Updates — Plain List

Continue Reading »


All Posts — Plain List


Continue Reading »



[Quietly spoken YouTuber, Way of the World, describes how Whites’ energies are being channeled into sports and other forms of “bread and circus” activities by the (((globalists))), while our race and culture is being systematically destroyed by these same people who are importing the Third World hordes into our lands. He calls on Whites around the world to unite in racial solidarity and to fight against this, or face destruction — KATANA.]





Way of the World


Join, or Die!









Click the link below to view the video:







Published on September 17, 2017


WotW looks at what a chaotic football match in London can tell us about the divisions we have amongst our people.
Please support this channel: https://www.patreon.com/wayoftheworld
https://www.facebook.com/wayoftheworld/ https://www.minds.com/WayoftheWorld https://www.bitchute.com/channel/wayo… https://gab.ai/WayoftheWorld











Recently there was a football match in London between an English team, Arsenal, and they German team, Cologne, that caused a lot of consternation in the media. Twenty thousand Cologne fans travelled all the way from Germany for the game, and there was a lot of chaos and disorder on the streets, and some fighting inside the stadium. As I watched these thousands of young White German men screaming for their team, I couldn’t help but notice where they were from. Cologne!


Cologne is the city that will be forever etched into my mind as the place where, on New Year’s Eve, 2015, around twelve hundred defenseless White German women were sexually assaulted by Muslim immigrant gangs.


So, as I saw this army of young German men defiantly marching through London like a conquering army, I couldn’t help, but wonder where they had been on that fateful night, while their women were being savaged in their own city.


The modern phenomenon of watching sports has bothered me for a while. It bothers me, because most days of the week you can see huge crowds of young White men, their faces contorted with rage over a poor refereeing decision, or a wayward shot on goal.


But where is their rage at how their countries are being destroyed by their politicians? Where is their rage at the invading hordes of Third World immigrants living off their tax money? Where is their rage at the sexual violation of their wives, girlfriends, daughters, and mothers?


I guess these men save up all their rage for match day.


It was the Roman poet, Juvenal, who first coined the phrase “bread and circuses” to describe the frivolous preoccupations of a previously heroic, but now lost populace. Of the people of Rome Juvenal said, and I quote:


Already long ago, from when we sold our vote to no man, the people have abdicated our duties for the people who once upon a time handed out military command, high civil office, legions, everything now restrains itself and anxious hopes for just two things, bread and circuses” unquote.


The bread and circuses where the free wheat and public entertainment the politicians used to gain the favor of the masses. I see today’s popular culture of football, TV, and drinking, as much the same thing, i.e., ways of diverting attention from the real issues and maintaining the power of those overseeing the decline.


As in Rome, the men of modern Europe have become infantilized by a system that glorifies trivialities.


These men have become so feeble minded, that all they can think about, all they can muster any passion for, is watching a bunch of foreign millionaires kicking a ball around, while their heritage, traditions, and very way of life are stripped away from them.


They are like infants that have been put into a playpen. They are out of harm’s way there. These “Man Babies” can do no harm to the globalist social order, while their masculine energy is being channeled into the black hole of mindless entertainment! They are impotent against their demographic destruction!


It’s time White men shook off this false conception of masculinity and took back control of their nations!


But this football match also made me think about how easy it is to make White people fight with each other over these meaningless things, such as which football team you support.


It’s time to grow up and recognize that modern culture is playing us for fools! Identities that derive from sport, culture, and even nations, are leading us towards extinction.


The World Wars of the twentieth century where the greatest imaginable tragedies for the White race! And look at the state of Europe now! Despite all that bloodshed, it’s my considered opinion that White people of all nations lost the Second World War! National identities are perfectly valid things, but when they are held above the much stronger and significant identity of race, they can result in the most awful consequences, as we have seen.


I recently received two very different comments from viewers of my channel. The contrast between them intrigued me, and I think there’s a lesson here for us as a movement. The first comment was in response to my video, ironically about the prospects of civil war in the United States. And it went thus:


Hold up! Is this guy American? He sounds Britain. He speaks for us? WTF is going on around here. Little girls are being raped all over the UK. Maybe he should kick that subject around. We can handle this ourselves.” unquote.


Now I was surprised and saddened to read this comment. Of course, it’s possible that this was just a troll, but, even if it was a troll he was pushing the same sort of divisiveness to which I have seen our movement fall prey many times.


He couldn’t seem to grasp that I, as a Brit, could possibly share a concern for the well being of my White brothers and sisters in the US. That I could possibly even have a personal stake in the stability and success of the US, which is the linchpin of the Western world. What a small and sad understanding of Western civilization and the common bonds of the nations that created it.


Ironically, in my videos, I have frequently mentioned events occurring in various parts of the West, including the Muslim pedophile gangs of the UK. But he offered my real critique of my work, just my nationality.


I am a Western man. I live in the West. I experience daily the indignities that we White Europeans are subjected to in our own lands. I see the international nature of the Globalist push to destroy Western civilization through mass Third World immigration. We nationalists must also adopt an internationalist approach in our response. We are going through this. We need each other.


The second comment I want to mention was from my man, also from the US, who had been watching my work for a while, and who had become confused and desperate. His comment read:


I watch your videos and I’m so disgusted and scared for my children. I come from a long line of combat vets, whom have served this country, including me, who served during the invasion of Iraq in a scout platoon. These liberal people make me sick! Almost makes me glad my grandfather isn’t here to see commies running free, beating up good Americans. How do I get involved? My first reaction is violence! But I know there is a better way, maybe. Please give me guidance, because I’m pissed off and I can’t believe this is even a threat I have to deal with, considering the other major threats that face our country from abroad.” unquote.


First, I want to say that it’s an honor that this man should have sought my counsel, and that his message was used in this video with his permission.


I don’t consider myself an expert, but I do what I can to be knowledgeable and aware, and to spread this information as best I can for the good of our people, wherever they may live.


This man, unlike the first, wasn’t interested in my nationality. All he was interested in was the cause, the identity that we share.


In response, I suggested to him that his love of country was not shared by many of those that had sent him into Iraq. I told him that I knew that he already understood that violence is not the way forward. That our way must be to elevate our people’s consciousness, to win their hearts and minds. I advised him to constantly improve his learning, and to always be a rational witness for our people and the truth. To seek the company of like minded people for strength and happiness. To write to me again if he ever needed anything. That I considered him a friend and brother, even though we had had only this brief exchange.


The various nations of the West represents important and valid cultural identities. But they do not come close to the much greater imperative of saving our race and Western way of life. Culturally I may be English, but my racial loyalty makes me also a Scotsman, Welshman, Frenchman, German, Spaniard, Swede, Italian, Pole, Russian, and American!


Wherever White people are, that’s where I’m from.


An international movement of nationalists is what we are. A coalition of nations, but one people. These lessons are part of our maturation as a movement, and there will be many more such lessons.


White identitarianism MUST be an international movement, because we share not only blood, but the struggle for our very survival!


Unite, or die, my friends!


Until next time. Be well.








PDF Notes

Version 1 — Sep 21, 2017.

* Total words = 1,719
* Total images = 2
* Total A4 pages = 11


Click to download a PDF of this post (0,5 MB):

Way of the World – Join or Die — TRANSCRIPT




Version History


Version 2: Sep 21, 2017  — Added PDF Version 1 for download.


Version 1: Sep 20, 2017  — Published post.



[NOTE: This is a re-post of what I wrote one year ago. I will add updated material here, later.

Three building (WTC 1, WTC2 and WTC7) on 9/11 were destroyed by controlled demolition. Over 2,900 architects and engineers have come to that conclusion. Just look at the pictures below. The only people capable of doing that and many other necessary steps were (((insiders))), not 19 Arabs. Any Arabs present were mere diversionary patsies in this massive crime, that has since killed millions, carried out by organized jewry for the purpose of creating, via a War OF Terror,  a Jew World Order — KATANA]



Organized jewry Did 9/11


The 16th Anniversary, 2017



The Basics



When any crime is committed the most important thing is obviously to find out who did it. How the crime was committed and why it was committed are usually secondary issues unless those aspects are critical in determining who did the crime.


With 9/11 the “Who did it” part can be easily figured out by looking at only “one event” that occurred that day. That “one event” is the method used in the destruction of the World Trade Center’s twin towers, WTC 1 (north tower) and WTC 2 (south tower) . We can also include the destruction of WTC 7 as part of that.


The official story that these three buildings were destroyed by the consequences of aircraft hitting two of the buildings is childish for anyone not mesmerized by “authority figure” pronouncements.


It should be obvious to anyone with average intelligence and commonsense that the buildings were brought down by some form of controlled demolition. Look at the pictures and look at the videos. There are also over 2,900 architects and engineers who have stepped forward and risked their careers and reputations by defying the official story and going public in supporting this commonsense view.


Once you understand that some form of controlled demolition was carried out on the twin towers on 9/11, then that is basically all you really need to know about the events of that day. The reason I say that is because the ONLY group of people capable of carrying out a controlled demolition of those buildings and subsequently covering up that crime, MUST be a group that is IN CONTROL of the US government and the media.


Any honest and informed person of politics will of course understand that the US government is, behind the scenes, fully controlled by ORGANIZED JEWRY. The politicians on both sides are mere puppets taking turns to do the bidding of organized jewry and those non-jews (shabbos goys) that have been co-opted.


Now, there are several other roads one can take about 9/11 that will lead to the same conclusion.


But the “controlled demolition road” is very simple and obvious, so I would recommend that.


We do not really need to know any of the details of that event, for example, what kind of explosives, whether there were planes or not, whether they were remotely controlled or how they were piloted, how many “terrorists” were involved, what happened at the Pentagon, what happened at Shanksville, and so on, ad nauseum?


All we essentially need to know about 9/11 is that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition, and that the only group capable of carrying out that, and the subsequent cover-up, has to be in control of the US government: in other words, ORGANIZED JEWRY!


Why did ORGANIZED JEWRY carry out 9/11?


It was to create the pretext, a new “Pearl Harbor” in their words, to launch The War OF Terror against the rest of the world, starting with the Middle East, but eventually expanding to include anyone or any entity that opposes the establishment of a world tyranny known as the Jew World Order.


Case closed, as they say.


Continue Reading »


[John Friend and Carolyn Yeager discuss the recent Greg Johnson vs Andrew Anglindebate” where the “Holocaust” and Revisionism were some of the topics discussed.

John and Carolyn then take Kevin MacDonald and Greggy to the woodshed for their failure to man-up and confront the fraudulent nature of the “holocaust industry” that the jews have placed, like a millstone, around the necks of Whites.

The Revisionists have systematically and conclusively proven that the “Holocaust” is the “hoax of the 20th century“. What stands in the way of this becoming general public knowledge is organized jewry’s stranglehold over our governments and media, etc.

Between this proven hoax and the public’s  lack of awareness stand two prominent members of the White movement, who for reasons explored by Carolyn and John, make excuses for evading this fact, or worst, pretend with word play that it still “happened“.

As Carolyn and John discuss, the fraudulent “Holocaust” is central to organized jewry’s strategy of guilt tripping Whites to prevent them into moving towards White nationalism by linking it negatively to racial awareness, that then leads to “Nazism” and the inevitable “gassing of six million innocent jews“.

As such, it is essential that the White movement comes to grips with exposing the Holohoax for what it is, so that this massive psychological weapon, roadblock, can be neutralized.

Meanwhile the jews continue on with their genocidal plans to destroy the White race — KATANA.]








The Realist Report


Carolyn Yeager


On the Johnson vs Anglin Debate





Click the link below to John’s blog post:


The Realist Report – Carolyn Yeager

Click the link below to listen the audio:




Or for a tidied up version of the audio, from Carolyn:





The realist Report Description


Published on Sep 6, 2017



On this edition of The Realist Report, we’re joined once again by Carolyn Yeager. Carolyn and I focus on the recent debate between Andrew Anglin and Greg Johnson which focused on the importance and relevance of historical revisionism in the overall pro-White struggle. Carolyn and I both agree that revisionism is an essential aspect of the struggle for the White race, as our historical narrative – especially as it pertains to WWII, Adolf Hitler, and the so-called “Holocaust” of “6 million Jews” – has been entirely weaponized against our people. We also address a number of other related issues in this very important podcast.

Below are relevant links for this program:

Subscribe to The Realist Report today, and support independent media!

Did you enjoy this program? Consider donating to The Realist Report to help us continue producing podcasts. Enter your email below and donate $10 now!












Voice over: You are listening to The Realist Report. And now your host, John Friend!


John: All right folks, welcome back to another edition of The Realist Report. This is your host John Friend. The website is The Realist Report dot com, where you can find an extensive archive of these pod casts as well as other radio broadcasts I have participated in, in the past. You can also find all of my blog posts and articles, a contact page, my Twitter feed, which is embedded on the right hand side of the website, and many other useful and important links. I am a regular reporter for American Free Press, America’s last real newspaper, and I also contribute to The Barnes Review, the bi-monthly history magazine affiliated with American Free Press. I encourage everyone listening to subscribe to both publications. Check out American Free Press dot net and The Barnes Review dot org for more details.


OK, with that said, let me introduce my special guest this evening. Carolyn Yeager is back once again to discuss a recent debate between Andrew Anglin and Greg Johnson. Which focuses on the importance and relevance of historical Revisionism in the overall pro-White struggle. A topic Carolyn and I have addressed in the past.


Carolyn, welcome back to the program! How are you this evening?


Carolyn: I’m just fine, John. Glad to be here.


John: Yes, good! I’m glad that you could join me. You wrote an article about this debate between Greg Johnson and Andrew Anglin which is over on Carolyn Yeager dot net. And I will link to it. I hope people go there and check it out. I think you have a lot of very important and good things to say about the debate. And really that’s going to be the main topic for this conversation. I will be honest, I did not listen to the entire debate. I think if you can find it on YouTube and you can also find it on, … There’s like a new alternative to YouTube from what I understand. I think it’s Bitchute, is that correct?


Carolyn: Yes.


John: Yes. You can find it [the debate] in multiple places. You have it linked on a couple of different, …


Carolyn: Yes. I have both of them linked.


John: Yes, over on your site. If you just Google it, you can find it. It’s been all over the place. It is a pretty interesting debate. Certainly worth checking out. Again I didn’t listen to the entire thing. I listened to most of it, and I mean, frankly I’ve basically heard what both Anglin and Johnson have to say about the subject, so it really wasn’t anything, …


[Image] The many faces of Andrew Anglin.


Carolyn: And then Anglin said, afterwards, that it wasn’t supposed to be a debate, but then afterwards they started calling it a debate. But I guess that was important to him, that he didn’t feel like he was in debate. You know, he wasn’t prepared, maybe, to debate anything. You know, but they did have interestingly pretty much opposing views when it came to “Holocaust” and revisionism, which is the part that I found interesting.


John: Right. Now there was a another debate that preceded the Anglin and Johnson debate, and that was between Greg Johnson and Vox Day. And they did a debate, and it was hosted by Terry McCarthy, who also hosted the debate between Anglin and Johnson.


[Image] Vox Day vs Greg Johnson debate.


In the Johnson and Vox Day debate, was a few weeks ago, I want to say, shortly after Charlottesville. And they were kind of addressing similar topics. They were talking about National Socialists and Nazis. How important, or relevant they are, like in the pro-White, Alt-Right movement, or whatever. And I’d listened to that too, again I didn’t listen to the entire thing, but I thought that was kind of interesting. Again, I’ve heard the arguments made by Johnson and Fox Day. So again, it wasn’t really anything, …


Carolyn: I had not before. It was sort of focused on Socialism in that debate, National Socialism and what Socialism meant, how to interpret it and so on.


And I listened to it, because you mentioned it to me. But I didn’t think much of it.




John: Yeah, you know, I really didn’t either. And even the Anglin and Johnson debate, I really wasn’t that impressed with either of them. So I mean, I agreed more with Anglin, but I think I would basically just present the information and present my perspective much differently than even Anglin would. I would explain it much differently and make different points than he would, than he did in this debate. Although I think he did OK. But I think I would have just handled it much differently.


So, I think overall, I would agree with Anglin.


Carolyn: The reason they had that, … According to Anglin, and it is true, was that Anglin complained that Greg Johnson had misrepresented him in the Johnson Vox Day debate. And so he said: “Well, you come on and we’ll talk about that.” And so in a couple places that’s when Johnson asked Andrew:


Well, how did I misrepresent you, Andrew?


And Andrew told him. He was prepared to say that. He had a couple different things that he thought were important. But then I don’t think Anglin had thought he was prepared to debate the “Holocaust” and, or Adolf Hitler, or anything like that. So, that’s why he said what he did, because maybe he would have done a different job, if he had gone there intending to debate that.


John: Okay, I get you.


Carolyn: He said what he thought, you know, I thought he did okay. But you’re right, he didn’t have some things right.


John: Yeah, I think overall he did pretty good.


Carolyn: Yeah.


John: And again I would certainly agree with Anglin over Greg Johnson, for sure, when it comes to this issue. So with that being said, I just want to say really quickly about Greg Johnson, because I think you’re going to be much more critical of him, than I will be.


I’ve been listening to and reading Greg Johnson for a number of years. I have one of his books, and I’m forgetting the title, off the top of my head. “New Right versus Old Right” I think that’s the name of it.


[Image] New Right vs Old Right by Greg Johnson. Click image to enlarge.


Carolyn: Yeah.


John: And I think Greg Johnson is a very, very smart man. He’s very articulate. I think he makes a lot of good arguments. His book I thought was really good, although there are certain sections, that I totally disagreed with. Including the article where he talks about the “Holocaust”. And it was actually the article that was published originally on The Occidental Observer dot net. It was basically the same article he wrote for the website, that was also published in the book.


And that’s an article that I’m sure we’ll bring up and talk about here as we proceed. But the book overall, was very good. I learned a lot from it. I think he makes a very good case for, you know, pro-White interests over all.


Again, I think he’s very articulate, very intelligent. I mean, the man’s a Ph D. He’s obviously, very smart. I just totally disagree with him when it comes to Revisionism and the “Holocaust”.


So, I just want to say that. I think he’s very smart, I think he is an asset to the movement overall. I just disagree with him. Then, of course, there’s also this debate, whether, or not he’s gay. And I don’t know if he is, or not.


Carolyn: John! John! That’s a definite fact! I mean, he didn’t want to talk about it for a long time, tried to avoid it and not talk about it. But he never denied it!


John: Right.


Carolyn: And it was Alex Linder who was trying to get him to deny it. And he didn’t do it. He was always walking around it. So, he’s even prides himself in being able to, you know, swerve around and make his arguments and come out with what he thinks is a winning argument. No matter what. It’s not based really on that he’s got all the facts right, or the facts on his side, but he just thinks he knows how to argue. And he said that. So, I think that there’s no doubt about that. He doesn’t want to say so, but he doesn’t fight it.


John: Right. And, you know, honestly I think you’re probably right, but again it’s not something that I frankly care too much about. It is what it is.


Carolyn: Let me say that I don’t care too much about him. I could leave him alone, but I do care about, as you know, about Revisionism. And I care about World War Two history, and I care about National Socialism. And when I hear him saying the things he does, I can’t, and I don’t think we should, just say, well that’s his opinion, he can have his opinion.


Naturally, he can have his opinion. But, I wouldn’t just let it pass it by and say it doesn’t matter. He’s good on other things. I think it does matter, because, as I’m going to try to point out here, the things that he says about it are totally ridiculous! And wrong! And uneducated!


John: Sure. I agree.


Carolyn: He makes this “great” argument. He makes this argument that just flips around. But, it’s not based on facts, and therefore it shouldn’t be respected, I don’t think.





John: OK. Yeah I sort of agree with you, I mean, pretty much. Before we get into the main topic, let’s actually just address this right off the bat. This issue of Johnson being gay. Because I’ve heard you argue in the article you wrote that his homosexuality seems to influence his thinking in his pro-White stance, and everything. So, how influential is his homosexual sexual identity in all of this? Do you think it has a huge role in his overall perspective?


Carolyn: Yeah, well I’ve said so and, you know, I realized when I was writing this, that I was just being way out there with talking about him actually giving the reasons for his thinking as his homosexuality, over and over, again. I knew I was doing that, and I didn’t actually get criticized for it. You know, to my face. But I thought I would. But then I thought, this just hits me so hard in everything that he says, while I kept to the “Holocaust” Revisionism, for the most part, and somewhat with the Hitler stuff.


It just strikes me so strongly that, that is the reasoning behind it. And this is not brand new, because I’ve said these things before, but I haven’t talked about Greg Johnson for a long time. And I don’t think, in a sense it’s none of my business what Greg Johnson is doing. But when he comes out publicly with this stuff on this topic, I just feel like I got to answer this, and I’ve got to say something.


John: Yes.


Carolyn: And there are some people who appreciate it.


John: No, definitely! I mean, every time I hear him, or Dr Kevin MacDonald, again two individuals I’ve learned a lot from, I respect. I think they’re certainly on our side, overall, but I just totally disagree with this. And I think it is a very important point. In fact, as you know, I often argue when I’m doing pod-casts when I’m writing, that the fake “Holocaust” story is the entire bedrock of this New World Order! This anti-White, White genocide agenda, jewish agenda. This is the heart of it. This is what drives all. It’s the paradigm that really shapes this and advances it. And I mean, I just don’t see how we can avoid it, if we are to confront these problems, and deal with them seriously. I don’t think that we can. And we will get into that as we, …


Carolyn: Yeah, I know you believe that John. But you’re also a very nice person, but also you are committed to the movement. You don’t want to criticize people. And I’m criticized for going out and criticizing people who some people think shouldn’t be criticized, especially Kevin MacDonald. And, you know, a couple weeks before this Johnson Anglin discussion, I wrote something* about Kevin MacDonald, which was longer than this.


[* See Carolyn’s Aug 8, 2017 blog post: “Kevin MacDonald on record saying whether the Holocaust actually happened is ‘not important’“]


[Image] Kevin MacDonald (pic taken at the 2016 NPI conference) and his landmark book on jews, “The Culture of Critique“.


He did a radio program with that, “non jewish” jew, and a girl there asked him about the “Holocaust” and Hitler and stuff. So he answered. And I was so shocked! Just thought his answers are pretty terrible. And I wrote about him about two years ago on the same topic, because a radio program* he did.


[* See Carolyn’s Nov 16, 2015 blog post: “The Heretics’ Hour: Kevin MacDonald’s problem with Holocaust revisionism“]


So these two men, … Now, MacDonald I always respected so much and I would never have, … Well he never talked about it, that I knew of in the past. But he did on these two occasions, because he was asked! And these were both, maybe since he was retired, I don’t know if he was retired the first one, but probably. And I thought, well that’s pretty ignorant! That’s not right. And so I made a noise about it, and I’m good at doing that. [John laughs]


John: Yes, you are.


Carolyn: That’s my role, I guess. So I have those two, that kind of go together in my mind. So when this came up with Greg Johnson, I thought, well I’m going to write something about this, too. Just to be fair! [chuckling]







John: Yeah, and I think it’s totally legitimate to have these discussions and to publicly disagree with other thought leaders, in the Alt-Right, or whatever. I think that’s totally fine. I think that’s healthy, really, what we should be doing, rather than engaging in drama, or gossip, and all this other crap. If we’re going to criticize somebody, …


Carolyn: We’re just ignoring it. Mostly, people don’t want to criticize someone like Kevin MacDonald, even over his views on “Holocaust” revisionism. But, it was a big hit, a lot of conversation about it. A lot of comments, a good thread about it and so on.


John: Right.


Carolyn: Anyway, like you, that is my big thing. And I’ve decided even more, and more, that when it comes down to it, that’s my big thing! And so, I’m going to push it as much as I can. And I don’t have the reach those guys do, but I can certainly say what I think about the misleading things they’re saying about it.


John: Yes, exactly. So, let’s get right into it. What were your overall thoughts on the debate? What points would you make?


Carolyn: Johnson said:


No honest revisionist claims that the “Holocaust” never happened.


And then he says:


Robert Faurisson claims that the “Holocaust” never happened. But only by insisting on a particular definition.


Those are his words. He says:


His argument is too clever by half and cannot be taken seriously.


He kept repeating:


We don’t have to rehabilitate the Third Reich.


And he said:


You can say that we are Nazis, or you can say, ‘No, we’re not Nazis’, or you can say, ‘Nazis are not evil’, but you can’t say, …


I don’t know, whatever.


John: Well, his main argument seemed to be that the pro-White struggle and having a pro-White identity, and just the overall pro-White message is in no way related to what happened during World War Two.


Carolyn: Right. Right.


John: that was his main thing. And theoretically what he’s saying is true! I mean, the fact that White people deserve their own countries, that there’s this very blatant anti-White, agenda that’s being advanced on every single White country. We’re being forced with all this mass immigration, forced multiculturalism, forced integration, all this anti-White propaganda, etc.


This is wrong, and our cause is totally legitimate. And is in no way related to, or tied to World War Two. That’s correct in theory, but that’s not the way it works in the real world, right?






Carolyn: Yeah, and everybody is familiar with that. You know, that is just a bunch of baloney, saying that. That’s fine for us to say, but nobody pays attention to it, as you just said, in the real world. So he kept saying:


Well we can made this wonderful argument, that this is absurd what people are saying.


To say what they call White supremacists, or just White identists, or White activists, are Nazis. That’s just so absurd on it’s face. That’s silly. And that’s not a good argument. First of all we can just ignore that, and just go on and do our thing whatever.


He doesn’t really have an answer to it. His whole answer to all of it, is to ignore it, in what he called in his article he wrote quite a number of years ago, that caused such a stir. He was using that phrase, “To step over it”. So we just “step over” the “Holocaust” and go on our way. And say it doesn’t have anything to do with us.



John: Right. But there’s no way to. I mean, theoretically you could, if you’re talking about it again from a theoretical perspective, …


Carolyn: Andrew Anglin countered that on that show, by saying that if we say we agree with everything Hitler said and did, which he does, you know, basically expects that people are going to do. If we agree with what Hitler did, we can’t then say that we have nothing to do with him. And he says that nobody’s going to fall for that. Nobody’s going to go along with that.


And Greg is saying, well he wouldn’t say that. He didn’t say those words, but that then leads him to trying to dismiss, get us away from Adolf Hitler’s National Socialism, too. Which he disagrees with. And that’s part of what the “New Right” is about, right?


John: Yeah. And from what I remember about the book, his main critique of the “Old Right” is that it was kind of brutal, and violent, and tyrannical. And I think that’s a totally distorted view of National Socialism.


Carolyn: Well it is. See now, that’s where the homosexuality comes in. That absolutely comes in there. He doesn’t like, … He was much more friendly toward Hitler and National Socialism, but he’s moved away from that, because he sees, or decided, or whatever, that this is over quite a number of years, that this is a government that could treat his group badly. And so therefore he rejects anything to do with fascism, you know, what we call fascism, or the Third Reich. He rejects it.


[Image] Heinrich Himmler talks of the problem with homosexuals in society. See: Heinrich Himmler on Homosexuality.


And to me, it’s because he’s afraid of the brutality, he’s afraid of the harshness. He doesn’t think that he could convince them that he’s a good guy and that they should leave him and his friends alone.


John: It’s almost as if he knows that he would be sort of excluded in a National Socialist type state, because he is a homosexual. And that’s kind of what motivates him. And that seems to be kind of the argument you’re making in your article. And I mean, it’s entirely valid. It certainly does seem to be sort of the case.


Carolyn: Well, I think that Greg has been so successful, financially, he takes in a lot of money. From the way I think, and the way you think, I’m pretty sure, as compared to how much money you have ever gotten, he gets a lot of money. I think he gets a lot from the homosexual community. Because, even though he was criticized for being homosexual, he wouldn’t admit to any of it. He published books by blatant homosexuals, like James O’Meara, who has been exposed on the Internet, cross-dressing, and doing a lot of weird things. Pictures and everything. And Jack Donovan, and he’s been very friendly, he was very friendly with him.



And I think he has a lot of writers. Although, I was looking at his site more recently, which I haven’t for a long time, and he’s got a lot of different people writing articles, there. I don’t know who they all are. But he had a lot of writers that I think, just from the sound of them, the way they wrote, what they wrote about, that I suspect they were homosexuals.


Now, your commenter, Tucker, thinks that I see homosexuals everywhere. I do, I guess, I may have a sensitively to them, because when I think that they are, I notice it. So, I just have my opinion, he depends a lot on the homosexual community, at least for money. And they send him a lot of money because he stands up and publishes their work, and so on.






[Image] Some of the homo imagery featured in Counter-Currents in the last 12 months. Click image to enlarge.


And he also, I don’t know so much now, but back when I was making a study of it, I noticed and pointed out that he had constantly photographs, you know, he has a picture with every little post announcement on his site. Way outnumbered photographs of men with a lot of muscles showing, and not wearing very much. Old classic pictures, [chuckling] classic paintings, and sculptures, and so on. He supposedly deals in the classics, but there’s all these men, the kind of pictures that homosexuals would like looking at. Would really love looking at. So the whole thing just all fits together. And when he would say something like, you know, let me find something that he actually said:


It’s foolish for us to attack the enemy at their best defended points, …


We’re now into revisionism.


… Because we can make a case for White identity and White interests that doesn’t depend on whether or not the Nazis got it right, or wrong.


Things like I, …


John: But I think he’s so wrong about that! Because any time you make a pro-White case, it’s inevitably going to be tied into Hitler, the Nazis and the “Holocaust”. I mean, the jews have been so successful with this fake story, it’s totally discredited any form of White identity, and they pathologize it. And it’s instantly tied in with this!


Carolyn: Yeah. And that’s why he wants to distance himself from National Socialism, and Hitler, as much as possible. And he thinks, says, that will work. But then he also said in this podcast:


There are many things I think the National Socialists did wrong. And I do think that their plans for the Slavic east were really genocidal.


Then he said that Plan Ost, which is on the famous Wikipedia page, was a fabrication, as far as he can tell. But he still considers the “Holocaust” a genocide against jews! Now what really gets me, and because we don’t have forever I’m going to jump to it.


In his article on his website that he wrote about the debate, he said some interesting things, and then this Ermin, … What’s his first name? Vince Irmin*, or something, who he published his book. Who wrote a book about Hitler, a kind of a friendly book about Hitler, and Greg’s company published it. He wrote a comment and said he thought Anglin was right.


* Vinson Irmin, “Some Thoughts on Hitler and Other Essays”. Foreword by Kevin MacDonald, edited by Greg Johnson (2012). Click image to enlarge.


He said, Anglin was doing the right thing by, making fun of the “Holocaust” and so on. And Greg wrote a reply to him and he said:


The ‘Holocaust’ is a great big pile of dead jews, not a normative claim* that jewish suffering is more important than non-jewish suffering.”


[* “Normative” statements/claims present an account of how the world should be. The word contains the stem ‘norm’: something that should be lived up to; or that should be pursued.]


Sorry, I left out that this Irmin said that:


The whole meaning of the ‘Holocaust’ is not genocide, but that it’s a claim of jews that their suffering, during World War Two was vastly more significant than any other suffering in history.



Comment exchange between Johnson and Irmin. Click images to enlarge.


A very good point, which you would agree with, I’m sure. That’s really what it’s all about. They are so jealous of anybody else having any claims to having, … Then that will come up when we talk about the Poles, and the Pole’s demands now for reparations, if we get a chance to do that.






So, anyway, Greg answered that:


The “Holocaust” is a great big pile of dead jews, not a normative claim that jewish suffering is more important than non-jews suffering. You can drop that moral absurdity, …


Everything, he wants to call that way.


But there’s still a great big pile of dead jews!


John: But is there really Carolyn?


Carolyn: No!


John: No, there’s not. Exactly!


Carolyn: I mean what is a pile of, … The “Holocaust” has to be more than a pile of dead Jews! There’s piles of dead people of all kinds!


John: Exactly! There’s photos of piles of bodies that are presented to a very gullible traumatized public and were told:


Oh! Hey look how evil the Nazis are! Look at all these dead people that died in these concentration camps!


It’s never explained how these people died, what happened, what was going on at the time, there’s no context. It’s all very emotional and psychological exploitative propaganda, that is designed to instill and reinforce this fake narrative!


Carolyn: Right! And here is where I want to make the point that I made in the wrong place before, that he said that Andrew’s position — in this article he said this — Andrew’s position on the “Holocaust” boils down to:


It never happened. But it should have.


And he says this is completely indefensible. And I ask, what is “it”? Because I’m saying, my point I’m going to make here, is that you need to define what the “Holocaust” is. That’s why saying it’s a big pile of dead jews, doesn’t cut it!


And then Greg writes:


First, to say it never happened is factually indefensible. No honest revisionist claims that the ‘Holocaust’ never happened.


And then he says:


Robert Faurisson, does claim this, but only by insisting on a particular definition. His argument is too clever by half, …


[laughs] The pot calling the kettle black!


… And cannot be taken seriously.


Oh come on!


Even if one grants every serious revisionist argument, what remains is ‘Holocaust’ enough for most people.


Now this is just coming from that 2012, I think it was, long article titled, “Dealing with the “Holocaustthat he published at Occidental Observer. And MacDonald, turns out was totally in agreement with him and ends up coming out later with the very same arguments.


The Occidental Observer article (Jul 20, 2012) by Johnson titled “Dealing with the Holocaust. Click image to enlarge. Note: the comments are not available to be viewed.


You know, the thing is Faurisson* is right. You have to have a definition for what you’re talking about! What is the “Holocaust”? You can’t talk about the “Holocaust” and then everybody talking about has a different idea what it is. And it’s just a big pile of dead jews, according to this very smart Ph. D., John! Who you say is such a smart man.


[* Robert Faurisson is one of Europe’s foremost Holocaust revisionist scholars]


Article (Aug 30, 2017) by Johnson on the “debate” with Andrew Anglin. Click image to enlarge.


John: No. I hear you. [Carolyn laughs] By the way, you’re referring to an article, and I’ve not read this article, I just found it on Counter hyphen Currents dot com. “My Conversation with Andrew Anglin”.


Carolyn: Right, right. I’ve got a link to it here.


John: I’ll link to that in this blog post, so people can go read what he has to say. It looks like it’s kind of his summary or concluding thoughts on his debate with Anglin.


Carolyn: Right.


John: One thing I wanted to ask you is, and Greg Johnson brought this up in the debate, he’s obviously not like an outright National Socialist, you know, he loves Hitler, etc. But, you know, he’s tries to be objective and fair and say:


Oh well, the Nazis weren’t that bad, but they did do some things wrong.


Carolyn, what exactly did Hitler and the Nazis do wrong? I’m trying to figure that out.


Carolyn: See, I don’t agree with that. He mentions that Operation Ost, or whatever it was called, they found some notes about it. There was kind of a plan, but they made all kinds of plans! That different people wrote out plans for the East when they took more control of it, and so on. That doesn’t mean they were ever carried [out], or they were going to be, quite in that way. And so there’s a whole lot made out of that. But then he admits that it’s a fabrication. But he thinks that still, he always says that the Nazis did things wrong. He said it in both the debate and in his article. But he can never really point out to what it is, but he thinks that they did exterminate jews! Now for him, that’s immoral.






He doesn’t say, you know, he’s supposed to be anti-jew, but that’s immoral. Well others, revisionists, say they didn’t exterminate jews and there was never a plan. Now this brings us to the definition of the “Holocaust”, which you’re very aware of, and a lot of people are, but let’s just go over real quick.


As Michael Shermer wrote in 2000, and he’s a jewish “Holocaust” apologist. He says:


When historians talk about the “Holocaust” what they mean, is that about six million jews were killed in an intentional and systematic fashion by the Nazis using a number of different means, including gas chambers.



[Image] Michael Shermer’s book “Denying History” in which he gives a standard definition of what is the “Holocaust“. Click image to enlarge.


And then Michael Berenbaum and Deborah Lipstadt, said the same thing. So have many, many others. And that’s known to be what they insist on! The jews themselves insist on that, for the “Holocaust”. They don’t let’s you change that, take away from the six million, or say that there was no plan, or intention to kill the jews. And Deborah Lipstadt says; “they were intended to kill every jew in Europe“, and things like that, you know. They have no evidence for that.


And that’s why someone like Greg Johnson doesn’t want to bring that up. Because he knows it can be debunked. But, at the same time he wants to say that there was a “Holocaust” and the Nazis are responsible for it, and that’s why we don’t want to be associated with them, or call ourselves Nazis. That is not the reason. That is all.


[Image] Carlo Mattogno’s book “Fail: Denying History” in which he gives Shermer’s book “Denying History” a good thrashing. Click image to enlarge.


John: And that’s what’s so bizarre to me with, how a guy like Greg Johnson, this very smart man, an academic, a Ph. D. Kevin MacDonald the same thing. Richard Spencer as well. He’s kind of always pooh-poohed revisionism. He doesn’t think it’s important and relevant, at least from what I’ve heard from him in the past, in conversations I’ve had with him.


Carolyn: They all do the same thing!


John: Yeah, they all think we can “step over it”. We don’t have to address it. We can ignore it. It’s not relevant, or related to our current, …


Carolyn: And you know, I also think, I don’t want to make a fuss here, but I also think that Richard Spencer is basically homosexual. And I think there’s a problem with, now of course, Kevin isn’t, but I think there’s a problem with having so many homosexuals in the White movement, as leaders. I think there’s a problem with that personally. So, I just thought I’d bring it up, because it comes up.


John: It always does. And to my knowledge Richard Spencer is not a homosexual. That’s all I’ll say about it. I don’t think that he is. From what I understand he is married and he has a child and everything.


Carolyn: You can do that.


John: My point is, … Right, yeah. Anyways, my point is that these guys, these very smart guys, always dismiss Revisionism. They don’t think it’s important. But what’s bizarre to me is that Revisionism itself is very, very well founded, from a scholarly perspective, from an academic perspective. I mean, all of the books that have been written debunking, scientifically debunking, the “Holocaust” in virtually every single regard, every single aspect of the official “Holocaust” narrative is not true. I can confidently say that at this point. None of it is true! It’s all propaganda! It’s all, just this fake narrative!



Carolyn: And these guys avoid that! They don’t talk about it!


John: Exactly!


Carolyn: They don’t talk about it at all, and then they just say:


Well I’m not convinced it didn’t happen.


What kind of thing? They don’t let themselves be convinced. They won’t read anything!


John: And Johnson even argued in the debate that it’s like, “over the heads of most people” and it’s “too difficult to go through all this information”. And it’s like, no! It’s not! I mean, if you just stop and think about it and break it down.


[Image] Holocaust Handbook Series — 1 of 4.  Click image to enlarge.


As you were kind of explaining, the basic tenets of the official “Holocaust” narrative, are; six million jews, it was done in gas chambers, largely, and it was a systematic, coordinated plan, carried out by the Nazis. All three of those assertions are easily proven to be false!


I don’t understand, … It’s clear to me that they are just afraid of this topic! They’re avoiding it, because they think it’s bad PR. I think that’s really what it boils down to.






Carolyn: I used to say that, but now I go further, and I’m pretty convinced that they don’t like Nazism. They don’t like Hitler. And I’ve given my reasons for why Greg doesn’t. But Kevin doesn’t, because he just never has. He likes Americanism. He thinks we need to be American. He doesn’t want to go there.


John: It’s too taboo I think, for MacDonald especially.


Carolyn: Yeah, yeah. I think with Kevin, he personally doesn’t like anything to do with Nazis. It personally turns him off. He doesn’t like uniforms, he doesn’t like the swastika, he doesn’t like any of that. The way they behave. I mean, he really sincerely doesn’t like it, but that means he’s not looking at it, as he supposedly looks at history, in an honest objective manner. He doesn’t want us to get involved with that. And so, that’s why they don’t want to reconstruct, or revisit the “Holocaust”, because if the “Holocaust” didn’t happen then Hitler might be rehabilitated! And that’s the one thing they don’t want. They want Hitler to be the bad guy.


John: Yeah.


Carolyn: You see, some of us don’t want that. So we’re really at odds here!


John: I totally, …


Carolyn: I can’t just ignore that and say:


Oh well, that is okay, I still support you.


Because, to me, what they’re doing is keeping us in this bondage to the jews. And they’re helping the jews! They don’t want to help the jews, but they think they can ignore the “Holocaust” and National Socialism, the Third Reich, and move ahead with White identity. And talking about where the jews are wrong and this won’t hurt anything. But all of them, are much more tolerant of jews as friends and in the movement then what I would be.


Richard Spencer was talking in that video I linked you in that comment I wrote, that he thinks that mixed race people can be in the White movement and if they’re mostly White they can certainly, you know, adjust if they really are for us. That we can just accept all these people.


That’s too lax for me.


John: Yep, I hear you. And by the way, the comments that you’re referring, and you mentioned Tucker who is a commenter on my website, this is from our last pod cast. So if you go back in the archives you find the most recent conversation I had with you, you can find all the comments there and kind of see what we’re talking about.


Carolyn: Yeah.


John: Yeah. I mean, to me it just doesn’t make any sense how these are obviously very smart, educated men, can just dismiss all of this scholarly research done into the “Holocaust”, by guys like Germar Rudolf, for example, who is himself a scientist and a Ph. D. Robert Faurisson and many others, countless others! Check out The Barnes Review dot org for all the most classic “Holocaust” revisionists books. They’re all for sale. They’re all worth purchasing and reading in my view.



[Image] Holocaust Handbook Series — 2 of 4.  Click image to enlarge.


We’ve proven that this story is not true! We’ve proven it scientifically, we proven it from a very scholarly perspective. It’s really, in my view, not up for debate anymore. So it’s just a matter of these guys not taking the time to do the research, or just choosing to ignore this and downplay it! And you can’t! I mean, it’s very clear that you can’t! Try going, …


Carolyn: They don’t want that to be a part of their movement!


John: Right.


Carolyn: So to me, they’re dishonest about it. They won’t argue it. You know, they won’t talk, … They won’t say:


Okay, I think this is wrong and this is why.


They won’t argue those points. They don’t want to get into it. Because they don’t think they have a very good argument, so they just avoid it. And that I think is dishonest, and it’s not fair.






Now I came across something else at Counter-Currents, just yesterday, written by Kevin MacDonald in 2016, September. One year ago posted there, titled “The Alt-Right and the jews”. And most of it was just the usual thing that Kevin talks about with the jewish influence and how it ruling in our societies, and so on. But then he got into a little more specific things, and he said, which others have said:


I think it’s fine that some organizations and some Alt-Right figures do not discuss jewish issues.


Well that’s OK, but then, a few sentences later he said:


I would love it if there could be an Alt-Right mass movement with significant jewish support.


And then he gives some reasons why that’s probably not going to happen and why it might not work out so well. But it shows that’s just a different attitude, that he would like to see Jewish support.


[Image] Kmac’s article, “The Alt-Right and the jews” with a couple of critical comments. Click image to enlarge.


John: It’s incredible! I mean, it’s a naive attitude to think:


Oh, maybe jews will finally be objective, like us, and realize that our message is legitimate, and righteous, and honest!


No! The jews are never going to admit this! At least not in large numbers. There might be a couple individual jews who would maybe support the idea of a White ethnostate or, sort of go along with our perspective. But overall, the jews have made very clear as a collective racial entity, that they are very, very, and blatantly hostile to our interests, and hostile to the future prospects of our race! And, in fact, are doing everything in their power to bring about our destruction! They make this very clear. So to me it’s very naive. I don’t understand it.


Like, just one day, we are going to finally convince the jews that we have a righteous cause?


Carolyn: If they want to have some jews who they think would see it, … And here’s what he said:


That jews would see it in their interest that White societies continue to be healthy, because that’s in the jews interests as they live there.


You know, they don’t want them to deteriorate into all these minorities, factions, and so on then. He’s still talking about jewish interests. So jews are doing it, because it’s best for them, not because it’s in the interest of White people! Not because they identify as White, but only that they want to live in White countries and get along all right for themselves.


So that’s a totally different thing! Yes, it is very naive and it’s very much academic, I guess. You praise these guys, because their Ph D.’s, and then this is an attitude that more academics tend to have. You know, I still respect Kevin MacDonald a great deal. I mean, I’ve always liked him, but I just think that this needs to be said. And I actually hope that more people would look at all this and make comments about it and think about it.


John: Sure.


Carolyn: I think it’s very harmful to what we’re trying to do.


John: I’ll just say publicly, I don’t know if Kevin MacDonald, or Greg Johnson, or Richard Spencer would even listen to this, but if they do and they’re interested in discussing this with me, I’d be more than happy to have them on. I’m sure most people listening [know that] I’m not like this very hostile interviewer. I want to hear them out. I would probably challenge them, obviously.


Carolyn: Well I don’t think they would.


John: I don’t think so.


Carolyn: I sincerely doubt very much, because they don’t want to have to explain themselves. That’s why they do it, the way they do.


John: Well, all I would say is, to a guy like him, Kevin MacDonald, or Greg Johnson, or Spencer, anybody else who kind of goes along with their line of thinking, that we can avoid this issue, “step over it” as Johnson argues, … If you really do think that, that’s fine I guess. I would just say don’t, to use an Alt-Right expression, don’t counter signal revisionists, people that are critically investigating the fake “Holocaust” narrative.




There’s no need to! If you’re not interested in this topic, if you don’t think it’s important, then simply avoid it! But! Don’t accept the mainstream jewish narrative in any way! Just say:


Hey look! It’s got nothing to do with what I’m saying. White people have rights. My pro-White ideas and views have nothing to do with Hitler, or Nazis, or the “Holocaust”. I don’t care about it! That happened seventy, eighty years ago. What I’m talking about is now!


That’s all they have to do!


Carolyn: Right.


John: They don’t have to go along with the fake story, they don’t have to say:


Oh well, Hitler did do some things wrong and jews were persecuted, and murdered.


No! Just avoid it altogether! That to me is the best approach to take, if you are going to go along with Johnson, and MacDonald, and Spencer, and these other guys.


Carolyn: Well right. I said that in that article about MacDonald and his pod-casts, and it would be okay with me, if you just said:


I don’t know anything about it. I haven’t studied it. I don’t like to talk about it, because I, have not studied the issue.


And then that would be it. But instead, he did give some opinions. And then he made a silly comment:


That I’ve never seen anything that convinced me.


Well that’s just a dumb comment!


John: He’s not looking very hard then!


Carolyn: No! [laughing] No!


[Image] Revisionist “Holocaust” books. Click image to enlarge.


John: Because, I mean, Dr MacDonald, I’ll send you multiple books, … I mean, you can find this all out on the Internet! And see, that was another thing I wanted to bring up. Johnson kept arguing that to get our message across to people in a modern context, we don’t need to rehabilitate Hitler, or the Third Reich, or National Socialism, or anything like that.


I would disagree with that! I think that from an objective, truth-seeking perspective, it’s very clear that Hitler was a very righteous and honorable man! He was the greatest political statesman in modern Western history! I think you could say that, argue that very, very convincingly from a very objective, scholarly, perspective.


Carolyn: Yes. But you would have to have all your facts and figures at hand. That is not easy, but, yeah! Sure you could! Of course you could.


John: That’s true. And also I think that he still, …


Carolyn: Johnson says that, not because he knows that, or anything, but he says that, because he doesn’t want it! He doesn’t want it to be rehabilitated! Because he doesn’t want it to return.


John: Yeah.


Carolyn: In that way, that’s exactly what the jews don’t want. The jews don’t want Hitler to be rehabilitated more than they care about the “Holocaust”. The “Holocaust” is very important to them. But they don’t want Hitler to return or anything like that! So they’re in accord with that. And that’s why they want to keep the “Holocaust” in place, so they can say:


Look! He’s responsible for this and we can’t have him. He was a bad guy!


John: Right, exactly, yeah.


Carolyn: I’m sorry to say, they’re not coming from an honest place. They’re not coming from an honest, scholarly place. And in truth, the whole thing is that everybody comes from what they want to happen. It’s all about power! When you come down to it, history is all, who’s in power, and it’s not what’s true. You can find a lot about truth and what’s true and have different opinions. But in the overall, it’s who’s in power and that’s what it’s going to be.


So you have to change the power. And so someone like Andrew Anglin and his way dealing with that, I’m not saying he does it the best, but that way of dealing with it is in the end, it’s necessary. Because we agree, but we could talk with other people until we were blue in the face. And if they don’t want to change the way, their views of modern life are, they’re not going to go with it.






John: Right. Well really, it’s all about who controls the narrative, and the jews have control of the narrative when it comes to pretty much every major issue of importance. All of the issues that really form our paradigms for how we understand the world, how we understand our history. It’s all a jewish narrative. It’s a jewish approved narrative that advances jewish interests and delegitimizes White interests. I mean, that’s what it’s all about. It’s about controlling the narrative. And what is sad to me is that we’ve made so much progress in countering that jewish narrative, that weaponized, jewish narrative. Certainly within the past, since I’ve been involved in this movement, anyways. I mean, think about “Adolf Hitler, The Greatest Story Never Told”.


Carolyn: Right.


John: What a brilliant film! Very professionally done! Very, very powerful! Very, very moving! A great film, and it’s huge on YouTube. I mean, it’s been censored countless times. But I would venture to say that literally millions of people have seen that, and it has profoundly impacted them. It certainly did for me. And there’s many other documentaries, many other books that have been written, many other pod-casts. I mean, you’ve done a lot of work on this. I think you’ve played a huge role in rehabilitating the image of Hitler, and Nazis, and the WWII narrative, in general. And other people have as well.


Carolyn: Thank you.


John: And this work is so important! And we’ve made a lot of progress, we really have!


Carolyn: You’re right! I mean, that’s why we got to keep pushing! We’ve got to keep pushing it! I’m convinced of that now. That if I do anything, I’m going to just keep working on “Holocaust” revisionism, and also what I can do with Hitler. But mostly with this revisionism, because there is so much. I mean, it’s all been figured out, it’s all been debunked. It’s just a matter of getting people to pay attention.


[Image] Holocaust Handbook Series — 3 of 4.  Click image to enlarge.


You know, I was talking to you about my nephew and what I noticed with him, he’s very open-minded, very nonjudgmental, willing to look at things. But he doesn’t care all that much. I can tell. I sent him some things to read and look at, and he did. And then he said:


Well, what about this and that, …


And he wasn’t completely convinced by it. Well, when I came to it I was, like, ready to be convinced. I mean, I wanted to be convinced, I admit that. I wanted it to not be true. Other people wanted it to be, so it was different. But he’s kind of like just, he’s more interested in the Constitution and things like that. So I’m not going to press it, but I did sent him the book, “Debating the Holocaust”, and he said he would read it.

But, you know, you can’t force this down people. It’s not really what they think is most important, so even if he was convinced to some degree, which would at least be nice, it doesn’t mean he would become like me. [laughs]


John: Right. That’s how the vast majority of people are. And that’s why controlling the narrative, controlling how information is presented, whether it’s through the media, whether it’s through our educational establishment, it’s so important. And the jew again, the jews have a total stranglehold over this! At least in the official channels. I think we’re chipping away at that and sort of eroding that. Certainly within the past ten years, or so.


But that’s really what it’s all about. Most people don’t care about World War Two! They don’t care about the “Holocaust”. They don’t care about Hitler.


Carolyn: No.


John: They’re just been taught all these truly false and highly weaponized narratives about this period of our history, and they just accept it. It doesn’t mean much to them, but that’s just what they know, what they’ve been taught. And they don’t really think about it.




So could you imagine, rather than watching Schindler’s List, in seventh grade, when we were in our English class, we’re watching, you know, “Adolf Hitler, The Greatest Story Never Told”. Which is clearly much more objective and scholarly than any of these ridiculous “Holocaust” films.



Carolyn: Right.


John: And people would have a much different perspective, a much different outlook on everything! On life in general.


Carolyn: They would! Absolutely! That’s just absolutely true! So, this is where it’s at. It’s a tough battle, that’s what it is. But I just think, that when it comes to revisionism, if everybody in the White activist movement would get on board with it. And would talk in favor of it, it would make a big difference. I think it would, because lots of people just never mention it, that are influential. I just think it would be good, but obviously it doesn’t look like it’s going to happen.






John: I completely agree with you. and I think that, again, more advice to people that kind of go along with Johnson, and MacDonald , and others. Look at this from strictly a free speech, freedom of expression, freedom of intellectual inquiry, think about it just from that perspective. I mean, we should be able to question the “Holocaust”! We should be able to critically examine it and to entertain other ideas, other perspectives about what really happened. Just that alone, I mean, just from a free speech perspective, …


Carolyn: Well, my nephew, …


John: You don’t have to agree with it, but you should be able to say:


Hey look, I think the “Holocaust” really did happen! but if somebody wants to question it and do research into it, I fully support them in doing that.”


You know what I mean?


Carolyn: Yeah. my nephew did say, … He looked at all these great arguments and he was like, “Yeah, yeah, yeah.


But then when I happened to bring up in passing, the laws against it in Europe, and how you couldn’t talk about it, you go to jail, he said:


That’s one of the more convincing part of it, to me.




John: Well, it is! It totally flies in the face of American traditions, you know, free speech, the First Amendment! It’s totally contrary to all that!


Carolyn: Yeah! Am I breaking up to you?


John: No.


Carolyn: Yours is breaking up to me, but maybe that doesn’t matter.


John: Okay. No. You’ve been crystal clear this entire time.


Carolyn: Okay.


John: Carolyn, I know we’re pretty much at the hour mark and we’re going to wrap up here in just a second. I just wanted to really emphasize the fact that this fake narrative, this fake “Holocaust” narrative, this hysterical, irrational, entirely unfounded, you know, demonization of Hitler and the Nazis. This narrative really is the bedrock of the entire New World Order agenda, the White genocide agenda, which are basically one and the same thing, right? This is so clear, so easy to demonstrate, that this is the case!


There’s a couple articles I just want to highlight and bring up here real quick. One of which was just published over at The Renegade Tribune, and it’s written by a man named, John Wear, who has actually contributed to The Barnes Review in the past, and I think The Barnes Review sells some of his books, if I’m not mistaken.



He wrote an article called “Why the Holocaust Story was Invented” and he lists a number of reasons that kind of explain the purpose of the fake “Holocaust” narrative. What agenda it’s advancing and, of course, the establishment of Israel, and the demonization of Germany, etc., There’s a number of arguments he makes. It’s very, very much worth reading. I don’t know if you caught that. I tweeted it out today.


I will also link it when I post, …


Carolyn: I read something by him, that maybe you sent to me?


John: It’s good, yeah.


Carolyn: I’m trying to remember it.


John: And this article this may be an older article, I’m not sure. I just saw it posted by Kyle Hunt at The Renegade Tribune. so it may be an article that John Wear wrote in the past, and he’s just reposting it. I know he does that often.


But it’s worth reading. it’s very good. I mean, …


Carolyn: Does he kind of hold off in certain areas, he’s not one hundred percent, or is this just in this thing I read? It seems like he was doing that. Maybe to be more acceptable, more convincing, or something? I don’t know. I can’t remember. I actually can’t remember exactly what it was. But would you say he kind of holds back a little bit, or not?


John: From what I can tell it doesn’t seem like that to me.


Carolyn: Okay.


John: I mean, maybe you wouldn’t be as forceful as we are when we talk about these subjects, but no, he seems pretty solid to me.


And this article is very good, it’s worth reading.


And then also, I wrote an article and, you know, I’ve been harping on this issue for a number of years. And this article goes back to April 26th of 2015. And it’s actually on my old blog, my old blogspot website, which amazingly is still up right now. If you go to it, it’s John Friends blog dot blogspot dot com. [johnfriendsblog.blogspot.com]







If you go to it, Google has that warning, you know, this is restricted content, or controversial content, or whatever. You have to click, “I understand and I Will Continue”. So they’re basically kind of censoring it. But anyways, you can still find it. And again I’ll link to this article as well.



And this article is titled, “Top jewish Leader Claims Entire Western World Culpable for the Holocau$t”*. And I just highlighted an article I found in the “Algemeine”, which is a jewish newspaper. Again, people who have followed my site know I highlight jewish newspapers and just what the jews actually say, just to expose their agenda and everything that they’re about. Because again, they openly admit these things and say exactly what they’re up to.


And this article in particular, I was highlighting, some comments that were made by Ron Lauder, who I believe still is the President of the World jewish Congress.


[* http:// johnfriendsblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/top-jewish-leader-claims-entire-western.html]


And this was right around the time of the, …


Carolyn: Whose name did you say?


John: Ron Lauder. Ronald Lauder.


Carolyn: Yeah.


John: Yeah, he’s a big time jew that is been involved in all this stuff for a long time. Anyways, he made a speech, this was at the seventieth anniversary of the liberation of Bergen-Belsen. And he’s basically arguing that literally the entire Western world is essentially responsible for the “Holocaust” happening. Because they didn’t do enough to help the jews!



And it’s just so incredible some of the statements that these jews make! You know, he’s demonizing the United States for, quote, unquote:


Shutting it’s doors to jews that were trying to flee Europe. And no one was doing enough to help the poor jews in Europe, ” etc.,


It’s just, it’s so infuriating seeing what these jews say, and just how brazen they are!


Carolyn: They’ve got such balls, they are almost like, insane! It’s almost like they’re stupid! Because they come out with stuff like. It’s not going to be accepted. And it just reinforces the idea that Jewish deaths are more important than anybody else’s! If the whole world has to stop and be responsible for what happened here, for this huge number they came up with, this six million baloney! But I mean, sometimes they are talking to jews and they don’t think the rest of us are going to be paying any attention.


John: Yeah. That is true, and most people, …


Carolyn: But I can’t see how xxx jews would like that either?


John: And that’s the thing, most people don’t ever sit down and read jewish newspapers and jewish news outlets. Which is why I try to highlight them and say:


Hey! Look these jews are saying this, not me! You can call me an anti-Semite, and a neo-Nazi and everything else, but all I’m doing is quoting jews themselves, OK?


Carolyn: Yeah.

It’s amazing the Jews are so important, that to say that the whole world, even to say all Europe and all Europeans are responsible for what happened to them! And then what? What does he say? What’s supposed to be done about it?


John: Well, unlimited money, unlimited sympathy, unlimited, just acquiescence to this jewish agenda to genocide our race.


Carolyn: Well, I think they want to pass laws against anti-semitism. I think that is what they’re after.


John: Yeah. Exactly.


Carolyn: And there’s nothing worse than that! To say:


Oh yeah, it’s illegal! You’re going to go to jail if you express anything that we consider anti-semitic.


And they’ve got a whole, … They’re working out what anti-semitism is. There’s a whole list of stuff. I mean, it’s all kinds of stuff! It includes criticizing Israel in various ways and so, you know, it just puts them totally, outside of anybody’s control in any way, shape, or form. And they can’t be harmed, nothing can happen to them in any way. So they’re not even responsible for obeying laws, or whatever.


So, they are just showing that they really do want extraordinary privileges.


John: Privilege! They talk about White privilege all the time! It’s really jewish privilege and [for] other minorities that they’ve elevated, and used as weapons against our race!


Yes no doubt! I mean, again it’s very clear if you just read what Jews have to say and listen to what they have to say.


[Image] Holocaust Handbook Series — 4 of 4.  Click image to enlarge.






Carolyn: I think sometimes we’re at war! That’s one thing that Hitler recognized. And people blame him for it, saying he shouldn’t have. This was a war and he couldn’t evade it. You have to go ahead and do it.


And we’re at war with these jews, and we can’t say:


Oh well, let’s hope we can all get along! Let’s hope that some of them will be on our side.


What? Five or six of them? [bursts out laughing]


John: Exactly! Exactly!


Carolyn: It’s just aversion for having to confront things. And of course for war, getting serious, … It’s no fun! It’s terrible! Of course we’d like to evade it! But sometimes you can’t, because you’re just going to be done in by it.


That’s probably one argument for what Hitler finally did about the jews in Germany. He went about it in such a mild way in the beginning! Just helping them out, you know, working with the Zionists that wanted to go somewhere else anyway. I don’t know, you know, … It built up, because of jews from around the world who didn’t want that to happen.


John: Yeah. Yeah again, and that’s what’s so incredible when you really have a good understanding of revisionism and all the research that’s been done to actually demonstrate that the Germans were not interested in killing jews, at all! They were interested in preserving their lives, because they wanted to use their labor in some of these labor camps.


Again, it’s like the total opposite of what we’ve been told. But again, the whole World War narrative is essentially the exact opposite of what we’ve been told!


But I wanted to also highlight one other article that I actually cite in this article that I mentioned. That’s on my blog. You can find you can find what I’m about to read there, and again I’ll link this when I post this program.


[Image] Ian Kagedan. Click image to enlarge.


There was an article written by a man named Ian Kagedan, I think is how you pronounce it. He was the former national director of the B’nai B’rth in Canada, and you wrote a very, very revealing op-ed in The Toronto Star, back in 1991. And the title of it is, get this Carolyn, I’m sure you’ve heard of this, “Memory of the Holocaust Central to New World Order”. That’s literally the title of the article, or of the op-ed.


Central to New World Order“, right? I mean, this is the title of the article. It’s incredible! And he argues here, quote:


The Holocau$t stands as Western civilizations greatest failure! It was a natural outcome of centuries of racism and of anti-Semitism. To deny the Holocau$t is to deny racism’s capacity to undercut our civilization’s basic values and to destroy democracy. Achieving our quest of a New [Jew] World Order depends on our learning the Holocau$t lessons.


And what are the lessons of the “Holocaust”? I mean, again, this proves my point. The fake “Holocaust” narrative is literally the linchpin of the entire New World Order agenda! Which is simply a jewish plot to enslave the world, politically, economically and culturally, destroying all genuine national and racial distinctions in the process.


And the lessons of the “Holocaust”, which, of course, include “tolerance, diversity, anti-racism, multiculturalism”. The lessons of the “Holocaust” are specifically designed to erode, de-legitimizes and ultimately destroy any form of White racial identity, and to justify multiculturalism, and massive non-White immigration into the West. And to end all criticism of jews and the jewish state of Israel, and to equate it with anti-Semitism and hate speech. That’s what this is all about!


Carolyn: Yeah.


John: I mean, how could we avoid this Carolyn?


Carolyn: He makes it very clearly, doesn’t he? That’s a horrible picture! Total enslavement! You’re going to be programmed with this stuff and you’re going to believe it, or you’re on the outs. You’re somebody who’s bad, can’t exist in our societies. So you’d have to go into some bad place, or whatever.


And this is the kind of thing you have to fight! But these people will say:


Oh! That is just that one guy. Nobody will ever fall for all that stuff!


Well look at how much the world has fallen for it, now.




And I guess they can fall for the rest of it, if the media continues to be so controlled. I don’t want to bring this up, as I don’t want to take up any more time, but just to say real quickly, … Then there’s Trump, who is like somebody who’s, you know, standing against that, but he doesn’t have the power to overcome it. We all have to overcome it! We all have to do it. We have to say:


God! We have to stop this!


And that’s why people like, this is what I was going to say, but I couldn’t remember. Just this, that’s what people like MacDonald and Johnson are getting in the way of! They’re actually helping the jews in what they’re doing!


They need to be told this! They need to, … This needs to be pushed in their face, actually! I mean, rather than say:


Oh well, we don’t want to say anything bad about them. We have to support them.


John: Yeah, I completely with you. I would be willing to discuss this with any of them and make my opinions very clear. Not just opinions. Again, how could you, …


Carolyn: You know, I wish we could! John, here’s an idea. Somebody was talking about they’d like to have a debate with, … Mark. Mark Weber! You know Mark Weber, … Johnson got his ideas from Mark Weber, or Mark Weber helped him. Or maybe he didn’t mean to send him in that direction, altogether, but they got it from there. And they think that Mark Weber and David Irving gives them some support.


And MacDonald, I believe too, knows Mark Weber quite well. And they get those ideas from Mark Weber. And yet I just don’t think Mark Weber is so afraid of this, as they are.


Maybe we could get a conversation with Mark Weber? At one time Mark Weber wanted to talk on the phone with me, and discuss all these things. And I wouldn’t do it, because I was so in disagreement with him, and I though he was trying to make me see it his way. But I would talk to him now, but I would rather talk to him in public, on a public debate, a public forum, not necessarily a debate. And ask him some questions. I don’t know he’d be willing to do that, or not. But it just occurs to me that he might be more willing than MacDonald or Johnson would be.


John: Carolyn, I’m going to see if I can make that happen, because I actually know Mark Weber.


Carolyn: Good.


John: I’ll see what I can do on that front. Boy! that would be very, very interesting! [laughing]


Carolyn: Yeah!


John: Well. I’ll see what I can do. And I’ll certainly be in touch. We’re well past the hour now, but that’s okay, let’s go ahead and wrap up.


I just want to conclude by saying, I think from my perspective, which I think I could defend very well, … Objectively speaking, Hitler was in fact the greatest White leader in modern history! That’s very clear to me. I think we do need to rehabilitate his image, and I think we’ve done a good job at doing that, over the course of the past, say ten years, or whatever. Pro-White ideas and perspectives will always! Always! Always be tied to Hitler, to the Nazis, to the “Holocaust”! There’s no reason to avoid it, or to cower in fear about it! We are right! And we have the evidence and the proof to demonstrate that we’re right!


And, this is something we need to tackle head on! And if you don’t want to, if you disagree with me, don’t counter signal it! Just, avoid it! Step over it. Whatever you’ve got to do. But don’t accept this jewish nonsense about gas chambers, and jews were murdered in this and that.


[Image] Holocaust Myth Cartoon. Click image to enlarge.


It’s all bullshit! Everything the jews have to say about the “Holocaust” is utter bullshit! Designed specifically to advance jewish interests, and to delegitimize White racial interests! That is so clear, it’s so obvious, we should not even be debating this at this point.


That’s all I got to say Carolyn. Go ahead.


Carolyn: Well. I agree with you John! Good for you!


John: Thank you. [both laugh]


Well this has been fun, Carolyn. I’ll go ahead and post this up tonight, and I’ll see if I get Mark Weber to talk about this. That would be very interesting.


Carolyn: Good! Okay! Well, it’s been fun for me too! And so, I hope the listeners enjoy it. Thanks John.


John: Okay. Thank you very much! I will talk to you real soon.


Carolyn: Good.


John: All right. Good night.











PDF Notes


PDF: Version 1 — Sep 21, 2017

* Total words = 12,423
* Total images = 35
* Total A4 pages = 94


Click to download a PDF of this post (6.0 MB):





Version History


Version 10: Sep 21, 2017 — Added PDF Version 1 for download.


Version 9: Sep 18, 2017 — Added some more links, and corrected some typos. Removed Transcript Status items. Added 1 image.


Version 8: Sep 17, 2017  — Added 15 images. Updated cover image. Expanded my intro.


Version 7: Sep 16, 2017  — Added 4 images. Proofed 15 more minutes. Total proofed = 80 mins. TRANSCRIPT NOW COMPLETE!


Version 6: Sep 14, 2017  — Added 3 images. Proofed 5 more minutes. Total proofed = 65 mins.


Version 5: Sep 13, 2017  — Added 3 images. Proofed 5 more minutes. Total proofed = 60 mins.


Version 4: Sep 12, 2017  — Proofed 10 more minutes. Total proofed = 55 mins.


Version 3: Sep 11, 2017  — Added 1 image. Proofed 10 more minutes. Total proofed = 45 mins.


Version 2: Sep 10, 2017  — Added 5 images. Proofed 10 more minutes. Total proofed = 35 mins.


Version 1: Sep 9, 2017  — Published post. Total proofed = 25 mins.


[Part 1 of a 10 part series discussing the jewish origins of communism and how it was organized jewry that took over Russia, in the so-called “Russian Revolution” of 1917, and proceeded to slaughter tens of millions of Russians in a systematic orgy of blood-letting, over many decades.

In the words of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn:

“It cannot be understated. Bolshevism was the greatest human slaughter of all time.

The fact that most of the world is ignorant of this reality is proof that the global media itself is in the hands of the perpetrators.”




[30/75 Minutes Complete]

















Part 1







Click the link below to view the video:







Published on August 27, 2017


(The Final Cut)


Censorship is validation of the message.


Communism was not created by the masses to overthrow the bankers, Communism was created by the bankers to overthrow and enslave the masses.

You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse.

The October Revolution was not what you call in America the “Russian Revolution.” It was an invasion and conquest over the Russian people.

More of my countrymen suffered horrific crimes at their bloodstained hands than any people or nation ever suffered in the entirety of human history. It cannot be understated. Bolshevism was the greatest human slaughter of all time.

The fact that most of the world is ignorant of this reality is proof that the global media itself is in the hands of the perpetrators.


We cannot state that all Jews are Bolsheviks. But: Without Jews there would have been no Bolshevism. For a Jew nothing is more insulting than the truth. The blood maddened Jewish terrorists murdered sixty-six million in Russia from 1918 to 1957.


Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (1918-2008), Nobel-Prize-winning novelist, historian and victim of Jewish Bolshevism.












Ken O’Keef: It is very clear that the head of the snake is the financial system. The whole point of Finance is to indent, otherwise to enslave. What is a mortgage? I mean, what does that stand for? It’s called, it’s a death grip. So when you get a mortgage you have a death grip held over you, because you are in debt. You don’t even own the house, the bank owns the house that loans you the money to buy the house. Unless you’re fortunate enough to have all the money to buy it outright, and even then you can be taxed by the government. And if you fail to keep up with those taxes the government can then take it from you.

The whole system is based on a financial fraud which effectively takes the power that we have and it gives it to a tiny group of individuals who are running the world through the control of Finance. With the infinite supply of money that we have allowed them to take, they have literally an infinite supply of money. And with that money, from their psychopathic point of view, they have bought everything and everyone who can be bought!

So, those of us who cannot be bought, because we operate on the level that goes way beyond the material, we are not rewarded for such behavior, we are punished for such behavior! And the most slovenly disgustingly criminal, pedophilia, you know, corrupt moral individuals, those are the ones that are rewarded in this system, which is upside down. We reward the pedophiles, we reward the corrupt, we reward the liars, we reward the people with no morals at all!




Narrator: In the middle of the 19th century, Moses Hess, formulated the first written principles of communism. In 1862 Hess, or the Communist rabbi as he was called, wrote the book, “Rome and Jerusalem” in which he laid the foundations for a jewish nationalist movement, called “Zionism”.



In the book he call them the jewish people to become separatists, and to prepare for the creation of a future of homogeneous jewish ethno-State.



Palestine would be occupied by the jewish people. But the big problem was, Palestine was at this time, 90 to 95% Arabic. Hess argued that international jewish bankers would help in his realization of stealing their land from the Palestinians.



Hesse suggested in his book that one last race and class struggle was being developed between the Aryans and the Semites. In this fight Hesse predicted that the jews would stand as winners and the Europeans losers. The jews would stand superior over all other peoples, and, because jews had preserved the racial purity over the centuries, it would give them a leading role in the world.




Hesse essentially promoted eugenics and racial hygiene for the jews, and talked about a future jewish ethno-state. He also referred to Christianity as “the religion of death”.



Fascinatingly he predicted a future war in Europe with Germany, Italy, and Austria involved as part of a “race struggle”.



Moses Hess was a close friend and collaborator of Karl Marx and Fredrick Engels, which he converted to communism and assisted them in their work with the “Communist Manifesto”, in 1848.


This proves that Socialism, Marxism, Communism and Zionism, in fact, share the same roots, although they travel different paths, they have same common goal, domination of the world!



They all work and plan for the day when their “chosen race”, shall “inherit the earth”. Karl Marx, real name Moses Mordechai Levi, was descended from a long line of famous rabbis, who were so-called “Talmudic scholars”. From which is the source that his own philosophy is derived.



Marx’s grandfather was a rabbi, by the name of Mordechai. In fact, his grandparents were related to the jewish Rothschild family through marriage. Rothschild would also partially funded Karl Marx, who will be remembered as the “jewish father of communism”.







Le Droit de Vivre, May 12 1936 said:


Jewry is the mother of Marxism.


The Communist Manifesto laid out the ideology of communism. It’s key points include:

— A central bank with monopoly and credit.
— Abolition of countries and nationalities.
— Abolition of the traditional family consisting of a man a woman and children.
— Abolition of private property which means no rights for the people.
— To make it impossible for people to earn a livelihood by introducing heavy taxation.
— Confiscation of property.
— Abolition of the right of inheritance.
— A communist state, i.e., jewish monopoly on credit and banking.
— The media in total control of the Communists.
— Women should not focus on family and children anymore. In their own words communism wants to do away with the status of women as mere instrument of production. — Abolition of Christianity and morality.



Marx refers to this totalitarian scheme as “Dictatorship of the proletariat”. And his cult followers promote violence, class envy, and hostility towards free markets, family, business, tradition, and Christianity.


Today they are instrumental in the destabilization of Europe.


Marx also openly encouraged genocide against Slavs, referring to them as “racial trash” and that they must perish in a revolutionary “Holocaust”.


Male academic: I don’t think many people know that only socialists publicly advocated genocide in the 19th and 20th centuries. I think that is a very little known fact, and it seems shocking if you mention it. I’ve lectured on it here and other universities. And it’s always greeted with a sense of shock!

It first appeared in January in 1849 in Marx’s journal, “xxxx”. Engels wrote of the, how the class war, in Marxian terms, means when the socialist revolution happens, the class war happens, tr will be primitive societies in Europe, two stages behind, because they are not even Capitalist yet. And he had in mind the Basques, and the Brettons, and the Scottish Highlanders, and the Serbs, and the, he calls them “racial trash”, “xxxx”, racial trash. And they will have to be destroyed because being to root stages behind in the “historical struggle” it will be impossible to “bring them up” to the point of being revolutionary.



Interviewer: You say that the xxxx, and dirty, dirtiness of Slavic people you see. And it says, for instance that Poland has no reason to exist.

Male voice over:

The classes and the races too weak to master the new conditions must give way. They must perish in the revolutionary Holocaust.” — Karl Marx.

Male academic: Marx began it. He was the ancestor of modern political genocide. And I don’t know of any European thinker on the modern period before Marx and Engels, ever publicly advocated racial extermination. I can’t find anything earlier there. So I presume it starts with them.

In his 1920 article “Zionism versus Bolshevism — the Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish PeopleWinston Churchill stated his belief that, international jews were seeking a worldwide communist state under jewish domination. The International jews, would use Communism and Zionism to accomplish this.

As a first step towards establishing Israel, Ezekia Niles described in Niles’ Weekly Register article that the Rothschilds had purchased Jerusalem in 1829.

Male interviewee: Rothschild have founded Israel and Rothschild has always been the backer of Israel. Whatever Rothschild wants, he gets. It is believed that he is the richest man in the world. And I have little doubt of that.






In 1897 the first Zionist Congress was held in Basel, Switzerland. It was chaired by Theodor Herzl. Jewish delegates from across Europe agreed that Palestine should be given to them. Prior to his death, in 1904, Herzl predicted that a world body will one day give Palestine to the jews, and that he will go down in history at the father of the jewish state.



For Herzl’s dream to come true European military powers would have to be manipulated and used into taking Palestine away from the Ottomans by force. In the German newspaper Deutsche Zeitung, Herzl wrote:


The wealthy jews rule the world; The fate of the governments lies in their hands. They start wars between countries, and when they wish, the government’s make peace. When the wealthy jews sing, the nations and their leaders dance along, and meanwhile the jews get richer!


Dr. Wolffsohn said in a New York Times article in August 22, 1907 that:


Jewish people must conquer the world!


The Federal Reserve


Communism was devoted to abolish private property in order to concentrate all wealth and power in the hands of the global central banking cabal. Around 250 years ago, in 1760, Mayer Amschel Rothschild created the House of Rothschild that paved the way for international banking and control of the world’s resources.


Money is power! Money is the only weapon that the jew has to defend itself with!



Voice over: Mayer Amschel Bauer, born in Frankfurt Germany in 1744, was a money lender and a goldsmith on jew street, whose shop had a sign out front with a red hexagram on it. Eventually he would change his name to “Rothschild”, which is German for red sign. Rothschild soon learned that loaning money to governments and Kings was more profitable than loaning money to private individuals. Not only were the loans bigger, but they were secured by the nation’s taxes.

Mayer Rothschild had five sons whom he trained in the skills of money creation. And sent out to the major capitals of Europe to open branches of the family banking business.

Mayer Amschel Bauer:You are five brothers! I want you each to start a banking business in a different country. One to go and open a house in Paris, one in Vienna, one in London. Choose the most important centers, so that when money is to be sent from here to London, let us say, you won’t have to risk life and gold. Amschel, here in Frankfurt, will just send a letter to Nathan in London, saying, “pay so-and-so”. And that will be offset by loans from London to Frankfurt. Understand?

Sons: Yes, father.

Mayer Amschel Bauer: In your day there will be many wars in Europe and nations that have money to transport will come to the Rothschilds, because it will be safe! Now five banking houses may cover Europe, but you will be one family! Rothschild! Who work always together! That will be your power!


Female voice over: Just how rich and powerful is Lord Evelyn Rothschild? Historically the Rothschild family’s wealth was hidden in underground vaults. The Rothschild secret financial records were never audited and never accounted for. Their family commissioned biographies give the illusion that their family fortune has dwindled. But researchers estimate their wealth at close to 500 trillion dollars. More than half the wealth of the entire world. Besides their many castles, palace mansions, wineries, racehorses, and exotic resorts, the Rothschild bought Reuters in the 1800s.

Reuters then bought, “The Associated Press” which selects and delivers the same news stories to the entire world, day after day. They have controlling interest in three major television networks and easily avoid media attention since they owe it. Until recently they owned and operated England’s Royal Mint and continued to be the gold agents for the Bank of England, which they also direct. They control the LBMA, London Bullion Market Association, where 30 to 42 million ounces of gold, worth over eleven billion dollars, are traded daily.





The Rothschilds earn millions weekly just on transaction fees alone. They also fix the world price of gold on a daily basis, and profit from it’s ups and downs. Over the centuries the Rothschilds have amassed trillions of dollars worth of gold bullion in their subterranean vaults and have cornered the world’s gold supply. They own controlling interest in the world’s largest oil company, Royal Dutch Shell. They operate phony charities and offshore banking services where the wealth of the black nobility in the Vatican is hidden in secret account at Rothschild Swiss banks, trust, and holding companies.

Although Ethelene Rothschild looks like a harmless gray-haired old man, make no mistake about it, Rothschild and an ancestors have hand-picked presidents, crashed stock markets, bankrupted nations, orchestrated wars, and sponsored the mass murder and impoverishment of millions.

The wealth hoarded by this one family alone, could feed, clothe, and shelter, every human being on earth!


Narrator: The Rothschilds is the head of the snake. Within the City of London there is a one-mile square that is referred to as “the city”. This is the headquarters of the jewish family Rothschilds’ banking dynasty that owns the money supply through the central banks of almost every nation on earth.


In November 1910, seven of the world’s richest jewish men, held a secret meeting on Jekyll Island, just of the coast of Georgia, to establish a central bank, which they called the “Federal Reserve Bank”. These men were Nelson Aldrich, and Frank Vanderlip, both representing the Rockefeller financial empire. Henry Davidson, Charles Norton, and Benjamin Strong, representing JP Morgan. And Paul Warburg representing the Rothschilds banking dynasty of Europe.


There were some powerful man who made abundantly clear that they were not in favor of the Federal Reserve system. Their total wealth today would be worth nearly eleven billion dollars. These were Benjamin Guggenheim, Isador Strauss, and Jacob Astor. Unfortunately all of them were aboard Titanic when it sank to the depths of the sea. All three died that night.



By April 1912, all opposition to the Federal Reserve had been eliminated. On December 23rd 1913 after many senators and congressmen had left town for Christmas, the President, Wilson, signed a bill and the privately-owned Federal Reserve System came into being in the United States.


After Woodrow Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act which gave private interest control of economic power in 1913, he said:


I’m a most unhappy man! I’ve unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is now controlled by it’s system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore and all our activities, are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled! One of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world! No longer a government by free opinion! No longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority! But, a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.” — Woodrow Wilson


Jewish bankers and their rabbis actually celebrated the passage of the Federal Reserve Act in 1913. After the Federal Reserve was up and running, Charles August Lindbergh added:


The financial system has been turned over to the Federal Reserve Board. This system is private, conducted for the sole purpose of obtaining the greatest possible profits from the use of other people’s money.


The Federal Reserve System was neither federal, nor does it contain reserves, and, nor is it a part of a decentralized system. The adoption of the debt based financial system preached by Marx in the Communist Manifesto had been accomplished. The current banking system, fractional reserve banking, enables privately owned banks to create money out of thin air!


Money today is simply numbers in a computer system, with only about 3% existing as physical currency. Through it’s control and monopoly of our money, the elite that own the Federal Reserve, now have total control over other banks, corporations, money, and politicians. The Fed system is designed to enslave us to never-ending debt. And to fool us to believe that our money has any real value. When it is, in fact, worthless! Created out of thin air based on debt, and backed by nothing.






It must enslave humanity to protect it’s monopoly over credit. It’s money creating tricks enabled Big Brother government to borrow endless money from the Fed. The Fed were now controlled by the jews, Rothschild, Warburg, and Schiff. Every Federal Reserve Chairman since 1980 has been jewish: Burns, Volcker, Greenspan, Ben Bernanke, and Yellen.


The House of Rothschild owns 57% of the stock of the privately held Federal Reserve Bank.


Interviewer: What is the proper relationship, what should be the proper relationship between the chairman of the Fed and a President of the United States?

Greenspan: Well, first of all, the Federal Reserve is an independent agency, and that means basically, that there is no other agency of government which can overrule actions that we take.


Narrator: The jew Harold Wallace Rosenthal explains:


Our power has been created through the manipulation of the national monetary system, … The Federal Reserve System fitted our plan nicely, since it is owned by us. But the name implies that it’s a government institution. From the very outset, our purpose was to confiscate all the gold and silver, replacing them with worthless non-redeemable paper notes, … We jews have put issue upon issue to the American people. Then we promote both sides of the issue as confusion reigns. With their eyes fixed on the issues, they fail to see who is behind every scene.

We jews glory in the fact that the stupid goy have never realized that we are the parasites consuming an increasing portion of production while the producers are continually receiving less and less.

Harold Wallace Rosenthal.


We have to understand that one of the most powerful tools the globalists have for profit and control is war! The most lucrative thing that can happen for the international bankers and the globalists, is war! For it forces the country to borrow even more money from the Federal Reserve Bank at interest!



First We Take Manhattan
by Leonard Cohen

They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom.
For trying to change the system from within.
I’m coming now, I’m coming to reward them.
First we take Manhattan, then we take Berlin.

I’m guided by a signal in the heavens.
I’m guided by this birthmark on my skin.
I’m guided by the beauty of our weapons.
First we take Manhattan, then we take Berlin, …





The next goal for the elite was to finish off Christian Russia and from there launch an invasion of the rest of Europe. According to the State Department’s documents, a group of jews including Jacob Schiff, Felix Warburg, Otto Kahn, Mortimer Schiff, Issac Zeelman already planned the overthrow of the Russian Tsar in 1916. They decided that Russia should be destroyed and a communist slave regime would be implemented.


The fact that we will never learn in school, is that communism actually was a jewish totalitarian ideology invented by jews, funded by jewish bankers, and economically manifested by jewish Bolsheviks, as Vladimir Lenin, Trotsky, Kaganovich, Yagoda.


The family of Tsar Nicholas II, his wife Alexandra, his daughters, Olga, Tatiana, Maria, Anastasia, and his son and successor, Alexei, were devout Orthodox Christians.






They exemplified everything that was precious in a traditional family. As a boy, Tsar Nicholas II had witnessed the assassination of the Tsar Alexander II by the jewish terrorist, Vera Figner, leader of a terrorist group called, “The People’s Will”.


Tensions between the jews and the Christian Russians started. Nicholas’ great tragic mistake was in failing to execute the Communists, before it was too late, after a failed 1905 revolution. Now his kindness returned to haunt him and his family. The Bolsheviks forced the Tsar to abdicate. The jew Alexander Kerensky was given $1,000,000 from the jewish Wall Street banker, Jacob Schiff, to immediately free all political prisoners and lift the ban on political exiles, to permit them to return to Russia.


Revolutionaries quickly flooded in to any and all public offices. Anarchy began, as criminals plundered houses and people were murdered and robbed. Jacob Schiff was chairman of the Kuhn Loeb bank and an assistant of the jewish Rothschilds. He took care of the contacts between the revolutionary movement in Russia and the jewish Masonic Order, B’nai B’rith.


On March 27, 1917, the jews Jacob Schiff and Max Warburg sent Lev Davidovich Bronstein, better known as “Trotsky” and his group of jewish communists off to Russia, to lead a jewish revolution with no less than 20 million dollars in gold. Today worth billions. Some 90,000 exiles, mostly jews, and Freemasons, returned from all over the world to infiltrate Russia. Most of them changed their jewish names to blend into the European society better.


Another banker who financed revolution was the Swedish jew xxx of the NIA Bank is local Olof’s grandsons Robert Akbari is a former member of the Swedish Communist Party and today, leader of the zionist anti-White organization called Expo, in Sweden.


Trotsky recruited Russian jews from the immigrant population of the Lower East Side of Manhattan and trained them as armed revolutionaries. Lenin, Marlo, Raddick, and Kamenev returned from Switzerland. Stalin, Sverdlov, and Sanonra [sp] returned from Siberia. The jewish chairman of the Central Executive Committee, Jacob Schavloeb [sp] send a message to the jew Yakov Yurovsky, head of the local CHEKA, where he communicated that he had received orders from Jacob Schiff to eliminate the Tsar and his entire family. Schavloeb ordered Yurovsky to carry out this order.


In the spring of 1918 the Tsar and his family were taking to Ekaterinburg in the Urals, where Yakov Yurovsky was given the mission to imprison, plan, and assassinate the imperial family. Yurovsky brought the Tsar Nicholas and his family to a house, that previously had belonged to a wealthy jewish merchant, named Ipatiev.


Nicholas’ imperial family was abruptly woken in the middle of the night on July 17, 1918, when Yurovsky told the Imperial family to dress and then brought them to the basement. They were told that they were going to pose for a group photograph. But the jewish assassins Yurovsky, Nikulin, Germako [sp] and Vaganov, [sp] had other plans in mind.


Seconds later Yurovsky then pulled out his revolver and aimed it straight at the Tsar’s head and fired. Nicholas died instantly. Next he shot Tsarina Alexandra as she made the sign of the Cross. Olga, Tatiana, Maria, and Anastasia were shot next. The daughters were stabbed to death after the initial gunfire had failed to kill them. Their doctor and three servants were also murdered in cold blood. Items that were related to the imperial family were burned and destroyed. Nothing was saved the family, even the dogs were slaughtered.


News of the brutal murder of the Romanovs would send shock-waves throughout Russia and all of Europe. To some jews though, the slaughter of the Romanov family, was treasured as a “jewish ritual murder”. In selected jewish owned shops, they sold greeting cards with images that were unavailable for Gentiles. The postcards carried the image of the xxx. This is an image of a rabbinical jew with the Torah in his hand and a white fowl in the other. The head of the depicted fowl is clearly shown to be the Imperial Russian Tsar, Nicholas the Second. Below this image is the inscription in Hebrew:

This is a sacrificial animal. So is my cleansing. It will be my replacement in cleansing the victim.






A bloody civil war between the red jews led by Trotsky and the White Christians led by Admiral Kolchak broke out before the jews could grab full power the Soviet power house to set up their own Bolshevik totalitarian system David R Francis US ambassador to Russia said in January 1918 the Bolshevik leaders here in Russia most of whom are jews and 90% of whom are returned excels care little for Russia, or any other country, but our internationalists and they’re trying to start a worldwide social revolution the jewish role in the calmness revolution was mentioned in many major jewish publications such as the jewish encyclopedia and the universal jewish encyclopedia and a encyclopedia Judaica, in fact, they are boasting about the essential role of the jews in the Russian Revolution the jewish Chronicle said there is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself in the fact that so many jews are Bolsheviks in the fact that the ideals of Bolshevism at many points are consulted with the finest ideals of Judaism of the 22 ministers in the first Soviet government 17 were jews the few were not themselves jewish often where freemasons had jewish wives and spoke Yiddish we can’t know for sure if Stalin is jewish, but at least he spoke Yiddish and at three jewish wives some historians claim that Stalin was Georgian and some say that he was George in jus Los Angeles B’nai B’rith messenger, for example, stated that stalling was a jew Stalin’s real name was Joseph Vissarionovich Yogesh really the jewish writer Morenstein schneider invented the term anti-semitic in 1860 the term would be used to silence all those that dare to expose jewish crimes, because of the predominant jewish character of the regime the very first piece of legislation approved by the communist regime was the anti-semitism act in 1917 anti-semitism who has made a capital crime an anti-communist was regarded as an anti-semite Leon Trotsky also started using the word racist to browbeat all dissenters of the communist ideology and to render debate impossible these words are used still to this day to bully any politically incorrect person into silence even more now than ever they’re trying to make it punishable to question, or criticize their actions by calling it hate speech fake news, or anti-semitic Semitism as he is used as a great blockade when somebody’s called an anti-semite it’s usually, because they asked some question, or made some comment about jewish behavior in some way shape, or form and, because jews don’t want to discuss that behavior they call you an anti-semite for daring to question that jews do anything bad ever that’s really why it is used anytime you say something about jews Zionist Israel anything with a tangent to jews that is in a negative what you’re going to be called an anti-semite by the jews, because this is the defense mechanism that they use to cover up their crimes and to prevent analysis of the criminal action that has happened which so very often leads to a jewish perpetrator the jewish philosophy is how did French Siler describe it the other day it is an excuse to commit crimes that’s all it is you put all your morals aside and you can do anything that’s the jewish philosophy then, of course, the other part of it for the people who actually are jewish and following the dictates of the Talmud believe that they are better than everybody else and they act accordingly and we see the horror in the world that is generated by that insanity.




You must understand the leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians the hated Russians the hated Christians driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse the October Revolution was not what you call in America the Russian Revolution it was an invasion and conquest over the Russian people more my countrymen suffered horrific crimes at the blood-stained hands than any people, or nation ever suffered in the entirety of human history it cannot be understated Bolshevism was the greatest human slaughter of all time the fact that most of the world is ignorant of this reality is proof that the global media itself is in the hands of the perpetrators we cannot state that all jews are Bolsheviks, but without jews there will be no Bolshevism for a jew nothing is more insulting than the truth the blood matted jewish terrorists murdered 66 million in Russia from 1918 to 1957 Alexander Solzhenitsyn Nobel prize-winning novelist historian and victim of jewish Bolshevism. [Music]


The jewish Bolsheviks implemented a policy known as collectivization by collectivization they could take away the peasants land in the name of the states this was what Marx himself described as the essence of communism to abolish private property. In early 1930 over 91% of the agricultural land was collectivist. The Communists were taking every good from the peasants. All weapons of the civilians were also confiscated by the state he ordered the governor to confiscate all grain all food from the Senate by doing that he News is condemning them to death.




Heart. For sickle the summer Kapusta salami a Kapusta whether worth of vodka vodka transmitter signature no no no Rosado to meto a noble savages.




During the periods of 1921 to 1922 1932 to 1933 in 1946 to 1947 the jewish Bolshevik regime deliberately mechanized three series of genocidal man-made famines aimed at starving farmers Ukraine Belarus Kazakhstan and Russia millions died a slow death and people resorted to eating grass and some even to cannibalism.





This real “Holocaust” is today referred to as the Holodomor encyclopedia britannica estimates around 8 million people 5 million of them Ukrainian were starved to death by the Stalin Kaganovich famine alone. And the three howl of the more genocides together resulted in a death toll of 16.5 million. Russian historian Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn estimated that between 1917 to 1958 the jewish Bolshevik regime managed to exterminate up towards 60 million Europeans, including victims of the forced collectivization, the hunger, large purges expulsion, banishment, executions, and mass deaths at gulags. [Music]


Industrial-scale murders like these are an essential part of communist theory.


With these families Lenin Stalin Kaganovich and all their jewish agents destroyed any remaining resistance to the Communists and ordered from Lenin and Trotsky the Red Terror was first announced by the jew Yakov Sverdlov Lenin stipulated that 3/for of mankind may die if necessary to ensure the other quarter for communism. Letting even outlined the purpose for the famines by stating destroying the peasant economy and driving the peasant from the country to the town the famine creates a proletariat letting also regarded Europeans as animals it is precisely now and only now when in the starving regions people are eating human flesh and hundreds if not thousands of courses are littering the roads that we can and therefore must carry out the confiscation of church valuables with the most savage and merciless energy not stopping short of crushing any resistance he continued the greater the number of representatives of the reactionary clergy a reactionary Verglas Eve we succeed in executing for this reason the better Leon Trotsky said we must turn Russia into a desert populated by White Negroes upon whom we shall impose a tyranny such as the most terrible Eastern despots never dreamt of the only difference is that this will be a left-wing tourney not a right-wing tyranny it will be a ready tyranny and not a White one we mean the word red literally, because we shall shed such floods of blood as we will make all the human losses suffered in the capitalist wars pale by comparison the biggest bankers across the ocean will work in the closest possible contact with us if we win the revolution we shall establish the power of scientism upon the wreckage of the revolutions funeral and we shall become a power, but for which the whole world will sink to it’s knees we shall know what real power is by means of terror and bloodbath we shall reduce the Russian intelligence Ziya to a state of complete stiff action and idiocy into an animal systems master rest in the middle of the night kidnapping executions and brutal tactics in the torture took place the communist plan was to use psychological warfare torture and terror to intimidate their White enemies into submission. Gendry chef goda was a jewish secret police official we served as a director of the NKVD a major Israeli publication, Y-Net news, reveal the truth about Yagoda, saying we must not forget that some of the greatest mass murders of all time were jewish. It goes on Ganesha Goethe was the greatest jewish murderer of the 20th century. He is responsible for the deaths of at least 10 million people.




The jewish CHEKA was a secret police force created through the NKVD later KGB on December 22 1917 by the jew Vladimir Lenin and was consequently led by the jew Felix jeff schinske jews made up nearly 80% of the rank and file checker agents reports Bruce Lincoln an American professor of Russian history the Shecky rounded up Christians and all those who did not support the jewish Bolshevik government the Shakur practiced torture methods including skinning victims alive scarf and cronies the barbed wire crucifixion hanging stoning to death women and children were also victims of a terror they would sometimes be tortured and raped before being shot children between the ages of 8 to 13 were imprisoned and executed with hot irons the Bolsheviks tortured those prisoners who were caught some victims were actually sliced to Pete fate by day while others were branded with hot irons their eyes poked out to induce unbearable pain burning coals were inserted into women’s genitals often in views of victim’s family members prisoners were publicly hanged communism car Co plays their victims in a row and nailed their hands to a table around their wrists with a knife poured boiling water over the hands and pulled on skin they poked out eyes broke bones in legs and arms and extracting nails cut off hands ears and noses victims were submerged in boiling, or tar victims would those with petrol and burned alive Lazar Kaganovich was the jewish head of the KGB and was well known for his purchase of those who opposed jewish control it is argued that Stalin who second wife was Kaganovich his sister was a mere figurehead some believe that the numerous used below Stalin in all significant positions ran the show as proof some point out that many of the churches were burned to the ground while the synagogues were left standing many priests were forced to sweep the streets and others were murdered the jewish Soviet leaders held rabbis in high esteem and those people who dared to criticize the jewish supremacy were mercilessly murdered as anti-semitism became a crime punishable by death in the Soviet Union the jew kaganovich ordered the deaths of millions and the total destruction of Christian monuments and churches among these victims were bishops professors doctors policemen officers lawyers civil servants journalists writers artists nurses workers and farmers the most intelligent and the highest achieving segment of the population was totally wiped out which left the population of ignorant workers peasants and a powerful jewish ruling elite Lenin said we must hate hatred is the basis of communism children must be taught to hate their parents if they’re not communists from the American Hebrew of September 8 1920 the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia was the work of jewish brains from jewish dissatisfaction of jewish planning whose goal is to create a new order in the world what was performed and so excellent way in Russia thanks to jewish brains and, because of jewish dissatisfaction and by jewish planning shall also through the same jewish mental and physical forces become a reality all over the world a righteous jew Henry H Klein explained that Zionism is a political program for the conquest of the world Zionism destroyed Russia by violent as a warning to other nations it is destroying the United States through bankruptcy as Lenin advises scientism once another world war is necessary to enslave the people our manpower is scattered over the world will we be destroyed from within, or will we wake up in time to prevent it the rabbi Stephen Samuel wise in New York said some called it communism, but I called it Judaism. [Music]


People were being shot and then I write the biggest comes in the world, but Stalin even got to the point of killing people by random by quarters let’s say hundred thousand in Campbell district okay that’s it whoever they grabbed and shot will be fulfilling quarter they will be care about names then after the quotas were fulfilled the local authorities would report to star into Central Committee and ask for additional quotas.




Kuroshio Brazil girl Anita what a system X dot a madam roselucia Alice so to see Emily was impeached for a book Narada on Brazil died two million a witness him not a medicinal quota will be given and after fulfilling again a free disco Potter and so it will go in circles it was like a like mincemeat machine, you know, I was just killing them killing in theory. [Music]


Sometimes the jewish butchers cut open installments of their victims pulled out a length of small intestines may lead to a telegraph pole and with the whip forced the victim to run circles around the pole until the whole intestine became unraveled and the victim died the most agonizing death properly pregnant Christine women were shamed to trees and their babies cut out of the bodies some victims in Kiev were placed in a coffin with a decomposing body and buried alive only to be dug up after half an hour Lenny was still not satisfied with this and reported more power to the terror the Bolsheviks would eliminate every freethinker trustee wanted every individual to be a rootless soldier of labour and he thought that all those demanding free speech free press and free trade unions should be shot like dogs if order to move they were forced to obey if they refused they were deserters who would be punished with death every move was a gunpoint Trotsky often executed his victims personally in the most cruelest ways he happily ordered disciplinary executions and he even ordered children murdered officers and their families were executed for disobeying orders the dude Grigory seen Onias real name here’s a film as head of the commies international wrote in an article in the des nya Gazeta in Moscow September first 1918 we will make our hearts cruel hard and immovable so that no mercy will enter them so that they will not quiver at the sight of the sea of enemy blood we will let loose the floodgates of that scene without mercy without sparing we will kill our enemies and scores of hundreds let them be thousands let them drown themselves in their own blood let there be floods of blood of deeper glossy more blood as much as possible. [Music]


Every people who dared to criticize the regime would be branded as anti-semitic and punished with death Christians priests and the most attractive youth and all non jewish intellectuals were the first to be exterminated in years to come Stalin’s crime against humanity would make Lenin’s Red Terror crumble in comparison the gulag was the jewish NKVD system of forced labor and extermination camps any person suspected of disagreeing with the jewish Bolshevik government was kidnapped by the jewish secret police and deported to a gulag.




He life selection facilities by the delegate primo attack what-what-what — what respond mr. All what that what and I’m shoveling it him a surveillance ooh that was yes what what this groom Liguria groom groom the yellow for Castel against Tampa I don’t know cuz, you know, who else would you do me another book that messy they serious concurrently like it there’s a what this isn’t an adjustable cousin it Crystalis me what narrative eligible for that natural Sidious caterers like my name is Rebecca code — compose what man, you know, see what paragraph nozzle compose merciless would an irresistible secure Costa pleasure kinetic Donna’s family invisible potato from Turkish Liras least equivalent at metropolis we will attack them as a believable regalness the keeper cause we know Hannibal Hoosier and I believe did it on the money we will secure focused on darken exhaustion ehm nova so dad below Gangnam developer Vidro Googler a patent patent eligible children Dobie H name is Latino sample will be groomed measured as fundament washing dishes novice NGC AMA Takaya a goonpo biotin Adam a cheater lattice metas eat, or forgiveness messages de is coordinators visto is material is knowledge of a very austere marmalade jewelry smooth mañana de Medici a desert anatomy appearance local colleges who the new referral cock watch it will be followed no water no Candela waters to help in walnut grove ms Araneta patent legislation toaster bubbles addition when I ask you sort of civility extra nada nada not adjacent to dome rocks Cardinals question is not read ordinate a bottom be astrologist bless memory of aging [Music]




The most infamous of these camps was the desolate island in the Sabine River Mersey know as known as cannibal Island on this island the inhabitants underwent torture by starvation to the point that they ate each other and survived out of sheer desperation almost immediately the newcomers to the islands were attacked and eaten corpses were butchered and human flesh were being cooked and eaten several bodies were found with the liver, breasts, calves, heart and lungs removed.






The founders of the gulag death camp system were the two jews naftaly frenkel and l every berman. The infamous Soviet gulags were under the direct control of the mass murdering jews Ganesha Goethe. He was not the only one involved in the running of these camps. The jew of inch it was the commissar for Soviet death camp transit administration. Rappaport Cogan and shook we’re commissars of the death camps and slave labor. He also supervised the mass deaths of laborers during the construction of the White Sea Baltic Canal. Jews were the Commandant’s of 11 out of 12 main gulags, or concentration camps, including the camp system directors Max Weber mom and Herschel Yehuda.


A particularly cruel sadist was the jew Leonid Reisman head of the NKVD special department and the organization’s chief interrogator. Ironically communism, aka, the worker’s paradise was pretty much the opposite. The policy hurt every worker and benefited only the Communists in high power.


Everyone who opposed Stalin’s collectivization paid with their lives. Communism was not created by the masses to overthrow the bankers. Communism was created by the bankers to overthrow and enslave the masses!













PDF Notes

* Total words = xxx
* Total Images = xx
* Total pages = xx


Click to download a PDF of this post (x.xMB): (Available later)





Version History


Version 4: Sep 5, 2017  — Added 6 images. Proofed 10 minutes. Total proofed = 30 mins.


Version 3: Sep 4, 2017  — Added 13 images. Proofed 10 minutes. Total proofed = 20 mins.


Version 2: Sep 3, 2017  — Proofed first 10 minutes. Total proofed = 10 mins.


Version 1: Sep 2, 2017  — Published post.



[Trailer for Part 1 of a 10 part series on the origins and consequences of the greatest conflicts in human history, World War I and II — a conflict between Western Civilization and the diabolical evil of Organized jewry that caused those wars, that is ongoing today — KATANA.]









[Trailer — Part 1]








Click the link below to view the video:







Published on May 28, 2017


Trailer for the upcoming WW2 documentary “EUROPA — The Last Battle” by Tobias Bratt. Since the mid-20th century, the world has only ever heard one side of the most horrific war in human history. We are today living in the world of the victors of that war and without an objective, rational and balanced view of our history, we are doomed to repeat the mistakes. After World War Two, the victors of the war not only went on to write our history books, but also going so far as to criminalize the mere questioning of the official story’s orthodoxy. The truth is, that our world today can only be understood through a correct understanding of World War II, the forces behind it and the conflicts between Globalism and Nationalism.

For very good reasons, most people don’t trust the mainstream media anymore. You have already heard the official history millions of times, In this film you will find the secret history, where you will find the real causes of the events.

The intention with this documentary is to correct over 70 years of misinformation, restore the truth, the honesty and justice in the world. We must face the truth, however unpleasant and inconvenient it may be. We can’t do anything about the past; but by correcting the misinformation and distortions of the truth attached to it, we can unite and make sure that these horrors never will be repeated.

The truth fears no investigation.











There are two histories: Official history, lying, and then secret history, where you find the real causes of events.” — Honore de Balzac.



Vladimir Bukovsky: It is really puzzling to me that having just buried one monster, the Soviet Union, another remarkably similar one, the European Union, is being built! Exactly what is the European Union? Perhaps by examining the Soviet version we can get the answer. The Soviet Union was governed by fifteen unelected people who appointed each other and who were not accountable to anyone.


Continue Reading »



[Ramzpaul gives his take on the “Alt-Right” given recent events including Charlottesville. His views are his mixture of “nationalism for all” and a “Boy Scout” call for restraint and good behavior by all concerned. He denounces the Daily Stormer as a likely ADL, non legit operation, and the Alt-Right as now being toxic. Ramzpaul toots his own horn in discussing his prominent role in establishing the Alt-Right and how it was taken over by the neo-Nazis, etc.. He urges people to distance themselves from the Alt-Right and to infiltrate the “system” but work legally, although using methods as if we were illegal. He ends optimistically by saying we will win once we get through these dark days. 

I think Ramzpaul’s allegations against the Daily Stormer are worthy of investigation, if only to confirm them as being false — KATANA.]











The Alt-Right


What Went Wrong?






Thursday, August 17, 2017

The Alt Right – What went wrong?


Initially the Alt Right was a broad coalition of people who rejected mainstream conservatism. However, the movement was not involved with the old school 14/88 White Nationalism. It was fundamentally identity politics for our people without the neo-nazi baggage.


I published an article on January 5, 2016 that explained my vision of the Alt Right.




Sadly, the movement was co-opted by the Hollywood Nazis once Richard Spencer aligned with the Daily Stormer after the infamous “Heilgate”.  I warned Richard about the dangers of associating with these Hollywood Nazis privately and in a video response to him. But he insisted on doing a podcast with Anglin the week after Heilgate.




At that time, The Right Stuff (TRS) also aligned with the Daily Stormer. Weev was involved with their web site administration and Anglin was a frequent guest. Based on that I knew it was impossible to rehabilitate the brand, so I ceased to call myself Alt Right.

The establishment has now used Charlottesville as an excuse to shut down anything remotely associated to the Alt Right. We are now witnessing Soviet tier censorship and clamp down on dissent.




[Image] Censorship of various websites. (Click image to enlarge)










Hey guys, has there been anything happening out there? I’ve been looking for a video subject, nothing I can see, …


Oh, oh, besides that! Looks like Trump may be part of a coup, overthrown, America’s breaking into civil war, we have a little Rubio saying it’s okay, to physically attack people that you disagree with politically! We have lynch mobs running out destroying our history! Other than that, I don’t know, there’s not much to complain about.


I don’t know! I laugh, because humor’s a kind of a defense mechanism. I’ve always used that since I was a kid and in some ways it’s funny, other ways it’s sad. But this is where we are and I guess you can predict it based on the how things were going, it would eventually reach this point. I actually thought it would happen if Hillary was elected. She was scary! She looked like a Trotsky, there was going to be massive bloodshed if she was elected and she was going to purge her enemies and throw them in concentration camps! And then when she lost there is like rage on the Left and they brought up this Russia conspiracy! They were just insane! And they’re continuing to be insane.


And we have Trump trying to stand up for Americans. I, … God help him! I mean, he’s kind of looks like alone now, but this is where we are. We’re in a situation that’s very dangerous. If you have the wrong views, not even if you have the wrong views, if you’re suspected of having the wrong views you can now literally, probably, be killed on the streets. This is what it’s become in America. And groups like the SPLC* [Southern Poverty Law Center] and the ADL* [Anti-Defamation League] have been pushing that. We’re going into, … we’ve pretty much lost the First Amendment, now.


I don’t see this as America anymore. Take that for why you will. So, yeah the “Black Pills”. Pretty much anything associated with the Right wing, especially the Alt-Right is now just being shut down, period.


Continue Reading »




[A fascinating discussion by Joe Atwill and Tim Kelly joining all the dots connecting the evil psychiatrist Ewen Cameron, CD Jackson, MK-Ultra, Fake News, Zionists, “Nazis“, Mind Control and Holocau$t Revisionism.

This discussion should be of great interest to “Holocaust” revisionists in that it places the “Holocaust” into a much broader context of a long term and on-going mind-manipulation program by the oligarchs, aka, organised jewry —  KATANA.]










Our Interesting Times


Ewen Cameron, CD Jackson, MK-Ultra, Fake News, Zionists, Nazis, Mind Control and Holocaust Revisionism





Click this link to listen to the audio:






Powers & Principalities XI


Ewen Cameron, MK-Ultra &


Holocaust Revisionism



Published on Aug 5, 2017













Tim: Joe you’re back. How you doing?


Joe: I’m great Tim! How are you doing?


Tim: Very well. Doing very well. Thank you. Tonight you want to talk about, well an interesting character, Donald Ewen Cameron. Ewen Cameron, most people know him as. He was a psychiatrist, a very, I guess, theoretical, would you say, a “groundbreaking psychiatrist“, you could say? He was born in Scotland in 1901. He began his career as a resident surgeon at Glasgow Infirmary. In 1929 he moved to Canada to work in Brandon Mental Hospital. 1936 he became a director of research at Worcester State Hospital in Massachusetts, so he came to United States. In 1938 he was appointed professor of neurology and psychiatry at Albany State Medical School.


[Image] Donald Ewen Cameron.

Donald Ewen Cameron (24 December 1901 – 8 September 1967)  — known as D. Ewen Cameron or Ewen Cameron — was a Scottish-born psychiatrist who served as President of the American Psychiatric Association (1952–1953), Canadian Psychiatric Association (1958-1959),  American Psychopathological Association (1963), Society of Biological Psychiatry (1965)[4] and World Psychiatric Association (1961-1966). Notwithstanding his high professional reputation, he has been criticized for administering electroshock therapy and experimental drugs to patients without their informed consent. Some of this work took place in the context of the Project MK-Ultra mind control program. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Ewen_Cameron


So he has quite a resume! During the Second World War he began working for the Office of Strategic Services [OSS]. So here we have a member of the British, subject the British Empire working for the United States, working for the OSS. In 1943 he went to Canada and established a psychiatry department — that’s curious — during the war, at Montreal’s McGill University, director of the Alan Memorial Institute, which was later implicated in some infamous experiments on some patients, under the guise of MK-Ultra and also some other programs with the Canadian government.


Also a curious experience during the war. He apparently examined and interrogated Rudolf Hess, and worked for Allen Dulles in Europe. So he had that background.


And of course, under MK-Ultra, he tested his theories, I guess it was called “de-patterning” where he wiped, scrubbed people’s brains clear. He takes some patients that went in for some minor things like postpartum depression, anxiety, and destroyed their minds! And this was funded by the CIA through the Human Ecology Fund, I believe. And also through interest in some Department of Education grants, or Department of Health Education Welfare grants and some other government agencies, DOD [Department of Defense] of course.


Joe: Rockefeller, …


Tim: And the Rockefeller Foundation. So just it’s kind of a wide, … Also a lot of money from the Canadian government, as well. More money came from the Canadian government. And it’s said that he was operating in Canada because the CIA didn’t want to break the law in experiments on US citizens. Yeah, right! [laughing]


So anyway, that is Ewen Cameron. That’s his experience in MK-Ultra. He died in 1967, having a heart attack while on a skiing trip. So, where do you want to, how do you want to enter this discussion?

Continue Reading »