Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Updates — Plain List

Posts that have been updated will be listed here, with the latest at the top.

_____________________

 

 

Version 4: Jan18, 2018 — Improved formatting. Added image of the “elephant in the room“.

 

 

 

 

Andrew Hitchcock with Alfred Schaefer – This is Not a Game — TRANSCRIPT  Version 4: Dec 11, 2017 — Proofed 3 more minutes. Total proofed = 21 mins.

 

 

 

 

Trump IS the Swamp! — TRANSCRIPT Version 5: Dec 9, 2017 — Added PDF of post for download.

 

 

 

 

 

  Version 3: Dec 7, 2017 — Improved formatting.

 

 

 

 

 

Andrew Hitchcock – Erasing the Liberty – The 50th Anniversary Of Israel’s Attack On America — TRANSCRIPT   Version 10: Dec 6, 2017 — Added PDF of post for download.

 

 

 

 

 


The Slave Trade in the Congo Basin – Part 1  Version 2: Nov 27, 2017 — Improved formatting. Added link to Part 2.

 

 

 

 


Mark Collett — Christmas Adverts – Multicultural Propaganda — TRANSCRIPT  Version 4: Nov 25, 2017 — Fixed typos. Added PDF of post for download.

 

 

 

 


Hidden Empire — Part 1  Version 2: Nov 21, 2017  — Added PDF of post for download.

 

 

 

 

Mark Collett — It’s Okay To Be White — TRANSCRIPT  Version 2: Nov 15, 2017  — Added PDF of post for download.

 

 

 

 

 

Book – The Myth of German Villainy – Part 20 – The Allied Goal? Destruction of Germany!  Version 2: Nov 12, 2017 — Added captions to additional images. Added the Real Holocaust cartoon. Added PDF of post for download.

 

 

 

 

Do Africans Really Have an IQ of 70 — TRANSCRIPT  Version 4: Nov 11, 2017 — Updated cover (added croc). Improved formatting. Updated PDF (Ver 3) for download.

 

 

 

 

Continue Reading »

Advertisements

All Posts — Plain List

all-posts-plain-list-header-ver-4

Continue Reading »

 

 

[In this YouTube Hangout (No 1) Morgoth, who runs the blog Morgoth’s Review. talks with Gentleman Jim Crow and Theberton about the “Skeptics” war with the Alt-Right, UKIP, and the problems facing Whites in general with the invasion of non-Whites into our countries engineered by organized jewry KATANA.]

 

IMPORTANT NOTE:

This transcript is only a rough draft. Please confirm any of the text by listening to the actual audio.

 

If you would like to improve the accuracy of the transcript please leave any corrected text in the comments section. Thank you.

 

 

 

Morgoth’s Review

 

YouTube Hangout 01

 


 

Skeptics and Cucks

 


 

Click here for the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qct0g7MVhQ

 

 

 

Published on Jan 19, 2018

 

 

YouTube Description

First ever Morgoth’s review hangout discussing skeptics and cucks, with Gentleman Jim Crow and Theberton.

 

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(87 mins)

 

 

 

[00:02]

 

Morgs: Weekend hang out number one. And we’re gonna talk I’m with Theberton who does the YouTube stuff, Jim who polishes the comments and other things through the blog, and it’s me Morgoth. We’re gonna have a general banter about the skeptic war, and, what else was on the table Jim?

 

Jim: The skeptic war, Henry Bolton and his business with his girlfriend.

 

Morgs: Right. Which I’ve done an article about. I will see how good may be about where the shit will get as well, but the thing with the skeptic war was that we’ve got this little clip that I wanted to have a look okay again that up further there there’s what’s he called me there yeah.

 

Theberton: I’m here I’m not Sulu, or something like that [01:00] loser Lou I’ve got on my tablet called boozled ooh.

 

Morgs: Yeah extra expect our favor expecting something why do we go.

 

Theberton: So got the video a lot.

 

Morgs: I don’t even well no it’s gonna be great there’s this there’s this skeptic kid I don’t know anything about, or my dad they want to slag them off, you know, and call them names of stuff, but the thing is that they’re engaging more and more with Latos which we all right White nationalists whatever you whatever you want to see it and these debates all these fucking videos keep popping up on YouTube. I’m just overwhelmed with content as they say. And this one popped up and, because it was a bit of a short one I had a bit of a click through it and I came across this question. Now, and I just thought in this [02:03] one question, it’s everything that I think is shit about the skeptic community. And why I’m happy that they’re being torn apart by nationalists. Let’s watch this. Can you play this Theby?

 

Theberton: Yes. Let’s see if this works.

 

Interviewer: So can you please explain to me why Anglo-Saxons being a minority in England is not such a bad thing.

 

Sceptic [he sounds very much like Sargon]: I would say, depending on exactly how it happens, it could just be a neutral thing. If you think that there’s some sort of inherent quality in Anglo-Saxon DNA that can’t be found in other DNA, I would simply refer you to the fact that, you know, these things can change over time. If we select for the quality that we’re looking for, and you guys are right, then it will just be Anglo-Saxons. But if you’re wrong, it won’t just be Anglo-Saxons, but it wouldn’t matter, because you’re wrong about that. So I mean, it’s a pretty simple argument from the Alt-right.

 

[03:08]

 

Morgs: Right so when your kid comes running home and see his daddy why am I the only White person in the class to show them that clip and everything will just be honky fucking daughter he wandered I mean, what do you make a lot Jim.

 

Jim: Um well in terms of the evolutionary argument is wrong on so many levels I don’t know where to start Anglo-Saxon DNA is it so special that it won’t just be recreated in the same environment no, of course, it won’t firstly Anglo-Saxons evolved over tens of thousands of years through hardship and through situations whereby certain traits were selected for those traits don’t exist anymore we now exist in a society of surplus and a welfare state so the traits that made Anglo-Saxons [04:00] special and develop them in the first place will not develop again if you live in a fundamentally different society. The only trait that’s being selected for now is ability to breed you haven’t even got to provide your own children so the idea that if we just let things play out again the same kind of people will arise it’s nonsense. And another point is the idea that well I think it might be slightly off that click clip 30 seconds before of 30 seconds after, but he says something like well what does it matter if Anglo-Saxons become extinct as long as they’re not killed, or wiped out, or as if they don’t suffer any, you know, pain, or hardship in the process well would anyone seriously argue that who cares at the plan that becomes extinct as long as they have a nice life and die comfortably in their beds at night that’s not the point we want to preserve our people and a very important people the idea of suffering in the process of death is neither here, nor there most people thought most things suffer when they die and even if they don’t that’s not the point is, but [05:01] preserving a very important species in life form.

 

Morgs: I mean, I’ll talk about on a couple of notes on this, because I for me it just sums up everything all the problem having worth meets these classic liberals all of the one of the points what all the accusations against them from our side of this is that there it’s everything gets put into abstractions and sophistry and it’s always well what about the half-castes what about the free speech don’t be a collectivist who pay for the roads, but it doesn’t, but it doesn’t actually address what’s going on in the real world it doesn’t so what he’s done is taken that question and the annie’s is kind of just it’s just utter bullshit, because what how is it not gonna be bad to be a minority why didn’t you just say well it’s gonna be fucking awful it’s gonna be it’s [06:01] gonna be hell on earth I said what.

 

Jim: He can’t speak to extinction he doesn’t go through the minority stage was to go on, you know, probably for centuries, you know, White mass isn’t gonna just die tomorrow they’re gonna have, you know, centuries of being a minority and the process so it’s a joke analogies kind of.

 

Morgs: In this particular instance has been convenient to zoom the lens out and then they talk about over millennia so maybe after all the terrorism and the rape gangs and the street violence and the kettle black slaughtering people for no reason once all that’s over then maybe there’ll be some kind of hybrid race of Anglo-Saxon come Jamaican come Pakistani Superman which will still exist., but for fuck’s sake you’ve got a man asking him saying wolf, you know, he knows he knows what’s being asked over there, but he can’t address it [07:02], because if he addressed it then he’d have to admit that I will if PA address the reality he’d have to admit that it was a problem and if he if he I know that was a problem then he’s gonna have to speak out against it and if he spoke out against it he’d be an all right Nazi! And instead of they were not he does the opposite he says well you can use this kind of sophistry and bullshit that I’ve just said as an argument against. So say he’s cool with his crop and then he kind of pointed backwards he points it back to all three all races well there you go you can use this argument against the Alt-Right you can use my bullshit against the people who are saying oh wait a minute it’s gonna be fucking hell on earth as a minority. And he’s proud of it that he’s chuffed on it. And this is why these people are fucking rotten! What are they doing? At least at least with a lefty are the lefty other say well [08:01] you’re an evil White man in Egypt who acts thing pretty much. And what these people are doing they just kind of bog you down and it’s like walking through a thick treacle of shite! I mean, of course, I mean, or on it as well it’s a neutral thing how the fuck can I be neutral to go to be forced in the minority state is in your own country? It’s and I’ve got a couple of notes that you sell at the blog and hey what do you think about that further.

 

Theberton: Yeah I think sub-zero it’s this kind of very it’s this typical, you know, middle-class detached, you know, everything is going to be within the realm of ideas and, you know, this is huge high value on can rationality and facts and you can see a lot of the classical liberals kind of really get off on that don’t they were all kind of suit themselves is very kind of enlightened [09:00] and it’s like it’s that kind of attitude sort of writ large and it’s also, you know, it’s like we’ve spoken about it before it’s the kind of the cliche of the so absent-minded professor, you know, there’s someone that has that can-do has all these kind of fancy arguments and all this fancy knowledge and stuff but, you know, doesn’t know how to type forgets how to tie their own shoes. It’s a similar sort of thing isn’t it yeah having all these kind of fancy arguments whereas couple of missing the bigger picture completely. It’s a recurrent trait with all these people of missing the missing the wood for the trees I mean, that’s what these people cover it’s the air they breathe isn’t it? It’s go though in, but there’s a way disconnect it’s like the same people that, you know, will get when it comes to the like on the reefs and the streets you’ve seen about the ethno states when it comes to that stuff they get really really into the nitty-gritty of things and, you know, into every sort of finer and I’m missing the point and where it’s missing the big picture well you know.

 

Morgs: I mean, if you we take [10:03] their kind of worldview and their core values which is individualism and free speech, but then you got YouTube channels right and they all hit collectivism we all read they all hit ethnic groups teaming together to force their will on individuals., but all the they are all individuals on YouTube and some of them own a lot of money and we have the YouTube’s moderated by the Anti defamation League. So then oh he couldn’t miss, you know, so then now they don’t mention that, or he never did in the first place and the thing is just a not see if he did do it, but we’ve literally got an ethnic collective group moderating there and censoring their free speech if they ever went any other problem where they had a [11:03] nice little bit of coin., you know, it what they will do was call a signal the people who are talking about it and they’ve just pissed all over their own values! And it’s just such fucking cowardice!

 

Jim: I absolutely agree with that, but going back to something thebe returned sadder, but they’ve got all the arguments and they’ve got all the, you know, the facts and all the rest of it they haven’t at all I mean, they are just assuming that if we have this great multicultural experiment it’ll all turn out right in the end and then in a thousand years time the White man won’t exist in this current form, but something else will take shape and it’ll be just as good if not better., but all of the evidence says no. If you look at every human society that has ever existed most of them were awful current Western civilization is the exception [12:01] not the rule and it’s far more likely that the situation that the civilization that arises is going to be abysmal than it is that it’s going to be something the same as better than what we currently have I think this faith that things are just gonna work out okay is not justified by any reference to the evidence, or to history.

 

Morgs: Yeah, but corn filling.

 

Theberton: I seen this with a lot this Mississippi nationalists Jim says is this kind of thing. It’s the sort of leap of faith that everything will just kind of work itself out and that things naturally tends towards, you know, to uh sort of a peaceful linear sort of way of turning out, but I mean, just now you can see that even just within our own country that the city’s the whole majority non-White. The cities that have, you know, been the most, you know, burden of mass immigration ever even just a, for example, that we have now is the opposite of what this guy’s saying isn’t it, you know, Western city they can point to this [13:02], you know, there’s majority non-White this actually there’s turning into this kind of classical liberal.

 

Morgs: Yeah I mean, like Jim said he’s coming up this from a point of view where eventually the Anglo-Saxons will be merged into the Third World and if we select for the characteristics of the newcomers., in other words, if we show bias towards people who have Anglo-Saxon take characteristics then nothing much will change, because they might be a little bit coffee colada they might be a bit, you know, a bit black! What the characteristics will be that we have selected will be Anglo-Saxon ones.

 

Jim: , but we’re not sorry what selecting for those characteristics at all the only thing we’re selecting for is ability to breed,

 

Morgs: Yeah, but I mean, even then like the [14:01] writing is on the wall now we can see the writing on the wall now we can see you the groups there Somalians and the Afghan needs and then yeah. If the globalists were the if they really did just want to create a population of consumers with they would have imported millions of millions of Han Chinese people, but the first thing is lots of White men have got yellow fever if they would have bred with the Asian women and then they would have went on and we would have got a high high IQ population which was great at making and buying iPhones., but we can’t we can see that it’s malicious and intent, because the terrorism is already here the rehab gangs are already here. Why do we need the political correctness? The contrary thoughts about it is already here so and when he thinks [15:01] it’s new rule well I think it’s new and, but it’s not it’s why do we need political correctness.

 

Morgs: Well I mean, one we that’s something I’ve wondered as well as in why do the powers that be wants to make the population less intelligent which is obviously what’s going to happen if you introduce vast numbers of lower IQ people. You would think you would if you want to create a populace that you want the best quality population you can have. One one sort of the apparent is that I think it applies particularly to Mexicans in the US and Hispanics, or things of that the 90 IQ is ruined about the sweet spot., but we’re aren’t where if you’re in that level you are intelligent enough to work intelligent enough to produce, but stupid enough to buy any crap that people want to sell you. I believe the Hispanics in the US are the greatest consumers of media. They’re the people who’ll go watch any movie that’s out there the people, you know, buy [16:01] the latest brand of trainers, or whatever it might be. And I think they’re trying to breed us to a sweet spot of about a 90 IQ for the masses not the Elite obviously they’ll keep themselves separate, but they want us in the 90 so we’re stupid enough to buy all their crap they’re still just about clever enough to work,

 

Morgs: And they reckon I think they’ll still be a few Whites around and they can import Indians to do jobs in Silicon Valley and design cars, or things they got so that they don’t know they will these kind of big companies will be able to select. There are they donate around from around the world they like the cleverest people to produce these be sold to the kind of 90 IQ cattle., or even then I mean, this and this is the great classic liberal future, because these [17:00] people are expecting like what will it be like a kind of half Somalian half kind of Welsh hybrid thing to sit around reading Thomas Paine and Locke? ,

 

Jim: , because that’s another thing Stefan Molyneux has got a lot of good material on this, but the idea of classical liberalism that is entirely Northwest European and entirely White. The dark races are getting no interest whatsoever in these things. If you look at voting patterns and then the you who asked this has been, you know, it’s a very well studied blacks and browns I’ve got no that they don’t have the same concept of personal risk instability they don’t have the same respect for liberty these just are alien concepts. It’s like asking us to appreciate yin-yang, or some Chinese philosophy it’s just not all of us and it’s not all of them. So he, you know, Western liberalism is all abuMorgs: It’s [18:01] nots of them they’re never going to adopt it’s not something to interest them. There’s no historical example of a non-White population adopting classical liberalism,

 

Theberton: Right another thing that’s amazing I think is that people like this guy and loads of the classical liberal types they sort of like to see themselves as the, because they don’t really take a side either way they kind of like to see themselves as the political referee, you know, managing things from either side. And it’s a nice easy way to kind of, you know, seem like you’re all above all this., but yeah the reality is that they’re they actually the ball itself being kicked around either side.,

 

Morgs: I mean, classic liberalism was all you ever do is sit on the toilet keep the toilet seat warm for somebody else until they get pushed off. Whether it’s from the far left I would say the their cultural Marxist left. I mean, the cultural Marxists starting from about the 50s and the 60s the it [19:02] just went through the classic liberals like shit through a goose! The classic liberal ideology has been a fucking failure time after time after time! Where was their resistance? The neo Marxist came after the war. It was a concerted effort start starting with Nuremberg, where nationalism and European ethnocentrism would basically they’d put it in a hole and throw away the hole! It would be just buried deep deep underground and forgotten about! And the kind of as this, you know, that J left, let’s say it, they understood the danger of nationalistic thought. And they knew they couldn’t take it on an equal and they still don’t to be honest. So it just had to be buried and forgotten about. Like I’ve said in a few posts like on Game of Thrones where you’ve got that wall [20:01] oh it was kind of let’s put them up let’s put the White Walkers up there behind the wall and guard the wall and make sure they never get out. There the liberals got smacked all over by the left, who went through them really easy! Just by inverting all of their values and then when it looks now I mean, it’s only YouTube drama and stuff like that., but it looks like the same things gonna happen to them again, but from the right! , because they don’t actually stand for anything! , but just like I say they’re just keeping the toilet seat warm for the next group who’s gonna push them off and take a dump on it.,

 

Theberton: Don’t wanna yeah yeah it’s just like it’s like they’re just sort of saying just, you know, just have society, you know, just have just leave leave us alone leave us with our individual, you know, our personal responsibility and all, you know, it’s like just someone else take care of someone else, you know, which they actually risk,

 

Morgs: It it’s something like the status quo, it’s gonna last forever [21:02] and be you okay and it’s obviously not! I mean, that’s also what he assumes and they’re in this answer to a basic question and it’s a fundamental question I mean, we could go through the whole video can’t be assed. Just a question how is it gonna be good for the English people in England, because I think it’s there what’s it called you, or something. I think he he’s just an English lad and so he’s being asked how is it gonna be good for your group for us to become minorities in our own country? And it’s not! It’s obviously not! It never can be! It never can be a good thing to become a minority in your own country! , but as I said, he can’t he can’t just say it, because and he talks about they talk about all of them they alternative-right, the nationalists so they did have one it’s all about ideology and the lefties [22:01] and the SJW’s it’s all about ideology. Well here you can see that he can’t even address the basic question head on, because of his own ideology. And so what he has to do is give an answer to a question I wasn’t even asked in the first place! He has to kick it into the long grass and zoom the camera right away. If we become this kind of Anglo-Saxon and another thing it’s in assumed assumed there’s this kind of will the power kind of well you look if we come out on top, which is another, so he’s going right in the evolutionary kind of thinking. Well if you do have sufficient will to survive then it’ll be okay. Put that all right you can go down that road pal, but that’s our way of thinking! That’s a strand of right-wing thinking where might is right [23:01]., but they don’t like that either.,

 

Jim: And also sorry and will also eat a branded political thought evolves in a certain situation in a certain time in place. Classical liberalism evolves primarily in 19th century England. A time when England was 99.9% White and everyone you were these third the old common values that there was a functioning nation. And in those circumstances classical liberalism, or something like it could work. I mean, I do have some sort of libertarian/classical liberal tendencies. I don’t believe in freedom of the individual and that kind of thing in context., but that kind of thing can only survive in frankly an ethno-states, because everyone’s got to be on the same page and all the same values. So these classical liberals they should be White nationalists they should be further to the right than us! , because it’s only [24:01] our worldview they can protect their values,

 

Morgs: It reminds me that there are like hobbits from Lord of the Rings where they a lot of they’re blind to the all these there’s a you’ve got these huge issues going on outside of the Shire and the Shire itself is in danger. What they do and see oh we just cling on if we just keep planting turnips and drinking Mulberry wine every we’ll be everything will be okay just keep calm everybody. And it’s fucking not! It’s not! And I’ve got a little bit of sympathy in that way that they ‘re still in the classic liberal especially., because a lot of them seem to be in Britain. It evolved in Britain. I’ve got a kind of sympathy for them, because they are just kind of, you know, don’t run for the exits., but they’re like the people on the Titanic who say don’t put the lifeboats out [25:01] yet, because people are panic! It’s gonna be okay! We will stop the ship from sinking! Don’t make things worse. And it’s not! It’s not! The ship has hit the fucking iceberg and were going under! , but there is a this kind of little Englander mentality of just don’t be extremists! Don’t be extremists! Will work and out. And it’s not! You’re not gonna work out! You’re not gonna work Out fucking fourteen hundred girls raped by Pakistanis in Rotherham! And I know all the rest of I could go on and on and on and I’m sure the people listening. The horror is here and it’s happening now. The demographics are baked into the cake as they say in America and it’s here in England as well.

 

So this idea we can just kind of well if everybody just have everybody just meant vidual be okay I gotta work. I mean, how are they actually gonna do that how are you gonna police [26:00] for people connect Lighting’s. Howdy are they gonna ban what’s it called in Britain, the jewish community secretary trust, or something I got it’s called. I mean, if somebody gonna make it as a skeptic gonna make YouTube videos in well, sorry sorry lads sort of put we’re gonna ban your organization, because it’s ethnic collectivism and, you know, you’re trying to push your agenda on the general population., of course, that’ll be fuckin hammered for it. They’re not even gonna be able to ban any Muslim organizer. Let alone how let’s see certain groups get into the BBC, or on the media and other newspapers and then they start helping each other even though it’s not written even though it’s kind of just realizing a name and that somebody went there’s somebody else’s ba-mitzbar it’s far [27:00] and, or well okay he’s a good one I’ll get him a job to worry and I’ll get him a job as a columnist in the independent would be Fame. How are they gonna police state for all that happening well they can and these people sorry they’d have to lease it,

 

Jim: Well they can’t and they wouldn’t even want to, because they believe in freedom of associations they believe that people should be able to join together with like-minded people. So their whole worldview is based on the assumption that everyone else is like them and the people will want to group together around, you know, particular interests, or philosophies and not around race., but if people do choose to lump together around race, or not thing they can do about it. That’s why their beliefs are fine in a White ethnos their, you know, classical liberalism is a nice way to be, but it’s just fundamentally incompatible with multiculturalism,

 

Morgs: It’s fine I mean, it’s fine in an all-white country as a set of ideals to aspire to, and, you know, the you [28:03] get the pasta on the church, or the school teacher to say well everybody’s an individual and you’ve got to give more individual rights and the freedom of speech and treat them with each bag of things ago that’s all well and good., but the first problem is pop out of the womb and start crawling around on the floor thinking about Thomas Paine and John Locke. From my point of view, because as I guess I’m a hardcore racist, kids do come out of the womb and stalk around with they need to be with my mother their ethnocentric their racist I’m not kind of through that what they’re gonna just waste show love that a week oh it didn’t happen we do a leg out it doesn’t so we’re just gonna wish it all away. It’s preposterous and I just wish [29:01] and that, you know, the problem is I don’t hear I must say a lot of memes are they’re pretty vicious to be honest. And I just want them to find some balls and jump on board with us instead of instead of this sophistry instead of this bullshit! , you know,

 

Theberton: I think it’s also easy to forget, because we’re us three often, you know, always in these kind of circles it’s easy to figure out that for a lot of people even just identifying even just calling ourselves a group even just to admit now, or to conceptualize that is, you know, you’re getting into some risky territory, even in their own minds, you know, let alone saying that, or when we’re in a minority it’s going to be fine. I mean, I don’t know that this is disconnecting them thinking that were all individuals, but he’s fine to admit that, you know, if we do become one, or if we to become minority, you know, it’s the ever shifting sands of us against them.,

 

Morgs: It yeah I mean, but the problem is though the we’re talking I’m [30:01] not talking about somebody that I’ve just bump into on the street. I’m talking about people who are act like engaged that they’re engaged in politics and a critique of a general coach our commentary on the general culture then they’re not unaware of the realities of it. They’re constantly watching videos about about rapes and Sweden, or who they’ll see thousands upon thousands of memes about who’s ruling the media in America who’s against Trump in America what. These people are in the game! That’s the difference! And to be in the game and still at this point and still count a signal like you may not like the ethno state and, you know, what are you gonna is the ethno state gonna ban my porn and my video games, or whatever? It is they say against, but who’s gonna build the roads and the ethnosphere alright alright [31:02] fair enough, but in Europe we already had the ethnosphere. And they’ve been taken away from us we we had the ethnos states in Europe and they’re being robbed! Against the people here so they’re gonna have to shift their arguments to kind of justify that, or they’re gonna have to just join us., but I don’t think they can sit in the Middle Ages for very much longer.,

 

Jim: Well I don’t think they can and their rationality is becoming their achilles heel. If you see what’s happening in the skeptic given is he really lately we’re trying to deal with race realism they can’t deal with it, because the evidence is on our side and it’s completely on arguable the races are biologically different so you cannot adopt a holier-than-thousand I only follow the facts in evidence philosophy and not acknowledge that the races are biologically different and the more honest ones among them are increasingly [32:00] drifting towards us I’m thinking of Andy war ski who is a no amusingly called Andy race war ski, because he’s a adopted he’s accepted racial differences and guys like Jean Francois Gary pay and those kind of people the bore honest ones are saying yet that the science is undeniable the races are different and the ones who remain are being left tie themselves in ridiculous philosophical knots to try and deny the obvious,

 

Morgs: Yeah and well I think well this is an example of it to be honest. It can’t be done it’s you they can’t hold this position it’s ridiculous and the this lad here, you know, he has he got a girlfriend is gonna have kids just what does he see in the future. I mean, he looks young miss Rawlings about 27, or something you see it he seems like a good lad., but the problem is these kids [33:00] are gonna grow up in a minority and the majority are gonna hate their fucking guts! And there’s no you can’t get around that and we’re not when it’s I think it’s really important to stay the game it this I mean, I can understand why, but the debate itself being shifted really heavily out American situation and the ethnosphere and then what constitutes is White your my great-grandfather was like an Indian, or something did he can I get on the after estate and they try and trip the Americans up on this all of the time, but in Europe we don’t have that problem in Europe we were ethno-States and so now they’re gonna have to justify the one way they can do it is by saying well it’s a natural process, but this is just the march of modernity, but again that’s gonna fall flat on it ass, because it’s illegal in Britain to have [34:02] a party representing the native people. The PA it happened with the BMP debris the a of the amid a test case of the BMP where they could see well it was illegal, because the BMP was really quite solely White pretty surely, or something they had this thing in their in their manifesto going on 2005, or something and the government said well no you can’t do you’ve got to be you can’t discriminate against people I’m the oven there was a kind of the idea was that the party was gonna get swamped with non weights and just kill the party that didn’t actually happen, but the precedent was set the it was now illegal for a half party representing the native people of Britain. So to get back to this idea that this is all just some kind of the natural flaw it’s just the way modernity works it’s just the ebb and flow of history it’s all perfectly natural. That’s [35:01] completely fuckin bullshit! A more accurate analogy would be that somebody is holding our head under the water and then when we try to come out for air they’re pushing us back one down brings on my head with a fucking hammer! ,

 

Theberton: Yeah every months we’ve let the whole flight listen to Jordan Peterson it’s a similar thing it’s like it’s almost like the last hundred years haven’t even happened in some ways, you know, it’s like all their idea is just on it’s just it’s just not enough it’s the this so many more salient things going on there that just isn’t part of their it’s not they don’t have the sort of psychological framework to even begin to confront some this stuff,

 

Jim: Well that’s it in terms of what’s going on in the world today and people who are concerned about things like feminism and classical liberalism and, you know, all these kind of things it would be lovely if we’re in [36:00] time to worry about those concerns that we fantastic if that was all we had to worry about, but we’re prone to invasion the only thing that matters is immigration if it’s not addressed very, very quickly indeed it’s game over I mean, there is nothing else that’s even worth discussing and that’s what’s going on in the US particularly with the whole wall business they’re trying to, you know, fall butt off and kick it into the long grass I think for the US that dies already cast already White babies are in the minority I think the United States is beyond saving. So as far as the United States goes it’s either a multicultural hell, or secession and separation in two different states, but they’re different ethnic groups and, of course, have multicultural lands for those who want to. That’s absolutely fine., but for Europe as more go away at least as we are we were ethnos States up until not much more than fifty years ago and we can still be returned to being at those states, but the longer this goes on the more difficult it is and someone made a good point to me recently [37:00] regarding Northern Ireland and, you know, if an ethnic population has dominated a territory for a few hundred years do they not then acquire a reasonable claim to it and I think that’s true I mean, and the United States cake is the blacks have been there for hundreds of years none of them could say I come from act place in Africa none of them of God exclusive ancestry in one place there’s no place you could sensibly return them to. And as the longer this multicultural morass goes on the more difficult it is to say no folk here you hear from there you better get yourself back there. So I think the window for Europe to set itself straight is quite narrow, because the longer this goes on and then all these people intermingle and become less distinct from their ethnic auckland’s the hard will be to send them back there,

 

Morgs: The difference between Europe and America and I think it’s Americans I’ve got a horror sell the Richard Spencer kind of look at with the [38:01] ethnosphere and obviously the people the debate was saw gone awry they picked up on it and what do you want to know is the policy decisions and then the ideological makeup and the ethics of the ethno-state of itself. That’s not something we have to deal with in Europe the I mean, you know, the Americans gotta team about themselves those arguments the Americans got a theory I know the kind of contours and things I got in Europe what we have to establish is do the teens have a right to Denmark do the Norwegians have a right to know where to eat your the boy British as it stands on the census I’m not even that much of a purity guy do the White British as it stands on the census to make it easy have a right to that own country and once it’s really a [39:02] moral system and fef the answer is no they’re gonna have to explain why not especially when it’s been against our will every step of the way. And so the in that way in Europe they’ve got a much higher hurdle the jump over to argue against our points in the America, because of history the way it is they’ve gotta do something with the blacks and things I got, but in Europe it’s not so we don’t have to argue about well what would it be like what would a 99% White Britain actually look like? What is somebody gonna censor my porn? What would it be like? We don’t have to answer that the question for now is do we have the moral right to our own countries? To remain the majority and be as ourselves on our own soil that’s the question of the age. Under the in this case of the skeptic kid [40:01] just basically said well it doesn’t exist it don’t know it there is no question it’s just a matter of how bad, or how good it’s gonna turn out and even then his reply was well it’s gonna be pretty much neutral it’s we’re gonna mingle a and I’m gonna look like facili in fucking forever you call them?

 

Morgs: Favella.,

 

Theberton: I think it’s something you said earlier that is also it’s a strange thing you see from the people that are very much involved in this and, you know, very much part of the sort of YouTube skeptic, or anything to this of the laughs of the skeptic community we know that making the distinction between them and just your average normally in the street I think you’re saying other day more guff about I might Ben Kevin Logan, you know, someone who is doing everything that’s going on, you know, seeing all the seeing the grooming gangs, you know, seeing the [41:01] Terrorism the acid attacks, you know, and all the rest I mean, that’s what do you think about that what’s going what’s going on they’re the people that are fully aware of all this, but today it’s nothing’s getting through.

 

Morgs: Well I think in any take somewhere in this Soviet Union in the Soviet Union you had, because everybody will point out with the jewish dominance of the Soviet Union, but the middle level at the middle level and the camp guards they were all Russia’s and that’s what we do, you know, if you’re dealing with any end and I know it sounds like a cliche, but in the end they are just fucking weak! They are just weak people! The Left ideology and way of looking at the world especially when it’s as dominant as it is now it it’s just like a magnet to weaklings, because that you don’t have to stand up for anything you don’t have to stand again against any kind of hostility [42:01] views, because if there’s a whole it’s like everything’s being handed to them all these shut down terms all of this moral superiority. The globalists of them all of the work for they’ve worked out the entire game plan for them. Even going back I mean, I think it was the Rockefeller Institute which funded Herbert Marcuse uses were things they got, because he had all of these people, you know, same background going over from Europe at all over and Herbert Marcuse and they were all from the Frankfurt school and they fled Germany and they ended up in America, but what always interested me was that be the Lama there who how did they pay the rent come from, because they were all very well off and very comfortable and they sat around there I think it was I think [43:02] it was Marquess who could be wrong a core member, but there was one of the more prominent ones and he absolutely adored Beethoven and Varga I think it’s I can’t him about have to look myself maybe for next thing the book there’s a series that is he is above it which they’ve got the strange paradox where you’ve got somebody who’s jewish and, you know, writing the groundwork for cultural Marxism., but he loves European high culture I mean, is there not a paradox there. He couldn’t stand jaMorgs: Music he here in it and it was just well and this lifestyle which it took fundamental ng and a lot of our Institute formula at that point there I mean, I’ve went off on a bit of a tangent, but the point is that it was all being funded from big money from the Rockefeller Institute from [44:00] roster central bank’s trilateral commission things they got going back down to the absolute gonna like that fat fuckin and teddy bear thing Kevin Logan this chubby kid from Birmingham I mean, everything was worked out for him before hand absolutely everything and what he got was a kind of set of ideals that it was like paint by numbers here you go this is what you believe this is what you have to see these are the arguments you hold these are morals II called now go forth amongst your own people and destroy them! It’s just weakness weakness! Absolute weakness! And then on top of that they think that free thing is, of course, against the system it’s a, but then he’s at the extreme end of the system, but [45:00] then you’ve got the skeptic community who by definition should be thinking hang on a minute I’m making YouTube videos on YouTube and I’m earning some pretty cash from like it’s going walk here and what do I hear I hate racial collectivism I hear it censorship a free speech and lobby groups try to impose their will on individuals and oh the ADL is all of that, but I’m not gonna talk about it, because then I’d be out right well maybe the fuckin Alt-rights is right! Maybe you’re just gonna have to admit that you’re wrong! Of what happens when we’re a minority in our own countries oh well that’s a difficult one, because if I had answer honestly it’s gonna be hell on earth, so instead of kicking into the long grass and come up with a kind of really clever sound an order of pata that means nothing! , you know, the people who are work with would listen to rock metal clip only it’d be really confused [46:00] by an intimidated by it. Was that if you say and well they’re shipping in all the Afghani zanna’s volumes of my my town now and what’s it gonna be like when, you know, there’s more of them than us? And then you get this kind of really esoteric abstract I’m sorry well maybe your town will be stronger for it if you select in the town for fuck’s sake! No it just means you’re gonna have bags of horseshit pushed through your letterbox! Means your windows are gonna be put through and your fucking door against touched up by Somalians on the way in school you twat! It’s not gonna be good and it’s not neutral!

 

Jim: You look what ice having you so you’ve been at out a lot of interesting points there’s there going back a couple. The idea that you can say to the general populace do we have the [47:01] right to exist there Danes of a right to Denmark the Norwegians of a right to Norway the kind of answer you’ll get from a lot of people is and I’ve had this experience myself a lot of times for who says a black man can’t be a clue she can be black in English he was boarding, or he was draw here so that’s step one that’s the mentality you’ve got to deal with, you know, a black man plays for my football team so, you know, our idea for him at the weekends and my friends black and, you know, he likes the same kind of things that I like so I think you’ve got to break down the separation of why a black man can’t be English.

 

Morgs: I mean, that I mean, I don’t want to do a like these three and three hour and 50 minute long livestream so that fits nicely and the next topic which is cuckoo servant lives and Henry Bolton’s little bit hot Tottie girlfriend, because that’s basically what his argument was wasn’t it.

 

Jim: Was that his [48:02] counter-argument that it I heard her a comment, or his response.

 

Morgs: I mean, I’ve got I’ve got an argument okay we can maybe I’ve got a a blog post up about it we can put it under the video of this about Henry Buhl know what’s happened, because some people may not know if they’re in America and something and they haven’t read the blog post which you should do and they might not be aware of that there that’s just get into what something you keep, or this like Civic Nationalist Party in Britain they got us breakfast it’s so fairly a lot the, you know, we’re gonna call not one for that, but the new and it they’ve got like and over the last year they’ve had about five leaders, or something, or how many it is and then all of the other leaders are really boring and I may get the Putin that the parties it’s the end it’s just the party’s just collapsing in on itself. So they’ve [49:00] got this blue can be Putin who’s like who either crush list and he let he dumped as he said in his fifties and he dumped his wife and kids to take off with this little bit hot toddy kind of titties out model, and it turns out she it’s been leaked that she’s said she would never sleep with a black man and she thinks that Megan what she called the Megan Marco lost some finger food worrying from sorry it’s gonna hear seed it’s gonna cause she’s half black. He’s gonna taint the royal bloodline and he’s dumped this girl he’s don’t this model, because she’s racist! , because she doesn’t find black men sexy! You, but this is the right wing this is a discipline right and they’re kosher [50:01] right in Britain where they’re fuckin he’s gonna dump his girlfriend, because she’s not racist, because just, because she’s a pianist, because she doesn’t find black men sexy! Fuckin hell! .

 

Theberton: Yeah it makes you realize just, you know, really draws to attention just think the currents of climate like surely that can’t be his actual it can’t be his actual reason for no it’s a riddle can you imagine him having the conversation to her, you know, or when he had she had to kind of let it go I wonder what it was actually said I wonder if even to her he still kind of had to, you know, toe the party line and under how under how honesty was in that.

 

Morgs: Well when they first got together um she she making it was a kind of tweet a storm thing, because she said that the ground felt, or fire thing and was [51:03] just it was really just a bunch of it she called it a nest of immigrants I was going up in flames and she didn’t give a shit she didn’t give a shit! Hahahaha! And then so he knew that before hand and you can’t tell me that she dinner they’ve been having dinner and he’s been buying her all these fucking watches and everything like that he knew she was racist for Christ’s sake! Well then in the end he’s not the choose the party, or whatever it is, but in the way how it looks as pathetic! Absolutely pathetic! To say, well I’m 54 years old enough about a 25 year old supermodel for a girlfriend and she’s like ah sorry what she’s racist I’m gonna laugh like that occur he’s never he’s never gonna sleep with a woman like that again! His wife back, because he’s a backstabbing two-timing scumbag yeah [52:01] what’s he gonna have? And I’m really sitting like alone at night and thinking oh my god wouldn’t it be great watch it wouldn’t it be great if Jo was here now coming in and a skimpy little panties with a little the-shirt on just fresh out the shower! Fucking lovely! Oh I let it cool, because she didn’t fancy black men! Hey fuck off! Well that’s what can anybody respect that.

 

ZTheberton: Well that’s what hope, you know, for at least half the country think as well the same people would call you Kipp far-right, you know, no that’s what, you know, their actual leader is it’s done it’s just.

 

Jim: It’s absurd on so many levels I mean, firstly I cannot believe that he is genuinely horrified that his girlfriend doesn’t fancy black man. I mean, who in real life would say oh no she doesn’t like black that’s her father. I mean, it’s ridiculous [53:01], but the second absurdity is the level of cockiness I mean, what he’s doing is bowing down to media pressure I mean, he doesn’t care it doesn’t fancy black man he’s probably quite pleased about it. Which he should be., but the media have said all that so rages that’s disgraceful you cannot hold those opinions and it just shows your house Sofia our society has now become nowadays not only can you not hold unapproved of opinions yourself you can’t even associate with anyone who holds unapproved opinions. So if you hold opinions which the media deem inappropriate everyone around you is supposed to unperson you lest they be tainted by those opinions. It’s mental! .

 

Morgs: And then the media of he’s caved in to the people who want to destroy a party anyway I’d like you clip it’s one of those things it’s different for the Conservatives and I hear the console [54:02] is far more than you, but the Conservatives he can police think well then you can begin listening. Sorry the dog was humping my leg! Anything well he had it but.

 

Jim: You didn’t hear me laugh and I was buted there was laughing at the dog humping your leg! I said that’s a nice image! 95% of Tory’s will probably thought fine black people attractive and wouldn’t want their qualities that their partner finding black people attractive it’s the media [55:00] who set up this entire false reality that everyone’s got to subscribe to no one very few White people find black people attractive I would see a subset of females the and they’ve largely been led by the media by say 90 95 % of the population of with no interest in blacks whatsoever so the idea this is some outrageous opinion to hold that, you know, that they should discuss than appalled that the general populace is mental! It just comes from the media normal people don’t think like that.

 

Morgs: No, but even the people that we have caved in will hear them anyway, because it and it’s if you look at who they’ve came to know they’ve basically caved into the mainstream, but the whole idea of you Kip was to go against the mainstream. At least in theory it was the idea well we don’t give a shit with the Guardian says. We don’t care about the BBC those people [56:01] all the enemies and that’s fair enough I mean, even if I’m not gonna Google, you know, that they’re not gonna go very far that they’re really weak, but then even then it was soon as the people they have designated as enemies which they have over the years attack them they’re gonna fool in an instant. They’re not gonna put any faith at once well you didn’t your 25 year old supermodel girlfriend rather than have a bad opinion piece in The Guardian and it’s not gonna work and he knew it’s not gonna work this is pathetic! In this call this konkwon I mean, especially now with social media like trumpet soon you can outdo that easily oh my I mean, how many eyeballs does a an opinion piece in The Guardian get out, or how many people actually watch news late well if you’ve taken a consideration up against that is [57:02] hundreds of thousands of people on Twitter day in day out the it’s as if they don’t understand the reach of social media and yet you kit was supposed to be the new sawy right-wing party which would get on get a cup so all’s the BNP didn’t I mean, going by the BNP didn’t understand that at all the PNP went up against the entire establishment with absolutely nothing and they were much more hardcore than UKIP and either they didn’t have a fucking clue about social media and about memes all about anything right now I mean, be having a Facebook page they had websites and that was it they just kind of marched up to the doors of the Citadel and said where he had to take over. I mean, of a million votes, or something. They’ve got people you’ve got the most half people more in the reach of social media against rights [58:02] of water, or you a YouTube channel and these kinds of things and yet there’s still yeah, so Silvio must knew that well, you know, the mainstream is not water ones we don’t have to cave in to them like we used to, because there’s something else to get the message and yet they still give in. And I think that’s interesting I mean, we were talking about advertising the other day as well that’s it it’s a similar thing, because why there’s this stop fundamental ng here it can’t be him well let’s add I don’t know then who’s involved, but let’s just say howdy places advertisements in the daily meal and you’ve got these left-wing groups they miss come with lobby group this company and thing called stopped running here and there won’t advertise us who I’m feeling ill and bright bought to stop advertising here no the other Tigers can [59:03] always just turn around and say, you know, what we don’t give a shit fuck off. We don’t care what you think, but they’re doing they actually care VIN they actually care VIN anything well one who are they trying to appeal to surely they’re thinking of the bottom line. Do you I mean, why it’s in it it comes down to the fact that we the Left cooled the more of the general concerns the morality is not neutral it’s not all people think this decent people think that is they like the put it yesterday concerned about Trump coming there to Britain where well we’ve got a lot of good people in this country who just doing what Donald Trump yeah. Well it’s not good well there’s enough there’s other people who will Trump yet not good then so how does it work well it means that the [60:00] moral virtue is bound up and kind of entwined with left-wing morality and that’s the not Henry Bulls gonna have. And you can tell that, because nobody really cared that he left his wife which in conservative circles that should have been worse leaving the mother of your child and the kids the wife to go off for the young lass should have beat her much worse for Parvin than the fact that, but the young lass that he ago no they did the new little blonde bit cloth is a racist. No conservatives should have given a shit about the fact that she was a racist, but he should have been outraged that he left his wife and kids. That would have made sense. I could have got that., but they didn’t they’re just totally cuckooed so the conservative idea of sticking with your wife and bringing up the kids is through out the window, but you bend over as soon as the [61:01] left find out about your new girlfriend’s a racist. If they can and again the morality the is a left-wing ideal and you Fe had any brains they’d be fighting against that they’d be saying well no he could just point it out and say what he did he didn’t really care when I left the wife, but you do care, because new girlfriends, or missus what kind of fucking bullshit, or out is this.

 

Jim: Well that’s a and I don’t think there’s one recorded instance of someone being forgiven for cucking. I mean, talking and apologizing is something his girlfriend will not make the media few more favorably, or a for autumn a more favorably see may as well not bother the only proper thing to do is to praise now for the only sensible thing to do is brazen I’m not saying it’s morally right after he left his wife for her, but the other interesting point you made was regarding UK and don’t they have people [62:01] monitoring social media and monitoring what’s going on and frankly I’m really not sure they do I think you kept seemed to be all Tories, you know, some Tories from the 80s and 90s and I don’t think they have their finger on the pulse of the cutting edge of the Internet the old way on all those kinds of things and I think if they, or a party like them did that it could be a lot more successful. That’s what’s happening in America so they withdrawn from the Alt-Right that a lot of is the youth who are seeing the horrors of diversity I mean, anyone that’s going to school today they’re going to be looking at their lucky 25% ethnic minority up there maybe 50 percent depending on where they are the country. Going to school today is a very different experience to what it was we went to school and as the youth are seeing the horror of it and as the youth that are increasingly going wife with seven generations icon and all the rest of it and I think any right-leaning anti-immigration party really needs to be youth focused to make any progress that ain’t new capes so blue in story [63:03] philosophy is not going to last that long.

 

Morgs: I mean, you can see I think I’m Marie Walters party is a lot more interesting than you kid, but I know you don’t like her, because she’s an Irish lesbian. And Christ I can sympathize math, but she this for Britain thing is breakaway is much more sawy with Twitter and YouTube and things they got. It’ll be interesting to see where she goes with this, because she’s much more within our reach I mean, you kept to me you’ve always been these kind of boring libertarian golf club twats and the conservative such as dead-eyed corporate zombies and so there’s a kind I think that’s gonna be this battle for Walters. As I might not the idea that she’s an Irish feminist lesbian is [64:01] pretty repulsive., but to me they’re just they’re just vessels to carry our ideas into the mainstream. And armory war as us like constantly engaging on Twitter how’s she hungry more us will see a shit-ton of say happy merchant memes and alright kind of propaganda on Twitter and she probably watches it on YouTube and things I got she’s much more engaged roughly the Internet., but the problem is how far she’s gonna take that is it gonna be wet she knows collected in the policies, because she does she does say I’ve watched some of the speeches and she does say it’s an attack it’s a war on White people. And she says I know people don’t like to hear it in these terms, but [65:01] that’s really what we’re dealing with yeah it’s a war against the native people of Europe. Was there one of the hours before Christmas there was one of the first beaches and I thought well she’s probably picked that up from social media and she’s thinking well this is where the future is. The problem is you’re gonna have certain parties who have got lots of money are gonna say well okay we’re going to invest see half a million pounds on your party, but we do want, you know, you’ll get a boost it and pay for some nice advertising move that so that’s a lot of campaign money however much it would be., but caveats and they’re gonna be that you have to support Israel we do what you see nice things about Palestinians and, you know, where it’s gonna go [66:00]. She’s gonna have to water it on the message and so she’s in this funny funny situation where on the one hand she’s kind of engaged with the alright which she knows what we’re saying at the same time the old enemy is also aware of that and gonna give her lots of money. And so like she she she was on the Henry Putin thing on Twitter she was quite chuffed about it, because she saw that they having problems and she was kind of rubbing salt in the wounds. And Millennial Woes replied over on Twitter and said well all you care about is Islamic fundamentalists at the end of the day you’re not that much better the new kid prove to us that you’re wrong, you know, I’m hearing will serve as soon as she, but if she did that she’s gonna lose her doing us I think that’s please, but I do want a CR Murray waters on question time [67:00] and I’d want to see it on the television just for a Trump factor just for the fact that she’s gonna fuck up the narrative and to me that’s more important than her being like a feminist lesbian I just want it’s the ideas that need to be carried by the mainstream rather than, you know, getting hung up on what the actual, you know, the shape of a telephone is.

 

Theberton: Yeah the idea is being carried into the mainstream do you think that there’s something about it’s almost like people aren’t ready to hear this from like a White guy still a White man in public it’s almost like it’s almost like we’re at the stage where these ideas can have to be introduced through women when you plan you’ve got the pen man for the ATM the ADF woman who’s the lady is willing to.

 

Morgs: Well I think it it’s easy for them, because it’s hard, but get the clips of them I mean, there’s [68:01] this thing about whether Sargon has a black granddad, or something and then when what people tend to do whether, or not that’s true I’ve got no idea I don’t really care, but what I’m seeing is that people tend to look for maybe in a way to cling on to a new Marxist identity politics. So they’ve got a kind of rapid world, or rundown so in the case of on Mary Moore as she can see well it does look like a war on White people and when I see what’s happening what the Pakistanis are doing poppy skills it breaks my heart and everything they are and then if she’s called over like she can see well I’m hung like a lesbian feminist. Who are you election me? I’m true I’m true to liberal values! The Dawkins kind of crowd argument about against Islam and this kind of thing. And they’ve all that they’re kind of [69:00] looking for is that, in other words, they’re still liberals they’re still liberals they don’t have a fundamentally philosophically right-wing, they’re liberals who don’t like Muslims they’ve learned that and, you know, there’s some honest fear that what’s happening against White people is wrong and they start to see that as well., but they also know that to talk about the JQ was just completely, you can’t do it. And I only weigh about up in our mains I don’t know.

 

Jim: In terms of what you sad about, you know, the need for someone to go on question time and blow the narrative wide open and do a Trump and start taking the bull by the horns and stating the plain truth I’m not sure the extent to which that’s possible in Britain. I think we are a lot [70:00] more buttoned down and say America is I’m thinking in particular the speech that Trump gave Lee was calling out the international bankers and calling and calling them the enemies of the American people and the things he said about Mexicans and all the rest of it and don’t if you did that and Brit you can find yourself up in court. So I’m not sure how far you can go in Britain in terms of pushing the truth and pushing that they’ve actually outlawed the truth that’s the position we’re in now..

 

Morgs: Yeah well I think when I said earlier where you can’t have a party that represents the native people. Cause there is no native people! That’s the law! It’s not the truth, but it’s the law. So, how do we deal with that? And I don’t know I really don’t know, because sooner, or later that’s gonna have to be broached and it’s one I don’t know how you get around that, because they’ve basically all told the truth. There is a [71:00] need of population to the British Isles and the population of British Isles have a moral right to remain the overwhelming majority in their own country. So the law runs against most objectively moral and good! And I really don’t know what you do that well what ends up happening is that we lose? , or there has to be some kind of revolution? , because the state is not going to retract those laws.

 

And I’ve seen these petitions going around as well about well we have together they get hold of hundred thousand votes and put them up before Parliament that we get rid of these Hate Speech Laws. They’re not gonna listen to it, because they can’t! .

 

Jim: I think there’s two things are two-pronged approach to dealing with that firstly I think we need to turn the rules against them and start taking action against all these various that [72:02] they societies the association of black police officers of black lawyers of all the ethnically specific non-White groups that there are. So it cannot possibly be proper that they can have explicit groups for themselves and we can’t so they could attack it that way. And I think secondly these wide scale disobedience people just need to L be difficult to start if people if everyone starts speaking their mind and saying no this is ridiculous here’s what how I think and telling the truth they can’t possibly jail as all., but it’s going to be hard to get the wave started. To get that underway..

 

Morgs: Well I mean, to be fair that’s a skeptic argument. A skeptic argument would be where all of these lovely these ethnic groups have to be disbanded and that they become just individuals., but then that relies on the people at the top of the system liberals are not a tight-knit ethnic community., because if [73:00] it is, and it is, then that’s never going to get off the ground so we’re gonna go nowhere. They’re never going to repeal here laws! In theory from the skeptic point of view there’s no good reason for a government not to repeal the hate laws, the hate speech laws. Now from so if you’re gonna be, you know, why this skeptic liberalist kind of camp, the popular will of the people says we don’t want these hate speech laws anymore they’ve gotta go. And they will try and justify that they’re trying yeah why a lot opers being social justice was. As if fuckin thought Social Justice Warriors have the power to sit at the top of the society and dictate, they create anti free speech and censorship laws for saying things that people either like on behalf of the great cause. It’s all crap! It [74:00] means that the people the group with the power in their society has a vested interest in maintaining those hate speech laws! They want them there! They’re there for a purpose, and they’re specifically designed to stop people singling out a minority. It’s right there than in the print those hate speech laws are specifically designed to stop people singling out a group of people and saying this group is doing this! And the sort of classic liberalist is absolutely useless against that! They do not know how to deal with that. And it gets even worse, when you bring an arena that’s just the kind of raw politics. It gets even worse when you bring it into the cultural realm. On one of those debates the other day it’s it’s, because if how do you control the [75:01] culture and they would say well you don’t have to control it, but all about me and just like you get that’s it all that means is that once again you get a highly motivated networking group that ends up controlling all of your media and then they pump all of this fucking poison in a of population and there’s nothing you can do about it! And then when people point out of it the Padre will look at this have you noticed they’ve all got something in common? They turn around and they said it’s, because they’re smart! That their high IQ! They work hard! Kathy Newman Kathy Newman the Marx feminist debating with Jordan peterson. Just let go to a Wikipedia page and see what pops up for fuck’s sake! I bet it’s just, because she’s smart and she worked hard! She’s not smart. What is Lena as Lena Dunham smart? Is [76:02] Adam Sandler really that smart? .

 

Jim: On my own pet peeve, what’s her name the fat one Amy Schumer. God I hate that woman! She’s a her uncle is her uncle’s Chuck Schumer the US Congressmen Yoshi cheese dogs result.

 

Morgs: Does she strike you as being particularly smart? Who’s puttin 70 hour weeks to become a major media player? It’s just it’s a fucking your argument is totally retarded! It really is! These people are fucking idiots if they can’t see what’s going on! .

 

Jim: Can I just go back to your last point before I address you on this one firstly it’s time to hate speech laws and some attacking them under this of skeptic classical liberal paradigm. Hate speech laws are antithetical to centuries of British tradition. Speech is either true it is not whether it is hateful, or [77:01] contrary to the interest of any particular group is entirely irrelevant. You cannot sensibly censor any speech which is true, and even speech which is untrue. That was governed by libel and slander and those kind of things. So the idea that you can’t make negative statements, but one particular group it just goes against everything British society has stood for, for centuries. It’s fundamentally against British principles of British constitution and everything else! , but moving on to the more recent point you made about the success of jews and how they will try and say that all yes, because we’ve got higher IQs and all the rest of it. That’s a point that I always find particularly amusing., because when White people do well and when White people are statistically over-represented in a particular field, it’ll be all White privilege that’s outrageous! You’re doing during the brown people in there, whatever else people. Whereas whatever jews are statistically over-represented is [78:01], because of their inherent brilliance! So I think that’s another open goal that we can attack them on! I mean, jewish over-representation that’s their field is way beyond anything that White people have in any field. And the idea if they try and argue well that’s just, because we’re better than you well, you know, but that sounds like hate speech! .

 

Morgs: Yeah yeah yeah., but I mean, the class of liberals would say well that’s just a meritocracy. In a meritocracy the best floats to the top. My argument of that and there’s a lot of arguments this is just utter bullshit., but one thing that I would say is that like I said before they’re not that smart. And what they’re doing is not great what was that Amy Schumer so series that went on in America where it was like all about people looking each other’s asses, or something? I mean, is this is this like what our cultural elite is giving us? And then shooting.

 

Jim: Going back to a point you [79:01] made considerably earlier about producing great culture that’s something that’s exclusively European. Is, I mean, you know, if you want to see the classic so you want to see offer if you want to see ballet, if you want to see classical music that is all European. There is nothing that jews have produced that is brilliant! So if they are so brilliant that so intellectually superior where other magnificent works? What could they point to and say yeah we did that’s why we’re better than you. I can’t think of anything..

 

Morgs: Mmm no, but more indie in Johan the YouTube channel Klaus don’t you have Jim we’re gonna have to get with we’re gonna have to be a little bit careful, because they own this well, you know. This if somebody reports this and they go through it they’re gonna hear it and then the old gonna do like what I’m hearing yeah we’re gonna have to shut this down! I and I know I know absolutely three times, but why aren’t the skeptics onto this? Why on the why [80:02] who was the greatest threat it’s some sjw intergender nutcase in university with purple hair who needs a two-and-a-half-hour fucking video about why she’s wrong? , because she’s got a blogger and all the fact that we can talk about real problem on YouTube, because we’re being censored by an ethnic collective! For fuck’s sake! And it’s that this is the big problem that just bullshit us! And I think I can’t see them lasting much longer really. They’re gonna have to they’re gonna have to lay the cards on the table and say well, you know, what let’s maybe it will happen in be hanging doors, or something like that cards on the TLC all right look well then they could lift more a lot of money a lot of our annual rest on it from [81:02] YouTube, or we would be rough we rather a lot. We didn’t know what you were talking about we didn’t understand the points and we just want to be left alone. Just leave us alone to like laugh at feminists and SJW’s and we would fuck with you ever again.

 

Or they can join us and they can help us out! I’d like to see them help us out to be honest., because to go back to the beginning of the Hangout that lad sitting there with his, you know, behind his computer you voila whatever he his necks on the line as well, yeah he we’re all in the same shit! I’m ticketed to kick all of this and there’s some kind of hi philosopher all just this sophistry! It’s not gonna fucking work! Come on! Come on! If and if you’ve got to swallow your pride and see it okay the Alt-Right was [82:00] right over the, you know, the Nazis have got more points than I thought. Then just swallow you if that’s what’s that’s what’s supposed to be a skeptic. You’re gonna get you’re gonna get pushed off a toilet seat anyway! .

 

Jim: Well there was an interesting phenomena about a year, or two ago now called the Alt-Left we why it was lefty liberal type, you know, your sir you hipsters and those kind of guys a guys that might live in, you know, East London, or Portland in America, or whatever. The people who like wearing big glasses and drinking craft beer and draw an amusing beards and all that kind of thing. And they were coming to the realization of the only way that they can have the lifestyle they want which is a very, very White lifestyle is in an overwhelmingly White environment and the Left was starting to realize they hey hang on we’ve got to keep our space White., because once all the blacks and the Mexicans, or the Pakistanis and whatever else move in we can’t live the way we [83:00] want to live. That seems to have gone away a bit, because I think very foolishly, the media will certainly in America not so much in the UK, have started to refer to an anti-fa the extreme left this as being the Alt-left as if they are the counterpoint to the Alt-right, but they’re not the old left they’re Marxist revolutionary communists. And they really should be called like revolutionary communist, because America hates communism. That’s something that really annoys me every time I hear it. If people are communist call them communist the American people hear communists do not do them the credit of calling them the Alt-left which makes them sound a lot more interesting in twists on them, you know, but if the Left need to realize and your White hipsters and you’re kind of going like Sargon and they’re so velu guy and all these people who like sitting behind their computers pontificating is White society that gives them these privileges. They won’t be doing that under Sharia they won’t be doing that when I was like Somalians [84:01] wanted rounder buddy this race with meat cleavers and machetes. They need to appreciate that is White society that gives them the comfort and security to live the sort of lifestyles they want to live. And I don’t think it should be that hard to persuade them of that they need to realize that they need the people who hate groups need the protection of our group to let them live the way that they want to live.

 

Morgs: Yes. So that is a pretty good hangout first time huh just for wait Wayne Adele where nobody has anybody got us only I’ll start.

 

Theberton: No I think that’s a good point to leave it we’ve been going just over an hour and we come back to what we started.

 

Morgs: With one thing I mean, I don’t want to just kind of cut you off there, but one thing that I’ve noticed on YouTube is that all these videos are platon hop up on my feed and I like three and a half fucking I was on who’s got who’s what anger [85:01] watch it three and a half hour video we’ll see how this goes and I’d like to keep it at an hour, because I really don’t like bore everybody to death. If he’s tea a more gross review I don’t really you a pop up you’ll get an hour you’re given an hour of good banter and then not see how like I’ll say no way. I’m not gonna ask you to put half a shift in listen this sort of it is I feel. I think and I was quite quite sufficient things. Everybody happy with us.

 

Theberton: Yes one.

 

Jim: Yeah I agree I see these water key ones at three there are powers of my heart saying an hour to two hours is the right range.

 

Morgs: Yeah I’ve got about five and a half years of water skis fuse to watch I’ll get back around I’ll get back out and you think gee Joe I’ll tell you I’m just gonna have is it there’s a there’s a channel called cruelness on YouTube and he kind of cuts out the highlights and puts them on YouTube so you can picked out, you know, like what they used to do a football [86:00] where you didn’t have the time to watch much of that year so you just watch the goals and that’s kind of that’s kind of what this cruelness channel is like uh one of the other understand well people just talk for like seven hours on YouTube every fucking day! That’s not my year that’s not that’s not gonna be the way here lads, I’ll tell you that! So anyway I think we’ll wind it down thanks thanks for joining I was alright when I went work here.

 

Theberton: Yes good having a lot.

 

Morgs: Jim?

 

Jim: Yeah that’s a will do for a first attempt..

 

Morgs: Not bad. Not bad at all. All right. I’ll catch you all down the trail boys.

 

Theberton: Bye everyone.

 

Jim: Cheerio.

 

END

 

 

============================================

 

PDF Notes

* Total words = 17,000

* Total images = xx

* Total A4 pages = xx

 

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

 

(Available later)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Version History

 

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2:

 

Version 1: Jan 19, 2018  — Published post.

 

 

[In this interview Andrew Hitchcock talks with Canadian-German Alfred Schaefer again, this time about the sudden arrest of his sister, Monika, in Germany, for the “crime” of making a 5 minute YouTube video entitled, “Sorry Mom, I was Wrong About the Holocaust“. Alfred makes an impassioned plea for people to support Monika and to spread the word about this ongoing  tyranny being brought about by organized jewry and their shabbos goy minions — KATANA.]

 

 

[48/57 Minutes Now Complete]

 

 

 

 

 

Andrew Hitchcock

 

with

 

Alfred Schaefer

 

How YOU Can Help

 

Monika Schaefer!

 


 

Click here for the audio:

https://cldup.com/8XDyvXPqQo.mp3

 

Click here for: Andrew Carrington Hitchcock webpage for this interview

 

 

 

Published on Jan 11, 2018

 

 

Andrew Hitchcock’s Description

The Andrew Carrington Hitchcock Show (534)

Alfred Schaefer – How YOU Can Help Monika Schaefer!

 

 

 

In today’s show originally broadcast on January 11 2018, EuroFolkRadio’s Andrew Carrington Hitchcock interviews Alfred Schaefer, for a show entitled, “How YOU Can Help Monika Schaefer!

 

We discussed:

— the circumstances surrounding Monika’s arrest at the Sylvia Stolz trial last week on January 3rd; how when Monika protested that she was a free Canadian citizen the state prosecutor said:

If you wanted to remain free you should have stayed in Canada!”;

— Monika’s experiences in Germany prior to her arrest; how Alfred has received absolutely no information from the German authorities regarding Monika’s condition, and has been unable to see or speak to her;

— how the German (((media))) are celebrating the abduction and persecution of Monika;

— how we can turn the abduction and persecution of Monika to our advantage;

— how Monika will be coping in prison; examples of the Jewish persecution of the White race;

— how Alfred is thrilled with the support Monika has been getting from around the world since her abduction and persecution;

— how there is no point raising the issue of Monika’s abduction and persecution with any political parties as they are all controlled by the same group;

— what YOU can do to help Monika;

— how YOU can contact Monika;

— Monika’s YouTube video, “Sorry Mom, I Was Wrong About The Holocaust,” which I played in its’ entirety on the show;

— how this YouTube video undid the hundreds of millions of dollars the Jews have spent over the years in indoctrinating the White race with their lies;

— how Adolf Hitler was incarcerated at the same prison as Monika in 1922;

— and many other topics.

 

You can write to Monika at the following address:

 

Monika Schaefer
Stadelheim Prison
Stadelheimer Straße
81549 Munich
Germany

 

Click Here To Listen To The Show

Click Here For Monika’s 5 Minute YouTube, “Sorry Mom, I Was Wrong About The Holocaust,” Which Is The Reason For Her Being Held in Solitary Confinement In Stadelheim Prison

Click Here For Stadelheim Prison’s Facebook Page

Click Here For The New, “We Are Monika,” Website

Click Here For Monika’s Website

Click Here For Alfred’s YouTube

Click Here For The Andrew Carrington Hitchcock Show Archive Where You Can Listen To Or Download All My Shows

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(57 mins)

 

 

[00:25]

 

You are listening to TBR radio, brought to you by The Barnes Review.

Now the Andrew Carrington Hitchcock Show with your host, Andrew Carrington Hitchcock.

 

 

Andrew: Hello everybody. Today’s show was booked to record, and it was booked to record with my good friends, Alfred and Monika Schaefer. Now unfortunately Monika can’t be with us, because she has been jailed in Germany, for producing the video, which was an apology to a mother, entitled, “Sorry Mom, I was Wrong about the Holocaust”. So I just have Alfred with me today. Now, I’m recording this January the tenth, and I’m actually broadcasting the very last show I recorded with Alfred and Monika, tomorrow, January eleventh. Now that might change and I might end up broadcasting this show tomorrow, and delaying that one, depending on how it goes. I’ve had a discussion with Alfred before hand. We’re going to see.

 

So I’m going to bring him up right now. Alfred are you with me?

 

Alfred: Yes Andy, and thanks for calling me up and I’m glad this is taking place now.

 

Andrew: Absolutely! Well either way, I mean, if we decide to put this out in a couple of weeks like we have been doing, then I can always release this. I’ll think of a way that I can release this early anyway, so, … Yeah, I’m all up in the air with this folks, because we don’t know where it’s going to go., but I think the best thing to do now is to hand over to you Alfred, and can you explain exactly what happened, from where Monika was staying with you for Christmas, and just after, and now is suddenly in jail in Munich.

 

Alfred: Yes, okay. It’s been precisely one week ago, that’s on the third of January, that Monika was arrested, as a quiet observer watching the bizarre Inquisition hearings against Sylvia Stolz in Munich. And that was done, … First of all, to get into the courthouse we had to pass all kinds of security clearances. And we went in there and watched the proceedings, and then within about forty minutes into the proceedings, the snake of a state prosecutor ordered an unplanned break, and said:

 

We’re going to reconvene here in the about twenty minutes.

 

So we say, “Oh well, let’s go out and stretch our legs a little bit, in the hallway.” So we step out into the hallway, and there was another snake of a state prosecutor, came up with three heavily armed thugs and they say:

 

[03:04]

 

Monika Schaefer?

 

In German, of course, and she says “yes” and she [state prosecutor] says:

 

You are herein detained”.

 

And they took her off to the side a bit, and slapped handcuffs on her. And when she protested:

 

Wait! You can’t do that! I didn’t do anything wrong! I’m from Canada. I’m a free citizen!

 

Then the snake of a prosecutor said:

 

If you wanted to stay free, you would have stayed in Canada!

 

So that was how the arrest proceeded. And then after going back into the court room, Sylvia Stolz’s lawyer came to me and he whispered in my ear, and he says:

 

Alfred, you had better get out of this room here, because we don’t know what they’re going to do to you.

 

And so I just got my jacket and left the courtroom. Waited outside, it was raining pretty miserably and then Henry Hoffenmyer came out after a while, and we just waited, basically in this car, until the proceedings ended. And then we could communicate with Sylvia Stolz and her lawyer, and a few other people.

 

So it was really a bizarre scene, like in the Middle Ages! I cannot believe this is happening in our so-called civilized world and even just listening to the proceedings against Sylvia Stolz, they basically take paragraphs and phrase them and package them in a way that you just cannot win! It is the same as if they stuffed you in a sack, threw you out in the water and if you sank then you were innocent, but you were dead. If you stay afloat, you are guilty and can be now tortured to death!

 

There is no winning with the framing of the paragraphs and wording that they use against us. And that basically brings us to the point where we have to define these things for what they are. This is inquisition. They are saying there is hate speech, there is political correctness, there is, anytime you go anywhere near the evidence of the truth, it is defined as hate and incitement. So it’s a bizarre situation that we have to extricate ourselves from, if we are to survive on this planet! , because this will continue to go down and the screws will be tightened.

 

And and this has to be dealt with, and if we can get a critical mass of people understanding that rapidly, which now, of course, what’s happening is faster and faster, then we can do it relatively peacefully. If we don’t succeed in getting the zombies detoxified from these lies and these are the terminology that has robbed them of the ability to even think, and destroy their ability to defend themselves. If we fail and this will continue to go downhill, until we have just wretched, horrible, genocidal, bloodbath in all of our Western countries!

 

[06:01]

 

Because we have to not only stop the deteriorating conditions as we see them on our streets, but we have to reverse them! We have to repatriate so many of the people that are thinking that they are entitled to something, and at the same time we have to get our people to understand this is these are our lands! Our territory! Our civilization! And these people that are coming in are participating in a free lunch! A feeding frenzy! Much the same as we had observed in the past after the same thing was done to the heart of the European people, which was a Germany, in what we call World War One and World War Two.

 

And when we see all this in the context of this being one huge World War against humanity, starting with the Europeans, against the Europeans by the jew, then it all starts making sense. In fact, everything makes sense if you understand the big picture! And so many of these components like, World Wars, “Holocaust”, or the fake moon landing, communism, democracy, Iron Curtain, … All of these things make sense when we see it in the context of the jew reaching for world domination!

 

But going back to your original question, and how these things happened from when Monika came here and visited me. First of all, I was thrilled that Monika was not afraid to come here into the heart of “Holocaust” country, despite knowing that, I’m in the crosshairs., but she says, “I’m coming. I didn’t do anything wrong!” And they could have arrested her coming in, I suppose. They could have arrested her while she was here, and we sure certainly didn’t hold back and make it a secret. And there was a fellow from France, a comrade from France, who was just desperate to come together with like-minded people, who understand what’s going on. And he was in contact with Monika and Monika says:

 

Just come to visit Alfred, while I’m there.

 

And so he came just after Christmas and he was such good company, and we had such a good time just exchanging ideas and making music. He plays excellent accordion, had a super nice accordion that he brought along. So we had more than a week basically, of culture, homemade music, you know, sitting outside around the fire and just enjoying ourselves. Just a really, really culturally rich time. So this period with him really helped Monika tank up her batteries, top them completely up! We were all in a spirit of elation and everything was just one hundred percent fine. And then this! We go to see this court case with Silvia Stolz, and this surprise kidnapping of Monika took place.

 

[09:02]

 

So her batteries could not have possibly been better prepared for what she is now having to deal with, than that which happened before, like this whole week of music, and culture, fine company. So that’s it. And she understands full well the role that she’s playing now.

 

So if it was their intention to snuff Monika’s message out, it has done precisely the opposite! It has brought two brilliant flames of light, Sylvia Stolz and Monika Schaefer together, to make an even brighter light! Even [with] Sylvia Stolz, they’re trying to delete her out of our consciousness. Well now, it has put her back on center stage as well! So, they really done an “own goal” with this one, and we have to take advantage of that, and just shoot out of every barrel of a gun that we have, to get this message out there! And it is working! More and more people coming on board with us, who are helping us to propel this message out there, on every channel and platform we can. And writing letters, doing this, and that, just making it ever more difficult for them to continue to remain on the course that they are, which is trying to snuff out the truth and make us even stupider than they’ve already made us!

 

Andrew: Absolutely! And now, what I’d like to know, because the news I’ve got is that Monika is actually being held in maximum security prison in Munich. And she’s in solitary confinement. So, what I’d like to know is, what information have you been given from the authorities, since they have basically said to her:

 

If you wanted to stay free you should have stayed in Canada!

 

What have you got from the authorities?

 

Alfred: Absolutely nothing! They just completely, … It’s like she’s been plucked off the earth by an alien spaceship! We have gotten absolutely nothing! It was just through a lot of effort that Silva Stolz’s lawyer which, you know, because this has happened at her trial, at her Inquisition, immediately took responsibility for what he could, and was able to see her in the detention cell. In fact, that would have been probably precisely to the minute almost like one week ago now.

 

And he said her condition was, she was laying on this wooden bench there, you know, put her glasses off on the table, that was there, and just waiting there. That’s all she could do. And was she was in good spirits., but that was right after this whole thing happened, and since then we have been unable to make any contact with her. The courts require us to request a visiting permit, or a speaking permit through the court system. So we’ve written the letters to do that. We’re doing everything we can and it’s almost like somebody gets kidnapped. How do you contact the kidnappers and how can you look and talk to the person who’s kidnapped? Monika is a prisoner of war!

 

[12:03]

 

And this is how we’re dealing with it. So we’re doing everything we possibly can to get her out of this total insane imprisonment before her batteries run out. I mean, she tanked up with all this music and everything else, and now they’re going to try to isolate her and make her think that nobody cares about her. We don’t know if she’s completely isolated. We just assume, since we cannot in any way, shape, or form, contact her. Yeah, she’s like gone from the planet basically, for us, at this point. We’re trying to get through to her. Maybe we’ll have a breakthrough, maybe even tomorrow, I don’t know., but right now, it’s all speculative. I cannot make any statements on that.

 

Andrew: Yes, and the other thing I wanted to ask was, of course, there are all these persecutions going on, as you mentioned. Sylvia Stolz, then in the UK we’ve got Alison Chabloz, who actually did some music with Monika in Canada, so they’re friends. To there’s Jez Turner in the UK as well. They seem to be coming after as many people as possible., but the way they think that they’re going to get away with it now Alfred, is that they own all the media, or they own 96 % of it. And this is another point where we’ve got these “Holocaust” laws. Ernst Zundel was asked to put his hand on the Bible and promise to tell the whole truth to the court. And at the same time they said that “truth was no defense”!

 

Well that’s exactly what they’re doing with the international definition of “anti-semitism”. They’re bolting in, along with the “Holocaust” laws, things like any accusation that the jews have inordinate control over the banking, or media system, means you’re guilty of anti-semitism, and all this sort of stuff. So this is the way that they think they are going to do it. And going back to the media, which is basically the basis of my question, has there been any mainstream media reports of Monika’s arrest in Germany, that you are aware of?

 

Alfred: Yeah, well they actually had to admit now, and they’re celebrating the fact that a “Holocaust” denier has been arrested! You see, so in the total zombified condition people are in, they jump up and cheer:

 

Oh yeah! Got another “Holocaust” denier!”

 

So, we’re getting a situation now where those people who are coming out of the matrix and understanding what is happening, which is easier and easier, because of the censorship is making it more difficult. On the other hand, though, there are an exploding number of excellent websites, that really clearly explains the whole picture, the “big picture”. And I found myself — and this is a conclusion that Monika and I have both come to — is that only recently have we really gotten the depth of understanding of the big picture that we have achieved so far. And the bigger the picture that you understand, the easier it is to understand all the components that this is composed of and as long as we are still in this zombie state of this totally compartmentalized way of thinking, where you cannot even go from one compartment to the next, because there’s these unsumountable walls in the way of “labels” such as “anti-semitic”, or “racist”, or “White supremacist”, or this guilt complex.

 

[15:29]

 

As long as we have not overcome those, we are not in full capacity of our own minds. And are basically walking around like somebody who is trying to run a race with two broken legs. You cannot, you know, we’re not even able to think. And in this crippled condition, we have been fed, you know, just been kept comfortable and softened up. Comfortable in terms of, well you can eat all this junk food, you can watch all kinds of crap on television, and then getting softened up, and softened up. And in this condition, it’s almost impossible for many, many people. For many, many people it’s not possible to come out of that condition, because it’s just too overwhelming. And it’s almost like taking a little baby and making it, “okay, now you have to go into battle”.

 

So we have to take those people, our people, who have leadership qualities, they will be coming out by themselves. And that’s what’s happening now. This is the time in history where the people who are the leaders, the natural leaders, will be coming out by themselves. We can’t even really recruit them. We can give people, you know, ask people to do their homework, ask people to start to try to use their brains and figure things out, and they can do it. It’s up to them, they have to do it. We cannot spoon feed them, we don’t have time.

 

And these leaders should all be rounding up more and more people, and helping them come out of this condition. So this really does become a mass movement. And this is what’s happened with Monika. They try to silence her, and it has had exactly the opposite effect! It is galvanizing people worldwide to our cause, because the hypocrisy of it is so glaring now, that it’s just blinding! It’s even visible for the zombies to figure out. So even a zombie says, “Just a minute, something’s not right with this picture!

 

And before, the zombies were always kind of held at bay, because, sure it was hypocritical with what was going on, but it didn’t seem to be a strong enough contrast for them to understand that. So now, we’re having a condition where those people are coming out, are completely polar opposite of the zombies. And, in fact, for people that understand the truth it becomes impossible to sit in the same space as the zombies. And when this goes through the entire society, this rift goes through families, through our entire society, with a small rock solid core of people who understand, that is growing by the day. Sort of like a, you know, these things in space that swallow everything up, like the black holes. We are accreting mass from the zombies at an every faster rate.

 

[18:21]

 

And so we’re taking people away, others on the condition to this core of people who understand. And this is a process that will not go back! It’s irreversible! And that’s the panic that the jews now find themselves in. I think there’s a lot of jews that are starting to wish:

 

Shit! We shouldn’t have done all this! Why did we do this and that? I mean, it was running so nicely for a long time, and now comes the day of reckoning!

 

And this is so completely inevitable, there’s no escaping this! The jews will find themselves in the same predicament that they always have, and we find ourselves right now, in a similar mood and situation that we always experience just before they get tossed out! It’s like when you have to throw up, you know, you feel really sick and now you have to go, and you can’t hold it anymore. And then you throw up. And this moment of throwing up, is really unpleasant and you think you’re going to die, but you throw up, you get the parasite out of you, and then you can sort of clean yourself off and start life over again.

 

That’s what we as the White race are facing now. And I am absolutely confident that we’re going to do it even if not each and every one of us are going to survive this throwing up! , but we are right now initiating the healing phase which means we are articulating the picture, we’re spreading it, we’re driving it basically, almost like a catalyzer to get this thing going faster and faster! So we’re winning right now, even if it looks gloomy at the moment, however we are winning, because we are gaining ground with every single second.

 

Andrew: Thank you Alfred. Now, one thing that obviously I’m worried about, and I know I speak for the listening audience as well, is Monika, you know, she’s not “elderly elderly” like Ursula Haverbeck, I believe she’s in a fifty’s, or sixty’s. She’s in maximum security, she’s in solitary confinement. And what can you tell us about Monika as a person, as to how she would be coping? And the other thing I want to ask you, is imprisonment ever been something that Monika discussed with you, as a possibility for her? What I’m really getting at, is a) you as her brother, how do you think that she will be coping in there? And also has this ever been something she’s considered may happen to her, which has helped her to potentially prepare for it?

 

[20:41]

 

Alfred: First of all, how she will be able to cope with it? One of the jobs she did in her younger years, was working in the [national] park, where she’d have a couple of horses, one to ride, one as a pack-horse, and go out in the back country to sort of patrol a fairly large area of outback Jasper National Park. And so she is used to being completely alone and responsible for everything she does. And she has gone through things where not many people would have the strength, and the courage, and the stamina to do what she had to do for her job, which she loved more than anything else.

 

So she knows she can be with herself, without breaking down, you know, where are my friends, or something. No. She is a fighter, she is a warrior. That is why she was also able to deal with the ritual defamation that she had to face after making that video and returning to her hometown. Now, very few people would have the stamina and backbone to do it like she did. So she survived this ordeal and she’ll survive whatever comes now. And we all consider that we can end up in solitary confinement for indefinite number of years, or whatever.

 

However, understanding what we are involved in, also has us understanding that what we are fighting, transcends anything that, you know, you, or I as individuals, that transcends everything! All of us! , because we are this single chain in our lineage now, that has to get this right, because the thousands of generations that came before us did not fight the odds that they fought to ensure that we are here, for us to become complacent, fat, lazy, and stupid! And allow this kind of a “mind manipulation” to bring an end to this lineage! And if we fail, it would mean we have zero generations ahead. If we succeed we have thousands of generations ahead and these thousands of generations will celebrate those people who contributed something to ensure that they exist! That is our responsibility! That is our role! And we European peoples I just cannot envision, ever us failing in this mission!

 

When I think of what our forefathers built out of nothing, out of the Ice Age Europe, to what we have now, the culture, the music, the inventions. All of these things, the vast majority of what’s good on this earth, what we call civilization, comes from our people! And we are now finding ourselves crawling on our stomachs with some parasite whining about a “Holocaust”! I mean, this is beyond obscene! Beyond pathetic!

 

And now we are tolerant and we are tolerating them teaching our young boys that they can be little girls! If our forefathers had seen that, any teacher that dared to do that, would be pulled out of that school, slapped, and if they did it again they’d have their head chopped off! Now that would be a healthy response to what’s going on!

 

But no, we are just crawling on our bellies, allowing them to do that! And there’s a reason for that. Once people understand why this is happening, why our little boys are being taught the little girls, it’s so that they will not do what any good warrior would do! And that is protect your people, your territory, your heritage, and your honor! And what they are doing with us is the most despicable, decrepit, most demeaning, most humiliating thing, that’s ever happened to us Europeans!

 

And once we understand that, and I, anybody who comes out from the zombie condition will affirm what I’m telling you now, is that you find you have energy that you never even knew existed! So when we get a critical number of our people understanding it, there is nothing, absolutely nothing that can stop this thing from just succeeding for us!

 

[24:48]

 

Andrew: Yes. The Rudyard Kipling poem, “The Wrath of the Awakened Saxon” comes to mind, Alfred. That is what we need, and that is what we are hoping to get. And I believe what we will get.

 

The other thing I wanted to ask you was regarding support for Monika. What’s the support like on the ground in Germany? Do you have a few people who are up to various, different things that you rely on? Just just on the ground really. I mean, obviously Sylvia Stolz is aware, so to that means any supporters of her, will now be aware. How’s it looking on the ground for you in Germany?

 

Alfred: I don’t want to make a statement on that, because I just observing what’s happening in the Internet basically, and how the people are understanding what’s going on. And I’m thrilled, I’m absolutely thrilled, how this incident, this single incident, has done more now to galvanize people to understand and you can see it., because I saw a number of people are putting out like, videos of very amateurish, but that’s okay, with me, they’re doing what they can. And they’re saying:

 

I never knew about Monika until this! And this really sort of shook me. So I’m doing something now.

 

And I’ve seen a number of things coming out now, within the first week, where people are triggered now, that they have to do something! And we didn’t see that before. Before people would still be complacent and say:

 

Well, why should I do something. I don’t want to do anything.

 

And this I think is making people understand, that hey, this is actually real. This isn’t just a movie. This isn’t just, you know, like a TV show you can turn it off, and laugh about it. No! This is reality.

 

So I see this as a galvanizing moment, and the year has just begun. I mean, I think it’s going to, … I don’t think at the end of this year, there’s going to be many people who don’t know what kind of a fraud this Holohoax is.

 

And in Germany, there’s more and more people also, … You get the extremes. You get some people say:

 

Oh thank god! They got another one of these people that are there threatening our peace, and blah, blah, blah!

 

But the people that are understanding, are becoming quite angry!

 

Andrew: Exactly. And also is there any chance of getting any support in Germany from certain more Right-wing political parties, like the AFD? Is anyone approaching, Alfred, or would that be a waste of time?

 

Alfred: These are all a waste of time right now. I’ll tell you right now, the solution will not come from any of these parties, because they are all completely controlled! There is no escaping this holohoax, and not a single party comes even close to saying, “That’s all a lie!” They won’t even talk about 9/11. They will not talk about anything! They only talk about what the jew, the parasite allows them to speak and say. Which is fairly limited, and getting narrower all the time.

 

[27:48]

 

So, the people are realizing that the solution will not come from these political parties, and it can’t. I mean, “democracy” itself is a complete tool for the jews, to be able to do that with what we now see. And more and more people are saying:

 

Never again democracy!

 

We always used to hear, “Never again Auschwitz”, actually this is leading to the conclusion, “Never again democracy!” in terms of what we are now being fed as what’s democracy. We need institutions that are accountable and take responsibility for what they have to do, and we don’t have that. In these political parties nobody is accountable for the decisions they make. They kind of anonymously put up their finger and say, “Yeah, we vote for this”, or vote for that, blah, blah, blah. And none of the real subjects are ever addressed! And we are being disenfranchised more and more every day. They move the power of decision-making to Brussels. I mean, it gets even more and more anonymous and further and further away, and that is intolerable for us as people. That’s why I say this system cannot survive the wrath that’s coming from the bottom up! And it’s coming.

 

Andrew: Alfred, can you let the listeners know how they can best support Monika? I understand there’s an address they can write to., but anything else that you would like to bring up?

 

Alfred: The best right now [is that] people should be writing letters of indignation to the prison basically. We’ve got the address in all kinds of videos and we should provide it to you, so you can put it in the show here. And feel free to say, “the political prisoner Monika Schaefer” and then the whole address, as it’s spelled out. And we’ll put that down in writing for your listeners to copy it off of the Internet. And just write these letters!

 

I mean, that’s a start, and get people who understand to help other people understand. Show your indignation, don’t buckle down underneath these control words all the time. Understand these words that are being used against us, that’s what we have to do.

 

Andrew: Yes. And the other thing I mean, for the benefit of some of the audience, I know listen to other shows and they call in. I don’t have call-ins on this show. But if you do that, just try raise the issue of Monika on call-in programs, things like that. The other thing that I’ve been doing is trying to mention it on various different shows. I did a show with Mike Walsh on the tenth of January, and we mentioned it there. Mike did a great article to highlight the situation.

 

[30:48]

 

I was David Duke’s a couple of days ago. I’m on with him generally on Mondays at the moment. And I managed to get her name into the discussion only briefly then, because we were talking about different topics, but I just try to get in there, where I can. Did a show with Gertjan Zwiggelaar last Friday. I generally do “Down the Rabbit Hole”, but we both agreed that we would dump that, that week and do a special show Monika’s persecution, the persecution of Monika Schaefer. And then on Monday I was very pleased to hear that Jeff Rense did a show with Gertjan Zwiggelaar, again on Monika’s situation. He and I both played the full, “Sorry Mom, I was Wrong about the Holocaust” video, in his show, and in my show, respectively. So folks, if you could just get the information out so people are getting aware of this. And as Alfred said, we very concerned about Monika. What Monika would want and correct me if I’m wrong here Alfred, but what Monika would want, is for us to capitalize as much as we can on the situation. We’ve got the opportunity. One of our own is being persecuted, being held against their will, for basically things that she said. And now we’ve got the opportunity that it’s in the time light, so we need to tap capitalize on it, and get as much information in our favor out there. Would you agree?

 

Alfred: Absolutely Andy! You know, when this happened, the very day it happened, I told Silvia Stolz, I says, you know, this really doubles her stock value — I hate using those terms, but, it makes it clear to understand — this has doubled her stock value and she says:

 

No, no, no, it hasn’t doubled it, it has made it ten fold!”

 

It’s an instant ten fold increase of her stock value, because this is going up, up up, because this is such a singular moment! I mean, the entire story — if you look at Monika and the actual charge on this — from the state prosecutor, which our lawyer could reveal, was actually this video, “Sorry Mom I was Wrong About the Holocaust”. Now, we are not going to get a better narrative than this for a long time to come, and we have to capitalize on this in every way we can, because this makes it so abundantly clear to almost anybody, even with a with an IQ of, you know, a gerbil would figure this one out!

 

[33:01]

 

 

That, if they can put someone in prison for apologizing to their mother and then repackaging that apology as being something evil, something is very, very, wrong. And at the same time that all these invaders are coming in, and they get a free pass to do anything they want. And then there’s this snake of a prosecutor, this jew, I assume she’s a jew, or a jew helper — that’s even worse — says, if you wanted to remain free you should have stayed in Canada!

 

Imagine if they take one of these invaders and tell them, “Well, you know, you should have just stayed your home country”, then they’d be accused of being a racist, you see! So here we are, in our own countries, a German descendant coming from Canada to Germany, comes to conclusions that you’re not allowed to, and then put in jail! I mean, the contrast of what’s happening now is just too much for any anybody who called themselves a human being to get to accept!

 

Our patience is out! Of our patience is also running out with those people who choose not to understand it! So that’s it. We have to capitalize on this, bring it up at every opportunity you get, because it really does embarrass our opponent. And that’s one of the best points of embarrassments that we can fire at them right now. And we have to fling it as often and hard as we possibly can!

 

And Monika would be completely satisfied with her condition and could go on and on, if she could just get us get a picture of what’s going on out here. Then she’d say:

 

Oh, that’s fine! I can just sit here and do nothing, because it’s going all by itself now.

 

So she would be, but they’re keeping that information away from her. And I’ve hardly been able to write a letter to her, explaining that, because they’ll censor it. They won’t let it go through. So this is it, we have to be able to get through to her.

 

So right now the best thing is for people, just everyone, if there’s nothing else, write a letter to this prison place and say “political prisoner Monika Schaefer”! You know, the shame of the BRD, which is the initials for Germany. Their political prisoner, our prisoner of war Monika Schaefer, and so forth, at this at this place. And when they get all these letters coming in, they will she’s got some support out there. So that’s a small step that a lot of people can make. That is, in fact, a pretty big help right here!

 

Andrew: Thank you Alfred. What actual prison is it in Munich? I’ve been trying to look it up. It’s not Stadelheim prison is it?

 

Alfred: Yeah. It’s Stadelheim. I’ve got the address, and I’ll see if I can get in an email here somewhere and then, …

 

Andrew: Well, what I’ll do for the listeners, I’ll just put Munich prison address into Bing, that’s what I typed in. Second one down, Stadelheim prison Wikipedia. And so that’s S T A D E L H E I M prison, because there’s going to be some people Alfred, that aren’t going to see the post for the show. They’re just going to be listening on their portable device, or something like that. They might be driving. And so, you know, I want people to actually get it in the body of the show as well.

 

[36:11]

 

Obviously you wouldn’t have a prison number, or anything like that for her, because you’ve not had any contact from the authorities. So really, all that people could do, is look up the address of Stadelheim prison, on the internet, and I’m going to get it for you in the next few minutes. Because, what I’d like to do if it’s okay, with you Alfred, I think it’s worth playing Monika’s video again on this show. It’s only five minutes, just to reiterate to anyone who’s unaware of this situation, exactly why she is being held. And she is being held for doing this video! And you can listen, you can have a think, do you think that it’s reasonable that someone should be a maximum security, solitary confinement, for basically what she said on this video? Is that okay, with you Alfred, would why like me to play it?

 

Alfred: Oh absolutely! Absolutely! And I’ll also read you the precise address when we’re done with that, where they can write. Yes, absolutely do that, yes.

 

Andrew: What I’ll do, is I’ll mute us both, and you probably heard, I had it lined up, I just found it. It seems to be coming through a bit loud, so if it does, I’ll turn it down. I’ll check my levels. So I’m going to mute us both now, and I’m going to play the video.

 

 

“Sorry Mom, I was wrong about the Holocaust — TRANSCRIPT

Hello. I’m Monika Shafer. I was born and raised in Canada, first generation Canadian citizen of German heritage. My parents both came from Germany. They immigrated to Canada in 1951 and ‘52, respectively. There was a bit of a disconnect between what I experienced in the home life and what I felt outside the home. I love the rich German traditions and culture that I grew up with and yet, I felt ashamed of my Germanness when I was at school, or outside with my friends. I learned very quickly to hide my heritage. It started in the first week of school. Day one, I wore my beautiful little dirndl, a traditional German dress and on day two, children were taunting me:

Oh you forgot to take off your apron! Ha ha ha!” as they were running away, or “Heil Hitler! , Ha ha!”, again taunting me.

I didn’t exactly know the meaning of that, but I knew it was not friendly. They were being cruel. That was very clear to me.

I’m reminded, just now, of the plight of the indigenous peoples of North America. They were also made to be ashamed of their culture.

I would like to share with you now a deep regret that I have for something which I would like to apologize to my parents for, but cannot, because they are no longer alive. Many years ago, I reproached my mother. You see I had been thoroughly indoctrinated as we all were. The stories seemed to be all around us, in school, in television in the very air, and the evilness of Adolf Hitler was as deep and diabolic as imaginable.

I said to her, to my mother:

Why didn’t you, your friends, your folk, your family. Why didn’t you do something to stop these bad things from happening! Stop Hitler and stop these death camps! You should have done something! You must have known!

I was really upset, my reproach was bitter. She listened and she paused and very quietly and in a sad tone of voice, she said:

We didn’t know about any of that. We just did not know. We did not hear about anything like that!

Well, now I know why she did not know. It is, because these things did not happen! It is only since the last couple of years, since about 2014, that I have begun to understand that this is the biggest and most pernicious and persistent lie in all of history! Everything has been turned upside down on it’s head!

Yes, there were detention camps. Nobody denies that there were camps! And yes, the prisoners were kept against their will. Again, nobody denies that. But these were work camps. The prisoners of the camps were being kept as healthy and as well fed as was possible in those terrible war years. They needed to be kept healthy. How else could they perform the work? It was war, and so the camps were basically armaments factories. And how much sense does it make, by the way, to have a hospital in a death camp? There were no gas chambers there. The only gas that was used was to get rid of the lice! Lice carried typhus and typhus was a deadly and rampant disease. So they had to delouse the clothing to keep the people healthy. Now, why would they do that if the goal was to just exterminate the jews? Makes no sense. That is the six million lie, as I know like to call it in a nutshell.

There is so much more to learn about this and this is all readily available now in 2016 thanks to the digital age with, or without the “thought laws”.

Back to my family. What a relief it is for me to learn that my parents and grandparents were not part of a people that suddenly became monsters overnight! The reproach which I directed at my mother, I wish I could apologize to her for this. I am, in effect, apologizing to her now, to her spirit. I would like to invite you to find out more by searching the following titles that had such a meaningful and healing influence on me.

Thank you.

 

[42:29]

 

 

Andrew: Okay Alfred.

 

Alfred: Yeah, you know, it’s funny when I hear that, when I listen to that I still get tears in my eyes. That has really shocked the jews, because this really did undo hundreds of millions of dollars worth of psychological warfare. But the jews are so clever, they, actually we, actually paid for their psychological warfare against us, because they would make these sick movies like “Schindler’s List” and the “Holocaust” and the like and stuff, and we would pay money to see the propaganda! And that’s bad! That’s really, really, bad. So that’s the summary of that.

 

Andrew: And the other thing I want to mention is that I’ve been looking around and it’s very easy folks. The address as Alfred said for Monika’s name, I would put “our political prisoner Monika Schaefer”. And then it’s Stadelheimer Strabe 81549 Munich Germany. It’s the simplest that. So Stadelheimer Strab 81549 Munich Germany.

 

So I’m going to spell the first line. Stadelheimer one word is STADELHEIMER. That’s STADELHEIMER. And Strabe is STRABE. That’s STRABE. 81549. Next line Munich. Next line Germany.

 

And then you could send it from anywhere in the world. So please, please, please get a letter in the mail. Get a card to her, or anything like. The important thing it’s not so much what you’re saying, which are, you know, is obviously important, because any prisoners we have, they need support. But it’s just to shock the authorities into how much support Monika’s got, and from all the different areas of the world that support is coming from. And this is really going to worry the Jews. That they’re not going to get away with this sort of nonsense for much longer. Alfred, your comments.

 

Alfred: Absolutely! They have to know that we understand the lies and no amount of censorship is going to prevent us from figuring out the big picture. And the further that they drive this now with their agenda of trying to dominate us by weakening us through this mass immigration of invaders, and so forth, the worse it’s actually going to be for the perpetrators! There are lists being compiled everywhere, of those people who have degraded themselves to help the jews, or the jews, themselves. I mean, these lists are being compiled everywhere. People are taking note, registering, you know, taking notes of who has done what, at what point in time.

 

You know people can say, “Well I didn’t know!” But the point in time that’s gone! Nobody can claim, “I didn’t know” any more. Because if every moron can figure it out, then the people doing this can’t plead ignorance anymore. If you buy stolen goods, they say that ignorance is no excuse. Ignorance does not excuse you from buying stolen goods. You see, it’s the same rules that are going to apply here. This is coming out, and anybody, everybody will be measured on what they did, or did not do, and on whose side they did what! And when the lie is through, and believe me it’s going to be through very, very soon, like quite soon! It’s through right now, only the zombies still think it’s real. Everyone’s going to be held to account. So that’s it! I mean, everybody has to make their own decision.

 

And like Monika was saying, she reproached our mother for not stopping what happened. Well, how was she supposed to stop these lies, they’re just lies? But now we know what the reality is. So anybody who is on the side of the lie, will expect, definitely can expect harsh treatment from every single person they know! Their children, their neighbors, their friends. Well, they won’t have any friends anymore. People who are now supporting the lie will not have any friends at all! They’ll be lucky if they are left alive when this goes through!

 

Because, depending on what they’re doing to support this lie, that is treason! It is treason! And treason has traditionally always carried with it the death penalty! But, because of the large number of treasonous offenders, those who have only done a little bit of bad, they can expect some leniency, or they can expect more leniency if they maybe turn in the ones who made them do that sort of thing.

 

So this is the phase that we’re going into, where those people who are on the wrong side of this thing, will be stabbing each other in the back! And that’s, you know, as is always the case when somebody is in a group doing something evil, you say:

 

Well if I tell you what that guy did, I get more leniency, right?

 

And this is what’s going to be happening now. In fact, starting right now in the United States, and actually everywhere.

 

 

[47:43] IN PROGRESS

 

 

Andrew: And the other thing not just found as well that some of the audience might find interesting is false they don’t have a Twitter accounts that’ll haul in prison have a Facebook page and so you’ll be able to, you know, contact them now if you think that’s wise I would stall to say nasty things that could result in them treating moment to even worse and they all put again spelt slightly differently S that L L and prison so you just thought the prison Facebook could to your, you know, what a search engine to using all use Yandex now and then you’ll come up with their Facebook page so you can have a look around that also if you do it that’s why folks that the address is just the at the top and the Left hand saw it so you could copy and pasted they’ve also got a phone number.

 

That’s another why I’m just really trying to push everything that we could possibly do to help monitor hey this is what’s and pull it.

 

Out for it we’ve got about seven minutes left so I’d like to have back to you to say anything else that you haven’t yet said.

 

Alfred: Well, you know, when you’re speaking of the Facebook page there’s a very good web page called vias in mourning which is which in German means we are morning got so it’s via White I R S I N D and then M O N I K And there’s a little hyphen between that, or a minus sign between these three words if you go there there’s all kinds of good stuff there and if you want a Facebook page you could just say free Monika free Monika, you know, just mentioning her name then we want more like a free and, because they might block all of things, but it’s a good word good try I mean, the have to do a lot of blocking, because I think I mean, the whole world is waking up.

 

I want people to understand that not to be gloomy no get your fighting spirit and let’s get her out of there it’s up to us and only us to get her out of there. Being gloomy and as if we were defeated. No! We are just starting and we are going to come out of this victorious and all those who are who understand that now are well positioned to take basically leadership roles in the struggle, because you are obliged to get as many people behind you and understanding and marching to get this thing through. We can’t do it alone. Everyone is responsible now to do their part and that’s all I can say is it’s a great time with that to have such a challenge that we can do it and we’re going to win. And to just partake in it it’s an exciting thing to do!

 

Andrew: Yes not just the we assumed Monaco folks this is W.R. Dash dash Monika dot com and you just go there and there’s all sorts of different things you might have to roll a click to get the page child’s lighted into English sometimes, but it’s all be all caught up strike twice on the path to my favorites now at a camp put it. In the post for the show on how to do what we’ve done today we still got a few minutes left to be useful in the hope that you will take the fall. Use of the soap. To the that. To. See how effective you could be as a force in raising awareness of Monika and also writing to Monika. Use at least various different methods Alford said I mean, you could quite easily Tom Facebook could say for the monitor there’s nothing wrong with that, but I don’t want you to start issuing any threats, or anything like that could cause problems for, you know, Monika, or even yourselves is a very unpleasant situation that we’re facing however southwards says we need to use this to our advantage.

 

[51:27] IN PROGRESS

 

Funnily enough startle Holland prison when I was looking it up adult Hitler was actually in prison there were nineteen twenty two Alfred. I don’t know if you’re aware of that?

 

Alfred: No, I did know that. So I guess that’s a great honor for a Monika got to be in the same prison as Adolf Hitler! That’s a pretty good!

 

Andrew: Exactly! Although I think it was on the Wikipedia page it’s got multiple bites of startle prism so yes, so there’s all sorts of different things that you could do we’ve got a few minutes left with our set so I just want to stress that. This is when we will be to come together folks, you know, when one of our gets persecuted we need to behave as the you that this is what the jews do what the jews do they promote diversity for the other groups for racial cohesion for themselves. That’s why there was so successful. That’s how they got the prison, because if I’m wrong now for, but wasn’t the part I put of Canada that contacted the German authorities of all for her to be arrested.

 

Alfred: Yeah, you know, that’s true and yet what’s interesting is the jews they ‘re they’ll be a never stop conniving how to sew the most, you know, Division into the people, because the official complaint as far as the papers go that our lawyer could look into it was that it was actually a denunciation from our own family. It was a distant relative here who thought that she could protect herself by denouncing us! Now it might be true that’s the actual cause, but I don’t think so. I think they’re just using that one. Because that was the one that could so some division in our family. So you see it like you have to, because it was deliberate that we contacted the German authorities, but they didn’t use that as the reason in the actual accusation. They did take a denunciation out of our own family and use that because, you know, that could so some more division. So if it’s interesting it’s very interesting.

 

Andrew: Yes and the other thing is the often to very strange while they waited so long until she was Sylvia Stolz twelve it must have been aware that she was in the country is there anything that you’d like to say about that I don’t want you to have to speculate on necessarily.

 

Alfred: , but don’t know yet, but I will, because I’ve thought about that a lot and I think there are people on the other side who are they have profiles on us they know how we’re going to react and they want they want to make it as Profitable for us for our side as possible and then later on they will come out and say look I was helping you guys from the other side and that’s a very plausible thing, because this is so I think it’s beyond coincidence. I don’t think they’re really that stupid, because they this way they brought Sylvia Stolz back on center stage.

 

[54:10] NEEDS PROOFING

 

So I think there are people on the other side who are helping us. And they will come out with the, you know, with evidence of what they have done to help us for their own defense when this thing goes through there’s a lot of people on the other side that wish they could they could get off the stage this is look they’re losing control so that’s it and I say that’s good they’re doing that if not maybe maybe it was just good luck maybe it’s our guardian angel I don’t know what it was, but it couldn’t have unfolded better for us than the way it did and I’m thankful for that and I and that’s why we say we have to take this positive energy that we seem to have backing us and go with it! If we don’t do anything, or that we waste it. So we all have to now do everything we can and take advantage of it an amplify it! And I see that happening I’m very happy to see to observe that this is, in fact, happening.

 

Andrew: Yes, of course, you’re absolutely right, because if they call there at the airport always she was staying away happy they couldn’t have got a more public spectacle than a trial in which the persecuting someone else for their views to think so with you they’re all for it we’re pretty much out of tonsil Could you please give a closing statement to our listeners.

 

Alfred: This incident in the courthouse in Munich it brought the glaring light of Sylvia Stolz and the glaring light of Monika together to make a super glaring light and now the devil is really in a panic! So that’s all I can say about this.

 

Andrew: Thank you so much and also if we long for the words of few who have life I would like you to remember Monika and Alfred in your prayers off the power of prayer. People to do anything that I can do to help Monika said write to her. Giving you all the different things in the show please listen to the show again and so that you can wear them bull the different things I’ve said I want to thank Al for it so much for joining me today I want to thank you all for listening I’ll be back with you all tomorrow, so bye for now.

 

You have been listening to the Andrew Carrington Hitchcock show on the euro folk Radio Network. Andrew’s book the Synagogue of Satan is now available on his website Andrew Carrington called. In an update to the censors.

 

 

 

 

 

[56:25]

END

 

 

============================================

 

PDF Notes

* Total words = xxx

* Total images = xx

* Total A4 pages = xx

 

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

 

(Available later)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Version History

 

 

Version 6:

 

Version 5:

 

Version 4:

 

Version 3: Jan 20, 2018  — Did 6 more minutes. Total proofed = 48 mins.

 

Version 2: Jan 15, 2018  — Fixed typos. Did 4 more minutes. Total proofed = 42 mins.

 

Version 1: Jan 14, 2018  — Published post. Total proofed = 38 mins.

 

 

 

[Arya Sattya, a British woman, gives a short, but very good, critique of the recent debate hosted by Andy Warski, between Richard Spencer and Sargon of Akkad, among others. Although she disagrees with some aspects of Spencer’s views, she is highly critical of Sargon for his lack of sincerity and constant naysaying about the viability of having White only ethno-state. She goes through several of Sargon’s “arguments” pointing out the “pipul” or hair-splitting, nature of many of them  KATANA.]

 

_______________________

 

 

Arya Sattya

 

Richard Spencer vs Sargon of Akkad

 

Debate Roundup

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Click the link below to view the video:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2DZSzxHZvY

 

 

YouTube Description

 

 

Published on Jan 5, 2018

 

This is a discussion of some of the points brought up in the debate between Richard Spencer and Sargon of Akkad on Warski live.

 

Please like, comment, share and subscribe!

 

 

 

 

This video is not intended to encourage or condone hatred or violence.

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(12:09)

 

[Music]

 

[00:12]

 

 

Hello.

 

I just wanted to talk about some points that came up in the debate last night on Andy Wolski’s channel with Richard Spencer, Sargon of Akkad, Styxhexenhammer666, but also included other people like, Millennial Woes, and so on. The stream at it’s highest, had over 13,000 people watching live, and at one point reached the point of being the number one most watched stream in the world on YouTube.

 

It was a really interesting debate, and I think all this really goes to show just how many people are starting to get interested in the ideas of the so called, “Alt-Right” and just how much progress the movement is making as a whole. I really recommend going on watching it now, if you haven’t already. But I’ll put a link in the description.

 

With regards to the debate itself, I’d like to start off by saying that there are lots of points of disagreement I have with Richard Spencer, and I do think that it’s highly likely that he is, to some extent, “controlled opposition“, which I think I’ll discuss in another video.

 

But, there are also a lot of things I do agree with him on. And I thought that he performed exceptionally well in the debate. There were various polls done afterwards and it was in my opinion too, that he comfortably won the debate.

 

So, it started off with Richard Spencer calmly stating his points, and Sargon just shouting over him and coming across as incredibly impatient, for seemingly no reason at all. The first major point was about whether to adhere to abstract principles, or real-world pragmatic concerns, which Sargon just couldn’t seem to understand at all. The worlds described by Locke*, that he always seems to harp on about, was ultimately one invented for and by White people in countries that were overwhelmingly White. The United States itself was explicitly invented by, and for, White people. Which Richard Spencer mentioned at a later point in the debate, when he spoke about the 1790 Immigration Act**, which explicitly welcomed White people of good character. Sargon here is making what one might call the “Enlightenment fallacy” which I think I want to expand on in a video of itself.

 

[* John Locke, (born August 29, 1632, Wrington, Somerset, England—died October 28, 1704, High Laver, Essex), English philosopher whose works lie at the foundation of modern philosophical empiricism and political liberalism. He was an inspirer of both the European Enlightenment and the Constitution of the United States. His philosophical thinking was close to that of the founders of modern science, especially Robert Boyle, Sir Isaac Newton, and other members of the Royal Society. His political thought was grounded in the notion of a social contract between citizens and in the importance of toleration, especially in matters of religion. Much of what he advocated in the realm of politics was accepted in England after the Glorious Revolution of 1688–89 and in the United States after the country’s declaration of independence in 1776.

The next major point was about the rights of individuals, versus, the rights of groups. I don’t think that these things are mutually exclusive at all. I think that most people want to live under a State that exists for their interests, and that protects the rights and freedoms of the individuals within that State. But that State is a group identity.

Source: https://www.britannica.com/biography/John-Locke]

 

[** Naturalization Act of 1790

The original United States Naturalization Law of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat. 103) provided the first rules to be followed by the United States in the granting of national citizenship. This law limited naturalization to immigrants who were free White persons of good character. It thus excluded American Indians, indentured servants, slaves, free blacks and later Asians although free blacks were allowed citizenship at the state level in certain states. It also provided for citizenship for the children of U.S. citizens born abroad, stating that such children “shall be considered as natural born citizens,” the only US statute ever to use the term. It specified that the right of citizenship did “not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_of_1790]

 

I personally want to live under an ethno-state that protects my freedom as an individual and acts in my interests. And I want that to be an ethno-state for, and by my group. Respecting individual and group rights is not mutually exclusive, which Sargon seems to go out of his way to pretend to not understand at all. It’s about finding a balance between Authoritarianism that’s necessary for a state to function, and Libertarianism which stands up for the rights and freedoms of people within the state.

 

 

[02:51]

 

 

The point that Richard Spencer was making was about how we already have States that restrict our freedoms, and Sargon doesn’t have a problem with that now. So, Sargon despite his constant waffling on about abstract principles that originally emerged more as descriptions of States inhabited by White people, than prescriptive ideals, he does understand that in the real world we do have to restrict some freedoms, and we do have to find a balance between authoritarian and libertarian ideals. We do have to find a balance between the rights of the individuals and the preservation of the group as a whole, which they exist in.

 

I think it’s all somewhat hypocritical, when, as some have pointed out, Sargon himself started an online poll to ban social justice causes in the universities. Surely this goes against some of Sargon’s beloved principles?

 

Continue Reading »

 

 

[In this interview Millennial Woes talks with Morgoth, who runs the blog Morgoth’s Review. [To be continued]   — KATANA.]

 

 

 

[48/104 Minutes Now Complete]

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millennial Woes’

 

Millenniyule 2017, No. 66

 

with

 

Morgoth

 


 

 

 

Click here for the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_anw3F8R_w

 

 

 

Published on Dec 28, 2017

 

 

YouTube Description

Streamed live on Dec 28, 2017

[This video is not intended to condone violence or hate.] [This project is my livelihood.
Please see http://www.millennialwoes.com/donate. Thank you.]

 

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

(104 mins)

 

 

[00:00]

 

 

Woes: Hello, and welcome to the final episode of Millenniyule 2017. This is number 66, and it’s with Morgoth, from Morgoth’s Review. How would you describe it? A British nationalist blog? Welcome to the channel again Morgoth! You’ve been on twice before, I think this is the third time, and I’ve been looking forward to it. So, welcome!

 

Morgs: Hello. I don’t want to trigger the dog with words.

 

Woes: Which words would trigger the, … All right, yeah, I get it. Okay, right. So tell people how would you describe your blog?

 

Morgs: What I try to do is analyze pop culture, mainly, and if something is going off, I’ll have the odd rant about a terrorist attack, something like that. But, the main content, as they call it these days, on the blog, is breaking down movies and pop culture, or something that’s appeared on the television. Because I discovered Counter-Currents and I saw an article by Greg Johnson, and it was about how you could take all of the propaganda machine, and then turn it on it’s head. You could use the weight of it and turn it back on it, if you critiqued what you are actually seeing. And it was it’s quite powerful.

 

And I was amazed that, … Going back six years that Counter-Currents have a movie section, I’ve never seen that before. And I thought that was the best thing in the world to have a movie section on a White nationalist site.

 

Woes: Yeah.

 

Morgs: And so I loved that! I thought that’s the way to go.

 

Woes: Radix did the same thing on their Vanguard podcasts. And then Alternative Right, the blog spot, they do similar stuff now and then. Other people asked me to do as well, but I never have enough time.

 

Morgs: Yeah, well I don’t a lot of stuff around demographics and race and things like that. Instead I’ll do like a thousand word article on the shitty new Star Trek diversity things they got. Everybody says it now, well I was there on the original Alternative Right site going back about six years. And one of the best articles that I read there, was one on the “Borg”. And again you think well this is great, because if they’re breaking down pop culture in a way that I haven’t seen before. And I think bright young men love that kind of thing, because they are starting to understand, … Because everybody’s being force-fed this pop culture and you can turn it back on it. You can use the weight of it to attack it!

 

 

[03:02]

 

 

It’s what I left have been doing to us, to White Christian society for last fifty years. It’s critique. You break it down. You don’t have to actually put anything positive there, you just rip everything down!

 

Woes: [laughing]

 

Morgs: It’s great fun! It’s great fun, because it gets it out of your system. Like these diversity adverts. Last year I did a blog post on the diversity adverts for that Christmas. Diversity adverts that came out last year. And this year I didn’t even bother, because everybody was at it!

 

 

Woes: Yeah. I did a video on that. So did Mark Collett. Oh god, who else did it? There were quite a few, because this year it was unbelievable!

 

Mark Collett — Christmas Adverts – Multicultural Propaganda — TRANSCRIPT

 

Morgs: Yeah. And we can get into later, because I’m gonna try and get a YouTube channel off the ground next year, soon. And one of the first things I was gonna do was what’s actually going through the head, of “John Bull” out in Zombieland, when he sees these diversity Christmas ads? What’s he actually thinking? Because he knows, his gut is telling him that there’s something wrong! But his brain is saying:

 

But you can’t mention it, because then you’re gonna be evil!

 

And you can get really into the problem just on that, just on the diversity ads. And your average bloke sitting there watching it, with a wife and kids, and he’s gonna think:

 

Well I’m bummed off here! I’m out of the fuckin equation! Where am I in the Marks and Spencers diversity ads?

 

And he isn’t! He’s gone! But if he mentions it, then he’s a “racist”. So he’s got this kind of problem:

 

It’s not right, but I can’t talk about it!

 

And I think another thing I’ll to do is to look into the morality of “Holocaustianity”. Because when it comes down to, that’s what we’re talking about. There you’ve got, …

 

Woes: Define that for me.

 

Morgs: Well, it’s something that’s been, … We don’t talk about it as much anymore, but I think earlier people in White nationalism talked about a more than it gets talked about now. You don’t even have to get into the “Holocaust” of World War Two. It’s the way it’s been used to chain White racial consciousness and ethnic feeling to pure evil! Literally! It’s a religion! It’s pretty much just a religion, …

 

Woes: It’s so useful. I mean, it can be invoked at any time. I watched an episode of Question Time, no, I didn’t watch the whole episode, I just saw a clip of it on YouTube. I cannot watch Question Time anymore! I haven’t watched a full episode for about five years now. But I saw a clip and it was Simon Schama.

 

 

[06:01]

 

 

It was around about at the end of 2015 — you can see where this is going. It was around the end of 2015 and everyone was talking about the migrant crisis. And he said — I can’t remember the words he used, or the point that he made — he basically said that people who don’t want the migrants coming in to Europe, like all these migrants coming in from Africa and the Middle East, people who don’t want that are basically wanting another “Holocaust”!

 

Morgs: Yeah. Well how it works is that, and again you don’t even have to get into the nuts and bolts of the “Holocaust” itself — I’m not that interested in that. But how it’s set up like a religion, is that the six million died for the sins of European racists. And Adolf Hitler is Satan, and now Europeans have to reject the evil forever to find salvation and moral purity and everything like that.

 

And you can see it. The further that you are, let’s say a kind of UKIP tier, or something like that, a kind of conservative like Jacob Rees-Mogg, then you’re more towards pure evil, than say, Yvette Cooper — who I want to talk about in a minute. And so the social justice warriors see themselves — or a lefty, you know, your typical kind of lefty — they actually, within this religion, this moral paradigm, they actually see themselves and think of themselves as being good! Because, within that moral system they are!

 

And so the more that you turn your back on White identity and embrace the “other” the better person you are. That’s how it works. And when one you understand that, you understand a lot about the shit that were are in!

 

And to get back to the diversity adverts, if John Bull out in Zombieland starts to ask the wife:

 

Well, what the fuck’s going on here! I’m not even in these adverts! There’s nothing representing me. There’s a black fella there!

 

A big jump towards being pure evil! And somehow, or other, we’re gonna have to break that! We’re gonna have to destroy it, somehow, or other.

 

[Click image to enlarge]

 

Woes: Yeah. And I mean, the scary thing for John Bull is that he’s not there in those adverts. But also implicit in that, is the fact that he won’t be there in the future. You know, this is it now. It’s the same thing with the “diversity barriers[concrete blocks protecting pedestrian areas]. Every Christmas now it’s going to be like that. Every Christmas market, because they’re never going to calm down. So, …

 

Morgs: Imagine the diversity adverts in 20, or 30 years time. When like now they’ve got the White woman and she’s just a sort of half-caste breeding factory, but then in 20, or 30 years time she’s just gonna be this sad old granny slumped in the corner, pissed [drunk]!

 

 

[09:08]

 

 

And then with all of these complete racial aliens running around. [laughing] It’s not like the nicest of futures! It’s okay now when she’s being romanced on the train by this nice black man! But her future is shit as well!

 

Woes: Oh yeah! Yeah! We don’t need to paint that in very detailed strokes, because it’s just so, it’s so fucking grim, you know! Yeah, the beautiful White girl today who’s flirting with a black man on the train! It’s a bit exotic, it’s a bit exciting, it would annoy daddy! Well her future is, she’s going to be surrounded by, first of all, lower IQ half-caste kids, and then even lower IQ, god knows what, grandkids! And, you know, the security that she could have had from having a White family is just going to be totally gone!

 

 

 

Morgs: Yes. And she’s gonna sit there, a kind of old flabby wreck, just getting a drunk in the corner, and farting, and just thinking:

 

Ah shit! Look at that! Look at this!

 

That’s what’s being promoted. The White man’s the first to go, but the lot for the White woman is not that nice, either. It really isn’t.

 

Woes: No. The statistics actually for mixed-race, like for a White woman to marry a black guy, the statistics are terrible. I saw them the other day, a summary of them. And the amount of violence, the frequency of divorce, the frequency of being on welfare, it’s, … The thing that they paint, these fucking Christmas adverts, a sort of ideal romantic relationship where it just works, you know. And he’s middle-class as well! It just goes swimmingly.

 

Nothing could be further from the truth! The reality of them of this, is frequently sordid and miserable, and poverty-stricken, and violent! So it’s disgusting! I mean, this is the kind of thing where you actually realize that the social conditioning is not only immoral, not only irresponsible in the grand scheme of things on the macro level, it’s also very cruel and irresponsible and immoral towards each of these individual women who’s being inveigled into doing this, to herself.

 

Morgs: Yeah. I mean, I don’t really want to go on about with diversity adverts, because like I say, everybody’s been on about it. But, you can see that, because before we went on, we were talking about Yvette Cooper. And I don’t know if many people have seen it, because I haven’t seen that before, where she was on a Common Select Committee.

 

 

[11:55]

 

 

 

Woes: I know. I should just introduce this for the non Facebook. Yvette Cooper, a Labour politician. She was up and rolling with [Tony] Blair, either cabinet, she was one of Blair’s fuckin babes in the late 90s, which is, you know, amazing to think of nowadays. And she’s just running these god-awful “champagne socialists” and she was in some sort of meeting in the House of Commons, governmental, with presumably representatives of YouTube.

 

Morgs: Yeah, I thought was strange as well. But basically this little video, I mean, I wish I’d seen it before, but this little video has Yvette Cooper on a Common Select Committee complaining really, like bollocking these bosses of YouTube saying:

 

I’ve just seen White genocide videos on your platform! [Morgs laughing]

 

For some reason YouTube has been recommending Red Ice, …

 

Woes: It’s hilarious really! [laughing] The algorithm has somehow recommended Red Ice videos to Yvette Cooper, who is just the worst champagne socialist. It’s hilarious to think that somehow, got this badly! [laughing loudly]

 

Morgs: Especially, because like, say 15 years ago, she had a bit of a kind of cute pixie look about her, but now it’s kind of sour, and she just looks like a vindictive bitch! And then, …

 

Woes: Yes!

 

Morgs: You know, the eyebrows used to be kind of cute, and now she’s just like a sour bastard! But, the funny thing is she’s actually seen, she’s actually watched videos on White genocide and she’s fucking furious about it. [laughing]

 

Woes: Because she’s emboldened it! She’s fucking doing it!

 

Morgs: She was probably in the fucking videos!

 

Woes: [laughing loudly] That’s why they were recommended to her! [laughing loudly]

 

Morgs: Because, I mean, I posted on the blog before. I spent Christmas day, it was a big family get-together at me mother’s house, and they put this YouTube kind of mix on, and so we saw what like my mother watched on YouTube. And it was like Val Doonican’s Greatest Hits and Karen Carpenter the Tragedy! Really bland mother’s kind of stuff. It wasn’t fucking White genocide videos! She wasn’t being recommended that!

 

So, what’s Yvette Cooper actually watching that’s making the YouTube algorithms show White genocide videos on her face? [Woes laughing] I wonder if she’s been Googling, going into YouTube and search like, “New Labour, Tony Blair, genocidal bastards, or anti-White”, or something like that? And she’s gonna get it! [Woes in a fit of laughing] New Labour on the working class, and then a fuckin video on White genocide pops up! And so she’s seen this, and she’s gone fucking berserk about it! She wants that down! She wants that shut! She wants that out! Out of it! But she supported, …

 

 

[15:09]

 

Woes: Well it’s disgusting, because, first of all, she was moaning that it was being recommended to her, but then that rapidly transformed into her moaning that it was on the website at all. That it was on YouTube at all! She was saying to them you have not taken it down. And I thought you fucking dummy! You know, how dare you! And when I shared it on Twitter I said:

 

And sometimes one can forget just how appalling British politicians are!

 

Because I was really disgusted, thinking this fucking bitch would actually want my channel to be deleted, you know. Just, because it’s contrary to the message that she wants the public to get!

 

Morgs: Yeah!

 

Woes: What a fucking bitch!

 

Morgs: The thing is, leaving Red Ice aside for a minute, because they are well-known, but there is a lot of White genocide videos now, and they’ve got like hundreds of thousands of hits. And they tend to be like, five to ten minutes long, where you see hordes of Africans, Muslims, just swarming towards Europe. They’re climbing over fences, you get newspaper clippings of rape statistics, and bomb attacks, and everything like that. And then you’ll see like certain, (((you know who’s))) [laughing] talking about how wonderful it all is.

 

And Yvette Cooper, her colleagues, anyway, definitely Tony Blair, would have been in the videos! But her constituents, the people a lot she supposed to represent, are watching it. And her a reaction of that is not to say:

 

Oh, hang on a minute. Hang on a minute! I represent a demographic who think, and a lot of them, not all of them, maybe not even not many of them, but some of them think there’s a concerted plan to blend them, breed them out and replace them in their own country.

 

I mean, she should be saying to another Common Select Committee:

 

Yeah look! There’s something going on out there, in normie-land and we have to get on top of this situation, because they think we’re fucking scum! They think we’re trying to bump them off!

 

But no! No! She just wants to remove the videos!

 

Woes: Yeah! That is why it was so infuriated for me to see that. You just want to delete this! You want to censor this. Because that’s inconvenient for you.

 

Morgs: Yeah! It doesn’t solve the problem.

 

Woes: It’s the height of arrogance to address the symptoms of something rather than the problem, which you yourself are creating. Nothing, I don’t know what could be more arrogant than that!

 

Morgs: Another thing, it means that she doesn’t have much faith in the arguments that she can put forward.

 

 

[18:02]

 

 

So they’ve got all of the media, all of the political class, they’ve got academia, they’ve got big business, they’ve got the bosses of these companies, YouTube, Twitter, Facebook. They’ve got them, more or less, on their side, and it’s not enough! They still can’t win the fucking argument!

 

Woes: Yeah! [laughing]

 

Morgs: Can she not make a documentary to say why we are not [promoting White genocide], you know, going up on Coronation Street adverts? Thirty second advert?

 

Okay White people, this is why you’re not being genocided and everything’s okay!

 

[laughing]

 

Woes: Well, you know, what she should do is offer to be interviewed by Red Ice, and she can prove them wrong! She can just, you know, defeat them in arguments and statistics and facts. But, of course, she won’t do that. She’ll try to get them deleted! Or barred in Britain. That’s more likely. That is what she’ll try to get YouTube to do.

 

I mean, it really just fucking disgusts me! Because that’s a fucking government politician, pressuring YouTube to censor this in their in her own country! It’s reprehensible!

 

Morgs: The people she represents are making very, … I don’t know how you put it, but they’re interested. Very interested in the idea that people like her, who move in her circles, are actually trying to bump them off, to get rid of them, in one way, or another. Now that’s a fucking hell of a serious allegation! It’s tantamount to accusing her and her political clique of high treason!

 

And that will open Tony Blair, … That was still on the books for being a hanging offence in England.

 

Woes: On high treason. Yeah, sorry you cut it out there for a minute. Are you on WIFI, by the way?

 

Morgs: Yeah.

 

Woes: All right. Okay, just wondered. It’s great. Your voice is cutting in and out sometimes.

 

But yeah, it’s tantamount to accusing them of treason. Yes it is! I they are guilty of treason! I think they should stand trial. I think the entire Blair cabinet should stand trial for treason against the British people! Treason against the British state! Fundamentally endangering the existence of the British people. I think this should all be on trial for that.

 

Morgs: I mean, it’s funny, …

 

Woes: Maybe one day they will be.

 

Morgs: If you’re like me, and I’ve been in this for nine, or ten years now, and there’s lots of juicy little facts which fall, by the wayside and you don’t see them brought up anymore. Like Tony Blair, pretty much as soon as he got the power and before he opened the gates, the death penalty for high treason, … I mean, it was only in theory anyway, it wasn’t actually gonna happen. But, you’ve got the biggest traitor in modern British history abolishes the last kind of “bits and bobs” of the hanging for treason [law], just before he actually commits the biggest act of treason, ever!

 

 

[21:10]

 

 

And to put that into perspective, when the John Major government, which in 1997 immigration was rolling between 30 to 40,000. And that was in total. They didn’t like, you know, fuck around with the numbers, the way they do now. So it’s like net, and they count how many people go out. So we had 30 to 40,000 people coming in the country in 1997, and within a couple of years of Tony Blair, the New Labour Party, which was dominated by a (((certain group))) you had what, about 300,000? So it was ten times the amount within just a couple of years.

 

Woes: Yeah. I mean, Mandelson* actually said that they were putting people out there into, you know, I think it was Pakistan. He said that they actually sent people out there to advertise that you could move to Britain.

 

[* Peter Benjamin Mandelson, Baron Mandelson (born 21 October 1953) is a British Labour politician, president of international think tank Policy Network and Chairman of strategic advisory firm Global Counsel.

He served as Member of Parliament (MP) for Hartlepool from 1992 to 2004, and held a number of Cabinet positions under Prime Ministers Tony Blair and Gordon Brown. He was the European Commissioner for Trade between 2004 and 2008.

 

Blair with Mandelson (click image to enlarge)

 

Mandelson was one of several key individuals responsible for the rebranding of the Labour Party as New Labour before it’s subsequent victory in the 1997 election. He resigned twice from the Cabinet before leaving Parliament to take up an appointment as a European Commissioner. He later rejoined the Cabinet for a third time after being created a Life Peer, sitting on the Labour benches in the House of Lords.

Peter Mandelson was born in Hampstead Garden Suburb, Middlesex, on 21 October 1953, the son of Mary Joyce (née Morrison) and George Norman Mandelson. His father’s family was Jewish; his grandfather had founded the Harrow United Synagogue. His father (known as Tony) was the advertising manager of “The Jewish Chronicle”.

Mandelson is gay, and he is said to be ‘intensely private‘ about his personal life.

He has lived with his life partner Reinaldo Avila da Silva, a Brazilian-British translator, since March 1998. The couple live in a house in Regent’s Park, London, bought for £7.6 million.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Mandelson]

 

Morgs: Yeah, because Britain wasn’t known as being an immigrant country. So, your average bloke out there in Pakistan, or wherever, he didn’t think that there was any chance of him coming to Britain, or a very small chance. But, Britain wasn’t open. Britain wasn’t an immigrant nation.

 

Source: Mandelson — Immigrants: We sent search parties.

 

And they just concocted all of these lies in the last 20 years! So there wasn’t the infrastructure of bringing masses amounts of people into Britain. It just wasn’t an issue. Going into the 1997 election, I mean, I was just a young fella at the time, but it was the first time I could vote and the issue was the minimum wage. And everybody was tired of the Tories. The Tories had been in forever.

 

Woes: Yeah, they’ve been in for 18 years at that time.

 

Morgs: Yeah. I mean, and you can shit on them and Thatcher and everything like that, but there’s a bit of a theory that they did kind of [help?], just a little bit from what was going on elsewhere. You know, I wouldn’t say my name for that, because you could be shot down in flames. But I do get the sense that we had it good with the Tories and we didn’t know how good.

 

Because, remember when the poster went around of Tony Blair, was like the devil? With the evil eyes, …

 

 

Woes: Yes, yes.

 

Morgs: And it was a kind of the old Tories and they were saying:

 

You don’t know what’s coming! You don’t know!

 

I mean, I think they were, the old Tories, were under pressure from other areas, the (((money power))) and things like that. And they didn’t hold it all off, but they kind of dragged their heels in the globalist project. And then it was, I don’t know, I’ve got a little pet theory that when Tony Blair came in, it was like, “we’re gonna have to catch up! We’re gonna have to, …

 

 

 

[24:04]

 

 

Woes: There’s a very interesting thing, I mentioned this at least once before on the channel, there’s a series called “Bill Brandt” from 1975, or six. And it’s a crap boring drama, but it’s about a Labour politician, he’s a sort of firebrand and I think he calls himself a left-wing reactionary, or something. And then, what’s interesting is just that it shows the Labour Party at a moment in transition, like the middle 70s you had old boring, sort of dry Michael Foot types, and then you had a young young generation, who I mean, literally they’re like 20, 22, 25 generation coming up, who had, you know, imbibed the new left, cultural Marxism, for the very first time at the universities.

 

You know, in the late 60s early 70s. And they were all about queer rights, and women’s rights, and lesbians, and all that. And, of course, immigration. You’ve got this very interesting transition point between the Old Left and the New Left but, of course, that didn’t really take hold for another 20 years!

 

Morgs: Yeah.

 

Woes: Because they had to get into the party work, their way up the ranks, but I think Tony Blair was first elected in 83, wasn’t he? Something like that. And so it took time. They were there in the party from the mid seventies onwards, but they weren’t gonna actually been able to do anything with it and reshape the country for another 20 years. But they got in and they did.

 

Morgs: Oh well, it was insane, because I lived away at the time. And I came back and like, I come from quite a big family, and my youngest brother was still in school, and he was coming home, and this was a year into New Labour. And he was coming home from school and he had prizes, even though he’d come last! He had awards for being the last in races! In the sprints, and the marathons and stuff, cross-country. And my dad, was saying:

 

I don’t understand any of this! He shit at running and they’re still giving him awards? What’s the awards for?

 

Woes: This is the “all must have prizes” literally!

 

Morgs: Everybody must have prizes. You could see it slowly creep in!

 

Woes: And yes, actually, that reminds me, I should have said this. In the middle 80s there’s a fascinating documentary on YouTube and I think at some point I’m going to make a video, just playing it and commenting on it throughout. It’s only about 20, I don’t know, maybe 15 minutes long, maybe shorter than that.

 

And it’s about the “Looney Left” in the middle eighties in London. And this thing, I said earlier that it took them 20 years, before they could actually start doing stuff, but that’s not true, because at the lower level and the council’s and stuff, they did, I mean, that’s like 10 years after the mid 70s, and they were doing stuff.

 

[27:01]

 

I mean, the “Looney Left” thing is real. The thing about “Baa Baa Rainbow Sheep”, [Morgs laughing] that turned out to be a story, yeah that was tabloid a tabloid invention. And, of course, therefore it said that the the whole Looney Left thing was a tabloid invention, but it wasn’t. It was absolutely real! And now what you had, I mean, people won’t know what I’m talking about, some people, … Well do you want to describe the Looney Left thing, or will I do this?

 

Morgs: In the 80s? I don’t know about them in the 80s.

 

Woes: Well, yeah, it was mainly in London, as far as I know. You had Left-wing local councils, so they’re not at the government, or not the national government level, but they’re at the local government level, and local education authorities, that sort of thing. And that was when they started injecting what we would know called “cultural Marxism” into the society at large, into culture.

 

And they started worrying about, … Well I suppose you could say it was the start of “political correctness”, actually becoming a sort of creed in daily life, you know?

 

Morgs: Yeah.

 

Woes: And so, it’s fascinating to see it now, because you tend to think this stuff started much later, but actually it didn’t! It was there at the fucking height of Thatcher’s government!

 

You know, you’ve got to remember, that was the height of her popularity. And people tend to think of Britain in the 80s as I sort of Right-wing, very hard Right country at the time. But no! Because this is what the Left do. While the Right are busying themselves at the national level, the Left are dissolving things below that, at the levels below that. Sort of unawares. So the Right think they’re triumphant and they’re controlling everything, but actually the Left are working below decks, fucking things up!

 

I mean, I guess that you could say the same thing has happened now, or is happening. I mean, look at Donald Trump’s in power in America and the anti-fa professors are going fucking berserk with the students.

 

Morgs: Well, it’s why I’d be wary of White knighting for the Tory government. I mean, on the one hand I can see that there were probably elements who are aware that they had to protect Britain for as long as possible from the (((wider globalist project))), but I think they were, a bit like the elves from middle-earth. They knew they were in the long defeat!

 

And then when Thatcher’s new liberalism just smashed communities to pieces. And you can’t you can’t defend that in the long run. You can’t defend it, because then when I Left did come in, they picked towns and steel worker, mill towns in the north, which were just absolutely hammered! And talk of anything else, what they did have was a glut of cheap house council houses, which was just stuffed full with Muslims.

 

 

 

[30:04]

 

 

And we had our first major grooming scandal, here in Newcastle this year. I did like a two-part article on it. And I mean, even before the Muslims, the mass immigration, started to arrive in the West End of Newcastle it was well known for being a shithole. I mean, I remember back in the day when I used to go out in Newcastle on a drink and stuff, there was a kind of urban myth went around that somebody drove his car to Newcastle, and then he got shit-faced drunk and he couldn’t drive home. So he swapped his car for somebody’s flat! [home unit] . Like a 300 pound car for a flat in the Newcastle West End, where this happened. It’s absolutely dire! And it already was. They were already on their last legs, and then what we did was just dump the Third World on top of them!

 

And I came back about 2002 to visit somebody in hospital. I said it before about me brother, getting awards for coming last! And then I came back and I went to the hospital and they had this, it used to be a bingo hall and it had been converted into an African Women Support Center! And I thought, well I don’t know what the fuck is that? Basically, that was really my reaction! Was, just what the fuck is that? African Women Support Center in the West End of Newcastle!

 

And it was the New Labour project kicking in. Because it didn’t happen overnight. I really wanted to get like a big [blog] post out about this, because it’s 20 years this year that has passed since the New Labour got in. And I did want to do like a few posts on it but I never got the time. But you could see it took a couple of years to trickle in and then you started to see weird community centres that didn’t make sense. What is that? What does that mean?

 

Woes: Yes, of course, yeah I’m here. I’m listening to everything you’re saying.

 

Morgs: There’s a writer now for New Statesman called John Harris. And he has written a book about the Britpop era. I mean, we could do a hangout all about this, just on it’s own, one day. But he’s written a book about the Britpop era, and Oasis and the Blur and everything like that. And he’s a complete champagne socialist twat! From fucking Chelsea, or somewhere in London. And it was in the New Statesman’s long-lead section and it was a good piece. I mean, I haven’t read his book, but I don’t really need you, because they’re flogging it like fuck in the New Statesman.

 

 

 [33:00]

 

 

 

And I just kept reading it, reading it, and he was going on. It was an interesting thing that you got this tension between Blur and Oasis which was kind of like the working-class North against the pampered South. And he got into a quite a lot and coming towards the end he said the one thing we have to look back on about the Britpop era and “Cool Britannia” and what it all meant, was that it was just so bloody White!

 

And I thought, there you’ve got it! There you’ve got the fucking cancer!

 

Woes: So what was he saying that, you know, was he sort of guilting that it was a White thing?

 

Morgs: Yeah. It was not inclusive, because what you could reasonably think of as being part of that, you had “Massive Attack” at the time. Which was this kind of, forgot what they called it now, xxxx were another, Beth Gibbons, she had a beautiful voice and xxxx came out of Bristol, and it was a sort of ambient gentle hip-hop thing that went on.

 

Woes: Yeah, yeah. I mean, they were good groups.

 

Morgs: The Britpop scene which came in with Blair was like entirely White! And it’s actually really tragic, because they and it’s the Britpop thing wafted, they kind of loved Blair. They were like:

 

Oh, we’re finally gonna beat these Tories and we’re gonna move off this new tomorrow.”

 

And they went and then Noel Gallagher’s snuffed coke off the back of Blair’s toilet in 10 Downing Street. And it was all just a total lie! They were playing us like a fucking fiddle! Because they thought they were in a kind of counterculture, but they weren’t! It was a sort of, the globalists were playing them for the counterculture. It was controlled!

 

Woes: Yeah. Well I remember at the time people saying it was kind of low-grade for a political party to affiliate itself with pop groups, you know, rock music, but again it was a baby boomer thing wasn’t it? I mean, it was really the first baby boomer government to be honest. And that’s their thing, rock and roll was their thing.

 

Morgs: Yeah. And films came out, like “Trainspotting” and it was all the Brits are gonna come, and beware Hollywood. And there was this general sense of a British identity, but it was synthetic! And it was bullshit! And it was kind of toothless, and it didn’t have any kind of backbone. And you have Geri Halliwell wearing this, she looked like a prostitute wearing the Union Jack, it says everything about it. Because really it was just waiting to get fucked!

 

 

[36:07]

 

 

Then it got fucked three years later as soon as Blair and his heavily dominated government of a certain ( ( (ethnic group) ) ) set about bringing the immigrants in. And then the party was definitely over! Then it was “hate speech” laws! And “watch what you are saying” or you’re going to get fired. And by fucking God did they kill the party!

 

Woes: Well indeed. This is the whole thing about the New Left totally shitting on the concerns of the Old Left. In the end it doesn’t matter the plight of the working class does not matter to the New Left.

 

Morgs: Yeah.

 

Woes: They’ll willfully ignore them and even make things worse for them, much worse!

 

Morgs: Yeah. And you can see that kind of transition with say Oasis being the working-class chad, and Blur being the middle class champagne socialist virgin! I mean, even back then that’s like a meme going around. Now even back then it was apparent. And now the disconnect has become xxx 20 years later. The disconnect is to the point where it’s a crisis! It’s a crisis! It’s where even a copper says; “take the shit down!” And people, the demographic who would have been on the racist side of this, say 20 years ago, now they’re a threat to the system.

 

Woes: It’s also worth saying that it was that demographic, the racist demographic, who voted for Brexit. And someone just pointed out in the live chat, that Noel Gallagher, was it Noel or Liam? I can’t remember. Noel Gallagher was pro-Brexit. Then you’ve got Tony Blair, who’s saying that he’s going to come back into politics, in order to reverse, or cancel Brexit.

 

Morgs: Yeah.

 

Woes: You couldn’t get such a more disgusting betrayer than Tony Blair!

 

Morgs: And that was a thing of Noel Gallagher saying about Muslims, about the bombing. And he was saying, look, that went round on Facebook and social media and stuff a few weeks ago, where you saying:

 

Look at our kids in London

 

And he was literally calling the government cunts! He said they’re not gonna change it. They didn’t change it. The next government’s not gonna change it! My kids are on public transport, because of these fuckers! You know, their lives are in threat. And so that divide that, I just find it interesting, that even we go back 20 years ago where you can see that it was a little bit of fun and games, the Blur-Oasis thing.

 

Woes: Well exactly! In contrast to today nothing really mattered back then! In retrospect it all was quite trivial!

 

 

[38:51]

 

 

Morgs: I was going out and getting pissed and smoking dope! And life was a fucking great party! I was late teens, and you look at it now and what you can see is that the seeds of that kind of friction have become now, where they see I’m in the racist camp.

 

This massive swarm of orcs at the gates of the metropolis, trying to burn them alive!

 

And creating blogs to try and get hits to wake people up and turn them against the elites!

 

Woes: Yeah! [laughing]

 

Morgs: And that basically is the problem.

 

Woes: [laughing] Ironically enough I wasn’t an Oasis fan, I was Pulp! [laughing] You know, what can I say?

 

 

Morgs: He’s a raging Leftie, Jarvis Cocker, he’s a wanker!

 

Woes: I know. I know. Ironically, his mother as a Tory counselor.

 

Morgs: Well, he’s supported by the UEF something, I don’t know I’ve kind of lost track of a lot of them, to be honest.

 

Woes: I mean, I never really liked Blur, to be honest. They had a few good songs. But I mean, Damon Albarn was always an obvious mommy’s boy, you know. And, of course, he was with Justine what was her name from Elastica? Justine Frischmann, who was a jewess, of course.

 

 

Morgs: Oh?

 

Woes: That’s a funny thing about, …

 

Morgs: Yes, she was, wasn’t she? Yeah, it’s like that’s the biggest letdowns since xxxxxx. [Woes laughing uproariously]

 

Woes: Also there was a cute girl, …

 

Morgs: Isn’t it xxxxx when that happens?

 

Woes: Yeah, I know, I know. Well there’s, what’s her name? There’s a there’s a really gorgeous English actress, I forgot her name. It’s Rosie Huntington-Whiteley! and she’s jewish! She’s gorgeous, an “English rose” kind of look.

 

 

Anyway, the funny thing is, there’s another Britpop group called Sleeper, and they had a female lead singer. Yeah, she’s jewish as well!

 

 

Morgs: Jesus!

 

Woes: This is why we need our own people, we need our own groups, our own talent, so that so that this doesn’t happen so much in future, you know.

 

Morgs: Yeah, I mean, we’ve talked about all this, I was gonna have that guitar xxxx from the Stone Roses as my YouTube channel, but I’ll get flagged [for copyright violation]. Because, there was the Manchester versus London Chelsea thing well, wasn’t it?

 

 

I was watching the videos from like the Stone Roses, Oasis and stuff, and I do like that kind of working-class swagger! Where they’re not cucks! They’ve never been to university, fuck all. They’re racists, you know, they’re racists, they don’t give a shit! And I like that. I like that kind of masculinity, that working-class kind of “fuck you” attitude.

 

 

[42:05]

 

 

 

And I think it’ll be great to bring some of that back in a kind of nationalistic Alt-Right way.

 

Woes: Yeah, yeah. Definitely! I mean, the alternative is that they just remain completely cowed by Islam, like the men in Rotherham, you know, who are afraid to do anything to protect their own daughters and sisters.

 

Morgs: Yeah.

 

Woes: That’s horrendous.

 

Morgs: I mean, you can wax lyrical about working-class masculinity, but they’ve behaved like absolute fucking faggots. But I mean, what do you do? I think it goes back to, “it’s evil to say anything about it!” And they are really, really atomized. It was the same story in the West End of Newcastle, that plays itself out everywhere. Where the pubs have been closed, the social clubs have been closed, so there isn’t any action, even if you leave aside the political correctness and the traumatized “your Nazi” and all that. And then there isn’t actually another a bunch of White men to round up and do what you have to do, whatever that would be. Because that they don’t have a social group. They sit in their house were their missus and drink wine! And watch X-Factor. And what goes on out beyond the door they don’t know!

 

And I’m not gonna make excuses for them. I’ve spent years trying to wake them up.

 

Woes: I think they need permission. I think, you know, this is gonna sound really snobby, but I think they won’t do it until they feel that the middle class are on their side.

 

Morgs: Well I agree! I ended up, in my two-part article on the Newcastle grooming scandal, I basically said:

 

Look, they’re not going to do it on their own. They don’t know how, they wouldn’t know how to organize anything.

 

If they thought they had organization and direction, they’ll do! They’ll do what needs to be done. But until then, they’re happy to sit playing Fifa on the PlayStation and smoke dope. And that’s shit! It’s just, …

 

Woes: It’s horrendous! I mean, if you’re playing Fifa on the PlayStation and smoking dope, while your sister is being groomed by Pakistani Muslims, I mean, there are no words for that really! It’s just absolutely fucking tragic!

 

Morgs: Yeah, yeah. I’m not gonna play the “working class hero card”. I’m not gonna defend them. I’m tired of it. I will work with them, and every day I know exactly the type, and they are aware of what’s going on. And their attitude is:

 

It’s not going to happen to us. We won’t let that happen!

 

[45:11]

 

But I’m sure all your working-class men in other towns said that as well. I mean, the funny thing is that a lot of them are really fucking tough, as an individual, when you look at them. You’ve got to kill them! It’s a kind of off topic, but a couple of months back and I saw one of them, full of tattoos, obviously really, a huge, physically huge.  and my dog came and snapped at his dog, and he had this big stupid fucking, … They all do, they like a kind of Rottweiler Pitbull crossbreed thing. And he said:

 

You know, the next time I’m gonna fucking” — because I’ve got a smaller terrier — and he said:

 

You know, the next time, I’m gonna kick your dog all over this fucking park!

 

Look! Your the daft cunt! You can’t control your dog mate! You’ve got a big stupid fucking savage thing on the end of that chain! And he was ready to dig in! He was ready to go! That would have been a fight to the death!

 

And you see this all of the time. People are going to hospital and they’ve got fractured skulls and jaws for nothing! And I’m sure he would have been a tough lad, a kind of, “well, yeah, whatever”. And I kinda let it go, because getting on a bit! I’ve grown out of all of that.

 

But the problem is, they’ll be a bunch of Muslims come in, and he doesn’t understand what the bigger picture. He only sees himself as being a tough guy, which he probably is, I didn’t find out. But he is totally blind to the bigger picture, and about how the groups work. And that he’s not going to be a match for seven scrawny lads from Pakistan with knives and machetes! And there that’s not even taking into consideration the PC police.

 

Woes: Well you’re talking about a future scenario in which the PC police have become irrelevant. Which I think is going to happen eventually. And we will be left with a straightforward conflict between us and the Muslims in Britain. That’s eventually going to happen. The champagne socialists are going to fuck off to wherever, to their gated communities, and now I think they will give up on this, because they’ll realize:

 

Okay, we’ll created this enormous fucking shitstorm! We’ve got no idea what to do about it! Whenever we say something they despise and loathe us, so let’s just get out while we can and leave the working class to it.

 

 

[48:01] IN PROGRESS

 

I think that’s probably going to be some version of what happened and at that point there will be no political correctness, but there will be very large numbers of Muslims in Britain who have a collective identity and they will be up against mainly the working class who aren’t who are atomized and that is the massive danger that we have to avert it’s funny, because then we go back with that Cooper and the I think if we’re honest about it the kind of, because I think I spend more time on YouTube and you definitely do then Yvette Cooper and the algorithms do care if this kind of straightforward wager save video would take her at her word that’s actually catering to working-class White men after our I would see it I would say based on what they’re looking at it will be like Tommy Robinson make chases are Muslim roam the mosque type of stuff and then that is linked on to White genocide I dual actually it’s a weird thing, because they, because of what I’m into I don’t actually get that I don’t actually get bombarded with White genocide type videos so and I think it says a lot about what the algorithms are catering to yeah yeah I it’s I mean, you don’t know what the algorithms God knows how complicated they are, but I am I would love to know why it pegs those for a vet Cooper yeah what was the event Cooper watching which made lots of weight genocide videos pop up on her as she called her timeline I mean, it is as if is it’s like a it’s like she’s betraying her guilty conscience like she’s gone onto YouTube and looked for this stuff at some point worrying about what the public are thinking and see him to each other and then she’s gone on again and it’s and it’s recommended more similar stuff and then she she decides to be outraged by that I mean, it really is just absolutely disgusting to think that she would be outraged that this stuff was on YouTube that people are seeing this stuff instead of being outraged that she and her own fucking colleagues created this situation yeah all she she went like a know — all everybody’s so happy in the diverse utopia me and you believer of creative let’s just check in about there’s lots of nice videos like hands are on Burnley and having Lewis summer picnics which are diverse and then there’s a kind of White genocide thing pops up with one of those infographics of just endless people coming in the Europe yeah well I wonder what she thinks when she sees that I mean, are we talking about someone who’s so ideological that she’ll see that and just switch off from it, or are we talking about someone who’s still got enough of her humour and it’s your life that when she sees a graphic like that she she has a she has some guilt and that would be and love to I’d love to fucking interrogate her and say to her have you any idea are you actually conscious of what you have done to your country you fucking bitch!

 

[51:25] IN PROGRESS

 

Morgs: She well if it was a video and it was about seeing how hard blacks have it in Britain and that there was a significant proportion or, you know, a sizable amount of people among the black population of Britain thought that there was a plan to bump them off then to get rid of them by in a White privilege, or what about was the White elites all yes then she would be like, you know, the black population have these concerns and we really need to start addressing them we really need to get on top of this position and me tell them everything’s gonna be alright and tell them that these arguments are not really true and we’re doing what we can, but then when it’s something similar coming from the White people whom she represents it’s shut it down well exactly and if she did put together some programs to reassure the fight people who are watching this up it would all be a pack of fucking lies, because I’m really I being replaced it would be like one of those chrome TV video is where everybody just pile it on it to debunk it and terabits internal means and fucking yeah you should start a YouTube channel of her own and Bank my White genocide myth is that I mean, I know the Guardian I’ve got like a YouTube channel I don’t watch it I don’t think when people do watch it Jules put some video on some names, but it will be funny wondering if they did like thriii man, or labour support and this is why my channel 3 was out I’m going to deep link White genocide videos and then you could get somebody like whether they’re Chia to like spend three hours going down bullshit and then it would be a back-and-forth and then eventually we’d find out that, you know, all these new labor types had set up a private discord to Docs us all they get to see you your tubing and below them can you explain messes what she said can you explain me why this content is still on your platform what do we have to do to get this stuff taken down! ?

 

[54:02] NEEDS PROOFING

And you think and if this blonde tart sitting there from YouTube most you think Jesus Christ what a bitch what about freedom of speech she Frank I hope that’s what she was thinking I know cuz she might have been thinking oh god yes we she’s absolutely right how can we be prevailing this filth on our platform we’ve got to we’re gonna stop it I’m gonna delete all these videos and these channels these peddlers of evil and hate, you know, that may be what she was thinking something obviously less less verbose than that but, you know, what if she did does go along with it what if she goes back to YouTube and says the bless us government have these concerns and they’re absolutely right to have these concerns above God to just either ban these channels in pressing lightly abandom in other countries in Europe I would actually just delete them now it could come to that I wouldn’t be surprised I mean, it’s all, you know, it’s like he’s loose rules everywhere are always very vague and he you might think that you’re on the right side of them and then they just decide one day you’re not on the right side of them anymore so, you know, you’re fucked it’s funny that, because I was talking on Skype, or we got to back I know it was like well Steen was the air of the new hope and 2017, or was the Empire Strikes Back and everybody’s been censored every it’s the great shutdown everybody’s just being routed from all Umayr platforms, but okay and it is for a it kind of isn’t like your still hope there’s beans losses on Twitter and my blog still hope and when not we’re not doing that bad and it’s like we’re not being really censored the daily stoma has had fuckin a lot of shit so I really you ought to see a lot, but by and large the great shut down well we’re doing okay um and you can now I mean, that Levi Cooper thing they’re just becoming hysterical it slits like well why aren’t you shooting this shit down shut it down it’s not being shot down well why don’t they tell the audience tell the people who read my blog, or watch all videos on water why don’t they put a counter-argument is, you know, on the public space to say well these people are bullshit debunkers bonkers I will piss on a public invitation right now to a vet Cooper, or any any similar politician if you want to come on my channel for a hangout and we can talk about what you’ve done to the country I will be glad to interview you so that’s just I want to put that out there it’s out there now and well, you know, obviously nothing will ever happen, but I want I said I would love I would love the opportunity to have one of these cunts on my channel these were these traitors!

 

[57:06] NEEDS PROOFING

It would be wonderful, because honestly they would have no fucking chance I mean, not, because I’m a good debater just, because they’re full of lies yeah well the first thing you’d have to deal with was the fact that multicultural it was never put a vote we never asked for it and anybody who raise any objections was shouted down and in Enoch Powell’s time so he won’t like, but 1968 it was about 83% wanted me I think it was just about back there and it was just like stop it just stop it altogether zero immigration and it was 83% I think it was I thought it was 74% who they did a poll someone did a poll I think it was Gallup poll look I may be wrong, but I believe the number was 74% of the British public who were polled agreed with Enoch Powell’s “River of Blood” speech have changed, because we were ignored and you get up to now and the pools which come out now are like 70 see it’s Iran, but no more like suddenly far 5% you consider that like 20% of there are threats in 15 to 20% of the population is immigrant it means the percentage of Whites who wander born fewer immigrants has actually increased since Enoch Palestine mmm-hmm that’s interesting that’s really interesting given the propaganda yeah and well I mean, this is where we get back to the “Holocaust” yell anything, because what I’m trying to do with the blog a lot is to it’s a it’s about raising why creation, or consciousness and then seeing how it manifests itself in the mean, you know, in what’s going on in the world and what’s going on in the culture and what’s being, because the people in the media Yvette Cooper they know they know that it’s bubbling the northerners rising and they’re looking for ways to hem it in and obviously in 2016 we’ve got brexit and Trump and people will say well Trump’s a shill and he’s a controlled opposition and all of that guy thing and I and my points like maybe he is I don’t know, but the point is we got to a point where the weights were willing to go that extra step and that’s a good thing and it’s hard to keep track of these things and I do it is there a kind of silver bullet, or is it just this grinding process of breaking things down in the media and like I say a kind of critique and a never-ending critical theory of the mainstream culture around you, because it’s a gift.

 

[60:14] NEEDS PROOFING

Zz yeah and I think that kind of critique that’s a sort of treat for the more cerebral types who enjoy such things and that’s great and I think it’s absolutely essential, because that keeps them engaged it keeps them interested it gives them something to — it gives them a way to grapple with the situation and, you know, that means that they are going to be evermore well it just maintains their commitment to the cause I think, but also it’s useful, because the more we do that the more people we convert okay we’ll get some wet this is what again I’ve said it before this is why I did the wet nil speech in me, because I thought that’s a good way to reach people who would never look for some lip for an eighth no nation Ellis channel they would never look for ethno national, you know, this type of people I’m talking about Artie, you know, that kind of stuff they may well look for a lecture about worth nil and I yeah and the find my channel I know I think we should all let anyone who’s got who’s good at talking about culture and Arts and Media should be doing channels like that, because it’s a very good way to get to attract the types of people that we need in this movement yeah I mean, obviously I’ve got a lot of posts and the tags and in the headlines I am really into popular culture I mean, the Star Trek I’ve got one up now on the film Trading Places from the nineteen eighties where he it was basically the it was a John John Landis and yeah you don’t need to look it up I know it’s thinking he is and so I don’t want to get your channel shut down and it was really it was saying it’s ridiculous cartoon of wasp America in the early eighties and then what we did was SWAT on me literally swapped an upright the White man with Eddie Murphy a kind of cat, or black guy and they swapped them around and it was a nature vs. Nurture argument so they were saying well what would happen if we swap them more wrong is it all just and what, you know, is it is the breeding as they really say at least the two jokes the applause is it the breeding of the O’s the wasps, or is it nurture I can’t come the blacks Lerner and things like that and it’s really interesting to look at, because that what they’re doing is attacking wasp culture and they’re seeing that it’s elitist and that it’s and White privilege you see a kind of embryonic White privilege in there.

 

[63:01] NEEDS PROOFING

And when you zoom it out it really is a vicious attack on elite White America which wasn’t even in 1983 when it came out it wasn’t even that White anymore if if, you know, what I mean, though the people on the stock markets and Wall Street another group primarily they were running the show it didn’t really have much to do with wasp America and so you see that it’s actually this ethnic kind of attack and yeah and if we were that dominant we wouldn’t have these countless films like that wouldn’t really exist it’s the same way that White privilege if I mean, if White privilege a privilege existed we wouldn’t have White privilege being taught in universities yeah we wouldn’t yeah exactly people wouldn’t be hearing about it, because we would have the privilege to suppress such things yeah I mean, I’m a racist White man and I’m gonna stop you doing that in the university exactly so it’s probably some other group that has the privilege at least in within academia and media yeah to be continued I guess um, but yeah there was something he said about the well I nature versus nurture that has become a massive thing I mean, that this whole thing with Croton that lately the skeptic community was all based on that it you can’t prove it’s nature therefore it probably is not sure, or we should assume it is, because that allows us to be as open-minded as possible um, you know, there is an assumption that you should be as open-minded as possible even to the detriment of your own group which again is it’s really isn’t it, but yeah with regard to I haven’t read your article on trading places yet, but one a similar thing that I really loved was the article you wrote about Saving Private Ryan and I think you said that you based on a YouTube video I can remember yeah I did it was them it was Rob we it’s Rob eager and he’s had a beauty channel gold for the ages and he dismantles films he got a little bit lost in stanley kubrick I got a bit boring, but when he hits the moggy hits the mark and see him Private Ryan he analyzed that not an article on earth it’s actually oh yeah I am he it was the way the German soldiers were demonized and as opposed to the American soldiers in Saving Private Ryan and that was it did it likes Spielberg did lots of little things to ensure the audience would not empathize with the German soldiers yeah, but we’d empathize with the German they’re American soldiers and I was known to the one I thought was the most sort of amazing really was that the German soldiers all had shaved heads the American soldiers all had a mop of, you know, that boyish here yeah and I thought wow I don’t even know what to say until it’s pointed out and then you realize fuck I mean, that’s not even yes far as I know that there’s that’s not historically accurate um well it it’s basically universal throughout the film and it does have that effect.

 

[66:32] NEEDS PROOFING

Morgs: Well it was the age as well the age of the Germans saw I mean, another thing was that the German soldiers when they got shot em they didn’t scream out in pain, but when the Americans got wounded the arrives around on the ground in absolute agony and you saw bits of like ligaments and muscles hanging out their bodies the most famous parts the star of the film where that’s really blasted an ear brain whereas when the film moves on to kill lots of Germans the first thing is the German soldiers themselves are in the late 30s and early 40s the actors and they’ve got this really weathered manly tough look about them and they’ve got I mean, they’re literally skinheads whereas the Americans you’ve got Matt Damon and at that time I think he would have been about 22 and he’s got this kind of big mop of blond hair and they’re all very kind of individuals you can tell one part from the other very easily and they’ve all got their own stories and it goes on long it’s very cleverly done yeah they’re the German soldiers you never hear anything about any of them like their background their story I don’t think he even knew their names there’s a strange thing I mean, and there’s somebody who’s probably listening list called Aaron Kasparov and he did a video of an article allocated which I thought was brilliant and an old order now about how White’s became brainwashed and “Holocaust” propaganda played a large role in that just cut along with the there’s the topic and if you see it this is true if you see it as somebody it might be less true now in the, you know, because of the internet, but I’m Generation X and then if you go to the Millennials it’s pretty true that if you say what was the first time he ever saw a picture of a naked human body well they’re probably gonna think it was maybe a woman topless on the beach, or something like that something kind of benign and I’m not talking about, you know, real life where your mother you’re a little child me and other gets all the bath, or something it’s what is the first time you ever saw a naked human being in a picture, or on television and it’s almost always the cast yeah that it’s a pile of dead bodies from a concentration camp.

 

[69:09] NEEDS PROOFING

And that there’s a lot of reasons behind that and, you know, a certain group in America I wanted to get poem published in the 1960s and the Catholic Church actually warned up on the one that round and said no we’re not gonna do it and then they came back and they said well what about these “Holocaust” things we want to show the reality of the “Holocaust” and yeah it is naked bodies, but it’s a horrible thing and yeah they were guilt-tripped and there was a well okay we’re not gonna put up a fight against that that, you know, you’ve obviously suffered, but the result of that was that the European body in a naked foam and European nakedness White nakedness, because that’s what it looks like there was pile of bodies they look like piles of dead White people naked and that’s the first image that most Europeans today see of a naked European ground is a pile of dead and it’s imprinted and another thing is that you’ll find about movies about the “Holocaust” this is why understanding culture and understanding the general culture is so important to break down and analyze, because this is the fucking a lot which is killing us, it’s psychologically another thing that you’ll notice about “Holocaust” movies is that there’s like a huge amount of kind of soft porn and in general nakedness in the films I mean, Schindler’s List as like extensive love scenes and quite quite hard Carlos teens with Liam Neeson of his girl and then Ralph Fiennes and his lover at a time you’ve got Kate Winslet who there was a phone called the reader where she’s a teacher and she’s like a this lengthy bath scene and the love scene what they’re doing is again and again and again they’re connecting the naked European form to horror and death this is a kind of it’s disgusting! It’s absolutely disgusting when you think of it, because that it means when you look at the nakedness of the European form, the European body are as an object of beauty in and of itself then you instantly go back to horror death concentration camps Nazis evil hitless it and we and we need to get over this we need to find a way to break through this and I mean, this is why I’m quite I’ve got quite a lot of contempt from follow the classic liberal skeptic kind of community. I think they’re just a bunch of bullshitters really.

 

[72:03] NEEDS PROOFING

Because they pretend that they’re free think as a need to understand any of this have V operate within the morality that this kind of fog hands down and instead about me a tacos the attack was for pointing it out well indeed that this is the thing that I’ve gone over this extensively so I don’t want to labor here, but they pretty they claim to be objective and rational when they are not and they are actually very ideological well it’s not just the YouTube community, because I know that being homage and I don’t really wanna repeat what everybody else a, but even if you follow their that the how would you put it the kind of wider classic liberal way of looking at it with Richard Dawkins and sam Harris they’re all inside of this bubble and what irritates me is that they all think they’re so fucking rational I’m so open-minded and they’re not they’re not at all I mean, that there are none Richard Dawkins a while back a few weeks ago where he said and I mean, this is a story in itself so it started on Twitter where somebody said somebody called right-wing rebel who was a Twitter account obvious kind of American patriot conservative free guns free speech type there were conference in Africa to about elephant conservation and this Twitter account said it’s a shame II did care about babies as much is he care about dead elephants, because Dawkins has kind of really opal abortion his fame and what worried what he’s done there and then he replied this and a full blog post and his idea was at the human baby well it doesn’t actually feel it doesn’t have any empathy and so it’s irrational to have it to hold it more dear than add an elephant, or an a live elephant Allah and it seemed that clever argument, because it’s purely rational, because the elephant does haven’t a fee it does feel and it does fear and a human baby in the mother’s womb doesn’t it doesn’t have any memory it doesn’t have any friends and blah, blah, blah and dolphins even used the word speciesism he said this right-wing rebel America was the speciesist the well-being of an unborn human baby over the well-being of an elephant and he another strether enough oh this is fucking mental!

 

[75:02] NEEDS PROOFING

Because everything that talk and subscribes to the elephant empathy taken care of it’s young it feels fear you can ascribe that to the common right so now we now he’s in a bad situation, because now he’s saying that we should care about a rat more than a human baby that hasn’t been born he’s rationalized himself in a fucking lunacy and he even in his own day job he can’t get himself out of this, because what he has argument is to say well why the human baby can’t feel the human baby is nothing it doesn’t have any friends it does not many empathy it doesn’t feel, but he’s already debate his own argument in his entire life’s work, because he wrote a Selfish Gene I feel bad baby than what I do for a fucking elephant, or a rat, because I’m selfish my genes are selfish I protect my own and he’s debunked and they’ve got this problem where on the one hand the door let’s see it all and is, but they all come from there this new atheist crowd sceptics all of it is where you say well it’s all rational and if we have it’s evolution and we have to go for laws of nature and if you when they talk and the Christians they’ll say I don’t give a flying fuck if your feelings are hurt by this I don’t care that it debunks your religion and your theology, but then all of a sudden they turn when you realize where that’s all heading they turn on a kind of liberals and see if what Dawkins on Twitter I talk about open borders and tolerance and diversity even though it flies in the face of every one of his fucking scientific principles you it’s ever shade and I can’t stand these people are really, because Dawkins knows and they’ll see if they sell it to the Christians for years on end we have to abide by the laws of nature we have to go if evolution that’s the facts and I don’t care if it hurts our feelings well okay so see if racial nationalism is just the selfish gene in political fall when it comes down to it it’s not very pretty it’s not very nice, but that’s what it is and then all of a sudden darkness thinks oh shit if I continue on thinking like this if I put my scientific principles and understanding into political form I’m going to look like I’m gonna be like a fucking Nazi so then he kind of lead they do like a kind of somersault and then they said oh well now and this is the occupant where well we’re humans so we have to overcome these barriers we have to write we are rational and we can write we can rationalize, or away into waging war on nature a overcometh vote down brexit and open doors and multiculturalism cannot be done.

 

[78:15] NEEDS PROOFING

Yeah yeah I think this is something that you okay yeah I think this is something that needs to be laid I’m very clearly for people, because it is our glaring contradiction view I mean, as you say it’s interesting, because it does go hand in hand with the progressivism in effect with whatever you call a gala telling us and it’s that same political thing and is tied to well the nihilism that the new atheist crowd peddle yeah and so you get you rationalize yourself into a situation where you can’t say I want my own biological genetic group to have let’s just say in Britain we, because we’ve got an island and it’s easy so we’ve got this island and what we were all pretty genetically similar and it was in our interest to hold this territory for ourselves you cannot use a selfish being argument at all to say that we should have immigrants it can’t be done so then what they have to do is rationalize themselves just to feel like just, because it will go down well it’s walking swanky dinner parties in Chelsea oh well we have to overcome this division why well, because it’s nice it’s a hold on a minute this is just gone an irrational lalalala this is what you hated the Christians for this is why you hated religion, because it feels nice I don’t get and this is where the mean came from oh I don’t give a shit about your feelings how many planks of wood does make to make doors awk oh I don’t know well fuck your feelings and now that doing is seeing themselves well sorry new atheist I don’t give a fuck about your feelings I want a knife no see it yeah it’s as simple as up yeah I mean, I wonder how relevant they are, because I mean, they’ve kind of morphed into the skeptics like that community yeah what I would say about the New Atheism thing in and off itself is I think it’s irrelevant it’s sort of obsolete no, because it’s so fucking empty it’s so nihilistic and I think that we’re heading into well basically where I think we’re heading anti-religious time, because and this is what progressivism this is the purpose it serves for people though and there’s Islam and people respect Islam which is very interesting, you know, and the very same people were talking about have a sort of, or their post rate themselves before Islam I find that fascinating as well.

 

[81:11] NEEDS PROOFING

And yes you could say that’s for also for racial reasons it’s the sort of thumb they know that Islam is strong and they know that they are weak so there are prostrating themselves before it, but as that, but I also think that it’s just a general fascination with religion the idea that people could actually believe in something and this is a huge danger actually, because a lot of Western White atheists well find themselves being attracted to Islam I think for that reason, because their lives are so fundamentally hollow spiritually I mean, I finished the article I did on Dawkins where we just found it grotesque the idea that you couldn’t I found a grotesque and I found that, but he was a total hypocrite, but I I’d known I’d known this for a long time about the atheist crowd and I’m talking about this, because it is the kind of wellspring of skepticism and classic liberalism in many ways so now you’ve got Jordan Peterson and sam Harris and all these kind of gatekeepers and it’s at your care it’s great to see the skeptics being shot down in flames, but there’s bigger ones out there is these bigger pieces I need to be so in and replaced with an overt nationalistic political philosophy, because we are more honest than we are I’m a more consistent I we’re not going to cook it out, because if, you know, that was an there’s a thing on YouTube and it’s going back for 10 to 12 year as well all the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse and it’s got Christopher Hitchens Dawkins Daniel Dennett and sam Harris on and they’re all sitting there own stroking each of us cops about how rational they are and about how will they even care about your feelings and we’re going to pursue the truth no matter where it leads and that’s what matters the truth always the truth the scientific truth and we don’t care for pisses you off and then Hitchens is pissed and he says well what about if the bell curve turns out to be true and the older and it takes a couple of seconds and you can watch this and they all look down and they all well, you know, and they just moved the conversation quickly on began I a Batman it’s gone my ten years I didn’t know what the bell curve was and so I had a quick Google search of it no it’s racial this part is an IQ and I thought you fucking frauds you fucking liars here you are sitting telling us don’t care we don’t when Oakland incorrect we it’s always wrong science all right would you and then piss top fucking trot, but the bell curve and you all shit your pants and I just that was me don’t know I thought fuck you guys I’m out!

 

[84:10] NEEDS PROOFING

Yeah well again is this cowardice they will they’re the gleefully destroy things as long as they have the permission of the cultural elite to destroy those things and also the rest of the sadism involved now I don’t think, you know, when they say I don’t care about your feelings I think that’s not quite the whole truth I think they do enjoy hurting people there is a sadism in the new atheist he does he does kill about the feelings that people have he wants them to be upset I think there is a tremendous egotism in that whole thing yeah yeah I mean, but even though I find I find that kind of meme I don’t care about your feelings now I think that’s like a real in and that kind of thing because, you know, where I am you go to a pub and you look along with somebody’s girlfriend and, you know, there’s a kind of exchange and you still look I don’t give a shit about your feelings, but you could somebody’s gonna kick your teeth in you it doesn’t work like that you can’t you can’t go up to Muslims, or jews and say it well, you know, what it is I don’t give a fuck about your feelings, because they’re gonna destroy you at the end of it here, but it’s phrased in such a way about the person who says you’ve hurt my feelings is a victim I’m the kind of snowflake in reality the person whose feelings you’ve just offended I’m gonna chop your fucking head off well exactly bitch is the ones that they can yeah it’s very typical and I think Christians have not stood up for themselves they haven’t stood up for their beliefs well I mean, a video about this years ago in the first year of the channel saying it’s a sad thing that you just see Christians giving in and, you know, I know that there’ll be people in there are people in the life chancing they don’t like Christianity that Christ cocks and all that, but it is still it doesn’t really matter whether you like her, or not it was still a belief system IR unifying that bonded people together and gave them spiritual strength in the West and it’s I don’t think you should celebrate their being deconstructed even if you think you’ve got a better alternative to it you should not celebrate the destruction of this thing, because it might well leave us completely fucking naked no, but I like Christian more than I like the new atheist crowd on this kind of X this lying Russian bullshit which is going to demand that I have the similar MAPI for atella elephant, or Iraq than for a human baby, because it’s obviously ridiculous and based on lies.

 

[87:00] NEEDS PROOFING

Our job I’m happier with Christianity the more I am of that, but in the end I think I’m more than each in time, because I’ve never known anything except fucking hardship that’s it it’s them, but no one I’m not even really really religious, but the more I look into this stuff yeah the closer I come the thing and well it’s not that bad, but I am I am well aware of the White nationalist critique of Christianity on it is pretty damning so I always say, or not to be I’m an agnostic I’m not I do really oh cool one way of the other another one one thing I’ll say about is them just to kind of finish it off no no that, because I was in the New Atheists coffee and it was good a few years ago he went on one who was horrible Sunday morning programs these DPA programs again it’s another reason why you need to understand and deconstruct this shit and there was it set up in a certain way where the idea was women’s rights in Islam and how that’s affecting people in the UK they’ll never say it Britain they would just say UK, you know, stare ayah so he’s like a cone resume yeah yeah and so Dawkins is facing off in the really isettas hope is that they’ve got a few plants in the audience who can ask strategic questions loan it and then we had Dawkins and they had this kind of like cartoon figure of an extremist Muslim with a big beard and he’s kind of fat from the owner benefits and he’s wearing his pajamas Lola and then he turned the tokens and he said and then this clips probably on YouTube and he took until Darwin’s on he said yeah well all your women this is important all your women they’re all just holes and they’re running around half naked and doing whatever they want and dorgon’s replied and he said they’re not our women and what you ha ha yeah anything are you fucking Turkey, because what is body it’s that individualist bullshit what’s God on there I wonder too bad that was gonna go what’s happening the Muslim is the Muslim is calling door ends out as being a cook, because the Muslims kind of right the Muslims kind of right Western White women are out of control and from his in his culture beyond and Dawkins has has kind of unset to this by single than, or ours.

 

[90:07] NEEDS PROOFING

Again it’s like yeah he has been accused of not keeping control of his women he replies by saying not only have I not kept control of them they’re no it’s my women so you can’t even I mean, he’s cut and then he’s been and then he’s cuts himself it’s amazing and, because what he’s doing is saying well we’re all individuals they can do whatever they want, but the Muslim was just thinking and he’s looking he’s sitting there with a big fucking grin on his face, because he’s thinking well, you know, what it is I’ve already got my woman, but I’m gonna take your women as well now, because don’t dorgon’s has disavowed his own woman and what’s worse than that if we get back to his kind of scientific work then after I’ve read I’ve read the ancestors em what’s a cool to be the unsexiest healed Dorgan spooky ancestor steel where you trees fuck and I’ve averaged two thousand pages of this prick telling me about the zebra finch the meals are preference needs the females are roughage it goes on and on and on throughout nature and then all of a sudden, because he’s on television and he’s a liberal he disavows it he disavows at all he hasn’t got any women he hasn’t got any fucking females ah oh god it’s just I haven’t got women they’re not our women, you know, it’s so full you just like I don’t think I even hate them it’s just like get the fuck off the stage get the fuck out of the way you stupid old dinosaur you silly old cunt this big pile of liberal dollop of shit we as nationalists should be driving through this shit like a coach and horses this is just waiting to be taken down now it’s, you know, the sceptics on YouTube are sort of that they’re kind of like little offshoots of it but, you know, let’s go for let’s go for let’s take a whole fucking two let’s rip and hold down, because that’s what it’s gonna take, because the gatekeepers, because they’re telling White people oh well if we’re all just individuals it’s not it’s not just Sauron on YouTube and all of that so there’s a much broader thing and it all needs taken down, but also just individuals we don’t have any women it’s you it’s you crazy Muslim with your big beard you are the problem and the Muslims just sitting there thinking Jesus Christ what a fucking faggot!

 

[92:57] NEEDS PROOFING

 

Ha ha ha indeed he just bared his his weakness he’s just displayed it to the Muslim who well, of course, be completely it’s, you know, and then what was all these programs, you know, on that one as well they’ve got like this kind of feminist Muslima in the audience and she stands up and disavows that the kind of masculine Putney are Muslim Lucas, but they’ve got telling Richard Dawkins what women are remote control and she says and so this plant this kind of Muslim obsessed GW feminist plant stands up and she says well, you know, what it is it’s, because of people like you Muslims have a bad name and Muslim women like me we are free and we do what we want and again he’s it’s like he’s sitting there the Alpha thinking do you don’t know you fucking don’t so he’s caught he’s got a Muslim feminist on one side and Richard Dawkins on the earth to serve on his own woman and he knows they’re all full of shit yeah well I suppose I mean, even the westernized Muslim women I believe will completely fall into line once the shit hits the fan oh yeah, but the purpose the purpose of having the feminist sjw Muslima on the program is so that John Bull zombie sitting out in la-la land looks at it and he’s there and, you know, he gets the scary fat Muslim thought benefit Muslim with his pajamas on and then from out the audience he gets like that the young Muslim woman who stands up sees you don’t control us we control our own destiny and then like John Bull and Zombieland thinks oh oh, you know, what it’s gonna be okay look at this modern feminist Muslim I was shitting myself when I saw the bollards going up in the terrorist attacks and the grooming gangs and the hundred and fifty billion dollar budget for terrorism in the country, but now that this little feminists gonna stir up and said hey you won’t control us, it’s gonna be okay we’re gonna survive the Muslims that’s the purpose of yeah is to show that Islam is being cocked by the West Islam is being dissolved by the same nihilistic forces that dissolve Christianity so don’t worry yeah yeah they’re not gonna kill us all yeah it’s gonna be okay a Muslim a Muslim girls startup and fault for a Muslim pantry RV, but the Muslim Patriarca is rock-solid yeah yeah it is and I think it and this is a seriously unnerving fact, you know, because we are not we are not solid we need to get fucking solid, you know, individuals and communities especially as communities to be honest so mr. Fat fat on my taxpayer money is selling them’s pajamas just laughing at this fucking weakness!

 

[96:12] NEEDS PROOFING

 

On the one hand he’s got the White guy Richard Dawkins disavowing his own wall may not lie women now everybody’s and then he’s got this stupid little Muslim teenage girl just talking shit and he thinks this is it this is ours this is ours yeah and we’ve got to make sure that it isn’t theirs I mean, this is a very important thing to emphasize because, you know, and this is the final millennial of the year 2017 I don’t want to end it with despair because, you know, this is essential this is a the fight of our lifetimes the battle that we are going to be involved in whether we like it, or not and for that reason I would say that it’s better to be optimistic than the not certainly about this about this we know we have to have a positive attitude this see I’m always nervous about using the word positive, because it’s, you know, the pause, but we have to have an optimistic attitude about yeah and I think that the yeah, because otherwise and the well more stone, you know, if we believe that we’re gonna fail then we will fail as simple as that so we have to believe even if we turn out to be wrong we have to believe that we are going to win ya know we’re gonna succeed I’m let’s take down let’s take down liberal liars this is my final parting shot look 2017 let’s destroy liberal liars and we’re going to talk about and again this time next year oh yeah will will assuming that my channel survives until this time next year I say that every year, but who knows and if it does get taken down I guess I’ll just start another one, but um yeah I think there is reason for optimism I mean, it’s not entirely of a rational fake it till you make it thing clearly National feeling is on the rise throughout Europe and America and I also think that as a component of that so that it’s still embryonic just now, but it will grow just as the nationalist the Civic nationalist thing was an embryo ten years ago and now it’s far more widespread far far more widespread than it was and within that is the embryo of ethno-nationalism and I think, you know, the developments of the last few months have seen far more mainstream normy types of people becoming involved and that’s becoming voices in this movement and I as I’ve said before I think that is a fantastic sign.

 

[98:55] NEEDS PROOFING

 

Morgs: Okay I think we have to look at it and in a and aware that we are rats in one of those circular mirrors and the atman rationalist we all right if you want to call out whatever we are on the ultra most sort of contours of the mears, but then we’ve still got lots of people lots of other rats it’s terrible now that’s yeah it’s actually terrible way to pull it, but okay I’ll go with and we need to break down and get them finding their way to us as fast as possible we need a prayer kick down them ears and show them the way to our where we are as fast as possible and that’s why I talked about “Holocaust” reality, because that’s key and, you know, people god problems with daily storm and they’ve said this up yeah, but one way you can do it which you’ve got to be in America for is to take it full on and just shit all over the entire morality both together that comes with costs, but there’s other ways around it explain it at people at just explain the paradigm just explain how it works good, but Hitler evil and that White racial consciousness has been shackled to Hitler as Satan we need to snap that we need to break it and move on yeah and so and the way to do that is to have as many voices doing this stuff as possible, because that, you know, that will create it’s own competition it will create it’s own ecosystem and, you know, I think we’ve seen with just this millennial last year it was twenty four this year that’s been 63f week sixty two if we discount the non identitarian guess that I’ve had so we’ve gone from 24 to 62 and that’s clearly fantastic, because it shows how the movement has grown and I think that we need more and more and more and I think we also need to concentrate things like there should be main channels major channels major outlets that we concentrate power in towards to keep them strong to keep them resilient, but I also think that the more voice is the better and so what I would say to people at the end of this season of millennial is it would be nice to have another sixty two channels on next year that podcasts blogs and so on next year people who have not appeared on this one, because they haven’t even started yet I would like you to start and I’d like you to create something and I’d like you to really try don’t do it by half-measures don’t do it and some lazy wait really put your all into it and do your best, because after all what’s at stake here is Western civilization in the future of the White race so don’t fuck around!

 

[101:49] NEEDS PROOFING

 

Yeah I’ll just like to say it before we wind it down that somebody’s making a blog I’m happy to post articles some more was reviewed higher your blog yeah and also you’re going to start your own channel and I think when you’ve done that when you when you’ve got a few videos up you could come back on my channel and sort of to advertise it for people that people know that you’ve got your own channel 9 so I don’t know maybe in a few months from now yeah yeah okay I will oh how I’m actually what I’m my YouTube channel is actually gonna look like I don’t know I think it’s gonna be mouki 10 minute videos nothing nothing fancy effects just me talking about events of the day as oh my god right okay all right well um so we end up there yeah um screw me and take care and Happy New Year everybody okay would you like to leave them with some encouraging words Morgoth hit them hard and hit them often okay all right Thank You Morgoth and this is the end of millennial 2017 I hope you’ve enjoyed it and I hope it’s been used to the community I think it has been and I’ll probably do the same thing next year who knows maybe it’ll be a bit different I’m not sure so okay I’ll put up a few more videos in a few days from now, but that’s it basically so I suppose I should just end it thank you for listening thanks for staying with me thanks for supporting me it’s been a hell of a year and I will need your continued support next year I will be here for you so thank you alright wait millennial 2017 is over thank you for listening.

 

 

 

 

[103:54]

END

 

 

============================================

 

PDF Notes

* Total words = 17,000

* Total images = xx

* Total A4 pages = xx

 

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

 

(Available later)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Version History

 

Version 8: Jan 6, 2017  — Did 6 more minutes of proofing. Total proofed = 48 mins.

 

Version 7: Jan 5, 2017  — Added 5 images. Did 3 more minutes of proofing. Total proofed = 42 mins.

 

Version 6: Jan 4, 2017  — Did 3 more minutes of proofing. Total proofed = 39 mins.

 

Version 5: Jan 3, 2017  — Added 2 images. Total proofed = 36 mins.


Version 4: Jan 2, 2017  — Did 6 more minutes of proofing. Total proofed = 36 mins.

 

Version 3: Jan 1, 2017  — Added 4 images. Did 12 more minutes of proofing. Total proofed = 30 mins.

 

Version 2: Dec 31, 2017  — Added 5 images. Did 12 more minutes of proofing. Total proofed = 18 mins.

 

Version 1: Dec 30, 2017  — Published post. Total proofed = 6 mins.

 

[In this video, Probing the Holocaust — The Horror Explained Part 1” some of the most iconic propagandistic film footage used to convince the post-war public that the Germans had carried out an extermination policy against the jews (and others), is analysed in the context of those camps and their conditions that prevailed as the war came to an end. The truthful explanation reveals that the public has been deeply manipulated and deceived by the explanations given in that footage.

This video, although dealing with only one part of the “Holocaust” narrative, forms part of a larger analysis by Revisionists that proves beyond doubt that the “Holocaust” is in fact an ongoing hoax of world historic proportions.

 

For people new to this view, one question that usually comes forward is; how? How could something so massively accepted by the media, governments, churches, academia, and so on, be false, a hoax? The answer is that the alleged victims of the “Holocaust“, the jews, are in fact the very people, as in “organised jewry“, that run our governments behind the facade known as “democracy“. In other words the alleged victims are the very perpetrators of this ongoing hoax of world historic proportions. These people were the “behind the scenes” instigators of both World Wars, and many other wars and false flags, right up to now.

Another question is; why? Why would organised jewry need to create such a hoax, known as the “Holocaust“? The answer is that it:

1) Fulfils jewish religious prophecy of a “Holocaust” or “burnt offering” of six million jews. This will then apparently lead to the return of a jewish Messiah and the establishment of jewish rule over the world.

2) Provided a sympathy pretext for the establishment of the jewish State of  Israel despite it resulting in the Palestinians being dispossessed of their lands through terror.

3)  Demonizes any form of  White nationalism. At first only the “Nazis” were blamed for the “Holocaust“, but then all Germans were, and now the blame for the “Holocaust” is placed on all Whites. Any White group, political party, organisation, etc., that attempts to look after White racial interests by, for example, rejecting mass non-White immigration, is implicitly, or on a sliding scale, explicitly accused of being “Nazi“.

Organized jewry uses their hoax “Holocaust” as a shield against any criticism of their world-wide aggression, and also as a sword to attack and guilt-trip Whites into not defending their right to exist and reject the takeover of their countries by the Third World.

The “Holocaust” needs to be exposed for what it is, a diabolical lie of historic proportions. It also needs to be exposed because that lie is being used by organised jewry as a major part of their arsenal of psychological weapons to genocide Whites out of their homelands and out of existence in the long term KATANA.]

 

_______________________

 

 

Probing the Holocaust

 

The Horror Explained

 

Part 1

 

By

 

Germar Rudolf, Eric Hunt

 

Dec, 2017

 

 

Contents

 

 

__________________________

 

 

The Horror Explained

 

Abstract

 

 

 

The Holocaust” is widely known as the murder of six million Jews by Nazi Germany, many if not most of them in gas chambers deceptively disguised as shower rooms.

 

We have all seen the terrible imagery of dead prisoners taken after concentration camps were liberated. This documentary reviews some of the most memorable of these images, which were taken in camps such as Dachau, Nordhausen and Bergen-Belsen. A closer examination of this imagery we’ve all been exposed to reveals a very different story than what we were made to believe. Surprisingly, a large number of the bodies we were shown were the direct result of Allied bombing and strafing attacks, rather than victims of a systematically planned Nazi exterimnation policy.

 

Probing the Holocaust: The Horror Explained (Part 1) presents surprising information which shed a new light on the horrific imagery and enables many viewers for the first time to truly understand what transpired in Germany during and at the end of the war. Watching this presentation with an open mind will surprise you and leave you asking questions of your own.

 

Download this video documentary:

 

 

Download subtitle files:

 

 

__________________________

 

 

Copyright Notice: This movie has been released to the public domain for educational purposes only. It may be copied and distributed free of charge only. No commercial use is permitted. If copied and distributed, no changes to the movie are permitted without the prior written consent of the author/director of the movie.

 

Note: This video replaces Eric Hunt’s Questioning the Holocaust: Why We Believed, Part 1, which had a number of quality issues.

 

 

To watch the video over at Inconvenient History please click here:

 

Probing the Holocaust: The Horror Explained 

 

 

Transcript

(96:40 mins)

 

 

It’s something we were told throughout our entire lives: Six million Jews, and large numbers of non-Jews, were murdered by the Nazis:

 

[Clips from various film footages:]

 

“Eleven million people died in Nazi Germany’s death camps. Six million were Jews.”

 

 

“An estimated six million Jews were killed during World War II.”

 

 

“Hitler murdered six million Jewish people”

 

 

“six million Jews”

 

 

“six million died”

 

 

“six million people crying from the grave…”

 

 

The term Holocaust commonly refers to the systematically planned and executed extermination of six million Jews by Nazi Germany during World War Two. Mainstream historians agree that, of these six million Jews, approximately three million were killed in gas chambers.

 

 

The vast majority of them, they say, were killed or died in six extermination centers in Polish territory. Here is a break-down of these three million alleged gas chamber victims by each of the six camps.

 

Camp Jewish Gas Chamber Victims
Auschwitz/Oświęcim 900,000*
Treblinka 900,000
Bełzec 500,000
Sobibór 210,000
Kulmhof/Chelmno 240,000
Lublin-Majdanek unknown (thousands)*
Total: 2,750,000 + thousands
* The total Jewish death toll of these camps is higher than the number given due to deaths resulting from other causes (diseases, exhaustion, executions etc.)

 

 

These numbers are an average of figures found on the websites of two of the most reputable Holocaust research institutions, the US Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C., and the Yad Vashem Museum in Jerusalem.[1]

 

 

The Holocaust is so important that the United Nations even decided to create a dedicated memorial day for it. Every January 27th, the day when the infamous Auschwitz Camp was occupied by the Soviet Red Army in 1945, the whole world is reminded to commemorate the victims of the Holocaust.[2]

 

 

 

In 2017, on the occasion of this International Holocaust Remembrance Day, the White House under U.S. President Donald Trump released this statement:[3]

 

 

[It is with a heavy heart and somber mind that we remember and honor the victims, survivors, heroes of the Holocaust. It is impossible to fully fathom the depravity and horror inflicted on innocent people by Nazi terror.

Yet, we know that in the darkest hours of humanity, light shines the brightest.‎ As we remember those who died, we are deeply grateful to those who risked their lives to save the innocent.

In the name of the perished, I pledge to do everything in my power throughout my Presidency, and my life, to ensure that the forces of evil never again defeat the powers of good. Together, we will make love and tolerance prevalent throughout the world.]

 

Stop the video to read it, if you like. There is nothing unusual about the statement, except maybe the fact that Jews aren’t mentioned in it. That triggered quite some vitriolic reactions, for instance from Jonathan Greenblatt, the current head of the Jewish Anti-Defamation League. He tweeted on that same day that Trump did not even mention Jews,[4] which triggered a deluge of similar attacks on the U.S. President for not having expressly mentioned the six million Jewish victims of the Holocaust.[5]

 

 

The White House countered a day later that it wasn’t just Jews who died in the Holocaust, but that five million gentiles were killed, too,[6] who also deserve equal remembrance, referring to an article which had appeared two years earlier in the Huffington Post.[7]

 

 

That in turn unleashed a series of attacks on the president and that 2015 article, claiming that this “five-million-gentiles” victim figure is bogus and vastly over-inflated. Among those, I may quote here The Times of Israel’s take on this death toll:[8]

 

 

It’s a statement that shows up regularly in declarations about the Nazi era. […] It is, however, a number without any scholarly basis. […] The ‘5 million’ [non-Jewish Holocaust victims] has driven Holocaust historians to distraction ever since Wiesenthal started to peddle it in the 1970s. […]

Yehuda Bauer, an Israeli Holocaust scholar […], said he warned his friend Wiesenthal […] about spreading the false notion that the Holocaust claimed 11 million victims – 6 million Jews and 5 million non-Jews.

‘I said to him, ‘Simon, you are telling a lie,’’ Bauer recalled in an interview Tuesday. ‘He said, ‘Sometimes you need to do that to get the results for things you think are essential.’

[…] Wiesenthal […] told them that he chose the 5 million number carefully: He wanted a number large enough to attract the attention of non-Jews who might not otherwise care about Jewish suffering, but not larger than the actual number of Jews who were murdered in the Holocaust, 6 million.

It caught on: […]

Deborah Lipstadt, a professor of Holocaust studies at Emory University in Atlanta, wrote in 2011 […] ‘this number is simply inaccurate, in fact made up […].’

 

 

Deborah Lipstadt went over the top, however, by accusing Trump of flirting with Holocaust denial.[9]

 

So, here we seem to have a case where a prominent Jew, the late Simon Wiesenthal, inflated the number of Holocaust victims for political purposes.

 

But did Wiesenthal really invent that number? And was he the only one exaggerating numbers?

 

During and right after the end of the Second World War, a number of war propaganda movies were filmed with the support or even under the control of the U.S. government. Throughout these propaganda movies, there are many references to the thousands and even millions of victims of National Socialist barbarism – yet none of these films ever single out Jews as the primary victims of a “Holocaust.”

 

 

[05:11]

 

The most infamous among those propaganda movies was titled Die Todesmühlen,[10] which was designed for, and eventually shown to, German audiences as a tool for shock-and-awe re-education. It was later also released in an English edition: Death Mills.[11] Both movies mention as the death toll of National Socialist persecution 20 million without making any specific reference to Jews:[12]

 

But these eleven hundred were a small fraction of the twenty million men, women and children murdered by the Nazis. 20 million human beings, equal to the population of 22 American states. 20 million corpses.”

 

In fact, the narrator insists that the victims were:

 

of all the nations of Europe, of all religious faiths, of all political beliefs, condemned by Hitler because they were anti-Nazi.[13]

 

This is only the most prominent example. There are more which highlight that death toll claims of National Socialist persecution have a history of exceeding the six million, and that Jews have been mentioned with regularity as only one among many victim groups.

 

This issue is also not just a matter of journalists and propagandists making up wild figures. In 2015, in a book about the forensic examination of mass-murder locations of the Holocaust, a British archaeologist who has been working with the leading scientists in the field for several years wrote, quote:[14]

 

The exact number of people killed during the Holocaust remains unknown. Some scholars have suggested a figure of around 11 million. Of these, it is estimated that approximately six million Jews were killed but the number of Roma, Sinti, disabled people, political prisoners and others killed cannot be estimated with complete certain[t]y.

 

She provides no source for that claim, though. So maybe she merely repeated what she had heard through Wiesenthal’s grapevine? But is it really Wiesenthal’s? Interestingly, the very same Washington Holocaust Museum that, according to just-quoted article in The Times of Israel, issued a statement on Trump’s text emphasizing the centrality of the annihilation of the Jews to the understanding of the Holocaust, had announced in 2013 in a press release that their research has revealed that:

 

The Nazi Holocaust may have claimed up to 20 million lives,

 

while leaving the 6-million Jewish death toll basically unchanged.[15] This would mean that as many as 14 million non-Jews died in the Holocaust, not just five.

 

I may also point out that 20 million is not the ceiling of death-toll estimates. For instance, an article of Sept. 21, 1992, from Germany’s most prestigious daily newspaper, the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (p. 13), illustrates in a very useful manner the kind of topic we are dealing with and the problems that are related to it. The title of the article translates to “Traces of the Crime; Shoes, Shoes, even Children’s Shoes.” It is a report written by a student about his visit to the Stutthof concentration camp not far from Danzig, in postwar Poland, that has been turned into a museum. The author, in his fourth sentence, states that he cannot imagine what an extermination camp might look like and talks of, quote, “installations in which ‘6 million Jews and a total of 26 million detainees […] were killed,’” unquote. So here we have a combination of the general 20 million victims plus six million Jews.

 

At the end of his account the author writes that he found himself facing, quote;

 

the remains of the most brutal genocide, the highly modern killing machines of the time, the cruelest crime of humanity,” unquote

 

By putting things that way, one of the most highly regarded newspapers in the world has given its definition of the Holocaust. The annihilation of a total of 26 million people by the National Socialists in ultra-modern killing machines is the cruelest crime in the history of humanity.

 

So, how many victims were there now? Six million Jews plus a few others, or eleven in total, or twenty, or even twenty-six million?

 

At most one of these figures can be correct, but with all this speculation going on, it may turn out that they are all wrong. But if that is so, what is the truth? Can you tell?

 

One thing is for sure: we obviously cannot believe everything we hear about the Holocaust, because the things we hear often contradict one another.

 

[09:56]

 

Let’s start at the beginning, with the documentary “Nazi Concentration and Prison Camps” that the Americans introduced during the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg in 1945 as proof of Nazi atrocities. Psychologically speaking, it was one of the most powerful pieces of evidence submitted, because a picture tells more than a thousand words. Here are some scenes about the Dachau Camp. Dachau was one of the first major camps the Americans captured toward the end of the war:[16]

 

Hanging in orderly rows were the clothes of prisoners who had been suffocated in a lethal gas chamber. They had been persuaded to remove their clothing under the pretext of taking a shower for which towels and soap were provided. This is the Brausebad, the shower bath. Inside the shower bath, the gas vents.

 

Actually, what you are seeing here are not gas vents but recessed light fixtures.

 

On the ceiling, the dummy showerheads. In the engineer’s room, the intake and outlet pipes. Push buttons to control inflow and outtake of gas. A hand valve to regulate pressure. Cyanide powder was used to generate the lethal smoke.

 

Interestingly, on August 19, 1961, a letter to the editors by German mainstream historian Martin Broszat was published in Germany’s biggest weekly newspaper Die Zeit stating, among other things:

 

Jews or other inmates were gassed neither in Dachau nor in Bergen-Belsen nor in Buchenwald. The gas chamber at Dachau was never fully completed and taken into ‘operation.’

 

On January 24, 1993, the famous Nazi hunter Simon Wiesenthal wrote in a letter to the editors of the U.S. military magazine Stars and Stripes in the same vein:

 

A gas chamber was in the process of being built at Dachau, but it was never completed.

 

Thus, between the 1960s and late 1990s, the Dachau Museum had a sign displayed inside the Dachau gas chamber stating:

 

Gas Chamber, disguised as a shower room never used as a gas chamber.

 

Today, however, this sign is no longer there. Instead, a less-visible text on a sign outside that room states:

 

Gas chamber

This was the center of potential mass murder. The room was disguised as ‘showers’ and equipped with fake shower spouts to mislead the victims and prevent them from refusing to enter the room.

 

Currently, the US Holocaust Museum itself admits, quote:[17]

 

There is no credible evidence that the gas chamber in Barrack X was used to murder human beings.

 

Barrack X was the official name for the crematorium building where that sinister room was located.

 

One of the leading books by mainstream historians on the gas chamber question, the 1993 collective tome Nazi Mass Murder, states on page 202:[18]

 

It has not yet been conclusively proved that killings by poison gas took place at the Dachau concentration camp.

 

And on page 203, we read:

 

But during the trial there was only one witness, a Czech physician assigned to care for the prisoners, Dr. Frantisek Blaha, who declared that experimental gassings had taken place in the Dachau gas chamber.

 

Blaha signed an affidavit on January 9, 1946, in which he described his experience with the Dachau gas chamber. It is in German, but an English translation was read into the record during the Nuremberg Tribunal as follows:[19]

 

Many executions by gas or shooting or injections took place right in the camp. The gas chamber was completed in 1944, and I was called by Dr. Rascher to examine the first victims. Of the eight or nine persons in the chamber there were three still alive, and the remainder appeared to be dead. Their eyes were red, and their faces were swollen. Many prisoners were later killed in this way.

 

And that’s it. If Blaha was the only witness on trial testifying about the gas chamber, and if he had no experience whatsoever about the gassing procedure, then how did the American documentary makers know that the victims;

 

had been persuaded to remove their clothing under the pretext of taking a shower for which towels and soap were provided?

 

Only a few days after the liberation of the Dachau Camp, a number of U.S. Congressmen visited the camp. Here they are shown inside the gas chamber. And this is footage taken in 2016. As you can see, the ceiling of that room is rather low. In fact, the room is roughly 2.15 meters or seven feet high. Why do I mention this? Because an official U.S. commission investigated what had transpired at Dachau, and in a report to the U.S. Congress dated May 15, 1945, compiled by David Chavez, we read, among other things, that in this room “the ceiling was some 10 feet in height[20]

 

[15:32]

 

How can anyone confuse seven feet with ten feet? But that’s not all, because that report continues as follows:

 

The supply of gas into the chamber was controlled by means of two valves on one of the outer walls, and beneath the valves was a small glass-covered peephole through which the operator could watch the victims die. The gas was let into the chamber through pipes terminating in perforated brass fixtures set into the ceiling.

 

However, the ceiling did NOT have brass fixtures, but merely zinc-plated iron showerheads. Furthermore, as can be seen in this photo of a spot where a showerhead had been removed by the Americans as a piece of evidence, these were merely fake showerheads – or rather watering can rosettes such as this – that were not connected to anything. Already the documentary we watched earlier said that there was:

 

A hand valve to regulate pressure.

 

But there’s a problem. Zyklon B, which was allegedly used for the murder, was not a gas under pressure that could be fed into pipes. It consisted of gypsum pellets soaked with liquid hydrogen cyanide, the active ingredient in Zyklon B. When such a can was opened, its poison evaporated slowly.

 

In addition, from many cases of accidental poisoning with hydrogen cyanide, and from executions with that poison as they were carried out in several U.S. states during the 20th century, we know that the victims Blaha claimed to have examined cannot have succumbed to Zyklon B. Such victims do not have red eyes. They do not have swollen faces. Actually, if they show any symptoms, it is a pinkish-reddish discoloration of their skin as shown here.

 

It is clear that the Americans, when making their documentaries and congressional reports, were jumping to a lot of conclusions, contradicting each other and the material facts in the process. But what’s the truth here?

 

The tubing shown in the American documentary is really impressive. Such heavy tubing with cast-iron hand valves are commonly used for piping large amounts of chemical liquids or pressurized gas. The design of this tubing was investigated by the French officer Capitaine Fribourg a week after the camp’s liberation. Here is a sketch drawn by him showing how the piping worked. According to this, fresh air was sucked in through this intake vent, which protrudes through the roof. This intake pipe is subsequently led through a heat exchanger located over the gas chamber in the building’s attic. Here, the air is heated by the building’s hot-water heating system. After that, the now-insulated pipe is split into two and led out of the attic area into the room behind the gas chamber, where both pipes are led in a semi-circle, each of which equipped with the hand valves shown. Leading back into the attic area over the gas chamber, Fribourg shows the pipes being merged back into the outgoing pipe, but that would make no sense at all, because then the air would go nowhere. Therefore, that’s a mistake. In fact, a report compiled by German architect Axel Will in the early 2000s, a copy of which we received from the Dachau Museum, described in detail that the layout actually looks like this. Will wrote:

 

Air is drawn in via a pipeline of 400 mm diameter extending over the roof, and is then led through a steam-operated heat exchanger. The pipeline is insulated behind the heat exchanger. It is split into two lines by means of a y-branch pipe, and leads with two pipes of 200 mm diameter into the room adjoining the gas chamber. There the airflow can be adjusted with a valve each. Both these and the other two valves of the ventilation system are made of massive cast iron and carry a $ sign in a circle. Such valves are common in gas pipelines but not in ventilation systems.

Behind the valves both pipelines are again led back into the attic area above the gas chamber and merged back together into one pipe. This pipe enters a sheet-metal shaft, which again goes through the adjoining room and leads the heated air to the air intake at the floor of the gas chamber.

This sheet-metal shaft is not insulated. This raises questions. Design logic suggests that this shaft would be the suitable location to add substances [such as Zyklon B] to the heated air prior to entering the gas chamber. The examination of the sheet-metal shaft has so far not revealed any opening for such a manipulation. Yet the missing insulation points to such a possibility.

 

 

[20:13]

 

So much from architect Will.

 

The air exhaust system starts with two openings in the ceiling. From there, the two non-insulated exhaust pipes merge into one, and are led toward the wall to the room behind the gas chamber, where the pipe splits up into two again. Then it is led outside in a semi-circle equipped with two hand valves, and led back into the attic area, where it is merged again into one pipe, as can be seen in this photo taken in the attic of that building. Then that merged pipe is fed into the electric blower that drives the whole operation, here visible in another attic photo, and from there out the exhaust chimney, which exits the roof here.

 

Now, if that gas chamber was meant to be operated with Zyklon B, it would have been smart, as architect Will correctly suggested, to equip the sheet-metal shaft running down the wall of the adjacent room with some trap door – hinted at here with blue lines – allowing for Zyklon B to be inserted into some kind of basket inside the shaft, hinted at here with the red meshwork. That way, the constant stream of warm air would have evaporated the poison gas quickly and would have spread it out inside the room rapidly. But, as architect Will correctly observed in his report, there is no trace of any provision to that effect.

 

So, the poison was neither administered using the false showerheads, as the congressional report claimed, nor using the ventilation system, as the U.S. documentary that was shown during the Nuremberg Tribunal suggested. But how else could it have been done? Here is the story as we are told today:

 

they would pour Zyklon B down these slots right here, and onto the floor.[21]

 

Rocks with Zyklon B could be inserted from the outside[22]

 

Here are some photos of these slots from the inside and from the outside. So, the entire sophisticated ventilation system did not serve any other purpose than moving air around. Why then was it so complicated? It makes no sense at all! It would have been much easier to simply feed the heated air directly into the shaft going into the chamber, as shown here, and to feed the exhaust pipes directly into the blower, using the blower’s speed to adjust for any needed change in air volume. For now, this entire ventilation system seems to be a nonsensical mystery.

 

But that’s not the only one. Fact is, that neither the congressional report nor the postwar documentary mentions these Zyklon B slots. In fact, David Chavez, the main author of the congressional report, had compiled an earlier version of this report that did not get submitted. It stated:[23]

 

 

Gas Chamber. Gas tight doors. Wooden shed believed to contain pump or compressor.

 

 

This wooden shed located just outside the alleged gas chamber can be seen in many photos and film footages shot right after the liberation. It was located where today the two Zyklon B slots are located. But according to Chavez, it did not contain any slots, but rather some not clearly identified equipment.

 

The French officer Capitaine Fribourg describing the facility on May 25, 1945 as he claims to have seen it on May 5, 1945, hence, a week after the camp’s capture by the Americans, also mentioned the wooden shed as follows:

 

Right next to the shower room, adjacent to the building, is a palisade some 2 meters high fencing off a space of 2 m wide. It was not possible to get inside due to the presence of a pile of decomposing corpses stacked up against the palisade.

 

and

 

behind the palisade is said to have existed or exists a compressor group (?)

 

He also described two slots in the wall obscured by this shed from the outside as follows:

 

At about 75 cm from the ground, 2 hoppers connect the shower room with the outside (palisade side). Each hopper ends on the inside with a grate, and on the outside with a movable shutter system.

 

That’s also what we see there today. Fribourg even included those hoppers in one of his sketches.

 

If we look at the outside of this wall in that location today, we can see these strange features. It may have been the electrical outlet for the device operated in that shed.

 

Looking closer at the Zyklon-B slots, we notice that the mortar around them is not original. The original mortar used to build Barrack X contains coarse gravel rather than sand, while any mortar used around the Zyklon-B slots, and on later repairs and patch-ups, as we can see them here, are made of mortar containing fine sand. Here we can even see how some of the new mortar flowed over the old mortar.

 

[25:01]

 

On the inside, it is apparent that the tiles around those slots have been damaged. In fact, a simple test with the finger nail shows that these rough surfaces aren’t even tiles. They are plaster made to look similar to the tiles around them.

 

In other words, those slots are not part of the original building. They were added later on by hacking holes through the existing wall.

 

Who did that change, and when was it done? Chavez didn’t mention them, and neither did the U.S. documentary on Dachau of May 3rd. Fribourg saw them two days later, but he did not claim that they were used to throw in Zyklon B. That wouldn’t have been a good idea anyway, because a large amount of the gypsum pellets would have gotten stuck on the grill on the inside. But what were those slots used for? Or is it a post-war forgery?

 

And if that is so, what else is?

 

Here is one hint. This footage was recorded on October 25, 2017 from the website of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. When searching their video archive for the term “gas chamber” the first result is this video. It’s titled “Exhumation; inspection of gas chambers; Lt. Hodges.

 

This is footage taken after the liberation of Paris of an alleged “Gestapo Torture Chamber” near the Eiffel Tower. In the description, we read:

 

World War II interiors of gas chamber used by the Germans in the execution of prisoners. Demonstrating method of securing prisoners in gas chambers. Various Close-ups, pipes leading into room.

 

And;

 

hand prints and scratches dug into cement wall of gas chamber by the victims.

 

Here are those ominous pipes. They are rather fancy, but not very functional. Most of all, they would have been within reach of the victims, and wouldn’t have survived very long, because they would have been demolished very quickly. Also notice all those windows illuminating this room. How long would those window panes have lasted if the victims inside trashed the place and tried to break out?

 

For that footage, they even pumped some innocuous, but dramatic-looking smoke through the pipes.

 

Here are the handprints in the cement, allegedly created by gassing victims during their death throes. Needless to say, handprints can only be made in fresh mortar, and only insane people would use a room as an execution chamber whose walls had just been plastered.

 

These gas pipes and handprints are not evidence of Nazi atrocities, they are evidence of a deliberate Allied psychological warfare campaign to demonize the defeated Germans. Because this hoax is so obvious, no mainstream historian has ever taken that claim seriously. That does not prevent the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum from presenting it to an unsuspecting audience, though. Unfortunately, most people just accept whatever the government, media, or religion tell them to believe.

 

So, what was necessary for the Americans, who had liberated Paris several months earlier, to create that footage? First of all, they must have had a plan. Then, they must have had at their disposal the necessary hardware to create the film set: pipes, smoke-generating devices, and some workers able to install that hardware and to create a cement wall with handprints.

 

In contrast to that utterly unknown Gestapo torture chamber in Paris, Dachau was one of the best-known German concentration camps. It was the first one to be opened right after the Nazis came to power. When the Americans finally moved in in April 1945, this camp had dominated the fantasy of Nazi opponents for more than a decade. So, did the American psychological warfare executives have a plan? You bet they did! And did they come with hardware and workers to put that plan into action? If they did it in Paris in January 1945, they surely were even more likely to pull it off at Dachau, which was a much more promising propaganda stage.

 

So, let me ask again: why are these fanciful pipes in Dachau so impressive and even intimidating, but at the same time so completely useless and pointless?

 

Before we jump to conclusions, let’s look at some wartime documents. First, there are the two photos shown earlier taken some time in 1944. On both, we can see the ventilation chimney that’s part of the gas chamber’s aeration system. So at least that exhaust chimney was built by the Germans prior to the end of the war. Next, among the few original documents available on that building, there are two blueprints of special interest. This one shows a cross section through the gas chamber. It shows that the ceiling is indeed only some 7 ft high, not 10 ft, as the rest of the building.[24] Next, a section enlargement of this document shows the floor plan of the gas chamber.[25]

 

[29:51]

 

As we can see, both doors are 90 cm wide and consist either of two doors each, one opening inward, the other outward, or of a swinging door. Either way, such an arrangement would not have been suitable for a gas chamber, as swinging doors could neither be made gas tight nor panic-proof, and in case this layout consisted of two doors, the inner one opening inward could not have been opened if dead bodies were piled up against it inside the chamber. Such an arrangement is actually common for morgues. For instance, the blueprints of the morgue in the old crematorium at Auschwitz show the same type of door design.

 

Today, this room is equipped with two heavy steel doors of the type that were quite common for air-raid shelters. The doors are one meter wide and set in steel frames. The same doors are shown in the U.S. footage recorded on May 3, 1945, hence just five days after the camp was captured by the Americans. They were therefore most likely built in there long before the Americans arrived. Also, one of the walls actually consists of two layers with a hollow space in between, which is typically used as insulation, something also seen at the above-mentioned Auschwitz morgue.

 

Hence, it looks like this room was initially meant to serve as a morgue. In fact, the striking feature of this building is that, if we discard the idea that this alleged gas chamber served as a morgue, this building has no other room of a suitable size equipped with a ventilation system.

 

But if that is so, what about the weird, oversized piping? And what about those heavy doors? And what about the shafts on the outside, evidently added after the building was completed?

 

And what about the peephole in the rear wall which Capitaine Fribourg described in his report? He even drew a sketch of it. It slanted rather steeply downward, hence it wouldn’t have allowed anyone to see anything except for maybe the feet of a few people standing or lying close to that hole.

 

The hole inside that gas chamber that is said to have been the other end of that peephole can be seen to this day, although it is way higher than what Fribourg reported, who in his sketch placed the peephole below the second little port visible on that wall, close to the floor. Today, neither the peephole’s exit nor the switches are visible in the adjoining room. The switch panel and switch box are shown in the footage recorded on May 3, 1945 for the U.S. documentary. But that documentary neither shows nor mentions that peephole. There is, however, a photograph of that area from May 1945 showing not only the switch panel and switch box plus some of the insulated pipes and hand valves, but also a crude opening in the wall just beneath the switch panel. If we compare that image with a still of the footage just shown, we see:

 

a) that the lid of the switch box to the left has disappeared;

b) and more importantly, the upper, rugged edge of the hole in the photo should also be visible in the still, but it isn’t. Therefore, somebody must have hacked that hole in there after the documentary was shot.

 

Here is how that hole looks on the inside, seen from the gas chamber. It does indeed angle upward. In the background you see bricks and mortar used by the museum to close up that gaping hole in the adjoining room. Inside this tube runs an electric cable put in there when the room was prepared as a museum exhibit.

 

What we see here is the fact that, since the camp’s liberation on April 29, 1945, quite a few people seem to have tampered with the evidence of this suspected crime scene. It’s difficult to assess what this hole was really used for. A peephole, however, would have been installed in the doors, as was and is common for air-raid shelter doors, rather than hacked through a thick brick wall, and it most certainly would not have slanted downward.

 

So, is the Dachau gas chamber a post-war fraud? Considering that the camp was liberated on April 29 and that the gas chamber was inspected by four members of the U.S. Congress only 3 days later, on May 2nd, this seems to be not enough time for a major fraud.

 

In fact, there is evidence pointing in a different direction. Most importantly, there is a letter in the German Federal Archives by Dr. Sigmund Rascher to Heinrich Himmler dated August 9, 1942, which reads:[26]

 

As you know, the same facility as at Linz is being built at the Dachau concentration camp. Since the ‘transports of invalids’ end up in certain chambers anyway, I ask whether the effect of our various combat gases can be tested on people who are destined for that anyway? So far, all we have are experiments with animals, or reports on accidents during the production of these gases. Because of this paragraph, I am sending my letter marked ‘Secret.’

 

Dr. Rascher was the infamous doctor who conducted medical experiments on inmates at Dachau, which were among the crimes prosecuted by the American occupational powers after the war in the famous “Medical Case” of the Nuremberg Trials of War Criminals. While there was plenty of evidence for a variety of experiments on human guinea pigs such as exposure to low air pressure and extended submersion in cold water, tests of combat gases at Dachau were not among the charges. There was simply too little evidence to make that case.

 

[35:16]

 

We may speculate that Dr. Rascher had indeed tried to re-rig the morgue of Barrack X for the potential testing of combat gases, with those shafts perhaps simply serving as air-intake shafts for a better ventilation, since the room had no windows. But since Dr. Rascher was arrested by the German police in April 1944 and eventually executed for a number of crimes, child abduction and murder among them, that project, if it ever existed, ended up being abandoned at that point at the latest. When the Americans arrived a year later, the room was nothing more than a morgue, filled with the victims of diseases and malnutrition, which could not be cremated due to the lack of fuel.

 

For the time being, any answer to the question what these strange objects were meant for remains speculation to a large degree, because almost the entire original paperwork regarding the planning and construction of that building – cost estimates, progress reports, blueprints, invoices etc. – have disappeared from the Dachau camp archives. Only a few, not very informative documents are left, such as the ones we just saw plus a few others. So, either the Nazis destroyed them because they had something to hide, or the Americans confiscated and/or destroyed them, because they wanted to prevent anyone from figuring out what that room really looked like and was used for.

 

At Dachau, imagery of a gas chamber disguised as a shower room was driven into our minds.

 

Dachau is where the world came to believe the rumors and saw what we believed to be evidence of well-engineered German machinery, capable of gassing with precision and efficiency.

 

So, if that gas chamber wasn’t what we are told, or at least wasn’t used at all for mass executions, why were there massive amounts of clothes hanging in its vicinity when the Americans arrived?

 

Hanging in orderly rows were the clothes of prisoners, who had been suffocated in a lethal gas chamber. They have been persuaded to remove their clothing under the pretext of taking a shower for which towels and soap were provided.

 

Actually, these are clothes airing outside the Dachau disinfestation chambers. The narrator merely claims that this is the clothing of homicidal gas chamber victims. Then they deceptively cut to the shower room door, making the viewer believe they are the same door; the one with the obvious written gas warnings on it and the supposed gas chamber, disguised as a shower room, designed to trick those entering.

 

The hoaxers showed film of these disinfestation gas chambers for fumigating clothing, located at the end of the building. They claimed these doors, clearly marked with warning signs and skull and crossbones, were used to gas prisoners.

 

This is where the disinfestation chambers are and the doors clearly marked with warnings. But the “shower room,” the alleged gas chamber, is located a few rooms away. The deception was to trick the average viewer into thinking, the clearly marked delousing chamber door with skull and crossbones located at the end of the building was the same as the shower room door. This dirty deception continues to this day.

 

For example, take this 2012 documentary on Dachau by filmmaker Levi Mierau. After showing the gas chamber and describing how it allegedly worked, he, too, deceptively cuts to the disinfestation chamber while continuing his narration about homicidal gassing. Watch it:[27]

 

A door labeled shower bath went into a large room, which is meant to deceive, since the room was not actually a shower room but a gas chamber. The room consisted of outlets in the walls, floor and roof.

 

Stoooop! Outlets in the floor and roof? These showerheads weren’t an outlet for anything, and those six drains in the floor are actually real drains, which indicates that the room was originally designed to handle a lot of water, not gas.

 

Fast forward a few seconds, we have this footage:[28]

 

Rocks with poison gas pellets named Zyklon B could be inserted from the outside. Since the gas chambers were only built during the camp’s last months, only seven were killed in the gas chambers used as test subjects.

 

So, while showing the disinfestation chambers, Levi deceptively talks about gas chambers, in the plural, used to kill seven people.

 

[39:50]

 

The same kind of deception is committed by the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum on its website (capitalization added):

 

View of THE door of THE gas chamber in Dachau.[29]

An American soldier stands outside of THE gas chamber in Dachau[30]

View of THE door to THE gas chamber at Dachau next to a large pile of uniforms.[31]

THE door to THE gas chamber in Dachau. It is marked ‘showerbath.’[32]

View of THE door to THE gas chamber in the Dachau concentrations camp. A sign above it identifies it as a shower.[33]

 

The US Holocaust Museum uses the singular “the” to imply, both of these doors were the same door of the same homicidal gas chamber, disguised as a shower room.

 

They show the outside of the clothing fumigation chamber doors, located at the end of the building, then show the inside of the shower room door, located all the way over here. There are four disinfestation chambers, not one.

 

But they chose photographs which show one door and used the singular “the” and mix it with images of the shower room. You can see the disinfestation chambers had warnings not to enter and marks designating when clothing fumigations started and when it was safe to open the doors again.

 

Here they refer to this as “a” gas chamber,[34] of course ignoring that it was one of the four used to delouse clothing.

 

The photograph’s caption reveals the early propaganda lies, still perpetrated today.

 

Gas Room – People were hung up in here.

 

These hooks were not used to hang people in gas chambers. They were just hooks for clothing, of course.

 

View of the hooks outside the door to the gas chambers in Buchenwald.[35]

 

First, this isn’t even Buchenwald. This is a photo of a Dachau delousing chamber.

 

The original caption reads:

 

Buchenwald was the home of Ilse Koch, wife of the commandant. She was known as the ‘bitch of Buchenwald,’ an insult to every dog who ever lived. She had her inmates tattooed in various designs, then had them killed, then skinned and their hides tanned to make book bindings, lamp shades, and other articles. I saw these things! One story has it that she enjoyed sexual intercourse with her victims – this may be apocryphal. These ‘meat hooks’ were used on the bodies of humans!

 

Just about every claim in this miscaptioned photo is false. This example illuminates the typical hysterical propaganda common at the time and still repeated today by a government-funded institution. In reality, these alleged “meat hooks” are just hangers for clothes to air out after passing through the fumigation chambers.

 

This complex machinery sure looked like it would be something we’d expect in German-designed death chambers. But because this equipment could NOT be used to introduce Zyklon-B fumes into the chamber, today we are told the Germans instead just dumped the pesticide pellets onto the room’s floor through these vents in the outside wall. This is quite odd, because the disinfestation chambers right down the hall actually did have advanced specially designed mechanisms to properly heat and circulate cyanide gas from the Zyklon B pesticide pellets.

 

This was called the DEGESCH circulatory device made by the manufacturer of Zyklon B.[36] A member of a clothing fumigation crew would put a can of Zyklon B into the holder. A built-in can opener operated from the outside with a crank would open the can. The pellets would drop down a chute into a basket where hot air would be blown through to speed the release of cyanide gas from the pellets. The pesticide would be spread throughout the clothing fumigation chamber, and when finished, the gas would be removed from the chamber and fresh air blown in.

 

One should be very skeptical upon learning that today the official story is that the Germans, rather than using something like this specially designed device used in the clothing delousing chambers right down the hall, simply poured Zyklon B pellets through holes in the wall. Such a procedure would have been very detrimental, because once those pellets were inside the room, they could not have been removed, unless the room had been cleared of all the corpses. Since Zyklon B releases its poison for an hour or more, depending on temperature and humidity,[37] this means that any effort to swiftly ventilate the room after an execution would have been in vain.

 

Hence, these shafts, if they were added during the war within the framework of Dr. Rascher’s testing frenzy, may simply have been designed to assist the ventilation of that room.

 

Anyway, this is not exactly the advanced German engineering we are constantly propagandized with, is it?

 

In the face of overwhelming evidence that this room was never used to gas anyone, mainstream historians now claim that the inmates employed to build this gas chamber managed to sabotage its completion by dawdling on the job for some three years, or so we read in the original French edition of Paul Berben’s “official history” of the camp, quote:[38]

 

The Dachau gas chamber, however, never functioned because to a certain extent, it seems, of sabotage carried out by the team of prisoners given the job to build it.

 

[45:13]

 

So, the narration of the Nuremburg trial evidence film “Nazi Concentration Camps” was completely wrong. This clothing did not belong to inmates suffocated in the gas chamber. This was just clothing which passed through the real gas chambers for delousing clothes and was airing out.

 

This deceptive narration of the Dachau segment is an important part of the falsehoods in the Nuremberg trials film evidence center piece.

 

This bizarre practice of calling shower rooms gas chambers continues to this day. We can see on the website of Israel’s Holocaust Museum “Yad Vashem” a photograph of the actual inmate shower room at the Dachau Camp captioned:

 

“A gas chamber after the liberation.[39]

 

This is just another real shower.

 

Flossenbürg, Germany, Gas chambers, which were called showers.[40]

 

This claim is repeated on the “HistoryWiz” web site “The Final Solution”. The photograph is captioned:[41]

 

The final destination for those who could not work, the gas chamber – here, the gas chamber at Flossenburg.

 

The hoaxers pulled the same old trick angle in the camera to block out the many windows of this real working shower room. The top official authorities today concede this room was a real shower, never used to gas anyone. Moreover, no mainstream historian has ever claimed that there was a homicidal gas chamber at the Flossenbürg Camp.

 

This doesn’t stop Israel’s Holocaust Museum and others from spreading gas shower nonsense. The “HistoryWiz” website presents an important quote:

 

To be ignorant of history is to remain always a child. – Cicero

 

That certainly holds true for those who childishly and ignorantly believe showers were gas chambers.

 

A major reason we believed in the stories of the showers of death is the terrible images of corpses taken at the end of the war. But those horrific images of emaciated and dead prisoners are not proof of an extermination program.

 

This special presentation of the Oprah Winfrey Show is brought to you with limited commercial interruption. It is supported in part by the new AT&T, committed to education.

I am here in Poland at the Auschwitz death camp, where it is estimated that 1.1 to 1.5 million people perished here in the Holocaust.

 

At an early age, you were probably already exposed to a program like this.[42] Documentaries such as this one are specifically aimed at young people. You can even see this copy was taken from a website called “School Tube”. Videos like this shock their audience by showing atrocious imagery which, if it were fiction, would be rated unsuitable for children.

 

That evil has a name: The Holocaust. A systematic mass murder meticulously planned and executed by Nazi Germany that brutally wiped millions of people off the face of the earth. More than six million of those human beings were Jewish.

 

But since this imagery is real, it is not rated unsuitable for children, although it is even more traumatizing exactly because it is real. However, hardly anyone, let alone a child, has the ability or experience to analyze the context of this imagery. This horrific film footage of emaciated corpses is presented with no context other than the claim that they are proof of a systematic extermination policy.

 

The Holocaust. A systematic mass murder meticulously planned and executed…

 

These images, however, were taken at the very end of the war. Mainstream historians claim, however, that any extermination activity had ceased in those camps in October of 1944 at the latest, based on an affidavit by German SS officer Kurt Becher, in which he quoted an order allegedly issued by Himmler in September of 1944 as follows:[43]

 

I prohibit any annihilation of Jews with immediate effect, and on the contrary order the nursing of weak and sick persons. I hold you (with this, Kaltenbrunner and Pohl were meant) personally responsible for this, even if this order is not strictly followed by subordinate departments.

 

Both Kaltenbrunner and Pohl were top officials of the concentration camp system. No trace of that Himmler order has ever been found, but that’s beside the point I want to make here. When we look at what was really going on in those camps, we are in for a surprise. Here is a chart showing the number of inmate deaths at Dachau as recorded first by the German authorities and then by the Americans. It clearly shows that mortality exploded at a time when Hitler’s extermination policy is said to have been abandoned. The same happened at the Bergen-Belsen Camp, where mortality exploded only in early 1945, as can be seen from this chart exhibited today at the Bergen-Belsen museum.

 

[50:12]

 

The reason for that was severe overcrowding combined with the disastrous collapse of food and water supplies as well as medical care and hygienic measures, which taken together caused malnutrition, starvation, and fatal diseases such as typhus and dysentery to spread out of control.

 

In those months, the Allies bombed Germany’s entire infrastructure to smithereens, including the supply lines into the camps. Shipments of medicine, sanitation supplies and food into the camps, power plants and water treatment plants were systematically bombed, and in some cases, they even bombed the actual camps. Not only Jewish concentration camp prisoners struggled and perished during the final months of World War II. For months upon months, the German civilian population was the target of an unprecedented fire-bombing campaign by the western Allies. From Hamburg to Dresden, tens of thousands of innocent German civilians were deliberately targeted and murdered. Women and children were burned alive, and terrified families suffocated from poison gas in bomb shelters. They don’t ever show you these pictures, do they? You should ask why, though.

 

Anyway, many Germans who survived became refugees running for their lives, and also struggled to feed themselves.

 

In the east, German civilian populations were also fleeing the invading Soviet army which was torturing and murdering civilians en masse. The Red Army raped untold numbers of German women from young children to the elderly.

 

Using these horrific images, the catastrophic last days of a collapsing Germany surrounded on all sides and bombed to smithereens, as proof of deliberate extermination camps is the dirty trick that is the main reason people believe in the Holocaust.

 

It’s why many react strongly against those critically investigating mainstream Holocaust claims. After all, we all saw the bodies, right? These images were taken in camps liberated by the western Allies, primarily Dachau, liberated by the Americans, and Bergen-Belsen, liberated by the British – camps which are today admitted, even by mainstream historians, not to have served as extermination or death camps.

 

Today, all of the so-called death camps or extermination camps are claimed to have been in Polish territories conquered by the Soviet Union.

 

Early witnesses originally claimed these western-liberated camps also had homicidal gas chambers, disguised as shower rooms. However, British and American doctors performed thousands of autopsies on some of the corpses the Allies discovered in those camps.

 

Russell Barton, an English medical student who had spent a month in Belsen after the camp’s liberation and had investigated the reasons for the camp’s disastrous conditions toward the end of the war, stated, quote:[44]

 

German medical officers told me that it had been increasingly difficult to transport food to the camp for some months. Anything that moved on the autobahns was likely to be bombed. […]

I was surprised to find records, going back for two or three years, of large quantities of food cooked daily for distribution. I became convinced, contrary to popular opinion, that there had never been a policy of deliberate starvation. This was confirmed by the large numbers of well-fed inmates. […] The major reasons for the state of Belsen were disease, gross overcrowding by central authority, lack of law and order within the huts, and inadequate supplies of food, water and drugs.

 

 

[53:46]

 

Here is an interview Dr. Barton gave to the late Ernst Zündel some ten years after this article had been published:[45]

 

You were on the scene in Belsen as a young man.

Yes. I went with a group of medical students. We arrived in Belsen on May the second 1945, and I first went to the camp on May the third. Himmler ordered the camp to be ceded on April 11th in order to stop typhus, which was an epidemic spreading throughout Europe. The British came in; a tank division came in on April the fifteenth at three o’clock, and they did their best to segregate the typhus[-infected] and the dying from the other.

How many people were in the camp at the time when the British took over the camp?

I think there were about fifty-seven or sixty thousand. The British bombed everything, and the Americans, that moved on the roads. So getting food there was extremely difficult. The water supplies became contaminated with sewage, and the administration in the camp more or less broke down. The distribution of food in the individual huts was left to the inmates, and the inmates, we found out – we were fooled at first, but this was after May, after I got there. The inmates… one particular group was in control; they would take what they wanted and then leave whatever food there was left to the rest of the hut. So that meant, perhaps ten powerful people would gobble everything, and three hundred and fifty would have whatever was left. There were, I’d say, all nationalities, mainly Polish and Russian. Most of them were Jewish.

Were there men and women?

Yes, there were men and women, and children.

And were they segregated?

Segregated.

Segregated camps. And that was still segregated when you got there?

Yes.

Even, let’s say, if the German camp administration had made maximum effort, and had been given everything at hand, could they have prevented this?

There was no cure for typhus at that time. The British put DDT, which is an insecticide, over everything and everybody, and in that way, I think, the typhus was contained. But it was a great danger. People don’t realize it was typhus. It was… I supposed 50, 60 percent of the people died of typhus.

Why are these bodies naked? I mean, some of them are so emaciated. Why don’t they have their clothing on?

Well, they did. When they were pushed outside the huts, they had clothing on. But clothing was so scarce – everything was scarce – that the inmates would immediately rush out and take all the clothing off, because it was a pity to waste it. That’s why they were naked.

Did you see, when you got there two weeks after the British army took over, any evidence of gas chambers, the way propaganda has said that the Germans had in these camps? Or was there any claim made to that effect?

No. I don’t think it was ever thought there was a gas chamber in Belsen-Bergen. People were dying at 500 a day, by the way, a rate of 500 a day.

Even under British administration…

Under British administration, yes. And what was happening mostly, the English soldiers were giving people their food, people half starved, had very thin stomachs. The stomachs would burst, and they’d die. The inmates said that the conditions there, this is what inmates said, that conditions weren’t too bad until the end of ’44. And then this mass immigration… But by the time they put in another 50,000, fully 50,000, of course…

Were you there during the time when the bulldozers were actually putting these bodies in the graves, in these long trenches that we’ve seen?

The bulldozers… the bodies were being thrown in. They would put… a truck went around every day and picked up the bodies outside the hut, and then they would take them to where the bulldozer had dug the grave, and they would throw them into the grave.

You are a man born in England. You published this article, I believe, for an English publication. And the London Times picked up on what you have published here?

That’s right. This was published in November 1968. I was asked to write it. I was solicited. I had no intention of so doing.

Nobody ever interviewed you from any German magazines or papers?

Oh no. No, no.

To this day?

Not to this day.

Did anybody ever, officially from Germany, come and contact you for a kind of historical documentation, of the [???German Federal] archives in Koblenz and places like that?

No.

No. Never?

Never.

 

Similar to this is the account given by Dr. Charles Larson, a U.S. forensic pathologist working for the U.S. Army’s Judge Advocate General. Right after the war, Dr. Larson performed autopsies on hundreds of victims in some twenty former concentration camps. In 1980, a newspaper article appeared reporting about his wartime experience. We read there:[46]

 

Larson has talked little publicly about the war experience. One reason for his silence has been that his autopsy findings conflicted with the widely held belief that most Jews in Nazi camps were exterminated by gassing, shooting or poisoning.

What we’ve heard is that 6 million Jews were exterminated. Part of that is a hoax,’ Larson said. […]

Never was a case of poisoning uncovered, he said.

 

 

[59:27]

 

Larson’s biographer wrote the following about this episode, quote:[47]

 

In one grave the bulldozers uncovered an estimated 2,000 bodies, many of which were subjected to autopsy examination by Major Larson. All of those autopsied had died of various conditions such as emaciation with starvation, tuberculosis, typhus or other infectious diseases.

For the next ten days, many nights with only an hour or two of restless sleep, Larson worked among the dead. He performed about 25 autopsies a day and superficially examined another 300 to 1,000 bodies. He autopsied only those bodies that appeared to have died questionably. ‘Many of them died of typhus,’ Dr. Larson told me recently.

At Dachau Larson’s work – the profile of the prisoner population that his autopsies projected – indicated that only a small percentage of the deaths were due to medical experimentation on humans. It indicated that most of the victims died from so-called ‘natural causes’ at the time; that is, of disease brought on by malnutrition and filth which are the handmaidens of war.

 

Today, these particular camps are admitted not to have had homicidal gas chambers at all. So, none of the corpses seen in these images were gassed. What you see in these images are prisoners who died from disease, as well as a lack of appropiate food, water and medical supplies. A large part of their condition was due to the Allies bombing supply lines to the camps.

 

Allied fighter planes even bombed and strafed trainloads full of prisoners as they were being evacuated to different camps. Those prisoners who weren’t hit by bullets or bombs were without appropiate supplies for days until arriving at their destinantion.

 

The liberation of Dachau concentration camp is dramatized in the film Shutter Island. The Americans liberating Dachau came across what became known as “The Dachau Death Trains”. They saw bullet holes in the sides of the trains and dead prisoners inside in terrible condition, believing the Germans locked starved prisoners inside the trains, then machine gunned them, the Americans turned their fury to the capture of German guards.

 

The guards surrendered, we took their guns, and we lined them up. It wasn’t warfare, it was, it was murder!

 

Many of the German guards who surrendered the camp had only recently been transferred to the camp in the final days of the war. Some were just teenagers from surrounding towns. Ironically, this young German guard even looks like the young DiCaprio. This young German was not a deliberate holocauster of Jews or anyone else but a young man tragically swept into the final days of the most brutal war in the history of mankind. The German soldiers surrendered, and with their hands up, the Americans shot dozens of captured unarmed German guards. And it didn’t happen in the heat of the moment either, as this movie suggests. In fact, the Americans actually brought the guards to the camp’s coal yard, got a heavy machine gun from their vehicle and brought it into position, and they had their army photographers take pictures of the event, as this photo and others prove. It was a war crime. The Americans played judge, jury and executioner. They even dragged German soldiers from a nearby hospital and shot them, even though they had nothing to do with the camp at all, let alone the death trains. Here is the testimony of one of the Americans involved in this murder:[48]

 

I was not prepared for what I saw in Dachau. Nothing could prepare you for that. Nothing could prepare you for that type of slaughter that was carried on in that camp. […]

I never liked to see people killed unnecessarily, no matter what their stripe is or what they have done. We did kill some people there that I consider unnecessarily. However, given the circumstances, while I am sorry about it, it was just one of those things that no one could control. Actually, the people that we killed died a much easier death than the people that they tortured and killed as we subsequently found out. Torture and hangings and executions in various manners was a daily occurrence. So, in a way, we were kinder to them than they were to the people that they murdered.

 

 

[65:05]

 

The only problem is that the people he helped to kill were not those who had run the camp for many years.

 

But evidence has come to light that the Germans did not lock prisoners inside the trains and machine gun them.

 

The bullets which tore through the trains full of prisoners were not German bullets but in fact the result of Allied war planes strafing the trains.

 

Here is a Jewish former prisoner talking about the Allies bombing and shooting his train, killing prisoners on the way to Dachau, explaining their condition:

 

I was ordered to go march out to the railroad station back into the cattle cars, but this time they had open wagons and regular cattle cars. But the only difference it was that the railroad tracks, on one track, the Nazis were retreating with the heavy artillery, ammunition and all their hardware. In another track the concentration camp inmates in the train load. The Nazis were hoping maybe because we are there they will not be bombed.

It would have been a short trip, but it took us almost three days to get to Dachau. What had happened, we got hit by air raid. They bombed the both of the tracks, they machine gunned our train. And in the train were I was sitting – this time it wasn’t so loaded – we were all squatting down. Both of the fellows beside me got hit by machine gun fire. And I just, days… by then the guards were gone. We opened the railroad car and stumbled out of the car and walked into the woods in nearby, and hid there. Remember going out on the fields and dug off some potatoes for food. But they came back next morning or a day later with dogs, gathered us together and ordered us back to the railroad cars. They never removed the bodies. This is how we arrived to Dachau.

 

This Jew’s train was bombed and shot by Allied planes. The prisoners the Allies killed were left inside the train. Prisoners who weren’t blown up or shot by the Allies suffered further malnutrition, in part due to the bombing of train tracks, delaying their journey.

 

The Allies were directly responsible for killing many on these death trains. Bullets from Allied air planes tore through the bodies of those prisoners shortly before the American infantry arrived at Dachau. American infantry, ignorant of the role of Allied bombing and strafing runs contributing to the deaths of the prisoners inside the death trains, put the blame on the Germans.

 

They lined the unarmed, surrendered German guards against a wall and executed them, committing a war crime, which has gone unpunished to this day. Misunderstandings, propaganda, falsehoods, blind patriotism, mistakes, rushing to judgement. How else could millions be driven to killing their own people, themselves essentially?

 

“It wasn’t warfare, it was murder.

 

The Allies also directly bombed concentration camp prisoners, and today we are told this is proof of a German planned Holocaust.

 

This is another segment from the American propaganda film “Nazi Concentration Camps” which was shown at the Nuremberg Trials.

 

The slave-labor camp at Nordhausen liberated by the Third Armored Division, First Army. At least three thousand political prisoners died here at the brutal hands of SS troops and hardened German criminals who were the camp guards. Nordhausen had been a depository for slaves found unfit for work in the underground V-bomb plants and in other German camps and factories.

 

A deceptively captioned image of Nordhausen appears in Steven Spielberg’s The Last Days companion book. We see American solders walking past corpses strewn on the ground. The caption reads:

 

The horrific scene of mass annihilation within the Nordhausen concentration camp.

 

Let’s look closer at the photograph. We can see the buildings have been bombed. Testimony of former prisoners shows they were lucky to survive Allied bombing attacks.

 

This Jewish former prisoner and doctor describes prisoners laying in the camp hospital, sick of tuberculosis in the final days of the war.

 

And there I had over 4 thousand prisoners laying on tuberculosis. Sick. What are you doing? It’s tuberculosis. No medications, nothing, hardly food, it was very meager already. The Germans didn’t have to eat.

 

 

[70:18]

 

This former prisoner and doctor described conditions in the camp in the final days of the war. Sick prisoners didn’t have enough supplies. However, he points out the Germans themselves also didn’t have enough even to eat. Clearly, the Germans could have killed the sick prisoners at any time, yet instead treated them in hospitals.

 

And all of the sudden, it was April 3rd at 3 o’clock, alarm, and American air force over us, and dropped the bombs just on our camp. And the whole camp was entirely destroyed. And out of this four thousand people, we were 200 survived. Because they died there. They were in the camps, you know. Hanging in the ceiling, their bodies and… It was awful. It was burning days and days. We were still…, the nurses, the doctors, the administration people, the working administration… we ran away.

 

And the Americans made a mistake because they didn’t know this is a concentration camp. They knew it is a military camp. They emptied the military the month before and in January they put us in, you see. So, they didn’t know. So, they came back at 9 o’clock in the morning and hit the whole city. The whole city they flattened. We ran away in the wood, in the fields, and when they emptied the planes, they came and strafed us with machine guns. They didn’t know who it is. They are Germans, you know. And we went into the woods, and we remained about a week in the woods. And we ate only the raw potatoes.

 

British Royal Air Force bombed the camp, full of sick prisoners. They turned around and shot survivors running for their lives. They flattened the nearby town, full of innocent German civilians.

 

The British are primarily responsible for the scene of, quote, “mass annihilation.” But images of Nordhausen recently bombed and strafed by British planes are still used today as proof of a deliberate German-planned Holocaust.

 

And it’s important to note that most of those seen in this photograph aren’t even Jews but primarily non-Jewish political prisoners, including Poles, Russians and Jehovah’s Witnesses. These majority non-Jewish victims of Allied bombing at a former labor camp are used to sell a supposed Jewish Holocaust.

 

The Oprah program deceptively used two shots of the aftermath of the British air raid at Nordhausen.

 

More than six millions of those human beings were Jewish.

 

This victim of the Allies blowing up and strafing sick prisoners at Nordhausen being carried over rubble was in fact likely not Jewish. So, we’re looking at someone who is both not killed by the Germans but by the British and who is likely not a Jew.

 

Here is another clip of Nordhausen. The prisoners of the camp for seriously ill prisoners were blown up and shot by the British, and were buried in this mass grave. The soldiers standing at the edge are Americans. But we are led to assume they are Germans, standing at attention after a job well done.

 

“[…] that brutally wiped millions of people off the face of the earth.”

 

Actually, the British brutally wiped these prisoners off the face of the earth. The Germans put them in a camp with doctors and nurses.

 

What’s incredible is that you were shown these images as proof of an organized, planned, systematic extermination program going according to plan.

 

A systematic mass murder meticulously planned and executed …

 

…when in reality, this was the result of the total disorganization and utter chaos of a collapsing Germany which was still being bombed relentlessly into submission.

 

Rather than do the right thing and accept blame for what could be said is accidental collateral damage based on faulty intelligence, the Allies instead just blamed the Germans. Images of a camp full of sick prisoners bombed and strafed by British planes at Nordhausen are used as proof of a systematic, planned German extermination program. However, every single mostly non-Jewish prisoner in this imagery was killed due to a British bomb or bullet.

 

The editing of the film “Nazi Concentration Camps” was supervised by Budd Schulberg, born Seymour Schulberg, son of the head of Paramount Studios. Schulberg was Jewish and a member of the communist party USA until 1939.

 

[75:03]

 

All of these dead were murdered with British bombs or bullets. Yet no mention is made of that. Schulberg claims they died at the brutal hands of Germans.

 

At least 3 thousand political prisoners died here at the brutal hands of SS troops and hardened German criminals who were the camp guards.

 

This is a total lie and inversion of history. The final shot of the “Nazi Concentration Camps” film shows footage of a prisoner at Nordhausen who had his head blown off.

 

A prisoner account describes exactly how this happened and who is responsible:[49]

 

THE APRIL 3 BOMBING. The accounts refer first of all to the Tuesday, April 3 bombing: ‘Right from the first blast, I took shelter under the concrete staircase of the Revier. A bomb hit the Block and the staircase was demolished. I ran to the middle of the camp, to a shelter dug right into the ground, where there were already a dozen civilians, women, children, and also an SS man – as green from fear as his uniform – who could only stammer: ‘Schrecklich! Schrecklich!’ (Horrible! Horrible!) And indeed, it was not a pretty sight; corpses every five or six yards, headless or their innards ripped open.

 

Today, images of Nordhausen are widely used as proof of a Jewish Holocaust. Why is this particular image so popular? The bodies of those blown up or shot by the British, then pulled out of craters or the rubble of buildings and lined up in ordered rows by the Americans are meant to imply an orderly German method of mass murder. Apparently, they want us to believe the Germans lined all these prisoners up here in neat rows and shot them where they stood. If these dead people were German soldiers, the Brits would pat themselves on the back for a job well done. Instead, the Allies just blamed their bombing and shooting screw up on the Germans. What a horrific scam, pulled right in front of our very eyes. Imagery of tragic deaths which were the direct result of the Allies’ actions are cynically exploited to sell a lie.

 

[Footage showing historian Stephen Ambrose:]

 

Adolf Hitler was pure evil. And he was in command of the most advanced technology and the best-disciplined people and the best-educated people in the world.

In the wrong hands, technology helped turn Europe into a slaughter house. This was a war that was also a crime.

Eisenhower, when he first encountered concentration camps, was shocked and surprised. He hadn’t been told about it. His immediate reaction was, ‘This is so horrible that there will inevitably become a revisionist movement some day to say ‘this never happened; this is propaganda; this is a figment of wartime imagination,’ so he insisted that every GI who could be marched through those camps and he said ‘bring your cameras with you.

 

This is a classic quote used to attempt to refute revisionists. Eisenhower said, there would be deniers in the future, so he ordered witnesses march through camps and film them. No one denies these are real bodies. But the false analysis of their cause of death deflecting all blame onto Germans is the propaganda. Every single shot in this news segment was taken at Nordhausen. All of the footage of murdered prisoners in the sick camp at Nordhausen shows prisoners blown up or shot by the British.

 

This is another example of the propaganda formula: supposed expert, deceptive imagery, plus calling those who question it evil haters. It turns out this master historian was later accused of plagiarism throughout his entire career.[50] He even lied about spending hundreds of hours with Eisenhower and meeting with him daily. Official records show he spent five hours on the record with Eisenhower. This is the mentality of these master historians, promoted to the forefront of the monopoly media. There was no plan to turn these prisoners into this condition. This was the result of the catastrophic end to the war. Not everything going perfectly according to an evil plan.

 

Up until this time these images of a bulldozer dumping naked emaciated corpses into a mass grave at Bergen-Belsen were the most horrifying imagery in the history of film. This film footage was shown to our grandparents’ generation on a big screen. It has been shown to you at a young age. What are you to believe? Some programs such as the Oprah presentation lead one to assume this is a German driving this bulldozer, making his quota of gassed Jews for the day, rather than a British solder pushing epidemic typhus victims into a mass grave.

 

[80:05]

 

Until the end of the war, Bergen-Belsen was not a death camp were Germans deliberately starved to death and murdered prisoners. In fact, it was originally designated as a recuperation camp, or Krankenlager, where sick prisoners were sent to improve their health. It wasn’t such a terrible place until the final days of the war, and there is evidence to prove it. Rose Kahn, a Hungarian Jew, was transported from Auschwitz to Bergen-Belsen in the summer of 1944. Before Auschwitz was abandoned, and Bergen-Belsen was severely overcrowded, she describes Bergen-Belsen as not such a terrible place.

 

So, when we arrived to Bergen-Belsen, and they told us to get out, and the Nazis came with those big, big dogs, with their wolves, and they asked us who cannot walk, is sick, should tell ‘em, so they gonna put us on a bus. I was afraid to say it. I couldn’t walk, but I didn’t say it. And if I would say, would been good, because this was not a bad place. This was not at that time, at that time.

So in other words it wasn’t a trick?”

No, no.

They really would have taken you by bus.

Yes, yes, yes.

I think you were right, though.

Yes, but I was so afraid, so my mother and my friends were holding me. We had to walk a few miles, quite a few miles to it. And we arrived there, and we lived in tents and straw, we slept on straw. And we weren’t treated badly. No, it wasn’t too bad over there. We were given nice meals. What happened? They wanted us strong to send out to work, so they didn’t want weak and sick people.

 

Witnesses such as this help prove that Bergen-Belsen was not a specially designed death camp whatsoever. Before the catastrophic end of the war, prisoners were routinely fed and decently cared for.

 

The major trick of the Holocaust promotion industry is to show these horrible images of emaciated bodies and make you believe that prisoners were always like this. That the Germans immediately starved them to death, and this deliberate starvation had been going on for years as part of their plan of extermination. However, witnesses such as this and others prove that at times the concentration camps were not so terrible.

 

This was not a bad place. This was not at that time.

 

It was only as Germany was losing the war, surrounded on all sides by a terror bombing campaign from the west and marauding Soviets in the east, that conditions in camps such as Bergen-Belsen deteriorated disastrously.

 

And then we stayed there until they started to build barracks for all the other Auschwitz people when Bergen-Belsen became hell.

 

Bergen-Belsen became hellish at the very end of the war. The major cause of this was the Allied bombing campaign. As the Allies fire-bombed German civilian population centers, burning innocent men, women and children alive and shot at or bombed just about anything that moved on roads or train tracks, even the Germans themselves had trouble finding enough to eat at the time.

 

[Camp survivors interviewed:]

 

…hardly food, it was very meager already. The Germans didn’t have to eat.

Food didn’t improve very much because, simple reason, they didn’t have very much themselves, so…

Did the civilians try to help you at all? Did they trade goods for things?

It’s as I say, we had almost everything what we wanted, from the soccer teams, from the civilians, from outside civilians.

 

The spread of deadly diseases and severe overcrowding exacerbated the entire situation. Prisoners from areas in the east which were now being overrun by the Soviets were hastily evacuated west. After days or weeks journey, often on foot, they wound up in these overcrowded camps full of deadly diseases. And because the German infrastructure was being destroyed, this was catastrophic.

 

In early February 1945, a large transport of Hungarians were admitted to Bergen-Belsen while the disinfestation facility was out of order. As a result, typhus broke out and quickly spread beyond control. The hot-air delousing machine sometimes failed to work for several days. The worst killer was typhus. But typhoid fever and dysentery also claimed their lives.

 

There was a breakdown in order and communication throughout the German system as the Germans were losing the war and fighting for their survival. Trainloads of food were destroyed by Allied planes. At Bergen-Belsen, the final factor which guaranteed mass casualties was in the final weeks of the war: The Allies bombed the power plant which supplied electricity to the facilities that pumped water to the camp.

 

[85:12]

 

 

Water too had been cut off. And so, the water cart was the most important thing to arrive. There had be no water supply for six days. The Germans pleaded it had been cut.[51]

 

The electric plant which powered pumps supplying water to Bergen-Belsen was not cut by some unnamed force. It was blown up by the British. A destroyed system for providing clean water to the camp compounded already disastrous hygiene and medical conditions. Clean water, necessary to shower prisoners, wash clothing and treat dehydrated typhoid fever, dysentery and typhus patients was indeed cut off by British bombs.

 

One might ask why all the inmates surviving were not removed out of the camp altogether to a large town, for example, where there would be feeding and housing facilities. The answer is simply the dread word – typhus.

A mobile bacteriological unit and all medical aid possible together with 90 medical students from London hospitals were rushed to the spot to deal with it.

Lack of soap and water brought lice to the inmates, and lice carry typhus. To get rid of typhus, one must first get rid of lice, so contaminated patients were removed from their huts and put through a laundry process.

 

The British struggled to remedy disastrous conditions in Bergen-Belsen after liberation. Many thousands died after liberation. In the end, the British burned the wooden barracks, as they became infested with deadly epidemic-typhus-carrying body lice. Images of the disastrous situation at Bergen-Belsen are fraudulently used to portray a deliberate German extermination policy.

 

These post-liberation images of Bergen-Belsen as well as Dachau and Nordhausen have become symbols of German barbarism. But these people were victims of the larger war, not a deliberate German extermination plan. The Germans did what they could to keep people alive, and in some cases contacted the Red Cross for assistance and even turned over some camps to them. The shameful truth hidden amongst this Holocaust propaganda is that not only were none of these people gassed, but the Allies played a major role in their deaths.

 

As terrible as these images of emaciated prisoners are, images of union prisoners of the American confederate civil war camp Andersonville show liberated prisoners also appeared in a similar condition. What happened at Andersonville was a complete breakdown in hygiene measures due to inadequate sanitation facilities. Toilets in the overcrowded camp didn’t drain properly, exposing prisoners to filth and disease, in particular dysentery. Symptoms of dysentery include diarrhea and rapid weight loss. In extreme cases, patients may pass over a liter of fluid per hour. It’s easy to see how someone who is repeatedly defecating, vomiting and urinating would quickly lose body weight, especially if food supplies, medicine and water became scarce.

 

At Andersonville, as overcrowding increased, so did the death toll. The confederates also lost the war in a catastrophic way much like the Germans. So, there is a direct correlation between the images of Andersonville prisoners and the so-called Holocaust images.

 

Now, these people at Andersonville aren’t Jews, and never has anyone alleged the South aimed for a total genocide of Northerners. The photographs of Andersonville and for instance Bergen-Belsen are quite similar and correlate with the breakdown in hygiene, overcrowding, the spread of disease and one side of the war losing catastrophically. What you see in these images at Bergen-Belsen is primarily the result of typhus.

 

Typhus is a disease carried by the body louse which is similar to head lice. But body lice prefer to attach themselves not to the scalp but to the inner seams of clothing. Typhus was responsible for the deaths of millions throughout history. Typhus epidemics routinely occurred throughout Europe during war time. During World War I, more than three million people died from typhus.

 

What you see in these images are primarily typhus epidemic victims. The Germans did not intentionally starve them to death. We can see several people liberated from the camps. Although not in pristine condition, some appear well fed, some even fat. They simply didn’t have disease. The Germans in fact tried to stop the spread of disease. The insecticide Zyklon B was a pesticide used to kill these deadly typhus-carrying body lice.

 

[90:02]

 

There is nothing inherently murderous about Zyklon B. In fact, Zyklon B was used on the Mexican border to gas the clothing of Mexicans crossing the border. The delousing process went like this:

 

Prisoners entering a camp would strip their clothing and get a haircut to prevent any areas where deadly typhus-carrying body lice could thrive. Then they would take a hot shower. At the same time, their clothing would be put into specially designed fumigation chambers where fumigation crews would use the insecticide Zyklon B to kill deadly typhus-carrying body lice.

The prisoners would then be given clean, lice-free clothing, and enter the camp. It is easy to see how this life saving delousing process involving real fumigation chambers for clothing and real showers was misconstrued into wartime propaganda about showers of gas by prisoners spreading rumors as well as Soviet propaganda artists deliberately framing their enemies.

 

One of the final exhibits at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C. sums up the importance of the information presented in this video.

 

Museum visitors are bombarded with film clips taken after the Allies captured concentration and labor camps. These films are meant to represent proof of a deliberate German extermination policy. But you have now seen many of these clips, explained and debunked.

 

Near the end of the museum’s main exhibit two banks of three video monitors flanking a fallen Nazi flag play film footage taken after camps were captured by the Allies.

 

Each of the three monitors is dedicated to one of the three major Allied powers: the Soviet Union, United States and Great Britain.

 

On this screen is US Army footage taken at Nordhausen, Dachau and Buchenwald. The caption reads:

 

Local German civilians are ordered to tour Buchenwald Concentration Camp.

 

This is an American army official gathering Germans around the supposed human-skin lamp shade and the table filled with propaganda props. Visitors are shown the Dachau death trains full of victims of Allied bombing and strafing attacks. Majdanek, the outside of a real shower facility, “Bath and Disinfection II,” and the inside of “Bath and Disinfection I” showing the real, working shower room. Again, the camera is angled away from the many windows. The caption reads:

 

Soviet Army officers inspect chambers where prisoners were killed by poison gas.

 

Today, every serious mainstream historian acknowledges this wasn’t a gas chamber with fake shower heads, it was a real working shower room designed to keep prisoners alive and free of disease.

 

Again, the bulldozer pushing epidemic typhus victims into a mass grave at Bergen-Belsen. A disaster, but not deliberate or planned.

 

On the last television screen, we’re shown footage of Nordhausen bombed to smithereens by 500 British warplanes over two days. Much like at the Nuremberg trials, the final shot we are shown before moving on to the exhibit on post-war trials is the victim of British war planes at Nordhausen with his exposed brains.

 

How sick to show gory imagery of Allied air attack victims as proof of the evilness of Germans.

 

Mothers rushing their children past this section never question the context of this imagery. This is powerful, trauma-based mind control used to brainwash, not by using logic and facts, but by searing these horror images into a captive audience’s mind, and manipulating emotions with mendacious narrations.

 

Real shower rooms, phony planted evidence like this lamp shade, and victims of Allied bombing are not proof of a genocide using gas chambers, disguised as shower rooms. We were manipulated, misled and lied to.

 

We were shown images taken during the final days of a destroyed and collapsed Germany as proof of a systematic, planned extermination program. Upon further investigation by the western Allies, these claims of extermination camps equipped with homicidal gas chambers in western-liberated camps have fallen by the wayside.

 

However, the powerful imagery of these western-liberated, overcrowded, disease-infested camps, devastated due to the Allied bombing campaign in the final months of the worst war in the history of mankind is still used to brainwash the public as proof of an extermination program of gas chambers disguised as shower rooms in camps captured by the Soviet Union.

 

In Part 2 of this documentary, we will explore some aspects of the most infamous of these camps: Auschwitz.

 

 

[94:55]

 

 

Disclaimer

 

This documentary is not meant to whitewash the National Socialist regime of Germany from any of its undisputed wrongdoings. Imprisoning people without proper due process is a crime. Any authority committing such a crime ultimately bears responsibility for those in its custody.

 

However, this crime was not only committed by the German authorities prior to and during World War II, but during the war also by the U.S. authorities who imprisoned many Japanese Americans as well as Italian and German immigrants. The biggest criminal in this regard, however, was the US’s most important ally of the Second World War, the Soviet Union, where millions were imprisoned and ultimately murdered prior to, during and after the war.

 

Unfortunately, this crime of unlawful incarceration is today again committed by U.S. authorities in Guantanamo Bay and other similar facilities.

 

[95:52]

 

__________________

 

Holocaust Handbooks, the world’s leading book series critically exploring what the powers that be don’t want examined. Mermerizing, comprehensive presentations, such as Lectures on the Holocaust, as well as cutting edge research results, such as The Real Case for Auschwitz. Read most of our books free of charge at holocausthandbooks.com, where you can also watch our riveting documentaries. All this high quality content was made possible by viewers like you. Please consider making a donation to help us create more of this content. We can’t do it without you! Thank you.

 

 

[96:28]

 

 

 


 

 

Notes

[1]

As of Oct. 2017, the following were found online (U = USHMM, Y = Yad Vashem): Auschwitz (U = “over 960,000” total, Y = “more than 1,100,000” total); Belzec (U = approximately 434,500, Y = 600,000); Sobibor (U = “at least 170,000”, Y = 250,000); Treblinka (U = “between 870,000 and 925,000”, Y = 870,000); Majdanek (U = “unknown”, “Between 89,000 and 110,000” “Most succumbed to starvation, disease, exposure, and the effects of physical torture or back-breaking labor performed under threat of violence”, Y = no number, total Jewish death toll “60,000” (Kranz), “200,000” (Łukaszkiewicz)); Chelmno (U = “at least 152,000”, Y = 320,000).

[2]

www.un.org/en/holocaustremembrance/docs/res607.shtml

[3]

Donald Trump, “Statement by the President on International Holocaust Remembrance Day,” Jan. 27, 2017; www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/01/27/statement-president-international-holocaust-remembrance-day (accessed on Oct. 4, 2017)

[4]

https://twitter.com/JGreenblattADL/status/825029350126936064 (accessed on Oct. 4, 2017).

[5]

The Guardian, Jan 27, 2017; www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/27/white-house-holocaust-remembrance-day-no-jews; Commentary, Jan 28, 2017; www.commentarymagazine.com/politics-ideas/the-white-house-holocaust-horror/;

[6]

Jake, “WH: No mention of Jews on Holocaust Remembrance Day because others were killed too,” CNN, Jan. 28, 2017; http://edition.cnn.com/2017/01/28/politics/white-house-holocaust-memorial-day

[7]

Louise Ridley, “The Holocaust’s Forgotten Victims: The 5 Million Non-Jewish People Killed By The Nazis,” The Huffington Post, Jan 27, 2015; www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/27/holocaust-non-jewish-victims_n_6555604.html; for more see Hadding Scott, “Anti-Gentiles Deny the 5 Million!,” Inconvenient History, Vol. 9, No. 2, spring 2017; www.codoh.comhttps://www.inconvenienthistory.com/9/2/4239/

[8]

Ron Kampeas, “‘Remember the 11 million’? Why an inflated victims tally irks Holocaust historians,Jewish Telegraph Agency, Jan. 31, 2017; www.jta.org/2017/01/31/news-opinion/united-states/remember-the-11-million-why-an-inflated-victims-tally-irks-holocaust-historians/; The Times of Israel, Feb. 1, 2017; www.timesofisrael.com/remember-the-11-million-why-an-inflated-victims-tally-irks-holocaust-historians/

[9]

Deborah Lipstadt, “The Trump Administration’s Flirtation With Holocaust Denial,The Atlantic Monthly, Jan 30, 2017; www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/01/the-trump-administrations-softcore-holocaust-denial/514974/

[10]

https://youtu.be/OxJZBrtFD6Y

[11]

Best resolution in two parts: https://youtu.be/6wJDlh5ozEY & … https://youtu.be/BQ0m-0AZ-m0

[12]

Ibid. starting at 1 min 23 sec.

[13]

Ibid. starting at 1 min 59 sec.

[14]

Caroline Sturdy Colls, Holocaust Archaeologies: Approaches and Future Directions, Springer, Cham, 2015, p. 3, footnote.

[15]

Matthew Day, “Nazis may have killed up to 20m, claims ‘shocking’ new Holocaust study,” Daily Telegraph, March 4, 2013; www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/9906771/Nazis-may-have-killed-up-to-20m-claims-shocking-new-Holocaust-study.html

[16]

https://youtu.be/_pQJ42ONPDo; starting at 45:18; see the authentications and explanation: IMT Document PS-2430: Nazi Concentration and Prisoner-of-War Camps: A Documentary Motion Picture, film shown at the Nuremberg Trial, 29 November 1945, IMT, XXX, p. 470;

[17]

www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005214

[18]

E. Kogon, H. Langbein, A. Rückerl (eds.), Nazi Mass Murder, Yale Univ. Press, New Haven/London 1993.

[19]

Document PS-3249, IMT, Vol. 32, pp. 57-64, here p. 62, quoted in IMT, Vol. 5, pp. 172f.

[20]

Document 159-L, IMT, Vol 37, pp. 605-627, here p. 621.

[21]

Dachau Concentration Camp”; https://youtu.be/pIxOQdeCWX0; 18:00-18:05

[22]

Levi Mierau, “Dachau Concentration Camp,” Documentary, Part 2; https://youtu.be/MQvB3sLER34; 6:55-7:01

[23]

U.S. National Archives, Dachau Trial (Trial of Martin Gottfried Weiss), M1174, Reel 1, microfilm page 000135.

[24]

Nuremberg Document NO-3886.

[25]

Nuremberg Document NO-3887.

[26]

NS 21/319.

[27]

Levi Mierau, “Dachau Concentration Camp,” Documentary, Part 2; https://youtu.be/MQvB3sLER34; 6:00-6:13.

[28]

Ibid., 6:54-7:23.

[29]

https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/pa1154600

[30]

https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/pa23334

[31]

https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/pa1166433

[32]

https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/pa1058759

[33]

https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/pa1158576

[34]

https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/pa1174716

[35]

https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/pa1168298

[36]

Ludwig Gassner, “Verkehrshygiene und Schädlingsbekämpfung,” Gesundheits-Ingenieur, 66(15) (1943) pp. 174-176.

[37]

See Richard Irmscher, “Nochmals: ‘Die Einsatzfähigkeit der Blausäure bei tiefen Temperaturen,’Zeitschrift für hygienische Zoologie und Schädlingsbekämpfung, 34 (1942), pp. 35f.

[38]

Paul Berben, Histoire du camp de concentration de Dachau, 1933-1945, Comité international de Dachau, Brussels 1968, p. 12.

[39]

Yad Vashem Archives, 1211/28, item ID 38051.

[40]

Yad Vashem Archives, 4029, item ID 57452.

[41]

http://www.historywiz.org/finalsolution.htm

[42]

www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IJ4mpCDVpE

[43]

3762-PS; IMT, Vol. 33, p. 68.

[44]

Russell Barton, “Belsen,” in: History of the Second World War, 109 (1975), pp. 3025-3029; cf. Barbara Kulaszka (ed.), Did Six Million Really Die?, Samisdat Publishers, Toronto 1992, pp. 175-180; www.vho.org/aaargh/fran/livres3/KULA.pdf (different pagination).

[45]

https://youtu.be/v8vGpqQBpNU

[46]

Jane Floerchinger, “Concentration Camp Conditions Killed Most Inmates, Doctor Says,The Wichita Eagle, April 1, 1980, p. 4C.

[47]

John D. McCallum, Crime Doctor, The Writing Works, Mercer Island, Wash., 1978, pp. 57-60, 69.

[48]

Levi Mierau, “Dachau Concentration Camp,” Documentary, Part 1, 5:32-5 :49 (https://youtu.be/cCi_PLl-rJs); Part 3, 0-1:03 (https://youtu.be/Xpnl-YyafI).

[49]

André Sellier, A History of the Dora Camp: The Story of the Nazi Slave Labor Camp that Secretly Manufactured V-2 Rockets, Ivan R. Dee, Chicago, 2003, p. 291.

[50]

David Plotz, “The Plagiarist: Why Stephen Ambrose is a vampire,” Jan. 11, 2002; www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/assessment/2002/01/the_plagiarist.html.

[51]

Memory of the Camps”, Alfred Hitchcock “documentary”; https://youtu.be/DY9y7cmmmFQ.

 

 

 

============================================

 

PDF Notes

Version 1 —

* Total words = xxx
* Total images = xx
* Total A4 pages = xx

 

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

(Available later)

 

 

 

 

Version History

 

Version 2:

 

Version 1: Dec 28, 2017  — Published post.

 

 

Dear Contributors and Readers, …

 

 

Merry Christmas  2017

 

 

&

 

 

A Happy New Year, 2018!

 

 

 

 And let’s also remember and honour those that

understood and fought the “problem” before we did, …

 

 

 

Some thoughts about, …

 

The Past

 

National Socialism drove Germany to achieve massive positive developments in all areas of life, supercharging the economic, scientific, social, and cultural life of the nation to great heights that were, given the economic depression that the rest of the world was being subjected to, the envy of all. Germany was headed for world superpower status, all based on its people’s industriousness and inventiveness, organised under a system that brought Germans together to work for the benefit of all.

 

Yet such positive and wonderful developments could not go un-answered by Hell!

 

Hell was unleashed on Europeans by Organized jewry in 1914 with its carefully planned WWI, and subsequent massive destruction of Russia in its 1917 “Jewish Revolution” and following slaughter of its people over decades.

 

Organized jewry then unleashed Hell, Version 2, aka, WWII, in response to the reactionary rise of National Socialism. Using  the best puppets that jewish Money Power could buy, it used its tools; Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin to wage war on Germany.

 

The end result was over 55 million dead, Europe in ruins, the expansion of the jewish Soviet empire and the everlasting poison pill, the “Holohoax“. But most importantly, National Socialism was “discredited” and jewish Money Power ended in full control, running our “democracies”, where Tweedledee is set against Tweedledum.

 

 

The Present

 

The latest major iteration of the “Tweedledee vs Tweedledum” puppet show being, Trump versus Clinton. Many see Trump’s election as a gain for our cause, all things considered. I see Trump as a complete tool of Organized jewry that used White concerns to divide us. His election is Organized jewry’s “business as usual” even if some bones are thrown our way.

 

 

The Future, …

 

No, you don’t need shades quite yet, as its brightness, all very much depends.

 

The future is up to us. We either fight Hell and defeat it, or we, and all our descendents will end up in hell, under a tyranny run by Organized jewry. That book, 1984 warned us about that.

 

I’m cautiously optimistic. Over the last several years I see more and more thinking people awaken to what is going on. We’ve been massively conned over many generations, yet there is a growing understanding of that.

 

To return to the past, the good Germans of the 1930s understood the problem, … can we do likewise while preventing Hell re-asserting itself?

 

A fantastically great future awaits humankind, if only we could, … and we will, with great struggle, …

 

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!

 

KATANA

 

 

 

======================================

 

 

Version History

 

Version 1: Posted, Dec 26, 2017

Hidden Empire — Part 4

 

[Hidden Empire was written by William Pelly in the late 1930s warning Americans of the threat that Organized jewry posed by its plans for the takeover of America and world domination.

In Part 4, Pelly first describes, in detail, the jewish Kahal that consists of a vast pyramid type of network that controls its adherents through a “Seven-times-Seven” form of organisation. The world is divided into two hemispheres with each having a “Prince Sponsor”, who in turn has seven “Arch-Censors” under him, with each Arch-Censor having seven “Ministers”. There are then seven, ‘Heralds” under each Minister, with further divisions under the titles of “Courier”, “Scrivener”, “Auditors“, finally ending with seven “Mutes”. This totals to 960,800 male jews in each hemisphere;

organized into a tight, rigidly controlled body, every man knowing all the men under him, but only the one man above him, and all responsible to the Prince-Sponsor at the top. There is no Jew of consequence in North America who is not involved in this organization — terrible in its power for predatory control of Christian society — or who is not listed some where down the line on the roster of its obedient adherents.

With this organisational structure and money power, jewry can then control events to its benefit, including the appointments of Presidents, starting and ending wars, including the Great War, creating economic booms and busts, etc.

In the next section, on Germany, Pelly describes how Organized jewry had insinuated itself into official positions of influence and control in Germany with a particular rise to ascendency during the Bismark era and subsequent Great War years, with jews profiting from military contracts, etc. In the following Peace Conference jews swarmed throughout the German delegation as as “experts” and “advisers”.

Hitler’s rise to power enabled the German people to rid themselves of this “Kahal Frankenstein”, although at the cost of the jewish controlled media in the USA defaming him and the German people endlessly, screeching about “persecution” of jews, while remaining silent about the mass murder of over 30 million Whites in the jewish controlled Soviet Union.

In the next section, on Russia, the takeover of Russia by Organized jewry and its enslavement and mass murder of millions of its people is described. Anti-semitism in Russia also became classed as counter-revolutionary, and was punished by death — KATANA.]

 

 

_______________________

 

 

Hidden Empire

by

 

 

William Dudley Pelley

 

circa 1939

 

Part 4

 

 

Contents

 

Part 1

William Dudley Pelley
Out of Their Own Mouths
“WHAT DO THESE HEBREWS HERE?”
INTRODUCTION

Part 2

WAS JESUS A JEW?
THE TALMUD CONDEMNED
“PERSECUTION”
“WE HAVE TARNISHED AND BROKEN THEIR POWER”

Part 3

THE WORLD MENACE FOR CENTURIES
THE ILLUMINATI
WAS LINCOLN A VICTIM OF THE PLOT?

Part 4

THE POWERFUL KAHAL
GERMANY
RUSSIA

Part 5

THE PROTOCOLS
RELIGION
PACIFISM

Part 6

MONEY
EDUCATION
INDUSTRY

Part 7

GOVERNMENTS
PROPAGANDA
CONCLUSION
WHAT TO DO?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

__________________________

 

 

 

 

William Dudley Pelley

(March 12, 1890 – July 1, 1965)

 

 

Bolshevik Revolution correspondent, Zionologist,
author and founder of The Silver Legion.

 

… By the end of the First World War, Pelley’s prestige was such that his publisher commissioned him as a foreign correspondent on assignment in Eastern Europe. With a generous expense account and the diplomatic rank of “consular courier” conferred upon him by the United States government, he shipped out for Russia in early 1918. To him, his assignment was a fun adventure, a well-paid lark and a chance to vacation overseas. It turned out to be something far more. Until his fateful voyage, Pelley was a happy-go-lucky, up-and-coming author, with no real convictions of his own. As he remembered years later, the experience transformed him “from a nondescript writer to a grim crusader.

 

For two years, he covered 8,000 miles by train and horse-back through Siberia, into the Ukraine, across the steppes of Central Russia, into the Far East and through Asia to Japan. Through all these extensive travels, he was a personal witness to the communist revolution. He saw peasant women crucified to barn doors and a schoolroom in which the teacher and all the students had been bludgeoned to death, their brains splattered against the blackboard. There where whole villages depopulated by murder, with corpses swinging from every lamppost and choking the nearby streams. These victims where rarely military personnel, nor politically involved in any way. They were common people, mostly farmers and factory workers. Such horrific sights, encountered wherever the Reds passed, almost unhinged his mind. But they were so commonplace, he gradually grew inured to the sea of blood through which he traveled daily.

 

He learned first-hand that communism was not an ideology, it was simply the organization of the worst criminal elements led by Jews to destroy society. This was no speculation. Virtually all the commissars he knew (some of whom he interviewed) where Jewish, while the majority of their activists where common murderers and perverts “liberated” from prison. They were motivated by hatred, power and revenge, nothing else. All their slogans about “Equality” and “Peace” where transparent rues to dupe thoughtless liberals among the Russian people, their victims.

 

Drunk with success, the Jews boasted openly of their plans for world conquest by fomenting the same kind of divisiveness in other countries. They told Pelley that Russia was just a stepping stone, a base for international subversion. Even their phony “communism” was utterly dispensable, just like their own followers, who they never hesitated to massacre on the slightest whim. Their long-range goal was one-world government, in which the masses became willing slaves, fueling an international economy with their genius and labor, while the Jewish people dominated all important positions of power.

 

 

“‘After Russia,’ one greasy commissar smirked at Pelley, ‘then Europe and later, America!’…

 

_____________________

 

 

 

THE POWERFUL KAHAL

 

 

 

 

AMERICANS living in New York frequently hear of the Jews giving Kehillah parties in city blocks, but the fact that the Kahal is a vast network of espionage and predatory action for world-wide Jewry, and that it correlates the progress of the Jewish nationals all over the earth, has only been authentically uncovered since the Boer War, mostly by the British military and secret service agents.

 

[Page 36]

 

Try and grasp fully what now is to be disclosed:

 

In the time of George Washington there were about 4,000 Jews in this country. Most of them were well-to-do traders. In 1783 the United States became the first country to grant them civil equality, and ever since they have enjoyed political equality.

 

According to published figures of the Jewish Statistical Bureau, the Jewish population in the United States increased from 229,087 in 1877 to 4, 228,029 in 1927, and apparently no Jewish census figures have been released to the general public since 1927.

 

However, we have received from an authoritative source, figures compiled by the Jewish World Government for its own purpose of levying poll taxes on Jews in all countries of the world, which tabulations indicate that in 1937 there were in United States 12,046,648 Jews, of whom about 4,000,000 were of foreign birth. Which means that the country was supporting 7,818,619 more Jews than in 1927; an increase of 15,000 a week or 2,200 a day. Whatever the true figure, when the statement is made that the most powerful among them are effectively controlled by one international organization so tightly constructed that one man rules it from the top, the information is labeled fantastic.

 

But wait! Listen to what espionage agents of several countries have attested before responsible committees:—

The Kahal officials divide the world into the two hemispheres; the Eastern and the Western. As the United States lies in the western hemisphere, we will confine ourselves to that alone.

 

[Page 37]

 

The Kahal is reputed to be constructed on the mystical Figure Seven, At the head of the hemisphere is placed the Sponsor.

 

The Sponsor for the eastern hemisphere is not of consequence herein. However, both Sponsors, for both hemispheres, are reputed to be accountable only to Aka’dham, the Unknown and Uncrowned Prince of Jewry throughout the earth, whose identity is kept a guarded secret. He has, as has been quoted, his Prince-Sponsors in each hemisphere, and under these Prince Sponsors divides the Seven-times-Seven organization —

 

Under each Sponsor are put seven Arch-Censors

Under each Arch-Censor, seven Ministers

Under each Minister, seven Heralds

Under each Herald, seven Couriers

Under each Courier, seven Scriveners

Under each Scrivener, seven Auditors

Under each Auditor, seven Mutes

 

These figure out to 960,800 male Jews in each hemisphere, organized into a tight, rigidly controlled body, every man knowing all the men under him, but only the one man above him, and all responsible to the Prince-Sponsor at the top. There is no Jew of consequence in North America who is not involved in this organization — terrible in its power for predatory control of Christian society — or who is not listed some where down the line on the roster of its obedient adherents.

 

Such an organization can, of course, be terrible for the peace or upset of any nation. It can set up or pull down Gentile governments, start or stop wars at its pleasure, control the most intricate dealings of Leagues of Nations, besides dominating all officialdom, determining the money standards of nations, including America’s, directing its economics, intimidating or controlling the nation’s newspapers, radio, and movie screen, so that nothing can be released that is inimical to its far flung interests, Careful researchers, who are not in its pay, declare that they have traced the prevailing depression in America directly to its threshold. Presidents have been elected by its money. Its directing heads and their satraps, often camouflaged politely in press and Congress as “International Bankers” have been busily engaged in buying — in America at bankruptcy prices, effectively looting and eliminating the United States permanently from its pathway as a major power, reducing it to the status of a third rate vassal state subject to their officers — Isaacs, Sassoon, Samuel, et al — in the so-called “British” Cabinet.

 

[Page 38]

 

This would seem to be the “influence” to which President Wilson referred on his return from Versailles when he said that “there was a secret power in Europe with which” he could “not cope.

 

Was this not the same power that started the World War in furtherance of its schemes, and that proved so effective that the statement is made on espionage authority that orders were given to the British Admiralty that at no time during the war was Berlin, Hamburg or Frankfort to be raided, shelled or bombed, because their homes and families were there and they had no intention of suffering physically or jeopardizing their lives in this war which they had conceived for their own world plans and financial profit?

 

Sir Douglas Haig, English Field-Marshal, obviously under the influence of his “secretary” — Philip Sassoon of the family of Bagdad Jews — explained that the English were too “humane” to bomb cities holding innocent women and children. That suited gullible Christians, and heaped full odium on the “Germans” who ordered such atrocities from Berlin to be perpetrated on London. And it did save the necks of the Kehillah Jews!

 

Small wonder that, with the whole Christian world hoodwinked into an international war, killing each other’s nationals off by the hundreds of thousands, Judah celebrated Der Tag, or the Day of the Jews coming into their own!

 

 

[Page 39]

 

 

GERMANY

 

No one knows where we would be today if a Bolshevist Reich had come into Stalin’s power. It would have been self-annihilation had Germany failed to heed her peril and had allowed the program of mass destruction of human life to be carried out. The loyal German people fought the Communists for ten years and when, at last successful, they started deporting the aliens that were responsible for the chaos, the fact that so many of them were Eastern Jews caused the rest of International Jewry to raise the old hue and cry of “persecution.” There is nothing that indicates so clearly the ownership and control of most of the American Press as the fact that the vilification of Hitler has been constantly wedded to a subtle praise of the Red Russian system in our newspapers.

 

Kahal officials had perfected their power over Germany and the Germans long before the outbreak of the war. In fact, their ascendency dates back to Bismarck who was surrounded and dominated by the Jews and who saw to it that Germany was turned over to the Princes of Jewry back in 1870 exactly as America is being turned over to the Princes of Jewry now.

 

The Jews were the only people who were able to use Bismarck so that all liberal reforms in Germany would turn out to the profit of the Jews.

 

An industrialist who visited the Prussian War Ministry in September, 1914, told with amazement that he found Jews predominating in this high office, and not German officers and military officials as he had expected.

 

Herr Walther Rathenau, a Jew, sat in a large room, at an enormous secretary writing-table and “dispensed” or gave away army contracts. Around him were seated, almost without exception, Jewish clerks and Jewish business people.

 

The feeble government under Emperor Wilhelm II which had already favored Jews in all important positions, allowed this to happen, owing to its perplexity and ignorance. In the course of the war, the fact arose conspicuously to the surface that since the beginning of Wilhelm II’s reign, the Jews had been the real rulers of the German Empire.

 

For the previous 15 years those in immediate personal contact with the Kaiser were mainly Jewish financiers, Jewish manufacturers and Jewish merchants like Emil and Walther Rathenau, Balin, Schwebach, James Simon, Friedlander-Fuld, Goldberger, Guttman, Hulshinisky, Katsenstein and others.

 

Upon the change from the old regime to the new, that is, from the monarchy to the so-called republic, the cabinet composed of six men, which superseded the Ministry of State, was dominated by the Jews Haase and Landsberg. Haase had control of foreign affairs. His assistant was the Jew Kaursky, a Czech, who in 1918 was not even a German citizen.

 

[Page 40]

 

Associated with Haase were the Jews Cohen and Herzfeld. The Jewish financial Minister of State was Schiffer, assisted by the Jew Bernstein. The Secretary of the Interior was the Jew Pruess, with the Jew Dr. Fround for his assistant. The Jew Fritz Max Cohen was government publicity agent.

 

The Kingdom of Prussia duplicated this condition of affairs. The Jews Hirschand Rosenfeld dominated the Cabinet, with Rosenfeld controlling the Department of Justice and Hirsch the Department of Interior. The Jew Simon was engaged in the Treasury Department. The Prussian Department of Justice was wholly manned and operated by Jews. The Jew Kastenberg was Director of the Department of Art. The War Food Supply was directed by the Jew Wurm, while in the State Food Department were the Jews Dr. Hirschand the Geheimarat Dr. Stradthagen. The Soldier’s and Workmen’s Committee was directed by the Jew Cohen, with the Jews Stem, Hertz, Katsenstein, Lowenberg, Frankel, Israelowicz, Laubenheim, Saligsch, Laufenberg, Heimann, Scheisinger, Marzand Weyl having control of the various activities of the Committee.

 

The Jew Ernst was Chief of Police at Berlin. In the same office in Frankfort was the Jew Sinzheimer, in Munich the Jew Steimer, in Essen, Jew Levy.

 

It will be remembered that the Jew Wisner was President of Bavaria, his financial adviser being the Jew Jaffe. Bavaria’s trade and commerce were in the hands of the half-Jew Brentano. The Jews Lipinky and Schwarz were active in the government of Saxony; the Jews Thalheimer and Heimann in Wurtemburg, the Jew Fulda in Essen.

 

Two of the delegates sent to the Peace Conference were Jews and a third was notoriously the tool of Jewish purposes. In addition, Jews swarmed through the German delegation as “experts” and “advisers” — Max Warburg, Dr. von Straus, Morton, Oskar Oppenheimer, Dr. Jaffe, Deutsch, Brentano, Struck, Wasserman and Mendelsohn-Bartholdi.

 

[Page 41]

 

Is it any wonder that with such a state of affairs obtaining, Hitler should have been espoused by the pure-blooded German people as a leader who would rid them of this Kahal Frankenstein, whose American arm has already become quite as offensive to enlightened persons here in the United States?

 

Hitler preached a doctrine of “Germany for the Germans” and we should preach a doctrine of “America for Americans.” Hitler used a steel wedge “to split a hardwood block” and at once when he had gained to power and started breaking up this Kahal monopoly, it set its publicity machinery at work all over the world to defame and misrepresent him, suggest boycotts, and introduce resolutions in houses of government which if acted upon would lead to war. It is obvious that the Kahal controlled press — which constitutes about 90 per cent of American metropolitan newspapers — and the radio and the screen, received their orders to acclaim Hitler as a monster and “persecutor” who had “set Europe back into the Dark Ages.” Protest meetings were held, the old whine about Christian tolerance for God’s Chosen People was dragged forth again, dusted off, and made to do service in stirring up protests. Hitler had thrown a big monkey wrench into the Kahal’s machinery in its steady progress for international domination, and with characteristic lack of any sportsmanship, the Jews began to gather around a new wailing wall and fill the air of the nations with their hypocritical lamentations. Wherever a Jew is blocked in the accomplishment of a predatory scheme against Gentiles, he will immediately whine “persecution” or “lack of tolerance.

 

The description of German national life during her period of strife almost fits our present order. The whole of her people were near losing their national honor, hundreds of thousands of her children were being taught by atheist teachers, filthy and dirty literature adorned all her news stands, and anti-Christian and immoral films constituted the choicest dish of entertainment. The International Red Relief (the same as our American Civil Liberties Union) worked under the cover of humanitarianism at aiding in. the defense of persons (Communists) charged with political crimes.

 

[Page 42]

 

As is stated in the book “Are These Things So?”:

 

A nation that is practically united in its campaign against Bolshevism and Communism, controlled by Jews, is not to be condemned by the same race which produces these elements which have for their objective the destruction of nationalism and substituting for it a form of Sovietism which is abhor rent to everyone who knows how it actually operates in practice..

 

Hitler saw the sword of Damocles hanging over Germany and in saving Germany from this insidious foe it meant that he acted as any courageous leader would act to defend his country, which, in brief, was to protect it from the false Jew..

 

America ought to be grateful for the barrier that is thus being created in its behalf, rather than join with those who are on record as having ulterior designs against this country which was once the land of the free and the home of the brave.

 

A fitting tribute to the fact that Germany is solving her Communist problem is the experience that befell Hitler’s representative to the Chicago World’s Fair when he landed in this country on May 25th, 1933. The New York Times. next day captioned:

 

Nazi Envoys Saved from Reds at Pied

 

And then proceeded to tell how it required the strenuous efforts of one hundred policemen to save these envoys from one thousand Communists. The envoys escaped from the mob by being spirited away from the liner in a tug.

 

There are nearly 600,000 Jews in Germany who protested Germany’s condemnation at the hands of our “American” press.

 

The following is a part of a letter sent to the American Embassy at Berlin by the Federation of Jewish Soldiers who fought at the front. Dated April 7, 1933, it reads:

 

We think, however, that it is about time to cease the agitation against Germany carried on by so-called Jewish intellectuals abroad. These men who, for the most part, never laid claim to being German, left their fellow Jews, for whom they claim to be fighting, in the lurch, and fled abroad at the crucial moment. They have forfeited the right to act as spokesmen in German-Jewish matters.

 

[Page 43]

 

The story of what happened in England, placing England in Jewish Kahal power, is too long to be told here, but Great Britain’s vassalage to the Sassoons, the Normans, the Samuels, and the Monds, is quite as complete as that of Germany before Hitler began dethronement of the anti-Christ element. Is it not odd that while the proven records of Jewish killings in Germany amounting to only three in number have received untold publicity, yet the destruction of over thirty millions of Gentiles in Russia has not even received world admission? Perhaps it gives you a bit of an idea of who controls our press.

 

 

RUSSIA

 

WHY is it that we are told that the whole population of Soviet Russia is kept at work and enjoys a measure of equality not enjoyed else where in the world? Why is it continually harped upon, regarding “persecution” of the Jews in Germany? Why are we not told the truth concerning the tragedies that are being enacted by untold millions in Communistic Russia? Why is the fact hidden from us that in 1929 alone, 1,370 church properties in Russia were either confiscated or destroyed ?

 

And that since then, other thousands of buildings used for religious worship have been closed and that only atheists can obtain work or food cards? Why is it that we are not told that an organized plan is being carried out by the present Communist government to wipe out the institution of family life, that people have been starved until they have had to resort to cannibalism?

 

The facts that you have heard and read should give you your answer. If there were not worldwide organization behind it and the same organization hat controls our press — we would know about it!

 

[Page 44]

 

Possibly the foothold that this pernicious element has obtained in our governmental institutions and administration can be appreciated when it is known that no money can be appropriated for the protection of our homes and families against the growing onslaught of Communism- the type of government that has been engaged, and is now engaged, in the systematic killing of the Christian population of that same country.

 

The Third International, a newspaper published in Moscow, gives the following official list of admitted Bolshevik murders in Red Russia, prior to 1933:

 

1 Royal family and seven innocent persons.

28 Bishops and Archbishops.

6,775 Priests.

6,575 Teachers

8,500 Doctors

54,850 Officers.

260,000 Soldiers.

150,000 Police Officers.

48,000 Gendarmes (detectives).

355,250 Intellectuals.

198,000 Workers.

915,000 Peasants.

 

The above figures were referred to by Congressman Hamilton Fish of the State of New York in his speech before the House of Representatives on February 29, 1932. It would be well worth your while to send ten cents to the Bureau of Printing and Engraving at Washington, D. C; and obtain the Congressional Report on “Communistic Activities in the United States.” It is interesting to note that this Congressional Report was never allowed to be read on the floor of Congress; it was buried in one of the committees.

 

[Page 45]

 

In this same Communistic Government of Soviet Russia you will note that the officials are preponderantly Jews. Below are statistics showing proximate participation of Jews in the present Soviet Government. The word “proximate” is used because there is a normal fluctuation of affiliations due to daily or weekly dismissals, deaths, etc. Before we proceed let us remember that the U.S.S.R., stands for the Union of Socialist Soviet Republics. Thus, any other country being converted to Communism automatically becomes attached to the U. S. S. R., receiving orders from Moscow. Here is the list:

 

Office ………………………………………………………. Total ……… Jews

Members of the Government (Total) ………… 503 ………. 406

Commissioners of the People ……………………. 22 ………… 18
………. “ ……….  for War ……………………………… 43 ………… 34
 ………. “ ……….  of the Interior ………………….. 64 ………… 45
………. “ ……….  of the Exterior …………………… 17 ………… 13
………. “ ……….  for Finance ………………………. 30 ………… 25
………. “ ……….  for Justice ………………………… 19 ………… 18
………. “ ……….  for Hygiene ………………………. 5 ………… 4
………. “ ……….  for Public Welfare …………….. 53 ………… 44
………. “ ……….  of Labor ……………………………. 7 ………… 6
………. “ ……….  for Social Aid ……………………. 6 ………… 6
………. “ ……….  for the Provinces ………………. 23 ………… 21
The Economic Council …………………………….. 56 ………… 45
Soviet Members in Moscow ……………………… 23 ………… 19
Editors of the Official Press ……………………… 42 ………… 41

 

The above information is not the product of Gentile discernings.

 

According to the “Jewish Chronicle” of January 6, 1933;

 

over one-third of the Jews in Russia have become officials.

 

Anti Semitism in Russia is now classed as counter-revolutionary, and is punished by death.

 

It is significant, that the Red Star which in former times was the symbol of Zionism, is now the symbol of the Russian Proletariat. If England were to be overthrown by a revolution and, as a result of that revolution the government were left almost entirely in the hands of some other nationality, would you not say then that this other nationality was responsible for the revolution? Of the 224 revolutionaries who in 1917 were dispatched with Lenin to Russia to foment Bolshevik Revolution, 170 were Jews.

 

[Page 46]

 

An individual who works for the Travelers’ Life Insurance Company, residing in Omaha at present, saw cannibalism in Russia in 1923, when he was purser on an American vessel. This man also saw over fifty children that were starved to the point where they were more like little animals than human beings, herded together in a shack that had no doors, packing themselves together in order to keep warm overnight. He saw them the next morning, two in the center suffocated and trampled, and three on the outside frozen, their lifeless bodies to be then dragged away by a pack of hungry dogs and eaten. Communism has been progressing in our country for fifteen years, and is getting worse in every other country but Italy, Germany, Austria, Spain, and Japan.

 

Do you care to see your children torn from you and left to shift for themselves like a pack of animals? Do you care to see your wife the property of beasts? Read part of an official Soviet Decree:

 

This decree is proclaimed by the Free Association of Anarchists of the Town of Sararov, In compliance with the decision of the Soviet Peasants, Soldiers and Workmen Deputies of Kronstadt, the private possession of women is abolished.

 

Social unequalities and legitimate marriage having been a condition in the past which served as an instrument in the hands of the bourgeoisie, thanks to which all the best species of the beautiful have been the property of the bourgeoisie, who have prevented the continuation of the human race.

 

Such ponderous arguments have induced the organization to edit the following decrees:

 

1. From March 1, 1918, the right to possess women having reached the age of 17 and not more than 32 is abolished.

3. The decree does not affect women having five children.

4. The former owners may retain the right of using their wives without waiting for their turn.

5. In case of the husbands resisting, they shall forfeit the rights given them in the last paragraph.

6. All women from this decree are exempted from private ownership and are proclaimed to be the property of the whole nation.

 

[Page 47]

 

14. All women proclaimed by the decree to be national property will receive from the funds an allowance of 238 rubles a month.

15. All women who become pregnant are released from direct duties for four months, three months before and one month after childbirth.

16. Children born are given to an institution for training until they are 17 years old, at the cost of the Public Funds.

 

(Signed)    Council of the City of Saratov.

 

The terrible consequences of this type of decree cannot better be shown than by a quotation from what a missionary on the Russian Border said in The Christian Alliance Weekly. It is as follows:

 

A Russian From Soviet Russia reports, under oath in a public court, that in Moscow the police made a street drive, bringing all the homeless children and young people together. They were inspected by a medical man as to their condition. Out of this mass from 1,200 to 1,400 were singled out, and by means of a good substantial meal, and other favors, they were induced to march with soldiers on horseback out of Moscow into the open country. At last they halted. The soldiers on the horses were on the outside of the children’s and young people’s group, driving them into a bundle tight together. A word of command. Hidden machine guns began a weird song of death. In a few minutes the whole group of humanity was a mass of dead and dying.

 

”The machine guns were silent. Soldiers came to bury everything that was left. Why was all this? From 1,200 to 1,400 young people, living on the streets of Moscow, had become so diseased that the government knew of no other way to get rid of the plague.

 

This, then, is the type of government that the United States was forced to recognize in spite of the fact that over two hundred patriotic organizations in the United States protested vehemently against such a procedure. This is the type of government that has openly avowed as its purpose the overthrowing of the United States Government and its replacement by a Soviet America.

 

[Page 48]

 

Should we not be interested? The large number of people who think the Communists are worthy of some consideration because they “overthrew” the “terrible” Czar Regime is another ever present testimony of the effectiveness of Red propagandization.

 

What are the facts? There were two Russian revolutions. The first came with the abdication of Nicholas I, on March 16, 1917; this marked the end of the Russian Empire. The governing power then devolved upon the Duma, the only legal mandate holding group in the country. A provisional government, under Kerensky, was organized, and was immediately recognized by the United States, our government being the first to recognize the right of the Russian people to revolt. Russia lived under a democratic form of government for about eight months, until November 7, 1917, at which time about 30,000 or 40,000 communists, falsely promising to satisfy the land hunger of the peasants, took over the Russian nation, the same being under the supervision of Lenin (a Jew), who, with thirty others, mostly members of the same race, was allowed to go through Germany in a sealed car, financed by Schiff money. The then Jewishly controlled German government was responsible for the assistance that enabled this band of international racketeers to place this vast nation in bondage [pp, 69 and 70 of this Fish Congressional Report).

 

See other Parts:

 

Hidden Empire — Part 1 — William Dudley Pelley; Out of Their Own Mouths; “WHAT DO THESE HEBREWS HERE?”; INTRODUCTION

 

Hidden Empire — Part 2 — WAS JESUS A JEW?; THE TALMUD CONDEMNED; “PERSECUTION”; “WE HAVE TARNISHED AND BROKEN THEIR POWER”

 

Hidden Empire — Part 3 — THE WORLD MENACE FOR CENTURIES; THE ILLUMINATI; WAS LINCOLN A VICTIM OF THE PLOT?

Hidden Empire — Part 4 — THE POWERFUL KAHAL; GERMANY; RUSSIA

 

============================================

 

PDF Notes

Version 1 —

* Total words = xxx
* Total images = xx
* Total A4 pages = xx

 

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

(Available later)

 

 

 

 

Version History

 

Version 2:

 

Version 1: Dec 20, 2017  — Published post.