute manière. Juifs, si vous avez peur des livres, c’est que vous avez sans doute des choses à vous reprocher !

A très bientôt, chers lecteurs, pour plus d’informations.

Hervé RYSSEN

PS : Je me demande si je ne vais pas dédier ce livre à Claire Lafoix, la présidente de la 17e chambre correctionnelle de Nanterre, qui m’a condamné le 9 avril 2014 à un mois de prison FERME, pour le simple port d’une bombe lacrymogène.

Il est vrai qu’elle entre en compétition avec les guignols de la 17e chambre correctionnelle de Paris, qui eux, m’ont condamné à deux mois de prison FERME pour une simple blague sur les moeurs de Bertrand Delanoë.

Auront-ils le courage de mettre un écrivain en prison ?

Sont-ils assez crétins pour aller jusque là ?

L’avenir nous le dira !

——————-

 

 

From Google Translate:

Our new book, The Billions of Israel, Jews and international financial Crooks (336 pages) will be available in bookstores on September 17 2014. The book can be ordered in advance in the month of August or early September via the printer. We will keep you posted shortly on how to proceed.

For the cops and other critics, know that the file is in good hands, and that even if a disaster should happen to me, the book would be published anyway. Jews, if you are afraid of books it is because you probably have something to hide!

See you soon, dear readers, for more information.

Hervé RYSSEN

PS: I wonder if I’m not going to dedicate the book to Claire Lafoix, the 17th president of the criminal court of Nanterre, who sentenced me April 9, 2014 to one month FARM prison for simply wearing a tear bombs.

True, it competes with the horns of the 17th Criminal Chamber of Paris, who themselves have sentenced me to two months in prison for simple FARM joke about the morals of Bertrand Delanoë.

Will they have the courage to put a writer in prison?

Are they fools enough to go that far?

The future will tell!

 

—————————————————————-

 

 

PDF of this post. Click to view or download (2.9 MB). >> Hervé Ryssen interviewed by Margaret Huffstickler Ver 3

 

 

Version History

  Version 3: Formatting – Jan 21, 2015. Updated PDF
 Version 2: Added more images – Oct 18, 2014. Updated PDF
Version 1: Published Oct 17, 2014

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »