Feeds:
Posts
Comments

ben-bradberry-mogv-bk-cover-front

 

 

[Benton Bradberry’s 2012 book, “The Myth of German Villainy” is a  superb, must-read, revisionist look at how the German people have been systematically, relentlessly and most importantly, unjustly vilified as the arch criminal of the 20th century. Bradberry sets out, cooly and calmly as befits a former US-Navy officer and pilot, to show why and how the German people have been falsely accused of massive crimes and that their chief  accuser and tormenter, organized jewry is in fact the real party guilty of monstrous crimes against Germans and the rest of the world  —  KATANA.]

 

NOTE: The author has very generously given me permission to reproduce the material here — KATANA.

 

 

 

 

The Myth of

 

German Villainy

 

by

 

Benton L. Bradberry

 

 

[Part 01]

 

 

Front and Back Cover Text

 

Neither Kaiser Wilhelm nor Adolf Hitler wanted war. Both WWI and WWII were thrust upon Germany by the Allied powers. Germany’s great sin was emerging too late as a consolidated nation-state and upsetting the long established balance of power scheme in Europe. The already established great powers, Britain, France and Russia, joined together in 1914 to destroy this new rival. When Germany rose phoenix-like from the ashes of WWI to again become a great power, they finished. the job with World War II. The deliberate destruction of Germany during the Second World-War can only be compared to the Roman destruction of ancient Carthage, and it was done for the same reason — to destroy a commercial rival. The “official” history of World Wars I & II, the story we learned in school, is a myth.

 

As the title “The Myth of German Villainy” indicates, this book is about the mischaracterization of Germany as history’s ultimate “villain“. The “official” story of Western Civilization in the twentieth century casts Germany as the disturber of the peace in Europe, and the cause of both World War I and World War II, though the facts don’t bear that out.

 

During both wars, fantastic atrocity stories were invented by Allied propaganda to create hatred of the German people for the purpose of bringing public opinion around to support the wars. The “Holocaust” propaganda which emerged after World War II further solidified this image of Germany as history’s ultimate villain. But how true is this “official” story? Was Germany really history’s ultimate villain? In this book, the author paints a different picture. He explains that Germany was not the perpetrator of World War I nor World War II, but instead, was the victim of Allied aggression in both wars. The instability wrought by World War I made the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution in Russia possible, which brought world Communism into existence. Hitler and Germany recognized world Communism, with its base in the Soviet Union, as an existential threat to Western, Christian Civilization, and he dedicated himself and Germany to a death struggle against it. Far from being the disturber of European peace, Germany served as a bulwark which prevented Communist revolution from sweeping over Europe. The pity was that the United States and Britain did not see Communist Russia in the same light, ultimately with disastrous consequences for Western Civilization. The author believes that Britain and the United States joined the wrong side in the war.

 

 

About the Author

 

Benton L. Bradberry served as an officer and aviator in the U.S. Navy from 1955 to 1977, from near the beginning of the Cold War to near its end. His generation was inundated with anti-German propaganda and “Holocaust” lore. Then, in his role as a naval officer and pilot, he was immersed in anti-Communist propaganda and the war psychosis of the Cold War era. He has had a life-long fascination with the history of this period and has read deeply into all aspects of it. He also saw much of Europe during his Navy years and has travelled widely in Europe since. A natural skeptic, he long ago began to doubt that the “propaganda” told the whole story. He has spent years researching “the other side of the story” and has now written a book about it. The author is a graduate of the Naval Post Graduate School in Monterey, California with a degree in Political Science and International Relations.

 

____________________

 

 

Contents

 

Preface  

Chapter 1   –   The Myth of Germany as an Evil Nation  

Chapter 2   –   Aftermath of the War in Germany

Chapter 3   –   The Jewish Factor in the War

Chapter 4   –   The Russian Revolution of 1917

Chapter 5   –   The Red Terror

Chapter 6   –   The Bolshevik Revolution Spreads throughout Europe

Chapter 7   –   The Nation of Israel

Chapter 8   –   Jews in Weimar Germany

Chapter 9   –   Hitler & National Socialists Rise to Power

Chapter 10  –  National Socialism vs. Communism

Chapter 11  –  Jews Declare War on Nazi Germany

Chapter 12  –  The Nazis and the Zionists actually work together for Jewish Emigration out of Germany

Chapter 13  –  Life in Germany under Hitler

Chapter 14  –  Hitler Begins Reclamation of German Territory

Chapter 15  –  The 1936 Olympics

Chapter 16  –  “Anschluss.” The unification of Austria and Germany

Chapter 17  –  Germany annexes the Sudetenland

Chapter 18  –  War with Poland

Chapter 19  –  The Phony War

Chapter 20  –  Germany invades France through the Low Countries. The Phony War Ends.

Chapter 21  –  The Allied Goal? Destruction of Germany!

Chapter 22  –  Germany as Victim

Chapter 23  –  Winners and Losers

Bibliography

 

 

 

Preface

 

 

I served in the United States Navy from 1955 until 1977, mostly as a Navy pilot, and saw a lot of the world as a result. Aircraft carriers on which I served regularly visited European ports, as well as other ports around the world. I have also traveled extensively in the years since leaving the Navy.

 

After traveling around most of Europe, Germany emerges as my favorite country. During our visits there we found the German people to be pleasant, industrious, disciplined and civilized with many similarities to traditional Americans. They in no way resemble the stereotypes depicted in all the anti-Nazi movies, books and articles we have been subjected to over the years.

 

I was born in 1937, my generation grew up virtually inundated with anti-German propaganda. We were taught, quite literally, to hate the Germans as a people. Yet, Germans I have met or befriended through the years seem no different from other Europeans, or even Americans, and they seem no more inclined to violence and militarism than anyone else; if anything, less. I have never detected anything that might be considered intrinsically “wrong” with the German character. They are a highly cultured, highly civilized people in every respect. When studied objectively, even Germany’s leaders of the 1930s and 40s were essentially no different from other European leaders. They were only made out to be different by the relentless hate propaganda directed against them.

 

Germany suffered more than any other country by far as a result of World War II. Some 160 of her largest cities and towns were completely destroyed by the Allied bombing campaign and more than 21 million Germans lost their lives as a result of the war. Yet, no one wants to hear their tales of suffering, and no sympathy has been allowed the defeated and disgraced Germans. The anti-German propaganda has cultivated the general feeling that they got what they deserved.

 

The entire responsibility for starting both World War I and World War II, and for all the death and destruction resulting from them has been assigned to the Germans (though the facts don’t bear that out). Because they were the losers of both wars, they were never permitted to present their case before the world court, nor to tell their side of the story through any medium. The winners of wars, after all, write the history books. Neither did the true story of what happened during the war come out in the Nuremberg Trials. The Nuremberg Trials were nothing more than Soviet style show trials which violated every standard of traditional British and American justice. Their purpose was not to discover guilt or innocence, but to spread a legal gloss over a decision which had already been made to execute Germany’s leaders. The entire Nuremberg circus was a sham and a travesty.

 

The anti-German propaganda, used to create the climate of hatred that made the massive destruction and the mass slaughter of German civilians possible, continued relentlessly long after the war was over when it would seem natural for sober minded historians to begin to moderate their extreme views about Germany. The fantastic atrocity stories continue even today. One needs only to tune in to the History Channel to see them repeated again and again. In contrast, World War I was not long over before the atrocity stories attributed to the Germans during that war were exposed as the deliberate lies they were. Responsible men conducted thorough investigations and found that none of it was true. All the lurid stories were deliberately fabricated to win British public support for the war against Germany and also to bring America into the war.

 

But a different factor was in play after World War II to keep the phony horror stories alive which did not exist after World War I. After WWII, the Jews exploited the anti-German world sentiment, which they themselves had largely created with their propaganda, to justify the creation of their long sought after state of Israel as a homeland for the Jewish people. These manufactured horror stories also served to disarm critics of Jews as they set about to regain power and control in Europe.

 

Through manipulation of the international information media, the Jews won worldwide sympathy for themselves with their sensational stories of unique Jewish suffering at the hands of the cruel Germans. They claimed that Germany had followed a systematic plan to exterminate all of Europe’s Jews and that by war’s end had managed to kill 6 million of them. The alleged method was to round the Jews up from all over Europe, haul them in sealed trains to so-called “death camps” where they were herded into gas chambers and killed, and their bodies then burned in giant crematoria, with, conveniently, no forensic evidence of what had happened left behind. In the absence of forensic evidence, eye witness testimony, no matter how bizarre, sufficed to convict Germany and to make her the pariah of civilized nations.

 

The judges at the Nuremberg Trials were themselves not immune to the torrents of anti-German hate propaganda, and were already predisposed before the trials ever began to believe any horror story, no matter how fantastic, about the Germans. Another factor which preordained the outcome of the trials was that the accusers also served as investigators, prosecutors and final judges. Moreover, the trials were also permeated throughout with an atmosphere of Jewish vengeance seeking. Just behind the Gentile front men, most of the lawyers, prosecutors, and investigators were Jews. Hundreds of Jews who could barely speak English disported themselves in American Army officer uniforms. Two of the eight Nuremberg judges were Jews, Robert Falco of France, and Lt. Col. A.F. Volchkov (real name Berkman) of the Soviet Union. The General Prosecutor for the “High Court” was Dr. Jakob Meistner, a Jew. Their dominance and control of the trials was blatant. Even the hangman for the 10 Nazi leaders sentenced to death, Master Sergeant John C. Woods, was a Jew. As a demonstration of just how blatant their dominance was, they scheduled the hangings to take place on October 16, 1946, the Jewish holiday of “Purim.” In the Book of Esther, the 10 sons of Haman, an enemy of the Jews, were hanged on Purim day. On Purim day in 1946, 10 German leaders were hanged. This was obviously not a coincidence.

 

According to Louis Marschalko, a wartime Hungarian journalist who wrote about the trials:

Out of 3,000 people employed on the staff at the Nuremberg Courts, 2,400 were Jews.

The Holocaust story that we all know so well today was developed during the Nuremberg Trials.

 

By skillfully cultivating and propagating this Holocaust story, the Jews have been able to extort hundreds of billions of dollars out of Germany, as well as the United States, much of which was used to fund the new state of Israel. The claim that the Jews in Israel “made the desert bloom” was true. They did it with German and American money. They are now hard at work extorting more billions out of other European countries in what has been contemptuously but correctly called “the Holocaust industry.

 

Even today, 70 years after the war, more than half a million so-called “Holocaust survivors” living mainly in Israel and the United States receive lifetime pensions from the German government. And what is a “Holocaust survivor?” Any Jew who lived anywhere in German controlled territory at any time during the war, whether living in a concentration camp or in the lap of luxury, is a Holocaust survivor and therefore eligible for a German pension. Moreover, any Jew who was forced to leave Europe during the Nazi era (even if he is a Hollywood producer) is a Holocaust survivor, and also eligible for a German pension. Some 4.39 million Jews were originally designated “Holocaust survivors.” Christian survivors of the war, no matter how horrific their experience are not eligible for pensions. “Shoah” is the Hebrew word for Holocaust. It has been joked around that “there’s no business like shoah business.” The entire Holocaust racket has become nothing so much as a vast shakedown of European countries, especially Germany. The Holocaust story has other uses as well. It is routinely invoked to disarm the general public from defending itself against Jewish predations. Prime Minister Netanyahu regularly invokes the Holocaust to justify Israeli attacks upon its neighbors, and the confiscation of its neighbors’ lands.

 

Keeping this gravy train moving requires the continued legitimization of Jews as history’s ultimate victim group, which, in turn, requires an ultimate victimizer of the Jews, and Germany has been designated to fill that role in perpetuity. The Jewish controlled History Channel, or the “Hitler Channel,” as it is sometimes derisively called, owes its success to endlessly repeating these anti-German propaganda programs. Any modification or revision of this carefully cultivated image of Germany as the evil monster of history, and particularly as the evil victimizer of the Jews, would threaten the entire Holocaust story. Therefore this image is jealously and carefully guarded by the Jewish controlled press and information media, and woe upon anyone who dares to question it. Anyone who does so is immediately attacked and smeared as a deranged anti-Semite. As a result of Jewish pressure, some 17 countries have made questioning, or even investigating, the Holocaust a crime which can get one a prison sentence.

 

The Jews are also unwilling to relinquish or even to moderate their quest for revenge. Old men who have suffered all their lives as fugitives, are still being tracked down as “war criminals,” and either “brought to justice,” or summarily murdered on the spot. (The MOSSAD, Israel’s equivalent of our CIA, is an assassination organization.) The only crime these old men may be guilty of was being an officer or soldier in the German army during the war.

 

But, why, one might ask, amidst all the carnage, death and destruction that occurred during World War II, has the so-called Holocaust emerged as the central atrocity story? Approximately 55 million people died during the war, only a tiny percentage of them Jews ― surely only a fraction of the 6 million claimed. All other combatant nationalities have long since put the war behind them and have tried to make peace with their former enemies, but not the Jews! More than two thirds of a century has gone by, but the Jews are still nourishing their grievances, still building Holocaust museums and memorials (not at their own expense, but at the expense of host governments), and still investigating new ways to extort money out of various countries as “compensation.” But why should only the Jews be compensated? Scores of millions of other people across Europe lost everything in the war.

 

The “Holocaust” has evolved over the years to become the national myth of the Jewish people with all the characteristics of a religion, complete with its very own Satan ― Hitler. The Holocaust myth is the glue that holds the Jewish people together as a distinct nationality, and because of that they carefully guard and protect it. As a consequence, the poor Germans are consigned in perpetuity to the role of history’s evil monster, regardless of what the actual facts may be.

 

But even if all the stories of German atrocities during WWII were true in every detail (which they are not), they would still not compare in their inhumanity to the atrocities committed against the Germans. The indiscriminate saturation bombing of German cities, the brutal expulsion of entire German populations after the war, the Allied imposed postwar deprivations, the Soviet massacres and political liquidations, simply dwarf the Holocaust in their destruction of human life and their destruction of the accumulated works of human civilization. Any final accounting and balancing of the conduct of all combatants during WWII could only result in the exculpation of Germany as “uniquely” barbarous in her methods of waging war, or in her treatment of subject populations.

 

The German people were devastated by the war, to a greater extent than any other participant, including the Jews, while at the same time they have been stigmatized as the evil, predatory perpetrators of the war. They have been made to pay a terrible price for atrocities during World War II which very probably never occurred, or at least, never occurred to the extent alleged. It is becoming clearer as time goes by that the Germans were the real victims of both World Wars I and II, and continue to be.

 

 

 

Chapter 1

 

The Myth of Germany as an Evil Nation 

 

 

As the result of losing two apocalyptic world wars, Germany has acquired a reputation as the evil nation of Europe, and, perhaps the evil nation of all time. Just mentioning the word “German” still brings forth an image in the mind’s eye of robotic, goose-stepping storm troopers, under the command of stiff-necked Prussian officers, ready to march off to inflict gratuitous murder and destruction upon their peace loving neighbors. We have been brainwashed by relentless propaganda to regard the Germans as intrinsically militaristic, aggressive, brutish, racist and anti-Semitic, with a predilection for blind obedience to authority figures. Hundreds of Hollywood movies, relentless Holocaust propaganda, and countless books and magazine articles have permanently reinforced this negative image of Germany in the popular mind. Rational motives for the inexplicable horrors Germans are accused of having routinely committed are not required. It is axiomatic that their evil nature explains it all.

 

Consider the movie, “Schindler’s List,” by the Jewish director, Stephen Spielberg, for example. The Nazi commandant of the concentration camp (supposedly the Plaszow camp outside of Krakow, not far from Auschwitz), is standing shirtless on the balcony of his house with a hunting rifle over his bare shoulders. The rifle is equipped with a telescopic sight. In the movie, the house is located on a hill above the camp so that he can look down on the throngs of prisoners milling around in the compound below. He lifts the rifle to his shoulder and through the telescope begins casually scanning from one prisoner to another. The image through the telescope now fills the movie screen. The crosshairs of the scope stop on a randomly selected prisoner. He pulls the trigger and the prisoner drops to the ground, dead.

 

mogv-chapter-01-2442-schindlers-list-sniper-scene

[Image — The actor Ralph Fiennes as Amon Goeth in the fictional story Schindler’s List, picking off camp inmates from his balcony.]

 

The screen then cuts back to the Nazi commandant to show bored insouciance as he actuates the bolt of his rifle and casually raises it back to his shoulder. He fires again, and again a prisoner drops to the ground, dead. Bored with his “target practice,” he turns his attention to the beautiful, sexy, naked woman lying on a bed just inside the house from the balcony. The woman is purportedly one of his Jewish housemaids selected from the camp, who also apparently serves as his sex slave. His face expresses disdainful, though lackadaisical, cynicism.

 

The point of the shootings, as well as bringing in the naked, Jewish housemaid, is to show the Nazi officer as totally depraved, without conscience, morality, or empathy for other humans; in short, a psychopath. It is presumed, of course, that the murdered prisoners were all Jews. Two popular Jewish themes are combined here: Nazi evil and Jewish persecution.

 

This episode is entirely fictional, based on a novel by Thomas Keneally, an Australian, who only visited the concentration camps once in 1980. No such actual event as described above has ever been recorded, yet the vast majority of movie goers swallow it whole and accept it as actual history.

 

The real Plaszow camp was located on the other side of a hill from the commandant’s house, and completely out of sight from the commandant’s balcony. It would have been impossible for him to shoot down into the compound as shown in the movie even if he had been inclined to do so, which is highly unlikely. The actual commandant of Plaszow, Amon Goeth, on which the character in the movie was based, lived in the house with his fiancé Ruth Kalder, with whom he had a child. Ruth said that they intended to marry but were unable to do so due to the chaos at the end of the war. She had her name and the child’s name changed to Goeth after the war with the help of Amon Goeth’s father. Amon Goeth was hanged after the war by the Polish government primarily for being a member of the Nazi party and a member of the Waffen-SS, not for shooting prisoners. Ruth described Amon Goeth as a cultured man who had a beautiful singing voice. Goeth did, indeed, have two Jewish housemaids, selected from the camp while he was commandant, but there is no information that he had untoward relations with them. That story was only included to add spice to the movie.

 

mogv-chapter-01-2429-sophies-choice-youtube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaPBzhEsCL0

 

Another example is the movie, “Sophie’s Choice,” by another Jewish director, Alan J. Pakula, in which “Sophie” and her two small children are sent to Auschwitz (Auschwitz is the holy temple of Holocaust lore). During the “selection” process (the “selection” is now one of the “stations of the cross” of the Holocaust religion) immediately after their arrival, Sophie is told by a stereotypically evil Nazi officer (supposedly Dr. Joseph Mengele of Auschwitz notoriety) that she can only keep one of her children and that the other must go to the gas chamber. She is forced to choose which one to keep and which one to be sent to the gas chamber, hence, “Sophie’s choice.” The evil Nazi officer provides no reason or explanation for requiring one child to die or for forcing her to make this heart rending choice. That he is an “evil” Nazi is presumed to be explanation enough. This preposterous movie was based on a novel by the American Southern writer William Styron, who had no firsthand knowledge of the camps. Auschwitz was simply used as the setting for a tale which came out of his imagination. Nothing of the sort ever happened in real life. Yet, evil Nazi stories such as these have long been a staple in Hollywood. The movie-going public has been so conditioned by this poppycock that fiction has become fact in the public mind. We have all been brainwashed to accept such absurdities without skepticism. Germans are “evil,” so they do “evil” things. No further explanation needed.

 

Yet, Germany was not always seen in this light. The image of Germany as a sinister, predatory, warlike nation only took root in the twentieth century. Nineteenth century Germany, by contrast, was seen as a place of peace and enlightenment. The English historian, Frederic William Maitland, described the way the English people saw the Germans during the nineteenth century:

“…it was usual and plausible to paint the German as an unpractical, dreamy, sentimental being, looking out with mild blue eyes into a cloud of music and metaphysics and tobacco smoke.”

The highly influential French writer and Salon matron, Madame de Stael, portrayed the Germans during the period of the Napoleonic Wars as a nation of;

poets and thinkers, a race of kindly, impractical, other-worldly dreamers without national prejudices and disinclined to war.”

 

The Americans also held a benign opinion of the Germans prior to the twentieth century. The American historian, Henry Cord Meyer, wrote,

“…whether seen in their newly united nation [Germany was united into one nation in 1871] or in this country [German immigrants in the United States], the Germans were generally regarded as methodical and energetic people who were models of progress, while in their devotion to music, education, science, and technology they aroused the admiration and emulation of Americans.”

 

In 1905 Andrew Dickson White, a noted American historian, educator, and United States Ambassador to Germany, wrote just nine years before the outbreak of World War I:

Germany, from a great confused mass of warriors and thinkers and workers, militant at cross-purposes, wearing themselves out in vain struggles, and preyed upon by malevolent neighbors, has become [after consolidation] a great power in arms, in art, in science, in literature; a fortress of high thought; a guardian of civilization; the natural ally of every nation which seeks the better development of humanity.”

 

The German people have historically made great contributions in every sphere of cultural, intellectual, and scientific achievement. In the field of music, there were such eighteenth century geniuses as Bach, Hayden, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert and Schumann, to name a few. This musical genius continued in the nineteenth century with the Strausses, Mahler and Richard Wagner. There were the literary contributions of Goethe and Schiller; the historical works of Ranke and Niebuhr; the philosophical studies of Kant and Hegel; and the great scientific contributions of Alexander von Humboldt and William Conrad Roentgen. These are only a few examples of a very long list. The Prussian system of higher education and the cultural flowering which characterized Prussia during the years following the Napoleonic wars greatly influenced both Europe and America. The American public school system as well as our university system was deliberately modeled after the Prussian public school system and university system. Germany was admired by the world as a center of learning, for its high culture and for its achievements in every field; but also for its culture of honesty, hard work, orderliness and thrift, which existed even at the lowest level of society.

 

British scholars and journalists had been very favorably disposed toward all things German, including their history, culture, and institutions throughout the nineteenth century. The highly respected Cambridge historian Herbert Butterfield commented extensively on Britain’s high regard for Germany.

In England the view once prevailed that German history was particularly the history of freedom, for it was a story that comprised federation, parliament, autonomous cities, Protestantism, and a law of liberty carried by German colonies to the Slavonic east. In those days it was the Latin States which were considered to be congenial to authoritarianism, clinging to the Papacy in Italy, the Inquisition in Spain and the Bonapartist dictatorships in militaristic France. The reversal of this view in the twentieth century, and its replacement by a common opinion that Germany had been the aggressor and enemy of freedom throughout all the ages, will no doubt be the subject of historical research itself someday, especially as it seems to have coincided so closely with a change in British foreign policy … Up to the early 1900’s when historical scholarship in England came to its peak in men like Acton and Maitland, words can hardly describe the admiration for Germany ― and the confessed discipleship ― which existed amongst English historians.”

 

And then British author Thomas Arnold (June 13, 1795 – June 12, 1842) saw Germany not as a nation with a unique predisposition toward authoritarianism and regimentation, but rather as a “cradle of law, virtue, and freedom,” and considered it a “distinction of the first rank” that the English belonged to the Germanic family of peoples. The following photos and drawings represent the way in which the world saw Germany during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, right up to the beginning of World War I. Pre-WWI Germany was seen as a peaceful land of fairy tales and dreamy castles, and of industrious, law abiding, disciplined people.

 

mogv-chapter-01-2405-castle-girl-and-boy-in-traditional-dress

 

mogv-chapter-01-2406-men-and-women-in-traditional-dress

 

mogv-chapter-01-2407-dancing-in-town-square

 

mogv-chapter-01-2408-german-girls-marching-in-line

 

 

Germany’s positive image changes over night

 

This view of Germany was to change almost overnight with the outbreak of World War I. After the war began in 1914 a grotesque image of a rapacious, bloodthirsty and uniquely aggressive Germany quickly took form and became the stereotypical image of Germany in Europe and America. This new image of Germany was the direct result of a virulent anti-German propaganda campaign conducted by the British government and later joined by the United States government in which deliberate and systematic lies, distortions and false atrocity stories were disseminated to the British and American publics. The emotions of both the British and American publics were deliberately whipped up to a fever pitch of hatred for the “Hun.” A pathological hostility towards all things German, which later became such a familiar and integral part of Western thinking about Germany, had its birth in this skillful propaganda campaign. After World War Two, historian Harry Paxton Howard examined this transformation of Germany’s reputation which began immediately after the start of WWI.

 

It was made out, he said, that Germany was not only evil but had always been that way, and that Germany, contrary to the facts, had always been the historical enemy of Europe and America. He wrote:

Actually, in the literal sense of the word, the biggest job of revising history was done during the First World War when our ‘histories’ were completely revised to show that Germany had always been our enemy, that Germany had started the war in 1914, that Germany had even started the Franco-Prussian War in 1870, and that in the Revolutionary War we had not been fighting the British but the Hessians ― not to mention such things as the Germans cutting the hands off Belgian babies, instead of the Belgians cutting off the hands of Congolese. This was a real revision of our histories which has distorted the American mind for more than forty years.” Harry Paxton Howard.

 

All belligerents, of course, including Germany, used propaganda against their enemies, as all belligerents have done in all wars throughout history, but the propaganda efforts of Germany and the Central Powers were amateurish and ineffectual compared to the British. In their propaganda efforts, the Germans tended to appeal to reason instead of to the emotions.

 

They never portrayed their enemies as bloodthirsty, inhuman beasts. The Allies, Great Britain in particular, by contrast, proved themselves masters at adroitly manipulating world opinion by widespread propagation of fantastic tales of German villainy. From the beginning of the war, stories of German atrocities filled British and American newspapers. (American newspapers depended at that time on British news services for most of their news stories about Europe, which came across undersea cables controlled by Britain. The Germans had no access to the American media. Great Britain made sure of that by cutting Germany’s six trans-Atlantic cables to America.)

 

The first atrocity stories came out of the German march through Belgium at the beginning of the war. Germany’s purpose was not to attack Belgium, per se, but to pass through Belgium in order to outflank French defenses and then make a drive toward Paris. This strategy was known as the Schlieffen Plan, which the Germans believed was the only way to achieve a quick victory over France.

 

Germany’s “violation” of neutral Belgium served as Britain’s pretext for going to war against Germany, though the decision to go to war for other reasons (mainly economic) had already been made. Belgium was only a pretext. To enter the war, it was necessary to win public support, and the propaganda opportunities resulting from Germany’s invasion of Belgium, as well as the fabricated stories of German atrocities in Belgium served that purpose. “Eyewitnesses” were found who described hairy knuckled Huns in Pickelhaube helmets tossing Belgian babies in the air and catching them on their bayonets as they marched along, singing war songs. Stories of German soldiers amputating the hands of Belgian boys were widely reported (reputedly to prevent them from firing rifles). Tales of women with their breasts cut off multiplied even faster. There were also tales of crucifixions of Allied soldiers. Europeans and Americans were more religious then than they are today and the crucifixion stories aroused outrage. (It should be mentioned that of all forms of evidence accepted in modern courts of law, eyewitness testimony is considered the least reliable.)

 

But rape stories were the favorite of all atrocity tales. One “eyewitness” described how the Germans dragged twenty young women out of their houses in a captured Belgian town and stretched them on tables in the village square, where each was raped by at least twelve “Huns” while the rest of the soldiers watched and cheered.

 

After being fed a steady diet of this kind of propaganda, the British public veritably demanded revenge against the loathsome Hun. A group of Belgians toured the United States (at British government expense) telling these stories to Americans. (Britain wanted to draw the United States into the war.) President Woodrow Wilson solemnly received the group in the White House.

 

The propaganda portrayed Britain as “a knight on a white horse” coming to the defense of violated, neutral Belgium. This was cynical manipulation of public opinion, of course, because if Germany had not violated Belgian neutrality, Britain would have done so without a second thought.

 

Germany angrily denied all of these stories. So did American reporters who were with the German army and knew that they were lies. But these denials did not find their way into American newspapers. The British controlled what went into American papers and it was the British who were generating the atrocity stories. To enhance the credibility of these fantastic atrocity stories, the British government asked Viscount Bryce early in 1915 to head a royal commission to conduct an investigation. The British government, of course, intended that Bryce would support this false propaganda, which he obediently did. Bryce was a well known historian with a good reputation in America. He not only had served as the British ambassador in Washington, but had written several complimentary books about the American government. The British knew that he was highly respected and admired in America, and that he had a reputation for rectitude and honesty. America would believe whatever he said. Bryce was also intensely loyal to his own country and therefore perfect for the job.

 

mogv-chapter-01-2410-soldier-with-speared-churub

 

False anti-German propaganda poster of World War I

 

The propaganda poster shown at left [above] and in the following pages are examples of the way in which the British portrayed their German foes — always as brutish, barbaric murderers of women and children.

 

Following these British propaganda posters are German propaganda posters against the British, French and Russians. Note the different styles. The Germans do not portray their foes as barbaric murderers.

 

mogv-chapter-01-2411-british-empire-union-propaganda-poster

mogv-chapter-01-2413-british-propaganda-poster-destroy-this-mad-brute

mogv-chapter-01-2414-british-propaganda-only-the-navy-can-stop-this

mogv-chapter-01-2415-british-propaganda-stop-him

mogv-chapter-01-2416-british-propaganda-cutting-off-hands

mogv-chapter-01-2417-american-propaganda-remember-belgium

An innocent Belgian girl about to be raped by a Hun.

 

Following are German propaganda posters directed against the British, French and Russians. Note that the Germans use ridicule against their enemies but do not portray them as inhuman beast.

 

mogv-chapter-01-2418-german-propaganda

The cartoon characters represent (L to R): Great Britain, France and Russia, and far right, Germany.

mogv-chapter-01-2419-german-propaganda

mogv-chapter-01-2420-german-propaganda-ein-42er-grubl

mogv-chapter-01-2421-german-propaganda-alles-geht-wie-am-schnurchen

mogv-chapter-01-2426-german-propaganda-gruss-aus-der-kriegsschule

mogv-chapter-01-2427-german-propaganda-gruss-aus-deutschlands-schwerer-zeit

mogv-chapter-01-2437-german-propaganda-nur-nicht-drangeln-es-kommi-ein-jeder-ran

[Patience! You all will get it!]

mogv-chapter-01-2438-german-propaganda-lieb-vaterland-magst-ruhig-sein

[Beloved fatherland, relax!]

 

Bryce and his six fellow commissioners, all lawyers, historians and legal scholars, “analyzed,” if you can call it that, 1,200 depositions of “eyewitnesses” who claimed to have seen these German atrocities first hand. Almost all of the eyewitness accounts came from Belgians who had left Belgium for England as refugees, though some accounts also came from British soldiers in France. The commission never interrogated a single one of these eyewitnesses, but relied on their written statements instead (shades of the Nuremberg Trials after the next war). Since there was a war on, there were no “on site” investigations of any reported atrocity. Not a single witness was identified by name, including the soldiers who had provided written accounts. Yet, the commission officially confirmed that all the atrocity stories, no matter how fantastic, were true. This bogus investigation was just another part of Britain’s anti-German propaganda campaign.

mogv-chapter-01-2439-the-bryce-report-and-james-bryce

[Image — The Bryce Report and its author, James Bryce.]

 

The “Bryce Report” was released on May 13, 1915, and the British government made sure it went to every newspaper in America. The impact was phenomenal, especially coming just after the torpedoing of the British liner Lusitania which caused the deaths of 135 Americans.

 

Americans from coast to coast were outraged. A wave of revulsion for all things German swept the country. Hatred of Germans reached fever pitch. Suddenly the American public was clamoring for war. (There is well founded suspicion that the Lusitania was set up as a decoy by the First Lord of the Admiralty, Winston Churchill, deliberately exposing it to a German submarine attack for the purpose of bringing America into the war).

 

But there were skeptics of the Bryce Report. In England, Sir Roger Casement called the report a lie, and wrote a report of his own refuting it, though no one paid much attention to it. The American lawyer, Clearance Darrow, was so skeptical that he travelled to France in 1915 and searched in vain for a single eyewitness who could confirm even one of the Bryce stories. Increasingly dubious, Darrow announced that he would pay $1,000, equivalent to around $25,000 today, to anyone who could produce a Belgian boy whose hands had been amputated by a German soldier, or any other Belgian or French victim who had been mutilated by German troops. None were found.

 

The “proofs” provided by the Bryce Committee in its investigation, as well as the methods employed in gathering them, violated every elementary rule of evidence. Careful scholars have long since demonstrated that the entire report was made up of nothing more than distortions and outright falsehoods. But Britain was determined to pull the United States into the war and Bryce and his colleagues were willing accomplices in that effort. They justified their lies and exaggerations because it served the higher cause of Mother England. After the war most historians dismissed 99 percent of Bryce’s atrocities as fabrications. One called the report “in itself one of the worst atrocities of the war.” “After the war,” recounts Thomas Fleming in his book Illusion of Victory;

historians who sought to examine the documentation for Bryce’s stories were told that the files had mysteriously disappeared.

 

mogv-chapter-01-2441-kaeiser-and-the-corpse-factory

[Image — Kaiser (to a 1917 recruit). “And don’t forget that your Kaiser will find a use for you—alive or dead.Punch, 25 April 1917.]

 

As the war drew on, another fabricated story was widely circulated. It was reported that the Germans were operating a “corpse factory” where the bodies of both German and Allied soldiers killed in battle were supposedly melted down for fats and other products useful to the German war effort. The Germans were accused of making soap out of human fat. Human skins were used to make fine leather goods such as lampshades, driving gloves and riding breeches. The bones of these corpses were said to have been ground up and used as fertilizer on German farms.

 

A detailed account of this so-called “corpse factory” appeared in the highly respected British newspaper, The Times, on April 17, 1917.

 

According to the story, trains full of corpses arrived at a large factory. The bodies were attached to hooks connected to an endless chain. The article carefully described the process inside the corpse factory.

The bodies are transported on this endless chain into a long, narrow compartment, where they pass through a bath which disinfects them. They then go through a drying chamber, and finally are automatically carried into a digester or great cauldron, in which they are dropped by an apparatus which detaches from the chain. In the digester they remain from six to eight hours, and are treated by steam, which breaks them up while they are slowly stirred by the machinery. From this treatment result several products. The fats are broken up into stearin, a form of tallow, and oils, which require to be redistilled before they can be used. The process of distillation is carried out by boiling the oil with carbonate of soda, and some of the by-products resulting from this are used by German soap makers. The oil distillery and refinery lie in the south-eastern corner of the works. The refined oil is sent out in small casks like those used for petroleum, and is of a yellowish brown color.” Note the meticulous detail.

 

The story was a total fabrication, but it was a “plausible” story, especially with all the detail, and it was not possible for the Germans to completely refute it while the war was still going on. After the war, of course, the story was exposed as the lie it was. No such corpse factory existed. It is interesting that the story of making soap out of bodies emerged again during World War II when the Germans supposedly made soap out of Jewish corpses. That lie is still widely believed and remains a staple of Jewish Holocaust propaganda. The “lampshades out of human skin” story also had its origin in World War I and emerged again during World War II when Germans were supposedly making lampshades out of Jewish skin. There was nothing to it, yet it also remains a staple of Jewish Holocaust propaganda.

 

The purpose of war propaganda,” historian Thomas Fleming, in his book “The Illusion of Victory,” observes;

as peddled by both the Anglo and American elite, was to create a widespread public image of Germans as ‘monsters capable of appalling sadism’ ― thereby coating an appeal to murderous collective hatred with a lacquer of sanctimony.”

The trick,” said Fleming, “is to leave the target audience at once shivering in horror at a spectacle of sub-human depravity, panting with a visceral desire for vengeance, and rapturously self-righteous about the purity of its humane motives. People who succumb to it are easily subsumed into a hive mind of officially sanctioned hatred, and prepared to perpetrate crimes even more hideous than those that they believe typify the enemy.”

 

mogv-chapter-01-2440-book-the-illusion-of-victory

[Image — The Illusion of Victory by Thomas Fleming (2003)]

 

The Bryce Report as well as all the other anti-German propaganda unquestionably helped England win the war. It convinced millions of Americans and other neutrals that the Germans were beasts in human form, and this, as much as anything else, helped bring America into the war. But there were adverse consequences to this lurid atrocity propaganda campaign. It poisoned public opinion against the Germans to such an extent that it could not be undone. It was an obvious factor, for example, in the British decision to maintain the total blockade of Germany for seven months after the war was over, which, incidentally, was a violation of international law. The blockade caused a million German civilians to starve to death, and unbearable suffering of millions more. The blockade itself was far and away the greatest atrocity of World War I, though it receives very little publicity, and it was done, not by the evil Germans, but by the saintly British.

 

By creating blind hatred of Germany, the anti-German propaganda campaign also contributed to the harsh peace terms imposed on Germany at the end of the war, which then sowed the seeds of World War II. Though historians and other scholars have exposed these German atrocity stories as nonsense, the image of German villainy has remained fixed.

 

The benign world opinion of Germany which existed right up to 1914 was replaced overnight by the myth of unique German savagery which left a permanent residue of Germanophobia deep in Western minds. This explains why “our boys” were so willing to obliterate whole German cities and kill hundreds of thousands of German civilians with air bombardments during the Second World War. This hate propaganda, as false as it was, also had the effect of totally demoralizing the German people.

 

 

[END of Part 01]

 

 

======================================

 

Click to download a PDF of this post (xx MB). (Available soon)

 

 

 

_____________________

 

Version History

 

Version 1Oct 1, 2016 — Created post.

worlds-first-anti-holocaust-convention-1979-cover-ver-2

 

[In this article, written for the Dec. 1979 edition of the revisionist journal, Instauration, an interesting account is given of the first ever, “Anti-Holocaust” convention, with speakers including: Robert Faurisson from France; John Bennett from Australia; Udo Walendy from Germany; Louis FitzGibbon from Britain; Arthur Butz and James Martin from the US. This was held in Los Angeles and organized by the Institute for Historical Review  —  KATANA.]

 

 

 

Instauration – Dec, 1979

 

The World’s First

 

Anti-Holocaust Convention

 

 

 

 

 

 

Text

 

 

World’s First Anti-Holocaust Convention

Instauration, Dec. 1979

 

A great and historic weekend — $50,000 offered for proof of gassing.

 

 

Labor Day weekend marked what may be the end of one historical epoch and the beginning of another — the end of the domination of the Six Million myth over the Western mind and the start of a new wave of historical revisionism that might well signal the reappearance of truth in history.

 

The Revisionist Convention of the Institute for Historical Review was held at Northrop Institute of Technology in Los Angeles. Speakers came from all over the world: Robert Faurisson from France; John Bennett from Australia; Udo Walendy from Germany; Louis FitzGibbon from Britain; Arthur Butz and James Martin from the US.

 

The proceedings began on Friday, August 31. Some of those present already knew each other. For the most part, however, the faces belonged to new converts to the anti-Holocaust cause. A significant proportion of the attendance were engineers — people with a liking for hard facts who instinctively resist overblown claims and sly innuendo. Also present were several physicists, a brace of computer programmers and one commercial airline pilot. The convention was dedicated to the memory of the founding father of revisionism, Dr. Harry Elmer Barnes, who passed into the realm of eternal history in 1968.*

*[Actually, Dr. Harry Elmer Barnes passed away on Aug. 25, I969]

worlds-first-anti-holocaust-convention-1979-2037-james-martin-left-with-harry-barnes-1954

[Image] James Martin (left) with Harry Barnes, 1954.

 

Saturday, the meeting began in earnest in the Northrop auditorium.

 

The delegates were formally welcomed by Willis Carto, one of the organizers of the Institute for Historical Review and the dynamic force behind Liberty Lobby. He then yielded to the permanent chairman George Resch, a libertarian investment counsellor associated with the Institute for Human Studies in San Francisco.

 

worlds-first-anti-holocaust-convention-1979-2033-willis-carto-at-the-podium

[Image] Willis Cartos (undated photo).

 

The first speaker was Dr. James Martin, life-long friend and colleague of Barnes, who presented a lively and informative chronology of revisionism. The only professional historian at the meeting, Martin remarked that we need not worry that very few present-day revisionists are professional historians. After all, not one of the Holocaust promoters is! Martin asserted many modern historians privately accept the truth of the revisionist argument, but are afraid to come out and say so. “There are two ‘Six Million’ atrocity stories,” Martin stated:

In Soviet propaganda the gassed six million are Slavs, not Jews. The Kremlin uses the myth to buttress the Soviet policy of keeping Germany divided and disarmed.

 

Dr. Arthur Butz, author of The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, presented a fascinating account of developments in the revisionist field since publication of his book in 1976.

 

worlds-first-anti-holocaust-convention-1979-2041-dr-arthur-butz-and-his-book-the-hoax

[Image] Dr. Arthur Butz, author of The Hoax of the Twentieth Century.

 

Butz described the continuing persecution of individuals in Europe who dared to question the Holocaust. Manfred Roeder, the German attorney, was expelled from the German bar, prosecuted for writing the foreword to Thies Christophersen’s Auschwitz Lie, and had to flee the country. Christophersen himself was given a suspended jail sentence for writing the truth about Auschwitz and faces a further trial upon his return to West Germany.

 

worlds-first-anti-holocaust-convention-1979-2071-auschwitz-a-personal-account-cover

[Image] Thies Christophersen’s Auschwitz Lie with a foreword by Manfred Roeder

See: https://katana17.wordpress.com/2013/05/05/auschwitz-a-personal-account-by-thies-christophersen/

 

Butz also explained that Dr. Wilhelm Staglich, author of the recently published Auschwitz Myth and a retired Hamburg judge who served in an anti-aircraft battery at Auschwitz, has also been subject to legal attack. His pension was reduced by 20% for five years for contradicting death camp atrocity tales.

 

worlds-first-anti-holocaust-convention-1979-2060-dr-wilhelm-staglich-pics

[Image] Dr. Wilhelm Stäglich, (1916 – 2006) German judge and historian, was an important revisionist writer, most notably for his detailed study, Der Auschwitz-Mythos (The Auschwitz Myth). During the Second World War he served from mid-July to mid-September 1944 as an Ordonnanzoffizier (orderly officer) on the staff of an anti-aircraft detachment stationed near the Auschwitz camp. As part of his duties, he maintained contact with the SS camp command, and had unlimited access to the Auschwitz main camp, where the command was headquartered.

 

When he appealed, the judge ruled it was no good introducing the books, or articles of Butz and Faurisson as evidence, because Butz and Faurisson were pseudonyms! As for the German translation of the Hoax of the Twentieth Century, Butz said it has been placed on the Bonn government’s “Index“, which means that it may not be advertised, or sold to minors.

 

Butz went on to relate that late in 1978 a respected German historian, Professor Hellmut Diwald, had published his massive History of the Germans by Propylaen, a division of Axel Springer’s publishing combine.

 

worlds-first-anti-holocaust-convention-1979-2069-professor-hellmut-diwalds-book-history-of-the-germans

[Image] Professor Hellmut Diwald’s book “Geschichte der Deutschen” (History of the Germans).

 

On two pages, Diwald wrote some critical things about the Holocaust story. The press shrieked for censorship. Golo Mann, Thomas Mann’s half- Jewish son, declared:

These two pages are the most monstrous that I have yet to read in a German book since 1945.

 

The publisher responded to the clamor by recalling the first edition of the book and substituting an altered version in which the offending pages were rewritten. Springer promised that this was only the start of an extensive job of rewriting and that eventually the history would be “unrecognizable.

 

In the English-speaking world, Butz said, most of the efforts to suppress revisionism have been through the “curtain of silence” technique. But from time to time there had been official government intervention. Harwood’s work Did Six Million Really Die? was banned in South Africa at the behest of the Jewish Board of Deputies, which published an “Answer to Harwood” called Six Million Did Die. The German translation of Harwood’s book was placed on the German “verboten-for-young- peopleIndex in late 1978.

 

The Institute of Jewish Affairs in London published in the psychopolitical journal Patterns of Prejudice the only critique of Butz worthy of the name that has appeared anywhere in the world. In April 1977, Butz wrote the magazine Index on Censorship in London, which is supposed to defend academic freedom, and followed up his letter with a personal visit in the summer of 1977. No action was taken.

 

Butz concluded his lecture by underlining the unacademic behavior of academics toward the controversy. He gave as an example Professor Wolfe of New York University who wrote to the New York Times condemning a book which he called Fabrication of a Hoax. He demanded that Butz be brought up on charges of “academic incompetence.” Clearly, the man had never read the book and had only seen a New York Times mention of it, where the title had been incorrectly reported. In an afterthought, Butz philosophized:

I’ve never been able to understand the hostile reaction from Zionist groups. Jews should be elated to discover that large numbers of their people were not deliberately destroyed.

 

Next on the program was Udo Walendy, the German translator of Butz’s book, who gave his first English-language lecture. His subject was faked atrocity photographs, of which he showed many dramatic examples.

 

worlds-first-anti-holocaust-convention-1979-2056-udo-walendy-pics

[Image] Udo Walendy, born in 1927 in Germany, is one of the most prolific revisionist researchers, writers and publishers in the world. He has written numerous books and since the early 1970s has been publishing a German periodical called Historische Tatsachen (Historical Facts), so far encompassing over 110 issues — including the German version of Did Six Million Really Die? and the German language version of the first Leuchter Report.

 

Walendy, who had been fired from his teaching job, because of his political views, exhibited an enlargement of one widely reproduced photograph of supposed victims of Dachau gas ovens. When it was established that Dachau never had any gas ovens, investigation proved the picture actually showed German corpses collected after the saturation bombing of Dresden.

 

On Saturday evening the convention members were “entertained” with a variety of Holocaust propaganda films, including Genocide (Britain), The Nuremberg Trials (USA) and Nacht und Nebel (France). Butz, Walendy and Faurisson presented a critique of each film in turn, but it was not long before viewers themselves were able to decipher the routine formula of the films, since each used almost exactly the same stills and clips.

 

The “martyred Warsaw ghetto boy” (now alive, well and well off in Britain) appeared in the films looking as plaintive as ever. As Faurisson pointed out, the commentary did not state that he had been arrested in a crackdown on juvenile thieves.

 

worlds-first-anti-holocaust-convention-1979-2057-martyred-warsaw-ghetto-boy

[Image] “Martyred Warsaw Ghetto Boy”. This photograph, perhaps the most familiar Holocaust image, shows seven-year-old Tsvi Nussbaum as he raises his hands in Warsaw in 1943. After the war, Nussbaum moved to Israel, and then to the United States, where he worked as a physician in New York State.

* D. Margolick, “Rockland Physician Thinks He is Boy in Holocaust Photo on Street in Warsaw,” The New York Times, May 28, 1982, pp. B1, B6; P. Moses, “Haunting Reminder,” New York Post, Feb. 20, 1990, p. 5.; In 1978 a London businessman named Israel (Issy) Rondel claimed to be the “Warsaw ghetto boy.” See: J. Finkelstone, “‘Ghetto boy’ lives here,” Jewish Chronicle (London), August 11, 1978, pp. 1, 2.; C. Harris, “Warsaw Ghetto Boy: Symbol of The Holocaust,The Washington Post, Sept. 17, 1978, pp. L1, L9. This claim later proved to be untrue. See: E. Kossoy, “The boy from the ghetto,” Jerusalem Post, Sept. 1, 1978, p. 5.

Source: http://codoh.com/library/document/2499/

 

The audience searched in vain for shots and bodies piled up vertically/horizontally/pyramidically (depending on which Holocaust “expert” one reads) in gas chambers at Auschwitz. The gruesome shots came from Belsen, where thousands died of typhus epidemics, because no Zyklon B was available to disinfect the camp’s new arrivals.

 

worlds-first-anti-holocaust-convention-1979-2063-professor-faurisson-pics

[Image] Professor Faurisson. For more than 20 years, Robert Faurisson has been Europe’s foremost Holocaust revisionist scholar. He was born on January 25, 1929, in Shepperton, England. His father was French and his mother was Scottish. As a boy and young man, he attended schools in Singapore, Japan, and in France. He was educated at a Lycée in Paris, and at the renowned Sorbonne. For his views Faurisson has repeatedly been a victim of physical assault. Between November 1978 and May 1993 he was a victim of ten attacks, at least nine of them carried out by Jewish thugs. None of the criminal assailants in any of these assaults has ever been brought to justice.

 

Sunday morning, Professor Faurisson delivered an address on the fraudulent gas chambers at Auschwitz. He compared the alleged asphyxiation of inmates to the execution of murderers in American prison gas chambers, pointing out that it was the neutralization of the gas which posed the most problems. In the US a full hour must pass before the gas chamber can be opened. The prisoner’s body must then be hosed down by a clean-up squad wearing gas masks and rubber gloves. Fans expel the almost neutralized gas into the atmosphere, but even then the risk is still so high that the guards must come down from their watchtowers to avoid the possibility of receiving a fatal dose of gas. The gas chamber itself must be hermetically sealed.

 

worlds-first-anti-holocaust-convention-1979-2068-rudolf-hoess-in-uniform

[Image] Rudolf Höss (center) was born in Baden-Baden on 25 November 1900, the son of pious Catholic parents. Höss was appointed as the first Commandant at Auschwitz concentration camp on 1 May 1940 and held this position until 1 December 1943 (3 years, 7 months). Höss was arrested by British military police near Flensburg, Schleswig- Holstein, on 2 March 1946, tortured and then handed over to the Polish authorities just over two months later.  He was executed by hanging on 7 April 1947, next to the house inside the Auschwitz camp, where he had lived with his wife and five children.

 

Faurisson asked the delegates to compare these precautionary measures with the account of Rudolf Hoss, one of the commandants of Auschwitz. In his “confession” to his Polish Communist jailers, Hoss stated the gas chamber operators entered the chamber immediately (sofort) after gassing 2,000 jews, while eating and drinking (and therefore not wearing gas masks). Faurisson demanded:

What kind of super-powerful fan could have evacuated the room so efficiently that it even removed the hydrocyanic acid (gas) from the entire room, from the pockets of air in between the bodies and from the walls, clothing, hair and bodies?

 

He then asked the audience to compare the Hoss confessions with the reality of the structures at Auschwitz. With a series of slides, some of which he obtained from the Auschwitz museum staff, Faurisson showed that the structure which is currently represented as a gas chamber is nothing of the sort. The entry to the room is not a hermetically sealed steel door, as described in Holocaust tracts. The “peephole” so frequently described is not in the gas chamber door, but in the door of an adjacent anteroom. Since there is an ordinary glass window high up in the gas chamber, Faurisson wondered why those being gassed could not have smashed their way our, or at the very least smashed the glass to allow the gas to escape.

 

 

Resolution unanimously adopted at the Revisionist Convention

 

We, the speakers, delegates and officers of the Institute for Historical Review 1979 Revisionist Convention, meeting at Los Angeles this September 2, after reviewing the evidence that the Germans killed six million Jews during World War II in an unprecedented act of genocide, and considering both sides of this question, as well as the evidence of genuine atrocities, resolve the following:

 

WHEREAS the facts surrounding the allegations that gas chambers existed in occupied Europe during World War II are demonstrably false, and

 

WHEREAS the whole theory of “the Holocaust” has been created by and promulgated by political Zionism for the attainment of political and economic ends, specifically the continued and perpetual financial support of the military aggression of Israel by the people of Germany and the U.S., and

 

WHEREAS the constantly escalating level of “Holocaust” propaganda distributed by the mass media and government agencies is poisoning the minds of the American people, especially youth, and

 

WHEREAS we are conscientiously concerned that this strident hate propaganda is seriously impeding the necessary peace, unity, brotherhood and understanding that we desire among all the peoples of the Western World; now therefore,

 

BE IT RESOLVED we urge that the Congress of the US investigate the whole question of war guilt, military aggression in the 20th century, the relationship of private political and banking interests with military aggression, deceitful wartime propaganda masquerading as fact, the real responsibility for war, twisted history, the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials, proven atrocities and genocide, such as the murder of thousands of Ukrainians and Poles at Vinnitsa in 1937 and Katyn in 1940 and the truth of the alleged extermination of six million Jews in Europe during World War II.

 

 

Most astonishing of all, Faurisson showed pictures of the far end of the gas chamber where there is an open doorway, but no door! In fact, it appears there was never a door. The doorway leads to the crematorium where corpses were incinerated. How was it, Faurisson asked, that the gas stayed in the room and did not flow out and gas the incinerator workers? And how was it that the Germans used hydrocyanic acid, which is inflammable and explosive, so near the ovens?

 

At regular intervals along the gas chamber walls were the remains of partitions which had previously divided the room into segments. Puzzled by this, Faurisson took the original German plans of the room to a specialist in mortuary construction in Paris, who took one look at them and said straight away that the structure was obviously a morgue. Part of it had been built underground to keep the bodies cool.

 

worlds-first-anti-holocaust-convention-1979-2064-katyn-massacre

[Image]  Katyn Massacre (1977). Louis FitzGibbon (1925 – 2003), a British scholar and humanitarian, was active for years in publicizing the suppressed truth about the 1940 killing of thousands of captured Polish officers by the Soviet secret police. Although the facts about the massacre are now well established, during the 1970s his efforts on behalf of justice and historical truth were considered controversial because many people still endorsed the World War II claim by the Allied powers that the gruesome wartime killings had been carried out by German authorities.

Source: http://www.revisionists.com/revisionists/fitzgibbon.html

 

Next on the program was Louis Fitz-Gibbon, the English author of Katyn, and half-brother of the pro-Holocaust writer Constantine Fitz-Gibbon (who translated the Hoss “confessions”). Louis presented a film about the Katyn massacre produced by the Polish Ex-Combatants Association in Britain. He then described his personal quest for 10,000 other missing Poles not found at Katyn. The author described how he had finally found what he was looking for, in the form of a KGB document which gave all the horrifying and clinical details of a similar massacre.

 

The final speaker of the morning session was Dr. Austin App, an elder statesman of the revisionist movement. The theme of his talk was the injustice of postwar reparations which pumped untold billions of dollars and marks into Israel – all, because of an “imaginary crime.

 

worlds-first-anti-holocaust-convention-1979-2049-dr-austin-j-app-pics

[Image] Dr. Austin J. App (1902-1984) was a German-American scholar, was a major revisionist author and publicist. App was the author of more than a thousand articles, columns and book reviews, which appeared in a wide range of American and European periodicals, as well as of eight books.

 

In the afternoon the delegates reassembled to listen to Devin Garrity, head of Devin-Adair publishing house, who spoke about his life-long struggle against censorship in the publishing industry.

 

John Bennett, an Australian civil liberties lawyer, gave a short talk on what he had been up to down under, publishing his own flyers and sending Butz’s books to libraries and historians.

 

worlds-first-anti-holocaust-convention-1979-2051-john-t-bennett-pics

[Image] John T. Bennett (1936-2013) was for decades well known in Australia as a vigorous and outspoken defender of civil liberties and freedom of speech and inquiry. He is also known as a Australia’s leading revisionist writer and publicist.

 

Bennett was drawn into the controversy when Australian Zionists tried to force a Palestinian radio program off the air. In the course of defending the Palestinians’ right of free speech, he found the Butz book was being suppressed by the same crowd. Bennett quoted a real gem from one of his critics, a Dr. Rubenstein:

Were the Holocaust shown to be a hoax, the number one weapon in Israel’s propaganda armory disappears.

 

The convention ended with a dramatic announcement from Willis Carto. He said the Institute for Historical Review was releasing a press statement offering a $50,000 reward to any person, anywhere in the world, who could prove that Nazis had operated gas chambers to exterminate Jews.

 

News of the reward, Carto stated, would be forwarded to the publishers of so-called “witness testimony” with the request that the witnesses step forward to have their evidence examined by a panel of knowledgeable investigators. As of November 25, no claimants for the reward had shown up. Carto also announced that the Institute would soon be starting a new publication journal of Historical Review to provide a platform for revisionists from around the world and that the first issue in the spring of 1980 would contain transcripts of the papers presented at the convention.*

 

Before the convention disbanded, the delegates were unanimous in expressing their profound thanks to the organizers for their foresight and courage. They had reason to only a few years ago such a meeting on such a subject would have been unthinkable.

 

 

* Subscriptions to the Journal of Historical Review cost $20 per year. But as an introductory offer charter subscribers will only be charged $16 and will also receive at no additional charge Katyn by Louis Fitz-Gibbon. The address is Institute for Historical Review, P.O. Box 1306, Torrance, CA 90505.

 

 

END

 

 

======================================

 

Click to download a PDF of this post (2.6 MB).

 

worlds-first-anti-holocaust-convention-1979

 

worlds-first-anti-holocaust-convention-1979-cover-ver-2

 

 

 

_____________________

 

Version History

 

Version 3Sep 30, 2016 — Some minor additions to text. Formatting.

 

Version 2Sep 28, 2016 — Added 13 images. Fixed some typos, formatting. Added PDF for download.

 

Version 1Sep 28, 2016 — Created post.

 

ursula-haverbeck-hooton-plan-cover

 

[In this 28 minute video, recorded in September 2015, Ursula Haverbeck, a German woman who lived through WWII discusses how the “migrant” invasion is part of larger plan to destroy Germany and is a continuation of the WW II era Hooton Plan  (and similar schemes) created by organized jewry as part of their larger goal of world domination, aka, the Jew World Order  —  KATANA.]

 

 

 

Ursula Haverbeck

 

The Hooton Plan

 

and the Migrant Crisis

 

 

ursula-haverbeck-hooton-plan-video-german

 

English version:

https://archive.org/details/UrsulaHaverbeckAugust2016TheHootonPlanAndTheMigrantCrisis

 

German version:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1BvRvNZo5Gk

 

Click on the above link, or copy the link into your browser to watch the video.

 

Recorded in Sept 2015, published in Aug, 2016.

 

 

 

Description

 

 

 

Ursula Haverbeck discusses the Hooton Plan and the “migrant” invasion.

Visit Ursula’s site (in German): http://ursula-haverbeck.info/

 

 

 

 

Transcript

[28:51 minutes]

 

 

[0:00]

 

 

Dear fellow supporters, near and far, and dear friends. First I want to thank you for the overwhelming flood of support following the Panorama interview. I did not even expect that at all.

 

ursula-haverbeck-hooton-plan-ursula

 

Today we have a new topic to discuss, namely the flooding of Europe with strangers.

Seldom one can say, does a century carry a name. Usually we are satisfied to give it a number, for example, we call the last century, the “20th century”, even though the number begins with 19. This century, surprisingly has two names. A Jewish Russian historian teaching in the USA, calls it the “Jewish Century”. And then in his extensive book* that he has written, he adds that this is also the century of anti-semitism. Yuri Slezkine, has described the history of the Jews in the world in his over one thousand page book. Half mythically, but very real, especially when he write about the Jewish century in Germany. This has been available in Germany since 2006.

 
Continue Reading »

Organized jewry Did 9/11

organized-jewry-did-911-cover

 

 

Organized jewry Did 9/11

 

 

[Three building (WTC 1, WTC2 and WTC7) on 9/11 were destroyed by controlled demolition. Over 2,600 architects and engineers have come to that conclusion. Just look at the pictures below. The only people capable of doing that and many other necessary steps were insiders, not 19 Arabs. Any Arabs present were mere diversionary patsies in a massive crime, that has since killed millions, carried out by organized jewry for the purpose of creating a Jew World Order — KATANA]

 

 

The Basics

 

When any crime is committed the most important thing is obviously to find out who did it. How the crime was committed and why it was committed are usually secondary issues unless those aspects are critical in determining who did the crime.

With 9/11 the “Who did it” part can be easily figured out by looking at only “one event” that occurred that day. That “one event” is the method used in the destruction of the World Trade Center’s twin towers, WTC 1 (north tower) and WTC 2 (south tower) . We can also include the destruction of WTC 7 as part of that.

The official story that these three buildings were destroyed by the consequences of aircraft hitting two of the buildings is childish in the extreme for anyone not mesmerized by “authority figure” pronouncements.

It should be obvious to anyone with average intelligence and commonsense that the buildings were brought down by some form of controlled demolition. Look at the pictures and look at the videos. There are also over 2,600 architects and engineers who have stepped forward and risked their careers and reputations by defying the official story and going public in supporting this commonsense view.

Once you understand that some form of controlled demolition was carried out on the twin towers on 9/11, then that is basically all you really need to know about the events of that day. The reason I say that is because the ONLY group of people capable of carrying out a controlled demolition of those buildings and subsequently covering up that crime, MUST be a group that is IN CONTROL of the US government and the media.

Any honest and informed person of politics will of course understand that the US government is, behind the scenes, fully controlled by ORGANIZED JEWRY. The politicians on both sides are mere puppets taking turns to do the bidding of organized jewry and those non-jews (shabbos goys) that have been co-opted.

Now, there are several other roads one can take about 9/11 that will lead to the same conclusion.

But the “controlled demolition road” is very simple and obvious, so I would recommend that.

We do not really need to know any of the details of that event, for example, what kind of explosives, whether there were planes or not, whether they were remotely controlled or how they were piloted, how many “terrorists” were involved, what happened at the Pentagon, what happened at Shanksville, and so on, ad nauseum.

All we essentially need to know about 9/11 is that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition and that the only group capable of carrying out that and the subsequent cover-up, has to be in control of the US government: in other words, ORGANIZED JEWRY!

Why did ORGANIZED JEWRY carry out 9/11?

It was to create the pretext, a new “Pearl Harbor” in their words, to launch The War OF Terror against the rest of the world, starting with the Middle East, but eventually expanding to include anyone or any entity that opposes the establishment of a world tyranny known as the Jew World Order.

Case closed, as they say.

Continue Reading »

Daily Stormer - A Normie's Guide Alt-Right - COVER

 

[The following text, A Normie’s Guide to the Alt-Right  (available here as a PDF) was posted on The Daily Stormer website by its publisher Andrew Anglin on August 31, 2016. Its purpose is to give people new to the movement a brief overview, from the Stormer’s point of view, of what the Alt-Right is and isn’t, covering its history, the people involved, beliefs and terms commonly used.

To quote Andrew Anglin:

The core concept of the movement, upon which all else is based, is that Whites are undergoing an extermination, via mass immigration into White countries which was enabled by a corrosive liberal ideology of White self-hatred, and that the Jews are at the center of this agenda.

— KATANA]

 

 

 

The Daily Stormer

 

 

A Normie’s Guide to

 

 

 the Alt-Right

 

 

 

 

Daily Stormer - A Normie's Guide Alt-Right - 2298 - Dark Reaches

 

http://www.dailystormer.com/a-normies-guide-to-the-alt-right/

 

Click on the above link, or copy the link into your browser to read the full post.

 

Published on Aug 31, 2016

 __________________________

 

 

Contents

 

Introduction

An Accurate History of the Alt-Right

Troll Culture

Conspiracy Theorism

Libertarianism/Paleoconservatism

The Manosphere

#Gamergate

The Old White Nationalist Movement

Identitarian Movements

A Reboot of the White Nationalist Movement

Creating a Counter Culture Which Eventually Becomes the 

Dominant Culture

The Ideology and Values of the Alt-Right

Anti-Semitism

White Countries for White People

Scientific Racism

Opposition to Feminism and “Gender Equality” Support

for Traditional Families

Endorsement of White History

Cultural Normalization

Common Sense Economics

The White Struggle as a Global Battle

Our Memes

Pepe

Bane

Normie

Dindu Nuffin

Shitlord

Cuck

White Genocide

We wuz Kangz

Le Happy Merchant

1488

Holohoax

(((Echoes)))

Nirvana Fallacy

Sam Hyde

GTK-RWN

Vibrant Diversity

Anime

RetroWave

It’s [Current Year]

Leaders” of the Alt-Right and the Media’s Fake Narrative

The Future of the Alt-Right

Version History & Notes

 

 

________________

 

 

Introduction

 

Following condemnations by Hillary Clinton, everyone in the world is now trying to define exactly what the Alt-Right is. Most of them are getting it wrong.

The short story is that although the term could refer to a lot of different people saying a lot of different things, the people that it is being used to refer to by the media – Trump-supporting White racial advocates who engage in trolling an other activism on the internet – are the core of the movement, with any other groups and figures being peripheral.

The core concept of the movement, upon which all else is based, is that Whites are undergoing an extermination, via mass immigration into White countries which was enabled by a corrosive liberal ideology of White self-hatred, and that the Jews are at the center of this agenda.

The Alt-Right is a “mass movement” in the truest possible sense of the term, a type of mass-movement that could only exist on the internet, where everyone’s voice is as loud as they are able to make it. In the world of the internet, top-down hierarchy can only be based on the value, or perceived value, of someone’s ideas. The Alt-Right is an online mob of disinfranchised and mostly anonymous, mostly young White men.  This collective of dissidents argued with itself until it reached a consensus (consensus is yet to reach 100%, but it is damn close). We have now moved from arguments and debates and become a new political collective, a type of hive mind.

The mob is the movement.

Some of the ways the movement presents itself can be confusing to the mainstream, given the level of irony involved. The amount of humor and vulgarity confuses people. The true nature of the movement, however, is serious and idealistic. We have in this new millennium an extremely nihilistic culture. From the point when I first became active in what has become the Alt-Right movement, it was my contention that in an age of nihilism, absolute idealism must be couched in irony in order to be taken seriously. This is because anyone who attempts to present himself as serious will immediately be viewed as the opposite through the jaded lens of our post-modern milieu.

Now, on to the long story.

I will first lay out what the movement actually is and where it came from, and then layout what it appears to be to the mainstream media, and why I believe these narratives differ so drastically, and conclude with some loose predictions of where I see all of this going in the future.

 

 

An Accurate History of the Alt-Right

 

Roughly four years ago, a new type of White nationalist movement began to form on the internet. This was mostly made-up of young people who were formulating ideas with minimal influence from prior White nationalist movements.

It was a situation of different online subcultures (some of which were influenced by older offline movements) coming together. These groups collided, based on their having reached common conclusions, and the result is what is now called the Alt-Right.

I am going to layout here these various factions, and what ultimately led them toward this center-point where we have all met. The campaign of Donald Trump is effectively the nexus of that centerpoint.

 

Daily Stormer - A Normie's Guide Alt-Right - 2298 - Pepe Trump

 

Note that there is quite a bit of overlap between these various communities, with many people – myself included – having traveled through more than one. Breaking them down into specific categories just makes it easier to grasp the overall development of the different threads of thought.

Note: I will list associated sites and people for each sub-group, though these sites will not necessarily be Alt-Right in nature. They are merely to let people know what is associated with the various factions.

 

 

[Please continue reading the rest at The Daily Stormeror download the PDF of the complete text below.]

 

 

_________________________

 

NOTES

 

 

=====================================

 

Click to download a PDF (78 pages (illustrated)) of this post (5.0 MB).

 

Daily Stormer – A Normie’s Guide to the Alt-Right – Ver 3

 

Daily Stormer - A Normie's Guide Alt-Right - COVER

 

 

_____________________

Version History

 

 

Version 3: Sep 5, 2016 — Improved PDF (Ver 3). Added missing image and link (Sam Hyde); improved formatting; added “Further Reading” in two chapters. [With thanks to B.Bitterburg from The Daily Stormer.]

 

Version 2: Sep 4, 2016 — Improved PDF (Ver 2). Added links in Contents; formatting [with thanks to B.Bitterburg from Daily Stormer].

 

Version 1: Sep 4, 2016 — Created post.

A Dissident Speaking Out - Gerhard Ittner - COVER

 

[In this 22 minute video Alfred Schaefer interviews German dissident Gerhard Ittner. Gerhard, a critic of the German regime and  its “Holocaust” lie talks about his persecution and jailing as a result of the peaceful expression of his opinions! Alfred concludes with his thoughts on the “Six Million Lie” and how necessary it is for people to free themselves from the “Holocaust” fraud and other deceptions, like 9/11, that organized jewry has imposed on the world. —  KATANA]

 

 

 

Alfred Schaefer

 

 

A Dissident Speaking Out

 

 

Gerhard Ittner

 

 

 

A Dissident Speaking Out - Gerhard Ittner - VIDEO

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mS6beqm7-sE

 

Click on the above link, or copy the link into your browser to watch the video.

 

Published onAugust 14, 2016

 

YouTube Stats

 

Sep 7 — Views: 1,873 – Comments: 48 – Likes: 104  Dislikes: 1

Aug 19 — Views: 1,156 – Comments: 28 – Likes: 71  Dislikes: 0

Aug 17 — Views: 979 – Comments: 32 – Likes: 63  Dislikes: 0

Aug 14, 2016  — Views: 468 – Comments: 18 – Likes: 44  Dislikes: 0

 

 

YouTube Description

 

 

A Dissident Speaking Out

Gerhard Ittner in a dialog with Alfred Schaefer

Please copy this video and reload it in as many locations as possible.

 

__________________________

 

 

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

 

[24:12]

 

[00:00]

 

Alfred: [00:10] It is my pleasure and a great honor to have someone in the line today, who has been abducted by the power now occupying Germany, in order that he could be imprisoned in this occupied Germany. These are methods like in the darkest Middle Ages. Just, because his opinion did not suite those in power.

Gerhard Ittner, thank you for taking the time to have this dialogue with me now. In a few words, please describe what happened, how you were abducted and taken back into the BRD.

 

Gerhard: [00:48] Yes, Mr. Schaefer, I greet you also, and the pleasure and the honor is all mine, to speak with a such a fantastic producer who has just put that outstanding video onto the internet, with your sister, Monika Schaefer.

And this video has had a phenomenal impact! And the enemy is spewing fire and venom, which gives me great satisfaction.

This video, it is opening the peoples eyes. I am following this on the internet, almost on a daily basis. The impact that this video with your sister Monika Schaefer is having, this is not only in Germany, but the impact is on an international level! The media is preoccupying itself with this video. In particular, the jewish media is preoccupied with it, for example, Bnai Brith, and many others.

And it really is fantastic what you and your sister have accomplished! One can see by the reaction that our opponent has become “Rumpelstilskin”. He is jumping in circles, he does not know what to do, because the peoples eyes are really being opened about how we have been deceived and lied to! And the lying press and media continue to do this.

To come back to your question. Yes! I was really abducted from another country, for no other reason than my completely peaceful expression of my dissident opinion.

The only thing that I did as a thinking person was forming my own independent opinions and expressing my doubts about the totally absurd claims regarding the so-called “Holocaust”. I think that this must be allowed!

It must be allowed that a person can form his own opinion and then to express this opinion, and if this opinion is that I do not believe your stories about your “Holocaust”, because they are nothing, but contradictions and bear no truths whatsoever!

I have never asked for more than the right to express my own opinion, and never will ask for more than this right, nor do all those other people who also do not believe the stories that are being forced down our throats.

 

Alfred: [4:44] Thank you Herr Ittne, I would feel very ashamed if someone were to imply that I believed in the so called “Holocaust”, now in 2016, just, because someone somewhere tells me to believe this.

The “cat is out of the bag” and having kittens!

Have you ever tried to get one of those cats back into the bag? It is not that easy!

But what I don’t understand Herr Ittner, is why did the BRD take you back here, that way they only focus more attention on this feeble minded criminality.

If they want to continue to poison the minds of the people with these perfidious lies, they would have been better off to leave you where you were. You were not bothering anyone where you were.

Continue Reading »

London Forum - Tony O’Neill - COVER

 

[In this 23 minute video Tony O’Neill, the leader of The Celtic People’s Party of Ireland, delivers a spirited and hard hitting talk at the London Forum, laying bare the EU’s [and behind it, organized jewry’s] engineered plan for the on-going destruction of our societies. Tony indicates how organized jewry is responsible for the European civil wars, known as WWI and WWII, that now continues into an undeclared, yet very real, WW III through multiple strategies, but most obviously by the invasion of the “Turd Worlders” into our European countries —  KATANA]

 

 

 

The London Forum

 

 

Tony O’Neill

 

 

WW III Has Already Begun

 

 

 

London Forum - Tony O’Neill - VIDEO

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_TBRts0tk4

 

Click on the above link, or copy the link into your browser to watch the video.

 

Published on July 5, 2016

 

YouTube Stats

 

Aug 18 — Views: 2,061 – Comments: (disabled) – Likes: 110  Dislikes: 8
Jul 19, 2016 — Views: 1,941 – Comments: (disabled) – Likes: 104  Dislikes: 8

 

 

YouTube Description

 

 

WW1 and WW2 were attempts to destroy Europe and the European peoples around the world. WW3 is designed to finish the job and has already begun. We as Europeans should recognize this fact and consider ourselves at war with those who would destroy us. Our enemies are those who peddle money usury, moral degradation and White genocide as official policy. If we are to win this war we must unite as Europeans and form a cohesive agenda in order to win political power both in our respective countries and also at European level. Tony O’Neill is the leader of ‘The Celtic People’s Party of Ireland’ and we are very pleased to welcome him here to London.

The Celtic People’s Party of Ireland

http://www.cppireland.org/

 

__________________________

 

 

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT

 

[22:45]

 

[00:00]

 

Jez Turner: Today is a very special day in White nationalism! It’s a day for White unity! We are Whites, whatever our nationality, whatever our culture, whatever our language. We’re all Whites and that’s all that matters! Because that’s all that matters to the enemy! There is more that unites us than divides!

Our next speaker is from Ireland and is very, very welcome here in England. He is not a kosher nationalist, he’s a real nationalist, a racial nationalist. He’s the leader of the Celtic Peoples Party. He’s Tony O’Neill!

 

Audience: [applause]

 

Tony: Thank you all. I’d like to thank Jez for inviting me to speak here today at the London Forum. I’d also like to congratulate the English people. As they say, the good English people, for voting the correct way with Brexit.

 

Audience: [applause] Hear! Hear!

 

Tony: I think England has, will be leading now other people to follow, … Maybe even Ireland will be next, someday. It won’t be tomorrow.

My fellow European brothers and sisters, this is no time for silence nor for playing politics. It is the time to say what we mean, and mean what we say! [applause] The war is being waged against us with all of it’s attendant propaganda, traitors, anti-free speech laws, militarized police forces and most spectacularly involved, two invading armies! One from Africa and the other one from Asia. The aim of the war is the total destruction of we the Europeans and European descended peoples of this planet.

World War III has already begun!

Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi was the founder of the Pan-European Movement and is considered by Eurocrats today to have fathered the EU. He said, and I quote:

The man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of space, time and prejudice. Eurasian Negroid will be the European race of the future.

Eurasian Negroid will be the European race of the future.

I ask you my brothers and sisters, is this not the open promotion of White genocide?

 

Audience: Of course, it is! Of course. Yeah!

 

Tony: Wesley Clark was the Jewish US general in charge of the destruction of Iraq in the 1990s. He’s what he has to say on the subject of Europe:

There is no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure states. That’s a 19th century idea and we’re trying to transition into the 21st century and we are going to do it with multi-ethnic states!

Again I ask your brothers and sisters, is this not the open promotion of White genocide?

 

Audience: Yeah!

 

Tony: In Ireland we have our own special brand of ethnic replacement experts. The top dog that the employers organisation in Ireland, xxx, is one Danny McCoy. At their annual conference of 2015 in Dublin Castle, he said and I quote:

The population of Ireland is expected to reach 10 million by the year 2050 and we should embrace this change.

So not only is the plan to make Celts a minority in our own country in the coming years, but we should welcome this and be delighted to hand over everything our fathers and forefathers fought and died for! I have, also have, a real beauty from one, Olivia Mitchell. Now she’s a Member of Parliament in Ireland and the 24th xxx a beauty here:

Irish people should interbreed with foreigners!

She actually said that, you know, and went down very well in the media in Ireland, you know. Since most of the partners who attempted to invade my country are from Africa and Asia, we must conclude that Mitchell wants Celtic people to breed with them and just destroy our Celtic gene pool in the process.

Ireland’s elected president, Higgins, a real fool of a man said recently that:

Irish people have a shared culture with those from Africa.

 

Audience: [loud derisive laughter and booing]

 

Tony: You gotta get your head around it! Unsurprisingly, this example of delusional thinking went completely unchallenged in the loony left that dominate and the press in Ireland. Our most ethnically diverse town is apparently the town of Ballybarnes, which is in the West of Ireland. The West of Ireland is much more traditional than the east, and it’s interesting that they’ve targeted the West of Ireland more than any part of Ireland for this sort of enrichment. According to the census of 2011 only forty percent of the town’s population is now Celtic. Local loony lefty and community organizer, one Mary Donnelley has stated [mimicking a female voice] :

There is such a mix of people from different backgrounds and I’m not sure if Ballybarnes is in a position to take many more refugees. The indigenous population is coming close to being the minority and the social cohesion of the town is now under threat!

 

[05:15]

 

Let’s hear that bit again:

The indigenous population is coming close to being the minority!

This stupid woman sees that the Celtic population in the town is being ethnically cleansed, but all she’s concerned about is “social cohesion”! Perhaps this stupid woman should talk to the young White victims of invader rape gangs in Rotherham, or Cologne, or Oslo!

 

Audience: [applause]

 

Tony: The town is only forty percent Celtic is bad enough, but the demographic of the local school is even more shocking! Out of the 322 attendees, only 90 are Celtic. Apparently the school Principal is very proud of this level of diversity.

 

Audience: [derisive murmuring]

 

Tony: I assumed that the Principal will be even more prouder when there are no White children at all.

 

Audience: [derisive murmuring]

 

Tony: The looney lefties are sacrificing the bodies of our daughters and the lives of our sons on their altar of multiculturalism, just to show that they aren’t racist! They are throwing our ancestors, our children, and those who will never have a chance even to be born into non-existence, framed as an act of charity, one cannot imagine a more selfish, hateful, or evil act committed against our peoples!

 

Audience: [applause] Hear! Hear.

 

Tony: Right here in London we see the evidence of the ethnic cleansing of the Anglo-Saxon people from their capital city. The famous East End is no longer the home of the Cockney pearly kings and queens. In fact, if TV serial Eastenders was to accurately portray the ethnic makeup of the East End today, then the cast would only be ten percent Anglo-Saxon. The remainder will be made up of Turd Worlders of one kind, or another. And the famous Queen Vic Pub would either be a kebab shop, or a mosque. [laughter]

The White British people were called racist when they objected to diverse immigrants. They were called racist again when you are afraid of becoming a minority. Finally, they were called racist one last time when they simply left areas flooded by foreign entities!

In the eloquent words of Mr. Frank Field, Labour MP in 2008:

The word on the street is apprehension! The word on the street is that people are leaving if they can! If you look at the composition of people going it’s, because they don’t like what’s happening to this country!

That my friends, is what is known as, “White flight”!

 

Audience: Yeah.

 

Tony: Or in other words, population displacement, or replacement, ethnic cleansing, genocide!

In the sobering light of this, let’s examine the United Nations Convention on Genocide, Resolution 260-111a of the United Nations General Assembly on the 9th of December, 1948 Article 1 states:

The contracting parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace, or in time of war, is a crime under international law, which they undertake to prevent and punish.

Article 2:

In the present convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole, or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group. (a) Killing members of the group.

It is true to say that the death and destruction heaped on the European peoples at the hands of the invaders by organized gang rape and violence qualifies here.

(b) Causing serious bodily, or mental harm to members of the group.

Again the organized gang rapes we saw in places like Cologne and Rotherham and elsewhere qualifies here.

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about it’s physical destruction in whole, or in part.

These conditions exist ultimately in Ireland as it is official policy to place the invaders at the top of every council housing list in the country! Even though thousands of our Celtic men, women and children sleeping rough in the streets every night. There is not one invader left homeless!

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group.

Thanks to the thousands of invaders that are being welcomed into Ireland, these measures are being implemented. Taxes are going up as is the cost of housing. Both of these factors negate against our people being able to afford a home and a family. And the top dogs know this.

(e) forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Official government statistics state that 78,000 of our young people are actively encouraged to leave Ireland every year in order to seek work abroad. No sooner have they left the country and their place is taken by Africans and Asians.

Thus we see that the organized ethnic cleansing of the indigenous peoples of Europe amounts to the crime of genocide. Yet, anyone who espouses these views is called an “extremist”, or “dangerous”, or “racist” by the loony Leftie brigade and their political masters.

In reality, “racists” are the greatest friends of other races, because they want to see the preservation of all races!

 

[10:00]

 

Audience: [applause] Hear, hear!

 

Tony: The insane Lefties on the other hand, want to create a bland, multi-culti blancmange of people, with no fixed racial, or cultural background at all.

No European was ever asked if he, or she, wanted to say goodbye to their culture and see their country destroyed by invaders! On the contrary, the policy was forced on us by dictatorial politicians, answerable only to the un-elected mandarins of the EU, who are bent on the destruction of the White peoples of Europe, as per, the Coudenhove-Kalergi plan!

EU policy is forcing us to descend into an alcohol and drug fueled culture of sleaze, decadence, pornography, pop trivia, casual violence, and also merged into a tidal wave of mass invasion and political correctness!

In other words, the EU is a communist entity from start to finish! And like every other communist entity in history, seeks to destroy the ethnic and social cohesion of the indigenous people!

My friends, if we wish to save our peoples, our cultures, and our countries, then surely scrapping the evil EU is the first step in that direction!

 

Audience: [applause] Hear, hear!

 

Tony: Now, what about the millions of refugees have been able to flood Europe? I say, we must send every single one of them back, to wherever he came from!

 

Audience: [applause]

 

Tony: Every Western European oligarchy happily flattens the law in order to achieve their communist agenda of multiculturalism. That is their great weakness! They have broken EU law by knowingly giving refugee status to bogus refugees! Therefore, every Western European oligarchy is criminally guilty on these grounds and on the grounds of genocide!

You see, for a person to be recognized as a refugee and thereby given asylum, that person must come directly from a war zone. Now Europe doesn’t border any country at war. So therefore, they cannot come into Europe claiming such status. By doing so, by coming from a country into a war-torn country, into someplace like Turkey, and then coming to Europe, then they negate any idea of being a refugee. They are simply illegal aliens at the point.

 

Audience: Yeah!

 

Tony: If we are to uphold law and order in Europe, we can’t pick and choose which laws to obey and which to disregard. For to do so invites chaos. Thus all of the invaders must be sent back to wherever they came from and those overseeing the breaking of EU law must be punished to the full extent of that law! Of course, the top dogs will use all kinds of subterfuge, guilt tripping, in order to shut people up.

The latest lie they are using against our people, is the “demographic time bomb” awaiting Europe, because Europeans aren’t having enough children. This argument has about as much validity as the “global warming scam” now better known as the “climate change scam”. The population of your Europe has been stable for decades. The increase in robotization means that fewer people are actually needed in a technically sophisticated society, like Europe. Meanwhile, Europe has a persistently high level of unemployment, especially amongst young people. Yet, we are told we need limitless numbers of Turd Worlders who are functionally illiterate even in their own languages. [laughter] they don’t share our moral, or our cultural values, and don’t speak our European languages. The top dogs insult our intelligence by feeding us the nonsense that we need these illiterates! Well, we’re not buying it!

Europeans have built up the most sophisticated and technologically advanced society on earth, and we don’t need to be burdened with the millions and millions of Negroes and Asiactics., because they haven’t managed to create a similar society of their own. At the same time as part of the EU angle on low birth rates and a demographic time bomb, the politicos and their media whores in my country, are once again promoting a vote for abortion on demand. Now in my lifetime, I’m 58 and in my lifetime, this is in my recollection the fourth time this has come up in Ireland. Very few people are interested in this, but it’s only a ( ( (small clique) ) ) who constantly push for it, because obviously in Ireland you don’t have an abortion on demand. Sad to say, thousands of young Irish women come to England and have done for many decades. Not that I blame English people, by the way, I don’t know them. Seriously, I don’t. That English people are not to blame. As Mellisa was saying, we know ( ( (who) ) ) controls us. It isn’t English people anymore than it’s Irish people.

 

Audience: [long applause] Hear, hear!

 

Tony: As I say, it isn’t Anglo-Saxon people, no more than it’s Celtic people. Since in Ireland everybody is Irish nowdays. Give them a piece of paper to all of a sudden a Pakistani is Irish. [laughter]

In their communist zeal for equality they attempt to mask the organized murder of our children by calling it, “a woman’s right to choose”. Well, I say, a society that gives a woman the legal right to murder her own baby is a society in the fast lane on the road to perdition.

 

[15:00]

 

Audience: [long applause]

 

Tony: The cost of the invaders will run into the billions over the coming decades throughout Europe. We will face ever increasing taxes and living costs in order to pay for Social Welfare, housing, education and healthcare. As a consequence our people will not be able to afford to have families. Our young man are being encouraged to be homosexuals. Meanwhile our young women are being told they don’t need to think about having a family, you know, they can have a career, working for some capitalist and on the weekend get stoned drunk and have as many sexual partners as they like! This is what feminists like to call, “women’s liberation”.

In reality, and we know this for a fact, the only real liberation our women ever get, amounts to the freedom to be wage slaves and whores!

 

Audience: [applause]

 

Tony: Feminism means nothing to the dignity of women. By the time they reach 30, or so and begin to think, “Oh! I must myself a husband!” they are no longer attractive to most men. Thus many of our young women never have families at all. This is no accident, friends, this is the result of EU policies as implemented by our treacherous politicos in our Parliaments.

We hear a lot from the loony Leftie brigade about “White privilege”. I say yes! Yes! The White race is the most privileged of races, because the White race has achieved more than any other race on this planet! Our system of law, architectural achievements, our European art, music and literature, our great inventions and the scientific discoveries. All account to produce the greatest civilization in modern history! Conversely it can also be said that the Turd Worlders are privileged as themselves, as they have benefited from a sophisticated society that they themselves could never create.

But I would ask, “What benefit do the European peoples get in return?” Apart from the sky high crime rates featuring gang rape and casual violence, and also miscegenation resulting in mongrelized offspring, we Europeans gain nothing from the multi-culti experiment. The loony Lefties, of course, will reject all of this! , but to deny the truth I’ve spoken is to deny the truth that one and one equals two. The Lefties like to style themselves as soft liberals! Well, of course, we know they’re nothing of the kind! They are totalitarian dictators who one must obey, or be targeted as a hater, or a Nazi, or a homophobe, or a xenophobe, or some other sort of phobe. They are libertarian, because they believe in anything goes, in their insane pursuit of the communist nonsense of equality.

Recently, and in spite of the crime rate being perpetrated by invaders on the Continent, it was announced that Ireland will “welcome” to, 500 of these people this year alone, 2016. It’s always put across to us that, we’re always told we’re, “welcoming” these people! I’ve never seen people actually welcoming them. The looney Left, yeah, it welcome anyone., but for the most part I don’t hear people say, “Oh, we’re delighted!

 

Audience: [laughter]

 

Tony: In the face of all of this official generosity, the latest government figures make for sober reading. Out of a total population of say, four million Celts in the south of Ireland, 504,000 people are in hospital waiting lists. 350,000 of our people are unemployed. 78,000 of our young people leave [Ireland] every year. Thousands of our men, women and children sleep rough on the streets every night. And perhaps most sobering of all, over 600 of our people take their own lives every year! I ask you my brothers and sisters, does that sound like a society in dire need of Turd World enrichment?

 

Audience: No!

 

Tony: I think not! The top dogs want a one world slave state populated by materialist, miscegenation, mixed up fools lacking any culture, religion, or tradition, or family, or community! In short a population devoid of identity, a population of perfect slaves, as we’ve heard already.

So, what must we do to save our European peoples from this fate? We must unite, we must get active, get organized, get political, win power! The disparate nationalist movements in our countries must work together in order to help each other win power in elections, both in our individual countries and at the European level. We should hold regular conferences and create discussion groups to coordinate our political efforts! At elections, we should have our own agents at every counting and polling station fully monitoring the process. No way we allow democratic process to be poisoned by those who would seek to deny us electoral victory, as we saw recently with Austria.

 

Audience: [applause]

 

[19:56]

 

Tony: Now, I’m not talking here about replacing the EU monster with some other. I’m talking about us joining together spiritually, so that we can fight more effectively for our people’s cultures and countries! Meanwhile, we should encourage our own people to seek a higher purpose in their lives, generally. To get away from the base pursuit of money for it’s own sake and instead concentrate their efforts on the legacy they leave their children in the future!

My friends! I have a very special message for our brothers and sisters in Northern Ireland. This flag, this crest contains no orange color! We are not the communist Sein Fien. We are the Celtic People’s Party of Ireland, and we have no interest in pursuing old enmities of any kind! We are brothers and sisters in a united fight to save our European way of life! And in this fight we do not back down! But, to do so is where our Europe and it’s indigenous peoples to die!

 

Audience: [long applause]

 

Tony: To Western Russia, Finland, Norway, Iceland, Ireland, Portugal, Spain, Sicily, Italy, back to Greece and all points in between, Europe must remain European if we are to survive!

 

Audience: [long applause]

 

Tony: We are in a very real war, friends. We are fighting for our beliefs, we are fighting for our countries, we are fighting for our xxx, we’re fighting for the future of our children!

As Europeans we face down the propaganda and brainwashing! We stand tall against the communists EU agenda! We remain true to ourselves, the truth and to our people!

And some people tell me, this is not possible, and that is not possible. I say, we are the guardians of our European blood, and whatever is called for in the true interest of our people is always possible! My beloved European brothers and sisters, let us go forward to victory!

 

Audience: [extra long applause]

 

Jez: Mass immigration, racial ethnic cleansing, White genocide is the plan. We are White so we are all under threat! We are all facing genocide! So it’s important that we work together to thwart that plan! It’s important that we fight against the enemy, side by side, alongside our White brothers and White sisters, anywhere and everywhere!

Tony O’Neill!

 

 

 

 

[22:45]

 

 

END

 

 

_________________________

 

NOTES

 

 

=====================================

 

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB).

(Available soon)

 

 

 

_____________________

Version History

 

 

Version 1: Aug 10, 2016 — Created post.