- A Blind Eye to Murder of Whites in South Africa Version 2: Mar 3, 2017 — Improved formatting. Added link, cover and updated PDF (Ver 2).
- Jim Rizoli Interviews Hadding Scott — TRANSCRIPT Version 2: Feb 23, 2017 — Added 25 images.
In this ever relevant essay Patrick Grimm describes how the dangers and machinations of organized jewry and its nation wrecking activities are wilfully over-looked by most Americans [and other Whites throughout the world], either through fear, ignorance, laziness or stupidity. We need to name organised jewry as the force behind the ongoing destruction of our societies if we are to defeat it — KATANA.
Were You Ever Wrong!
So you thought the Jews were just another clannish and ethnocentric group interested in preserving their religious and cultural traditions. You believed the Jews when they told you that they only wanted to live and let live. You took them at their word when they said they were only desirous of a country where they could reside free of persecution. You didn’t think twice when they larded up their pronouncements with lots of inclusiveness and out-group words of good will. You believed the scholars who pinned all the blame for anti-Jewish persecution, pogroms, expulsions and genocide on those people who were not Jewish. You thought it not unseemly that these same Jews were a bit touchy when it came to their history and their preoccupation with Holocaust dramatizations. Boy, were you ever wrong.
You knew your country was sick, didn’t you? Yes, you did. You can feel this sick degeneration down deep in your bones. It was a sixth sense you had. It spoke to you like a still small voice and it whispered ever so softly. It told you that the foundations were crumbling and the buffering institutions were being eroded. But you wanted to call it something else. You ranted about “liberalism”, “big government”, “high taxes”, “overregulation” and how bad those Democrats were. Perhaps you attended a few Tea Parties and whined to your friends about the dangers and wickedness of an Obama administration. You might have even dropped a few dollars in the coffers of yet another “conservative” group, thinking you were doing your due diligence. Sarah Palin is probably your girl in 2012. Her shallow rhetoric and inane sound bites did not dissuade you one bit. You, a solid red state flag-waving “patriot” probably cheered the war in Iraq even as the pseudo-mission became more and more opaque and fuzzy. This didn’t stop you from sending your precious son or daughter to “fight for democracy and freedom” and kill more Muslim people all for the nebulous pronouncements of War Party bureaucrats who knew nothing about Sherman tanks, but spent most of their time in think tanks.
When your child came home from college or university mocking the religious beliefs you taught them since their birth and began spouting rehearsed bromides against the evils of white European culture, you blamed “liberal professors.” When your offspring waxed pretty about alternative lifestyles, the merits of homosexuality and the open-minded beauty of bi-curious pursuits, you blamed those damn liberals and Communists. You were half right, which still means that you were also half wrong too. You didn’t look any deeper, did you? You asked shallow questions and you got shallow answers. What did you expect?
Now, as you glance about you and see very few Americans flying American flags (they are almost non-existent in my community), you are chagrined. Like you, many of our citizens know that a sick force has seized our government and our institutions. You know something is awry. But that’s all you know. You, even more than a liberal or a progressive, believe what the controlled, so-called “conservative” media tells you. You don’t ask questions. You are a “controlled opponent” and don’t even know it. You parrot the tired rehashed lines of a Glenn Beck, a Rush Limbaugh or (god forbid) a Sean Hannity. These folks talk about the symptoms all day long, but they want to leave the causes untouched.
You know that patriotic fervor is dead in the USA, but you don’t know why. You know your dollar won’t buy you much, but you’ve done little to investigate exactly why this is the case. The hatred against your country grows, but you, like most Americans, assure your family that “we live in the best country in the world”, even though you share a typically American lack of curiosity about other nations. You’ve never been anywhere else. Europe must be jealous of America. That’s it. It couldn’t be that our foreign policy has created a hatred now erupting in violence aimed at our citizens.
Despite all of the chaos now dragging this country into the abyss, you can’t think outside the box. If you just happened upon this little essay, you have already branded me as “anti-Semitic.” As almost every economy except Israel’s falls to rubble, you don’t ask why. Have you ever wondered why it seems that the Jews are the only ethnicity sitting pretty in the worst economy since the Depression? No, you don’t because you are a Zionist, an Israel-Firster, even as that crooked alliance extracts more blood from our people. You go to church and sit obediently in your pew as your minister defends the Jewish people, calls them “God’s Chosen” and declares Israel’s existence a fulfillment of all sorts of vague biblical prophecies. You don’t blanche when your preacher, a man with little knowledge outside of his skewed predilections towards the Bible, warns you that any resistance or criticism of Jews will earn you an eternity in hell. You try to jettison any negative thoughts you may have had about Jews in the past, quivering and genuflecting like a slave who must deny reality. You have long ago taken all your church’s ideas into your unthinking mind and made them the dogma that keeps you silent, ensuring that you will never defend yourself.
Occasionally, cognitive dissonance will trouble you, but not for too long. If you own a business or work for a company that has dealings with Jews, you have surely noticed the two-faced ugly ways that Jews behave in the marketplace. You’ve seen them try to get something for nothing. Maybe they tried to “Jew you down” or hoodwinked you or stole from you or, god forbid, even tried to steal your company, robbing you of your birthright. (I have had many business dealings with Jews and they are always looking for a hand-out or some sort of extravagant special treatment not afforded others.) But you won’t, you can’t see these traits as quintessentially Jewish. You wouldn’t dare be particularistic or ethnically conscious. No way. It might get you labeled, and that would be worse than death. It would also be a sin against the Judaic god too, and he is known for having a short temper when somebody messes with his favorite pets. So you amble along, turning your lily-white cheek to the destroyer, smiling as you are displaced, dispossessed, disarmed by Jewish social policy and demoralized and debauched by the cancer that Jews mistakenly call entertainment.
You never wonder why your immune system so reflexively attacks itself and not the malignancy that weakens your body just a little more each day. You never question why an outside group gets to decide how a European-founded country is run. You never ask why your group is the only group not allowed to name itself and to organize on its own behalf and for its own interests. You don’t even think you have any unique interests. Perhaps you really do believe that any curiosity might cause the early demise of the proverbial cat.
Here’s the deal: You made one mistake. Either out of fear, ignorance, laziness or stupidity, you overlooked the Jew. You saw the Jew and his politically active brethren as just another political group and for that I can’t be too hard on you. As America becomes darker and more multicultural, the Jew becomes harder to recognize as a unique and pernicious danger to all races and peoples, including yours. It’s hard to pick out a freak when you’re right in the middle of a freak show put on by the freak himself. You’ve been busy shadowboxing in the dark and you’ve been swinging at phantoms who did not cause the dilemma that is destroying you. You didn’t realize that Judaism is not a true religion at all, but an evolutionary strategy designed to topple what they perceive to be “false idols”, that being anyone or anything that is not of them, by them and for them. The Jewish tribalists hate your guts. Their books order them to feel this way about you. They aren’t changing and they can count on your complicity or your cowardly silence as the cold war against your traditions rages unabated.
Now there is only one thing for you to do, and I hope I have given you a small push in that direction. Do your homework. Do some research. Learn what motivates the Jew and his rancid activities. Does your mind still intrinsically call me an “anti-Semite” even now? It’s okay. I once was as you are. I know what you’re going through. Trust me, I do. Open your mind, think outside the box and dare to believe the unbelievable truth. It is the truth, and when you finally connect the dots you will never be fooled again.
Posted at 06:53 PM | Permalink
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Re “Akira, how did you find that information on our noble Premier?”:
– When you wrote, “The premier of…BC..is selling off the public trusts to his crony friends. I looked for the J-wish, Zionist connection there but was unable to find it,” I thought you can’t be looking very hard, or refuse to see what’s in front of your eyes.
I decided to just google BC, Premier, Gordon, sell-off, Jew etc, and came up with the BC>Campbell>Plutonic>Kiewit>Grewcock>Jewish- “charity” -launders-profits Connection within minutes. It’s all there for anyone who cares to look. Just about every political-financial scandal will heavily involve Jews. You can take it for granted and any non-Jewish racket is the exception (or just means the Jewish connection is better hidden).
As for your concerns about, “School of the Americas exporting…terrorist laced “democracy” into South and Central America…impoverished hordes that are now flooding into your country…slavery…The USA is dying…Military Industrial Complex…wars, black ops, torture…disrespect for other countries and cultures.” — All of these things are from or involve or are funded by: Jews, Zionists, Judaism, Israel, Mossad, Jews, Jews, Jews, Jews. ALL JEWISH!
World Wars: Jewish
Winning at all costs: Jewish
Immorality of the West/America: Jewish
Posted by: Akira | 11/24/2009 at 09:38 AM
John, the Protocols are a garbage fascist document, and serve as flypaper. Anyone who says it is 100% accurate hasn’t read it.
“21. It is only with a despotic ruler that plans can be elaborated extensively and clearly in such a way as to distribute the whole properly among the several parts of the machinery of the State: from this the conclusion is inevitable that a satisfactory form of government for any country is one that concentrates in the hands of one responsible person. Without an absolute despotism there can be no existence for civilization which is carried on not by the masses but by their guide, whosoever that person may be. The mob is savage, and displays its savagery at every opportunity. The moment the mob seizes freedom in its hands it quickly turns to anarchy, which in itself is the highest degree of savagery.”
… hmmm not quite accurate is it? We aren’t under a dictatorship, we are ruled by collective and ad hoc lobbies and secret and not-so-secret societies. The Protocols says it is concentrated in one person. Actually maybe it is, but still correlation is not causation, elitists think the same everywhere you know.
Maybe some people are swayed by it’s back hand, calculated and deliberate attempts to denigrate human freedom movements, but I hope you’re not that simple.
“25. Far back in ancient times we were the first to cry among the masses of the people the words “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity,” words many times repeated since these days by stupid poll-parrots who, from all sides around, flew down upon these baits and with them carried away the well-being of the world, true freedom of the individual, formerly so well guarded against the pressure of the mob. The would-be wise men of the GOYIM, the intellectuals, could not make anything out of the uttered words in their abstractedness; did not see that in nature there is no equality, cannot be freedom: that Nature herself has established inequality of minds, of characters, and capacities, just as immutably as she has established subordination to her laws: never stopped to think that the mob is a blind thing, that upstarts elected from among it to bear rule are, in regard to the political, the same blind men as the mob itself, that the adept, though he be a fool, can yet rule, whereas the non-adept, even if he were a genius, understands nothing in the political — to all those things the GOYIM paid no regard; yet all the time it was based upon these things that dynastic rule rested: the father passed on to the son a knowledge of the course of political affairs in such wise that none should know it but members of the dynasty and none could betray it to the governed. As time went on, the meaning of the dynastic transference of the true position of affairs in the political was lost, and this aided the success of our cause.”
You hear that! Screw that Liberty and freedom shit, stupid Goyim! “Chains, despotism, and paranoia” are so much better than “liberty, equality, and fraternity”.
“The Protocols made me turn fascist”
— Goyim Pride
The fact is the Protocols were a forgery of Machievelli, that is proven.
Even the ‘antisemitic’ Tsar realized they were a fake.
Tsar Nicholas II read and accepted the Protocols as genuine. An investigation later showed that the work was fraudulent, however, and Nicholas ordered that they no longer be used for anti-Semitic propaganda. When the Tsar was overthrown in the Russian Revolution, the situation changed, and the Protocols were widely read by the “White” army that lost to the “Red” army during the revolution. The losers blamed the revolution on the Jews and used the Protocols as the document explaining their motivation. Thus was started the myth of the Jewish-Communist conspiracy that helped fuel the German campaign of anti-Semitism.
Stop being such fools, people!
Posted by: anarchore | 11/24/2009 at 11:14 AM
Anarchore – Those Protocols are what THEY WANT! You are looking at it from the wrong angle! They (jews) are saying in the protocols people are stupid therefore WE THE JEWS need to rule over them. Germany and Hitler were AGAINST JEWISH RULE, nothing more, nothing less. Once most countries understand they are ALREADY UNDER JEWISH RULE AS WHAT THE PROTOCOLS SAID, they will see that the New World Order is the JEW world Order.
You are a Jew period. Only a Jew would say what you say. A forgery is just a COPY of an original, meaning the original EXISTED, who cares if its a COPY!!!!
In fact you should be ignored from now on by everyone on this webpage, you have proven your alliance to the jew.
“The losers blamed the revolution on the jews”……ummm because the Bolsheviks WERE JEWS.
Start running jew boy.
Posted by: John | 11/25/2009 at 02:36 AM
“The Russian government then took a serious interest in the activities of the Jews. An agent of the Russian Secret Police discovered a Jewish plot called The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. These Protocols spelled out a Jewish plan to subvert and control governments through Jewish control of the press, bribery, blackmail and even seduction. (Anyone remember Monica Lewinsky or Chandra Levy?) Henry Ford commented that the Protocols fit world history. The Protocols call for the Jewish-controlled press to push Gentile nations into war against any nations that remove Jews from power. The Protocols were first published in Russian in 1897. A second printing in 1905 reached Western nations. After the communist takeover of Russia, the possession of a copy of the Protocols by a non-Jew would bring the death penalty.”
Posted by: Turner | 11/25/2009 at 10:43 AM
“A forgery is just a COPY of an original, meaning the original EXISTED, who cares if its a COPY!!!!”
It’s a plagiarism of Machievelli. I never used the word forgery.
Not all the proponents of the Protocols are shills or idiots, but all the shills and idiots are proponents of the Protocols.
Posted by: anarchore | 11/25/2009 at 09:19 PM
Whoa- I should have read that last paragraph from the birdman link above more carefully. These were not my words, but those of Gordon Stein. Well, Birdman did say the essay was flawed.
“The losers blamed the revolution on the Jews and used the Protocols as the document explaining their motivation. Thus was started the myth of the Jewish-Communist conspiracy that helped fuel the German campaign of anti-Semitism.”
I repudiate that completely! Please excuse me.
I certainly do think that Jews, especially high finance, were highly placed in the ‘revolution’, that they were responsible for most of the genocides under the Soviet Union, and the rape of German women after the war. That is documented and undeniable.
I still think that pointing to the Protocols as some kind of proof is foolworthy, because that is what you will be made out to be as soon as someone points out that it is a fake, then there goes your credibility. The last link above pretty much proves it.
Posted by: anarchore | 11/25/2009 at 09:34 PM
Anarchore has spent a lot of time going around the web trying to soften the blow on his jewish tribe. Not a word he says is worth a damn. His agenda is clear. He’s not hear to help you understand the issue, he’s here to interject DOUBT, so he can save the skin of his comrades. No point having a conversation with a jew who’s busy trying to protect the hive. There is better work to be done destroying it from other angles. He’s a waste of your energy.
Posted by: SubvertedNation | 11/26/2009 at 12:03 AM
The funny thing is jews are so easy to spot on the web now, what they say only adds weight to everything the rest of us are saying. They are sealing their own fate, I think its funny. They are their worst enemy sometimes, but not for long, their worst enemy is humanity thats aboutb to steamroll over them.
The retard said “I never used the word forgery” and you can clearly see he did. Just like the holocaust fables, they can’t kept their story straight. I thought jews were smart?! This guy must be one of those bottom level jews that even most jews spit on. Jews must HATE the internet, they can’t get away with lying on here.
Posted by: John | 11/26/2009 at 03:41 AM
Blablabla… If I wanted to point fingers, I’d say Subintellectnation is trying to save the corrupt J-ws by blaming all J-ws, so the corrupt ones at the top of the heap get away… like they did throughout history.
Posted by: anarchore | 11/27/2009 at 10:09 PM
Face up to me Anarchore, you worthless kike. ANY DAY you are ready to show your face, just let me know. You can’t hide on here, and you can’t hide anywhere else. Nobody is trying to save any jews except for you kike. People like me are looking to make sure EVERY JEW, including you, gets what they finally deserve. Being a jew means you are going down with them. You are trying to save all kinds of jews, as your own website states, I want NONE of them saved. You want to put my name all over your website full of down syndrome drivel and bullshit rhetoric? Have the balls to meet me in person JEW. How about a home address? Or maybe your real name, Moishe?
I’m pointing the finger DIRECTLY AT YOU right now, what are you going to do about it? I’m saying you are a JEW trying to control the discussion, so how are you going to prove me wrong? How do you figure you’re going to save all these jews anyway? Your words are as hollow as your head, but I will continue to challenge you until you face up to me. You know your charade is over when everyone gets a look at your sloped forehead and that big fat bottom lip, kike.
Look at all these other people on here who already have your ignorant a$$ pegged as a kike! You can’t hide anywhere amongst the humans, and neither can your devilish little clan. I know you don’t want to be executed, but nobody is asking for your opinion JEW.
Posted by: SubvertedNation | 11/27/2009 at 11:05 PM
I knew you would revert to drunken consternation. 😉
Posted by: anarchore | 11/28/2009 at 11:46 PM
Here’s simple research about the Jew
Look up the word: Kol Nidre
What does it mean?
What does it mean when you take the Kol Nidre?
Benjamin Freedman in his speech explains the Kol Nidre.
Just keyword it in a search.
Cause once you know the meaning of that magical word,it will blow your mind alway.
It goes a long way to put the Jew in perspective
Posted by: roninfreedom | 11/29/2009 at 07:56 PM
Im laughing as I see people starting to understand its not the “New world order” its the “Jew world order”…..and its not hard to see and understand these days. You dumbass kikes should have kept your lying mouths shut, but you couldn’t help yourself, you tried to cover up your crimes against humanity, and manipulate everyone into thinking you are special and untouchable.
The one thing you underestimated about Americans is they hate being made a fool of. You are about to see and feel the long end of a manila hemp rope burning around your neck, and it will be your own fault. You can’t live with people, you must dominate them, and people do not like that. You never learn, this time you won’t get another chance to learn.
Go get’m Americans! Long live the land of the free and the home of the brave!
Posted by: John | 11/30/2009 at 04:51 AM
Too bad it isn’t really that simple. I really wish the enemy wore a label, or had a bodily mark, but it simply isn’t the case.
The enemy is everywhere. Here in rural BC, the developers and local polluticians collude to pull the wool over the eyes of the people, but nary a Kike in sight! How do you explain that?
Could the problem be systemic, in the way people think? Could it be that the system favours sociopaths and the rich, no matter their ethnic background? Of course.
Perhaps some of these anti-Judaic fanatics(other than those which are directly in the employ of the Federal government, trying to create a civil war against innocent J-ws and their protectors — and there will be a lot of people protecting and hiding them if Adam Austin’s fantasies get underway), are businessmen who wanted into the corrupt games but got rejected? Perhaps J-ws do control things in your small town but it is not like that everywhere.
The ‘all J-ws are the problem’ nonsense is just as ridiculous as the blacks saying ‘all crackers are the problem’… just the anti-Judaics, they are partly right, but morally, philosophically, intellectually wrong.
Posted by: anarchore | 11/30/2009 at 07:00 PM
Anarchore, you are a good rhetoritician. You intermix your anecdotal experiences with jews to make some point, and I don’t know why, that jews are not power hungry evil little shits that ruin nations.
What we know is that the jews have gotten the the US into 2 world wars. They destroyed Russia and executed 20 million Christians there, mainly by starvation. They have been responsible for devastating economic upheavals in the US. They are directly the engine behind the real estate boom bust, as it was a jew controlled Wall Street that came up with a new easy credit-inflate the housing market-sell the debt international scam.
I actually don’t care whether your street level middle class jew is a dishonest cheat. If that’s all they were, we wouldn’t be having this conversation and I personally would enjoy beating the shit out of some kike who tried to jew me in a transaction. What I can’t do (yet) is rack up my .308 and start blowing the heads off wall street jews and hollywood jews who have decimated this nation on a macro scale. I can’t put wall street kike in choke hold (yet) till he hands me back the $50K I’ve lost in my stock account from the rigged equity market. And I can’t help in rounding up the hollywood and las vegas kikes(yet) and putting them in camp till we figure out whether to deport or hang them.
I don’t care whether they’re ALL bad or not. They have proven, that as race, they are an enormous liability and eventual vector for decay and destruction of the host nation. Therfore, it is not worth even looking for the bad jews amongst the “good” jews. It is simply better and easier to purge them lock stock and barrel.
The fact that you make it a point to post over and over again that the jew is fundamentally not a problem indicates extreme naivate on your part or something worse.
Posted by: Blackdak22 | 12/01/2009 at 12:02 AM
This is a false label, false attack for it is not ‘Jews’ but, ‘men who say they are Jews’ and are not. Jesus himself spoke of them, as did John in the Revelation, very precisely warning of them-these are the men behind Zionism, wholly different than a Jew, for Jew is a people who follow the tenets of the Torah and observe, these Zionists you are writing about deny God and are atheists who hate Jesus, and count you and me as dogs. They (Zionists) set up a nation (Israel) and killed many Jews to get it to come about…see this and continue to learn, but at some point you need to actually read and understand the Bible and what it teaches-you are foolish because you know pastors are preaching Zionism, and yet you look to them to shape your understanding of the Holy Bible and what it says, to disregard it. Read and study it, it is the truth, and in it you will find salvation for your soul. Link: http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/zionism/zanda.cfm
Posted by: Notofthisworld | 12/02/2009 at 01:00 PM
“I can’t put wall street kike in choke hold (yet) till he hands me back the $50K I’ve lost in my stock account from the rigged equity market”
So you’re mad at the J-ws because you wanted to play the J-ws game, of making money without working, and you got burned? ROFL, now you want to put them all in camps?
I’ve got a better idea.
Since the economic factors are what determine the degree of evil that a person is cabable of being tempted with, let’s use that as our measure.
Everyone who has a credit card, they are willingly participating in the empowerment of the banksters, so they will be sent to camps. It doesn’t matter if they are cognizant or not, they support the corruption so let’s liquidate them.
Everyone owning property, we send them to camps, because it is their petty preoccupations with their property values that empower the developers, realtors and other parasites that have turned North America into strip mall hell.
To paraprhase Blackdak22:
“I don’t care whether they’re ALL bad or not. They have proven, that as a class, they are an enormous liability and eventual vector for decay and destruction of the host nation. Therfore, it is not worth even looking for the bad businessmen amongst the “good” businessmen. It is simply better and easier to purge them lock stock and barrel.”
That way the system assembled by the pigs of the trough of corruption, can be dismantled rather than have it go on as business as usual after a cosmetic purge of scapegoats.
I’ve never had a credit card and I do not own property. I never played the stock market, and avoid paying taxes. You better get yourself to my level of cleanliness, before you go on a genocidal rant against innocent people.
Khmer Rouge, is what you idiots need.
I am an aryan, who will stand with the J-ws against genocidal fascist scumfuckers like you. You’re probably a Fed like Adam Austin, the retard superhero… go fuck yourselves you scum.
Here’s a song, just for you:
Youre a star-belly sneech
You suck like a leach
You want everyone to act like you
Kiss ass while you bitch
So you can get rich
But your boss gets richer off you
Well youll work harder
With a gun in your back
For a bowl of rice a day
Slave for soldiers
Till you starve
Then your head is skewered on a stake
Now you can go where people are one
Now you can go where they get things done
What you need, my son.
Posted by: anarchore | 12/02/2009 at 03:06 PM
“You sure sound like a jew the way you talk, because everything you say directly benefits the jew. You need to rethink what you say and understand that Americans have a great chance to do the right thing. YOU SHOULD BE ENCOURAGING THEM and educating them!
I think the jews GREATLY underestimated Americans. They are about to get bitch slapped hard. It will make the 100+ exiles in the past seem like a birthday party!
It wasn’t “Americans” that came down to slaughter South Americans, it was the Jewish run CIA etc. Americans have remained indifferent because their life was good, and they were told they were freeing people. It’s all coming out. Why do you think the suicide rates are so high in the US military? Because Americans are learning they ARE ON THE WRONG TEAM, that is, the jews team. It is absolutely gut wrenching for most people to realize they have “helped” the jew gain all the power they have, which, will be used to enslave them in the future.”
I do encourage Americans to get the criminal Zionists(and other scums), but when you talk about rounding up innocent people just because they share a geneological/cultural link to J-ws, you are actually working for the criminals.
I thought fairness was an ‘aryan’ trait.
You start to talk about getting rid of bourgeois property relations and the capitalist monopolism and lobby politics then you are a real cancer fighter.
The fact is that there are reams of criminality linked to Zionists, and the occasional non-Zionists… but you guys muddy the water with your exhortations to persecute all J-ws, regardless of criminality or participation in Ziofascism.
Your praxis can only result in confusion, civil war and tragedy, and in the end the fascist regime that follows will surely be staffed with Rothschild-picked crypto-J-ws, that will get the adulation of the masses by hanging a few scapegoats.
So it is not me that is defending “the Jew”, it is you.
Posted by: anarchore | 12/02/2009 at 05:01 PM
It appears the vaunted zio-propoganda network has discovered your blog.
Congratulations on achieving that level noteriety, but I would make a suggestion that you moderate these scum, like anarchore carefully.
This is a known tactic of the jew hasbara. To act like one of us but assail those who understand fully the nature of the jew and the final solution for its problem in order to undermine it.
Newcomers here and those only beginning to understand the inhuman nature of the jew will understandably mistake this for genuine discord among whites, with the “moderates” challenging the “radicals”.
Posted by: Blackdak22 | 12/04/2009 at 06:42 PM
It seems the crypto-zio-fascists have discovered your blog. You better silence those who have different views!
Blackdak, is “the freemen” your site?
Do you actually expose real Zionist conspiracies, like I do of the Bronfmans and Suzuki? http://ziofascism.net/blog/?p=1988
Or do you just rant on about a bunch of unsubstantiated, unreasonable crap on other people’s blogs?
Do you get a cheque from the US or Israeli govt, for posting your intellectually repellent, hateful, uncited, idiosyncratic, pseudo/crypto fascist Zionist views, that play right into the hands of “the Kikes”?
Very clever of you to try to leverage growing awareness of the Hasbarats to your anti-intellectual, Zionist power serving ends.
Mine was one of the first blogs to expose the Hasbara corps. What have you done? Make stupid arguments for genocide? Ask writers to ban intellectuals? Go fuck your self, you Zionist scum.
I love arguing with you ziofascist turds; you never can substantiate or justify anything you say, and you just end up flapping in the wind, like a turd flag, or a flag with turds on it like your country of Isr-el. Like your Rothschild star flag depicts, you Zionists are soon to be between bars for real.
Posted by: anarchore | 12/06/2009 at 02:30 PM
Amy asks: “Is it safe to say that there is really only one war on this earth?”
Where have you been all my life Amy? Yes! there is only ONE war on this earth. It is WAR itself!
Hey PG! Do you see what I see? The Winter Solstice is now on our horizon. Resurrection is now announcing itself! The time in which all Sun-Gods are reborn! Perhaps our Future ain’t so bad after all!
It is good to have you back PG! Your return will be felt! Perhaps your most prolific year lies ahead! We will see!
“Ha, ha, my ship! thou mightest well be taken now for the sea-chariot of the sun. Ho, ho! all ye nations before my prow, I bring the sun to ye! Yoke on the further billows; hallow! a tandem, I drive the sea!” — Captain Ahab
Posted by: Ed | 12/09/2009 at 01:07 AM
It won’t end with the Jews. Nobody is saying that. Anyone that helps, protects or is directly involved with Jews in doing what they do, will be treated the same way as the jew.
“Fairness”…..Can you be fair watching jews butcher everyone, and knowing jews are the worlds biggest murderers (communism) either directly or indirectly? Why should ANYONE OF ANY RACE treat the Jews “fairly”? Only a kike would say shit like that. I am a white male married to an ASIAN woman, I have lived in Asia I see what the jewish money system has done to those countries. I know what is in store for Canada, England, Australia, New Zealand and America.
I also lived in BC/Alberta Canada, and Jews control Canada from the TOP DOWN. Many Canadians (most) are just warm fuzzy people who say “eh” a lot. They do not understand the monster that has them by the balls.
They took over Canada long ago without even firing a shot.
They will soon learn. When the North American Union is pushed through and they are fighting Gonzalos Alberto for a job for $2.50 an hour and struggle under a communist jewish jackboot.
The Prime Minister Steven Harper is married to a jew, so he has JEWISH KIDS. Surely you people might have noticed…..Does it matter??
Damn right it does.
Alberta has a kike named Ed Stelmach as the Premier.
New Zealand also has a Jewish Prime Minister. 5,000 Jews in New Zealand, 4 million + people, and they have a kike as PM……
If people can’t see whats going on, then go bury your head in the sand and bark like a dog.
Jews THRIVE on white people (and other races) being FAIR…they push fairness so you will be fair to THEM, all the while they are STEALING your pension funds, poisoning your food and water, and sending your kids to wars that DIRECTLY BENEFIT THE JEWS.
The Iraq war is about controlling the oil and pumping it to Israel, so Israel (jews) can profit from it. The Afghanistan war is all about PROTECTING the opium fields for their pharmacutical industry.
The bonus is they piss of the entire muslim population so when the jews start homegrown terror in North America and other western countries, they have a great scapegoat already made.
Time for people to wake the hell up, and ARM THEMSELVES.
Check out ROK for those of you with a view towards some action.
There are like minded people out there, do not fall for the jews line of “do not trust anyone”. They do that so there is no opposition to them. Moles, FBI guys and others can easily be spotted now. They had better find out real quick where their loyalties lay, because they will soon have to face a choice, work with the jew, or against them. There will be no jumping fences or changing teams.
The American anti-jewish/banker wholesale slaughter/expulsion is going to happen soon.
Posted by: John | 12/11/2009 at 04:30 AM
See, just instigate a jew and he will always show his true colors. Anarchore can’t shut up long enough not to make it patently obvious he’s a shifty little crooked eyed, hook nosed jew. This is why he won’t dare meet me in person and let me take his photograph, because he knows once you see that he is a scrawny little yid, his whole gig is up.
Quit making excuses for jews dude. I can’t count on both hands how many times you claim the jews are “innocent people”, and that’s a bad move in the face of people who know better. We’re not talking about “zionists” because they weren’t “zionists” in Russia, they were the NKVD and called themselves “bolsheviks”. They weren’t “zionists” in Armenia, they were “young turks”. I don’t think the people they kill in the Ukraine, Poland, Germany, Russia, and everywhere else cares for those labels. The one common denominator is that they were JEWS.
The same thing is happening here in America today, and same common denominator is JEWS. They weren’t “zionists” when they were EXILED 109 different times from 84 countries over the last 1750+ years!!! They were just JEWS, as always.
Yet, SOMEHOW, you want us to believe we got us a whole new batch of JEWS, that are nothing like the ones we’ve watched the last 2000 years, because so many of them are just poor INNOCENT SOULS?!?!?!
You may have bitten the hand that fed you 109 times already, but 110 is going to bite you back. ALL OF YOU, including yourself JEW.
Posted by: SubvertedNation | 12/12/2009 at 06:20 AM
Out of curiousity PG- do you have certain “criteria” that you utilize before you decide to post certain comments from your visitors? Is there a filtering process that is important to you and that you tap into?
Does not the greatest task require the greatest sacrifice? Who is willing to offer themselves up for this task? Who is willing to become Forge and Crucible at the same time? Anyone?
Just a few questions to ponder PG before the darknesss turns itself into Light here in the next 10 days or so.
“Essence must appear” — Hegel
Posted by: Ed | 12/13/2009 at 02:46 AM
to answer a question posed above — yes, there are jews who protest israel’s very existence, and they’ve shown up in numbers exceeding 50,000 outside the UN in new york protesting israel’s existence. they’re neturei karta.
that being said, one may argue (but only speculate) on who will run towards which side if the shit hits the fan. we can only speculate, because there is no real experience to draw on.
I personally live in los angeles, and grew up around jews. I’ve seen the good and the bad. the thing to understand is that the issue is not black and white. there are as many shades of gray as there are jews. they do not all think alike — I’m sorry. I’ve seen this from first hand and lifelong experience.
if and when the shit hits the fan, people are going to mostly run for whatever side looks more assured of success, whether it’s jews or gentiles. I know many people who grew up in culturally jewish households who want nothing to do with israel or judaism-who don’t even consider themselves jews. I have friends who grew up in immoral jewish households who are now avid christians.
my best friend grew up in a jewish household, and that household is the most charitable and MORAL household I know of, and I grew up in a fundamentalist christian household.
my point is, there are many many factors to take into account while pointing fingers of blame. jews as a whole are not out to get anyone. the elite among the jews have used the jews themselves as tools for their world domination just like they’ve used non-jews.
jews deserve every stereotype they have, just like every other group of people. but to speak of people in groups is to speak in generalities.
jews would love for us to look at this as a race war, but it is simply a class war — the jewish elite against humanity. their only drive is domination and subjugation, and they will do anything to achieve it.
the white race is certainly vilified in the media, and has been for a long time, but that does not make race the main issue in this war. the main issue is and has always been either awareness or ignorance. if we are aware, their power is worthless.
but they will change their story and even their plans to conform to any challenge that faces them. if the race war does not work, they will attempt anything else, and already are, to destroy western thought.
I’m with patrick grimm — there is a difference between zionists and jews, but a zionist is simply who supports israel. atheistic jews have been around since the pharisees.
patrick — this was a thought-provoking article, and sadly you’re right — most of the people you would be trying to reach with this article’s approach are immediately going to label you a jew-hater without a second thought. my father (who is a mormon bishop) used to call me an anti-semite all the time simply for criticizing israel. I could care less what anyone calls me, and “anti-semite” is turning into a badge of honor.
by the way, I’ve lost jewish friends over the truth about jewish history, and I’ve had jewish friends get more into exposing it than me. I honestly think the elite of the jews hate jews more than anyone else hates jews. they have let the blame for their actions fall heavily on the heads of the average jew very much on purpose.
in any case, as much as jews control the infrastructure of this country, it’s ridiculous to imagine the average little old jewish lady saying prayers wishing death and disease upon all non-jews. I’ve known enough poor jews with no money in my life to know it is not a religion-wide conspiracy.
great piece, mr. grimm. most of the comments were also well-thought out and informative. good stuff…
Posted by: brandon dean | 12/16/2009 at 07:53 PM
All jews are guilty. Period.
Any gentile who thinks jews are innocent is guilty. Any gentile who helps a jew is guilty. Any gentile who thinks a jew is decent is guilty. You get my point.
I don’t believe in spirits, but if there was a satan, his children would be called jews.
Subverted Nation has the right attitude about the jew. History tells us very clearly that they cannot be trusted under any circumstances.
Posted by: Herodotus | 12/17/2009 at 07:12 PM
Exactly Herodotus….HISTORY has already proven who they are and what they are doing, and what they are working towards. ANY GENTILE caught helping Jews will get the same punishment as the jew.
The good jew myth is a “safety valve” for jews so they can run to it when their host nation rises up against them.
This time it will be met with “WE DON’T GIVE A FUCK IF YOU ARE A GOOD JEW”….They are part of the SAYANIM NETWORK …
America is to lead the charge, and other nations will follow.
Jews have sealed their own fate. It was not non-jews going around controlling peoples money and media, it’s jews. Everything they deserve, they will get.
Read about jews here in the best damn book out there.
and get over to http://www.realoathkeepers.org
Its a free book to download, but send $ what you think the book is worth to the Author, and help finance the revolution! If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem, so fall in line and get with the program!
Time is fast aproaching, you need to decide who’s side you are on. The jews, or humanity.
Posted by: Mack | 12/18/2009 at 06:08 AM
you know, it’s funny, but the last two comments remind me ironically of this quote, from the TALMUD:
“Every goy [non-Jew] who studies the Talmud and every Jew who helps him in it, ought to die.” -Sanhedryn, 59a, aboda Zora 8-6, Szagiga 13
sound familiar? oops… you may not want to act like the guilty jew if you wish to be separate from them. next…
Posted by: brandon dean | 12/18/2009 at 01:29 PM
I have already bought that book and read it.
Another good source is Martin Luther’s OnThe Jews and Their Lies.
Mr. Brandon Dean, the jew is a cancer. He is inherently evil. Just like poison it is his nature to kill and subvert what he is not able to kill. What the jew has made clear that he wants is to kill or enskave all non-jews.
The jew hates the Muslim because the Muslims have had his number for centuries. The Muslims do not have the infatuation of the Christians, the jews are god’s ‘chosen people’. Muslims do not suffer from that mental illness. They see the jew for what he is, a snake in the grass, actually worse than a snake.
Jews always betray their host. Ask the Spaniards on how the jews betrayed them to the Moors.
Ask the Persians. Ask the Turks, the Russians, the Germans, the Frech, the English……….
No, no. There will be no false sentimentality in dealing with the jew and the shabbos goy. There is not one damn jew in these United States condemning Joe Lieberman and Thomas Friedman for wanting to exterminate the Iranians. Where the blazes are the half-way decent jew? They do not exist.
A people whose religion says that their own god rejected them. How vile must such a people be. Think about it. If you had a son who was so evil that you had to reject him a thousand percent. That is how rotten the jew is. There is no more research to be done on my part. I have read talmudic writings and I know what the jew is.
I am just waiting for the leaders of this movement to act.
The leaders know who they are.
Posted by: Herodotus | 12/18/2009 at 03:38 PM
“you may not want to act like the guilty jew if you wish to be separate from”.
Thats exactly the kind of thing jews say, because it benefits them if people don’t fight back. Christians have it in their minds that Jesus was a Jew, and loved everyone and the image of jesus in most Christians minds is of him cuddling a lamb. The opposite is true.
Jesus was a REVOLUTIONARY WHO HATED THE JEWS, but he was too soft. He gave these people a chance and tried to talk them out of it, but in the end even he resorted to VIOLENCE because he knew it was the only way to deal with the these creatures.
Hitler was even too soft, and so were the German people, and the people of Europe. Look what being soft on the Jew has done for them! They have a communist European Union!Older Germans who know they were right must be livid at what the Jews have done to the Fatherland.
There can be no survivors this time. This will be a real worldwide holocaust.
Talking to them, wishing they would change their ways, praying to god, ignoring them, only benefit the jew, and drags this thing out.
People think that spreading love around the world will change the jew. This is not a utopia, this is the real world, with real criminals.
They love nothing more than ignorant, lazy, apathetic, weak, gulible people.
SO DON’T BE ONE.
“There is no more research to be done on my part. I have read talmudic writings and I know what the jew is.”
I think many who have done the research hit this point, and when you have reached this far you are already armed to the teeth and have a sidearm and rifle at the ready, even enough for friends and family members. Doing the research and educating yourself is all the justification you need. Your motivation is what you know they will do to you and your family and community, based on their history.
Posted by: Mack | 12/19/2009 at 02:58 PM
Jews always try to manipulate and emasculate by telling you that you are just as bad as your oppressors if you defend yourself against your oppressors. All jews are oppressors of all gentiles, especially white gentiles.
There will be no negotiating and no discussion. It is an all out encounter to the very end.
The only gentile that a jew will tolerate is one who will sacrifice his whole family and himself for the jew. This is the fool the jew calls a ‘righteous gentile’. And what does the jews’ talmud say about their “precious” righteous gentile ? “EVEN THE BEST OF THE GENTILES SHOULD BE PUT TO DEATH”
That is probably why the story about vonBraun died. If the jews kept it in the media spotlight the dumb masses might want to read his book called “Kill the Best Gentiles”.
So, to any gentile who wants to help the jew, you are a jew in my sights ( I have multiple).
Posted by: Herodotus | 12/19/2009 at 07:48 PM
“It seems the crypto-zio-fascists have discovered your blog. You better silence those who have different views!
Blackdak, is ‘the freemen’ your site?”
Yes it is, kike. And I choose not to write about your stinking race till I deem fit. But rest assured, the demolition of the jews in this nation is the ultimate goal. It is the ONLY way to regain liberty, because the jew is the historical enemy of liberty. And you people are so damned good at sucking it out from under your host nation.
“Very clever of you to try to leverage growing awareness of the Hasbarats to your anti-intellectual, Zionist power serving ends.
Mine was one of the first blogs to expose the Hasbara corps. What have you done? Make stupid arguments for genocide? Ask writers to ban intellectuals? Go fuck your self, you Zionist scum.
I love arguing with you ziofascist turds; you never can substantiate or justify anything you say, and you just end up flapping in the wind, like a turd flag, or a flag with turds on it like your country of Isr-el. Like your Rothschild star flag depicts, you Zionists are soon to be between bars for real.”
You try too hard, jew. I don’t even care to differentiate between jew and zionist. The jew is simply a parasite. The zionist a new phenomenon because it is only in the last 100 years the jews ever had hope in hell of getting the west to give them Palestine. Most jews are zionists. All jews are parasites.
It will be all too easy for me to help exterminate this wretched spawn of satan. The talmud is confirmation of the satanic nature of the jew. Revelation 2:9 identifies the talmudic jew. And the first modern time the jew attained power over a nation in the Bolshevik revolution in Russia, they exterminate 15-20 million gentiles. You are too stupid to even know that we ALL know these things. And yet you still defend your stupid little race of roaches. Disease ridden, filthy, complaining, vengeful, ugly race of people. The old Polsih proverb is INDEED TRUE : “The jew cries out in pain as he strikes you.”
Posted by: Black Dak | 12/20/2009 at 03:04 AM
You are right. The useful idiots who defend jews are no better than the scum they love. Wasn’t it a jew who coined the term “useful idiots?” VI Lenin
Posted by: Black Dak | 12/20/2009 at 03:09 AM
“Kill the best gentiles” is here for free-
Posted by: Mack | 12/20/2009 at 02:52 PM
Those who call for the rounding up of all Jews, have historically been Jews themselves. Why? To draw the attention away from the powerful criminal element. That is what the fascist filth want. That is how the criminal element survived, despite many cosmetic ‘purges’ in the past, which persecute the little Jew.
Subverted Nation is Zionist Jew. Black Dak is Zionist Jew. Herodotus is Zionist Jew.
They want you to persecute the little Jew, and ignore their Zionist sugar daddies.
These types of guys were all over Hal Turners FBI blog too, calling for rounding up of all Jews.
Posted by: anarchore | 01/04/2010 at 09:19 PM
“that being said, one may argue (but only speculate) on who will run towards which side if the shit hits the fan. we can only speculate, because there is no real experience to draw on”
You obviously don’t know what happened in Eastern Europe when the “commies” rode through town. The jews turned on their Christans neighbours, and they will do it again when the $hit hits the fan in all “western countries”, especially the USA where there numbers are greater.
They have proven time and time again who’s side they are on. Why are you so confused? The jew has no friend. NO FRIEND. All non-jews are their enemy. Go learn more about them, while I arm myself against them.
You are being fooled by one of their tricks, of which they have many. They are confusing you. It’s all part of the plan. Jews will ALWAYS BE JEWS. Even jews have said this.
Grab your guns fella, there are only 2 sides. There is good and evil, jews or Gentiles, take your pick. But remember when non-jews have chosen to be on the jews side, they do a PURGE every now and then and kill all the non-jews(communist Russia). Why would they do that? Because they know it’s a war between Jews and Gentiles.
“George Orwell” wrote his book 1984 based on what he had learned from the communists in spain, he was one, a gentile communist until he found out what they do to non jews, and found out about the plan for jewish world domination. His book is based on what he learned.
This is no time to be soft. Find your balls, fall in line.
Posted by: Mack | 01/05/2010 at 12:10 AM
> This caller identified as John from Franklin, N.Y. and maybe not his
> real name but his use of the phrase “that jewed us into Iraq” is
> important to point out. Many so-called Americans in rural areas
> especially, and even in Sarah Palin’s Alaska where I often hearr these
> terms being used in daily conversation, and it is entirely possible
> that Ms Palin has used such wording before herself in regarding to
> “jewing someone down” in regard to backyard garage sales in Wasilla
> and Juneau—I know, because I lived in Alaska for 12 years and often
> heard very nice Alaskans use this terminology, to my own face even,
> and friends in Alaska born in Minnesota, too, used this phrase right
> to my face without even being aware they were slurring an entire
> people—so this use of “that jewed us into Iraq”—using to jew as a verb
> in such an ugly antisemitic way—bares watching by the late William
> Safire and other wordsmiths. This is not an isolated case. Some
> reporter should ask Sarah Palin if she ever uses such terms when
> talking about bargaining at yard sales in Alaska. And if she doesn’t
> use the term herself, does she speak up when she hears a fellow
> Alaskan speaking this way within earshot and tell them to curb their
> antisemitism, however, innocent it may be?
Posted by: ellen jardens | 01/14/2010 at 08:05 AM
So-called Americans often use “to jew” as a verb for: 1. bargaining at
dpt stores and yard sales, the way they use “to gyp someone” or to get
gypped, which refers to a slur against Gypsies…… and 2. in
political circcles now we see the neofacsits white supremacts saying
things like “the Neocons jewed us into Irag” so the verb takes on
another ugly meaning. Notice people never say Jew Up it is always
negative Jew down, get gypped, and now the Cspan guy saying the Jewish
Neocons “jewed us into Iraq..” just like Harry Reid got called onto
the carpet for saying Negro recently when talking about Obama, we as
a nation need to look again into how the word “jew” has been mal-used
by so-called Americans as a verb for “bargaining down the price” and
“Jewish cabals jewing the USA into foreign wars.” If Bill Safire was
alive, he would do a column on this. Which brave Jewish or non-Jewish
newspaper columnist on language will look into these issues for us?
Posted by: ellen jardens | 01/14/2010 at 08:05 AM
Ellen, the Jews deserve far worse than harsh language. You are either a Jew, or you know absolutely nothng abou the people you ar “protecting”. I highly recommend you learn about what they really think of you before you defend them. Learn about the Talmud, learn how Jews murdered 30 million Christian Russians. They key to understanding jews is to understand they keep changing their names to confuse people!
“Neofacist white supremacist”…..wrong. We are normal humans reacting to a problem we can clearly see. I have a very multi-cultural family, I only hate jews because I see what they are doing to people. I see what the jewish central banks are doing to countries, especially my wifes country, and it infuriates me.
We see that jews are behind virtually every movement there is, all the money and media, and the countless propaganada to make people believe they ae “victims”.
Being a jew by defintion means being anti-non jew. THEY ARE THE SUPREMACISTS AND THE DESTROYERS! They have said that themselves, and they are correct! It’s written in ther own bible, the talmud that they can do to non-jews. They pretend to be the friend of the Chritian, but the Christian is their worst enemy, and they have said the need to destroy it.
Again, why defend these creatures if you know nothing about them?
My bet is that you are a jew and are trying to manipulate others. All I say is for people to LOOK AND SEE why so many people hate jews, ad why they have been kicked out of 84 countries 109 times in 2000 years. THERE IS A RESON! Learn from history, or be doomed to repeat it. If you people had any idea what they have planned for you under the “New world order” you woud already be fighting them.
Read his freebookand learn what jews say about you in THEIR OWN WORDS.
This book has been BANNED by lulu and is no longer availabe in hardcover format. They banned it because they do not want you to see any real history.
Jews suck baby penises in their circumcision practices! DO YOU AGREE WITH THIS PEDOPHILIC ACT ELLEN!?
Be careful who you align yourself with.
Posted by: Mack | 01/16/2010 at 05:19 PM
OK Anarchore….show me a JEW that says we should KILL ALL JEWS. Do it, I fucking triple dog dare you. The ONLY JEW who EVER came close to that was Bobby Fischer, but I would have put his ass in the woodchipper too.
You are a faggot ass KIKE trying to “save the jews”, and nobody buys your bullshit.
Come meet me in person, and let’s get a look at that neanderthal head of yours ANARCHORE. WE KNOW you are a JEW, because ONLY jews talk the stupid rhetorical BULLSHIT you do. Let’s see some photos of you and the family at the synagogue. Let’s see what YOUR FACE looks like.
Your problem is you can only run your sorry fucking mouth. You can’t show your face, because EVERYONE will recognize you as the little yid that you are. Either show your face or shut up.
Don’t be a pussy. You want to save the jews? OK, then FACE ME, because if you want them saved, you will have to one time or another anyway.
Persecute the “little jew” and leave their “zionist” sugar daddies alone?
WRONG FAGGOT. Persecute EVERY JEW, even those that HIDE BEHIND this bullshit ideology called “zionism” AND all of their non-jew lap dogs. WE won’t leave one stone unturned. We know where the roaches hide…and we won’t leave your sorry ass behind either. Faggot, penis licking kike.
Posted by: Subverted Nation | 01/16/2010 at 05:38 PM
…brilliant, brilliant, brilliant, brilliant, brilliant. Never visited this site before, but your perpsectives and analysis comes across as brief and concise. Well done sir, and keep it up.
Posted by: knuckledragger | 01/17/2010 at 04:50 PM
You guys need to check out this audio
Posted by: Mack | 01/18/2010 at 02:57 AM
Brandon Dean, You are being devious. I have read a thread some time ago at your site, War on You, in which you admitted that at least some of your family was jewish and that you could be but chose not to be. Your views and the information at your forum site seem straightforward and useful, but your deception as to your background should disqualify your comments.
I think it is very likely that Anarchore is a jew attempting to draw useless distinctions, too. I do think that some jews are truly more happy being Americans than they are being jews, but I think most of them would help the jewish Kahilla were they called upon.
Abolishing double citizenship would force many of these jews to make choices to leave or to stay, and would reduce a great number of them before more active measures became necessary. It would also leave them without a purported legal cover of automatic sanctuary.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
What is it like to live jew free and out of the clutches of usury? Our ancestors can tell us.
“Finally, in 1290 on July 18th a statute was passed by King Edward I (1272-1307) and the House of Commons compelling all Jews* to leave England for ever by November 1st of that year. Any Jews who remained in the kingdom after that date were liable to be executed.
The announcement of the expulsion was greeted with great joy and jubilation throughout the land. Unlike with the modern practice of ethnic cleansing, the Jews after paying a tax of 1/15th of the value of their moveables and 1/10th of their specie were permitted to leave with all their goods and chattels.
With the banishment of the money-lenders and the abolition of usury, we may observe how the finances of the English nation were practised at the different levels of society.
For the individual who wished to buy a house costing, say, £100 he would be required to make a down-payment of £10 and negotiate a loan of £90 from a bank. He would own 10 per cent of the house and the bank would own the remaining 90 per cent. Rent would be payable on the house of which 10 per cent would accrue to himself and the balance of 90 per cent to the bank. The following year he would pay the bank a further instalment of 10 per cent, reducing the bank’s ownership to 80 per cent and the amount of rent payable to it. These instalments would be continued until he owned 100 per cent of the property.
In the event of the buyer defaulting on his rent payments he would be evicted. However, he could never lose that portion of the house he had paid for and would continue to receive rent on it. House price inflation was not a factor during this era, as the rate of inflation was zero — as it should be. In any normal society which does not practise usury.”
Posted by: Flanders | 01/19/2010 at 03:51 AM
Correct Flanders. What gets me is why people are so scared to get the jew, THATS ALL JEWS, bankers and ordinary jews, out of their country. Think of it this way folks. The government BORROWS on your behalf, the money to run the country. That money must be paid back to the jewish bankers PLUS INTEREST. Its a system DESIGNED to fail so in the end the jew owns everything.
Imagine a government that CREATES the money out of thin air (like jews do now) and uses that money to build society and do what it does now. The people all work like they do now, and the money goes around in society, but because the government is also the supreme bank, the money never “leaves”. It just goes round and round. There are no debts for the government, meaning little if no taxes are needed. If a school needs to be built, the government prints the money for the school.
There would be more control over the housing markets. Every working family is entitled to a government loan (interest free) to buy a house. With no external debts a country can have its own destiny in its own hands.
JEWS do not want this kind of system and are fighting hard to make sure NO COUNTRY ON EARTH can ever break away and live free.
Do not kid yourself. ALL JEWS are working towards a jewish new world order where they are the engineers and top level paper shufflers and you are the working class slave with no hope for anything. You will get crumbs if you are lucky.
Posted by: Mack | 01/20/2010 at 03:28 PM
Hello? Is anyone still here? Where is that creator guy? That writer? The actor? The passionate one? The one who continually transforms himself? That guy! Hello? Anyone still here?
I would like to discuss the cry of Hamlet- “The time is out of joint!” Could this be our problem? Both a Jewish problem and one of Time itself? Temporality! That which is and has been for some time “out of its hinges.” The questions become: How are the Past, the Present, and the Future related? How are History, the State, and the Individual interconnected?
A mighty historical bloc surrounds us. A mighty social crisis now awaits us. A nightmarish multidimensional reality of hidden forces is brewing and whose upsurgance will thrust us into a new Homeric Age. This will begin with the coming birth and consolidation of the New International! A spectre is now haunting Hamlet! What to do?
When the house of the great collapses
The lowly are also many of then crushed.
Those who do not share the fortunes of the mighty
Often share their misfortune. The lurching wagon
Drags the sweating oxen with it
Into the abyss- Bertolt Brecht
Posted by: Ed | 01/26/2010 at 12:26 AM
“A nightmarish multidimensional reality of hidden forces”.
Wrong, they are not hidden they are IN YOUR FACE, and they are jews.
Posted by: Mack | 01/27/2010 at 03:41 PM
What a great thread. The whole jew question settled in 71 posts. An internet milestone! You jews out there better run for the hills, because we are coming for you. In fact, we are not all that bad, we will let youlive!…………. on the sun! It’s yours! take it! 🙂
Posted by: Mack | 02/05/2010 at 08:31 AM
Get to the next level of thought, go to subvertednation.net and listen to the latest audios ……with the voice of venom!
Posted by: Mike | 02/14/2010 at 08:22 AM
Say Hi to Hal Turner for me, Mr FBI. Subverted Nation and Voice of Venom, are obvious psy-ops. Nice try, Feds. Have fun in your crappy echo chamber Zio-shill site. ‘Solar Zionism’, how made to order by the ADL is that. “Oi Vey the antisemites are becoming more articulate at fingering the Zionists, Morty, call the FBI and tell them to up the antisemites on Subverted Nation. We need a real enemy again!”
Posted by: anarchore | 02/20/2010 at 11:43 AM
This is a fantastic essay. I would like to tweak it abit for general consumption and hand it out en-masse at some local colleges. If you are ok with that.
If you are, then I will share with you my recut of it and we can go from there. Please remove this post on your blog if you are ok with it. I don’t want any pre-notice to the anti-crowd being made public. Let’s chat offline.
Posted by: Jon | 02/28/2010 at 11:03 PM
Adam Austin of Subverted Nation.net is no “FBI” guy. You want to see what an “FBI” guy or “CIA” guy is check out http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/03/07/world/main6275953.shtml
Or HAL TURNER
The MESSEGE ALWAYS kills shills, because they cannot say the REAL THING out in the open, because it only hurts the jews.
Jews DO NOT WANT people to get together (of all races) and unite to fight and destroy the jew. A SHILL CANNOT PROMOTE THIS and label the jew as the enemy at the same time.
You are a jew just trying to deflect away from people with REAL SOLUTIONS to the problems, and the ordinary people can see right through you.
Posted by: Mike | 03/07/2010 at 05:49 PM
Anarchore, you are nothing but a faggot pedophile jew crying because we want you and all of your ilk executed. Nobody cares to here some creepy pedophile like you cry and play victim.
Nobody on Subverted Nation is talking about “zionists” you weak turd. We are speaking about the JEWISH RACE as a whole, which INCLUDES YOU.
Why do jews think their input on anything makes a difference to those of us in the know? It’s quite a supremacist attitude you have there anarchore, to actually believe people will listen to a JEW like yourself. Where’s that photo of your face at? Reveal your identity and let us show the world what we already know to be true. You’re a racist jew supremacist baby raping piece of SHIT!
Posted by: SubvertedNation | 03/10/2010 at 04:46 PM
Adam Austin of Subverted Nation.net is no “FBI” guy
He looks like it to me fuckface!
Jews DO NOT WANT people to get together (of all races) and unite to fight and destroy the jew.
LOL, what is “the jew”? Your fucking pinhead?
You are a jew just trying to deflect away from people with REAL SOLUTIONS to the problems, and the ordinary people can see right through you.
Nope you just exposed yourself HasbaRat!
Anarchore, you are nothing but a faggot pedophile jew crying because we want you and all of your ilk executed. Nobody cares to here some creepy pedophile like you cry and play victim.
Nobody on Subverted Nation is talking about “zionists” you weak turd. We are speaking about the JEWISH RACE as a whole, which INCLUDES YOU.
Why do jews think their input on anything makes a difference to those of us in the know? It’s quite a supremacist attitude you have there anarchore, to actually believe people will listen to a JEW like yourself. Where’s that photo of your face at? Reveal your identity and let us show the world what we already know to be true. You’re a racist jew supremacist baby raping piece of SHIT!
Ohh the head faggot speaks out… fuck you ‘superhero’, why don’t you go tongue some ZioNazi rectum you filth… you scum are exposed for what you are.
Rather than a genocide of J-ws it will be against psychopaths… we will remove you from society whatever race.
The psychos the ZioNazis, the Feds and the Hasbarats are being exposed daily… you, Hal Turner, that ‘spic hater’ with a Mexican wife and kids Curt May’tard, Dev Satan Evil Devael, COINTELPROthink, holy fuck you creeps are a bunch of fucking cartoon characters!
The latest to be exposed as a Hasbarat-nest is the ZioNazi faggot Incogman’s site(Nazism is super faggoty!)… you better move ‘superhero’, run to Israel you fucking ZIo-Nazi filth!
Posted by: anarchore | 04/07/2010 at 01:28 AM
Hmm the formatting didn’t work out… reposted with labels to improve readability:
Fuckface:Adam Austin of Subverted Nation.net is no “FBI” guy
Anarchore:He looks like it to me fuckface!
Fuckface:Jews DO NOT WANT people to get together (of all races) and unite to fight and destroy the jew.
Anarchore:LOL, what is “the jew”? Your fucking pinhead?
Fuckface:You are a jew just trying to deflect away from people with REAL SOLUTIONS to the problems, and the ordinary people can see right through you.
Anarchore:Nope you just exposed yourself HasbaRat!
Fuckface: Anarchore, you are nothing but a faggot pedophile jew crying because we want you and all of your ilk executed. Nobody cares to here some creepy pedophile like you cry and play victim.
Nobody on Subverted Nation is talking about “zionists” you weak turd. We are speaking about the JEWISH RACE as a whole, which INCLUDES YOU.
Why do jews think their input on anything makes a difference to those of us in the know? It’s quite a supremacist attitude you have there anarchore, to actually believe people will listen to a JEW like yourself. Where’s that photo of your face at? Reveal your identity and let us show the world what we already know to be true. You’re a racist jew supremacist baby raping piece of SHIT!
Anarchore: Ohh the head faggot speaks out… fuck you ‘superhero’, why don’t you go tongue some ZioNazi rectum you filth… you scum are exposed for what you are.
Rather than a genocide of J-ws it will be against psychopaths… we will remove you from society whatever race.
The psychos the ZioNazis, the Feds and the Hasbarats are being exposed daily… you, Hal Turner, that ‘spic hater’ with a Mexican wife and kids Curt May’tard, Dev Satan Evil Devael, COINTELPROthink, holy fuck you creeps are a bunch of fucking cartoon characters!
The latest to be exposed as a Hasbarat-nest is the ZioNazi faggot Incogman’s site(Nazism is super faggoty!)… you better move ‘superhero’, run to Israel you fucking ZIo-Nazi filth!
Posted by: anarchore | 04/07/2010 at 01:31 AM
Tracking the pattern of the jew media (JMSM) attacks against Whites and Nationalists. In the instance spoken about here, the killing and slandering of Eugene Terreblanche.
“No I am not shocked. I actually expected this and was waiting for it.
The pattern is always the same. From the Austrian Nationalist leader Jörg Haider’s assassination to Eugene Terreblanches assassination…everytime it is the same pattern that we see.
Let me tell you what the pattern is…
It goes like this.
A good and hounarable Nationalist leader stands up to lead his people… But Nationalism is the arch enemy of Communism who wants to introduce a one world Communist state. So Mr Nationalist is first approached by the Communist agents to try and corrupt him. They offer him money and riches beyond his wildest dreams…When Mr Nationalist refuses, the attack against him starts in the form of disinformation and mudslinging in the media to discredit him and character assassinate him. He will be made out to some sort of sexual deviate. Either gay or a child molester or a prostitute frequenter. Further he will be made out to be an alcoholic, a wife beater or as treating his workers badly.
When he is still standing and survives this character assassination onslaught, the plans will be made to physically eliminate him. Kill him. The death is normally highly ritualised, because the perpetrators want everyone to know who did it, why they did it and at the same time send out a warning to other potential wannebe leaders or followers.” [Continues]
The traitors from within — What the Mass Media do to White leaders who stand up for their principles and their people
Also, Swartberg ISS Forensic investigation results of murder scene
Posted by: Flanders | 04/23/2010 at 03:09 AM
show TONIGHT AT 9PM EASTERN
Episode #29.7 — Roid-Rage&WhiggerSwill&HAC&Mattoid-Meercats&Moaners A fighting, fussing, fucking, farting, foolish ball of . . . something.
Posted by: Prothink | 08/05/2010 at 03:27 PM
A Dual-Seedline Christian Identity ‘take’ on events of the past week within the White Nationalist [bowel] Movement by an Aryan Nations activist of over 16 years experience.
TONIGHT AT 11[M EASTERN
Posted by: joe | 08/29/2010 at 02:32 PM
Do you desire a house but you lack enough cash to acquire it?
Posted by: RamonGustav | 08/31/2010 at 09:29 AM
damn boy!… you seem to be obsessed with Jews… that’s even worse than being one!
Posted by: Jesus | 09/10/2010 at 03:01 PM
The new year is already knocking at the door, let it will bring only happiness and joy.
Posted by: Antivirus¥man | 12/07/2010 at 03:46 AM
I liked your site, you are very interesting to write. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
Posted by: JOBS¥frend | 12/26/2010 at 07:39 PM
I liked your site, you are very interesting to write. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
Posted by: JOBS¥frend | 12/27/2010 at 03:30 AM
I always thought the mainstream media (apparently 96% jewish controlled) was an insulting machine of idiot perpetuation. Hollywood has never taught me a damn thing I COULD ACTUALLY USE. I will not be entertained, no matter what. It all makes me ill and even now it is consuming my time, but I’m ok with that under these circumstances. I do not let a single thing enter my brain without it being carefully scrutinized for any signs of life or value. Entertainment should happen as a result of something meaningful, usually on accident. Anyway, all I was trying to say was if Jewish CEO plankton poor sports and their tard-faced legions are ‘letting this go on’ or even worse ‘knowingly enforcing it’, then yeah I fucking hate them!! Just the amount of time I’ve had to spend constructing mental traps in my brain to deflect this bullshit makes me incredibly angry! Luckily I have been free now for quite some time! Jewish controlled media babysitting, not cool. Ever. I don’t care who you are, where you’re from, how important your God is, how many lives you’ve saved, how many trophies you’ve won, or the number of awards ceremonies that have been held in your honor, FUCK YOU. Jews are enforcing a retarded nightmare called ‘the real world’ and it needs to stop. I don’t give a fuck about any responses to my post.
Posted by: Imaginary Borderlines | 07/03/2011 at 06:11 AM
Amazingly blunt and original article, btw.
Posted by: Imaginary Borderlines | 07/03/2011 at 06:34 AM
Posted by: Hassaan | 08/10/2011 at 06:23 AM
I keep showing this article to my friends, and one by one, they are all waking up. Thank you so much Zionist Watch.
Posted by: imaginary borderlines | 10/04/2011 at 07:26 PM
Jews do what they do because they are the children of the Devil, the literal children of the Devil. That is what Christ called them, and that is what they are. Jews are programmed genetically to destroy whites by any means available to them, even if they are destroyed in the process. They can’t help themselves any more than the scorpion could resist stinging the frog that was carrying him across the river. No matter where in white civilization Jews dwell, Christianity (minus the oxymoronic “judeo” in front of it) and white racial unity are what they seek to undermine above everything else, because it is these two things combined which pose the greatest threat to them.
Posted by: Obadiah 1:18 | 12/27/2011 at 07:17 AM
Speaking of bitchslapping, you might want to check out this video of Canadian comedian Josh Rimer. It makes me laugh! http://youtu.be/yDCk3NN¥HAs
Posted by: alex | 12/31/2011 at 12:16 PM
Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):
Version 1: Mar 21, 2017 — Published post.
Posted in America, Brainwashing, Christainity, Communism, Deception, Iraq, Jew World Order, Jews - Hostile Elite, Jews - Lying, Jews - Naming, Media - jewish domination, Mind Control, Multiculturalism, New World Order, Patrick Grimm, Propaganda, Race, Race - Mixing, Secret Elite, Third World, Third World Immigration, White Nationalism, WW II | 3 Comments »
March 15, 2017 by katana17
[Benton Bradberry’s 2012 book, “The Myth of German Villainy” is a superb, must-read, revisionist look at how the German people have been systematically, relentlessly and most importantly, unjustly vilified as the arch criminal of the 20th century. Bradberry sets out, coolly and calmly as befits a former US-Navy officer and pilot, to show why and how the German people have been falsely accused of massive crimes and that their chief accuser and tormentor, organized jewry is in fact the real party guilty of monstrous crimes against Germans and the rest of the world.
In Part 17, the lead-up to the German invasion of Poland is described and how Germany was provoked into that act by the Polish, who adopted a murderously belligerent and uncooperative policy towards Germany’s offers of a sensible solution to the Danzig and Polish Corridor issues.
Poland was encouraged in adopting that attitude because of the guarantees and promises made by the British and American war-mongers, such as Churchill, Halifax, Vansittart, Roosevelt and Bullitt who were acting as tools of International jewry to create another World War. This was engineered to finish what their World War I had not accomplished, that is, the complete crushing of Germany and its sovereignty.
Hitler, who knew first hand the horrors of armed conflict, never wanted a war, let alone a World War, yet was forced into one on the day that Britain and France, on the orders of international jewry, officially declared war on Germany on Sep 3, 1939 — KATANA.]
NOTE: The author has very generously given me permission to reproduce the material here — KATANA.
The book can be bought at Amazon here: The Myth of German Villainy
The Myth of
Benton L. Bradberry
Chapter 1 – The Myth of Germany as an Evil Nation
Germany’s Positive Image Changes Overnight
Chapter 2 – Aftermath of the War in Germany
The Versailles Treaty
Effect of the Treaty on the German Economy
Was the War Guilt Clause Fair?
Did Germany Really Start the War?
Chapter 3 – The Jewish Factor in the War
Jews at the Paris Peace Conference
Jews in Britain
Chapter 4 – The Russian Revolution of 1917
Bolsheviks Take Control
Jews and the Russian Revolution
Origin of East European Jews
Reason for the Russian Pogroms Against the Jews
Jews Leave Russia for America
Financing the 1917 Revolution
Jews in the Government of Bolshevik Russia
Chapter 5 – The Red Terror
Creation of the Gulag
Bolsheviks Kill the Czar
Jews as a Hostile Elite
The Ukrainian Famine (Holodomor)
Chapter 6 – The Bolshevik Revolution Spreads throughout Europe
Jews in the Hungarian Revolution
Miklos Horthy Saves Hungary
Jews in the German Revolution
The Sparticist Uprising in Berlin
Jewish Bolsheviks Attempt to Take Italy
Jewish Bolsheviks Attempt to Take Spain — The Spanish Civil
Czechoslovakia in Danger of Communist Takeover
The Comintern’s Aim? World Domination!
Chapter 7 – The Nation of Israel
History of the Expulsion of Jews
Chapter 8 – Jews in Weimar Germany
Jews Undermine German Culture
Chapter 9 – Hitler & National Socialists Rise to Power
The 25 Points of the National Socialist Party
Chapter 10 – National Socialism vs. Communism
Jews Plan Marxist Utopia
Chapter 11 – Jews Declare War on Nazi Germany
Text of Untermeyer’s Speech in New York
The Jewish Persecution Myth
Effect of Boycott on the German Economy
Jewish Exaggerations are Contradicted by Many
Chapter 12 – The Nazis and the Zionists Actually Work Together for
Jewish Emigration out of Germany
The Nuremberg Laws – 1935
The Zionist Movement
Chapter 13 – Life in Germany Under Hitler
Night of the Long Knives
1934 Annual Nazi Rally at Nuremberg
Hitler Revives the German Economy
Hitler Becomes the Most Popular Leader in the World
Chapter 14 – Hitler Begins Reclamation of German Territory
Chapter 15 – The 1936 Olympics
Chapter 16 – “Anschluss”. The Unification of Austria and Germany
Austrian Economy Revived
Chapter 17 – Germany Annexes the Sudetenland
Chapter 18 – War with Poland
The Polish Problem
Hitler’s Proposal to Poland
German-Polish Talks Continue
Jews Influence both Roosevelt and Churchill
British and American Political Leaders Under Jewish Influence
Roosevelt’s Contribution to Hostilities
Lord Halifax Beats the War Drums
Germany Occupies Bohemia and Moravia
Roosevelt Pushes for War
Anti-war Movement Becomes Active
Poles Murder German Nationals Within the Corridor
Chapter 19 – The Phony War
The Norway/Denmark Campaign
German Invasion of Denmark and Norway
Churchill Takes Chamberlain’s Place as Prime Minister
Chapter 20 – Germany invades France Through the Low Countries.
The Phony War Ends.
Churchill the War Lover
The Fall of France
Hitler Makes Peace Offer to Britain
Chapter 21 – The Allied Goal? Destruction of Germany!
Chapter 22 – Germany as Victim
Rape and Slaughter
The Jewish Brigade
Chapter 23 – Winners and Losers
War with Poland
The international jubilation over the peace pact between Prime Minister Chamberlain and Chancellor Hitler resulting from the Munich Agreement, did not last for long. Public opinion outside Germany soon began to cool again and turn against Hitler and the Nazis; the result of the relentless anti-Hitler, anti-Nazi propaganda. Propaganda is a powerful weapon and it was used to its fullest potential to turn public opinion against Nazi Germany, and to create pretexts for war, both in Britain and the United States. This hate campaign was controlled and managed mainly by the Jews who spared no effort to undermine the Nazi regime.
British historian Nesta Webster wrote in her book, Germany and England, published in 1938, shortly before World War II began:
“Britons in the past have not been easily worked up to hate, but this insane hatred of two men, Mussolini and Hitler, is being instilled in them by the Jews and those who benefit by them, and acting like a poison in the life blood of our people.
Germany is under a visible anti-Jewish dictatorship. We are under an invisible Jewish dictatorship, but a dictatorship that can be felt in every sphere of life, for no one can escape from it.
Already the Jews can make or break the career of any man as they please. Once war breaks out we cannot doubt that they will be found in every key position and will hold us at their mercy. Then the real purpose of the world war will become apparent. As long as the Jews do not hold Germany they can never realize their final aim – world domination. Therefore Hitler must be overthrown and Jewish power restored.” (emphasis added)
[Add. image] Nesta Webster’s booklet (33 pp), “Germany and England” (1938).
In this atmosphere of hate, distrust and bellicosity created by the anti-Hitler propaganda, the Western leaders were preconditioned to take the worst possible interpretation of any foreign policy initiative by Hitler. He had been made out to be an aggressive psychopath by the Jewish press and was therefore given no credit for having legitimate claims for Germany.
After the Munich conference, personal control of British foreign policy passed from Prime Minister Chamberlain to his Foreign Minister, Lord Halifax, who thereafter waged a relentless campaign to provoke a war with Germany. Halifax and certain British leaders on both the left and the right joined together to castigate Hitler and the Nazis and push for war. Principle among these was Sir Robert Vansittart, Chief Diplomatic Advisor to the British Government, who made anti-Nazi radio broadcasts.
[Add. image] Robert Gilbert Vansittart, (25 June 1881 – 14 February 1957), known as Sir Robert Vansittart between 1929 and 1941, was a senior British diplomat in the period before and during the Second World War. He was Principal Private Secretary to the Prime Minister from 1928 to 1930 and Permanent Under-Secretary at the Foreign Office from 1930 to 1938 and later served as Chief Diplomatic Adviser to the British Government. He is best remembered for his opposition to appeasement and his strong stance against Germany during and after the Second World War.
Vansittart’s radio broadcasts were intended to awake the British public to “The Nature of the Beast” ― to the habits of militarism, aggression and blind obedience which, according to Vansittart, had been inculcated into the Germans since the time of Tacitus, and which made them uniquely dangerous to their neighbors. Vansittart used the metaphor of the butcherbird he had observed years before on the Black Sea, ruthlessly eliminating its unsuspecting prey one by one. In Vansittart’s view, Nazism was no aberration but the logical outcome of German history. Vansittart and the others characterized each foreign policy move by Hitler as a new “surprise” and declared that he could not be trusted and had to be “stopped.” Vansittart’s broadcasts were very effective in inflaming British public opinion against Germany.
In reality, Hitler had made it clear from the beginning of his chancellorship that he intended to reclaim those territories taken away from Germany by the Versailles Treaty. His plan for a single German state that would include all Germans was also made clear from the beginning. “Ein Reich, ein volk, ein fuhrer,” (one country, one people, one leader) he repeated again and again. So far, he had remilitarized the Rhineland, annexed Austria, and annexed the Sudetenland ― all peacefully. The majority German city of Memel had also been returned to East Prussia from Lithuania. The only remaining pieces of the puzzle were Danzig and the Polish Corridor. It was obvious that they were next on the agenda. Hitler had already made that clear. But he also renounced any claim to the provinces of Alsace and Lorraine which had been returned to France at the end of World War I. Hitler stated his plan clearly and then followed that plan, step-by-step, precisely as he said he would do.
Moreover, numerous world statesmen, journalists and academics concurred with Hitler’s demand for reclamation of these German territories, and declared that his demands were both reasonable and just. The Versailles Treaty was based on the “War Guilt” clause which assigned blame for starting WWI to Germany. Revisionist historians had already disproved the war guilt allegation against Germany, so there was no longer any basis for the onerous terms of the Versailles Treaty and it should have been scrapped long before Hitler was elected to office. It was simply disingenuous for Churchill, Halifax, Vansittart, and the other members of the British “war party” to characterize Hitler’s moves as “aggression” or “surprises.” To say that his word could not be trusted was not true.
The Polish Problem
The Versailles Treaty had taken a large swath of German territory, along with its German inhabitants, to create the new sovereign state of Poland. This included a strip of land across Germany to give Poland access to the Baltic Sea, called the Polish Corridor. The main problem of the Corridor was that it split Germany in two, separating East Prussia from the rest of Germany. For Germans to travel back and forth between East Prussia and the rest of Germany, they were required to go around the Corridor by ship. They were not allowed to cross the Corridor. The German City of Danzig had also been taken from Germany and placed under the supervision of the League of Nations as a “free city” for the purpose of providing Poland with her port facilities. Around one and a half million ethnic Germans now lived as second class citizens in this Polish controlled territory.
This territory, along with its residents, had been German for centuries and its people made it clear from the start through countless mass demonstrations that they did not want to be separated from Germany. Danzig had been a member of the old Hanseatic League, and was one of the most German of German cities. It’s population was 96 percent German, and in a plebiscite they voted overwhelmingly to be returned to Germany. The ethnic Germans living in this region were now a minority in a hostile Polish state, under Polish rule, and suffered the same kind of discrimination and repression that the Germans had suffered in the Sudetenland. Germany had a just claim for the return of all of the territory taken from it by force by the Versailles Treaty, and many world leaders openly acknowledged that. A prominent British authority on Germany and German affairs, William Harbutt Dawson, wrote in “Germany Under the Treaty,” 1933:
“… no factor in the life of Europe today offers so grave and certain a menace to peace than the Corridor, which cuts Germany into two parts, and severs Danzig, one of the most German of cities, from the fatherland. Can Europe afford to ignore this menace and allow matters to drift? To do so would be tantamount to inviting and hastening catastrophe, for instead of improving, the conditions in the Corridor after and because of 12 years of Polish occupation, are steadily growing worse.
Because it is now abundantly clear that all the needs of Polish trade, present and future, can be satisfied without the corridor, and because good relations between Germany and Poland, which are so essential to the settlement of peace in Europe, will be impossible so long as that political monstrosity continues. The greater part of the territory should go back to the country to which it owes its civilization.”
Halifax and the “war party,” however, refused to acknowledge the justification of Germany’s claims, and characterized each of Hitler’s revanchist actions as naked aggression and proof of his intent to take over the world. They claimed that he even had designs on Britain itself. There was no basis in fact for either of these claims. President Roosevelt was at the same time, preposterously warning the American people of a possible German invasion of the United States through South America.
Hitler’s Proposal to Poland
Poland had traditionally harbored hostile feelings towards Germany and for all German people, so Hitler proceeded with caution in attempting to settle this last territorial dispute. He was moderate in his approach and displayed considerable generosity in recognizing Polish interests. British Ambassador to Berlin, Sir Neville Henderson, acknowledged Hitler’s reasonable approach.
“Of all the Germans,” Henderson said, “believe it or not, Hitler is the most moderate as far as Danzig and the Corridor are concerned.”
On October 24, 1938, Hitler had his foreign minister, von Ribbentrop, propose the following four step plan to Polish Ambassador Lipski that would have rectified the injustices of the Versailles Treaty and which should also have eliminated all sources of friction between Poland and Germany.
1.) The return of the Free City of Danzig to the Reich, but without severance of its economic ties to the Polish State. This offer would guarantee to Poland free port privileges in the city of Danzig, as well as extra-territorial access to the harbor.
2.) Germany would make no demand for the return of its former territory, now called the Polish Corridor, but Germany should be allowed to build a highway and a railroad across the Polish Corridor in order to reunite Germany with East Prussia.
3.) Mutual recognition of the location of the borders between Germany and Poland would be permanently settled. In other words, Germany would not demand return of any remaining territory ceded to Poland by the Versailles Treaty.
4.) The German-Polish Pact of 1934 would be extended from ten to twenty-five years. (In the German-Polish Pact of 1934, both countries pledged to resolve their problems through bilateral negotiations and to forgo armed conflict for a period of 10 years. The pact effectively normalized relations between Poland and Germany, which were previously strained by border disputes arising from the Treaty of Versailles.)
In his negotiations with Poland, Hitler could not have been more reasonable.
[Add. image] Jewish shops damaged during “Kristaslnacht”.
While these negotiations were going on an unfortunate event known as “Kristasllnacht” (night of broken glass) occurred in Germany which had the effect of further turning international public opinion against Germany. It could not have occurred at a worse time. The trigger for Kristalnacht was the murder of the German diplomat, Ernst vom Rath, in Paris by a young Jewish man named Herschel Grynszpan, on November 9, 1938. Grynszpan’s family, along with approximately 15,000 other Jews who had entered Germany from Poland after 1914, and who were not German citizens, had been expelled out of Germany back to Poland on October 27, 1938. Seventeen year old Herschel Grynszpan, who was living in Paris with an uncle at the time, shot and killed vom Rath inside the German Embassy in revenge for the deportations, though vom Rath personally had nothing to do with it. News of the murder was in all the German papers.
Anti-Jewish feeling was already running high as a result of the Jewish “holy war” against Germany, and the German people reacted angrily over vom Rath’s murder. On the nights of November 9 and 10, gangs of youths roamed through the Jewish neighborhoods breaking windows of Jewish businesses and homes and setting fire to synagogues. Uniformed SA men also participated. The official German position on these events was that these were spontaneous outbursts of angry German citizens over the murder of a German diplomat by a Jew, but the international Jewish press accused Nazi officials, specifically Goebbels, of orchestrating the event.
That seems doubtful, however, because early in the morning following the Kristallnacht events, Dr. Goebbels announced in a radio broadcast that any action against Jews was strictly prohibited and warned of severe penalties for disobeying this order. Numerous people were also arrested for violence against Jews. Government and Nazi Party officials were furious over what had happened because of the negative propaganda against Germany which would obviously follow. Hitler was also furious when he first heard about it and ordered a telex message to be sent to all Gauleiter offices, which read:
“By express order from the very highest authority, arson against Jewish businesses or other property must in no case and under no circumstances take place.”
Unfavorable international reaction was impossible to avoid, and popular opinion of Nazi Germany declined dramatically as a result of Kristallnacht. The British historian, Martin Gilbert, himself a Jew, writes that;
“no event in the history of German Jews between 1933 and 1945 was so widely reported as it was happening, and the accounts from the foreign journalists working in Germany sent shock waves around the world.”
The Times of London wrote at the time:
“No foreign propagandist bent upon blackening Germany before the world could outdo the tale of burnings and beatings, of blackguardly assaults on defenseless and innocent people, which disgraced that country yesterday.”
There was no need to exaggerate what had happened. The violent rampage against Germany’s Jews was truly a disgrace. But in typical fashion, the international Jewish press did exaggerate the event out of all proportion to what actually happened, providing their usual “eye witness” accounts. An orgy of brutal beatings, rapes, and murder of large numbers of innocent Jews all across Germany, as well as extensive damage to Jewish property was alleged. These exaggerated reports had the effect of poisoning international public opinion against Germany, as they were intended to do. Yet, it makes no sense that the German government or the Nazi Party could have orchestrated this pogrom, as the negative publicity resulting from it hurt Germany and the Nazis far more than it did the Jews. Already sensitive to the hysterical anti-Nazi propaganda campaign being waged against them, German officials were being very careful not to create incidents, such as Kristallnacht, for which they could be criticized further. It is more likely that Kristallnacht was a spontaneous pogrom against the Jews, caused by the buildup of hostility over the International Jewish “holy” war against Germany, and triggered by the vom Rath murder.
[Add. image] A New York Times headline.
In the aftermath of Kristallnacht, the world press became overwhelmingly sympathetic to the Jews, and bitterly hostile towards Germany. In France, Britain and the United States, calls for war against Germany became increasingly bellicose as a result of Kristallnacht.*
[*] [For an alternative view on who was behind Kristallnacht please see: The Bizarre Story of Kristallnacht – Part 1 ]
German-Polish Talks Continue
On January 5, 1939, Poland’s Foreign Minister, Josef Beck, met with Hitler at Berchtesgaden. Hitler reiterated to Beck a clear and definite guarantee that Germany would make no claims on the Polish Corridor, and reaffirmed that he only wanted to build a railroad and a highway across it. The following day, January 6th, in a meeting with Polish officials in Munich, von Ribbentrop confirmed Germany’s willingness to guarantee, not only the Corridor, but all Polish territory. This friendly, generous offer was repeated again by von Ribbentrop during a state visit to Warsaw on January 23, 1939. During this state visit von Ribbentrop appealed for a final all-inclusive settlement of German-Polish territorial points of contention.
A settlement in accord with the “four points” outlined above would have taken nothing away from Poland. Danzig was not a Polish city, but a “free city,” supervised by the League of Nations. Germany’s four point offer would have permitted Poland to continue to use Danzig’s port facilities, as before. Germany did not demand a return of its lost territory, now known as the Polish Corridor, only the right to build a highway and a railroad across it in order to reconnect with East Prussia. There was nothing unreasonable in Germany’s demands.
Yet, on March 21, 1939 French President LeBrun and British Prime Minister Chamberlain met in London and proposed a French-British-Polish alliance to contain Germany. This proposal was then sent on to Polish officials, which had the effect of further steeling their resistance to Hitler’s demands. Despite Germany’s best diplomatic efforts, the Poles were now refusing to concede anything.
The popular view today is that an overwhelmingly powerful Germany was threatening and intimidating a weak and impotent Poland, but in reality, that was hardly the case. Poland had a long military tradition and maintained a powerful, well trained army. The Polish army had only recently (1920) defeated the Russian “Red” army. Polish military leaders were not in the least intimidated by the power of Germany. It should be remembered that German armed forces had been reduced to only 100,000 men by the Versailles Treaty, and that Germany at the time of the crisis with Poland was still in the process of rebuilding her military forces. Not only was Poland not intimidated by Germany, she was even belligerent.
These Polish tanks were the equal of anything in the German army.
[Add. image] The Polish tank TP-7, 9 ton.
In October 1930, the influential Polish newspaper, Die Liga der Grossmacht, carried the following declaration:
“A struggle between Poland and Germany is inevitable. We must prepare ourselves for it systematically. Our goal is a new Grunewald (The Battle of Tannenberg on July 15th, 1410 when the Teutonic Knights were defeated). However, this time a Grunewald in the suburbs of Berlin.”
“That is to say, the defeat of Germany must be produced by Polish troops in the centre of the territory in order to strike Germany to the heart. Our ideal is a Poland with the Oder and the Neisse as a border in the West. Prussia must be re-conquered for Poland, and indeed, Prussia as far as the Spree.”
“In a war with Germany there will be no prisoners and there will be room neither for human feelings nor cultural sentiments. The world will tremble before the German-Polish War. We must evoke in our soldiers a superhuman mood of sacrifice and a spirit of merciless revenge and cruelty.”
At around the same time, Poland’s Marshall Rydz-Smigly said:
“Poland wants war with Germany and Germany will not be able to avoid it even if she wants to.”
Edvard Rydz-Smigly, Marshall of Poland
Jews Influence Both Roosevelt and Churchill
As the result of restrictions placed on them in Nazi Germany, Jews involved in theater and the movie business left Germany en masse for Hollywood where they were quickly made welcome by the Jews who ran the motion picture industry. These German émigré Jews then joined the Hollywood Jews in making anti-Nazi movies (usually with pro-Communist undertones) for American audiences. The stereotype Nazi officer, complete with monocle, cigarette holder, arch aristocratic manner, impeccable uniform, erect, arrogant bearing, and an evil sneer or a sinister smile on his haughty face, became a stock character in these movies.
[Add. image] The stereotypical Nazi officer as portrayed by Hollywood Jews.
The mass information and entertainment media in Britain and the United states was almost entirely under Jewish control, so a very one-sided picture of events in Germany was presented to the British and American people. Hitler and the members of his Nazi government were relentlessly smeared as guttersnipes, murderers and psychopaths, in total contradiction of the actual facts, thus public opinion in both countries was turned against Nazi Germany.
In 1940 and 1941 appeared Jewish made, pro-war films such as Charlie Chaplin’s burlesque of Hitler and Mussolini, The Great Dictator, as well as Man Hunt, directed by German Jewish émigré Fritz Lang, The Mortal Storm, A Yank in the R.A.F., Sergeant York, I Married a Nazi and numerous other such movies. These movies were an integral part of the vigorous campaign by various elements to get the United States into a war with Germany.
Once the United States was at war with Germany, the studios churned out one anti-Nazi potboiler after another. An audience today is likely to snicker at such “classics” as Hillbilly Blitzkrieg, Women in Bondage, The Devil with Hitler, I Escaped from the Gestapo, Hitler’s Children, That Nazi Nuisance, Strange Death of Adolf Hitler, Enemy of Women, Hitler’s Madman, The Master Race, The Hitler Gang, Hotel Berlin and Tarzan Triumphs.
[Add. image] Posters for Tarzan Triohphie Des Nazis and Tarzan Triumps starring Johnny Weissmuller. Storyline: “Zandra, white princess of a lost civilization, comes to Tarzan for help when Nazis invade the jungle with plans to conquer her people and take their wealth. Tarzan, the isolationist, becomes involved after the Nazis shoot at him and capture Boy: “Now Tarzan make war!””
A summary of the plot of Tarzan Triumphs will illustrate the flavor of these potboilers. Nazi agents parachute into Tarzan’s peaceful kingdom and occupy a fortress, hoping to exploit oil and tin. Johnny Weissmuller, a slightly flabby but still commanding noble savage, rallies his natives (all of whom are white) against the Axis. “Kill Nadzies!” Tarzan commands the natives. They nod eagerly. The Germans are so despicable even the animals turn against them. Tarzan chases the head of the Nazi troops into the jungle, and, just as the fear-crazed German officer frantically signals Berlin on his shortwave radio, Tarzan kills him. In Berlin the radio operator recognizes the distress signal and rushes out to summon the general in charge of the African operation. While Tarzan, Boy, and Jungle Priestess laughingly look on, Cheetah the chimp chatters into the microphone of the transmitter. Ignorant of the fatal struggle in the jungle depths, the general hears the chimp on the radio, jumps to his feet, salutes, and yells to his subordinates that they are listening not to Africa but to Der Führer.
The roles of the sadistic, sex-crazed, bullet-headed, Nazi “Krauts” in these Jewish made anti-German movies were played by such Hollywood “heavies” as George Siegman, Erich von Stroheim, Walter Long and Hobart Bosworth. Actor Bobby Watson was kept busy throughout the war playing the part of Adolf Hitler.
The American public, inundated with this kind of anti-German propaganda, was brainwashed to hate Germany and the German people. Anything our brave and noble armed forces could do to them was less than they deserved. Bomb their cities, kill their women and children. But destroy evil Germany by all means possible!
British and American Political Leaders
Under Jewish Influence
The political leaders in both Britain and America were also under the controlling influence of the Jews. Both Roosevelt and Churchill had surrounded themselves with Jewish advisors, to the exclusion of almost anyone else, and relied on Jewish money to support their campaigns for office. Jews were 2% of the American population, but of the 15 members of Roosevelt’s “Brain Trust,” 8 of them were Jews. The Jews therefore had control of the political leaders of both Britain and America, as well as control of public opinion in both countries.
A partial list of Jews surrounding FDR included: Bernard Baruch, Felix Frankfurter, David E. Lilienthal, David Niles, Louis Brandeis, Samuel I. Rosenman, Henry Morgenthau, Jr., Benjamin V. Cohen, Rabbi Stephen Wise, Francis Perkins, Sidney Hillman, Herbert H. Lehman, Jesse I. Straus, Harold J. Laski, Charles E. Wyzanski, Samuel Untermyer, Edward Filene, David Dubinsky, Mordecai Ezekiel, Abe Fortus, Isador Lubin, Harry Dexter White (Weiss), David Weintraub, Nathan G. Silvermaster, Harold Glasser, Irving Kaplan, Solomon Adler, Benjamin Cardozo, Anna Rosenberg, …and numerous, numerous others, almost to the exclusion of Gentile advisors.
As a consequence, Roosevelt was enveloped in a milieu of Jewish hate and hostility for Germany, to the extent that he eventually became a part of it himself, habitually making malicious anti-Hitler and anti-Nazi remarks in public. These indiscreet public remarks by Roosevelt foreclosed any possibility of amicable diplomatic relations between Nazi Germany and the United States.
Moreover, these Jews were, to a man, sympathetic to Stalin and the Communists and acted essentially as the Soviet Union’s agents within the American government. These Communist leaning Jews proliferated in every branch of Roosevelt’s government and spied routinely for the benefit of the Soviets. Roosevelt warmly regarded Joseph Stalin and referred to him as “Uncle Joe.”
Churchill likewise surrounded himself with Jewish advisors. Churchill enjoyed living high on the hog though he had very little money. He was accused more than once during his long career of taking Jewish money in exchange for advocacy of policies which favored them. Churchill supplemented his salary as a public servant by writing as a journalist and by writing books, though these combined amounts were inadequate to finance his lavish life style. During his “wilderness years,” as he called them, between 1930 and 1939 when he was out of government, though still a Member of Parliament, Churchill was supported by a slush fund set up by a secret anti-German pressure group known as “The Focus.” Focus membership was composed of wealthy British Jews, like Sir Robert Mond, a directory of several chemical firms, and Sir Robert Waley-Cohen, the managing director of Shell Oil, who employed Churchill as their Gentile front man. The American Jew Bernard Baruch also made significant contributions to Churchill’s well being. Churchill’s assigned task was to fight Germany; to start warning the world about Nazi Germany. Churchill was a brilliant orator and a superb writer, and he did his job splendidly.
Jewish money, primarily through “The Focus,” paid for Churchill’s lavish life style, got him into the British cabinet, and eventually made him Prime Minister. From his position as a Member of Parliament, and subsequently as a member of the cabinet, Churchill, doing the bidding of The Focus, began loudly and belligerently berating Nazi Germany and sternly criticized first Stanley Baldwin’s and then Neville Chamberlain’s alleged blindness to the threat to Britain posed by Nazi Germany. He began to clamor for war. Both Roosevelt and Churchill became Gentile front men in international Jewry’s war on Germany.
A German Cartoon of Winston Churchill, depicting him as the paid front man of the Jews. In fact, he was paid lavishly by the Jewish group called “The Focus.”
[Add. image] The two faces of the jewish controlled Churchill.
Churchill, in a speech before the House of Commons on October 5, 1938, said:
“…but there can never be friendship between the British democracy and the Nazi power, that Power which spurns Christian ethics, which cheers its onwards course by a barbarous paganism, which vaunts the spirit of aggression and conquest, which derives strength and perverted pleasure from persecution, and uses, as we have seen with pitiless brutality the threat of murderous force.”
He was, of course, only repeating the super-heated, hysterical exaggerations and outright lies of international Jewish propaganda against Nazi Germany.
Contrary to Churchill’s warnings, Germany had no designs on Britain, whatever. Hitler actively sought an alliance with Britain, which the British rejected. Hitler even offered to provide German military assistance if it were ever needed to protect Britain. Hitler believed, and often stated, that the British Empire, and the Catholic Church, were international institutions which were absolutely essential to world peace and to world stability. Hitler was an open Anglophile who yearned to be accepted by the British and did everything he could to forge an alliance between Britain and Germany. He often said, as many British did also, that the British and German peoples were the same race; the same people actually, divided only by language. Hitler wanted only peace and friendship with Britain.
Hitler was dismayed by the steady stream of invective and hate propaganda directed at Germany by these British war mongers. In a speech given in Saarbrucken on October 9, 1938 he said:
“…All it would take would be for Mr. Duff Cooper or Mr. Eden or Mr. Churchill to come to power in England instead of Chamberlain, and we know very well that it would be the goal of these men to immediately start a new world war. They do not even try to disguise their intents, they state them openly…”
In the post-World War II world, Churchill has become almost God-like in the common mythology about the war, but the common mythology is so far from the truth that even an ardent Churchill sympathizer, Gordon Craig, felt obligated to write:
“It is reasonably well-known today that Churchill was often ill-informed, that his claims about German strength were exaggerated and his prescriptions impractical, that his emphasis on air power was misplaced.”
In “Rethinking Churchill,” 1998, Dr. Ralph Raico wrote:
“For all the claptrap about Churchill’s “far-sightedness” during the 30s in opposing the “appeasers,” in the end the policy of Chamberlain’s government to rearm as quickly as possible, while testing the chances for peace with Germany was more realistic than Churchill’s.”
Roosevelt’s Contribution to Hostilities
The attitude of President Roosevelt and his entourage toward Germany was even more extreme than that of the British leaders. Roosevelt was predisposed from the beginning of his career in public office to a deep antipathy for the German people in general, probably stemming from the anti-German propaganda of WWI, and there is no doubt that he personally despised Adolf Hitler. According to Professor David L. Hoggan (“The Forced War” – 1961):
“Roosevelt’s hatred for Hitler was deep, vehement, passionate ― almost personal. This was due in no small part to an abiding envy and jealousy rooted in the great contrast between the two men, not only in their personal characters but also in their records as national leaders.”
The public lives of Roosevelt and Hitler had many similarities. Both assumed the leadership of their respective countries at the beginning of 1933 and then proceeded down parallel tracks. They both faced the enormous challenge of mass unemployment during a catastrophic worldwide economic depression. Each became a powerful leader in a vast military alliance during the most destructive war in history, albeit on opposite sides. Both men died while still in office within a few weeks of each other in April 1945. Though there were many similarities, the contrasts in their lives were enormous.
Roosevelt was born into one of the wealthiest families in America, and his life was completely free of economic worry. He, like Hitler, served in the First World War, but in an entirely different way. Roosevelt spent the war in an office in Washington as Under Secretary of the Navy. Hitler was born into a provincial family and grew up in semi-poverty. As a young man he worked as a manual laborer and lived hand-to-mouth. He served in the First World War as a front line soldier in the hell of the Western Front, never higher in rank than corporal. He was wounded several times and was decorated for bravery.
Despite his Ivy League education, his confident, aristocratic manner and persuasive rhetoric, Roosevelt was unable to solve the enormous economic problems existing in the United State which he inherited when he became president. Throughout his presidency, he was never able to reduce unemployment or to get the economy moving again. At the end of his first four years as president, millions of people remained unemployed, undernourished and poorly housed in a country rich in all the resources required for incomparable prosperity. Roosevelt’s New Deal was plagued from beginning to end with bitter strikes and bloody clashes between labor and industry.
The story unfolded very differently in Germany under Hitler. When Hitler became Chancellor, he was faced with all the problems facing Roosevelt, multiplied many times over. Yet, Hitler rallied his people behind a radical program that transformed Germany within a few years from an economically ruined land on the verge of civil war, into Europe’s powerhouse. Germany underwent a social, cultural and economic rebirth without parallel in history.
The contrast between the personalities of the two men was also stark. Hitler tended to be straightforward in his relationship with others and unambiguous in communicating his intentions. He had a conservative sense of Christian morality and was not a liar. Roosevelt put on a front of bon homme, but behind the big smile he was devious and calculating, and he manipulated others by misleading them. He was very probably a sociopath, devoid of a conscience, as many successful politicians are.
Hitler, on the other hand, was truly a man of the people who genuinely wished to elevate the German people out of their “slough of despond” to the realization of their full potential as a people and as a nation.
In contrast to Hitler, there was much of the cynical politician in Roosevelt who may have cared about the people in an abstract way, but he believed that only he knew what was best for them and that they were incapable of understanding such matters themselves. He manipulated the American people through devious and deceitful means, such as lying about his true intentions about taking America to war. He even admitted his devious and contradictory nature. He once said:
“I never let my left hand know what my right hand is doing.”
Roosevelt had worked in the Wilson administration during the First World War and was impressed by Wilson’s boundless idealism, and also by the way he was idolized by people around the world for his high-minded approach to the peace settlement after the war. Like Wilson before him, Roosevelt had an exaggerated, messianic view of himself as uniquely qualified for national leadership, and believed that he had been called upon by providence to reshape the world. He was convinced, as so many American leaders have been, that the world could be saved only by remodeling itself after the United States. Presidents like Wilson and Roosevelt, and George W. Bush most recently, view the world not as a multiplicity of different nations, races, and cultures who must mutually respect each others’ separate collective identities in order to live together in peace. They look at the world from a self righteous missionary perspective which divides the nations of the world into two groups ― those representing “good” on one side (our side), and those representing “evil” on the other (This is known as a “Manichean” world perspective.). They also see America as providentially ordained as the permanent leader of the forces of “good” in the world, with the mission of either destroying or converting the forces of “evil.” (Luckily, this view just happens to correspond to the economic and political interests of those who wield power in the United States.) Nazi Germany, in Roosevelt’s view, represented the forces of “evil,” with whom normal relations were impossible, and with whom one could not even reason; and so, he refused to try. He regarded Nazi Germany with total hostility.
Roosevelt most certainly did not see himself as an evil man, though his actions certainly made him one. He sincerely believed that he was doing the right and noble thing in pressuring Britain and France into a war against “evil” Germany. He was St. Michael the archangel leading the world in an existential struggle against the forces of Satan. The result of his vision of himself as the leader of the forces of righteousness, and his view of Germany under the Nazis as the force of evil in the world constantly threatening the forces of righteousness, produced an atmosphere of war hysteria and war psychosis among those who surrounded him and who ran his administration, to the extent that any utterance or action of this “force of evil,” that is, Nazi Germany, was given the worst possible interpretation, and evil designs were imputed to them however benign their actual intentions. The Jews who surrounded him and advised him, and who hated Hitler’s Germany for their own reasons, fed Roosevelt’s delusions about himself and his role in the world, and validated his Manichean view of the world.
To illustrate the war psychosis which had seized American political leaders during this time, Assistant Secretary of State F.B. Sayre exclaimed to British Ambassador Sir Ronald Lindsay on September 9, 1938;
“…at such a time, when war is threatening and Germany is pounding at our gates, it seems to me tragic that we have not been able to reach and sign an agreement [against Germany].”
To imagine Germany “pounding at the gates” of America in 1938 was totally absurd. Germany lacked the means to pound at the gates of Britain, just across the English Channel. Moreover, Hitler and the Nazis had no motive or reason in 1938 to view America with hostility; only with dismay at America’s baseless bellicosity towards Germany. If anything, it was the United States “pounding at the gates” of Germany.
In this atmosphere of false urgency, America’s Jewish secretary of the Treasury, Henry Morgenthau, Jr., telephoned the Jewish French President, Leon Blum, and suggested freezing German bank accounts in France, in hopes of pushing France into war with Germany. Roosevelt, himself, became increasingly belligerent towards Hitler, and repeatedly made personally insulting remarks about him in public. (Rather like the current war hysteria over Iran, but more extreme.)
William C. Bullitt was the American Ambassador to France at the time, as well as Ambassador at Large to all other European countries. Like Roosevelt, Bullitt “rose from the rich.” He was born into a wealthy Philadelphia banking family and was descended from Jonathan Horwitz, a German Jew who had immigrated to America. Bullitt was especially close to Roosevelt and shared Roosevelt’s enthusiasm for “Uncle Joe” (Stalin) and the Soviet Union, as well as his enthusiasm for war with Germany. Bullitt was used by Roosevelt to transmit messages to other American Ambassadors, including Joseph P. Kennedy, Ambassador to London (father of President John Kennedy), and Anthony Biddle, Ambassador to Warsaw, and those messages consistently expressed Roosevelt’s belligerence towards Germany.
In 1919 Bullitt was an assistant to President Wilson at the Versailles Peace Conference. That same year, Bullitt was sent to Russia to meet with Lenin to determine if the new Bolshevik government deserved recognition by the Allies. Bullitt was impressed with what he saw in Bolshevik Russia, and upon his return to Washington, urged recognition of the new regime. He was very sympathetic to Communist aims. In 1923 Bullitt married Louise Bryant Reed, the widow of American Communist leader John Reed (The movie, “Reds,” starring Warren Beatty, 1981, was about John Reed). When Roosevelt became president in 1933, he brought Bullitt back into diplomatic service. Throughout his career, Roosevelt had consistently maintained close relations with people who were either Communists or Communist sympathizers. In 1938, all U.S. envoys in Europe were subordinated to Bullitt who was based in Paris. Roosevelt bypassed the State Department and frequently spoke with Bullitt directly by telephone, often daily, giving him precisely detailed and ultra-confidential instructions on how to conduct America’s foreign policy.
Bullitt had access to Roosevelt by telephone at any hour of the day or night. Roosevelt and Bullitt were close friends and saw eye to eye on all foreign policy issues, and were especially in consonance in their hostility to Germany. Both were aristocrats and thorough internationalists with a shared view on how to remake the world, and both saw themselves as destined to bring about that grand reorganization. In Europe, Bullitt spoke with the voice and the authority of President Roosevelt himself.
President Roosevelt riding in a car with his “agent provocateur” Ambassador William C. Bullitt
The Polish Ambassador to Washington, Count Jerzy Potocki, reported back to Warsaw that William C. Bullitt had informed him that President Roosevelt was determined to bring America into the next European war. Bullitt predicted that a long war would soon break out in Europe.
“Of Germany and her Chancellor, Adolf Hitler, he [Bullitt] spoke with extreme vehemence and with bitter hatred,”
“He [Bullitt] suggested that the war might last six years, and he advocated that it should be fought to a point where Germany could never recover.”
[Add. image] William Christian Bullitt, Jr. (January 25, 1891 – February 15, 1967) United States Ambassador to the Soviet Union, 21 November 1933 – 16 May 1936. United States Ambassador to France, 1936–1940. Bullitt was born to a prominent, well-to-do Philadelphia family, the son of Louisa Gross (Horwitz) and William Christian Bullitt, Sr.
Potocki asked Bullitt how such a war might begin, since it was very unlikely that Germany would attack either France or Britain. Bullitt said that it would likely begin with a war between Germany and some other country, and that the Western Powers would then intervene against Germany. Bullitt predicted an eventual war between Germany and the Soviet Union, which Germany would probably win, but would then be so worn out that it would have to capitulate to the Western Powers. Bullitt assured Potocki that the United States would participate in any such war if Britain and France made the first move. When Bullitt asked about the German-Polish problem, Potocki said that Poland would fight rather than give in to German demands, and Bullitt and Roosevelt were both encouraging Poland in this stance. Potocki attributed the belligerent American attitude toward Germany solely to Jewish influence. He reported to Warsaw again and again that American public opinion was merely the product of Jewish manipulation.
In a report from Washington back to the Foreign Ministry in Warsaw, dated February 9, 1939, he wrote:
“The pressure of the Jews on President Roosevelt and on the State Department is becoming ever more powerful …
… The Jews are right now the leaders in creating a war psychosis which would plunge the entire world into war and bring about general catastrophe. This mood is becoming more and more apparent.
In their definition of democratic states, the Jews have also created real chaos: they have mixed together the idea of democracy and communism and have above all raised the banner of burning hatred against Nazism.
This hatred has become a frenzy. It is propagated everywhere and by every means: in theaters, in the cinema, and in the press. The Germans are portrayed as a nation living under the arrogance of Hitler which wants to conquer the whole world and drown all of humanity in an ocean of blood.
In conversations with Jewish press representatives I have repeatedly come up against the inexorable and convinced view that war is inevitable. This international Jewry exploits every means of propaganda to oppose any tendency towards any kind of consolidation and understanding between nations. In this way, the conviction is growing steadily but surely in public opinion here that the Germans and their satellites, in the form of fascism, are enemies who must be subdued by the ‘democratic world.’ ”
Lord Halifax Beats the War Drums
Britain’s Foreign Minister, Lord Halifax, continued to maintain a hostile attitude toward Hitler and Germany, and was determined to provoke a war with Germany. He circulated rumors both at home and abroad which presented the foreign policy of Hitler in the worst possible light. He would have found fault with Hitler no matter which direction he turned or what he did. Halifax dispatched a message to President Roosevelt on January 24, 1939 in which he claimed to have received;
“a large number of reports from various reliable sources which throw a most disquieting light on Hitler’s mood and intentions.”
He falsely claimed that Hitler harbored a fierce hatred for Great Britain. Hitler had, in fact, consistently expressed only admiration for Great Britain and had pursued a goal of Anglo-German cooperation. Regardless, Halifax continued to claim the opposite. Halifax claimed that Hitler wanted to establish an independent Ukraine, and that he intended to destroy the Western Powers in a surprise attack before moving Eastward. He claimed that not only British intelligence but “highly placed Germans who are anxious to prevent this crime” had furnished him evidence of this evil conspiracy. No German had furnished any such thing to him. He made it up. Hitler had not the remotest intention of attacking either Great Britain or France.
Churchill and Halifax were determined to have a war with Germany.
How to explain the desire of these men to have a war with Germany? These men, Churchill, Halifax, Cooper, Eden, Vansittart, et al, were conservative men devoted to the British Empire and to its dominant position in the world. But they were also nervously aware that British power was waning. Churchill had been one of the most vocal advocates for war against Germany before World War I. He, and the others, were now advocating war with Germany for the same reason as before ― Germany was becoming too powerful, both commercially and militarily, and therefore threatened to eclipse the dominance of the British Empire.
These conservative British leaders were devoted to the old balance of power principle worked out after the Napoleonic Wars. Preventing any one power from becoming dominant on the European continent had always been an overriding foreign policy principle of Great Britain.
Germany’s defeat in a war would serve the interests of both Britain and International Jewry. Vilifying Hitler and deliberately misinterpreting his actions and intentions served only as pretexts for a war they were determined to bring about for their own reasons. These advocates of war with Germany were well aware that Britain could not defeat Germany without bringing the United States in on her side, as in World War I. At the same time that they were developing pretexts for war against Germany, they were propagandizing President Roosevelt to make sure he was behind them, though little propaganda was needed, as Roosevelt was already in their corner. To fan the flames, Halifax made the most dire, though unfounded warnings to Roosevelt concerning Germany’s intentions. He told Roosevelt in a telegram that Hitler planned to invade Holland and give the Dutch East Indies to Japan. (Japan needed its oil.) Germany had no such plan. He told Roosevelt that he was certain that Germany would soon give Britain an ultimatum. Halifax added that the British leaders expected a surprise air attack from Germany before the ultimatum actually arrived. He claimed to have knowledge that Germany was mobilizing for such an attack as he was composing the telegram and that the attack could occur at any moment. These were preposterous inventions.
Hitler was preoccupied at the time with the Polish matter and had not given a thought to attacking Britain. But Halifax was determined. He went on to emphasize “Hitler’s mental condition, his insensate rage against Great Britain and his megalomania.” He confided that Britain was greatly increasing her armament program, and he believed that it was his duty to enlighten Roosevelt about Hitler’s intentions and attitudes;
“in view of the relations of confidence which exist between our two governments and the degree to which we have exchanged information hitherto.”
Halifax claimed that Chamberlain was contemplating a public warning to Germany prior to Hitler’s annual Reichstag speech on January 30, 1939, and suggested that Roosevelt should do the same without delay. Chamberlain gave no such warning, but Halifax hoped to goad Roosevelt into making another alarmist and bellicose speech.
Halifax had sent Anthony Eden to the U.S. in December 1938 to spread rumors about sinister German plans, and Roosevelt responded with a provocative and insulting warning to Germany in his message to Congress on January 4, 1939. Halifax hoped for a repeat performance from Roosevelt as a result of his most recent telegram. Halifax was preparing a war propaganda campaign for the British public and such a warning from Roosevelt would feed into his purposes. All of these machinations of Lord Halifax amounted to sheer fantasy, but Roosevelt, already predisposed toward war with Germany, swallowed it whole. Halifax only told him what he already wanted to hear.
Secretary of State, Cordell Hull, another strident advocate for war, sent a message to Halifax stating that;
“the United States Government had for some time been basing their policy upon the possibility of just such a situation arising as was foreshadowed in your telegram.”
This was the Roosevelt administration’s way of informing Britain that it supported the idea of war with Germany despite American public opinion, which was totally against it.
Roosevelt wanted a war to distract attention from his failed economic policies. He also wanted war because he cherished the idea of himself as a heroic wartime president. The Jews who surrounded Roosevelt, such as Henry Morgenthau, Jr., as well as all the other officials in the Roosevelt administration, worked themselves into a fever fantasizing about Nazi Germany’s malevolent intentions.
Henry Morgenthau, Jr.
According to David L. Hoggan, in his paper, “President Roosevelt and the Origins of the 1939 War”:
“…anyone within Roosevelt’s and Hull’s circle who did not declare that Hitler was hopelessly insane was virtually ostracized.”
On January 4, 1939, Roosevelt told Congress that U.S. neutrality policy must be re-examined. He wanted a freer hand to act against Germany. At this same time (the next day, in fact) Poland’s foreign minister, Beck, joined Hitler at Berchtesgaden in an amicable meeting during which Hitler stressed German-Polish cooperation in settling the matter of Danzig and the Polish Corridor. Though cordial, the conversations were unproductive and nothing concrete was settled. Hitler made clear, however, that as Danzig was a German city, sooner or later it would have to be returned to Germany.
The contrast between Hitler’s calm, diplomatic approach in his talks with Polish officials, and the deranged, hysterical, confrontational manner imagined of him by officials surrounding Roosevelt, could not have been greater.
American Charge d’Affaires in Berlin, Prentiss Gilbert, reported back that the situation between Poland and Germany was not as incendiary as Washington officials imagined. He reported to the State Department on February 3, 1939 that Hitler’s basic policy in the East was friendship with Poland. It seemed certain according to Gilbert that Beck would be willing to allow the return of Danzig to Germany in exchange for a 25 year Pact, and for a German guarantee of the Polish Corridor. That is not, however, what Roosevelt and his officials wanted to hear. But had Britain and America stayed out of it, that is most likely what would have happened.
Germany Occupies Bohemia and Moravia
Meanwhile, what remained of Czechoslovakia after the German annexation of the Sudetenland, soon fell apart, as described in the previous chapter. All that remained of the former Czechoslovakia was parts of Bohemia and Moravia, and on March 15, 1939, with the consent of the Czecho-Slovak president, Emil Hacha, Germany occupied Bohemia and Moravia and proclaimed it a German protectorate in order to prevent its being taken over by the Communists. In any case, Bohemia and Moravia had existed under German rule for most of its thousand year history, so this was nothing new. Czechoslovakia was a new, artificial creation of the Peace Conference after WWI, which now had already fallen apart. The entire region had a German character. Mozart premiered his opera “Don Giovanni” in Prague. Pilsen, Bohemia’s fourth largest city, is known worldwide for Pilsner beer, a German beer. Another Bohemian city with a German name, Budweis, is best known for the original Budweiser beer (the European brand).
Britain initially accepted the German occupation, reasoning that her guarantee of Czechoslovakia was rendered invalid by the collapse of the Czech state. But Prime Minister Chamberlain had been under attack by Churchill, Halifax, Duff Cooper, and Vansittart, among others, for his “appeasement” of Hitler through the Munich Agreement. After Germany occupied Bohemia and Moravia, the attacks on him intensified, and were egged on even further by Roosevelt. Chamberlain became flustered and defensive. In a speech on March 17, he declared that he wished to correct a misapprehension of weakness on his part. He said that Munich had been the right policy, but now Hitler had broken that agreement by occupying Czechoslovakia (Bohemia and Moravia). From that point on, Chamberlain stated, Britain would strenuously oppose, even to the point of war, any further territorial moves by Hitler, no matter how justified.
The occupation of Bohemia and Moravia caused a greater outburst of hostility towards Germany in Washington, D.C., than it did in Britain, or for that matter, in any other capital in the world, though the reason for it is not clear. The occupation in no way affected American interests.
Nevertheless, the head of the German Embassy in Washington reported back to Berlin that a violent press campaign against Germany had been launched throughout the United States. President Roosevelt also pressured Lord Halifax to adopt an “outspoken anti-German policy,” in Britain, as well. Halifax replied by promising Roosevelt that the British leaders were “going to start educating public opinion as best they can to the need for action.” In other words, they would launch an anti-German/pro-war propaganda campaign.
Roosevelt Pushes for War
Ambassador Bullitt informed the Poles that both he and President Roosevelt were counting on Polish willingness to go to war over Danzig if necessary. On March 19, 1939, Bullitt informed the Poles that Roosevelt was prepared to do everything possible to promote a war between the British and the French against Germany. Halifax, meanwhile, was attempting to create a broad anti-German front and an encirclement of Germany by proposing an alliance to include Britain, France, Poland and the Soviet Union. The Poles distrusted the Soviets as much as they did the Germans, and backed away from any such agreement that would bind Poland to the Soviet Union.
Both Lord Halifax and President Roosevelt began to vigorously encourage the Poles in their refusal to accept the German demands regarding Danzig. Bullitt finally told the Poles that he regarded an alliance between Britain, France and Poland, without the Soviet Union, to be the best possible arrangement. He said that British leaders hoped that there would be a war between Germany and the Soviet Union, and that they were not eager to make commitments to the Soviet Union for that reason. The Soviet Union was also becoming ever more distrustful of Britain and France.
On March 26, Bullitt contacted Ambassador to London Joseph P. Kennedy and instructed him to tell Prime Minister Chamberlain that the United States hoped that Great Britain would go to war against Germany in event of hostilities over Danzig. Britain then announced a doubling in size of its army. On March 31, 1939 Prime Minister Chamberlain announced in Parliament a “blank check” guarantee to Poland in event of war between Poland and Germany, that is, that Britain would declare war on Germany if Germany were to invade Poland. France joined Britain and made the same guarantee.
Ambassador Kennedy was appalled at the idea of a war with Germany, and only reluctantly carried out his duties as Ambassador when that possibility was involved. To this extent, he was out of step with the Roosevelt administration, as well as with the British government. Both Roosevelt and Bullitt disliked and distrusted Kennedy and Kennedy disliked and distrusted both of them. In a letter to his wife, he wrote:
“I talk to Bullitt occasionally. He is more rattlebrained than ever. His judgment is pathetic and I am afraid of his influence on FDR because they think alike on many things.”
Anti-war Movement Becomes Active
Meanwhile, back in the United States, the anti-war movement was growing in strength. One of the leading voices in that movement was that of Hamilton Fish, a leading Republican congressman from New York. Fish made a series of radio speeches to expose Roosevelt’s march to war while claiming that he only wanted peace. On January 6, 1939, Fish told a nationwide radio audience:
“The inflammatory and provocative message of the President to Congress and the world [given two days before] has unnecessarily alarmed the American people and created, together with a barrage of propaganda emanating from high New Deal officials, a war hysteria, dangerous to the peace of America and the world. The only logical conclusion to such speeches is another war fought overseas by American soldiers.
All the totalitarian nations referred to by President Roosevelt … haven’t the faintest thought of making war on us or invading Latin America.
I do not propose to mince words on such an issue, affecting the life, liberty and happiness of our people. The time has come to call a halt to the warmongers of the New Deal, backed by war profiteers, Communists, and hysterical internationalists [meaning Jews], who want us to quarantine the world with American blood and money.
He [Roosevelt] evidently desires to whip up a frenzy of hate and war psychosis as a red herring to take the minds of our people off their own unsolved domestic problems. He visualizes hobgoblins and creates in the public mind a fear of foreign invasions that exists only in his own imagination.”
In another radio address of April 5, 1939, Congressman Fish said:
“The youth of America are again being prepared for another blood bath in Europe in order to make the world safe for democracy.
If Hitler and the Nazi government regain Memel or Danzig, taken away from Germany by the Versailles Treaty, and where the population is 90 percent German, why is it necessary to issue threats and denunciations and incite our people to war? I would not sacrifice the life of one American soldier for a half dozen Memels or Danzigs. We repudiated the Versailles Treaty because it was based on greed and hatred, and as long as its inequalities and injustices exist there are bound to be wars of liberation.
The sooner certain provisions of the Versailles Treaty are scrapped the better for the peace of the world.
I believe that if the areas that are distinctly German in population are restored to Germany, except Alsace-Lorraine and the Tyrol, there will be no war in western Europe. There may be a war between the Nazis and the Communists, but if there is that is not our war or that of Great Britain or France or any of the democracies.
New Deal spokesmen have stirred up war hysteria into a veritable frenzy. The New Deal propaganda machine is working overtime to prepare the minds of our people for war, who are already suffering from a bad case of war jitters.
President Roosevelt is the number one warmonger in America, and is largely responsible for the fear that pervades the Nation which has given the stock market and the American people a bad case of the jitters.
I accuse the administration of instigating war propaganda and hysteria to cover up the failure and collapse of the New Deal policies, with 12 million unemployed and business confidence destroyed.
I believe we have far more to fear from our enemies from within than we have from without. All the Communists are united in urging us to go to war against Germany and Japan for the benefit of Soviet Russia.
Great Britain still expects every American to do her duty, by preserving the British Empire and her colonies. The war profiteers, munitions makers and international bankers [meaning Jews] are all set up for our participation in a new world war.”
The hero aviator, Charles A. Lindbergh, was also a leading opponent of Roosevelt’s war aims, and went around the country speaking out against going to war with Germany. In his diary entry of May 1, 1941, Lindbergh wrote:
“The pressure for war is high and mounting. The people are opposed to it, but the Administration seems to have ‘the bit in its teeth’ and [is] hell-bent on its way to war. Most of the Jewish interests in the country are behind war, and they control a huge part of our press and radio and most of our motion pictures. There are also the ‘intellectuals,’ and the ‘Anglophiles,’ and the British agents who are allowed free rein, the international financial interests, and many others.”
Roosevelt’s motives for wanting a war with Germany have long been the subject of debate. As America’s interests were not threatened in any way by Germany, nor would they be served by a war, Roosevelt’s determination to have a war made little sense…, that is, unless one takes into account Roosevelt’s intimate ties to organized Jewry. As Jewish historian Lucy Dawidowicz noted:
“Roosevelt himself brought into his immediate circle more Jews than any other President before or after him. Felix Frankfurter, Bernard M. Baruch and Henry Morgenthau were his close advisers. Benjamin V. Cohen, Samuel Rosenman and David K. Niles were his friends and trusted aides.”
Roosevelt was totally in thrall to the Jews, owed his political career to the Jews, and had so surrounded himself with Jews, almost to the exclusion of all others, that he essentially became one of them. Their attitudes, motives and goals became his. They hated Germany, so he hated Germany. They were determined to destroy Germany, so he was determined to destroy Germany.
In the summer of 1939 Polish ambassador to Washington, Count Jerzy Potocki returned to Warsaw on leave and was astonished at the calm mood in Poland, compared to the war psychosis that had gripped the West. In a conversation with Polish Foreign Ministry Under-Secretary, Count Jan Szembek, about the growing war psychosis that had gripped the West. Potocki said to Szembek:
“In the West there are all kinds of elements openly pushing for war: the Jews, the super-capitalists, the arms dealers. Today they are all ready for a great business, because they have found a place which can be set on fire: Danzig; and a nation that is ready to fight: Poland. They want to do business on our backs. They are indifferent to the destruction of our country. Indeed, since everything will have to be rebuilt later on, they can profit from that as well.” From the diary of Count Szembek.
Poles Murder German Nationals
Within the Corridor
Reports of increased hostilities breaking out between Poles and ethnic Germans in Polish controlled territories created a feeling of urgency in Germany. For several months before Germany’s invasion of Poland, ethnic Poles, protected by the Polish Army, launched a reign of terror against German nationals living within the Polish Corridor. (Formerly part of Germany where Germans had lived for several hundred years.) It is estimated that some 58,000 German nationals were killed during this period by marauding mobs, encouraged by the Polish government. The German government lodged dozens of formal complaint with the League of Nations, but with no results. Hitler became increasingly distressed about it and said to the British Ambassador Sir Neville Henderson on August 25, 1939:
“Poland’s provocations have become intolerable.”
Typical of these massacres was that which occurred in the German town of Bromberg, in the Polish Corridor. In this massacre, called “Bloody Sunday,” 5,500 ethnic Germans were slaughtered like pigs. Children were nailed to barns, women were raped and hacked to death with axes, men were beaten and hacked to death. 328 Germans were herded into Bromberg’s Protestant church, after which the church was set on fire. All 328 burned to death.
[Add. image] William Joyce, aka, “Lord Haw Haw” and a book on his radio work for the German war effort.
William Joyce, nicknamed Lord Haw Haw by British propaganda, became a German citizen and took up Germany’s cause against Poland. He described the horrible conditions of the Germans who lived in the former German territory which was now a part of Poland, in his book, “Twilight Over England.” The following is his description of what happened in Bromberg:
“German men and women were hunted like wild beasts through the streets of Bromberg. When they were caught, they were mutilated and torn to pieces by the Polish mob… . Every day the butchery increased… . Thousands of Germans fled from their homes in Poland with nothing more than the clothes that they wore.. On the nights of August 25 to August 31 inclusive, there occurred, besides innumerable attacks on civilians of German blood, 44 perfectly authenticated acts of armed violence against German official persons and property.”
According to historian John Toland in his book “Adolf Hitler,” when Hitler first learned of the Bromberg slaughter, at first he refused to believe that such a number had been killed, but, when Berndt (the German public official who had brought the matter to his attention) replied that it may have been somewhat exaggerated but something monstrous must have happened to give rise to such stories, Hitler shouted:
“They’ll pay for this! Now no one will stop me from teaching these fellows a lesson they’ll never forget! I will not have my Germans butchered like cattle!”
At this point, according to Toland, the Fuhrer went to the phone and, in Berndt’s presence, ordered Keitel to issue “Directive No. 1 for the Conduct of the War.” That may well have been the actual trigger for the war, though the causes of the war were multiple.
Murdered Germans before their burial in the Protestant cemetery of Bromberg.
German woman weeping over the murder of her husband in Bromberg by marauding Poles.
[Add. image] The German Catholic Priest of the Church of the Sacred Heart, Bromberg, in silent prayer before the bodies of murdered Bromberg Germans.
On August 24, 1939, a week before the outbreak of hostilities, Sir Horace Wilson, advisor to Chamberlain, went to Ambassador Kennedy with an urgent appeal from Prime minister Chamberlain to President Roosevelt. He wanted Roosevelt to “put pressure on the Poles” to open negotiations with Germany in order to avert a war. Chamberlain was already regretting Britain’s “guarantee” to Poland. Kennedy telephoned the State Department and said that the British;
“felt that they could not, given their obligations, do anything of this sort but that we could.”
Roosevelt rejected Chamberlain’s plea out of hand. When Kennedy reported this back to Chamberlain, Chamberlain, according to Kennedy, said:
“The futility of it all, is the thing that is frightful. After all, we cannot save the Poles. We can merely carry on a war of revenge that will mean the destruction of all Europe.”
Kennedy sent a telegram to Roosevelt urging him to intervene on behalf of peace. “It seems to me,” Kennedy wrote;
“that this situation may crystallize to a point where the President can be the savior of the world. The British government as such certainly cannot accept any agreement with Hitler, but there may be a point when the President himself may work out plans for world peace. Now this opportunity may never arise, but as a fairly practical fellow all my life, I believe that it is entirely conceivable that the President can get himself in a spot where he can save the world.”
Joseph P. Kennedy, Sr., U.S. Ambassador to Britain under Roosevelt.
Roosevelt rejected Kennedy’s efforts and called Kennedy’s plea;
“…the silliest message to me that I have ever received.”
Roosevelt told Henry Morgenthau that Kennedy was a;
“pain in the neck.” “Joe has been an appeaser and will always be an appeaser,”
“If Germany and Italy made a good peace offer tomorrow, Joe would start working on the King and his friend the Queen and from there on down to get everybody to accept it.”
Angered by Kennedy’s stubborn attempts to prevent a war in Europe, Roosevelt essentially instructed him to cease and desist, and told him that any American peace effort was completely out of the question. Kennedy resigned shortly thereafter under pressure.
Deep distrust was developing between the British government and the Soviets. The British had made strong efforts to create a mutual pact against Germany that would include Britain, France, Poland and the Soviet Union, and had finally obtained the Soviets’ agreement to a joint declaration. But when Chamberlain gave his blank check guarantee to the Polish government, he did it without consulting the Soviets. The Soviets were bewildered that the British would go ahead with a new plan without consulting them, and took it as an insult. The Soviets were already convinced that France and Britain were scheming against them. The Poles, for their part, were deeply distrustful of the Russians, and the British/French guarantee of Poland strengthened Polish resistance to Soviet participation in any kind of alliance in which they themselves took part. The British/French guarantee antagonized the Russians but at the same time did not have the effect of restraining Hitler.
Unable to reach a collective agreement with Britain and France against Germany, the Soviets began to fear that they might face a war with Germany alone, so they began searching around for a change of policy. On May 3, 1939, Stalin fired Foreign Minister Maksim Litvinov, who was Jewish and an advocate of collective security with Britain and France, and replaced him with Vyacheslav Molotov, who soon began negotiations with the Nazi foreign minister, Joachim von Ribbentrop. The Soviets, at the same time, continued negotiations with Britain and France, but in the end Stalin decided to reach an agreement with Germany. In so doing, he hoped to avoid a war with Germany until such time that he could re-build the Soviet Military which had been severely weakened by the purge of the Red Army officer corps in 1937. For his part, Hitler wanted a nonaggression pact with the Soviet Union so that his armies could invade Poland without winding up in a two front war. After the Polish matter was settled, Hitler believed that he would then be able to deal with Britain and France from the stand point of a fait accompli regarding Poland. Hitler did not believe that Britain and France would follow through on their guarantee to Poland and actually declare war on Germany. It made no sense to him that they would take such a step when they were manifestly in no position to act upon it.
The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was signed in Moscow on August 23, 1939. Formally a nonaggression pact, the agreement also included a secret provision to divide Northern and Eastern Europe into German and Soviet spheres of influence. Poland was to be divided between Germany and the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was to take back the region of Poland that it had controlled since 1772. The Baltic states, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Bessarabia, Northern Bukovina and the Hertza region (on the Romanian border in Southern Ukraine), were ceded to Soviet control.
Soviet Foreign Minister Molotov signs the Nazi-Soviet Non-aggression Pact while German Foreign Minister von Ribbentrop and Stalin look on.
The news of the Pact was met with utter shock and surprise by government leaders and media worldwide, most of whom were unaware of the negotiations which had been going on between the Soviet Union and Germany. They were aware only of the ongoing negotiations between the Soviets and Britain and France. Jews around the world, who looked upon the Soviet Union as the base of International Jewry, were particularly shocked by the agreement. They saw it as a sell out by the Soviets. In reality it was only a ploy to buy time by both Stalin and Hitler, and neither side saw it as permanent.
During the months leading up to the outbreak of war, Polish armed forces repeatedly violated German borders. Numerous altercations occurred between Polish irregulars and regular or auxiliary Germans all along the Polish/German border; in each case, on German territory. Poland in 1939 was highly militarized with an army larger than the German army. Moreover, Poland’s new leaders were military men with an aggressive attitude towards Germany. Poland even underwent a partial mobilization in March, 1939, and on August 30, 1939, ordered a total mobilization. (According to the Geneva Convention, mobilization is equivalent to a declaration of war.) On August 31, 1939, Polish irregular armed forces launched a full scale attack on the German border town of Gleiwitz.
The next day, September 1, 1939, German forces invaded Poland. On that same day, Hitler addresses the Reichstag.
“For months we have been suffering under the torture of a problem which the Versailles Diktat created ― a problem which has deteriorated until it becomes intolerable for us. Danzig was and is a Germany city. The Corridor was and is German. Both these territories owe their cultural development exclusively to the German people. Danzig was separated from us, the Corridor was annexed by Poland. As in other German territories of the East, all German minorities living there have been ill-treated in the most distressing manner.
… proposals for mediation have failed because in the meanwhile there, first of all, came as an answer the sudden Polish general mobilization, followed by more Polish atrocities. These were again repeated last night. Recently in one night there were as many as twenty-one frontier incidents; last night there were fourteen, of which three were serious. I have, therefore, resolved to speak to Poland in the same language that Poland for months past has used towards us. This night for the first time Polish regular soldiers fired on our territory. Since 5:45 a.m. we have been returning fire, and from now on bombs will be met by bombs. Whoever fights with poison gas will be fought with poison gas.”
The invasion of Poland occurred one week after the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was signed. On September 3, 1939, to Hitler’s great surprise, Britain and France declared war on Germany, though they totally lacked the means of intervening in Poland.
On September 3, also, Winston Churchill was returned to the cabinet by Prime Minister Chamberlain as First Lord of the Admiralty, the job he had had in WWI. Churchill’s bellicose warnings against Hitler leading up to the war now made him seem prescient and far sighted to many. On September 17, the Soviet Union invaded Poland from the other side. The Soviet invasion of Poland produced no reaction from Britain and France, though the Soviets had done precisely the same thing the Germans had done, albeit, without Germany’s justification of reclaiming lost territory. This gave the lie to Britain’s reason for declaring war on Germany.
Germany’s invasion of Poland provided only Britain’s needed pretext for war. It was not a casus belli. The war with Poland ended on October 6, 1939, after which Germany and the Soviet Union divided and annexed Poland.
As in interjection, we shall mention here the reaction of Poland’s Jews to the Russian invasion of Poland. Jews throughout Europe saw the Soviet Union as “good for the Jews,” and were very favorably disposed towards the Soviet Union. Alexander Solzhenitsyn, in his book “Two Hundred Years Together,” wrote that when the Soviets invaded Poland:
“Polish Jews, and the Jewish youth in particular, met the advancing Red Army with exulting enthusiasm” (as they had also done during the Soviet invasion of 1919).
The enthusiastic welcome of the Soviet invaders by Poland’s Jews angered Polish patriots and became a major aspect of Polish anti-Jewish attitudes in later years. Jews welcomed the Soviet troops in the very same way when they later invade Lithuania, the other Baltic States, and other central and east European countries. After the war when the Soviet Union took control of all of Eastern and Central Europe, all-Jewish regimes were installed in each of these countries.
Hitler’s invasion of Poland is known as the beginning of World War II, though that is not what Hitler intended. Hitler did not even want a war with Poland, much less a world war. Hitler had made every attempt to settle diplomatically the dispute with Poland over the return of Danzig and a highway across the Polish Corridor. In fact, Hitler wanted more than to simply settle the dispute with Poland; he wanted an alliance with Poland in his anti-Comintern pact against the Soviet Union, which he had already concluded with Japan. Poland saw the Soviet Union as her enemy and the anti-Comintern pact would actually have served Poland’s interests. They were foolish, indeed, to have rejected it.
The Poles had stubbornly refused to negotiate with Germany for a number of reasons. First, the Poles and the Germans had shared a mutual hostility for centuries. The military officers who ruled Poland were a proud lot with an exaggerated confidence in their military power. Britain, France and the United States all pressured Poland to resist Hitler’s demands; and finally, British Prime Minister Chamberlain had insanely given the Poles an unsolicited war guarantee, promising to declare war on Germany if Hitler invaded, and he talked France into doing the same. From March to August, 1939, Hitler did his best to negotiate a settlement with Poland over Danzig, and his demands were far from unreasonable. But the Poles, confident in their British and French war guarantee defiantly refused. Finally, at wits end, Hitler made a deal with Stalin and the two invaded and divided Poland.
What would it have cost Poland to have concluded a peaceful settlement with Hitler? The German city of Danzig, which was under the supervision of the League of Nations, and did not belong to Poland, would have been returned to Germany. Germany would also have been allowed to build a highway and a railroad across the former German territory, the Polish Corridor, to reconnect with East Prussia. That’s it! A peaceful settlement of the dispute would have taken nothing away from Poland. But the cost of refusing to settle the dispute peacefully was a world war in which millions of Poles were killed, much of their country destroyed, followed by 50 years of Nazi and Soviet occupation. If Poland had yielded, there would have been no World War II, no Cold War, no Korean War, and no Vietnamese War, and Eastern Europe would have escaped the horrific occupation and domination by the Soviet Union.
[END of Part 17]
* Total words = 14,484
* Total pages = 70
*Total images = 22
*Note: Images not in original book are indicated as “Add. image” (Additional image).
*Text in [square brackets] is not part of the original book.
*Special thanks to reader “mblaine” for providing the text for this book.
Click to download a PDF of this post (3.0 MB).
Click on a link to go to another part:
Part 01 — Cover text; About the Author; Preface; Chapter 1: The Myth of Germany as an Evil Nation
Part 02 — Chapter 2: Aftermath of the War in Germany
Part 03 — Chapter 3: The Jewish Factor in the War
Part 04 — Chapter 4: The Russian Revolution of 1917
Part 05 — Chapter 5: The Red Terror
Part 06 — Chapter 6: The Bolshevik Revolution Spreads Throughout Europe
Part 07 — Chapter 7: The Nation of Israel
Part 08 — Chapter 8: Jews in Weimar Germany
Part 09 — Chapter 9: Hitler and National Socialists Rise to Power
Part 10 — Chapter 10: National Socialism vs Communism
Part 11 — Chapter 11: Jews Declare War on Nazi Germany
Part 12 — Chapter 12: The Nazis and the Zionists Actually Work Together for Jewish Emigration out of Germany
Part 13 — Chapter 13: Life in Germany Under Hitler
Part 14 — Chapter 14 & 15: Hitler Begins Reclamation of German Territory; The 1936 Olympics
Part 15 — Chapter 16: “Anschluss” The Unification of Austria and Germany
Part 16 – Chapter 17: Germany Annexes the Sudetenland
Version 2: Mar 16, 2017 — Improved formatting. Added PDF of post for download.
Version 1: Mar 15, 2017 — Created post.
Posted in America, anti-communism, Benton L. Bradberry, Bk - The Myth of German Villainy, Britain, Churchill, Communism, Danzig, Europe, Europe - Central, Europe - Eastern, Franklin D., Germany, Hitler, Hollywood, International Finance, Jew World Order, Jewish Bolsheviks, Jewish Problem/Question, Jews, Jews - Hostile Elite, Jews - Lying, Kristalnacht, Media - jewish domination, National Socialism, Poland, Polish Corridor, Propaganda, Propaganda - Anti-German, Revisionism, Roosevelt, Rothschild, Russia, Solzhenitsyn, Sudeten German, The Focus Group, Third Reich, Treaty of Versailles, Winston Churchill, WW II | 4 Comments »
Amazon has now banned hundreds of books written by revisionists on the so-called “Holocaust” after being pressured by organized jewry. Despite the books remaining available at much smaller outlets this will have a large negative impact on the public being able to access the revisionist side of the argument that exposes the “Holocaust” Industry’s lies. This move is further evidence of organized jewry’s desire to impose a tyrannical muzzle on our ability to not only speak truth to jewish power, but also what we can even read and consequently think.
The jewish “Holocaust” lies that have been imposed upon Whites represents the keystone that supports a whole system of other jewish idealogical lies that attack and seeks to destroy White societies through guilt tripping us into racial self destruction.
Amazon, by bowing down to organized jewish demands to remove revisionist books, is showing that it now supports jewish surpremacism and is against historical truth, and therefore also anti-White.
Something that needs to be emphasized is the silver lining to this banning of Revisionist books.
That the claimed three pillars of the “Holocaust“, namely that National Socialist Germany had a plan to exterminate all the jews that it could, that it used “industrial” methods, i.e., gas chambers to do so, and that it succeeded in murdering six million jews, can not stand scrutiny is demonstated, once again.
It is effectively a “Declaration of Defeat” on the part of the Holocaust Industry.
It sees it cannot win the argument, so it resorts to banning the Revisionist’s argument from public circulation, using a mega-company that should more appropriately be now called, “Amazion”.
Below are the reactions from various websites — KATANA
Bans 100s of
CODOH — Amazon Mass-Bans Dissident Materials
American Free Press — WAR DECLARED
Daily Stormer — The Shuttening: Amazon Caves to Holocaust Lobby, Bans Skeptical Literature
Carolyn Yeager — Shock: Amazon Deep-Sixes all Holocaust Revisionist Books; Begs for a Boycott
National Vanguard — Amazon Decides That the Jewish “Holocaust” Cannot Stand Up to Critical Scrutiny
Renegade Tribune — Go Ahead, Amazon, Make My Day
Darkmoon — Amazon Bans “Holocaust Denial”, Shreds and Incinerates Thousands of Books
Michael Hoffman — Amazon Bans World War II Revisionist Books
Version History & Notes
Amazon Mass-Bans Dissident Materials
Hundreds of Titles Erased within a Day
On February 23rd, 2017, the world’s media started spreading the news that Israel’s government-sponsored Yad Vashem Holocaust Memorial Center started putting Amazon under pressure to remove any and all material that questions the orthodox Holocaust narrative. Here is a list of items for your perusal:
Interesting in this context is the reference by Yad Vashem and the world’s media that one reason to ask for this act of censorship was the recent “unfortunate change in climate with more-visible antisemitism” (Jerusalem Post, Feb. 23, 2017).
We at Castle Hill Publishers were holding our breaths. Amazon had been criticized by the media many times before for allowing the sale of controversial material on their website, but they never censored anything that was legal. So at first, nothing happened. But then, as if ordered to emphasize the urgency of Yad Vashem’s request, two Jewish cemeteries were vandalized, first one in Philadelphia (Feb. 27), then allegedly another one in New York (Mar. 3). The New York case, however, was later retracted: the tombstones there had fallen over decades due to age. Be that as it may, the cemetery stories added fuel to the fire in which Amazon’s feet had been put.
Then, on the first workday of the week following the second (false) cemetery story, on March 6, 2017 at 6:39 pm, we received the following email from Amazon’s EBook Subsidiary Amazon KDP, that is to say, Kindle:
We’re contacting you regarding the following book:
Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of ‘Truth’ and ‘Memory’ (Holocaust Handbooks Book 1) (ID 5513183)
The Rudolf Report: Expert Report on Chemical and Technical Aspects of the “Gas Chambers” of Auschwitz (Holocaust Handbooks Book 2) (ID 5513316)
Der Jahrhundertbetrug: Argumente gegen die angenommene Vernichtung des europäischen Judentums (Holocaust Handbooks 7) (German Edition) (ID 5516699)
Jewish Emigration from the Third Reich (Holocaust Handbooks Book 12) (ID 5583159)
Concentration Camp Majdanek: A Historical and Technical Study (Holocaust Handbooks Book 5) (ID 5646916)
The Giant with Feet of Clay: Raul Hilberg and his Standard Work on the ‘Holocaust’ (Holocaust Handbooks Book 3) (ID 5644182)
Debunking the Bunkers of Auschwitz: Black Propaganda versus History (Holocaust Handbooks Book 11) (ID 5653917)
Concentration Camp Stutthof: Its History and Function in National Socialist Jewish Policy. (Holocaust Handbooks Book 4) (ID 5646680)
The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The Case Against the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry (Holocaust Handbooks Book 7) (ID 5650743)
Belzec: Propaganda, Testimonies, Archeological Research, and History (Holocaust Handbooks Book 9) (ID 5653626)
Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transit Camp? (Holocaust Handbooks Book 8) (ID 5653335)
The Central Construction Office of the Waffen-SS and Police Auschwitz: Organization, Responsibilities, Activities (Holocaust Handbooks Book 13) (ID 5656753)
Auschwitz: Plain Facts: A Response to Jean-Claude Pressac (Holocaust Handbooks Book 14) (ID 5656817)
Lectures on the Holocaust: Controversial Issues Cross Examined (Holocaust Handbooks Book 15) (ID 5656850)
Auschwitz: Open Air Incinerations (Holocaust Handbooks Book 17) (ID 5661735)
Auschwitz Lies: Legends, Lies, and Prejudices on the Holocaust (Holocaust Handbooks Book 18) (ID 5661787)
Sobibor: Holocaust Propaganda and Reality (Holocaust Handbooks Book 19) (ID 5663589)
Chelmno: A German Camp in History and Propaganda (Holocaust Handbooks Book 23) (ID 5666222)
The Gas Vans: A Critical Study (Holocaust Handbooks Book 26) (ID 5666316)
Inside the Gas Chambers: The Extermination of Mainstream Holocaust Historiography (Holocaust Handbooks Book 25) (ID 5666251)
Auschwitz: The First Gassing: Rumor and Reality (Holocaust Handbooks Book 20) (ID 5663739)
The “Extermination Camps” of “Aktion Reinhardt”: An Analysis and Refutation of Factitious “Evidence,” Deceptions and Flawed Argumentation of the “Holocaust … Bloggers (Holocaust Handbooks Book 28) (ID 5666327)
The Real Case for Auschwitz: Robert van Pelt’s Evidence from the Irving Trial Critically Reviewed (Holocaust Handbooks Book 22) (ID 5664509)
Auschwitz: Crematorium I: and the Alleged Homicidal Gassings (Holocaust Handbooks Book 21) (ID 5664451)
Der Holocaust: Die Argumente (German Edition) (ID 5732388)
Auschwitz: A Judge Looks at the Evidence (ID 5730537)
The Dissolution of Eastern European Jewry (Holocaust Handbooks Book 29) (ID 5799550)
Auswanderung der Juden aus dem Dritten Reich (Holocaust Handbücher 12) (German Edition) (ID 5882846)
Auschwitz-Lügen: Legenden, Lügen, Vorurteile von Medien, Politikern und Wissenschaftlern über den Holocaust (Holocaust Handbücher 18) (German Edition) (ID 5895297)
Chelmno: Ein deutsches Lager in Geschichte und Propaganda (Holocaust Handbücher Book 23) (ID 5895338)
Freiluftverbrennungen in Auschwitz (Holocaust Handbücher 17) (German Edition) (ID 5895359)
Auschwitz: Krematorium I: und die angeblichen Menschenvergasungen (Holocaust Handbücher 21) (German Edition) (ID 5896239)
Der Holocaust vor Gericht: Der Prozeß gegen Ernst Zündel 1988 (German Edition) (ID 5896290)
Belzec: Propaganda, Zeugenaussagen, archäologischer Forschung und Geschichte (Holocaust Handbücher 9) (German Edition) (ID 5896743)
Die Leuchter-Gutachten: Kritische Ausgabe (Holocaust Handbücher 16) (German Edition) (ID 5896317)
Der Erste Holocaust: Jüdische Spendenkampagnen mit Holocaust-Behauptungen im Ersten Weltkrieg und danach (Holocaust Handbücher 6) (German Edition) (ID 5896844)
Vorlesungen über den Holocaust: Strittige Fragen im Kreuzverhör (Holocaust Handbücher 15) (German Edition) (ID 5897402)
Das Rudolf Gutachten: Gutachten über die ‘Gaskammern’ von Auschwitz (Holocaust Handbücher 2) (German Edition) (ID 5895434)
Schiffbruch: Vom Untergang der Holocaust-Orthodoxie (Holocaust Handbücher 25) (German Edition) (ID 5899236)
Treblinka: Vernichtungslager oder Durchgangslager? (Holocaust Handbücher 8) (German Edition) (ID 5899290)
Konzentrationslager Majdanek: Eine historische und technische Studie (Holocaust Handbücher 5) (German Edition) (ID 5899308)
Kardinalfragen an Deutschlands Politiker: Autobiographische Skizzen und Gedankensplitter zu Wissenschaft, Politik und Menschenrechten (German Edition) (ID 5909218)
Riese auf tönernen Füssen: Raul Hilberg und sein Standardwerk über den ‘Holocaust’ (Holocaust Handbücher 3) (German Edition) (ID 5909313)
Sobibor: Holocaust Propaganda und Wirklichkeit (Holocaust Handbücher 19) (German Edition) (ID 5909930)
Die Zentralbauleitung der Waffen-SS und Polizei Auschwitz: Organisation, Verantwortlichkeiten, Tätigkeiten (Holocaust Handbücher 13) (German Edition) (ID 5911841)
Auschwitz: Nackte Fakten: Eine Erwiderung an Jean-Claude Pressac (Holocaust Handbücher 14) (German Edition) (ID 5912128)
Das Konzentrationslager Stutthof: Seine Geschichte und Funktion in der nationalsozialistischen Juden-politik (Holocaust Handbücher 4) (German Edition) (ID 5910180)
Sonderbehandlung in Auschwitz: Entstehung und Bedeutung eines Begriffs (Holocaust Handbücher 10) (German Edition) (ID 5915776)
Holocaust High Priest: Elie Wiesel, “Night,” the Memory Cult, and the Rise of Revisionism (Holocaust Handbooks Book 30) (ID 5968760)
Vorlesungen über den Holocaust: Strittige Fragen im Kreuzverhör (Holocaust Handbücher 15) (German Edition) (ID 6078966)
Die Bunker von Auschwitz: Schwarze Propaganda kontra Wirklichkeit (Holocaust Handbücher 11) (German Edition) (ID 6079821)
Der Auschwitz-Mythos: Legende oder Wirklichkeit? Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme (German Edition) (ID 6212283)
“Die Vernichtung der europäischen Juden”: Hilbergs Riese auf tönernen Füßen (Holocaust Handbücher 3) (German Edition) (ID 6401246)
Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth & Reality (Holocaust Handbooks Book 31) (ID 6415492)
Debating the Holocaust: A New Look at Both Sides (Holocaust Handbooks Book 32) (ID 6445119)
The Central Construction Office of the Waffen-SS and Police Auschwitz: Organization, Responsibilities, Activities (Holocaust Handbooks Book 13) (ID 6503905)
The First Holocaust: The Surprising Origin of the Six-Million Figure (Holocaust Handbooks Book 6) (ID 6624763)
The Leuchter Reports: Critical Edition (Holocaust Handbooks Book 16) (ID 6652708)
Gesundheitsfürsorge in Auschwitz: Die medizinische Versorgung und Sonderbehandlung registrierter Häftlinge (Holocaust Handbücher 33) (German Edition) (ID 6893072)
Auschwitz: Nackte Fakten: Eine Erwiderung an Jean-Claude Pressac (Holocaust Handbücher 14) (German Edition) (ID 7388229)
Auschwitz: Die erste Vergasung: Gerücht und Wirklichkeit (Holocaust Handbücher 20) (German Edition) (ID 7396915)
Feuerzeichen: Die ‘Reichskristallnacht’: Anstifter und Brandstifter – Opfer und Nutznießer (German Edition) (ID 7413507)
Curated Lies: The Auschwitz Museum’s Misrepresentations, Distortions and Deceptions (Holocaust Handbooks Book 38) (ID 7547229)
Special Treatment in Auschwitz: Origin and Meaning of a Term (Holocaust Handbooks Book 10) (ID 7760164)
Fail: “Debunking Holocaust Denial Theories”: How James and Lance Morcan Botched Their Attempt to Affirm the Historicity of the Nazi Genocide (ID 7848728)
The Holocaust: An Introduction: Exploring the Evidence (ID 7977642)
Fail: “Denying the Holocaust”: How Deborah Lipstadt Botched Her Attempt to Demonstrate the Growing Assault on Truth and Memory (ID 8080904)
Till Bastian, Auschwitz und die “Auschwitz-Lüge”: Über das Versagen der Kritiker des Holocaust-Revisionismus (German Edition) (ID 8185504)
Fail: “Denying History”: How Michael Shermer and Alex Grobman Botched Their Attempt to Refute Those Who Say the Holocaust Never Happened (ID 8280843)
Healthcare in Auschwitz: Medical Care and Special Treatment of Registered Inmates (Holocaust Handbooks Book 33) (ID 8289137)
During our review process, we found that this content is in violation of our content guidelines. As a result, we cannot offer this book for sale. If we identify additional submissions with similar content that violates our guidelines you may lose access to optional KDP services and/or face account level actions up to and including termination.
To learn more about our content guidelines, please visit our Kindle Direct Publishing Help page at:
[Image — click to enlarge]
American Free Press
March 10, 2016
Amazon.com bans thousands of book titles in blitzkrieg on free speech
By Paul Angel
“Who controls the past, controls the future,” or so said George Orwell in his prescient book 1984. He also claimed that “The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history.” So it seems the global thought censors are taking Mr. Orwell literally. As we went to press, we received word that possibly thousands of history books and e-publications have been removed in one fell swoop from the largest and most lucrative vending website in the world — Amazon.com, owned and run by Jeff Bezos (currently worth at least $250 billion, according to online sources). Note that Amazon by itself accounted for 60% of all sales on Black Friday 2016 for all venues — online and bricks and mortar stores combined.
Most of the books removed from Amazon deal with alternative views of World War II history, including hundreds of scholarly tomes by chemists, scientists researchers and philosophers dealing with the details of the WWII “holocaust of the Jews.”
One publisher, Lance Frickensmith, proprietor of World War Two Books & Videos, says he had some 770 titles wiped out with the push of a button. Revisionist historian Germar Rudolf, one of the world’s most reputable revisionist scholars, informed us that Castle HillPublishers had 100 titles — both in e-version and print — removed for [from] sale from Amazon.
Anti-Zionist Jewish philosopher Gerard Menuhin saw his book Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil — a book about Zionist power — removed from Amazon in the blink of an eye. The Bad War: The Truth Never Told About World War II by Michael King, a book touching on the role of the Rothschilds in fomenting unrest in Europe before WWII was also banned. We expect more book burnings to come.
So how does one so efficiently carry out the biggest book banning since 60,000 titles were removed from the shelves of German libraries after World War II by the victorious powers? Who holds such power over companies like Amazon and Google and YouTube who represent, together, net worths of somewhere approaching a trillion dollars?
According to The Jewish News (TJN), Britain’s biggest Jewish newspaper, a group called The Board of Deputies of British Jews (BDW) is taking partial credit. According to TJN, BDBJ Vice President Marie van der Zyl said:
“It is very welcome that Amazon has listened and removed the offending titles from their website. These are not works of historical integrity. They are an anti-Semitic attempt to exonerate the Nazis of their crimes and to stoke the fires of hatred.”
Ms. Van der Zyl further warned:
“Should any member of the public find further offending works, please get in contact with us and we will report them using the appropriate channels.”
So, one might say, at the very least, after carefully interpreting the words of Ms. Van der Zyl, that:
“Judea has declared war on free speech.”
Germar Rudolf had this to say:
“The sweeping mass ban enforced within hours, and the senseless aimlessness and random nature with which it was implemented, clearly show that these books were not pulled, because their content was checked and found impermissible, but, because someone (probably Yad Yashem Holocaust Memorial Museum) had sent [Bezos] a list of items to ban, and Amazon simply complied by checking off all the items on that list.”
Dr. Kevin Barrett, who writes for this newspaper, had this to say in an online column on the subject:
“In what amounts to a ringing endorsement of the claims of Holocaust revisionists, Amazon has apparently concluded that their books cannot be effectively refuted – and therefore must be banned.”
Still, hundreds of employees and many man hours must have been involved. Is it possible this was in the works for some time and, in anticipation of this move, a propaganda effort to convince the public that “anti-Semitism is on the rise” is being conducted, as shown by the hyping of hundreds of bogus threats against Synagogues and Jewish cemeteries, most of, …
The Shuttering: Amazon Caves to
Bans Skeptical Literature
By Eric Striker
March 9, 2017
When it comes to free flow of ideas and books, Amazon has always been extremely fair. The only outright censorship I can think of on this platform was when they pulled an e-book on how to groom and lure prepubescent children for sex (which they only banned after having defended it first).
I think it’s pretty universal consensus to say that how-to books on raping children are obscene speech, not free speech. Nevertheless, Amazon still hosts a number of novels and books dealing with incest, pedophilia, bestiality and other disgusting crap.
Yet, when one book, “The Pedophile’s Guide To Love and Pleasure” was yanked, some tech journalists were fuming at this puncture wound against “free speech,” and a debate on what should and shouldn’t be allowed raged.
Enter the Holocaust lobby.
After having been pressured by Jews, Amazon is beginning to purge books written byengineers, academics and historians on the laughable inconsistencies of the urban legend known as the Holocaust. Many of the more memorable claims associated with the Holocaust that were questioned by revisionists, such as human lampshades and soap, have in recent years been acknowledged as lies by Israel’s Yad Vashem itself.
Recently, in an eye-brow raising admission, Jews confessed that the 5 million Poles, Gypsies and homosexuals they claimed for decades were gassed at Auschwitz and other camps was fiction made up by Simon Wiesenthal!
They were able to literally invent 5 million World War II casualties and get away with it for decades. That is because there is an unspoken rule that you can’t contradict a Jew talking about the Holocaust, no matter how big and transparently fraudulent the claim is.
The only reason the 6 million figure continues to stick is that you’re not allowed to question it.
Shock: Amazon Deep-Sixes all
Holocaust Revisionist Books;
Begs for a Boycott
By Carolyn Yeager
March 8, 2017
IN A MIDDLE FINGER TO AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL FREE-SPEECH TRADITIONS AND LAWS, Amazon.com has wiped all Holocaust Revisionist books from its website. Seemingly overnight, this assault on Truth has taken place, obviously in conformity with the international Jewish lobby against truth in historical research and publishing.
Jeff Bezos (pictured above) is worth around 80 BILLION dollars from the growth of the publicly-traded company he founded and owns. Amazon succeeded because of its liberal policies, but now that has changed. You’ll look in vain for any of the Holocaust Handbook series edited by Germar Rudolf that had been available on the site, while you’ll have no trouble finding all the books arguing for the ‘Holocaust’, including the emotional, anti-historical diatribes of Deborah Lipstadt.
Amazon Decides That the
Cannot Stand Up
to Critical Scrutiny
By Kevin Strom
March 8, 2017
Editorial Note by Kevin Alfred Strom: Giant, oligopolic sites such as Amazon are de facto public utilities and should be treated as such: They should not be permitted to censor public debate on ideas of significance. We should immediately put public pressure on Amazon to reverse this decision.
A FEW DAYS AGO, a lunatic Israel-first group calling itself “United With Israel” urged its mostly Christian dupes to participate in the Jewish pressure campaign to intimidate Amazon to stop sales of books that “deny the Holocaust” — that is, books which historically examine Jewish WW2 atrocity claims and find them wanting. Their boilerplate is copied almost word-for-word from that issued by many Jewish organizations in the past week or two in a tightly-orchestrated campaign.
The online retailer Amazon caved in to the pressure and has stopped selling three “Holocaust denial” books after Jewish groups insisted that they stop selling any books of which Jews disapproved on the topic.
Jews have demanded such censorship for years, but the recent Jewish campaign to convince the world that “anti-Semitism” is an exploding, out-of-control “crisis” prompted Robert Rozett, a senior official at Jewish “Holocaust remembrance” group Yad Vashem, to orchestrate the latest pressure campaign on Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos — in which hundreds of Jewish and Christian groups called for “immediate action” to censor historical works that dispute Jewish claims.
On Wednesday morning, the three titles that Mr Rozett had mentioned in his campaign were suddenly unavailable for purchase. Two were not showing up in searches, and one was listed but with a note saying that it was “under review” and could not be bought. This was the case for both US and UK stores.
Mr Rozett said the company had taken a “positive first step” which showed that they were listening to him and other Jewish groups that echoed his demand, such as the World Jewish Congress.
The titles in question were:
Holocaust: The Greatest Lie Ever Told, by Eleanor Wittakers;
The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The Case Against the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry, by American professor Arthur R. Butz and;
Did Six Million Really Die? by Richard Harwood.
Go Ahead, Amazon, Make My Day
By Mike Walsh
March 8, 2017
After years of pressure, Israel has finally succeeded in coercing the world’s largest booksellers into submission. The flickering candles of honest history are now being snuffed out.
Amazon-published books that dispute what George Orwell described as ‘the prevailing orthodoxy’, are today being thrown on to bonfires lit by the holohoax hucksters.
Harold Covington put it in a paragraph:
“Take away the holocaust and what do you have left? Without their precious holocaust what are the Jews? They are just a little grubby bunch of international bandits, assassins and squatters, who have perpetrated the most massive, cynical fraud in human history.”
Unable to deny evidence of massive holocaust-related fraud Yad Vashem has finally resorted to outright censorship. In a futile attempt to buy time the Israeli funded body is now desperately trying to hide proof of their guilt.
In May, 1945, Doctor Joseph Goebbels penned the words:
“Do not let yourself be confused by the uproar that will now reign throughout the world. The lies will one day break down under their own weight and the truth will again triumph. The hour will come when we shall stand pure and undefiled as our aims and beliefs have always been.”
American journalist Mark Twain agreed:
“A lie will travel the world while the truth is still pulling its boots on.”
Truth has now pulled its boots on and having cornered the holohoax hucksters Truth is set on doing some shit-kicking.
Amazon Bans “Holocaust Denial”,
Shreds and Incinerates
Thousands of Books
By Lasha Darkmoon
March 11, 2017
Hundreds of important books on the Holocaust by revisionist scholars have suddenly been been banned by Amazon on instructions from angry rabbis in Israel (see video at the end of this article) and from Yad Vashem, the World Holocaust Remembrance Center in Jerusalem.
Even books not directly relating to the Holocaust, but pertaining to Jewish affairs during WWII, have been included in the mass ban. Revisionist scholar Germar Rudolf has given a complete list of these books (see below) and it’s highly likely more volumes will be added to this growing list of “forbidden books” in the days ahead.
Meanwhile, in an apparent attempt to muddy the waters, The Times of Israel published an article a few days ago in which it stated that only three books have been banned by Amazon in the UK — without referring to Amazon in the US or the long list of banned books mentioned by Germar Rudolf on CODOH. (See Amazon Mass-bans Dissident Materials, Hundreds of Titles Erased within a Day)
A reliable source informs me that several thousand volumes have been shredded or put through incinerators at Amazon, but this is hard to verify. This has to be one of the greatest acts of cultural vandalism perpetrated within recent times. In characteristic Orwellian fashion, many historical facts are being “flushed down the memory hole” and false factoids put in their place — like the fairy tales spun by Elie Wiesel, e.g., Jewish blood gushing from the ground in geysers(picture).
The Cultural Vandals dare not debate these matters in public, preferring the Stalinesque weapons of censorship and intimidation, followed in many cases by fines and imprisonment.
Amazon Bans World War II
By Michael Hoffman
March 8, 2017
Today Amazon, the huge, Seattle-based online book distributor, has removed from sale “dangerous” books authored by Dr. Arthur R. Butz of Northwestern University, Carlo Mattogno of Italy, and other eminent dissident scholars who dare to ask scientific and technical questions about the operation of alleged homicidal gas chambers in Auschwitz. These heretics have trespassed on the sacred liturgy of Holocaustianity and their troubling treatises must be forbidden so as to preserve the holiness of World War II dogma.
Amazon has been selling these and similar books for years, but in the past 20 months rabbis and the Yad Vashem “Holocaust” museum have pressured Amazon to remove these and cognate titles. Moreover, Amazon’s owner, Jeff Bezos, purchased the Washington Post and fashioned it into a beachhead of Left wing orthodoxy. The process may have politicized and neutralized his formerly Libertarian instincts.
Books advocating Satanism and sodomy, and denying the Allied holocaust against German civilians, and the Israeli holocaust against the Palestinians, continue to be sold by Amazon.
The censorship is conducted under the rubric of “fighting hatred” and “combatting anti-Semitism.” But this is just special pleading. Books evincing hatred for Germans, Arabs, Iranians and white southern “deplorables” are all on offer at Amazon, as are books denying that Jesus Christ rose from the dead. So it all depends on whose ox is being gored. As many of you know, there’s one sacred cow that is more equal than others. Its name is the Golden Calf.
* Total words = 4,534
* Total Images = 15
* Total pages = 37
Click to download a PDF of this post (2.0 MB):
Version 5: Mar 12, 2017 — Added Darkmoon and Hoffman articles. Updated my introduction. Added Contents. Updated PDF for download (Ver 2). Added the Three Pillars image.
Version 4: Mar 11, 2017 — Updated my introduction. Added PDF of post for download. Improved formatting.
Version 3: Mar 10, 2017 — Added AFP text, Carolyn Yeager, National Vanguard and Renegade Tribune articles. Improved formatting.
Version 2: Mar 10, 2017 — Added AFP and Daily Stormer articles.
Version 1: Mar 9, 2017 — Published post.
Posted in Amazon Books, America, Brainwashing, Carolyn Yeager, CODOH, Deception, Holocaust, Holohoax, Jew World Order, Jewish Problem/Question, Jews - Hostile Elite, Jews - Lying, Media - jewish domination, Mind Control, National Vanguard, New World Order, Propaganda, Renegade Tribune, Revisionism, WW II, Yad Vashem, Zionism, Zionists | 15 Comments »
March 5, 2017 by katana17
[Patrick Grimm wrote extensively during 2007 and 2008 exposing and warning the world about the dangers and machinations of organized jewry and its nation wrecking activities. Here is a two part series that he wrote that lists the numerous ways that they are destroying our countries — KATANA.]
There Must Be 15 Ways
I have updated my listing of ways that the Jewish supremacists are wrecking America. This list provides a good introduction to those neophytes just immersing themselves in the world of the anti-Zionist and anti-Jewish supremacist movement, and shows them the countless ways Jewish extremism negatively affects our country. It’s a quick and handy primer to enlighten and educate our people (European-Americans), preparing them for this noble struggle for survival they must choose to fight if they are truly desirous of having a future life upon this planet for their children and grandchildren. Supremacist Jewry is killing us; it is killing our soul, killing our spirit, killing our will, killing our pride and killing our nation. Its policies are killing our people. We must make this clear and present the ugly reality and the unpleasant truth in an easy-to-understand format. I believe this list is a good step in that direction.
They have destroyed our pride in our history, and a nation that loses its sense of history soon ceases to be a nation.
They have labeled our beloved Founding Fathers as “racists” and “white slavers”, ignoring the great representative republic that these men constructed.
They have promoted multiculturalism, celebrating every culture — no matter how backward and barbaric — except for Western white European culture. As Jewish Marxist intellectual thug Susan Sontag stated in a poisonous rant “The white race is the cancer of humanity.”
They have driven our Christian faith and heritage from the public square by utilizing their countless criminal cadres of ADL and ACLU Communist lawyers. Our children will soon grow up in a society wiped clean of any vestiges of the Bible, Christ or the cross. However, the menorah is still allowed in the White House for Hannukah celebrations. In fact, the Jewish religion is the only faith that can’t be mocked openly in Hollywood entertainment.
They have torn our borders open, permitting, indeed cheering, the Third World dregs who will soon replace us as the majority. The Javitzes, the Lautenbergs and Cellers meticulously designed the legislation (Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965) that will genocide us. They have done all this while simultaneously — and with no sense of irony supporting Israel’s “Jews-only” immigration policy.
They have created, pushed and profited from pornography and perverse entertainment. The “Chosen” make up 90% of all American pornographers. The Hollywood they run has mainstreamed wife-swapping, common law marriages, pedophilia, scatology, licentious sex, drug and alcohol abuse and self-indulgence. Bestiality will be next on the list. In fact, they are already releasing a documentary portraying men who have sex with horses.
Posted in America, Anti-Defamation League, Banksters, Blogroll - 911, Brainwashing, Christainity, Cold War, Communism, Cuckservatives, David Duke, Deception, Douglas Reed, Gun Control, Hollywood, Holocaust, Holohoax, Homosexuality, Jew World Order, Jews - Hostile Elite, Jews - Lying, Jews - Naming, Media - jewish domination, Mind Control, Multiculturalism, New World Order, Patrick Grimm, Propaganda, Race, Race - Mixing, Religion, Secret Elite, Third World, Third World Immigration, White Nationalism, WW II | 5 Comments »
February 26, 2017 by katana17
[Ryan Dawson of the Anti-NeoCon Report hosts a long (nearly 4 hours) and often heated debate between Eric Hunt and Fritz Berg on what happened to all the “missing” jews during the alleged “Holocaust” of WWII.
Eric Hunt, a producer of revisionist videos, in an unexpected change of conviction has recently revised his own revisionist views and now believes that in fact, jews and others were mass murdered in gas chambers and also shot in large numbers in the East.
Fritz Berg strongly supports the revisionist position that no homicidal gassings occurred what-so-ever and that any shootings of jews in the East were legitimate actions taken against partisans and their supporters — KATANA.]
Volunteers are needed to help complete this transcript in a timely manner.
Please step forward and do your bit!
[90/231 mins, now complete!]
Always leave a message in the comments BEFORE starting on a time-slot.
Why Bother with Transcripts?
Occasionally, people ask if having a transcript is really necessary (considering all the work involved) when people can just listen/watch the audio/video.
Here are some reasons. If you can think of any more or would like to elaborate on the ones here please leave a message in the Comments.
Some of the advantages of a transcript are as follows:
You are able to read the whole presentation with full accuracy at the speed that you can read, which is generally a lot faster than listening to the audio or watching the video.
Some speakers, with strong accents or idiosyncratic speech habits, are often difficult to follow.
You can easily scan the text and zoom into what interests you in a non-linear manner.
You can easily quote verbatim from the text when making comments about the text.
You can print out a hard copy for future reference.
When you listen to an audio or watch a video you tend to forget much of the points made, etc. Having it in writing allows you to refresh your memory quickly and accurately.
Transcripts lend themselves to be available off-line and spread via hard copies.
Transcripts can make it easier to create accurate translations of the material which can in turn be used to create video and audio versions.
Video and audio files often become unavailable, for many reasons including censorship (on YouTube, etc.), technical causes due to lack of equipment or power.
Video and audio files are many times larger than a text file of the same material, sometimes hundreds of times larger. In many cases presenting the information in video or audio format has no worthwhile advantage over a text file. Of course there are may cases where the opposite is true.
That all said, a transcript is often no substitute for an audio/video file and vice-versa. They are complimentary to each other.
- BEFORE starting, indicate in the COMMENT section the time slot that you are willing to complete. For example: >>> I will do 15:00 to 20:00 <<<
- Every minute of transcription will take you about 15 minutes to complete accurately.
Doing even 1 minute is helpful!
- As a double-check, please look at the COMMENTS to see whether anyone has indicated they are already doing a particular time-slot. (Comments are automatically posted. There is always some delay in the time-slot status being updated in the actual post by me.)
- Time slots that I know are being worked on will be marked as IN PROGRESS in the post so as to help avoid unnecessary duplication of effort. Always check the COMMENTS though.
- If you have little time, don’t worry or fuss about typos, spelling, punctuation, etc. I can clean it up.
- If something is unclear put your best guess followed by some question marks, e.g., “He said that xxx ??? thought this, …” Don’t spend time trying to figure it out.
- Please enter the transcript in the comment section with the times. I will then copy it (after proofing it) into the post.
- NOTE: Comments with MORE than 3 URLs are automatically treated as SPAM by this WordPress system. So in those cases change the 4th or more URLs from, e.g.: “abc.com” to “abc . com”.
- Another way to help if you don’t have time to do any transcription is to point out any errors, however small.
- Remember that old adage, “Many hands make light work“.
Here is the full Hunt/ Fritz debate on the Holocaust. This is for ANC members This debate is specifically on the question of transit camps and gas chambers. If there were transit camps, then where are the records of where all these prisoners said to have shipped east ended up? If there were gas chambers…
Free download of the mp3 audio file –
Questioning “The Holocaust” (Eric Hunt’s website):
Audio files (split into 4 parts) also available here at archive.org:
Eric Hunt vs Fredrick Berg
Ryan: What I thought was going to be a one hour debate, or planned, ended up being about three and a half hours.
OK, this is Ryan Dawson of ANC Report, the Anti Neo-con Report. We’re usually covering the antiwar thing, the anti neo-con material. We often get into “hidden history” and sometimes conspiracy, … Not that wacky Jonestown kind. But today’s topic is one of the more taboo, if not the most taboo topic on the Interwebs, and that’s the “Holocaust“. There’s a lot of exaggerations in both directions about the “Holocaust“. Over exaggerating it, maybe under exaggerating it.
And we have two revisionists on today, one revisionist is Eric Hunt who’s been on the program before. He has recanted some of his views and he will be explaining that. And here to debate him is Fritz Berg, or Friedrich Paul Berg of the website, Nazi Gassings dot com. Also Eric Hunt’s web site, Questioning the Holocaust dot com. And you can see his long, well recanting on that, as well as other information.
So gentleman, I’m going to give you guys the floor. Hopefully I won’t have to jump in too much. I do want to make it clear to everyone that the point of this is to get at the truth where this is never supposed to be something dogmatic and I hope people will refrain from accusations, saying somebody is anti German, or anti-jewish. The idea here is just to get at the truth of the matter, based on the best evidence available.
So Eric, I will start with you, because you were a revisionists who is now revised your revisions and you’re catching some flak for that. So I’ll let you explain your position and then I’ll let Fritz respond.
Eric: All right, thanks. First up I’d like to thank Fritz Berg for agreeing to debate. Fritz has never been afraid to defend his views and has debated Roberto Muehlenkamp, who accepts the garssing claims and has repeatedly asked to debate revisionist Fred Leuchter. Surprisingly it’s the revisionists like Leuchter, dodging the debate, not those defending the claims of mass gassing and shooting such as Muehlenkamp. I recommend for listeners to listen to the Berg-Muehlenkamp debates. It is my opinion Mr Muehlenkamp presents entirely logical arguments and overwhelming evidence in favor of mass gassings having occurred. We will likely not be repeating many of the same arguments from those debates here today.
Fritz has and is operating in the supposed spirit of the revisionists who claim to desire open debate on the Holocaust and Fritz should be commended. It’s very telling that no other top revisionist scholars, as they claim, has so far agreed to debate me upon publishing my controversial findings in an article titled “The End Of The Line” available to read at: Questioning the holocaust dot com. This exposes the hypocrisy of those claiming they simply desire open debate on the subject. I put forward that this clique of SS mass murder deniers instead want to spread their extreme, indefensible, illogical denialist falsehoods in their safe little echo chambers. I’ve determined the behavior of this community is more consistent with a religious cult like the Jonestown cult you mentioned in your opening, than something claiming to be related to science. And I’m hoping to tell people listening not to drink the Kool-Aid.
For those who claim to oppose censorship, both Fritz and I have been banned from the Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust forums. I have determined even before coming to this conclusion that [that forum] is paradoxically the most closed forum which claims to debate the “Holocaust“. And I have heard Fritz say the same throughout the years. I want to make it clear I’m not here to totally put down, or insult revisionists. One reason revisionists haven’t been debated more often is, because the “Holocaust Industry”, as Norman Finkelstein calls them, really does engage in many hoaxes. “Mini”, I meant to say, mini hoaxes, small hoaxes, propaganda, exaggeration and willingly spreading falsehoods. The blind believers repeatedly defend indefensible and scientifically impossible eyewitness accounts. Often these accounts are forced upon the American public, especially on naive schoolchildren.
[Image] An illustration of one of Elie Weisel’s sadistic tall tales as described in his mostly fictional book, “Night“.
I’d like to talk briefly about some of the things I’ve done and what I stand behind. Elie Weisel’s fictional tale of walking to the edge of a flaming pit of fire at the entrance of Auschwitz Birkenau, where dump trucks full of babies were dumped alive for no reason other than dramatic effect, during that titular night, is forced upon naive school children.
These children don’t know the flaming pit never existed, as all eyewitnesses confirm, including Weisel’s own sister. The fire and atrocity invention is just a lame literary device by a Jewish poet to represent entering into the hell of Auschwitz.
My exposé on Steven Spielberg’s 1999 Academy Award winning “Holocaust” documentary, “The Last Days” is one for the ages, which I’m very proud of. To investigate in particular that film star survivor, Irene Zisblatt’s false testimony, I did what any skeptical researcher should do. I investigated her claims, bought her book and read it. I found the book to be almost total fiction and saw ways to prove it. I followed the evidence trail to Stanford University to watch her video testimony, recorded for Steven Spielberg’s Survivors of the Showa a Visual History Foundation. In this video testimony Zisblatt seems to invent in real time new fake atrocity stories, one after the other. Zisblatt claims she was selected to become a lampshade, because of her smooth skin! She claims the Nazis tried to change the color of her eyes. Zisblatt claims that Dr Mengele removed her Auschwitz tattoo in excruciating experiments. Despite being on a list of Jews quickly transited through Auschwitz to other labor camps, never given a tattoo. Zisblatt claims to have escaped from inside Auschwitz Birkenau Crematoria III gas chamber. She claims a boy then threw her over an electrified barbed wire fence, naked, onto a train where she escaped. That train would have been at least one hundred feet away from the fence.
Zisblatt’s calling card claim of repeatedly defecating and swallowing diamonds for a year and a half pales in comparison to her other outrageous lies! Steven Spielberg produced other falsehoods in that Oscar winning documentary, including featuring a discredited African American soldier who already falsely claimed to have liberated Dachau in a previous propaganda film, “Liberators”, which was withdrawn from public airing, as a hoax. As a result of sharing Zisblatt’s testimony to the world, rather than have the evidence looked at in a major examination of this outrageous false testimony, shown to children and even the US Congress, I was instead banned from Stanford University libraries!
Posted in America, Auschwitz, Bergen-Belsen, Blogroll - 911, Brainwashing, Buchenwald, Carlo Mattogno, CODOH, David Cole, Deception, Dr. Charles Larson, Elie Wiesel, Eric hunt, Ernst Zundel, Freedom of Speech, Germany, Germar Rudolf, Himmler, Hitler, Hollywood, Holocaust, Holohoax, Israel, Jew World Order, Jewish Bolsheviks, Jewish Problem/Question, Jews, Jews - Hostile Elite, Jews - Lying, Mark Weber, Media - jewish domination, Multiculturalism, National Socialism, National Socialism - Philosphy, New World Order, Propaganda, Propaganda - Anti-German, Race, Rothschild, Russia, Ryan Dawson (ANC Report), Thies Christophersen, Third Reich, Third World Immigration, Transcript, Twitter, Uncategorized, Waffen SS, White genocide, White Nationalism, WW II, WW II - Eastern Front, Zionism, Zionists, Zyklon B | 12 Comments »
February 21, 2017 by katana17
[On the 11th of February, 2017 in Dresden a rally led by Gerhard Ittner was held to draw attention to the Holocaust being perpetrated on the German people in general and the genocidal crime of Dresden in particular. Speeches on the attempts to abolish Germany and the German people were also made today by dissidents and regime critics; Alfred Schaefer, Bernhard Schaub, Sylvia Stolz, Henry Portmayer, Dagmar Brenne, Reza Begi, Valentin Heciak, Valeri Killer and Hartmut Wostupatsch.
In the following, words of greetings from GERARD MENUHIN and Dr. FREDRICK TÖBEN were read to supporters — KATANA.]
[NOTE: The English translation is from Google Translate. Please help by providing corrections in the Comments section.]
Das Kriegs- und Völkermordverbrechen der Zerstörung Dresdens vom Februar 1945 ist wie der Vertreibungsvölkermord an den Deutschen aus den bis heute besetzten Ostgebieten unseres Deutschen Reiches ein erschütterndes Symbol für den Holocaust am Deutschen Volk. Der von langer Hand geplant gegen das Deutsche Reich und Volk entfesselte Vernichtungskrieg hörte 1945 nicht auf, sondern er wird seither und zuletzt verstärkt mit anderen Mitteln fortgeführt.
Am 11. Februar 2017 fand in Dresden das von Gerhard Ittner angemeldete Gedenken an diesen Holocaust am Deutschen Volk im allgemeinen und das Völkermordverbrechen von Dresden im besonderen statt. Es wurde dabei der Bezug zu den Bestebungen zur Abschaffung Deutschlands und des Deutschen Volkes heute hergestellt. Redner waren die Dissidenten und Regimekritiker Alfred Schaefer, Bernhard Schaub, Sylvia Stolz, Henry Hafenmayer, Dagmar Brenne, Reza Begi, Valentin Heciak, Valerij Killer und Hartmut Wostupatsch.
Im folgenden der Wortlaut der zu diesem Anlaß in Dresden verlesenen Grußworte von GERARD MENUHIN und Dr. FREDRICK TÖBEN. Beides furchtlose Kämpfer der Wahrhaftigkeit gegen eine Mafia der Einschüchterung und der Willkür des Machtmißbrauchs, welche ihre Interessen unter Einsatz des Terrors einer immer noch schlimmer werdenden Meinungsverfolgung gegen Dissidenten und Regimekritiker aufrechtzuerhalten versucht. Aber das wird am Ende vergeblich sein — denn mit Meinungsverboten und Meinungsverfolgung ließ sich noch niemals in der Geschichte das auf Dauer aufrechterhalten, was schon allein deshalb den dringenden Verdacht erweckt, keine Wahrheit zu sein, da es zu seinem Bestand der Meinungsverbote und der Meinungsverfolgung bedarf und nicht ohne diese allerschäbigsten Methoden einer Diktatur auskommt, sich nicht den Bedingungen der Meinungsfreiheit und der offenen Diskussion sowie des kritischen Angezweifeltwerdens zu stellen wagt. Dies wohl im Wissen darum, diesen Bedingungen nicht standhalten zu können. Doch was mit dem Verbrechen der Meinungsverfolgung beginnt, wird mit dem Untergang der sich dieser schändlichen Methode bedienenden Regime enden!
Posted in Brainwashing, Deception, Dresden, Ittner Gerhard, Media - jewish domination, National Socialism, New World Order, Propaganda, Race, Schaefer - Alfred, Third World Immigration, Uncategorized, White Nationalism, WW II | Leave a Comment »
[In yet another interesting interview Jim Rizoli talks with a well-known figure in the Revisionist movement, Hadding Scott. We learn about Hadding’s earlier years and how he first learnt from his mother the old saying, “Don’t believe everything that you hear!” Then, we learn how he became aware of some of the character traits of jews from listening to the Larry King radio show. Hadding recounts it was in 1992 that he became finally convinced that the “Holocaust” was a myth after listening to a Dr. Willian Pierce radio show. Further on, the matter of the “revisionists” who have moved away from revisionism, like Irving, Weber, Cole and now Eric Hunt, is discussed — KATANA.]
Jim Rizoli interviews Hadding Scott, Feb 2017, discussing Hadding’s ‘awakening’ concerning revisionism of Iraq and then, of course, WWII.
Jim: Hi everyone, Jim Rizoli here. And I have another special guest for the show today, it’s Hadding Scott. And we’re going to be discussing a little bit about his life and some of the things that he’s been doing. So let’s get started.
So Hadding again, welcome to the program.
Hadding: Well, hello!
Jim: First of all, the only, really thing I know about you is just in e-mails, I see coming here and there. And the biggest thing I know about you, I should say is, because my brother Joe. He was very much involved listening to your discussion about Henry Ford with Carolyn Yeager.
Hadding: Oh yeah, “The International Jew Study Hour”.
Jim: Right, right! So, maybe you can tell us a little bit, … I’ll tell you what, before we get into that, why don’t we, you know, find out a little bit about you. So, what would you consider yourself?
Hadding: Well, I really hate to see somebody prevail through lying! This is something that you could notice in various things that I’ve done. But, you know, I really came to “Holocaust” revisionism through other things.
Hadding: My origin has a lot to do with, … My parents were about a generation older than people my age. I just born in the ninety sixties. My parents were born in the nineteen twenties. And my mother was raised by her grandparents who were born not very long aft the War Between the States. So I got a very old perspective from my mother. And my mother always used to say, “Don’t believe everything that you hear!” And she gave me another perspective, when I brought home what I learned about Abraham Lincoln in school. And she also told me that all the stories about the cruelty of slavery in the South were not true. That this was exaggeration. And that slaves generally, were treated very well. And that the war was not about slavery, right?
So this really is a nice analogy to Holocaust revisionist. And I grew up with that.
Jim: Are you a teacher or anything like that? Are you an academic person?
Hadding: I have been a teacher.
Hadding: Not presently.
Jim: OK. Well, basically you, you know, you’re like me. I mean, I, you know, I got into this, because I didn’t like lying! [laughing] So, you know, I didn’t like people saying things that were just completely absurd and they’re lying and I’m trying to figure out what, why are they saying this if it’s not true? So I could understand that. So what were the first things that you took up within your travel through life, here? What were some of the topics? I mean, you mentioned Abraham Lincoln. But I mean, what other things did you do?
Hadding: Well, I can tell you how I arrived at Holocaust revisionist, all right? From this dissident perspective that was inherent in my parentage and my upbringing, I was already accustomed to the idea that much of what we hear in mass media is not true. I grew up with that! Right? But I had other things still that I needed to learn. I needed to learn that there was lying also about the Second World War, because my parents didn’t really have any inkling of that. My mother was very well informed about how there was lying against the South, but not about lying against Germany. But it was not a big leap to think that there might have been lying against Germany. But a lot of this depends on what you think about the character of the jews. Right?
I grew up with this idea that the jews were pretty much like everybody else, except they had a different religion, and the [???] jews were victimized by some mass psychosis that swept over Germany. And you have to learn about the jews to understand that this is not really how it was. And the way that I became acquainted with the real character of the jews was by listening to the Larry King Radio Show on the Mutual Broadcasting Network, beginning around 1978 and into the early 1980s.
I used to, actually I dropped out of high school at a very early age, actually. I got away with that. And I would stay up all night listening to Larry King radio show. And this was a big eye opener for me, because Larry King from my perspective was insane! [Jim laughing] This was a man who professed to believe in racial equality, whereas I as a Southerner, knew first hand that this was clearly not true! And I noticed other things about Larry King. Well for one thing he made no secret of being a jew. He talked about it often and he would have guests on his show all the time the he identified as jews and many of them were buddies from the old neighborhood in Brooklyn. You could learn from listening to the Larry King Show the character of New York City jews and the fact that jews were very prevalent in the mass media and had no shame about using their positions in mass media to promote specifically jewish interests. And Larry King was also extremely unfair to callers that disagreed with him on these particular issues, like race, and, … Well, especially race. If you disagreed with racial equality, he was very likely to badger you until you became incoherent and then hang up on you and then play the Looney Tunes thing. Right? [Mimicking the Looney Tunes music]
This was extremely unfair and this was really how I learned about jews. I mean, it’s sort of like seeing the platonic form of something, you know, you see the platonic form and then you see how that form exists in it’s imperfect form and the others. So, Larry King was sort of “concentrated jew”. And I saw that there was a little bit of Larry King in a lot of jews!
Jim: Did you ever call into the show?
Hadding: I did a couple of times.
Jim: And what happened?
Hadding: It was a long time ago, … I managed to get some stuff out and got hung up on.
Jim: [Laughing] Yeah! So that was your bad introduction to jews. And he’s such a wack job anyway, that guy!
Hadding: The thing about Larry King is he’s completely different on television, compared to how he was on the radio.
Hadding: On television he’s very toned down. You don’t, you don’t get the shameless promotion of jewish interests on his television shows, that he used to do on the radio.
Jim: Did he ever talk about the “Holocaust” or anything like [it]?
Hadding: I’m sure that he had Simon Wiesenthal on there and Eli Weasel. But at that point I wasn’t really suspicious about the Holocaust. I believed in the Holocaust until the late nineteen eighties. I started to have some questions about it in the late nineteen eighties. All right? Before I started to question the Holocaust. I had become interested in psychology. And I read a lot of psychology books, and one of the books I read was by a Scottish psychiatrist named R. D. Laing. And R. D. Laing labeled and demonized, obviously Adolf Hitler and the National Socialists.
So, because of R. D. Laing I was open to the idea that Adolf Hitler and the National Socialists might have their own story. That what they did does not seem crazy, right? What they supposedly did, right? So, before I arrived at questioning the Holocaust, I arrived at the position of trying to understand why this happened. What did the jews do to bring this on them? Right? That seemed to me a logical question. Now, I did know from having been exposed to Larry King and also some other experiences with jews, that it was entirely possible that there was exaggeration and distortion. But I still believed the “Holocaust” must have had at least some truth in it.
It was not until about 1992 that I was convinced that the Holocaust was false. I had started listening to short wave and the alternative media on short wave. Like Radio Free America with Tom Valentine, and I stumbled across also the American Dissident Voices radio program, which was usually Kevin Strong. But once a month Dr Pierce would make a broadcast. And I wrote to them because I was very interested in the fact that the way Dr Pierce talked about racial problems was very similar to the way that I talked about these things. And he presented a rational discussion of these things.
And I was certainly already open to the, … I knew from listening to Larry King that jews had a lot to do with these problems. That jews in the media push for racial equality! And I ordered books and magazines from them, and one of the magazines that I ordered was an issue of National Vanguard magazine from 1989. It had Adolf Hitler on the cover, it was the one hundredth birthday of Adolf Hitler issue of National Vanguard magazine. And that magazine had an article in it called, “The Evidence of the Prussian Blue”. I had heard and read before that before the Zundel Trial. I heard Ernst Zundel interviewed on Radio Free America with Tom Valentine.
I had read an article by Professor Robert Faurisson that somebody that reproduced. But, I wasn’t sure about how much of what they said I should believe! I didn’t know who Robert Faurisson was. He could have been a crazy man, for all I knew. He said that there was no chemical residue in the gas chambers and there should have been chemical residue in the gas chambers. Well, that’s a valid argument, but, it seems to be a valid argument, but I don’t know who is Robert Faurisson, what is his expertise? How can I be sure that there really should have been residue there. He just says that there should have been. How do I know it?
But with Dr Pierce, when I read it from him, I believed him, because he had a lot of credibility with me, because he spoke my language. I mean, in terms of how he talked about race and racial issues. And he also was a physicist, you know, he would know things like whether there should be cyanide residue in the bricks. You couldn’t fool him on these things and I knew he was a man who consistently told the truth. Therefore, when I read this very concise presentation about the Leuchter Report, from Dr Pierce, I was convinced. And he presented it very concisely. He talked about the blue staining in the bricks which was in the delousing chamber at Birkenau but not in Krema one in Auschwitz [I] nor in any other Krema’s [crematoria]. And this convinced me!
Jim: So that was a good awakening for you, to see that. Now how did you pursue it after that?
Hadding: I didn’t do very much was Holocaust revisionism after that until about 2002, 2003. During the propaganda for, war against Iraq. Because it was very clear at that time that Hitler comparisons and the invocation of the “Holocaust” played a very large role in this anti-Saddam Hussein propaganda. Saddam Hussein was supposed to have gassed the Kurdish, the Kurds, he’s supposed of gassed Kurds, Kurdish civilians, for no reason! It was just an unprovoked gassing of these poor Kurdish civilians! That Saddam Hussein was supposed to have done for no reason. And this was supposed to make Saddam Hussein like Hitler. And he wanted to conquer the whole world like Hitler, right? So they were all these comparisons of Saddam Hussein legend, which I knew to be false by that point about Adolf Hitler.
And I wrote some articles, in early 2003, before the US invasion, in which I debunked the propaganda about Saddam Hussein. It was not true that Saddam Hussein had gassed any Kurdish civilians! This was a story that originally had been put out by the Iranians. Because what happened was that the Iranians were attacking this town in northern Iraq called Fallujah and there was nobody in the town. But then some Kurdish rebels went into Fallujah and the Iranians thought they were Iraqi soldiers and shelled them with cyanide canisters. And the Iranians accidentally killed these Kurds in Fallujah. What happened aft the Iranians went Fallujah and saw the dead Kurds is that they blamed it on the Iraqis. And they called in journalists to see what happened there and they said, “Look what the Iraqis did!”
If you read the early reports about this incident you can tell that they’re somewhat skeptical. The reports are somewhat skeptical what the Iranians say. The Iranians said there were five thousand dead Kurds killed by the Iraqis. The reporters said that they saw one hundred or so, bodies. This is the kind of initial reporting on Fallujah. But what happened after, Iraq came out of the war much stronger, as a sort of a regional superpower. jews started in with their anti-Saddam Hussein propaganda. It happened on September first, 1988.
There was an article, a news article and also an editorial by William Safire in the New York Times. In which William Safire mentions that this cyanide gas had been used to kill the Kurds at Fallujah was the same gas used at Auschwitz! George Herbert Walker Bush also made an explicit Hitler comparison. Compared Saddam Hussein to Hitler. And Saddam Hussein also returned the comparison, comparing George Herbert Walker Bush to Hitler! Everybody that you want to motivate people to attack apparently is just like Hitler.
So we have this war in 1991, but I’m perfectly willing to believe the Iraqi side of the story that April Glaspie, that the Kuwaitis provoked the Iraqis and that April Glaspie told them that the USA wouldn’t care if they invaded Iraq. Also I found out the CIA had made a fake satellite photograph showing Iraqi tanks on the Saudi border to try to get the Saudis to support the whole project of invading Iraq, attacking Iraq. Which echoes, of course, the fake CIA photograph that was published in Life magazine of the fake aerial photograph of Auschwitz that was published in Life magazine, I think in 1977. That showed doctored photographs of Auschwitz with people lined up for the gas chamber.
Jim: I’d like to see that picture.
Hadding: Yeah! Well that’s online. You just do a search, “Life magazine Auschwitz”. You’ll find it. Actually, it had people standing on the corner of buildings in these lines that were lined up, to go into the gas chamber. It was a kind of sloppy alteration. And they also put in a wall to hide people, so that they could pretend these people going to be gassed were not seen by people outside of the camp. There was there was no such wall.
Hadding: Anyway, so this anti-Saddam Hussein propaganda about the gassed Kurds went on for fifteen years, until we had the invasion and overthrow of the Iraqi government in 2003. Really the gassed Kurds story was the basis of the whole propaganda. Because this is an observation that I’ve made about how propaganda works. Most people are so overwhelmed with information that they can’t bother to check everything that they hear, or even very much of what they hear. So what people will do, is that they will take a few bits of information that they’ve heard and that they believe and they’ll construct a picture based on assumptions. So basically they try to see a pattern and fill out a picture based on that. In Gestalt psychology this is called “reifications” where you have a few, a few hints about what a shape might be and you can imagine that the shape is there. That’s called “reification”. It literally means “making the thing”, “thing making”.
So this tendency of people to fill out their knowledge gaps with imagination is exploited in propaganda. And the biggest way that they do this, is by misinforming people about somebody’s character. Once it was spread that Saddam Hussein had gassed the poor Kurds and had done it with no cause, people would believe that he could do anything! All right, this is a crazy man! A man who might very well have been involved in the 9/11 attacks! You couldn’t really convince people that he wasn’t involved in the 9/11 attacks, because that would that would require checking the evidence and most people will never do that. But it would fit, … If people implied that he might have been involved in the 9/11 attacks they were very ready to believe it, because of what they had been told about Saddam Hussein’s character. And this is something that has to be addressed is also in regard to the Holocaust.
One thing that a lot of people in Revisionism seem to do, they seem to focus on these details about gas chambers and crematoria and they don’t really look at questions like, “What kinds of people were these that were accused of doing these things?” “What is the character of the people making the accusations?” That’s extremely important!
Now, since 9/11 and actually since the late 1970s when people started becoming critical of the state of Israel, but especially since 9/11, there’s a lot less trust of jews, because a lot of people noticed after 9/11 that there was a lot of dishonesty.
I just had a conversation yesterday with a leftist. I asked him privately if you believed in the Holocaust. And he said he wasn’t sure, but he doesn’t trust jews. This guy’s a leftist! He says he doesn’t trust jews! Right? Because he doesn’t trust jews, he’s open to the possibility that the whole cause could be a big lie. Right? That’s very important! And this is something that has to be addressed if you’re trying to say that there was no Holocaust, while maintaining, “Oh yes! The Nazis were these horrible people!” you’re not going to be very convincing.
Jim: The big thing for you to understand how a lie could be propagated upon us and not be true, and I understand that too, … And I do I do believe you, what you say there about this psychology of this all too. There’s a lot more involved than that. That a lot of people don’t get into. I mean, I don’t get into it, because it’s hard, it’s hard to deal with that aspect of it, unless you show pictures [laughing] ., you know, what I mean? I mean, you know, people, you could talk psychology all you wanted but it seems like it only resonates with a certain type of people, the psychology aspect of it. I mean, I think it’s a good aspect of it. Just like, what’s her name, Elizabeth Loftus. Is that her name? She’s the one that talks about the false memory syndrome. Have you ever hear of her?
Jim: So I mean, she was saying, …
Hadding: I’ve heard of False Memory Syndrome.
Jim: Yeah. Well anyway, that’s, I think that’s who she is. And she’s the one that, you know, she went at it from that aspect. But she didn’t get into the “Holocaust”. She just gets into it from other people in life, but being a jew, she didn’t want to deal with that topic of the Holocaust, because obviously, you know, the tribes she belongs to, the tribe and that’s not going to be too good for her. So that’s why she never, … But that is an interesting topic if you ever wanted to find out about her. I think it’s Elizabeth Loftus.
Hadding: Well I’ll tell you another psychologist who wrote something that casts a lot of doubt on the Holocaust is Leon Festinger. He wrote “A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance”. This was published in 1957. And you really have to wonder what Festinger had in mind.
It’s irresistible to make the analogy, jews hearing the rumors in Auschwitz, or someplace like that. If they were, … If they had a bad conscience, if they really hated the Germans, if they were communists and had bad intentions and had been locked up in this camp. But were being treated way better than they expected, or way better than seem justified. They would be disposed to believe the same kind of rumors that these Japanese interned in these American camps believed. They had this rumor that they were being secretly killed and it was the same rumors that the jews had.
Jim: Can I ask you this about your relationship with Carolyn Yeager doing that real, you know, I guess it want on for what, months? Your thing about Henry Ford.
Hadding: Yeah, it was some 50 chapters.
Jim: Wow! So how long did that go on for?
Hadding: It was about a year, I guess.
Jim: Yeah, my brother, … I mean, the reason I know about that, is my brother Joe, he takes the mp3s and he listens to them when he drive. So he told me all about it and, you know, it’s a great way of understanding, or actually getting the book in without reading it, you know. Because sometimes people, they can’t read. My brother he, … And I do too. When I get on the plane I take mp3s and listen to them as I fly. You know, right now I’m listening to “The Myth of German Villainy”. Are you familiar with that book?
Hadding: No. Who wrote that?
Jim: Oh my goodness! Ben Bradberry. You have to get that book! If you want to understand World War Two, and prior to World War Two, World War One, and even prior to that from the 1850s on, what happened with Germany and the whole ten yards, you have to, … You have to read that book. Because you’ll get the best education on what really happened. And I think of all the books I’ve ever read, that probably has been the best one.
I interviewed him actually, Ben Bradberry. You could probably do a search for it on You Tube “Ben Bradberry Jim Rizoli interview” But he’s been he’s been interviewed by Red Ice and Rense and all these other people, too. So he’s a phenomenal writer and the book, … I don’t even know how he wrote his book. There’s so much in this book. It’s like how does anybody get into so much information and put it into a book? I just can’t even comprehend it. But he did it. So, yeah, if you ever get a chance definitely read that. I actually have it all online as a mp3 that I downloaded on the site, the archive site [https://archive.org/details/MRTAPMAN_gmail_MGV] that people can download it and listen to it, like I’m listening to it. But it’s like, how many hours, my goodness, I think it’s fourteen hours just audio. So it’s pretty long. But, I do recommend that.
But anyway, getting back to Carol Yeager. Have you done any more stuff with her, or what?
Hadding: She’s not doing very much these days, so she just posts articles on our blog, occasionally. She has this website called, January 27 [http: //jan27.org], you know, the “Holocaust” Revisionist Commemoration on International “Holocaust” Remembrance Day. I just wrote an essay for that.
Jim: Yeah, I saw that. It’s not Jan27.org is it? Is that it? Oh, that’s her site, then OK, all right
Jim: Right. That’s a real good site there. So she basically, she hasn’t been doing much with, you know, online interviews and stuff anymore?
Hadding: I haven’t heard her do an interview in months.
Jim: Oh, OK. I mean, I know I was on her show some years ago. But I haven’t really heard much about her since, you know.
What do you think about, … Here’s something that we’ve been discussing here, Diane and I. We’ve been discussing what’s happening in the revisionist movement. A lot of people, well not a lot, but some pretty high ranking people in the movement are kind of recanting! They have [moved??] now. Like for instance Eric Hunt. You know, what do you think about what’s going on there?
Hadding: Well, Eric Hunt, I don’t know if it’s really “high ranking”. He’s got notoriety because he makes videos in which, I mean, he’s prominent, because he makes videos, …
Hadding: I think mostly, … Honestly I don’t pay a lot of attention to what other people do, but I’m sure mostly in his videos he summarizes other people’s findings.
Hadding: With Cole, he had an argument, …
Jim: Oh! David Cole, yeah, yeah, …
Hadding: And apparently he felt badly about his performance in the argument with Cole. And he felt he had been defeated, I guess. He said, “We really need to prove that those jews weren’t killed in the Action Reinhardt Camps!” Well, wait a second. The burden of proof is on the accuser, you know. That’s one of the reasons why I wrote this essay called, “Semi-revisionism is Dead” [https://jan27.org/semi-revisionism-is-dead] .
Jim: Yeah, I read it and it was excellent. I thought it was very good, but I think, … You know what’s happening with this conversation, OK, what I’m noticing anyway, is these, … I call them the “Holocaust”-hucksters and what they do is they turn the conversation on us, to prove something that didn’t happen!
Hadding: To prove it didn’t happen!
Jim: I mean, it’s like, how do you do that!? How do I prove something didn’t happen!? And their biggest thing is [laughing] if you ever get in the conversation is, “Where did the jews go if they weren’t executed?” and I’m saying to myself, “Who cares? I don’t care where they went!” they weren’t killed, that’s all I care about, you know. So that’s my, you know, my take on that. But, you know, now he in his last article I just saw, he writes all about, you know, the Reinhardt Camps and that people were killed in those camps, because, you know, “Where did they go if they want were killed?” And the thing that really bothers me is they make all these assumptions that, you know, the jews had to go somewhere if they weren’t killed, but they forget all the other information showing how ridiculous the hoax is!
Hadding: That’s right.
Jim: I mean, I don’t get it! I don’t understand how this guy can even look at himself in the mirror and think, “Well gee! Let’s talk about those Reinhardt Camps and, you know, find out where they get all that wood?” You know, how they do all this, you know, those, … How they burnt all these bodies just with lighting a match to a body and the whole body just incinerates, you know, “puff” and the whole pile goes up [laughing] just, you know, just like that! Yeah, I don’t know. I just get so aggravated when I hear it.
But then, you know, I hear David Irving, he’s kind of capitulated not??? . Mark Weber, you know, he’s the same way, you know, he basically says, “While I think that millions of jews were killed, …” but he doesn’t get into how it happened. He just said it happened.
Hadding: I thought you humiliated Mark Weber by asking him, “How were they killed?” and he couldn’t answer that.
Jim: I mean, how do these guys show their face!? I mean, how do you, how do you make, … I mean, you know, I use a lot of IHR [Institute of Historical Review] material and, you know, the old stuff. And, you know, I’m always using it and then I talk to a guy that can’t even give me two facts that show that it happened! And that, you know, David Cole is the same way, you know. So yeah you got David Irving, David Cole and obviously, you know, Mark Webber and now we get Eric Hunt. You know, who’s next? You know, that goes, …
Hadding: Irving, Weber and Cole all have different motives. David Irving, he wants to have his career back, right. I don’t think he’s going to get it, but that seems to be, … I mean, that’s what somebody opined, somebody very well informed and prominent and famous, opined to me in 1996 when the “Goebbels: Mastermind of the Third Reich” came out. David Irving wants his career back. So that is why David Irving is espousing this semi-revisionism the continues the demonization of Goring and Goebbels and Himmler, .. But not Goring, but Himmler and Goebbels. But it’s really a reversion to the position that he had in the 1970s. That was always his position. That he constructed this drama where Hitler was doing good things and he had these evil men around him that were harming jews behind his back.
Hadding: But this is the kind of drama that David Irving has constructed. And really he’s just gone back to that. Mark Weber has a different motive, I think he just wants to avoid Holocaust revisionism and not discuss it to the extent that he can avoid it.
In the case of David Cole, … David Cole got involved in Holocaust revisionism only after the 1988 False News Trial when the Leuchter Report appeared and Leuchter testified and David Irving testified on behalf of Ernst Zundel. The holocaust industry was, in general, was in retreat at that point. And you could see this for example in Yehuda Bauer, his letter to The New York Times. An article about Yehuda Bauer to The New York Times followed by a letter from Yehuda Bauer, talking about the need to lower the death toll at Auschwitz, because those neo Nazi holocaust deniers, “They can count, you know!” They realized that they were under a lot of scrutiny and criticism and that they needed to make revisions themselves to try to save their holy myth. And this is when David got involved! By his own account it was 1989 when he got involved. And the first time that the world heard anything about David Cole wasn’t until 1992. David Cole as a “Holocaust” revisionist.
By that time it was the period when Holocaust revisionism appeared to be this great chariot leading to victory, right? And, you know, that’s what David Irving clearly believed in 1988. He believed that revisionism would prevail within, he said, five to ten years. And then the history books could be rewritten. Well it didn’t turn out that way.
Hadding: But during that time David Cole got involved. He endorsed the findings to the Leuchter Report. And he made this video at Auschwitz, where he basically duplicated what other revisionists had already done. There’s really no new information, I don’t think, in Cole’s Auschwitz video. It is very well done, you know, it has a nice tempo to it and has good audio and it’s watchable. All right? But David Cole was basically just putting a jewish face on what others had already discovered.
Hadding: That’s what he was doing. It’s jewish damage control!
Jim: Right. I know Mark Weber, you know, I don’t know, maybe, you know, this, or not. I don’t know, but he inherited a lot of money, you know, in a settlement he got, you know, he actually inherited like, for the IHR.
Jim: Yeah and all that. He got several million dollars out of that. I mean, did, you know, that?
Hadding: Well, I knew that there was this woman, I think, left a lot of money to the IHR.
Jim: Yes, she was part, …
Hadding: ??? And Carto had embezzled it and, …
Jim: Yeah, there’s a whole story there. But the bottom line was, the end result, was he inherited seven, I think seven and a half million dollars that went to IHR and that’s the reason why you don’t hear Mark Weber saying anything anymore. Because he’s got so much money that he’s just sitting on it and just waiting to retire and live happily ever after. So, and he’s not doing anything! No new books, no new writings, nothing! Because he’s pretty well set for life, now. I mean, that’s what I get out.
Hadding: Well, from what I see apparently he’s perfectly happy to travel and give a speech against the Zionist jewish power!
Hadding: He’s apparently happy to talks about Palestinians, but he doesn’t want to talk about the “Holocaust”.
Jim: Right. Well, that’s the point, you know, why, because he’s still, he’s still reaping money. He’s getting money that’s coming in from people that still donate to his cause and, you know, he, like I said, he doesn’t want to upset the apple cart with the, you know, maybe some of the jews even contribute to his cause that want him to keep quiet, you know, what I mean? [laughing].
Hadding: Who knows?
Jim: So I think, oh yes, I think, you know, I think that’s part of the issue there with him. But that’s sad because, you know, Germar Rudolf, he wrote a really good article about that. About what happened with all that. I just read that, I think the other day, you know, the whole relationship about revisionism and how money corrupts. And it sure has, because it keeps revisionism from doing more. Because, you know, if they have a lot of money they don’t have to do anything. And Germar, I think Germar out of all the revisionists, he’s the one I think is the top one now, you know, that’s really doing something and, you know, trying to make this work. Germar. I mean, he’s, that’s my opinion anyway, you know. I don’t know any other one that’s that’s doing anything as much as Germar.
Hadding: Oh sure. Faurisson some years ago referred to the amazing energy of Germar Rudolf, or something to that effect.
Jim: Yes, it’s phenomenal what he’s doing. And, you know, we interviewed, we went down to Pennsylvania and interviewed Germar and he was really a good man. I really like him and I just hope he can, … I mean, what really bothers me is you get these inheritances that come in to these organizations and you think the IHR would throw some money his way, you know, because of all the work that Germar has done, you know. But no, he doesn’t get anything from anybody. You know, he’s just poking along. It’s just sad! I hate to see that happen but, you know, it’s happening, you know. Anyway, but that’s, …
Hadding: Well, I don’t think. I just want to clarify. I don’t think that receiving money is what’s wrong with Mark Weber, all right. Mark Weber, I mean, this is according to Faurisson’s account. Mark Weber is a weak man! He’s a weak man. He’s not very brave. When they were in, I think, in Germany and police had detained Ernst Zundel. They were going to have, … I don’t remember the story now, but they were in Germany and they are in danger of being arrested and Mark Weber’s teeth were chattering!
Hadding: But, you know, Mark Weber he’s not a, just look at him. He does not convey strength.
Jim: Yeah, he at that point that you are talking about, I’m going to use a term that, there’s no other way I could use it any differently, … He was ready to shit his pants! OK! Because [laughing] he was so afraid of getting arrested and that’s what happened with him. So yeah. But, you know, I look at Fred Luechter and, you know, hey Fred, you know, he took it. I mean, he, you know, he was going to go to jail too and he hung in there. He eventually got out of there which was the smartest thing to do too. But if he goes back there, they’re going to put him in jail [laughing] So, you know, Fred hung in there and he’s, you know, he’s not going back on any of his views about how things were done in the, you know, the Luechter Report and all that. And he suffered more than anybody, you know. So, you know, when I see these people talking about suffering like Eric Hunt, you know, my whole life has been topsy turvy by this and that. I just say, please!
Hadding: So you think that’s why he’s backing away from this?
Jim: Well, that’s what I think. I think even Germar said that too. But you got to understand too with David Cole, you know, they threatened David Cole. They had a hit on him, to kill him. You know, he was supposed to, he was going to be killed.
Hadding: Yeah, it’s an interesting thing, they didn’t kill him, did they?
Jim: No, no, I know, yeah, because he talked to, what was his name?
Hadding: Irv, …
Jim: OK, OK. Irv Ruben, at the time anyway. He went to jail. He actually end up going to jail, but he actually end up talking to him and as far as I understand, the story what Cole said, he ended up paying him money or something, not to do anything to him. That’s the story that I heard. I thought I heard from Cole, when I was listening to one of Cole’s audios, videos, like we are doing now. So, the point is it seems like a lot of these people might have been threatened, you know, I can understand that would cause a problem with you, but, you know, we’ve all suffered. I mean, I lost a business, because of the jews. So I mean, that’s life. You just get on and, you know, I know I didn’t stop. I actually got more, I got more involved with it. I didn’t get less involved in it, because now I have the time to put to it! You know, that’s that’s what I feel is important, you know, use your time wisely. And I think that’s what we all have to do you know.
Hadding: Well Irv Ruben has been dead for years now. I don’t think that Irv Ruben is the reason for what David Cole is doing now. I presented in my essay, “Semi-Revisionism is Dead” background that would support the interest that David Cole was never really interested in debunking the Holocaust, as such. That is never what he wanted to do. He tried, like Yehuda Bauer, he wanted to revise it to keep it alive.
Hadding: That’s my thesis.
Jim: Well, he got [???] too. After all that he ended up working for the “Holocaust” museum, or whatever. Somebody involved with that and he was doing videos for them. According to what David Cole says now. I’m telling you what David Cole said. After he went into hiding, he ended up doing stuff for the opposite cause, here. And doing videos and research for the pro-holocaust people.
Hadding: As Stein?
Jim: Yeah as Stein.
Jim: Yeah, he changed his name. And then, you know, that’s what happened there. I mean, well, you know, what are you going to do? I really don’t care about him. I have no interest. I would like to interview him though and really hit him with, you know, some really tough questions, but I don’t know if that’s ever going to happen, you know. I’m not really worry about it.
So what, … Do you have like a website, do you like, have a blog site or anything like that?
Hadding: Yes, my main blog is The National Socialist Worldview. Its National hyphen Socialist hyphen Worldview dot blogspot dot com [http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com].
Jim: Oh OK. That’s good. So we can go to that and see what’s going on with you. Like you post things there all the time, or something, or keep it up?
Hadding: Yeah. I try to post at least one thing a week but, you know, sometimes it’s only one thing a month. If I get working on something for CODOH it might keep me from posting on my blog for a while.
Jim: Yeah. So explain to me a little bit about CODOH. So you do stuff with them and who is running CODOH now?
Hadding: Germar Rudolf!
Jim: OK. So Germar is running it and how’s that going?
Hadding: It’s a good gig., you know, I wasn’t really, … It pays a little less than the Occidental Observer, but the Occidental Observer won’t publish my stuff anymore. And I get published much more regularly on CODOH than I could on the Occidental Observer. I use this to pay my bills.
Jim: Right, right. Who runs the Occidental Observer?
Hadding: That’s Kevin MacDonald. MacDonald is afraid of, seems to be afraid of, that subject.
Jim: Well, you got to understand that if he takes that topic on he’s going to be dead, just like Irving!
Hadding: Well, he’s retired, so what does he have to lose?
Jim: Oh, is that what it is. OK, well I can understand that. So, well that’s good. So, I mean, I just started going to the CODOH site looking up more things. I mean, that’s a great site. I mean, a lot of information there, you know. We, you know, we’re revisionists, I mean, we have a tremendous amount of information out there, you know, the “Holocaust” handbooks. I mean, my goodness. I mean, there’s so much stuff there. The problem is the majority of people out there don’t get to see it because, you know, you can’t get it out there. I mean, you know, you have to look for it deep down in the Internet to find it. But it’s there if people, you know, want to look at it, you know. We can we can definitely look at it.
So, basically, you know, you’re just biding your time. Just, you know, writing things as they come. I mean again we, you know, we enjoy what you write. I mean, you know, you’re a good writer. You know, you have a nice, you know, style and insight. I would say about things and I think that’s important that people, you know, see that stuff. I mean, that article you wrote about, you know, the three revisionist, what was it, three revisionist you took up?
Hadding: Yes, “Semi-Revisionism is Dead” is the name of it.
Jim: Yes, that was a super article! That was a great article, you know. So anytime you get something, you know, a new, .. Well you send them my way anyway, so we get what you’re doing now. So that’s important.
Well, anything else you have you like to, … What do you think, what do you think the future is for us? You know, the movement, you know, revisionism, the truth movement and all that?
Hadding: I think that we have some people falling away from Holocaust revisionist right now that maybe hadn’t really thought through their position very well initially. Maybe their commitment wasn’t very deep to begin with. So I wouldn’t worry about that too much. I just worry about what I’m doing and trying to make sure what I’m doing the right thing. And keep doing it. And as long as I can get by and pay my bills and have enough to eat while I’m doing the right thing that is what I keep doing.
Jim: Right, right. Well, I agree. I’m the same way. You know, I was saying to Diane, I was saying I don’t, I really don’t care what anybody even the revisionist views are! I know common sense! You know, me I can read and I can understand common sense and if someone wants to go back on common sense and go to stupidity and believe things that just can’t happen I mean, that’s that’s up to them! I just feel sorry for them that they can’t stick it out and do what’s right.
But, well look, I really appreciate that you came on with us today. Again you contribute a lot to the cause! I just want to let, you know, that, OK!
Hadding: Thank you very much.
Jim: Yeah, I mean, you’re a good man and, you know, keep continuing on and don’t let anybody discourage you. I know financially, you know, things could be better, but it could be like that for all of us to, I suppose. But the truth is the truth! And no matter what the topic is you’ve got to let people know about it. I don’t care what the consequences are, you’ve got to just let everybody, you know, deal with it and go along with it, you know.
Well look, Hadding, thank you very much for our interview. Good luck with what you’re doing and, you know, another time we’ll probably try to talk to you again when something else comes up that, we know, we can talk about too.
Hadding: All right. Well, thank you very much.
Jim: All right. Bye now!
* Total words = 7,849
* Total Images = 27
* Total pages = 29
Click to download a PDF of this post (2.0 MB):
Version 3: Mar 14, 2017 — Added PDF of post for download.
Version 2: Feb 23, 2017 — Added 25 images.
Version 1: Feb 20, 2017 — Published post.
Posted in Auschwitz, Benton L. Bradberry, Bk - The Myth of German Villainy, CODOH, David Cole, David Irving, Eric hunt, Ernst Zundel, Germany, Germar Rudolf, Goebbels, Henry Ford, Himmler, Hitler, Holocaust, Holohoax, Institute for Historical Review, Jew World Order, Jewish Problem/Question, Jews, Jews - Lying, Jim Rizoli, Mark Weber, Media - jewish domination, Mind Control, National Socialism, New World Order, Occidental Observer, Propaganda, Propaganda - Anti-German, Revisionism, Robert Faurisson, Third Reich, Transcript, Willis Carto, WW II, Zionism, Zionists | Leave a Comment »
- Patrick Grimm – Boy, Were You Ever Wrong!
- Book – The Myth of German Villainy – Part 17 – War with Poland
- Amazion Bans 100s of Holocaust Revisionist Books!
- Patrick Grimm – How the Jewish Supremacists Wrecked America
- ANC Report Holocaust Debate: Eric Hunt vs Fritz Berg 2017 — TRANSCRIPT
- Dresden Grussworte [Greetings from Dresden] — Feb 2017
- Jim Rizoli Interviews Hadding Scott — TRANSCRIPT
- Book – The Myth of German Villainy – Part 16 – Germany Annexes the Sudetenland
- Book: White World Awake! — Stopping the Planned Extermination of Our Volk
- Murdoch Murdoch — Fatherland — TRANSCRIPT
- Jan 27 — International Day of Commemoration in Honor of “Holocaust” Revisionists
- A Woes By Any Other Name — TRANSCRIPT
- Alfred Schaefer – Police Raid and My Confession — TRANSCRIPT
- Book – The Myth of German Villainy – Part 15 – “Anschluss” The Unification of Austria and Germany
- Book – The Myth of German Villainy – Part 14 – Hitler Begins Reclamation of German Territory; The 1936 Olympics
- Merry Christmas 2016 and a Happy New Year!
- Book – The Myth of German Villainy – Part 13 – Life in Germany Under Hitler
- Colin Liddell — Discussing Stormerism in a Storm — TRANSCRIPT
- The Realist Report Interviews TANSTAAFL — 2016 — TRANSCRIPT
- Red Ice Radio: Andrew Anglin – Somalian Refugee Nightmare & Trump’s Fix — TRANSCRIPT
- RAMZPAUL Alt-Right RIP and Sieg Heils — TRANSCRIPTS
- Kevin MacDonald — NPI 2016 Conference — TRANSCRIPT
- Bradley Smith’s Smith Report # 1
- The Nuremberg Laws — Chart in English
- Book – The Myth of German Villainy – Part 12 – The Nazis and the Zionists Actually Work Together …
- Updates — Plain List
- Book – The Myth of German Villainy – Part 11 – Jews Declare War on Nazi Germany
- Leon Degrelle — My Revolutionary Life: Muzzling the Vanquished
- Book – The Myth of German Villainy – Part 10 – National Socialism vs Communism
- Book – The Myth of German Villainy – Part 09 – Hitler and National Socialists Rise to Power
- Let the World Know: Germany is Going Down
- Book – The Myth of German Villainy – Part 08 – Jews in Weimar Germany
- Trump as j-Tool?
- All Posts — Plain List
- Book – The Myth of German Villainy – Part 07 – The Nation of Israel
- Book – The Myth of German Villainy – Part 06 – The Bolshevik Revolution Spreads throughout Europe
- Book – The Myth of German Villainy – Part 05 – The Red Terror
- Book – The Myth of German Villainy – Part 04 – The Russian Revolution of 1917
- Book – The Myth of German Villainy – Part 03 – The Jewish Factor in the War
- Book – The Myth of German Villainy – Part 02 – Aftermath of the War in Germany
- Book – The Myth of German Villainy by Benton Bradberry – Part 01
- The World’s First Anti-Holocaust Convention — Instauration Dec, 1979
- Ursula Haverbeck – The Hooton Plan and the Migrant Crisis — TRANSCRIPT
- Organized jewry Did 9/11
- The Daily Stormer – A Normie’s Guide to the Alt-Right
- Alfred Schaefer – A Dissident Speaking Out – Gerhard Ittner — TRANSCRIPT
- London Forum: Tony O’Neill, “World War III Has Already Begun” — TRANSCRIPT
- Red Ice Radio – Germar Rudolf – Persecution of Revisionists & Demographic Disaster – Part 1— TRANSCRIPT
- Ursula Haverbeck “The Greatest Problem of Our Time” — TRANSCRIPT
- David Duke Announces for US Senate — TRANSCRIPT
- March 2017 (4)
- February 2017 (5)
- January 2017 (5)
- December 2016 (6)
- November 2016 (9)
- October 2016 (12)
- September 2016 (4)
- August 2016 (3)
- July 2016 (8)
- June 2016 (7)
- May 2016 (6)
- April 2016 (7)
- March 2016 (4)
- February 2016 (5)
- January 2016 (4)
- December 2015 (5)
- November 2015 (5)
- October 2015 (6)
- September 2015 (4)
- August 2015 (15)
- July 2015 (19)
- June 2015 (14)
- May 2015 (17)
- April 2015 (13)
- March 2015 (17)
- February 2015 (18)
- January 2015 (16)
- December 2014 (7)
- November 2014 (11)
- October 2014 (13)
- September 2014 (17)
- August 2014 (7)
- July 2014 (17)
- June 2014 (13)
- May 2014 (19)
- March 2014 (2)
- February 2014 (11)
- January 2014 (12)
- August 2013 (2)
- July 2013 (1)
- May 2013 (9)
- September 2012 (1)
- (((Person of Echo))) (1)
- Admin (3)
- Afghanistan (3)
- Africa (33)
- Alex Jones (5)
- Alex Linder (2)
- Alfred Rosenberg (2)
- Allende (1)
- Amazon Books (1)
- America (150)
- American Renaisance (5)
- ANC (1)
- Andew Anglin (4)
- Andrew Anglin (1)
- Andrew Joyce (3)
- Anschluss (3)
- anti-communism (15)
- Anti-Defamation League (14)
- Arabs (27)
- Arthur Butz (1)
- Arthur Kemp (1)
- Aryan (15)
- August Wollenhaupt (1)
- Auschwitz (41)
- Australia (1)
- Austria (7)
- Avery Brundage (1)
- Balfour Declaration (22)
- Baltic States (22)
- Bangladesh (1)
- Banksters (9)
- Barbara Spectre (1)
- Barnard Baruch (1)
- Baron Walter (1)
- Benjamin Disraeli (1)
- Benton L. Bradberry (18)
- Bergen-Belsen (5)
- Bk – Camp of the Saints (1)
- Bk – Deadlier than the H-Bomb (6)
- Bk – Germany Must Perish (2)
- Bk – Gulag Archipelago (1)
- Bk – Hellstorm (3)
- Bk – Into the Darkness – Stoddard (24)
- Bk – Jews Must Live (1)
- Bk – March of the Titans (1)
- Bk – Mein Kampf (3)
- Bk – Onward Christian Soldiers (15)
- Bk – Riddle of Jew's Success (18)
- Bk – The American Jew (7)
- Bk – The Case for Germany (11)
- Bk – The Empire of The City (9)
- Bk – The Jewish Century (1)
- Bk – The Jews (2)
- Bk – The Jews and Their Lies (1)
- Bk – The Myth of German Villainy (18)
- Bk – The Nameless War (7)
- Bk – The Riddle of the Jew's Success (2)
- Bk – The World Conquerors (13)
- Bk – Two Hundred Years Together (1)
- Bk – Uncovering The Forces For War (6)
- Black Crime (15)
- Blogroll – 911 (11)
- BNP (2)
- Bradley Smith (2)
- Brainwashing (61)
- BREXIT (3)
- Britain (65)
- British Renaissance (4)
- Buchenwald (4)
- Canada (5)
- Carlo Mattogno (2)
- Carolyn Yeager (1)
- Chaim Weizmann (1)
- Charles Lindbergh (1)
- Cheka (2)
- Cheka – torture (2)
- Chicago (4)
- Christainity (86)
- Churchill (17)
- Clinton – Hillary (1)
- CODOH (10)
- Cold War (4)
- Communism (80)
- Critical Theory (5)
- Cuckservatives (13)
- Czar – Nicholas II (1)
- Czechoslovakia (7)
- Dachau (17)
- Daily Stormer (7)
- Danzig (4)
- David Cole (2)
- David Duke (11)
- David Irving (1)
- Death Squads (1)
- Deception (22)
- Democrat Party (2)
- Democrats (5)
- Denmark (1)
- Donald Day (15)
- Donald Trump (14)
- Douglas Reed (5)
- Dr. Charles Larson (2)
- Dr. Gregor (1)
- Dr. Manfred Roeder (1)
- Dresden (1)
- Echo People (1)
- Echo Person (2)
- Edward Mandell House (1)
- Elie Wiesel (3)
- Emil Hacha (1)
- England (35)
- Eric hunt (4)
- Ernst Rohm (1)
- Ernst Zundel (7)
- Estonia (6)
- Europe (190)
- Europe – Central (5)
- Europe – Eastern (17)
- Eva Braun (1)
- Evalion (4)
- Evolution (7)
- Evolution and Behavior (11)
- Facebook (1)
- Family – Anti (15)
- Fascism (17)
- Felix Dzerzhinski (1)
- Felix Frankfurter (1)
- Feminism (18)
- Finland (15)
- France (45)
- Francis Yockey (2)
- Frankfurt School (8)
- Franklin D. (9)
- Fred reed (1)
- Freedom of Speech (2)
- Friedrich Engels (1)
- Friedrich Grimm (1)
- Gaza (2)
- Genrik Yagoda (1)
- Germany (198)
- Germar Rudolf (12)
- Glaring Hypocrisy (1)
- Goebbels (8)
- Goldman Sachs (3)
- GPU (2)
- Greetings (2)
- Gulags (2)
- Gun Control (5)
- Happy New Year (1)
- Harry Elmer Barnes (1)
- Henrik Palmgren (1)
- Henry Ford (25)
- Henry Morgenthau (2)
- Hervé Ryssen (9)
- Hidden History (4)
- Hilaire Belloc (2)
- Hillary Clinton (1)
- Himmler (8)
- History Review Channel (5)
- Hitler (77)
- Hitler Youth (13)
- Hollywood (8)
- Holocaust (95)
- Holodomor (22)
- Holohoax (60)
- Homosexuality (19)
- Hooton – Earnest (1)
- Hooton Plan (3)
- Hungary (8)
- Ilse Koch (1)
- Institute for Historical Review (3)
- International Finance (64)
- IQ (16)
- Iraq (1)
- Ireland (11)
- ISIS (10)
- Israel (56)
- Ittner Gerhard (3)
- Jack Sen (3)
- Jacob Schiff (3)
- James Martin (1)
- Japan (4)
- Jared Taylor (6)
- Jürgen Graf (2)
- Jesse Owens (1)
- Jew World Order (105)
- Jewish Bolsheviks (15)
- Jewish Diaspora (6)
- Jewish Problem/Question (81)
- Jews (295)
- Jews – Hostile Elite (24)
- Jews – Lying (45)
- Jews – Naming (121)
- Jews – New York (12)
- Jews – Tool of (2)
- Jim Rizoli (2)
- John Bennett (1)
- John Friend (2)
- Johnathan Bowden (1)
- Kai Murros (1)
- Karl Marx (1)
- Kaufman – Theodor (1)
- Kevin MacDonald (10)
- KGB (1)
- Kibbutz (1)
- Konrad Henlein (1)
- Kristalnacht (1)
- Kulaks (1)
- Latin America (1)
- Latvia (14)
- Lavrenti Beria (1)
- Lazar Kaganovitch (1)
- LBGT (2)
- League of Nations (7)
- Leon Degrelle (2)
- Leon Trotsky (1)
- Liberalism (12)
- Lionel de (2)
- Lithuania (2)
- Lloyd George (2)
- London Forum (5)
- Lord of the Rings (1)
- Louis Brandies (1)
- Louis FitzGibbon (1)
- Mag – Liberty Bell (1)
- Mark Weber (2)
- Martin Luther (3)
- Marxism (21)
- Marxist Utopia (1)
- Media – BBC (7)
- Media – jewish domination (89)
- Merry Christmas (1)
- Millennial Woes (1)
- Mind Control (54)
- Morgoths Review (2)
- Multiculturalism (63)
- Murdoch Murdoch (1)
- Muslim invasion (24)
- National Policy Institute (5)
- National Socialism (147)
- National Socialism – Philosphy (4)
- National Vanguard (1)
- Nazi-Zionist Medallion (2)
- Negros (53)
- New World Order (101)
- New Zealand (1)
- News and Misc (5)
- Nick Griffin (1)
- Nigeria (1)
- Night of the Long Knives (1)
- Nizer – Louis (2)
- NKVD (1)
- Noel Ignatiev (1)
- Noriega (1)
- Norway (14)
- NPI Conference (4)
- Nuremberg (24)
- Nuremberg Race Laws (4)
- Nuremberg Rally (1)
- Nuremberg Trials (1)
- Obama (8)
- Occidental Observer (5)
- Olympics – Berlin 1936 (1)
- Orania (1)
- Ottoman Empire (2)
- Pakistan (1)
- Palestine (6)
- Paris 11/13 (2)
- Paris 20151113 Attacks (3)
- Paris Peace Conference (1)
- Parody (1)
- Patrick Grimm (2)
- Paul Weston (1)
- Plutocracy (13)
- Poland (32)
- Polish Corridor (1)
- Portugal (1)
- Propaganda (22)
- Propaganda – Anti-German (139)
- Putin (3)
- quenelle (1)
- Rabbi Stephen Wise (1)
- Race (148)
- Race – Mixing (41)
- Race Differences (70)
- Radio 3Fourteen (3)
- RAMZPAUL (1)
- Red Ice Radio (8)
- Red Terror (4)
- Religion (14)
- Renegade Tribune (1)
- Republican Party (7)
- Revilo P. Oliver (2)
- Revisionism (128)
- Rhineland (1)
- Richard Spencer (5)
- Robert Faurisson (10)
- Robert Ley (1)
- Roosevelt (7)
- Rothschild (32)
- Russia (44)
- Russian Revolution 1905 (2)
- Russian Revolution 1917 (5)
- Ryan Dawson (ANC Report) (1)
- Saudia Arabia (1)
- Schaefer – Alfred (8)
- Schaefer – Monika (7)
- Scotland (1)
- Secret Elite (11)
- Serial Killers (1)
- Simon Wiesenthal (1)
- Slavery – in Africa (5)
- Smith's Report (1)
- Solzhenitsyn (2)
- Somalia (1)
- South Africa (11)
- Spain (2)
- Spain – Moorish (2)
- Spanish Inquisition (1)
- Stalingrad (1)
- Stalingrad – Sword of (1)
- Stasi (1)
- Stefan Molyneux (2)
- Steven Spielberg (4)
- Sudeten German (8)
- Suicide (6)
- Sweden (22)
- Syria (14)
- Syria – Assad (4)
- Talmud (12)
- TANSTAAFL (1)
- Ted Nugent (2)
- The "City of London" (20)
- The Focus Group (3)
- The International Jew (120)
- The Right Stuff (2)
- Thies Christophersen (6)
- Third Reich (184)
- Third World (32)
- Third World Immigration (55)
- Thomas Dalton (2)
- Tony Hall (1)
- Traitors – Journalists (2)
- Transcript (51)
- Treaty of Locarno (2)
- Treaty of Versailles (31)
- Turkey (2)
- Twitter (3)
- typhus (12)
- Udo Walendy (2)
- UKIP (3)
- Ukraine – Famine (1)
- Uncategorized (17)
- Unity Valkyrie Mitford (1)
- Ursula Haverbeck (3)
- Victor Orban (3)
- Volkswagon (1)
- Waffen SS (6)
- White genocide (49)
- White Nationalism (115)
- Willis Carto (3)
- Wilson’s “Fourteen Points.” (1)
- Winston Churchill (7)
- Woodrow Wilson (1)
- WW I (103)
- WW II (187)
- WW II – Eastern Front (2)
- WW III (3)
- Yad Vashem (1)
- Yakov Sverdlov (2)
- Yuri Andropov (1)
- Yuri Slezkine (1)
- Zionism (32)
- Zionists (18)
- Zsolt Bayer (1)
- Zyklon B (10)